The Joe Rogan Experience - January 10, 2019


Joe Rogan Experience #1222 - Michael Shermer


Episode Stats

Length

2 hours and 48 minutes

Words per Minute

189.07347

Word Count

31,903

Sentence Count

2,826

Misogynist Sentences

30


Summary

Why is there something rather than nothing in the universe? Joe Rogan and Michael Shermer try to figure it out. They talk about it in the latest issue of Skeptic Magazine, where they discuss the idea that the universe might not be real at all, but rather, that it's all a ruse designed to keep us awake at night. They also talk about astrology, and whether or not the universe exists at all. And, of course, they answer the question, "Is there a purpose to life?" or is there no purpose at all? This episode was produced by Alex Blumberg and edited by Annie-Rose Strasser. Our theme song is Come Alone by Suneaters, courtesy of Lotuspool Records. Our ad music is by Haley Shaw. Additional music was made by Mark Phillips, and additional engineering and mixing by Bobby Lord. The show was mixed and produced by Matthew Boll, and Matthew Boll. Special thanks to our sponsor, Ajinx.co.nz. We are a proud supporter of the show, A Good Omens. and the Skeptic Podcast. A very special thank you to our patron, Alyssa Milano for making great sound quality and editing, and for supporting the show with amazing sound design and production. A very much appreciated. Thank you to A Good Ol for the use of our logo and logo by our logo design, and thanks to A. Gooding. for all the work done by our good friend, and our thanks to my good friend . , and to our supporter, , for all of our supporters, and to all of you, the listeners, for the support and support, and all of the support we get back from our supporters. , thanks to you, and thank you for your support, for making this podcasting efforts, and we really appreciate it, and your support and all the support, we really do appreciate it. thank you, thank you so much, and appreciate you all of your support. -A Good Ol Ol' Day? - Thank you, Thank you for listening, and keep on coming back, good day, and good night, and God bless you, good night. -- Thank you. Michael, Joe, and Good Night, Good Blessings, and Thank You, bye, bye. XOXO - Joe, Kristy, Thank You.


