The Ben Shapiro Show - May 02, 2019


Wrecking Barr | Ep. 772


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 7 minutes

Words per Minute

207.35905

Word Count

13,976

Sentence Count

970

Misogynist Sentences

30

Hate Speech Sentences

13


Summary

Democrats attack AG Bill Barr, Ilhan Omar blames Venezuela's crisis on America, and I have thoughts on Avengers Endgame. Plus, why the Justice Department won't turn over Robert Mueller's full report to Congress, and why it's not a stonewalling tactic at all. Ben Shapiro is on The Ben Shapiro Show, wherever you get your shows, and wherever you listen to it, you ll get the latest episode of the Ben Shapiro Report. Subscribe to The Ben and Mark Show on Apple Podcasts and leave us a rating and review! Thanks to our sponsor, LegacyBox, for making digital copies of all of our favorite movies and TV shows. If you haven't already, you can get 40% off your first order with discount code: BONUS40 at checkout, and you can save 40% with code BenShapiro at checkout! You can also get 20% off of your first purchase when you place an order with LegacyBox by clicking the coupon "LEGO" when you sign up for a discount code "Ben Shapiro" at checkout. . The show is now available in Kindle, iBook, Paperback, Hardcover, and Hardcover. The podcast is also available on Audible, and Audible. Kindle $9.99, and paperback $99, including Audible 49ers $99.99 & Audible Free. Hardcover 49ers 49ers, 49ers Free, $99 and 49ers & T-List 49ers.99.00, plus shipping + shipping & shipping. All other third-party shipping & freight will be available for Prime memberships starting at $99 a month. You'll get 10% off the first month, plus a limited edition copy of the book "Avengers: Endgame edition starting in January 2020. and shipping starts shipping starting in March 2020, shipping starts at $49, plus they'll get you an additional $99 + shipping starts starting in mid-May, shipping will be shipping free, plus an additional 3 months, plus free shipping starts, and shipping will get you a maximum of $99 or $99 shipping starts after that gets you get a limited offer, plus you can choose a maximum number of choices, and a discount of $49 or two months, and two months of shipping choices, plus she'll get an extra $49/month, and she'll receive an ad-only offer, and all other options, including shipping starts begining shipping starts start-up options, starting in July 2019.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Democrats attack Attorney General Bill Barr.
00:00:02.000 Ilhan Omar blames Venezuela's crisis on America.
00:00:05.000 And hey, I saw Avengers Endgame and I have thoughts.
00:00:07.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:08.000 This is the Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:10.000 Oh yeah, there are going to be spoilers.
00:00:16.000 So I'm just going to warn you, late in the show when we do Avengers Endgame, if you haven't seen the movie yet, I would recommend that you either fast forward or that you pause it.
00:00:24.000 We'll get to all of that in just a second.
00:00:26.000 First, let me tell you about Legacy Box.
00:00:28.000 So if you want to give the greatest gift that you can give, I really believe this to anybody, it's the gift of their memories, preserving those memories.
00:00:34.000 Because as we get older, we have those memories stacked up in our garage or they're backed up in our phone.
00:00:40.000 We have a bunch of crap that we haven't done anything with and it's moldering out there.
00:00:44.000 It's falling apart.
00:00:44.000 We've got all of our photos from our grandparents and from our parents.
00:00:47.000 What are you going to do with all that stuff?
00:00:48.000 Well, how about changing it from analog formats to digitizing it?
00:00:53.000 There are lots of reasons to want to do this.
00:00:55.000 You can save your family films, prevent photos from degrading or being lost forever.
00:00:59.000 You're unable to play your recordings because you don't have a VCR anymore?
00:01:02.000 Well, why don't you just translate that over to a digital format?
00:01:04.000 You can ensure your family history is preserved forever.
00:01:06.000 Send your Legacy Box filled with old home movies and pictures.
00:01:09.000 They will do the rest over at Legacy Box.
00:01:10.000 They'll professionally digitize your moments onto a thumb drive, digital download, or DVD.
00:01:15.000 I've used it for my family.
00:01:16.000 You should, too.
00:01:17.000 It's really fantastic.
00:01:18.000 They have easy-to-follow instructions, safety barcodes included for every item, receive all your original recorded moments back, along with perfectly preserved digital copies, get personalized updates at every step, and receive up to 12 personalized email updates along the way.
00:01:30.000 Legacy Box is the world's largest, most trusted digitizer of home movies and photos.
00:01:34.000 All the work is done by hand right here in the United States.
00:01:36.000 There's never been a better time to digitally preserve your memory, so go visit LegacyBox.com today to get started.
00:01:42.000 For a limited time, they're offering my listeners an exclusive discount.
00:01:44.000 Go to Legacybox.com slash Ben and get 40% off your first order.
00:01:48.000 That's Legacybox.com slash Ben.
00:01:50.000 Save 40% today.
00:01:51.000 Get started preserving your past.
00:01:53.000 Legacybox.com slash Ben.
00:01:55.000 Important gift, as well as just a really meaningful one.
00:01:57.000 Legacybox.com slash Ben.
00:01:59.000 You can save 40% today.
00:02:00.000 Okay, so we begin with the Democrats who are very, very angry at Attorney General William Barr.
00:02:05.000 Today, the big story is that William Barr has said that he would not testify before a House panel.
00:02:10.000 The Justice Department issued a double-barreled rebuff to Democrats on Wednesday, informing the House Judiciary Committee that Attorney General William Barr would not show up for his scheduled testimony before the panel, and that the Department would not comply with the subpoena for Special Counsel Robert Mueller's full report.
00:02:28.000 The administration has the nerve to dictate our procedures.
00:02:30.000 It's simply part of the administration's complete stonewalling of Congress, period.
00:02:34.000 Okay, so a couple of things.
00:02:36.000 It's not a complete stonewalling of Congress to turn over Mueller's entire report to Congress.
00:02:40.000 That is not a stonewalling of Congress.
00:02:42.000 And by the way, certain Congress people have seen the unredacted material.
00:02:46.000 So the notion that Congress has not seen the unredacted material, even that is not particularly true.
00:02:51.000 Also, It is not the job of the Justice Department to be the investigators on behalf of Congress.
00:02:56.000 There is a separation of powers in the Constitution.
00:02:59.000 A separation of powers, which means Congress has investigative power, and they can subpoena things, and the Justice Department, which works for the executive branch, is not mandated to turn over those things.
00:03:09.000 This is why the President can declare executive privilege.
00:03:12.000 It's why the Justice Department can point out that it does not have to, under regulations, turn over underlying materials and investigations.
00:03:18.000 Can you imagine if the power of Congress extended to the ability to go to the DOJ and then ask for all underlying confidential grand jury testimony?
00:03:29.000 I mean, if it extended to that, you know that Congress would immediately leak that stuff into the public sphere.
00:03:35.000 You know that Congress would immediately take that stuff and blow it up.
00:03:37.000 The reason that William Barr is not turning over the unredacted materials in the grand jury testimony is, number one, some of that stuff is classified, and number two, It is not the job of Congress to be able to grab grand jury testimony that is being attained and obtained by the Justice Department under threat of criminal prosecution.
00:03:57.000 That's not Congress's power.
00:03:58.000 Congress has its own investigative power.
00:03:59.000 They've got subpoena power.
00:04:01.000 They've got the ability to hold people in contempt.
00:04:03.000 But they do not have law enforcement power.
00:04:05.000 There is a difference between Congress and the law enforcement arm of the government, which is the executive branch.
00:04:11.000 I think Bill Barr is completely right to say I'm not turning over unverified grand jury gossip that was not included in the final Mueller report to you.
00:04:20.000 That is well within his purview.
00:04:22.000 The Thursday hearing, which was set to examine Barr's handling of the Mueller report, would have included an extra hour to allow committee lawyers to question the Attorney General.
00:04:30.000 The Justice Department had argued it would be inappropriate for staffers to question a cabinet member, and as a result, Barr backed out.
00:04:35.000 This, of course, is indeed the prerogative of the executive branch.
00:04:38.000 They don't have to agree to any of the conditions that Congress sets on them.
00:04:41.000 And then, if it ends up in court, it ends up in court.
00:04:43.000 If Congress chooses to hold somebody in contempt or impeach, they can hold somebody in contempt or impeach.
00:04:49.000 There is a solution to this.
00:04:50.000 If they want to impeach Barr, they can go for it.
00:04:51.000 And they are talking about impeaching Barr, but again, they're doing so not even on the basis that he is now being obstructive, they're doing so on the basis that he's been obstructive in the past.
00:05:00.000 Which is weird, because the conversation has gone something like this.
00:05:03.000 Democrats to Barr.
00:05:04.000 Why are you obstructing this investigation?
00:05:06.000 Where is the Mueller report?
00:05:07.000 Barr.
00:05:08.000 It's in front of you, on the table, printed out, and in public view for everyone to see.
00:05:12.000 Democrats.
00:05:13.000 Obstruction, though!
00:05:15.000 That's how this conversation has gone.
00:05:16.000 It's a cover-up!
00:05:17.000 This is this is wild stuff.
00:05:19.000 So Democrats, of course, are trying to play politics with a Mueller report that did not give them what they wanted, namely a clear cause of action for impeachment or or certainly a criminal prosecution of the president of the United States.
00:05:31.000 Jerry Nadler, who is deeply dishonest about all this stuff, the representative from New York, Who once used to believe that the executive branch didn't have the necessity to turn over these sorts of reports during the Clinton era.
00:05:43.000 He says, given his lack of candor in describing the work of the special counsel, our members were right to insist that staff counsel be permitted to question the attorney general.
00:05:51.000 I understand why he wants to avoid that kind of scrutiny, Nadler added.
00:05:53.000 He is terrified of having to face a skilled attorney.
00:05:55.000 Well, last I checked, these Congress people are supposed to be skilled attorneys.
00:05:59.000 I mean, I'm glad they're acknowledging that they're idiots now, but it is not.
00:06:03.000 It is not William Barr's decision to have to sit.
00:06:07.000 He doesn't have to sit in front of a bunch of lawyers who are unelected bureaucrats to grill him so they can catch him in some sort of perjury trap.
00:06:15.000 Justice Department spokeswoman Kerry Kupec countered that Nadler had established, quote, unprecedented and unnecessary conditions for the hearing, adding, quote, Congress and the executive branch are co-equal branches of government, each have a constitutional obligation to respect and accommodate one another's legitimate interests.
00:06:30.000 In a separate letter, Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd told Nadler that his subpoena for the full unredacted Mueller report, plus the underlying evidence and grand jury information, was not legitimate oversight.
00:06:40.000 The department has long resisted congressional attempts to rummage through its files, Boyd wrote.
00:06:45.000 He added that Nadler had issued the subpoena knowing the department could not lawfully provide the unredacted report, that the committee lacks any legislative purpose for seeking the complete investigative files, and that processing a request would impose a significant burden on the department.
00:06:57.000 Nadler says he'll hold Barr in contempt of Congress if the department doesn't turn over the unredacted Mueller report and all of the underlying evidence in the next day or two.
