The Ben Shapiro Show - April 23, 2018


The Worst Arguments | Ep. 523


Episode Stats

Length

47 minutes

Words per Minute

207.6923

Word Count

9,900

Sentence Count

671

Misogynist Sentences

18

Hate Speech Sentences

6


Summary

A shooting at a Waffle House prompts some of the worst arguments for gun control ever. Americans cannot take a joke about anything, and I could not be more excited about Kanye 2020 launching. This is The Ben Shapiro Show, and on rare occasions, there is an event that happens in American public life that unleashes all of the stupid. And yesterday, indeed, it turns out, was that event. There was a shooting at the Waffle house, and there is a guy who is incredibly heroic. We re going to talk about all of it, as well as the left s reaction to it because the left's reaction is just, fully, crazy and crazy. And as the shooter, James Shaw Jr., was present at the shooting, he decided to charge the shooter. So, anyway, here is what is amazing about this: As the shooter had an AR-15, he was able to lock the shooter down. And, as a result, no one has been charged in connection with the shooting in Nashville, Tennessee. That s pretty good, right? Right now, use promo code Shapiro for that special deal. You get $55 a year, a digital scale, and a 4-week trial. That's a pretty solid deal just for using our promo code SHIPPERS. Shout out to the Daily Wire for helping us cover this! SHOUT OUT to: Ben Shapiro for the Shapiro Show! - Ben Shapiro: The Daily Wire - The Shapiro Show Podcast - Episode 004 - Episode 449 - Episode 547 - Episode 627 - Episode 723 - Episode 801 - "The Real Thing" - "It's My Life, It's Not Yours, My Story?" - "I'll Tell You What I'm Gonna Do It, And I'm Not Gonna Say That, I'll Say That's My Story, And That's Not My Story? - "Let Me Say It?" - "I'm Gotta Have It!" - "That's My True Story." - "My Story, That's It's My Real Story?" - "No More Than That, My Thoughts And I'll Be That's That's Gotta Say It, I'm Just That's Actually That's So Good, I've Got It?" -- "Ayyeeeeeeeeeeayeee, That'll Say It's That'll Hear It?" -- "That'll Hear That, OK?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 A shooting at a Waffle House prompts some of the worst arguments for gun control ever.
00:00:04.000 Americans cannot take a joke about anything.
00:00:06.000 And Kanye 2020 is launching, and I could not be more excited.
00:00:09.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:10.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:16.000 So, on rare occasions, there's an event that happens in American public life that unleashes all of the stupid.
00:00:22.000 And yesterday, indeed, it turns out was that event.
00:00:24.000 There was a shooting at a Waffle House, and there's a guy who's incredibly heroic.
00:00:27.000 We're going to talk about all of it, as well as the left's reaction to it, because the left's reaction is just fully crazy.
00:00:32.000 Like, fully stupid and crazy.
00:00:34.000 But before I get to any of that, first, I want to say thanks to our sponsors over at Stamps.com.
00:00:37.000 So, these days you can get practically everything on demand.
00:00:40.000 This podcast you can get on demand, you can get
00:00:42.000 Movies on demand?
00:00:43.000 Well, there's a reason you should be able to also get postage on demand with Stamps.com.
00:00:47.000 With Stamps.com, you can access all of the amazing services of the post office right from your desk, 24-7 when it's convenient for you.
00:00:52.000 We use Stamps.com here at The Daily Wire offices on a regular basis because we don't have time to send folks down to the post office.
00:00:58.000 Instead, they can sit at their desk, they can...
00:01:00.000 Print exact postage, they can stick it on the packages, and they are good to go.
00:01:03.000 You buy and print official U.S.
00:01:04.000 postage for any letter, any package, using your own computer and printer, and the mail carrier picks it up.
00:01:09.000 Just clink, print, mail, and you are done.
00:01:12.000 Again, we use it here at the offices, and we do so for a reason.
00:01:14.000 Right now, use Shapiro when you go to stamps.com, and you get a special offer.
00:01:19.000 $55 a free postage, a digital scale, and a four-week trial.
00:01:22.000 So a pretty solid deal just for using our promo code Shapiro with a special offer over at stamps.com.
00:01:27.000 Again, go to stamps.com.
00:01:28.000 Before you do anything else, click on the radio microphone at the top of the homepage and type in Shapiro.
00:01:32.000 That's stamps.com.
00:01:34.000 Enter promo code Shapiro for that special deal.
00:01:35.000 There is a reason why so many businesses use stamps.com, including we here at The Daily Wire.
00:01:40.000 So check it out.
00:01:41.000 Stamps.com.
00:01:42.000 Promo code Shapiro.
00:01:44.000 All righty.
00:01:45.000 The big news yesterday is that there was an awful shooting at a Waffle House in Nashville, Tennessee.
00:01:51.000 Chris Enslow over at The Blaze reports on it.
00:01:53.000 He says,
00:02:05.000 So you might ask, why was this person walking naked into a Waffle House and shooting people?
00:02:10.000 How did he get his firearms?
00:02:12.000 Well, I have the answer for you.
00:02:13.000 The Secret Service said Sunday its agents arrested the killer in July 2016 after he was found in a restricted area near the White House, according to the Tennessean.
00:02:20.000 So it wasn't just that he was arrested.
00:02:22.000 He was arrested by the Secret Service near the White House because what the hell?
00:02:26.000 Okay, Secret Service Representative Todd Hudson said he wanted to set up a meeting with the president.
00:02:30.000 Which it turns out is not the way to set up a meeting with the president.
00:02:33.000 Like, really.
00:02:33.000 I know how to set up a meeting with the president.
00:02:35.000 You don't do it by walking up to the White House and saying you want to set a meeting with the president.
00:02:38.000 That hasn't been true since, like, 1860.
00:02:40.000 The killer, who is reportedly from Illinois, was revoked of his ability to possess firearms following his arrest in Washington.
00:02:46.000 Illinois police also confiscated four firearms from his possession, including the AR-15 he used in Sunday's killing, a spokesman for the Nashville police said.
00:02:53.000 Tazewell County Sheriff Robert Huston
00:02:55.000 We're good to go.
00:03:22.000 I don't know what law on the books would prevent any of this.
00:03:24.000 Really.
00:03:24.000 Because it's criminal negligence for the father to have given the guns to the son and the son was already not only barred from having the gun but had had his guns taken away from him.
00:03:42.000 Now, what's amazing about this is that there is an amazing American here named James Shaw, Jr., who is present at the Waffle House.
00:03:48.000 And as the shooting went on, he decided to charge the shooter.
00:03:51.000 The shooter had an AR-15.
00:03:52.000 He charged the shooter anyway.
00:03:54.000 So here is James Shaw, Jr.
00:03:55.000 speaking about this publicly.
00:03:57.000 When he proceeded to come in, I actually went behind this like a push door, a swivel door.
00:04:05.000 He shot through that door, I'm pretty sure, and I'm pretty sure he grazed my arm.
00:04:11.000 And it was at that time that I kind of made up my mind, because there's no way to lock that door, that if it was going to come down to it, he was going to have to work to work to kill me.
00:04:24.000 So at the time that he was either reloading or the gun jammed or whatever happened,
00:04:30.000 Is when I ran through the swivel door, I hit him with the swivel door and then the gun was kind of jammed up and it was pushed down.
00:04:39.000 So we were scuffling and I managed to get him with one hand on the gun and then I grabbed it from him and I threw it over the countertop.
00:04:50.000 And then after that I was trying to get out the door and I think he was pretty much in the entrance way.
00:04:54.000 So I just took him out with me out of the entrance and all the way outside.
00:05:00.000 Now, that dude's an American hero.
00:05:01.000 I mean, that is an incredible thing, right?
