The Joe Rogan Experience - November 29, 2018


Joe Rogan Experience #1208 - Jordan Peterson


Episode Stats

Length

2 hours and 54 minutes

Words per Minute

181.37883

Word Count

31,702

Sentence Count

2,209

Misogynist Sentences

36

Hate Speech Sentences

26


Summary

In this episode, I sit down with author and keynote speaker Joel Sobel to talk about what it's like to travel the world and speak to people who are trying to get their lives back on track after a life of drugs and alcohol. Joel is a best-selling author, bestselling author, keynote speaker, speaker and public speaker. He's also the host of the award-winning TV show, and is one of the most impactful people I've ever met. He travels the world with his wife, Tammy, and they have three kids, and it's so inspiring to watch them grow up in such a loving and supportive environment. I hope you enjoy this episode and that it inspires you to keep going and keep pushing forward. I know that it did for me. I'll be back with a new episode next week with a much longer interview with my good friend, Dr. Michael Hyatt, who is also a keynote speaker and author. Stay tuned for that! -Joel Sobel is a good friend of mine, and I'm so grateful to have him on the show. Thank you so much for being so generous with your time and for sharing your story and your wisdom. I really appreciate it. -Jonah Sobel I hope that you enjoy the episode, and that you have a wonderful rest of the week! I'll see you next Tuesday! - Jonah Jonah's book, , is out on Amazon if you're looking for a good book recommendation, check it out! . Don't Tell me what you think of the book you've been reading or listening to this episode? or watching it on Amazon? I'm looking forward to hearing from someone else? - Thank you Jonah, Jonah is looking for some good advice? -- I'll send you a review! --Jonah's Book Recommendation: Jonathan Sobel's book: "Good Morning, Good Life, Good Morning, Bad Life, Bad Day, Good Day, Bad Night, Good Luck, Good Rest, Good Things, Good Vibes, Good Relationships, Good Times, Good Enough, Good Blessings, Good Thoughts, Good Sleep, Good Nights, and Good Things I've Been Through It's a Good Day by Jonathan Sobell Thank You Jonah Sobell's Book recommendation: -- -- Thank You, Jonathan Sobelman


