The Ben Shapiro Show - October 23, 2018


The New Democratic Agenda | Ep. 644


Episode Stats

Length

51 minutes

Words per Minute

200.87883

Word Count

10,362

Sentence Count

754

Misogynist Sentences

12

Hate Speech Sentences

16


Summary

Barack Obama is back with his take on 2018, Hillary Clinton learns to love federalism, and the anti-science left takes center stage. I'm Ben Shapiro, and we'll talk about it all on this episode of the Ben Shapiro Show! Today's After Show Was Hosted By: Ben Shapiro Subscribe to the After Show on Apple Podcasts Subscribe on iTunes Learn more about your ad choices. Use the promo code: PODCAST to receive 10% off your first month with discount code: CRIMINALS at checkout. Enjoy this exclusive clip from our new ad-free version of the show, featuring a live audience Q&A with Ben Shapiro! Enjoy & spread the word to your friends about what you're listening to, and don't forget to rate, review, and subscribe to our other shows: The Anthropology, The HYPE Report, and HYPETALKS. Subscribe today using our podcast s promo code POWER10 at checkout to receive $10 OFFER CODE POWER10 for 10% OFF OFFers, and a FREE FIVE- PIECE Spring Cleaning Set from Zuppe! If you like what you hear, please HIT SUBSCRIBE and leave us a review and tell a friend! I'll be giving out 5 stars and a review on iTunes! Thank you for supporting the show! You'll get 5 stars, and I'll get 20% off the next week's mail discount when you review the next month's issue of the new issue of The New York Times issue! Subscribe, rate, and review the show gets a new ad on Apple Watch, and get 5-day shipping starts shipping free on Prime Video starts shipping on Prime Pod! Thanks! FREE PRICING $99, plus an ad discount, plus a FREE VIP membership & shipping discount, and 7 days shipping throughout the rest of the world gets an ad-only shipping offer, and they'll get a FREE 7-place promo code, plus I'll receive an ad on my next month, and 5-country shipping starts starts starts starting shipping worldwide! and 7-country PROMO shipping starts start shipping worldwide, shipping nationwide, and 3-country pricing starts starts available on my new place gets a FREE PROMEXCLUSION starts available in mid-month, shipping starts only $19GBPROMO, WORLD RODE FREE WORLD PRODUCED WORLD WEEKEND, AND 7-PRICING FREE, FREE INTERVIEW AND VIP PROMOTION ONLY, AND FREE PROGONE PRODUY, AND I'll also receive an AMAZING SUPPORTING THE MOST AMONG THEMSELVED VOTING PACKAGE AND PATREON FREE PRODCAST AND PRODONE FREE, AND A FREE FAST FOLLOWING PROODS AND SUPPORTING IN THE FIRST MONTH TO CHECK OUT THE FIRST PLACE TO CHALLENGER?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Barack Obama is back with his take on 2018, Hillary Clinton learns to love federalism, and the anti-science left takes center stage.
00:00:07.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:08.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:14.000 You thought he was gone.
00:00:15.000 You thought he wouldn't be back.
00:00:17.000 But, wrong you are.
00:00:18.000 He's back.
00:00:19.000 And we'll talk about him in just a second.
00:00:21.000 But first, let's talk about all of the events surrounding Election 2018.
00:00:26.000 If you look at the rhetoric from the leftist news outlets on the heels of Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation, they're trying to solidify the left for the midterms.
00:00:33.000 It is going to be a battle to hold the House.
00:00:34.000 Here's what's at stake if the Democrats take it.
00:00:36.000 All the positive policies Republicans have enacted over the past couple of years, all the things to help the economy, the tax cuts, the judicial appointments, the
00:00:43.000 Cutting of the regulations.
00:00:44.000 All of it could be stymied if the Democrats take control of either the House or the Senate.
00:00:48.000 And when they start to obstruct, what effect could that have on the economy, on stocks, on other unknowns that might impact your savings?
00:00:54.000 What is your plan for uncertainty?
00:00:55.000 Can you afford another hit to your retirement, like the last downturn when the S&P dropped 50%?
00:01:00.000 Well, you should hedge against inflation and hedge against uncertainty and instability with some precious metals.
00:01:04.000 Gold is a safe haven against uncertainty.
00:01:06.000 My savings plan is diversified.
00:01:08.000 Yours should be, too.
00:01:08.000 Doesn't mean take all your money and stick it in gold.
00:01:10.000 It means take some of your money and put it in precious metals.
00:01:12.000 The company I trust with precious metal purchases is Birch Gold Group.
00:01:15.000 And right now, thanks to a little-known IRS tax law, you can even move that IRA or eligible 401k into an IRA backed by physical gold and silver.
00:01:23.000 Perfect for folks who want to protect their hard-earned retirement savings from future geopolitical uncertainty.
00:01:27.000 Birch Gold Group has thousands of satisfied customers, countless five-star reviews, an A-plus rating with the Better Business Bureau.
00:01:33.000 Contact Birch Gold Group now.
00:01:34.000 We're good to go!
00:01:54.000 We are watching in the news as the country seems to be on the verge of something really, really terrible.
00:02:00.000 It seems like something that's building up, frankly, on both sides.
00:02:03.000 A couple of parallel stories that are really ugly over the last 24 hours.
00:02:07.000 Story number one, George Soros, who is not a person I admire in any way.
00:02:13.000 George Soros is, of course, a leftist funder of a bunch of radical causes, but he is not a person who ought to be murdered.
00:02:21.000 And yet, an explosive device
00:02:23.000 was found in the mailbox at his home on Monday afternoon.
00:02:27.000 According to senior law enforcement, as according to the New York Times, the device was proactively denotated by bomb squad technicians from the Westchester County Police Department.
00:02:37.000 The bomber's motive remains unclear.
00:02:38.000 Soros is a favorite target of right-wing groups.
00:02:40.000 He was not at home at the time.
00:02:42.000 The investigation has been taken over by the FBI.
00:02:44.000 All of this is ugly stuff.
00:02:46.000 Now again,
00:02:48.000 I am no George Soros fan.
00:02:49.000 I think that George Soros does terrible, terrible things for world politics, and I think he backs awful causes.
00:02:54.000 That doesn't mean that folks should go out bombing him.
00:02:57.000 This is insanity.
00:02:58.000 And it's not just George Soros.
00:03:00.000 According to the Daily Caller, House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy's office in California was vandalized on Monday, according to an Instagram post by the Congressman McCarthy, who could be the future Speaker of the House.
00:03:10.000 His local office is in Bakersfield, California.
00:03:12.000 He posted photos of the suspect and some of the damage.
00:03:15.000 Two young men were caught on surveillance camera outside the office.
00:03:17.000 It had its windows smashed in by a large boulder.
00:03:20.000 And he doesn't know exactly who these folks are.
00:03:22.000 He put out the notice.
00:03:24.000 McCarthy's office, of course, is not the first GOP office to be vandalized in recent weeks.
00:03:28.000 A Republican Party office in Wyoming was intentionally set on fire two days after it opened in September.
00:03:33.000 Vandals later hit the Metropolitan Republican Club on Manhattan's Upper East Side in October, smashing windows and spray-painting anarchist signs on the doors.
00:03:41.000 All just wonderful stuff.
00:03:43.000 And, yesterday, there was a dangerous situation in Washington, D.C.
00:03:46.000 A suspected intruder was shot after kicking down the glass doors at WTTG Fox 5 on Monday.
00:03:52.000 He was previously known to both Fox executives and police.
00:03:55.000 He had leveled threats against both previously.
00:03:57.000 D.C.
00:03:57.000 police responded to the building on Wisconsin Avenue in the Friendship Heights neighborhood, as officials say that the man had been shot in the station's lobby by an armed security guard after forcing his way
00:04:07.000 Through the glass doors.
00:04:08.000 His name was George Odoms and he apparently started walking directly toward the desk station in the direction of the main part of the building.
00:04:15.000 At that point, the security guard shot the guy.
00:04:17.000 He is in critical but stable condition.
00:04:20.000 It's apparently this guy has mental health issues but the problem is that we now live in a society in which we don't know who has mental health issues and who is being politically motivated and who has mental health issues and is being politically motivated.
00:04:32.000 We're living in an incredibly volatile time and that's unusual because the economy of the United States is thrumming along.
00:04:39.000 We're doing really well, economically speaking.
