The long-awaited whistleblower report is declassified and released, but does it help Democrats in their impeachment efforts? Plus, Trump fires back. Ben Shapiro explains why the whistleblower report may not have been as damning as many have assumed. The full transcript of a phone call between President Trump and the President of Ukraine has now been declassified, but is it enough to clear the name of Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden in the Ukraine scandal? Or was there a quid pro quo going on between the Trump administration and the Ukraine government in order to get rid of a corrupt prosecutor who was trying to investigate Joe Biden in Ukraine? And will that be enough to get President Trump impeached? Or will there be more to the story than what's in the report? All that and more on this episode of The Ben Shapiro Show with Ben Shapiro! Subscribe to Ben Shapiro on iTunes and leave us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts! Subscribe on iTunes Learn more about your ad choices. Rate, review and subscribe to our other podcast, The FiveThirtyEight Podchaser! and help spread the word to your friends and family about our new show! We post polls, questions, thoughts and thoughts on all things political and policy related to politics and everything else going on in our new podcast! The Five ThirtyEight podcast. Subscribe, comment and let us know what you thought of the latest episode by using the hashtag on social media! using , and we'll be listening to it! on the next episode of next week's episode of the FiveThirtyeight podcast, with a new episode will be out next Tuesday! ! Thanks for listening and Good Morning America, Ben Shapiro Thank you! - Your continued support is much appreciated! Timestamps: 5 Starred 5 Star Potential? 6 Starred? 7 Stars? 8 Starred by 7 Starred Out? 9 Starred in Five Star Review? 10 Starred Up? 11 Starred Across the Hill? 12 Starred In Five Starred By Me? 13 Starred Down? 15 Star 16 Starred & Reviewed? 17 Starred and Reviewed by You'll Be Forgotten by Meghan McCain 18 Starred or Lost in It? 21st Day? 19th Day 26 Starred Meals?
00:00:19.000The whistleblower report that was so scrutinized and examined and talked about in the past few days, finally it has been released to the public, a declassified version, which means very mild redactions, in the whistleblower report.
00:00:32.000Now, remember, this whistleblower report was basically the inception of the entire Ukraine scandal.
00:00:36.000So the whistleblower report was filed with the inspector general of the intelligence community by a member of the intelligence community back on September 9th.
00:00:44.000The Congress was notified about it on September 9th.
00:00:46.000On September 11th, President Trump restored aid to Ukraine.
00:00:49.000And the whistleblower report was seen as sort of the be-all end-all in terms of the beginning of the examination of President Trump's activities with regard to Ukraine.
00:00:57.000So as always, I want to recap in 30 seconds what exactly we are talking about, because this stuff gets very complex.
00:01:03.000In 2016, Joe Biden, Vice President of the United States, was presiding over the withholding of $1 billion in loan guarantees to Ukraine.
00:01:10.000He was doing so explicitly saying he wanted a certain prosecutor named Viktor Shokin fired in Ukraine because he was widely perceived to be corrupt.
00:01:17.000Now at the same time, Shokin was allegedly investigating a company on which on whose board Joe Biden's son Hunter Biden was sitting.
00:01:25.000There have been reports since that perhaps that investigation had already been basically put down and was no longer active.
00:01:31.000Nonetheless, this raised a lot of hackles and suspicions, especially in Trump world and with President Trump specifically.
00:01:36.000So President Trump then deployed Rudy Giuliani in the aftermath of the election to Ukraine to investigate what exactly went on with Hunter Biden and Joe Biden in Ukraine, among other issues, including his suspicion that the hack of the DNC may not have been Russian after all.
00:01:52.000That CrowdStrike, the company that was hired to examine Hillary Clinton's servers, was in fact a Ukrainian proxy company and all this, a bit of a conspiracy theory.
00:01:59.000Okay, so that was the lead up to July.
00:02:01.000In July, President Trump withdrew aid from Ukraine.
00:02:05.000He did not really explain why he was withdrawing aid from Ukraine.
00:02:08.000A week later, he held a call with the president of Ukraine.
00:02:11.000The transcript of that call was the subject of yesterday's show and the subject of tremendous speculation and hubbub.
00:02:16.000Was President Trump pressuring Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden by withholding military aid from them in a time when they are effectively at war with Russian proxy groups in Ukraine?
00:02:26.000Was he withholding the sort of aid necessary to protect the people of Ukraine in order to advance his own domestic political agenda?
00:02:32.000The transcripts came out yesterday, and the transcript basically showed that while President Trump was having conversations with Ukraine about aid, he was also having conversations about ways that he thought that Ukraine could clean up its corrupt act, what kind of cases were being investigated.
00:02:47.000There was no clear quid pro quo, but if you were inclined to believe that Trump was pushing a quid pro quo, then the transcript certainly does not disabuse you of that notion.
00:02:56.000On the other hand, if you think that the transcript definitely proves that Trump was in fact pressuring Ukraine specifically to investigate Joe Biden using American taxpayer dollars as the lever, well, that is not exactly proved by the transcript either.
00:03:09.000The member of the intelligence community got wind, second-hand, of this phone call, and then he reported it up the ladder to the Inspector General of the intelligence community, who proceeded to report the existence of this whistleblower report to Congress.
00:03:25.000Well, this led the Congress to say, OK, hand over the whistleblower report.
00:03:27.000So the Trump administration originally said, OK, well, here's the transcript.
00:03:43.000And as it turns out, the Democrats Who are sort of counting on as late as yesterday, we're counting on the whistleblower report going way above and beyond what the transcript said.
00:03:52.000If they believe the transcript was not enough for impeachment, maybe the whistleblower report would point them in the right direction or would be the other shoe to drop.