00:05:03.000 To charge a guy with the AR-15, take the gun away from him, and stop the shooting is an amazing thing.
00:05:07.000 Obviously, he's wearing the bandages on his hands because he burned his hands because he grabbed the red hot barrel of the AR-15, which had been firing.
00:05:14.000 He also, I believe, was grazed by a bullet in the arm, is what it looked like.
00:05:19.000 And he's fine.
00:05:20.000 Then he went afterward with his family to church to pray.
00:05:23.000 So, amazing, amazing dude.
00:05:25.000 You might say, well, this is a story of an American hero stopping a person when he had no resources to do so, because this guy is just a hero.
00:05:33.000 And you might say, you know what would have been even better?
00:05:34.000 Is if this guy had had a gun on him.
00:05:35.000 Because then, presumably, this guy would have walked in with the AR-15, taken the first shot, and you know this guy, this hero right here, would have done something about it, right?
00:05:42.000 This is the kind of guy who would have pulled out his gun and shot the bad guy, maybe even saved a couple more lives.
00:05:48.000 You might think that it would have been better if this fellow, James Shaw, had actually had a gun.
00:05:52.000 You would be wrong, according to the left.
00:05:53.000 So the left comes up with, legitimately, the stupidest possible arguments I have ever seen.
00:05:57.000 Like, an insane number of stupid arguments have arisen from this, because now the left is making the claim that because James Shaw Jr.
00:06:04.000 was not armed, that now we should expect people to disarm people with guns.
00:06:08.000 Now, this is a little bit different from the argument that was being made just a few weeks ago with regard to AR-15s.
00:06:14.000 They can't expect an armed school security officer to charge a person with a gun.
00:06:18.000 That if you have a pistol, that you shouldn't be able to shoot somebody with an AR-15, right?
00:06:21.000 They were saying the AR-15 is so wildly powerful,
00:06:24.000 That you shouldn't be able to take down that shooter, even if you have a gun.
00:06:27.000 Now they're saying that everyone should be unarmed to take down the shooter or something.
00:06:31.000 OK, I'm going to show you a series of some of the dumbest arguments you have ever seen.
00:06:34.000 I mean, this is really insane.
00:06:36.000 Even folks on the left who are in favor of gun control should recognize how stupid these arguments are and stay away from them as much as possible if you actually want to win the argument.
00:06:43.000 So here is David Axelrod.
00:06:45.000 David Axelrod was, of course, one of the lead advisors, campaign advisors, to President Trump.
00:06:49.000 And then he was in the White House as, was he chief of staff?
00:06:52.000 A chief strategist for the White House under President Obama.
00:06:56.000 And here's what he tweeted out, quote, So this is a really, really bad argument.
00:06:58.000 So the argument that he's making here is that the manufacturer is somehow responsible for the person using the gun to kill people.
00:07:17.000 Which is weird, because I tweeted back to David Axelrod, full props to the makers of the M4 for generating the firearms used to kill Osama bin Laden.
00:07:27.000 No props to President Obama, right?
00:07:29.000 President Obama made the call, and all we heard about in 2012 was that Osama bin Laden is dead and Detroit is alive.
00:07:36.000 And they took credit for the killing of Osama bin Laden.
00:07:38.000 According to David Axelrod, it's the gun manufacturer who really gets the credit for the killing of anyone, right?
00:07:43.000 If anyone is killed, it's the gun manufacturer who's responsible for that.
00:07:46.000 So presumably, it's the gun manufacturer that gets to take credit for the Osama bin Laden kill, and not Barack Obama.
00:07:51.000 I assume David Axelrod would not agree with that logic, but instead, he is saying such stupid things about gun manufacturers.
00:07:56.000 This is why, you know, you hear this myth that's put out there by the left, that there is some sort of loophole for gun manufacturers when it comes to liability.
00:08:02.000 That if someone gets shot, you can't sue the gun manufacturer, that there's some sort of legal
00:08:07.000 No.
00:08:09.000 Products liability is a well-developed area of Anglo-American common law, and products liability suggests that there are a few types of liability.
00:08:16.000 One is, if you design a product that is inherently dangerous, and then that product goes off in the inherently dangerous way, then you are responsible for its danger.
00:08:25.000 But rifles are designed to do what they do, and people buy them to do what they do, so there is no
00:08:31.000 Failure in design.
00:08:32.000 There's no design flaw when it comes to product manufacturing in an AR-15.
00:08:36.000 And there's also no manufacturing flaw, which would be like you buy a product and then it breaks on you, right?
00:08:40.000 There's no manufacturing flaw.
00:08:42.000 So when people say that a gun, that gun manufacturers should be able to be sued, they are able to be sued.
00:08:47.000 If you bought a gun and the gun were to backfire on you and hurt you, for example, you could sue the gun manufacturer for a product manufacturing claim.
00:08:54.000 Or if the gun
00:08:55.000 We're good to go.
00:09:13.000 Sue the Ginsu knife company because it cuts things.
00:09:17.000 That's not the way that this works.
00:09:19.000 But again, blaming gun manufacturers for the evil of individual human beings, it makes no more sense than failing to credit heroes for the individual heroism of human beings.
00:09:27.000 One thing that we should all learn from James Shaw, by the way, this is what folks say in law enforcement, is that if you are in a mass shooting scenario,
00:09:33.000 Then charging the shooter sometimes is the best thing that you can do.
00:09:35.000 Obviously, not everybody is given that kind of courage, either by God or has developed it themselves.
00:09:40.000 James Shaw Jr.
00:09:41.000 is one of the people who has developed it.
00:09:43.000 Good for him.
00:09:43.000 So other stupid arguments.
00:09:45.000 A bunch of the students from Parkland started making the same argument, and this was an intensely, intensely stupid argument.
00:09:51.000 Emanuel Gonzalez tweeted out, the local police say a man at the scene wrestled his gun away.
00:09:57.000 Looks like you don't need to arm a teacher or a resource officer to stop a shooting.
00:10:00.000 There goes the sales pitch for Smith Wesson.
00:10:03.000 Um, no?
00:10:05.000 So, the argument, I guess, is that if you have a guy who's super brave and who runs into the face of fire and grabs a gun from someone else, no one needs a gun, so I guess we should disarm the police?
00:10:15.000 Matt Walsh had a great reply to this.
00:10:16.000 He said,
00:10:21.000 Like, what?
00:10:22.000 So I guess the solution is that law-abiding people should not have guns, but non-law-abiding people who have guns, we should stop them because we should run in there with our magical bulletproof chests and somehow stop them.
00:10:34.000 This line of argument was repeated ad infinitum yesterday.
00:10:37.000 It was crazy.
00:10:38.000 I mean, I was seeing it all over the internet yesterday.
00:10:39.000 It wasn't just Emma Gonzalez.
00:10:40.000 David Hogg also tweeted this out, the insufferable Parkland survivor who says that everyone who disagrees with him is an evil pig.
00:10:47.000 He says, so only a good guy with a gun can stop a bad guy with a gun?
00:10:50.000 And then he tweeted at the NRA, this had 56,000 likes.
00:10:55.000 56,000 likes.
00:10:56.000 No one said only a good guy with a gun can stop a bad guy with a gun.
00:10:59.000 Okay, what we did say is that there is a much better shot that you are going to stop a bad guy with a gun with a gun than you are charging the guy.
00:11:06.000 I would like to see, statistically speaking, how many people who have actually tried to charge a shooter ended up being shot.
00:11:12.000 I'll bet you the number's pretty high.
00:11:13.000 I'll bet you the number is pretty high.
00:11:15.000 And then it didn't stop with him.
00:11:17.000 Seth MacFarlane, the dope who makes Family Guy, he tweeted out, Again, I don't know what you're trying to argue here.
