The Ben Shapiro Show - December 22, 2022


Zelensky Goes To Washington | Ep. 1636


Episode Stats

Length

42 minutes

Words per Minute

216.94283

Word Count

9,296

Sentence Count

639

Misogynist Sentences

4

Hate Speech Sentences

39


Summary

Why does the U.S. have to get involved in Ukraine? And why is it a good idea? Ben Shapiro explains why it makes sense to be involved in the Ukraine conflict, and why it's not a bad idea. The Benchmark Show is sponsored by ExpressVPN. Protect your online privacy today at ExpressVpn.org/ProtectYourOnline Privacy. Ben Shapiro is the host of The Ben Shapiro Show on the Public Eye and host of the Daily Wire. He is a regular contributor to The Daily Wire and the Weekly Standard, and is a frequent contributor to the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the New Republic, among other publications. His articles have appeared in The Daily Beast, The Hill, and The Weekly Standard. You can also find Ben on social media at and . Ben's new book, is out now: The Dark Side of the White House: A Guide to America s Most Powerful People in the 21st Century, out now. is available for pre-order on Amazon Prime and Vimeo worldwide. It's also available in Kindle, iBook, Paperback, Hardcover, and Audio Book format. If you prefer to buy a copy of the book, you can get it for only $99.99, including Audible and Audible. The Audible membership trial, which includes a limited edition hardcover edition of The Testaments edition, which sells for 99 copies for $99,99.95.0099.00.00, shipping starts in July. and includes an Audible paperback edition for $49.00 and limited edition print edition for 99 pounds.00 USPs, plus shipping is also available on Audible Prime memberships, and VHS rental, Blu-Auction, and T-Vee Pro, which will be shipping nationwide, and a limited limited edition 3-day shipping, shipping service, starting from $99 and 7-AVRP, starting at $99/month, starting in January 2020. All other options are available for Prime Minister John McCain will be available for purchase starting July 1st, starting on Nov. 21st, with shipping starts, starting September 2019. Learn more about shipping services, shipping plans, shipping services are available nationwide, shipping options, and more than $100,000, shipping only $50,000 in the US, and shipping plans are available worldwide, shipping will be limited to $200,000.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky comes to Washington, D.C.
00:00:03.000 and receives a hero's welcome.
00:00:04.000 Republicans debate whether to vote against a massive omnibus spending boondoggle.
00:00:07.000 And House Democrats release Donald Trump's tax returns.
00:00:10.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:10.000 This is the Benchmark Show.
00:00:12.000 The Benchmark Show is sponsored by ExpressVPN.
00:00:20.000 Protect your online privacy today at expressvpn.com slash Ben.
00:00:23.000 Well, big news of the day.
00:00:24.000 Obviously, Vladimir Zelensky visited Washington, D.C.
00:00:27.000 yesterday.
00:00:27.000 He spoke before a joint session of Congress last night.
00:00:30.000 This is his first trip outside of the country since the beginning of the Ukraine war that Russia launched in February of 2022, a lot earlier this year.
00:00:38.000 The war has been going on for at least 10 months at this point.
00:00:42.000 It has claimed hundreds of thousands of lives. One of the big questions that has arisen, particularly on the right, but also on some for some people on the left, is why the United States is involved in this in the first place. And the answer is actually multifaceted because foreign policy is a complicated area.
00:00:57.000 So the answer is actually not all that complicated. Russia is a geopolitical foe of the United States.
00:01:03.000 Degrading Russia is in the strategic interest of the United States.
00:01:06.000 Now, there are some people on the right who are very isolationist in orientation, and they're constantly asking why the United States should basically be involved anywhere in the world, which was a fair question in about 1850.
00:01:15.000 It is a less fair question today.
00:01:18.000 When obviously global supply chains have to do with international politics, when global economics have to do with international politics, when the ability to move weaponry and troops and terrorists around the globe is very, very easy.
00:01:30.000 We live in a very global society.
00:01:31.000 What that means is that the waters that once protected the United States from all encroachments abroad, those waters look a lot narrower than they did circa about 1850.
00:01:40.000 And what that means is that geopolitically, our foes are either on the move or they are in retreat.
00:01:44.000 The United States is either on the move or it is in retreat.
00:01:47.000 The world is a safer place when the US has more hegemony.
00:01:50.000 The world is a less safe place when the US tends to create a vacuum in foreign policy, which is then filled by geopolitical foes like Russia or like China.
00:01:59.000 What this means on a sort of hard-nosed level is that we do have an interest in degrading Russia's military strength to invade surrounding countries.
00:02:08.000 We have that interest because Russia, again, is a geopolitical foe of the United States that is not interested in forming an alliance with the United States.
00:02:13.000 It's been our foe in Syria.
00:02:14.000 It's been our foe in Afghanistan.
00:02:15.000 It's been our foe repeatedly throughout the world that is hoping to shape a new sphere of influence to activate against the West.
00:02:23.000 Russia is not a part of the West.
00:02:25.000 Russia's goal has been pretty overtly to break NATO.
00:02:27.000 particularly in the fall of the Soviet Union, to do that.
00:02:30.000 Russia just has not taken advantage of any of that.
00:02:33.000 Russia's goal has been pretty overtly to break NATO.
00:02:35.000 NATO in the aftermath of the Cold War was reconstituted as a sort of anti-Russian alliance, knowing that Russia had predatory instincts with regard to the Baltic States particularly, but also with regard to Ukraine, with regard to Poland, with regard to a lot of the former satellites of the Soviet Union, NATO continued to be a viable defense mechanism against the Russians.
00:02:54.000 That doesn't mean that NATO's policy with Ukraine has made any sense.
00:02:58.000 It hasn't made any sense.
00:02:59.000 NATO, which originally was formed with a tripartite purpose, keep the Americans in, keep the Germans down, keep the Russians out, right?
00:03:05.000 That was the tripartite purpose.
00:03:07.000 That continues to be NATO's mission is to keep Germany at the center of European politics without allowing them to sort of break out because they've done so twice in the 20th century to the devastation of the world.
00:03:20.000 To keep the Americans in because America has an interest in European politics, at least to the extent that we send the money.
00:03:25.000 And to keep the Russians out because again, Russia's predatory instincts were communist and now they are more oligarchic.
00:03:31.000 So that mission maintains, but that does not mean that NATO wasn't playing games with Ukraine.
00:03:36.000 They kept making overtures to Ukraine.
00:03:37.000 Maybe you should come.
00:03:38.000 And finally, Russia got tired of it and invaded.
00:03:38.000 Maybe you should not come.
00:03:41.000 And you see why Putin invaded doesn't mean it was justified, but you see why he did it.
00:03:45.000 He also had the bizarre notion that Ukraine was not at this point a polity of its own, that it considered itself part of Russia so you'd be able to walk in just the way that Hitler walked into Austria during the Anschluss and everybody just cheered.
00:03:56.000 Putin obviously thought that was going to happen in Ukraine.
00:03:59.000 That did not happen.