00:03:59.000Well, it turns out none of that is true.
00:04:01.000It turns out that the whistleblower report is effectively a lot of hearsay.
00:04:05.000The whistleblower report is secondhand reported by somebody in the intelligence community.
00:04:09.000It mentions a few different issues, none of which are nearly as sort of suspicious as even the transcript of the original telephone call.
00:04:17.000In fact, the whistleblower report seems to be milder in many ways and less harmful to the Trump administration, to President Trump personally, than the actual transcript of the phone call that the Trump administration released yesterday.
00:04:30.000So now we have a copy of the whistleblower complaint, this much-ballyhooed whistleblower complaint.
00:04:35.000And the Republicans had been urging its public release.
00:04:37.000Democrats actually seem to be a little bit less interested in public release.
00:04:49.000So this looks like a summary of a document that we already have.
00:04:52.000Right, we now have more information at our disposal because the transcript has been made available than the whistleblowers did when he wrote the report.
00:04:59.000So the whistleblower report reads very speculatively.
00:05:01.000Whereas the transcript is the transcript, and we went through it word-for-word yesterday on the podcast and the radio show.
00:05:06.000You can go back and listen to those if you want, like a word-for-word analysis of what exactly went down.
00:05:11.000My read on that transcript of the phone call is that Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, clearly was attempting to broker some sort of deal to restore military aid, and President Trump was talking in a completely different direction.
00:05:22.000Which, again, is not unique to conversations with President Trump.
00:05:26.000You're talking to him about X, and he's talking to you about Y, and he does not listen, and so there's no actual meeting of the minds in the middle of the conversation, and that appears to be the case in that conversation, like many of the conversations in which Trump engages.
00:05:37.000Well, now we have the whistleblower complaint, and we're gonna go through it for you, because information first here on the show, and then we'll get to opinion.
00:05:45.000First, All of this stuff may make you uncomfortable, all this impeachment talk, but there's one thing that should make you very comfortable, and that is your underwear.
00:05:52.000Tommy John doesn't just claim to be the most comfortable underwear on the planet, they actually have the stats to back it up.
00:06:17.000They've got all sorts of good stuff for you to wear.
00:06:18.000Plus, dudes, here's something for the ladies in your life.
00:06:21.000After two years and countless hours of obsessing over every small detail, Tommy John is proud to introduce the most comfortable bras on the planet.
00:06:29.000If you prefer to shop in stores, you can find them in over 1,200 retail locations across the country, including Nordstrom stores nationwide.
00:07:21.000This letter is unclassified when separated from the attachment.
00:07:25.000In the course of my official duties, I have received information from multiple U.S.
00:07:28.000government officials that the President of the United States is using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S.
00:07:36.000This interference includes, among other things, pressuring a foreign country to investigate one of the President's main domestic political rivals.
00:07:43.000The president's personal lawyer, Mr. Rudy Giuliani, is a central figure in this effort.
00:07:46.000Attorney General Barr appears to be involved as well.
00:07:48.000Now again, because this is based on secondhand information, it now appears that Attorney General Barr was not really involved in this particular investigation.
00:07:58.000The reason, presumably, that the whistleblower is saying this is because he had a second-hand report that Trump mentioned Attorney General Barr and Rudy Giuliani in his conversation with Zelensky, but as we now know, Barr really had nothing to do with anything.
00:08:10.000That's just Trump mouthing off, because the way Trump thinks, the way his brain works, is he goes, Giuliani's my lawyer.
00:08:25.000The whistleblower knew less when writing this complaint than you and I now know about what happened in that conversation with Zelensky.
00:08:32.000Because you and I have gone through the transcript of the conversation.
00:08:35.000The whistleblower had no access to that transcript, and so was operating off second-hand sources.
00:08:40.000So what's more important, the primary or the secondary sources?
00:08:44.000Obviously the answer is the primary sources.
00:08:46.000Okay, so there are a few wrinkles here that will add some fire to the Democratic investigation, a little bit, at least give them some areas where they can push in the investigation.
00:08:56.000So the whistleblower complaint says, over the past four months, more than a half a dozen U.S.
00:08:59.000officials have informed me of various facts related to this effort.
00:09:02.000The information provided herein was relayed to me in the course of official interagency business.
00:09:08.000officials with responsibility for a particular regional or functional portfolio to share such information with one another in order to inform policymaking and analysis.
00:09:16.000In other words, this guy's saying, I'm not a political hack out there to get Trump.
00:09:18.000People are just sort of coming to me with all the information.
00:09:21.000That's important because Trump has suggested that this whistleblower is in fact a political hack who favors Joe Biden.
00:09:26.000And the inspector general himself said that there may be political bias at work here.
00:09:31.000And by the way, important to note here, the whistleblower himself wants to be able to testify in front of Congress, but his lawyers, according to the New York Times, are saying that he hopes to remain anonymous.
00:09:43.000You've just put forth one of the most bombshell political documents in modern political history that could lead to the impeachment of the President of the United States for the third time in American history, and you want to remain anonymous?
00:09:58.000He says, I was not, I mean this is on page one, the whistleblower, I was not a direct witness to most of the events described.
00:10:05.000However, I found my colleague's accounts of these events to be credible because, in almost all cases, multiple officials recounted fact patterns that were consistent with one another.
00:10:12.000In addition, a variety of information consistent with these private accounts has been reported publicly.
00:10:25.000He says, I am deeply concerned that the actions described below constitute a serious or flagrant problem, abuse or violation of law or executive order that does not include differences of opinions concerning public policy matters consistent with the definition of an urgent concern under the law.