00:11:25.000 Are you trying to argue that it's bad for good people to have guns?
00:11:27.000 Because I promise you, if James Shaw had a gun, he would have used it in far better fashion than he was even able to use his body.
00:11:33.000 This is such a dumb argument.
00:11:35.000 We'll talk a little bit more about the dumb arguments of the left on gun control in just a second, but first,
00:11:39.000 I want to say thanks to our sponsors over at PolicyGenius.
00:11:41.000 So, 71% of human beings say they need life insurance, but only 59% of Americans have coverage, which means at least 12% of Americans are procrastinating.
00:11:50.000 And procrastinating normally is a bad thing.
00:11:52.000 It's really bad when if you drop dead, you leave your family bereft, right?
00:11:54.000 We actually know somebody that's happened to.
00:11:56.000 PolicyGenius is the easiest way to prevent that from happening.
00:11:59.000 You go online, you compare life insurance prices, you can compare quotes in just five minutes.
00:12:03.000 When it's that easy, putting it off becomes a lot harder.
00:12:05.000 You can compare quotes while sitting on the couch watching TV.
00:12:07.000 You can compare quotes while listening to this podcast.
00:12:09.000 Policy Genius has helped over 4 million people shop for insurance and placed over $20 billion in coverage.
00:12:14.000 And I've been very focused on getting life insurance for myself.
00:12:16.000 My wife has life insurance as well.
00:12:18.000 If you are an adult, if you have a family, there's no excuse for you not to have life insurance.
00:12:21.000 And when it's this easy, there certainly is no excuse.
00:12:24.000 Go over to policygenius.com.
00:12:26.000 Again, I know it's morbid to think about your own death.
00:12:28.000 It's even more morbid to think what happens to your family if, God forbid, something happens to you.
00:12:32.000 Go to policygenius.com.
00:12:33.000 And, by the way, they don't just do life insurance, they also do disability insurance and renter's insurance and health insurance.
00:12:38.000 If you care about it, they can cover it.
00:12:39.000 Policygenius.com.
00:12:41.000 When it's this easy to compare life insurance, why put it off?
00:12:43.000 Policygenius.com.
00:12:45.000 Go and check it out.
00:12:46.000 You really owe it to your family to do so.
00:12:48.000 One of the parts about the gun debate that is so annoying is that whenever there's an incident, people, instead of looking at the facts of the incident and then drawing conclusions, they immediately rush to their various sides of the aisle to back up whatever narrative they think is supported by all of this.
00:13:03.000 So, the right looks at this story and what the right says is, okay,
00:13:07.000 I'm going to look at the facts of the case.
00:13:08.000 Here are the facts of the case.
00:13:09.000 The facts of the case are that this shooter had his guns taken away and then got his guns back.
00:13:14.000 So don't blame us.
00:13:15.000 Blame law enforcement.
00:13:16.000 Don't blame law-abiding citizens like me, who have a 9mm handgun and I have a shotgun.
00:13:21.000 You're going to take away my guns because the police couldn't take away somebody else's?
00:13:25.000 How is that even logical?
00:13:26.000 So the police couldn't protect me, but I need to be disarmed?
00:13:29.000 How does that work?
00:13:29.000 And then beyond that, we look at the case with James Strachan.
00:13:32.000 We say, listen, that guy's a hero, but you know what would be better?
00:13:34.000 It would be better to lower the burden of entry for heroism.
00:13:37.000 So what I mean by that is that there are certain obstacles to being a heroic person, right?
00:13:42.000 One of those obstacles is risk.
00:13:43.000 So to be a heroic person means to undergo a certain level of risk in order to do something good.
00:13:48.000 But people are willing to undergo lower levels of risk and higher levels of risk.
00:13:52.000 James Shaw was somebody who was willing to go undergo ultimate risk in order to do something that needed to be done, disarming the shooter in this particular case.
00:13:59.000 Most people might be cowering in the back hoping the shooter would leave.
00:14:02.000 But that's because the burden is really high, right?
00:14:04.000 Charging a guy with a gun is a pretty high burden.
00:14:07.000 And this is true in military service, too, right?
00:14:09.000 Asking people to do pickets charge is a different thing from asking them to go into a well-planned operation.
00:14:13.000 It requires a different level of risk assessment and willingness to undergo risk in order to follow a particular order.
00:14:19.000 Well, that's why the best planners in the military spend their time trying to figure out ways where people have to undergo less risk.
00:14:25.000 You are lowering the threshold of entry for heroism.
00:14:28.000 Well, one of the things that lowers the threshold for entry for heroism is lowering the risk, and one of the things that lowers the risk is having a gun to shoot a bad guy.
00:14:35.000 Then how many folks in that diner were willing to charge the guy?
00:14:37.000 Probably lower than the number of people in the diner who, if they had guns, would have been willing to shoot the guy.
00:14:42.000 I assume everybody in there would have figured, okay, the risk to me of pulling out my gun and shooting this guy is pretty low, right, because now I have a gun and he has a gun.
00:14:50.000 It's certainly a lot lower than the risk of me charging the guy.
00:14:53.000 But the left wants the risks to be as high as possible, apparently, when faced with a mass shooter.
00:14:58.000 And this is a serious problem.
00:15:00.000 It's a serious problem.
00:15:01.000 And it's also one of the reasons why so many Americans look at the left and they say, you guys just want to take our guns.
00:15:06.000 And so people on the left are constantly saying, no, we don't want to take your guns.
00:15:08.000 What are you even talking about?
00:15:09.000 We're not interested in taking your guns.
00:15:11.000 Like, why would we do that?
00:15:12.000 Where's the evidence?
00:15:13.000 The evidence is that you think that the ultimate great situation is what happened to James Shaw, as opposed to this is an outlier situation where a hero was able to charge a guy with a gun and succeed.
00:15:23.000 And I don't want everybody to have to charge a guy with a gun.
00:15:25.000 I would prefer very much for those people to be able to shoot that guy.
00:15:28.000 That does not seem unreasonable to me.
00:15:30.000 But speaking of unreasonable, I now want to turn to the fact that everyone in America has apparently lost their mind with regard to the capacity to take even mild criticism or joking.
00:15:40.000 It's a pretty amazing thing.
00:15:42.000 It really is pretty amazing.
00:15:43.000 So this is so speaking of people who can't take a joke about guns, Jay Feeley is a I believe a kicker, right?
00:15:51.000 I think he was a kicker in the NFL for the Philadelphia Eagles for years.
00:15:56.000 And he was.
00:15:58.000 Yeah, he was a kicker.
00:15:59.000 That's right.
00:16:00.000 And Jay Feeley tweeted out this photo.
00:16:03.000 OK, he tweeted out a photo of himself
00:16:06.000 With his daughter, right, who's apparently a beautiful blonde girl, and her date to the prom, right, who's just a, you know, a normal-looking dude who looks like a couple of former employees here.
00:16:17.000 And he is, and Jay Philly is standing between them with his arm around his daughter and a, what looks like a Glock in the other hand.
00:16:25.000 He's got a pistol in the other hand.
00:16:26.000 And then it says, wishing my beautiful daughter and her date a great time at prom.
00:16:29.000 Hashtag bad boys.
00:16:30.000 Has had 133,000 likes.
00:16:33.000 This is the oldest joke in America.
00:16:35.000 It's the oldest joke.
00:16:36.000 This joke has been done a thousand times.
00:16:38.000 I remember when I was in law school, there was a Halloween party and a couple showed up as a shotgun wedding.
00:16:45.000 The oldest joke is that if you hurt my daughter, I will hurt you.
