A second whistleblower comes forward in the Trump impeachment saga, Rudy Giuliani and President Trump play defense, and Chuck Todd goes off on Chuck. The Ben Shapiro Show is sponsored by Express VPN. Protect your online privacy today at ExpressVPN.org/ProtectYourOnline Privacy. Ben Shapiro is a regular contributor to the Financial Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the New York Times. His articles can be found wherever you get your news and financial information. He is also the host of the popular Financial Times podcast, The Weekly Standard, and hosts the popular Fox News show, Fox News Radio. If you like what you hear here, please HIT SUBSCRIBE and become a supporter of the show by becoming a patron. You'll get access to all the latest financial news and information, including Hedge Fund and Bitcoin recommendations, as well as access to the latest investing and investing advice from the best financial experts in the world. Use the promo code: "ELISSA" at checkout to receive $5 and receive $10 off your first purchase when you become a patron! Today's Rate/subscribe in Apple Podcasts! Subscribe to my new weekly newsletter! I'm giving away a free 5-star rating and review! Rate, review, and subscribe to my newest podcast, "The Best of Ben Shapiro's newest podcast: The Best Thing I've Ever Read." - Subscribe to Ben Shapiro Podcast! The Best Podcast Episodes of the Week? Subscribe & Review Ben Shapiro s Best Podcasts: Subscribe on Apple Podcast! Subscribe on iTunes Learn more about your ad choices and more! Leave us a review on iTunes and comment on your thoughts and opinions on the podcast! Connect with us on Podcoin.co.fm - Rate and review us on social media! We'll be giving away $5 stars to our new podcasting platform! - Ben Shapiro on The Besties and other links to our social media platforms! Thank you Ben Shapiro - The Best BONUS EPISODE of the week? Ben's Besties: Ben Shapiro Besties? - Thanks Ben Shapiro, & Chuck Todd on The FAST & Gellie Good Morning America? Ben Good Morning Joe? & much more! by Instapod? #Ben Shapiro's Best Podcast of the Day? and much more on this Podcast? .
00:00:00.000A second whistleblower comes forward in the Trump impeachment saga, Rudy Giuliani and President Trump play defense, and Chuck Todd goes off.
00:00:29.000The first whistleblower didn't have a lot to say other than what was actually in the transcript of the Ukraine phone call.
00:00:34.000Remember, this whistleblower, the first whistleblower, turned out to be a registered Democrat who was working inside the intelligence community.
00:00:39.000He was a CIA officer, and it looks a lot like that whistleblower was working in cahoots with Adam Schiff on the House Intelligence Committee, and that the two of them were sort of playing an inside-outside game.
00:00:50.000Now, Whether that's the fault of the whistleblower or whether that just means that the aide to Adam Schiff was passing the information along to Adam Schiff and he was then pressing for information from the outside, the whole thing looked at least a little bit fishy.
00:01:02.000Well, now we have a second whistleblower.
00:01:27.000What could a whistleblower even say at this point that would radically shift the case?
00:01:31.000Well, presumably the whistleblower could say that they have evidence that Donald Trump specifically said that he was creating a quid pro quo for the purposes of getting Joe Biden, not merely targeting corruption generally and Joe Biden as an aspect of that, but to get Joe Biden regardless as to whether Joe Biden was guilty or not.
00:01:47.000And that this whistleblower had actual firsthand or hearsay knowledge that Trump had said this directly to somebody.
00:01:54.000That's not what the whistleblower is saying.
00:01:56.000However, remember the first whistleblower, we already have the transcript.
00:01:58.000So what is the second whistleblower going to say that the first one didn't?
00:02:01.000Attorney Mark Zaid represents both whistleblowers.
00:02:03.000He said in a text message to the AP that the second person has spoken to the ICs, that's the intelligence community's internal watchdog, and can corroborate information in the original whistleblower complaint.
00:02:13.000Which, like, what is in there aside from the transcript of the phone call and stuff that we already sort of know from the text messages between Kurt Volker, who is the Special Envoy to Ukraine, and Gordon Sondland, who is the U.S.
00:02:25.000Ambassador to the European Union, and Bill Taylor, who is the...
00:02:29.000Temporary ambassador to the Ukraine like we already know all that stuff because all those texts were released So what can the second whistleblower actually do other than just sort of add fuel to the fire because whoo whistleblower whistleblower?
00:02:39.000We're all we are all very fond of this term whistleblower and so that means that they must have something relevant to say well what if there's not all that much there we're gonna find out because Who the hell knows what this whistleblower has to say.
00:03:59.000Okay, so as the Associated Press reports, the new whistleblower is apparently just going to corroborate Well, we already have all the documents, so I'm not sure exactly what the new whistleblower is going to say.
00:04:10.000Apparently, the new whistleblower works in the intelligence field and has first-hand knowledge of key events.
00:04:16.000I mean, if the whistleblower is not just speaking on third-hand knowledge like the first whistleblower, but actually has heard Trump say something, that might change something.
00:04:23.000The emergence of the second whistleblower threatened to undermine arguments from Trump and his allies to discredit the original complaint.