Transcript

00:00:05.000 And we're live.
00:00:06.000 Hello, Michael Shermer.
00:00:07.000 Hello, Joe Rogan.
00:00:08.000 I'm doing well, thank you.
00:00:09.000 Good to see you with your pile of your writing.
00:00:11.000 Look what you've got there.
00:00:12.000 You've got the moral arc, heavens on earth.
00:00:16.000 Look at you.
00:00:17.000 Skeptic magazine.
00:00:18.000 That's the latest issue.
00:00:19.000 Why is there something rather than nothing?
00:00:21.000 We like to tackle the little questions.
00:00:22.000 That's a deep one.
00:00:23.000 You've dealt with this on the show.
00:00:25.000 Yeah, too much.
00:00:26.000 That's one that just, you know, when you're in traffic and you go, what is this?
00:00:30.000 When you have someone like Neil or Sean Carroll or Lawrence Krauss talking about this, it's like, whoa.
00:00:37.000 I mean, I'm not a physicist.
00:00:38.000 I'm a social scientist.
00:00:39.000 So for me, I come at it like, what do you mean by this word nothing?
00:00:42.000 Because most of us have this idea of what it means.
00:00:44.000 Oh, no, in physics, it means this other thing.
00:00:46.000 Like, okay.
00:00:47.000 Yeah.
00:00:47.000 Yeah, well, I think our limited understanding of what they're talking about, when I see those guys writing down on legal papers with all that scritchity-scratchity, crazy-looking, fake alien language mathematics, like, thank God you guys are out there.
00:01:03.000 Well, I opened Heavens on Earth with, imagine yourself dead.
00:01:07.000 You know, most people go, well, you know, I see myself in the casket, and my friends and family are around, and hopefully they're mourning.
00:01:13.000 No, you wouldn't see anything, of course.
00:01:15.000 You're dead.
00:01:15.000 I mean, to imagine anything, you have to be conscious and alive.
00:01:19.000 So you can't even picture being dead.
00:01:21.000 So you can't picture not existing, and it would be the same thing.
00:01:25.000 Imagine there's no universe.
00:01:26.000 Okay, I see blackness.
00:01:27.000 No, there's no blackness.
00:01:29.000 I mean, nothing would literally be, not just no light, but no...
00:01:32.000 No perception of darkness.
00:01:34.000 Nothing.
00:01:35.000 Not even nothing.
00:01:36.000 I was going through Instagram the other day, and there was this one person who was talking about the purpose of life and when you die, what's going to happen.
00:01:47.000 And I immediately just started laughing.
00:01:49.000 I'm like, you don't know.
00:01:51.000 How are you saying this?
00:01:52.000 Like, when you die, what happens?
00:01:55.000 And he was like one of them spiritual-type characters, just kind of a huckster.
00:01:59.000 There's a lot of spiritual hucksters out there these days.
00:02:02.000 There are, yes.
00:02:03.000 In the 90s, we debunked all those psychics talking to the dead.
00:02:06.000 That was a...
00:02:07.000 That hasn't been too popular in recent years, but that was a big thing.
00:02:10.000 People caught on to that little earpiece thing.
00:02:12.000 The earpiece, or just the cold reading.
00:02:15.000 I see a father figure.
00:02:17.000 Is this a grandfather, father, uncle, friend of the family?
00:02:21.000 And he's saying something about, you know, it's okay for you to forgive yourself.
00:02:26.000 Oh, okay.
00:02:28.000 How about like, well, where was the will?
00:02:30.000 Yeah.
00:02:31.000 He hid his will somewhere.
00:02:32.000 Where is that?
00:02:32.000 Because that's what we want to know is, you know, that ring he had.
00:02:35.000 Where is that?
00:02:36.000 If you're just vague enough, I mean, like horoscopes.
00:02:39.000 If you're just vague enough, people are like, oh my God, it's right all the time.
00:02:43.000 It's always right.
00:02:44.000 Like, that's not even a real horoscope.
00:02:46.000 If you really want to pay attention to actual astrology, they have to know the date you were born, the time you were born.
00:02:54.000 It's not just the month of August.
00:02:56.000 Right.
00:02:57.000 It's like they've got to nail it down.
00:02:58.000 They want to know morning or evening.
00:03:00.000 What do you think about all that stuff?
00:03:02.000 It's all bunk.
00:03:03.000 Is it?
00:03:03.000 Yeah, yeah, yeah.
00:03:04.000 Why has it been around so long?
00:03:06.000 Well, because the, well, it's called the Barnum Effect, where, you know, P.T. Barnum, you just offer something for everybody.
00:03:12.000 So if you make it general enough, you know, I sense you're an intelligent, wise person that people really enjoy your company, and you like going to parties and being with other people, and yet you like the quiet solitude of a walk on the beach, you know, and people going, yep, that is so me!
00:03:28.000 Well, I've pretty much described every scenario you can have.
00:03:30.000 You're alone, you're with people.
00:03:32.000 But it's one of those things where if you talk to someone who is an actual believer in astrology, like, they are so convinced.
00:03:41.000 I got a friend of mine who's trying to tell me that he makes all of his decisions based on consulting with his astrologer.
00:03:48.000 Mm-hmm.
00:03:48.000 Well, Reagan, well, Nancy Reagan did that for his travel after he was shot.
00:03:52.000 She got real paranoid about that.
00:03:54.000 Well, so part of the problem is the astrologers and psychics are themselves remembering their hits and forgetting their misses, the confirmation body.
00:04:01.000 So I knew a psychic or a magician who was working the Psychic Friends Network back in the 90s when it's hard to make a living as a magician doing kids' parties.
00:04:13.000 They all want to have their own Vegas show, but only a few people get that.
00:04:15.000 So you got to do something on the side.
00:04:17.000 So this guy was doing Psychic Friends Network.
00:04:20.000 And he told me all about it.
00:04:21.000 They gave him a book, a three-ring binder.
00:04:23.000 Here's the kinds of things you should say.
00:04:25.000 And people are calling for love, health, money, career questions.
00:04:29.000 So you can spend 20, 30 minutes at $3.95 a minute just going through there.
00:04:33.000 I sense you're in a relationship right now, and one of you is more committed than the other.
00:04:37.000 Tell me about that.
00:04:38.000 Ten minutes later, they're still talking.
00:04:40.000 And you're thinking about travel.
00:04:42.000 You're not happy with your job.
00:04:43.000 There's some financial stress in your life right now.
00:04:46.000 And then he told me about stuff like, now go get a crystal and then a candle, and I want you to set it up here on your desk.
00:04:52.000 And this would go on and on for hours.
00:04:54.000 And they charge by the hour.
00:04:56.000 And they charge by the hour.
00:04:56.000 So one of the problems that Psychic Friends Networks had was people were not paying their phone bills because they, you know, come back an $800 phone bill or whatever, so they would just not pay it.
00:05:04.000 So the phone companies cracked down on the Psychic Friends Network company going, hey, this is getting out of hand.
00:05:10.000 People aren't paying their bills.
00:05:12.000 So they had to ratchet it back a little bit.
00:05:14.000 Oh, that's right.
00:05:15.000 They would do it through the phone.
00:05:16.000 That's interesting.
00:05:17.000 Yeah, they wouldn't get a credit card from you.
00:05:19.000 They would just stay on the line with you.
00:05:20.000 Right.
00:05:21.000 So he told me that when he first started, he got like 60 cents on the minute for the $3.95 per minute.
00:05:28.000 But then they bumped it up as he got more experience and kept him on the line longer.
00:05:33.000 They gave him bonuses.
00:05:34.000 Now you get a dollar per minute or whatever.
00:05:36.000 How is that not illegal?
00:05:37.000 I mean, he's not even a psychic.
00:05:39.000 Shouldn't you have to, like, if you want to be a doctor, you have to go and you got to, you know, go to medical school, you got to get a degree?
00:05:45.000 There's an interesting history there because in New York City, for example, it was difficult to outlaw, like, the three-card Monty guys on the sidewalk with the cardboard because it's just kind of a game.
00:05:56.000 Now, it would be illegal to sell fraudulent stocks or something like that.
00:06:00.000 Or sell a product that's advertised as a health product when it's not.
00:06:05.000 But if, say, in that case, it's under food rather than drugs or, say, no health products like vitamins are under different standards than, say, medical drugs.
00:06:16.000 A psychic is more like an entertainer.
00:06:19.000 So this is for entertainment purposes only, so we can do whatever we want, as opposed to a medical doctor that's dispensing advice.
00:06:27.000 I get that.
00:06:28.000 Maybe a doctor's a bad example.
00:06:30.000 Maybe I should have said engineer.
00:06:31.000 But the point is, if you're going to work as a psychic, Like, on a psychic network, if you have a business of selling psychics.
00:06:40.000 Yeah.
00:06:40.000 Like, you should be able to, you have to exhibit some sort of psychic something.
00:06:45.000 Yeah, well, they can't.
00:06:46.000 You know, under controlled conditions, they always fail.
00:06:48.000 There's nothing that's ever been done?
00:06:50.000 No, no, no.
00:06:50.000 What about the one thing that I've read that statistically more people can recognize that people are staring at them?
00:06:57.000 Yeah.
00:06:58.000 Like, when they're looking at you from behind, is that horseshit?
00:07:00.000 Well, it's not been consistently replicated.
00:07:05.000 So is it possible that some people with a certain sensitivity can detect?
00:07:10.000 Well, okay, so one explanation, the skeptic's explanation, is that if I'm in, say, a Starbucks or something, and I kind of have a sense that people are talking about me, maybe looking at me, and...
00:07:19.000 And I look, and that catches somebody's eye, and they turn to me, and I think, oh, that person's looking at me.
00:07:25.000 Or vice versa, I'm looking at them, and then they sense something or whatever.
00:07:29.000 So there could be some element of chance to that.
00:07:31.000 Now, the guy that does this, Rupert Sheldrake, you know, he believes that it's actually some kind of, like, psychic power through the medium.
00:07:40.000 Like, when I'm looking at you, something's coming out of my eyes and tickling your neck, so to speak.
00:07:45.000 That's his morphic resonance theory.
00:07:47.000 Morphic resonance.
00:07:48.000 Yeah.
00:07:48.000 Richard Wiseman, a British experimental psychologist, he's tried to replicate that, and he always fails.
00:07:54.000 And then this other woman, Marilyn Schlitz, she also tried to replicate it, and she was able to replicate some of it.
00:07:59.000 So there may be an experiment or bias.
00:08:02.000 It's not clear if it's the skeptics that are biased or the believers that are biased.
00:08:05.000 But in that case, it's best to just say, you know, we don't know.
00:08:09.000 So the default position, the null hypothesis, is that it's not true.
00:08:13.000 Until you prove otherwise, and that's a difficult one to prove.
00:08:16.000 Now, if I say, well, why is the effect so subtle?
00:08:20.000 Why can't you go to Vegas and become a millionaire gambling or play the stock market?
00:08:25.000 We know traders just need a tiny 0.01% advantage over the other traders or whatever, and they can make a lot of money.
00:08:32.000 You mean in terms of just psychic ability?
00:08:33.000 Psychic ability is a very broad term, right?
00:08:35.000 It's almost like saying drugs.
00:08:37.000 Because there are certain drugs that put you to sleep and certain drugs that make you hyper.
00:08:41.000 They have very different effects.
00:08:43.000 So saying psychic ability, like maybe you have the ability to see if someone's looking at you, but you don't have the ability to pick the lottery.
00:08:48.000 Right.
00:08:48.000 Right.
00:08:49.000 So the hard part in testing psychics is to pin down, what exactly are you saying you could do?
00:08:54.000 Right.
00:08:55.000 And that's where it gets pretty fuzzy.
00:08:57.000 So these, like, why is it legal for the phone psychics?
00:09:00.000 Because you can't pin them down.
00:09:02.000 If somebody says, look, I'm just giving relationship advice, why is that illegal?
00:09:05.000 If I say, like, the Tony Robbins Netflix documentary, I'm not your guru, which is basically I am your guru, He has that moment in this huge auditorium.
00:09:14.000 There's like 3,000 people there, and he gets this woman up on stage, and she's got relationship problems.
00:09:19.000 He says, do you have your phone?
00:09:21.000 She goes, yeah.
00:09:22.000 Take out your phone and call him right now.
00:09:24.000 And he talks her through dumping this guy on stage, on the phone, and he's at work or something.
00:09:30.000 He's like, what?
00:09:31.000 And then she hangs up, and everybody's happy that she did this.
00:09:34.000 Now, is that a good thing or a bad thing?
00:09:37.000 I have no idea.
00:09:38.000 That's great for show business, but what if...
00:09:41.000 I mean, that seems crazy.
00:09:43.000 How do you know what kind of relationship they really have?
00:09:46.000 You'd have to talk to both of them, right?
00:09:48.000 Wouldn't you?
00:09:49.000 I brought this up at an event recently, a party, and somebody said, oh, I know the backstory.
00:09:53.000 His staff had been working the audience, and they knew all about her and the relationship, and it was about to go sour anyway.
00:10:01.000 So we brought her up.
00:10:03.000 It's like, okay, so this is the thing with you see the psychics on TV. There's a lot of stuff you don't see.
00:10:08.000 They work the audience.
00:10:09.000 They know.
00:10:09.000 People fill out, like the faith healers, they fill out prayer cards.
00:10:14.000 They put their name and address and their ailment.
00:10:16.000 And then, you know, the faith healers have a little earbud in there, and they're listening to the person in the back reading.
00:10:22.000 Okay, here's the person.
00:10:23.000 They have, you know, glaucoma or whatever.
00:10:25.000 And you hear them calling this out.
00:10:28.000 So there's a lot of that that we don't see.
00:10:30.000 But Anthony Robbins is not claiming any kind of psychic ability.
00:10:34.000 He's just trying to provide positive paths for improving your life.
00:10:38.000 And if you're in a bad relationship, that would be a positive path.
00:10:41.000 Let's get out of that relationship and move forward with emotion and power and love.
00:10:47.000 And he'd fucking probably throw a karate kick and get everybody pumped up and jump around with little Bobby Brown headphones on.
00:10:55.000 It's like...
00:10:56.000 But he's a showman, too.
00:10:58.000 Yeah, that's right.
00:10:59.000 But my point is that the psychic could say the same thing.
00:11:02.000 Look, I'm just dishing out.
00:11:03.000 I don't know if this is true.
00:11:04.000 But he's not...
00:11:04.000 I mean, it's weird to put him in that category, right?
00:11:07.000 Because he's just trying to get people excited.
00:11:09.000 I think he does some good.
00:11:11.000 I really do.
00:11:12.000 Because he did me some good.
00:11:13.000 When I was 21 years old, I used to listen to his...
00:11:17.000 I think it was called Unlimited Power.
00:11:19.000 I think that was the name of the book.
00:11:21.000 And I listened to it on audio cassette by the pool in this shitty apartment.
00:11:24.000 That I was living in when I was trying to be a stand-up comedian.
00:11:27.000 And it helped me.
00:11:28.000 He had some really good advice in terms of setting goals and in terms of the way you approach things and look at things.
00:11:36.000 I agree.
00:11:37.000 All of that, any of these self-help books, Jocko's books or Amy Alcon, there's a lot of stuff that's very similar to what Tony Robbins' issues.
00:11:47.000 And okay, that makes sense.
00:11:48.000 Set goals and And be motivated and think positive.
00:11:51.000 Maybe err a little bit on the side of over-optimism so you can push through the failures.
00:11:55.000 But don't be blind because maybe it's certain times to cut and run and change course in your life, something like that.
00:12:01.000 The hard part is studying that, which, you know, experimentally, which are the best techniques versus others.
00:12:08.000 And there was a guy who wrote a book called SHAM, S-H-A-M, Self-Help Actualization Movement, and he was the head book guy for Rodeo Press that publishes these self-help books.
00:12:19.000 And so his takeaway in this book was that the number one predictor of people who will buy self-help books are people who already bought self-help books, and they continue buying them.
00:12:30.000 So if you say, does it work?
00:12:32.000 Well, it works if you work it sort of consistently.
00:12:35.000 Like you got to listen to the tapes like every weekend or every low moment.
00:12:40.000 It's not like taking the pill and your cancer's gone.
00:12:43.000 You have to kind of keep practicing it as a lifestyle change for it to work.
00:12:48.000 Yeah, that's...
00:12:50.000 And also, what do you mean by work?
00:12:51.000 So Tony goes into a corporation and they get a bump.
00:12:54.000 This is an example in this book.
00:12:56.000 They get a bump in sales.
00:12:57.000 So they get the salesmen all motivated.
00:12:59.000 They hit the phones on Monday morning.
00:13:01.000 Within two weeks, their sales are kind of back to where they were.
00:13:06.000 So they've got to bring the self-help guy back in every month or so to keep them super motivated.
00:13:12.000 Well, you've got to give them some sort of incentive to stay pumped, right?
00:13:16.000 I mean, some financial incentive.
00:13:19.000 It's one of those old-school phrases, inspiration is like bathing.
00:13:24.000 It works, but you have to do it regularly in order for it to be effective.
00:13:28.000 I like that.
00:13:29.000 Yeah.
00:13:30.000 I mean, bathing works, but you're like, hey, two months later, I smell like shit.
00:13:33.000 Yeah.
00:13:34.000 Yeah, it works daily.
00:13:36.000 Yeah, you have to do it all the time.
00:13:38.000 Or it's like saying, why can't the NFL teams play the whole game like the last two minutes because it's so exciting, the two-minute drill?
00:13:45.000 Because they can't do it physically.
00:13:46.000 You can't keep that up.
00:13:47.000 Yeah, yeah.
00:13:48.000 Well, I think you could physically keep up that enthusiasm that Anthony Robbins provides, but you have to be...
00:13:54.000 Either you have to have some sort of an office environment that is incredibly enthusiastic to the point where you guys have engineered this environment where everybody's pumped up.
00:14:06.000 But that's going to be it.
00:14:07.000 I mean, that doesn't leave a whole lot of room for the individual to be themselves.
00:14:10.000 I feel like that would be terrible to work in a place like that where everywhere you go there's motivational sayings and people are, you know, chanting things in the hallway and everybody's just got to Energy at 10!
00:14:22.000 Let's go!
00:14:23.000 That's what a guy like Anthony Robbins will provide you with a short burst.
00:14:28.000 We just hope that some of it sticks, right?
00:14:30.000 Well, this is in Amy Alcon's book, Unfuckology.
00:14:33.000 It's a great book.
00:14:34.000 She calls these small wins, or whoever calls them small wins, like make your bed in the morning, or shave, or whatever.
00:14:40.000 Or like Jocko's little Twitter post at 4.30am.
00:14:43.000 Yes.
00:14:43.000 Now, I'm never getting up at 4.30, but when I get up at 6.30… You will occasionally, right?
00:14:47.000 Like this morning for the morning ride that leaves at 7am, I get up at 5.30.
00:14:51.000 So I'm not happy getting up at 5.30, but I think, okay, Jocko has been up an hour.
00:14:56.000 He's already worked out.
00:14:57.000 He's already done working out.
00:14:58.000 Okay, I can't really complain.
00:15:00.000 Come on, Shermer, get going.
00:15:01.000 That kind of little thing.
00:15:03.000 This is Jordan Peterson's point of the get your life in order.
00:15:08.000 What is he talking about?
00:15:09.000 Just stand up straight, make your bed, clean your room.
00:15:13.000 What's he talking about?
00:15:13.000 He's talking about these little wins.
00:15:15.000 Like, if you can do that, then the next thing that's a little harder...
00:15:18.000 It becomes a little easier.
00:15:40.000 Right.
00:15:41.000 So those little things apparently do matter.
00:15:43.000 There's a theory of crime called the broken windows theory that is favored by criminologists to explain the decline, the crime decline in the 90s.
00:15:54.000 What happened?
00:15:54.000 In New York City, they started cleaning up the graffiti.
00:15:57.000 They started catching the turnstile jumpers.
00:16:00.000 They started cleaning up the streets.
00:16:01.000 They started You know, boarding up windows so there's no broken windows or replacing the windows.
00:16:06.000 The theory is that if there's a signal in society that no one's paying attention, there is no law and order here, there are no rules or norms, do whatever the fuck you want.
00:16:16.000 You're going to get more crime.
00:16:17.000 If you send the signal through little things like, we're not going to allow graffiti on this wall anymore, and no more turnstile jumpers in the subways, and so on.
00:16:26.000 So when that happened, then there was a trickle-down effect, and then crime declined.
00:16:30.000 So that's the most popular theory for that, and I think there's something to that.
00:16:34.000 Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.
00:16:35.000 And what they did with New York City is really kind of fantastic.
00:16:38.000 If you go back to when I was a kid and I traveled to New York City the first time and I saw Times Square, I guess I was probably like 18 or 19. I was like, look at this fucking crazy place.
00:16:49.000 Like, this is madness.
00:16:50.000 And, you know, you see it in movies and it's just always this horrific scene.
00:16:55.000 It's always peep shows and hookers and pimps and thugs and drug dealers.
00:17:01.000 And you go there now and it's like a mall threw up.
00:17:04.000 You know, it's like a giant neon Mall of America, like Times Square.
00:17:10.000 If you took a person, if you grabbed a guy from like 1988 and you put him in a time machine and said, hey man, I'm going to bring you 30 years in the future and you're going to see New York City the way it looks then.
00:17:21.000 Like, what do you expect?
00:17:22.000 Like, oh my God, it's going to be like Blade Runner.
00:17:25.000 People are going to be shooting people and selling body parts and No, you get there and it's like Guy Fieri's restaurant and huge, gigantic LCD screens.
00:17:34.000 And there's some people that would long for the old days, the dirty seediness that Lenny Bruce talked about, you know, when he lived there.
00:17:43.000 It's like, I mean...
00:17:46.000 Well, that has a certain charm, I guess, if you're going into the nightclubs or whatever.
00:17:49.000 But the surrounding daytime neighborhood or something, this isn't where you want to live.
00:17:54.000 You'd rather live in the vomited mall?
00:17:56.000 Well, I'm not crazy about that either.
00:17:59.000 So there's a reason why cities have certain restrictions on those kinds of stores coming in.
00:18:04.000 But in a crappy neighborhood like downtown Old Town Pasadena now is kind of a hot place to go.
00:18:09.000 But in the 70s, I mean, I went to the Ice House back in the day in the 70s.
00:18:15.000 Just as a spectator.
00:18:17.000 But it was terrible down there.
00:18:19.000 Was it really?
00:18:20.000 Oh, yeah.
00:18:21.000 It was a dump.
00:18:21.000 I mean, there was...
00:18:22.000 Pasadena?
00:18:23.000 Oh, terrible.
00:18:23.000 Yeah, it was horrible.
00:18:24.000 The word was, according to my friend Bob Fisher, who owns the Ice House, he said that what it was was in the early days of Hollywood, the producers would all buy homes in Pasadena.
00:18:36.000 They have these beautiful old estates in Pasadena.
00:18:40.000 Yeah, South Pass, yeah.
00:18:40.000 But the stars would all live in the Hollywood Hills.
00:18:44.000 So they would all be just boozing it up and partying it down in the Hollywood Hills.
00:18:48.000 And the producers were like, let those crazy animals go have at it in the hills.
00:18:52.000 We're going to back out a little bit.
00:18:54.000 And they established that community out there in Pasadena.
00:18:58.000 Right.
00:18:58.000 So to turn it around, like one of the key things a mall can do is get what they call an anchor store.
00:19:04.000 Someone like a Saks Fifth Avenue.
00:19:06.000 Somebody that's really respectable, big.
00:19:08.000 And then you can call the other guys, go, look, we got Saks Fifth Avenue.
00:19:11.000 Oh, you got Saks Fifth Avenue.
00:19:12.000 Then I can be next to him.
00:19:14.000 And then it starts going.
00:19:15.000 And then little by little, each of them cleans up their neighborhood a little bit more.
00:19:20.000 And pretty soon you end up with Old Town Pasadena now.
00:19:22.000 Well, I was telling you guys before I had an issue today where my credit card got robbed.
00:19:29.000 And, you know, whatever.
00:19:31.000 Credit card fraud.
00:19:31.000 Someone got a hold of my number.
00:19:33.000 Which is really...
00:19:34.000 That's the one thing that people worry about the most about shopping online, right?
00:19:39.000 But I guess that could kind of happen everywhere.
00:19:41.000 Yeah.
00:19:41.000 But you've got to think that if there's anything that has changed malls more than anything, it's got to be the ability to just shop online on your phone.
00:19:49.000 Like Amazon.
00:19:50.000 The fact that they figured that out.
00:19:53.000 I remember when Amazon came out and it was just a bookstore.
00:19:55.000 I was like, who the fuck is going to buy books online?
00:19:58.000 You could just go to the bookstore.
00:19:59.000 This is ridiculous.