00:10:38.000I am therefore fulfilling my duty to report this information through proper legal channels to the relevant authorities.
00:10:47.000If you're suspicious that something is going on, reporting it up the chain is the right thing to do.
00:10:51.000Leaking it to the media would be the wrong thing to do.
00:10:53.000There is something to the notion that there are members of the intelligence community who despise Trump and have been consistently leaking material that would supposedly damage him for the past three years, going all the way back to the campaign, but moving forward through the investigation of Trump-Russia ties.
00:11:08.000And there is a belief that the intelligence community basically that maybe this whistleblower far from being super duper honest as we have been told by people including Joseph Maguire who is the president's own appointee as acting director of national intelligence maybe the whistleblower really doesn't like Trump and the whistleblower is seeking to as as they say who the president and do that because He has access to information.
00:11:31.000However that works, he didn't do the wrong thing by leaking it to the press, right?
00:11:34.000You gotta give him credit for that, right?
00:12:14.000So we can analyze how true to form this whistleblower's complaints are against the content of the transcript itself.
00:12:20.000He says, early in the morning of 25th of July, the president spoke by telephone with Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky.
00:12:26.000I do not know which side initiated the call.
00:12:28.000This was the first publicly acknowledged call between the two leaders since a brief congratulatory call after Zelensky won the presidency on April 21st.
00:12:35.000Multiple White House officials with direct knowledge of the call informed me that after an initial exchange of pleasantries, the president used the remainder of the call to advance his personal interests.
00:12:44.000Namely, he sought to pressure the Ukrainian leader to take actions to help the president's 2020 re-election bid.
00:13:06.000You can be suspicious, but again, if you're going to impeach, you need more than just you're suspicious.
00:13:09.000According to the White House officials who had direct knowledge of the call, the president pressured Mr. Zelensky to enter Aliyah, initiate or continue an investigation into the activities of former Vice President Joseph Biden and his son Hunter, assist in purportedly uncovering allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S.
00:13:25.000presidential election actually originated in Ukraine, with a specific request that the Ukrainian leader locate and turn over servers used by the DNC and examined by the U.S.
00:13:34.000cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike, which initially reported that Russian hackers had penetrated the DNC's networks in 2016, and meet or speak with two people the president named explicitly as his personal envoys on these matters, Giuliani and Barr, to whom the president referred multiple times in tandem.
00:13:52.000One, it is important to distinguish between these various requests.
00:13:57.000So, to start, the whistleblower's complaint, at least factually, I'm not saying his interpretation, but factually this is accurate, right?
00:14:03.000We've read the transcript, this is a fair representation of the phone call, although it is adding a patina of opinion, which is that Trump pressured Zelensky, as opposed to Trump requested that Zelensky do X and didn't overtly connect it to military aid.
00:14:17.000Also, The question is whether Trump is requesting this stuff because it helps Trump, or because it is in the interest of the United States to find out what exactly happened with things like CrowdStrike, at least in Trump's mind.
00:14:28.000The President also praised Ukraine's Prosecutor General, Mr. Yuri Lutsenko, and suggested that Zelensky might want to keep him in his position.
00:14:35.000Note, starting in March 2019, Mr. Lutsenko made a series of public allegations, many of which he later walked back, about the Biden family's activities in Ukraine.
00:14:43.000Ukrainian officials purported involvement in the 2016 U.S.
00:14:46.000election and the activities of the U.S.
00:14:49.000The White House officials who told me this information, says the whistleblower, were deeply disturbed by what had transpired in the phone call.
00:14:56.000They told me there was already a discussion ongoing with White House lawyers about how to treat the call because of the likelihood, in the officials' retelling, that they had witnessed the president abuse his office for personal gain.
00:15:07.000This is the part of the complaint that I frankly do not understand so much.
00:15:10.000People are treating it as a bombshell that Trump, quote-unquote, hid the conversation.
00:15:14.000The president has the power of classification and declassification.
00:15:18.000Normally, transcripts of foreign leaders are not revealed to anyone because that does violate the president's unitary power of the executive plenary power over foreign policy.
00:15:28.000Trump actually violated presidential principle in releasing the transcript.
00:15:31.000He would have been fully within his rights, really, to say, I'm not releasing the transcript because, hey, I'm the president of the United States.
00:15:39.000So the complaint seems to be that the White House officials sort of hid it within particular executive channels where they wouldn't normally hide it, maybe out of fear that it would be leaked by unflattering members of the intelligence community.
00:16:11.000Does it mean that we still need more answers about the underlying activity and whether Trump was in fact utilizing taxpayer dollars to benefit himself?
00:16:18.000Yeah, we do need more information about that, but the specific complaint, which is that Trump took this conversation and then sort of hid it in a safe somewhere, He's the president.
00:16:46.000In just a second, we'll get to the rest of the whistleblower report and then we'll get to the big hearing that is happening today with Joseph Maguire, who's the acting head of the National Intelligence Services.
00:18:23.000Donald Trump expressed his conviction that the new Ukrainian government will be able to quickly improve Ukraine's image and complete the investigation of corruption cases that have held back cooperation between Ukraine and the United States.
00:18:33.000Now, I'm not sure why that's super suspicious.
00:18:35.000The Obama administration pressured Ukraine to investigate Paul Manafort.
00:18:40.000Paul Manafort was a suspicious character.
00:18:43.000So, that in and of itself should not raise the hackles of the whistleblower in the absence of this other information.
00:18:49.000Now, what the whistleblower report does do is set the predicate for further investigation, meaning he's saying there are a bunch of people who know about this stuff and you should go ask them questions.
00:18:58.000The whistleblower says, based on my understanding, there are approximately a dozen White House officials who listened to the call, a mixture of policy officials and duty officers in the White House Situation Room, as is customary.