00:04:28.000They have called it politically motivated, claimed it was filed improperly, and dismissed it as unreliable because it was based on second-hand or third-hand information.
00:04:36.000Now, as you'll know from listening to this show, I have never claimed that the actual whistleblower complaint was deeply unreliable.
00:04:44.000The big problem with the whistleblower complaint is whether it actually Whether it represented something that was truly impeachable.
00:04:53.000I shouldn't say truly troubling, because I am troubled by it.
00:04:55.000I'm troubled by President Trump going to Ukraine and then throwing Joe Biden's name out there because obviously it raises the ugly specter of the President of the United States, even possibly.
00:05:18.000The reason it doesn't help is because Trump's entire defense right now, his entire defense, rests on something very simple, which is he is saying, I was targeting corruption in Ukraine, and thus all of my threats to withhold aid, all of my threats to keep Vice President Pence from meeting with Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, all of my threats not to meet with Zelensky myself, all of that was predicated on my desire to fight corruption.
00:05:40.000And Joe Biden, well, that's because, you know, listen, that stuff's corrupt, right?
00:05:46.000And so I told them, investigate that as an aspect of broader corruption investigations.
00:05:51.000Now, that only works if you believe that Trump's primary or main or even admixed motivation has to do with corruption.
00:06:00.000If you actually believe that Trump wanted to go after Biden and that all the corruption stuff is basically just nonsense that he added on top, it's sort of a facade, and you rip away the facade and all that's there is his desire to get Biden, well, that's impeachable.
00:06:13.000But if he's ripping on corruption, well, Frankly, that is what Joe Biden did, right?
00:06:18.000I mean, Joe Biden did, in fact, threaten to withhold $1 billion in loan aid to Ukraine contingent on Ukraine fighting corruption.
00:06:27.000And one of the aspects of corruption that Ukraine was supposed to fight was getting rid of a prosecutor who may or may not have been investigating Burisma, the oil and natural gas company on which Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, was sitting.
00:06:39.000He was sitting on the board at the time, taking down $50,000 a month for basically being a person with the last name Biden.
00:06:45.000According to the Associated Press, Democrats have zeroed in on the State Department in the opening phase of their impeachment investigation.
00:06:51.000The Intelligence, Oversight, and Foreign Affairs Committees have already interviewed Kurt Volker, a former Special Envoy to Ukraine who provided the text messages.
00:06:58.000At least two other witnesses are set for depositions this week.
00:07:15.000Because what Volcker said is, listen, I didn't talk to the Trump administration about Biden.
00:07:19.000In fact, I told Rudy that I thought that the Biden stuff was way overblown.
00:07:23.000And I encouraged the United States to work with Ukraine to root out corruption and to get them their aid.
00:07:30.000But Volcker didn't actually say that nobody inside the administration ever said anything about Biden.
00:07:36.000He never suggested that Giuliani was not whispering sweet nothings into Donald Trump's ears.
00:07:41.000In fact, Volker sort of suggested the opposite.
00:07:43.000He sort of suggested that Rudy Giuliani, as the chief envoy to Ukraine, basically, for the Trump campaign, was in fact the go-between that the Ukrainians were having to please.
00:07:55.000Right, so Volker's testimony was not particularly helpful.
00:07:58.000Gordon Sondland, he's gonna be showing up to testify.
00:08:01.000The reason Gordon Sondland is important is because Bill Taylor, who was the acting U.S.
00:08:05.000ambassador to Ukraine, texted Gordon Sondland and said, this sounds like a quid pro quo to go after Biden.
00:08:10.000And Gordon Sondland texted back, no, that's not true.
00:08:13.000Democrats presumably will hone in on that and suggest that the reason that Sondland wanted this to be a call as opposed to a text message is because he was going to explain offline that maybe in fact, this was in fact a quid pro quo to go after Joe Biden.
00:08:26.000And finally, Marie Yovanovitch, who was the U.S.
00:08:29.000ambassador to Ukraine, she was ousted, and the claim has been that it's because she was not going to pressure the Ukrainian government to go after Biden, although that is still, again, unclear, because she was ousted based on general belief that she was a pro-Democrat And you have to understand that a lot of what President Trump does on a daily basis is coming from a lack of security in his own administration.
00:08:56.000It's coming from a belief that inside the administration there are people who are leaking against him, which is true.
00:09:01.000There's a belief that there are people inside the administration who are looking for excuses to come after him to undermine his presidency.
00:09:10.000And it does make one suspicious if it turns out that this is now what the third whistleblower inside of a week and a half who's now using the whistleblower status in order to pump some sort of quasi scandal into the public viewpoint without proper information being made public in the first place.
00:09:26.000According to the Associated Press, Trump and his supporters deny that he did anything improper, but the White House has struggled to come up with a unified response.
00:09:32.000No administration officials appeared on the Sunday news shows to defend the president, while other Republicans focused mainly on attacking Democrats.
00:09:38.000A few Republicans suggested that Trump was only joking this past week when he publicly called on China to investigate the Bidens.
