The Ben Shapiro Show - September 11, 2020


The Strategy Is Failure | Ep. 1093


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 5 minutes

Words per Minute

216.25702

Word Count

14,136

Sentence Count

936

Misogynist Sentences

30

Hate Speech Sentences

16


Summary

It's September 11th and it's a good time to remember that we're supposed to be a unified country. In the midst of a global pandemic that has taken, at this point, nearly 200,000 lives, that we can't come together and recognize why we like each other or why we want to live in the same country? And maybe it's just been too long since 9/11 for people to remember exactly how we felt on the morning of September 11, 2001, as we watched terrorists plow two civilian airliners into the Twin Towers and as they plowed another civilian airliner into the Pentagon, and as a fourth civilian airliner went down in a field in Pennsylvania, it was a formative experience for a lot of us. But for those of us who are old enough to remember it, we remember the gut-wrenching horror of watching our fellow Americans, people we had no idea what they believed about the world, having to hurl themselves from the highest floors of the World Trade Center, knowing full well that they would probably die trying to save other people with children as they charged into those buildings. Unfortunately, maybe we haven't faced down such horrifying images in a day and age, because it's so much more than what divides us. because we haven t had to do so in a full day, because we don't seem to be willing to do what was supposed to bring us together as Americans, and remember why we should be so unites us in the face of a country that was meant to be uniting us. The Ben Shapiro Show is sponsored by Express VPN. Visit ExpressVPN.co/TheBenShawnshow to get 20% off your first purchase of a VPN, and get 15% off of your first month with discount code "ExpressVPN" when you use promo code "BENSHIPPERS" at checkout. That's discount code: BENSHIP at checkout to save $250 and get $5 off your entire bill! The average person is saving $400 a year on their wireless bill, and there's no contract, no monthly fee, and they'll get the same coverage as AT&T, VASH, Sprint, T-Mobile, or Sprint, and Vimeo, they'll give you the same service, no contract and no fees, all for just $20 a month. So, grab your mobile phone, dial POUND 250, say Ben Shapiro, and dialing POUND250, say .