Transcript

00:00:00.000 3...2...1...
00:00:05.000 Here we are again.
00:00:06.000 Hey, Joel.
00:00:07.000 Hello, Jordan.
00:00:08.000 How are you doing, man?
00:00:10.000 I'm doing great.
00:00:12.000 The schedule that you have and the amount of energy and enthusiasm you maintain with the schedule is very remarkable because you're not stopping.
00:00:21.000 You're not slowing down.
00:00:22.000 I mean, you've had your foot on the gas for like two solid years now.
00:00:27.000 Make hay while the sun shines.
00:00:29.000 I guess so.
00:00:29.000 Is that what it is?
00:00:30.000 Is that how you feel about it?
00:00:31.000 Well, you know, when you have an opportunity that's completely preposterous, you're a fool to take it for granted.
00:00:38.000 Yeah, I guess that's it, right?
00:00:40.000 Yeah, so Tammy and I have been to 100 cities since January.
00:00:45.000 So, everywhere, you know.
00:00:46.000 And part of what keeps us going, well, first of all, I have a really good crew.
00:00:50.000 You know, like the CAA guys, they're really good.
00:00:53.000 Live Nation's been really good.
00:00:54.000 They make sure the theatres are smooth and we've had no problems at all.
00:01:00.000 And then I have lots of people who are helping me with my scheduling and Tammy travels with me.
00:01:04.000 And then the lectures themselves, well, I really like doing them, partly because I do a different lecture every night.
00:01:11.000 And so that keeps me sharp and it makes sure that I'm thinking about new things all the time and trying to formulate my thoughts more precisely.
00:01:18.000 And they're also unbelievably positive.
00:01:22.000 So that's also...
00:01:24.000 That's also something that makes it a lot easier to do because, you know, I go to a city and there's 1,500 to 2,000 people waiting for me there which is like staggering in and of itself wherever I go and they're all there listening intently and it's a sophisticated discussion or at least as sophisticated as I can make it and I'm communicating directly with the audience and all the people are there to try to get their lives together.
00:01:49.000 And so the feeling in the hall is really, really positive.
00:01:54.000 And then I usually talk to about 150 people afterwards.
00:01:58.000 And, you know, all of them, all of them, well, many of them, you know, they just say hi and they're polite and we have a photograph and all that.
00:02:06.000 But lots of them have stories about how they've been putting their lives together and they're thrilled to death about it, you know, that they're out of the hole they were in.
00:02:13.000 Or they've started a new business, or they've sold a new business, or they just decided to get married, or they're going to have some kids, or they've fixed up their relationship with their parents, or they quit drinking, and they're not addicted.
00:02:23.000 I talked to one guy in Europe.
00:02:25.000 He'd stopped.
00:02:26.000 He was addicted.
00:02:28.000 I don't remember what to, but it was something that wasn't good.
00:02:31.000 He'd stopped for nine months and got nine of his friends to quit, too.
00:02:34.000 So he comes up.
00:02:35.000 He's just, like, bouncing, you know.
00:02:36.000 He's so damn happy that...
00:02:38.000 his life is better and not only that that he had this additional positive effect on other people so and it's so fun because I have these conversations with people they're brief but they're very personal and they're very intense you know because they you think people have to trust you to tell you that their lives weren't going so well and then they have to trust you even more to tell you that they're going better now because of course what you want when you tell someone that things are going better is you want Real encouragement
00:03:08.000 and real sense from the person you're talking to that they're happy for you.
00:03:12.000 And I'm absolutely thrilled to hear these things.
00:03:14.000 Like, I was in Whole Foods this morning.
00:03:16.000 I went down near where I'm staying.
00:03:19.000 And two of the guys that work behind the meat counter came out to talk to me.
00:03:23.000 And independently.
00:03:25.000 And they'd both been reading my books and watching my lectures.
00:03:27.000 And one of them said he had a seven-year-old son.
00:03:29.000 He really wanted to do right by him.
00:03:31.000 He was looking for ethical and moral guidance.
00:03:33.000 And, you know, he found the books really helpful.
00:03:35.000 And then it was helping him put his life together.
00:03:37.000 And so a guy at the car rental place last night told me the same thing.
00:03:42.000 And so it's so exciting, so ridiculously exciting to go everywhere around the world and to go into airports or to walk down the street and have people come up and say, I've been watching you on YouTube.
00:03:55.000 They often mention you.
00:03:57.000 I've been listening to what you say.
00:03:58.000 I've been developing a vision for my life.
00:04:00.000 It's really helped me out a lot.
00:04:02.000 Thanks a lot.
00:04:02.000 And Jesus, like to be able to have that happen.
00:04:06.000 You know, time after time, day after day, all over the place, that's just absolutely...
00:04:11.000 It makes going to 100 cities, like, continually energizing, because it's so positive.
00:04:20.000 And then there's all this weird crap in the press, you know, about my dangerous followers and all this alt-right nonsense, and it's so ridiculous, you know.
00:04:27.000 I've talked to 250,000 people in seven months.
00:04:32.000 We haven't had one incident that was negative in that entire time.
00:04:36.000 Not one.
00:04:37.000 Nothing.
00:04:38.000 No misbehavior on anyone's part.
00:04:40.000 We had one heckler, who was obviously not a fan of mine, given that he was a heckler.
00:04:45.000 That was it.
00:04:46.000 Other than that, the audiences behave perfectly.
00:04:49.000 They all dress up.
00:04:50.000 They come in suits, which is really cool.
00:04:52.000 A lot of the young guys, they dress up.
00:04:53.000 So they have a little suit competition with me, which is quite fun.
00:04:56.000 So that's an additional bonus.
00:04:58.000 Yeah, it's...
00:05:00.000 It's pretty damn good, Joe.
00:05:01.000 I think it's really fantastic, and I think what's going on is, it makes me very optimistic, because I think that one of the things that new media has provided is these new avenues for information to get out there.
00:05:16.000 And these new things like these lecture circuits.
00:05:19.000 When was the last time you saw public lecture circuits that were popular to the tune of thousands and thousands of people?
00:05:26.000 I saw the ones that you and Sam Harris did on YouTube.
00:05:29.000 And, you know, Sam's doing them with a lot of other people as well.
00:05:31.000 You're doing them with Dave Rubin as well.
00:05:34.000 I mean, this is a very unique thing.
00:05:37.000 That's for sure.
00:05:38.000 And also this desire to understand new paths of behavior and patterns of thinking.
00:05:44.000 And that these are corrective paths and patterns that can lead you to a more fulfilled and happier life.
00:05:50.000 And recognize the pitfalls of certain types of behavior that people just fall into.
00:05:55.000 And I think oftentimes the difference between someone who lives a fulfilled life and someone who lives a life filled with disaster Is following incorrect patterns and not knowing what the correct ones are.
00:06:07.000 So there's a lot of good people out there that live shitty lives.
00:06:10.000 And they don't do it because they're just dumb or because they're bad.
00:06:14.000 They do it because they've been influenced by certain patterns.
00:06:18.000 They've fallen into patterns, whether it's because of the people that they surround themselves with or the neighborhood that grew up.
00:06:24.000 The people that are around them have this way of being and they kind of fall into that.
00:06:27.000 Or it's drugs or it's alcohol or whatever it is.
00:06:30.000 But then they find a new one.
00:06:32.000 And then they can slide right into that new one.
00:06:34.000 And all of a sudden, they feel energized when they wake up in the morning instead of hungover.
00:06:38.000 They're getting exercise in.
00:06:39.000 They're eating healthy.
00:06:40.000 They're starting to think about things correctly and do good things.
00:06:43.000 And the momentum of them doing those good things leads them to feel good about themselves and energized.
00:06:49.000 And these are all things that you promote and that I think are genuinely really significant.
00:06:56.000 Really important.
00:06:57.000 But the thing is, it gets maligned.
00:07:00.000 You get pushed into this weird, what we were talking about before the podcast, by a small, select group of people.
00:07:08.000 It's a very small but vocal minority that wants to misrepresent you, and then there's the periphery that listen to this small group, and then they sort of parrot those words out without any real thinking about what you've said.
00:07:23.000 Well, you know, one of the things that I have made a mistake about in the past that I just realized in the last couple of weeks was that, you know, people often accuse me and they say, well, most of the people that listen to you are men.
00:07:34.000 And I think...
00:07:36.000 You know, when you're accused like that, your automatic response is, well, you wouldn't be accused if you weren't doing something wrong.
00:07:41.000 So there must be something wrong about that.
00:07:43.000 It's like, why isn't it 50% women?
00:07:45.000 And so I've said things like, well, you know, 80% of the people who watch YouTube videos are men.
00:07:50.000 And so the fact that 80% of the people who watch my videos are men isn't that surprising given that base rate.
00:07:56.000 But then about three weeks ago, I started thinking, what the hell am I doing?
00:08:00.000 It's like, what, is there something wrong with talking to men?
00:08:03.000 Is that actually a problem?
00:08:04.000 It's like I'm trying to...
00:08:05.000 I'm trying to...
00:08:06.000 I mean, I didn't set out to do that specifically, but if that's the way it's working out, and there is a majority of men coming to my shows, say, then is that...
00:08:15.000 Why is that all of a sudden supposed to be a bad thing?
00:08:18.000 I'm asking men to, you know, to be more honest, especially in their speech and their thinking, and to be more responsible for themselves and for their family and for their community.
00:08:30.000 And to grow up and to shoulder their burden and to live a responsible and meaningful life and putting those two things together conceptually.
00:08:37.000 And then there's an accusation about that, as if there's something wrong.
00:08:40.000 And I thought, why am I even playing into this?
00:08:43.000 It's like, fine, I'm talking to men.
00:08:45.000 I'm encouraging them.
00:08:46.000 And I am absolutely thrilled.
00:08:48.000 Like, every time someone comes up to me...
00:08:51.000 And that's happening maybe a hundred times a week or something like that and tells me one of these stories about how they put their life together.
00:08:58.000 It's like I'm absolutely thrilled about that.
00:09:01.000 And so I don't see...
00:09:04.000 It's just a sign of how pathological our times have become in some sense that there would have been any guilt about that to begin with.
00:09:10.000 Because how is that not a good thing, man?
00:09:13.000 It's weird.
00:09:13.000 I think a lot of that has to do with this concept that men are running everything and that men have this massive advantage.
00:09:20.000 There's a white male advantage and privilege that we all enjoy and share.
00:09:24.000 And that men have this advantage financially.
00:09:27.000 There's disparity in terms of the gender gap in pay and income.
00:09:32.000 And that if you were really a good person, you would be looking out, you would be trying to balance that out.
00:09:39.000 And then you wouldn't be trying to pump up the winning team.
00:09:42.000 Right.
00:09:42.000 Well, that's the funny thing.
00:09:43.000 Well, that's it.
00:09:44.000 And that's part of that narrative that, well, if there's winners, there has to be losers.
00:09:49.000 And the reason that there are losers is because there's winners.
00:09:52.000 And that's complete bloody nonsense, because as far as I'm concerned, and I really believe this, is that every single person who sets out to put themselves together ethically...
00:10:02.000 It's a net positive to everyone around them.
00:10:04.000 There's no downside to that.
00:10:06.000 My book has been criticized by people who've read it very poorly, especially chapter one when I talk about hierarchies, that I'm somehow supporting the idea that Power in a hierarchy is the right way to be.
00:10:19.000 And there's absolutely nothing in what I've written that suggests that at all.
00:10:23.000 I'm suggesting that human hierarchies are very complex and that the way that you win in a human hierarchy is by being competent and reciprocal.
00:10:33.000 And so, I mean, for example, even if you're selfish, let's say, You've got to think very carefully about what that would mean if you were selfish and awake, because you have to work to take care of yourself and what you want, say, in this moment.
00:10:47.000 But then there's you tomorrow, and there's you next week, and there's you next month, and next year, and ten years from now, and when you're old.
00:10:54.000 So because you're self-conscious and because you're aware of the future, you're actually a community unto yourself.
00:11:01.000 And if you're selfish and impulsive, all that means is that you're serving the person you are right now, you know, in that impulsive way, but not the person you're going to be.
00:11:09.000 And so that's not a good grounds for any sort of ethical behavior.
00:11:12.000 And I see that if you serve yourself properly, there's no difference between that and serving your family properly and serving your community properly.
00:11:20.000 Those things all mesh in a kind of a harmonious manner.
00:11:23.000 And one of the things that's really been effective in the lecture tour is a discussion about that idea And the relationship between that and meaning and responsibility, because one of the things that strikes the audience as silent constantly,
00:11:40.000 because I'm always listening to them to see when the attention is maximally focused, is whenever I point out to people that The antidote to the meaninglessness of their life and the suffering and the malevolence that they might be displaying because they're resentful and bitter about how things have turned out,
00:11:56.000 the antidote to that is to take on more responsibility for themselves and for other people, and that that's aspirational, which is kind of cool.
00:12:04.000 You know, the conservative types, the duty types, and I'm not complaining about them, You know, they're always basically saying, well, this is how you should act, because in some sense, that's your duty, right?
00:12:15.000 That's how a good citizen would act.
00:12:17.000 And that's a reasonable argument.
00:12:18.000 But the case that I've been making is more that, well, there is value distinctions between things.
00:12:25.000 Some things are worth doing and some things aren't and you can kind of discover what that is for yourself and then you should aim at the things that are most worth doing and what you'll find if you watch carefully is that the things that you find worth doing are almost always associated with an increase in responsibility because if you think about the people you admire for example you spontaneously admire people and that's a manifestation of the instinct to imitate and Again,
00:12:52.000 people are very imitative.
00:12:53.000 You don't admire people who don't take care of themselves.
00:12:55.000 Like, unless there's something wrong with you, you at least want an admirable person to be accountable for themselves.
00:13:02.000 And then if they've got something left over so they can be accountable for their family, well, then that's a net plus, obviously.
00:13:07.000 That's someone you think is solid.
00:13:09.000 And then maybe they take care of some more people.
00:13:12.000 They have a business or they're involved in the community in some positive way.
00:13:15.000 You see, well, that's a person whose pattern of being is worth imitating.
00:13:20.000 And that's all associated with responsibility.
00:13:22.000 And it's so interesting because it's as if everybody kind of knows this, but that it hasn't crystallized.
00:13:29.000 It's like, well, you should be responsible because that's what a good citizen is.
00:13:34.000 No, no.
00:13:34.000 You should be responsible because you need to have a deep meaning in your life to offset the suffering so you don't get bitter.
00:13:40.000 And the way you do that is to bear a heavy load, you know, to get yourself in check for...
00:13:46.000 for you now and for you in the future and then to do the same for your family and your community and that there's real nobility in that and there's real meaning and more the other thing that I've been suggesting to people and I also believe this is that and I think that the guys that have come to talk to me especially the ones that have had real rough lives they really understand this If you don't get your act together and you let yourself slide,
00:14:06.000 then what kind of moves in to take the place of what you could have been is something that's really not good at all.
00:14:13.000 So it's not only that if you're living like a dissolute life that you're not aiming at anything positive and so you don't have any real meaning and you're subsumed by anxiety and all of that hopelessness.
00:14:25.000 But something kind of hellish moves in there, too, to occupy that place.
00:14:29.000 And so then you end up making things worse.
00:14:31.000 And one of the things I learned about studying totalitarian systems, whether they were on the right or the left, was that part of the reason that the totalitarian horrors of the 20th century manifested themselves was because average people didn't take on the proper responsibility.
00:14:47.000 They shut their eyes when their eyes should have been opened, even though they knew it.
00:14:50.000 And they did and said things they knew they shouldn't have done and said.
00:14:53.000 And that was what supported those horrible systems.
00:14:56.000 So, you know, if you don't get your act together, then you leave a little space for hell.
00:15:00.000 And I really believe that.
00:15:01.000 Don't you think...
00:15:03.000 When things are happening, like something like Nazi Germany, I would imagine that during that time, the people that were not in support of it felt helpless.
00:15:12.000 Whether you're in Germany, you're a part of this country, this country is turning towards this horrible situation where Jewish people are being put on trains.
00:15:24.000 The people that didn't speak out, I don't necessarily know if it's a lack of discipline or just complete fear and paralysis.
00:15:34.000 It's fear for sure.
00:15:35.000 No knowledge of how to deal with it or what to do and wanting to protect your family as well, so not wanting to step out of line.
00:15:42.000 Absolutely.
00:15:44.000 The problem is that if you're going to forestall that sort of thing, you have to do it early.
00:15:50.000 Because the longer you wait, the higher the price you pay for it.
00:15:53.000 But it's hard to take that jump early because you're not exactly sure where it's going.
00:15:58.000 That's true.
00:15:58.000 And you're also likely to be jumped on.
00:16:01.000 I mean, you can see that happening in our own culture.
00:16:03.000 You make a mistake on Twitter or even something that isn't a mistake.
00:16:07.000 You can pay what feels to be a pretty high price.
00:16:11.000 Whether it is a high price or not, it's hard to tell because Twitter is so weirdly fictional.
00:16:16.000 It's so hard to get a grasp on exactly what's going on.
00:16:22.000 It's also your comprehension of what is your emotional reaction to people that you don't know being mean to you.
00:16:30.000 What is that price?
00:16:32.000 And some people want to dismiss that as being just nothing.
00:16:37.000 It's not that big a deal.
00:16:38.000 But it is a big deal.
00:16:39.000 It causes people to commit suicide.
00:16:41.000 I mean, it has, absolutely.
00:16:42.000 Bullying online has caused many people to commit suicide.
00:16:45.000 Well, the thing is, you know, the weird thing about that online communication is that, like, I find that I tend to react to a negative Twitter comment as if it's someone sitting across from me talking to me that I know.
00:16:58.000 Now, it's not.
00:16:59.000 And I don't even know if the person is real, because the accounts are often anonymous, right?
00:17:04.000 So that person isn't really real.
00:17:06.000 But your emotional response is still, well, someone's gone out of their way to be harshly critical to you.
00:17:13.000 And that doesn't happen that often in your day-to-day life.
00:17:16.000 And so, if you're a reasonable person, You're very sensitive to criticism because it's rare and because you might be wrong, especially if there's a lot of people criticizing you, because you kind of have to be psychopathic in order just to brush that off.
00:17:30.000 You know, it's like, well, a hundred people think I'm wrong.
00:17:32.000 There's nothing to that.
00:17:33.000 It's like, well, if it's a hundred people out of a hundred million, But you can't tell on Twitter, then it's irrelevant.
00:17:40.000 But if it's a mob of 100 people that show up outside your house, which is kind of what Twitter feels like, then you think, well, God, you know, I must have done something wrong because otherwise why would all these people be here?
00:17:51.000 And I think that's why so many people are driven to apologize.
00:17:55.000 You know, when they do something on Twitter or do something and then the Twitter mobs go after them, they think, oh, God, I must have done something wrong.
00:18:03.000 I should, you know, do some soul searching.
00:18:06.000 Yeah.
00:18:07.000 So some of that's not even fear, it's more like, in a sense, it's a morality that's misplaced because of our inability to calibrate the social messaging.
00:18:17.000 I mean, I've stopped, almost completely stopped reading Twitter comments in the last month, and I'm definitely better for it.
00:18:26.000 Yeah, it makes you way happier, right?
00:18:27.000 Oh yeah, it's just, it's too much.
00:18:29.000 It's too much.
00:18:30.000 It's too crazy.
00:18:30.000 It's too crazy, yeah.
00:18:31.000 What is your number up to now, the number of followers you have?
00:18:33.000 About a million on Twitter.
00:18:34.000 That's when it's about time to get out of Dodge.
00:18:37.000 Yeah, yeah.
00:18:38.000 Well, I mean, I'm still following people and reading what people are posting, but no, the comments, I'm just...
00:18:44.000 It's not worth it.
00:18:44.000 No, it's not.
00:18:45.000 And I think it does have something to do with the technology itself.
00:18:49.000 Like, I do believe that that small limit...
00:18:53.000 It facilitates angry, impulsive responding.
00:18:57.000 Perhaps because you're trying to get people to respond to you, but the alternative is Facebook, where you have these long posts that are just rambling first drafts that people put out.
00:19:10.000 When they start ranting about politics or what have you, I just can't get involved.
00:19:14.000 They're just too big.
00:19:15.000 And then people jump in and comment on them, and often their comments are massive as well.
00:19:20.000 It's just too verbose.
00:19:22.000 Whereas the good thing about Twitter is it makes you boil down what you're trying to say to a very succinct thing.
00:19:28.000 Although I do enjoy when someone has a good Twitter thread.
00:19:32.000 Like there was a really good Twitter thread.
00:19:34.000 What was that gentleman's name?
00:19:35.000 Respectable Lawyer.
00:19:38.000 Respectable Law, I believe.
00:19:39.000 Respectable Law.
00:19:54.000 Yeah, and he wrote this long history of these people and what they've had to endure with being, you know, a few people going to them and doing some awful things and diseases and stuff like that.
00:20:05.000 So I enjoy when someone will do that, like these long – like every now and then someone will use it in a novel way.
00:20:11.000 I really like that.
00:20:12.000 But there's – A lot of it is just people just trying to get a reaction.
00:20:17.000 And what's the reaction they can get?
00:20:18.000 By pissing you off.
00:20:19.000 That's like the best one.
00:20:20.000 Well, they also might be the ones that are most...
00:20:22.000 We don't exactly know what motivates people to respond on Twitter.
00:20:26.000 And it might be that the fundamental motivation for a Twitter response is anger.
00:20:31.000 You know, rather than the desire to share something, because we don't know anything about how these new communication techniques function psychologically.
00:20:38.000 Like, maybe Twitter is skewed 90% towards people who are impulsively angry at that moment.
00:20:44.000 It could easily be.
00:20:46.000 We don't know.
00:20:47.000 Like, you know, if you're driving in your car and someone cuts you off, you curse.
00:20:50.000 You know, or at least I do.
00:20:52.000 And it's often a situational issue rather than a personality flaw on the part of the other driver, even though it's easy to assume that.
00:20:59.000 But you respond impulsively.
00:21:01.000 I mean, God only knows how much of our social media networks are set up to differentially reward impulsive behavior.
00:21:09.000 And it's also not that easy to hold people accountable in some sense.
00:21:14.000 Maybe there's some utility to that, but with anonymous accounts and all of that, the anonymity is also problematic, because it certainly enables people to allow their worst to manifest themselves, especially if they're resentful and angry.
00:21:28.000 The only benefit that I can see to anonymity is it gives you the opportunity to explore controversial ideas without blowback.
00:21:35.000 True, true.
00:21:36.000 If it's used correctly.
00:21:37.000 Well, that's it.
00:21:38.000 That's true.
00:21:39.000 I think there's some utility.
00:21:41.000 I mean, I don't think that it should be forbidden, but, well, like most things, it has its advantages and its disadvantages.
00:21:47.000 Yeah, like most things.
00:21:48.000 It's not entirely negative to be anonymous.
00:21:50.000 Hey, so I figured something out that I thought I'd tell you about.
00:21:53.000 This took me like 30 years to figure out, and I figured it out on this tour.
00:21:56.000 So there's this old idea, you know, that you have to rescue your father from the belly of the whale, right?
00:22:01.000 From some monster that's deep in the abyss.
00:22:04.000 You see that in Pinocchio, for example.
00:22:06.000 But it's a very common idea.
00:22:08.000 And I figured out why that is, I think.
00:22:11.000 So, imagine that we already know from a clinical perspective that, you know, if you set out a path towards a goal, which you want to do because you need a goal and you need a path, because that provides you with positive emotion, right?
00:22:24.000 So, you set up something as valuable, so that implies a hierarchy.
00:22:28.000 You set up something as valuable.
00:22:30.000 You decide that you're going to do that instead of other things, so that's kind of a sacrifice, because you're sacrificing everything else to pursue that.
00:22:36.000 And then you experience a fair bit of positive emotion and meaning as you watch yourself move towards the goal.
00:22:42.000 And so the implication of that is the better the goal, The more full and rich your experience is going to be when you pursue it.
00:22:49.000 So that's one of the reasons for developing a vision and for fleshing yourself out philosophically because you want to aim at the highest goal that you can manage.
00:22:58.000 Okay, so you do that.
00:23:01.000 And then, what you'll find is that as you move towards the goal, there are certain things that you have to accomplish that frighten you.
00:23:07.000 You know, maybe you have to learn to be a better speaker, a better writer, a better thinker.
00:23:12.000 You have to be better to people around you, or you have to learn some new skills and you're afraid of that.
00:23:16.000 Whatever, because it's going to stretch you if you pursue a goal.
00:23:19.000 And so that'll put you up against challenges.
00:23:22.000 Okay, so all the clinical data indicates, or the opposite of safe spaces, as Jonathan Haidt has been pointing out, You identify something that someone is avoiding that they need to do because they're afraid.
00:23:36.000 You have them voluntarily confront it.
00:23:39.000 And so you break it down.
00:23:41.000 What you try to do if you're a behavior therapist is you break down the thing they're avoiding into smaller and smaller pieces until you find a piece that's small enough so they'll do it.
00:23:49.000 And it doesn't really matter.
00:23:50.000 As long as they start it, you know, then they can put the next piece on and the next piece.
00:23:54.000 And what happens is they don't get less afraid, exactly.
00:23:58.000 They get braver.
00:24:00.000 It's like there's more of them.
00:24:01.000 And here's why.
00:24:03.000 So imagine.
00:24:03.000 You do something new.
00:24:06.000 And that's informative, right?
00:24:08.000 There's information in the action and then you can incorporate that information and turn it into a skill and turn it into a transformation of your perceptions.