00:19:09.000The officials I spoke with told me that participation in the call had not been restricted in advance because everyone expected it would be a routine call with a foreign leader.
00:19:16.000Which again goes to President Trump's tweet saying, it was a routine call with a foreign leader.
00:19:20.000You think I'd be stupid enough to offer a quid pro quo in front of 20 witnesses?
00:19:46.000officials that senior White House officials had intervened to, quote-unquote, lock down all records of the phone call, especially the official word-for-word transcript.
00:19:53.000Now, this is sort of a moot point because, again, the White House just spilled it out there.
00:19:59.000So it's kind of like it's hard to call it a cover-up when it's now available to you and to me and to everybody.
00:20:06.000And then there is Section 3 ongoing concerns.
00:20:09.000So the idea here is that members of the Ukrainian government basically believed that they had to pursue investigations beneficial to Trump in order to get aid.
00:20:18.000Now, their perception is not necessarily the reality that Trump pressured.
00:20:23.000Meaning that we may have a he said he said situation here in which the Ukrainian government believed that Trump wanted a quid pro quo and Trump didn't actually want a quid pro quo.
00:20:54.000But this whistleblower says, I learned from multiple U.S.
00:20:56.000officials that on or about August 2nd, Giuliani reportedly traveled to Madrid to meet with one of President Zelensky's advisors.
00:21:03.000officials characterized this meeting, not reported publicly at the time, as a direct follow up to the president's call with Mr. Zelensky about the cases they had discussed.
00:21:11.000It is not a violation of law for Giuliani to meet with members of the Ukrainian government to gather information relevant, yes, to the 2020 campaign.
00:21:19.000It is a violation of law if the president is withholding military aid based on the unwillingness of Ukraine to do so.
00:21:26.000The whistleblower complaint says, on July 26th, the day after the call, the U.S.
00:21:30.000Special Representative for Ukraine Negotiations Kurt Volker visited Kiev and met with Zelensky and a variety of Ukrainian political figures.
00:21:36.000Ambassador Volker was accompanied in his meetings by U.S.
00:21:39.000Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland.
00:21:41.000Based on multiple readouts of these meetings recounted to me by various U.S.
00:21:44.000officials, Ambassadors Volker and Sondland reportedly provided advice to the Ukrainian leadership about how to navigate the demands the President had made of Zelensky.
00:21:53.000Okay, again, this does not go to quid pro quo.
00:21:56.000Maybe he made the demands, and the demands were broader than merely the things he brought up.
00:22:01.000And the Obama administration made a bunch of anti-corruption demands.
00:22:04.000Joe Biden made specific anti-corruption demands of the Ukraine.
00:22:07.000Fire this prosecutor or you don't get aid.
00:22:09.000The question is whether this was done to benefit Trump politically, and whether it was done to target his domestic political opponents.
00:22:16.000And then the rest of the whistleblower complaint is basically just a bunch of reports on public recorded stuff.
00:22:21.000I mean, it's a bunch of references to articles from Bloomberg and Fox News and The Hill, talking about how various characters did various things.
00:22:32.000I mean, literally, he's just recounting stories from the New York Times.
00:22:35.000And he's saying, these stories make me suspicious.
00:22:37.000Okay, so, he floats this thing up the chain, and after floating this thing up, there's about one paragraph here, maybe two paragraphs that are redacted in the appendix.
00:22:49.000And, you know, there's really not too much else here.
00:22:53.000I'm kind of stunned that there's not much more than this.
00:22:55.000And you can see the media playing it up, like, that the big story here is that Trump urged that the transcript be locked down, but the transcript's now available to everybody.
00:23:02.000So again, this is sort of like when there were big stories about how Trump was going to fire Mueller, and then he never fired Mueller.
00:23:07.000How Trump was engaged in a cover-up, and then there was not really a cover-up.
00:23:12.000There are a few other details in the complaint, right?
00:23:14.000He says, I learned from U.S. officials that on or around May 14th, the president instructed Vice President Pence to cancel his planned trip to Ukraine to attend Zelensky's inauguration.
00:23:23.000Rick Perry led the delegation instead.
00:23:25.000According to officials, it was made clear to them the president did not want to meet with Zelensky until he saw how Zelensky chose to act in office.
00:23:32.000This is all incredibly, incredibly vague.
00:23:34.000And then there is the Inspector General letter, which conveys this to Congress and says, I find this at least urgent, and you should take a look at it.
00:23:43.000And then the Office of the Director of National Intelligence They said, well, this doesn't really raise to the level of urgent since it has nothing to do with the intelligence community.
00:23:52.000So we don't have to convey this over and that's what started off this whole firestorm.
00:23:57.000Now in a second, I want to get to the Ukrainian perception versus the Trumpian perception and the big hearing that's happening today with Joseph Maguire, the acting director of National Intelligence.
00:24:12.000And I can tell you, the thing that I care about most in life is making sure that my kids are set up for success.
00:24:17.000That means that I want them to have the best resources available.
00:24:20.000I want them to get the best education.
00:24:22.000And one of the things that I had when I was growing up, but it was insufficient, was every so often you run into school work trouble and you need a tutor.
00:24:29.000And usually the way that you go get a tutor is you like ask around, does somebody know math?
00:24:34.000Or you're in high school chemistry and you're like, does somebody know high school chemistry?
00:24:37.000and you find somebody from your local community, your church or your synagogue or just somewhere, or somebody online who's like a college student, and then you bring them in and maybe they know chem and maybe they don't.
00:24:46.000You know, finding a good tutor is actually really, really hard.