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Democrats block a COVID relief bill.
00:00:02.000 Joe Biden continues to futz and struggle while the media cover for him.
00:00:05.000 And Netflix comes under fire for a film containing disturbingly pedophilic images.
00:00:08.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:09.000 This is the Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:16.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is sponsored by ExpressVPN.
00:00:18.000 Why haven't you gotten a VPN yet?
00:00:20.000 Visit ExpressVPN.com slash Ben before we get to all the news.
00:00:23.000 And it is a varied and wild news cycle.
00:00:25.000 First, let's talk about the fact that you're spending way too much on that cell phone bill, like a lot of money on your cell phone bill.
00:00:30.000 And you don't need to spend that much on your cell phone bill.
00:00:32.000 I mean, let's be real about this.
00:00:34.000 You're spending a lot because you're paying for unlimited data.
00:00:35.000 Are you actually using unlimited data, or are you using, as it turns out, very limited data?
00:00:39.000 And what you actually need is to cut down on that cell phone bill, but still get the same exact kind of coverage that you have right now.
00:00:44.000 Well, good news for you!
00:00:45.000 That's what Pure Talk does.
00:00:46.000 Pure Talk will give you the exact same coverage, same towers, same bars as AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, but it'll cost you half.
00:00:53.000 No contract, no excessive fees.
00:00:55.000 Right now, you can enjoy unlimited talk, text, and 2 gigs of data, all for just $20 a month.
00:00:59.000 The average person is saving $400 a year on their wireless bill.
00:01:02.000 So, grab your mobile phone, dial pound 250, say Ben Shapiro.
00:01:06.000 When you do, you save $250 off any iPhone, including the new iPhone SE.
00:01:10.000 Again, that is pound 250, say keyword Ben Shapiro.
00:01:13.000 Pure Talk USA is Simply Smarter Wireless.
00:01:15.000 There is no reason to overspend, especially these days.
00:01:17.000 You need to save your money.
00:01:18.000 You need to spend it on things that actually matter to you.
00:01:21.000 Not spending on a phone company for that unlimited data that you are not using.
00:01:24.000 Go check out Pure Talk USA right now now by dialing pound 250 and saying Ben Shapiro to save 250 bucks off any iPhone as well, including that new iPhone SE.
00:01:33.000 OK, so we begin at this hour with a quick note that today, of course, is September 11th, which is a good time to remember that we're supposed to be a unified country.
00:01:43.000 I know these are incredibly divisive times, and people look at each other across the aisle and we think, how about a national divorce?
00:01:48.000 We don't seem that we want to live in the same country anymore.
00:01:51.000 It's amazing to say that it's been nearly 20 years since 9-11, but for those of us who are old enough to remember 9-11, it was a formative experience for a lot of us.
00:01:59.000 I know a lot of people who shifted from left to right in the aftermath of 9-11.
00:02:02.000 I know a lot of people who had a revivified sense of what it meant to be an American after 9-11.
00:02:06.000 It turns out that when America is under attack from an existential threat, When Americans are being murdered by the thousands in America's biggest and greatest landmarks.
00:02:15.000 Americans tend to resonate to that and remember what it is that was supposed to bring us together as Americans.
00:02:22.000 And frankly, it's incredible that in the midst of a great pandemic, we can't even do that again.
00:02:27.000 In the midst of a global pandemic that has taken, at this point, nearly 200,000 or about 200,000 American lives, that we can't come together and at least recognize why exactly we like each other or why we want to occupy the same country.
00:02:40.000 And maybe it is that it's just been too long since 9-11 for people to remember exactly how we felt on the morning of 9-11 as we watched terrorists plow two civilian airliners into the Twin Towers, and as we watched them plow another civilian airliner into the Pentagon, and as a fourth civilian airliner went down in a field in Pennsylvania.
00:02:58.000 But for those of us who are old enough to remember, we remember the gut-wrenching horror of watching our fellow Americans, people we had no idea their politics, we had no idea what they believed about the world, having to hurl themselves from the highest stories of the World Trade Center, people with families, people with children, watching as firefighters charged into those buildings knowing full well that they would probably die doing that and trying to save other people's lives.
00:03:20.000 Knowing full well that people who are joining the military and making sacrifices most of us were not willing to undertake to go overseas and protect America, that this was indeed a great country and a country worth upholding.
00:03:29.000 And that is worth remembering again.
00:03:31.000 That is worth remembering again, that what unites us is supposed to be so much more than what divides us.
00:03:35.000 Unfortunately, in today's day and age, maybe it's because we haven't faced down A 9-11.
00:03:41.000 Maybe it's because we haven't had the spectacularly horrifying images on TV of what happened on 9-11 hit the United States.
00:03:49.000 Again, maybe because COVID isn't an external enemy so much as just an ever-present threat.
00:03:53.000 Maybe, for whatever reason, we have not come together.
00:03:56.000 Instead, we have decided to stab each other, tear each other apart, and see each other as enemies rather than friends, as enemies rather than brothers and sisters.
00:04:04.000 Good indicator of this today on Twitter.
00:04:05.000 There's a trending hashtag Hashtag all buildings matter.
00:04:09.000 Now the ideological contortions you have to go through in order to tweet that and believe that you're saying something good, relevant, or moral are pretty astonishing.
00:04:17.000 So presumably this has meant this.
00:04:18.000 This hashtag all buildings matter is meant as a rebuttal to the all lives matter rebuttal to black lives matter.
00:04:25.000 So in order to try and understand the logic of this, you have to go back to what Black Lives Matter was supposed to represent.
00:04:29.000 So Black Lives Matter, as I've said before, is a term of semantic overload.
00:04:32.000 It can mean several different things.
00:04:34.000 One, it can be the inarguably true and obvious proposition that Black Lives Matter in the United States, which we all agree with.
00:04:40.000 Then it could mean the Black Lives Matter organization, which is a radical neo-Marxist movement.
00:04:45.000 And then it could mean the Black Lives Matter movement more generally, not the organization, but the movement more generally, which argues that America is systemically racist and dislikes black Americans and discounts black bodies and tries to harm black Americans, a proposal for which at this point in American history, there's not only no evidence, there's significant counter evidence.
00:05:01.000 Okay, All Lives Matter was meant as a rebuttal, generally speaking, to that second contention, which is that everybody agrees that Black Lives Matter because Black Lives Matter just as much as everybody else's life.
00:05:11.000 Okay, so, people who are advocates of Black Lives Matter decided that they were going to hashtag All Buildings Matter, as though the comparison where you say that the World Trade Centers matter while all buildings matter equally.
00:05:21.000 Okay, this makes no sense.
00:05:23.000 This makes no sense.
00:05:24.000 Because the argument of Black Lives Matter is that black people are being disproportionately targeted, that America is systemically racist, Okay, that is a bad argument.
00:05:31.000 There's not a lot of data to back that.
00:05:32.000 In fact, as I say, there is significant counter data to back that.
00:05:35.000 The hashtag, all buildings matter, presumably suggests that certain buildings were not targeted.
00:05:40.000 Well, we know which buildings were targeted.
00:05:42.000 And in fact, we know why we were upset that those buildings were targeted, not merely because they were landmarks, but because as it turns out, they were holding thousands of human beings, black, white, and green.
00:05:50.000 Anybody who thinks it's an intelligent point to tweet out all buildings matter at this point is an idiot.
00:05:55.000 And everybody understands that they're an idiot or should understand that they're an idiot and that they're not making a good point about Black Lives Matter or anything else for that matter.
00:06:01.000 But to use 9-11 as an anniversary...
00:06:04.000 For divisiveness.
00:06:06.000 To suggest that 9-11 ought to immediately be channeled into a debate about Black Lives Matter is kind of wild.
00:06:14.000 The only thing that makes it not wild is, of course, if you buy into this theory that America is inherently bad, then you end up in the Ta-Nehisi Coates position of writing about the fact that you watched 9-11 happen from your apartment rooftop, smoked pot, and felt nothing.
00:06:24.000 That's something that Ta-Nehisi Coates has actually written about in his books.
00:06:28.000 Because America is so systemically terrible that he didn't feel anything while watching 9-11.
00:06:31.000 This is something that he wrote in, I believe, Between the World and Me.
00:06:35.000 If you believe that, then there really is nothing that can hold America together anymore.
00:06:39.000 So if 9-11 doesn't mean anything to you because you weren't born, that's one thing.
00:06:42.000 But if you're old enough to remember 9-11, if you're old enough to remember what it felt like, and you don't still have that churning gut feeling every time you think of the horrors of that day, and you still can't think why people would fly a flag in the aftermath of 9-11.
00:06:55.000 I remember this.
00:06:56.000 I mean, we all remember this.
00:06:57.000 All the flags that went up all around the United States in solidarity with each other.
00:07:02.000 They have the feeling of brotherhood and sisterhood that came along with 9-11.
00:07:06.000 The final realization that we were all part of the same country and that it was a country worth upholding, that we are a good country.
00:07:15.000 That when shown against in stark relief with so many other places around the world, including the ideologies of places like Afghanistan and the Taliban and Al Qaeda.
00:07:25.000 When you're placing the United States in stark relief with any place else on earth, this is an amazing, amazing place with amazing people.
00:07:31.000 Heroes.
00:07:32.000 People that don't know other people who they are willing to sacrifice their lives for.
00:07:37.000 We should be reminded of that as we approach a contentious election when it appears that violence in the streets is a real possibility.
00:07:43.000 We should remember all of that.
00:07:45.000 Okay, in just a second, we're going to get to the news of the day.
00:07:49.000 First, let us talk about the fact that you need better employees.
00:07:52.000 You do.
00:07:53.000 Okay, and these days it can be tough to find really great employees.
00:07:55.000 Also, it could be really tough to find a job if you're an employee looking for a great employer.
00:07:59.000 Monica Starks could relate.
00:08:01.000 She needed to hire for a pivotal role at her construction company, GS Group.
00:08:04.000 She was having a tough time finding the right person, especially with a lot of candidates out there.
00:08:07.000 So she switched to ZipRecruiter.
00:08:08.000 ZipRecruiter doesn't depend on candidates finding you, it finds them for you.
00:08:12.000 Its technology identifies people with the right experience for your job and then actively invites them to apply, which is why you should try ZipRecruiter for free at ZipRecruiter.com slash DailyWire.
00:08:21.000 And that is how Monica found Lamont Jenkins.
00:08:23.000 She said ZipRecruiter sent Lamont's profile to her around five minutes after she posted her job because he was a great match for the role.
00:08:29.000 Through ZipRecruiter, Monica's company has hired everybody from accountants to project managers to field scientists.
00:08:33.000 Monica is not the only employer who loves ZipRecruiter.
00:08:35.000 Here at DailyWire, we've been using ZipRecruiter consistently.
00:08:38.000 So say that you have a brand new producer named Rebecca and she seems quite wonderful.
00:08:41.000 There's only one problem.
00:08:42.000 Rebecca has a very avant-garde take on the film Cuties from Netflix.
00:08:46.000 A take that I may share, but if it goes badly, Rebecca may find herself on the breadlines nonetheless.
00:08:50.000 Well, this is why you need Zip Recruiter.
00:08:53.000 Four out of five employers who post on ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate within the very first day.
00:08:57.000 See for yourself how ZipRecruiter makes hiring faster and easier.
00:09:00.000 Try it right now for free.
00:09:01.000 That is correct.