00:04:41.000 We're not in the middle of any major foreign crisis, and yet we're at each other's throats politically, and the bleeding edge of that fight is actually bleeding.
00:04:50.000 I mean, the bleeding edge actually carries the possibility of serious violence.
00:04:55.000 Heating up the rhetoric on both sides is obviously not a worthwhile cause, and yet that seems to be happening.
00:05:01.000 Barack Obama, who was one of the contributing factors to the breakdown in social fabric in the United States during his presidency, he continued that crusade yesterday.
00:05:09.000 He was campaigning in Nevada against Dean Heller, who's the sitting senator, and he just made clear that the sort of political polarization that he supposedly preaches against, he's actually very much for.
00:05:20.000 Here's President Obama back on the stump for the Democrats, and he is saying that President Trump is a tin-pot dictator.
00:05:26.000 It is not a Democratic or a Republican idea that we are not supposed to pressure the Attorney General or the FBI to use the criminal justice system to try to punish political opponents.
00:05:39.000 That's not how America works.
00:05:41.000 That's how some tin-pot dictatorship works.
00:05:45.000 That's not supposed to be America.
00:05:48.000 Okay, well, here's the problem, and this is really the problem with President Obama.
00:05:51.000 You're going to see this repeated throughout his little speech that he gave yesterday in Nevada.
00:05:55.000 Everything he accuses the right of doing, he actually did while he was in office.
00:05:59.000 He says things like, you're not supposed to influence the FBI.
00:06:01.000 You're not supposed to influence your Attorney General.
00:06:04.000 His own Attorney General, Eric Holder, called himself Barack Obama's wingman.
00:06:08.000 That was Eric Holder, his own DOJ head, calling himself the President's wingman.
00:06:12.000 The President has asserted executive privilege to protect Eric Holder from a Republican Congress over the Fast and Furious scandal.
00:06:19.000 So this is just nonsense.
00:06:20.000 And when the President says that you're not supposed to activate executive agencies to target political opponents,
00:06:25.000 That's exactly what his IRS did.
00:06:27.000 His IRS targeted conservative 501c3s, pro-Israel 501c3s.
00:06:31.000 The evidence was extraordinarily solid in that case.
00:06:34.000 The DOJ didn't do a serious investigation, nor did they prosecute anybody.
00:06:37.000 So when the President says that President Trump is doing all this stuff, when Obama says that Trump is doing all of this stuff, just remember, President Trump is a reaction to President Obama.
00:06:47.000 And the more you look at American history, and history in general,
00:06:51.000 What you really do see is that the nature of the human being is to swing from side to side, that we react to things that happen in our life.
00:07:00.000 And we usually overreact to things that happen in our life.
00:07:02.000 So we react to President Bush by putting in President Obama, then react to President Obama by putting in President Trump.
00:07:08.000 But the pendulum, in order for it to start swinging less wildly,
00:07:14.000 It takes a force of collective will.
00:07:15.000 It takes all of us saying to each other, we are not going to allow this pendulum to swing quite as wildly as it has been in the past.
00:07:21.000 If you look at the vacillations between the presidencies right now, I would say that if you looked back in the 1960s, like the difference between say LBJ and Richard Nixon on policy, what you were looking at was a vacillation that was
00:07:35.000 Semi-major, but not enormous.
00:07:38.000 The swing of the pendulum was not quite as far.
00:07:40.000 The same thing is true with Eisenhower and JFK.
00:07:42.000 The swing of the pendulum was not quite that far.
00:07:44.000 If you look at how far the pendulum is swinging now, it's almost at 180 degrees.
00:07:48.000 The pendulum is swinging wildly side to side, and that's dangerous for the country, because eventually the pendulum is going to swing over the bar, and things are going to get really insane.
00:07:59.000 President Obama did not help that.
00:08:01.000 This revisionist history where President Obama was a great peace-bringer, this revisionist history where President Obama did not create conflict inside the United States, where he was a unifying figure as opposed to a polarizing figure, that is just a lie.
00:08:16.000 When he was elected, maybe he was a unifying figure for five minutes, and then he proceeded to govern as an extraordinarily far-left guy, and then he also proceeded to polarize the country along ethnic, racial, and sexual lines.
00:08:27.000 It's a real, it's just, it's obvious that he's doing this.
00:08:31.000 He trolled the right into insanity and now President Trump is trolling the left into insanity.
00:08:35.000 This is all reactionary stuff.
00:08:36.000 Here's President Obama, again, he's such a troll.
00:08:38.000 He's such a troll.
00:08:39.000 When people accuse President Trump of being a troll, I'd like to remind folks, the first presidential troll was Barack Obama.
00:08:45.000 Here's President Obama trolling people in Nevada yesterday, saying that he was very committed to the truth as President of the United States.
00:08:53.000 Here's just one simple fact.
00:08:55.000 This is a fact.
00:08:58.000 Unlike some, I actually try to state facts.
00:09:02.000 I believe in facts.
00:09:04.000 Right?
00:09:10.000 I believe in a fact-based reality and a fact-based politics.
00:09:18.000 Okay, that is just a lie.
00:09:19.000 He did not believe in a fact-based reality, a fact-based politics.
00:09:22.000 It's just not true.
00:09:23.000 And he says that he didn't lie, he didn't like to fib like some people.
00:09:26.000 Really?
00:09:27.000 How about if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor?
00:09:29.000 How about if the president doesn't have authority to grant executive amnesty?
00:09:34.000 How about those men died in Benghazi because of a YouTube video?
00:09:38.000 How about the Iran deal is being pursued because of a new moderate policy pushed by the new Iranian moderate administration?
00:09:46.000 The president lied every five seconds.
00:09:47.000 Barack Obama was a congenital liar while he was in office and he was replaced by a guy who doesn't have tremendous regard for the truth either.
00:09:53.000 Again, reaction in American politics is almost completely proportionate.
00:09:59.000 Barack Obama was very far to the left, and Donald Trump is his funhouse mirror image.
00:10:05.000 And when Barack Obama says things like he tries to state facts and Donald Trump just goes out there and he lies all the time, it's just not true.
00:10:12.000 I like when he says that he's based in facts.
00:10:14.000 This is a president of the United States who took Title IX of the Civil Rights Act, which said you're not allowed to discriminate against women, and tried to apply that to men who believe they are women, saying that this was somehow fact-based.
00:10:28.000 Almost nothing that Barack Obama did was fact-based.
00:10:31.000 Almost nothing he did was fact-based.
00:10:32.000 And this is why so many people reacted to Barack Obama.
00:10:35.000 They said, listen, if facts don't matter to the left, well, maybe they don't matter to us either.
00:10:38.000 All that matters now is victory.
00:10:39.000 Because that was the mentality of the left.
00:10:41.000 The mentality of the left was that slandering George W. Bush as a war criminal was fully justified in order to get Barack Obama elected.
00:10:48.000 That slandering John McCain as George W. Bush Part III was totally fine, so long as it got Barack Obama elected.
00:10:54.000 That slandering Mitt Romney as a dog-killing
00:10:58.000 Evil genius who gave women cancer specifically so that he could fire their husbands.
00:11:03.000 Right?
00:11:03.000 That was totally fine so long as he won.
00:11:06.000 That Harry Reid was fine in saying that Mitt Romney didn't pay his taxes because, after all, they won.
00:11:12.000 This stuff does not spring from nowhere in American politics.
00:11:16.000 Evil in American politics, the nastiness of American politics, did not spring out of the ground full-blown like Athena out of Zeus's head.
00:11:23.000 That's not the way this works.
00:11:24.000 Barack Obama was the progenitor of Donald Trump.
00:11:27.000 Barack Obama was the predictable forebear of Donald Trump in retrospect.
00:11:32.000 And second, we're going to give you some more of Barack Obama's propaganda.
00:11:35.000 And the fact that the left doesn't even acknowledge any of this is one of the reasons why the right continues to act the way the right is acting.
00:11:40.000 We'll get to more of that in just a second.
00:11:42.000 First, I want to talk about what you are doing for the sheets in your bed.