00:24:49.000And if you want to set your children up for success, having access to great tutors pretty much on demand, it's really, really helpful.
00:24:56.000Well, this is where Varsity Tutors comes in.
00:24:58.000Whether it's in-person or online, Varsity Tutors connects students with expert instructors in anything from early reader phonics to SAT test prep to college courses.
00:25:05.000Unlike other programs, Varsity Tutors has a rigorous tutor vetting process, and it ensures your child is working with the best tutors from the top schools in the country, which is just awesome.
00:25:15.000The online live learning platform is a two-way video chat and collaborative workboard to make learning easy and convenient.
00:25:21.000You actually can do this online, so no matter where you live, you have access to a tutor.
00:25:24.000Varsity Tutors has a 4.9 out of 5 satisfaction rating.
00:26:15.000discussion with american officials ukrainian officials came to recognize a precondition to any executive correspondence the advisor said it was clear that president trump will only have communications if they will discuss the biden case said sergey lishenko an anti-corruption advocate and former member of ukraine's parliament who know who now acts as an advisor to zelensky this issue was raised many times i know that ukrainian officials understood lishenko also talked about rudy juliani's push for a biden investigation and said he believes
00:26:40.000then prosecutor general luri litsenko invented the investigations that juliani pushed as part of an effort to keep Okay, so was Ukraine trying to make guarantees to Trump to get aid?
00:26:56.000Or is it possible that Ukraine was taking away from all the conversations that Trump wanted a quid pro quo but Trump never actually asked for a quid pro quo?
00:27:03.000There's one dot that has to be connected here and nobody has connected it.
00:27:06.000The whistleblower report doesn't do it.
00:27:09.000So basically, where things currently stand is that unless the Democrats can uncover somebody who can say, just without a doubt, that President Trump informed me he is withholding aid to Ukraine unless the Ukrainians investigate his chief political rival Joe Biden.
00:27:24.000Not just Trump is withholding aid from Ukraine until they fix up their corruption problems or investigate a myriad of topics.
00:27:32.000Or even investigate the 2016 election, which is relevant to the United States broadly, not just with regard to Trump.
00:27:39.000So there's a very specific thing that has to be fulfilled in order for a quid pro quo to have happened and impeachment to really be justified.
00:27:46.000Without that, there's just not enough.
00:28:10.000All that media overreach cuts in Trump's favor.
00:28:13.000There was another one of these stories yesterday.
00:28:15.000The Washington Post reported that the acting director of national intelligence threatened to resign over concerns that the White House might attempt to force him to stonewall Congress in his testimony.
00:28:24.000The official said that Joseph Maguire warned the White House he was not willing to withhold information from Congress, where he is scheduled to testify in open and closed hearings on Thursday.
00:28:43.000I am committed to leading the intelligence community to address the diverse and complex threats facing our nation.
00:28:47.000The White House also said, This is actually not true.
00:28:50.000The Washington Post says they stand by their story.
00:28:52.000Okay, so with that controversy brewing and with the credibility of the media always in a significant amount of question, Joseph McGuire appears before the House Intelligence Committee on Thursday.
00:29:05.000And McGuire, I think rightly, says that he did not deem the complaint as urgent under the definition of legal statute.
00:29:12.000But when President Trump says this was just a partisan hack job, he says, no, you know, I have no evidence of that.
00:29:17.000The Whistleblower Act did in good faith.
00:29:19.000I want to stress that I believe that the whistleblower and the Inspector General have acted in good faith throughout.
00:29:49.000So, in a second, we'll get to the Democratic interpretation, and then we'll get to the Republican interpretation of all of these events, and where exactly we are, where exactly things stand, because President Trump Is really going to war.
00:30:04.000We'll get to all of that in just one moment.
00:30:06.000First, let's talk about the difficulty of creating healthy habits.
00:30:09.000So, it is very difficult to change your lifestyle.
00:30:14.000Diet, it sounds like a quick fix and then you end up on a diet for like three weeks and you feel good and then you get bored and you stop doing it.
00:30:19.000Or you go to the gym and you're like, oh, it's the new year, I'm going to the gym, I'm gonna stay in shape this year.
00:30:24.000And three weeks later, you're sitting on your couch eating potato chips while watching TV.
00:30:28.000Well, the fact is, you do need to change your habits.
00:30:29.000Wouldn't it be great if there were an app that helped you change those habits?
00:30:32.000It's called Noom, and it really is fantastic.
00:30:34.000I've been using it myself to get in better... Listen, I was already in good shape, but to get in magnificent, godlike, Apollo-esque shape.
00:30:41.000Specific goals are achievable with Noom.
00:30:44.000You can tell them how much weight you want to lose, and they set up a program that helps you achieve it.
00:30:49.000They are constantly giving you all sorts of information about how you can change your habits and things to watch out for and you're in a bad mood today and how to get over the hump.
00:30:57.000They give you a social network that you can connect in with people who are trying to do the same things that you are.
00:31:01.000All of this is supremely, supremely important.
00:31:48.000OK, and then he the press secretary gave a statement today about the declassified whistleblower report saying nothing has changed with the release of this complaint, which is nothing more than a collection of third hand accounts of events and cobbled together press clippings, all of which show nothing improper.
00:32:02.000The president took the extraordinary and transparent step of releasing the full unredacted declassified transcript of his call with President Zelensky, which forms the heart of the complaint, as well as the complaint itself.
00:32:12.000That's because he has nothing to hide.
00:32:13.000The White House will continue to push back on the hysteria.
00:32:18.000Remember, I've been saying for this entire week that basically there are three cases that could be put forth for impeachment and two of them are insufficient.
00:32:26.000One is that the case could be that Trump is covering things up.