00:09:01.000 Free at ZipRecruiter.com slash DailyWire.
00:09:04.000 That's ZipRecruiter.com slash DailyWire.
00:09:06.000 If you're an employer, keep your employees in abject terror of being replaced by somebody better who has a more conventional take on cuties.
00:09:12.000 And if you are an employee and you're looking for a job, check out ZipRecruiter right now.
00:09:16.000 ZipRecruiter.com slash DailyWire.
00:09:18.000 That's ZipRecruiter.com slash DailyWire to find the best employees and the best employers.
00:09:23.000 Okay, so news of the day.
00:09:25.000 The Democrats continue to block COVID relief.
00:09:28.000 The media are covering for them.
00:09:29.000 So what you've seen is Senate Republicans fail to advance bill.
00:09:33.000 Senate Republicans fail to advance bill.
00:09:34.000 No, that's not what happened here.
00:09:36.000 What actually happened here is that Senate Democrats, who are in the minority, utilized that Jim Crow relic, according to Barack Obama, the Senate filibuster, to filibuster a COVID relief package.
00:09:45.000 Kamala Harris voted in favor of that filibuster.
00:09:47.000 So Democrats used the filibuster to kill a COVID relief package just a few weeks after using that Jim Crow hallmark, the filibuster, in order to kill police reform proposed by Republican Senator Tim Scott.
00:09:58.000 So it seems like Democrats are very much willing to use Jim Crow relics when it serves their interests.
00:10:04.000 They're willing to use any institution of power or get rid of any institution of power in pursuit of their goals, which is one of the reasons why Republicans have very little trust that Democrats are going to abide by any rules of the game when it comes to upholding American institutions.
00:10:16.000 It's one of the reasons why I, among other conservatives, am deeply fearful that Democrats, who have now pledged that they wish to pack the courts, that they wish to get rid of the Senate filibuster, that they wish to add states, could systematically change the nature of American government if they achieve a majority in the Senate and the presidency of the United States in 2020.
00:10:34.000 So why are Democrats doing this?
00:10:35.000 The answer is obvious.
00:10:36.000 They would love to see the economy tank just before the election and ensure that Joe Biden wins election.
00:10:41.000 According to the New York Times, prospects for any additional stimulus to address the coronavirus pandemic's devastating toll before the election darkened considerably on Thursday when a whittled down Republican plan failed in the Senate on a partisan vote.
00:10:52.000 Democrats voted unanimously to block the proposal from advancing, calling it inadequate to meet the mounting needs for federal aid in the latest indication of a lack of political will to reach an agreement, even as critical federal aid for individuals and businesses has run dry.
00:11:04.000 It was a nearly party-line vote whose outcome was never in doubt.
00:11:07.000 The proposal amounted to a fraction of the $1 trillion plan Republicans had offered in negotiation with Democrats, who in turn were demanding more than twice as much.
00:11:15.000 Well, the reason that the Republicans then proposed a slim-down bill is they said, you can't agree on any of the ancillary stuff in the bill, so let's just at least agree that we should extend some unemployment benefits for a little while.
00:11:24.000 We should make sure that people have enough money to pay their rent for the next month or so.
00:11:28.000 A failure to compromise would leave millions of jobless Americans in potentially dire straits as they exhaust traditional jobless benefits and states run out of additional funds Trump steered to the unemployed by executive order last month.
00:11:38.000 It would also strand a wide swath of small business owners who have endured steep drops in revenue as the pandemic chilled economic activity.
00:11:45.000 Senator Pat Roberts, Republican of Kansas, said, quote, Along with the pandemic of COVID-19, we have a pandemic of politics.
00:11:50.000 Looking to the House, or for that matter, our colleagues across the aisle, is a sort of dead-end street.
00:11:55.000 This is right.
00:11:56.000 Senator Marco Rubio of Florida, Republican, said Congress isn't going to pass more COVID-19 relief before the election.
00:12:02.000 And again, the reason for this is because Democrats have decided that they will benefit from a lack of relief at this point.
00:12:08.000 Remember, Democrats have never met a spending bill they don't like, except for this one, because the spending bill that they don't like is the one that would presumably help Trump have a possibility of winning re-election or help Republicans who are in very contentious Senate races.
00:12:20.000 There are a lot of very close Senate races around the nation right now.
00:12:24.000 So, combine the alarmism that Democrats are performing about COVID and the possibility of a second wave in New York, New Jersey, with their unwillingness to push forward relief, and it's pretty obvious what is going on here.
00:12:35.000 People are playing politics.
00:12:36.000 The media are helping out by immediately running headlines about how the Republicans have failed here.
00:12:41.000 It's not the Democrats who are obstructionists.
00:12:41.000 It's the Republicans who failed.
00:12:43.000 It's the Republicans who failed.
00:12:44.000 Meanwhile, the same media are pushing the idea that the virus is continuing to be a complete threat to all Americans of all sorts.
00:12:52.000 The New York Times ran with a research letter from Harvard that talked about how COVID-19 is, quote, a life-threatening disease in people of all ages.
00:13:00.000 That research letter from Harvard found that among the 3,222 young adults hospitalized with COVID-19, 88 died, about 2.7%.
00:13:07.000 1 in 5 required intensive care.
00:13:10.000 1 in 10 needed a ventilator to assist with breathing.
00:13:13.000 Among those surveyed, 99 patients, 3%, could not be sent home from the hospital or were transferred to facilities for ongoing care or rehabilitation.
00:13:21.000 The study, quote, establishes that COVID-19 is a life-threatening disease in people of all ages.
00:13:25.000 Okay, now, the reason that this study is incredibly stupid is because, of course, number one, the people who are young that you are talking about are largely people with pre-existing conditions.
00:13:34.000 Over one-third were obese, one-quarter extremely so.
00:13:37.000 Roughly one in five had diabetes, one in seven had hypertension.
00:13:39.000 But more than that, you're talking about the number of people who got COVID who were then hospitalized.
00:13:44.000 You're talking about a subset of a subset of a subset.
00:13:45.000 You're talking about young people who got COVID, who were then hospitalized for COVID, and who had preexisting conditions.
00:13:51.000 Yes, it turns out that a disease can be very dangerous to people who are already hospitalized.
00:13:55.000 But the question is, how many of those people are actually hospitalized in the first place?
00:13:59.000 When you're talking about young people, the answer is not very many.
00:14:02.000 Young people are not being hospitalized at a high rate when it comes to COVID-19.
00:14:06.000 But again, there's a narrative that is attempting to be driven by the media, and that is COVID is an ever-present threat, particularly to everybody in the United States, including young people.
00:14:14.000 This is an anti-data perspective.
00:14:17.000 It's the reason why the AP ran a story yesterday suggesting that three teachers had died because schools reopened.
00:14:22.000 None of the three teachers actually died as a result of contact with students.
00:14:25.000 So you're just seeing alarmism in the media combined with Democratic intransigence on providing any sort of relief before the election.
00:14:31.000 The conclusion they want you to draw is that this is an unchecked pandemic about which the federal government is doing nothing.
00:14:36.000 And that, of course, is Donald Trump's fault.
00:14:40.000 Now this has been driven forward, of course, by Trump's foolhardy decision to speak with Bob Woodward and then say on tape to Bob Woodward that he downplayed the pandemic.
00:14:47.000 As I said yesterday, the narrative that is being driven by this is actually not true.
00:14:51.000 So the narrative that the Democrats are trying to drive is that Trump lied, people died.
00:14:54.000 That Trump knew full well in early February this thing was airborne and super dangerous, way more dangerous than the flu, and then he lied about it for months.
00:15:01.000 Okay, this assumes a level of knowledge and intent on the part of President Trump that I think is utterly not in evidence.
00:15:06.000 As Bob Woodward himself recognized, the reason he didn't report Trump's comments at the time is because he didn't know whether Trump was puffing or knew what the hell he was talking about because literally no other health official was saying that this thing was airborne and multiple times as deadly as the flu in early February.
00:15:19.000 That was not a thing that was being said.
00:15:20.000 Okay, nonetheless, Jonathan Karl of ABC News questioned Trump about that yesterday.
00:15:24.000 He said, why did you lie to the American people?
00:15:26.000 And as we will see, the Biden campaign is already running ads on this.
00:15:30.000 Why did you lie to the American people and why should we trust what you have to say now?
00:15:34.000 That's a terrible question and the phraseology.
00:15:37.000 I didn't lie.
00:15:39.000 What I said is we have to be calm, we can't be panicked.
00:15:43.000 I knew that the tapes were, these were a series of phone calls that we had, mostly phone calls.
00:15:49.000 And Bob Woodward is somebody that I respect just from hearing the name for many, many years, not knowing too much about his work and not caring about his work.
00:15:59.000 But I thought it would be interesting to talk to him for a period of, you know, calls.
00:16:05.000 So we did that.
00:16:07.000 Okay, so again, why would you speak to Bob Woodward?
00:16:09.000 Because you thought it was interesting?
00:16:10.000 Like, this is just setting a trap for yourself.
00:16:12.000 And then yesterday, of course, Trump then talked about how much TV he had watched, which is always a bad look in the middle of a pandemic or a presidential election.
00:16:18.000 He talked about all the shows that he had watched over the past 24 hours, which of course provided fodder for Joe Biden.
00:16:25.000 I watched some of the shows.
00:16:28.000 I watched Liz McDonald.
00:16:29.000 She's fantastic.
00:16:30.000 I watched Fox Business.
00:16:33.000 I watched Lou Dobbs last night.
00:16:36.000 Sean Hannity last night.
00:16:38.000 Tucker last night.
00:16:40.000 Laura.
00:16:41.000 I watched Fox and Friends in the morning.
00:16:44.000 You watch these shows, you don't have to go too far into the details.
00:16:49.000 They cover things that are, it's really an amazing thing.
00:16:53.000 Okay, so as we'll see, this became fodder for a Biden ad.
00:16:56.000 Again, the entire Biden campaign is predicated on the fact that he can stay in his basement and just rip on Trump and the media will do his heavy lifting for him.
00:17:02.000 Because when he steps out of the basement, things get very ugly for him.
00:17:04.000 We'll get to Joe Biden in just one second.
00:17:06.000 First, let's talk about how now is not a great time to go to the auto parts store.
00:17:09.000 In fact, as it turns out, Never is a great time to go to the auto parts store.
00:17:12.000 You're going to go there.
00:17:13.000 It's going to cost you too much money.
00:17:14.000 They're going to have to order the part online anyway.
00:17:15.000 They might offer you an upsell based on whether you are a commoner or whether you are an auto parts pro.
00:17:21.000 Instead, why don't you just go check out rockauto.com?
00:17:23.000 It is much, much easier than walking into a store and someone's demanding quick answers to things like, is your Odyssey an LX or an EX?
00:17:28.000 And then they usually just have to order the part online anyway and they upcharge you for it.
00:17:32.000 Instead, Go directly to the source with rockauto.com.
00:17:35.000 Rockauto.com will always offer the lowest prices possible, rather than changing prices based on what the market will bear like airlines do.
00:17:41.000 I spend up to twice as much for the same parts.
00:17:43.000 Like say you happen to need a Delphi FG-1456 fuel pump assembly for a 2005 to 2010 Honda Odyssey, and it costs like $354 at a big chain store.
00:17:51.000 That is the kind of thing you could get at Rock Auto for $217.
00:17:54.000 RockAuto.com is a family business that serves auto parts customers online for 20 years.
00:17:58.000 Go to RockAuto.com to shop for auto and body parts from hundreds of manufacturers, best of all.
00:18:02.000 Prices at RockAuto.com, they're always reliably low, and the same for professionals and do-it-yourselfers.
00:18:07.000 Why spend up to twice as much for the same parts at the RockAuto.com catalog?