00:11:46.000 OK, the fact is that when you think about your sleep quality, you rarely think about your sheets.
00:11:49.000 You think, OK, well, I can just go down to the local bed, bathroom and beyond.
00:11:52.000 I can pick up the cheapest set of sheets they've got and it will be perfectly adequate.
00:11:56.000 Wrong you are!
00:11:57.000 That is not the way this works.
00:11:58.000 You need supremely comfortable sheets.
00:12:00.000 And the best sheets you can buy, the best sheets on the market, are bowl and branch.
00:12:04.000 Everything bowl and branch makes, from bedding to blankets, is made from pure 100% organic cotton.
00:12:08.000 It means it starts out super soft, they get even softer over time.
00:12:11.000 You can buy directly from them, so you're essentially paying wholesale prices.
00:12:14.000 Luxury sheets can cost up to $1,000 in the store.
00:12:17.000 Bowl and branch sheets are only a couple of hundred bucks.
00:12:19.000 Everyone who tries Bull & Branch sheets loves them.
00:12:21.000 That's why they have thousands of five-star reviews.
00:12:23.000 Even three U.S.
00:12:24.000 presidents sleep on Bull & Branch sheets.
00:12:26.000 Shipping is free.
00:12:27.000 You can try them for 30 nights.
00:12:28.000 If you don't love them, send them back for a refund.
00:12:30.000 You're not going to want to send them back.
00:12:31.000 They are that comfortable.
00:12:32.000 To get you started, right now, my listeners get $50 off your first set of sheets at BullAndBranch.com, promo code Ben.
00:12:38.000 BullAndBranch.com, promo code Ben, for $50 off your first set of sheets.
00:12:41.000 These sheets are so comfortable, I actually tossed out all of our other sheets.
00:12:44.000 We only own Bull & Branch now.
00:12:45.000 That's how good they are.
00:12:46.000 B-O-L-L-M branch dot com promo code, Ben.
00:12:48.000 Use that promo code, Ben, to get 50 bucks off.
00:12:52.000 So, Barack Obama is a great reminder as to why Donald Trump is president.
00:12:56.000 And then he tried to take credit in Nevada last night for the way the economy is growing.
00:13:00.000 Now, let's be clear.
00:13:01.000 The stock market did climb under Barack Obama because it fell to all-time lows under Barack Obama also.
00:13:07.000 You'll recall that the economy collapsed in late 2008, right before the election.
00:13:11.000 That wasn't on Obama.
00:13:12.000 And then it continued to collapse until early 2009.
00:13:15.000 And then it started to recover.
00:13:17.000 And then we had the slowest peacetime recovery in American history.
00:13:21.000 I'm old enough to remember when folks were saying things like, a 4% GDP growth rate is no longer possible for the United States, and now we have had that for a couple of quarters in a row.
00:13:30.000 I'm old enough to remember when people said that the manufacturing sector in the United States was doomed to failure, that obviously is not true.
00:13:35.000 When folks were saying that the stock market was going to top out where Obama left it, that obviously was not true.
00:13:40.000 That job creation was going to top out, that obviously was not true.
00:13:44.000 There's no question the economy is growing faster under Donald Trump than it was under Barack Obama.
00:13:49.000 It is superheated.
00:13:50.000 Under Donald Trump in a way that it was not under Barack Obama.
00:13:52.000 Again, very, very slow recovery under Obama.
00:13:55.000 And whatever recovery is due to Obama, you really can only attribute for the first couple of years.
00:14:00.000 Because after that, it was the Republicans stymying every budget that Obama tried to propose.
00:14:04.000 Obama passed one budget in eight years.
00:14:07.000 Republicans rejected every budget proposal Barack Obama ever made.
00:14:10.000 And yet here is Barack Obama saying that if anybody gets credit for the economy, it's him.
00:14:15.000 Now, listen, I'm never a fan of crediting the president with the economy.
00:14:18.000 I just don't.
00:14:19.000 I think the economy is too complicated for that.
00:14:21.000 I usually think that it has more to do with a predictable policy emanating from the halls of Congress.
00:14:26.000 The fact is that since Republicans were elected in 2010, we've had a consistent rate of growth in the United States economy accelerating when they didn't have to battle it out with Barack Obama over regulatory policy.
00:14:37.000 If you actually want to attribute economic growth to any one body, give the credit to Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, and all the other Republicans who have been instrumental in the formation of policy under Obama and under Trump.
00:14:48.000 But here's Barack Obama trying to take credit for himself.
00:14:52.000 Okay, we did not cut the deficit in half, so let's stop it right there.
00:14:55.000 When he says we cut the deficit in half, what he means by that is that he blew out the deficit in his first year, and then the deficit numbers went down the next couple of years.
00:15:22.000 And the reason that that is cutting in half, that's like saying, you know what I did last month?
00:15:26.000 Last month, I went $10,000 over my credit card bill.
00:15:29.000 This month, I went $5,000 over my credit card bill.
00:15:31.000 I just cut my deficit in half.
00:15:33.000 That's what he's talking about.
00:15:35.000 That's not cutting your deficit in half.
00:15:36.000 I mean, technically, it sort of is, but not really, considering that you're still blowing out the spending.
00:15:42.000 But, again, Barack Obama was the creator of the Trump phenomenon.
00:15:47.000 For the left to refuse to acknowledge this, putting it out on the campaign trail, it's such a mistake.
00:15:51.000 But this is the thing.
00:15:53.000 The Democrats really don't have a lot to offer at this point, and so they are doubling down on stupid.
00:15:59.000 The only person who seems to be discovering anything new, ironically, is Hillary Clinton.
00:16:03.000 I'm going to discuss that in just a second.
00:16:04.000 So, Hillary Clinton, one of the things I do love,
00:16:08.000 about the Trump era is that the left suddenly realizes that when the levers of power are given to the other party, things don't wind up great for the left.
00:16:18.000 So the left is all in favor of federal power, as long as it's Barack Obama in charge.
00:16:22.000 When it's President Trump in charge, suddenly they discover federal power is bad.
00:16:25.000 And I'm pretty consistent on this.
00:16:26.000 I think federal power sucks all the way through.
00:16:28.000 I think the first rule of good governance is don't create a weapon that can then be wielded by the other side.
00:16:35.000 Folks on the left are for gun control.
00:16:36.000 You know what I'm for?
00:16:38.000 I'm for federal power control.
00:16:40.000 You reduce the amount of federal power available to anyone, and then you're not going to have to worry about the federal power being used against you.
00:16:46.000 One of the great ironies, though, is that Hillary Clinton, one of the great advocates of federal power of the modern era, she is now discovering federalism again.
00:16:54.000 Amazing how this works.
00:16:55.000 Donald Trump comes along, suddenly Hillary Clinton and the left are discovering that states are kind of great.
00:16:59.000 Here's what she tweeted yesterday.
00:17:00.000 Is that really a new, important front in protecting civil rights?
00:17:13.000 Or does it turn out that the states were always an important front in protecting civil rights?
00:17:17.000 Now, folks are going to say, well, think about the fact that states were responsible for Jim Crow.
00:17:21.000 That's true.
00:17:22.000 It was also states that were responsible for failing to abide by the Fugitive Slave Act in the 1850s, leading to the Civil War.
00:17:28.000 The federal government was trying to force states in the North to abide by the Fugitive Slave Act.
00:17:32.000 States in the North were refusing to abide by the Fugitive Slave Act.
00:17:35.000 States are only as good as the people who comprise them, and their policy is only as good as the people who comprise them.
00:17:40.000 The one thing that is certainly true is that the United States, as a mixed state and national system, as it is put in Federalist 39, as a mixed system, state governments are designed to preserve the centrality of locality in American jurisprudence.
00:17:59.000 And the fact that the left is only now realizing this as soon as somebody who's in office they don't like is at the head of the federal government demonstrates just how dishonest they are.
00:18:06.000 Because here's the thing, Hillary Clinton and her ilk, if they ever got in charge again, how long do you think they'd stick by the states' rights proposal?
00:18:13.000 How long do you think they'd be in favor of states' rights?
00:18:15.000 The answer is five seconds.
00:18:17.000 Five seconds.
00:18:18.000 The left is just dishonest about all this stuff.