00:07:05.000 For notes on how effective it is to hold an attorney general in contempt, he should turn to his Republican colleagues who once held Eric Holder in contempt and then did nothing about it.
00:07:12.000 And Eric Holder is now sitting out there proclaiming from his perch on moral high how terrible William Barr is.
00:07:19.000 The chairman also said he could issue a subpoena to compel Barr's attendance at a future hearing.
00:07:24.000 The committee had teed up the clash earlier Wednesday after a tense party-line vote on establishing the ground rules.
00:07:29.000 Under the motion adopted by the Democrats on the committee, the attorneys for the Democratic and Republican sides of the panel would have had an hour equally divided to question Barr, who had threatened to back out of the hearing if that was the arrangement.
00:07:40.000 Democrats said that despite DOJ claims, there is ample precedent to use staff attorneys, Republicans have jumped to Barr's defense, asserting it would be disrespectful to have anyone but lawmakers question the Attorney General.
00:07:51.000 Now again, I don't see the purpose.
00:07:53.000 If I'm Barr, I don't do that.
00:07:55.000 Because then I'm basically testifying in the open without the help of my own legal counsel in danger of perjury from lawyers whose job it is to create what we call perjury traps.
00:08:06.000 Now, there are people out there who say, there's no such thing as a perjury trap, just tell the truth.
00:08:09.000 Well, sometimes you can tell a version of the truth and people will not believe you and they will still prosecute you for perjury.
00:08:18.000 This is, for example, when Bill Clinton said he didn't know what the meaning of is is.
00:08:22.000 That is a very lawyerly answer, for example.
00:08:24.000 Well, Barr could give a lawyerly answer and still be accused of lying.
00:08:27.000 In fact, there are members of Democratic Congress who have suggested that he's lying right now, and he has not yet lied.
00:08:32.000 It's pretty amazing.
00:08:33.000 Well, the Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee are very upset about this.
00:08:36.000 So upset that they brought a bucket of fried chicken to the House Judiciary Committee.
00:08:41.000 It's pretty incredible.
00:08:43.000 So, Steve Cohen, who's another one of the geniuses in the Democratic House, he showed up to the hearing with a ceramic chicken and a bucket of fried chicken, which he proceeded to chomp, and then talk about how Barr was a chicken.
00:08:57.000 You guys get the- you get it?
00:08:58.000 Like he's a chicken?
00:08:58.000 Like he's scared?
00:08:59.000 Basically, Steve Cohen is needles from Back to the Future 2.
00:09:04.000 Pretty- What are you, Chicken McFly?
00:09:08.000 Here's Steve Cohen being a full-fledged silly person.
00:09:15.000 A chicken bar should have shown up today and answered questions.
00:09:19.000 He was afraid of Barry Burke.
00:09:21.000 He was afraid of Norm Eisen.
00:09:23.000 An attorney general who was picked for his legal acumen and his abilities would not be fearful of any other attorneys questioning him for 30 minutes.
00:09:31.000 This man was picked to be Roy Cohn and to be Donald Trump's fixer.
00:09:36.000 The Black Sox look clean compared to this team.
00:09:39.000 It's a sad day in America.
00:09:40.000 A sad day in America.
00:09:41.000 Here's my ceramic chicken, guys.
00:09:43.000 Take me seriously.
00:09:45.000 Chicken Bar.
00:09:46.000 By the way, I'm really considering opening now, in discussion with my producers, opening a restaurant called Chicken Bar.
00:09:52.000 It sounds delicious.
00:09:52.000 There'd be many types of chicken.
00:09:53.000 There'd be teriyaki chicken, there'd be fried chicken, there'd be chicken a la king.
00:09:57.000 Like, all sorts of chicken.
00:09:59.000 It sounds great.
00:10:00.000 And William Barr's picture would grace the entrance.
00:10:02.000 Because Chicken Bar.
00:10:04.000 Yeah, I'm taking you super seriously when you say it's a sad day in America as you wield a ceramic chicken at me.
00:10:11.000 Steve Cohen.
00:10:12.000 Don't worry guys, this is super serious stuff.
00:10:14.000 Democrats are taking this really seriously.
00:10:16.000 They've uncovered wrongdoing, so much wrongdoing, that the entire report is sitting on a desk in front of them.
00:10:20.000 Like right there.
00:10:21.000 Then James Comey sounds off, so that's always exciting.
00:10:23.000 James Comey, who has spent the last year and a half, couple of years, wandering the woods, staring at the sights of nature.
00:10:30.000 Sort of like Thanos after the snap fingers.
00:10:33.000 He's just become a farmer.
00:10:35.000 He's just out there staring at the trees and being all weird.
00:10:38.000 Well, now James Comey is back to write an op-ed for the New York Times in which he attacks all of his former colleagues as deeply corrupt.
00:10:45.000 He says, people have been asking me hard questions.
00:10:48.000 People are not you, dude.
00:10:49.000 Like, you standing in the mirror asking yourself hard questions, James Comey, those aren't people.
00:10:52.000 That's just you.
00:10:53.000 It's okay.
00:10:53.000 This is what happened to the leaders in the Trump administration, especially the Attorney General, Bill Barr, who I have said was due the benefit of the doubt.
00:11:01.000 How could Mr. Barr, a bright and accomplished lawyer, start channeling the president and using words like no collusion and FBI spying?
00:11:08.000 Well, first of all, he used the words no collusion because the report found no collusion and FBI spying because spying means surveillance and surveillance was taking place.
00:11:15.000 So there's that.
00:11:16.000 How could he downplay acts of obstruction of justice as products of the president's being frustrated and angry?
00:11:21.000 Something he would never say to justify the thousands of crimes prosecuted every day that are the product of frustration and anger.
00:11:28.000 Well, actually, James Comey, since you were incompetent at your job, you tried to rewrite the classification statutes to include intent as an element of the crime.
00:11:37.000 You said Hillary Clinton didn't intend to expose classified material to public scrutiny, and therefore she was not guilty of the crime.
00:11:43.000 Intent was not an element of the crime, you just rewrote the law to include it.
00:11:47.000 You know where intent is an element of the crime?
00:11:49.000 Obstruction of justice.
00:11:50.000 So when William Barr goes to the president's state of mind, that's because intent is an element of the crime.
00:11:54.000 If James Comey had two brain cells to rub together, it would help.
00:11:57.000 We'll get to more of James Comey on this in just a second, but first, admit it, you think cybercrime is something that happens to other people.
00:12:04.000 You might think that no one wants your data, or that hackers can't grab your passwords or credit card details.
00:12:08.000 You would be wrong.
00:12:09.000 Stealing data from unsuspecting people on public Wi-Fi, it's one of the simplest and cheapest ways for hackers to make money.
00:12:14.000 When you leave your internet connection unencrypted, you may as well be writing your passwords and credit card numbers on a giant billboard for the rest of the world to see, which is why I decided to take action.
00:12:23.000 To protect myself from cybercriminals, I use ExpressVPN.
00:12:26.000 ExpressVPN secures and anonymizes your internet browsing by encrypting your data and hiding your public IP address.
00:12:32.000 ExpressVPN has easy-to-use apps that run seamlessly in the background of your computer, phone, and tablet.
00:12:37.000 Turning on ExpressVPN protection, that only takes one click.
00:12:40.000 Using ExpressVPN, I can safely surf on public Wi-Fi without being snooped on or having my personal data stolen.
00:12:45.000 For less than $7 a month, you can get the same ExpressVPN protection that I have.
00:12:49.000 ExpressVPN is rated the number one VPN service by TechRadar.
00:12:52.000 It comes with a 30-day money-back guarantee.
00:12:54.000 Protect your online activity today.
00:12:55.000 Find out how you can get three months for free at expressvpn.com slash ben.
00:12:59.000 That's e-x-p-r-e-s-s-vpn.com slash ben for three months free with a one-year package.
00:13:04.000 Visit expressvpn.com slash ben to learn more.
00:13:07.000 Go check them out right now.
00:13:08.000 Okay, so James Comey writing in the pages of the prestigious New York Times.
00:13:13.000 He says, How could William Barr write and say things about the report by Robert Mueller, the special counsel, that were apparently so misleading they prompted written protest from the special counsel himself?
00:13:23.000 Note, as we mentioned yesterday on the show, the letter did not actually accuse William Barr of misstating the conclusions of the Mueller report.
00:13:31.000 Basically, what Mueller wanted is for Barr to include all of the color commentary provided by Tom Musburger or whatever.
00:13:38.000 You want all the color commentary.
00:13:40.000 That was going to show how mean and cruel and nasty Trump was without being criminal.
00:13:45.000 And Barr kept saying, um, guys, that's not my job.
00:13:48.000 I'm not the nasty, mean, cruel police.
00:13:50.000 I'm the police police.
00:13:51.000 It's my job to prosecute crimes.
00:13:52.000 And if no crime takes place, not my job to talk about my feelings about all of that.
00:13:57.000 Nonetheless, James Comey, I mean, a guy who actually did go out and talk about all of the bad things Hillary Clinton had done and then exonerate her, now he's ripping on Barr.
00:14:05.000 He says, how could Barr go before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday and downplay President Trump's attempts to fire Mr. Mueller before he completed his work?
00:14:12.000 Well, he didn't downplay that.
00:14:14.000 He didn't downplay that.
00:14:15.000 The one thing that he certainly did do was mention that this was not a crime, which is his job.
00:14:20.000 He says, what happened to these people?
00:14:22.000 I don't know for sure, said James Comey.
00:14:24.000 People are complicated.
00:14:25.000 So the answer is most likely complicated.
00:14:27.000 OK, thanks.
00:14:28.000 Thanks, psychologist.
00:14:29.000 Dr. Comey, we really appreciate your take on people are complicated.
00:14:32.000 How could people be like this?
00:14:33.000 I don't know.
00:14:34.000 People are complicated.
00:14:36.000 But I have some idea.
00:14:37.000 From four months of working close to Mr. Trump and many more months of watching him shape others, amoral leaders have a way of revealing the character of those around them.
00:14:44.000 Sometimes what they reveal is inspiring.
00:14:46.000 For example, James Mattis resigned over a principal.
00:14:48.000 A concept so alien to Mr. Trump, it took days for the president to realize what had happened.
00:14:53.000 You know who didn't resign over principal, as I recall?
00:14:55.000 A tall gentleman.
00:14:56.000 Six foot nine.
00:14:58.000 Kind of weird.
00:14:58.000 Gawky, gangly.
00:14:59.000 Tried to hide in the curtains one time when Trump was talking to him.
00:15:02.000 Yet didn't quit.
00:15:03.000 Was fired?
00:15:04.000 I see.
00:15:05.000 His name rhymes with shmames momy.
00:15:08.000 I remember.
00:15:08.000 I remember that guy.
00:15:09.000 You remember that guy?
00:15:09.000 I remember that guy.
00:15:11.000 He says that William Barr and Rod Rosenstein, they've gone along with President Trump because he, because President Trump just pressures people and they fall prey to the pressure.