00:16:48.000 And yet, people lost their minds over this.
00:16:51.000 People went crazy over this.
00:16:53.000 How dare Jay Feeley?
00:16:54.000 How could Jay Feeley do something like that?
00:16:57.000 Look at him.
00:16:58.000 He's threatening that man with a gun.
00:16:59.000 First of all, if you look at the picture, it's pretty clear that this kid is not really feeling very threatened, right?
00:17:03.000 He's smiling.
00:17:05.000 Second of all, it's a joke!
00:17:07.000 My goodness.
00:17:08.000 My favorite response to this was from the feminist Lauren Duca, who can always be counted on for the hottest feminist take.
00:17:13.000 She said, Oh good, another picture of a man showing that he thinks his daughter is his property.
00:17:18.000 So, number one, my daughter does not have free reign over her own life until she becomes an adult and is capable of making adult decisions.
00:17:24.000 But, that's really not what this photo is showing.
00:17:26.000 Right now, my daughter is, effectively speaking, my property because she is four.
00:17:30.000 What I mean by that is I get to control her life.
00:17:32.000 She does not have all the freedom that she would have if she were an adult, grown human being.
00:17:35.000 In this case, the daughter is 17, probably.
00:17:38.000 16 or 17 years old.
00:17:39.000 But that's not what the joke is, you idiots.
00:17:42.000 The joke is, if you hurt my daughter, they will never find the body.
00:17:46.000 That's the joke here.
00:17:47.000 But men acting like men is now being seen as something wildly toxic, even when men are just joking about acting like men.
00:17:54.000 I found a great insight about this yesterday.
00:17:56.000 It was from a guy named Neon Taster.
00:17:57.000 He said, you know, the entire left talks about the evils of rape culture.
00:18:01.000 So they say, oh, rape culture.
00:18:02.000 So people saying that rape is OK.
00:18:04.000 So evil.
00:18:05.000 Father tweets out photo saying, if you hurt my daughter, I'll kill you.
00:18:08.000 Father is the bad guy.
00:18:11.000 Again, folks, we need more fathers who are like this, not fewer.
00:18:14.000 Okay, we need more fathers who are joking, half-joking, about the fact that if you hurt their daughters, they will do something really, really nasty to you.
00:18:21.000 It is good for men to protect women.
00:18:22.000 Does anyone really think Jay Feeley is gonna, like, go shoot this guy?
00:18:25.000 Like, if his daughter and this guy go have consensual sex, that Jay Feeley's gonna break in the room, guns a-blazin'?
00:18:30.000 Is that really what anybody thinks?
00:18:31.000 Of course nobody thinks that.
00:18:33.000 Of course nobody thinks that.
00:18:34.000 But the left has to think that, because the idea from the left is that the gun inherently makes Jay Feeley a bad guy.
00:18:39.000 They don't know Jay Feeley from Adam.
00:18:41.000 But they figure that if Jay Feeley is holding a gun, then he must be one of those grunting Neanderthals who thinks that his daughter is his property.
00:18:50.000 Which is, of course, insane.
00:18:51.000 There's a certain level of cultural anger that exists on the left toward people who are culturally on the right.
00:18:56.000 I'm not even talking about people who are politically on the right.
00:18:59.000 I'm talking about people who, for example, own a gun.
00:19:01.000 If you own a gun, there are a lot of — I've spent my entire life living in Los Angeles and Cambridge, Massachusetts, being surrounded by people on the left.
00:19:07.000 If you say that you own a gun around people on the left in Los Angeles or in Cambridge, Massachusetts, they look at you as though you are the kind of person who goes hunting for boar with a spear and then roasts it over an open flame before taking your wife, Og, back to your cave.
00:19:21.000 Owning a gun is that sort of cultural hallmark to a lot of people on the left.
00:19:25.000 And that's all this is.
00:19:27.000 That's all this is.
00:19:28.000 Because if the guy had been standing there, right, if Jay Feeley had been standing there with, say, for example, a noose,
00:19:34.000 Right?
00:19:34.000 And basically suggesting that he was going to come after this kid if something happened to his daughter.
00:19:39.000 Nobody would have cared.
00:19:40.000 Everybody thought, okay, funny joke.
00:19:41.000 He's carrying a gun, though.
00:19:42.000 And so the idea is that the gun makes him super aggressive and super scary and super terrible.
00:19:46.000 How dare Jay Feeley, that scary, scary, scary man.
00:19:50.000 Guns are not inherently scary, except if you train kids that guns are inherently scary.
00:19:54.000 Now, it's possible to train kids that guns are inherently dangerous, which they are.
00:19:57.000 But it is also possible to train kids that guns are a tool in the hands of the people who wield them.
00:20:03.000 But the left doesn't see it that way.
00:20:04.000 The gun in Jay Feeley's hand made Jay Feeley evil.
00:20:06.000 The gun in the hands of the guy in Tennessee made the guy in Tennessee evil.
00:20:09.000 It's not that the guy in Tennessee is evil and had a gun, or the guy in Tennessee was mentally ill and had a gun, and that Jay Feeley is a fine law-abiding citizen and he had a gun, and so it's a completely different story.
00:20:18.000 And meanwhile, speaking of cultural intolerance, so Shania Twain
00:20:21.000 has been raked over the coals because Shania Twain had made the awful, awful, awful mistake of suggesting that she might actually, that she might actually go ahead and vote, she's Canadian, that she might have voted for Trump.
00:20:35.000 I'll explain to you in just a second, but first, I want to say thanks to our sponsors over at Helix Sleep.
00:20:40.000 So, there's nobody on the planet who is just like you, which is a good thing, because I mean, like, come on.
00:20:44.000 But, why would you buy a mattress suited to somebody else?
00:20:47.000 Can you want to sleep well at night?
00:20:48.000 You need Helix Sleep mattresses.
00:20:50.000 I'm not saying that it's going to relieve all your sleep problems, but I am going to say that whatever sleep problems you are having with a mattress, Helix Sleep will go a long way toward resolving those.
00:20:56.000 Working with the world's leading sleep experts, Helix Sleep has developed a mattress that is customized to your specific height, weight, and sleep preferences, so you can have the best sleep of your life at an unbeatable price.
00:21:05.000 Here's how it works.
00:21:05.000 You go to HelixSleep.com, you fill out their two-minute sleep quiz, and they will design your custom mattress that can even customize each side for you and a partner.
00:21:13.000 In 2018, Helix Sleep has even taken customized sleep to the next level
00:21:16.000 I think so.
00:21:34.000 Our Helix Sleep mattress is so good.
00:21:35.000 Go to helixsleep.com slash ben right now and get up to $125 toward your mattress order.
00:21:39.000 That's helixsleep.com slash ben for up to $125 off your mattress order.
00:21:44.000 Helixsleep.com slash ben.
00:21:47.000 And again, that is up to $125 off your mattress order.
00:21:50.000 Check it out.
00:21:51.000 There's a reason that Helix Sleep is such a fast-growing company, and there's a reason we use Helix Sleep in our home, not just because they're advertisers.
00:21:57.000 All right.
00:21:59.000 Meanwhile, speaking of people who cannot take a joke, this is an insane thing.
00:22:02.000 So, Shania Twain was in an interview, right?
00:22:06.000 She was in an interview, and here's what she said, right?
00:22:09.000 It was an interview with The Guardian.
00:22:10.000 She said, quote,
00:22:24.000 Okay, so basically she said what everyone in the United States felt, which is that President Trump was more authentic than Hillary Clinton.
00:22:29.000 Now, vote for Hillary Clinton or vote for Donald Trump.
00:22:32.000 You know, there are a lot of questions about how to vote in that last election cycle, but
00:22:36.000 It is not really in question that Trump is a more authentic human than Hillary Clinton, because it's difficult to find a less authentic human than Hillary Clinton.
00:22:43.000 There are legitimately mannequins that are more authentic than Hillary Clinton.