00:18:10.000 It is unique, it is remarkably easy to navigate.
00:18:12.000 They have amazing selection, reliably low prices, all the parts your car will ever need.
00:18:16.000 Check them out at rockauto.com.
00:18:17.000 Head out to rockauto.com right now, see all the parts available for your car or truck.
00:18:21.000 And write Shapiro in there, how did you hear about us box?
00:18:23.000 So they know that we sent you.
00:18:24.000 Again, write Shapiro in there, how did you hear about us box?
00:18:26.000 So they know that we sent you.
00:18:28.000 Okay, so Joe Biden, his entire campaign has been predicated on Orange Man Bad, and he continued that trend yesterday.
00:18:34.000 He put out an ad about Trump.
00:18:35.000 Why is Trump watching so much TV?
00:18:37.000 And again, All Trump has to do is not.
00:18:40.000 All Trump has to do is not.
00:18:41.000 Just deprive Biden of the air, and Biden will keel over, politically speaking.
00:18:46.000 Because once he actually has to talk, as we'll see, Joe Biden gets himself in all sorts of trouble, all sorts of hot water.
00:18:51.000 Anyway, here's the Biden ad against Trump.
00:18:53.000 I watched some of the shows.
00:18:56.000 I watched Liz McDonald.
00:18:57.000 She's fantastic.
00:18:58.000 I watched Lou Dobbs last night.
00:19:01.000 Sean Hannity last night.
00:19:03.000 Tucker last night.
00:19:05.000 Laura.
00:19:05.000 And then it runs a counter of U.S.
00:19:07.000 COVID deaths yesterday versus minutes of TV watched.
00:19:12.000 And then it concludes, minutes of television watched, 480 US COVID deaths yesterday, 1,176.
00:19:16.000 Now, I have a question.
00:19:17.000 If Trump were watching less TV, would fewer people have died?
00:19:20.000 The answer, of course, is no.
00:19:21.000 But again, this is Trump kind of shooting himself in the foot.
00:19:24.000 Now, the reason I keep saying that Trump has to avoid giving Biden this sort of air, this sort of oxygen, is because when Biden is deprived of the Trumpian oxygen upon which he lives, he keels over.
00:19:34.000 So yesterday, Joe Biden had a rough day in terms of interviews.
00:19:38.000 There's a reason that on 9-11 he has decided he's not going to politic.
00:19:40.000 He says he's pulled all of his ads.
00:19:41.000 I've seen no evidence he's pulled all of his ads thus far on 9-11.
00:19:45.000 He says he's not going to do any interviews today, which maybe that's about 9-11 or maybe it's about the fact that he doesn't like doing interviews.
00:19:50.000 I mean, the past several days he has done like one interview and it went really, really poorly.
00:19:54.000 In any case, here's how the interviews went yesterday for Joe Biden.
00:19:56.000 So in the middle of an interview, he mocked Trump over Trump making claims about Biden's health.
00:20:01.000 And he lost his train of thought in the middle of mocking Trump.
00:20:04.000 For going after his mental health.
00:20:06.000 Here is Joe Biden wandering off into the blithery wilderness.
00:20:12.000 I mean, this idea of, you know, slow Joe.
00:20:19.000 Anyway, I shouldn't laugh about it because Anyway, Donald Trump, just look at us both.
00:20:27.000 Watch us and determine whether or not you think I'm misleading anyone.
00:20:32.000 Not you personally, but the public.
00:20:35.000 You know, look at me.
00:20:36.000 Judge me based on... I know what the job takes.
00:20:39.000 Um, yeah.
00:20:41.000 Slow Joe.
00:20:41.000 Why would they call me Slow Joe?
00:20:42.000 And what's over here?
00:20:45.000 Is there pudding?
00:20:46.000 Is it early bird time?
00:20:48.000 Yeah, that's that's a good look.
00:20:50.000 OK, Brett Baer asked Biden's spokesperson, because this has come up recently, whether Biden is using a teleprompter during interviews, because there's an interview that he was doing with some labor union in which somebody asked him a question and he literally says in the interview, I want you to scroll up.
00:21:04.000 Now, as somebody who operates with a teleprompter, I don't use this teleprompter on the show.
00:21:09.000 I'll tell you exactly when I use the teleprompter.
00:21:11.000 The only time I ever use the teleprompter on the show is if I'm reading an ad, which you'll know, or if I'm making a pitch for the subscribers, which you'll know, or at the very beginning, like that little intro at the beginning of the show.
00:21:22.000 That's the only time I use the teleprompter.
00:21:24.000 All the other times, I'm not using the teleprompter.
00:21:26.000 I'm just staring into camera.
00:21:27.000 And when I do interviews, I'm not using the teleprompter either.
00:21:29.000 Because during interviews, that'd be incredibly distracting and very weird.
00:21:32.000 No one uses a teleprompter during interviews.
00:21:35.000 You don't do that.
00:21:35.000 That's called cheating, right?
00:21:37.000 But Joe Biden's spokesperson was asked whether Biden uses a teleprompter during interviews, and he has literally no answer.
00:21:44.000 It's very, very awkward stuff.
00:21:48.000 Has Joe Biden ever used a teleprompter during local interviews or to answer Q&A with supporters?
00:21:54.000 Brett, we are not going to engage... This is straight from the Trump campaign's talking points.
00:21:58.000 Yeah, they're using it.
00:21:59.000 And what it does, Brett, is it's trying to distract the American people.
00:22:03.000 They're using it.
00:22:04.000 They talk about it every day.
00:22:05.000 Can you say yes or no?
00:22:06.000 They talk about it every day, Brett, because they don't have a coherent strategy.
00:22:10.000 Well, you have an answer.
00:22:11.000 Yes or no.
00:22:12.000 Brett, they talk about it every day because they don't have a coherent argument for why Donald Trump deserves re-election.
00:22:17.000 Correct.
00:22:17.000 Correct.
00:22:18.000 Because the fact is that Joe Biden is using teleprompter during interviews because he is in declining mental health.
00:22:23.000 We all know this.
00:22:23.000 His decline is obvious to everyone.
00:22:25.000 And that's why his interviews are going really, really badly.
00:22:27.000 to distract from that fact. I understand, but you can't answer the question. Correct. Correct.
00:22:32.000 Because the fact is that Joe Biden is using teleprompter during interviews because he is in declining mental health. We all know this. His decline is obvious to everyone. And that's why his interviews are going really, really badly. He did an interview with Jake Tapper yesterday in which he did a bunch of stuff that really was not beneficial to Joe Biden. So he suggested that.
00:22:50.000 You didn't.
00:22:50.000 He did.
00:22:50.000 He tried to deny Trump credit for renegotiating NAFTA.
00:22:53.000 So he had said over and over that he wanted to renegotiate NAFTA.
00:22:55.000 They never did it.
00:22:56.000 And Tapper was like, well, Trump did it.
00:22:57.000 Shouldn't you give him credit?
00:22:59.000 And Biden's like, no.
00:23:01.000 And Tapper looks at him incredulously.
00:23:03.000 It's pretty amazing TV.
00:23:06.000 Now when you ran for president and when Barack Obama ran for president, you both said you would renegotiate NAFTA.
00:23:12.000 You didn't.
00:23:13.000 He did.
00:23:14.000 Does he deserve credit for that?
00:23:15.000 No, I think we remember he didn't.
00:23:17.000 He wasn't the one that pushed that particular one in the past.
00:23:20.000 The House amended the bill.
00:23:22.000 He renegotiated NAFTA and you didn't, is the point.
00:23:25.000 I mean... Because we had a Republican Congress that wouldn't go along with us renegotiating it.
00:23:31.000 But doesn't he deserve some credit for that?
00:23:32.000 It's better.
00:23:33.000 The USMCA is better than NAFTA.
00:23:36.000 It is better than NAFTA.
00:23:37.000 Um, so, um, yeah.
00:23:41.000 Yeah.
00:23:42.000 That pause from Jake Tapper is everything.
00:23:43.000 Like, can you believe this guy?
00:23:47.000 It's pretty, it's pretty amazing.
00:23:48.000 So good stuff right there from Joe Biden.
00:23:50.000 Speaking of good stuff from Joe Biden, he also said that it was not a bad idea to give China most favored nation status when it came to world trade, which is a weird take considering that China has used its most favored nation status to cheat on trade to strengthen its own regime and to ensure that it can continue with its perpetuation of tyranny in Hong Kong, as well as in Chongqing province.
00:24:09.000 Here is Jake Tapper questioning Biden and Biden again, making a boo-boo.
00:24:13.000 A lot of people think that Allowing China into the World Trade Organization, which you supported, extending most favored nation status to China, which you supported, those steps allowed China to take advantage of the United States by using our own open trade deals against us.
00:24:37.000 Do you think, in retrospect, that you were naive about China?
00:24:40.000 No.
00:24:40.000 Here's the thing.
00:24:41.000 In the context of that, we want China to grow.
00:24:44.000 We wanted China to grow.
00:24:45.000 I mean, if Trump can't use that in an ad, we wanted China to grow.
00:24:48.000 As China, meanwhile, unleashes the coronavirus on the rest of the world and completely destroys Hong Kong's freedoms and subjects a million and a half Uighur Muslims to genocidal tyranny.
00:25:00.000 Yeah, good job there, Joe.
00:25:01.000 Again, this is why Trump has to deprive him of the oxygen of Trump.
00:25:05.000 You just got to stop with the Trump stuff.
00:25:07.000 If you stop with the Trump stuff, all you get is this crazy old bat.
00:25:11.000 In a second, we're going to show you more of the crazy old bat.
00:25:13.000 We'll get to that in just one moment.
00:25:15.000 First, let us talk about the fact that when you are running a business, HR issues can absolutely kill you.
00:25:18.000 You don't start a business to worry about HR, but HR issues can come and bite you directly on the butt.
00:25:23.000 We're talking wrongful termination suits, minimum wage requirements, labor regulations.
00:25:27.000 You need somebody who's going to handle your HR.
00:25:29.000 You just do, particularly as your company grows beyond being a few people.
00:25:32.000 HR manager salaries, they are not cheap.
00:25:34.000 They average $70,000 a year.
00:25:35.000 Can you afford $70,000 a year just for HR compliance?
00:25:38.000 Probably not.
00:25:39.000 Instead, why not check out Bambi?
00:25:40.000 It's spelled B-A-M-B-E-E.
00:25:42.000 It was created specifically for small business.
00:25:44.000 You can get a dedicated HR manager, craft HR policy, and maintain your compliance all for just $99 a month, which is a great way of ensuring that your company not only runs smoothly and in compliance with law, but limits your legal liability, because if you don't have HR people, Bad news, guys.
00:25:58.000 You might end up with an enormous amount of liability you had not particularly foreseen.
00:26:03.000 From onboarding determinations, Bambi will customize your policies to fit your business and help you manage your employees day-to-day, all for just $99 a month.
00:26:10.000 Month-to-month, no hidden fees, cancel anytime.
00:26:12.000 You didn't start your business because you wanted to spend time on HR compliance.
00:26:15.000 Go to Bambi.com slash Shapiro right now to schedule.
00:26:18.000 Your free HR audit.
00:26:19.000 That is B-A-M-B-E-E dot com slash Shapiro.
00:26:22.000 Bam to the B-E-E dot com slash Shapiro.
00:26:25.000 Go check them out right now and they'll give you a free HR audit and you got to get your HR in order.
00:26:30.000 I mean, it's just something that as a business owner, I'm telling you, get your HR in order.
00:26:34.000 OK, so back to Joe Biden.
00:26:36.000 Probably Joe Biden's biggest boo-boo in that Jake Tapper interview is he essentially says that the reason that Trump won in 2016 was because of racism.
00:26:43.000 He suggests that counties that voted twice for Barack Obama and then flipped to Trump did that because of inherent American racism in response to Trumpian dog whistling.
00:26:52.000 So we are now back to Barack Obama, the bitter clingers are the bad guys, and Hillary Clinton, the deplorables are the bad guys.
00:26:57.000 Why Democrats feel the necessity to constantly go to, it's a bunch of racists supporting my opponent.
00:27:02.000 Now vote for me.
00:27:03.000 I don't understand it other than just the deep-rooted disdain that so many Democrats have for people who live in the middle of the country and in rural areas particularly, and their own self-righteous belief that they are the only anti-racism crusaders in the country, and therefore that anyone who opposes them, whether it be Mitt Romney, who Joe Biden, remember, said wanted to put y'all back in chains, or Donald Trump, that all of those other people are racist and the people who support them are racist.
00:27:26.000 Here is Joe Biden calling his political opponents racist.
00:27:30.000 We're in Macomb County, Michigan right now.
00:27:33.000 This is a county that President Obama and you carried twice, and then President Trump carried by 12 percentage points in 2016.
00:27:42.000 Why do you think so many of these voters turned against the Democratic Party in 2016?