00:15:20.000 He tried it with me.
00:15:21.000 I didn't go along with it, but these people will.
00:15:23.000 These people will.
00:15:25.000 You can't say this out loud, but in a time of emergency with the nation led by a deeply unethical person, this will be your contribution, your personal sacrifice for America.
00:15:32.000 You're smarter than Donald Trump.
00:15:33.000 You're playing a long game for your country.
00:15:35.000 You can pull it off where lesser leaders have failed and gotten fired by tweet.
00:15:38.000 Of course, to stay, you must be seen as on his team, so you promise further compromises.
00:15:42.000 Compromise, compromise.
00:15:43.000 Remember, James Comey did not quit.
00:15:45.000 He was fired.
00:15:46.000 So, now we get to what the Democrats have actually been accusing Barr of.
00:15:50.000 And this is bewildering, because what exactly are they accusing Barr of doing?
00:15:54.000 They're mad at him that he won't talk with the lawyers.
00:15:56.000 You know, maybe Barr should show up and talk with the lawyers just to show them that he can run circles around them, but there's no necessity for him to put his life in danger, the possibility of being imprisoned for a perjury trap set by Democrats, for example, or an attempt to subpoena him in violation of, for example, executive privilege.
00:16:15.000 There are a lot of legal issues that arise whenever the Attorney General testifies before Congress, which is why they do have a negotiation about setting the ground rules in the first place.
00:16:23.000 But what exactly is Barr accused of doing?
00:16:26.000 No one knows.
00:16:26.000 He issued a four-page letter.
00:16:28.000 It accurately summarized the findings of the Mueller report.
00:16:31.000 Even Mueller acknowledged that it accurately summarized the findings of the Mueller report.
00:16:34.000 So here was William Barr testifying yesterday and from the Senate Judiciary Committee.
00:16:38.000 Suggesting, correctly, that focusing on his four-page synopsis when the entire report is available is really, really weird.
00:16:45.000 I understood you to say, and these are my words, not yours, the first concern that Mr. Mueller had, he felt like your letter wasn't nuanced enough.
00:16:54.000 Correct.
00:16:55.000 Okay.
00:16:55.000 That problem's been solved, has it not?
00:16:57.000 Well, it was sort of solved by putting out the whole report.
00:16:59.000 Exactly.
00:17:00.000 Which was the, that's why I think this whole thing is sort of mind-bendingly bizarre, because I made clear from the beginning that I was putting out the report, as much of the report as I could, OK, so this, of course, is true.
00:17:14.000 He put out as much of the report as he could.
00:17:16.000 So what exactly?
00:17:17.000 Why are they focusing on a synopsis that is obviated by the actual report?
00:17:20.000 This is like William Barr writes a summary of a book.
00:17:24.000 The book is publicly available and you're mad at his summary, even though you could just buy the book.
00:17:29.000 Barr also mentioned, hey guys, like the Mueller team didn't recommend charges.
00:17:34.000 I hate to break it to you, but the Mueller team had the ability to recommend charges to me and they did not do so.
00:17:39.000 They declined to do so.
00:17:40.000 Here's Barr reminding Democrats of this fact.
00:17:43.000 Has the Mueller team changed its mind on its conclusions?
00:17:47.000 Its conclusions as to what?
00:17:49.000 As to collusion, conspiracy, and conspiracy.
00:17:52.000 Not that I'm aware of.
00:17:54.000 So, the decision not to bring an indictment against the president No, it hasn't.
00:18:00.000 conclusion conspiracy with Russia has not changed.
00:18:05.000 - No, it hasn't. - And the conclusion not to bring an indictment against the president for obstruction of justice has not changed.
00:18:12.000 - No. - Okay.
00:18:14.000 None of that has changed.
00:18:16.000 And then people on the left were saying, well, maybe the reason that Mueller didn't prosecute is because of the Office of Legal Counsel opinion that suggested that the president could not be prosecuted for obstruction of justice.
00:18:25.000 And Barr said, nope.
00:18:25.000 I talked to Mueller.
00:18:26.000 Remember, Barr's under oath here.
00:18:27.000 He said, I talked to Mueller three separate times.
00:18:30.000 And Mueller said he didn't decline to prosecute because of the LLC opinion.
00:18:33.000 He declined to prosecute because the evidence was not clear one way or the other.
00:18:37.000 Special counsel Mueller stated three times to us in that meeting In response to our questioning, that he emphatically was not saying that, but for the OLC opinion, he would have found obstruction.
00:18:51.000 He said that in the future, the facts of a case against the president might be such that a special counsel would recommend abandoning the OLC opinion, but this is not such a case.
00:19:03.000 We did not understand exactly why the special counsel was not reaching a decision.
00:19:10.000 And when we pressed him on it, he said that his team was still formulating the explanation.
00:19:16.000 Okay, so in other words, Mueller explicitly said to Barr, there's an OLC opinion.
00:19:21.000 If we thought the fact pattern overcame the OLC opinion, we would just recommend the overthrowing of the OLC opinion.
00:19:26.000 We don't think that happened here.
00:19:27.000 So Barr asked Mueller, so why don't you just recommend a charge or not recommend a charge?
00:19:31.000 And Mueller demurred.
00:19:32.000 He said, oh, we're coming up with an explanation.
00:19:34.000 The real explanation is that Mueller knew he didn't have enough to charge here.
00:19:37.000 He didn't want to exonerate President Trump.
00:19:39.000 So instead, he wanted to dump out into public life all of the bad stuff about Trump.
00:19:44.000 Well, sort of washing his hands of the whole thing.
00:19:47.000 As I said yesterday, Mueller did not have the intestinal fortitude to simply pull the trigger on an obstruction of justice charge, nor did he have the legal backing.
00:19:54.000 So instead, he took what I think is a pretty cheap way out by dumping all of the material in public and then suggesting, well, not up to me, up to William Barr.
00:20:04.000 Kick it over there.
00:20:04.000 Even though it is his, really, responsibility to give a determination as to whether he thinks this thing is prosecutable or not.
00:20:12.000 And then Bart points out, by the way, I didn't even exonerate Trump.
00:20:15.000 I just said we didn't have enough material to prosecute, but I'm not exonerating the guy on all of the stuff that he did with regard to pressuring his underlings on the Mueller report.
00:20:23.000 You, in effect, exonerated or cleared the president.
00:20:27.000 No, I didn't exonerate.
00:20:29.000 I said that we did not believe that there was sufficient evidence to establish an obstruction offense, which is the job of the Justice Department.
00:20:38.000 And the job of the Justice Department is now over.
00:20:41.000 That determines whether or not there's a crime.
00:20:44.000 The report is now in the hands of the American people.
00:20:47.000 Everyone can decide for themselves.
00:20:48.000 There's an election in 18 months.
00:20:50.000 That's a very democratic process.
00:20:53.000 But we're out of it.
00:20:54.000 We have to stop using the criminal justice process as a political weapon.
00:20:58.000 I love William Barr having to educate sitting senators in how law works.
00:21:03.000 It is not my job to come up with stuff that's mean or bad.
00:21:05.000 It's my job to determine whether the law has been broken.
00:21:07.000 All the bad stuff is out there.
00:21:08.000 You want to vote against him, vote against him.
00:21:09.000 This is correct.
00:21:10.000 William Barr is getting a lot of flack for suggesting that Mueller's letter to him was snitty.
00:21:14.000 It is, in fact, a snitty letter, as I mentioned yesterday.
00:21:17.000 It was Mueller not protesting that Barr had been dishonest in his letter, but protesting that Barr hadn't sufficiently captured his mood when he wrote the Mueller report.
00:21:25.000 So Barr is correct in this characterization.
00:21:27.000 This letter was an extraordinary act.
00:21:29.000 A career prosecutor rebuking the Attorney General of the United States Memorializing in writing.
00:21:38.000 I don't consider Bob, at this stage, a career prosecutor.
00:21:41.000 He's had a career as a prosecutor.
00:21:42.000 Well, he was a very eminent... He was the head of the FBI for 12 years.
00:21:47.000 I know of no other instance of... But he was also a political appointee, and he was a political appointee with me at the Department of Justice.
00:21:53.000 I don't... You know, the letter's a bit snitty, and I think it was probably written by one of his staff people.
00:22:00.000 OK, pretty hilarious.
00:22:01.000 So, you know, Barr is correct about all of this.
00:22:04.000 Obviously, you know, he knows Mueller.
00:22:06.000 He had conversations with Mueller.
00:22:07.000 And so he feels like Mueller's people were probably ticked at Mueller that Barr's letter came out.
00:22:11.000 And that's probably why this whole thing happened.
00:22:12.000 Now, in a second, we're going to get to the Democrat attempts to take down Barr directly.
00:22:18.000 Suffice it to say, they fail because they don't understand basic law and because this whole thing is a railroading of the highest order.
00:22:24.000 We'll also get to the situation over in Venezuela where Ilhan Omar has some words.
00:22:29.000 We'll get to all that in just one second.
00:22:30.000 First, Mother's Day is coming up.
00:22:32.000 There's absolutely nothing most of us wouldn't do to make sure the special moms in our life are happy.
00:22:36.000 This is where Sherry's Berries comes in.
00:22:38.000 Sherry's Berries has special Mother's Day berries designed just for mom.
00:22:41.000 They are topped with chocolate chips, pink shimmer sugar, swizzles.
00:22:44.000 You choose your delivery date to ensure mom gets your gift of Sherry's Berries exactly when you want her to, and your satisfaction is always guaranteed.
00:22:50.000 Let me explain something.
00:22:51.000 Sherry's Berries, their chocolates, their chocolate tasting substances, they're just spectacular.
00:22:57.000 Okay, so they have a bunch of kosher products.
00:22:59.000 I have personally tasted Sherry's Berries.
00:23:00.000 They are so good that after I had some, I then proceeded to spend all of our money on Sherry's Berries.
00:23:05.000 I mean, like, boxes of Sherry's Berries products.
00:23:09.000 So good.
00:23:10.000 Like, the best sweets you will have ever had.
00:23:12.000 Incredible.
00:23:13.000 Incredible.
00:23:13.000 Worth the calories, worth the money, worth all of it.
00:23:16.000 Do not wait until the last minute on this one.
00:23:18.000 Visit berries.com today to order freshly dipped strawberries starting at $19.99 for the moms in your life.
00:23:23.000 To make mom really happy, you can double the berries for just $10 more.
00:23:26.000 Mother's Day is Sunday, May 12th, so visit berries.com.
00:23:29.000 That is B-E-R-R-I-E-S dot com.
00:23:32.000 Click on the microphone in the upper right corner.
00:23:34.000 Enter my code BENSHOW.
00:23:36.000 That's berries dot com.
00:23:37.000 Click the microphone.
00:23:38.000 Code BENSHOW.
00:23:39.000 Sherry's Berries.
00:23:40.000 I promise you, she won't be disappointed in you.
00:23:42.000 You may have disappointed her your entire life.
00:23:44.000 You may just be an irritable.
00:23:45.000 But I promise you, you want to make your mom happy?