00:22:46.000 There are robots on TV that are significantly more authentic than Hillary Clinton.
00:22:49.000 And I'm not even talking about the robots from, you know, from Westworld.
00:22:55.000 I'm talking about, like, actual Rosie robots, like from the Jetsons, are more authentic than Hillary Clinton.
00:23:00.000 So this is not a particularly controversial statement, but she then had to tweet out a four-part apology.
00:23:05.000 Okay, here's what she tweeted, quote, So, number one, first of all, she is Canadian.
00:23:08.000 Why is anybody, like, upset with how a Canadian would vote?
00:23:09.000 She can't even vote.
00:23:23.000 Who cares?
00:23:24.000 Second of all, it is the most Canadian thing in the history of Canada that you are Canadian, cannot vote in an American election, you're asked about voting in the election, then you apologize to Canadians about how you would have voted in an election that's not in Canada.
00:23:36.000 Pretty Canadian stuff, eh?
00:23:37.000 Well, here's what she said.
00:23:38.000 I would like to apologize to anybody I have offended in a recent interview.
00:23:42.000 And she continued by saying, I am passionately against discrimination of any kind and hope it's clear from the choices I have made and the people I stand with that I do not hold any common moral beliefs with the current president.
00:23:51.000 Okay, and then she continued along these lines, and she said,
00:24:03.000 And she concluded, So, again, I'm not sure what's divisive about her saying he was more authentic than Hillary Clinton, so I would have voted for him.
00:24:09.000 She's from Canada.
00:24:22.000 She is from Canada.
00:24:23.000 But this is the world we now live in, where every controversy has to be about President Trump.
00:24:28.000 Everything in the world is about President Trump.
00:24:29.000 And it's a point of high irritation to me, because my view about President Trump is that President Trump is not that important a human being.
00:24:35.000 Right?
00:24:36.000 He's important because he's President of the United States.
00:24:38.000 But as a person, you know, worrying about every little thing Trump does or says, like, I think a lot of the stuff that he's said and done is, I think, mostly said.
00:24:46.000 I think a lot of the stuff he's done is great.
00:24:47.000 I think a lot of the stuff he's said is excorable.
00:24:50.000 But, so what?
00:24:51.000 You know he's the president.
00:24:52.000 I think that about every president.
00:24:55.000 The idea that everything has to be about Trump is just an amazing, amazing thing.
00:24:58.000 And the fact that we take the word of celebrities so seriously is pretty crazy.
00:25:01.000 Now, I will point this out.
00:25:02.000 You know, the entire left, they went insane when Laura Ingraham on Fox News suggested that LeBron James should shut up and dribble, right?
00:25:08.000 Even though she wrote a book called Shut Up and Sing about the Dixie Chicks in 2004.
00:25:11.000 They went nuts over Laura Ingraham.
00:25:13.000 How could Laura Ingraham say such a thing to LeBron James?
00:25:15.000 Shut up and dribble.
00:25:16.000 I said at the time, listen, I think it's kind of a, you know, he can say whatever he wants.
00:25:20.000 Is he an expert on politics?
00:25:21.000 Not really.
00:25:21.000 That's really what Laura was saying, I think.
00:25:23.000 But the entire left said to Shania Twain, shut up and sing.
00:25:26.000 I don't know how you can hold those two thoughts in mind at the same time.
00:25:30.000 You can't say to LeBron James, shut up and dribble, but you can say to Shania Twain, shut up and sing.
00:25:34.000 Very weird and demonstrative again of the fact that when it comes to the left, it's the silencing that is more important than the reality.
00:25:41.000 Now, I will say this.
00:25:42.000 The fact that we grant our celebrities any sort of credibility on politics in the first place is bizarre and also the reason why we now have celebrity politicians.
00:25:49.000 Not only President Trump, but Hillary Clinton, let's face it, was a celebrity politician.
00:25:53.000 Hillary Clinton may have had more of a legal background than President Trump, but when she ran for Senator of New York, she'd only been First Lady of the United States.
00:26:00.000 That was not an elected position.
00:26:01.000 She never held elected office, and she went directly to being Senator, and then she went directly from that to running for President.
00:26:06.000 So, Hillary Clinton was a celebrity politician, too.
00:26:09.000 She was.
00:26:10.000 George W. Bush was a celebrity politician.
00:26:12.000 Because, yes, he was governor of Texas, but the only reason he was governor of Texas is because his last name was Bush.
00:26:17.000 Now, I think Bush was a much better president than Hillary Clinton would have been, obviously.
00:26:21.000 I think Donald Trump is doing stuff that I never thought a conservative would do in office, and that's great.
00:26:27.000 But the obsession of Americans with celebrity is pretty gross, and it's not exclusive to the left.
00:26:32.000 So the right likes to think about the left, that the left is really obsessed with celebrity.
00:26:36.000 And they are.
00:26:37.000 There's no question that folks on the left think that folks in Hollywood have some sort of greater window on the human condition than anywhere else.
00:26:43.000 It's the reason why they take so seriously all of the people from Hollywood, and it's the reason why all these Democratic politicians want to have Lena Dunham speaking at the DNC, even though Lena Dunham is one of the most off-putting human beings on God's green Earth.
00:26:55.000 But the right is not immune to this.
00:26:57.000 There is something to the human condition that when someone is famous or someone is rich, that we somehow grant them a halo effect.
00:27:05.000 It's an actual psychological thing called the halo effect.
00:27:08.000 You grant them the credibility of believing that they are good at everything.
00:27:13.000 So if somebody is super wealthy, then we assume that they are super smart also.
00:27:17.000 Or if someone is super beautiful, we assume that they are also
00:27:21.000 Worth listening to on politics.
00:27:22.000 If someone is really good with, for example, astrophysics, like Stephen Hawking, this means he must have important things to say about politics and religion.
00:27:29.000 If you're Einstein, this means that you are good at politics.
00:27:32.000 So Einstein was a socialist.
00:27:33.000 You'll see people on the left say this all the time.
00:27:35.000 Einstein, one of the great geniuses of all time, who's also socialist in his economic leanings.
00:27:41.000 So, he was good at science.
00:27:43.000 Nobody said he was good at economics.
00:27:45.000 Right?
00:27:45.000 And I assume that you wouldn't have, I assume you wouldn't have Frederick Hayek do your physics for you.
00:27:49.000 But, because people are famous, we then grant them a certain level of credibility on other issues.
00:27:54.000 So, the latest example of this is Kanye West.
00:27:56.000 So, believe it or not, the right is now resonating to Kanye West.
00:27:59.000 So, Kanye, I will not say, like, can we remember back to 2005, when after Hurricane Katrina, Kanye West went out there and said that George W. Bush had purposely targeted black people with a hurricane?
00:28:09.000 That guy?
00:28:10.000 Like the guy who jumped on stage with Taylor Swift and said, I'ma let you finish?
00:28:14.000 That one?
00:28:15.000 So now he's tweeting out deep thoughts, and the right is so excited.
00:28:17.000 They're so excited because Kanye West is tweeting out things that sound kind of right-wing, like he tweeted out that he supports Candace Owens.
00:28:22.000 Candace Owens, nice gal.
00:28:24.000 I'm friendly with Candace.
00:28:25.000 Candace is, she works with Charlie Kirk over at Turning Point USA.
00:28:28.000 She's a black conservative.
00:28:29.000 And Kanye West tweeted out that he likes how she thinks.
00:28:32.000 And now he tweets out, we have freedom of speech, but not freedom of thought.
00:28:35.000 And then he also tweeted this one out.
00:28:37.000 OK, that's true, I think.