00:18:21.000 The same left that proclaims that Donald Trump is dishonest, this is dishonest.
00:18:24.000 When Hillary Clinton says she likes states' rights, no, what Hillary Clinton means is that she wants to use any obstacle to prevent President Trump from governing, but she doesn't actually believe in states' rights.
00:18:33.000 If she actually believed in states' rights, then presumably she'd want a devolution of authority to the states from the federal government across the board, including if she had been president.
00:18:42.000 We all know that that was never going to happen.
00:18:44.000 We all know that was never going to happen.
00:18:45.000 Instead, the truth is, what Democrats really want is to copy the policies of Scandinavian countries, where people forget to tell you this, but the policy in Scandinavian countries is not just a massive social welfare state, is a massive social welfare state paid for by enormous, unbelievably high taxes.
00:19:03.000 The taxes in places like Denmark and Norway, 50 to 60% on everybody making more than 50 or 60 grand a year.
00:19:09.000 And we're not talking about taxes on just the wealthy.
00:19:12.000 Even folks on the left are not willing to be honest about what exactly it would take to pay for all the crap that they are talking about.
00:19:18.000 Instead, what they will do is they will just kick the can down the road.
00:19:21.000 So what exactly are they proposing?
00:19:23.000 So they're not really proposing federalism, and they're not obviously proposing fact-based legislation.
00:19:28.000 The left is proposing spending a lot of money.
00:19:29.000 So now we are going to get, in the 2020 primaries from the Democrats, who can spend the most cash.
00:19:35.000 So we have Kamala Harris, who's proposing giving every poor family 500 bucks.
00:19:40.000 Based on nothing.
00:19:41.000 We really don't know where exactly this money is going to come from, how this is going to spur the economy, any of that stuff.
00:19:48.000 Cory Booker says, well, why do 500?
00:19:51.000 Why not do 100 times 500?
00:19:53.000 Let's give everybody 50 grand.
00:19:56.000 So why not give everybody 500 grand, by the way?
00:19:58.000 Why not 5 million?
00:19:59.000 Why not just helicopter pallets of cash over Newark?
00:20:03.000 And we'll just drop pallets of cash.
00:20:04.000 I mean, hopefully people get out of the way.
00:20:06.000 If not, they will be crushed by money and die happy.
00:20:09.000 That apparently is the idea from Cory Booker.
00:20:11.000 So according to Vox, which is the repository of all things stupid, that's not to say that everybody at Vox is stupid.
00:20:16.000 There's some intelligent folks at Vox, although why they remain there is beyond me.
00:20:20.000 Senator Cory Booker is introducing a bill aimed at closing the gap between rich and poor.
00:20:24.000 His idea is to give lower-income kids a sizable nest egg
00:20:28.000 Well, you know what?
00:20:29.000 This particular proposal relies on people to use money well.
00:20:31.000 You know what else relies on people to use money well?
00:20:33.000 Basic reason and free markets.
00:20:53.000 So dropping cash on people without actually using that cash for good purposes is counterproductive.
00:21:00.000 We're going to get to some more of the Democratic agenda, the reason-based Democratic agenda Barack Obama talks about in just one second.
00:21:06.000 First, let's talk about your underwear.
00:21:08.000 So dudes, fall is here and as you switch out your wardrobe, don't neglect the undies.
00:21:12.000 Now is a perfect time to upgrade or restock your drawers with all new fall colors and prints from Tommy John.
00:21:17.000 Tommy John obsesses
00:21:18.000 Over every little detail and stitch, they use proprietary fabrics that perform like nothing you've worn before.
00:21:22.000 As a result, Tommy John's men's and women's underwear, they sport a no-wedgie guarantee, comfortable, staple waistbands, and a range of fabrics that are luxuriously soft, feather-light, moisture-wicking, breathable, and designed to move with you, not against you.
00:21:33.000 That means no bunching, no riding up.
00:21:35.000 Tommy John is so confident in their underwear, if you don't love your first pair, you can get a full refund with their best pair you'll ever wear or its free guarantee, so you really don't have anything to lose.
00:21:43.000 That includes their new life-changing women's underwear, which are now fully back in stock.
00:21:47.000 Hurry to tommyjohn.com slash ben right now.
00:21:50.000 Get 20% off your first order.
00:21:52.000 The underwear are fantastic.
00:21:53.000 I am wearing them right now.
00:21:54.000 I have many pairs of Tommy John underwear because they are so good.
00:21:57.000 That's tommyjohn.com slash ben for 20% off.
00:22:00.000 One of the great things about these underwear, by the way, is that no matter how many times you put them in the wash, they still operate.
00:22:05.000 They don't fall apart at the drop of a hat.
00:22:07.000 Go to tommyjohn.com right now.
00:22:09.000 Tommyjohn slash Ben for 20% off.
00:22:11.000 Okay, so the Democratic fact-based agenda now revolves around Kamala Harris offering everybody $500 and Cory Booker offering everybody $50,000 paid for by, hmm?
00:22:23.000 Eh?
00:22:24.000 Okay, here is what the American Opportunity Accounts Program would look like.
00:22:28.000 Okay, so in other words, we are just going to basically buy a house and an education for you, paid for by...
00:22:58.000 Eh?
00:22:59.000 Nobody really knows.
00:23:00.000 Okay, so that's really great.
00:23:01.000 You know what's another way of doing this, actually?
00:23:02.000 If you actually want to help young people, you know what's another way of doing this?
00:23:05.000 Privatizing Social Security.
00:23:06.000 Because that's basically what he's talking about here.
00:23:08.000 He's basically talking about taking people's retirement savings and putting them in an account for them, a lockbox for them, for many, many years, and then giving them to them much later.
00:23:20.000 It all sounds great, except for exactly how this money is going to be generated.
00:23:27.000 And folks on the left never talk about how the money is generated, they just talk about free money.
00:23:30.000 So, part one of the Democrats' new agenda is apparently, according to Hillary Clinton, federalism.
00:23:34.000 So, congratulations to all of us.
00:23:36.000 That's been around for a couple hundred years, now Democrats are discovering it.
00:23:39.000 Part two is give people lots and lots of free money.
00:23:41.000 And part three is
00:23:43.000 Hating science.
00:23:44.000 So part three is, science is stupid and we don't need it anymore.
00:23:47.000 So yesterday, we talked at length about this new proposal from the Trump administration to define sex as, you know, the dictionary definition of sex.
00:23:55.000 Like there are males and females.
00:23:56.000 And we talked about the left's weird attempt to separate gender from sex and then to retroactively conflate sex and gender.
00:24:04.000 They're exactly the same thing.
00:24:06.000 And they're really pushing this hard now.
00:24:07.000 There's a person named Jennifer Finney Boylan who is a genetic male, which is to say a male human, and has had a bunch of surgeries and now considers himself female.
00:24:16.000 The piece in the New York Times is called Trump Cannot Define Away My Existence.
00:24:21.000 And this is so weird.
00:24:22.000 I love this argument from the left.
00:24:24.000 You can't define away my existence.
00:24:26.000 You literally define away the existence of millions of unborn children every single year.
00:24:30.000 They don't exist according to you.
00:24:33.000 Now, transgender people exist according to me, but that does not mean that they are actually members of the sex to which they claim membership.
00:24:41.000 I can fully acknowledge that people who suffer from the mental disorder known as gender identity disorder or gender dysphoria, those people exist.
00:24:49.000 Of course they exist.
00:24:50.000 I mean, they're there.
00:24:52.000 I know some of them.
00:24:53.000 Like, okay.
00:24:54.000 That's not the same thing as saying that you are actually a woman if you say that you are a woman.
00:24:59.000 And again, there's no objective evidence, there's no objective test I can use to determine that you are a woman if you say that you are a woman.
00:25:05.000 But here is the piece in the New York Times, the anti-science piece of the new democratic agenda, feelings over fact.
00:25:10.000 Here is this piece by Jennifer Finney Boylan.
00:25:13.000 I was surprised to learn on Sunday morning that I do not exist.
00:25:16.000 Well, that's weird.
00:25:17.000 She says, this will come as sad news to my children, to whom I've been a mother for over 20 years now.
00:25:23.000 Well, presumably, you were a father at one point to your children.