00:23:46.000 There's only one way to do that properly.
00:23:48.000 That is berries dot com.
00:23:49.000 Go to Sherry's Berries and get yourself some Sherry's Berries for your mom.
00:23:52.000 She will appreciate it, and she'll probably think that you're a better child also.
00:23:55.000 Enter my code BENCHO at checkout when you click the microphone for that special deal.
00:23:59.000 Okay, so Democrats have decided that Barr is, nonetheless, despite the fact that Barr has not actually violated the law, that he is not obstructing anything, they have decided that he is obstructing something and that secretly, deep down in the cockles of his heart, Mueller was ready to prosecute Trump and Mueller just decided not to prosecute Trump because, Mueller was ready to prosecute Trump and Mueller just decided not to prosecute Trump because, what, William He said the magic words and then Mueller turned into a pumpkin?
00:24:23.000 Or what?
00:24:24.000 The funniest thing here was Democrats trying to push Barr to say that Donald Trump should be prosecuted for non-criminal behavior.
00:24:32.000 So the report, which I have read the entirety of, summarized twice on the show, the report does not include evidence of criminal conduct by the President of the United States, at least criminally prosecutable conduct by the President of the United States.
00:24:45.000 It includes a lot of bad behavior, a lot of immoral behavior.
00:24:47.000 A lot of behavior that is not appropriate for the president of the United States to engage in.
00:24:52.000 That is not criminal.
00:24:53.000 As William Barr, the attorney general whose job it is to prosecute criminal violations, told Dianne Feinstein, who certainly knows better, the senator from California.
00:25:02.000 You still have a situation where a president essentially tries to change the lawyer's account in order to prevent further criticism of himself.
00:25:16.000 Well, that's not a crime.
00:25:18.000 So you can, in this situation, instruct someone to lie?
00:25:24.000 No, it has to be, well, to be obstruction of justice, the lie has to be tied to impairing the evidence in a particular proceeding.
00:25:35.000 Okay, that is called the law.
00:25:37.000 His job is to enforce the law.
00:25:39.000 Dianne Feinstein's job is to yell at him for enforcing the law.
00:25:42.000 Kamala Harris tried the same tactic.
00:25:45.000 This was pretty amazing.
00:25:46.000 So Kamala Harris is now proclaiming that Robert Mueller did a bad job.
00:25:49.000 So we were told for years that Robert Mueller did a great job.
00:25:51.000 I mean, they were buying votive candles.
00:25:53.000 They had shirts with his face on it.
00:25:56.000 Chelsea Handler said she wanted to sleep with Robert Mueller.
00:25:58.000 Like, the left was, Robert Mueller was going to save them all.
00:26:00.000 And then Robert Mueller didn't save them.
00:26:01.000 He looked down at them and said, no.
00:26:04.000 And Senator Kamala Harris got very, very angry at this.
00:26:07.000 And so her suggestion is that Robert Mueller, in fact, did a very bad job and that William Barr, the Attorney General, should have gone around Mueller, looked at all the underlying evidence and then prosecuted, and then prosecuted President Trump based on evidence not synopsized, not summarized by Robert Mueller.
00:26:25.000 Kamala Harris was the Attorney General of California.
00:26:27.000 I promise you, if one of her lower level prosecutors came to her and say, you know, Attorney General, I've got this case.
00:26:35.000 I'm not going to tell you whether you should prosecute it or not.
00:26:38.000 Here's the evidence.
00:26:39.000 You think that Kamala Harris is going to read the synopsis and say, you know what, this doesn't look like it rises to the level of a crime for me?
00:26:44.000 Or is she going to go back through the hundreds of thousands of pages of grand jury testimony?
00:26:48.000 The 25 million dollars already spent on the investigation.
00:26:51.000 She's going to go around that and come to her own magical determination, ignoring Mueller.
00:26:55.000 So the Democrats kept saying that Barr is going to ignore Mueller.
00:26:58.000 Then Barr doesn't ignore Mueller and they're mad at him.
00:27:00.000 Here's Senator Kamala Harris being deeply disingenuous.
00:27:03.000 The special counsel's investigation produced a great deal of evidence.
00:27:07.000 I'm led to believe it included witnesses' notes and emails, witnesses' congressional testimony, witnesses' interviews, which were summarized in the FBI 302 forms.
00:27:16.000 Former FBI Director Comey's memos and the President's public statements.
00:27:21.000 In reaching your conclusion, did you personally review all of the underlying evidence?
00:27:29.000 No, we accepted the statements in the report as the factual record.
00:27:34.000 We did not go underneath it to see whether or not they were accurate.
00:27:38.000 We accepted it as accurate.
00:27:40.000 So, in other words, Kamala Harris is like, why did you trust Mueller?
00:27:42.000 So after years of, you must trust Mueller, now it's, why did you trust him?
00:27:46.000 What, you weren't going to look at it yourself?
00:27:48.000 Why not?
00:27:48.000 And I love Cory Booker in the background there, kind of smirking along.
00:27:52.000 Cory, let me just remind you, you're running for president against Kamala Harris and she's drinking your milkshake right now.
00:27:56.000 Here's Kamala Harris afterwards saying Barr should resign.
00:27:58.000 Based on what?
00:27:59.000 Based on nothing.
00:28:01.000 He made a decision and didn't review the evidence.
00:28:04.000 No prosecutor worth her salt.
00:28:08.000 Would make a decision about whether the President of the United States was involved in an obstruction of justice without reviewing the evidence.
00:28:17.000 This Attorney General lacks all credibility and has, I think, compromised the American public's ability to believe that he is a purveyor of justice.
00:28:27.000 Oh, is that what happened here?
00:28:28.000 I remember when Kamala Harris was fighting mad, fighting mad at Attorney General Loretta Lynch for not ignoring the recommendation of James Comey and looking at the underlying evidence to bring a prosecution against Hillary Clinton.
00:28:39.000 I remember when Kamala Harris and the Democrats were fighting mad.
00:28:42.000 Oh, wait, no, that never happened because it's too much bullcrap that she's spewing right there.
00:28:46.000 It's just nonsense.
00:28:47.000 OK, then you've got and then you've got Richard Blumenthal, the senator from Delaware, who lied for a very, very long time about his involvement in the Vietnam War, calling Barr a liar and saying the Barr should resign.
00:28:58.000 So he has got a lot of credibility to stand right here.
00:29:01.000 I think that Attorney General William Barr ought to recognize that he has an obligation to resign here.
00:29:08.000 I have called at the very least for him to recuse himself from those 12 to 14 ongoing investigations into the President of the United States in other jurisdictions.
00:29:18.000 He declined.
00:29:20.000 In fact, he ducked the question entirely as to whether He has had any conversations with the White House about them, said he couldn't recall a response that is very difficult to believe.
00:29:33.000 So I think he should resign.
00:29:34.000 Okay, so he should resign.
00:29:35.000 By the way, he's the senator from Connecticut, not Delaware.
00:29:37.000 And then Maisie Hirono, who's the worst of all.
00:29:40.000 So she says, you're a liar.
00:29:41.000 This is before she asked him a question, by the way.
00:29:43.000 She didn't ask him a question and then accuse him of lying to her.
00:29:46.000 She just said, you're a liar and a mean man and I hate you and I don't like your hair and you're ugly and you have bad glasses and you smell.
00:29:52.000 Senator Maisie Hirono from the great state of Hawaii.
00:29:55.000 Well done, Hawaii.
00:29:56.000 Now the American people know that you are no different from Rudy Giuliani or Kellyanne Conway or any of the other people who sacrificed their once Decent reputation for the grifter and liar who sits in the Oval Office.
00:30:09.000 You once turned down a job offer from Donald Trump to represent him as his private attorney.
00:30:15.000 At your confirmation hearing, you told Senator Feinstein that, quote, the job of Attorney General is not the same as representing, end quote, the President.
00:30:23.000 So you know the difference, but you've chosen to be the President's lawyer and side with him over the interests of the American people.
00:30:31.000 Okay, so well done, Mazie Hirono.
00:30:33.000 I mean, that's some hard-hitting questioning right there.
00:30:35.000 Ted Cruz, senator from Texas, was a guest on our program yesterday, sitting through all of this nonsense.
00:30:40.000 Senator Cruz has a rough job.
00:30:41.000 He actually has to sit in these committees while these Democrats say this stuff and then be polite to them.
00:30:44.000 That's a very difficult job, and the man does have a lot of forbearance.
00:30:48.000 But you would have to, to be the Zodiac Killer, obviously.
00:30:50.000 So Senator Ted Cruz, he just rips on the Democrats, and you can see William Barr trying not to laugh as Senator Cruz does so.
00:30:59.000 The principal attack that Democratic senators have marshaled upon you, it's an attack that I want people to understand just how revealing it is.
00:31:06.000 If this is their whole argument, they ain't got nothing.
00:31:10.000 So their entire argument is, General Barr, you suppressed the 19 pages that are entirely public, that we have, that we can read, that they know every word of it.
00:31:25.000 And their complaint is it was delayed a few weeks.
00:31:28.000 If that is their argument, I have to say that is an exceptionally weak argument.
00:31:38.000 Even Barr can't hold himself back at this point.
00:31:40.000 The best reaction in all of this, by the way, as always, belongs to Chris Matthews over at MSNBC.
00:31:45.000 Come in the morning, come in the show.
00:31:48.000 Maybe watch a little pornography last night.
00:31:50.000 I have a few metaphors for what happened to William Barr last night.
00:31:53.000 I was watching some... It was weird.
00:31:54.000 Pizza guy showed up.
00:31:55.000 Knocked the door.
00:31:57.000 Lady answered the door.
00:31:58.000 Said, I want a pizza.
00:31:59.000 He said, here's your pizza.
00:32:00.000 And then things get all weird.
00:32:02.000 Strange.
00:32:02.000 I watched that last night.
00:32:03.000 Made me think of the Mueller report.
00:32:04.000 Made me think of William Barr.
00:32:05.000 I don't know why.
00:32:06.000 Because that's just how things go in this crazy head of mine.
00:32:09.000 Go, Chris Matthews, go!
00:32:10.000 Once he's testified before Mr. Mueller's special counsel investigation, how can he now say, I won't make the same testimony in public claiming executive privilege?
00:32:20.000 I think it is sort of like virginity kind of thing.
00:32:23.000 Once you start talking about a matter in your jurisdiction, and then you say, oh, I'm not doing it anymore.
00:32:29.000 You can't do it once you've started.
00:32:30.000 I understand that's how executive privilege works.
00:32:32.000 Once you've given it up, you can't grab it back.
00:32:35.000 I'm not going to go with you on that metaphor, Chris.
00:32:39.000 I'm sorry about that metaphor I used before.
00:32:41.000 I've been admonished already about it, so I really should have used it.
00:32:44.000 It's not talking about virginity.
00:32:45.000 That's really awkward.
00:32:46.000 Kamala, this is the only time I've ever liked Kamala Harris.
00:32:50.000 Kamala Harris is trying not to burst out laughing at Chris Matthews.