00:28:39.000 And then he tweeted out that thought police want to suppress freedom of thought.
00:28:42.000 Also true.
00:28:43.000 And then he also tweeted out at one point that self-victimization is a disease.
00:28:48.000 Agree.
00:28:49.000 Agree with all of these things.
00:28:50.000 And I'm looking forward to Kanye West tweeting out, facts don't care about your feelings.
00:28:52.000 Like, I think it'll be great.
00:28:54.000 But the right responded to Kanye West as though it was an earth-shattering thing that a big celebrity like Kanye West was saying things that were remotely conservative.
00:29:02.000 It just demonstrates the right's desperation to be taken seriously in the sphere of pop culture.
00:29:06.000 I think that the Roseanne ratings are another evidence of this.
00:29:10.000 I think that the right wants to be taken seriously.
00:29:12.000 They don't want to be seen as bad, evil people.
00:29:14.000 And the pop culture decides who's seen as bad and evil.
00:29:16.000 Pop culture tells you stories.
00:29:18.000 And the folks in pop culture decide who gets to be portrayed as the villain and who gets to be portrayed as the hero.
00:29:23.000 So every time somebody on the right is portrayed as not the villain, the right is willing to take it.
00:29:27.000 So if Roseanne voted for Trump, even if she is pro-crossdressing and pro-gay marriage and pro-promiscuity and pro-abortion, we'll go, well, you know what?
00:29:35.000 At least she's treating us well, so we like Roseanne now.
00:29:37.000 We're doing the same thing with Kanye West.
00:29:39.000 But I would just warn folks on the right.
00:29:41.000 You know, you can be happy that Kanye West said something that seems to be conservative, but let's not pretend that Kanye West is some sort of genius, okay?
00:29:48.000 I will use every opportunity ever to play this clip.
00:29:52.000 This is from Jimmy Kimmel's show back when Jimmy Kimmel's show was not garbage.
00:29:55.000 He had on Josh Groban, and Josh Groban the singer, and Josh Groban sang some of the best Kanye West tweets.
00:30:01.000 Here's what that sounds like.
00:30:03.000 Fur pillow
00:30:13.000 These are all his tweets.
00:30:40.000 Okay, so, I would play the whole video, because I love it so much, but Kanye West is not, like, a super intelligent human being, and he is certainly not politically intelligent, and so the right resonating to anything anyone in pop culture says, because, look, that guy's famous.
00:30:55.000 Okay, Kanye West tweeted out, he tweeted out the other day, self-victimization is a disease.
00:31:01.000 He has also in the past tweeted out, quote, I hate when I'm on a flight and I wake up with a water bottle next to me, like, oh great, now I gotta be responsible for this water bottle.
00:31:09.000 Okay.
00:31:09.000 This is a guy who tweeted, quote, Or this one.
00:31:11.000 How about this one?
00:31:32.000 I will say, dude's funny.
00:31:33.000 But should he be deciding tax policy?
00:31:36.000 Probably not.
00:31:37.000 Don't you hate when people clap too loud in the car?
00:31:39.000 It's like, yo, this is a closed area.
00:31:40.000 Your clapping is way too loud.
00:31:43.000 Like, I love this.
00:31:44.000 This is an entire tweet storm.
00:31:46.000 My favorite unit of measurement is a bleep load.
00:31:48.000 Like when people ask how many shoes I got, I tell them I got a bleep load of shoes.
00:31:51.000 How much is a bleep load?
00:31:53.000 I'm assuming it's much more than a piss load.
00:31:55.000 Kanye West, man.
00:31:58.000 What a genius.
00:31:59.000 I just threw some kazoo on this B-word.
00:32:02.000 This is the guy you're going to?
00:32:03.000 For your guidance in politics?
00:32:05.000 Really?
00:32:05.000 Really, folks?
00:32:06.000 And then we wonder why our politics is so stupid?
00:32:08.000 Because we are stupid, okay?
00:32:09.000 The answer is because we're dumb.
00:32:10.000 It'll cut right to the chase.
00:32:11.000 We're all stupid.
00:32:12.000 Okay, so.
00:32:13.000 More on our stupidity in just a second.
00:32:15.000 But first, you're going to have to go over to dailywire.com and subscribe.
00:32:18.000 For $9.99 a month, you can get a subscription to dailywire.com.
00:32:20.000 When you do, you get the rest of this show live.
00:32:22.000 You also get the rest of Andrew Klavan's show live, the rest of Michael Knowles' show live.
00:32:26.000 We have all sorts of awesome goodies that are coming up for you.
00:32:29.000 I don't want to spoil who I just did an interview with last week, but it's pretty awesome, and we're going to start doing some long-form interviews with extras attached, so those will be available if you're a subscriber.
00:32:39.000 So go over right now and subscribe.
00:32:41.000 We have so many goodies coming, I can't even tell you.
00:32:43.000 And I'm not fibbing this time.
00:32:44.000 It's actually true.
00:32:45.000 So check it out.
00:32:46.000 Also get the annual subscription for $99 and you get this, the Leftist Tears Hot or Cold Tumblr.
00:32:51.000 It will revivify you and refresh you.
00:32:53.000 You'll become younger.
00:32:54.000 It is the fountain of intellectual youth.
00:32:55.000 The Leftist Tears Hot or Cold Tumblr.
00:32:57.000 Get that right now or listen for free later at iTunes or YouTube.
00:33:00.000 Please subscribe.
00:33:01.000 Please leave us a review.
00:33:02.000 It always helps.
00:33:03.000 We are the largest, fastest growing conservative podcast in the nation.
00:33:11.000 Okay, now speaking of insane stupidity, I have to move on to this story from GQ.
00:33:17.000 So, nobody reads GQ anymore, because why would you read GQ, right?
00:33:21.000 Like, I'm not sure it had that many subscribers in the first place.
00:33:23.000 They have a full list, by the editors of GQ, of 21 books that you should not read.
00:33:28.000 21 books you should not read.
00:33:30.000 So, that's exciting, because there are lots of books that I think that you should not read, but the books that they suggest
00:33:37.000 Like, this is so stupid.
00:33:38.000 It's basically the SJW guide to books you should burn.
00:33:41.000 And it's pretty incredible.
00:33:43.000 So number one on their list is Lonesome Dove by Larry McMurtry.
00:33:46.000 Okay, Larry McMurtry is not on the right.
00:33:49.000 Okay, Larry McMurtry, I believe, is the same guy.
00:33:52.000 Didn't he write Brokeback Mountain?
00:33:53.000 Larry McMurtry?
00:33:55.000 I believe that's right.
00:33:56.000 I believe that he wrote... Yeah, that's right.
00:33:58.000 He wrote the screenplay to Brokeback Mountain.
00:34:01.000 So Larry McMurtry is not exactly a right-wing dude.
00:34:05.000 They say you shouldn't read Lonesome Dove, which is just a story about two friends on the prairie, basically.
00:34:10.000 And it says, quote, I actually love Lonesome Dove, but I'm convinced that the cowboy mythos, with its rigid, masculine, emotional landscape, glorification of guns and destruction, and misogynistic gender roles, is a major factor in the degradation of America.
00:34:22.000 Rather than perpetuate this myth, I'd love for everyone, but particularly American men, to read The Mountain Lion by Gene Stafford.
00:34:27.000 It's a wicked, brilliant, dark book set largely on a ranch in Colorado, but it acts in many ways as a strong rebuttal to all the old toxic Western stereotypes we need to explode.
00:34:34.000 You mean the Western stereotypes about people pioneering out into an area where they had no protection?
00:34:39.000 In order to build the rest of the United States?
00:34:41.000 You mean that Western ethos?
00:34:43.000 You mean the ethos of men protecting women?
00:34:46.000 That ethos?
00:34:47.000 Not everything that happened in the Old West was good.
00:34:48.000 There's plenty that was bad.
00:34:50.000 Later this week, I'm going to recommend a movie that's about a lot of the bad stuff that happened in the West, but Lonesome Dove is not about those things, and you're stupid.
00:34:57.000 Bottom line, GQ editors, you are incredibly stupid.
00:34:59.000 They say you shouldn't read The Catcher in the Rye by J.D.
00:35:01.000 Salinger, and what they say is that instead of reading The Catcher in the Rye, you should read a book called Olivia, the story of a British teenage girl who's sent to a boarding school in France, who falls in love with a female teacher, and it's basically Lolita, but with lesbians.