00:04:00.000 Part of the reason, by the way, it didn't happen is because Russia had invaded the Donetsk-Luhansk region as well as Crimea in 2014 and turned those places into absolute hellholes.
00:04:07.000 So if you're a Ukrainian looking to your east and you look at Luhansk-Donetsk or looking to your south at Crimea and you say, I can be living like those people or I could be living not like those people.
00:04:15.000 The answer is you don't want to live under Russian rule.
00:04:17.000 It turns out that Vladimir Putin's rule has not been good for Russians and it has not been for Ukrainians inside Luhansk-Donetsk or inside Crimea.
00:04:24.000 So that miscalculation by Putin has led to an entrenched war in which he has been pretty thoroughly rebutted.
00:04:31.000 The surprise of the war is not only that Ukraine was able to stave off Russia, but the Ukraine has been able to inflict extraordinary casualties on Russia.
00:04:39.000 Now part of that is because Russia's conventional military is actually incredibly second rate.
00:04:44.000 Not just their trained soldiers, but also their weaponry.
00:04:47.000 Their weaponry is really old.
00:04:49.000 Because Russia is a very poor country.
00:04:51.000 I mean, it really is.
00:04:52.000 Russia's GDP total is about the GDP of the state of Florida.
00:04:56.000 Russia is not a rich country.
00:04:58.000 Russia is, as some people have suggested, an oil station with a nuclear arsenal.
00:05:02.000 And because of that, Russia's conventional military was defeated by Ukraine, which was armed with NATO weaponry, which actually is significantly upgraded weaponry over whatever the Russians have to offer.
00:05:12.000 So Russia has been forced back.
00:05:13.000 That is in the interest of the United States.
00:05:14.000 It upholds the deterrent power of NATO.
00:05:17.000 It degrades Russia's conventional military to the extent that Russia is going to have a very tough time with adventurous ambitions in terms of foreign policy and violating other countries' borders, which is good for the world.
00:05:26.000 Stability is generally a good thing.
00:05:27.000 Violation of borders is generally a bad thing.
00:05:30.000 And it deters China as well, because again, the cost that Russia has now borne is so significant that if China is looking at Taiwan and thinking to itself, maybe we'll try that, while looking at what happened to Russia, not wonderful if you're China.
00:05:42.000 We'll get some more on this in just one minute.
00:05:44.000 First, are you tired of overpaying for your wireless network?
00:05:46.000 Get Talk, Text, and Blazing Fast data for just $30 a month.
00:05:49.000 PeerTalk gives you the same network, the same towers, the same coverage as the other guys at half the price.
00:05:53.000 Happy Hanukkah and Merry Christmas, everybody.
00:05:56.000 PeerTalk's US-based customer service team makes the switch incredibly easy.
00:05:59.000 You can feel good.
00:06:00.000 Knowing you're supporting a veteran-owned business.
00:06:01.000 When you go to puretalk.com and enter code SHAPIRO, you'll save an additional 50% off your very first month of coverage.
00:06:06.000 There's no reason to pay Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile over 80 bucks a month for wireless services when you can get the same exact service on the same exact network over at Pure Talk for half the price.
00:06:14.000 Again, at the same tower network.
00:06:16.000 So what exactly are you waiting for?
00:06:18.000 Go to PeerTalk.com, enter code SHAPIRO, save 50% off your very first month of coverage.
00:06:18.000 Start saving money today.
00:06:23.000 That's PeerTalk.com.
00:06:24.000 Promo code SHAPIRO for 50% off your very first month.
00:06:27.000 PeerTalk is simply smarter wireless.
00:06:29.000 You're paying for all the brick and mortar stores, the other big guys.
00:06:31.000 You're paying for their political spending.
00:06:33.000 You're paying for all of their overhead.
00:06:34.000 Don't do that.
00:06:35.000 Just go over to PeerTalk.com, promo code SHAPIRO, get 50% off your very first month, and you'll be saving hundreds of dollars down the road.
00:06:41.000 Again, that's PeerTalk.com.
00:06:42.000 Promo code SHAPIRO to get started.
00:06:45.000 You've been hearing me rave about my Helix Sleep Mattress for literally years, but Helix has now moved outside the bedroom and now they are making you sofas.
00:06:50.000 We're talking about the other place that you rest, where you spend a disproportionate amount of your time, where you work, where you sleep, where you watch TV.
00:06:57.000 Allform is the company that makes you the best sofas available.
00:07:00.000 Allform sofas are American-made, easy to assemble, scratch and stain resistant, stylish and comfortable.
00:07:05.000 All-form sofas are modern yet timeless seating pieces that come in a variety of sizes, shapes, and configurations.
00:07:09.000 They're easily customizable.
00:07:10.000 They cost a fraction of what you'd pay in traditional stores.
00:07:12.000 All-form sofas are designed to grow with the way you live.
00:07:15.000 The All-Form Sofa Collection has got everything from armchairs and loveseats to an eight-seat sectional, so you can find the perfect piece for any space plus.
00:07:21.000 Allform sofas are shipped directly to your door, can be assembled in just a few minutes, no tools necessary.
00:07:25.000 We love our Allform sofa at The Shapiro Household.
00:07:27.000 It's really durable, which is great because my kids beat up all pieces of furniture, and Allform stands the test of time.
00:07:33.000 If getting a sofa without trying it in store sounds a little risky, you don't need to worry.
00:07:35.000 Get 100 days to decide if you want to keep it.
00:07:37.000 If you don't love it, they'll pick it up for free and give you a full refund, but that's not going to happen.
00:07:40.000 To find your perfect sofa, check out allform.com slash ben.
00:07:43.000 Allform is offering 20% off all orders for our listeners at allform.com slash ben.
00:07:47.000 Step up your sofa game today.
00:07:50.000 Now China's gotten some side benefits like namely it's been able to turn Russia into its giant oil field.
00:07:54.000 Russia's been shipping all of its oil to China instead of China once being a client state of the Soviet Union.
00:07:59.000 Now Russia is essentially a client state of China.
00:08:02.000 So in some ways it's maximized Chinese powers but in other ways it's actually degraded a very strong strategic ally of the Chinese and made it harder for them to engage in adventurous foreign policy in Taiwan.
00:08:12.000 So the United States has achieved a bunch of interests.
00:08:15.000 With regard to the Ukraine war and as far as the investment that the United States has made in the Ukraine war, again, we've expended no lives in the Ukraine war.
00:08:22.000 We've expended a fair bit of money in the Ukraine war, but the truth is that the amount of money that we have spent in 2022 amounts to approximately 6% of total US defense spending.
00:08:32.000 In 2022, the U.S.
00:08:33.000 defense budget was $715 billion.
00:08:36.000 The amount that we've spent in Ukraine is something like $77 billion.
00:08:41.000 It'll raise to maybe $100 billion.
00:08:42.000 It's a lot of money.
00:08:43.000 It is a lot of money, but it represents a fraction of the United States' military budget.
00:08:47.000 If you could trade Say, 10% of the American military budget.
00:08:52.000 Four, the complete degradation of the Russian military.
00:08:55.000 That actually is not a bad move, considering that Ukrainian armed forces have already killed or wounded at least 100,000 Russian troops.
00:09:02.000 That is half of its original fighting force.
00:09:04.000 There have been almost 8,000 confirmed losses of armored vehicles, including thousands of tanks, thousands of APCs, artillery pieces, hundreds of fixed and rotary wing aircraft, numerous naval vessels.
00:09:14.000 So basically, you've destroyed half of the Russian military by just giving the weapons to Ukraine.