00:25:28.000 It will come as a shock to my wife, too, to whom I've been married for 30 years.
00:25:30.000 It would have been a disappointment for my mother as well.
00:25:32.000 The conservative evangelical Christian Republican, who, when she learned I was transgender two decades ago, said I would never turn my back on my child, and then quoted 1 Corinthians, these three remain, faith, hope, and love, but the greatest of these is love.
00:25:44.000 Okay, that's fine, but it also says in the Bible that male and female, he created them.
00:25:49.000 So, I mean, if we're going to selectively quote the Bible, you may as well quote the whole thing.
00:25:53.000 It has been a hard life for me these last 60 years, but on the whole, I felt grateful for the many blessings that have come my way, and being trans, not least.
00:25:59.000 It is so disappointing, then, and more than a little embarrassing, to learn I'm imaginary, a creature no more real than a cyclops or a hippogriff.
00:26:07.000 Again, you're a real human, but you're not a real woman.
00:26:12.000 You know why?
00:26:13.000 Because you are not genetically a real woman.
00:26:15.000 Now, you want to say that you are gendered feminine?
00:26:18.000 That you are a male who had surgeries to look more female?
00:26:20.000 And that you carry feminine attributes?
00:26:23.000 That is accurate.
00:26:23.000 That is accurate use of language.
00:26:25.000 It is not accurate use of language to say that you are a female.
00:26:27.000 On Sunday, news broke that the Trump administration seeks to narrowly define gender as an immutable condition determined by genitalia at birth.
00:26:34.000 Well, actually, they were defining sex that way.
00:26:37.000 And then you guys conflate sex and gender, so you say it's the same thing.
00:26:40.000 I admit I'm reluctant to react to this latest cruelty, which is obviously just one more cynical move clearly designed to stir the pot ahead of the election.
00:26:47.000 Trans people are the latest conservative whipping girl, like African Americans in the 1950s.
00:26:53.000 Or gay people in the 1990s and 2000s.
00:26:57.000 Nope.
00:26:57.000 Nope.
00:26:58.000 Gay people can objectively claim to be attracted to members of the same sex.
00:27:04.000 That's a subjective claim.
00:27:05.000 There is no way to objectively verify that.
00:27:07.000 So, that is what it is.
00:27:09.000 I can objectively verify your sex, for a variety of measures.
00:27:13.000 And black people, a white person who claims that they're a black person, is not in fact a black person, as Rachel Dolezal learned.
00:27:18.000 I was speaking at the F. Scott Fitzgerald Festival in Rockville, Maryland this weekend, when I first read about the administration's intents.
00:27:24.000 Since then, I've thought a lot about Nick Carraway and the Great Gatsby.
00:27:29.000 And then this continues.
00:27:31.000 Look, there are toucans and puffins, there's a duck-billed platypus and a blue lobster, the Venus flytrap.
00:27:38.000 Isn't it a miracle that God has given us all these wonderful things?
00:27:41.000 Surely if there is room in this world for these, there should be room in this world for me.
00:27:45.000 Again, nobody is suggesting that transgender people should be mistreated.
00:27:49.000 But you do not get to tell the entire civilization to redefine biological sex on the basis of anti-science positions because of how you feel on the inside.
00:27:58.000 My favorite part of this piece is the suggestion that science is on the side of this policy.
00:28:02.000 There is no science on the side of the policy promulgated by the left that sex does not exist.
00:28:07.000 So they started off with sex exists, but gender is unconnected with sex.
00:28:10.000 And then they went to gender exists, but it exists on a spectrum.
00:28:13.000 Then they went to sex exists again, but it only exists on a spectrum.
00:28:18.000 Sex didn't exist for a while, now it exists again, but it only exists on a spectrum.
00:28:21.000 There's a spectrum of sex.
00:28:22.000 There's no spectrum of sex.
00:28:24.000 Human beings are sexually dimorphic.
00:28:26.000 If you want to suggest that there are other species where sex can change, fine.
00:28:30.000 But you are not a fish.
00:28:32.000 You're not one of these fish that changes sex.
00:28:34.000 You are a human.
00:28:36.000 Among humans, sex does not change.
00:28:37.000 That's not the way this works.
00:28:39.000 But this has been pushed by the hard left.
00:28:41.000 And so you get the odd spectacle of Stephen Colbert tut-tutting Trump, tut-tutting President Trump on this trans issue.
00:28:47.000 And how telling is the remark that he's about to make?
00:28:49.000 It's pretty telling.
00:28:50.000 I'll explain why in a second.
00:28:52.000 The Trump administration is thinking about writing new guidelines that say gender should be defined, quote, on a biological basis that is clear, grounded in science.
00:29:01.000 Oh, now you care about science.
00:29:05.000 Wow, how convenient.
00:29:08.000 And listen to the crowd cheer that.
00:29:10.000 Shouldn't you be happy that they care about science?
00:29:13.000 I'm confused.
00:29:14.000 So you say that when it comes to climate change that the Trump administration is utterly anti-scientific.
00:29:18.000 When it comes to the EPA, they're utterly anti-scientific and that's bad.
00:29:21.000 But now they care about science when it comes to biological sex.
00:29:25.000 And that's bad.
00:29:26.000 Does he even see the hypocrisy in what he's saying himself?
00:29:29.000 The answer is no, because to the left, even science is malleable.
00:29:32.000 Now, my position on climate change, I've made clear multiple times on this program.
00:29:35.000 I did like an entire program on it a couple of weeks ago, talking about the new IPCC report.
00:29:41.000 The world is warming.
00:29:42.000 It's warming at a slower rate than the scientists said it was going to, according to their modeling.
00:29:46.000 Probably a majority of that warming, according to every scientist I've ever seen, including Roy Spencer, who is Wright's favorite climate scientist, suggests that the majority of that warming is due to human action.
00:29:57.000 That does not dictate global governance of the climate, nor does it dictate that we have to crush capitalism in spirit or in action.
00:30:05.000 But that is considered an anti-scientific position by the left.
00:30:09.000 And it is considered, I guess, bad form to mention science when it comes to biological sex now.
00:30:15.000 If this is the new democratic position, good luck with this, guys.
00:30:17.000 Good luck.
00:30:18.000 Okay, so in just a second, we'll talk about some other democratic positions and why the news cycle continues to cut in favor of the President of the United States.
00:30:26.000 First, let me remind you that you don't have to go to the post office today.
00:30:28.000 I know, you need stamps.
00:30:29.000 And the post office is great.
00:30:31.000 They have a lot of great services.
00:30:31.000 But you don't actually have to get in your car and go down to the post office
00:30:34.000 That's not a thing you have to do.
00:30:35.000 You don't have to spend the time.
00:30:36.000 Instead, all you have to do is log on to stamps.com.
00:30:39.000 With stamps.com, you can get all the amazing services of the post office right from your desk, 24-7, when it is convenient for you.
00:30:45.000 Buy and print official U.S.
00:30:46.000 postage for any letter, any package, using your own computer and printer.
00:30:50.000 The mail carrier picks it up.
00:30:51.000 Just click, print, mail, you're done.
00:30:52.000 Could not be easier.
00:30:54.000 We use stamps.com here at the Daily Wire offices to send letters and packages, merchandise for the show.
00:30:59.000 Go over to stamps.com.
00:31:00.000 You can do it, too.
00:31:01.000 Right now, use promo code SHAPIRO for this special offer.
00:31:04.000 55 bucks of free postage, a digital scale, and a four-week trial.
00:31:07.000 Again, go to stamps.com.
00:31:09.000 Before you do anything else, click on the radio microphone at the top of the homepage and type in promo code SHAPIRO.
00:31:13.000 That's stamps.com, promo code SHAPIRO.
00:31:16.000 Go check it out right now.
00:31:17.000 Again, stamps.com, promo code SHAPIRO.
00:31:19.000 We use it at the office because it is great and it saves lots of time, and for us, time is money.
00:31:23.000 Go to stamps.com.
00:31:25.000 Again, promo code SHAPIRO for that special deal.
00:31:28.000 55 bucks of free postage, a digital scale, and a four-week trial.
00:31:31.000 It's a great service.
00:31:32.000 Go check it out right now.
00:31:33.000 Okay, so I want to talk a little bit more about the science of transgenderism.
00:31:38.000 And I want to get into the specific details because I want to rebut all the arguments that you're going to hear made by the left over the next
00:31:45.000 A few years, as they try to turn transgenderism into the new civil rights movement.