00:20:00.000 What a stupid business.
00:20:01.000 Meanwhile, that guy has more money than any human on the planet.
00:20:04.000 That's right, yeah.
00:20:05.000 That poor bastard's getting divorced, too.
00:20:07.000 I heard last night that there's a rule in Washington that everything that you make as a couple, you have to split.
00:20:13.000 So they've been together for over 25 years.
00:20:15.000 Well, California law is 50-50.
00:20:20.000 Well, long-term marriage is 10 years or more.
00:20:23.000 It's 50-50.
00:20:24.000 And that includes downstream income.
00:20:27.000 From anything you did that you're still getting paid for, say, 10 years ago, you wrote a book or whatever.
00:20:31.000 Well, Mrs. Bezos is getting paid.
00:20:35.000 He's worth $100-plus billion.
00:20:38.000 $137, they said.
00:20:40.000 Wow, so she's going to get half of that.
00:20:43.000 Because it's a lot of stock, they said they're going to have to just stay friends.
00:20:47.000 Oh, they better stay friends.
00:20:48.000 She should be super nice to him.
00:20:51.000 Even if he only gives her a quarter, she's like, I got wrong.
00:20:55.000 I got wrong.
00:20:56.000 They're just not the richest people in the world now.
00:20:58.000 But after all these bookstores went out of business, there's some irony that Amazon now wants to start opening physical brick-and-mortar stores.
00:21:04.000 That is kind of ironic.
00:21:05.000 But it does make sense, though, because there are some brick-and-mortar stores, and I think that guy's a conqueror.
00:21:11.000 I think he just wants to take over everything.
00:21:12.000 Well, why else would he buy Whole Foods?
00:21:15.000 You know, it's like, oh, the supermarket business.
00:21:17.000 I can fuck this up, too.
00:21:19.000 Well, automate it.
00:21:20.000 He can...
00:21:21.000 I don't know.
00:21:22.000 Maybe you could order Whole Foods delivered to your house.
00:21:23.000 I don't know if that's available yet.
00:21:25.000 I think it is, right?
00:21:27.000 I was going to say, now most grocery stores, even like all the Ralphs, have home delivery within two hours to compete with Amazon Prime.
00:21:33.000 They have to.
00:21:35.000 Wow.
00:21:36.000 And if they don't do that, you can just order it online and pick it up and they'll bring it out to your house.
00:21:39.000 Yeah, I went to Pavilions the other day and they had a bunch of delivery trucks parked in the parking lot.
00:21:44.000 I was like, look at this.
00:21:45.000 They got these cool delivery trucks.
00:21:48.000 They have to.
00:21:48.000 Wow.
00:21:49.000 That's great, though.
00:21:50.000 They have that one store you can walk in and there's no cashiers.
00:21:51.000 They just trust that everyone's not stealing.
00:21:54.000 And I think they just are comfortable with a certain amount of theft.
00:22:00.000 Oh, wow.
00:22:01.000 Yeah.
00:22:01.000 That's interesting.
00:22:03.000 Well, they probably have cameras everywhere, too.
00:22:05.000 But the online purchasing, that must be putting the most...
00:22:12.000 As far as like the most impact on stores, brick and mortar stores, it's like the ability to purchase online has got to be devastating for them, right?
00:22:19.000 Totally.
00:22:19.000 And up in Santa Barbara where I live now, just riding up State Street this morning at the end of the ride, you know, it's like maybe a quarter of the stores are closed, out of business.
00:22:27.000 Wow.
00:22:28.000 Empty.
00:22:29.000 And, you know, State Street, Santa Barbara, this was like the happening place to be.
00:22:33.000 And a real estate friend of mine says, oh, well, see that store there?
00:22:36.000 That's, you know, $22,000 a month to lease.
00:22:39.000 Like, whoa, okay.
00:22:40.000 So you have to have a retail outlet that's really turning over the customers, and there's a lot that just can't do that.
00:22:45.000 I mean, you can't have an antique store that's going to do that or a little knick-knack store.
00:22:49.000 Santa Barbara is one of my favorite places.
00:22:51.000 And it's really interesting because it's a small area.
00:22:56.000 Like, I don't think there's 150,000 people.
00:22:58.000 Less than that.
00:22:58.000 It's about 90,000.
00:23:00.000 Is it?
00:23:00.000 Montecito included?
00:23:02.000 With Montecito included, Galito is like another 30,000 or so.
00:23:06.000 And then below that you have Carpinteria, that's like another 20,000 or so.
00:23:10.000 So yeah, it's...
00:23:11.000 And it's beautiful, and it's quiet, and you get the right spot, man.
00:23:16.000 But it's also, I feel like it needs to be that close to Los Angeles.
00:23:21.000 Like, you get a little bit of trickle.
00:23:23.000 I can zip down here 75 miles from my house to your studio here, my office in Altadena for Skeptic Magazine.
00:23:29.000 That's 105 miles, so it's doable.
00:23:32.000 Yeah, but I think that human beings When they're living in these gigantic communities, whether it's Los Angeles or New York or something like that, there's just a certain amount of...
00:23:45.000 People become less valuable.
00:23:49.000 There's just too many of them.
00:23:51.000 You lose that sort of appreciation for people, and there's a tension.
00:23:57.000 You don't mind if a few people drop off.
00:24:00.000 You know what I mean?
00:24:00.000 Yeah, there's a balance in size.
00:24:02.000 My wife's from Cologne, Germany, which is about 1 million people.
00:24:05.000 And that's about as big as you want to get.
00:24:07.000 It's a big enough city.
00:24:08.000 There's lots of action.
00:24:09.000 You could do all sorts of things.
00:24:11.000 But it's not 6 million or 10 million, which is just like L.A. It's just too many.
00:24:16.000 Have you ever seen that study that they did where they set up a camera on one end of the street and a camera on the other end of the street and they timed people walking through and in the footage of those people walking through they were able to determine by how fast these people walked They got an average,
00:24:35.000 which was really accurate, of how many people lived in the city.
00:24:39.000 Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, scale.
00:24:41.000 Yes.
00:24:42.000 Yeah, there's that book, that physicist, West, Jeff, G-E-O-F-F, West, I think is his name, wrote that book.
00:24:49.000 The bigger the city, the more efficient and faster things become.
00:24:52.000 Yeah, including dialogue, the way people communicate.
00:24:55.000 They talk a little faster, they walk a little faster.
00:24:58.000 And he had a formula showing how many restaurants per 100,000 or gas stations per 100,000 you'll get as you scale up.
00:25:05.000 You don't need as many restaurants and gas stations as populations increase because there's more efficiency in the flow of traffic and people throughout the city, whereas smaller towns are less efficient.
00:25:18.000 That was the theory.
00:25:19.000 But it's just fascinating that human beings adjust because of all of these other human beings around them.
00:25:26.000 They change the way they walk.
00:25:27.000 They walk faster.
00:25:29.000 They talk faster.
00:25:30.000 Is this right here?
00:25:30.000 Yeah, scale.
00:25:31.000 Universal laws of life and death in organisms, cities, and companies.
00:25:36.000 I'm listening to it right now, actually.
00:25:37.000 Are you really?
00:25:38.000 Yeah, like coincidentally.
00:25:39.000 Co-winky-dinky.
00:25:41.000 Yeah, that's...
00:25:44.000 I mean, you feel it.
00:25:45.000 You know, when I lived in Boulder for a short amount of time, one of the things, you know, Boulder's small as well, I think it's 100,000 people.
00:25:52.000 When I came back here, the first thing I realized is how fast everyone's driving.
00:25:56.000 Everyone's just cutting everybody off and zooming ahead, and people are really in a rush everywhere they go.
00:26:02.000 And that has to be, in some way, shape, or form, it has to be influenced by all the other people around them and their energy, right?
00:26:11.000 What is that?
00:26:12.000 That's right.
00:26:12.000 What do you think that is, though?
00:26:14.000 Well, first of all, it's all unconscious.
00:26:16.000 I think it's just mostly the kind of overall pace you get that pushes everybody along or slows them down.
00:26:22.000 I just started this book called Rule Makers and Rule Breakers.
00:26:26.000 It's by a woman who is a cultural psychologist.
00:26:30.000 Sorry, I forget her name.
00:26:32.000 So Rule Makers, Rule Breakers.
00:26:34.000 So she talks about tight cultures versus loose cultures.
00:26:37.000 James Fast is a fucking bullet.
00:26:38.000 Yeah, Michelle Gelfand.
00:26:41.000 So she talks about tight versus loose cultures.
00:26:44.000 So, like, again, my wife from Germany, it's a tighter culture.
00:26:49.000 People are more likely to obey norms and rules, and there's a little more uncomfortableness in violating them.
00:26:55.000 California, we're a little loosey-goosey about rules, and so my wife's always giving me a hard time about it.
00:27:01.000 My idea of traffic laws is I'll just do whatever I feel like, pretty much, as long as it's safe.
00:27:06.000 I kind of know, you know, I'm driving up the 101. If I stay at 79 or below, I'm fine.
00:27:12.000 And she's like, but the speed limit is 65. It's like, yeah, so what?
00:27:16.000 I mean, I know where the cops park.
00:27:18.000 I know everybody else is going.
00:27:20.000 And the left turn into our street is a left arrow.
00:27:23.000 So, of course, my wife, she's just like, well, we got to wait.
00:27:26.000 It's like, but it's midnight.
00:27:27.000 I'm just going to go.
00:27:28.000 You can't go.
00:27:29.000 It's like, yeah, this is California.
00:27:30.000 I'm going.
00:27:31.000 There's no one there.
00:27:32.000 There's no one there.
00:27:33.000 Yeah.
00:27:34.000 So that's a tight culture versus loose culture.
00:27:36.000 So I guess she's going to talk about how norms then affect laws and how then people change their behavior.
00:27:43.000 You're not even aware you're doing this.
00:27:44.000 You're just kind of unconsciously absorbing the cultures.
00:27:47.000 But what do you think?
00:27:49.000 I mean, but there's a difference between West Coast-type culture, or large groups, rather, and East Coast large groups.
00:27:58.000 Do you think that's influenced by weather?
00:27:59.000 It's one of the things that I've been thinking about a lot.
00:28:01.000 The aggression of East Coasters is very different than the aggression of West Coasters, and I always wonder, it's like, how much of that is because they have to deal with shit weather for five months out of the year?
00:28:11.000 It could be.
00:28:12.000 That, I don't know.
00:28:15.000 And the influence of immigrants as well.
00:28:17.000 Like, because, like, my parents, my grandparents were immigrants.
00:28:21.000 They all came over from England and Ireland and Italy, and they were all savages.
00:28:26.000 They were all people that were willing to get on a boat and cross the ocean.
00:28:29.000 Right.
00:28:30.000 You know, those are aggressive people.
00:28:31.000 They're like, I'm getting out of here!
00:28:32.000 Fuck you!
00:28:33.000 And then they land on New Jersey.
00:28:35.000 Or else they're higher risk takers.
00:28:36.000 Yes, yes.
00:28:37.000 Yeah.
00:28:37.000 Yeah.
00:28:38.000 Yeah, so it's not a random population that came to America, nor with Australia.
00:28:42.000 You know, you send all these convicts there.
00:28:45.000 It's not going to be a typical gene pool there.
00:28:47.000 Yeah, but meanwhile, how good did that work out?
00:28:49.000 Those are the nicest people ever.
00:28:51.000 Well, same thing, you know, Germans, you know, here after World War I and World War II, oh, these are bellicose people.
00:28:57.000 They're the nicest people in the world.
00:29:00.000 They don't want to fight anybody.
00:29:01.000 Yeah, that is interesting, right?
00:29:01.000 That's one generation.
00:29:03.000 Right, right.
00:29:03.000 And more than that, I mean, they have massive war guilt and Holocaust guilt.
00:29:08.000 I mean, they are all raised and taking tons of classes in school about what happened, why we're never going to do this again.
00:29:17.000 Here's what we did to the Jews.
00:29:18.000 You know, they're still paying Israel reparations for that.
00:29:21.000 There are these little stumbling stones that are these sort of brass square cubes all over Germany of the name and year that the person was murdered.
00:29:33.000 These are all Jews.
00:29:34.000 In front of the house where they used to live.
00:29:37.000 They're all over the place.
00:29:37.000 Yeah, I have a picture of them in the moral arc here.
00:29:40.000 I'll show you.
00:29:40.000 It's really dramatic.
00:29:43.000 And you literally stumble across them.
00:29:45.000 I mean, they're just there in the street.
00:29:48.000 If you Google stumbling stones, you can see that they're better in four color.
00:29:52.000 Another interesting thing about Germany is they won't let Scientology in.
00:29:55.000 They're very sensitive about cults and cult behavior.
00:29:59.000 That's right.
00:30:00.000 Well, there's another reason for that, and that is...
00:30:02.000 I can't find the pictures now.
00:30:04.000 In Germany, most people don't know this, there's a religious...
00:30:07.000 There it is.
00:30:08.000 Jamie's got it up there.
00:30:08.000 Yeah, there they go.
00:30:09.000 Oh, so they're actually above ground?
00:30:12.000 Yeah, so you're just walking along and you look down.
00:30:14.000 Oh, some of them, they're not like that, right?
00:30:17.000 They're not like little bricks on the ground?
00:30:18.000 Yeah, they're like that.
00:30:19.000 You just walk on them.
00:30:20.000 Oh, so they're in the ground.
00:30:20.000 Yeah, they're in the ground.
00:30:21.000 So it's the person's name, and they're in front of the house where they used to live, the date that they were departed and the date that they were murdered, and where they were murdered, Auschwitz or Treblinka or Majdanek and so on.
00:30:33.000 Yeah, there you go.
00:30:34.000 So it's pretty moving, and it's kind of a reminder, this is what we did, and we're not going to do this again, remember?
00:30:43.000 So that's changing norms.
00:30:45.000 How does this happen?
00:30:45.000 Really, you can do it through the law from the top down, but really it's more culture from the bottom up.
00:30:51.000 You were saying that there's another reason besides the Holocaust that they're sensitive to Scientology?
00:30:58.000 Oh, yeah, because in Germany, they have a religious withholding tax.
00:31:03.000 So when you get your first job, they do a withholding for your religion, and they give a percentage of your paycheck to your religion, the religion you were born into, baptized, whatever.
00:31:13.000 It's mostly Catholic and Protestant.
00:31:16.000 But others want to get in on that because that's cumulative.
00:31:19.000 You know, you can make some money doing this as a religion.
00:31:22.000 The humanists of Germany get a little piece of this action.
00:31:25.000 It's considered a religion.
00:31:26.000 So Scientology, when they saw that, they went, oh, okay, free government money, tax money.
00:31:30.000 And the Germans go, no.
00:31:32.000 You're not a real religion, and you're not getting in on this.
00:31:35.000 And yeah, so again, when my wife came here, before she came here, she quit church.
00:31:43.000 And you literally have to go down to the courthouse, fill out a form, and say, I am leaving the church.
00:31:49.000 Please don't take my money anymore out of my paycheck.
00:31:51.000 So you have to opt out.
00:31:52.000 You will be giving money to your religion unless you fill out the form and opt out.
00:31:56.000 Wow.
00:31:58.000 And in this case, it was kind of a funny story, they go, okay, so just to make sure you know, now if you sign this, you can't get married in the Catholic Church, you can't get buried in the Catholic Church, you can't go to the ceremonies and so on, you're done.
00:32:10.000 And she goes, yep, that's the way I want it.
00:32:12.000 And she went down there with her Four Horsemen t-shirt, said Dawkins, Dennett, Harris, and Hitchens.
00:32:18.000 And they're like, who's this?
00:32:20.000 Anyway, so they said, oh, but now, okay, the moment you sign, it starts effective today, but there's a three-month lag for us to not take the money out of your paycheck.
00:32:29.000 What?
00:32:30.000 My wife is like, yeah, like, wait a minute.
00:32:32.000 In a business, when a contract ends, it ends for both parties.
00:32:35.000 They go, uh, no.
00:32:36.000 They're just going to steal money for three months?
00:32:38.000 Three more months, yeah.
00:32:39.000 What a weird thing that you have to opt out like that, that it has to be so definitive that you have to sign papers and go someplace.
00:32:46.000 What a fucking shady law.
00:32:49.000 It is.
00:32:49.000 It's no good.
00:32:50.000 I know.
00:32:50.000 That's got to change.
00:32:51.000 So a lot of us are trying to talk people into opting out.
00:32:55.000 Quit church.
00:32:56.000 Well, it is amazing that in this country, I mean, I would like to know what the number is.
00:33:02.000 If the churches in this country had to pay taxes, I mean, clearly, especially when you look at the televangelists that are driving Rolls Royces and flying around in private jets, I mean, there's profit.
00:33:13.000 There's extreme amount of profit and it's discretionary income.
00:33:16.000 They can do whatever they want with it.
00:33:17.000 And you're dealing with massive, massive sums of money, and they don't contribute.
00:33:22.000 So these people are clearly personally benefiting from the contributions of these people, and then they don't pay taxes on it.
00:33:28.000 And in the case of ministers who live in a church-owned home, they don't have to pay property tax.
00:33:34.000 So there's a lot of hidden benefits there.
00:33:37.000 It's dirty.
00:33:38.000 Yeah, it is dirty.
00:33:39.000 It's amazing that it's still here.
00:33:40.000 I mean, especially when you deal with something like Scientology, where you know the guy who wrote it.
00:33:45.000 Right.
00:33:46.000 Like, this is not some ancient text that we're handed down from up on high.
00:33:51.000 Buried in the mists of time.
00:33:51.000 Yeah.
00:33:51.000 You know the guy.
00:33:52.000 And the guy was a terrible writer.
00:33:55.000 Yeah.
00:33:55.000 I mean, he was a terrible science fiction author.
00:33:57.000 He just wrote.
00:33:59.000 Every fucking thing he wrote was a first draft.
00:34:01.000 Just boom, gone.
00:34:03.000 I mean, it's just the most nonsensical nonsense writing, and yet they don't have to pay taxes because it's considered a legitimate religion.
00:34:11.000 Harlan Ellison, the great science fiction writer, died this year.
00:34:14.000 He told me the famous story where L. Ron Hubbard allegedly said, you know, I'm going to go start a religion.
00:34:20.000 He said it's real, it's a true story.
00:34:22.000 But it was just a bunch of science fiction writers sitting around like this chatting and complaining about how poorly paid they are.
00:34:29.000 They have to crank out by the word, you know, a penny a word kind of thing.
00:34:32.000 And somebody said, you know, we should just start a religion and make shit up like that.
00:34:36.000 And L. Ron Hubbard goes, yeah, you know, that's a good idea.
00:34:39.000 I think I might do that.
00:34:40.000 And then he went out and wrote Dianetics, and that became the founding document of Scientology.
00:34:45.000 Did you watch the HBO series on it, the documentary rather?
00:34:50.000 Yeah, the Going Clear.
00:34:51.000 Unbelievable.
00:34:52.000 That's the best documentary on it.
00:34:53.000 Of course, I've seen Aaliyah's show.
00:34:56.000 She's got big guts to go after that.
00:34:59.000 I don't know if she's got good lawyers or A&E has good lawyers or whatever.
00:35:03.000 Maybe they've stopped suing people.
00:35:05.000 I don't know.
00:35:05.000 I think the climate has shifted.
00:35:07.000 And I think people are more...
00:35:09.000 First of all, for the longest time, all we thought of when you thought about Scientology, you thought about positive thinking and John Travolta and Tom Cruise.
00:35:17.000 They're all...
00:35:18.000 Super positive, you know, and they're getting things done and there's auditing and they're really taking care of their mind and, you know, thinking clearly and eliminating all the negative influences.
00:35:29.000 But then once, there's a bunch of factors, I think, but once the internet opened up, We're good to go.
00:35:53.000 People started leaving the church.
00:35:55.000 Lawrence Wright wrote the book.
00:35:56.000 All these things are happening.
00:35:57.000 And now Leah is coming in.
00:35:59.000 And Leah was, you know, I knew her.
00:36:01.000 I mean, I'm friends with Kevin James from The King and Queen.
00:36:04.000 So I've known Leah for 20-plus years.
00:36:07.000 And when I first met her, she was just like this hard-ass, beautiful woman who's just like driven.
00:36:14.000 And like, she's a Scientologist.
00:36:15.000 I'm like, oh, let's get the fuck out of her way.
00:36:17.000 You know, it was like that she's just like super...
00:36:21.000 Active and just getting things done and just being productive.
00:36:25.000 I mean, that's what you thought about when you thought about Scientology.
00:36:28.000 But now what you think about it is like nonsense and foolishness.
00:36:32.000 And once Going Clear aired and you got to see L. Ron Hubbard and listen to him talk and you see the captain's outfit he had on with the medals that he gave himself.
00:36:43.000 You're like, what?
00:36:45.000 Who would buy this stuff, right?
00:36:46.000 It's so dumb.
00:36:48.000 It's amazing that it's so effective and so financially successful.
00:36:54.000 Yeah, I think their membership roles are pretty low, but their property holdings, I think, are pretty extensive.
00:37:00.000 Yeah, I mean, they're the second biggest real estate owner in Los Angeles.
00:37:04.000 Is that right?
00:37:05.000 Yeah.
00:37:05.000 Oh, wow.
00:37:05.000 At least they were.
00:37:06.000 There were some Japanese folks that were number one, and then it was number two was Scientology.
00:37:13.000 Maybe that's not true anymore.
00:37:14.000 Might be oil barons now.
00:37:18.000 Well, back in the 90s when the internet first got cranked up, we were doing articles on Scientology is when some of these ex-members started posting the secret doctrines, the Zenu story and the Going Clear, you know, at level 8 or whatever when you find out the inside story.
00:37:34.000 And they got raided.
00:37:35.000 I mean, the Scientologists went to court, to judges, and said, this is copyrighted material.
00:37:42.000 And it's like, wait, you're a religion?
00:37:44.000 How can you copyright a religious...
00:37:46.000 Well, and they somehow got around that.
00:37:48.000 I mean, this would be like the Catholic Church not telling you about Jesus and the resurrection until level 8 after you've paid $100,000 or something like that.
00:37:55.000 It's just insane.
00:37:56.000 Well, what's amazing is that the IRS caved and turned them into tax exempt.
00:38:00.000 Unbelievable.
00:38:00.000 When that happened, I remember when that happened, I thought, oh my God, I don't want to fuck with these guys.
00:38:04.000 I mean, they beat the IRS. I'm a nobody.
00:38:06.000 How am I going to defend myself again?
00:38:07.000 But maybe they've stopped suing people.
00:38:09.000 Maybe they're not going after Leah like that.
00:38:11.000 Here it goes.
00:38:13.000 Portfolio properties reported at $400 million in Hollywood alone, paid for in cash no less.
00:38:19.000 The Church of Scientology is undeniably a formidable player in the real estate game.
00:38:25.000 That's what you got.
00:38:26.000 They have some beautiful properties, too.
00:38:29.000 It's just really amazing.
00:38:31.000 It's amazing.
00:38:32.000 So, you know, my skeptic friends go, oh, they're going to go out of business anytime soon.
00:38:36.000 It's like, I don't know.
00:38:37.000 I think they could have practically no members and still they have all this real estate.
00:38:40.000 Here's the thing.
00:38:41.000 Even though it's nonsense, just...
00:38:47.000 So is most religion.
00:38:48.000 Let's just be honest.
00:38:49.000 I mean, if you want to talk about guys coming back from the dead after being buried for three days or Adam and Eve being the only two people and they have kids and their kids just start having sex with each other and that makes all the people in the world or Moses parting the Red Sea and Jesus walking on water.
00:39:04.000 I mean, you're looking at horseshit everywhere.
00:39:05.000 It's just older horseshit.
00:39:07.000 It's, you know, whether or not it's based on some real events or some real people, who knows?
00:39:12.000 Who knows?
00:39:13.000 You know, but it's all nonsense.
00:39:15.000 Have you ever heard Julia Sweeney's monologue, Letting Go of God?
00:39:18.000 No.
00:39:19.000 Do you know Julia from Saturday Night Live?
00:39:20.000 I know who she is.
00:39:21.000 I do not know her.
00:39:22.000 Yeah.
00:39:22.000 She just moved back to LA, so you should have her on the show.
00:39:24.000 She's terrific.
00:39:25.000 I would love to.
00:39:26.000 So she was born and raised Catholic, loved being a Catholic, the whole culture and all that was great.
00:39:32.000 And then she started reading Dawkins and me and Harris and so on, and then kind of let all that go, and then she wrote a monologue.
00:39:38.000 It's very moving.
00:39:39.000 So the monologue opens.
00:39:40.000 She's in her house in Hollywood, and the Mormon boys come by.
00:39:45.000 And she invites them in and they want to, you know, tell the story and she's thinking, this is like a Hollywood pitch story.
00:39:50.000 You're going to pitch the story and I'll get back to you later until you know how I like it.
00:39:54.000 No, no, they wanted to, you know, to actually, you know, press to see if she could join right then and there, you know.