00:35:16.000 Okay, and the guy who writes it, this saying that you shouldn't read Catcher in the Rye, is the guy who wrote Call Me by Your Name, which is again, Lolita for gay guys.
00:35:23.000 So, just very, very exciting stuff from GQ.
00:35:26.000 They say you shouldn't read Goodbye to All That by Robert Graves, which is a book about Graves' time in the trenches during World War I. It's a great book.
00:35:34.000 They say it's incredibly racist because he includes samples of near-unintelligible essays produced by three of his students, Mahmoud Mohamed, Mahmoud Mohamed, Mahmoud Mohamed, and Mahmoud Mohamed, from his post-war stint as an English instructor in Cairo.
00:35:48.000 So, basically, you should definitely not read this book about World War I because it was written by a guy who lived during World War I, and during World War I, people were more racist, so we shouldn't read anything from them.
00:35:56.000 So don't read any old literature, guys, because if you read old literature, you might learn that old people had bad racial stereotypes, and then you might want to fight against those racial stereotypes by reading old books.
00:36:04.000 That's bad.
00:36:05.000 They also say don't read The Old Man and The Sea.
00:36:08.000 They say that you should not read, let's see, A Farewell to Arms.
00:36:11.000 They really hate Hemingway.
00:36:12.000 They're really angry with Hemingway.
00:36:15.000 They say you shouldn't read Blood Meridian by Cormac McCarthy.
00:36:17.000 I actually think Blood Meridian is overrated, but Cormac McCarthy is a very good writer.
00:36:22.000 They say you should not read John Adams by David McCulloch.
00:36:24.000 Do not read John Adams.
00:36:26.000 Do not do.
00:36:27.000 Do not do it.
00:36:28.000 Instead, you should read a history about the assassination of President Garfield.
00:36:33.000 OK.
00:36:34.000 Sure.
00:36:34.000 And then they say, 9 and 10, do not read The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain.
00:36:40.000 So they really, really hate Twain.
00:36:41.000 Why?
00:36:41.000 The worst crime committed by Adventures of Huckleberry Twin is that it makes first-time Twain readers think Twain wrote tedious, meandering stories.
00:36:47.000 He did, as is evidenced by this, his book of tedious, meandering stories.
00:36:50.000 But he also wrote a lot of richly entertaining, meandering stories that are not constrained by the ham-fisted narration of a fictional backcountry child or suffused with his sweaty imitation of a slave talking.
00:36:59.000 Sweaty imitation of a slave talking?
00:37:01.000 What the hell are you even talking about?
00:37:03.000 Okay, the adventures of Huckleberry Finn is one of the great works of American literature, and it is an anti-slavery tome, you morons!
00:37:11.000 But again, history means nothing here.
00:37:13.000 I want to go through the rest of this list in just a second.
00:37:15.000 So, here are some of the other things on the list.
00:37:17.000 I have to finish what they say here about Huckleberry Finn.
00:37:20.000 They say,
00:37:22.000 First of all, I've recommended Frederick Douglass, but you don't have to ignore Huckleberry Finn.
00:37:30.000 I love this.
00:37:31.000 They say Mark Twain was a racist.
00:37:32.000 Just read Adventures of Huckleberry Finn.
00:37:34.000 The whole point of the book is that black slavery is an evil, you idiots.
00:37:42.000 There are a couple books they recommend that are pretty good, like The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich by William Shirer, which I've recommended on the show.
00:37:48.000 But I love this.
00:37:48.000 Number 12 on their list of books you definitely should not read is the Bible.
00:37:52.000 You definitely should not read the Bible.
00:37:54.000 They say the Holy Bible is rated very highly by all the people who supposedly live by it, but who in actuality have not read it.
00:38:00.000 So I agree, not enough people have actually read the Bible.
00:38:02.000 But they say those who have read it know there are some good parts, but overall it is certainly not the finest thing that man has ever produced.
00:38:08.000 Oh, you mean the basis for all of Western civilization is not the finest thing that man has ever produced?
00:38:12.000 There's no way to read Shakespeare without knowing the Bible.
00:38:15.000 There's no way to read the Declaration of Independence without knowing the Bible.
00:38:17.000 There's no way to read any modern literature without knowing biblical references.
00:38:21.000 There's no way to read anything that Westerners have written that has any importance.
00:38:24.000 You can't read Dostoevsky.
00:38:25.000 You cannot read Tolstoy.
00:38:26.000 You cannot read any great Western literature without reading the Bible, even the stuff that is directed against the Bible.
00:38:32.000 You even can't read stuff that I think is stupid crap at the left legs, like The Handmaid's Tale, without understanding the Bible.
00:38:38.000 He says those, I love this, it is repetitive, self-contradictory, sententious, foolish, and even at times ill-intentioned.
00:38:45.000 Okay, editors of GQ, I'm sure that you know more than the rest of human history combined.
00:38:50.000 Instead, they recommend that you read a book called The Notebook.
00:38:53.000 No, not the one about, like, the two youngsters who have sex, but they're actually old.
00:38:57.000 Not that one.
00:38:59.000 Something called Agoda Christoph, a marvelous tale of two brothers who have to get along when things get rough.
00:39:05.000 Okay, then?
00:39:05.000 Alright.
00:39:05.000 They say you shouldn't read Lord of the Rings.
00:39:07.000 Lord of the Rings is really bad.
00:39:08.000 Because if you read Lord of the Rings, then you might know about things like virtue.
00:39:11.000 That would be bad.
00:39:12.000 Also, don't read Dracula.
00:39:26.000 Because Dracula is boring.
00:39:27.000 This is not true, by the way.
00:39:28.000 Dracula is actually very not boring.
00:39:29.000 It's a really good book.
00:39:31.000 It's anti-Semitic, right?
00:39:32.000 It doesn't cut in favor of my folks, but it is not a bad book.
00:39:35.000 Catch-22 they say you shouldn't read.
00:39:37.000 I love this.
00:39:38.000 I could never get into Catch-22.
00:39:39.000 It fails to capture the absurdities and impossible conflicts of war.
00:39:43.000 What in the world are you talking about?
00:39:44.000 The entire book is about the absurdity of war.
00:39:47.000 The title of the book is Catch-22.
00:39:48.000 The Catch-22 is that if you fly too many missions, right, if you're capable of flying a lot of missions, then they put you up in the air, even if you've already fulfilled your quota.
00:39:58.000 And if you don't fly enough missions, they won't let you out, so they make you fill more missions.
00:40:01.000 That's what Catch-22 is.
00:40:03.000 The whole thing is about the absurdity of war, you numbskulls.
00:40:07.000 They say that you should not read Gravity's Rainbow by Thomas Pynchon.
00:40:09.000 You should instead read Inherent Vice by Thomas Pynchon.
00:40:11.000 Okay, Gravity's Rainbow is unreadable, there is no question.
00:40:14.000 But, Inherent Vice is not a good book, okay?
00:40:17.000 So, if you're gonna read Pynchon, go read Crying of Lot 49.
00:40:19.000 They say you shouldn't read Slaughterhouse-Five by Vonnegut.
00:40:22.000 You shouldn't read Gulliver's Travels by Jonathan Swift.
00:40:25.000 You definitely should not read that.
00:40:27.000 So, some of the great Westerns, some of the great literature of the Western canon you should definitely not read, but you should read these obscure SJW books that they are recommending for you from GQ.
00:40:37.000 So, well done GQ, demonstrating once and for all the intellectual scorn in which you hold the great works of Western literature is fully justified by the fact that you write for a magazine nobody reads.
00:40:46.000 But this does go to sort of the shallowness of modern American culture, is that people believe that because they were born now, they are smarter than people who were born 200 years ago.