00:09:44.000Well, as we will discuss in just a little while, there is a reason why Republicans are not appearing on national television, and it is not really fear of the media.
00:09:51.000It is fear that President Trump will reverse course on them.
00:09:54.000In a matter of a heartbeat, and then they'll be stuck holding the short end of the broom, and things are not going to go great for them at that point.
00:10:01.000They'll go out there, they'll defend President Trump, and then he will just go on Twitter and completely blow up that defense.
00:10:10.000He wrote, the great scam is being revealed.
00:10:12.000He painted himself as the victim of the deep state.
00:10:15.000Again, there may be a case that there are people inside his own government who are who are militating against the success of his administration.
00:10:23.000After all, the FBI was in fact investigating him for two years on the Mueller stuff and came up with basically nothing that was criminal in terms of behavior.
00:10:33.000Trump also decided to go after Nancy Pelosi.
00:10:35.000He tweeted out, Nancy Pelosi knew of all of the many shifty Adam Schiff lies and massive frauds perpetrated upon Congress and the American people in the form of a fraudulent speech knowingly delivered as a ruthless con and the illegal meetings with a highly partisan whistleblower and lawyer.
00:10:51.000This makes Nancy nervous every bit, nervous Nancy every bit as guilty as little Adam Schiff.
00:10:56.000He always puts it like a little apostrophe at the end of little, which that's not how English works.
00:11:00.000Little Adam Schiff for high crimes and misdemeanors and even treason.
00:11:02.000I guess that means that they, along with all of those that evilly colluded with them must all be immediately impeached.
00:11:09.000Yeah, he also would later go after Chuck Todd, as we'll see in just a few minutes.
00:11:14.000So, this is the real reason why Republicans are sort of all over the place with President Trump.
00:11:20.000The answer is because how exactly are they supposed to defend a guy who has a series of shifting defenses every five seconds?
00:11:57.000Then there's the non-obvious reason, which is they won't use their investigative power as members of Congress.
00:12:01.000Instead, they're waiting for people inside the administration to militate against the administration from within, which is driving Trump's paranoia, which in turn is driving him to Believe in certain conspiracy theories that he is then seeking to justify, that he is seeking to evidence by sending people like Rudy Giuliani to Ukraine.
00:12:19.000We'll get to more of that in just one second.
00:13:35.000So as I say, the Democrats are over the moon about this whole whistleblower thing.
00:13:39.000Dr. Allison Stranger has a piece in the New York Times today called, Well, sometimes they're partisans, sometimes they're stewards of our constitutional democracy, and sometimes they're both.
00:13:51.000Sometimes they're stewards of our constitutional democracy, and sometimes they're both.
00:13:56.000The question is, what are these whistleblowers?
00:13:59.000It's just not true that everybody who claims to be blowing a whistle is doing a grand public Sometimes the person blowing the whistle is alleging a crime that doesn't actually end up being fulfilled.
00:14:10.000This is why Trump is so paranoid about people inside his administration.
00:14:13.000This is why he was putting his conversations, his transcripts with foreign leaders in this classified file.
00:14:20.000This electronic file that nobody was able to get access to.
00:14:22.000Because there were people inside his administration who kept running the media every five seconds.
00:14:27.000That, by the way, has prompted a federal judge to order the White House to preserve a wide range of evidence about President Trump's dealings with foreign leaders, including his interactions related to Ukraine that have fueled an impeachment investigation in the House.
00:14:39.000District Judge Amy Berman Jackson issued the order on Thursday, directing that White House officials not destroy records of meetings, phone calls, and other communications with foreign leaders.
00:14:50.000The judge's order also appears to specifically address reports that the Trump White House set up a special system to limit access to certain records of presidential conversations with foreign leaders.
00:14:59.000Jackson, of course, is an appointee of Barack Obama.
00:15:01.000It is a very weird thing, by the way, to suggest that the White House has to preserve records of foreign conversations with foreign leaders.
00:15:11.000It's one thing to suggest that if they are under subpoena, you have to preserve the records.
00:15:15.000It's another thing to suggest that they have to preserve the records even when they're not under subpoena.
00:15:20.000I think it's probably a good thing as a general rule that these things are preserved, but if the idea is that the executive branch must turn that stuff over to the legislative branch, I'm not sure that's always the case.
00:15:31.000The president does have plenary power over foreign policy, whether you're Barack Obama signing a crappy deal with Iran or whether you are Donald Trump saying ill-advised things to foreign leaders.
00:15:41.000Meanwhile, the Democrats are expanding their rage against William Barr, who's the attorney general, obviously.
00:15:47.000There's a piece in the Wall Street Journal today talking about Attorney General Barr going to various foreign capitals to seek help in reviewing the origins of the U.S.
00:15:57.000counterintelligence investigation begun during the 2016 presidential campaign.
00:16:00.000And this is where we start getting into this very dicey territory.
00:16:03.000And a lot of people on the left today, and they keep saying, why are so many Republicans not just saying impeach already?