00:32:53.000 William Barr is like, you know, he didn't assert executive privilege, and he wants to assert executive privilege.
00:32:57.000 Like a lady trying to hide her virginity.
00:32:59.000 I mean, what are they going to do?
00:33:00.000 Carry it out?
00:33:01.000 Carry it around the town?
00:33:02.000 Try to show everybody she's a virgin?
00:33:03.000 Like what?
00:33:04.000 What?
00:33:05.000 What?
00:33:05.000 Is it like biblical law?
00:33:06.000 Ah!
00:33:07.000 Kathleen didn't do that!
00:33:08.000 I don't know about Kathleen!
00:33:09.000 I don't know about me!
00:33:09.000 I don't know anything!
00:33:11.000 Just come over here?
00:33:12.000 Come out of the show?
00:33:12.000 Getting this chair swiveled around all weird like?
00:33:15.000 Chris Matthews, MSNBC report.
00:33:17.000 Michael Isikoff, what do you say?
00:33:19.000 Ah, I love our media.
00:33:21.000 They're just great at their jobs.
00:33:23.000 All right.
00:33:23.000 In a second, we're going to get to the latest developments from Venezuela.
00:33:26.000 Suffice it to say, things are not great.
00:33:27.000 But first, It can be a little frustrating, especially if you're in a hurry or running late, to find yourself at a railway crossing waiting for a train.
00:33:35.000 You're sitting there, and nothing's happening, and you're thinking, okay, I could probably make it around these little barriers here.
00:33:41.000 Well, if the signals are going and the train is not even there yet, you might feel a little tempted to try to gun it and get across the tracks.
00:33:47.000 Don't do this.
00:33:48.000 Ever.
00:33:48.000 This is a stupid, stupid idea.
00:33:51.000 Trains are often going a lot faster than you expect them to be going, and they cannot stop.
00:33:55.000 It's not like they can hit the brakes or blast the horn at you or something, and then stop the train.
00:33:59.000 That's not how it works.
00:34:00.000 Even if the engineer hits the brakes right away, it can take a train over a mile to stop.
00:34:04.000 By that time, what used to be your car is just a crushed hunk of metal, and what used to be you is a crushed hunk of human flesh.
00:34:11.000 It's good times.
00:34:12.000 The point is, you don't know how quickly the train is going to arrive, and the train can't stop even if it sees you, and sometimes you can't see the train properly, and it can't see you properly, and even if it can, it's gonna run you over.
00:34:22.000 The result?
00:34:23.000 Disaster.
00:34:23.000 So, if the signals are on, assume the train is on its way.
00:34:27.000 Please do not be a stupido, and you just need to remember, you should stop, because the train cannot.
00:34:32.000 Okay, so, in a second, we are going to get to the situation in Venezuela, and our moral light in the U.S.
00:34:39.000 Congress is speaking out about Venezuela.
00:34:41.000 We'll get to that in just a second.
00:34:42.000 First, you have to go over to dailywire.com.
00:34:43.000 For $9.99 a month, you can get a subscription to dailywire.com.
00:34:46.000 When you do, you get the rest of this show live.
00:34:49.000 You get the rest of Andrew Klavan's show live, you get the rest of Michael Moulse's show live, you get the rest of Matt Walsh's show live, you get two additional hours of me every single afternoon.
00:34:57.000 And we have great guests.
00:34:58.000 Like yesterday, we had an Arthur Brooks from the American Enterprise Institute and Senator Ted Cruz.
00:35:03.000 Also, the show is basically like an all-day show at this point, because I do this show in the morning, and then later I come back and do two more hours, so I am doing like 24-hour news coverage from this desk right here.
00:35:13.000 The least you could do is subscribe.
00:35:14.000 And become part of the club.
00:35:15.000 Also, when you get the annual subscription for $99 a year, you get this.
00:35:18.000 The leftist here is Hot or Cold Tumblr.
00:35:20.000 It is magnificent.
00:35:21.000 You will enjoy it.
00:35:22.000 You will live it.
00:35:23.000 You will love it.
00:35:24.000 So go get one of those and make your life better right now.
00:35:27.000 Also, make sure that you give us a follow at YouTube or iTunes and leave us a review.
00:35:30.000 We always appreciate it.
00:35:31.000 We are the largest, fastest-growing conservative podcast and radio show in the nation.
00:35:34.000 Meanwhile, here is the update from Venezuela.
00:35:43.000 So, the dictator of Venezuela, Nicolas Maduro, is still in power.
00:35:47.000 The protests continue apace in Venezuela.
00:35:51.000 Venezuela's Juan Guaido is remaining defiant after a failed attempt to oust Maduro.
00:35:56.000 Maduro has now appeared in public with soldiers.
00:35:59.000 These soldiers, some of them are Venezuelan soldiers and some of them apparently are from Cuba.
00:36:04.000 According to the BBC, in a show of defiance against his opponents, Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro appeared flanked by soldiers at an army base in Caracas on Thursday.
00:36:12.000 Maduro called on the armed forces to oppose any coup plotter.
00:36:15.000 As clashes between opposition supporters and pro-government forces continued, opposition leader Juan Guaido tried on Wednesday to spark a military defection and force Maduro from office.
00:36:23.000 Guaido has urged public employees to strike to undermine the government.
00:36:26.000 Maduro praised the army's loyalty on Thursday, since he's paying them off and they're running over civilians in trucks, calling on the military to unite in defense of the constitution, a constitution that he has overridden personally.
00:36:37.000 He says, no one dare touch our sacred ground or bring war to Venezuela.
00:36:41.000 What he's trying to do is draw the West into actual military conflict so that he can then claim imperialism is what is causing this, as opposed to an uprising by the Venezuelan people, who it turns out are not all that fond of eating dog.
00:36:52.000 In January, Guaido declared himself Venezuela's interim leader.
00:36:55.000 He has the support of more than 50 countries, including the United States, the UK, and most of Latin America.
00:37:01.000 The reason that people are unhappy with Maduro is because they were unhappy with Chavez, increasingly, because socialism is a giant fail.
00:37:09.000 Venezuela is one of the most oil-rich nations on earth.
00:37:12.000 The average Venezuelan adult has lost 24 pounds over the course of the Chavista regime.
00:37:17.000 On Wednesday, both pro- and anti-government supporters held demonstrations in Caracas that were initially peaceful.
00:37:22.000 There were reports of gunfire in the city.
00:37:24.000 A local NGO said that one 27-year-old had been shot dead during a rally in the opposition stronghold of Altamira.
00:37:30.000 At least 46 people were injured in clashes between opposition supporters and the security forces.
00:37:36.000 Guaido posted a video on Tuesday showing him with a number of men in military uniforms saying that he had the support of the military.
00:37:44.000 That obviously has not materialized as of yet, and thus we have what is effectively a stalemate.
00:37:50.000 According to the Washington Post, the United States was presented a plan by Guaido as to what exactly was going to happen here.
00:37:57.000 There was a strong suggestion that Nicolas Maduro might peacefully fly to Havana.
00:38:02.000 On Monday, the plan started to fall apart because Maduro had gotten wind of it, and Juan Guaido responded by rushing ahead with his plan anyway.
00:38:09.000 At dawn, he released that video.
00:38:11.000 After a day of bloody protests, the government was still intact.
00:38:13.000 The Trump administration blamed Russia and Cuba for keeping him in place and in discouraging high-level defections.
00:38:19.000 The White House has held an emergency meeting of top national security aides to mull next steps.
00:38:23.000 They say significant progress on defense matters was made.
00:38:26.000 Throughout the day, there were mixed messages about what exactly the United States military would do.
00:38:30.000 Obviously, there aren't really mixed messages.
00:38:32.000 They're saying that we're not interested in getting involved, but all options are on the table.
00:38:35.000 Obama used to use that language all the time because, as president, you constantly use that sort of language.
00:38:40.000 Well, there's one group to blame, according to Ilhan Omar, you know, our moral leader.
00:38:44.000 She says that the U.S.
00:38:45.000 is responsible for what's been happening in Venezuela.
00:38:48.000 The United States, like us, Now, it should be noted, the sanctions that were placed in Venezuela were not placed on Venezuela as a country.
00:38:55.000 They were not placed on Venezuela's oil exports.
00:38:57.000 They were placed specifically, and for years, on specific leaders and business figures inside Venezuela.
00:39:04.000 So this is just not true.
00:39:06.000 Venezuela was destroyed from within.
00:39:08.000 Ilhan Omar has never found a socialist dictator that she couldn't cozy up to.
00:39:11.000 Here is another one.
00:39:12.000 So she's cozying up to Nicolas Maduro.
00:39:14.000 Worth noting here.
00:39:15.000 Ilhan Omar thinks that you should sanction Israel The only democracy in the Middle East in a place where Muslims are treated better than any place in the Middle East.
00:39:22.000 She thinks that that country should be sanctioned.
00:39:25.000 Venezuela, no sanctions.
00:39:26.000 She's not anti-Semitic though, guys.
00:39:27.000 She's just a human rights advocate.
00:39:29.000 A lot of the policies that we have put in place has kind of helped lead the devastation in Venezuela and we've sort of set the stage for where we are arriving today.
00:39:45.000 Particular bullying and the use of sanctions to eventually intervene and make regime change really does not help the people of countries like Venezuela and it certainly does not help and it's not in the interest of the United States.
00:40:05.000 It's not in the interest of the people of Venezuela not to eat dogs.
00:40:07.000 Dogs are delicious, apparently.
00:40:09.000 And it's really in their interest to continue under the auspices of an illegitimate government.
00:40:12.000 That's in their interest.
00:40:14.000 And if you don't agree, that's because you are an Islamophobe or something.
00:40:18.000 That's the direction this is going.
00:40:20.000 Meanwhile...
00:40:21.000 The President of the United States was honoring Yom HaShoah today.
00:40:24.000 Yom HaShoah, of course, is the International Day for the Remembrance of the Holocaust.
00:40:30.000 And that is perfectly appropriate at a time when anti-Semitism is spiking.
00:40:33.000 Anti-Semitic attacks have indeed spiked to the highest level in decades.
00:40:38.000 According to the Associated Press, Israeli researchers reported on Wednesday that violent attacks against Jews spiked significantly last year, with the largest reported number of Jews killed in anti-Semitic acts in decades, leading to an increased sense of emergency among Jewish communities worldwide.
00:40:52.000 Capped by the deadly shooting that killed 11 worshippers at Pittsburgh's Tree of Life Synagogue on October 27th, assaults targeting Jews rose 13% in 2018, according to Tel Aviv University researchers.
00:41:02.000 They recorded nearly 400 cases worldwide, with more than a quarter of the major violent cases taking place in the United States.
00:41:08.000 That spike was most dramatic in Western Europe, where Jews have faced even greater danger and threats.
00:41:12.000 In Germany, for example, there was a 70% increase in anti-Semitic violence.
00:41:16.000 And this is because there are three types of anti-Semitism that are at work in today's world.
00:41:20.000 There is left-wing anti-Semitism, right-wing anti-Semitism, and radical Muslim anti-Semitism.