00:09:19.000 So that is a pretty solid return.
00:09:21.000 I mean, the truth is that on a year-to-year level, the amount of money that we'd be spending in the American military budget in order to counter whatever moves the Russians are making would easily be that amount of money.
00:09:31.000 And here you're talking about a one-time expenditure that has taken out an extraordinary percentage of the Russian military.
00:09:37.000 So, is it in America's interest to fund this?
00:09:39.000 Sure.
00:09:40.000 Now the question becomes, what the end of this war looks like?
00:09:42.000 And this has been my point.
00:09:44.000 The United States and Ukraine had convergent interests when it came to the beginning of this war.
00:09:48.000 Stopped the Russians, pushed the Russians back, degraded the Russian military.
00:09:51.000 Now the question becomes, for how long?
00:09:53.000 What is the end point here?
00:09:54.000 Because the truth is that the United States does have an interest in stability.
00:09:58.000 Despite all the talk about how we would love to see regime change in Russia, the truth is we don't know what comes next in Russia.
00:10:03.000 And were the Russian regime to fall, what you could end up with, as Henry Kissinger has said, is a complete destruction of any centralized authority in Russia.
00:10:09.000 And now you're talking about an extraordinarily large landmass with tribal situations taking over all over this landmass armed with 2,500 nuclear weapons.
00:10:18.000 That does not sound like an ideal situation.
00:10:20.000 You actually do need a centralized government in Russia as much as you think that Vladimir Putin is a thug and a strong man.
00:10:26.000 As much as that is true, the complete collapse of the Russian government into sort of chaos would be a worse solution probably than what we are currently looking at right now.
00:10:35.000 And so this means that we actually do have some divergent interests from the Ukrainians.
00:10:39.000 The convergent interest is Ukraine pushing back the Russians.
00:10:42.000 Where it diverges is the end goal.
00:10:44.000 If you're Ukraine, what you want is for the Russians to actually just surrender.
00:10:47.000 You want the Russians to surrender in Ukraine.
00:10:49.000 You want them to just leave.
00:10:50.000 That is not going to happen.
00:10:51.000 Putin can't allow that to happen.
00:10:53.000 If you're the United States, what you want is for the Russians to be defeated.
00:10:56.000 They have been conventionally.
00:10:58.000 You want the Russian military degraded?
00:11:00.000 You want NATO upheld?
00:11:00.000 You want NATO deterrence upheld?
00:11:01.000 You want deterrence of China?
00:11:03.000 All that stuff has already happened.
00:11:04.000 So the question becomes where the line gets drawn and how we best get to that line.
00:11:08.000 And this is why I've been saying for a long time here that we need to pursue a two-fold strategy, the United States.
00:11:13.000 One, you have to continue funding Ukraine so they don't actually lose the war.
00:11:17.000 You need to allow them to continue to push the Russians pretty hard on the battlefield.
00:11:20.000 At the same time, we need to open up backchannel negotiations with Putin, and we have to say to him, what does a solution, what does a goal look like to you?
00:11:26.000 What does the end goal look like to you?
00:11:27.000 Because at a certain point here, Joe Biden is going to have to be the bad guy.
00:11:30.000 At a certain point here, the President of the United States is going to have to say, here is what a solution looks like in Ukraine, and we are going to stop funding military aid that is used this way.
00:11:40.000 Until we get what we need.
00:11:41.000 If the Ukrainians are the ones who actually push back against that possible solution.
00:11:45.000 The reason that Biden needs to be the bad guy is because Zelensky at this point cannot go back to his own people and say, I'm going to accept Russian domination of particular territory.
00:11:53.000 He's lost too many people.
00:11:54.000 His people are mobilized on behalf of war.
00:11:56.000 War leaders have a very, very difficult time with the negotiated peace.
00:12:00.000 That's a very difficult thing to do.
00:12:02.000 Absent just the abject surrender of the other side, which again is not going to happen because Putin cannot allow that to happen, which means that Biden is going to have to make the sacrifice of going out there and saying, here is what a negotiated solution looks like.
00:12:14.000 I'm going to cram it down.
00:12:16.000 Is he actually going to have the stones to do that?
00:12:17.000 I have very serious doubts whether he's going to have the stones to do any of that.
00:12:21.000 Now, in this whole analysis, it is not necessary to ignore all of the problems inside Ukraine.
00:12:27.000 There's been a lot of talk about why are we even supporting Ukraine against the Russians.
00:12:30.000 I just explained on a geopolitical level why we're supporting Ukraine against the Russians.
00:12:33.000 Russia presents a geopolitical threat to the United States.
00:12:36.000 It backs all of our foes, including Iran, including China.
00:12:39.000 It has been an aggressive foreign player in foreign policy, invading other countries and surrounding regions.
00:12:43.000 It does not have the economic interests of the West or the United States at heart.
00:12:48.000 It is clearly opposed to many of those interests.
00:12:51.000 Ukraine is to all extents and purposes for the United States kind of a nothing burger until the Russians invaded.
00:12:58.000 So the United States had an interest in Ukraine remaining an independent country apart from Russia, but it's not as though the United States had like heavy investment in Ukraine.
00:13:06.000 Ukraine was just another country until Russia invaded it.
00:13:10.000 And you don't have to ignore the problems inside.
00:13:12.000 Ukraine has serious problems.
00:13:13.000 Ukraine, you don't have to be a person who flies the Ukrainian flag because you love Ukraine, because you love the governance in Ukraine, in order to oppose the Russian predations upon Ukraine.
00:13:23.000 It's a false binary.
00:13:25.000 I can accept all of these things.
00:13:25.000 Foreign policy is a place where you are constantly making choices between unpalatable actors.
00:13:31.000 Is Ukraine a place where you'd normally want to sink billions of dollars?
00:13:35.000 No, it is completely corrupt.
00:13:36.000 Okay, the government of Ukraine has been completely corrupt for decades.
00:13:39.000 There's nothing new about this.
00:13:41.000 And those corruption allegations do include people like Vladimir Zelensky.
00:13:44.000 It was the Associated Press that was reporting all the way back in July, quote, Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky's dismissal of senior officials is casting an inconvenient light on an issue that the Biden administration has largely ignored since the outbreak of war with Russia, Ukraine's history of rampant corruption and shaky governance.
00:13:59.000 This is leading a lot of Americans to say, okay, why are we sending so much money over there without any oversight?
00:14:03.000 Which is a proper and correct question.
00:14:06.000 Obviously, we need oversight of where that money is going.
00:14:08.000 In some ways, it's better for us to just ship the weaponry directly in as opposed to sending them the money to buy the weaponry.
00:14:14.000 At least if you just ship them the weaponry, you know they have the weaponry.
00:14:16.000 If you ship them the money, it might be going into Zelensky's personal bank account.
00:14:18.000 You just don't know.
00:14:20.000 Unless that sounds like some sort of slanderous idea about Zelensky.
00:14:22.000 It's been true of literally every Ukrainian prime minister so far as I'm aware for the last several decades.