00:39:59.000 They're on their two-year mission that they do, you know.
00:40:01.000 So picture these two 18-year-olds with their white start shirts and their bicycles and...
00:40:05.000 So, Julia starts pressing him a little bit.
00:40:08.000 So, what's the story here?
00:40:09.000 Well, see, this guy, Joseph Smith, he found these gold plates in his backyard, and he translated them from ancient hieroglyphics into English, and with these magic stones, and they're going on, and then Jesus came to America, and there was the good Indians and the bad Indians,
00:40:26.000 and Julia's like, I just want to tell them, okay, don't start with this story.
00:40:29.000 This is a bad-pitched story.
00:40:31.000 Even the Scientologists know, don't tell them about Xenu until way down the line.
00:40:36.000 But then she says, reflecting on it, you know, if I told somebody my Catholic story who never heard of it, it would sound just as wacky.
00:40:43.000 Because it's virgin and the resurrection, what?
00:40:47.000 Yeah, all of it's wacky.
00:40:48.000 100%.
00:40:49.000 I mean, it's like we were talking about earlier.
00:40:50.000 When you die, what's going to happen is you don't know.
00:40:54.000 You don't know.
00:40:55.000 And the reality is, look, maybe there is an afterlife.
00:40:58.000 Maybe when we stop living, something happens and our essential energy dies.
00:41:06.000 It goes into another dimension.
00:41:07.000 It's possible, but you don't know.
00:41:09.000 Look, being alive is so titanically bizarre.
00:41:13.000 Just being a human being looking through eyeballs at each other across from this wooden table that was cut down from living organisms that turn into hard surfaces and you sand them and saw them and then you put it in a building and it's got electricity's rolling through the walls and if you stuck a fork in there you'd die.
00:41:32.000 All of it is crazy.
00:41:33.000 The fact that we're on a planet.
00:41:34.000 I mean, the fact that the universe is at least, as far as we can tell, infinite.
00:41:39.000 All that stuff is crazy.
00:41:41.000 The idea that your essential energy doesn't transfer into some other state.
00:41:46.000 Why not?
00:41:47.000 The whole thing's crazy.
00:41:49.000 But you don't know.
00:41:50.000 That's right.
00:41:50.000 No one knows.
00:41:51.000 The thing is, you don't know.
00:41:52.000 And until you know...
00:41:53.000 Whenever you say something that you're not sure of, and you say, this is what's going to happen, but you don't really know, you're a huckster.
00:42:00.000 That's right.
00:42:01.000 Yep.
00:42:01.000 Absolutely.
00:42:02.000 No one knows.
00:42:02.000 No one knows!
00:42:03.000 And that's the conclusion of Heavens on Earth.
00:42:04.000 I don't know, and you don't either.
00:42:06.000 I saw a bumper sticker that said, militant agnostic.
00:42:08.000 I don't know, and you don't either.
00:42:12.000 Okay, so here's my bottom line on this.
00:42:14.000 I don't know.
00:42:15.000 No one knows for sure.
00:42:16.000 I'm happy to wake up in some great place and there's my friends.
00:42:20.000 It would be awesome.
00:42:21.000 Unless God was mad that you didn't follow the rules that he laid out.
00:42:24.000 Well, that's right.
00:42:25.000 Christopher Hitchens called the Christian heaven celestial North Korea.
00:42:29.000 It's like, here's this dictator that knows everything you do and controls everything forever.
00:42:34.000 That's hilarious.
00:42:35.000 Celestial North Korea.
00:42:37.000 But he doesn't tell you anymore.
00:42:38.000 I told you already.
00:42:40.000 I told you 2,000 years ago.
00:42:42.000 This dude wrote it down.
00:42:44.000 Pay attention to that.
00:42:45.000 Right.
00:42:45.000 But then it's not even that, right?
00:42:47.000 It's like one guy might have write it down a long time ago, but then a bunch of other dudes got together and had to revise it.
00:42:54.000 They had like a new draft, and the new draft, they get to decide, people got to decide what goes in and what doesn't go in, and some of the stories are based on accounts from hundreds of years after Jesus' death.
00:43:05.000 The Bible is a wiki.
00:43:07.000 It is like a wiki.
00:43:08.000 Yeah, it's just the people contributed it to over the years and so on.
00:43:12.000 Hitchens had a great analogy with when he was dying.
00:43:15.000 He wrote a series of essays for Vanity Fair, his column, which you can get as a book now.
00:43:20.000 I think it's called Mortality or something like that.
00:43:22.000 Anyway, one of them was people think dying is like you're at a party and someone taps you on the shoulder and says, you have to leave now.
00:43:31.000 And worse, the party's going to go on without you.
00:43:33.000 It's like, oh no.
00:43:34.000 He goes, okay, so let's play this out.
00:43:37.000 You're at the party, and you get tapped on the shoulder and said, you can never leave the party.
00:43:44.000 You have to stay here forever with these people.
00:43:47.000 Like one of Julia's funny lines is the Mormon boys were telling her, like, in heaven, it's going to be great.
00:43:55.000 You're made whole again, like the blind shall see and the deaf shall hear again and the crippled shall be whole again.
00:43:59.000 And she said, well, I had uterine cancer and I had my uterus taken out.
00:44:04.000 Do I get my uterus back?
00:44:05.000 And they're like, you can imagine these 18-year-olds going, what's a uterus again?
00:44:10.000 And they're like, yeah, you get your uterus back.
00:44:12.000 She goes, I don't want it back.
00:44:13.000 And then she said, what if you had a nose job and you liked it?
00:44:16.000 Do I have to have my old nose back in heaven?
00:44:18.000 That's a good point.
00:44:20.000 And then they said, and you get to spend the rest of eternity with your family.
00:44:24.000 And she went, oh, no, that would not be good in my case.
00:44:27.000 Maybe they'll be cured, though.
00:44:28.000 They'll realize the errors of their way, so they'll be all enlightened.
00:44:32.000 Well, here's the problem.
00:44:33.000 So this is called the problem of identity.
00:44:34.000 Who are you?
00:44:35.000 And, you know, that Theseus' ship, you know, the Greek Minotaur slayer, Theseus, comes back and is a hero, and they preserve his ship in the museum forever.
00:44:46.000 But the wood rots, and they replaced the ship, and over the centuries, there's no wood left from the original.
00:44:51.000 But it's still cherished.
00:44:53.000 So I call this Shermer's Mustang, because my first car was a 66 Ford Mustang, a classic, and I had that for 19 years.
00:44:58.000 Love those cars.
00:44:59.000 It was a great car.
00:45:00.000 But I banged it up so much.
00:45:01.000 I replaced this and that.
00:45:03.000 Pretty much by the time I sold it as a classic and made a nice little chunk of change on it, there was very little of the original left.
00:45:10.000 But it's the pattern, not the material, that counts.
00:45:14.000 So, this whole debate about when you're resurrected in heaven with Jesus, what's up there?
00:45:19.000 Is it your physical body?
00:45:21.000 Because some Christian sects say, yeah.
00:45:22.000 It's like, okay, how old are you when you're in heaven?
00:45:25.000 30. This is the year they came up with, because that's the age Jesus was when he was crucified.
00:45:31.000 Okay, but if Joe Rogan, I don't know how old, you're 40-something.
00:45:34.000 51. You're 51. Okay, so if you're resurrected at 30-year-old Joe Rogan, what happened to the last 21 years of Joe Rogan's body, memories?
00:45:42.000 I don't want to go back to that dude.
00:45:44.000 That dude was dumber than me.
00:45:46.000 You don't?
00:45:46.000 You don't?
00:45:46.000 No.
00:45:47.000 You're happy where you are in your life at this moment?
00:45:49.000 Yeah.
00:45:49.000 Oh, for sure.
00:45:49.000 Yeah.
00:45:49.000 Yeah.
00:45:50.000 Well, that means you've a well-lived life.
00:45:52.000 So what's up there with Jesus?
00:45:55.000 I wouldn't mind having that body.
00:45:57.000 Okay.
00:45:58.000 30-year-old body had, like, less problems.
00:46:00.000 Fewer injuries.
00:46:01.000 Yeah.
00:46:01.000 I've been beating on it for 21 years since then.
00:46:03.000 Right.
00:46:04.000 Like, when I was 30 is when I got hardcore into jiu-jitsu.
00:46:07.000 So that's 20 years of getting choked.
00:46:11.000 But, of course, the Christian would say, well, God makes you whole again.
00:46:14.000 You'll have no injuries.
00:46:15.000 But that's not really part of you.
00:46:17.000 Part of you is...
00:46:18.000 Your injuries, your muscles.
00:46:20.000 What I was going to say, though, is all the stuff that I did that hurt me, I also learned from.
00:46:25.000 That's right.
00:46:26.000 Made you stronger.
00:46:27.000 Well, not just that.
00:46:31.000 I think through incremental struggle, whether it's rigorous exercise or learning something.
00:46:37.000 I think everything that I do that's difficult makes me just a little bit more aware, a little bit better at other things, just a little bit...
00:46:45.000 A little bit better to talk to, a little bit easier to deal with, a little more friendly.
00:46:50.000 All those things I think I wouldn't give up for anything.
00:46:54.000 I think that's more important than whatever injuries I've got with.
00:46:59.000 I wonder how you're going to feel when you're 80. I wonder if you'll feel like that.
00:47:02.000 There's got to be a point of diminishing returns.
00:47:05.000 I'd rather be stupid in 40 than to be enlightened and can't get out of bed very well.
00:47:10.000 My older athletic friends tell me it's about mid-80s when things drop off fairly quickly.
00:47:16.000 You know, they can stay pretty fit into their 70s, maybe still racing, bike racing at 80, but 85 or so, things drop off pretty quick.
00:47:24.000 That's where you've got to go to hormone replacement therapy.
00:47:27.000 Or whatever, yeah.
00:47:28.000 Or the ice plunges or the young person's blood or something like that.
00:47:32.000 Okay, so I deal with, you know, there's no breakthrough miracles yet.
00:47:36.000 But again, I'm not against any of these things happening.
00:47:38.000 You know, when someone like Jeff Bezos puts $100 million into an aging company, I hope he's successful.
00:47:45.000 Does he have $100 million in an aging company?
00:47:47.000 He and Peter Thiel and the Google guys through Calico and a few others have invested many hundreds of millions of dollars into companies like Calico, for example.
00:47:57.000 These are companies that are trying to – their big goal is to defeat aging through reengineering cells, okay?
00:48:04.000 And the sort of philosophical goal behind it is we have to defeat aging so people can live for centuries or forever.
00:48:12.000 To which I say, let's not worry about living 500 years.
00:48:16.000 Let's worry about prostate cancer and breast cancer and Alzheimer's and dementia and so on.
00:48:23.000 Just the little incremental medical problems that people have.
00:48:26.000 Quality of life things.
00:48:27.000 Worry about things that take people out young.
00:48:29.000 Yeah.
00:48:29.000 And so that you can live a longer, higher quality life.
00:48:32.000 But do you imagine Michael Shermer at 300 years old?
00:48:35.000 No, I can't.
00:48:35.000 If you could keep this body.
00:48:36.000 If you can keep the body that you have now.
00:48:38.000 You're moving around great.
00:48:39.000 Everything's well.
00:48:39.000 You look really healthy.
00:48:41.000 How smart would you be?
00:48:42.000 How much more enlightened would you be?
00:48:44.000 Or wise, maybe, is the way you think of it.
00:48:47.000 I'm not against that.
00:48:48.000 I'm happy to live as long as I possibly can.
00:48:50.000 There are people that go, well, that's not right.
00:48:52.000 It's not natural.
00:48:53.000 It's like, okay, what's natural?
00:48:55.000 There's surveys on this.
00:48:56.000 And people's answer is whatever the current average lifespan is.
00:48:59.000 So, well, 80 seems about right.
00:49:01.000 Okay, fast forward to the day before your 80th birthday.
00:49:04.000 Tomorrow you're going to go.
00:49:06.000 You want another week?
00:49:07.000 Yeah, I'll take another week.
00:49:09.000 Okay, fast forward six days.
00:49:11.000 Would you like another month?
00:49:12.000 I'll take another month, thank you.
00:49:14.000 And that would never end.
00:49:15.000 So, of course, if you're healthy and happy and you don't want to off yourself or whatever because you're super depressed or something like that, yes, you're just going to want to keep going.
00:49:23.000 Nothing wrong with that, if we can do that.
00:49:27.000 But what if you die and it's way better?
00:49:30.000 What if you die and you really do?
00:49:32.000 You leave your physical body, there's no need for emotions and all of the entanglements of human existence and you go to this beautiful place of bliss and life and love and it's just pure love without a body, unembodied, unhindered.
00:49:48.000 I don't know.
00:49:49.000 Would that be fun?
00:49:50.000 I don't know.
00:49:50.000 Is that what we're here for?
00:49:51.000 We're here for fun?
00:49:53.000 We're here for fun.
00:49:53.000 We're doing a shitty job.
00:49:54.000 We should be going crazy right now.
00:49:56.000 We should be in a party van on the way to Vegas.
00:49:58.000 I had a college professor when I was in my Christian days who asked me when I was pitching him the Christian story.
00:50:05.000 He says, are there golf courses and tennis courts in heaven?
00:50:08.000 Because I like physical challenges.
00:50:10.000 I want to get out there and push myself.
00:50:12.000 I don't know.
00:50:14.000 Yeah.
00:50:14.000 So, I mean, would heaven be no challenges, no working out, no physical, you know, tensions?
00:50:20.000 True, right?
00:50:21.000 Yeah.
00:50:22.000 Maybe you don't need it.
00:50:23.000 So you'd have to remove that part of humanity, that we no longer want challenges and to be pushed to better ourselves.
00:50:30.000 Do they play chess in heaven?
00:50:32.000 That's right.
00:50:33.000 Right?
00:50:33.000 Exactly.
00:50:34.000 Do you get to win?
00:50:35.000 Right.
00:50:36.000 Do you get to win in heaven, or is everybody a winner?
00:50:38.000 Everybody gets a gold medal and a Nobel Prize and whatever.
00:50:43.000 That is a problem.
00:50:44.000 The things that we're attracted to, the things that we enjoy, accomplishments and achievements and all these things, they exist only inside of civilization, inside of this realm that we've created.
00:50:54.000 The significance of them is entirely based on our own agreements that it's important when you take the king.
00:51:02.000 It's important when the ball goes into the net.
00:51:04.000 We've agreed.
00:51:05.000 When someone shoots a three-pointer, it's really not that big a deal.
00:51:08.000 You're just throwing a ball into a hole.
00:51:10.000 Nothing really significant happens.
00:51:11.000 But because we've attached all this meaning to that, then it's something that we really want to see.
00:51:16.000 And everybody, score!
00:51:17.000 The goal went in!
00:51:19.000 The puck went in the net!
00:51:20.000 Yes!
00:51:21.000 Yes!
00:51:21.000 It becomes this giant thing.
00:51:23.000 Yeah, theists have no good answer for this.
00:51:25.000 When you say, well, what's heaven like?
00:51:26.000 Well, the psychics will tell you.
00:51:27.000 It's bliss and love.
00:51:28.000 But what does that mean?
00:51:29.000 It sounds, again, back to Hitch, it sounds boring.
00:51:32.000 I have to stay at this party forever?
00:51:34.000 That sounds boring.
00:51:36.000 Did you ever see the guy who took a photo of himself in heaven?
00:51:39.000 No.
00:51:40.000 You never saw that one?
00:51:42.000 He used a Samsung Galaxy phone to take a picture of himself in heaven.
00:51:48.000 Are there what?
00:51:49.000 It's just white.
00:51:50.000 It's just him smiling.
00:51:51.000 It is one of the funniest fucking photos you're ever going to find on the internet just because of the context of it.
00:51:56.000 That's funny.
00:51:57.000 Yeah, I believe he was an African gentleman who was either he's telling the truth or he's hilariously full of shit.
00:52:04.000 I mean, imagine if he really did go to heaven and he took a picture and we're just mocking him.
00:52:08.000 Really, we should be going to him for advice.
00:52:10.000 That's right.
00:52:11.000 So what is it really?
00:52:12.000 Have you found it?
00:52:12.000 You see the picture?
00:52:13.000 I'm only finding the mocking, the memes of making fun of him afterwards.
00:52:17.000 Oh, there's no actual picture?
00:52:19.000 I'm trying to find the original.
00:52:21.000 Just Google man takes.
00:52:23.000 I did.
00:52:23.000 That's what they get.
00:52:24.000 Everyone wants to make fun of.
00:52:25.000 The internet is so overwhelmingly mocking.
00:52:29.000 It's so good.
00:52:31.000 That's got to be playing a large part.
00:52:34.000 You got it?
00:52:35.000 I think this is, everyone's saying this is this one.
00:52:37.000 No, it was all white.
00:52:39.000 It wasn't like that.
00:52:40.000 It wasn't that.
00:52:41.000 It was just...
00:52:43.000 It was that picture of him holding his hand up like that, but it was just the background wasn't rainbows and shit like that.
00:52:50.000 You can find it, man.
00:52:51.000 I have faith in you.
00:52:53.000 I found it the other day.
00:52:56.000 It's, you know...
00:52:59.000 It's just hilarious that someone would be so confident to put that picture online knowing full well that the world is going to see that picture and start writing on it.
00:53:09.000 Remember the guy who sold his soul on eBay?
00:53:12.000 Really?
00:53:12.000 I forget what he got for it.
00:53:14.000 And then a lot of religious people were offended by this.
00:53:16.000 You can't sell your soul.
00:53:18.000 Why not?
00:53:19.000 You sold your soul to your religion.
00:53:21.000 Did he get a good price?
00:53:22.000 I don't know.
00:53:22.000 I think it was a few hundred bucks or something like that.
00:53:24.000 Oh, that's nice.
00:53:24.000 I'm forgetting when it...
00:53:25.000 Go to dinner with that.
00:53:26.000 Yeah, that's right.
00:53:27.000 Nice.
00:53:29.000 But my concern about all of this obsession with the afterlife...
00:53:33.000 That's not it.
00:53:34.000 This is from his page.
00:53:35.000 It says, woke up this morning and saw this, had to take a picture.
00:53:38.000 Oh, okay.
00:53:39.000 Yeah, but that's not the actual photo.
00:53:42.000 The photo of him in heaven is what's hilarious.
00:53:44.000 It's that picture with him.
00:53:45.000 Far left.
00:53:46.000 Far left.
00:53:46.000 That's it.
00:53:47.000 That's it.
00:53:48.000 That's the photo.
00:53:48.000 That is him.
00:53:50.000 That is the photo.
00:53:51.000 Went to heaven.
00:53:52.000 That's it.
00:53:53.000 That's the exact photo he took.
00:53:54.000 I don't know who took the photo.
00:53:55.000 He's like, hey, angel, do me a solid.
00:54:00.000 Yeah, it's not a selfie.
00:54:01.000 No!
00:54:02.000 His one hand is down, so he's not taking it with that hand.
00:54:05.000 The other hand is up.
00:54:07.000 That's him in heaven.
00:54:09.000 Love it.
00:54:10.000 The internet is so good for mocking things, though.
00:54:12.000 It's so good.
00:54:13.000 It's one of the best things ever in terms of, like, there's so many people that are paying attention and so many people that are funny that aren't comedians, per se.
00:54:23.000 They just might work in an office somewhere, and they've got a little bit of free time, and they'll make a hilarious meme about something, and then everybody runs with it, and things just get mocked mercilessly.
00:54:31.000 Remember the video of the guy, he was having an interview and his kid started walking in behind him and he's trying to talk about foreign relations in Poland or something and the little kid is back here and then somebody, the wife rushes in and so on.
00:54:43.000 Anyway, there's a bunch of funny spoof videos on that where some woman is sitting there talking about nuclear strategy or whatever and then the kid comes in and she's ironing the shirt and then she defuses a bomb and then she cleans up the socks or whatever.
00:54:57.000 It's really funny.
00:54:58.000 Yeah, it's just we were always – all of our information was distributed to us through these very controlled networks, whether it's CBS or NBC or ABC. And everything was very cut and dry and very professional in the way people talked,
00:55:15.000 the way information was presented.
00:55:17.000 But now it's just – It's open.
00:55:20.000 As soon as I find out about something happened in the world, I Google it.
00:55:25.000 I go, what is it?
00:55:25.000 What happened?
00:55:26.000 What happened?
00:55:26.000 I Google it, and then I'll go to Twitter.
00:55:28.000 And when I go to Twitter, it's all pictures and memes, and it's the dude with the question marks.
00:55:35.000 There's so many memes that people will throw up when anything crazy happens in the world.
00:55:40.000 It becomes so interesting to hear the news and hear commentary on the news from this just gigantic mass of humans and it's what's most funny or most interesting or most succinct or poignant that rises to the top.
00:55:55.000 Yep.
00:55:56.000 Yeah, there's endless content to entertain.
00:55:59.000 Also, just high-quality content.
00:56:02.000 I mean, I'm a content producer.
00:56:04.000 I write and so on, but I am a huge consumer.
00:56:06.000 Most of the people I follow on Twitter post articles.
00:56:09.000 Most of them I want to read.
00:56:11.000 So in the course of a couple hours, my little window pop-ups just spread across the top of the screen.
00:56:16.000 I want to read all of these articles, and I plow through as many as I can.
00:56:19.000 They're pretty much like The Atlantic or Vanity Fair, Time, whatever.
00:56:24.000 They're pretty high-quality, well-written articles.
00:56:27.000 The problem is, as a content producer myself, is that the half-life of these articles is so short.
00:56:35.000 When I post one of my Scientific American columns, I put a lot of work into it, and then a couple hours later, maybe a day later, gone.
00:56:43.000 No one's talking about it.
00:56:44.000 Done.
00:56:45.000 Well, I put a lot of work into that.
00:56:48.000 But taking me out of the equation, like the New York Times did that huge New York Times Sunday Magazine article on Trump's business going all the way back to the 70s.
00:56:58.000 They spent like a year working on this, like 10 journalists.
00:57:01.000 This would have been a Pulitzer Prize winning piece.
00:57:04.000 This would have done in anybody else but Trump, right?
00:57:07.000 I mean, they had his old business contracts and lawsuits and all the shady stuff going on.
00:57:13.000 And this got huge media attention for about a day and a half.
00:57:17.000 And by Sunday morning, by Tuesday, no one's talking about this anymore.
00:57:21.000 It's like, these guys spent a year working on this.
00:57:24.000 I mean, what did it take to get that lawsuit paperwork from the courthouse?
00:57:28.000 And they had hundreds of things like that.
00:57:30.000 It's like, gone.
00:57:31.000 Like, whoa!
00:57:32.000 Well, Trump in particular, there's so many scandals that I think we've all become numb about.
00:57:38.000 Yeah, there is that too, yeah.
00:57:39.000 There's so many that you just, you get numb to it and it doesn't affect you.
00:57:44.000 You're just like, oh.
00:57:45.000 He paid off a woman?
00:57:47.000 Whatever.
00:57:47.000 Yeah.
00:57:48.000 Those are the tiny ones.
00:57:49.000 The big ones are the lawsuits, the businesses, you know, the construction businesses where he didn't pay small companies, you didn't pay them.
00:57:56.000 Like, sue me.
00:57:57.000 And then these companies went under.
00:57:59.000 Like, there's a lot of those.
00:58:00.000 Right.
00:58:00.000 There's a lot of the unethical business practices.
00:58:03.000 Yeah, that's all in that article.
00:58:04.000 Yeah.
00:58:05.000 Yeah.
00:58:05.000 Again, anybody else would be done in by something like that.
00:58:09.000 Any politician except him.
00:58:11.000 It's just amazing.
00:58:12.000 Well, it's also what he represents to those people.
00:58:14.000 It doesn't necessarily have to be what he really is.
00:58:17.000 It's what he represents.
00:58:18.000 What he represents is the American flag and eagles.
00:58:22.000 They have this really juvenile sense, some folks do, of what he is and what he represents.
00:58:30.000 Despite all the evidence to the contrary, they have him in this category that he's going to drain the swamp and these liberals are just going to cry and he's going to make America better.
00:58:42.000 That's the side that they're on.
00:58:44.000 They're on the Make America Better side.
00:58:46.000 Don't you think it's also people don't have the time to really look into this stuff?
00:58:49.000 Who could fact check these things?
00:58:51.000 Not just that.
00:58:52.000 It's like if you work eight hours a day and you have children and hobbies, how much time are you really paying attention to Trump's ethics?
00:58:58.000 Are you really looking into it?
00:59:00.000 Are you really considering it before you vote?
00:59:02.000 Are you really taking into consideration what kind of a person he is and what ripple effect it would have?
00:59:07.000 Would any of his policies take place?
00:59:09.000 I think you're right.
00:59:10.000 People vote by their team.
00:59:11.000 This is my team.
00:59:13.000 Okay, so he won the primary.
00:59:14.000 All right, that's our guy.
00:59:15.000 We're sticking with him no matter what.
00:59:16.000 I think there's a huge element of that for sure.
00:59:19.000 Yeah, there's also people love to argue online too.
00:59:21.000 And as soon as they find someone who's opposed to something that they believe in, they stick to their guns and they just hold strong.
00:59:27.000 It would take so much for people to turn on Trump.
00:59:30.000 The real hardcore Trump believers, it would take so much for them to decide enough is enough.
00:59:35.000 Yeah.