00:31:48.000 But first, you're gonna have to go over to dailywire.com and subscribe to watch it live.
00:31:51.000 For $9.99 a month, get the rest of this program live.
00:31:53.000 Get the rest of Michael Knowles' show, his terrible show live.
00:31:56.000 Get the rest of Andrew Klavan's good show live.
00:31:58.000 Get all of those things.
00:31:59.000 And then, you can also be part of our mailbag, which we do on Fridays here.
00:32:03.000 You get to be part of our mailbag when we do Daily Wire backstage.
00:32:05.000 We have another one of those coming up election night.
00:32:07.000 We have all sorts of goodies that are coming out on a routine basis.
00:32:10.000 For $99 a year, you also get this.
00:32:12.000 The Travel Mug.
00:32:13.000 The leftist here is hot or cold.
00:32:15.000 Tumblr, look at this thing.
00:32:16.000 Feast your eyes upon it.
00:32:18.000 It is, in fact, glorious.
00:32:19.000 $99 a year gets you the subscription, along with that, the Travel Mug.
00:32:24.000 And when you subscribe at iTunes and leave us a five-star review, then I believe you get the Sunday special as well in your feed.
00:32:31.000 And we have a Sunday special this week that's just awesome.
00:32:33.000 Like, really, I'm very excited about our Sunday special this week.
00:32:36.000 It's really, really great.
00:32:38.000 So go check that out.
00:32:40.000 Also, I would urge you, if you're a listener to the show,
00:32:42.000 Apparently, iHeartRadio has a new, uh, they actually have a new podcast awards that they are giving out.
00:32:50.000 All you have to do is go to iHeart.com and then check out their podcast awards.
00:32:54.000 And you just go to iHeart.com, then you can see at the very top, it's iHeart.com slash podcast dash awards.
00:33:00.000 And you can vote up to five times a day.
00:33:02.000 It's like the North Korean elections.
00:33:03.000 All you have to do is go to the news section and then vote for me five times so that we can beat out Pod Save America.
00:33:08.000 Does it matter?
00:33:09.000 But it's fun anyway.
00:33:11.000 It would be fun bragging, right?
00:33:12.000 So go check it out at iHeart.com and we can win that award if you see that we are fit to do so.
00:33:19.000 We are the largest, fastest growing conservative podcast in the nation.
00:33:26.000 So how stupid is the left's agenda with regard to the anti-science nonsense pushed by the transgender movement?
00:33:31.000 This is an actual tweet from New York Times Science.
00:33:34.000 The idea that a person's sex is determined by their anatomy at birth is not true.
00:33:37.000 And we've known that it's not true for decades.
00:33:42.000 Okay.
00:33:43.000 Well, realistically speaking, I suppose that's not true only in the most narrow sense.
00:33:49.000 It is determined by chromosomes.
00:33:51.000 It is determined by genetics.
00:33:53.000 And theoretically, you could have some sort of birth malformation when you are born that leaves you bereft of the genitalia that match up with your actual genetics.
00:34:00.000 So I guess in the very narrowest sense, it's true.
00:34:02.000 But the idea that that means that sex is on a spectrum among humans is just stupid.
00:34:06.000 I love this headline though.
00:34:07.000 Anatomy does not determine gender, experts say.
00:34:09.000 Right, genetics determines gender.
00:34:11.000 I love this.
00:34:12.000 Researchers who have studied gender issues and provided healthcare to people who do not fit the typical male-female pigeonholes, the typical male-female pigeonholes, as though they are just created by society, said that the Trump administration's latest plan to define gender goes beyond the limits of scientific knowledge.
00:34:25.000 The idea that a person's sex is determined by their anatomy at birth is not true, and we've known that it is not true for decades, says Joshua Safer, an endocrinologist
00:34:34.000 And the executive director of the Center for Transgender Medicine and Surgery, of course, at the Mount Sinai Health System in New York.
00:34:40.000 You want to talk about ascientific stuff?
00:34:42.000 Okay, talk about whether there are beneficial effects to transgender surgeries over time.
00:34:46.000 Okay, there is not good evidence to suggest that the end effect over the course of decades is actually significantly superior to no surgery, and yet this has become part of the transgender movement shtick.
00:34:57.000 Now,
00:34:58.000 Let me be clear.
00:34:58.000 We live in a free country.
00:35:00.000 You want to go carve up your own genitals?
00:35:01.000 That's your problem.
00:35:02.000 Right?
00:35:02.000 You can find a surgeon who's willing to do that for you.
00:35:05.000 Go for it.
00:35:05.000 It's a free country.
00:35:07.000 But let's not pretend that the science is on the side of all of the claims that are being made.
00:35:12.000 I love this.
00:35:13.000 Barry down in this article, I say, genetics does play a role though.
00:35:17.000 Oh, you think?
00:35:18.000 Oh, you think?
00:35:20.000 By the way, you know how you know that it's not just genitalia?
00:35:23.000 Because if a male were to have his twig and berries physically removed in some sort of accident, he would still be a male.
00:35:30.000 Yet if he intends to do so in a surgery, we are now supposed to consider him a female.
00:35:35.000 Okay, that is not logical.
00:35:36.000 I want to talk for just a second about the sort of propaganda that's been promoted on this issue, and it really is insane propaganda.
00:35:43.000 So, the notion that is pushed by the left that transgenderism is not a mental disorder is completely ascientific.
00:35:51.000 Now, what the left does is they like to cite things like the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, because the DSM-5 suggests that gender identity disorder is no longer a mental disorder.
00:36:00.000 Instead, what the DSM-5 says is that a mental disorder is a quote, "...syndrome characterized by clinically significant disturbance in an individual's cognition, emotion regulation, or behavior that reflects a dysfunction in the psychological, biological, or developmental processes underlying mental functioning."
00:36:17.000 Now, this is the funny part.
00:36:20.000 Socially deviant behavior and conflicts that are primarily between the individual and society are not mental disorders, unless the deviance or conflict results from a dysfunction in the individuals described above.
00:36:29.000 So in other words, if you have something that makes you think that a pink elephant is stalking you, unless this makes you feel bad, this is not actually a mental disorder, according to the DSM.
00:36:40.000 The definition makes room for it's making clear room for politically correct posturing, right?
00:36:44.000 If I am having a significant problem in and of myself, all I have to do is blame it on society's intolerance and it is no longer considered a mental disorder.
00:36:52.000 So if you are suicidal because you're a man who believes he's a woman,
00:36:56.000 The DSM can still find a way to blame that on society.
00:36:58.000 All you have to say is the reason I'm suicidal is because people are mean to me in society, not because I've suffered with this terrible conflict inside my brain for my entire life.
00:37:08.000 Right?
00:37:09.000 Now it's society's fault.
00:37:10.000 This is how the DSM-5 avoids the obvious implication that if you're a man who believes you're a woman, you have a mental disorder.
00:37:15.000 If you're, by the way, if you're a fat person who believes you are skinny or a skinny person who believes you are fat, we all acknowledge you have a mental disorder.
00:37:21.000 If you're a skinny person who believes you're fat, it's called anorexia.
00:37:24.000 It's dangerous and it's a mental disorder.
00:37:25.000 If you're a person who believes that you do not need a left arm, right?
00:37:29.000 This is something called body dysmorphia.
00:37:30.000 This is a mental disorder.
00:37:32.000 But if you're a man who believes you're a woman and you don't need your penis, then it's not a mental disorder.
00:37:35.000 It's society's fault.
00:37:37.000 You explain that one to me.
00:37:39.000 None of this has anything to do with science.
00:37:41.000 And all of it is specifically designed to blame society for what is clearly and obviously a mental disorder.
00:37:47.000 The reason that I'm serious about calling it a mental disorder, and the reason I do so, is because you can't actually treat a mental disorder by blaming it on society.
00:37:55.000 If you want to come up with new treatments for mental disorder, the way to do that is not by saying that society at large is responsible for the discomfort of people suffering from the mental disorder.
00:38:03.000 I'm somebody who takes mental illness extraordinarily seriously.
00:38:06.000 My grandfather was either bipolar or schizophrenic.
00:38:09.000 There are some lines that are hard to sort of diagnose there.