00:32:36.000Two, would be that the transcript itself, the mere attempt to garner information from the Ukrainians amounted to some sort of campaign finance violation.
00:33:06.000First, you have to go over to dailywire.com and subscribe.
00:33:08.000$9.99 a month gets you the rest of this show live.
00:33:10.000It also gets you an additional two hours of this show every day.
00:33:13.000And on busy news weeks like this one, you want the updates later in the day because things are dropping like it's hot.
00:33:18.000I mean, it's happening all like Stuff is happening the whole day, and we are here to update you.
00:33:22.000Basically, we have now become an all-day show for your viewing pleasure.
00:33:25.000Go check us out over a daily, I mean literally all day.
00:33:27.000Yesterday, we did the podcast, we did two additional hours of radio, and we did a backstage all about this topic.
00:33:33.000Okay, so that's five hours of content that I brought to you.
00:33:36.000All you have to do to get that content is subscribe.
00:33:38.000That also means you can ask us questions, become part of the mailbag, it means you get early access to our Sunday special, and we have a bevy of fantastic Sunday specials that are coming up in the next few weeks.
00:33:47.000I can't wait for you to see them, they really are great.
00:34:49.000So here is Adam Schiff getting out over his skis again, suggesting that we now have graphic evidence the president betrayed his oath of office.
00:34:57.000Yesterday, we were presented with the most graphic evidence yet that the president of the United States has betrayed his oath of office.
00:35:05.000Betrayed his oath to defend our national security and betrayed his oath to defend our constitution.
00:35:13.000For yesterday, we were presented with a record of a call between the President of the United States and the President of Ukraine, in which the President, our President, sacrificed our national security and our Constitution Okay, so, again, that is the part that has not actually yet been proved.
00:35:37.000Right, he says that he sacrificed our national security and our constitution for his personal political benefit is a conclusion driven from a read of the transcript alone.
00:36:08.000And this has led to the Republican interpretation, which is Devin Nunes saying, Devin Nunes, the Republican from California and President Trump's favorite Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, he accused Democrats of trying to obtain every possible thing about Donald Trump.
00:36:24.000And he put this into the context of Democrats digging deep on the Steele dossier and Trump-Russia.
00:36:29.000He basically says, listen, you guys have had I'm trying to find a clean way to say this.
00:36:35.000You guys have had a very strong desire to get President Trump impeached since the very beginning, and now this is just the latest iteration of a story we've already seen before.
00:36:45.000Ukrainian official Sergei Lashchenko was a source for Nellie Orr, wife of Department of Justice official Bruce Orr, as she worked on the anti-Trump operation conducted by Fusion GPS and funded by the Democrats.
00:37:02.000And of course, Democrats on this very committee negotiated with people who they thought were Ukrainians in order to obtain nude pictures of Trump.
00:37:11.000Okay, I believe that that is a reference to a prank phone call that Adam Schiff was engaged in.
00:37:16.000So, Nunes is basically saying, listen, you guys have been going after Trump since the beginning, and you got nothing, and you still got nothing.
00:37:23.000So those are the two competing strains over all of this.
00:37:29.000Now, the Democrats do have a bit of a pickle on their hands, and that is that a majority of the House does now support the impeachment inquiry.
00:37:35.000That was going to be obvious as soon as Nancy Pelosi endorsed this thing.
00:37:38.000As soon as Nancy Pelosi endorsed this thing, it was pretty obvious that impeachment was going to happen.
00:37:42.000If you had to put your money down, you say that impeachment happens in the House and nothing happens in the Senate.
00:37:46.000Well, Nancy Pelosi cannot afford to announce an impeachment inquiry and then say, oh, by the way, we're not impeaching him.
00:38:11.000The question is whether that is justified and whether Republicans in the Senate will join or whether anything in the House will join except for Justin Amash, who now considers himself an independent.
00:38:21.000The problem is that there's not a lot of suggestion that in the polling data that Americans actually want impeachment.
00:38:30.000There's an article from the New York Times saying for many Democratic voters around the country, the prospect of an explosive impeachment battle in Washington left them nervous.
00:38:41.000So there's not a lot of public approval for impeachment at this point.
00:38:46.000There's not a lot of poll data on impeachment, but there's a story yesterday, it was a new poll, it said the majority of Americans were against the impeachment and removal of President Trump.
00:39:14.000Now of course Democrats want Trump impeached because they're Democrats.
00:39:17.000But overall, this is not a winning issue for Democrats, especially if they don't have a smoking gun.
00:39:24.000So, Democrats are really running a bit of a risky game here.
00:39:29.000Now, what they feel is like, okay, fine, so people don't support impeachment, so we impeach, what's the big deal?
00:39:33.000He doesn't get removed from office, and then Elizabeth Warren runs on the basis of him being corrupt and wins.
00:39:37.000So they're banking on Trump having an underlying popularity problem in a way that Bill Clinton did not.
00:39:42.000Bill Clinton was a pretty popular president until the impeachment hearings began.
00:39:46.000He was less popular afterward, but still pretty popular, and his popularity actually increased as the impeachment hearings went on, and as Democrats successfully, if falsely, argued that the whole thing was about sex.
00:40:40.000Probably not, because maybe Obama wanted flexibility for the Russians from a sort of defensive standpoint, because he thought it'd be good for the country.
00:40:50.000Personal political benefit and the country's interests are not necessarily completely, completely separate is the problem.
00:40:57.000The statement continued, let us be clear, no quid pro quo is required to betray our country.
00:41:02.000Trump asked a foreign government to interfere in our elections.