00:59:35.000 Well, it'll be interesting to see if members of his own party do something in 2020. Probably not.
00:59:40.000 Doesn't it seem like with Fox that Fox is slowly starting to shift their coverage?
00:59:46.000 A little bit.
00:59:47.000 They're criticizing him.
00:59:48.000 A little bit.
00:59:48.000 They're pushing back a little bit.
00:59:50.000 Shepard Smith is pretty good on that.
00:59:51.000 He's always been that way.
00:59:53.000 Yeah, yeah.
00:59:53.000 Yeah, he's always been great at that.
00:59:54.000 Hannity will probably be last to go.
00:59:56.000 He's never going.
00:59:56.000 He's never going.
00:59:57.000 He's never going.
00:59:58.000 They have the same fucking lawyer.
01:00:00.000 Yeah.
01:00:00.000 Yeah, that's right.
01:00:01.000 I mean, the fact that that didn't sink Hannity.
01:00:04.000 Right.
01:00:04.000 You know, that he had Michael Cohen was his lawyer.
01:00:06.000 Like, whoa!
01:00:07.000 Yep.
01:00:09.000 Yeah, the only thing we can count on with the media is that there's lots of sources, and you just have to just cross-check as many as you can.
01:00:15.000 Don't stick on any one channel.
01:00:18.000 Well, I wish there was a really, truly objective service.
01:00:22.000 Like, it would be wonderful if there was people that were dedicated to no editorial slant whatsoever, just 100% fact, this is how we know the facts, regardless, left, right, no ideological curve to it at all.
01:00:38.000 Wouldn't that be – there's got to be a market to that.
01:00:41.000 Real news.
01:00:42.000 Well, of course, they all say that that's what they do.
01:00:44.000 Yeah, but we know better.
01:00:45.000 PolitiFact is pretty good.
01:00:47.000 They're the fact-checking organization.
01:00:49.000 I mean, they're not reporting news.
01:00:50.000 They're reporting on the facts said by politicians and so on.
01:00:54.000 So that's useful.
01:00:55.000 And I think there's a market competition amongst those people to get more hits.
01:00:59.000 Like, we're fact-checking more than the other guys are fact-checking.
01:01:02.000 Although there is two different – there was aim, accuracy in media, and then there was another one, I forget the name, and one was left-leaning and one was right-leaning.
01:01:12.000 It's like, can I have one without a wing?
01:01:13.000 No right wing, no left wing.
01:01:16.000 Yeah.
01:01:17.000 It seems like that – I mean, I'm – Reading Jonathan Haidt's book, the two books that I've been reading recently, one of them we discussed on the podcast we did on Monday, but the other one is The Coddling of the American Mind.
01:01:31.000 I'm into that now.
01:01:33.000 It's fantastic.
01:01:34.000 And he covers this quite a bit.
01:01:36.000 Yeah.
01:01:39.000 Jonathan's on to something good there with the Heterodox Academy, which I'm a professor at Chapman University, and so I was the first member there.
01:01:47.000 And our university is pretty centrist.
01:01:50.000 We don't get a lot of these protests and microaggressions and safe space stuff.
01:01:54.000 It's pretty quiet.
01:01:56.000 And Jonathan's point is that it's more of a sort of East Coast, West Coast public university thing, or maybe Harvard, that kind of thing.
01:02:02.000 Middle of the country, you don't see as much of that.
01:02:05.000 But the polarization thing has gotten worse.
01:02:08.000 You can see the polls since like 1990 to 2018. You ask people, how evil are the Democrats or Republicans?
01:02:17.000 And it used to be tiny little differences, and then they diverge like that now.
01:02:22.000 Where the other side is not just wrong, but they're immoral.
01:02:25.000 They are evil.
01:02:26.000 I do think talk radio and television feeds into that, you know, if you just – or now social media in the bubble there.
01:02:35.000 But on the other hand, again, the Heterodox Academy has like 2,000 members now, professors that said, yep, I'm going to stand up against this censorship.
01:02:45.000 On college campuses, you were talking to Jonathan about Pete Boghossian.
01:02:50.000 You had Pete on.
01:02:51.000 I've known Pete for many years before the hoax papers, and I think they've had it in for him long before the hoax papers.
01:02:59.000 Well, let's explain that to people, so this could be standalone.
01:03:01.000 Pete Boghossian, James Lindsay, and what is the woman's name?
01:03:04.000 Helen Pluckrose.
01:03:05.000 And she wasn't on the podcast, so I didn't get to meet her, but she's in England, I believe.
01:03:10.000 They published a bunch of preposterous Papers, like really ridiculous, like on, you know, what is it, the dog park one?
01:03:21.000 Yeah, dog park culture and dog park.
01:03:24.000 And the re-translation of a chapter from Mein Kampf replacing males with Jews.
01:03:31.000 Eliminate the males.
01:03:33.000 So they did one before, actually, Pete and James Lindsay did one two years ago on the conceptual penis, it was called.
01:03:41.000 And that the penis is a concept.
01:03:42.000 It's not a real thing.
01:03:44.000 It's a hilarious paper.
01:03:47.000 And the same month that came out, it was published in kind of a third-tier feminist studies journal.
01:03:54.000 So they got criticized like, eh, that's not one of the big ones.
01:03:57.000 So you didn't really hoax anything.
01:03:59.000 But the same week that came out, there was another paper published on feminist glaciology.
01:04:05.000 And I thought, oh, someone beat Pete to the hoax.
01:04:08.000 Oh, my God, this is totally – and I read it, and I thought, this is utter bullshit.
01:04:11.000 What is glaciology?
01:04:12.000 You know, the study of glaciers.
01:04:13.000 Oh, God.
01:04:14.000 Yeah.
01:04:15.000 Feminist glaciers?
01:04:16.000 Glaciers are very hard and erect, and, you know, it's all masculine, and, you know.
01:04:21.000 Anyway, so I called the university that was affiliated with the lead author, and I said, this is a hoax, right?
01:04:28.000 Come on, just before I say anything, I don't want to be embarrassed.
01:04:30.000 This is a hoax, right?
01:04:31.000 No, no.
01:04:32.000 This is real.
01:04:32.000 It's like, I can't tell the difference between the conceptual penis paper, which I know is a hoax because Pete wrote it, and the feminist glaciology paper.
01:04:40.000 That's the problem.
01:04:41.000 Well, let's explain what's happening to Pete now, because Pete was brought before Portland State University.
01:04:48.000 They're What exactly are they charging him with?
01:04:51.000 With faking data, fraudulent data.
01:04:55.000 Fraudulent research, faking data, that he didn't go through the institutional research board, which approves experiments that professors want to run.
01:05:05.000 Like, for example, you could not do Milgram shock experiments, where you hook people up and tell them you're going to give electric shocks to somebody.
01:05:12.000 They wouldn't approve that.
01:05:13.000 Mm-hmm.
01:05:17.000 Mm-hmm.
01:05:35.000 So, of course, Pete and James and Helen didn't do that because, first of all, James was the primary director of this thing.
01:05:43.000 He's not affiliated with the university.
01:05:44.000 He doesn't have to answer to anybody.
01:05:47.000 Pete was affiliated with it, so they're getting him on that.
01:05:50.000 And that he didn't go through the IRB and get approval.
01:05:54.000 Well, of course, if you're going to tell people, if you're going to fake something, you can't tell them ahead of time that we're going to fake because it's going to get out and then the gig is up.
01:06:03.000 The analogy I made the other day was in 1971, a Stanford psychologist named David Rosenhan, a clinical psychologist, sent a bunch of his graduate students into mental hospitals all over the country and said, just tell them you're feeling kind of blue and that you kind of hear this inner voice and that you just kind of don't feel right and you need some help.
01:06:27.000 So they did.
01:06:28.000 They all got themselves checked in.
01:06:30.000 And then from there on out, they acted perfectly normal.
01:06:33.000 And then the goal was, let's see how long it takes you to get out.
01:06:36.000 And so it was a study in how mental hospitals treat people who are completely sane.
01:06:42.000 So the title of his famous paper is called, Being Sane in Insane Places.
01:06:47.000 So first of all, the grad students report it's incredibly boring.
01:06:51.000 So one of them would sit there and write essays and take notes.
01:06:55.000 And so in the psychiatrist's evaluation of this patient is, you know, patient exhibits excessive writing behavior.
01:07:02.000 This is clearly an example of his erupting libidinal impulses from his childhood, blah, blah, blah.
01:07:10.000 Another one was a painter, so she's doing paintings with landscapes and so on.
01:07:14.000 Oh, patient, you can see in the paintings the erupting emotions and the conflicts in her personality.
01:07:19.000 They're just acting normal, right?
01:07:21.000 So the point of this hoax was that there's something wrong with our mental institutions.
01:07:26.000 If they can't tell the difference between a sane and an insane person, what are they doing?
01:07:30.000 So, of course, the industry got pretty upset about being hoaxed.
01:07:35.000 So Rosenhan came back and said, okay, in the next year, I'm going to send in some more.
01:07:40.000 Let's see if you can find him.
01:07:42.000 And he didn't send anybody.
01:07:44.000 Oh, wow.
01:07:44.000 So they're like, okay, we think this guy's fake.
01:07:47.000 Again, they couldn't tell the difference in their own patients, and no one was even faking.
01:07:51.000 So in a way, this is kind of what Pete and James and Helen did.
01:07:55.000 It's like, if they're sending these papers out, if you can't tell, then what are you doing in this field?
01:08:01.000 Yeah.
01:08:01.000 Well, people are, for whatever reason, people are, some people, I should say, are drawn to these nonsense ideas.
01:08:10.000 And one of the papers, the Dog Park paper, it got lauded for its excellent scholarship.
01:08:17.000 I mean, it got praised.
01:08:19.000 It's one of the weirder ones that they hoaxed.
01:08:22.000 I mean, because it's so obviously preposterous when you're reading it.
01:08:25.000 You're like, what?
01:08:26.000 I think it was the fat bodybuilding one.
01:08:28.000 That was another one.
01:08:29.000 I think it won an award.
01:08:30.000 Yes!
01:08:30.000 This is the best paper we've ever had.
01:08:32.000 Oh, okay.
01:08:35.000 Yeah.
01:08:35.000 And really, Pete and James and Helen, they are like professional scholars in the grievance studies.
01:08:42.000 Yeah.
01:08:42.000 Because if you read those things, it's hard to write like that.
01:08:45.000 I mean, it took them a lot of practice to get the jargon and the style down.
01:08:50.000 What are the options for someone like Pete?
01:08:52.000 Because if he does get fired from the university, what could he possibly do?
01:08:57.000 I mean, what Jordan has done is pretty extraordinary.
01:08:59.000 He's essentially left teaching.
01:09:02.000 Because of the controversies that he went through, he became famous.
01:09:06.000 He became famous for doing podcasts.
01:09:08.000 And writing things, and then his YouTube videos, they're so insightful and wonderful that people just got drawn to him, and then they go to see him speak live.
01:09:20.000 They've made him into a monster.
01:09:22.000 By censoring him, by attacking him, they've essentially turned him into a global, international star.
01:09:29.000 That's right.
01:09:30.000 One of the best arguments against censorship is it's going to have the opposite effect you want it to.
01:09:35.000 If someone is of the quality of Jordan Peterson, which is pretty rare.
01:09:38.000 It's pretty rare.
01:09:39.000 I've talked to Pete about this as well as Brett Weinstein, because he suffered the same thing at Evergreen, and he's out.
01:09:46.000 At least he and his wife, Heather, got a payout, so they have a little cushion.
01:09:51.000 But this model, like Sam on Patreon or Dave Rubin, especially Jordan Peterson, very rare.
01:09:58.000 It's very rare to be able to make a living as a public intellectual on your own.
01:10:02.000 Most public intellectuals that are not in academia, they're with a think tank.
01:10:07.000 You know, the Cato Institute or Reason Magazine or, you know, any of these.
01:10:10.000 There's left-wing, right-wing, they're all over the board.
01:10:13.000 You know, it's possible they could get jobs there where you actually have a paycheck.
01:10:17.000 And those groups are usually funded by wealthy supporters that just, we like the cause, and here's a pile of money, not through Patreon.
01:10:29.000 It's possible that Pete and Brett could do this, but it's a tough road to hoe.
01:10:35.000 I mean, Jordan is very rare.
01:10:37.000 I've watched this through my whole life.
01:10:40.000 This idea of making $10,000 a talk, $50,000 a talk, $100,000 a talk, almost nobody gets that kind of money.
01:10:47.000 Maybe Neil, DeGrasse Tyson, Richard Dawkins maybe, Carl Sagan back in the day, whatever the equivalent of that would have been in the 80s.
01:10:56.000 But that's pretty much it.
01:10:58.000 You know, and there's thousands of scientists that would love to do that.
01:11:01.000 Like, yeah, I want to go with that.
01:11:02.000 Well, they're not entertaining.
01:11:03.000 The thing about Jordan is he's very engaging.
01:11:06.000 Like, his words are, it's not just they're wise.
01:11:10.000 It's not just he's very articulate.
01:11:13.000 There's something engaging about the style in which he presents these things.
01:11:17.000 It's very captivating.
01:11:19.000 He's very charismatic.
01:11:20.000 I agree.
01:11:21.000 You know, people discount that.
01:11:23.000 Or, you know, I know a lot of scientists who are kind of jealous of Neil deGrasse Tyson or, say, Bill Nye.
01:11:28.000 It's like, oh, I could do that.
01:11:30.000 No, I doubt that you can.
01:11:32.000 I mean, Neil and Bill are really entertaining.
01:11:34.000 They are funny.
01:11:35.000 They are engaging.
01:11:36.000 You can't take your eyes off them.
01:11:38.000 They're so much fun to watch.
01:11:40.000 Most people are not like that.
01:11:41.000 Sean Carroll's brilliant.
01:11:42.000 He's really brilliant.
01:11:44.000 And I'm glad that he's doing a podcast now.
01:11:46.000 But when you listen to him talk and you listen to Neil talk, Neil just has this booming presence and this sense of drama and energy and entertainment.
01:11:56.000 He knows how to be...
01:11:57.000 He knows how to deliver it in a way that just catches you.
01:12:02.000 It's fun to listen to.
01:12:04.000 That's a lot.
01:12:05.000 And I did a public event in Australia, in Sydney, and unfortunately I went before him, or maybe that's actually good.
01:12:14.000 And I'm a pretty good public speaker.
01:12:16.000 I have a sense of my value as a public speaker.
01:12:19.000 I'm pretty good, and I had never seen him speak.
01:12:22.000 And I did my talk.
01:12:24.000 It's pretty much like my TED talk you can watch online.
01:12:26.000 It's pretty entertaining.
01:12:27.000 And I'm done.
01:12:28.000 I get a nice applause.
01:12:29.000 I'm feeling pretty good.
01:12:30.000 And then Neil gets up and he starts.
01:12:31.000 I'm like, oh crap, this guy is fucking good.
01:12:35.000 You don't want to follow that.
01:12:36.000 I know.
01:12:37.000 I'm so glad I already went.
01:12:38.000 So much energy.
01:12:41.000 Yeah, but he also has, I don't know, that sort of connection with the audience.
01:12:46.000 It captures them.
01:12:48.000 And yeah, I could tell afterwards, you know, throngs of people around him.
01:12:51.000 And yeah, it's there.
01:12:52.000 And not very many people have that.
01:12:54.000 And I don't think it's something you can just learn.
01:12:56.000 I think it's a temperament.
01:12:58.000 I mean, you can hone it and refine it, but you can't just sort of naturally be funny and engaging.
01:13:02.000 I think it's personality that comes out.
01:13:04.000 I think you can certainly improve, but I think you're right.
01:13:07.000 I think whatever personality you have, he has that kind of engaging, fun personality, and it translates very well to doing those public speeches.
01:13:18.000 Since I was here a year ago, I saw Jordan's event in Thousand Oaks at the Kavli Theater there, 2,000 seats, sold out, standing room only.
01:13:27.000 And it was good.
01:13:29.000 He was, like, different than Neil, of course, but just as engaging.
01:13:33.000 It wasn't political.
01:13:34.000 A lot of people there, you know, recognized me and I could see, you know, these aren't like right-wing nuts.
01:13:41.000 These aren't young male, angry males.
01:13:44.000 This isn't like this at all.
01:13:46.000 And his message was, you know, pretty straightforward.
01:13:49.000 Get your life in order.
01:13:50.000 You know, this is the way life is.
01:13:52.000 It's hard.
01:13:53.000 And he kind of went through his thing and it's like, all right, that makes sense.
01:13:57.000 And people loved it.
01:13:59.000 Very, almost no politics in it.
01:14:01.000 And Dave Rubin tells me he doesn't really get political on stage.
01:14:04.000 So that's not the motive.
01:14:06.000 And I think, you know, life is hard enough for most people that they like, back to the self-help thing, it's nice to be reminded, here are a few simple things you could do to get your life in order.
01:14:17.000 It's like, yeah, well, yeah, I kind of knew that.
01:14:19.000 I'm going to go back out and do that again.
01:14:21.000 Well, his principles are very effective, too.
01:14:23.000 They're very straightforward, as you said.
01:14:25.000 But for the guy like Pete Bogosi, you know, to bring it back to that, what could he do if he does get fired?
01:14:30.000 It's going to be very difficult for him to get a job at another university.
01:14:33.000 He's obviously got roots in Portland.
01:14:35.000 He lives there now.
01:14:38.000 The thing is, he's pretty liberal.
01:14:40.000 It's not like he's a closeted conservative and they're after him.
01:14:43.000 He's definitely more liberal than me, and I could tell even years ago that they're going to go after him, I can tell, mainly because he puts truth and free speech ahead of Political positions.
01:14:57.000 He might say, I'm a liberal and these are my political positions, but more important to me is the truth.
01:15:03.000 Yes.
01:15:03.000 Okay.
01:15:04.000 Well, that's not, as Jonathan points out in his book, universities are now at this divide between are we here for social justice or are we here for truth?
01:15:14.000 Yes.
01:15:14.000 And they're having to make a decision, and too many of them are going for it.
01:15:17.000 We're here for social justice.
01:15:19.000 Well, then just be honest about it, because you can't bury it.
01:15:24.000 Well, not just that.
01:15:25.000 I don't think that's an effective way to pursue social justice.
01:15:28.000 If you're ignoring the truth, you undermine your message, because then it's not like it's hidden somewhere.
01:15:34.000 It's not like people can't read into it and see exactly what you've said and how you've supported certain causes and denied the reality of others.
01:15:44.000 Yeah.
01:15:45.000 The Google memo thing was a gigantic disaster.
01:15:47.000 Yeah.
01:15:48.000 Because ideologically, people jumped on a side and argued.
01:15:52.000 And I heard the CEO of YouTube talk about how damaging it was to women.
01:15:56.000 I'm like, what are you talking about?
01:15:57.000 Like, what are you saying?
01:15:59.000 Like, what did he say?
01:16:00.000 He's just talking about preferences that are described by tests.
01:16:04.000 This has all been peer-reviewed, studied papers on the differences between the preferences of males versus females.
01:16:12.000 It's not like a value assessment at all.
01:16:16.000 And in fact, not only that, he put into his paper a page and a half of recommendations of how to get certain women interested in tech.
01:16:25.000 And perhaps you could recruit certain women and make it more palatable or exciting to them.
01:16:31.000 It's not a sexist screed at all.
01:16:35.000 No, no, no.
01:16:36.000 Online, there's a really good debate with Steven Pinker and a feminist scholar at Harvard.
01:16:42.000 And Steve has all his slides up there, and he just goes through all the different things that are in that Google Memo.
01:16:47.000 This is before the Google Memo.
01:16:48.000 Maybe James Damore got some of that from Pinker's lecture.
01:16:52.000 But it's pretty solid stuff.
01:16:54.000 There's nothing...
01:16:55.000 It's inflammatory about the debate.
01:16:57.000 This is kind of normal scientific debates.
01:16:59.000 You know, here's a study that shows this.
01:17:01.000 Well, but there's this other study.
01:17:02.000 And then they go at it.
01:17:04.000 Okay, end of story.
01:17:05.000 We're not saying women are better, men are better.
01:17:07.000 That doesn't happen.
01:17:09.000 Unfortunately, if I was Pete's boss, here's what I would do.
01:17:13.000 Because a lot of us have written letters in support of Pete, and you can kind of see what's about to happen.
01:17:19.000 Let's just drop this whole thing, let him keep his job, keep our mouths shut, because this is going to backfire on us big time.
01:17:25.000 Like it did with Evergreen State University.
01:17:27.000 Yeah, exactly.
01:17:28.000 Or with the Google memo.
01:17:29.000 Yes.
01:17:30.000 That's what I would do.
01:17:30.000 Did it backfire on the Google memo?
01:17:32.000 I mean, we realize that they've got a preposterous ideology over there now.
01:17:36.000 We know that.
01:17:37.000 Maybe their stock price isn't.
01:17:38.000 I don't think it affected them very much.
01:17:40.000 And many more people support it.
01:17:44.000 It's one of those things where you hear one version of it, and that version sticks.
01:17:53.000 The version is, he's a sexist.
01:17:55.000 You know, the sexist Google memo, and then that's all I need.
01:17:59.000 The Google memo is very sexist.
01:18:01.000 It's very anti-female.
01:18:03.000 And there's many, many people who support the idea that something that was sexist was removed from Google.
01:18:10.000 They've made it a safer environment for women.
01:18:12.000 Right.
01:18:13.000 Yep.
01:18:14.000 But did they?
01:18:15.000 I don't know what they...
01:18:17.000 It doesn't seem like they did.
01:18:18.000 It seems like they made it an environment where you have to be careful about facts.
01:18:22.000 Right.
01:18:22.000 Because, again, it's not a value assessment of women.
01:18:25.000 If women choose to go into the medical fields, more women are physicians, more women...
01:18:34.000 Disproportionately attract women.
01:18:36.000 That's not a negative value assessment.
01:18:38.000 That's just people are different.
01:18:40.000 You know, I don't want to do what certain people do because I'm different than them.
01:18:44.000 I'm not attracted to those fields.
01:18:46.000 It's fascinating to find out why people are attracted and when you see that there's actual There's actual statistics in terms of what fields men are more attracted to or what fields women are more attracted to.
01:18:58.000 Now, on the other hand, if there's a reason why women aren't attracted to those fields because they get harassed when they go into them, well, that should be demonstrated, and that's obviously a bad thing, and that should be addressed.
01:19:10.000 Yeah, absolutely.
01:19:10.000 Totally.
01:19:11.000 But that's not what he's talking about.
01:19:12.000 No.
01:19:12.000 And James Damore is like a very kind, soft-spoken...
01:19:18.000 I know you had him on...
01:19:19.000 He's great.
01:19:20.000 He's a nice guy.
01:19:21.000 He's very introverted.
01:19:22.000 He's a kind guy.
01:19:23.000 And he's on the spectrum somewhere.
01:19:25.000 There was no way you'd look at James Damore and go, there's the patriarchy.
01:19:28.000 Yeah, he's a nice guy.
01:19:30.000 And they said to him, if you have any input on these things and feel like you can help, please contribute.
01:19:36.000 And he's like, okay.
01:19:37.000 So that's what he is.
01:19:39.000 He's a fucking software engineer.
01:19:41.000 He sat down and looked at all the data and compiled it.
01:19:45.000 And he's saying, well, actually, it seems like this is the reason why women are more attracted to other jobs.
01:19:49.000 And this is the reason why men are more attracted to these fields.
01:19:52.000 And they're like, Sexist!
01:19:54.000 And he's like, no, no, no, no, no.
01:19:55.000 These are the studies.
01:19:57.000 This is what you're asking me to do.
01:19:58.000 The concern that if the science doesn't come out a certain way, then people won't be treated equally is a bad idea because then you're going to force the science to be distorted if it doesn't match your political ideology.
01:20:11.000 So whether trans is natural or whatever percentage is or how old you have to be before you get trans surgery and the hormones or whatever, that's a raging debate right now.
01:20:21.000 But underlying that debate is, like, we have to make it come out in a way that trans people are treated equally.
01:20:28.000 It's like, no, no, they should be treated equally anyway, regardless of what the science says.
01:20:34.000 But that's a problem now.
01:20:37.000 Now, the problem for people like Pete and Brett, like, joining a think tank is almost all these think tanks are politically affiliated left or right.
01:20:46.000 You have to...
01:20:47.000 And therefore, you have to kind of toe the political line.
01:20:50.000 This is our ideology in this think tank, and you're going to write white papers and op-eds and send them out with our kind of slant.
01:20:58.000 The problem with that is, well, but what if I disagree with this and this and this here?
01:21:01.000 Well, then you can't work here.
01:21:03.000 Something like that.
01:21:04.000 So that's the problem with those.
01:21:06.000 Right, but is that the only option today?