00:14:29.000 As it presses ahead with providing tens of billions of dollars in military, economic, and direct financial support to Ukraine and encourages allies to do the same, the Biden administration, according to NPR, again this is NPR, back in July, is now once again grappling with long-standing worries about Ukraine's suitability as a recipient of massive infusions of American aid.
00:14:45.000 Those issues, which date back decades and were not an insignificant part of former President Donald Trump's first impeachment, have been largely pushed to the back burner in the immediate run-up to the Russian invasion.
00:14:53.000 But Zelensky fired his top prosecutor, intelligence chief, and other senior officials, resurfacing those concerns.
00:14:59.000 This may have given fresh attention to allegations of high-level corruption in Kiev made by one outspoken U.S.
00:15:03.000 lawmaker.
00:15:04.000 Now again, it may be that in the years to come, we find out that a lot of the money that we've been sending to Ukraine actually went into the pocket of Vladimir Zelensky's friend.
00:15:11.000 Like, that would not be the craziest possible outcome of this, because again, given how politics works in Ukraine, it'd actually be shocking if that wasn't the outcome here.
00:15:21.000 With that said, that does not undermine the idea that the United States should be providing aid to Ukraine for all the reasons that we've already mentioned, mainly checking the Russians and deterring the Chinese.
00:15:30.000 The same thing holds true with regard to Ukrainian religious treatment.
00:15:33.000 Now, there are a few myths that have been purveyed here with regard to Ukraine.
00:15:37.000 One is that Ukraine is some sort of secular liberal paradise.
00:15:39.000 It is not.
00:15:39.000 Ukraine has higher levels of church-going than Russia does.
00:15:42.000 Ukraine does not allow same-sex marriage.
00:15:43.000 Ukraine is not pro-transgender.
00:15:45.000 Ukraine is a very socially conservative country.
00:15:48.000 However, is it true that Vladimir Zelensky is cracking down on the Ukrainian Orthodox Church?
00:15:53.000 The answer is yes, and the reason that he's been doing that is because he believes that the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, not without evidence, is linked to Moscow.
00:16:00.000 Because as it turns out, they've actually done some raids on the Ukrainian Orthodox Church.
00:16:04.000 And what they found is large amounts of cash, dubious Russian citizens, leaflets calling on people to join the Russian army, etc, etc.
00:16:11.000 Now, is that a violation of religious freedom?
00:16:13.000 It very well may be.
00:16:14.000 And you don't have to excuse it away in order to say that it's still better to choose to give aid to Ukraine, to stave off the Russian.
00:16:21.000 Again, it was Russia that crossed Ukraine's borders.
00:16:24.000 It's not the other way around here.
00:16:26.000 You also don't have to ignore the reality that Battalions like the Azov Battalion have been covered since like 2014 as rooted in neo-Nazi ideology.
00:16:36.000 That was reported by virtually every major media outlet.
00:16:39.000 That is not Russian propaganda.
00:16:40.000 That happens to be the truth.
00:16:41.000 That white nationalism is in fact quite present in many areas of the Ukrainian military.
00:16:46.000 All of those things can be true.
00:16:48.000 All those things can be true.
00:16:49.000 It can also be true that the vast bulk of the Ukrainian military is not those people.
00:16:52.000 It can also be true That again, Ukraine is standing up to the Russians, and that is a good thing for the United States.
00:16:58.000 The United States does have an interest in all of these things.
00:17:00.000 So all of these things can be true at once.
00:17:02.000 Because we are constantly thinking in such Manichean, black and white, what Manichean means, Manichean terms.
00:17:08.000 What we tend to think is, well, we either are fighting for the forces of light against the forces of darkness.
00:17:14.000 Or the only side that we can support has to be absolutely pure and every dollar has to go exactly where we say it's going.
00:17:19.000 None of that has ever been the reality in foreign policy.
00:17:21.000 Whenever in foreign policy we give aid, a lot of that money is wasted.
00:17:24.000 Whenever we give military aid to a country, we're giving aid to countries generally that are not as open and honest as the United States.
00:17:30.000 The United States happens to be the greatest country on earth.
00:17:32.000 That means that by definition, when we give aid to other countries, those countries are not as great as the United States.
00:17:37.000 This happens all the time in American foreign policy.
00:17:40.000 And yes, America does have an interest in shaping the world to its priority.
00:17:44.000 There are a lot of folks out there who say that it's not America first if you are interested in the foreign sphere.
00:17:49.000 No, precisely the opposite.
00:17:51.000 It is because I wish to protect America's interests that I believe that a muscular America on the world stage is better.
00:17:57.000 It's the reason why it was an idiotic move to pull out of Afghanistan for no apparent reason and hand the country over to the Taliban who promptly welcomed terrorists back in.
00:18:06.000 Whenever the United States retracts on the world stage, people who hate us take over.
00:18:11.000 This is the rule in American foreign policy, and this is why the United States is involved.
00:18:15.000 Now again, one of the things that drives people absolutely up a wall is the fact that everyone in politics speaks about this stuff without any nuance.
00:18:22.000 Everybody in the political sphere, the people who should be expressing some sort of nuance with regard to this sort of stuff, they're making clear all of the holdups that they have with Ukraine, making obvious that they do not think that Ukrainian government is free of corruption, that it is a bastion of light and happiness.
00:18:38.000 But we are going to support them against the Russians because the Russians are the predatory power in this particular situation and the United States has an actual national interest in staving off Russian victory in this particular arena.
00:18:50.000 Instead of politicians actually saying any of that stuff, what you get is the happy talk.
00:18:54.000 And the happy talk, I understand it rubs everybody the wrong way.
00:18:57.000 Instead, what you have is the Ukrainians are, the Ukrainian government is absolutely scot-free wonderful.
00:19:04.000 It's the greatest.
00:19:06.000 The Ukrainian flag, I won't fly the American flag, but I will fly the Ukrainian flag.
00:19:10.000 I won't shut the American border, but I will ship $45 billion in military aid to Ukraine.
00:19:14.000 Now, the criticism there is not about shipping aid to Ukraine.
00:19:17.000 The criticism about shutting the border So, whenever you hear people who say, why are we shipping the aid to Ukraine as opposed to shutting the border?
00:19:24.000 The real question for Joe Biden should be, why aren't you shutting the border?
00:19:28.000 It's not about the aid.
00:19:29.000 The aid isn't really the question.
00:19:30.000 The question is, why aren't you shutting the border?
00:19:32.000 The notion that, while I can't believe we're spending $45 billion on Ukraine, while we're spending $1.7 trillion, we don't have, we're borrowing the money to spend it.
00:19:41.000 That's a question about American spending.
00:19:42.000 Generally speaking, it is not about this specific spending priority.
00:19:45.000 I agree with all those critiques.
00:19:47.000 I just think it's a non sequitur in many cases.
00:19:49.000 The question is whether it is in the interest of the United States to again fund Ukraine to the defeat of Russia.
00:19:54.000 And the answer is, truthfully speaking, this is one of the greatest American military investments of all time.