00:16:09.000Why aren't they saying impeach already?
00:16:13.000One, you actually have to prove the elements of the crime.
00:16:16.000And two, you also have to prove that the elements of the crime committed are beyond any crime committed before by a president that was not used as the basis for impeachment.
00:16:28.000In other words, there is the legal standard for impeachment, which is basically anything.
00:16:33.000And then there's the criminal standard for impeachment, which is you must commit a crime.
00:16:36.000And then there's the James Comey standard for impeachment.
00:16:38.000Remember the James Comey, when he was talking about Hillary Clinton, he said, listen, yes, intent was not an element of the crime, of misuse of classified information.
00:16:47.000But our history of prosecution suggests that we don't have any similar cases like Hillary's, where we actually went forward with prosecution.
00:16:53.000Precedent suggests that she not be prosecuted.
00:16:56.000And people like me who said, whoa, hold up, that's not right.
00:16:58.000You're supposed to stick with the statute.
00:17:00.000OK, well, that is that is generally true.
00:17:04.000I will, however, point out that there is a case to be made that what Comey was saying was at least correct in terms of prosecutorial discretion.
00:17:10.000And when you're talking about impeachment and you're talking about impeachable offenses, here's the reality.
00:17:14.000Nearly every president commits some sort of impeachable offense.
00:17:18.000I mean, there's a good case to be made that Barack Obama, the IRS droning American citizens.
00:17:22.000There's a lot of stuff that Barack Obama was doing that at the very least fell into the category of criminality.
00:17:29.000Right, whether it required more proof to actually prove it for impeachment purposes, probably.
00:17:33.000But I mean, I wrote an entire book called The People vs. Barack Obama, where I talked about the various activities that bordered on the criminal inside the Obama administration.
00:17:42.000So, in order for Democrats to now claim, here's the thing, in order for Democrats to claim that Republicans should get on board for an impeachment, what they must show is not merely that a crime has been committed, they must show that the crime is different in kind than anything that they justified themselves.
00:17:59.000That was the difference between the Nixon activities and activities by prior presidents.
00:18:04.000The fact is there were prior presidents, like I believe LBJ actually, bugged Barry Goldwater's headquarters in 64.
00:18:10.000But the reality is that it was proved with Nixon, the cover-up was proved with Nixon, and Republicans said, listen, this is beyond anything that we've actually seen before, so we're jumping on board.
00:18:19.000Democrats are holding a standard, and that standard should be upheld.
00:18:23.000We saw with Bill Clinton committing perjury, that it was completely partisan.
00:18:27.000There was nobody on the Democratic side of the aisle who actually supported the impeachment of Bill Clinton.
00:18:33.000But Republicans at least could make the case that the president had committed perjury, and this was a new standard of low.
00:18:40.000You need to prove one criminal activity, in my opinion.
00:18:44.000Right, again, this is all opinion, because the fact is you don't have to prove anything for an impeachment.
00:18:47.000An impeachment is completely political.
00:18:50.000The provisions about impeachment say nothing about an actual crime being committed.
00:18:54.000It says high crimes and misdemeanors, but that is a political term.
00:18:57.000With that said, I think the standard for impeachment should be twofold.
00:19:00.000One, criminal activity occurred, and we can all agree criminal activity occurred.
00:19:04.000And two, that criminal activity was so far and above beyond what had come before and was not the basis of impeachment that it justifies impeachment.
00:19:14.000So when Democrats are going after Attorney General Barr and saying that Attorney General Barr is doing something deeply wrong in talking with foreign allies to review the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation, and they say by meeting directly with foreign leaders rather than relying on investigator-to-investigator channels, Mr. Barr has stirred up domestic politics in some of the countries he has tapped for assistance because he talked with Italy and he talked with Australia and people were getting super uptight.
00:19:43.000I struggle to see why it is, considering that three Democratic senators earlier this year called on the government of Ukraine to cooperate with the Mueller report and in fact investigate allegations regarding Russian election interference.
00:19:58.000So when it comes to impeachment, if you want a bipartisan impeachment, then it really does have to be what's good for the goose is good for the gander.
00:20:04.000In other words, it's got to be some sort of standard that rises beyond partisanship.
00:20:08.000And that is exactly what we are not seeing at this point from the Democrats.
00:20:13.000First of all, we don't see the full extension of the crime.
00:20:16.000Because as they say, in order to prove the crime here, in order to prove the quid pro quo that is criminal in nature, Not just a quid pro quo, but a quid pro quo for something criminal.
00:20:23.000You have to prove that it wasn't about corruption at all.
00:20:28.000Rudy Giuliani is a very awkward human being, but Rudy Giuliani did in fact make this point.
00:20:33.000He said, listen, we have a mandate to investigate corruption.
00:20:36.000And just because Joe Biden gets caught up in that does not mean that Joe Biden is the target or that it is improper to investigate Joe Biden in the first place.
00:20:46.000There's nothing wrong with her doing it.
00:20:47.000I mean, the fact is the President of the United States has every right to ask countries to help us in a criminal investigation that should be undertaken.