01:21:08.000 When you see that, I mean, I know he's not Jordan and, you know, there's very few people like Jordan, but Sam Harris is also able to do these speeches.
01:21:15.000 He's very compelling as well.
01:21:16.000 He's doing a lot of public speeches and doing these big, big events.
01:21:21.000 There's more opportunity to do alternative things now than have ever been before, and I would hope that that becomes available.
01:21:29.000 Look, I hope Pete just keeps his job.
01:21:32.000 But if he can't keep his job at Portland State, I would hope that some other avenue, some other path is possible.
01:21:40.000 Yeah.
01:21:41.000 It might be.
01:21:42.000 You never know.
01:21:43.000 But you put a date on the calendar and you tell the world, do they come?
01:21:47.000 Do they pay $10 a ticket, $50 a ticket, $100 a ticket?
01:21:50.000 Not many people can fill a 3,000-seat auditorium or a 500-seat auditorium.
01:21:55.000 One thing he could do is do a lecture series on the grievance studies and have the three of them on stage talk about how silly these things were.
01:22:06.000 If they could put that together as a theatrical presentation, it would really be funny because there's some hilarious subjects that they covered.
01:22:13.000 All they have to do is read portions.
01:22:15.000 When James Lindsay and Boghossian were in here and we were talking about these things, we were crying laughing.
01:22:20.000 It was really, really funny stuff.
01:22:22.000 That's actually probably the best path for him, is to put together some sort of a public show.
01:22:26.000 They should do a book.
01:22:28.000 And then have a book, a show, and then maybe even a TV documentary about it.
01:22:33.000 Well, somebody's making a documentary.
01:22:35.000 That's a good start.
01:22:36.000 When I was in college at Pepperdine, G. Gordon Liddy and Timothy Leary did a stage show.
01:22:42.000 Wow!
01:22:43.000 And they were touring the country doing this.
01:22:46.000 It was at UCLA, so I drove down and saw it, and it was so entertaining.
01:22:52.000 I mean, G. Gordon Liddy, he's the G-man there with his three-piece suit, and he's got his gun.
01:22:57.000 And Timothy Leary comes out in his boat shoes and his flower shirt.
01:23:01.000 But they had it kind of scripted, but it was well-scripted in a way that seemed kind of spontaneous, but it was really funny.
01:23:09.000 And educational about how the government works and freedom versus security and rights.
01:23:14.000 And I thought that was brilliant.
01:23:16.000 And I think they did, I don't know, like a 50-city tour of that.
01:23:19.000 G. Gordon Liddy was on Fear Factor.
01:23:21.000 He was?
01:23:21.000 Yeah.
01:23:22.000 Oh, I didn't know that.
01:23:22.000 It's an interesting guy.
01:23:23.000 Did he hold his hand above a flame?
01:23:24.000 No, he didn't.
01:23:25.000 But we did hang him by his ankles and slam him into a pool like over and over and over again.
01:23:31.000 I forget what the stunt was, but I was like, Jesus, this guy's old to be doing this.
01:23:35.000 But he did some physical challenges, I remember thinking.
01:23:39.000 Like, this guy is more fit and more active than most young people.
01:23:45.000 And he was deep into his 60s at the time.
01:23:46.000 Yeah.
01:23:47.000 When we had him on Fear Factory.
01:23:48.000 The only thing that screwed him up was in the end, the final stunt was a driving stunt.
01:23:52.000 And it was at night.
01:23:54.000 And unfortunately, his eyes are not that good.
01:23:56.000 And he just couldn't see well without glasses.
01:23:59.000 So as he was driving the car, he slammed into something or something.
01:24:02.000 You get what it was?
01:24:03.000 What, you got him there?
01:24:05.000 No, it's all right.
01:24:06.000 But I got a chance to talk to him for a few days.
01:24:10.000 He did.
01:24:10.000 Hang out with him.
01:24:11.000 Very interesting guy.
01:24:12.000 Yeah.
01:24:13.000 Strong mind.
01:24:14.000 Yeah, that's right.
01:24:15.000 He had a talk show back in the 90s I was on when my first book came out, Why People Believe Weird Things, and I talk about conspiracies there.
01:24:21.000 So he asked me, well, tell me about conspiracies.
01:24:24.000 I said, well, you tell me about conspiracies.
01:24:26.000 You know more than I do.
01:24:27.000 He knows about real ones.
01:24:28.000 Real ones, yeah.
01:24:29.000 Yeah.
01:24:29.000 That is my number one beef with conspiracy theories, is that when you, you know, some of them that are so preposterous, like whether it's Flat Earth or the really dumb ones.
01:24:39.000 There's a base on the opposite side of the moon and NASA knows about it.
01:24:42.000 Aliens are living in New Mexico, the lizard people.
01:24:45.000 The problem with those is they undermine actual conspiracies.
01:24:49.000 Right.
01:24:52.000 And they get categorized as conspiracy theories.
01:24:57.000 Then when someone says, well, there's a conspiracy about this, well, it's already a tainted idea, because the word conspiracy is connected to nonsense.
01:25:06.000 Because there's so many nonsense conspiracy theories, it's hard to recognize, oh, something like Enron, that really did happen.
01:25:12.000 There is the Northwoods Papers.
01:25:14.000 There's a bunch of legitimate conspiracies.
01:25:17.000 You're like, wow.
01:25:18.000 You know, you found out about the Gulf of Tonkin.
01:25:19.000 You're like, well, they really did that.
01:25:21.000 Yep, that's right.
01:25:22.000 Yeah, I'm writing a paper now on why people believe conspiracies.
01:25:25.000 And so I go through the whole list of all the psychological things.
01:25:28.000 And the whole second half is because a lot of them are true.
01:25:32.000 And there are reasons we should be suspicious.
01:25:35.000 Just think of the WikiLeaks or the Panama Papers.
01:25:39.000 You know, like the Panama Papers, here's all these billionaires opening these shell corporations, keeping their money.
01:25:44.000 They're not paying tech.
01:25:45.000 That's a conspiracy, you know?
01:25:46.000 By definition, two or more people meeting in secret to conspire to benefit themselves that harms the public good or other people.
01:25:53.000 This happens a lot in the U.S. government, in corporations.
01:25:58.000 There's a reason we should be suspicious.
01:26:00.000 There is, but what is it about people that want to look for a conspiracy in everything?
01:26:05.000 Even if it's, you know, they want to see...
01:26:08.000 They want to see contrails behind jets as evidence of the government spraying things in the sky to control our minds.
01:26:16.000 Right.
01:26:16.000 So the sort of baloney detection tools are not too finely tuned.
01:26:21.000 The problem is that the tendency is to look for some global, simple explanation for complex systems.
01:26:28.000 So while we all kind of recognize, yes, we know corporations cheat and stock traders trade with inside information, but that's kind of small and mundane.
01:26:37.000 It's not very interesting.
01:26:39.000 Global domination of the world.
01:26:42.000 This is, ooh, ooh, who's doing that?
01:26:44.000 Then it becomes like a Dan Brown novel.
01:26:46.000 It's more compelling as a narrative story about how the world works.
01:26:50.000 It's super simple.
01:26:51.000 There's these 12 guys in London called the Illuminati, and they're calling the shots, and they're controlling the Bilderbergers, the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, the Illuminati, the CFR, the New World Order.
01:27:04.000 George Soros is doing it.
01:27:05.000 He's a part of it.
01:27:07.000 Oh, totally.
01:27:07.000 That's what I hear.
01:27:09.000 He's number 13 in the Illuminati.
01:27:11.000 There's so many different competing theories, too.
01:27:14.000 So a couple of criteria.
01:27:16.000 The more people that have to be involved, the less likely it is to be true.
01:27:20.000 It was Gordon Liddy that told me this, that three people can keep a secret if two of them are dead.
01:27:26.000 People can't keep their mouths shut.
01:27:28.000 And also, he would know because he worked in government, most people are pretty incompetent.
01:27:32.000 So the idea that you could orchestrate a thousand people, and each of them is going to go out and do this one thing at 9 o'clock Tuesday, and it's all going to come together just perfect, impossible.
01:27:41.000 Yeah.
01:27:42.000 And he should know.
01:27:43.000 I mean, they couldn't even break into the Watergate Hotel room to get these papers.
01:27:47.000 Well, it's also who is getting into government in the first place.
01:27:50.000 Are they the geniuses of the world, the heads of their field, or are they people that just, like, decided to get into a job?
01:27:56.000 You know, and this is a good percentage of the people that are involved in government.
01:28:00.000 If those people know as well, these unexceptional folks that are just, like, uninspired, and they're also there, like, do they – it's they.
01:28:08.000 That's – Right.
01:28:09.000 That's the they.
01:28:09.000 Air quotes, they.
01:28:10.000 Do they really have the kind of wherewithal to control the whole world?
01:28:15.000 Mind control.
01:28:16.000 That's my favorite.
01:28:17.000 Right.
01:28:17.000 Mind control.
01:28:18.000 Psy Ops.
01:28:18.000 I mean, this idea that operatives went into the World Trade Center buildings, both of them, two of the most tightly controlled and secure buildings in the world, and under the pretense of working on the elevators, managed to get into and break through the drywall to get into the main beams to wrap them up in explosive devices,
01:28:38.000 this thermite stuff.
01:28:40.000 Yeah.
01:28:40.000 We know how long it takes to demolish a stadium or a big building.
01:28:45.000 They're there for weeks or months preparing all the explosive devices.
01:28:49.000 Somehow they did this in the World Trade Center building without anyone noticing.
01:28:53.000 Not to mention all the people that worked on this.
01:28:55.000 They never told their spouses or friends or buddies what they were doing or they didn't mention it to anybody.
01:29:01.000 They don't want to go on CNN or 60 Minutes and go, I saw something and here's what happened.
01:29:07.000 Nobody.
01:29:07.000 Well, anytime you have a gigantic catastrophe like that, just a gigantic, horrific event, there's so many emotions, there's so much chaos, there's so much going on that you're going to get a bunch of really wacky eyewitness accounts because people just aren't good at remembering things when they're under extreme duress.
01:29:27.000 It's just a fact.
01:29:29.000 They hear things, they remember explosions, they see things that aren't necessarily what was really in front of them.
01:29:36.000 That's just...
01:29:37.000 The human memory is one of the most flawed ways of gathering information.
01:29:43.000 It's terrible.
01:29:44.000 We have terrible memories.
01:29:45.000 Right, and everything, once something happens, then you back up and look for all the sort of pregnant moments leading up to it that otherwise would have been unnoticeable.
01:29:55.000 With the JFK assassination, there's a famous story about the Umbrella Man.
01:29:59.000 Yes.
01:29:59.000 Okay, so there he is.
01:30:01.000 It's a clear, sunny day.
01:30:02.000 Why does he have an umbrella?
01:30:03.000 And for decades, you can go online, you can see these examples of how the umbrella could have been turned into a rifle, and then he shot like that.
01:30:12.000 Anyway, somebody finally tracked this guy down decades later, and he said, I was out there protesting Kennedy.
01:30:17.000 The umbrella was a protest, and that stems back to Neville Chamberlain coming back after meeting with Hitler before Hitler annexed – I think it was the Sudetenland – and he came back and said, you know, holding his umbrella, here Hitler signed this paper and promised he wouldn't do anything more bad.
01:30:34.000 And so the umbrella became a symbol of sort of caving into evil people or what's the word for it?
01:30:45.000 Appeasement.
01:30:46.000 How convoluted.
01:30:47.000 Do you think people are going to get that?
01:30:48.000 I don't know.
01:30:49.000 So this is what he said.
01:30:50.000 I had my umbrella because I didn't like what Kennedy was doing with Castro and the Cubans.
01:30:56.000 Okay, so in other words, the umbrella meant nothing in terms of the assassination.
01:31:01.000 Right.
01:31:01.000 And this is true, so like 9-11, oh, there was this little puff of smoke, or somebody found this passport over here, this little thing.
01:31:08.000 All those little things, really, it's just randomness.
01:31:11.000 Well, the other thing is the people that want to think that the windows blowing out are indicative of some sort of controlled demolition.
01:31:18.000 Or the buildings caving in.
01:31:21.000 The floor pancaking, it pushes the air out.
01:31:23.000 Yeah.
01:31:23.000 That's it.
01:31:24.000 Yeah.
01:31:24.000 Well, there's never been a controlled demolition that went from the top down either.
01:31:29.000 Like the way they did it, the plane slammed in.
01:31:32.000 They all go from the bottom up, right?
01:31:33.000 The one that looks crazy is Building 7, Tower 7. That one looks crazy.
01:31:38.000 It does, but it burned for like eight hours or something.
01:31:43.000 That one's just slightly fuzzier, but explosive experts tell me that it's fully explicable by burning all day.
01:31:50.000 Well also when you see the images of it collapsing what you don't see is the interior structure had collapsed previously and there's video of that where you watch the interior cave in and that as this fire was burning because apparently there was Obviously I don't know what really what happened,
01:32:06.000 but there was diesel tanks apparently in the basement and the diesel fuel had burned incredibly hot and the whole inside of it all the structure had been completely weakened and and then as it collapsed it just all gave out.
01:32:19.000 It just happened to be a shit design.
01:32:23.000 If I was the guy who owned that building, I would sue everybody.
01:32:27.000 I mean, he got his money back, I guess, because there's some insurance money.
01:32:30.000 But what a terrible design.
01:32:33.000 There was some issue with the legal insurance payout to the owner of the World Trade Center buildings, whether this was like one event or two events or one building or two.
01:32:45.000 The difference was between like $8 billion and $16 billion payout or something like that.
01:32:51.000 How do they get people to get into that new building?
01:32:54.000 I'd be like, fuck you.
01:32:55.000 I'm not renting an office in this building.
01:32:57.000 This building, they blew it up in 93. They blew it up again in 2001. Get out of here with this shit.
01:33:03.000 I'm not taking a chance at this new-ass building.
01:33:05.000 What is it, the Freedom Tower or something like that?
01:33:07.000 Freedom Tower, yeah.
01:33:08.000 That's just a big old bullseye.
01:33:09.000 Yeah, I haven't been in it yet.
01:33:11.000 I've been around it.
01:33:12.000 It's not even that big.
01:33:14.000 Well, I think it's taller than the...
01:33:16.000 It's not.
01:33:17.000 It's not.
01:33:18.000 It's not as big as the original towers, right?
01:33:20.000 I think it is as tall.
01:33:22.000 Is it?
01:33:22.000 Yeah, I think so.
01:33:23.000 I thought it was shorter.
01:33:24.000 It's definitely not as big as the one in Dubai.
01:33:26.000 The Dubai one's like a half a mile, right?
01:33:29.000 Isn't it something crazy like that?
01:33:31.000 How tall is the tallest building?
01:33:33.000 I just went to the One World Trade Center leasing page.
01:33:37.000 It says at 1,776 feet, One World Trade Center is the tallest LEED gold-certified building in the Western Hemisphere.
01:33:45.000 That's not good enough.
01:33:46.000 This is America.
01:33:47.000 We need to be number one.
01:33:48.000 We need to go straight to the moon.
01:33:50.000 In the solar system.
01:33:51.000 Yeah, we need to take an elevator right to the fucking moon.
01:33:55.000 Right outside of space.
01:33:57.000 Is that possible?
01:33:58.000 Can they build a building that's so high that it goes into space?
01:34:02.000 Why not?
01:34:02.000 No, I don't think so, because structurally it wouldn't hold.
01:34:05.000 Why not?
01:34:06.000 Make it the shape of a pyramid.
01:34:07.000 Well, it's like, why aren't trees, you know, a thousand feet tall?
01:34:11.000 Because the material would just collapse.
01:34:12.000 I don't think you could have it strong.
01:34:14.000 It'd have to be so fat.
01:34:15.000 Oh, that's right.
01:34:16.000 Japan was going to build that space elevator.
01:34:18.000 Oh, look at it.
01:34:19.000 You got jacked with the pop-ups.
01:34:21.000 Japan takes tiny first steps towards space elevator.
01:34:24.000 Yeah.
01:34:24.000 You can fuck off.
01:34:25.000 I'm not getting into that thing.
01:34:26.000 It would take a few years before I'm willing to climb into that sucker.
01:34:30.000 But...
01:34:32.000 So the other problem with conspiracies, just to get back to that for a moment, is the problem of anomalies.
01:34:36.000 What do you do with anomalies?
01:34:37.000 This is true in all science.
01:34:38.000 No theory explains every single thing that's out there that we want to study.
01:34:43.000 There's always going to be some, like, quirky thing that the main theory here that explains all these things here doesn't account for that.
01:34:50.000 Okay, what do we do with that?
01:34:51.000 Well, my joke is you assign it to a grad student.
01:34:54.000 Let them figure it out.
01:34:56.000 But what outsiders mistake is that, well, my theory explains this little anomaly, so therefore it should replace this theory.
01:35:04.000 And so people like Neil and Sean Carroll, Lawrence Krauss, Michio Kaku has like two webpages.
01:35:10.000 He has a link on his webpage.
01:35:12.000 If you have an alternative theory of physics, go to this page.
01:35:15.000 So they go there and it has, your theory has to explain all of these things over here that our theory currently explains and your, whatever your said anomaly is.
01:35:25.000 And, of course, they can't.
01:35:27.000 So it's not that scientists are dogmatically close-minded to the anomalies.
01:35:32.000 It's that we can't explain everything, and you don't have to do anything with that.
01:35:36.000 Just leave it there.
01:35:37.000 Maybe eventually they'll pile up, and there'll be a new theory, like with Einstein's relativity.
01:35:44.000 Okay, there's enough anomalies here, like the orbit of Mercury and a few other things.
01:35:49.000 And so we have to modify Newtonian physics a little bit.
01:35:53.000 Okay, that happens.
01:35:54.000 But for the most part – and so conspiracies are filled with these things.
01:35:58.000 Like the moment something big happens, you go back and – okay, but there's this weird thing here.
01:36:03.000 How do you explain that?
01:36:04.000 I don't know.
01:36:05.000 We don't have to explain everything.
01:36:07.000 Do you know that there's a growing movement that think that the space is fake?
01:36:13.000 Space is fake?
01:36:14.000 No.
01:36:14.000 This is different than the flat earthers?
01:36:16.000 Google hashtag space is fake.
01:36:17.000 Oh, no.
01:36:18.000 Hashtag space is fake is people that are so fucking stupid the flat earthers kicked them out.
01:36:23.000 Oh my god.
01:36:24.000 For real.
01:36:25.000 Flat earthers kicked out the space is fake people.
01:36:27.000 Space is fake is...
01:36:29.000 Oh my god.
01:36:29.000 They're the most skeptical.
01:36:31.000 So what would be the upper atmosphere would be the edge of the universe?
01:36:34.000 It's all bullshit.
01:36:34.000 It's all fake.
01:36:35.000 And it's tied in some weird way to religion, which is really interesting.
01:36:39.000 Because even the flat earth people, there's a tremendous amount of them that are extremely religious.
01:36:43.000 And they talk about the firmament and the Bible and that this is what's really going on.
01:36:50.000 They're trying to keep us from the knowledge that God has created this place as a very special place.
01:36:55.000 Right.
01:36:56.000 And so by pretending that it's round, they somehow or another are controlling us.
01:37:03.000 We're thinking that we're not exceptional and we're not lucky.
01:37:06.000 Space is fake.
01:37:07.000 They're using a video from Ryan Gosling's movie he just made about Neil Armstrong, The First Man on the Moon.
01:37:12.000 Just be like, look, here's proof.
01:37:15.000 This is how they fake everything.
01:37:16.000 They're making a movie.
01:37:17.000 Because the way they made the movie, that's evidence that it's fake?
01:37:22.000 I don't know if maybe this person doesn't recognize that as being Ryan Gosling right there.
01:37:27.000 He's got a NASA suit on.
01:37:28.000 Maybe it's just a troll account.
01:37:30.000 This is how NASA fakes everything.
01:37:32.000 This is the video I was talking about, guys.
01:37:35.000 Now you know it's all a big act.
01:37:37.000 Click on space is fake, though.
01:37:40.000 This is what I'm on.
01:37:41.000 I'm on the whole thread.
01:37:43.000 Yeah, but I mean click on it because there's a bunch of other ones.
01:37:44.000 Yeah, no, I'm on that thread.
01:37:45.000 There's a tremendous amount of people that literally believe that space is not real.
01:37:51.000 Google a video of Buzz Aldrin and how he deals with the no moonies that we never went to the moon.
01:37:57.000 There's a video of Buzz Aldrin punching a guy.
01:38:00.000 Yeah.
01:38:00.000 Have you seen that?
01:38:00.000 That guy.
01:38:01.000 I had dinner with that guy.
01:38:02.000 You did?
01:38:03.000 The guy he punched.
01:38:04.000 Yeah, I was a firm believer that we never went to the moon.
01:38:07.000 You were?
01:38:07.000 Yeah, this is what happened.
01:38:08.000 I watched that Fox documentary, The Moon Conspiracy Theory, Did We Go?
01:38:13.000 And I was like, holy shit.
01:38:14.000 Because it was on television.
01:38:16.000 And this was 96, 97. I remember I went to work and I told everybody, you've got to see this documentary.
01:38:24.000 It's crazy.
01:38:24.000 We never went to the moon.
01:38:25.000 And I watched that one and I watched this guy's...
01:38:31.000 What is his name?
01:38:32.000 Bart Seibel.
01:38:32.000 Bart Seibel.
01:38:34.000 So I had dinner with him.
01:38:35.000 He absolutely believes that we never went to the moon.
01:38:37.000 100% believes it.
01:38:38.000 I don't know if he still believes it.
01:38:40.000 I think he's like a cab driver or something now.
01:38:42.000 He was involved in the news or local television or something like that, back where he's from.
01:38:49.000 Then he released a documentary called A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon.
01:38:53.000 And in his documentary, one of the things he did have is some really interesting footage of the lunar module, where it looks like they're faking a shot of them being really far out, but then when they remove this cover,
01:39:09.000 the covers from all the windows that were inside the lunar, not the lunar module, what is the one, the orbiter?
01:39:17.000 It really looks like they're in low Earth orbit.
01:39:20.000 And this is like the main thing pointing to that they couldn't get out of low Earth orbit.
01:39:26.000 Then there was also the fact that they lost all of the telemetry data, which was the binary, you know, the ones and zeros that show the position of the lunar module at every stage.
01:39:38.000 There was a bunch of different things.
01:39:39.000 The fact that no one wanted, especially Neil Armstrong, he became a recluse, never wanted to talk about it.
01:39:45.000 You go and watch the press conference, the press conference, they look very shady, look like they're completely full of shit.
01:39:50.000 Yeah, but Buzz Aldrin's not like that.
01:39:52.000 He talks to everybody.
01:39:53.000 He was a drunk for a long time, though.
01:39:54.000 He was very depressed and became an alcoholic after the moon landing.
01:39:59.000 And the idea is that, in conspiracy circles, if I'm talking as them, the idea is that he got over it after a while and needed to make a living, and now he talks about it constantly.
01:40:07.000 But Neil Armstrong never did.
01:40:25.000 Some of the space walking stuff and some of the things that they would do to walk outside of a spaceship.
01:40:34.000 They had them all strapped up with cables and they're just experimenting with these things.
01:40:38.000 They took that photograph and then blacked out the background.
01:40:42.000 Probably some overzealous PR agent.
01:40:45.000 You mean when they're in the pool in Houston?
01:40:47.000 This is it right here.
01:40:48.000 So what it is is like...
01:40:50.000 So the first one is clearly he's in a studio and they're working on things and just trying to understand how all this stuff works.
01:40:58.000 And the second one, they took the exact same photo and just reversed it and blacked out the background.
01:41:03.000 But that doesn't mean that they didn't go to the moon.
01:41:06.000 That just means that someone got a hold of some photographs and faked it.
01:41:11.000 It's way more likely that there was more of that going on than that people didn't actually go to the moon.
01:41:20.000 The thing about going to the moon that's really interesting is if they can go again, and they do go again, and they find all that stuff there, You know, then everybody has to just go, oh, yeah, I guess we were wrong.
01:41:33.000 The stuff is there.
01:41:34.000 I mean, there's instruments on there that we still monitor that the Apollo astronauts left there.
01:41:39.000 Well, not necessarily monitor.
01:41:41.000 We shoot a laser up there and it bounces off.
01:41:43.000 But, you know, a laser will also bounce off the surface of the moon.
01:41:46.000 Yeah, but I don't think like that.
01:41:48.000 Not as precise.
01:41:48.000 Right.
01:41:49.000 Right, yeah.
01:41:49.000 But the Russians did that too with Lankahood 1 and 2. I believe they left solar or laser reflectors up there as well with an unmanned mission.