00:19:59.000 You have degraded the Russian military by a factor of one half at the cost of less than $100 billion.
00:20:04.000 It's a pretty big win, especially when you look at the wars that are going to be prevented in the future because you have basically made it impossible for the Russians to get predatory anywhere else in the world because their military has been degraded so much by this particular war.
00:20:17.000 Now again, The big problem is our politicians have no capacity to explain any of this.
00:20:21.000 They're not honest with the American people.
00:20:23.000 And so instead what you get is the light versus darkness, dark side of the force versus the Jedi kind of description of this conflict.
00:20:32.000 No nuance at all.
00:20:33.000 And that's a problem because it actually doesn't teach Americans or tell Americans or explain to Americans that foreign policy is a place filled with lots of complexity, lots of nuance and lots of darkness.
00:20:42.000 We'll get to more on this in just one second.
00:20:43.000 First, it is very important for you to have life insurance.
00:20:45.000 Are you a responsible human being?
00:20:47.000 Do you have dependents?
00:20:48.000 Well, one of the worst things that can happen is not just you die, but you have nothing in the bank to give to them and you have no life insurance to help cover them because your funeral is expensive and then so is the rest of their life.
00:20:57.000 So you should actually have life insurance.
00:20:59.000 This is why you need Policy Genius.
00:21:00.000 Life insurance through your workplace might not offer enough protection for your family's needs.
00:21:04.000 In fact, it probably doesn't.
00:21:05.000 Since life insurance typically gets more expensive as you age, now would be the time to buy.
00:21:08.000 PolicyGenius gives you a smarter way to find and buy the right coverage for you and your family.
00:21:12.000 PolicyGenius was built to modernize the life insurance industry.
00:21:15.000 Their technology makes it easy to compare life insurance quotes from top companies and find your lowest price.
00:21:19.000 With PolicyGenius, you can find life insurance policies that start at just $17 per month for $500,000 in coverage.
00:21:24.000 PolicyGenius has licensed agents who can help you find options that offer coverage in as little as a week and avoid those unnecessary medical exams.
00:21:30.000 Those agents are not incentivized to recommend one insurer over another, so you can trust their guidance.
00:21:34.000 There are no added fees.
00:21:35.000 Your personal info is private.
00:21:36.000 No wonder they have thousands of five-star reviews on Google and Trustpilot.
00:21:39.000 Your loved ones deserve a financial safety net.
00:21:41.000 You deserve a smarter way to find and buy it.
00:21:42.000 Head on over to policygenius.com slash Shapiro or click the link in the description.
00:21:46.000 Get your free life insurance quotes.
00:21:47.000 See how much you could save.
00:21:48.000 That's policygenius.com slash Shapiro.
00:21:50.000 Again, policygenius.com slash Shapiro to get started.
00:21:54.000 You may have noticed that during the holiday season, you are busier than ever, and you need coffee to keep you awake.
00:21:59.000 I know that I do.
00:22:00.000 My kids wake me up very early every morning.
00:22:02.000 Now we're getting a puppy, which means I'm gonna be up in the middle of the night even more than that.
00:22:05.000 Yes, my kids finally pressured me into doing that.
00:22:07.000 This means I'm gonna need my coffee from Black Rifle Coffee Company even more than usual.
00:22:11.000 And, Black Rifle Coffee Company is helping you knock out your holiday shopping with a ton of awesome new products this year.
00:22:16.000 Designed for folks who love country and coffee, you can shop Brewing Gear Thermoses Mugs and Apparel for 10% off with promo code SHAPIRO.
00:22:22.000 Black Rifle sources the most exotic roasts from around the globe.
00:22:25.000 All coffee is roasted here in the United States by veteran-led teams of coffee experts.
00:22:28.000 Every purchase you make with Black Rifle helps support veteran and first responder causes.
00:22:32.000 Daily Wire plus kitchens are stocked with Black Rifle Coffee.
00:22:34.000 Yours can be too.
00:22:36.000 Head on over to BlackRifleCoffee.com, use promo code SHAPIRO, get 10% off coffee, coffee gear, apparel, or when you sign up for a new coffee club subscription.
00:22:43.000 That's BlackRifleCoffee.com with promo code SHAPIRO for 10% off Black Rifle Coffee, supporting veterans and America's coffee.
00:22:50.000 That's BlackRifleCoffee.com, use promo code SHAPIRO, get 10% off today.
00:22:55.000 So, for example, Nancy Pelosi yesterday, Zelensky was preparing to come to Washington, D.C., and the outgoing Speaker of the House, she says that Zelensky is a total and complete hero.
00:23:05.000 To have a complete, total hero in the Congress of the United States, fighting for democracy, leading people who are fighting for democracy, would bring honor to the Congress of the United States.
00:23:22.000 And then Pelosi, of course, did what she always does, and she tried to liken January 6th to what's happening in Ukraine.
00:23:27.000 This is just a bad habit for Democrats.
00:23:29.000 Pretending that a couple hundred rioters breaking into a building and quickly being ousted is the same thing as a country nearly being stamped out by another country is pretty ridiculous on its face.
00:23:41.000 Again, I will say this about Zelensky.
00:23:42.000 Zelensky acted heroically in staying in Kiev.
00:23:44.000 He could have fled.
00:23:45.000 Many other leaders have.
00:23:46.000 You saw this in Afghanistan.
00:23:48.000 His leadership has been excellent in terms of wartime leadership in Ukraine.
00:23:52.000 Zelensky's leadership has been very good.
00:23:53.000 He's great on TV.
00:23:54.000 He's very charismatic.
00:23:55.000 This is his job.
00:23:56.000 And he's very good at his job.
00:23:57.000 And is that in Ukraine's interest?
00:23:59.000 Sure.
00:23:59.000 So if you are Ukrainian, do you like Zelensky?
00:24:01.000 Sure.
00:24:02.000 Of course.
00:24:02.000 I mean, he's acting in his national interest.
00:24:04.000 But this sort of drooling, overweening talk is not necessarily, I think, the most honest.
00:24:10.000 Yes, he's acting heroically.
00:24:12.000 Is he a quote-unquote total and complete?
00:24:15.000 Is this the way that you should talk about something where you're going to have to impose a negotiated solution in the very near future?
00:24:19.000 I have some problems with it.
00:24:21.000 Meanwhile, Mitch McConnell using very similar language to talk about this.
00:24:24.000 Here is the Senate Minority Leader.
00:24:27.000 Providing assistance for the Ukrainians to defeat the Russians.
00:24:32.000 That's the number one priority for the United States right now.
00:24:38.000 According to most Republicans, that's sort of how we see the challenges confronting the country at the moment.
00:24:47.000 Okay, that's a wild overstatement.
00:24:49.000 I mean, that is not remotely the number one priority for most Republicans or most Americans.
00:24:53.000 I mean, by polling data, that's just not true.
00:24:55.000 I think it's a major foreign policy priority.
00:24:57.000 Is it the main priority of the United States to fund Ukraine?
00:25:01.000 No, I mean, these mass overstatements, all they do is drive opposition because, again, they're not true.
00:25:06.000 It's not true that this is the vast priority of the United States.
00:25:08.000 Kevin McCarthy, presumably at some point, the Republicans in the House will make him the Speaker.
00:25:13.000 He was actually more accurate about this.
00:25:14.000 He was on the floor with Laura Ingraham last night.
00:25:15.000 He said, listen, we should be signing checks to Ukraine, but there needs to be oversight and we need to make sure we know what we're doing with the money.
00:25:20.000 This seems like a perfectly reasonable response from Kevin McCarthy.