00:20:56.000That happens to involve a political opponent.
00:21:39.000So before we get into like, this is something completely different in kind, I don't really see how it's something completely different in kind unless, unless, unless this thing, and this is what we have yet to see, unless this thing was solely about getting Joe Biden and it was not at all about corruption.
00:21:55.000I'll show you another example in a second of the media trying to pretend that certain activity that may be something you don't like is somehow only bad when one side of the aisle does it.
00:22:11.000It's on the way, which means it's time to break out rubber spiders and fake cobwebs and jack-o'-lanterns.
00:22:15.000And also, think about death, because that's what Halloween is about.
00:22:18.000Well, now that you're thinking about death, let me just say, do you have life insurance?
00:22:21.000Because if you're thinking about death and you don't have life insurance, well, you're being a dum-dum, because you do, in fact, need life insurance.
00:22:27.000And this is why you should try PolicyGenius.com.
00:22:30.000PolicyGenius is the easy way to shop for life insurance online.
00:22:33.000In just minutes, you can compare quotes from top insurers and find your best price.
00:22:37.000Once you apply, the PolicyGenius team will handle all the paperwork and the red tape.
00:22:41.000And PolicyGenius doesn't just make life insurance easy.
00:22:43.000They can also help you find the right home insurance and auto insurance and disability insurance.
00:22:47.000They can do all of these magical things just for you.
00:22:50.000Well, since it is the time of year when you're getting ready for Halloween and thinking about ghouls and demons and your own moldering corpse, well, maybe now would be a good time to prepare for that eventuality with a little bit of life insurance.
00:23:02.000Go to policygenius.com, get quotes, apply minutes.
00:23:04.000You can do the whole thing on your phone right now.
00:23:06.000And then you can enjoy the candy because, hey, if you die early from some sort of horrible Okay, so, as I say, one of the reasons why Republicans are not jumping on the bandwagon is because every piece of news seems directed toward ignoring Democrats doing sort of the same thing.
00:23:28.000So, let me give you a perfect example.
00:23:49.000Because then the AP has a piece called Profit Not Politics, what some Trump allies did in Ukraine.
00:23:57.000As Rudy Giuliani was pushing Ukrainian officials last spring to investigate one of Donald Trump's main political rivals, a group of individuals with ties to the president and his personal lawyer were also active in the former Soviet Republic.
00:24:10.000This circle of businessmen and Republican donors touted connections to Giuliani and Trump while trying to install new management at the top of Ukraine's massive state gas company.
00:24:19.000Their plan was to then steer lucrative contracts to companies controlled by Trump allies, according to two people with knowledge of their plans.
00:24:26.000The effort to install a friendlier management team at the helm of a gas company called Naftogaz would be taken up by Ukraine's new president, with Ukraine's new president, by U.S.
00:24:35.000Energy Secretary Rick Perry, whose slate of candidates included a fellow Texan who is one of Perry's past political donors.
00:24:41.000Now, you may be saying to yourself, hold up a second.
00:24:45.000Am I supposed to be suspicious of Rick Perry because Rick Perry has friends who are in the Ukrainian natural oil and gas sector and maybe are using, dropping names in order to get ahead?
00:24:56.000What if I switched that name for you, and instead of Rick Perry, I just said Joe Biden?
00:25:00.000Are we allowed to be suspicious anymore, or does the suspicion disappear?
00:25:03.000We're supposed to pretend it's not suspicious at all when Hunter Biden ends up with no oil or natural gas experience, pulling down 50 grand a month, because his daddy is the Vice President of the United States.
00:25:16.000Is it, like, this is why people are going nuts.
00:25:18.000Like, okay, so you're gonna tell me it's super corrupt when friends of Trump are doing business in Ukraine with oil and natural gas, but when it's Joe Biden's son, then we're supposed to pretend that none of this matters at all.
00:25:30.000We're supposed to pretend that Joe Biden is pure as the driven snow, and so is Hunter Biden, and any questions you ask about them are fully illegitimate.
00:25:36.000Now again, for the 1,000th time, if Donald Trump has no evidence and no serious questions to be asked about Joe Biden or Hunter Biden, he's just going after them for political purposes by leveraging military aid to a country under the threat of the Russians in order to go after his political opponents solely and completely because of not corruption, and not because of 2016, and election interference, not because of any of that, but simply because he doesn't like Joe Biden, not only is that wrong, that's impeachable, but are we there yet?
00:26:06.000I think we have a ways to go there at first.
00:26:08.000I do find it somewhat hilarious that you get people like Cory Booker, who says that the minute you ask him a question about Joe Biden, it is completely unfair.
00:26:20.000He said that even asking questions about Joe Biden is unfair at this point.
00:26:26.000If you could just stop it, stop asking those questions.
00:26:29.000Are questions about Hunter Biden fair in the context of a president who is accused of doing really what I would think were unimaginable things?
00:26:41.000Is it questions about Hunter Biden in this context?