01:41:58.000 Japan has video footage as of like last week.
01:42:01.000 Yeah, the dark side of the moon.
01:42:02.000 And people say that's all fake too.
01:42:04.000 Of course.
01:42:05.000 Well, space is fake, dude.
01:42:06.000 There's no space.
01:42:07.000 Of course the moon's not even...
01:42:09.000 What is the moon if space is fake?
01:42:10.000 How do they explain that?
01:42:13.000 What's interesting is the images of the dark side of the moon look exactly, even like the landing and the whole setup looks very similar to the Apollo missions.
01:42:22.000 So they would have to either be in cahoots or have worked together with NASA. Same sound studio.
01:42:28.000 Yeah, to figure, they'd use the old stuff.
01:42:30.000 Yeah, look at it.
01:42:31.000 I mean, this is the footage.
01:42:32.000 I mean, goddamn, that looks eerily similar to what you saw when the Apollo astronauts were there.
01:42:40.000 I think it is entirely possible that some of the practice film footage of them on the surface or doing things turned out to be pushed off as actual footage of moon landings.
01:42:57.000 There was no television.
01:42:59.000 Back then there was no internet.
01:43:01.000 There was no VCRs.
01:43:02.000 There was no ability to review things and watch them over again.
01:43:06.000 They projected something on television one time and that was it.
01:43:10.000 So when they released pressed releases and videos, it's entirely possible that some of those videos that got through were actually just tests.
01:43:19.000 It's entirely possible that there was, just like the Michael Collins photos, that there was some fuckery going on.
01:43:24.000 You're dealing with so many human beings.
01:43:26.000 You're dealing with so many people.
01:43:28.000 See, an estimated 530 million people watched Armstrong's televised image and heard his voice described.
01:43:34.000 Okay, what does that mean?
01:43:35.000 It was broadcasted live for like six hours that day.
01:43:37.000 Yes, yeah.
01:43:38.000 It was actually broadcasted live on a projection screen.
01:43:42.000 What they did was they didn't get a straight feed.
01:43:45.000 They were filming the footage that was on a projection screen.
01:43:49.000 That's how they did it.
01:43:50.000 And there's some wonky shit that looks like they fall down and then they get pulled back up by wires when they're on the surface of the moon.
01:43:57.000 But again, I think...
01:43:59.000 How much of that is actual footage of them being on the moon?
01:44:03.000 And how much of that is just test footage?
01:44:05.000 I mean, I don't know.
01:44:07.000 I don't know.
01:44:09.000 I'm not sure about that.
01:44:10.000 But I think also, I don't know jack shit about space travel.
01:44:14.000 I don't know anything about astrophysics.
01:44:16.000 I don't know anything about, like, what it takes to land on the moon and come back and whether or not...
01:44:22.000 And most of the people that talk about this don't know.
01:44:24.000 You know, the Mythbusters did a nice episode on, you know, did we fake going to the moon, and they showed a bunch of little things.
01:44:30.000 For example, on the moon with its gravity, when you go something like that into the dust, you know, the particles come up and they arc back down in a certain way that would be different than if you're on Earth.
01:44:41.000 So the gravity is different, causes the dust to settle in a different way.
01:44:44.000 There was a bunch of things like that that proved we were there.
01:44:48.000 Well, it certainly proved that what took place took place in a vacuum.
01:44:53.000 Yeah, and a gravitational pull, the same as the moon.
01:44:57.000 Right.
01:44:58.000 You've probably seen the feather and the hammer drop.
01:45:00.000 But you know you can do that here.
01:45:02.000 Well, yes, in a vacuum, yes, that's right.
01:45:05.000 Yeah, but even a feather and a hammer, it depends upon what kind of feather it is.
01:45:12.000 But a feather and a hammer, even if you just held them here and dropped them on the ground, they probably would land at a very similar pace.
01:45:19.000 There's a spoof video about, that we never went to the moon, but a couple of British comedians.
01:45:25.000 The Kubrick thing?
01:45:26.000 Is that the Kubrick one?
01:45:27.000 No, Peele, what's their name?
01:45:30.000 Key and Peele.
01:45:31.000 Key and Peele, yeah.
01:45:32.000 So the three of them are talking and, you know, okay, we're going to fake this whole thing.
01:45:36.000 And then the troubleshooters, she's like, well, now, you know, people are going to ask, well, how did we go to the moon?
01:45:43.000 And we're going to have to, you know, build a big rocket so we can say, well, we went in that big rocket.
01:45:48.000 And they're like, well, how much would it cost to build that big rocket?
01:45:50.000 Well, it would be really expensive.
01:45:51.000 I mean, we might as well just go to the moon.
01:45:53.000 And then they start talking about the expenses.
01:45:55.000 Well, we only have to feed three of them if we go to the moon.
01:45:57.000 But if we shoot it as a shoot here in the studio, we have to have catering for everybody to be super expensive.
01:46:02.000 It kind of goes on like that.
01:46:03.000 It's very funny.
01:46:04.000 That is funny, but the conspiracy theorists would say, well, they couldn't send someone to the moon, so they had to fake it.
01:46:10.000 That's why they haven't been back.
01:46:12.000 They went from 1969 to 1973, is that what it was?
01:46:17.000 Six successful missions, seven attempts, Apollo 13 being the one that didn't make it.
01:46:23.000 It's a fun theory.
01:46:24.000 And what happened with me is I got way better at spotting bullshit and learning critical thinking skills and then paying attention to all sides.
01:46:34.000 I mean, the real issue...
01:46:37.000 With something like that, is if someone could prove, definitively, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that not only is it impossible, that no one ever went to the moon, absolutely prove it, that would be giant.
01:46:50.000 I mean, it really would be.
01:46:52.000 I mean, it would be a huge story.
01:46:54.000 But is it even possible to do that?
01:46:58.000 The other analogy I use, like with the WikiLeaks, is there, of all those tens of, hundreds of thousands of memos and papers and letters and government documents, there's not one mention anywhere of 9-11 as an inside job, you know.
01:47:10.000 And we had to allocate these funds to go to this construction company who was then, you know, seen working at the World Trade Center.
01:47:17.000 Nothing like that.
01:47:18.000 So that, in this case, the absence of evidence is evidence of absence.
01:47:22.000 It didn't happen.
01:47:23.000 Not an inside job.
01:47:25.000 The 9-11 one.
01:47:26.000 Yeah.
01:47:26.000 And something like that would be true for the moon landing.
01:47:29.000 I mean, all those people that worked on that, not one of them saw anything and wanted to write a book, go on 60 minutes.
01:47:36.000 The idea would be that it was compartmentalized and that everyone, like say if you're working on the O-rings, you don't have access to the people that are working on the thrusters.
01:47:43.000 If you have access to this, you don't have access to that.
01:47:46.000 And that there was only a very small group of people that controlled everything.
01:47:50.000 Also, 1969 was a very different environment in terms of what you could get away with and not get away with, what you could say.
01:47:56.000 It's just, it was really fun.
01:47:58.000 It was really fun to believe that they're fake going to the moon.
01:48:01.000 I spent an inordinate amount of time looking at it, but I completely dropped it.
01:48:05.000 I completely dropped it after I just...
01:48:08.000 I paid attention to what I actually know.
01:48:11.000 But now you can kind of empathize with those who do believe crazy theories.
01:48:16.000 Oh, yeah.
01:48:17.000 But you want to hear a dumber one?
01:48:18.000 Yeah.
01:48:18.000 Here's a dumber one.
01:48:19.000 For the longest time, like months, I believed in a thing called rods.
01:48:24.000 Do you know about the rods?
01:48:24.000 Yeah, I know about rods.
01:48:25.000 The little insects.
01:48:26.000 Yes.
01:48:27.000 Well, this guy put out this document.
01:48:30.000 This documentary that there was these things flying so fast we couldn't see them with the naked eye.
01:48:36.000 And that they were like jellyfish-like creatures that lived amongst us.
01:48:41.000 And they had all this video footage of especially these people that were jumping.
01:48:46.000 They were skydiving into this enormous cave in Mexico.
01:48:50.000 And as they're skydiving into this cave, you see those things flying back and forth.
01:48:54.000 And I was hook, line, and sinker.
01:48:56.000 I was like, oh my god, these things are around us all the time.
01:48:59.000 I was going outside, looking up, trying to spot them.
01:49:02.000 Like, imagine, these beings that are flying so fast that we can't see them.
01:49:06.000 The only way you capture them is on camera.
01:49:08.000 And then a show called Monster Quest cracked the riddle.
01:49:12.000 Right.
01:49:12.000 They show that it's a video artifact.
01:49:14.000 And then if you have really high speed camera, you just see the insect.
01:49:18.000 But if you have low speed, standard definition video cameras, it creates this artifact as these things pass by very close to the lens at a high rate of speed, it elongates their video signal and it makes them look like this jellyfish type thing.
01:49:33.000 But it's really just a video artifact.
01:49:36.000 Yeah, again, it's a good example of anomalies.
01:49:38.000 You know, here's this weird video anomaly.
01:49:40.000 What is it?
01:49:41.000 How about just say, I don't know.
01:49:43.000 Well, if you don't know anything about video, it's way easier to say, oh, they captured something.
01:49:49.000 You know, take a camera, put it outside.
01:49:51.000 You will capture these things.
01:49:52.000 Amazing.
01:49:53.000 Right.
01:49:54.000 Yeah.
01:49:54.000 That's right.
01:49:55.000 The other aspect with conspiracy theories is cognitive dissonance.
01:49:59.000 That is, we want the size of the event to be matched by a cause that's equally of that size.
01:50:05.000 So the analogy I use is, you know, the Holocaust, the worst genocide in human history caused by the Nazis, the worst regime, political regime in human history.
01:50:15.000 There's a match there.
01:50:16.000 Right.
01:50:16.000 But if you say something like, you know, JFK, the leader of the free world, brought down by who?
01:50:22.000 Lee Harvey Oswald?
01:50:23.000 Just some nobody?
01:50:24.000 You know, there's this mismatch.
01:50:25.000 Or 9-11, this huge thing by 19 guys with box cutters?
01:50:28.000 Do you think that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone?
01:50:30.000 Yeah.
01:50:31.000 Do you really?
01:50:31.000 What makes you think that?
01:50:33.000 All of the evidence, and none of the evidence against anybody else, and all of the evidence against, particularly him.
01:50:39.000 Gerald Posner's book, Case Closed, and then the attorney, what's his name, that was the Manson attorney.
01:50:48.000 I forget his name.
01:50:49.000 He has a massive book where he lines up every single one of the arguments by the JFK conspiracy.
01:50:55.000 For example, Experisists make a big deal about how Oswald got a job at the Book Depository building, which just happened to be where the parade route was going, so he could have a clear shot.
01:51:07.000 So it was Posner that tracked down when the White House determined, even when Kennedy was going to Dallas, let alone what the parade route would be, and Oswald already had the job there.
01:51:17.000 That's just chance.
01:51:19.000 He knew in advance, bro.
01:51:21.000 That's right.
01:51:22.000 He knew the future.
01:51:22.000 Do you think it's possible that Oswald was in cahoots?
01:51:26.000 No.
01:51:27.000 No?
01:51:27.000 No.
01:51:28.000 Why do you think that?
01:51:28.000 What about the magic bullet theory?
01:51:31.000 Well, that's been settled by the fact that the way it's shown in the videos is that the two seats are like this, and that the bullet has to do this.
01:51:38.000 Well, in fact, the seats were like that, and that Connelly was down here in Kennedy.
01:51:42.000 Well, you're explaining this in audio form, just when you're saying it's like stadium seating.
01:51:47.000 One's elevated above the other one.
01:51:48.000 That's right.
01:51:49.000 So the bullet actually, when it passes through the neck, Through Kennedy's neck and then hits Connolly's shoulder, it is already moving down.
01:51:57.000 I think it hit his wrist.
01:51:58.000 It fractured his wrist.
01:51:59.000 Right.
01:52:01.000 This has been tested and tested and tested.
01:52:03.000 Well, sort of.
01:52:04.000 Here's my issue with it.
01:52:05.000 There's a couple issues.
01:52:06.000 One, on the pro side, the idea that bullets will take a straight path is ridiculous.
01:52:12.000 I've talked to hunters that have shot animals...
01:52:20.000 We're good to go.
01:52:32.000 Well-versed in firearms and shot animals and hunted.
01:52:38.000 Sometimes a bullet goes straight through, and sometimes it hits bones and wacky things happen, things deflect.
01:52:45.000 But on the negative side, they always distort.
01:52:48.000 Bullets always distort, particularly when they hit bone.
01:52:51.000 What bothered me was that they found that bullet in Connelly's gurney, When they brought him to the hospital, they just conveniently found this bullet.
01:52:59.000 Aha!
01:53:00.000 We have it.
01:53:00.000 This is the bullet.
01:53:01.000 It matches the same rifle.
01:53:04.000 But it wasn't pristine.
01:53:05.000 It was flattened.
01:53:06.000 Barely.
01:53:07.000 If you look at that bullet, that bullet is nothing like a bullet that's hit bone.
01:53:11.000 When bullets hit bone, they mushroom, they balloon, they bend, they distort wildly.
01:53:16.000 They don't come out looking like that.
01:53:18.000 They come out looking like that when you shoot them into water or when you shoot them into feathers.
01:53:22.000 They don't come out looking like that under normal circumstances when they shatter the bone of two different people.
01:53:28.000 Well, do you know that for sure?
01:53:30.000 No, I do not know that for sure.
01:53:31.000 But one thing I do know a lot about is I know quite a bit about what bullets look like when they hit things.
01:53:38.000 I've looked into this pretty extensively and I've talked to a lot of people in law enforcement, military, hunters, and none of them believe that that bullet Hit bones, shattered bones, and came out looking like that.
01:53:50.000 Is it possible that that bullet was the only bullet ever in the history of the world that did do that?
01:53:55.000 Yeah, it might be.
01:53:56.000 Okay, so we're getting kind of caught up in the weeds of the anomalies.
01:54:00.000 Just the bullet.
01:54:02.000 Oswald himself had attempted to assassinate a general named Walker six months before.
01:54:08.000 With his rifle and a handgun, and he went over to the house.
01:54:11.000 He took a shot through the guys when he saw him at the desk, took a shot, missed him.
01:54:16.000 He told his wife about it.
01:54:18.000 He's, I'm a revolutionary.
01:54:19.000 I'm trying to start something here.
01:54:21.000 Don't get me wrong.
01:54:21.000 I'm not saying that Oswald was innocent.
01:54:23.000 I'm not.
01:54:24.000 I mean, and I think it's very possible that Oswald did shoot at the president.
01:54:28.000 He might have even hit the president.
01:54:30.000 It's also very possibly that some other people were involved as well.
01:54:33.000 Who?
01:54:34.000 I don't know.
01:54:34.000 See, this is the problem.
01:54:35.000 But wait a minute.
01:54:36.000 Why is it a problem?
01:54:36.000 If you don't know who they are, just because you don't know who they are doesn't mean they didn't exist.
01:54:40.000 Okay, but why do we need to postulate extra people?
01:54:43.000 Because of all the gunshots that happened in a short amount of time.
01:54:46.000 The reason why they came up with the theory of the magic bullet in the first place, because they had to account for a bullet that hit a curb underneath the overpass.
01:54:54.000 Do you know that, right?
01:54:55.000 Yeah, well, okay, there's...
01:54:56.000 Do you know why they came up with the...
01:54:59.000 Yeah, I've been there.
01:55:00.000 Do you know why they came up with the...
01:55:01.000 But it's short.
01:55:01.000 I mean, it's right there.
01:55:02.000 You can hardly miss.
01:55:04.000 That's not the point.
01:55:04.000 Well, that's sort of true.
01:55:06.000 Yeah, it's not a far shot.
01:55:08.000 And he was a pretty good marksman.
01:55:10.000 Posner tracked down his...
01:55:11.000 We're not talking about that.
01:55:12.000 We're talking about the reason why they came up with the magic bullet theory in the first place.
01:55:15.000 Do you know why?
01:55:15.000 Well, I thought it was because of the alignment of the seats.
01:55:19.000 No, because they had to attribute three shots...
01:55:23.000 They had to figure out, and one of them, they were thinking, well, all these wounds came from three bullets.
01:55:28.000 But then they found a bullet that had hit the curb on the underside, and a guy checked into a hospital because he was hit with a ricochet.
01:55:34.000 So there's a curb that they proved was hit with a bullet.
01:55:38.000 There was a bullet hole in the granite or whatever the fuck the curb's made out of.
01:55:42.000 It hit this guy.
01:55:43.000 He went to the hospital, so he was hit with a ricochet.
01:55:47.000 So they knew that one bullet had not hit the president, and so they had to attribute all of these wounds to one bullet now.
01:55:55.000 They had one bullet that landed into his neck, another bullet that hit him in the head.
01:55:59.000 So how do these three bullets cause a wound on Connolly as well?
01:56:04.000 Then they came up with the...
01:56:05.000 There's the bullet.
01:56:06.000 Look at that bullet, bro.
01:56:07.000 But you have to look at the end.
01:56:09.000 It's flattened if you look at it from the end...
01:56:11.000 No, it's not.
01:56:12.000 Look at this.
01:56:24.000 Here's the thing.
01:56:25.000 I don't necessarily think that...
01:56:29.000 There was some grand conspiracy, but I do think it's entirely possible that someone took that posthumously, took that rifle, and wanted to pin it on Lee Harvey Oswald definitively.
01:56:39.000 Look, there's people that do things when they know someone's guilty, and they plant evidence.
01:56:43.000 Mark Furman did that with O.J. Simpson.
01:56:45.000 They found his glove, and they planted evidence.
01:56:48.000 And that was one of the reasons why O.J. got off, because there was some sort of conspiring to make it look like he was, you know, the evidence was a clear path.
01:56:56.000 They could have just taken that rifle and...
01:56:59.000 Look, it could have been that Oswald did it alone.
01:57:01.000 It's possible.
01:57:02.000 But it also could have been that some other people were shooting at him, too.
01:57:05.000 It could have been that they had decided to have Oswald be a part of this.
01:57:09.000 And when Jack Ruby ran in and shot him, that doesn't look a little suspicious?
01:57:12.000 That some guy with ties to the mob gets right up to this guy who just shot the president and shoots him?
01:57:18.000 Like, why?
01:57:18.000 He's never shot anybody before.
01:57:20.000 Do it publicly?
01:57:21.000 Posner talks about Ruby's character and who he was, major Kennedy supporter.
01:57:27.000 Running with some bad dudes, some bad hombres there in Texas, and he was a gun owner.
01:57:33.000 Security wasn't anything like it is now.
01:57:35.000 He really could just walk right in like he did.
01:57:38.000 It's possible, but it's also possible that that guy owed something to the mob, and this is what they told him to do.
01:57:44.000 You're going to get rid of that guy.
01:57:45.000 No one's going to care.
01:57:46.000 They're going to be happy.
01:57:46.000 Fuck that guy.
01:57:47.000 He just shot the president.
01:57:48.000 Who knows?
01:57:49.000 It seems so...
01:57:51.000 It seems like people want it to be one way or the other, and they want this case closed option.
01:57:58.000 It doesn't have to be that way.
01:57:59.000 I mean, Lincoln was assassinated by a conspiracy, and that was evident pretty quickly afterwards, and they rounded him up.
01:58:06.000 World War I was launched by a conspiracy with the assassination of Franz Ferdinand by a Serbian group called the Black Hand, a group of nationalists.
01:58:14.000 Well, we already talked about the Vietnam War, too, the Gulf of Tonkin incident.
01:58:17.000 That's a false flag.
01:58:18.000 So these things do happen.
01:58:20.000 They're all false flags.
01:58:21.000 There are conspiracies to assassinate foreign leaders.
01:58:24.000 Hitch wrote this book on Kissinger as a war criminal, that all the shenanigans we were doing in South America with dictators there were backing this dictator because he's a son of a bitch, but he's our son of a bitch versus this guy, and we're going to assassinate Castro,
01:58:39.000 all the stuff that came out that Johnson tried to cover up that came out.
01:58:43.000 In the Pentagon Papers about Kennedy plotting to have Castro assassinated, that's a kind of conspiracy.
01:58:52.000 Absolutely, this does happen.
01:58:53.000 The question is, did it happen in that particular case or this one or here?
01:58:57.000 And the evidence, in my opinion, after reading particularly Gerald Posner's book, Case Closed, it's There's a funny internet meme that went around last week of a guy that dies goes to heaven and God says, you've been such a good fellow your whole life.
01:59:12.000 I'll grant you one which you can ask me anything.
01:59:15.000 He said, all right, who killed Kennedy?
01:59:16.000 And God said, it was Lee Harvey Oswald acting alone using his own Carcano rifle.
01:59:21.000 And the guy goes, this goes higher up than I thought.
01:59:27.000 That's funny, man.
01:59:28.000 Did you ever read David Lifton's novel?
01:59:30.000 Or a book about it, rather?
01:59:33.000 Yeah.
01:59:33.000 Best Evidence?
01:59:34.000 Best Evidence.
01:59:35.000 I didn't read the whole book when I was researching this back in the 90s after the Oliver Stone film came out.
01:59:43.000 Because after that, when that came out, I thought, man, if only half of this or 10% of this is true, it's definitely a conspiracy.
01:59:50.000 But then there are websites dedicated to everything he got wrong there.
01:59:53.000 Well, he made people up.
01:59:54.000 Like the general, the Donald Sutherland character, that guy doesn't even exist.
01:59:58.000 He just used him as a theatrical tool.
02:00:01.000 Yeah, a very distorting film.
02:00:02.000 But film is such a powerful medium that it's hard to overcome that.
02:00:06.000 Well, that movie in particular, you've got Kevin Costner, who's the good guy.
02:00:09.000 Everybody's in that.
02:00:10.000 Everybody loves it.
02:00:12.000 Jack Lemmon and Walter Matthau.
02:00:15.000 It's a crazy movie.
02:00:16.000 And it really has you believing that there's some sort of a conspiracy.
02:00:19.000 Back and to the left.
02:00:20.000 Back and to the left.
02:00:22.000 Here's the thing about that, though.
02:00:23.000 I've looked at that over and over again.
02:00:26.000 Yes, it is back and to the left, but the spray kind of comes out of the front.
02:00:31.000 Yeah, it does, yeah.
02:00:32.000 Yeah, it kind of comes out the front, and one thing that does happen when people or things get shot is you have nerves, and nerves react, and things do weird results in your body.
02:00:46.000 If you get hit by something, it doesn't...
02:00:48.000 Well, like the throat one where his hands come up like that.
02:00:52.000 Well, he's grabbing his neck, apparently.
02:00:54.000 That was the other thing, was there was a difference in the autopsy results from Bethesda, Maryland versus in Dallas, Texas.
02:00:59.000 Dallas, Texas...
02:01:00.000 They attributed the throat wound to a frontal shot that something hit him in the front.
02:01:07.000 And then the Bethesda, Maryland, they said that it was a trach wound.
02:01:11.000 They opened him up to clear his breathing pathway.
02:01:14.000 And then the conspiracy theorists would say, why would you clear the breathing pathway of a guy who doesn't have a brain?
02:01:19.000 His brain was shot out of his head.
02:01:20.000 There's a lot of shenanigans.
02:01:22.000 I just don't like when people say they know one way or another.
02:01:25.000 We Harvey Oswald acted alone.
02:01:27.000 How the fuck could you know?
02:01:28.000 There was also bullet fragments in Connelly's wrist that weren't missing from the bullet itself.
02:01:34.000 The bullet itself, whether you think it's pristine or not, it's still not missing a lot of fragments.
02:01:40.000 And there's fragments in Connelly's body that you could detect on an x-ray.
02:01:44.000 There's x-rays of his wrist.
02:01:46.000 And you could see the little pieces of the bullet.
02:01:47.000 I don't know.
02:01:48.000 I don't know what the explanation for that is.
02:01:49.000 Exactly!
02:01:50.000 That's my point.
02:01:51.000 But the fact that I don't know, I'm not the world's expert on this stuff.
02:01:53.000 People want to clean it up.
02:01:54.000 That's what I don't like.
02:01:55.000 They want to clean it up or they want to muddy it up.
02:01:57.000 Instead of looking at it 100% objectively, they want one thing or another.
02:02:02.000 I think it's entirely possible that Lee Harvey Oswald...
02:02:05.000 It's either, to me, they want to say...
02:02:07.000 These are the two narratives.
02:02:09.000 Lee Harvey Oswald was a patsy, he had nothing to do with it, the government set him up, or he acted alone.
02:02:14.000 Yeah.
02:02:18.000 Yeah.
02:02:22.000 Yeah.
02:02:25.000 Yeah.