00:38:12.000 He was institutionalized when my dad was a child.
00:38:15.000 He thought the radio was talking to him.
00:38:17.000 He thought the curtains were trying to strangle him.
00:38:19.000 He suffered from that.
00:38:21.000 That was not something where if we had blamed society's intolerance and just said, you know what, Nate?
00:38:24.000 The radio actually is talking to you.
00:38:26.000 It's just society can't hear what you hear.
00:38:29.000 That would have been foolish.
00:38:30.000 They gave him lithium and he was much better.
00:38:32.000 That does not mean there's a good treatment for gender identity disorder, gender dysphoria, but to pretend that the treatments are all available and that transitioning is the only available sort of fix and that everything else is society's fault is anti-scientific in the extreme.
00:38:45.000 And to quote the DSM, which is a political football and has been a political football for decades, as the sort of apotheosis of scientific knowledge is just silly.
00:38:53.000 It's just silly.
00:38:54.000 The definition of mental disorder itself is not scientific according to the DSM-5.
00:38:59.000 There's no way that you can pose a hypothesis and then debunk it.
00:39:03.000 It is not scientifically verifiable.
00:39:05.000 With all of that said, the left has embraced a bunch of positions that are unsustainable, I believe, in American politics.
00:39:12.000 The latest position they are embracing that is unsustainable in American politics has to do with this migrant caravan.
00:39:16.000 So, this migrant caravan, as we mentioned yesterday, is now approaching the American border, with presumably the help of the Mexican government.
00:39:23.000 You can see the Mexican authorities are driving alongside the caravan.
00:39:26.000 It is now 10,000 people large, and it is moving toward the border.
00:39:29.000 Now, there are processes for asylum in the United States.
00:39:33.000 All you have to do is go to a U.S.
00:39:34.000 embassy and apply.
00:39:35.000 Or you can go to a border checkpoint and apply.
00:39:37.000 And you can see the pictures, if you're able to watch this, because you subscribe at DailyWire.com, you can see the pictures.
00:39:43.000 I mean, these are marches stretching a mile long, ten wide, and there's an enormous, enormous number of people.
00:39:51.000 Well, President Trump, he got himself into trouble yesterday because he said, listen, there are some bad people who are coming in this caravan.
00:39:59.000 Now, are there bad people coming in the caravan?
00:40:01.000 Who the hell knows?
00:40:02.000 The answer is we don't know the answer to that.
00:40:04.000 Presumably, some of those people are bad.
00:40:06.000 Presumably, many of those people are not bad.
00:40:08.000 But the answer is we don't know who they are.
00:40:10.000 So how can we possibly open our borders this way?
00:40:13.000 What's happening right now as a large group of people, they call it a caravan.
00:40:20.000 And in that caravan, you have some very bad people.
00:40:23.000 You have some very bad people.
00:40:25.000 And we can't let that happen to our country.
00:40:45.000 I am pretty libertarian when it comes to people who are immigrating for employment reasons.
00:40:50.000 This is why I think that we ought to let in more people through legal immigration methods in the United States.
00:40:54.000 But, let's recognize something.
00:40:56.000 The social structure of the United States is not the same in 2018 as it was in 1907.
00:41:01.000 The reason I use 1907 is that's when my ancestors got here.
00:41:04.000 The comparison here is not between the ethnicities of the folks showing up.
00:41:07.000 I don't care about ethnicity.
00:41:08.000 I really don't.
00:41:09.000 It makes no difference to me.
00:41:10.000 The question is, what is the social system that people are being integrated into?
00:41:14.000 When my great-great grandparents got to the United States, when they got here in 1907, and they arrived on the boats, they spoke Yiddish and had no money.
00:41:23.000 There was no social safety net.
00:41:24.000 They were immediately thrust into a capitalist economy where they had to learn English and they were forced by circumstance into assimilating specifically so that they could operate in the economy of the United States and become good American citizens.
00:41:35.000 There were people who left stuff behind in their home country to come to the United States so that they could actually live a better, more adventurous life.
00:41:43.000 No, I think a lot of immigrants still want that.
00:41:45.000 But the fact that we have a social safety net that picks up after everybody, the fact that if you have a baby in the United States, that baby is now an American citizen and you can take advantage of all of the benefits of American citizenship, that there are all these, you know, tremendous social safety nets available to you, means we have to be a little bit more circumspect about who we let in the country.
00:42:04.000 And again, citing the Scandinavian countries,
00:42:06.000 The Scandinavian countries are really tough on immigration.
00:42:09.000 They're very tough on immigration.
00:42:11.000 And they should be, because the richer your social safety net, the more folks are going to want to take advantage of it.
00:42:15.000 And let's not pretend that there's no anti-American animus in this caravan.
00:42:19.000 There clearly is.
00:42:20.000 You can look at some of the pictures.
00:42:22.000 So some of the folks who are marching were carrying the Honduran flag.
00:42:26.000 So this one, I believe, is actually from Honduras.
00:42:29.000 Let's go back to the Honduran flag one.
00:42:30.000 So you can see
00:42:32.000 At the front of this march, there are people who are carrying the Honduran flag.
00:42:36.000 Now, the claim of the caravan is that these are people who are attempting to escape from Honduras.
00:42:40.000 Honduras is a bad place, right?
00:42:41.000 It's a place where they can't live the life they want to live.
00:42:44.000 It's a place of little economic opportunity.
00:42:47.000 So why are you carrying the flag of that place?
00:42:49.000 When Cuban refugees got onto 1950s Chevys, inflated the tires and tried to float their way to Florida, they weren't carrying a Cuban flag when they arrived on American shores.
00:42:58.000 They were trying to escape Cuba.
00:43:00.000 That was sort of the point.
00:43:01.000 If you're marching from Honduras to escape Honduras, why are you coming here with a Honduran flag?
00:43:05.000 When my ancestors got here, they weren't carrying a Russian or Lithuanian flag.
00:43:10.000 They came to the United States ready to carry an American flag.
00:43:13.000 That is the point.
00:43:16.000 This idea that you can assimilate all cultures, including people who forcibly do not want to be assimilated, in a social safety net society is just not accurate.
00:43:24.000 And yet that's what Democrats continue to promote.
00:43:27.000 I mean, over in Honduras, by the way, in support of the migrants, they've been burning American flags at some of these protests.
00:43:32.000 This is a famous picture going around yesterday.
00:43:35.000 Somebody painted a swastika on the American flag and then burned it.
00:43:38.000 So then why do folks want in?
00:43:40.000 America's Nazi Germany is not really a great pitch as to, I also want to enter there.
00:43:45.000 You know, that push, again, it leads folks to the position that President Trump has taken, where he says he's a nationalist, not a globalist.
00:43:53.000 Now, President Trump said this at a rally yesterday, that he's a nationalist, not a globalist.
00:43:57.000 I've distinguished between nationalism and patriotism.
00:44:00.000 I'm not a big nationalist in the sense that I don't think that simple borders and living in the same place is enough of a rationale for you to be enthused.
00:44:08.000 I think that instead you actually have to be about ideas.
00:44:11.000 But what he's reacting to is the left's focus on globalism.
00:44:14.000 The left's belief that there should be no borders, that people should be able to cross willy-nilly into the United States and never assimilate because multiculturalism is the way to go.
00:44:22.000 You want to know why President Trump is popular?
00:44:24.000 It's because of this.
00:44:26.000 A globalist is a person that wants the globe to do well, frankly, not caring about our country so much.
00:44:36.000 And you know what?
00:44:36.000 We can't have that.
00:44:38.000 You know, they have a word.
00:44:39.000 It sort of became old fashioned.
00:44:41.000 It's called a nationalist.
00:44:44.000 And I say, really, we're not supposed to use that word.
00:44:46.000 You know what I am?
00:44:47.000 I'm a nationalist, okay?
00:44:48.000 I'm a nationalist.