00:26:44.000Somebody who has been investigated, somebody who from the Ukrainians to Americans to Europeans, there's no evidence whatsoever.
00:26:52.000So no, it is not fair that the president of the United States is trying to get all of us to be talking about someone else Other than him.
00:27:01.000Okay, and then it'll be fun to watch CNN immediately shift in the next segment to let's talk about Rick Perry's energy connections in Ukraine, guys.
00:27:07.000Let's talk about the Trump administration's energy connections in Ukraine.
00:27:11.000And by the way, the Washington Post will give a full op-ed to Joe Biden called Trump Won't Destroy Me and He Won't Destroy My Family.
00:27:19.000And it's all about how Joe Biden is a wonderful dude and anybody who asks questions about Hunter Biden is just wrong and it's all mean and it's all terrible.
00:27:27.000He says end to Trump and those who facilitate his abuses of power and all the special interests funding his attacks against me.
00:28:04.000Two, is that criminal act impeachable?
00:28:07.000Because not every criminal act is impeachable.
00:28:09.000So we're going to get back to the double standard, which sets the standard for that second question, right?
00:28:14.000Is this something brand new and beyond the pale?
00:28:16.000And why Republicans seem to be kicking back so hard against the idea that this is something brand new and beyond the pale.
00:28:22.000It's funny, Democrats seem to believe that the world began spinning with Trump.
00:28:25.000And so you have all these articles today about, well, the unworkability of American government and this feeling of cynicism that is spread across the country.
00:28:33.000I'm old enough to remember a president before Trump named Barack Obama.
00:28:35.000Some of us are pretty cynical about politics because of that sort of manipulation.
00:28:38.000We'll get to more of this in just one second.
00:28:41.000First, sometimes you just need to pray, okay?
00:28:45.000Not just on politics, but, you know, just on life.
00:28:48.000Prayer is something that I do thrice daily.
00:28:50.000In fact, I'm about to spend an entire day at prayer on Yom Kippur.
00:28:53.000Prayer is very important to my life because not only does it help Comfort you and give you an ability to focus and create for yourself the intense sort of agenda for the coming day.
00:29:07.000It helps you coordinate with something beyond yourself.
00:29:09.000And this is why we here at The Ben Shapiro Show are partnering with Pray.com.
00:29:12.000It is the number one app for prayer and sleep.
00:29:15.000Both anxiety and sleep deficiency can do serious damage to your brain and your body.
00:29:18.000High stress, lack of sleep, they make you more prone to accidents, weight gain, depression.
00:29:22.000With Pray.com, He will discover a new daily and nightly prayer routine, as well as inspirational Bible stories designed to strengthen your faith and lift your spirit.
00:29:30.000They've got Old Testament, they've got New Testament, they've got all sorts of good stuff.
00:29:32.000Hear the Bible come to life through stories like Adam and Eve, Noah and the Ark, and the Ten Commandments as part of your daily prayer routine on Prayer.com.
00:29:40.000Right now, Ben Shapiro listeners get 60% off a Prey.com premium subscription by downloading the Prey.com app at Prey.com slash Ben.
00:29:56.000Okay, in just a second, we're gonna continue discussing these double standards and the media's outrage at Republicans who refuse to immediately cave in to, it's time to impeach, it's time to impeach.
00:30:05.000By the way, They asked Amy Klobuchar, a Democrat in the Senate, about whether she would impeach, and she was like, I'm not going to answer it.
00:30:44.000We are the largest, fastest growing conservative podcast and radio show in the nation.
00:30:47.000So as I say, when you're talking about the double standard in which the left engages, So John Brennan, I mean, this is just insane.
00:31:03.000So John Brennan, the former head of the CIA, he was on the news over the weekend being newsy.
00:31:10.000And I don't even know why exactly this dude is considered a reliable pundit in any way.
00:31:15.000He's on Meet the Press, and he says the CIA would literally not assess America as a democracy any longer.
00:31:21.000We're supposed to take John Brennan seriously about this.
00:31:23.000This is gaslighting of the highest order.
00:31:25.000We would look at it as a very corrupt government that is under the sway right now of this powerful individual who has been able to just corrupt the institutions and the laws of that country.
00:31:39.000What would you say about the stability of the democracy?
00:31:42.000I think it's no longer, you know, a democracy if an autocrat has it in his hands.
00:31:47.000And people like Johnson and others are putty in his hands, which means that the democratic principles upon which this country was founded are eroding right now.
00:31:57.000...tended to erode the democratic principles when you lied in front of the Senate repeatedly.
00:32:01.000In 2014, John Brennan, who is the CIA director, lied emphatically, according to Victor Davis Hanson, that the CIA had not illegally accessed the computers of U.S.
00:32:09.000Senate staffers who were then exploring a CIA role in torturing detainees.
00:32:13.000Liberal senators started going after him, and Brennan had to apologize.
00:32:17.000In May 2017, as an ex-CIA director, he again almost certainly did not tell the truth to Congress when he testified and answered to Representative Trey Gowdy's questions that he neither knew who had commissioned the Steele dossier, nor had the CIA relied on its contents for any action.