00:27:47.000 I think it was the feeling that they were taking for granted.
00:27:51.000 I don't know that for a fact.
00:27:53.000 And I think that he used that dog whistle on race.
00:27:59.000 Now it's a bullhorn.
00:28:01.000 Okay, so, again, is that smart politics by Joe Biden?
00:28:05.000 The answer is no, which is why, again, Trump's biggest political malfeasance here is putting himself front and center.
00:28:10.000 I know Trump likes the attention.
00:28:11.000 I know he wants the camera on him.
00:28:12.000 The more the camera is on Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, the more they talk, the worse it is for them.
00:28:17.000 As I have said before, elections are a referendum on one of the two candidates.
00:28:20.000 Whoever the referendum is on loses.
00:28:22.000 In 2016, the misimpression from the media is that what was going to happen is it was going to be a referendum On Donald Trump.
00:28:29.000 It was not, in fact, a referendum on Donald Trump.
00:28:31.000 It was a referendum on Hillary Clinton.
00:28:32.000 It was a referendum on Hillary Clinton because she had a 30-year history of alienating American voters, which is why, even though she won the popular vote by driving out votes in California and New York, in the middle of the country, people did not show up for her.
00:28:42.000 Donald Trump won Wisconsin with fewer absolute votes than Mitt Romney lost Wisconsin in 2012.
00:28:47.000 So that ain't about Trump driving out new votes.
00:28:50.000 That is about people not showing up for Hillary Clinton.
00:28:52.000 Well, the same thing could easily happen with Joe Biden because the more you see of him, the less you like him.
00:28:57.000 So Donald Trump needs to remove himself from the stage, right?
00:29:01.000 Stage left, followed by Barrett.
00:29:03.000 Like, get off the stage right now, President Trump, and let Joe Biden be the center of attention.
00:29:08.000 You don't have to be the center of attention.
00:29:09.000 The more Joe Biden is the center of attention, the worse he looks.
00:29:12.000 Now, meanwhile, the entire culture has decided to press forward with its narratives on racism because they think that this is the way they're going to drive Trump from the stage, is by suggesting that America is systemically racist across the board and every cultural institution will be hijacked in order to push forward this particular push.
00:29:28.000 We'll get to that in just one second.
00:29:29.000 First, let us talk about how you protect your online data.
00:29:32.000 There are a lot of viruses out there right now.
00:29:35.000 There's new ransomware viruses that are coming along nearly every day that are designed to basically lock key files for you unless you pay them money.
00:29:40.000 It's really, really bad stuff.
00:29:41.000 This is why you need PCmatic.
00:29:43.000 It's a next-generation antivirus designed to stop modern threats like ransomware.
00:29:46.000 Independent testing firm AV-Test just named PCmatic a top performer in the cybersecurity industry, giving it the best performance award for 2019.
00:29:55.000 Only PCMatic has American research, development, and support.
00:29:57.000 PCMatic's competition is foreign-made, often in countries where malware originates.
00:30:01.000 PCMatic blocks annoying and malicious ads for hassle-free web browsing, makes your computers faster and more reliable, even after years of use.
00:30:07.000 PCMatic protects Windows computers, including XP, Vista, Windows 7, 8, and 10, Windows servers, Macs, MacBooks, and Android phones and tablets.
00:30:14.000 PCMatic is just $50 for five devices for one year, with a full 30-day money-back guarantee.
00:30:18.000 If you act now, PCMatic has offered my listeners a free month of security protection with the purchase of an annual license.
00:30:24.000 To access this offer, go to PCmatic.com slash Ben.
00:30:27.000 Again, to get that world-class security that keeps your computers running great, go to PCmatic.com slash Ben.
00:30:33.000 That is PCmatic.com slash Ben.
00:30:36.000 Go check them out right now and protect your computer.
00:30:39.000 In a second, we're going to get to the cultural Narratives that are being pushed, and we'll get to people blaming climate change for the fires in California.
00:30:46.000 As it turns out, that is not particularly accurate.
00:30:48.000 We'll get to that in a second.
00:30:49.000 First, as part of our Daily Wire audience, there are a number of ways to take in the podcast.
00:30:52.000 You can listen on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or another podcast app.
00:30:55.000 You can also watch our podcasts at YouTube, Facebook, or over at dailywire.com.
00:30:58.000 Here's the bottom line.
00:30:59.000 We're making our content available to you anywhere you want to watch or listen.
00:31:02.000 And now we're introducing a new upgraded experience.
00:31:05.000 Daily Wire is now on Apple TV and Roku, so members can enjoy all of the visual elements on this podcast on your big screen, either live or on demand.
00:31:12.000 Find The Daily Wire on Apple TV or Roku and download it today.
00:31:14.000 You have to be an Insider member to watch live.
00:31:16.000 Head on over to dailywire.com slash Shapiro.
00:31:18.000 Use code WATCH at checkout to get 15% off your membership purchase.
00:31:22.000 The deal won't last long, so act fast if you want live shows on your big screen.
00:31:25.000 Plus, the one-of-a-kind, highly coveted Leftist Heroes Tumblr.
00:31:28.000 Again, it is dailywire.com slash Shapiro to get 15% off with code WATCH.
00:31:32.000 Download the Daily Wire on your Apple TV and Roku today.
00:31:35.000 Also, another great episode of the Sunday Special.
00:31:37.000 It is coming up this weekend.
00:31:38.000 Former Secret Service agent, conservative political commentator Dan Bongino You can get the two biggest scandals of our time wrong in the media.
00:31:45.000 You can say Spygate was a hoax.
00:31:46.000 It wasn't.
00:31:47.000 And Collusion was real.
00:31:48.000 in the riots and looting taking place across the country.
00:31:50.000 So head on over to dailywire.com or listen on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, wherever else you get your podcasts.
00:31:56.000 Here's a little bit of what the Sunday special sounded like.
00:31:59.000 You can get the two biggest scandals of our time wrong in the media.
00:32:04.000 You can say Spygate was a hoax, it wasn't, and collusion was real, it wasn't, and you get a Pulitzer Prize.
00:32:12.000 Alrighty, so go check that out right now.
00:32:17.000 It is definitely worth the watch, really, really interesting stuff.
00:32:21.000 Meanwhile, you are watching the largest, fastest growing conservative podcast and radio show in the nation.
00:32:26.000 ♪ Hey ♪ Bye.
00:32:32.000 Meanwhile, the culture wars continue apace.
00:32:34.000 So, last night was the NFL opener.
00:32:37.000 I can assume that the ratings are going to suck this year just like they sucked last year.
00:32:39.000 It turns out that when you politicize everything people want to remain apolitical, people get uptight.
00:32:44.000 And I understand all of the folks out there on the left who keep saying, you know, you keep saying you just want sports to be sports.
00:32:49.000 When were sports ever just sports?
00:32:50.000 When it didn't infuse the field of play.
00:32:53.000 That is the answer.
00:32:53.000 You want the actual answer?
00:32:54.000 The answer is when it didn't infuse the field of play.
00:32:56.000 Athletes always spoke out about stuff.
00:32:58.000 Charles Barkley was on the cover of Sports Illustrated in the early 90s, wearing, like, chains, suggesting that he was a slave, right?
00:33:04.000 I mean, like, this has been a part of American sport for a long time.
00:33:08.000 When Americans start to get uptight is when they sit down to watch the game, and then they are preached to.
00:33:12.000 That is not the same thing as athletes speaking out.
00:33:14.000 Athletes have always spoken out, and that's fine.
00:33:16.000 They're Americans.
00:33:17.000 They get to speak out just like everybody else.
00:33:18.000 Doesn't mean that we have to take their...
00:33:21.000 They're words with any level of seriousness.
00:33:23.000 Like, I don't think LeBron James actually knows anything about politics.
00:33:25.000 I think he knows very, very little about politics.
00:33:27.000 That is not his field of expertise.
00:33:29.000 I know nothing about rebounding, and LeBron James knows nothing about politics.
00:33:32.000 But that doesn't mean that when I turn on a game and I am preached at by a bunch of people who know nothing about politics, that's not alienating.
00:33:39.000 Within the confines of the court, within the confines of the field, people expect to get a product that has to do with the court or the field, not a bunch of propaganda about particular political points of view.
00:33:49.000 This is why the NFL is so unbelievably stupid for getting super political on the field of play.
00:33:55.000 So the NFL has decided that they're going to put giant letters reading, end racism in end zones.
00:34:00.000 Which of course will totally end racism.
00:34:02.000 Like all the white supremacists out there, they're gonna look at the end zones of the NFL, and they're gonna be like, wow!
00:34:08.000 That end zone says to end racism, done!
00:34:11.000 Hiring discrimination, finished!
00:34:14.000 Redlining, soft redlining, self-segregation.
00:34:17.000 It's over, man, because that says end racism in the end zone.
00:34:20.000 Okay, what this really is is corporate virtue signaling, so the NFL will continue to make bucks from people who purchase based on political likes and dislikes.
00:34:28.000 What it really ends up doing, of course, is removing all ability to have just normal kind of non-political water cooler talk, which is kind of important, right?
00:34:35.000 When you hang out with your friends, you spend most of your time talking about politics?
00:34:38.000 Or did it used to be that football was like the go-to at Thanksgiving, when you had nothing else to talk about with your crazy uncle, regardless of your political side?
00:34:45.000 You couldn't talk about anything, so you talked about how much the Lions suck.
00:34:48.000 That was the way this used to work.
00:34:49.000 Not anymore.
00:34:51.000 So Roger Goodell made a huge mistake by first allowing Holland Kaepernick to kneel and then allowing everybody else to kneel.
00:34:56.000 He should have said right from the outset the same thing that David Stern said back in the 90s.
00:35:00.000 The national anthem is part of the game.
00:35:01.000 You're going to stand for it.
00:35:02.000 America is a good place.
00:35:04.000 This doesn't seem particularly controversial.
00:35:06.000 And if you want to say what you want to say off the field, enjoy.
00:35:07.000 You have every right to say what you want to say off the field, on the field.
00:35:10.000 You're working for the business.
00:35:12.000 Which, by the way, is how every other business in America functions.
00:35:14.000 You can talk about so many things that have happened to help our country get to a better place, and sports has been a big, big influence on that.
00:35:21.000 And, you know, we're not here to make political statements.
00:35:23.000 Here's Roger Goodell overtly politicizing the NFL now.
00:35:26.000 You can talk about so many things that have happened to help our country get to a better place.
00:35:34.000 And sports has been a big, big influence on that.
00:35:37.000 And, you know, we're not here to make political statements.
00:35:40.000 We're here to help make our communities better.
00:35:44.000 Oh, so you're not here to make a political take.
00:35:47.000 It's not political when you put end racism and end zones.
00:35:50.000 The underlying supposition being that racism is indeed the chief factor in American life.
00:35:54.000 It's not political, as it turns out, when you allow the players to put on their helmets the names of various supposed victims of American racism.
00:36:01.000 So I guess we'll get a Michael Brown helmet, even though he was a person who attacked a police officer.
00:36:05.000 We'll probably get a Jacob Blake helmet, despite the fact that he was an alleged rapist.
00:36:08.000 We'll probably get a Rayshard Brooks helmet despite the fact that Rayshard Brooks attacked two police officers and tried to tase them after stealing a taser from one of them.
00:36:16.000 How's the NFL gonna screen for that?
00:36:18.000 I remember when the NFL wouldn't allow Dallas players to pay tribute to the cops after several cops were shot a few years back.
00:36:24.000 But it's not political, you see, when Roger Goodell pushes this.
00:36:27.000 Except for how political it is.
00:36:29.000 So this all broke out into the open last night in a couple of ways.
00:36:32.000 So the Miami Dolphins, who will go 2-14 this year, as is their wont, they stayed in the locker room for the National Anthem and then they released a statement about why they were staying in the locker room for the National Anthem.