00:41:26.000 And each one of them poses a different sort of threat.
00:41:29.000 So, let's start with right-wing white supremacist antisemitism.
00:41:32.000 Right-wing white supremacist antisemitism, not only does it exist, it is the most individually dangerous form of antisemitism to specific Jews.
00:41:41.000 Meaning that if I see that a shul was shot up in the United States, I will almost immediately assume that it is a white supremacist, because statistically speaking, it usually is.
00:41:50.000 And that is because there are these marginalized, as they should be, marginalized evil people who find communities online, self-radicalize, almost like adjunct members of ISIS, and then go and shoot Jews at places like synagogues.
00:42:04.000 These same people will go and try to burn down mosques or shoot Muslims in mosques in many cases.
00:42:08.000 So that's right-wing extremist white supremacist antisemitism.
00:42:14.000 That is one ideology.
00:42:16.000 And the type of danger that it poses is not a political danger.
00:42:18.000 It is a safety danger.
00:42:21.000 Then there's left-wing anti-semitism.
00:42:22.000 Left-wing anti-semitism is the belief that the Jews are in control of the world because the Jews are disproportionately wealthy and successful and don't agree with the anti-biblical notions of the secular left and thus they ought to be quashed.
00:42:36.000 This would be Jeremy Corbyn in the UK, it would be Ilhan Omar in the United States.
00:42:41.000 Now left-wing anti-semitism is not quite as likely to lead to specific violence.
00:42:46.000 It is much more likely to lead to widespread anti-semitic Act against the state of Israel collectively, for example, or to legislation that targets Jews in places like Belgium.
00:42:56.000 It's much more likely to lead to government action because left-wing anti-Semitism has been mainstreamed.
00:43:01.000 So right-wing anti-Semitism has not been mainstreamed.
00:43:03.000 It's basically been cast out.
00:43:05.000 It's a small group of people who are exceedingly dangerous in how they interact with other people, but it's a small group.
00:43:11.000 Left-wing anti-Semitism is less specifically dangerous, but more broadly dangerous in the sense that it leads to broad political changes that target Jews.
00:43:20.000 This would be people like Ilhan Omar, who has made anti-semitic references repeatedly, and then is given the green light by the Democratic Party, celebrated, put on the cover of Rolling Stone, they raise money for her.
00:43:31.000 So it's a different type of anti-semitism, and it is a type of anti-semitism that is more viral.
00:43:37.000 It's more easy to spread among large groups of people.
00:43:41.000 Now, Ilhan Omar tries to cover for all of this.
00:43:43.000 I mean, it's amazing.
00:43:44.000 Ilhan Omar yesterday was at some rally and she said she can't fight Islamophobia if she won't fight anti-Semitism.
00:43:49.000 Well, then I guess she's not fighting Islamophobia because she has not fought anti-Semitism.
00:43:53.000 She is engaged in anti-Semitism.
00:43:54.000 When we are talking about anti-Semitism, we must also talk about Islamophobia. - Yeah.
00:44:03.000 It's two sides of the same coin of bigotry.
00:44:05.000 So I can't ever speak of Islamophobia and fight for Muslims if I am not willing to fight against anti-Semitism.
00:44:15.000 Okay, but she's not been willing to fight against anti-Semitism.
00:44:17.000 Now, what she says there about Islamophobia and anti-Semitism being two sides of the same coin, there's truth to that when she's speaking about right-wing anti-Semitism.
00:44:25.000 They are not two sides of the same coin when it comes to left-wing anti-Semitism, because left-wing anti-Semitism is based on the hierarchy of intersectional grievances.
00:44:33.000 In which case, Muslims are victimized and Jews are victimizers, according to left-wing extremists.
00:44:38.000 And this has become a mainstream view inside the Democratic Party, which is why Ilhan Omar is still praised.
00:44:43.000 It's also why the New York Times will print openly anti-Semitic cartoons and then pretend they don't know what they are doing.
00:44:49.000 The cartoonist who drew that anti-Semitic cartoon in the New York Times earlier this week, by the way, he said that it was not an anti-Semitic cartoon.
00:44:56.000 It was just an anti-Israel cartoon.
00:44:57.000 It was just an anti-Zionist cartoon.
00:44:59.000 Well, this is the convenient cover of the left for their hatred of Jews collectively.
00:45:04.000 Anytime Jews get together in one place, it's obviously seen as a bad thing by anti-semitic members of the left.
00:45:10.000 This guy, it's a perfect example.
00:45:12.000 This guy is on the left.
00:45:14.000 He hates Israel, and he really dislikes Jews.
00:45:17.000 How can you tell he dislikes Jews?
00:45:18.000 Because he says this cartoon is not anti-semitic.
00:45:20.000 He claimed that the anti-semitism charges are a misunderstanding, quote, made through the Jewish propaganda machine, which is anytime there's criticism because there's someone anti-semitic on the other side, and that's not the case.
00:45:32.000 He says the Jewish right doesn't want to be criticized and therefore when criticized they say we are a persecuted people, we suffered a lot, this is anti-Semitism.
00:45:38.000 So it's the Jewish propaganda machine, but he's not an anti-Semite, guys.
00:45:41.000 So that's left-wing anti-Semitism.
00:45:42.000 Not quite as specifically dangerous to individual Jews, deeply dangerous to Jews across the world who are then...
00:45:50.000 Put at risk by both government policies on a broad scale and also by left-wing antisemitism's tolerance for the third type of antisemitism, which is radical Islamic antisemitism.
00:45:59.000 Now that is widespread across the Muslim world, unfortunately.
00:46:03.000 By polling data, antisemitism in the Muslim world is certainly not uncommon.
00:46:07.000 There are moderate and reformed Muslims who do not believe this stuff, but there are many Muslims who do believe this stuff.
00:46:12.000 And that does manifest not only in government policies in Muslim countries that crack down on Jews or bar Jews from even entering, but also it is manifest in specific acts of terrorism that have taken place across Europe.
00:46:22.000 So in Europe, a lot of the attacks that are taking place against Jews are Muslim in orientation, and they are made room for by the left wing that has suggested that anti-Semitism is really just anti-Zionism, the apex case of this being the burning of a synagogue in Germany that was ruled to be an anti-Zionist the apex case of this being the burning of a synagogue in Germany that was ruled to be an So those are the three types of anti-Semitism.
00:46:45.000 And as we remember the Holocaust today and the murder of six million Jews, it is worthwhile to remember that any form of anti-Semitism that collectively seeks to destroy the Jews as a people and target them as a people, those forms of anti-Semitism are not far from what happened in the Holocaust, nor are they dead.
00:47:01.000 They're very much alive, and they are thriving in certain fringe areas of the right, in certain mainstream areas of the left, and in certain mainstream areas of the radical Muslim world.
00:47:09.000 We have to keep our eye on that, or we fall prey to the possibility of greater evil in the future.
00:47:15.000 Okay, time for some things that I like, and then some things that I hate.
00:47:19.000 So, things that I like today.
00:47:21.000 Today is Yom HaShoah.
00:47:24.000 And Yom HaShoah is the memorial day for the Holocaust.
00:47:29.000 For folks who have never actually seen any of the footage from the Holocaust, it is worthwhile to do so.
00:47:35.000 There are fictional films about the Holocaust that are worth seeing.
00:47:39.000 Obviously, there is a miniseries called Shoah that is very good.
00:47:43.000 Schindler's List is a very good film.
00:47:46.000 If you haven't seen, there's a miniseries called Uprising about the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising that I think is well worth watching.
00:47:52.000 And then there's entire documentary series.
00:47:54.000 I would watch the documentaries because the fictionalized film accounts don't do justice to what exactly happened in the camps and what exactly was the movement to put Jews, particularly specifically target Jews.
00:48:05.000 This was not just a question of the Nazis killing millions of people.
00:48:07.000 This was the specific targeting of Jews for their Jewish ancestry.
00:48:12.000 Anybody who was at least one quarter Jewish was considered capable of being slaughtered by the Nazis.
00:48:17.000 Six million Jews go to the gas chambers or are shot in mass shootings.
00:48:22.000 Everyone focuses on the gas chambers.
00:48:23.000 People forget that mass graves were dug and Jews were shot en masse above the mass graves.
00:48:26.000 Millions of Jews died that way as well.
00:48:30.000 And the brutal nature of humanity is worthy of note.
00:48:35.000 If you actually want to prevent brutality in the future, we have to realize that there is a true dark side to human nature.
00:48:40.000 There's also great heroism to human nature.
00:48:42.000 If you read Viktor Frankl, you see how people found purpose and kindness and generosity, even in the midst of the greatest act of collective victimization in the history of humankind by numbers.
00:48:54.000 Victor Frankl, his book Man's Search for Meaning, or Elie Wiesel's Night.
00:48:57.000 I was privileged to be able to help ghostwrite the autobiography of Jack Slomovic.
00:49:03.000 Jack Slomovic was Elie Wiesel's cousin.
00:49:07.000 He was with him in Auschwitz, and Jack Slomovic then came to the United States.
00:49:13.000 He became an immigrant to the United States.
00:49:15.000 His story is really pretty amazing.
00:49:16.000 I was privileged because I know his son.
00:49:18.000 I'm friends with his son.
00:49:19.000 As he was dying, he was diagnosed with late-stage cancer.
00:49:23.000 I had the privilege of sitting with him for hours and hours as he told me stories of what exactly had happened during the Holocaust.
00:49:29.000 Slomovic's story is pretty amazing, and I want to tell it to you now.
00:49:33.000 He passed away in 2011.
00:49:35.000 He was born in 1925 in a little town in Czechoslovakia called Salatvina.
00:49:41.000 With the outbreak of World War II, the Hungarians took over the town.
00:49:43.000 They implemented anti-Jewish laws at the behest of the Nazis.
00:49:46.000 In 1944, the Germans themselves then came and occupied Salatvina, and they moved all the Jews into a ghetto, and from there, the Jews were shipped directly to Auschwitz.
00:49:54.000 Slomovic was shipped with his father, his two uncles, and his cousin Elie Wiesel to Buna, which was a labor camp near Auschwitz.
00:50:00.000 His mother, five of his siblings, were immediately separated from them and then sent to be gassed to death in the chambers.
00:50:06.000 Over the next year, Slomovic was shuttled to several concentration camps.
00:50:09.000 He was forced on death marches.
00:50:11.000 He was able to steal small bits of food to keep his family alive.
00:50:16.000 He tried to protect his father all the way through the Holocaust.
00:50:19.000 He somehow kept his father, who was ailing, alive all the way to the end of the Holocaust.
00:50:23.000 But literally the day before liberation at Theresienstadt, his father had already become deadly ill with typhus and died in his arms days after the liberation in Theresienstadt.
00:50:33.000 Slomovic's story, though, is an amazing story of how human beings are able to rise from the ashes.
00:50:38.000 He wandered the streets of Prague.
00:50:40.000 People don't know this, but in the aftermath of World War II, after the liberation, Jews went back, in many cases, to their homes in some of these Eastern European countries, and those homes had been occupied by non-Jews.