00:32:31.000Then he spent two years Claiming that he had secret information that the other shoe was about to drop in the Russia investigation.
00:32:37.000Like, that dude did more to undermine confidence in America's institutions than virtually anybody in American public life for the last five to ten years.
00:32:46.000And yet, you got Chuck Todd, that wonderful Do you understand how we got here?
00:32:52.000creator yeah i mean chuck todd just really sterling stuff over the weekend saying you know john brennan does he ask him a follow-up about that you know when you talk about destruction of american institutions were you instrumental in any of that mr mr no it's why is everyone so mean to you john brennan why are people so mean to you do you understand how we got here and how would you explain to somebody you've been completely character assassinated and eviscerated and And it doesn't matter whether people like you or hate you.
00:33:19.000I think everybody can agree, you've been put through this.
00:33:27.000That was the question that led to, oh, now the institutions have been led awry.
00:33:31.000Again, you think the Republicans are immediately going to cave to, yes, I think that the Democrats are not pursuing a partisan impeachment.
00:33:37.000I think they're being completely above board.
00:33:39.000Listen, Amy Klobuchar, the senator from Minnesota running for president, she was asked straight up, would you vote to remove the president from office today?
00:33:46.000And even Amy Klobuchar was like, eh, I'm not sure I can say that because Amy Klobuchar is the only non-crazy person running for president.
00:34:52.000And then I became famous, like, what are we talking about?
00:34:54.000And yet, and so when it comes to scandals, when it comes to, President Trump came up with a plan.
00:34:59.000The plan was deploy Rudy Giuliani to uncover the specific corruption of Joe Biden, and then leverage the Ukrainian government to help Rudy Giuliani to go after the specific corruption of Joe Biden because the man, he has a gimlet-eyed, sharp-eyed, steely, steely-missile-man-eyed plan.
00:35:51.000As every good defense lawyer knows, there are a few defenses that are available when it comes to crimes of intent.
00:35:56.000And when it comes to a bribery situation like this, like a bribery case that they're trying to make, or a quid pro quo, or a targeting case, which is what they're talking about, an abuse of power, you sort of require intent as an element of the crime.
00:36:10.000The quick answer for a defense lawyer is intent was not here.
00:37:48.000Like if you asked Trump, any random country, like if you just put, if you said to him five minutes before he went out on the South lawn, the country of Malaysia.
00:37:58.000He would just be like, sure, Malaysia should investigate Biden.
00:39:29.000So this is the one where you choose to take him super seriously, George?
00:39:32.000Like, you know better than that, right?
00:39:34.000That's the proper... But the problem is, Trump watches TV.
00:39:36.000So if Jordan says that, then Trump might tweet out against Jordan.
00:39:40.000And you get this from all the Republicans.
00:39:42.000So Republicans are not allowed to make the proper defense.
00:39:46.000They're not allowed to make the proper defense.
00:39:48.000And so they end up in this kind of weird Neverland where they're making half the proper defense and half the not proper defense.
00:39:52.000So here is Senator Ron Johnson with Chuck Todd.
00:39:54.000So this got all sorts of press over the weekend because apparently Johnson was just in over his head and Chuck Todd just destroyed him because this is what journalisming is all about.
00:40:38.000Senator, I'm asking about... Because this is underlying exactly why President Trump is upset.
00:40:43.000Okay, so what Johnson is trying to say in that whole exchange, if you actually watch the whole exchange, what he's trying to say is President Trump is very upset with members of his own administration who are in the executive branch who keep leaking on him and so he's taking stuff and he is putting stuff Basically in a secret vault so that they cannot leak it.
00:41:02.000And he is also deeply suspicious that there are members of the intelligence committee who are coordinating with whistleblowers.
00:41:09.000And he is deeply suspicious that members of the intelligence community are not working on his behalf with regards to the investigation of interference in the 2016 election in Ukraine, which we do know happened according to Politico in 2017.
00:41:23.000And so that's why he's deploying Rudy Giuliani, right?
00:41:41.000We already know that President Trump has done things that are not good.
00:41:44.000The question is whether they are in the criminal territory and whether they are in the unprecedented territory.
00:41:49.000And when it comes to unprecedented, that one is actually even easier than criminal.
00:41:53.000Because for a lot of Republicans, the answer is absolutely not.
00:41:57.000For a lot of Republicans, they are looking at the fact that Hillary Clinton worked with the DNC and the Ukrainian embassy to try and dig up dirt on Donald Trump And they funneled a bunch of bad information to the FBI, to Barack Obama's FBI, in the middle of the election cycle.
00:42:13.000They're looking at the fact that there was a two-year investigation of Donald Trump by his own intelligence services.
00:42:19.000They're looking at the fact that the Obama administration did not let up on Paul Manafort when it found out that Paul Manafort was gonna become Trump's campaign manager and didn't warn Trump about it.
00:42:27.000Instead, they broadened the investigation to include Trump.
00:42:29.000Again, all of this is backdrop for, do we think that you're partisan hacks or do we think that you honestly are bothered by Trump?