00:36:41.000 We need owners with influence and pockets bigger than ours.
00:36:45.000 To call up officials.
00:36:46.000 And flex political power.
00:36:48.000 When education is not determined by where we reside.
00:36:52.000 And we have the means to purchase what the doctor prescribed.
00:36:55.000 And you fight for prison reform and innocent lives.
00:36:58.000 And you repair the communities that were tossed to the side.
00:37:01.000 And you admit you gained from it and you swallowed your pride.
00:37:05.000 And when greed is not the compass, but love is the guide.
00:37:07.000 And when the courts don't punish skin color, but punish the crime.
00:37:11.000 Until then, we'll just skip the long production and stay inside.
00:37:15.000 Oh, so bad poetry is what they're going to do.
00:37:18.000 I also do enjoy how every single video that is ever cut by celebrities has them speaking in three word phrases and then cutting to another celeb.
00:37:25.000 It really makes a huge difference.
00:37:27.000 Also, I'm amused by NFL players who are among the highest earners in America, suggesting that only the owners have systemic power or money to actually help heal all of this stuff.
00:37:34.000 And their big stand is going to be what?
00:37:36.000 To stay indoors for the national anthem because the national anthem is super bad?
00:37:39.000 America is to blame for all of the problems in American life.
00:37:43.000 It's America and America's systems.
00:37:44.000 Okay, so this again took sort of center stage last night.
00:37:48.000 The Kansas City Chiefs, playing the Houston Texans.
00:37:51.000 They did this in Kansas City.
00:37:51.000 They had some socially distanced crowds there.
00:37:53.000 A couple, it was like 17,000 fans showed up in Kansas City.
00:37:58.000 And the players before the game decided to link arms in a show of unity.
00:38:02.000 Now, I know that there are some people who think that this is, you know, this is better than kneeling for the anthem.
00:38:06.000 It is better than kneeling for the anthem.
00:38:08.000 I just, I literally don't understand what the show of unity is in favor of or against.
00:38:13.000 Like, racism, bad.
00:38:14.000 Yeah, I think we all agree on that, but if this idea is that you're making a show of courage by standing against racism.
00:38:21.000 Also, death, bad.
00:38:23.000 Cancer, bad.
00:38:24.000 Can we get some shows of solidarity?
00:38:27.000 And the underlying implication is what people object to, which is that America is a deeply racist country, and that if you don't stand, then you are obviously okay with racism.
00:38:34.000 So people started booing this, and some people were shouting Trump 2020, and this led everybody in the sports media to get very, very upset, of course.
00:38:42.000 What's really going to happen is people are just going to turn off because they don't like being called implicit racists if they don't enjoy being preached at about their evil racism for not supporting X, Y, or Z. The Denver Broncos put out a photo of their players going out to some sort of rally that said, if you ain't with us, you against us.
00:39:01.000 And nobody knows exactly what they're supposed to be with or against, but here's my basic rule.
00:39:04.000 If somebody ever says that to me, I'm against you.
00:39:07.000 That is my basic rule.
00:39:07.000 If you ever say, if you're not with us, you're against us, I'm against you.
00:39:10.000 Because I'm not going to be blackmailed into that sort of ideological virtue signaling, that sort of partisan virtue signaling.
00:39:16.000 It's not just sports, of course.
00:39:18.000 It also happens along the lines of entertainment.
00:39:21.000 So Netflix's CEO was out there propagandizing.
00:39:24.000 You may have noticed that during the Black Lives Matter movement, Netflix began to propagandize on its main screen.
00:39:30.000 They're putting forward black stories.
00:39:31.000 And again, a lot of these movies are good.
00:39:33.000 I've seen a lot of these movies.
00:39:35.000 But the idea that Netflix is making a big difference by pushing education via movies, I'm sorry, this is just, sure, sure it is.
00:39:42.000 So here was the head of Netflix talking about the consequences of slavery and how bad America is.
00:39:49.000 This is a very, very rich man talking about the evils of the American system, of course.
00:39:52.000 As a consequence of slavery, Jim Crow, and housing policy, black families in America have about 110th of the wealth of white families.
00:40:03.000 If we're going to start to close that economic and power gap, we need black banks to be able to invest in the black community.
00:40:11.000 If every major corporation takes 1% of their cash and deposits it in a black bank, it will be transformative in that sector.
00:40:21.000 Okay, well, actually, the reason that people can't get loans typically has more to do with income and ability to pay back loans than the race of the people giving the loans.
00:40:29.000 The fact remains that no matter who owns the banks, banks are not going to give loans to people who are unlikely to pay back the loans.
00:40:34.000 And even if you take your money and put it in a black bank, unless the black bank is poorly run, it's not going to give loans to people who are unlikely to pay back the loans.
00:40:41.000 Banks are in the business of making loans that they expect to receive income on.
00:40:45.000 That is literally what they do.
00:40:47.000 Which does bring up, all of this kind of corporate virtue signaling does bring up, this is the 50th anniversary of an essay that was written by Milton Friedman that is now getting all sorts of flack.
00:40:59.000 I'll get to that in a second.
00:41:00.000 First, I just want to make one more example of this.
00:41:02.000 Lululemon, you want to talk about corporations' virtue signaling and making everything political?
00:41:06.000 Lululemon put out a poster, I'm not kidding, a workshop, September 17th, a workshop to unveil historical erasure and resist capitalism.
00:41:18.000 This is a real thing.
00:41:19.000 Resist capitalism.
00:41:20.000 Lululemon.
00:41:22.000 The people who charge a hundred bucks for yoga pants for suburban rich white ladies.
00:41:26.000 They want to decolonize gender and resist capitalism.
00:41:29.000 Okay, so number one, I don't think you can decolonize gender through yoga pants.
00:41:32.000 Yoga pants seem kind of gendered.
00:41:33.000 Just gonna put that out there.
00:41:35.000 For all the dudes in the audience, they know what I'm talking about.
00:41:37.000 Turns out that yoga pants?
00:41:39.000 Guy's kind of into them.
00:41:40.000 Not wearing them, looking at them.
00:41:42.000 That's just a reality of life.
00:41:44.000 But beyond that, Lululemon resisting capitalism is a hell of a statement from Lululemon.
00:41:49.000 I don't believe them.
00:41:51.000 I don't believe them.
00:41:52.000 But again, all of this is is.
00:41:55.000 Based on a notion that we are a better country and we're a better society when our corporations get super political and when they start looking down the road at the rest of American society.
00:42:04.000 Okay, this runs in direct opposition to an essay that was originally written by Milton Friedman about 50 years ago.
00:42:09.000 Actually, exactly 50 years ago.
00:42:11.000 It was an essay in which he talked about shareholder capitalism and he said that the basic job of a corporation is to pursue profit on behalf of its shareholders.
00:42:18.000 Now, Milton Friedman was not an advocate of corporations engaging in regulatory capture, right, trying to set up monopolies. He was not an advocate of corporations trying to set regulatory standards such that no one else could get into business. He was not in favor of people violating labor laws.
00:42:34.000 And that's not what Milton Friedman was talking about.
00:42:36.000 What he was talking about is that when a corporation decides to virtue signal with somebody else's money, they're either taking money away from the shareholders or from their workers or from the consumers whose prices they have to increase.
00:42:46.000 That the job of a corporation is to provide goods and services at the best possible price to the most possible consumers and to pay its employees What they deserve on the basis of making that sort of money.
00:42:57.000 And competition ensures that the wages go up.
00:42:59.000 Which, by the way, they have.
00:43:01.000 Because when you have multiple companies competing for the same workers, then the wages go up.
00:43:04.000 Okay, this is now considered very bad.
00:43:06.000 And so the New York Times Magazine put together an entire issue, an entire compendium on the evils of shareholder capitalism.
00:43:13.000 Because the real essence of corporations should be social do-gooderism.
00:43:18.000 Because I want Netflix setting my social standards.
00:43:19.000 As we'll see, may not be a great idea.
00:43:22.000 I want Lululemon telling me about resisting capitalism.
00:43:26.000 I want the NFL virtue signaling about race in America.
00:43:29.000 That's what I want.
00:43:30.000 I want Nike making statements about kneeling for the national anthem.
00:43:34.000 Well, actually, all I want from my corporations is that they give me the products and services I want at a price that I am willing to pay.
00:43:39.000 That is really what I'm looking for from them.
00:43:41.000 And that they pay their employees what their employees deserve on the open market.
00:43:45.000 That's pretty much it.
00:43:47.000 Anand Garadhas, who writes for New York Times Magazine.
00:43:52.000 He has an incredible piece in New York Times Magazine talking about the evils of shareholder capitalism.
00:43:58.000 He says, today in America, somebody will be laid off right after his or her company announced record earnings.
00:44:03.000 Someone's hours will be cut without notice.
00:44:04.000 Someone's water will be poisoned by fracking.
00:44:06.000 And among the pantheon of villains they can thank is Milton Friedman.
00:44:09.000 Okay, Milton Friedman was not in favor of environmental degradation.
00:44:14.000 In terms of cutting somebody's hours, that may be necessary in order to ensure that consumers still get the best possible price.
00:44:20.000 In a competitive market.
00:44:23.000 But this really goes to what you think the purpose of an economy is.
00:44:26.000 And this is something that actually spans the gamut right to left.
00:44:30.000 There are a lot of people on the right who believe that the purpose of an economy is to quote-unquote create jobs or provide meaning.
00:44:35.000 That is not what an economy is for.
00:44:36.000 An economy is to preserve property rights and get you the best products and services at a price you are willing to pay consensually.
00:44:41.000 That's what a market is for.
00:44:42.000 That is all the things a market is for.
00:44:43.000 It is not to provide you meaning.
00:44:45.000 It is not to provide you joy.
00:44:46.000 It is not designed in order to provide you your purpose in life.
00:44:50.000 That's supposed to be provided by social institutions, by family, by all the things that provide you meaning.
00:44:55.000 And the market is not designed to quote-unquote create jobs.
00:44:57.000 The market is designed to create jobs as a side product of creating goods and services.
00:45:02.000 Right, that is what a market is designed to do.
00:45:04.000 But everybody wants to turn the market into a human tool.
00:45:06.000 This is why it drives me up a wall when I hear conservatives, people on the right, the kind of common good conservatives, talk about, well, you know, the markets weren't designed with human needs in forefront position.
00:45:21.000 Well, the markets weren't designed, period.
00:45:22.000 The market is based on a certain basic human truth.
00:45:25.000 Your labor belongs to you, and you get to alienate it as you see fit.
00:45:29.000 That's the entire thing.
00:45:30.000 And property rights in your labor deserve to be protected.
00:45:33.000 That's the whole market.
00:45:34.000 It's just a recognition that you as an individual have rights.
00:45:37.000 That is what a market is.
00:45:38.000 It is not a system, quote-unquote, designed.
00:45:40.000 It is not, quote-unquote, designed to achieve particular ends.
00:45:44.000 It is a wonderful byproduct of that system that it happens to achieve particular ends.
00:45:47.000 But it is a moral system because it assumes that you have control over your own labor and you can alienate it and make deals with others and engage in consensual back and forth with other people.
00:45:56.000 But according to Anand Giridharadas, Friedman criticizes business people for straying from their lane, making money, and worrying about social good.
00:46:03.000 Window dressing.
00:46:04.000 Business people should not assume quote-unquote governmental functions of tending to the public welfare.
00:46:08.000 And then he says, on that point, I actually agree, but here's the thing.
00:46:11.000 Friedman militantly condemns the business person who enters the public realm to be charitable, to be kind to employees, to invest in the commons, because he wants all of these functions to be left to government.