00:50:51.000 Something like 10,000 Jews were murdered in the aftermath of World War II simply for going back to their homes and saying they wanted their homes back, and then the people who were living there would kill them.
00:50:58.000 In any case, Slomovic wandered the streets of Prague.
00:51:00.000 Eventually, he found his way to the Sudetenland and sought an American visa.
00:51:04.000 By the time he got his visa, war had broken out in the nascent state of Israel.
00:51:08.000 And instead of using that visa to travel to the United States, instead, Slomovic volunteered to be smuggled into Israel to fight on behalf of the Jewish state.
00:51:16.000 They took him off the boat, they gave him two hours of training, they handed him a rifle, and then they sent him to the front lines of Latrun, which was the bloodiest battle of the independence war.
00:51:24.000 Now when folks talk about Israel being unnecessary, the fact that millions of Jews have been slaughtered throughout history, the fact that the population of Jews in today's world is still lower than the population of Jews in 1940.
00:51:36.000 That is why the state of Israel exists to protect Jews all over the world and to give Jews a place to go when things go bad.
00:51:42.000 That is one of the reasons for the Jewish state to exist on just a practical root level.
00:51:47.000 And it's funny, the same people who say Israel is unnecessary are the same people who are making room for anti-Semitic attacks on Jews.
00:51:53.000 They say Israel is unnecessary, Israel's bad, and also anti-Jewish acts in the West are just anti-Israel acts.
00:51:59.000 Do you think we believe you?
00:52:01.000 Really, do you think we believe you?
00:52:02.000 That when you say you're just anti-Zionist, and therefore it's okay for people to be anti-Semitic against Jews, you think that we believe that if you got rid of the State of Israel, suddenly you'd be nice to the Jews?
00:52:11.000 I have my doubts.
00:52:13.000 In any case, Slomovic was shipped over to the front lines of Latrun.
00:52:17.000 150 people went into battle along with Slomovic, and only 15 came out in one piece.
00:52:21.000 Slomovic actually became a guy who served behind enemy lines.
00:52:24.000 He was good at it.
00:52:25.000 He met Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion, who gave him a bottle of vodka before one particularly dangerous mission.
00:52:31.000 And Slomovic was part of all of these secret missions.
00:52:35.000 So at the end of the war, Slomovic felt that his role was done.
00:52:37.000 He moved to the United States.
00:52:39.000 He had a sixth grade education.
00:52:40.000 He worked as a day laborer and a night watchman to make ends meet.
00:52:43.000 And then he began working as an apprentice to an electrician.
00:52:45.000 And then finally, he went out on his own.
00:52:47.000 He literally walked the streets looking for jobs on which he could bid.
00:52:51.000 Within a few years, he was running a full electricity store with a bunch of employees.
00:52:54.000 And then he eventually became a millionaire, became a pillar of the L.A.
00:52:57.000 Jewish community.
00:52:58.000 Supporting local schools and synagogues, became trustee of the Jim Joseph Foundation, which is a billion-dollar endowment focused on Jewish education.
00:53:05.000 The Holocaust is a grave act of evil.
00:53:07.000 The anti-Semitism that supported the Holocaust still lives in many human hearts, and the possibility of that darkness still exists.
00:53:15.000 Please go watch the footage today in honor of the people who died, and remember that evil is never truly gone, unfortunately.
00:53:22.000 But neither is good.
00:53:22.000 Neither is good, and that good is there.
00:53:24.000 That's why we have to stand between the evil and those it would victimize.
00:53:29.000 Okay, time for a quick thing that I hate.
00:53:35.000 So I lied, this isn't gonna be quick.
00:53:36.000 So, I saw Avengers Endgame last night with my wife.
00:53:39.000 Now, I didn't hate it, okay?
00:53:40.000 It's a little strong to say that I hated Avengers Endgame, but, and I don't really like throwing cold water on people's favorite movies and the things that they love a lot.
00:53:50.000 Well, I won't say I don't like doing it.
00:53:52.000 I don't enjoy it more than I should.
00:53:53.000 In any case, Avengers Endgame, it is one million hours long, it is the Wagnerian Ring Cycle, and it has moments, but There are a bunch of spoilers coming, guys.
00:54:03.000 It does not work as a film.
00:54:04.000 It does not work as a film.
00:54:06.000 It basically destroys all of the main characters that you actually care about in favor of a bunch of characters you don't.
00:54:10.000 It's got the Star Wars problem.
00:54:11.000 So the new Star Wars basically took all the characters you like and killed them off to make room for characters that you don't actually care about.
00:54:17.000 It relies on the nostalgia that you have for the last 16 films, and it is a cool thing that they were somehow able to put together 16 films that led all the way up to this final film.
00:54:28.000 Like, that's really a neat achievement on a cinematic level.
00:54:32.000 The problem is that none of this works, and they destroy all of your favorite characters, with probably the exception of Black Widow, Scarlett Johansson, who finally gets a character arc that is worthy of her acting skills.
00:54:41.000 So, here are all the spoilers.
00:54:43.000 So, Iron Man obviously plots this, right?
00:54:44.000 At the end, Iron Man dies.
00:54:46.000 Iron Man's character arc is the only interesting thing in this movie, but they totally botch it.
00:54:50.000 The reason that they botch it is because Iron Man, Robert Downey Jr.' 's character, for all of his movies, the struggle for Iron Man has been not, do I go save the world or am I selfish?
00:54:59.000 That's solved in movie one, right?
00:55:01.000 The rest of the movies are all about, will he settle down with POTS?
00:55:06.000 Will he settle down?
00:55:07.000 Will he build a family?
00:55:09.000 Can he contain himself?
00:55:10.000 Will he become a solid citizen?
00:55:12.000 That was the struggle of Robert Downey Jr.
00:55:14.000 When was he going to grow up and be an adult?
00:55:15.000 That was the question of Robert Downey Jr.
00:55:17.000 And after Thanos snaps his fingers in the first 45 minutes of the movie, you find out that Robert Downey Jr. has gotten married to Pepper Potts and that he has actually had a kid with her.
00:55:26.000 And this is good, right?
00:55:27.000 This is a good setup.
00:55:28.000 And then it arises through really dumb coincidence – Hey guys, have you ever had the idea of time travel?
00:55:37.000 Have you thought about it?
00:55:37.000 Like, seriously?
00:55:39.000 And then Robert Downey Jr.' 's like, oh man, well, I guess, I haven't thought about it, it's impossible.
00:55:45.000 Well, I have five minutes here.
00:55:46.000 So in five minutes he comes up with a time travel plan.
00:55:48.000 So forget about how silly that is, that he comes up with a time travel plan in the next five minutes.
00:55:52.000 It's an Avengers film, you can't look for him to spend four years trying to figure out how time travel works or anything like that.
00:55:59.000 But here's the problem.
00:56:01.000 Now, Tony Stark has stakes.
00:56:03.000 The stakes are, and they present this choice, it's ready to be made.
00:56:06.000 The stakes are, do you go back and change the past, and thus lose what you have built for yourself in the aftermath of you becoming a mature human being?
00:56:14.000 Lose a daughter?
00:56:15.000 Do you sacrifice your own daughter to save the world?
00:56:18.000 Right?
00:56:18.000 That's a real moral choice.
00:56:20.000 But then they obviate that choice in the next 30 seconds of the film, where they explain that if they go back and change the past, it won't actually change this timeline, and therefore Tony Stark's kid will still be alive, and his wife will still be alive, and everything will be hunky-dory.
00:56:32.000 So now this just becomes another Iron Man film, where it's about Tony Stark risking himself to go save the world, but there are no heightened stakes at all.
00:56:39.000 So you've built up to his final character transformation into a responsible human being, and the question is going to be, now is he even more responsible than the responsible human being?
00:56:47.000 He's built a family, now is he willing to sacrifice his own family and his own happiness in order to save the world?
00:56:53.000 And the answer is, we're not going to make him answer the question.
00:56:56.000 Because we don't have the guts to actually pose that choice.
00:56:59.000 So that's the problem with Iron Man's character.
00:57:00.000 Captain America's character... The problem with Captain America's character is they've always gotten it wrong.
00:57:04.000 So Captain America is basically John McCain.
00:57:06.000 He's supposed to be this crotchety old guy in a young guy's body.
00:57:09.000 A man out of time.
00:57:11.000 Captain America has never felt like a man out of time to me.
00:57:13.000 He's just felt like generic superhero who's kind of dopey and a good guy.
00:57:17.000 That's the way Chris Evans has played him.
00:57:19.000 And this isn't just because Chris Evans dislikes me.
00:57:21.000 Chris Evans apparently...
00:57:24.000 Like, the people who write the script basically felt that he would just be like any normal guy.
00:57:28.000 Like, if you saw Captain America without the uniform, you wouldn't know he's Captain America.
00:57:32.000 He's just a guy.
00:57:33.000 Well, that's not how the character is in the comics, and that's not how the character should be here.
00:57:37.000 So, the stakes for Captain America aren't extraordinarily high.
00:57:41.000 Now, Captain America's ending, where they have him basically go back in time, and then he is able to... and then he basically just stays back in time with the love of his life, I was fine with that.
00:57:52.000 I really didn't have a huge problem with his ending.
00:57:54.000 I thought his ending was the most appropriate.
00:57:55.000 I thought Iron Man dying, even that would have been appropriate if they had set it up properly.
00:58:00.000 That was okay.
00:58:01.000 The person who I really couldn't stand what they did with him was Thor.
00:58:03.000 So what they did with Thor makes no sense on a character level.
00:58:06.000 So I understand you guys wanted the joke.
00:58:08.000 You wanted Thor with the dad bod.
00:58:09.000 Got it.
00:58:10.000 Okay, you want him to be fat and burp a lot and be Big Lebowski.
00:58:12.000 Okay, it's funny.
00:58:14.000 For the first five minutes.
00:58:15.000 And then it's, this is not Thor.
00:58:16.000 Right, we've had several Thor movies at this point.
00:58:19.000 Thor's problem has never been lack of courage.
00:58:22.000 It's always been that he is afraid, that he does not have the moral fiber to be the leader.
00:58:28.000 It's been that he's afraid of leadership.
00:58:29.000 That's been his moral conflict, is that he's been afraid of leadership the whole time, and leadership has to be thrust upon him, and then he realizes he's a leader.
00:58:37.000 But instead they decided to go the direction of, not that he doesn't want to take leadership, but that he's afraid to participate himself.
00:58:43.000 That he won't even participate.
00:58:44.000 And so they make him basically a drunk weakling.
00:58:47.000 And it's silly.
00:58:49.000 And you never actually get to see Thor really in action, because they've decided to saddle him with a fat suit for the joke.
00:58:55.000 Which is, again, not in character, and also very silly.
00:58:58.000 Like, I was waiting for the point where Thor would just kind of take the hammer, or the axe, and slam it on the ground, the lightning comes, and he's back to being old Thor, right?
00:59:04.000 I was waiting for that sort of transformation.