00:44:50.000 Okay, the reason that you're not supposed to use the word nationalist typically is because it's largely been connected with repressive regimes who are focused in on commonalities in ethnicity and culture as opposed to commonalities and ideas.
00:45:03.000 But if he is posing sort of American interests against folks who want inundation of our borders,
00:45:09.000 Then that's perfectly rational.
00:45:11.000 That's perfectly rational.
00:45:13.000 Okay, so it's time for... Are we up to some things I like and things I hate?
00:45:17.000 Is that where we are?
00:45:18.000 Okay, so let's do some things that I like and some things that I hate.
00:45:20.000 So things that I like today.
00:45:22.000 There's a book that was recommended to me by Andrew Klavan.
00:45:25.000 I've been going through kind of Drew's reading list.
00:45:27.000 It's called The Last Supper.
00:45:29.000 By Charles McCary, and it's a really good sort of action thriller dating all the way back.
00:45:35.000 It's sort of a Cold War thriller that dates all the way back to the 1920s and then carries forward through the Vietnam War.
00:45:40.000 It's really worth the read.
00:45:41.000 It's really well written, and I'm sort of a devotee of action thrillers, at least old-fashioned ones.
00:45:47.000 One of my favorite books is The Day of the Jackal by Frederick Forsythe, which is the best action thriller in the history of literature.
00:45:52.000 It's so good.
00:45:53.000 But this one is quite good too.
00:45:54.000 Charles McHarry's The Last Supper.
00:45:55.000 Worth a read.
00:45:56.000 Go check it out.
00:45:58.000 That's worth checking out.
00:45:58.000 Okay, other things that I like today.
00:46:01.000 I do enjoy PETA.
00:46:03.000 The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.
00:46:05.000 Because they're totally crazy.
00:46:06.000 So I do enjoy them.
00:46:07.000 Here is what they tweeted out yesterday.
00:46:09.000 Really?
00:46:19.000 Didn't know that was a thing.
00:46:20.000 So, apparently, I knew it was a thing only because of the New York Times, we talked about a piece earlier this week, in which white supremacists were guzzling cow's milk to demonstrate their genetic superiority because they could tolerate lactose.
00:46:31.000 Which, again, seems like not the world's most important skill set.
00:46:35.000 Like, you can't really put on your resume, tolerates lactose well.
00:46:39.000 That's not something that, like, if somebody put that on their resume for the Daily Wire, it'd be like, uh, this person's not getting hired.
00:46:45.000 But, but PETA's response is just as stupid, which is,
00:46:49.000 Not, why should cow's milk be used by white supremacists?
00:46:51.000 It's cow's milk itself is indeed white supremacist, so you should not use cow's milk anymore.
00:46:56.000 Goat's milk, apparently, not white supremacist.
00:46:59.000 So that's good to know.
00:47:00.000 So I guess forcible milking of the goats is on its way.
00:47:04.000 And also, what do you do if you like chocolate milk?
00:47:07.000 If you like chocolate milk, are you also a white supremacist?
00:47:11.000 Further questions.
00:47:12.000 My children, big fans of milk.
00:47:14.000 Really enjoy it.
00:47:15.000 Did ever since they were babies, it turns out.
00:47:18.000 Were they white supremacists when they were small babies?
00:47:20.000 Because babies like cow's milk.
00:47:22.000 True.
00:47:23.000 True story.
00:47:24.000 So, PETA.
00:47:25.000 Doing Yeoman's work and demonstrating just how insane they are each and every day of the week.
00:47:30.000 Well done.
00:47:31.000 Well done, PETA.
00:47:32.000 Okay, time for a couple of things that I hate.
00:47:39.000 Thing number one that I hate.
00:47:40.000 A new study, 25% of students say they were traumatized by the 2016 election.
00:47:46.000 Researchers surveyed Arizona State University students around the time of President Trump's inauguration in 2017.
00:47:51.000 Some had stress scores on par with that of seven-month follow-ups to school shooting witnesses.
00:47:57.000 25% of the 769 students reported clinically significant levels of stress.
00:48:02.000 Women, Black, Hispanic, non-Christian students reported higher stress.
00:48:05.000 So apparently, they now say that they are suffering basically from post-traumatic stress disorder.
00:48:11.000 Not kidding.
00:48:12.000 This is actually what they're saying.
00:48:14.000 So they're saying that they suffer from PTSD.
00:48:16.000 A quarter of these students.
00:48:18.000 They found it so traumatic, they now report symptoms of PTSD according to the study.
00:48:22.000 So, things that caused PTSD for young people in the past.
00:48:26.000 1910s, World War I, trench warfare.
00:48:29.000 1920s, aftermath of World War I and trench warfare.
00:48:32.000 1930s, the Great Depression and mass starvation.
00:48:35.000 1940s, World War II.
00:48:37.000 The 1960s, the Vietnam War.
00:48:40.000 The 1970s, vast social unrest, bombings in the United States.
00:48:45.000 2018, you lost an election.
00:48:49.000 Oh, you pansies.
00:48:50.000 I prescribed you, take some avocado toast and call me in the morning.
00:48:54.000 Really, PTSD?
00:48:56.000 PTSD from an election?
00:48:57.000 Listen, when John Kerry was poised to win in 2004, I was living in Cambridge, Massachusetts, because I was going to Harvard Law at the time, and while I was
00:49:07.000 And while I was there, John Kerry was supposed to speak just down the road.
00:49:10.000 The entire town was abuzz because John Kerry was going to be the next president.
00:49:13.000 I went to Tower Records, which used to exist.
00:49:15.000 It used to be a place, kids.
00:49:17.000 And Tower Records was a place where they sold this thing called CDs.
00:49:19.000 And CDs were these things that had music on them and you played them.
00:49:22.000 So I went over to Tower Records in Harvard Square.
00:49:27.000 And I bought myself Mozart's Requiem and prepared for a deep, depressing evening.
00:49:31.000 As it turns out, the 2004 election was great, but I was prepared.
00:49:35.000 Was that PTSD?
00:49:37.000 No, it wasn't.
00:49:39.000 And come on.
00:49:40.000 Man up.
00:49:41.000 Man up.
00:49:42.000 Come the hell on.
00:49:44.000 If this is the generation we are reliant upon, no.
00:49:47.000 No, I think we're all screwed.
00:49:49.000 I think it's fair to say we're screwed.
00:49:50.000 If a quarter of all humans were, a quarter of all students were stressed to the level of PTSD,
00:49:58.000 Yeah, we're jacked.
00:49:59.000 The United States is over.
00:50:00.000 Okay, other things that I hate.
00:50:01.000 This is actually a thing that I like.
00:50:02.000 So Amy Schumer confirmed that she was pregnant.
00:50:05.000 And she tweeted out, Chris, she's married.
00:50:07.000 Chris and I are thrilled and almost positive he's the father, which is funny.
00:50:09.000 Okay.
00:50:10.000 Well, just, I'd like to make a quick point.
00:50:13.000 I am extraordinarily excited and happy that Amy Schumer has a meaningless cluster of cells in her womb.
00:50:20.000 Could not be happier for her about this meaningless cluster of cells in her womb.
00:50:24.000 Now, do I believe it's a meaningless cluster of cells?
00:50:26.000 Of course not.
00:50:27.000 That's the point.
00:50:28.000 I think it's a baby, which is why it makes sense for me to be happy when people are pregnant.
00:50:32.000 What makes less sense is the idea that I can be happy about this meaningless cluster of cells in my womb if it's me, but if it's somebody else, I have no way to be happy for them because what do they think?
00:50:40.000 Maybe they think it's a meaningless cluster of cells.
00:50:43.000 Presumably, if Amy Schumer wanted to abort this cluster of cells, it would just be a cluster of cells.
00:50:47.000 The same people who say that we are erasing transgender people by saying transgender people exist but are not members of the opposite sex, which is biologically true, say that babies don't exist because they're meaningless clusters of cells.
00:50:59.000 Embryos are just meaningless clusters of cells, which is both anti-scientific and erasing human beings.
00:51:04.000 So, there's that.
00:51:06.000 Okay, you know what?
00:51:06.000 That's enough for today.
00:51:07.000 I'm ready to leave.
00:51:08.000 So we're gonna do another show tomorrow.
00:51:09.000 We'll be back here then.
00:51:10.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:51:11.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:51:16.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is produced by Senya Villareal, executive producer Jeremy Boring, senior producer Jonathan Hay.
00:51:21.000 Our supervising producer is Mathis Glover, and our technical producer is Austin Stevens.
00:51:26.000 Edited by Alex Zingaro.
00:51:27.000 Audio is mixed by Mike Caramina.
00:51:29.000 Hair and makeup is by Jesua Alvera.
00:51:31.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is a Daily Wire Ford Publishing production.
00:51:33.000 Copyright Ford Publishing 2018.