00:46:20.000 Okay, well, but that is the... I mean, that's kind of right.
00:46:23.000 I mean, if a corporation takes money, and then takes the money and just gives it away, they are presumably taking it from shareholders who have invested their money, or they're upping prices in order to pay for that, or they're taking the money away from their workers.
00:46:35.000 Those are the only sorts of money that comes into a corporation.
00:46:38.000 What this really is, is an argument that capitalism is bad and corporations should run the world.
00:46:42.000 It's amazing, the same people who say that corporations are evil, also say that they want corporations to donate to their favorite social justice causes.
00:46:48.000 Corporations who fall for this are out of their minds.
00:46:51.000 Because these same people are going to come after your corporations.
00:46:54.000 Full scale.
00:46:56.000 By the way, Anand Jharadhas' piece in the New York Times Magazine was so crazy, So crazy that the New York Times Magazine had to cut it.
00:47:03.000 Okay, here's the end of the piece.
00:47:04.000 quote, Milton Friedman's legacy is tragic.
00:47:07.000 I'm not being hyperbolic.
00:47:08.000 I'm being totally literal because I've seen their faces and have told their stories.
00:47:11.000 When I say that a great many people needlessly suffered and died because he lived.
00:47:15.000 Great many people needlessly suffered and died Milton Friedman's economic program was adopted more and more broadly over the course of the latter half of the 20th century, raising literally billions of people from abject poverty, slicing excessive poverty on planet Earth by up to 80% over the last several decades.
00:47:35.000 Insuring free trade, insuring property rights, and all the New York Times Magazine can come up with is, well, probably he should have told corporations to engage in a virtue signaling.
00:47:45.000 Okay, speaking of bad messaging, so there have been a bunch of wildfires in California.
00:47:50.000 We can tell that there are a bunch of bad wildfires in California because we can look out the windows out here and the sun looks particularly orange.
00:47:56.000 It looks like something, as people have noted, out of Blade Runner 2049.
00:47:58.000 It is a really, really weird feeling to walk outside and the entire sky is covered with smoke.
00:48:04.000 It is not completely unprecedented.
00:48:05.000 We've had this every other summer probably for several years.
00:48:08.000 The scale of the fires that are happening right now is pretty radical compared to recent years.
00:48:16.000 This has led Democrats to immediately Here is supposedly devout Catholic Nancy Pelosi talking about the anger of Mother Earth, which is weird.
00:48:22.000 Wildfires are happening because quote unquote, Mother Earth is angry.
00:48:25.000 Here is supposedly devout Catholic, Nancy Pelosi, talking about the anger of Mother Earth, which is weird.
00:48:31.000 Here is Nancy Pelosi.
00:48:33.000 We have these fires in California and in the West.
00:48:37.000 16 people have died in Washington, Oregon, and California, including a firefighter and a one-year-old baby.
00:48:45.000 We are.
00:48:46.000 Our firefighters have been so very, very courageous.
00:48:49.000 Now we're again breaking records.
00:48:51.000 Mother Earth is angry.
00:48:52.000 She's telling us, whether she's telling us with hurricanes on the Gulf Coast, fires in the West, whatever it is, that the climate crisis is real and has an impact.
00:49:04.000 Okay, so it is not Mother Earth being angry.
00:49:07.000 Climate change does have an impact on the severity of wildfires, but the major severity of wildfires is due to bad forest management.
00:49:15.000 Michael Schellenberger writes over at Forbes magazine, It is not the case that California's fires have grown more apocalyptic every year, as the New York Times reported.
00:49:22.000 In fact, in 2019, 2019 saw remarkably small amounts of acreage burn, just 280,000 acres compared to 1.3 million and 1.6 million in 2017 and 2018, respectively.
00:49:33.000 John Keely, a leading forest scientist, says, I see the current California fires as a normal event, just not one that happens every year.
00:49:39.000 He said on July 30th, 2008, we had massive fires throughout Northern California due to a series of lightning fires in the middle of the summer.
00:49:45.000 It's not an annual event, but it's also not an unusual event.
00:49:49.000 In fact, if you look at areas burned in California during prehistoric times, many, many more acres were burned in California.
00:49:58.000 In fact, Keeley notes that since 1960, the variation in spring and summer temperatures explain 50% of the variation in fire frequency and intensity from one year to the next, but the half century since 1960 is the same period in which the U.S.
00:50:09.000 government promoted, mostly out of ignorance, suppression of regular fires that most forests need to allow for new growth.
00:50:14.000 It's not just right-wing sources saying this.
00:50:15.000 ProPublica has an article by Elizabeth Weil pointing out that the prevention of megafires requires that you allow smaller fires to actually happen, and they have not allowed it to happen every year.
00:50:26.000 So, instead, quote, we keep doing overzealous fire suppression across California landscapes where the fire poses little risk to people and structures.
00:50:32.000 As a result, wildland fuels keep building up.
00:50:35.000 At the same time, the climate grows hotter and drier.
00:50:37.000 Then, boom, the inevitable.
00:50:38.000 The wind blows down a power line or lightning strikes dry grass and an inferno ensues.
00:50:42.000 This week, we've seen both the second and third largest fires in California history.
00:50:46.000 So, yes, prescribed and managed burns that have been completely ignored by both the federal and the state government.
00:50:51.000 That would be the major reason why you're seeing these massive megafires.
00:50:55.000 So again, government mismanagement has a lot to do with what we are seeing in California and the sort of paganistic, Mother Earth is angry with us, that's why we're seeing all this.
00:51:02.000 You see this also when there's a hurricane?
00:51:03.000 So when Jim Inhofe brings a snowball to the floor of the Senate and he says, global warming isn't happening, people mock him.
00:51:08.000 When there's a hurricane and everybody on the left goes, this is because hurricanes are becoming so much more severe thanks to global warming.
00:51:14.000 Nobody has the heart to point out the reason that hurricanes are more damaging is because there is more human structure in the way of those hurricanes, not because the hurricanes are either more frequent or more damaging in and of themselves.
00:51:25.000 Alrighty, so I would be remiss today if I didn't do a deconstructing the culture.
00:51:30.000 Okay, it's time for some deconstructing the culture.
00:51:33.000 On the menu today is this film, Cuties.
00:51:36.000 So I have some complex thoughts about this film, Cuties.
00:51:39.000 Now, Cuties is a film that first made headlines on Netflix because the poster for Cuties is supremely disturbing the way that Netflix originally put it out.
00:51:48.000 So Netflix put out a poster of these four little girls.
00:51:50.000 I mean, and they are little, they're 11 years old.
00:51:52.000 Okay, and as a father of two daughters under the age of seven, I can say that the way these girls were dressed was perverse and disgusting and pedophilic.
00:51:59.000 And they are dressed completely inappropriately and horrifically and they are posing in very sexual images and all this.
00:52:06.000 It's gross and Netflix had to take down the poster correctly.
00:52:09.000 Then, there's the film.
00:52:11.000 Now, many things can be true about the film simultaneously.
00:52:15.000 One, the themes of the film are why over-sexualization of children are bad.
00:52:20.000 That is the actual theme of the film.
00:52:22.000 Now, the honest question to be asked about the film is when you cross the line, and this has been a long debated question in film, when you cross the line between depiction and exploitation.
00:52:31.000 This has been a discussion in American film, really going back to the end of the Hays Code, when you started seeing movies like A Clockwork Orange, and people were saying, okay, this shows a pretty graphic rape scene.
00:52:40.000 Is that exploitation and pushing of rape, or is it actually condemnation of rape?
00:52:46.000 You've seen this in the context of violence, where ultra-violent movies are very often considered glorifications of the violence rather than condemnations of it or mere depictions of it, and so people get very upset about all this.
00:52:58.000 This film falls squarely into that category.
00:53:01.000 I think you can certainly make a fair case that the director in this particular film directed the camera in disgusting ways at 11-year-old children.
00:53:10.000 Not only can you make that case, I think that case is fairly obvious from the actual footage of the film.
00:53:15.000 The question is whether the director is doing that in order to make you uncomfortable with the way these kids are being depicted because that is part of a pop culture in which they are submerged.
00:53:24.000 So the reason that I bring this up is because I think a lot of the people who watched the clips of the film didn't actually watch the film and they gave hot takes based on this.
00:53:32.000 So this is why I'm going to provide a little bit of nuance because I've actually spent the time yesterday of watching this film and it is indeed incredibly disturbing and upsetting and difficult to watch.
00:53:43.000 The clip that was making the rounds yesterday was this clip of these little girls dancing in very, very sexual ways.
00:53:50.000 Okay, these kids are 11.
00:53:51.000 Two of them are of African extraction or Arab extraction.
00:53:56.000 One is from Senegal.
00:53:57.000 I'm not sure where the other one is from in the movie.
00:53:59.000 And then two of them are white, French.
00:54:04.000 Again, this is a French movie.
00:54:06.000 To explain the context of this clip, I have to explain the plot of the movie.
00:54:09.000 So the plot of the movie is that there is a little girl, her name is Amy, she's 11 years old, and she is a Muslim girl who is living in a fundamentalist Islamic family in Paris.
00:54:20.000 Her parents, her mom is in the movie, her mom is being forced to accept that the dad is going back to Senegal in order to bring a second wife, right?
00:54:28.000 We find this out 15 minutes into the movie, that they've reserved a bedroom for the second wife.
00:54:32.000 And that this little girl is being brought up in a culture that says that polygamy is good and that women should be forced to accept it thanks to the whim of Allah.
00:54:41.000 Okay, this is made very, very clear in the film.
00:54:43.000 This is not me, you know, as a quote-unquote Islamophobe saying that, okay, I'm not an Islamophobe, number one, but beyond that, That is not what the film says.
00:54:50.000 So the film is making the point that radical fundamentalist Islamic culture is anti-woman, which happens to be obviously true.
00:54:57.000 Any culture that says that one wife should be forced to accept another wife is an anti-woman culture.
00:55:03.000 Monogamy is one of the great hallmarks of Judeo-Christian civilization in the West.
00:55:07.000 So she lives in this radical fundamentalist Islamic household.
00:55:11.000 And she's being forced to accept as the daughter of one woman that she's going to have like a new stepmom, basically, because daddy is off in Senegal bringing back the wife.
00:55:19.000 Dad is not present the entire film.
00:55:21.000 Upset with her own culture, she begins to engage with a highly sexualized group of young 11-year-old girls.
00:55:28.000 The point of this girls group is that they are bad people.
00:55:31.000 Right?
00:55:31.000 That they've been completely misled by the culture.
00:55:33.000 The parents are not there in any way, shape, or form.
00:55:36.000 They're basically being raised by the internet.
00:55:37.000 The point of the film is that these girls are being raised by the internet.
00:55:40.000 And there are several scenes that prove this.
00:55:42.000 Right?
00:55:42.000 That these girls are ignorant about sex.
00:55:44.000 That they don't know anything about sex.
00:55:45.000 That all they know about sex is stuff that they are learning online.
00:55:48.000 There's a scene where they're talking about the actual biological function of sex and they literally have no idea what they're talking about.
00:55:52.000 There's a scene in which one of the girls finds a used condom.
00:55:55.000 In a forest where they're hanging out, and she blows it up like a balloon because she literally has no idea what it is, and all the other girls freak out.
00:56:03.000 These are little girls.
00:56:03.000 They're 11.
00:56:04.000 They're ignorant about sex.
00:56:06.000 But they know what they see online.