00:24:16.000 So there's more to you because you've tried something new.
00:24:19.000 So that's one thing.
00:24:20.000 But the second thing is, and there's good biological evidence for this now, that if you put yourself in a new situation, then new genes code for new proteins and build new neural structures and new nervous system structures.
00:24:35.000 Same thing happens to some degree when you work out, right?
00:24:37.000 Because your muscles are responding to the load.
00:24:39.000 But your nervous system does that too.
00:24:41.000 So you imagine that there's a lot of potential you locked in your genetic code.
00:24:47.000 And then if you put yourself in a new situation, then the stress, the situational stress that's produced by that particular situation unlocks those genes and then builds new parts of you.
00:24:58.000 And so that's very cool because who knows how much there is locked inside of you.
00:25:02.000 Okay, so now here's the idea.
00:25:04.000 So, let's assume that that scales as you take on heavier and heavier loads.
00:25:11.000 That more and more of you, you get more and more informed, because you're doing more and more difficult things, but more and more of you gets unlocked.
00:25:19.000 And so then, what that would imply is that if you got to the point where you could look at the darkest things, so that would be the abyss, right?
00:25:26.000 That would be the deepest abyss.
00:25:28.000 If you could look at the harshest things, like the most brutal parts of the suffering of the world and the malevolence of people and society, if you could look at that straight and directly, that that would turn you on maximally.
00:25:43.000 And so that's the idea of rescuing your father because imagine that you're like the potential composite of all the ancestral wisdom that's locked inside of you biologically.
00:25:56.000 But that's not going to come out at all unless you stress yourself, unless you challenge yourself.
00:26:01.000 And the bigger the challenge you take on, the more that's going to turn on.
00:26:05.000 And so that as you take on a broader and broader range of challenges, And you push yourself harder, then more and more of what you could be turns on, and that's equivalent to transforming yourself into the ancestral father.
00:26:19.000 Because you're like the, what would you call it, you're the consequence of all these living beings that have come before you, and that's all...
00:26:28.000 Part of your biological potentiality.
00:26:30.000 And then if you can push yourself, then all of that clicks on.
00:26:33.000 And that turns you into who you could be.
00:26:36.000 And that's the re-representation of that positive ancestral father.
00:26:40.000 So that's why you rescue your father from the belly of the beast.
00:26:43.000 So you think that this ultimate goal of sacrifice and of risking your life in order to save someone who's truly important to you, that this somehow or another maximizes your potential as a human being?
00:26:58.000 Well, I think you can think about it religiously, too.
00:27:01.000 So think about it this way.
00:27:02.000 So in the Christian story, for example, you have Christ does two things that are messianic.
00:27:09.000 One is, takes the suffering of the world onto himself.
00:27:13.000 Okay, so that's a weird idea.
00:27:15.000 Okay, so what does that mean?
00:27:16.000 Let's think about it psychologically.
00:27:17.000 Well, maybe it means that, well, that's your job.
00:27:20.000 The world's full of suffering, and you should accept that as your responsibility.
00:27:24.000 Past, present, and future.
00:27:26.000 You're supposed to do something about that, as much as you can about it.
00:27:29.000 And maybe you start with your own...
00:27:32.000 Localized suffering, you know, put yourself together, but then you expand that outward and you decide that you're not a victim of that, even though, you know, you're part and parcel of it, but you're the potential solution to that.
00:27:45.000 And so you accept that as a responsibility.
00:27:47.000 So that's part of taking on a load.
00:27:49.000 That's part of bearing a cross.
00:27:50.000 You could look at it that way.
00:27:51.000 The cross is sort of a symbol of the place of maximal suffering.
00:27:55.000 Okay, so you accept that as a challenge, not as something that you're victimized by.
00:28:01.000 Maybe you accept that as the price of being.
00:28:03.000 Okay, so that's one responsibility.
00:28:06.000 You're responsible for addressing the suffering in the world.
00:28:09.000 So that could give you some meaning, seems to me.
00:28:12.000 Then the next thing is, there's a story of course that Christ met the devil in the desert, and so that's the encounter with malevolence.
00:28:18.000 So that would be the other thing, because the two major problems that people face obviously are suffering, tragedy, and malevolence.
00:28:25.000 And so that's the other thing that you're responsible for.
00:28:28.000 Is that you're supposed to look at the capacity for human evil as clearly as you possibly can, which is a very terrifying thing.
00:28:35.000 You know, that causes post-traumatic stress disorder in people that aren't accustomed to it.
00:28:39.000 And in the mythology that's associated with the encounter with evil, it's almost always the case that the entity that does the encountering, even if it does it voluntarily, is terrifying.
00:28:52.000 We're hurt by it.
00:28:54.000 So the Egyptian god Horus, for example, who's the eye and the falcon, the thing that can see and pay attention.
00:28:59.000 When he encounters his evil uncle, Seth, who's the precursor of Satan, he loses an eye.
00:29:05.000 Because it's no joke to encounter malevolence.
00:29:07.000 You know, it can really shake you.
00:29:10.000 The idea would be that if you can face the malevolence and you can face the suffering, then that maximally, that opens the door to your maximal potential.
00:29:19.000 And then the optimistic part of that is, and this is why it's so useful to peer into the darkness, let's say, the optimistic part of that is that although the suffering is great and the malevolence is deep, your capacity to transcend it is stronger.
00:29:37.000 So what you get out of the most negative viewpoint is the most positive possible consequence.
00:29:43.000 Because one of the things you'd like to know, if you wanted to know something deep about yourself, is that you could face the worst that there was in prevail.
00:29:49.000 And I believe that people are capable of that.
00:29:54.000 I think that despite how tragic life is and how malevolent things are, that fundamentally our spirit, let's say, has the capacity to confront that and to fix it, Like, psychologically, to confront it courageously,
00:30:10.000 to be able to bear up under that if you do it voluntarily, but also to address it.
00:30:14.000 Not only to deal with it psychologically, but to deal with it practically.
00:30:17.000 And that we could make things much better.
00:30:19.000 There's always a striving towards utopia, right?
00:30:22.000 Like, this is the ultimate goal that if you ask people, what would you like out of civilization?
00:30:27.000 Well, I'd like everyone to be happy and everyone to get along and there'd be no war, nothing, no suffering, no anything.
00:30:33.000 In order to really, truly learn about yourself and about life, you have to overcome adversity.
00:30:38.000 You have to experience things.
00:30:39.000 And I firmly believe that in order to truly appreciate love, you have to understand and really have felt hate.
00:30:47.000 And to really appreciate camaraderie, you have to feel loneliness.
00:30:51.000 So this is just a part of being a person, for whatever reason.
00:30:55.000 Yeah, well, maybe, see, the other thing that I've been thinking along the same lines is that, you know, it isn't...
00:31:00.000 So, in the biblical stories, in the Abrahamic stories, for example, Abraham basically hangs around his dad's tent until he's like 80. He's one of these guys that fails to launch, you know, in a big way.
00:31:11.000 And God eventually gets sick and tired of him, like, you know, playing video games in his basement and says...
00:31:16.000 Get the hell out there into the world and have a life.
00:31:19.000 And so he does.
00:31:21.000 He leaves his father's tent and his community and his country, which is what he's commanded to do.
00:31:26.000 And then he goes out and has an adventure.
00:31:28.000 But, you know, the first thing he encounters is a famine, and then he encounters a tyranny, and then he encounters a bunch of people in the tyrannical state that want to take his wife.
00:31:36.000 And so you can imagine that Abraham's response to that is like, it was a hell of a lot better sitting in my dad's tent playing video games.
00:31:43.000 But what's cool about that story, what I realized when I was doing the lectures on it last year, was that that was a call to adventure.
00:31:49.000 You know, and that the right way of conceptualizing what we're talking about isn't that utopia would be a place where everyone was happy.
00:31:57.000 And I think because of what you just laid out is you need that polarity, you know, and people need a load, and we need adversity, and we need difficulty.
00:32:06.000 We need all of that.
00:32:09.000 So maybe what you want is an adventure, the greatest adventure that you could have.
00:32:12.000 And that would involve, you know, something to push against.
00:32:15.000 It would involve real challenge.
00:32:17.000 And so just a...
00:32:19.000 See, Dostoevsky knew this because when he wrote Notes from Underground, which I would highly recommend to everyone who's listening.
00:32:25.000 It's a great book and it's a very short book.
00:32:28.000 He criticized socialist utopia back in like 1860, way before it became the sort of widespread idea that it is now.
00:32:38.000 And what Dostoevsky said was that, well, human beings are these very peculiar creatures, and if you gave us a utopia so that we had nothing to do but eat cake and busy ourselves with the continuation of the species, that was his line— That the first thing we do is smash it all to bits just so that something unexpected and troublesome would happen.
00:32:58.000 Because we're built for adventure and not for peace and happiness.
00:33:02.000 Well, we're designed to overcome the natural world.
00:33:04.000 The natural world is filled with that.
00:33:06.000 The natural world is filled with things, trying to eat things.
00:33:10.000 Everywhere you look, that's all you observe.
00:33:12.000 You observe predators and prey and animals eating vegetables, and that's it.
00:33:16.000 And I think that this concept of overcoming adversity, it's so human, it's so a part of what we are, that I want to bring it back to you.
00:33:25.000 Because one of the things that I've been considering is that, I've said this many times, and I just had a conversation with my good friend Steve Rinella the other day, where he brought it up independently.
00:33:33.000 He said, I think Jordan Peterson is the most misunderstood and misinterpreted guy in the world.
00:33:38.000 He's like, people are always, like, not just misstating what you believe in, misstating what you say.
00:33:46.000 This opposition to you, this, I mean, like, we were talking about this GQ interview, which I thought was, I thought that woman was far more intelligent than the, and her approach was far better and far more reasoned and well thought out than some of the other attacks on you before.
00:34:04.000 So they're bringing in the varsity level players, is what I'm saying.
00:34:07.000 But I think this is important.
00:34:09.000 I think this is part of what forges this message, is that you are, and this is one of the things that Eric Weinstein and I had said about you, is that you're essentially the Hoist Gracie of the intellectual dark web.
00:34:26.000 If you don't know what that means, it's the early days of the UFC, No one knew what the best martial art was.
00:34:34.000 And the idea was like, there was all these martial arts that are running around independently, and they were all claiming that they had the best technique, and let's see what happens.
00:34:43.000 And Hoyce Gracie was the one who represented jujitsu and went out there and beat all these people with superior technique and superior strategy.
00:34:51.000 South American?
00:34:52.000 Yes, he's from Brazil.
00:34:53.000 Brazil, yeah, okay, I know about him, yeah.
00:34:55.000 And he launched this Brazilian, and his family launched this Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu empire that has since taken over the world of martial arts.
00:35:04.000 But you are the one who's consistently engaging in these people.
00:35:08.000 You're the one who's involved in these Vale Tudo events where you're debating these people who are coming at you hostile, with notes.
00:35:17.000 And I think, as uncomfortable as those moments are, like, who was the woman that said, so what you're trying to say is...
00:35:23.000 Yeah, Kathy Newman.
00:35:24.000 Yeah, I think her approach...
00:35:25.000 I think she underestimated you.
00:35:27.000 I think she underestimated you.
00:35:29.000 I think she misinterpreted who you are, and she thought that she could come at you with this straw man sort of article, argument rather, and frame your positions in a very unflattering way.
00:35:41.000 It just didn't work.
00:35:42.000 No.
00:35:42.000 It was like the early days of Hoist Gracie.
00:35:45.000 Guys would come at him flailing and he'd get him in an arm bar and they'd tap out and they'd go, fuck.
00:35:49.000 That's kind of what happened with you.
00:35:50.000 But now this woman who you had this conversation with in GQ, she was much more skilled.
00:35:56.000 She was better verbally.
00:35:58.000 Her arguments made more sense.
00:36:00.000 She seemed more reasonable, more well-read.
00:36:03.000 She was able to think on her feet quicker.
00:36:05.000 But still, these are really important conversations.
00:36:09.000 Well, it was a funny day because I went to the hotel room in Baltimore, you know, and I went out of my way to do it.
00:36:16.000 And she was hostile to me the second I walked into the room.
00:36:20.000 Really?
00:36:20.000 Yes.
00:36:21.000 And that really kind of put me off.
00:36:23.000 How so?
00:36:24.000 Well, she basically told me that we were going to have a war, you know, not so many words, but just there was a coldness to her and a distaste for me that was sort of radiating from her.
00:36:36.000 So she was animus-possessed from a Jungian perspective.
00:36:40.000 That's the right way of thinking about it.
00:36:41.000 One of the ways of thinking about that is that she had a chip on her shoulder in relationship to me.
00:36:45.000 So she'd already formulated who I was in her imagination.
00:36:49.000 It was also maybe a form of projection, so like I was the embodiment of all the things that she found distasteful, and that's who she was.
00:36:57.000 So there was no willingness to consider on her part that I could be different than her preconceptions of me, right?
00:37:08.000 And so she was hostile to me in the way that you would be if you were prejudiced against someone right from the beginning.
00:37:16.000 And so by the time...
00:37:19.000 It was uncomfortable in the room, and there was a photo shoot, and so by the time the conversation started, I was more impatient than I would normally be, because one of the things that I do expect from journalists, and Kathy Newman was like this, by the way, and so have some of the other people that have gone after me,
00:37:36.000 at least They had the professionalism to be civil before the interview started.
00:37:43.000 Because there's a certain amount of politeness, I would say, not that I'm owed, but that someone you're interviewing is owed if they come out of their way to go talk to you.
00:37:55.000 It's just human decency.
00:37:56.000 There's no real conflict until you have this conflict.
00:38:00.000 It's just, hello, nice to meet you.
00:38:03.000 It's just two human beings interacting with each other.
00:38:06.000 Yes, yes, well, on relatively professional, well, even just professional, right?
00:38:11.000 Even just professional grounds.
00:38:12.000 It's like, well, we're both here to do a job, and I've agreed to come, but no, there was palpable enmity in the air right to begin with.
00:38:21.000 You know, I actually thought at the end of that interview, I thought, geez, you know, maybe I've done enough interviews because I found that I was more impatient than I would have liked to have been.
00:38:31.000 Now, luckily, it doesn't seem to have gone overboard because I've been watching the comments on that GQ interview.
00:38:37.000 I think it's got about 4.5 million views, some ridiculous number of views.
00:38:42.000 And people have said that I was more impatient and a little harsher than usual, which I think is true.
00:38:49.000 And I thought, God, you know, maybe I'm starting to run out of patience.
00:38:52.000 Which isn't good, right?
00:38:53.000 Right.
00:38:54.000 I don't want to run out of patience.
00:38:56.000 Because then it will flavor the message that you're putting out there.
00:39:01.000 Definitely.
00:39:01.000 And people will take it in the wrong way, and they'll take it in with that bitterness.
00:39:05.000 Yes, exactly.
00:39:05.000 One of the things that I think is very important is that you don't become resentful.
00:39:13.000 When I'm on this tour, for example...
00:39:16.000 There's no resentment for me, because you might think, well, this is a lot of work, and I've been running around like mad, and it takes a lot of organization, and it's quite demanding, and all of that, and that's all true, and none of that is a complaint.
00:39:31.000 And I decided with Tammy right at the beginning that, well, first of all, that this was going to be work and not a vacation because we're not stupid.
00:39:38.000 We know you can't have everything at the same time if you have any sense.
00:39:41.000 You're lucky if you get some things that are good at once, you know.
00:39:44.000 So we're very grateful to have that opportunity and that I was going to continue to do this as long as I was thrilled to be in front of the audience and Then when I meet people afterwards that I'm not looking at the end of the line to see when the night ends, you know, because I want to be sure that every single person that comes to meet me,
00:40:01.000 I'm, you know...
00:40:03.000 Present.
00:40:03.000 Present for, absolutely, because I am actually quite taken aback and...
00:40:10.000 Thrilled, I guess is the right word.
00:40:12.000 Grateful?
00:40:13.000 That's better.
00:40:14.000 That they're there.
00:40:15.000 It's like, God, man, some of these people, you know, like I was in, they're coming from all over the place.
00:40:20.000 You know, people flying from Australia to Europe.
00:40:23.000 They've flown, they've flown, it's lots of Eastern Europeans came to England.
00:40:28.000 In fact, they're making huge treks.
00:40:29.000 There's guys who came from like eight...
00:40:31.000 It took them like 12 hours to get through Russia to come to Finland to watch the talk there.
00:40:37.000 And then not just a few people like that.
00:40:40.000 People are really going way the hell out of their way.
00:40:43.000 And then they line up and it's not inexpensive because these venues are expensive and all of that.
00:40:50.000 And I'm...
00:40:54.000 And it's the same with the damn interviews.
00:40:56.000 It's like, I'm doing my best to not take any of this for granted and not get annoyed about it.
00:41:03.000 And that goes for the conflict, too.
00:41:05.000 It's like, well...
00:41:08.000 You know, I've tried to have my agent screen out maybe the more egregious interviews, you know, the ones that would just be nothing but combat because I find them quite stressful, though I wouldn't say I'm hiding from them.
00:41:23.000 But you don't know...
00:41:25.000 To begin with, how an interview is going to go, and I could just say, well, I'm done having interviews for a while, but I can't help but see that the conflict is a necessary part of this, even though I don't find it pleasant.
00:41:38.000 People accuse me of being a provocateur, of enjoying the conflict.
00:41:42.000 It's actually not true at all.
00:41:44.000 I don't enjoy it at all.
00:41:45.000 It usually takes me about three days to recover from a particularly contentious interview, because I find conflict, interpersonal conflict, quite stressful.
00:41:54.000 Yes.
00:41:56.000 Everyone does.
00:41:57.000 Yes.
00:41:57.000 And to pretend you're either a sociopath or you're a liar.
00:42:01.000 Yes.
00:42:01.000 Well, there are people who seem to enjoy that kind of intellectual combat.
00:42:06.000 And the political types are more like that.
00:42:08.000 But I think they still afterwards feel it.
00:42:11.000 And if they read the comments and people are against them, it's just that unease.
00:42:15.000 It carries.
00:42:16.000 Well, you would think so.
00:42:17.000 I mean, I don't even know how people deal with it because, I mean, I'm being fortunate because although, you know, I've had a fair bit of negative press coverage, the comments on YouTube in particular, which is where the bulk of them are, and I would say among the general public,
00:42:34.000 have been overwhelmingly positive.
00:42:36.000 I don't know what the hell it would be like to be in a world where that was reversed, where, you know, the majority of people are...
00:42:41.000 Against you.
00:42:42.000 I've seen it.
00:42:43.000 I've seen it happen with guests that I've had on the show where I've met them afterwards and you see a physical effect on them.
00:42:51.000 You see them beaten down like, Jesus Christ, those comments are so mean.
00:42:54.000 I'm like, you can't read those.
00:42:55.000 You just can't read those.
00:42:56.000 And you see how it's affecting them.
00:42:58.000 Like, they can't sleep.
00:42:59.000 They read it.
00:43:00.000 It fucks with them.
00:43:01.000 They'll stay up for nights.
00:43:02.000 You know, it's not good.
00:43:05.000 You're taking in All of these opinions of hundreds, if not thousands, of people that you don't even know.
00:43:10.000 You don't know if they're coming from a healthy place.
00:43:12.000 And most of those opinions, they would not express it that way if they were talking to you.
00:43:17.000 Even if they could get the same message across, like, I think you were ignorant to these facts.
00:43:22.000 I think you're biased in your perceptions.
00:43:25.000 Even if they had an opinion that was unflattering, the way they'd express it to you, they'd be considerate about you and your feelings as a human being.
00:43:34.000 And if they weren't, you wouldn't take into consideration what they're saying because this guy's just an asshole.
00:43:38.000 Yeah, right.
00:43:38.000 But when you just see it in type, we just see print, it just doesn't, it just, it could be a smart person, it could be a psycho, it could be a fool, it could be anything.
00:43:48.000 Well, it's also funny too because the negative comments that are part of social media seem to be just as potent as negative comments in real life, but the positive comments don't seem to be as positive as the positive comments in real life.
00:44:03.000 Yes.
00:44:04.000 They don't seem as real.
00:44:05.000 And I guess that's partly because we're wired to be more sensitive to threat and to negative emotion because we can be hurt.
00:44:13.000 Well, it's also healthy, too, to not stroke your ego too much.
00:44:15.000 If you're just concentrating only on...
00:44:17.000 There's something distasteful if you go to someone's page and they just retweet all the positive things that people say to them.
00:44:23.000 Because then it has this sort of reinforcing...
00:44:26.000 People know that if I say something really positive to Jordan, he's going to retweet me.
00:44:29.000 There are some people that they engage in this sort of commerce.
00:44:33.000 You say something positive, they retweet you, and it's a little too strokey.
00:44:41.000 People get really into that, stroking their own back.
00:44:43.000 Yeah, I guess the danger of that is that There's a possibility of that ego inflation that you really want to avoid because that's a bad idea.
00:44:52.000 That's a very bad idea.
00:44:53.000 Well, you've done a wonderful job of avoiding those waters because this is a new...
00:44:57.000 For a guy who's in his 50s who becomes famous out of nowhere and doesn't just become famous but becomes this...
00:45:11.000 I think?
00:45:29.000 With your research, you're backing it up with real science, you're backing up with a tremendous amount of history of the human race and of religion and of the scientific studies that have been done that show correlations between different types of behaviors and human beings and all this is rich.
00:45:49.000 It's very rewarding if you could take it all in, but when it goes against What people have, their preconceived notions or their own set of beliefs that they're bringing to your conversations, to your debates, then it creates this hostile battle where what you're saying is very contrary to the way they've been living their life or the preset patterns of behavior.
00:46:14.000 I really saw that in Scandinavia.
00:46:16.000 Scandinavia.
00:46:16.000 Yeah, well, I was there.
00:46:18.000 I went to Stockholm twice and Oslo twice and Helsinki twice and Copenhagen once.
00:46:25.000 In the last month, and I spent quite a bit of, there was a lot of interviews, and a lot of discussion about the so-called gender paradox.
00:46:34.000 That's a very interesting thing, because it's really put their tails in a knot in Scandinavia.
00:46:38.000 And that makes sense, because the Scandinavians are going to have to deal with this first, because they've gone the farthest down the road for, like, making their society gender equal.
00:46:50.000 Explain that to people.
00:46:51.000 I will, I will.
00:46:52.000 Okay, so...
00:46:53.000 So imagine, first of all, that there's two kinds of equality that you might pursue.
00:46:58.000 One would be equality of opportunity.
00:47:00.000 And so that would mean that, you know, there's a wide range of talent across people regardless of their type, whatever that might be, sex, gender, race, ethnicity.
00:47:12.000 There's talent distributed everywhere.
00:47:15.000 And It's kind of a truism, and I would say a truism of the West in the deepest sense, that each of the individuals within those groups should be put in a position where they're encouraged to manifest those talents, partly because that would be good for them spiritually and psychologically,
00:47:33.000 but also because that would be of obvious benefit to the community.
00:47:36.000 Right?
00:47:36.000 I mean, talent's rare, which people don't understand.
00:47:39.000 There's lots of different kinds of talent, but in each domain it's rare.
00:47:43.000 And so it's to everyone's benefit to exploit talented people to the maximal possible degree.
00:47:49.000 So even if you're just selfish, you'd want to push for equality of opportunity because the more talented people there are out there, the more cool stuff you get to have, and hopefully the more diverse and interesting your life is.
00:48:02.000 So you can pursue equality of opportunity policies, and the Scandinavians have done that.
00:48:08.000 Especially trying to knock down barriers for women in the workplace.
00:48:13.000 And by all accounts, by all standard theories, the Scandinavian countries and places like the Netherlands, Canada too, to a slightly lesser degree, have gone farther than any other countries in pursuing those policies.
00:48:33.000 Okay, and part of the consequence of that is that some of the differences between men and women have been minimized.
00:48:41.000 So obviously there's far more women in the workplace than there were 40 years ago.
00:48:44.000 And in many occupations, there's actually dominance by women.
00:48:48.000 There's dominance in the universities.
00:48:49.000 There's dominance in the healthcare fields.
00:48:51.000 And so women have poured into the workplace.
00:48:53.000 And hypothetically, there's problems with that because it's put a lot of stress on family structure.
00:48:59.000 But Hypothetically, that's for the best.
00:49:03.000 Because it gives people a broader range of choices and it gives everyone access to more talent.
00:49:07.000 And then also, if you look around the world, you see that one of the best predictors of the probability of economic development in developing countries is the attitude in those countries towards equal rights for women.
00:49:19.000 And it looks causal.
00:49:20.000 The more positively the country is predisposed to female rights, the more likely they are to develop economically.
00:49:27.000 And maybe that's because that indicates that they're open to new ideas or something like that, or open to transformation.
00:49:32.000 So, okay, so that's one kind of equality.
00:49:34.000 Open up the playing field so that everybody has a chance to compete and cooperate and land where they will.
00:49:40.000 But then the other kind of equality is equality of outcome.
00:49:43.000 So, and that's often described as equity in today's language.
00:49:47.000 And so the ultimate equity...
00:49:49.000 Utopia would be take every job, every conceivable kind of job, and then stratify that by every conceivable level of authority within every job, and then ensure that every single category of person is represented in precise proportion to their We're good to
00:50:19.000 go.
00:50:28.000 First thing to say about that is that's impossible.