00:40:54.000 I promise you, you weren't smarter than the people who were born 200 years ago.
00:40:57.000 You're standing on their achievements.
00:40:59.000 You're running on the fumes of their value system.
00:41:02.000 You're living in a free country because of stuff that they did.
00:41:04.000 But don't, you know, you weren't born on third base, okay?
00:41:09.000 I mean, you didn't hit a triple.
00:41:10.000 You were born on third base here.
00:41:11.000 Civilizationally speaking, everyone in this civilization seems to think that they hit a triple when they were born on third base.
00:41:17.000 You live in a free, relatively crime-free, relatively egalitarian society because of the sacrifices made by legitimately millions of people over the course of 3,000 years of human history, and many of those people were smarter than you.
00:41:28.000 There's this weird belief that because you have more information than they did in some areas of life, this means that you are smarter on everything.
00:41:35.000 You're not smarter on human nature, which has not changed in several thousand years, simply because you know more about how the Hubble telescope works.
00:41:43.000 It's just an idiotic argument.
00:41:44.000 Knowing more science doesn't mean knowing more about how human beings operate and what makes human beings human beings, or knowing what great literature is.
00:41:51.000 Insight into human nature is as old as time and as deep as the thought of people who lived long before you did.
00:41:58.000 Okay, so, time for a couple of things that I like and then we'll do some things that I hate.
00:42:02.000 So...
00:42:03.000 I don't know.
00:42:27.000 Yeah.
00:42:44.000 Or where reason makes assumptions that reason can't justify.
00:42:47.000 It's, I think, a really good beginner's guide to the conflict between faith and reason and where they unify.
00:42:53.000 And it's a good attempt to put the pieces back together a little bit.
00:42:55.000 So check that out.
00:42:56.000 Two Wings Integrating Faith and Reason.
00:42:57.000 Pretty easy read.
00:42:58.000 It's about 240 pages.
00:43:00.000 And well worth taking a look at.
00:43:02.000 So you should go and check that out as well.
00:43:05.000 Okay, time for some things that I hate.
00:43:11.000 So one of the things that makes me absolutely nuts about the state of modern politics is, again, everything revolves around President Trump.
00:43:17.000 Even though, in reality, President Trump is a guy in the Oval Office who's trying to do a job.
00:43:21.000 Sometimes he does it well, sometimes he doesn't do it so well.
00:43:23.000 But because of Trump, everybody has now been forced to take a position on the world as though Trump is the prism from which all light refracts.
00:43:31.000 And one of those people is Bob Corker.
00:43:32.000 Bob Corker is the senator from Tennessee.
00:43:33.000 He's a lifelong Republican.
00:43:35.000 And Bob Corker is now
00:43:37.000 Essentially refusing to endorse his successor, Marsha Blackburn, in Tennessee.
00:43:42.000 Which means the Republicans could lose the Senate if she loses that seat in Tennessee.
00:43:45.000 But he can't find a way to say something nice about Marsha Blackburn because Marsha Blackburn has been friendly to Trump.
00:43:50.000 Let's be real about this.
00:43:52.000 Most Republicans are pretty friendly with Trump because he's the president of the United States.
00:43:55.000 Bob Corker has a lot of distaste for Trump.
00:43:57.000 That's fine.
00:43:58.000 That's his prerogative.
00:43:59.000 But to not endorse the priorities that you've spent your entire career supposedly fighting for, Bob Corker, because you don't like Trump, is definitely cutting off your nose to spite your face.
00:44:08.000 Here's Bob Corker failing to defend Marsha Blackburn.
00:44:11.000 Dana, the rest of the story wasn't written during the interview I had with the Christian Science Monitor.
00:44:18.000 Senator, that's not a ringing endorsement of Marsha Blackburn to say that she should be elected just because she's going to vote for Mitch McConnell.
00:44:31.000 Dan, you know, I'm supporting the nominee.
00:44:35.000 I've worked with the nominee for some time, and I don't know what else to say.
00:44:40.000 So much, so much, you know, so much virtue signaling because he knows he's talking to Dana Bash on CNN as opposed to being on Fox News.
00:44:46.000 And this is one of the things that you can always notice about politicians.
00:44:48.000 They do say different things on different networks.
00:44:51.000 Okay, speaking of people who are refracting things through the prism of Trump, Elizabeth Warren is an amazing thing.
00:44:56.000 So, Elizabeth Warren.
00:44:58.000 Trump has said that she has Native American blood.
00:45:00.000 She has Native American ancestry.
00:45:01.000 There's no evidence to this effect.
00:45:03.000 None.
00:45:03.000 Zero.
00:45:03.000 Zip.
00:45:04.000 Zilch.
00:45:04.000 Her best defense is that her grandmother apparently had high cheekbones.
00:45:07.000 I am not joking.
00:45:08.000 This is what she has said.
00:45:09.000 And that she once wrote a recipe for a cookbook called Pow Wow Chow.
00:45:12.000 Again, not kidding.
00:45:13.000 That's a thing she's actually said.
00:45:15.000 Trump, making fun of her, has called her Pocahontas.
00:45:17.000 That's not a rip on Native Americans.
00:45:18.000 That's a rip on her for pretending to be a Native American in the same way that people rip on Sean King because they think that Sean King has no evidence of actually being black.
00:45:26.000 Because on his birth certificate, his father is white and his mother is white.
00:45:29.000 Okay, so making fun of Sean King is not racist.
00:45:32.000 Making fun of Sean King is making fun of Sean King because Sean King may not, in fact, be a black person, right?
00:45:36.000 According to people who think this.
00:45:38.000 Okay, Elizabeth Warren is not a Native American person by any evidence whatsoever.
00:45:42.000 And in Elizabeth Warren, because she is refracting everything back through that lens of Trump, she gets to claim that Trump's Pocahontas insult is racist.
00:45:48.000 So, she's not a racist for claiming that she's Native American.
00:45:51.000 Trump is racist for calling her out on claiming that she's Native American.
00:45:54.000 You know, look, and he's been told over and over and over by tribal leaders, cut this out, stop this, this is racist because it's a racist intent.
00:46:05.000 He's not doing this to pay a compliment.
00:46:08.000 He's doing it to get out there and boy, just get everybody, us against them, us against them, us against them in every possible way.
00:46:17.000 OK, so again, this is just the pandering is so high.
00:46:22.000 You know, it's highbrow pandering here.
00:46:23.000 And again, because it's all about Trump.
00:46:25.000 And that means that we have to ignore all of the crimes of everybody else.
00:46:28.000 Now, listen, this is not whataboutism.
00:46:29.000 I think that, again, Trump has said some stuff that I've been very, very critical on him about.
00:46:33.000 We're good to go.
00:46:55.000 Who is the head of the DNC.
00:46:56.000 He says that we've seen a mountain of evidence on Trump-Russia collusion again.
00:47:00.000 He can say this about Trump because people are angry at Trump, but there's no evidence.
00:47:03.000 I mean really there's very little evidence whatsoever on this.
00:47:05.000 I believe in doing your homework, and over the course of the last year, we have seen, I think, a mountain of evidence of collusion between the campaign and the Russians to basically affect our democracy.
00:47:19.000 Okay, so again, if you have that evidence, you can show it anytime, but it just demonstrates that the Democrats, because they believe that all of life revolves around Trump, they will attempt to impeach him if they do win back the House, even if they have no evidence to support it, because they will just claim evidence and then hope enough people hate Trump that they'll get away with it.
00:47:34.000 Okay, so, we ran out of time to do a Federalist paper, we'll do one tomorrow, but we'll be back here then.
00:47:38.000 I'm Ben Shapiro, this is The Ben Shapiro Show.