00:56:07.000 And what they see online is a bunch of women, grown women, who are acting in extraordinarily hyper-sexualized ways, and they understand that it makes these women popular, and that the culture values this, and so they start acting in those same ways.
00:56:18.000 Now, the other girls in the group, because they are sort of more ensconced in French secular hedonism, They sort of understand where the appropriate lines are, but Amy does not, and so she continues to escalate her behavior to the point where she's taking shots of her crotch and she's putting them online.
00:56:33.000 The point of the movie, she becomes a worse person for moving away from fundamental moral tenets and moving toward a social media culture that values women for their sexuality and values girls for their sexuality.
00:56:43.000 And so she's constantly misinterpreting things.
00:56:46.000 There's a scene where she attempts to sexually proposition.
00:56:49.000 She steals a cell phone from her cousin, who's an adult.
00:56:52.000 She attempts to sexually proposition him in order to get back the cell phone.
00:56:55.000 He, of course, reacts very badly because she's 11.
00:56:57.000 And the point is that she doesn't know where any of the lines are because she's being raised by the Internet.
00:57:01.000 Because the Internet and our over-sexualized culture deliberately forces the internalization of hyper-sexualization into young teens, into pre-teens.
00:57:11.000 There's a scene that is described in a lot of the descriptions in which a 16 or 17 year old girl shows her breasts on screen.
00:57:17.000 That's because the girls in the movie are watching this happen online.
00:57:21.000 They're watching that video online.
00:57:23.000 And they don't at any point say, is what the girl is doing right or wrong?
00:57:26.000 Instead, they just say, wow, look how many legs she has.
00:57:28.000 Maybe we should do stuff like that.
00:57:30.000 Okay, so, the point of the movie is that France has basically broken down into a society where, because of its multicultural ethos, it tolerates radical fundamentalist Islam, in which people are shipping in second wives from Senegal, on the one hand, and on the other hand is providing, as a lived alternative, the secular, hedonistic lifestyle that over-sexualizes children, and that there's bleed-over effect from that over-sexualized lifestyle from adults to children.
00:57:58.000 So that's a pretty conservative message.
00:57:59.000 Like, the actual message of the film is actually quite conservative.
00:58:03.000 Now, the problem with the film comes in in the depiction, right?
00:58:06.000 Does this film cross the line between depiction and exploitation?
00:58:09.000 So there's a clip going around yesterday of these girls dancing.
00:58:11.000 It is, you know, warning, spoiler warning, and not only spoiler warning, like, nausea warning right now.
00:58:17.000 This clip is graphic.
00:58:18.000 It is a graphic clip of these girls dancing in very sexual ways.
00:58:21.000 They are 11 years old.
00:58:21.000 It's disgusting.
00:58:22.000 It is meant to be disgusting.
00:58:24.000 Okay, and I'll show you kind of why It's meant to be disgusting.
00:58:28.000 Okay, so here is the clip that was going around yesterday, and people were rightly outraged at this clip.
00:58:37.000 Okay, you can see the adults reacting in the clip, not being upset that these girls are twerking, not being upset, and, you know, being kind of happy about it.
00:58:43.000 And these girls are dancing very, very sexually.
00:58:46.000 They're 11 years old.
00:58:46.000 It's really, really disturbing for folks who can't see this, you know.
00:58:49.000 And there are shots of crotches and shots of butts.
00:58:52.000 Okay, and it is these kinds of shots that people are saying, how in the world is this being promoted?
00:58:56.000 How in the world is this even being filmed?
00:58:58.000 I mean, these are 11-year-old girls in real life who are being exploited.
00:59:00.000 This way, you can see the adults are very excited about it.
00:59:02.000 They're very happy about it.
00:59:03.000 Okay, and then, the girls start to get more and more sexual.
00:59:07.000 And they start to get more and more sexual because they've coordinated this dance based on a video that they've seen online that is very much like WAP.
00:59:15.000 Okay, like these very sexualized, hyper-sexualized, lesbianic dances.
00:59:18.000 That's a scene in the film.
00:59:20.000 There's a scene in the film where the main character, who is, again, the Senegalese girl, is literally sitting in a session with the other women.
00:59:25.000 The other women have scarves over their head and they're praying, and she's sitting with her earphones in, watching this sexualized, hyper-lesbian stuff, right, on her cell phone.
00:59:34.000 As that scene goes on, you start to see cutaways of the crowd, and the crowd starts to get more and more disquieted because people in the crowd are realizing this is really over the top, this is really, really bad.
00:59:43.000 The end of the scene, which was cut off online, was cut off for a reason.
00:59:47.000 The end of the scene is this girl, the main character, weeping openly and stopping the dance because she realizes that she has been exploiting herself, that she has made herself a worse person.
00:59:56.000 She runs away from the dance.
00:59:58.000 The end of the film is her rejecting both the second wedding for her father and the hypersexualized culture in favor of sort of this generic childhood innocence.
01:00:07.000 She puts on a sweater that kind of buttons all the way up to the neck because it's supposed to be modest.
01:00:11.000 And then she goes and she jump ropes to try and regain her innocence.
01:00:13.000 That's the end of the film.
01:00:15.000 So, several things can be true at once, and I think it's important to actually watch things before you analyze what they are about.
01:00:21.000 This may not justify why the film was made.
01:00:25.000 The director of the film, by the way, has openly said that the reason the film was made is because she was a black woman who was of Senegalese descent and grew up in an Islamic household.
01:00:34.000 She said she was walking through the park in France, and she saw a group of 11-year-olds dancing like this.
01:00:39.000 And she was sickened by it, she says.
01:00:42.000 And so she decided to make a movie trying to explore what in the world, as a culture, would we get to the point where 11-year-olds are dancing like this.
01:00:50.000 She's talked about this openly in interviews.
01:00:52.000 So several things can be true at once.
01:00:53.000 One, I don't think that the director meant to hyper-sexualize the girls for the pleasure of pedophiles.
01:00:58.000 Two, Netflix definitely, with its original poster, hyper-sexualized the girls for the purpose of pedophiles.
01:01:03.000 Netflix, their original poster, was really, really bad.
01:01:06.000 Three, the theme of the movie is that hyper-sexualization of children is not only bad, but that it springs from an adult culture that suggests that consent is the only value, and that bleeds down to people for whom consent is not possible.
01:01:17.000 In ways that they don't themselves understand.
01:01:19.000 That the hyper-sexualization of a society does bleed down to kids.
01:01:21.000 That is a theme of the film.
01:01:22.000 Third, that a culture that allows for no choice but a choice between a hyper-sexualized, secular humanistic vision of hedonism on the one hand, and Islamic fundamentalism on the other, is a society that is fated for the garbage can.
01:01:38.000 That is a point that the movie is pretty openly making.
01:01:41.000 Now the critics, because critics mainly hate the right, and the critics have sinned here too, because the critics mostly hate the right, they've decided that this is a story of female empowerment through leaving Islamic fundamentalism in favor of twerking.
01:01:53.000 That's not what the film is about, the director has said that's not what the film is about.
01:01:56.000 Okay, the real question that should be asked here is, should a film like this even be made, despite the messaging, if it has to depict images like this in order to be made?
01:02:03.000 I think that's a fair question.
01:02:05.000 I think it's a fair question.
01:02:06.000 I think it's a very fair question to ask whether the film has to depict as much of this as it does in order to achieve its purpose.
01:02:13.000 The director would probably tell you that her purpose in showing this stuff was to make you uncomfortable, was to deliberately make the viewer uncomfortable so you realize that so many people are complicit in this culture that bleeds down to little girls.
01:02:24.000 My guess is that's what the director would say.
01:02:25.000 Does that justify the behavior?
01:02:28.000 I think the case can be made that it certainly does not.
01:02:31.000 That 11-year-old girls, no matter what you believe, were actually exploited in the same way that Brooke Shields was exploited at 12 when she was forced to get naked in, like, Blue Lagoon.
01:02:39.000 I think that case can be made.
01:02:41.000 But I think, again, that it is important to recognize what the movie is, what it was meant to be, and what it kind of isn't.
01:02:48.000 So that you can have a more fully-rounded discussion about it.
01:02:50.000 Now, should you watch it?
01:02:51.000 I don't think so, not unless you're willing to take, you know, an hour and a half of being clubbed about the ears by some of that imagery, which again is supremely disturbing.
01:03:00.000 But is it possible for somebody to say that they think that the messages of the film are not about pedophilia?
01:03:06.000 I mean, it's pretty obvious the messages of the film are not about pedophilia.
01:03:09.000 So there is a fully rounded, shaded version of what exactly Cuties was about.
01:03:13.000 Now, does Netflix deserve to be boycotted for airing Cuties?
01:03:16.000 Well, it's directed at mature audiences.
01:03:18.000 It specifically says that on the film.
01:03:20.000 Netflix should have been boycotted over its original poster.
01:03:23.000 There are a lot of films on Netflix that depict really bad stuff.
01:03:27.000 The original poster was the problem.
01:03:29.000 Okay, the film itself can be a problem.
01:03:31.000 I can certainly see why you would think that it shouldn't have been made in the first place, and that it shouldn't have been receiving this sort of glorious coverage.
01:03:37.000 On the basis of the images that it glorifies, right?
01:03:40.000 Even if it was doing so in order to make you uncomfortable.
01:03:42.000 Did it have to do that in order to make the point?
01:03:44.000 John Nolte said this.
01:03:45.000 I think he's probably correct.
01:03:46.000 It didn't need to go this far in order to make the point.
01:03:49.000 I totally get that.
01:03:49.000 I kind of agree with it.
01:03:51.000 The poster was the real problem because the poster obviously was directed at glorifying the sexual excess of children.
01:03:58.000 That was the real problem.
01:03:59.000 Okay, so now you have your movie guide to cuties.
01:04:02.000 It's a little more complicated than I think most of the takes you're gonna get on it.
01:04:06.000 Um, but I think that, you know, in all essence, we should, we should try to be fair when we watch these movies and note where they are wrong and where they are evil and where they're making an overall not terrible point.
01:04:15.000 The movie can be exploitative and bad in the way that people view it, and it can also be making a fairly good point, actually, about the destruction of a culture that has no centralizing principles rooted in virtue and morality.
01:04:27.000 Alrighty.
01:04:28.000 We'll be back here a little bit later today with two additional hours of content.
01:04:30.000 Otherwise, we'll see you here on Monday.
01:04:32.000 Don't forget to tune in to the Sunday special.
01:04:33.000 We've got Dan Bongino this week.
01:04:35.000 Otherwise, we'll see you here on Monday.
01:04:36.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
01:04:42.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is produced by Colton Haas.
01:04:44.000 Our Technical Director is Austin Stevens.
01:04:46.000 Executive Producer, Jeremy Boring.
01:04:48.000 Our Supervising Producers are Mathis Glover and Robert Sterling.
01:04:51.000 Assistant Director, Paweł Wajdowski.
01:04:53.000 Our Associate Producer is Nick Sheehan.
01:04:55.000 The show is edited by Adam Sajewicz.
01:04:57.000 Audio Mix by Mike Karomina.
01:04:58.000 Hair and Makeup is by Nika Geneva.
01:05:00.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is a Daily Wire production.
01:05:02.000 Copyright Daily Wire 2020.
01:05:05.000 You know, the Matt Wall Show, it's not just another show about politics.
01:05:08.000 I think there are enough of those already out there.
01:05:10.000 We talk about culture, because culture drives politics, and it drives everything else.
01:05:15.000 So my main focuses are life, family, faith.
01:05:20.000 Those are fundamental, and that's what this show is about.