00:50:31.000 And the reason it's impossible is because there's no limit to the number of ways that you can categorize people into groups.
00:50:38.000 So, you know, you know about sex and ethnicity and race, maybe those are the obvious ones, but now you have gender and then you have ethnicity and, you know, and then there's attractiveness and intelligence and temperament and height and age and socioeconomic background.
00:50:53.000 And I mean, let's say there's 20, but there's a lot more than that.
00:50:56.000 There's no possible way that you could ever regulate a society so tightly that every single one of those groups was equally represented in every single one of those occupations at every single level of the hierarchy.
00:51:12.000 That is impossible.
00:51:12.000 So they want to concentrate on the significant ones, which are men and women and race.
00:51:15.000 Well, yeah, but who's to say those are the significant ones?
00:51:18.000 That's the other thing.
00:51:19.000 It isn't even obvious that they are, because I would say that a more significant one is cognitive ability.
00:51:24.000 Because that's a way bigger predictor of long-term life success than sex or race.
00:51:28.000 So I don't even think that we've necessarily identified the canonical groups.
00:51:33.000 We've just decided that gender and race are the, maybe they're the most obvious.
00:51:37.000 Right, but isn't there a problem is that people don't, what they don't do is they don't take, in terms of cognitive ability, they don't get on a team.
00:51:45.000 They don't get on like, there's people that are sexist.
00:51:49.000 Yeah.
00:51:49.000 But it's very rare that someone is elitist in terms of their cognitive ability.
00:51:55.000 Well, hard to say, Joe.
00:51:57.000 I mean, I think one of the reasons that...
00:51:58.000 I shouldn't say elitist.
00:51:59.000 Prejudiced is a better word.
00:52:01.000 I don't know.
00:52:01.000 I mean, you could be right.
00:52:03.000 But look, I think one of the reasons that...
00:52:05.000 Here's something that's kind of peculiar.
00:52:07.000 Actually, it doesn't even make sense now that I'm thinking about it.
00:52:08.000 Of course they are.
00:52:09.000 Well, there's one thing that's quite peculiar about the United States in that regard.
00:52:13.000 It's like...
00:52:14.000 Most working class people, let's say, are far more irritated with the intellectual elite than they are with the wealthy elite.
00:52:22.000 And that's because they think they could become wealthy.
00:52:25.000 And they could.
00:52:26.000 But they don't think they could become part of the intellectual elite.
00:52:30.000 And it isn't obvious to me that the intellectual elite, so those would be the liberal left-leaning types that dominate the media and academia, are particularly positive in their In their attitudes towards the typical working class person.
00:52:45.000 I think they're prejudiced and elitist.
00:52:47.000 I do believe that that's the case.
00:52:49.000 And I think they're also, what would you call it, patronizing.
00:52:53.000 And I think that the typical working class person, say, who voted for Trump is very, very sensitive to that.
00:52:59.000 And so they're much more concerned with the 1% who are the cognitive elite than they are the 1% who are the economic elite.
00:53:05.000 Because at least they think that's a game they could play.
00:53:09.000 So, anyways...
00:53:10.000 But it's not also because there's caricatures, right, of the 1% of the economic elite, you just think of people that are in these lofty positions that are in control of the financial institutions, but the 1% of the intellectual elite, you think of in terms of, like, some of the more preposterous things you're hearing out of universities now,
00:53:27.000 and safe spaces, and...
00:53:28.000 Oh, yeah, there's that, too.
00:53:30.000 There's that, too.
00:53:31.000 There's no...
00:53:32.000 Well, there's no appreciation on the part of the intellectual elite for the pathologies of rationalism.
00:53:38.000 I mean, there's nothing stupider than a smart person who went wrong.
00:53:45.000 I've seen this in my clients frequently.
00:53:48.000 If I have a particularly smart client who's particularly disordered in their personality, that's so difficult.
00:53:56.000 It's almost unimaginable because they're so good at rationalizing, for example.
00:54:01.000 What is your approach to handling someone like that who's super intelligent but yet completely their life is in disarray?
00:54:08.000 Well, you know, I usually take a very practical approach.
00:54:13.000 Like, you know, we try to identify, because I start always in my therapy practice, I always start with behavioral principles.
00:54:19.000 It's like, okay, well, let's see if we can identify a few areas, you know, through negotiation that are really causing you grief and misery.
00:54:26.000 You know, like, what's wrong with your life as far as you're concerned?
00:54:29.000 And so that often takes a lot of discussion.
00:54:31.000 And then we might try to figure out what's causing that.
00:54:34.000 And that's often very difficult to figure out too because it might be, geez, it might be something physical.
00:54:39.000 You know, you might be sick in some way because depression is, lots of depression is autoimmune related and anxiety can be a side effect of all sorts of physiological disorders or eating improperly or sleeping badly or not exercising, you know, enough to kind of keep yourself regulated.
00:54:55.000 So you try to figure out what's causing it and then you try to sketch out some possible solution that we could both test.
00:55:01.000 And then with the more intelligent ones, you know, often they can come up with all sorts of reasons why none of this is going to work.
00:55:10.000 Or a thousand reasons why, yeah, well usually a thousand reasons why none of this is going to work.
00:55:15.000 And with people like that, sometimes it's useful to turn to their dreams if they dream.
00:55:20.000 Because one of the things that's cool about dreams is that even though they're hard to interpret, they never lie.
00:55:26.000 And so sometimes you can take someone who's hyper-rational, and they'll have a dream, and they'll tell you the dream, and then you can work through an interpretation, which is a tricky business, and the dream will tell them something, and there's just no denying it.
00:55:37.000 It's like, well, it's a statement from nature.
00:55:40.000 So what are you going to do?
00:55:41.000 Are you going to pretend that that's not the case?
00:55:43.000 So that's often extremely useful.
00:55:48.000 Okay, so back to the equality issue.
00:55:51.000 Okay, so here's what's happened.
00:55:53.000 So psychologists have, and this is what's putting a tail, not in the tail of the Scandinavians, psychologists have come to a pretty decent agreement about standard personality models, right?
00:56:03.000 So there's extroversion, neuroticism, agreeableness, openness, and conscientiousness.
00:56:07.000 And they look fairly stable cross-culturally.
00:56:10.000 And that was all done by asking thousands of people, hundreds and hundreds of questions, and then grouping them statistically.
00:56:17.000 So it was atheoretical, basically.
00:56:20.000 We took computational power and statistics to find out that these are how traits group.
00:56:27.000 So, inextroverted people are sociable and happy, and neurotic people experience a fair bit of negative emotion, so that's the positive and negative emotion dimensions.
00:56:36.000 Agreeable people are maternal, and disagreeable people are competitive, and there's a fair bit of male-female difference there.
00:56:42.000 Conscientious people are dutiful and industrious and orderly, and the open people are creative.
00:56:47.000 And so those are your basic five dimensions.
00:56:49.000 Okay, so that's been established, and everyone more or less agrees on it.
00:56:52.000 Now, maybe there's seven dimensions, and we've got a questionnaire that breaks the five down into ten.
00:56:59.000 That's called understand myself.
00:57:03.000 But basically, there's good consensus on the five.
00:57:09.000 Okay, so now, as soon as you have the five basic traits, you can ask some questions like, well, do men and women differ?
00:57:15.000 And so what you do is you just give the questionnaire.
00:57:18.000 You can either fill it out yourself or have other people fill it out on your behalf.
00:57:22.000 And it could be a teacher, it could be a parent, you know, and that's all being done.
00:57:26.000 And what you find is there are systematic differences between men and women.
00:57:29.000 And the biggest differences are that women experience more negative emotion.
00:57:33.000 And that they're more agreeable than men.
00:57:37.000 And that's borne out by the psychiatric evidence because higher levels of negative emotion are manifested in depression and anxiety and women are diagnosed with higher levels of depression and anxiety all around the world.
00:57:51.000 And with agreeableness, that's also borne out by the clinical literature in some sense, the medical literature, socio-medical literature, because disagreeable people are more likely to be incarcerated, because it's the best predictor of being incarcerated, even though it's not a very good predictor, and men are incarcerated at about a 10 to 1 rate compared to women,
00:58:09.000 and are more likely to be anti-social and conduct disordered.
00:58:11.000 So, the personality differences are mirrored in the socio-medical literature.
00:58:17.000 Okay, so there are differences.
00:58:19.000 But then there's a question.
00:58:20.000 Are those differences a consequence of socialization or are they biological?
00:58:24.000 And the answer to that is tricky because How much something is social and how much it is biological actually depends on the social circumstances.
00:58:33.000 So here's an example.
00:58:35.000 If you have a society where no one has enough to eat and people are starving, then there's a huge cultural effect on people's intelligence, let's say, that's mediated by economic factors, even though it's got a biological impact.
00:58:50.000 Origin, right?
00:58:51.000 The starvation.
00:58:52.000 So, the relationship between biology and culture is actually partly culturally dependent, so it makes it complicated.
00:58:58.000 But in any case, here's how the scientists decided to address this.
00:59:03.000 They thought, well...
00:59:06.000 Why don't we rank order countries by how egalitarian their social policies are, which you can do with a fair degree of reliability.
00:59:16.000 You know, you put the countries where women are second-class citizens at the bottom, and you'd put the Scandinavian countries at the top.
00:59:22.000 You can get good reliability across raters for how you'd rate those countries.
00:59:26.000 And then look at the magnitude of the differences between men and women by the egalitarian social policies.
00:59:33.000 And so then you'll find out.
00:59:34.000 And here's the hypothesis.
00:59:36.000 If the differences between men and women are primarily social, then as cultures become more egalitarian, men and women will become more alike.
00:59:46.000 That's not what happened.
00:59:47.000 The opposite happened.
00:59:49.000 The more egalitarian the society, and it turns out the richer the society, because that's also being discovered now, the more different men and women become.
00:59:59.000 And so the differences are not huge.
01:00:01.000 So with agreeableness, for example, if you took a typical man and a typical woman out of the population, just randomly, and you had to bet that the woman was more aggressive than the man, you'd be wrong 60% of the time.
01:00:18.000 So there's quite a bit of overlap, right?
01:00:20.000 Because you'd be right 40% of the time.
01:00:23.000 But the problem is that a lot of selection takes place at the extremes.
01:00:27.000 Maybe you're only concerned about disagreeable people when they become violent.
01:00:31.000 And maybe it's only the 1 in 50 most disagreeable person who's violent.
01:00:36.000 And they're all men.
01:00:37.000 So you can have quite...
01:00:40.000 A bit of similarity at the average level and big differences at the extremes.
01:00:45.000 And the extremes is where people do things like employment selection.
01:00:49.000 So the biggest difference that's been discovered between men and women, and this is the one that gets biggest in the Scandinavian countries, is interest.
01:00:57.000 Men are more interested in things and women are more interested in people.
01:01:01.000 And it's a big difference.
01:01:03.000 It's one full standard deviation.
01:01:04.000 And so what that means is that if you're a man...
01:01:09.000 You would have to be more interested in people than 85% of men to be as interested in people as the 50th percentile woman.
01:01:18.000 And you'd have to be more interested in things than 85% of women to be as interested in things as the typical man.
01:01:25.000 And how do you define things?
01:01:27.000 Gadgets.
01:01:28.000 Gadgets.
01:01:29.000 Gadgets.
01:01:29.000 Gadgets.
01:01:29.000 Things.
01:01:31.000 Non-animate things.
01:01:32.000 Cars.
01:01:33.000 Yeah, yeah.
01:01:34.000 Tools.
01:01:36.000 Technology.
01:01:37.000 Right.
01:01:37.000 Right.
01:01:37.000 STEM fields.
01:01:39.000 Because the other thing that's happened is that the more egalitarian the society, the fewer women go into the STEM fields.
01:01:45.000 The fewer That's interesting.
01:01:47.000 Yeah, okay, so now this unravels in a big way.
01:01:52.000 This is a hugely relevant issue politically because it means that you cannot have equality of opportunity and equality of outcome at the same time.
01:02:03.000 It's not possible because as you make your society more egalitarian and you open up the opportunity for equality of outcome, You increase how different men and women are and that changes their occupational choice.
01:02:18.000 So if men are more interested in things, which they are by a substantial margin, then way more of them are going to be engineers.
01:02:25.000 Wouldn't that possibly support this idea that an enforced Model of equality would allow people to be themselves more.
01:02:38.000 I mean, this is almost what you're saying.
01:02:40.000 Well, that is the optimistic viewpoint.
01:02:43.000 The optimistic viewpoint.
01:02:44.000 Well, look, it's so funny because the Swedish foreign minister told me to go climb back under the rock that I came out from under when I was in Scandinavia because I was describing this science.
01:02:56.000 I read that, but I'm not exactly sure why Well, she regards me as misogynist because I think that there are, because I think, because I've been putting forward the evidence that there are genuine differences between men and women.
01:03:07.000 But she should be held accountable for that, because that's just a flippant thing to say.
01:03:11.000 Like, you should have, especially in a position of power like she's in, you should have a very specific argument.
01:03:18.000 Saying, like, for a leader to have such a base thing to say, such a crude, dumb thing to say, crawl back under the rock that you came from.
01:03:27.000 Well, I thought she was making a joke about lobsters, but I don't think she was.
01:03:30.000 Do lobsters go under rocks?
01:03:32.000 I guess they do.
01:03:32.000 They're going cracks.
01:03:33.000 Yeah, and the bigger lobsters have better rocks.
01:03:35.000 That was another very interesting thing in the GQ thing, where the woman was challenging you on your neurobiology, your neurochemistry, your understanding of lobsters.
01:03:42.000 Well, hardly any psychologists understand that serotonin is associated with hierarchies.
01:03:50.000 It's like a truism.
01:03:51.000 It's been known for 30 years, so...
01:03:52.000 We can definitely get back to that, but I'm very curious about this, because this idea of enforced equality, right, ensuring that there is such a high emphasis placed on equality that you have the equal amount of men,
01:04:07.000 the equal amount of women, and the opportunities are absolutely available as much to women as they are to men, this is enforced.
01:04:13.000 Yeah.
01:04:15.000 It creates an environment where there's less resistance.
01:04:18.000 Now, in an environment where there's less resistance, perhaps women don't feel as compelled to say, I'll show you.
01:04:25.000 Yeah, that is what seems to happen.
01:04:27.000 Look, here's an example.
01:04:30.000 So, there are fewer women mathematicians in the higher echelons.
01:04:34.000 Okay, but here's something interesting about mathematical ability.
01:04:38.000 First of all, it's very rare, so that's the first thing to keep in mind.
01:04:42.000 Now, it looks like, if you look in junior high, that mathematically gifted men and males and females are approximately as common.
01:04:50.000 Now, there's a little bit of debate about that, because there is some evidence that maybe at the very upper extremes there's a male advantage, just like there's a male disadvantage at the low end, because the male distribution for intelligence might be flatter.
01:05:02.000 And so that's the greater male variability hypothesis.
01:05:06.000 There's been papers putting that forward that have been retracted as a consequence of pressure from politically correct people, even though greater male variability is actually quite common in the animal kingdom for a variety of reasons.
01:05:18.000 Men are more expendable, that males are more expendable in some ways, or you could say that males are more likely to pursue high-risk, high-return strategies.
01:05:27.000 You can look at it either way, and it's certainly possible.
01:05:29.000 In any case, The men, the males in junior high who happen to be mathematically gifted are less likely to also be verbally gifted.
01:05:38.000 Whereas that doesn't seem to be the case for the females.
01:05:41.000 And so if you're a male math nerd, then math is a pretty logical pathway for you because You don't have as many other options, whereas if you're a female math nerd, you have other options because you're more likely to also be verbally gifted.
01:05:57.000 And so that's enough to, at least in principle, account for some of the reason why there are fewer women mathematicians than men mathematicians.
01:06:05.000 They have other options.
01:06:06.000 They have other options.
01:06:07.000 And there's lots of complex reasons like this.
01:06:11.000 And so we have this reflexive idea, and this is very much the case because this is like the core idea among the feminist neo-Marxist types, is that if there's differences in outcome, that's...
01:06:23.000 That's proof of prejudice and that's support for the idea of the patriarchal tyranny and that's like the core axiom of the radical left is the patriarchal tyranny as far as I'm concerned.
01:06:34.000 That's God for them, the patriarchal tyranny.
01:06:37.000 It's like, well, if it turns out that many of these differences in outcome between men and women aren't a consequence of the patriarchal tyranny, In fact, even get bigger when you reduce the tyrannical aspect of the patriarch and even the patriarchal aspect to it, then it makes that theory not only...
01:06:55.000 Wrong, but opposite of the truth, which is the worst kind of wrong.
01:07:00.000 And so, you know, if men are more likely to pursue careers in the STEM fields, which seems to be the case, under conditions of optimal freedom for men and women, then that's going to drive income disparities because the STEM fields pay more.
01:07:13.000 And they pay more partly because they're scalable.
01:07:16.000 Like, it's really hard to scale care for people.
01:07:19.000 You know, like if you work in a daycare, you're going to care for three infants.
01:07:22.000 You're not going to care for 50, because you can't.
01:07:25.000 It's not scalable.
01:07:26.000 But if you're like a software designer, it's infinitely scalable.
01:07:29.000 And so, there's a much wider range of possibility for generating much larger...
01:07:47.000 That's a good thing for everybody who's listening to know.
01:07:51.000 If you have a job, you want to be the guy or the woman who's working that extra 10%.
01:07:56.000 Because the return on that is nonlinear.
01:07:58.000 So that's a really useful thing to know.
01:08:00.000 Men are more likely to work outside.
01:08:01.000 They're more likely to work in dangerous businesses.
01:08:03.000 They're more likely to run full-time businesses rather than part-time businesses.
01:08:08.000 And they're more likely to move in pursuit of their career goals.
01:08:12.000 And that all contributes to differences in...
01:08:14.000 And among Uber drivers, they make 7% more money because they drive faster.
01:08:22.000 That's not good, though.
01:08:23.000 Well, no, but it's a high-risk, high-return issue, right?
01:08:27.000 It's a pattern male, a common male pattern.
01:08:31.000 There's more risk in it.
01:08:32.000 So there's more return as long as you don't get hurt.
01:08:34.000 And I think that's a pretty common male pattern, is there's more return as long as you don't get hurt.
01:08:39.000 The problem seems to be, when discussing these things, in any way romanticizing or glorifying male behavior or putting any emphasis whatsoever on there being a positive aspect to a lot of the things that we think of as being negative,
01:08:57.000 like aggression or ambition or competition.
01:09:03.000 Competition amongst men is fine.
01:09:05.000 Competition with men against women is often thought of as cruel.
01:09:09.000 Yeah, well, that...
01:09:10.000 Yes, well, and there's a certain amount of reason for that as well, because obviously physical competition is...
01:09:17.000 It's easy for that to border on cruel.
01:09:20.000 This is why we were talking before the show, that instead of calling people men and women when referring to like...
01:09:27.000 Because there's this...
01:09:29.000 Very disturbing, in my opinion, trend of transgender women entering into these competitions now with women who are biologically female and dominating them.
01:09:39.000 And that instead of calling people men and women, let's dispense with that.
01:09:42.000 Yeah, you can be a man or a woman.
01:09:44.000 Yeah, you can be a man or a woman, that's your choice, and you can change it whenever you want.
01:09:48.000 So you're a man or a woman, and that's your choice.
01:09:51.000 But we're going to have a new rule, which is that if you have an XY chromosome, so you're an XY person, or an XX person, then if you're an XY person, you don't get to engage in physical combat with an XY person.
01:10:05.000 Yes.
01:10:05.000 Men or women.
01:10:06.000 With an XX person.
01:10:07.000 Doesn't matter.
01:10:07.000 Yeah.
01:10:08.000 How would that be?
01:10:08.000 If you're XY, you can't engage in physical combat with XX. That's right.
01:10:12.000 XYs cannot hit XXs.
01:10:14.000 How's that?
01:10:15.000 And maybe they can't run in running contests against them.
01:10:20.000 And maybe they can't play tennis against them.
01:10:22.000 Yes.
01:10:22.000 And maybe that's just reasonable.
01:10:25.000 It is reasonable.
01:10:25.000 Yes, it is certainly reasonable.
01:10:26.000 It is reasonable, but if you talk about that, especially someone like you, who you were against this bill that was going to enforce these pronouns and compelling the use of these pronouns, that you're thought to be a transphobic person because you feel like there maybe should be some Rational discussion about the physical limitations of certain body structures,
01:10:49.000 because that's what it is.
01:10:50.000 If you're talking about my field of business, you're talking about combat sports.
01:10:55.000 I've been involved in combat sports my whole life, and there is a difference.
01:10:59.000 And it's not to say that females aren't competent.
01:11:02.000 I mean, I had Miriam Nakamoto on yesterday.
01:11:04.000 She's a good friend of mine.
01:11:05.000 She's an eight-time world Muay Thai champion.
01:11:08.000 She's a monster.
01:11:10.000 But she doesn't fight against men, and she shouldn't fight against men, although she probably could beat a bunch of them.
01:11:15.000 She shouldn't have to.
01:11:17.000 A tough woman can beat a variety of men, but a really tough man can beat all women.
01:11:24.000 Yes.
01:11:24.000 Right, so that's the problem.
01:11:25.000 That's the reality.
01:11:26.000 Yes, that is definitely the reality.
01:11:28.000 You know, and people don't like to hear these things and they want to pretend that you can even out the playing field with hormones.
01:11:36.000 No, you can even it a little.
01:11:38.000 There's certain things like, I've always said, if you gave Brock Lesnar a sex change and put him in a dress, he's going to run through every woman that's ever lived in the history of women.
01:11:49.000 There's not a single woman that's going to be able to deal with that bone structure and that mind that that guy has had with testosterone pumping through it for 39 years.
01:11:59.000 It's just not fair.
01:11:59.000 It's just preposterous that we even have to have the discussion.
01:12:03.000 It's so absolutely ridiculous.
01:12:05.000 Is the one thing that I was attacked on more than anything in my entire life is saying that I think it's ridiculous to have a trans woman compete against women in mixed martial arts.
01:12:15.000 I was like, you want to have them do it in chess?
01:12:17.000 You want to have them do it in something that's non-physical?
01:12:19.000 Sure.
01:12:19.000 You want them to be a woman?
01:12:21.000 Yes, okay.
01:12:22.000 You want them to be recognized as a woman?
01:12:23.000 Sure.
01:12:24.000 But as soon as you're compelling people, like here's one that's going up lately.
01:12:27.000 If you don't want to date a trans woman, then you're some sort of a bigot.
01:12:36.000 You know, you remember in Brave New World, in Huxley's book, it was considered immoral to reject anyone's sexual advances because it was prejudicial.
01:12:47.000 Oh, yes!
01:12:48.000 And the thing is, it is prejudicial.
01:12:51.000 That's the thing.
01:12:53.000 So that makes the question even more interesting, because the question is, at what point do you have the right to your prejudices?
01:13:00.000 And one of the things that we seem to cling to, and I would say rightly, is that we're allowed to be prejudiced when it comes to who we interact with sexually.
01:13:12.000 And who we choose as friends.
01:13:14.000 And that's the right to association.
01:13:18.000 But only up to a certain point.
01:13:20.000 Because this new logic is kind of leaking into even sexual preference now.
01:13:27.000 Like if you have a problem with someone being overweight, then you're a sizist or something like that.
01:13:33.000 Like what is that?
01:13:34.000 Well, the thing is, is that you can't have preferences without having prejudices.
01:13:38.000 Of course, yeah.
01:13:39.000 Right, so that's a big issue.
01:13:40.000 So what does that mean?
01:13:41.000 You don't get to have any preferences?
01:13:43.000 How's that going to work out?
01:13:44.000 In terms of, like, what you like to eat, or what kind of films you enjoy, or what kind of books you read, you're allowed to have these preferences.
01:13:50.000 But when it comes to what you're sexually attracted to...
01:13:53.000 There's new emphasis now in trying to draw that line and say, but it's preposterous people that are pushing this, and almost everybody's pushing back.
01:14:01.000 But I find it interesting when these things come up.
01:14:04.000 Well, it's a logical conclusion to all these other things that have been happening, because that is where the rubber hits the road.
01:14:09.000 It's like, you know, when I... Well, I've seen this in debates that I've had publicly where people, you know, talk about prejudice and I've pointed out to them that they have prejudicial attitudes with regards to their sexual preferences because they don't just sleep with anyone who asks them.
01:14:25.000 Right.
01:14:26.000 So it's like, well, how is that not a prejudice?
01:14:29.000 Well, of course it's a prejudice.
01:14:30.000 Well, then the question is, under what circumstances are prejudices justifiable?
01:14:35.000 And that's a conversation we don't like to have because we believe that there are no circumstances whatsoever under which prejudices are acceptable.
01:14:43.000 There's a big difference between prejudices and discrimination.
01:14:46.000 I think those two get conflated.
01:14:48.000 Yes, there is a big difference between prejudice and discrimination.
01:14:53.000 Hopefully discrimination has to do with setting your standards in relationship to the task at hand.
01:15:01.000 That's what you'd hope for.
01:15:02.000 That's the appropriate form of discrimination.
01:15:05.000 That's like intelligence.
01:15:08.000 Everything isn't the same about everything all the time.
01:15:11.000 So you discriminate, you rank order things, and you need to rank order them even to pursue things that are valuable.
01:15:17.000 This is one of the problems with the people who are so anti-hierarchy, like the radical leftists.
01:15:22.000 Well, there shouldn't be hierarchies.
01:15:24.000 It's like, okay, then why do something?
01:15:26.000 Well, that argument is so foolhardy.
01:15:30.000 It's difficult to take seriously, but you do have to engage in it.
01:15:34.000 And I think when you engage in it, it's really fascinating to watch.
01:15:38.000 Because it's like you're playing a game of chess with someone who only has a couple of pieces.
01:15:44.000 They have this...
01:15:44.000 Strong move that they do, but you've got all these other pieces.