00:41:06.000Again, pretty solid info, according to John Solomon of The Hill, that the Obama administration was pressuring the Ukrainians to investigate Paul Manafort, who ended up being Trump's campaign manager.
00:41:14.000Plus, Hillary Clinton was working with the Ukrainians to gather dirt on Trump and Manafort.
00:41:19.000Nonetheless, you're seeing the Democrats shift their standard because they know that they now have to impeach, they've gone too far not to impeach, and they don't have the goods.
00:41:26.000So instead, they're shifting the standard.
00:41:28.000So you got Neal Katyal, the acting Solicitor General in the Obama administration, has a piece in the New York Times today called, Trump doesn't need to commit a crime to be kicked out of office.
00:41:38.000So this went from Trump definitely committed a crime, to what he did is bad but not criminal, to It doesn't have to be criminal at all.
00:41:46.000We can impeach him for any reason whatsoever.
00:41:48.000Katyal says, the potential criminality of the president's conduct is not the full picture.
00:41:52.000Our founders deliberately drafted the Constitution's impeachment clause to ensure the potential grounds for impeachment would cover more than criminal activity.
00:42:02.000It took place the day after Robert Mueller testified in Congress, perhaps when Trump felt liberated from the shadow of the Russia investigation.
00:42:10.000He says to make matters worse, before the call record of that conversation was released on Wednesday, Trump pointed to it as exculpatory evidence, which makes you wonder what will be revealed about other calls or contacts, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
00:42:20.000But the bottom line is this, Democrats are now shifting the goalposts.
00:42:26.000is making accusations that she can't back up, right?
00:42:28.000AOC was on Chris Cuomo's show, not Fredo's show on CNN, and she says, without evidence, that Trump was actively withholding aid in order to achieve personal political benefit.
00:42:39.000That is the dot that has not yet been connected.
00:42:42.000What we are talking about here is the president essentially participating in what looks like a series of events that looks like extortion, withholding aid to an ally, and then quote-unquote asking for a favor to essentially benefit yourself politically, not in the interest of the United States of America, but in the interest of your own re-election.
00:43:08.000Okay, so the Democrats are shifting the standard.
00:43:11.000Now, President Trump is responding in a couple of ways.
00:43:14.000First of all, he did a press conference with the Ukrainian President Zelensky.
00:43:17.000Zelensky came out and said there was no pressure.
00:43:19.000That's a pretty strong talking point for Trump, because if Zelensky says there was pressure, then Trump, at the very least, has a problem.
00:44:07.000Okay, and there's Trump filling in the gap.
00:44:09.000You can see Trump is super irritated by all of this, obviously.
00:44:12.000He doesn't think that he pressured the Ukrainians for this stuff, at the very least.
00:44:15.000When Trump then came out yesterday, he said, I fully support transparency.
00:44:19.000Which, by the way, again, he has now revealed two documents he did not have to reveal.
00:44:23.000The whistleblower memo and the full transcript of the call.
00:44:27.000We were going to do this anyway, but I've informed them, all of the House members, that I fully support transparency on the so-called Whistleblower information, even though it was supposedly secondhand information, which is sort of interesting.
00:44:47.000And other things have come out about the whistleblower that are also maybe even more interesting.
00:44:53.000But also insist on transparency from Joe Biden and his son, Hunter, on the millions of dollars that have been quickly and easily taken out of Ukraine and China.
00:45:03.000By the way, Joe Biden is hardest hit in all of this.
00:45:05.000Trump will likely survive this entire attempt.
00:45:10.000He was asked yesterday while leaving a car about Hunter Biden.
00:45:13.000There are new allegations, by the way, that other members of Biden's family routinely try to take advantage.
00:45:17.000of the fact that they are related to Biden to get special benefits.
00:45:20.000There's a I think it's his brother who was trying to join a company having to with cancer research, who was promising members of the company that Biden's cancer moonshot would go to fund that research.
00:45:29.000Anyway, here's Biden walking away from a car while not answering any questions about the Hunter Biden stuff.
00:45:34.000Mr. Biden, Mr. Biden, can you can you respond to criticism that you and your son should not been working in Ukraine at the same time?
00:46:10.000Okay, now what he's saying there is actually true.
00:46:12.000So it is true that back in May, there were several Democratic senators, including Bob Menendez of New Jersey, and I believe Dick Durbin, who wrote a letter openly saying that if Ukraine didn't investigate the Manafort-Trump connection, and connections that Trump may have had with Ukraine and Russia, that if they didn't do that, that maybe they would withhold aid from Ukraine.
00:46:33.000So Mark Thiessen reported on this yesterday in the Washington Post.
00:46:37.000So what he's saying there is absolutely 100% true.
00:46:41.000Now, one of the problems here is that a lot of the things that President Trump talks about being worried about with regard to corruption are stories that have not really been substantiated.
00:46:52.000That is where Democrats are honing in on, right?
00:47:02.000But what Trump perceives as corruption stuff may, in fact, not really be corruption stuff.
00:47:06.000It may be stuff that Trump has sort of heard about in the ether, and now he's channeling it into the general box of corruption.
00:47:13.000So, for example, he mentions CrowdStrike in that call to Zelensky.
00:47:17.000That is a reference to a company called CrowdStrike, which is an intelligence data firm.
00:47:22.000And Hillary Clinton, the DNC, they turned over their servers to CrowdStrike as opposed to the FBI in the middle of an investigation so that those servers could be looked at and audited to see who exactly had been hacking into the servers.
00:47:38.000And CrowdStrike came up with the idea that it was the Russians.
00:47:40.000And Trump has always been suspicious of that idea.
00:47:42.000So he mentions to the Ukrainians that maybe CrowdStrike is a Ukrainian-owned company, and that maybe the real DNC servers are still out there in Ukraine.