00:25:24.000 Germany's already reneged on its own military expenditures, and we're spending 62% of all the costs in Ukraine, but it's supposed to be the big threat to Europe.
00:25:36.000 Why are the American people on the hook for this, to the tune of 85 billion more, it looks like?
00:25:41.000 Well, we shouldn't be.
00:25:41.000 Before the election, I explained to everybody, no more blank checks for Ukraine.
00:25:48.000 No more blank checks for Ukraine is probably right.
00:25:51.000 I mean, there should never be a blank check.
00:25:52.000 I mean, I understand that's all the Congress does these days, just sign blank checks to everything.
00:25:56.000 Now, here's the thing.
00:25:57.000 The American people actually are pretty much on the same page about this, meaning they support Ukraine against Russia.
00:26:03.000 They don't want this to be endless.
00:26:04.000 They don't think that America's interests are entirely convergent with Ukraine's interests in terms of the end goal.
00:26:09.000 So when you hear politicians say, well, we're willing to fight this thing, we're just going to keep it going ad infinitum, the American people are not with that.
00:26:14.000 The American people They want to see Russia chastened.
00:26:17.000 They want to see Russia lose.
00:26:18.000 They want to see Ukraine funded.
00:26:19.000 They also want to know what the end goal here is.
00:26:22.000 They want to know where our money is going.
00:26:23.000 They want to know what this looks like.
00:26:25.000 What does the solution look like?
00:26:26.000 The latest opinion poll that I can find on this.
00:26:29.000 It's from December 5th.
00:26:30.000 It is from the Chicago Council on Global Affairs.
00:26:33.000 And here is what they find.
00:26:35.000 An equal percentage of Americans say that Russia, 26%, Ukraine, 26%, has the advantage in the current conflict.
00:26:41.000 Plurality, 46%, believes neither country has the advantage.
00:26:44.000 Solid majorities of Americans continue to support supplying Ukraine with arms, that's 65%, and economic aid, 66%, accepting Ukrainian refugees, 73%, and sanctioning Russia, 75%.
00:26:55.000 Only 40% of Americans, however, believe that the United States should maintain its current level of support for Ukraine indefinitely.
00:27:02.000 Now, the rest of the public splits in two different ways, right?
00:27:05.000 3 in 10 say the United States should intervene militarily to tip the advantage to Ukraine, which of course is silly.
00:27:10.000 We're not going to put troops on the ground, nor should we, and end the war as soon as possible, or that the United States should gradually withdraw support for Ukraine at 29%, which means that Again, the American public is pretty split on this.
00:27:21.000 They're pretty ambivalent about the spending.
00:27:24.000 They don't know what a solution looks like because Joe Biden has not talked about a solution.
00:27:27.000 I quoted a Washington Post piece, maybe a month ago, talking about how the Biden administration said, this is not going to end with Russia leaving Ukraine.
00:27:33.000 We don't know what it is going to look like, the end solution.
00:27:36.000 We're not going to impose a solution.
00:27:37.000 We're going to continue funding.
00:27:38.000 That is a very bad policy.
00:27:39.000 That is a policy that doesn't look like anything that Approach is an end.
00:27:43.000 You literally have to have an end goal in mind when you go into a war or there will be no end to the war.
00:27:48.000 And this is a basic rule of war.
00:27:52.000 Americans are now closely divided on whether Washington should support Ukraine as long as it takes.
00:27:58.000 48% of Americans say that Washington should support Ukraine as long as it takes.
00:28:03.000 47% say Washington should urge Ukraine to settle for peace as soon as possible.
00:28:05.000 That's 47%.
00:28:07.000 So again, Americans are pretty split on this issue.
00:28:10.000 This notion that it's like a wild right-wing conspiracy to say that we should get to a solution here, that America's interest is in coming to an end point because we've already achieved our interests.
00:28:20.000 That is not a wild right-wing position.
00:28:22.000 That's a fairly mainstream position.
00:28:25.000 And if you look at the US policy on Ukraine, Russia, and poll statistics on what Americans believe, A majority of Republicans believe in increasing economic and diplomatic sanctions on Russia, sending additional arms and military supplies to the Ukrainian government, providing economic assistance to Ukraine, accepting refugees.
00:28:44.000 Only 26% of Republicans believe that the U.S.
00:28:47.000 should send troops to the Ukrainian government, but that's accompanied by about 34% of Democrats, right?
00:28:53.000 Only one third of Democrats believe in that.
00:28:54.000 So Americans are actually Fairly in agreement on all of this.
00:29:01.000 The only area in which they are in significant disagreement is when it comes to maintaining the current level of support for Ukraine indefinitely, or whether we should intervene militarily to end the war in favor of Ukraine as quickly as possible.
00:29:12.000 Mainly, Republicans think we should gradually withdraw U.S.
00:29:15.000 support for Ukraine, and Democrats, by plurality, or by majority, believe that we should maintain the current level of support for Ukraine indefinitely.
00:29:23.000 That number is going to shrink over time.
00:29:25.000 Again, fewer Americans say the United States should support Ukraine as long as it takes.
00:29:31.000 Right now, about 61% of Democrats think that the U.S.
00:29:35.000 should support Ukraine as long as it takes, which again, means open-ended spending, which Democrats will not support the minute a Republican takes office, as we all know.
00:29:42.000 But only 48% of Americans overall actually agree with that position.
00:29:46.000 If you look at independence, independents are split 46-46 on whether the U.S.
00:29:50.000 should gradually reduce its aid, They take the position the United States should urge Ukraine to settle for peace as soon as possible, so the costs aren't so great for American households, even if that means Ukraine will lose some territory.
00:30:01.000 So the notion that there's sort of like an overwhelming majority for endless aid is not true.
00:30:05.000 The American people are beginning to settle on the notion that there has to be some sort of end point which of course is perfectly correct.
00:30:11.000 This is perfectly right.
00:30:12.000 Now you don't blame Zelensky for coming and asking for the aid.
00:30:14.000 That's literally what his job is to do.
00:30:16.000 I'm not going to blame Zelensky for that because why would I blame Zelensky for that?
00:30:19.000 That is his job.
00:30:20.000 What I blame is the President of the United States for not making clear what exactly America's policies are or doing the things that are necessary to come to a conclusion point here.
00:30:28.000 Now what's weird about this is that The Democratic Party and Joe Biden in particular, the president, they're taking a very split rhetorical view of the situation.
00:30:38.000 On the one hand, they're saying they want to be careful.
00:30:39.000 On the other hand, they're being completely not careful.
00:30:41.000 So for example, John Kirby, who's national security spokesperson, he says, we're going to be very careful what we talk about with Vladimir Zelensky.
00:30:48.000 He said this on MSNBC.
00:30:49.000 And then publicly, they're not careful at all.
00:30:52.000 But if you give us broad strokes as to how the U.S.
00:30:54.000 is ensuring his safety to Washington and then back home.
00:30:58.000 I can tell you that the U.S.
00:31:01.000 is in support in various ways of helping him get here to the United States safely.
00:31:06.000 He is en route right now.
00:31:07.000 And obviously, because he has to get back into country, we're going to be careful in terms of what we talk about.