01:15:48.000 And you're like, well, let's just keep this game going until this comes to this logical conclusion, which is checkmate.
01:15:53.000 There's hierarchies all throughout nature.
01:15:55.000 It doesn't mean people should suppress people.
01:15:57.000 It doesn't mean people shouldn't have rights.
01:15:59.000 It doesn't mean people should enforce themselves or force themselves on other folks.
01:16:03.000 That's not what it means.
01:16:04.000 It also doesn't mean that the hierarchies, especially if they're human hierarchies, are good.
01:16:08.000 Well, or that they're only, that's right, not that they're good necessarily, or that they're predicated on power.
01:16:14.000 Like, one of the most pathological elements of the postmodern types, especially people like Foucault, is their insistence that all hierarchical structures are predicated on power, and that there's nothing other than power.
01:16:26.000 And that's completely preposterous.
01:16:27.000 I mean, I used examples of plumbers in my lectures more recently, because it's rather comical.
01:16:33.000 It's like, well...
01:16:34.000 On what basis do you hire a plumber?
01:16:36.000 So imagine that there's a hierarchy of plumbers ranging from very successful to very unsuccessful.
01:16:41.000 Okay, and you say, well, what makes plumbers successful?
01:16:44.000 Well, the power theory would imply that there are roving bands of mafiosial plumbers who come pounding on your door at three in the morning and tell you that if you don't get their particular posse to fix your pipes leaking or not,
01:16:59.000 that they're going to come and burn down your house.
01:17:01.000 Of course, that's completely absurd.
01:17:04.000 When you go to hire someone like a plumber, well, the first thing you want to know is reputation.
01:17:10.000 Can they actually fix a pipe?
01:17:12.000 Because you actually want your pipe fixed.
01:17:13.000 And then you want to know, well, do they deal with you fairly?
01:17:15.000 And part of what's tangled up in that, in all likelihood, is do they deal with their employees fairly?
01:17:20.000 Because that's going to make their business function properly.
01:17:22.000 And so the hierarchy of plumbers, which is part of the patriarchal tyranny, is almost entirely predicated on competence.
01:17:30.000 And almost every enterprise in the West is like that.
01:17:34.000 Because I keep wondering, well, where the hell is this patriarchal tyranny?
01:17:38.000 Like, is it massage therapists?
01:17:41.000 Is it nurses?
01:17:42.000 Like, most nurses are female.
01:17:43.000 If you get females organized into a hierarchy, which you do in nursing, is that all of a sudden, is that part of the patriarchal tyranny?
01:17:51.000 Or is it the fact that now all those people are women, does that mean it's no longer, well, it's still a hierarchy?
01:17:57.000 Is it no longer a tyranny?
01:17:58.000 Is it no longer patriarchal?
01:18:00.000 Like, is it patriarchal only because there's men in it, or is it patriarchal because it's a hierarchy?
01:18:04.000 All this stuff is so incoherent that it just...
01:18:07.000 All you have to do is think about it, and that hasn't been done to any great degree, and it just dissolves in your hands.
01:18:12.000 Yes, that's what I'm saying.
01:18:13.000 If you're entering into a job straight out of college, you leave university, and now you're entering into your first year in the workplace, It's just a natural fact of life that there's going to be people that are further ahead in this race than you.
01:18:30.000 Yeah, because they're better at what they do.
01:18:31.000 They're better at it.
01:18:32.000 They have more experience.
01:18:33.000 They have more education.
01:18:34.000 It might be some of them are more crooked and sneaky, too.
01:18:36.000 Sure, that's possible as well.
01:18:37.000 But it's the agreeing, everyone agreeing that this is a game.
01:18:42.000 This is some sort of a competition.
01:18:44.000 And you're going to have hierarchies and competitions.
01:18:46.000 You're going to have people who win.
01:18:48.000 You're going to have people who do better.
01:18:49.000 Yes.
01:18:49.000 Yes, no matter what the...
01:18:51.000 So that's the fundamental issue.
01:18:52.000 As soon as you...
01:18:53.000 So we could look at it this way.
01:18:54.000 As soon as you...
01:18:55.000 Let's assume people have problems.
01:18:58.000 Everybody can agree on that.
01:18:59.000 And then we could assume that people would like solutions to those problems.
01:19:03.000 So we could agree on that.
01:19:04.000 Then we could say, well, then if you implement a solution socially, so with other people, then you're going to cooperate and compete in relationship to the solution.
01:19:13.000 And that's instantly going to produce a hierarchy.
01:19:15.000 Because no matter what the problem is, some people are going to be better at solving it than others.
01:19:23.000 Right.
01:19:25.000 Right.
01:19:49.000 To give them some status.
01:19:50.000 And reward them extraordinarily.
01:19:51.000 If necessary, yes.
01:19:52.000 When you look at the people that are the head of giant industry, the CEOs of super successful companies, they're the ones who have the giant yachts and the big houses, and this is the incentive for people to try to get to that position.
01:20:04.000 And the idea that there's no incentive and that there should be no incentive, but yet you're still going to have all this innovation is ridiculous.
01:20:09.000 It's not how it works.
01:20:10.000 It's not how human beings work.
01:20:12.000 If human beings are going to work really hard, there has to be some sort of a reward, and it can't be an equal reward.
01:20:17.000 Yes, and then what you could say, like, so, okay, so the right, that would be, roughly speaking, a conservative position.
01:20:24.000 And then you can take a left-wing position that's reasonable, and you can say, yes, there are hierarchies, but we have to stay awake, because they can degenerate into power-hungry tyranny, so that it's no longer competence.
01:20:37.000 It's political machination and game-playing and tyranny that produce the positional differentiation.
01:20:45.000 So we've got to stay awake to that.
01:20:47.000 And so we've got to criticize the hierarchies, not the fact of hierarchy, but the structure of hierarchy so they stay honest.
01:20:53.000 And then we also have to be careful because when you do set up a hierarchy, Then a lot of people collect at the bottom.
01:21:00.000 That's the necessary consequence of a few people collecting at the top.
01:21:03.000 And so then you have to be concerned about those people at the bottom.
01:21:06.000 And so there's a variety of things that you would do to express that concern.
01:21:10.000 One, you might want to have a lot of hierarchies.
01:21:12.000 So that people of different talents could play different games.
01:21:15.000 And a complex society is pretty good at that.
01:21:17.000 But you're still going to have people who stack up at the bottom of all hierarchies.
01:21:21.000 Those are going to be people who are sick.
01:21:23.000 Mentally and physically, and maybe people who are cognitively impaired or, you know, or experienced some kind of catastrophe in their life.
01:21:30.000 And then you want to set up your system so that those people don't suffer unduly, partly because that's bad and partly because that destabilizes your whole society.
01:21:40.000 And so you could say, well, that's the left's place, is to speak on behalf of the unjustly dispossessed.
01:21:48.000 And the right's position is to stabilize and maintain functional hierarchies.
01:21:54.000 And encourage competition.
01:21:55.000 And encourage competition that's of benefit to the whole.
01:21:58.000 Yes.
01:21:59.000 And to the individuals within the competition.
01:22:01.000 And then the political dialogue is a continual discussion between the left and the right saying, well, you know, this hierarchy is getting a little too steep and a little too rigid.
01:22:09.000 And, well, for me, that's also the fundamental reason for the necessity of free speech.
01:22:17.000 It's because...
01:22:18.000 That's the only way to discuss this.
01:22:19.000 It's the only way of working it out.
01:22:22.000 And it is the case.
01:22:23.000 You're going to produce hierarchies.
01:22:25.000 If you're going to pursue things of value socially, you're going to produce hierarchies.
01:22:28.000 And they're necessary.
01:22:29.000 And there's also...
01:22:30.000 I have a giant issue with the concept that these things are mutually exclusive.
01:22:33.000 That you can't have competition and also have a good social environment.
01:22:39.000 I think that's ridiculous.
01:22:40.000 That's a preposterous idea.
01:22:41.000 I mean, one of the things I really like about the...
01:22:44.000 Psychologist Jean Piaget, who's, I would say, the world's foremost expert on games, is that he did a very careful analysis of, say, competitive games.
01:22:53.000 Okay, so let's take hockey or soccer, doesn't matter, same example.
01:22:56.000 Okay, you say, well, because people now, they have kids play these games and don't keep score, which, of course, the kids keep score because they're not stupid like the adults, but, you know, well, we can't have it be competitive.
01:23:07.000 Okay, so let's take it apart.
01:23:08.000 It's like, well, is hockey a competitive game or a cooperative game?
01:23:12.000 Okay, well, so first of all, everyone's trying to do the same thing.
01:23:17.000 That's cooperative.
01:23:17.000 It's not like half the people are playing chess and another, you know, a third of them brought a basketball and two of them are boxing in a corner.
01:23:23.000 Well, sometimes they do in hockey, boxing in a corner.
01:23:26.000 But everyone's trying to do the same thing.
01:23:28.000 So that's cooperative.
01:23:29.000 Okay, everyone plays their position.
01:23:32.000 That's cooperative.
01:23:33.000 They all follow the same rules.
01:23:35.000 That's cooperative, right?
01:23:37.000 So there's competition, right?
01:23:40.000 But it's nested inside a fundamental structure of cooperation.
01:23:44.000 And the cooperation is the basis of the game itself.
01:23:49.000 Let's all arbitrarily agree that it's important to put this black disc in the net, which is to get your aim right.
01:23:55.000 And then let's cooperate within our teams to do that.
01:23:59.000 Because we're going to pass, and we're going to pass to each other, and we're also going to work so that each of us is a good player, but so that we all work for the betterment of our team, because we want to win games across multiple games, so that's also cooperative.
01:24:12.000 And then you want to interact with your enemies, let's say, the other team, in a way that's indicative of good sportsmanship, so that the entire league can flourish.
01:24:21.000 And to think of that as competitive is absolutely...
01:24:24.000 It's so...
01:24:26.000 There's no other way of describing it than stupid.
01:24:30.000 That's what it is.
01:24:31.000 It's an ignorant, unidimensional analysis.
01:24:34.000 It's put forward by someone who's reflexively opposed to anything that smacks of competition and who isn't thinking it through at all.
01:24:42.000 They're denying the benefits of competition and the fact that they reap those very benefits of competition by enjoying the products that are created by these corporations.
01:24:50.000 It's very hypocritical.
01:24:52.000 Well, that's for sure.
01:24:53.000 That's called a performative contradiction.
01:24:55.000 It's like, well, I like to complain about left-wing issues on my iPhone.
01:24:59.000 Right, exactly.
01:25:00.000 It's like, well, yeah, fair enough, but you should have a little gratitude for the fact that you've got your iPhone to complain about.
01:25:06.000 And those organizations, those corporations, are unbelievably competitive.
01:25:12.000 And they fall apart almost instantly when that competition stops being an issue, because then there's no constraint on the behavior of the system.
01:25:22.000 So, yes.
01:25:24.000 And you know, the issue with men, I think, with young men, and this is one of the things I've been trying to address, is that if your fundamental presupposition is that our culture is a patriarchal tyranny, which is an appalling presupposition, along with the idea that the best way of looking at history is that it was the oppression,
01:25:41.000 the continual oppression of women by men, which is also something that I regard as an absolutely reprehensible doctrine, Then, okay, so it's a patriarchal tyranny.
01:25:51.000 But in their defense, that did exist.
01:25:54.000 There has been continual oppression of women.
01:25:56.000 It's just not the only thing that's happened.
01:25:58.000 There have been women that have been revered.
01:26:01.000 There's been women that have been celebrated.
01:26:03.000 There's been women that have accomplished great things.
01:26:05.000 But there's been a lot of oppression.
01:26:06.000 So if they concentrate primarily on that oppression, and that's their main point of study, and that's the thing they want to talk about all the time, They kind of have a point in the fact that if you're looking at all the events that have ever taken place, there's a significant number of them that have been women being oppressed.
01:26:21.000 Yeah, but I don't know if there's more women who've been oppressed than men who've been oppressed.
01:26:26.000 That's a very good point.
01:26:27.000 So I would say that the entire history of...
01:26:29.000 I mean, you look at it this way, is that...
01:26:32.000 We oppress ourselves personally with our own malevolence and stupidity.
01:26:36.000 And then we're all oppressed by the crushing hand of the social world that molds us in one way and not in another.
01:26:43.000 And then, of course, nature is doing her best all the time to give birth to us, but also to kill us and take us out.
01:26:49.000 And so there's this endless...
01:26:52.000 Like, there's this endless, what would you call it, vulnerability that characterizes our existence psychologically and socially and naturally.
01:27:00.000 And I would say 150 years ago, that was even more intense than it was now, you know, because the typical person in the West lived on less than a dollar a day before 1895. And so, the way I think that we should view the history of the world is that men and women labored under virtually impossible conditions for the entire bulk of human evolution,
01:27:19.000 and they did their best to cooperate And to compete, but to cooperate so that they had some modicum, some possibility of a modicum of security and satisfaction, and that that's the right framework.
01:27:34.000 And then within that, of course, there's power games that are played by people who are corrupt.
01:27:38.000 Yeah, within that there's horrible events.
01:27:40.000 Of course there are.
01:27:40.000 But there's a massive amount of hypocritical thinking when you are criticizing the actions of so many people and talking about how many people are complicit in these things while you're carrying around a phone that's made by someone who gets a dollar a day.
01:27:54.000 I was talking to a journalist in Slovenia who is a lefty and not a very sophisticated one, and she was talking about the 1%.
01:28:04.000 And I said, well, do you know that if you make more than $32,000 a year that you're part of the 1%?
01:28:09.000 She said, well, what do you mean?
01:28:10.000 I said, well, that's the worldwide statistic.
01:28:13.000 It's like, so you're part of the 1%.
01:28:15.000 Well, she didn't...
01:28:16.000 First of all, she said, well, I don't believe that statistic.
01:28:18.000 And I thought, well, that's fine.
01:28:19.000 You can go look it up yourself.
01:28:21.000 But what was so interesting was that for her, that characterization, the 1% victimizers, was only relevant within the confines of her national border.
01:28:32.000 Right.
01:28:33.000 As soon as I said, well, no, all you have to do is expand that out a little bit and you're the problem and not the solution, then that was completely untenable for her.
01:28:41.000 Exactly.
01:28:42.000 She couldn't include herself in the population of victimizers, even though, you know, she lives in a Western country, and she's a well-paid journalist, and she lives a very privileged life, so to speak, by historical and world standards.
01:28:53.000 In comparison to someone living in the Congo or something.
01:28:55.000 Well, or anybody living anywhere in the entire history of the human race.
01:29:01.000 Right.
01:29:01.000 Yeah, for sure.
01:29:02.000 If you make $34,000 today, you absolutely are in the top 1% of everybody who's ever lived.
01:29:07.000 Oh, definitely.
01:29:08.000 Well, of course, of course.
01:29:09.000 Ever.
01:29:09.000 Yes, yes, definitely, especially given what you can buy with it.
01:29:12.000 The only reason to deny that is because it doesn't fit what you've come into the argument with.
01:29:17.000 Right.
01:29:17.000 It doesn't fit the predisposed notion that you have.
01:29:24.000 Your idea that you're – it's so rigid, this idea that you are not one of the ones that's pressing.
01:29:31.000 That's right.
01:29:31.000 That's exactly it.
01:29:43.000 Yeah, well the victim victimizer narrative only works if you assume that you're a victim.
01:29:53.000 And as soon as you assume that you're a victimizer, well then it's not so much fun.
01:29:56.000 One of the things, I wrote the foreword for the new version of Solzhenitsyn's Gulag Archipelago, the abridged version.
01:30:04.000 It came out November 1st.
01:30:05.000 And I was trying to figure out why the Russian Revolution went wrong so rapidly.
01:30:10.000 Because it went wrong right from the beginning.
01:30:12.000 And Solzhenitsyn quotes this guy, I think his name was Walter Latsas, if I remember correctly.
01:30:19.000 He got the Latsas part right anyways.
01:30:20.000 And he said, when you're interrogating a member of the bourgeoisie, To decide whether they constitute an enemy of the state.
01:30:30.000 You don't give any credibility to such niceties as individual guilt or innocence.
01:30:36.000 All you care about is their group and their background and their economic status.
01:30:40.000 And if they're in the wrong group, the bourgeoisie, then...
01:30:43.000 That's it.
01:30:44.000 That's the end of them.
01:30:45.000 And Solzhenitsyn comments, not just the end of them, but the end of their children and their grandchildren as well.
01:30:50.000 And Latsis was eventually executed by Stalin.
01:30:53.000 Somebody wrote me and just told me that after I wrote the foreword.
01:30:56.000 But one of the things I figured out was this, and this is really worth thinking about, man.
01:31:00.000 So the intersectional claim is that, you know, each person has more than one group identity.
01:31:06.000 So fundamentally, if you're going to calculate their victim status, then you have to calculate it across all the different groups that they might be victims in.
01:31:14.000 And so, you know, maybe...
01:31:17.000 Oh, who knows, a Native American is one form of victim in this line of thinking, but a Native American victim is, female, is like twice the victim, or however you would calculate that mathematically.
01:31:29.000 It's like, okay, and maybe you have, maybe you can be put into six different groups.
01:31:34.000 We already talked about that a little bit.
01:31:36.000 But here's the bloody rub.
01:31:39.000 If I put you in six groups, in one of those groups you're a victimizer.
01:31:43.000 You can bloody well bet on it.
01:31:45.000 And then here's the next rule.
01:31:47.000 If you're a victimizer among any possible dimension of analysis, then it's the gulag for you.
01:31:54.000 And so that's the fundamental danger of that group identity, victimizer-victim narrative, is that you fragment your identity in multiple dimensions, you'll find out that you're a victimizer, and then everyone's a criminal, and then everyone's guilty.
01:32:08.000 That's exactly what happened in Russia.
01:32:10.000 And then you think, well, wait a minute, there were a bunch of people who were really compassionate about the poor.
01:32:14.000 It's like, let's say, just for the sake of argument, that at the beginning of the Russian Revolution, that 20% of the communists were really concerned about the poor.
01:32:23.000 Maybe we could say 50%, just to be arbitrary about it.
01:32:27.000 The other 50% were jealous and resentful about anyone who anything more than they did.
01:32:31.000 Alright, now, you put those two groups head-to-head in a battle for four years and see who's standing at the end.
01:32:36.000 Even if you are one of those utopians who actually cares for the dispossessed, when the revolution comes, you can bloody well be sure that your head's going to be first on the chopping block.
01:32:46.000 Because the people who are motivated by hate are going to be a lot more vicious in their attempts to eradicate than you're going to be, what would you call it, effective in your attempts to save.
01:32:56.000 That whole game, that whole identity politics game, that is dangerous beyond belief.
01:33:00.000 And it's predicated fundamentally on resentment and the desire to devolve people back into a tribal antagonism.
01:33:08.000 I think it's so important that you talk about it this way, and I think it's really interesting when I see the resistance to you talking about it this way, and how many people are unwilling to look at it as this multi-level, historical sort of record.
01:33:21.000 You could look and see how this played out, and you can look and see what's going on right now with these control games that people are playing socially.
01:33:29.000 And that they are enforcing certain types of behavior and certain ways of thinking, and then trying to rein in earnings and rally against capitalism and support communism and socialism, and doing so in this sort of weird, trendy way, without understanding the full scope of the historical implications when it's been tried in the past.
01:33:48.000 And that it's not as simple as, like, you know, you got this Anne Ryan thing doing, you're looking at this world of...
01:33:57.000 You know, capitalism against socialism.
01:33:59.000 It's good people who care about folks versus people who are ruthless.
01:34:03.000 It's not that.
01:34:05.000 Well, that isn't even how...
01:34:06.000 Capitalism doesn't even work like that.
01:34:09.000 You know that managers are more stressed by the people they manage than the people they manage are stressed by their managers?
01:34:15.000 I mean, and think about it, right?
01:34:16.000 All you have to do is think about that for a minute.
01:34:18.000 It's like, you're an employee, and you have a manager.
01:34:21.000 And the manager's a bit of a jerk, let's say.
01:34:23.000 But there's 20 of you.
01:34:25.000 So there's like, you're kind of 1 20th oppressed by the manager.
01:34:28.000 But now you're the manager, and you're managing 20 people, and you're responsible for them.
01:34:32.000 And we're assuming that you're not a psychopath.
01:34:34.000 And you're probably not, because you probably wouldn't have been able to get to be a manager if you were a psychopath.
01:34:39.000 Because psychopaths generally aren't very successful, and they have to keep moving as people figure out who they are.
01:34:45.000 So the idea that psychopathic power is a good route to power in a functioning organization is a stupid theory.
01:34:51.000 There are some organizations that are pathological enough so that works, but they don't last very long either.
01:34:56.000 So you're the manager, and you're a decent human being, and you've got 20 people who are dependent on you, and at least two of those people are real trouble.
01:35:04.000 Like, they're serious trouble.
01:35:05.000 And they're your concern all the time.
01:35:10.000 And so you see this, and as people move up the corporate hierarchies, you think, well, they have more and more power.
01:35:15.000 It's like, yeah, but not really.
01:35:18.000 They have more and more responsibility, and their behavior is actually monitored with increasing severity.
01:35:24.000 It's like you're quite constrained in most high-level positions of authority in complex organizations.
01:35:32.000 Like, you have to behave pretty damn carefully, or you're going to get yourself in trouble very, very quickly.
01:35:37.000 Well, certainly today.
01:35:38.000 I think that that wasn't necessarily the case a decade ago or two decades ago.
01:35:42.000 It was less the case.
01:35:43.000 Yes, less the case.
01:35:44.000 Today it's far easier to get called out on things.
01:35:47.000 But even so, like, you know, even 20 years ago, like, if you didn't treat your customers properly, you know, and carefully, reciprocally, in long-term relationships, you were going to be a failure.
01:35:57.000 And, you know, in any corporation that produces anything of any value, I mean, the production is one thing, so you have to be competent at the production, but you have to be in constant communication with your buyers and foster those relationships personally because there's intense competition and If those personal relationships aren't of high quality,
01:36:17.000 then your business fails.
01:36:19.000 And one of the things I really learned, because I spend a lot of time with business people as well as academics, is that business people do a tremendous amount of socialization compared to academics.
01:36:29.000 Academics can judge each other's work more or less on the basis of its scientific merit.
01:36:35.000 And so they don't have to establish personal relationships to the same degree.
01:36:39.000 But business people are always wondering, well, can I trust you?
01:36:42.000 Can we enter into a reciprocal relationship that's going to be of mutual benefit over the long run?
01:36:46.000 And so they're testing people out socially all the time.
01:36:48.000 And if you're not capable of...
01:36:51.000 If you're reciprocating, honestly, over some decades, say, then you're going to screw things up in an absolutely horrible way.
01:36:58.000 It's one of the reasons why they like to use golf as a metric.
01:37:00.000 Yes, exactly.
01:37:01.000 That's exactly right.
01:37:02.000 Because golf is two things.
01:37:03.000 One, you get to see how someone handles competition.
01:37:05.000 You get to see if they cheat, because people do cheat in golf.
01:37:08.000 You know, it's an interesting story.
01:37:09.000 A good friend of mine, his...
01:37:24.000 I think?
01:37:27.000 He's a cheater.
01:37:28.000 He cheated at golf.
01:37:30.000 And he thought it was not that big a deal.
01:37:31.000 It's like, it's just a game of golf.
01:37:32.000 He's like, no, this is a big deal.
01:37:34.000 Turns out the guy was a fucking criminal.
01:37:36.000 It just took a while to find out.
01:37:37.000 I mean, he wound up doing a lot of other things.
01:37:39.000 How you do some things is oftentimes how you do everything.
01:37:42.000 Yeah, well, that's why people are so interested in games.
01:37:46.000 Yes.
01:37:46.000 You know, because games...
01:37:47.000 Get to see who a person really is.
01:37:49.000 Well, games...
01:37:50.000 And this is, again, why I'm such an admirer of Piaget, because he knew very well that...
01:37:54.000 Game is a microcosm of reality.
01:37:56.000 That's why we like...
01:37:57.000 I mean, you have to have an explanation for why people like games.
01:38:01.000 I've been talking about this a lot in my lectures too.
01:38:03.000 You think, well, any game, any competitive game, soccer is a good example, it's basically a hunting game because you're firing a projectile at a target.
01:38:16.000 Okay, so the target's the goal and the projectile's the ball, but it doesn't matter.
01:38:20.000 So you have teams that are figuring out how to hunt properly.
01:38:25.000 Then you think, well, to hunt properly, you have to put the ball in the net as many times as you possibly can.
01:38:33.000 And so you organize yourself in a hierarchy to facilitate that.
01:38:36.000 But then that's not the whole story.
01:38:39.000 Because you tell your kids, it doesn't matter whether you win or lose, it matters how you play the game.
01:38:45.000 And the kid's all freaked out about that because he doesn't know what you mean.
01:38:49.000 And he says, well, what do you mean, Dad?
01:38:50.000 I'm supposed to try to win.
01:38:51.000 And you say, I don't know what I mean, but it's still true.
01:38:55.000 But here's what you mean, is that if you're in a league, you're not trying to win the soccer game.
01:39:01.000 You're trying to win the soccer championship.
01:39:04.000 And to win the championship, you have to win a whole bunch of games.
01:39:07.000 And the rules to win a whole bunch of games aren't the same as the rules to win one game.
01:39:11.000 You know, like you could go flat out as the prima donna and bend the rules and cut corners and exhaust everyone and win the game and then lose the next three because that's a stupid medium to long-term strategy.
01:39:22.000 Or you could be like the superstar and hog the ball all the time and never give your teammates a chance to develop, but then you're injured and your team is out.
01:39:29.000 So that's a stupid strategy too.
01:39:31.000 So you think, well, what you have to do to win the championship is that you have to organize your team so that the best players lead, but that everybody gets developed, and that you play the medium to long-term game in a fair way, in a fair and decent way.
01:39:46.000 Okay, and so you think, well, that's how you win a championship.
01:39:48.000 I talked to a coach a while back and he said one of the things he did to select athletes was to watch what happened when they scored a goal.