00:59:06.000 That never really happens.
00:59:08.000 And in fact, the best thing about Thor is in the first five minutes of the film, when he kills Thanos, right?
00:59:12.000 The first five minutes of the film, where he chops Thanos' head off, that's the best thing that he's got in the entire film.
00:59:16.000 The rest of the time, he's basically wasted, which is a pity, because Chris Hemsworth can actually hold his own on screen.
00:59:22.000 I don't think Chris Evans can.
00:59:23.000 I think Chris Hemsworth can with Robert Downey Jr., but they don't give him anything to do except be funny, which he is.
00:59:29.000 I mean, in that there's a final kind of thing with Chris Pratt and Chris Hemsworth that's very funny.
00:59:34.000 Okay, but he was supposed to be more than a funny character.
00:59:36.000 If you watched the first Thor film directed by Kenneth Branagh, it was supposed to be far more serious.
00:59:40.000 Also, as my business partner, Jeremy Boring, has pointed out, that it's pretty obvious from the film that they wanted Anthony Hopkins to come back and do a scene with Chris Hemsworth, and they weren't able to get Hemsworth to do it, so instead they brought back Rene Russo for a conversation, and it really doesn't work fantastically well.
00:59:58.000 Thanos is built up in the first Avengers film as this guy with an interesting backstory and with an actual With an actual rationale, right?
01:00:06.000 He feels that balance has to be brought back because he lived on a planet where overpopulation was a problem, so he snaps his fingers, half the people are gone, balance is restored.
01:00:13.000 Okay, now they bring us back to old Thanos, who still has that same mission.
01:00:17.000 And they basically just turned him into Big Daddy, right?
01:00:20.000 Now he doesn't have an interesting backstory.
01:00:22.000 Now he's just a sadist.
01:00:24.000 And there's a line near the end of the film.
01:00:25.000 Where he turns to Robert Downey Jr.
01:00:27.000 or Captain America, I think it's maybe Captain America, and he says, you know, your little planet, I'm going to enjoy destroying it.
01:00:33.000 Okay, come on.
01:00:35.000 Come on.
01:00:35.000 Like, if you want to draw a good villain, then you can't just make them a sadist.
01:00:39.000 Every bad villain, like Steppenwolf from Justice League, is just a sadist who wants to do bad stuff.
01:00:44.000 But Thanos had an interesting backstory, and the thing about Thanos is that Thanos was willing to sacrifice his own daughter for what he believed in.
01:00:51.000 Right, Danos, he's immoral, he's a bad person, but he's willing to make a sacrifice they don't even ask Robert Downey Jr.
01:00:57.000 to make in the second Avengers film.
01:01:00.000 So that is a problem as well.
01:01:01.000 Now, there are two characters who I do think are treated well by the script.
01:01:04.000 Black Widow is treated well by the script.
01:01:06.000 Hawkeye, Jeremy Renner, is treated well by the script.
01:01:10.000 Carol Danvers, the Captain Marvel character, I just have to say that she's insanely boring.
01:01:16.000 So I didn't actually see the Captain Marvel film.
01:01:19.000 I'm intending on going and seeing it at some point.
01:01:20.000 I didn't really feel the compunction to see it, but I suppose that I will see it.
01:01:25.000 In any case, she's in the film, but she's basically a block of wood that breaks things.
01:01:31.000 That's what Carol Danvers does.
01:01:32.000 She doesn't have any character.
01:01:33.000 You don't know why she's there.
01:01:34.000 You don't know her motivations.
01:01:35.000 She just flies around and she smashes things.
01:01:38.000 Alright.
01:01:39.000 And she's, and she's... Dave Sexmackina.
01:01:41.000 Another point made by my business partner, we had a conversation about this this morning, is that one of the problems with this film is that you also don't know the comparative power of the characters.
01:01:49.000 So it's like every character has a power that is equally powerful, despite the fact that they don't.
01:01:55.000 There's a scene near the end where the Avengers headquarters is hit by one million missiles, and somehow Ant-Man, who is a human, and Jeremy Renner, who is a human, are fine.
01:02:04.000 They're at the bottom of twenty stories.
01:02:05.000 They're fine.
01:02:06.000 Totally cool.
01:02:07.000 That makes no sense.
01:02:09.000 And there's a scene where Thanos, who does not have the Infinity Gauntlet at this point, is fighting off Captain America and Thor and Iron Man.
01:02:16.000 He's fighting off all three of them.
01:02:17.000 Well, if you remember back to the first Avengers film, He barely holds off Thor alone, right?
01:02:23.000 Thor shows up and Thor nearly takes him out while he has the Infinity Stone.
01:02:26.000 So if he doesn't have the Infinity Stone, he's basically just a big bad guy.
01:02:29.000 So why are all three of them unable to take him out?
01:02:32.000 And then there was the NFL ad recapitulation where they're trying to run the gauntlet between players and it's like, oh, okay, I understand you're doing fan service.
01:02:40.000 Look, there's Black Panther.
01:02:41.000 Ooh, there's Spider-Man.
01:02:42.000 Oh, look, they're handing it to this other character who we don't care about.
01:02:45.000 Yay!
01:02:46.000 And then they're just kind of throwing in the gauntlet just to remind you that all these characters exist.
01:02:51.000 The center of this universe was always supposed to be Iron Man, Captain America, Thor.
01:02:55.000 They turned Thor into a loser, Captain America is boring, and Iron Man, they don't give a full motivation and prohibit him from making a proper choice.
01:03:01.000 Now, there are, again, scenes in this movie that are quite good.
01:03:04.000 The scene between the Hulk, for example, the Mark Ruffalo character, And Tilda Swinton, the character from Doctor Strange, that's actually a good scene.
01:03:16.000 The scene with Robert Downey Jr.
01:03:17.000 and his dad, that's a good scene too.
01:03:19.000 But overall, I felt like it was a mishmash, I felt like it didn't really work.
01:03:23.000 I understand that for uber-fans of Marvel, I'm not speaking as an uber-fan of Marvel, I've seen virtually all of these films, I think that Captain Marvel is the only one that I have not seen.
01:03:33.000 There are uberfans who are sitting there, like, just picking out the Easter eggs.
01:03:36.000 Oh, remember when they did that in this movie?
01:03:38.000 And then we're flashing back to that movie now.
01:03:39.000 Isn't that cool?
01:03:40.000 Isn't that funny?
01:03:41.000 And there's a lot of stuff there.
01:03:43.000 But that's fan service.
01:03:44.000 It's not filmmaking.
01:03:45.000 And it doesn't give an emotional resonance.
01:03:46.000 The only emotional resonance, really, is Iron Man's death, which I guess is what it was supposed to be.
01:03:51.000 And even there, I felt like it was diminished somewhat by the fact that he basically just dies in a normal adventure story that could have taken place in any of the other Iron Mans.
01:03:58.000 Also, final critique.
01:04:00.000 I don't feel the necessity to have a giant battle with all of the people in the universe at the end of every movie.
01:04:06.000 I didn't like it at the end of Aquaman.
01:04:08.000 I don't like it here.
01:04:09.000 In fact, the battle was much more interesting when it was just a couple of people fighting before all of these things show up, before Doctor Strange unleashes the beast and all these people come walking through back from the dead.
01:04:20.000 It felt throughout the movie like there were no stakes.
01:04:22.000 And this is my big problem.
01:04:23.000 I didn't get anything that I thought was really unexpected.
01:04:25.000 I felt like they deliberately lowered the stakes, not heightened the stakes, with that decision that I referred to about Iron Man.
01:04:31.000 I felt like it was blase and bland.
01:04:33.000 I didn't feel like anyone was really in any danger, and even Iron Man's death is sort of inevitably foreshadowed by what happens to the Hulk when he puts on the gauntlet.
01:04:44.000 I wish I had liked the movie more, since I spent three hours of my life on it and fifty bucks.
01:04:47.000 The tickets for IMAX were expensive, man.
01:04:49.000 But I will say that I understand why people enjoyed it, if you're a superfan.
01:04:54.000 But I am not up with the, this is great.
01:04:58.000 Now, where is the future of Marvel?
01:05:00.000 This is a serious question.
01:05:01.000 Because when you look at the second ranks of characters, they've now gotten rid of all their big stars, right?
01:05:06.000 Chris Hemsworth, I guess, might appear in the future, but not in a Thor movie.
01:05:09.000 He'll probably do a cameo in a Guardians of the Galaxy movie, which is a Chris Pratt property.
01:05:13.000 So Guardians of the Galaxy will continue to be a functioning series, because all those characters are still there.
01:05:19.000 But who's going to be the new Iron Man?
01:05:20.000 Can they replace Robert Downey Jr.?
01:05:22.000 I don't think so.
01:05:22.000 I really don't think so.
01:05:23.000 He's too iconic.
01:05:24.000 And especially if they decide to make it Gwyneth Paltrow or something.
01:05:27.000 She's been in all the movies.
01:05:28.000 She's not the reason people see movies.
01:05:30.000 Do they really think that... What's the name of the character who replaced... The Eagle?
01:05:34.000 Who's gonna replace Captain America?
01:05:37.000 That's not gonna play.
01:05:38.000 There are great black superheroes, right?
01:05:40.000 Black Panther is one of them.
01:05:41.000 That's a viable property.
01:05:43.000 I don't think that just sliding the Eagle into Captain America's suit... By the way, does he have any superpowers at all?
01:05:50.000 Like, Captain America took the serum.
01:05:52.000 Is the guy who's becoming the new Captain America, does he have the serum, or is he just a human with a shield?
01:05:56.000 As for Thor, they really think they can replace Chris Hemsworth with Valkyrie.
01:05:59.000 And again, the character arc for Thor doesn't exist.
01:06:03.000 So his whole character arc is he refuses to take leadership, but he's the best among us, and thus he will receive the hammer.
01:06:08.000 That is Thor's character arc.
01:06:10.000 And at the end, not only does he not receive the hammer, but also he then hands off the mantle of leadership, which he has been attempting to avoid his entire life.
01:06:17.000 So it's never thrust upon him, and he never takes it.
01:06:19.000 So in the last Thor movie, he actually does take it.
01:06:22.000 Right?
01:06:22.000 In the last Thor movie, he is forced to take it, right?
01:06:24.000 He loses his eye, he becomes weathered, he loses the long hair, he loses the beard, right?
01:06:29.000 Suddenly, he is, you know, the king that his father was.
01:06:33.000 And by the end of this movie, he's back to being the loser he was at the beginning of movie number one.
01:06:36.000 So, lots of problems with the movie.
01:06:38.000 Paul Rudd did a good job as Ant-Man.
01:06:39.000 Okay, we're done.
01:06:40.000 We'll be back here later with a couple more hours.
01:06:42.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
01:06:44.000 I'm Michael Knowles, host of The Michael Knowles Show,
01:07:11.000 Students at Hofstra University are demanding the school tear down a statue of Thomas Jefferson.
01:07:16.000 Meanwhile, a Northern California public school district wants to remove a mural of George Washington.
01:07:21.000 We will analyze the end of history.