00:31:15.000 Okay, but it's not just they're careful in what they talk about with regard to him coming in, him coming out.
00:31:19.000 They say they're gonna be careful as far as what they talk about in terms of weaponry.
00:31:21.000 And there's some pretty significant disagreements between the Biden administration and between Ukraine.
00:31:26.000 Ukraine would love for them to, they'd love to have Patriot missiles capable of striking into Russian territory, for example.
00:31:32.000 Their case is you have to hit the Russians where they live in order so that they stop sending people over the border.
00:31:36.000 And the United States is saying, we don't want you to escalate by attacking across the border.
00:31:40.000 But the Biden administration is not making that very clear.
00:31:42.000 Okay, so finally, Zelensky arrives at the White House yesterday.
00:31:45.000 A lot of people aren't making a big deal out of the fact that Zelensky wore essentially his military suit, which is his green sweatshirt and his military pants.
00:31:54.000 I mean, it looks like he's wearing fatigues almost.
00:31:56.000 Getting out of the car here, here's what it looks like.
00:32:03.000 You can see here, here comes Lenski.
00:32:05.000 He's wearing sort of the military fatigue uniform and Biden is wearing a suit.
00:32:08.000 A lot of people were apparently upset that he wasn't wearing a suit.
00:32:11.000 I mean, frankly, I don't care.
00:32:13.000 I think the bigger problem is that we have a senile daughter as the president of the United States.
00:32:16.000 I care very much less what people wear to greet that, that senile daughter.
00:32:21.000 When I hear people from there like, they're not showing proper respect to Joe Biden.
00:32:24.000 It's like, guys, pretty sure that the level of respect that Joe Biden is, number one, due, and number two, that we have granted him on the right, are not particularly high.
00:32:33.000 And I think that that is justified.
00:32:34.000 Second of all, obviously, this is a photo op.
00:32:37.000 If you are doing a photo op near Vladimir Zelensky, leaving your military invaded country for the first time since the beginning of the war, And you're still dressed in sort of your military gear.
00:32:45.000 I'm not going to blame you for that.
00:32:46.000 I think it's kind of ridiculous that people are getting very upset about what Vladimir Zelensky is wearing to meet Joe Biden.
00:32:52.000 And come on, come on.
00:32:54.000 In one second, we'll get to Zelensky's comments with Joe Biden and Joe Biden's response.
00:32:57.000 Then we'll get to his speech in front of Congress.
00:33:00.000 My book club, Ben Shapiro's book club, is back tonight for a whole new episode, 8, 7 Central, exclusively on Daily Wire.
00:33:05.000 Plus, this month's book is The Screwtape Letters by C.S.
00:33:08.000 Lewis.
00:33:08.000 It's a phenomenal book.
00:33:09.000 It is a deeply moving book with a ton of great philosophy, great religious theology.
00:33:14.000 You must be an all-access member to join in on the fun.
00:33:16.000 Head on over to dailywire.com slash ben.
00:33:18.000 Become a member today.
00:33:18.000 Join us tonight at 8, 7 Central as we discuss The Screwtape Letters.
00:33:22.000 That is dailywire.com slash ben.
00:33:24.000 I will see you there.
00:33:25.000 Okay, so Vladimir Zelensky comes to the United States.
00:33:27.000 He sits down with President Biden at the White House and promptly calls Russia a terrorist country.
00:33:32.000 He then proposed what he called a global formula for peace summit, but he didn't offer any details as to what exactly that looks like.
00:33:38.000 And herein is the rob.
00:33:39.000 We actually need to know what the solution looks like before we decide whether to back that solution.
00:33:44.000 I'm not sure why that conversation is not taking place.
00:33:46.000 Here was Zelensky yesterday.
00:33:49.000 We are discussing sanctions and legal pressure on the terrorists in Russia.
00:33:56.000 Russia needs to be held accountable for everything it does against us, against our people, against Europe and the whole free world.
00:34:06.000 And it is very important that we have the peace formula and for that we offer very specific steps what America can do to help us to implement them.
00:34:18.000 We propose global formula for peace summit.
00:34:25.000 So what exactly is that global formula for peace summit?
00:34:28.000 Nobody actually knows.
00:34:29.000 And then Joe Biden himself spoke and he just spoke in constantly high praise for Zelensky.
00:34:34.000 Now again, Zelensky's war leadership in Ukraine has been incredibly impressive.
00:34:39.000 I mean, just on a pure leadership level, him staying in Kiev, him refusing to leave the country, his global appeals, all this has been very, very effective.
00:34:48.000 Pretending it's not been effective would be very silly.
00:34:50.000 Of course it's been effective.
00:34:51.000 The question is, what is the strategic aim of the President of the United States here?
00:34:55.000 If, in fact, he wants to get to some sort of negotiated solution with Putin.
00:35:00.000 Now, you don't know what's happening behind closed doors, obviously.
00:35:03.000 On the one hand, I'm not going to blame Biden for talking up Zelensky at the same time that he's pushing on the other end for Putin to make some sort of negotiated move.
00:35:10.000 The question is what the end of that's going to look like.
00:35:12.000 Here was Biden praising Zelensky yesterday.
00:35:15.000 We have a famous thing that occurs once a year.
00:35:18.000 We pick the man of the year in Time magazine.
00:35:21.000 You are the man of the year in the United States of America.
00:35:28.000 He's the man of the year in the United States of America.
00:35:29.000 Now again, is this an overstatement?
00:35:31.000 It is.
00:35:31.000 I mean, he's the man of the year in terms of, you know, sort of political news coverage for sure.
00:35:36.000 Is he the man of the year in the United States?
00:35:37.000 Is this an issue that Americans really even care about very much?
00:35:40.000 The answer really is kind of no.
00:35:42.000 Biden said the Ukraine's war is part of something bigger.
00:35:45.000 Again, I don't like these sort of big sweeping terminology that Biden uses when he talks about this sort of stuff, mainly because it's wildly inconsistent, right?
00:35:52.000 He'll talk about how we're standing up against autocracy on behalf of democracy.
00:35:55.000 Well, I mean, we constantly make alliances with autocracies if it's in our national interest.
00:36:00.000 What he should say is in the American people's national interest to back Russia, to back Ukraine against Russia in order to prevent the constant crossing of borders, the destabilization of the world, in order to degrade a military power that has been threatening to America's allies.
00:36:15.000 And there are a lot of reasons to support Ukraine.
00:36:18.000 Chief among those reasons is not the giant battle.
00:36:20.000 This is all language that's been adopted from World War II, and it really is not completely applicable.
00:36:26.000 Americans of every walk of life, Democrats and Republicans alike, had the resources to rebound in a resounding, united way to provide unequivocal and unbending support for Ukraine.
00:36:41.000 Because we understand in our bones that Ukraine's fight is part of something much bigger.
00:36:49.000 You know, he then went on to talk about how it was part of a bigger fight against autocracy.
00:36:53.000 And there's a guy who literally handed over Afghanistan to the Taliban.
00:36:56.000 So I don't buy a lot of this kind of broad spectrum language from the president of the United States.
00:37:01.000 It doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
00:37:02.000 It also tends to alienate erstwhile allies who actually are not democracies.
00:37:07.000 Plus, Ukraine is a rather imperfect democracy at best.