01:39:57.000 And if they were celebrating on their own, you know, in sort of an egotistical way Then that wasn't such a good sign.
01:40:03.000 But if they scored a goal or a touchdown or whatever it was, and their entire team came in and mobbed them and then lifted them up on their shoulders, then they thought, that guy is an athlete.
01:40:12.000 Because not only can he put the ball in the net, but he does it in a way that benefits the entire team.
01:40:20.000 And that's the person you want around for the long run.
01:40:22.000 And so then the goal isn't just to put the ball in the goal.
01:40:25.000 The goal is to put the ball in the goal...
01:40:28.000 The largest number of times while simultaneously benefiting as many of your fellow players as you can.
01:40:35.000 Well, although I think that's a great strategy, I don't think that's necessarily the meaning of it doesn't matter if you win or lose, it's how you play the game.
01:40:41.000 I don't think people think of it in terms of like a long-term strategy for championship leagues.
01:40:46.000 I think when they're saying it doesn't matter whether you win or lose, it's how you play the game, meaning don't cheat, do your best, and learn.
01:40:55.000 Right, but I think...
01:40:56.000 Learn from your endeavor.
01:40:57.000 That's right.
01:40:58.000 Well, learn how to handle failure.
01:41:00.000 Right.
01:41:00.000 Learn how to handle victory.
01:41:02.000 Well, also learn from the experience itself.
01:41:05.000 Like, if you make a mistake and you're trying your hardest, but you make an error because someone has a counter to that, then you learn from that.
01:41:12.000 Yeah, right.
01:41:13.000 That is how you play the game.
01:41:14.000 If you play stupidly and you don't think and you win just because you got lucky, that's not as good as playing intelligently and doing your best and losing because the other people are superior and then you learn from the fact that they figured out a way to have solutions to all the problems that you presented.
01:41:32.000 Yes, okay.
01:41:33.000 So one of the things that you're pointing out is that while you're playing, you want to be expanding your range of skills so that you get better at playing the next game.
01:41:40.000 But then you think, well, even the soccer championship isn't the whole game because your life is a whole series of games, of championships of different types.
01:41:49.000 The idea is that championships will come if you continue to excel and get excellent.
01:41:54.000 Yes, and also if people invite you to play.
01:41:56.000 Yes.
01:41:57.000 So those are the two things.
01:41:59.000 So that's the goal, right?
01:42:01.000 The goal isn't to put the ball in the net.
01:42:03.000 The goal is to get excellent and to be invited to play.
01:42:06.000 And the mechanism is that you put the ball in the goal.
01:42:09.000 And that makes sense.
01:42:11.000 See, that helps explain why people find competitive sports so unbelievably compelling.
01:42:16.000 Because you can be cynical about it and you can say, well, look, there's 50,000 people there watching somebody kick a...
01:42:22.000 A spheroid object into a net.
01:42:24.000 Who the hell cares?
01:42:26.000 But that's not the issue.
01:42:28.000 What you are in fact doing is you're going there to watch people develop expertise and to learn to play reciprocally in a noble and ethical manner.
01:42:40.000 And all of that sport, when it's done properly, is a direct physical incarnation of that ethic.
01:42:47.000 And so it's not surprising that that's why people get so excited when they see an athlete do something.
01:42:52.000 Imagine the best thing that you can see at a sports event is someone who does something purely in the spirit of fair play and in a manner that's unbelievably excellent.
01:43:04.000 Wayne Gretzky was very good at that, right?
01:43:06.000 Because he was an excellent sportsman and also unbelievably skilled.
01:43:10.000 And so people loved him and that's perfect because he was...
01:43:14.000 A player who played the game like it was more important to play it properly than to win, and he was on the top of his game at the same time.
01:43:20.000 And that's what you want to be in life.
01:43:22.000 He didn't cut corners.
01:43:23.000 That's right.
01:43:23.000 There's no cutting corners.
01:43:25.000 And so that's very cool, and you see a very high-order ethic emerge out of that.
01:43:30.000 You want to be the kind of player that everybody...
01:43:32.000 I kind of wrote about that in 12 Rules for Life, because part of my advice in Rule 5 was not to let your kids do anything that makes you dislike them.
01:43:40.000 And that's part of the idea there is that, you know, if you're really on the side of your children, you help them develop in a manner that makes them eminently desirable to other children and capable of interacting properly with adults because then the whole world opens up to them.
01:43:54.000 And that's a really...
01:43:55.000 And you do that.
01:43:56.000 The thing that's cool about that too is that, and this is what makes the postmodern and the Marxist type so wrong, is that your best strategy for success in life isn't the exercise of raw power.
01:44:07.000 It's a really counterproductive strategy.
01:44:09.000 It doesn't even work very well for advanced animals.
01:44:11.000 Your best strategy is skill and reciprocity.
01:44:17.000 So there's a real high order ethic in that.
01:44:19.000 That has nothing to do.
01:44:20.000 So the idea that our hierarchies are predicated on power and they're corrupt because of that and the whole world is a battleground between hierarchies of, you know, different power hierarchies and it's winner take all and, you know, the devil take the hindmost.
01:44:32.000 That's just, that's completely inappropriate psychologically.
01:44:36.000 There's a real situation where...
01:44:40.000 You very rarely find people who excel at competition and who have benefited from competition who are against competition.
01:44:49.000 And you very rarely find people who have no skill in competition at all and who have never engaged and have shied away from it their whole life that support it and believe that it's an important part of our culture.
01:45:02.000 I think people want Mm-hmm.
01:45:21.000 I think?
01:45:39.000 Well, the other thing that's kind of sad about that is that no matter what system you set up, that's the outcome.
01:45:45.000 If you look at the Pareto distribution, so if that's the distribution of wealth...
01:45:52.000 You'll find that in every society that we know of, whether it's capitalist or socialist or communist for that matter, a small proportion of the people have a disproportionate amount of the resources.
01:46:04.000 So the other thing that I've been trying to explain in my lectures is that if you were really concerned about the dispossessed and the poor, you wouldn't put hierarchical dispossession at the feet of capitalism.
01:46:18.000 Because it's a way worse problem than that.
01:46:20.000 You know, because the Marxist types, they think, well, if we didn't have capitalism, there wouldn't be hierarchies and there wouldn't be dispossession.
01:46:26.000 And that's complete bloody rubbish, because the problem of hierarchy and the problem of dispossession is way deeper than the problem of capitalism.
01:46:33.000 So, like, if you look at Neolithic grave sites, way before there was capitalism, you see that a small number of people are buried with all the gold.
01:46:42.000 So the fact of unequal distribution of resources, that's as old as hierarchies are old.
01:46:53.000 It's unbelievably old.
01:46:55.000 And so for the leftists to take an anti-capitalist position and assume that that's going to be of benefit to the dispossessed is an idea that's at least 145 years out of date as far as I'm concerned.
01:47:05.000 But we do want to discourage tyranny.
01:47:08.000 We do want to keep that.
01:47:09.000 We do want to keep someone from accumulating so much wealth that they dominate the world and have a disproportionate effect on culture and do things that are detrimental that could be, in fact, detrimental for decades and decades to come.
01:47:22.000 I mean, look, to this day...
01:47:24.000 Well, that's why you have a balance of powers in the United States, too.
01:47:26.000 Because, yeah, well, the thing is, it's not the case...
01:47:31.000 The fact that you can't characterize the West as a patriarchal tyranny doesn't mean that hierarchies don't become tyrannical.
01:47:39.000 Sometimes they do.
01:47:40.000 And we have to be alert to that.
01:47:42.000 And that's been known for a very long time.
01:47:44.000 So is it fair to say that the West has some aspects of a hierarchical tyranny?
01:47:50.000 Of course!
01:47:51.000 Of course!
01:47:51.000 And I would say that's a mythological truism.
01:47:55.000 So, like, the way that society is represented in our deep narrative structures is always twofold.
01:48:01.000 There's a wise king and a tyrannical king.
01:48:03.000 And they're pitted against each other.
01:48:05.000 And your job is to amplify the wise king and keep the tyrant under control.
01:48:10.000 That's the evil advisor to the king, you know, like Scar in The Lion King.
01:48:14.000 Yeah.
01:48:14.000 Right?
01:48:14.000 So there's always this shadowy figure in the background that's malevolent and psychopathic and power-obsessed that's attempting to take over the hierarchy by ill-gotten means.
01:48:26.000 That's evil itself in some sense.
01:48:29.000 It's the archetype of evil.
01:48:30.000 And so that has to be taken into consideration.
01:48:33.000 But the problem with The viewpoint that's so prevalent in our society right now is that, and that's the patriarchal tyranny viewpoint, is that it's only the evil king.
01:48:42.000 And then that's particularly hard on young men because if you believe that all of our hierarchies are predicated on nothing but arbitrary power, and that that's a natural consequence of masculinity, then whenever you see anyone who's masculine manifest anything that's associated with competence or confidence or Or,
01:49:02.000 let's say, competitiveness or, you know, heaven forbid, aggression, then you immediately assume that that's nothing but a manifestation of tyrannical power and that you discourage it or you certainly fail to encourage it.
01:49:15.000 And I think that that's a dreadful mistake, because that masculine energy, whether that's characteristic of women or men, because women can certainly manifest that, that's something that should be integrated and celebrated.
01:49:27.000 And the way you do that, that's partly why mechanisms like competitive sports are so necessary, is that you want to take kids, let's say boys, the more competitive and aggressive boys, just for this example, You want to take them and you want to socialize them intensely so that they take that aggressive competitive impulse and they're capable of manifesting it inside a social structure like a game so that it's of benefit to everyone.
01:49:53.000 And you can do that.
01:49:54.000 It's not a problem.
01:49:56.000 You know, you teach an aggressive kid that it's beneath his dignity to bully someone weaker.
01:50:04.000 So you can attach that right to the competitiveness.
01:50:06.000 It's like you're a loser.
01:50:07.000 You bully someone weaker than you, you're a loser.
01:50:10.000 That's pathetic.
01:50:12.000 It speaks right to that competitive drive.
01:50:16.000 It says, oh, I don't want to be a loser.
01:50:17.000 Tenets of martial arts are so critical.
01:50:19.000 That's one of the major tenets of martial arts.
01:50:21.000 It is a huge part of what's taught in traditional martial arts academies.
01:50:28.000 There's a very clear way of behaving.
01:50:34.000 Right, right.
01:50:35.000 And you're supposed to have extreme reverence.
01:50:36.000 Because it's a misuse of your power.
01:50:38.000 Exactly.
01:50:39.000 And you're supposed to have extreme reverence for the people who taught you.
01:50:42.000 I mean, you're master.
01:50:43.000 You literally call them a master.
01:50:45.000 Right.
01:50:45.000 In almost all martial arts, they're referred to in some way.
01:50:49.000 So that's another thing that's really interesting about a functional hierarchy.
01:50:54.000 Because the leftist critics look at a hierarchy and they think every position is up looking down.
01:51:00.000 But what you're saying, what you're pointing out is, in a functional hierarchy, there's plenty of respect going up.
01:51:08.000 So it's not just power.
01:51:11.000 It's authority and subordination at the same time.
01:51:14.000 Voluntary subordination.
01:51:16.000 Because you should be properly subordinate to the people who are better at what you're doing.
01:51:23.000 Yes.
01:51:23.000 And in a functional organization that happens naturally.
01:51:25.000 And the other thing that happens too, and the radical leftists never take this into account as far as I'm concerned, is that one of the things I've learned about people who've run successful organizations, whether they're academic or business, Is that they really love mentoring young people.
01:51:41.000 It's an intrinsic pleasure.
01:51:43.000 Because, you know, you think, well, for the evil capitalist, it's winner-take-all and to hell with everyone else.
01:51:50.000 And that's an unbelievably cynical view of human nature.
01:51:53.000 It only really applies to people who are genuinely psychopathic, and they're very rare.
01:51:58.000 And so, most of the people I know that have been hyper-successful are absolutely thrilled if they can find a young person, and they don't care, generally speaking, about sex or creed or colour or any of that crap.
01:52:09.000 They care about competence.
01:52:11.000 They want to find a competent young person who's got a lot of possibility and then open up all sorts of doors of opportunity for them and to see how they can help them develop.
01:52:20.000 And if they can do that with 20 or 30 people, then...
01:52:22.000 Like, my graduate supervisor had his...
01:52:27.000 He's getting old, and he had his retirement party about two years ago, and about 30 of the people that he trained into becoming scientists came to his party, and they talked nonstop about the beneficial effect that he had on their life, you know?
01:52:41.000 He found a lot of them were, you know, they were young and smart, but weren't really all that properly oriented in the world, and he picked them out and gave them opportunities, and he certainly did this for me, has opened all sorts of doors for me, and that was a huge source of pleasure in his life.
01:52:55.000 I think maybe the primary source.
01:52:57.000 He had a family as well, and obviously his family was of primary importance, but in his professional career it wasn't His name on papers and his name in the Marquet, it was all these young people whose careers he could foster.
01:53:11.000 It was a never-ending source of satisfaction.
01:53:13.000 Yeah, I think that's a critical aspect of being a successful person, that you have to realize that there's a great personal benefit in helping other people, and that you feel this.
01:53:23.000 This is not just like something that looks good on paper.
01:53:25.000 When you can show some young person who's coming up the way, you're 10 years ahead of them, And you can say, these are the mistakes that I made.
01:53:33.000 I can help you get through this.
01:53:34.000 And then you see them flourish.
01:53:36.000 There's a great deal of personal satisfaction.
01:53:38.000 Oh, definitely.
01:53:39.000 And there's got to be some sort of an evolutionary benefit to this kind of behavior.
01:53:43.000 Well, that's part of...
01:53:44.000 See, that's...
01:53:45.000 The thing is, we are evolved for reciprocity.
01:53:48.000 We really are.
01:53:48.000 We're not evolved for power.
01:53:50.000 This is what's so deeply wrong about the damn post-modernists and the Marxists.
01:53:55.000 First of all, power is not the best strategy to attain success.
01:54:01.000 It's simply not.
01:54:02.000 It doesn't even work for chimpanzees because the brute chimps, the ones that rule purely as a consequence of force, as soon as they weaken two subordinates that are reciprocally engaged so that they have a friendship, tear them into pieces.
01:54:16.000 So I don't care how strong you are.
01:54:18.000 Three guys that are like two-thirds of your strength are going to take you out.
01:54:22.000 So you're much better situated in society and in your life if you're in an interactive network of reciprocally beneficial relationships.
01:54:34.000 That works in games, but it also works in life.
01:54:36.000 And to reduce that, and if you're competent, so there's the killer combination.
01:54:42.000 Hyper-competence and the capacity for genuine reciprocity.
01:54:46.000 That makes you unstoppable.
01:54:47.000 Why is there this lack of understanding and appreciating this nuance in people that oppose these ideas?
01:54:59.000 What's the willingness to be ignorant about all the variabilities, especially when you consider the bulk of the research?
01:55:06.000 Well, I think some of it's justification for failure.
01:55:09.000 You know, like if you're not doing very well, then it's really easy to think that the game is rigged.
01:55:14.000 It's also easy to be resentful about people who seem to have more than you have, especially if you're not thinking about it very clearly.
01:55:21.000 You know, and that's another thing that I've been trying to lecture to people about, is that you should be very careful about assuming that someone else has more than you do.
01:55:29.000 I mean, one of the best predictors of whether someone has money is how old they are.
01:55:34.000 So old people are richer than young people.
01:55:37.000 Well, obviously, right?
01:55:38.000 Because they had their whole life to accrue wealth.
01:55:40.000 It's like, well, who's got it better?
01:55:44.000 You want to be rich and old or young and poor?
01:55:47.000 You know, I mean, you can't buy youth with money.
01:55:52.000 So, it isn't obvious who's better off in a situation like that.
01:55:56.000 In fact, I think most people who are old and rich would trade it for young and poor fairly damn quickly.
01:56:01.000 Well, that's why people really get angry when they see young rich people.
01:56:04.000 Yeah.
01:56:05.000 I know, that's just too much to bear.
01:56:07.000 Yeah, like a young, rich, famous rapper.
01:56:10.000 Like, what's that fella?
01:56:12.000 The 17-year-old?
01:56:14.000 Lil Pump.
01:56:14.000 Lil Pump.
01:56:15.000 How about that?
01:56:17.000 Famous.
01:56:17.000 17. I was in high school when I was 17. Well, the funny thing, too, though, is that even with people who have that sort of, let's call it good fortune, independent of their talent, you don't have to scratch beneath the surface very far,
01:56:33.000 even in successful people's lives, until you find a pretty decent vein of tragedy.
01:56:39.000 And so, that jealousy of the successful is also based on a really unidimensional view of exactly what constitutes success.
01:56:49.000 You see the trappings, whatever they might be.
01:56:53.000 Let's say it's a yacht and more money than you know what to do with.
01:56:56.000 And you assume, well, that's going to put that person at the pinnacle of a satisfying life.
01:57:00.000 But there's no shortage of dreadfully unhappy and addicted people.
01:57:04.000 Celebrities.
01:57:05.000 And it isn't obvious always that more money is good for people.
01:57:09.000 You know, I mean, you say, oh, that's a problem I'd like to have.
01:57:11.000 It's like, look, fair enough.
01:57:12.000 I mean, there are worse problems.
01:57:14.000 But celebrity and fame and fortune are also not that easy to deal with, and they come with their own pitfalls.
01:57:20.000 Plus, there's lots of things they don't protect you against.
01:57:24.000 You know, people still get divorced, and they still get sick, and they still die, and their parents still get Alzheimer's, and all of that.
01:57:29.000 Like, the fundamental tragic elements of life are still in place.
01:57:34.000 One of the interesting things about people that are jealous of other people that are extremely successful is that you're missing one of the core lessons of competition.
01:57:42.000 One of the core lessons of competition is to be inspired by those who are more successful and not to try to chip them down and take away their accomplishments because they don't make you feel good.
01:57:53.000 The people that are piss poor at competition are always the ones that are trying to diminish the accomplishments of those who are extremely successful.
01:58:00.000 You see this in sports fans.
01:58:02.000 If you see a loser, fat sports fan talking about what a piece of shit LeBron James is because he dropped the ball or he missed a shot, the extreme reaction that they could have to someone who's extraordinarily successful is almost always in direct proportion to how Much of a failure they are in their own life.
01:58:23.000 And that's one of the reasons why, in contrast, it looks so ridiculous.
01:58:27.000 Yeah, well, that's part of the danger.
01:58:28.000 I would say that's part of the danger of the entire identity politics movement is that reasonable care for the dispossessed, which we already talked about, is easily contaminated by hatred and resentment for people who are not only successful, but who are...
01:58:43.000 The most annoying person who's successful is the person who deserves it, not the person who doesn't deserve it.
01:58:49.000 Because you can write the person who doesn't deserve it off.
01:58:51.000 Right, the lottery winner.
01:58:52.000 You can say, oh yeah, well, you know, he just got lucky.
01:58:54.000 You inherited his money.
01:58:55.000 Yeah, exactly.
01:58:55.000 But then you see the person who's broken themselves in half and, you know, come out of a really pathological background and has been successful and you're like, you're uselessly wasting your life away.
01:59:07.000 That's the sort of person that you really don't like because they cast you in a very dim light.
01:59:11.000 So this is where competition is so important, because the person that has a background in competition, has been involved in competition, sees a person who's busted their ass and becomes something really extraordinary, and it's incredibly inspirational.
01:59:25.000 And you look to those people, and you want to read their biographies, and you want to watch documentaries on them, because it literally gives you fuel.
01:59:32.000 Whereas the person who shies away from competition, is afraid of their own insecurities and failures, and really has never tested themselves, those are the ones that find these people extremely distasteful.
01:59:43.000 Because when they put themselves in comparison to these incredible people, they come up short.
01:59:49.000 Every ideal is a judge.
01:59:52.000 And so what's the answer to that?
01:59:54.000 No ideals.
01:59:56.000 That's a stupid suggestion.
01:59:58.000 No, it certainly doesn't, because then it leaves people without any meaning in their life.
02:00:03.000 Well, I think it speaks to what you were talking about earlier, that we need adversity.
02:00:06.000 That we need adversity, we need difficulty, we need struggle.
02:00:09.000 You need a weight to carry.
02:00:11.000 And if you don't have any of this, you do not get your character tested.
02:00:14.000 You do not advance in your own perception of who you are in this world and how you engage with all the other people around you.
02:00:22.000 You don't call out what's best in you.
02:00:24.000 Yes.
02:00:24.000 And then you can't live without that.
02:00:26.000 You need that.
02:00:27.000 You need that.
02:00:27.000 And the trick seems to be that voluntary acceptance of the adversity.
02:00:32.000 See, that's one of the things that I think is core to the mythos of Christianity, because there's an idea that you should pick up your cross and stumble uphill.
02:00:41.000 And that's really what that means, is that you set your eyes on some high-level vision, the city of God on the hill, whatever that happens to be.
02:00:50.000 And then you take the burden, whatever burden you're capable of lifting, which is obviously going to be a burden of suffering, at least to some degree, and you carry that voluntarily.
02:01:00.000 That's the trick.
02:01:01.000 And then you say, well, you need a purpose in your life.
02:01:03.000 It's like, well, look, there's a lot of problems around you in the world.
02:01:06.000 You have some problems.
02:01:07.000 Some problems even that bother you, right?
02:01:10.000 Personally, they seem to call out to you those problems.
02:01:12.000 Maybe those are your problems.
02:01:13.000 Those are the problems you should solve.
02:01:15.000 And those, I think, are the call to adventure.
02:01:18.000 It's like, there's a problem.
02:01:19.000 It bugs me.
02:01:19.000 Okay, do something about it.
02:01:21.000 That's your problem.
02:01:23.000 There's a certain amount that you can tolerate.
02:01:25.000 I mean, I think it's like weight training.
02:01:27.000 There's a certain amount where it becomes detrimental.
02:01:29.000 Yeah.
02:01:29.000 Where you've over-trained.
02:01:31.000 Your body's breaking down.
02:01:32.000 There's a certain amount of problems that you have in your life that are extremely beneficial.
02:01:36.000 Right.
02:01:36.000 Because through going through these problems, sorting them out, you build your spirit.
02:01:41.000 You build your character.
02:01:43.000 And if you don't accomplish anything and you never encounter any problems, you are this gelatinous, soft, atrophied soul.
02:01:51.000 And you don't have the intestinal fortitude or the spirit or the human potential has not been developed to the point where you can overcome adversity.
02:02:00.000 The only way to overcome adversity is to face it.
02:02:02.000 So that optimum that you were talking about, so I've really been interested in the neurophysiology of the sense of meaning.
02:02:13.000 Neurophysiology of the sense of meaning.
02:02:15.000 Yeah, because the meaning, the feeling of meaning is an instinct.
02:02:18.000 Right.
02:02:18.000 It's not a thought.
02:02:19.000 It's not a secondary consequence of rational processes.
02:02:22.000 It's way deeper than that.
02:02:23.000 It's something that drives rationality itself.
02:02:26.000 Does it vary amongst people?
02:02:28.000 Definitely.
02:02:29.000 But it varies in this way, as far as I can tell.
02:02:32.000 So imagine, as you said, that there's an optimal load.
02:02:36.000 You exceed that to your detriment.
02:02:39.000 And you see that in the weight room.
02:02:40.000 You pull a muscle, you'll hurt yourself.
02:02:42.000 You can injure yourself very badly.
02:02:44.000 You can take yourself out for the count.
02:02:46.000 But then if you work too little, well, then there's no gain in it.
02:02:50.000 You have to find that thin edge, Where you're competent at what you're doing, but you're pushing yourself.
02:02:58.000 That's going to be where meaning lies.
02:03:00.000 That's what meaning tells people.
02:03:02.000 It says you're on the edge where you're competent and out of undue danger, but pushing yourself enough so that you're continually developing.
02:03:11.000 That's the instinct of meaning.
02:03:13.000 And that looks to me like it's a consequence of the interaction between the right and the left hemispheres.
02:03:17.000 And a consequence of the interaction between the negative emotion systems, anxiety and pain, that regulate you, that protect you from harm, and the exploratory and play systems that drive you forward.
02:03:29.000 You want the exploratory and play systems to drive you forward, but then they're regulated by these negative emotions so you don't hurt yourself.
02:03:36.000 And if you get that optimally right, then that's the point of maximal challenge.
02:03:40.000 And that makes you really alert, because your positive emotion is functioning.
02:03:44.000 That's what's driving you forward.
02:03:45.000 This is worth doing.
02:03:47.000 And your negative emotions are alert too, saying, yeah, but be awake and be careful.
02:03:51.000 And you know what that's like in the weight room.
02:03:53.000 You know, you're lifting something that's at the edge of your ability, and you've got a spotter.
02:03:57.000 You want to push, and you can barely do it, and you want to make sure that you're not going to, like, pull your arm down and rip the hell out of your muscle.
02:04:04.000 But you're right on that edge, and that's the place of maximal gain.
02:04:07.000 And that sense of meaning, that's what puts you on the border between chaos and order.
02:04:12.000 Right?
02:04:12.000 Because too much order means you're just practicing what you already know.
02:04:16.000 And then you stultify and stagnate.
02:04:18.000 And too much chaos means you better look out because you're going to hurt yourself.
02:04:22.000 You're pushing yourself beyond your limits.
02:04:24.000 You stay right on that edge.
02:04:26.000 That's where there's maximal meaning.
02:04:27.000 And the only way to find out where that edge is is to push it.
02:04:32.000 Now, one of the things I recommend to young people, especially true for people in their 20s, is that you should push yourself beyond your limits of tolerance in your 20s to find out where it is.
02:04:42.000 How much can you work?
02:04:43.000 How disciplined can you become?
02:04:45.000 Like, can you work 12 hours a day?
02:04:46.000 Can you work 8 hours a day?
02:04:48.000 Can you work 3 hours a day?
02:04:49.000 Like, flat out.