00:47:51.000And maybe it wasn't the Russians after all who hacked the whole thing.
00:47:53.000Now, Trump may see that as, why won't Ukraine investigate that?
00:47:58.000In reality, there's not a lot of support for it.
00:48:00.000This is why Trump yesterday makes the sort of bizarre statement that Hillary's deleted emails might still be in Ukraine.
00:48:05.000I don't know where he's getting this from or why people think that information is particularly credible, but that doesn't go to Trump's personal political benefit alone.
00:48:13.000If he actually believes that there was a Ukrainian proxy company that was actually hacking the DNC's emails, as opposed to the Russians, that does have some pretty significant national security ramifications for the United States, not just personal ramifications for Trump.
00:48:29.000Do you believe that the emails from Hillary Clinton, do you believe that they are in Ukraine?
00:48:41.000Because frankly, I think that one of the great crimes committed is Hillary Clinton deleting 33,000 emails after Congress sends her a subpoena.
00:48:53.000Okay, so again, I don't know what he's referring to here, but that in and of itself, the fact that President Trump believes a lot of things that he reads on InfoWars, that does not necessarily mean that he is acting out of concert with the interests of the United States.
00:49:05.000It means that he perceives the interests of the United States differently, maybe based on factual incorrectness, but not necessarily for his political benefit.
00:49:23.000I mean, the Trump administration support for Ukraine has been significantly stronger than the Obama administration support was.
00:49:29.000That still doesn't answer the two outstanding questions I have from yesterday.
00:49:33.000And by the way, if Trump doesn't answer those questions, That doesn't mean he's impeachable, because the burden of proof is on the prosecution.
00:49:39.000But, it would be good to have answers to why did Trump cut off the aid, and also, why was the State Department sending Rudy Giuliani to Ukraine?
00:49:55.000The United States of America has stood strong with Ukraine ever since the Russian military overran Crimea and has been underwriting a savage war in the Donbas province of Ukraine.
00:50:09.000Different from the last administration, we've actually been providing defensive weapons.
00:50:13.000The Obama administration was sending them blankets and pillows.
00:50:16.000But this president said, nope, we're going to stand for the territorial integrity and the sovereignty of Ukraine.
00:50:21.000We've provided them with weapons, the ability to defend themselves.
00:50:58.000Trump will likely be impeached by the House, but if all they've got is what they've got right now, there will be no removal by the Senate or even a competitive attempt to remove Trump via the Senate.
00:51:08.000Okay, time for a thing I like and then a thing that I hate.
00:51:12.000Sometimes cute things happen on TV, and Ellen's show featured this child drummer, really, really cute kid, whose hero is Lenny Kravitz, and it led to this extremely adorable moment where this little talented kid is playing the drums, and suddenly his hero walks out on stage, which is a cool thing.
00:52:09.000Okay, time for a quick thing that I hate.
00:52:14.000So it is now incumbent, apparently, on every corporation to virtue signal its way through the world, so Mattel has decided that they are now going to launch gender-inclusive Barbies.
00:52:24.000Because that's what the kids are demanding, of course.
00:52:30.000Where's the vast outcry and desire for gender-neutral toys?
00:52:37.000In primates, in primates, female primates, like monkeys, female monkeys will play with dolls and male monkeys will turn them into weapons.
00:52:45.000There are differences between male and female and this idiotic post-feminist attempt, it actually undercuts feminism, the post-feminist attempt to suggest that gender is completely malleable or that gender neutrality is a thing.
00:53:00.000Or that gendered attributes are completely disconnected from biology is completely insane.
00:53:08.000They're a company, they can do what they want.
00:53:09.000Do I think these things are gonna sell off the shelves?
00:53:12.000I think there are gonna be some woke parents who feel like better people for doing this sort of stuff, but it's actually been a problem.
00:53:16.000They did it in Norway, and these sorts of toys aren't selling off the shelves, and by the way, aren't impacting the gender gap, which remains very wide in the Nordic countries, specifically because when it turns out that women live not in poverty, Then many of them will opt for careers that they would rather do as opposed to careers that pay better.
00:53:33.000I mean, really, there's a bigger gender gap in places like there are more... I think the statistic is that there's a bigger gender gap in Norway than there is in Albania.
00:53:42.000And that's because when you live in a country with poverty, women have to get the best job they can that pays the most.
00:53:47.000When you live in a country that does not have poverty, then women get to pick and choose whatever kind of jobs they want that actually in some weird ways leads to a significant gender gap.
00:53:58.000Look, Mattel can do what it wants to do.
00:54:01.000But, is this really about selling dolls or is this really about just free earned media from a media that is pushing the absolute lie that gender is completely disconnected from sex and that little girls everywhere are desperate to play with dolls that they can't tell if they're boys or girls?
00:54:15.000Come on, this is just absolute silly towns.
00:54:18.000Apparently, Mattel put out a statement.
00:54:22.000They said, we see this line as an opportunity for us to open up a dialogue around what dolls are for and who dolls are for.
00:54:28.000We kind of know they're mostly for girls.
00:54:31.000I mean, I hate to break that to you statistically, dolls are mostly for girls.
00:55:07.000If you really want to go for it, Mattel?
00:55:08.000If you really want to pretend that boys and girls want to play with the same dolls and that girls are desperate for gender inclusivity, you should, as a way of fighting back against gender stereotypes, get rid of female dolls entirely.
00:55:20.000They should all be gender- I mean, they don't have genitals.
00:55:22.000They should all be Okay, we'll be back here later today with two additional hours of content.
00:55:27.000I'm sure there will be updates, so stick around for that.