00:37:09.000 Is it better than Russia?
00:37:10.000 Absolutely.
00:37:11.000 Is it a perfect democracy?
00:37:12.000 Not even close.
00:37:14.000 Meanwhile, John Kirby, again, the spokesperson for the National Security Wing of the presidency, he says, we're not going to force a conversation on Zelensky.
00:37:20.000 And herein lies the problem.
00:37:21.000 When you make this sort of pre-commitment, we're not going to force a conversation on Zelensky.
00:37:26.000 The question is, is America's interest identical with the interest of Ukraine?
00:37:29.000 I don't think so.
00:37:29.000 I think there's crossover.
00:37:30.000 I don't think that it's identical.
00:37:33.000 Does President Biden need to understand what President Zelensky's bottom lines are?
00:37:38.000 And how to get Putin to the table?
00:37:40.000 And of what happens to Crimea and, you know, territory that Putin has had since 2014?
00:37:46.000 I absolutely think that diplomacy will be part and parcel of what's discussed today.
00:37:53.000 This won't be about, however, forcing President Zelensky to negotiate or describing or dictating to him what the terms of a negotiation might look like.
00:38:03.000 He's the commander in chief.
00:38:04.000 It's his country.
00:38:07.000 Okay, well, I mean, that may be true, but it's our money.
00:38:10.000 So, I mean, at a certain point, we are going to have to have a pretty strong say in this.
00:38:13.000 Are we not?
00:38:14.000 And what does that say look like?
00:38:16.000 Has the administration made that clear along any lines?
00:38:18.000 And the truth is that on a practical level, there are disagreements between the Biden administration and Ukraine.
00:38:21.000 I mean, all of this sort of pretend we stand shoulder by shoulder, everything you want, we'll give you is not true.
00:38:26.000 As the Washington Post reports, in a tweet labeled My Christmas Wishlist posted earlier this month before this week's announcement of another $1.85 billion worth of U.S.
00:38:33.000 security assistance, Zelensky adviser Mikhailo Podolyak's top five items included four the Biden administration has declined to offer or help provide, including advanced battle tanks and long-range missiles.
00:38:42.000 The fifth, the Patriot air defense system, was included in the new aid package.
00:38:46.000 U.S.
00:38:46.000 defense officials said Ukraine already has enough tanks and that the U.S.
00:38:49.000 M1 Abrams sought by Kiev are too difficult to maintain and complex to operate, meaning that we'd actually have to put soldiers on the ground in order to operate those things, which we're not willing to do.
00:38:56.000 When asked at a joint news conference with Zelensky about the missiles, which would allow Ukrainian forces to strike targets inside Russian territory, Biden actually warned such weaponry could shatter NATO unity in support of Ukraine.
00:39:05.000 He said of the alliance, we're not looking to go to war with Russia, which of course is correct.
00:39:09.000 A little bit more of that, a little bit more balance in terms of the rhetoric might be something nice here.
00:39:13.000 Okay, so all of this led up to Zelensky actually speaking in front of a joint session of Congress last night.
00:39:19.000 Again, this is all PR.
00:39:20.000 It's all optics.
00:39:21.000 And you can't blame Zelensky for being good at his job.
00:39:23.000 He is good at his job.
00:39:24.000 I mean, that's literally his job, is to go into the joint session of Congress to brag about his country's achievements and to get the picture of Nancy Pelosi and Kamala Harris holding up a Ukrainian flag, which is what he did.
00:39:34.000 By the way, I'm aware of no other time in modern American history in which you have the Vice President of the United States and the Speaker of the House holding up the flag of another country no matter what that country is.
00:39:45.000 So it's pretty astonishing display on their behalf.
00:39:47.000 One I don't think was actually entirely appropriate.
00:39:51.000 Say the least again.
00:39:52.000 You believe in anti-Ukraine and not believe in those sort of optics.
00:39:55.000 I think that they would have a harder time holding up an American flag at this point than a Ukrainian flag.
00:39:58.000 Anyway, Zelensky, he gave a speech.
00:40:00.000 Speech was good.
00:40:01.000 He said that Ukraine is alive because Russian tyranny has lost control.
00:40:04.000 Here was Zelensky last night.
00:40:05.000 Against all odds and doom and gloom scenarios, Ukraine didn't fall.
00:40:14.000 Ukraine is alive and kicking.
00:40:17.000 You Europeans gained this victory.
00:40:21.000 And that's why Europe is now stronger and more independent than ever.
00:40:28.000 The Russian tyranny has lost control over us.
00:40:35.000 I mean, it is important to remember how historic it is that the Russians tried to invade a country and got thrown back.
00:40:40.000 I mean, it's like the Winter War in 1939 in Finland.
00:40:42.000 It's kind of an amazing achievement.
00:40:44.000 And certainly, Zelensky deserves incredible props for all of that.
00:40:48.000 Then Zelensky asked for more aid.
00:40:49.000 And here's a line that tended to tick a lot of people off.
00:40:51.000 He said, this is not charity.
00:40:53.000 Financial assistance is also critically important and I would like to thank you.
00:40:59.000 Thank you very much.
00:41:00.000 Thank you for both financial packages you have already provided us with and the ones you may be willing to decide on.
00:41:10.000 Your money is not charity.
00:41:13.000 It's an investment in the global security and democracy that we handle in the most responsible way.
00:41:24.000 Okay, now I understand again why he's saying that.
00:41:26.000 I also understand that it is in fact charity.
00:41:29.000 I mean it is both.
00:41:29.000 These things, these are not mutually exclusive.
00:41:31.000 You assume when you give charity that people are going to use the charity not to buy drugs or alcohol with it.
00:41:35.000 You assume that they will go better their lives with it.
00:41:37.000 It is in fact both in America's interest for Ukraine to stand up to Russia and also it is charity.
00:41:41.000 And by the way, when we say it's charity, we mean that it is taxpayer taken charity.
00:41:45.000 It is not the government having its own money.
00:41:47.000 It is the government taking your money and giving it to Ukraine.
00:41:49.000 So a little, you know, he's being grateful, but he should say, we thank you for the money that you're giving us.
00:41:56.000 And we are in acknowledgement that it is in America's interest to do so.
00:41:59.000 The line that it's not charity, I think is completely superfluous there.
00:42:03.000 Absolutely.
00:42:03.000 Okay.
00:42:03.000 But does Zelensky come away with what he wants?
00:42:06.000 Well, he comes up with a political win for sure.
00:42:09.000 Does it provide more cover for Joe Biden to give more aid?
00:42:12.000 Sure, that was probably going to happen.
00:42:13.000 Anyway, the question again is going to be what a solution looks like here.
00:42:17.000 And I keep asking it over and over because the Biden administration has provided no guidance as to this.
00:42:21.000 Not only have they provided no guidance, when you actually have in a PR Opportunity like this, where you have a foreign leader coming to the United States in the middle of a war that we are funding, meeting with the President of the United States, what you're showing is shoulder to shoulder.
00:42:36.000 So, is it any surprise that Putin is now upping the ante?
00:42:39.000 Alrighty, guys, the rest of the show is continuing right now.
00:42:41.000 You're not going to want to miss it.
00:42:42.000 We'll be getting into your phone calls, plus an update on Amber Heard and Johnny Depp.
00:42:46.000 I don't care, but you guys apparently do, so we're covering that.
00:42:49.000 Apparently, she's now signing a check to Johnny Depp.