02:04:50.000 Where's your limit?
02:04:52.000 And how much work can you do and how much socialization?
02:04:55.000 You should find out.
02:04:56.000 Push yourself past and then back off to that point where it's optimally sustainable.
02:05:01.000 That's what a lot of people do, isn't it?
02:05:02.000 I mean, they party too much when they're in their 20s, they make a lot of mistakes.
02:05:06.000 It's what they're doing, and I would say in sort of a haphazard way, right?
02:05:09.000 Because there's that instinct to go out there and do more.
02:05:13.000 But it's unregulated and it's not as self-conscious as it might be.
02:05:18.000 It's good to know that there's...
02:05:19.000 It's good to think about that as a goal.
02:05:22.000 It's like you're trying to discover what your limitations are when you're in your 20s so that you can hit that edge so that you can sustain yourself across the decades.
02:05:30.000 And so, yeah, because you don't want to have too much fun.
02:05:34.000 Too much fun takes you out.
02:05:36.000 You don't want to be the oldest guy at the disco.
02:05:39.000 It's not fun being the 40-year-old at the singles bar, precisely.
02:05:43.000 So you want to make sure that what you're doing is age-appropriate and you want to push yourself in every direction that you can, but you should be doing that with an aim in mind.
02:05:51.000 It's like you're trying to make yourself into a better and more competent person.
02:05:54.000 And so some discipline along with the fun is a good idea.
02:05:57.000 So to take care of yourself and the people around you, that's a...
02:06:01.000 One of the things I recommended to people, and I've had quite a few people actually tell me that they've done this, interestingly enough, I said, well, one thing you could aim at, if you had any sense when you were young, is to be the most worth, you could be the most reliable person at your father's funeral.
02:06:17.000 And so I think that's a good challenge.
02:06:19.000 And I had a bunch of people come up to me in this last tour and tell me that that's exactly what they did.
02:06:22.000 These were often young guys, you know, like before 20. He said, my dad died suddenly or, you know, he died after a year's illness and it was just taking me out.
02:06:30.000 And no wonder, you know.
02:06:31.000 He said, I was listening to your lectures.
02:06:33.000 You said, you want to be the most reliable person at the funeral because everyone else is grieving and what the hell else are you going to do?
02:06:39.000 He said, that's what they tried to do and that got him through it.
02:06:42.000 So...
02:06:43.000 No, that's part of that, picking up that load, as far as I'm concerned.
02:06:47.000 You get a little self-respect out of that, too, in a real sense, right?
02:06:50.000 Because, you know, you're this sort of sad, suffering creature that's capable of a fair bit of malevolence, but if you find out that you can carry a heavy load and take care of yourself and have a little leftover for some other people, then you can wake up at 3 in the morning and think, well, man, I could be worse.
02:07:05.000 And this is not a political perspective.
02:07:07.000 This is a positive, constructive way of looking at how to navigate the world.
02:07:13.000 When you break down these sort of behavior types, whether it's the people that generally support socialism or socialist ideas or they're anti-competition versus people that are pro-pushing yourself.
02:07:28.000 They fall into these right wing, left wing sort of paradigms in this really weird way.
02:07:34.000 I think that's especially true on the radical ends, but I think you get that on the radical right, too, because you get people who are collectivist in their fundamental orientation, and they're trying to take undue credit for who their racial ancestors were.
02:07:49.000 What I would say with the political issue is that I think that you can build decent, responsible people who are on the...
02:07:58.000 Middle right of the spectrum and the middle left, you know, because I think that you can have left-wing political beliefs that are genuinely aimed at aid to the dispossessed without being resentful of the hierarchies and without contaminating it with jealousy for the successful.
02:08:15.000 It's hard, right?
02:08:17.000 Because when I worked for the NDP when I was a kid, that was the Socialist Party in Canada, the leaders, some of the leaders were people like that.
02:08:26.000 Like a lot of the low-level party functionary types, they were the activist types that you still see today, and they're mostly resentful.
02:08:32.000 I didn't like them at all.
02:08:33.000 But some of the leaders were genuinely, genuine advocates for the working class.
02:08:38.000 You know, and they had their flaws, obviously, but they put their money where their mouth was, and they were trying to ensure that the hierarchies were open to advancement for, let's say, the common person, so to speak, the person who's stacked up at the bottom, or for their children,
02:08:54.000 which might even be more important, you know, so that the hierarchies remain open to advancement.
02:08:59.000 Genuine competition based on competence.
02:09:02.000 Which would be a perfectly reasonable thing for the left to insist on, right?
02:09:05.000 Is that let's bloody well make sure that it's a fair game.
02:09:08.000 And so that people don't get locked out of movement forward because of arbitrary positions of power.
02:09:14.000 And that's a reasonable part of the discussion.
02:09:19.000 So I think if you build better people, you can build better people on the left and on the right.
02:09:23.000 And people that are going to appreciate that rules to the game are better for everyone.
02:09:27.000 They're better for the people that win.
02:09:28.000 They're better for the people that are coming up.
02:09:30.000 They're better for everyone.
02:09:31.000 Yes, if that's right.
02:09:32.000 You have to have real structure and real rules and that you're better off being a guy like Wayne Gretzky.
02:09:37.000 Yes.
02:09:37.000 Better off being a guy who's respected, who plays the game correctly, and just does his best, and really, truly becomes a champion and loved by all because of it.
02:09:44.000 You're better off in every way.
02:09:45.000 Right.
02:09:46.000 Right.
02:09:46.000 And that's the other thing that's so cool about that.
02:09:48.000 So imagine this.
02:09:49.000 This is the antidote to moral relativism.
02:09:52.000 Okay.
02:09:53.000 So the first thing is, is that...
02:09:55.000 There are real problems, and hierarchical organizations can offer real solutions, socially and personally.
02:10:02.000 So you can confront the problems courageously and you can solve them.
02:10:05.000 So that's real.
02:10:06.000 It ameliorates suffering and limits malevolence.
02:10:09.000 And so there's nothing morally relative about that.
02:10:11.000 The second is that sense of meaning that we discussed.
02:10:14.000 That's not some philosophical second-order consequence of thinking.
02:10:19.000 It's way deeper than that.
02:10:20.000 That sense of meaning tells you When you're Vygotsky, the Russian psychologist, called that the zone of proximal development, which I believe is where the phrase the zone came from.
02:10:30.000 And so in the zone of proximal development, this is what adults do with children, little kids that are learning to talk.
02:10:36.000 Adults automatically talk to little children who are learning to talk at a level that slightly exceeds their current vocabulary.
02:10:43.000 They do that without even knowing it.
02:10:45.000 And that puts those kids in the zone, right?
02:10:47.000 Because if you just talk baby talk to kids, then all they learn is baby talk.
02:10:50.000 And if you just talk like an adult, then they don't understand a word you're saying.
02:10:54.000 So you find this happy medium in between where the kid mostly understands what you're talking about and that you're pulling them forward.
02:11:01.000 So that puts them in the zone.
02:11:02.000 And that's a meaningful zone.
02:11:04.000 And so you can feel the operation of that zone in your own life.
02:11:08.000 That's what the Taoists are on about.
02:11:10.000 Because they say, well, the Tao is the way, right?
02:11:12.000 And that's the pathway between chaos and order.
02:11:14.000 That's meaning.
02:11:15.000 And you can feel that in your life when you're deeply engaged in something.
02:11:18.000 Like, we have deeply engaging conversations.
02:11:21.000 Okay, which is part of the reason that we keep having them and I think why they're popular.
02:11:25.000 And we're not paying attention to how the clock is ticking or how time is flowing or even to the fact that we're doing what we're doing.
02:11:30.000 We're just having a conversation.
02:11:32.000 And it's meaningful.
02:11:33.000 It's engaged.
02:11:34.000 It keeps our eyes focused and our senses...
02:11:38.000 Concentrated on what's happening.
02:11:39.000 And the reason for that is that there's enough information flowing between us so that we're being slightly transformed as a consequence of the discussion.
02:11:47.000 So we're both comfortable.
02:11:49.000 We trust each other.
02:11:50.000 We trust that the conversation is aimed at something that's of mutual benefit.
02:11:54.000 We trust each other to tell the truth to the degree that we're capable of doing that.
02:12:00.000 And then when you engage in this exchange of information, and to the degree that it's breaking you down a little bit and building you up in a different way, that's a little death and rebirth.
02:12:10.000 There's constant little deaths and rebirths in a meaningful conversation.
02:12:13.000 Then that keeps you alive and functioning.
02:12:16.000 And that focuses you.
02:12:19.000 That speaks to you so deeply that that focus happens without any consciousness.
02:12:23.000 And that's meaning.
02:12:25.000 And that's that line between chaos and order.
02:12:27.000 And that's real.
02:12:28.000 And I would say, here's another thing that's cool.
02:12:32.000 So that line between chaos and order, that's the same thing that's happening when you're playing a game properly.
02:12:39.000 Because you're in the game, and you're exercising your skill, but you're pushing it.
02:12:44.000 But you're pushing it in a way that's also a benefit to your teammates and to the progression of the game as such, and to being a better general player.
02:12:51.000 You're doing all that at the same time.
02:12:53.000 And you're evolved.
02:12:55.000 With enough natural intelligence so that the sum total output of your nervous system says to you, you're in the right place at the right time doing the right thing.
02:13:05.000 And that's what makes your life meaningful.
02:13:06.000 And that's real.
02:13:08.000 And I think it's more real than anything else.
02:13:10.000 I think it's more real than suffering.
02:13:12.000 I think it's more real than malevolence because it's the antidote to both of those.
02:13:16.000 And so the whole moral relativism issue for me is a non-starter.
02:13:20.000 It's just wrong.
02:13:22.000 There's lots of ways of interpreting the world, but there aren't very many ways of interpreting it optimally.
02:13:27.000 And you can feel when you're doing that.
02:13:29.000 It makes you stronger.
02:13:30.000 And then the people that come to me after my talks and say, well, you know, I've been putting my life together.
02:13:34.000 I've developed a vision.
02:13:36.000 I've been trying to be more responsible.
02:13:37.000 I've been trying to be more honest and put my relationships together.
02:13:40.000 They're all sparkly-eyed because of this, or crying sometimes, because it's really had an impact at them on...
02:13:46.000 On them at a deep level, they think, oh, wow, this actually works.
02:13:49.000 It's like, yeah, it actually works.
02:13:50.000 It's real.
02:13:51.000 It's real.
02:13:52.000 And I would say as well that that's associated with the idea of the deep Western idea of the logos, which is meaning in action and speech.
02:14:00.000 So, you know, if we have a conversation that's meaningful.
02:14:04.000 Then, that's a manifestation of the spirit of the Logos, and that's the thing that destroys and recreates at the same time.
02:14:13.000 Because you learn something, it destroys a little presupposition that you had that was erroneous, and replaces it with something that's healthier.
02:14:21.000 And every time you have a meaningful conversation, that happens.
02:14:24.000 It's like a little tweak.
02:14:25.000 Now, I wasn't quite right here.
02:14:26.000 Click!
02:14:26.000 That moves, and something new takes its place.
02:14:29.000 So, and that's a little death and rebirth instead of The catastrophic death and rebirth that you might have to have if you weren't paying attention.
02:14:36.000 So, that's all tied together.
02:14:38.000 That's all tied together with that phenomenon of meaning.
02:14:40.000 And that's the same as the adoption of responsibility.
02:14:43.000 That all ties together so nicely.
02:14:46.000 Yeah, the concept of meaning, like what is important, that it's so huge to people, but so fleeting.
02:14:52.000 It's so difficult to, like, what is meaning?
02:14:55.000 Well, you know, there's the simple ones, right?
02:14:56.000 Like family and loved ones and companionship and community and finding something that you enjoy doing that, you know, you can do that seems bigger than you or bigger than yourself.
02:15:07.000 But meaning, like the meaning of life, what is meaning?
02:15:10.000 It's one of the things that gives people so much existential angst, and I think is the cause of a lot of despair, because there's no real answer.
02:15:18.000 Well, you can question it.
02:15:19.000 Yes.
02:15:20.000 But the thing is, is that that's one of the dangers of rationality, is that, see, the Egyptians associated, the Catholics did this to some degree, too.
02:15:29.000 They associated rationality with a proclivity to malevolence.
02:15:35.000 Partly because rationality tends to fall in love with its own productions.
02:15:38.000 Intelligence has this like in-built arrogance.
02:15:40.000 And the Egyptians in particular were really insightful.
02:15:45.000 They tried to replace the idea of intelligence as the highest virtue with the idea of attention as the highest virtue.
02:15:51.000 This is something Aldous Huxley knew.
02:15:53.000 He wrote a book called Island.
02:15:54.000 Island was an island that was populated by, had a lot of birds on it, and the birds could talk, and all they did was say, pay attention, to remind everybody on the island to pay attention all the time.
02:16:04.000 You can undermine your sense of meaning and you can question it, but the best thing to do is to actually pay attention to when it manifests itself.
02:16:12.000 Because it's a phenomenon like color or like love or like beauty.
02:16:18.000 It exists.
02:16:19.000 It isn't something you create.
02:16:21.000 It's something that you discover.
02:16:22.000 And you can discover it.
02:16:24.000 You just have to watch.
02:16:25.000 Like you're ignorant about yourself.
02:16:27.000 You think, okay, well I'm going to...
02:16:28.000 I told my clinical clients to do this and my students.
02:16:31.000 Watch yourself for two weeks.
02:16:33.000 Just watch like you don't know who you are.
02:16:35.000 And notice when you're doing something that you're engaged in.
02:16:39.000 It's like you'll see.
02:16:40.000 Maybe it's only ten minutes because your life is pretty out of balance, but you'll see that, oh man, I was engaged in something there for ten minutes.
02:16:46.000 It's like, why?
02:16:47.000 What did you do that was right, that engaged you?
02:16:50.000 You were in the right place at the right time, doing the right thing for a few minutes.
02:16:55.000 What was it?
02:16:56.000 What were the preconditions?
02:16:57.000 There's this line in the New Testament.
02:17:00.000 Christ says, the kingdom of God is spread across the earth, but men do not see it.
02:17:05.000 And that's what it refers to.
02:17:06.000 Is that you wander into paradise now and then when you're engaged, when you're deeply engaged in something.
02:17:13.000 But you don't notice it.
02:17:14.000 You don't think, oh, look, I'm in the right place and everything's working out right now.
02:17:18.000 It means I've got it right somehow.
02:17:20.000 And then I need to practice being there more and more and more, which is...
02:17:25.000 Well, that's the appropriate thing to try to practice.
02:17:28.000 And that's to make, that's to come to some negotiated, what would you call it?
02:17:34.000 It's to come to a negotiation with that intrinsic sense of meaning and to realize it as a fact rather than just as an opinion or something that's secondary.
02:17:43.000 It's an alien concept for people, though, to be so aware of who they are and what they're doing, they could recreate that.
02:17:50.000 So when they do feel that feeling of meaning, that they could figure out a way to get back into that state, and what were all the extenuating circumstances, and where was my head at?
02:17:59.000 What caused me to have this feeling like things were right?
02:18:02.000 Yes, well, it's like someone gives you a gift, and you think, well, I'd like that gift again.
02:18:05.000 It's like, yeah, well, you have to figure out what it was that you did to deserve it, so to speak.
02:18:09.000 And yeah, I know it requires a fair bit of careful reflection, but it also requires that ignorance, as you have to think, well, I don't know who I am.
02:18:19.000 I'm going to find some things meaningful.
02:18:21.000 What are they?
02:18:22.000 They might not even be things you want to find meaningful.
02:18:24.000 They might be things that you might even be ashamed of.
02:18:26.000 You know, because sometimes people are interested in things that they don't think that they should be interested in.
02:18:32.000 Like, maybe you'll have a guy who was, this is kind of a cliché, but who was, you know, socialized to be a real tough guy and he finds out that he's kind of interested in art or aesthetics.
02:18:43.000 It's like, well, he's ashamed of that because maybe it's too feminine or whatever.
02:18:47.000 Well, it doesn't matter because that's actually something that's speaking to him from the core of his genuine being.
02:18:54.000 He's going to have to pursue that.
02:18:56.000 Or you might find that someone who's really agreeable and kind of a pushover stands up to someone.
02:19:04.000 Just once at work, says what they really think, and then they realize afterwards, wow, you know, that was exactly right.
02:19:10.000 Then they think, oh my god, you know, I've decided when I was a little kid, maybe they had a harsh father, and they decided when they were four, I'm never going to be angry in my whole life.
02:19:18.000 There's something wrong with aggression.
02:19:19.000 So they've gone out of their way their whole life to be free of conflict.
02:19:23.000 Then they find out that one day they stand up for themselves, that that whole domain that they'd parsed off as inappropriate actually contains exactly what they need to put themselves together.
02:19:33.000 But you find what you need where you least want to look.
02:19:36.000 That's the old alchemical dictum.
02:19:39.000 I want to talk to you about activists.
02:19:43.000 Because it's something that you brought up earlier, saying that you find them unappealing.
02:19:48.000 I want to know what you think the motivation of a lot of these particularly radical left-wing activists that want to shut down lectures and scream people down in these auditoriums.
02:20:02.000 What do you think the motivation of these people is, and what do you think is the root of it?
02:20:09.000 Well, I think that it's a quick root to moral virtue.
02:20:13.000 You know, like, it's actually really hard to put yourself together, and you have to do that in ways that you can't trumpet.
02:20:20.000 You know, because most of the things that are wrong with you are kind of low, what would you call it, second-rate and embarrassing.
02:20:29.000 You're all your stupid little habits and your proclivity to procrastinate and all the things that you're minorly ashamed of.
02:20:34.000 And then you have to work on those slowly because the probability that you're going to be able to fix them quickly is low.
02:20:42.000 And you can't really brag about it because it's so embarrassing just to admit that they exist to begin with that you can hardly brag about it and it's sort of painstaking private work and you don't get a lot of social, you don't get a lot of quick social status for it.
02:20:56.000 It's effortful, embarrassing, humbling and difficult.
02:21:00.000 And then you can do something like be an activist and you get all that public acclaim for being on the good side with no effort whatsoever.
02:21:10.000 So it's a plus.
02:21:12.000 Do you think that there's any motivation at all to try to make the world a better place?
02:21:16.000 Yes.
02:21:17.000 I think there's some.
02:21:18.000 You think that's part of it?
02:21:19.000 Sure.
02:21:19.000 But you think it's flavored by this desire to broadcast your virtue?
02:21:25.000 Yes, because it's very difficult to make the world a better place.
02:21:29.000 That's the thing.
02:21:30.000 No, I mean, young people have a messianic impulse.
02:21:34.000 That's another thing that was documented by Piaget.
02:21:37.000 There's a stage in late adolescence where you want to make the world a better place.
02:21:41.000 I would say that's probably part of the impulse to...
02:21:47.000 Establish a permanent relationship and have a family and take care of people and to take on some of the burden of life.
02:21:54.000 It's the psychological precursor to that.
02:21:57.000 And it's reasonable for smart young people to be concerned about Broader philosophical issues if they tilt in that direction as well.
02:22:06.000 But it's all too easy for that to be pathologized into resentment for those who seem to have more unfairly.
02:22:16.000 And also to take the easy route out.
02:22:19.000 And there aren't easy routes.
02:22:21.000 There are only difficult routes to doing useful things.
02:22:24.000 And it's better just to do that.
02:22:26.000 And then...
02:22:27.000 So I think that there's some impulse to...
02:22:31.000 You know, there's some wish that things could be less unfair and that fewer people could suffer.
02:22:36.000 But it's kind of a low-level virtue that reflects of compassion.
02:22:42.000 You know, I'm not saying it's without merit, because that compassion is the basis for the ability to take care of people who are ill and infants and so forth.
02:22:51.000 What makes you feel it's low-level?
02:22:53.000 It's not thought through.
02:22:56.000 Things are complicated.
02:22:57.000 It's hard to make complicated systems work better.
02:23:01.000 And it's really easy to make them work worse.
02:23:04.000 What about activists that want to shut down certain speakers?
02:23:07.000 Like someone who's, in my opinion, fairly innocuous in terms of the...
02:23:13.000 Here's one.
02:23:15.000 Christina Hoff Summers.
02:23:16.000 I don't see a good argument for shutting her down.
02:23:18.000 She's so polite.
02:23:19.000 She's a feminist.
02:23:21.000 She's well-read.
02:23:22.000 She's a really nice person.
02:23:24.000 Yeah, Janice Fyomenko is like that too in Canada.
02:23:27.000 Same sort of person.
02:23:28.000 It doesn't make sense that people would shout her down, yet they do.
02:23:32.000 They shout her down, they say horrible things about her, they mischaracterize her in a really brutal way that it completely invalidates their argument or their opposition to her, to anyone that's paying attention to what she said.
02:23:46.000 Well, a lot of it is also just immature acting out.
02:23:51.000 There's an arrogance to it.
02:23:53.000 But it's tolerated in some sort of a very strange way.
02:23:56.000 Yeah, it is.
02:23:59.000 It's part of our doubt, I suppose, about authority and our willingness to assume that all authority is contaminated by power.
02:24:10.000 It's a sanctioned heckling, too.
02:24:12.000 It's almost like if you're doing a play, or a musical, or you're singing a song, and someone just decides to start screaming out, well, that person's an asshole.
02:24:20.000 But if you're espousing an opinion, and that person decides to scream out, and they do so under the guise of moral virtue, then they're tolerated.
02:24:29.000 It's undeserved access to power.
02:24:31.000 Yes.
02:24:32.000 You know, and it's no wonder that the radical leftists in particular concentrate on power.
02:24:36.000 Everything's about power.
02:24:37.000 Well, then it's okay if they use power as part of their means of expression.
02:24:41.000 It's like, well, you're just playing power games.
02:24:44.000 It's perfectly reasonable, even appropriate for me to play power games because, you know, I'm oppressed compared to you.
02:24:50.000 If everything's power, then everybody gets to yell.
02:24:52.000 And there's no...
02:24:53.000 One of the things I realized about recently as well is that There isn't a debate about free speech, exactly.
02:25:02.000 Not the way that we think about it, you know, because there's the classical defense of free speech.
02:25:07.000 So the classical defense of free speech is that it's better for both of us if we're able to exchange our opinions because I have the opportunity to learn from you and you have the opportunity to learn from me and you have the opportunity to learn from your own mistakes and social feedback and so do I. And negotiation beats war.
02:25:27.000 Okay, so that's kind of the classical...
02:25:30.000 Now, but that's predicated on some assumptions, and those are you're an autonomous being, you're capable of formulating an opinion that's actually unique to you, and that in dialogue we can mutually modify each other's unique opinions in a way that produces a mutually harmonious and beneficial outcome.
02:25:50.000 That's all the predicate.
02:25:51.000 Well, the people who are opposed to free speech, you see...
02:25:55.000 It's not that they're trying to shut down people whose opinions are different than theirs exactly.
02:26:00.000 It's that they're opposed to the idea that free speech exists.
02:26:04.000 It's a way deeper problem.
02:26:06.000 Because at the bottom of the post-modernist mess is the following assumption.
02:26:11.000 Is that, well, there's no...
02:26:15.000 There's no one way of interacting with the world that's preferable to any other way.
02:26:20.000 And so what people do is organize themselves into hierarchies of power and then struggle for dominance within the hierarchies and then the hierarchies struggle between each other.
02:26:29.000 So it's a landscape of warring hierarchies.
02:26:32.000 That's all it is.
02:26:33.000 And you think that you're a person and that you have an opinion, but you're not.
02:26:37.000 You're just the mouthpiece of your privileged hierarchy.
02:26:42.000 And so am I. And it's incommensurate if we're from different hierarchies.
02:26:47.000 There isn't a you talking to a me that could come to an agreement.
02:26:50.000 There's just you acting as a mouthpiece for your power and me acting as a mouthpiece for my power.
02:26:55.000 And so, since I'm part of my group and I want to win because it's all about power, then why the hell would I ever want you to talk?
02:27:02.000 It's not like I have anything to learn from you or even that learning is possible or even that there are two people having a discussion.
02:27:10.000 There's nothing but the mouthpiece of power.
02:27:13.000 There's two mouthpieces of power warring.
02:27:16.000 And so why should I listen to you?
02:27:18.000 I'll just shut you down.
02:27:19.000 Because then I win.
02:27:20.000 And so this free speech debate isn't about whose opinion should be allowed within...
02:27:28.000 You know, an overarching framework where free speech is a real thing.
02:27:32.000 It's a debate about whether there's such a thing as free speech at all.
02:27:36.000 The radical post-modernist types, they deny even that there's such a thing as an autonomous individual in any way.
02:27:43.000 You're just the nexus of economic forces, economic and social forces.
02:27:48.000 You're entirely socially constructed.
02:27:50.000 There's no you.
02:27:52.000 These are deep criticisms.
02:27:54.000 I've made this case before that the postmodern types, although they have to ally themselves with the Marxists for reasons that we don't have to go into, they are going after things that are so fundamental you can't believe it.
02:28:07.000 There is no autonomous individual in the postmodern world.
02:28:12.000 That's a modernist or an enlightenment viewpoint, or a Christian viewpoint, or a Judeo-Christian viewpoint, or maybe an Abrahamic religion viewpoint.
02:28:21.000 Who the hell knows?
02:28:22.000 It might be that deep.
02:28:24.000 You're the nexus of sociological forces.
02:28:27.000 There's no integrated self.
02:28:28.000 You don't have ideas or opinions.
02:28:30.000 And there's no dialogue between us.
02:28:33.000 That doesn't exist.
02:28:35.000 There's your group, your identity, your struggle for power, and that's all.
02:28:40.000 This is your interpretation of it?
02:28:42.000 No, no, no!
02:28:44.000 This is the fundamental essence of post-modernism.
02:28:48.000 It's especially true in the format espoused by Derrida and Foucault.
02:28:52.000 Foucault, everything's about power.
02:28:54.000 Everything's about power.
02:28:55.000 And Derrida was definitely, that's why he criticized the idea of logocentrism.
02:29:01.000 Logos is that ability of the individual to engage in dialogue.