00:42:36.000Now, motivations normally should not matter, but when it comes to impeachment, they kind of do.
00:42:40.000The reason being, if you're trying to build a bipartisan consensus, then people have to feel that there is a standard, and the standard must be upheld on both sides.
00:42:47.000It can't be a standard that is upheld on one side.
00:42:49.000As I say, if you have a double standard, then you have no standard, because nobody is going to abide by a double standard.
00:42:55.000If you feel that somebody else is not playing by the rules, why would you play by the rules?
00:42:59.000And that is where we end up right now.
00:43:02.000That is a separate question from whether Trump actually did something criminal.
00:43:09.000That one is the one that is still outstanding.
00:43:12.000And by the way, it doesn't help when President Trump goes after Mitt Romney.
00:43:16.000The media are trying to conflate, by the way, Republicans who are critical of Trump on the China comments and on the Ukraine comments with saying that they would vote for impeachment.
00:43:24.000Mitt Romney has never said that he would vote for impeachment.
00:43:27.000You know, Trump should just deal with the fact that he said something bad about China.
00:43:31.000It is bad to call on the Chinese communist to investigate an American citizen based on scanty evidence.
00:44:44.000Did the president, in his capacity as president, basically act as campaign president and dictate that the auspices of the government should be used to do Rudy Giuliani's dirty work?
00:44:56.000And that's really what this is all about.
00:45:05.000So, as you may notice, I am not broadcasting from my usual studio.
00:45:08.000I am instead over here in Israel, in an unspecified location.
00:45:13.000So, that means that if I'm looking a little peaked, that is because I was just on a 13-hour flight with a 5-year-old and a 3-year-old, which means I got no sleep, and I'm kinda tired.
00:45:24.000So, if I've been bumbling and stumbling over my words a little bit today, that is because I'm half-dead.
00:45:29.000That also means that I watched 1,000 movies on the plane because it's a 13-hour flight.
00:45:34.000One of the movies that I had a chance to watch was a movie that I like to call Liam Neeson Has a Gun, which is like every Liam Neeson movie, basically.
00:45:40.000And I will watch all of them because I don't really care what he's doing as long as Liam Neeson has a gun.
00:45:45.000In this one, Liam Neeson plays a man who has a gun.
00:45:47.000And in this movie, he is a man who has a gun who is the father of a man who does not really have a gun and doesn't know how to use a gun.
00:45:53.000Here is a little bit of the trailer for Run All Night.
00:45:55.000It's got to be 15 years since I've been in here.
00:47:14.000Their silence is deafening on LGBT rights.
00:47:17.000Their silence is deafening on the animal rights movement.
00:47:22.000Every time there's some sort of political controversy, we have to hijack major corporations and use them to cram down particular political agendas.
00:47:31.000Major corporations are after the cash, and that means that very often, they have no actual moral interest, and treating them as moral entities is quite silly, in fact.
00:47:42.000And proof of this comes this week from the NBA.
00:47:46.000So apparently the general manager of the Houston Rockets, according to the New York Times, sought to quell an outcry in China on Sunday night after the support he expressed on Twitter for pro-democracy protesters in Hong Kong upset sponsors, media outlets, and basketball officials in a country that invests billions in the NBA.
00:48:00.000The initial and quickly deleted message by the general manager, Daryl Morey, on Friday night to stand with Hong Kong put the NBA at odds with its largest and highest priority international market.
00:48:10.000But he tried to mitigate the damage with two clarifying tweets from Tokyo, where the Rockets are scheduled to play two exhibition games against the Toronto Raptors.
00:48:16.000I did not intend my tweet to cause any offense to Rocket fans and friends of mine in China, Mori wrote.
00:48:21.000I was merely voicing one thought based on one interpretation of one complicated event.
00:48:25.000I've had the opportunity since that tweet to hear and consider other perspectives.
00:48:28.000In other words, the NBA called him and got very angry at him because they thought that he was threatening their Chinese market by talking about the fact that the Chinese Communist regime is evil and terrible.
00:48:40.000I've seen other corporations, like for example, Google, go out of their way to try and work with the Chinese government, even if it means doing their dirty work for them.
00:48:48.000Now, this is why when people say, big business is Republican, big business is for free markets.
00:49:23.000Like, why isn't Adam Silver being called on the carpet by the American people for not standing with Hong Kong, by the way, just because he wants to sell a few more sneakers and basketball jerseys in China?
00:49:32.000Alrighty, we'll be back here tomorrow with all of the latest.
00:50:10.000Hey everyone, it's Andrew Klavan, host of The Andrew Klavan Show.
00:50:14.000One of about a million ways politics makes us stupid is by attacking people's personal piccadillos as a way of supporting massively destructive ideas.
00:50:22.000Donald Trump is a loudmouth, so let's get rid of him and give the country to baby-killing socialists who hate both the First and Second Amendment.
00:50:28.000Luckily, I'm here to laugh uproariously at that idea.
00:50:31.000Plus, Norris and I will discuss Joker.