02:29:05.000 The root for dialogue is logos or logic.
02:29:08.000 That's all criticized.
02:29:09.000 That's all gone.
02:29:10.000 The identity politics players, the people who are serious about this philosophically, they don't believe in the idea of the autonomous individual.
02:29:18.000 That's gone.
02:29:21.000 So it's not like they're playing a game within, you know, you think, well, this is a game We're all playing a game where we agree on some things, and we're just disagreeing about the details.
02:29:30.000 It's like, oh no, no, no, no.
02:29:32.000 You don't want to make that mistake.
02:29:34.000 This critique is way, way deeper than that, which is why Derrida was opposed to the idea of logocentrism.
02:29:41.000 He didn't believe in the idea of an autonomous individual.
02:29:45.000 That didn't exist.
02:29:46.000 That's just a fiction set up by those who have used the idea of the autonomous individual to advance their power maneuvering within the confines of the colonialist West.
02:30:00.000 And what's the rationalization for that perspective?
02:30:03.000 Is this to enhance their argument, to try to push forth their ideas in a less...
02:30:12.000 I think the motivation is hatred for competence.
02:30:15.000 Hatred for competence.
02:30:16.000 I truly believe that.
02:30:18.000 I've been trying to go down, like go down as deep as I could to find out I think it's Cain and Abel.
02:30:23.000 Wow.
02:30:24.000 I really believe that.
02:30:25.000 I think that because I can't understand the motivation otherwise it's like well why are you tearing these things down?
02:30:31.000 Well it's on the basis you know we have sympathy for the oppressed.
02:30:34.000 It's like well Well, why?
02:30:37.000 Where in your conceptualization does that idea of sympathy for the oppressed come from?
02:30:42.000 You don't even have the idea of the individual in your conceptualization.
02:30:46.000 It's like, that's just a...
02:30:49.000 I don't buy any of that.
02:30:52.000 I think it's Cain and Abel all the way down.
02:30:54.000 Do you think that when you're talking about the Scandinavian model where they've made it incredibly equal and through this massive effort to take away any opportunity or to rather open up every possible opportunity for women that men also have and you've seen these Differences in genders actually accentuate because of this.
02:31:20.000 Do you think that maybe What we're seeing also, even in terms of the post-modernists and the radical leftists versus people on the right, this same sort of competition aspect of it is also problematic because it's one of the reasons why there's so much debate in the first place and that if we had maybe more middle ground and more opportunity,
02:31:45.000 there would be less of an argument.
02:31:47.000 There would be less of a reason to have these These extreme polar opposites that may be embracing of more – like there's certain socialist aspects of our society that we just accept, right?
02:32:03.000 Like the fire department, right?
02:32:04.000 Yeah.
02:32:05.000 Universal provision of infrastructure.
02:32:07.000 Yes.
02:32:08.000 Yeah, that's a good one.
02:32:10.000 Schools should be, I think, more emphasized in that direction, but it gears towards We're good to go.
02:32:36.000 Definitely higher education.
02:32:38.000 Making higher education far more accessible and far less costly.
02:32:42.000 Stop subsidizing these student loans.
02:32:44.000 Stop making student loans something that you can never escape.
02:32:46.000 Well, I think this is part of the eternal debate, right?
02:32:49.000 Because we've already talked about the utility of hierarchies and the necessity of putting those who can in charge.
02:32:58.000 Right.
02:33:14.000 Yeah, from hitting zero.
02:33:15.000 Because zero's not good.
02:33:17.000 You can't play when you hit zero.
02:33:18.000 And that's not good.
02:33:20.000 And so, I don't think there is a universal solution to that problem because the problem keeps manifesting.
02:33:27.000 Think about it as an eternal problem.
02:33:29.000 Here's the problem.
02:33:31.000 There's a set of problems.
02:33:32.000 That'll never go away.
02:33:34.000 Now, what the problems are, change.
02:33:36.000 But the fact that there are problems never go away.
02:33:38.000 Okay.
02:33:39.000 The fact that you have to produce hierarchies to solve those problems never goes away.
02:33:43.000 The fact that the hierarchies dispossess never goes away.
02:33:48.000 But the details shift all the time.
02:33:51.000 And so the whole reason that you need the political discussion is to take a look at the particulars of the hierarchies and the particulars of the dispossession and say, okay, well, now we need to shim it up here, and now we need to shim it up here, and now we need to adjust this, and now we need to adjust this, because you can't come up with a final solution to those problems.
02:34:09.000 I think that's partly why you have consciousness itself.
02:34:12.000 You know, because if you could automate the solution, imagine there was a permanent solution.
02:34:17.000 Well, there's a permanent solution to breathing.
02:34:20.000 You have a part of your brain that just breathes.
02:34:22.000 You don't think about it.
02:34:23.000 You don't adjust it.
02:34:24.000 Well, you do a bit when you're talking, but you get my point.
02:34:27.000 It's like problem taken care of.
02:34:30.000 Well...
02:34:31.000 There's other problems that are so fluid, like they're eternal problems, but they're so fluid in their detail that you need awareness and linguistic capacity to address them.
02:34:39.000 And I would say the problem of hierarchy and dispossession fit exactly into that category.
02:34:45.000 Is that we're going to organize ourselves hierarchically because talent is unequally distributed.
02:34:51.000 It doesn't matter.
02:34:52.000 Like as soon as you invent basketball and instantly, you know, there's 1% of the population who are super great at basketball.
02:35:00.000 It doesn't matter.
02:35:01.000 As soon as you set up an arbitrary value structure, you get a hierarchy.
02:35:04.000 Then there's the whole schlubs at the bottom that can't put a ball in the hoop to save their lives.
02:35:11.000 And that's an eternal problem.
02:35:13.000 That's why it says in the New Testament that the poor will be with us always.
02:35:17.000 A very pessimistic...
02:35:19.000 There's two lines like that.
02:35:20.000 One is...
02:35:22.000 To those who have everything, more will be given, and from those who have nothing, everything will be taken.
02:35:26.000 That's a rough line.
02:35:27.000 And the second is, the poor will be with us always.
02:35:30.000 Okay, so why?
02:35:31.000 Well, it's a reflection of what we just described, is that you're going to get hierarchical structures and they're going to dispossess.
02:35:37.000 Okay, so then what we want to do is we want to use mercy.
02:35:41.000 Say, justice gives you what you deserve.
02:35:44.000 So that's on the competitive end.
02:35:46.000 You get what you deserve.
02:35:47.000 But there's this old idea, an old religious idea.
02:35:49.000 This is a good idea.
02:35:51.000 God rules with two hands.
02:35:53.000 Right hand is justice and the left hand is mercy.
02:35:56.000 Justice means you get what you deserve.
02:35:58.000 But the world can't survive that way because people are flawed and make mistakes.
02:36:03.000 And if you only got exactly what you deserved, it would be a hell of a world, right?
02:36:07.000 Because you'd be punished for every single mistake you make.
02:36:10.000 You know, you'd be held accountable in a way that would be unbearable.
02:36:13.000 So that has to be tempered with mercy.
02:36:16.000 And so, maybe the left is the end of the distribution that tempers with mercy, when it's functioning properly.
02:36:23.000 But it can degenerate into that Cain-like resentment of the successful, and that's a danger.
02:36:32.000 On the right, you have the opposite danger, which is, well...
02:36:35.000 You know, you advance because of your competence, but then that can ossify, and so you want to hang on to that position even though your competence no longer justifies it.
02:36:44.000 You start to use the advantages of your position to accrue benefits for yourself that you did not earn.
02:36:51.000 And that's the proclivity of the hierarchy to become blind and tyrannical.
02:36:56.000 And that's an eternal problem.
02:36:58.000 The Egyptians had a god for that, Osiris.
02:37:02.000 Osiris was the god of hierarchies, and he was always threatened by Seth, who was his evil brother.
02:37:06.000 And his evil brother was always conspiring to overcome him.
02:37:10.000 And that's the problem with hierarchies, is that they tilt towards tyranny.
02:37:13.000 And the reasonable left says that.
02:37:15.000 Watch the hierarchies, because they tilt towards tyranny.
02:37:18.000 It's like, yes, it's true.
02:37:22.000 But that doesn't mean that the idea of hierarchy itself is flawed, and that doesn't mean that all hierarchies are tyrannical.
02:37:29.000 That's going way too far.
02:37:31.000 Do you think that the Scandinavian model that has revealed that when you do make things more equal, you will find that people generally tend to gravitate more towards traditional gender roles?
02:37:44.000 Does this...
02:37:46.000 Do you think that this makes people happier?
02:37:49.000 Has it been observed that this is a happier result?
02:37:53.000 That's a good question.
02:37:55.000 The indices of life satisfaction are pretty high in Scandinavia, but I don't know if anybody has done an analysis that would indicate whether the sexual sorting Is a contributor to that?
02:38:10.000 That's a good question.
02:38:11.000 I mean, the general idea has been that the Scandinavians are happier because their societies are more egalitarian.
02:38:19.000 But they're not more egalitarian in the sense that men and women are also more different.
02:38:27.000 Men and women are more different, but the opportunities are more egalitarian.
02:38:31.000 Yeah, yeah, yeah.
02:38:32.000 And then the societies are more satisfied.
02:38:35.000 But it's tough, because there's other variables, because the Scandinavian countries are relatively homogenous, right?
02:38:41.000 And more homogenous societies tend to be more peaceful and happier, not more diverse societies.
02:38:48.000 And they're also small countries, so they're somewhat easier to govern.
02:38:53.000 And they tend to be wealthy.
02:38:57.000 So it'd be hard to parse out all those contributors, right, to figure out what it is that's making the Scandinavians relatively content.
02:39:05.000 Because it's almost like a super tribe versus a country.
02:39:08.000 Yeah, right.
02:39:09.000 And those sorts of societies, in some sense, are easier to manage.
02:39:13.000 Is there any benefit to this model that we could perhaps bring to the United States or to Canada and maybe mitigate some of the issues that we have between the right and the left?
02:39:26.000 Like, maybe there's some sort of a compromise that'll lead to less debate and dispute.
02:39:33.000 Well, I think that you guys in the States are doing real well, actually, personally.
02:39:38.000 I mean, you know...
02:39:41.000 Your system of checks and balances seems to work out pretty well.
02:39:44.000 There's a fair bit of, let's say, left domination right now of the mainstream media.
02:39:50.000 I think that's a reasonable claim.
02:39:51.000 And also of academia and of the intelligentsia.
02:39:55.000 But the political system is skewed pretty hard to the Republican end of things at the moment.
02:39:59.000 And so that's not a bad balance.
02:40:01.000 And then in the last election, I mean...
02:40:04.000 Maybe you could make a case, perhaps, that things had tilted a little too far to the Republican side, but that that got balanced out because the Democrats took the House again, and it seems like they were more moderate Democrats.
02:40:16.000 That seems to be the scuttlebutt.
02:40:18.000 So, you know, it isn't obvious to me that your system isn't functioning well.
02:40:23.000 I think that one of the things that's happening that's making things look more contentious than they are is that The mainstream media is under such assault by the up and coming media forums,
02:40:39.000 including people like you, that as their financial models I think?
02:41:02.000 And it depends on how you calculate these things, but that the radical leftists and the radical right-wingers are only about 5% of the population on each side.
02:41:10.000 And that the vast majority of Americans consider themselves something approximating the relatively silent majority.
02:41:17.000 And so...
02:41:19.000 I don't think that things are polarized as badly as they seem.
02:41:24.000 And it is also the case right now that if you poll people and ask them about the conditions of their life in the United States, they tend to say that they're doing quite well, but that other people aren't.
02:41:36.000 I don't know this for sure, but I think maybe that the technological pressure that's being put on the mainstream media is driving extreme political views as a means of gathering the attention of a shrinking market share.
02:41:51.000 That's a very interesting take on it, and I wonder how detrimental that is to us as a whole, because we are constantly dealing with this clickbait nonsense headline, and everything is a dispute, everything's a war.
02:42:05.000 Well, it's nerve-wracking.
02:42:07.000 I mean, I noticed this years ago, because I really stopped watching the news 25 years ago, although I've been heavily involved in it the last two years.
02:42:15.000 Because I noticed that most of what passed for news wasn't.
02:42:18.000 Because my sense was, well, if it isn't important in a month, if it isn't important a month from now, it was never important.
02:42:25.000 And almost everything that's news is like important right now.
02:42:28.000 Yeah.
02:42:29.000 And so I tried to stay away from that.
02:42:30.000 It was better for my peace of mind.
02:42:32.000 And I often...
02:42:33.000 Recommended to my clinical clients who were depressed and anxious that they shield themselves from the news as much as possible.
02:42:40.000 But now there's the news is everywhere, right?
02:42:44.000 It's everywhere.
02:42:44.000 It's Twitter.
02:42:45.000 It's Facebook.
02:42:46.000 It's YouTube.
02:42:46.000 It's like we're just inundated by it.
02:42:48.000 It's like CNN on steroids.
02:42:50.000 It's 24-hour news cycle and it's produced by everyone whether they're I think it's also similar to what we were talking about earlier when it comes to reading comments on Instagram or Twitter.
02:43:09.000 I just think there's just an amount of data.
02:43:11.000 Yeah.
02:43:12.000 That's incomprehensible.
02:43:13.000 I don't think you can handle it.
02:43:14.000 I don't think you can navigate it.
02:43:15.000 You can't navigate that many relationships.
02:43:17.000 I mean, this is the reason why we have this Dunbar's number in our head.
02:43:21.000 If you're dealing with hundreds of thousands of people, in your case, a million followers that are constantly interacting with you, it's going to fucking drive you mad.
02:43:29.000 Well, you don't even know what to do with it.
02:43:31.000 Well, I don't even know what my ethical obligation is to my Twitter followers, you know, because there's a million people following me.
02:43:37.000 You can't.
02:43:38.000 React to all of them.
02:43:39.000 No, definitely.
02:43:40.000 Well, certainly I know one limitation, which is that having it drive me insane is probably not a good outcome for anyone, except for those who hope that I would fall, crawl back under my rock, let's say.
02:43:52.000 This is a personal thing, right?
02:43:53.000 Because they're responding, and the mentions are to you personally.
02:43:56.000 But in a lesser way, perhaps, but is still also overwhelming, is just the sheer amount of information that's available constantly about everything.
02:44:07.000 There's a million stories every day about every single thing that's going on in your life.
02:44:12.000 Well, everywhere.
02:44:13.000 Everywhere on the whole planet, yeah.
02:44:15.000 And how are you supposed to navigate that?
02:44:18.000 How are you supposed to get through life and concentrate on things that are truly meaningful for you in the present moment without being completely detached from the outside world?
02:44:27.000 Yeah.
02:44:28.000 There's a balance that people try to find that is so elusive.
02:44:31.000 It's so hard to figure out how much to watch.
02:44:34.000 How much of this political process do I pay attention to?
02:44:37.000 Well, that's the big technological challenge.
02:44:40.000 When I was a kid, we thought, oh my god, kids are sitting in front of the television four hours a night.
02:44:45.000 It's like, well, you ain't seen nothing yet.
02:44:47.000 Yeah, right?
02:44:48.000 Now it's all day long with their phones.
02:44:50.000 All day long.
02:44:51.000 Yeah, and the phones are so much more powerful than television.
02:44:54.000 Well, it's like a typewriter compared to a computer.
02:44:56.000 Yes.
02:44:57.000 So we don't know how to adjust to that psychologically, but it's even worse than that because as soon as you adjust to the degree that you do, the technology changes on you.
02:45:09.000 Right.
02:45:10.000 It becomes more immersive.
02:45:11.000 Sure.
02:45:12.000 And it's always leading in that direction.
02:45:13.000 Yeah, so it's a real, I mean, you know, I see this especially with parents who have teenage kids.
02:45:20.000 It's like they know the phones aren't, you know, I've been talking to some teenagers lately about, you know, maybe these are kids that are getting bullied on social media.
02:45:30.000 It's like, I think, well, when I was 14, you know, it's kind of a rough time of life and you go to school and you've got your friends and you've got your enemies and then you come home and Your friends aren't there and neither are your enemies.
02:45:42.000 You're outside.
02:45:44.000 There's an outside of that.
02:45:46.000 But now, on social media, there's no outside.
02:45:49.000 One kid I was talking to had moved schools and is doing quite well in the new one.
02:45:54.000 But the people from the person's old school are still after them on social media.
02:46:00.000 So, you know, and you think, well, just don't use your phone.
02:46:04.000 It's like, yeah, yeah.
02:46:05.000 You tell that to your teenager.
02:46:06.000 You try not using your phone for a whole day.
02:46:09.000 Yeah.
02:46:09.000 You think, well, the teenager's going to be able to manage the phone.
02:46:12.000 It's like, no, they're not.
02:46:13.000 You can't manage the phone.
02:46:14.000 Nobody can manage the phone.
02:46:16.000 It's not just teenagers.
02:46:18.000 My middle daughter is 10 years old, and all of her friends have phones.
02:46:23.000 Yep.
02:46:23.000 We're good to go.
02:46:51.000 All day long.
02:46:52.000 Well, and they are mastering the technology.
02:46:54.000 That's the other thing.
02:46:55.000 It's not surprising that they're trying to adapt to it.
02:46:57.000 But it's happening at a really early age.
02:47:00.000 Because if you're giving your kid a phone, you're not putting any parental filters on it.
02:47:04.000 You're allowing that kid to have full access to Google and the World Wide Web, and they're just going to...
02:47:08.000 If you give your kid a phone and you don't think they'll know how to use the phone better than you within a year, you're a fool.
02:47:13.000 That's true.
02:47:14.000 They're going to have that thing figured out in ways that you haven't even imagined.
02:47:18.000 Yeah, you're not controlling it, that's for sure.
02:47:21.000 It is a very extraordinarily unprecedented time to sort of navigate this world.
02:47:32.000 And I don't think any...
02:47:34.000 I mean, civilizations have had to deal with worse things, right?
02:47:38.000 In terms of violence and famine and disease.
02:47:41.000 But I don't think anyone's had to deal with such a...
02:47:46.000 A radically transformative medium.
02:47:48.000 Well, we have this range of possibilities.
02:47:51.000 Well, and you ain't seen nothing yet, right?
02:47:52.000 No.
02:47:53.000 I mean, this is just getting going.
02:47:54.000 Well, have you been watching the Boston Dynamics videos?
02:47:57.000 Yes!
02:47:57.000 Oh, my God.
02:47:58.000 Those robots, man.
02:47:59.000 Yes, trying to get those guys in here.
02:48:00.000 Oh, yeah, I bet.
02:48:01.000 I mean, the amount of progress they've made in five years is just absolutely staggering.
02:48:05.000 I bet they smell like sulfur and they don't even know it.
02:48:07.000 I bet you bring them in here like...
02:48:09.000 What the fuck is going on?
02:48:10.000 These guys are dim.
02:48:11.000 Well, Elon Musk was on the podcast talking about some new development they're working on called Neuralink and that this is some radical new way of accentuating bandwidth between human beings and information and just increasing the access to it.
02:48:26.000 And he was very vague about it.
02:48:28.000 He said it was going to come out within X amount of months.
02:48:32.000 Yeah, well, they've already, you know, there are scientists who've already managed direct brain-to-computer links, right?
02:48:38.000 So they can get monkeys, for example, to move a robotic arm.
02:48:41.000 And so, and I suspect that, you know, you can learn to control single neurons in your face.
02:48:48.000 My suspicions are that we'll be able to develop technologies that'll be wearable, that won't have to be neural implants, that you'll be able to communicate with neurally.
02:48:56.000 And that that's not very far down the road.
02:48:58.000 And the...
02:48:59.000 You know, the probability that we're going to build...
02:49:03.000 You know about, what's his name, Kurzweil's idea of the singularity.
02:49:11.000 Well, it's a wild idea and it seems somewhat improbable.
02:49:15.000 I had a friend who once told me that if something's impossible, then it won't happen.
02:49:20.000 There'll be something that will come up to stop it that you won't expect.
02:49:24.000 And maybe the singularity is one of those things.
02:49:26.000 But, you know, I know a lot of guys who are in the High-end computational world, and a lot of them are convinced that we're within a decade of a machine that's as powerful as a human brain.
02:49:36.000 And I know people have been saying that for a long time, but, Jesus, you know, computers are getting good at emotion recognition.
02:49:42.000 They're getting really good at facial recognition.
02:49:44.000 They can communicate with one another.
02:49:46.000 They can imitate.
02:49:46.000 Those Boston Dynamic robots are pretty damn impressive, and they're mostly autonomous.
02:49:51.000 We've got all sorts of things that can navigate on their own, like these autonomous cars.
02:49:55.000 Like, all these things are...
02:49:57.000 They're coming together real fast.
02:49:59.000 Have you ever watched Black Mirror on Netflix?
02:50:02.000 The only one I watched was the one that outlined what the Chinese are now doing to their own people.
02:50:07.000 Oh, yeah, the CRISPR one.
02:50:08.000 No, no, the one where everything you do is rated and tracked.
02:50:12.000 Oh, right, the social network one.
02:50:14.000 Right, right, right.
02:50:15.000 Yes, which is quite frightening and reasonably probable.
02:50:19.000 Oh, 100% probable.
02:50:20.000 I was talking about the one, I think it's called Heavy Metal.
02:50:24.000 It's about autonomous robots that seek out people and kill them.
02:50:28.000 And these artificial intelligence robots.
02:50:31.000 People that are making these Boston Dynamic robots.
02:50:35.000 The scariest one that I read about was a DARPA one called the Eater Robot.
02:50:40.000 E-A-T-R. It operates on...
02:50:43.000 It uses as a fuel...
02:50:45.000 It uses biological material as fuel.
02:50:48.000 Which means...
02:50:50.000 You're kidding.
02:50:50.000 You're kidding.
02:50:51.000 No, I'm not kidding.
02:50:52.000 E-A-T-R. So this is going to be able to eat dead bodies in the field...
02:50:59.000 Theoretically.
02:51:00.000 And use it as fuel to continue to kill people.
02:51:02.000 That sounds like a fine thing to develop.
02:51:05.000 Just fucking imagine an army of robotic, armed, artificially intelligent things that eat corpses in order to have fuel to continue to kill more people.
02:51:16.000 Well, someone's obviously imagining that.
02:51:18.000 It's made.
02:51:19.000 It's made.
02:51:19.000 I mean, this is a real thing.
02:51:21.000 Yeah, well, I mean, part of the reason that I'm doing what I'm doing with regards to these lectures is, you know, I think that we're in a time of unparalleled possibility.
02:51:29.000 Yes.
02:51:30.000 So, for good and for evil.
02:51:33.000 And that the more people that there are out there who have their acts together, the better the probability that we're going to be able to manage it.
02:51:39.000 Because we've all got some pretty hard decisions to make coming up real fast.
02:51:43.000 You know, and these guys that are working on these AI systems, I'm hoping that the ones that are more ethically oriented in a proper direction will be the ones that have the upper hand.
02:51:52.000 I'm really hoping that.
02:51:54.000 So...
02:51:54.000 Yeah, collectively, and what's the matter?
02:51:56.000 I was looking into it because that came up before that it breaks the Geneva Conventions if they actually eat dead bodies.
02:52:03.000 You can't do that.
02:52:05.000 Yeah, whatever.
02:52:07.000 Once we have a robot war, dude, that Geneva Convention's out the window.
02:52:11.000 Yeah, no, I couldn't agree with you more.
02:52:16.000 And I think personally, this is important, and collectively, it's very important.
02:52:20.000 I mean, I just think it's – I think what you wrote, 12 Rules to Life, we need – We need rules.
02:52:26.000 We need rules to be able to figure out how to navigate this thing.
02:52:30.000 It's complicated.
02:52:31.000 Well, that's why I think that the individual level of analysis is the right one, is that I'm hoping that, you know, that, like, every time someone comes up and talks to me and says, look, you know, I was in a dark place and I got my life together and this is how it's going, I think that tilts the scales non-trivially towards a good outcome.
02:52:48.000 Yes.
02:52:48.000 And the more people that that's happening to, the better.
02:52:51.000 And I don't think there's a more effective way of doing it than to concentrate on the individual.
02:52:55.000 Yes.
02:52:55.000 No, I don't think there is either and it's happening a lot.
02:52:57.000 I hear it every day.
02:52:59.000 I hear it every day.
02:53:00.000 People that find you and find a lot of other inspirational people online and just Jocko and there's just so many of them.
02:53:06.000 There's so many and there's so much fuel now for inspiration.
02:53:09.000 There's so much guidance.
02:53:10.000 It's pretty fun that inspiration could become popular.
02:53:13.000 Yeah, it's crazy.
02:53:14.000 Who saw this coming?
02:53:15.000 No kidding.
02:53:16.000 No kidding.
02:53:17.000 And encouragement.
02:53:18.000 And one of the things that's quite sad is how little encouragement people need.
02:53:23.000 It's so touching, you know, because I'm constantly in a state of, like, being overwhelmed, well, even with what happened this morning when I went to Whole Foods, you know, because it's overwhelming to have people come up and, like, they share these really intimate pieces of their life with you in, like, 20 seconds, you know?
02:53:37.000 It's like you're an old friend, you know, and it's like, here's what my life was like.
02:53:40.000 It's dark, you know, it's dark, and here's a bunch of good things that are happening.
02:53:43.000 It's like this little blast of...
02:53:46.000 It's like the persona of the person disappears and you get to see the real person there for like 20 seconds.
02:53:51.000 It's like, it's really, it's overwhelming.
02:53:53.000 But every time that happens, as far as I'm concerned, it's a victory.
02:53:56.000 And it's a victory that multiplies too, as far as I'm concerned.
02:53:59.000 So I'm hoping that...
02:54:02.000 Well, every little bit helps, you know.
02:54:05.000 It certainly does.
02:54:06.000 And by the way, if you meet me and you have one of those stories and I don't know how to react, that's just how it is.
02:54:11.000 You know, I go, wow, that's amazing.
02:54:13.000 Yeah, well, that's good enough, man.
02:54:15.000 I'm super happy for you.
02:54:16.000 That's it, that's it.
02:54:16.000 I'm genuinely happy for you, but I still don't know how to react.
02:54:19.000 That's how to react.
02:54:20.000 I never will learn.
02:54:21.000 That's how to react.
02:54:23.000 It's like, that's how to react.
02:54:24.000 That's all you need.
02:54:24.000 It's like, that's great, man.
02:54:25.000 I hope you keep doing it.
02:54:26.000 That's all I can ever say.
02:54:28.000 And it always feels flat.
02:54:30.000 You know, I mean, like what they said is so mind-blowing, and I'm saying, terrific!
02:54:34.000 Yeah.
02:54:35.000 But it is terrific.
02:54:36.000 It is terrific.
02:54:37.000 It's awesome.
02:54:37.000 Yes, it is.
02:54:37.000 It is.
02:54:38.000 Absolutely.
02:54:39.000 We just did another three hours.
02:54:40.000 It's gone.
02:54:41.000 Thank you, sir.
02:54:42.000 Always a pleasure.
02:54:42.000 Good to see you, Joel.
02:54:43.000 Jordan Peterson, you're a good man.
02:54:45.000 It's a pleasure to be here again.
02:54:46.000 Thank you, everybody.
02:54:46.000 Bye.
02:54:47.000 Thanks very much.