02:02:37.000 Who's to say that he wasn't with other people and they killed him because this guy was going to go to jail and he was going to start talking?
02:02:43.000 When they arrested him, he said, I'm a patsy.
02:02:46.000 I'm just a patsy.
02:02:47.000 And then, blam!
02:02:48.000 He's dead.
02:02:48.000 Oh, we got him.
02:02:49.000 And that's it.
02:02:50.000 Wrap it up tight.
02:02:50.000 It wasn't until the Zapruder film that people really started to question.
02:02:53.000 And I think that was...
02:02:56.000 It might have been ten years later, right?
02:02:58.000 We've talked about this.
02:02:59.000 You know the whole history of the Zapruder film, how it was released?
02:03:02.000 The Geraldo Rivera show.
02:03:04.000 Isn't that crazy?
02:03:05.000 Dick Gregory, a comedian, brought the film footage to the Geraldo Rivera show and showed it on television for the first time.
02:03:14.000 Life Magazine had the rights and didn't do anything with it.
02:03:34.000 The American, what was it?
02:03:36.000 Oh, that's crazy!
02:03:38.000 75!
02:03:39.000 So all those years later, and then people got a chance to see the footage, and they were like, whoa, this is not how it was described to us at all.
02:03:45.000 And it made people skeptical.
02:03:47.000 There's a good NOVA show on ballistics and the head and testing the rifle and could you shoot that many times and that many seconds and so on.
02:03:55.000 To me, it's pretty convincing.
02:03:57.000 The problem with me is I know too much about what happens when bullets hit bones.
02:04:01.000 I don't buy that that was the bullet.
02:04:03.000 I think they could have just dropped that bullet off.
02:04:06.000 It doesn't mean that Lee Harvey Oswald didn't do it.
02:04:09.000 The thing about that bullet, though, is that there might be some fuckery involved.
02:04:12.000 And the David Lifton book, that was the book that got me into conspiracies.
02:04:17.000 That fucking book, goddammit.
02:04:19.000 If I could go back and not read it.
02:04:21.000 I bombed on stage because of that book.
02:04:23.000 You did?
02:04:23.000 Yeah, well, it was my fault.
02:04:24.000 But I read that book the day I was performing.
02:04:29.000 And I was freaking out.
02:04:30.000 Because I was like 24 or something like that.
02:04:33.000 I was like, oh, this is crazy!
02:04:34.000 They killed the president!
02:04:35.000 You know, I was so naive.
02:04:38.000 I was, like, really bummed out when I went on stage.
02:04:40.000 And then I realized, like, oh, you can't – like, I didn't know any better.
02:04:44.000 I'd only been doing comedy for three years.
02:04:45.000 I'm like, oh, you can't go on stage bummed out.
02:04:47.000 Like, you've got to get your head together.
02:04:48.000 You can't just say the jokes and not have some emotional attachment to them.
02:04:51.000 But that book highlights – what it was was Lifton was a bookkeeper or an accountant, I believe.
02:04:58.000 And he was hired to do something with the Warren Commission Report.
02:05:03.000 And because he found some contradictions, and he went over the entire Warren Commission Report, which is an enormous, enormous publication, and he found all of these problems, all of these problems in the Warren Commission Report, and all these contradictions.
02:05:19.000 It was his determination after reading everything and writing his book.
02:05:23.000 He thought that the conclusion they made, they made before the fact and that they wrote all this stuff to sort of back up their conclusion that it wasn't based entirely on an objective version of the facts and of the event itself.
02:05:39.000 And his take was there was a conspiracy.
02:05:42.000 Well, it's launched a mini-industry of books and films.
02:05:45.000 It has, man.
02:05:46.000 Think about all the money that's been made off of the Kennedy assassination.
02:05:48.000 You could go down the rabbit hole with this stuff endlessly.
02:05:52.000 Did you ever see the Jesse Ventura version of it?
02:05:55.000 He believes everything's a conspiracy.
02:05:58.000 He's the best.
02:05:59.000 I was on his conspiracy show.
02:06:01.000 Were you?
02:06:02.000 Yeah, he's out there.
02:06:03.000 Oh yeah, he believes it.
02:06:04.000 Yeah, he was like, no one could have made that shot!
02:06:07.000 They definitely could have made that shot.
02:06:09.000 It's a rifle.
02:06:10.000 It's not that far.
02:06:11.000 And just because someone gets lucky doesn't mean they can't get lucky.
02:06:15.000 Like, people get lucky all the time.
02:06:16.000 People flip a coin and it lands on heads a mile away.
02:06:20.000 I mean, you know, you could throw a coin.
02:06:22.000 You could throw a coin out of a helicopter, you know?
02:06:26.000 And you could say, this is going to be heads when it lands.
02:06:30.000 And it can be heads.
02:06:31.000 You can get lucky.
02:06:32.000 It really is possible.
02:06:34.000 Well, this assassination of Franz Ferdinand that triggered the First World War, they messed up.
02:06:41.000 I mean, they had like seven of them, and they met in secret, and they got their weapons that morning, and so on, and a couple of them chickened out, somebody else got lost.
02:06:48.000 There's like three of them there.
02:06:49.000 Somebody threw a hand grenade, missed, rolled into the car behind Franz Ferdinand, and they got hurt and went to the hospital, and he's like, oh, fuck this.
02:06:59.000 I'm not giving my speech.
02:07:00.000 Let's go to the hospital and visit, see how he's doing.
02:07:02.000 So they double back like half an hour later.
02:07:05.000 They double back and come back down the same route.
02:07:07.000 And the guy who had missed, he was just sitting there on the curb.
02:07:10.000 It's like, oh, fuck, here they are.
02:07:11.000 Bam!
02:07:12.000 Yeah.
02:07:12.000 Pure luck.
02:07:13.000 Pure luck.
02:07:14.000 Yeah?
02:07:14.000 Yeah.
02:07:14.000 That does happen.
02:07:15.000 Yeah?
02:07:16.000 Yeah.
02:07:16.000 I mean, I think that history turns more on that kind of thing than on carefully orchestrated, perfectly executed plots.
02:07:23.000 Sure.
02:07:24.000 It certainly can.
02:07:25.000 But, you know, the idea that...
02:07:27.000 I've always found it offensive, the idea that there's no way Oswald could have hit him.
02:07:32.000 Like, people say that.
02:07:33.000 Like, there's no way.
02:07:34.000 There's no way.
02:07:35.000 Like, you never shot anything.
02:07:36.000 Right.
02:07:37.000 That's crazy.
02:07:38.000 I can make that shot.
02:07:39.000 100%.
02:07:40.000 Yeah.
02:07:41.000 Look, if you have a rifle with a scope and a guy is 100 yards away, you tell him you can't shoot him?
02:07:46.000 Right.
02:07:47.000 That's crazy talk.
02:07:48.000 That's crazy talk.
02:07:49.000 The rifle was out of line.
02:07:50.000 That was the other thing they said.
02:07:51.000 The scope wasn't lined up correctly.
02:07:54.000 Here's the thing, folks.
02:07:56.000 If you have a rifle, okay, and this has happened to me before, and you drop the rifle, the scope gets damaged.
02:08:01.000 It gets moved.
02:08:02.000 It's a very sensitive thing.
02:08:04.000 Like, when you're talking about something that goes faster than the speed of sound, a bullet, boom, firing out of a rifle.
02:08:12.000 That is going incredibly fast, and to be able to get that reticle exactly on where you think that bullet's going to hit requires a lot of adjustments.
02:08:20.000 When you go to the range, they set up a lead sled.
02:08:22.000 You put your rifle down on this sled so you're not holding the rifle.
02:08:26.000 And by the way, Osball wasn't holding it either.
02:08:29.000 The idea was that he had it rested.
02:08:30.000 Right.
02:08:31.000 Which makes it much more steady and much more easier to make an accurate shot.
02:08:34.000 So you set up this rifle on the lead sled, and it's usually 100 yards or 200 yards, however far the distance is to the target.
02:08:42.000 You squeeze, squeeze, squeeze, boom, the trigger goes off, and you see that the bullet is low and to the left by a couple inches.
02:08:49.000 You make an adjustment on the scope.
02:08:51.000 If you drop that rifle, that scope gets knocked, the adjustment's out the window.
02:08:55.000 So the idea that there's like a perfect chain of command between Lee Harvey Oswald pulling that trigger and that scope never got rattled at all.
02:09:02.000 No, but the conspiracy theorists want you to think there's no way he could have made that shot.
02:09:07.000 That scope wasn't even lined up good.
02:09:09.000 How the fuck do you know?
02:09:10.000 How do you know?
02:09:11.000 You don't know.
02:09:12.000 Anybody who knows anything about rifles knows there's no way you could know.
02:09:15.000 Because all you'd have to do is whack it.
02:09:17.000 Here, I'm going to bring you the rifle and just bump it with your elbow funny.
02:09:21.000 Knock it into a wall when you're handing it to someone and that scope's going to be off.
02:09:25.000 So then you take it to a range.
02:09:27.000 We're going to prove definitively that he could have never made this shot because his scope is off.
02:09:30.000 Boom!
02:09:31.000 Look!
02:09:31.000 It's six inches to the left.
02:09:33.000 Wow!
02:09:33.000 Case closed.
02:09:34.000 Right.
02:09:35.000 No, there's no way people know whether or not that scope was on when he was pulling that trigger.
02:09:42.000 There's no way you know.
02:09:43.000 When I went to Dealey Plaza, it's so big in our public imagination.
02:09:47.000 It's not.
02:09:48.000 It's not.
02:09:48.000 You go there and you're like, this is it?
02:09:50.000 It's tiny.
02:09:50.000 It's so small.
02:09:51.000 And then you go up to the museum and you're on the sixth floor, the book depository, and you look down and they have an X, the two X's in the street.
02:09:58.000 And you think, that's just right there.
02:10:00.000 Dude, I could shoot that with an arrow.
02:10:02.000 I bet you could.
02:10:03.000 I can.
02:10:03.000 I guarantee you.
02:10:04.000 If you give me some time, you give me some time.
02:10:06.000 If you put a target right where that thing was, right where that Lincoln was, and you put me in that window, I guarantee you I hit that target with a bow.
02:10:15.000 Right.
02:10:16.000 The idea that you couldn't...
02:10:17.000 I'm holding it.
02:10:18.000 No rest.
02:10:19.000 The idea that you couldn't do that with a rifle?
02:10:22.000 You certainly could.
02:10:24.000 Lee Harvey Oswald certainly could have done it.
02:10:26.000 He certainly could have shot at Kennedy.
02:10:28.000 He was a crazy fuck.
02:10:30.000 Lee Harvey Oswald was involved in a lot of shady shit.
02:10:32.000 It wasn't like he was just some dentist somewhere.
02:10:35.000 And he scored the second highest marksmanship.
02:10:40.000 There it is, right here to here, right?
02:10:41.000 Dude, that's so small.
02:10:42.000 That is such a short distance.
02:10:44.000 Then the other question I had, when you're coming up Houston Street and going left, I always wondered why he didn't shoot him there when the car's coming right at him.
02:10:53.000 What was in the other window?
02:10:55.000 He was in the window on the left-hand side.
02:10:56.000 He was over there.
02:10:57.000 No, no.
02:10:58.000 No, no.
02:10:58.000 It's...
02:10:59.000 Uh-uh.
02:10:59.000 It's over here?
02:11:00.000 Yeah, it's right there.
02:11:01.000 That's where he shot him from?
02:11:02.000 That window there?
02:11:03.000 Yeah.
02:11:03.000 So I always wondered why he didn't shoot him when the car was coming right at him, because that would have been a cleaner shot, it seems to me.
02:11:09.000 Head-on, you mean?
02:11:10.000 Yeah.
02:11:10.000 Yeah.
02:11:12.000 Maybe we want to shoot him in the back of the head.
02:11:14.000 Does it have a sniper?
02:11:16.000 Maybe panic.
02:11:17.000 It's that upper right, yeah.
02:11:18.000 Ooh, look at that.
02:11:19.000 3D. Wow.
02:11:21.000 Yeah, when we drove through it, not last time I was in Dallas, a couple times ago, but when we drove through it, it's like, it's eerie.
02:11:27.000 You're like, wow.
02:11:28.000 Yeah.
02:11:28.000 It all happened right here.
02:11:30.000 I've been twice there, and there's always conspiracy people walking around.
02:11:33.000 They're looking for a tip, so I gave this guy 10 bucks.
02:11:35.000 They go, all right, give me the whole story.
02:11:37.000 And, oh, he was very entertaining.
02:11:38.000 Okay, here's the grassy knoll, the pickety fence.
02:11:40.000 Yeah.
02:11:40.000 And he had another one about this man.
02:11:42.000 He took the manhole cover off.
02:11:43.000 He goes, there was somebody down here in the manhole.
02:11:45.000 Oh.
02:11:45.000 Oh.
02:11:46.000 Popped up.
02:11:46.000 Bam.
02:11:46.000 Shot him.
02:11:47.000 Went back down in the manhole.
02:11:47.000 My favorite dumb conspiracy is they believe that the driver turned around and shot Kenny.
02:11:52.000 Right.
02:11:52.000 That's the best one.
02:11:53.000 Right.
02:11:54.000 Yeah.
02:11:54.000 Those are the space's fake people.
02:11:56.000 Right.
02:11:56.000 What do you You're always going to get a bunch of really wacky conspiracies whenever anything happens in the news, whatever it is, anything and everything.
02:12:05.000 Particularly if it's big and famous, again, back to this cognitive dissonance, like Princess Di, cause of death, drunk driving, speeding, no seatbelt.
02:12:14.000 Tens of thousands of people died.
02:12:15.000 The guy was drunk?
02:12:16.000 He was drunk, yep.
02:12:18.000 The driver of her car was drunk?
02:12:19.000 I didn't know that.
02:12:20.000 Well, drunk.
02:12:20.000 He was partially drunk.
02:12:22.000 He was tipsy drunk.
02:12:24.000 Wow.
02:12:24.000 I didn't know that.
02:12:25.000 Yeah, that's right.
02:12:26.000 So drunk driving, speeding, and she wasn't wearing a seatbelt.
02:12:29.000 Why wasn't she wearing a seatbelt?
02:12:31.000 But it doesn't feel like someone like Princess Di should die the way tens of thousands of Americans die in automobiles every year.
02:12:39.000 Seems like there should be the MI5 and the royal family and the Arabs and the Palestinians.
02:12:46.000 Everybody was involved.
02:12:48.000 Well, here's an example of an absolute conspiracy that we know was a conspiracy.
02:12:53.000 Jamal Khosoggi.
02:12:55.000 Yes, right.
02:12:55.000 Yeah, good example.
02:12:57.000 This kind of stuff does happen.
02:12:58.000 This is a real conspiracy.
02:12:59.000 That guy was murdered.
02:13:00.000 He went to the Saudi embassy in Turkey.
02:13:04.000 They had him set up.
02:13:05.000 They flew in 15 people, including a guy who was a...
02:13:11.000 He was a forensics expert, and he was an expert in forensics evidence, and they think that he was there to make sure that there was nothing left behind.
02:13:20.000 This is the official story.
02:13:22.000 They strangled him, caught him up, and there's even recordings, apparently, that people have listened to.
02:13:28.000 That goes all the way to the top, Saudi Arabia.
02:13:32.000 What is this, Jamie?
02:13:33.000 That's the last video I've seen him.
02:13:36.000 Oh, the body double video?
02:13:37.000 Yeah, that's him walking in, and then it's the last time he was seen.
02:13:40.000 Yeah.
02:13:40.000 He entered into there and there was 15 different dudes that were waiting for him.
02:13:46.000 They killed him, chopped him up, and there's videos of those guys leaving with suitcases.
02:13:51.000 And they say that the suitcases had his body in them.
02:13:54.000 Yeah.
02:13:54.000 Chopped up.
02:13:56.000 Yeah, it's...
02:13:58.000 That's real.
02:13:59.000 But that's also, you know, Saudi Arabia, they can get away with some pretty sketchy shit.
02:14:04.000 And it seems like nothing's going to happen, right?
02:14:06.000 Like a few people got fired?
02:14:08.000 Well, I have to say on this that Michael Moore's film on 9-11, he made the point, he was the first I'd seen make the point, that the Saudi Arabia family got out of the United States on 9-12 when all flights were canceled.
02:14:23.000 Yes.
02:14:24.000 And that Bush let them, you know, And now here we see that Trump doesn't want to condemn the Saudis because they're our allies.
02:14:32.000 So there's a bunch of shit in there.
02:14:34.000 It goes all the way back to 9-11.
02:14:36.000 And we know the Saudis bankrolled most of the 19 hijackers.
02:14:43.000 Yeah.
02:14:44.000 So that's the kind of conspiracy that we should be paying attention to.
02:14:48.000 Not that Bush was involved and made it happen in the secret – this is the kind of shit that really happens in politics.
02:14:54.000 People are banking each other, so we have to be nice to each other and overlook it.
02:15:00.000 Like when Trump said, Putin murders people.
02:15:04.000 Oh, well, everybody does that.
02:15:06.000 What?
02:15:07.000 Yeah.
02:15:08.000 Well, we do some terrible things, too.
02:15:10.000 And that's true.
02:15:12.000 Well, it is true.
02:15:13.000 And, you know, I guess he's got a point.
02:15:15.000 But, yeah, there's so much money.
02:15:19.000 There's so much money involved in Saudi Arabia.
02:15:21.000 In this article I was writing, I cited the criminologist Manuel Eisner in a study of 1,500 monarchs in 45 monarchies across Europe between AD 600 and 1800. Found that about 15% of them,
02:15:36.000 227, were assassinated, corresponding to a homicide rate of about 1,000 per 100,000 ruler years, 10 times the background rate.
02:15:44.000 So in other words, assassinations in history are pretty common.
02:15:47.000 This is how power often changes hands before liberal democracy spread and after 1970s.
02:15:53.000 This was not uncommon.
02:15:55.000 So we shouldn't be surprised that people believe this kind of stuff because there's some truth to that.
02:16:00.000 The Khashoggi thing is unsettling to folks because what he was killed for, they think, well, there's two different versions of it, right?
02:16:08.000 He was killed for criticizing the Saudi Arabian government, but there's also that he was criticized because he was aware, or he was killed, rather, because he was aware of some spy software that's being utilized and that if he wrote a story about this spy software being utilized by the Saudi Arabian government that it would be a huge disaster Could be.
02:16:35.000 Yeah.
02:16:35.000 I mean, there's probably more.
02:16:37.000 I'm sure there's a lot we don't know.
02:16:39.000 So here's my concession to conspiracy theories.
02:16:42.000 When you get elected president, they take you in the back room and they go, okay, here's what's actually going on.
02:16:46.000 Right.
02:16:46.000 Oh, shit, I can't close Gitmo.
02:16:48.000 No, I can't close Gitmo because no one will take those bad dudes.
02:16:50.000 Okay, but I was going to pull the troops out of Afghanistan.
02:16:53.000 No, I can't pull the troops out of Afghanistan if we do that.
02:16:55.000 Here's what happens.
02:16:56.000 Oh, shit, but we don't know this.
02:16:58.000 Right.
02:16:58.000 We know this.
02:16:59.000 And I think that something like that does go on, maybe not quite so secretly, but just that, you know, you and I don't need to know these things.
02:17:06.000 We need to know basis, and the President does.
02:17:26.000 Yeah, I think I think you're correct.
02:17:31.000 I suspect the same thing.
02:17:32.000 What's fascinating to me about Trump is that he doesn't seem to care at all about violating protocol or about releasing information that he probably should.
02:17:44.000 I mean, he's already accidentally released top secret information.
02:17:49.000 I would just feel like if he knew for sure some stuff, he would be the last guy you would want to trust with that.
02:17:58.000 Right.
02:18:00.000 I know.
02:18:00.000 But, you know, this thing about him wanting to pull the troops out of Syria, there's got to be another story behind there.
02:18:06.000 Like, you know, Putin maybe said, look, we got to take care of our business here in Syria.
02:18:10.000 We're going to take care of Americans over here and you get your Trump Tower in Red Square when I'm gone.
02:18:17.000 Whatever, you know, there's some kind of – that kind of stuff is the sort of thing that will come out in a – The equivalent of a WikiLeaks in 20 years will go, oh, like the Gulf of Tonkin.
02:18:25.000 Oh, okay, that's what happened.
02:18:27.000 What do you think of conspiracy theory that says that there's some video of Trump getting peed on or peed on people?
02:18:34.000 That was published in some serious newspapers.
02:18:42.000 There's so much of this stuff that I just can't keep track of it.
02:18:45.000 Don't you think with him, though, too, they're more than willing to put stuff like that out there because they don't like him.
02:18:51.000 So they'll pull that trigger a little bit quicker.
02:18:53.000 Maybe.
02:18:53.000 Yep.
02:18:54.000 But during the Bush administration, people hated George W. Bush.
02:18:57.000 Do you think they hated him as much as they hate Trump?
02:18:59.000 No.
02:19:00.000 I think now they're going, oh, we would love to have George W. Bush back.
02:19:04.000 Yeah.
02:19:04.000 I feel like they just thought he was incompetent.
02:19:06.000 Asked directly, Putin does not deny possessing compromising material on Trump.
02:19:12.000 But what did he actually say?
02:19:14.000 Yeah, I don't know.
02:19:15.000 Yes, this is about the pee tape, says Matthew Iglesias.
02:19:20.000 Vox.
02:19:21.000 What is it?
02:19:21.000 Oh, it's Vox?
02:19:23.000 I don't know.
02:19:23.000 Keep moving.
02:19:25.000 That doesn't mean anything.
02:19:27.000 He probably didn't understand what they were saying.
02:19:29.000 He speaks Russian.
02:19:29.000 Right.
02:19:30.000 I don't know.
02:19:32.000 Do you find it odd that these conspiracies not only...
02:19:38.000 It seems like it's a part of our mind, the way our brains work, our collective mindset.
02:19:46.000 Is that we tend to be attracted to conspiracies and we tend to hope that those are true more than we hope a simple explanation exists.
02:19:58.000 Yeah, well, it depends.
02:20:00.000 It depends on who your group is and do they have power or not.
02:20:04.000 So we know from studies that people that are out of power tend to concoct conspiracy theories about those in power.
02:20:12.000 And the moment they get in power, they drop the conspiracy theories and the ones that are out.
02:20:16.000 So you're going to get more conspiracy theories about Republicans when the Democrats are out of power from left-leaning people and vice versa.
02:20:24.000 Blacks are more likely to think that the CIA planted crack cocaine in the inner cities and those sorts of things.
02:20:30.000 Conservatives are more likely to fear big government conspiracies.
02:20:34.000 Liberals are more likely to fear big corporate conspiracies.
02:20:37.000 There may be elements of truth in all of these things, but the ones you latch on to have to do with How much power you perceive the other guy has that you don't have, and therefore they must be doing something to get that that I can't do.
02:20:51.000 I'm on the outside.
02:20:52.000 And so we tend to misperceive how much control and power people really have in positions of power, CEOs, politicians, and so on.
02:21:01.000 Usually they don't have as much control and power as we think they do.
02:21:06.000 And people that get in there, they go, oh, I don't have this kind of control or power.
02:21:10.000 I thought I would when I got here, but obviously I don't.
02:21:12.000 Too many things that have to check some balances that are in place.
02:21:17.000 Also, you can't do these things on your own.
02:21:19.000 You really need a group of people to conspire along with you.
02:21:22.000 So you need to have these frank discussions with some sort of an understanding that you have to...
02:21:32.000 Right.
02:21:33.000 In other words, like 12 guys in London are going to control the world's economy.
02:21:36.000 How are they going to do that?
02:21:38.000 I mean, who do you call to start a war and cause inflation or whatever?
02:21:42.000 More likely, it's like in the Cuban Missile Crisis, where you have jockeying back and forth, back and forth, back and forth.
02:21:49.000 Okay, look, we're going to give you the missiles in Turkey if you take the missiles out of Cuba.
02:21:54.000 And it just ends up being some boring little thing that dissolves...
02:21:58.000 The tension that could have been World War III. It's like, wow, just this little thing.
02:22:03.000 So much of history turns on those little – so in a way, we got lucky there, but not just luck.
02:22:09.000 I mean, Kennedy and Khrushchev both wanted to untie the knot.
02:22:14.000 Khrushchev sent a memo to Kennedy saying – You have pulled on this rope, and I have pulled on this rope, and I don't know if either of us can untie it, but here's an idea.
02:22:23.000 That's when he floated the, you take the missiles out of Turkey.
02:22:26.000 And I was just watching this Netflix documentary on this, and there was a thing about Castro sent a memo to Khrushchev saying, light him up!
02:22:35.000 You know, comrade, we are ready to die for the cause.
02:22:38.000 You can just nuke all of Cuba and nuke America.
02:22:40.000 I don't care.
02:22:41.000 We're ready to die.
02:22:42.000 And Khrushchev apparently was like, holy fuck, this guy's a madman.
02:22:46.000 We're not going to do that!
02:22:49.000 Wow.
02:22:50.000 Castro is ready to nuke Cuba?
02:22:53.000 Yeah.
02:22:53.000 Jesus.
02:22:54.000 Where's that memo?
02:22:56.000 They talked about this in this Netflix.
02:23:00.000 This was during the times of Operation Northwood when they were going to blow up a drone jetliner and blame it on the Cubans and arm Cuban friendlies to attack Guantanamo Bay and use it as a motivation to get us into war.
02:23:14.000 Castro was a fascinating case because that guy kept that place 90 miles away from Miami.
02:23:20.000 He kept that place running on his own until he died.
02:23:24.000 That is crazy.
02:23:25.000 Right.
02:23:26.000 Really, it's crazy that he was able to pull that off.
02:23:29.000 Well, he had a lot of economic support from Russia.
02:23:32.000 Otherwise, that would not have succeeded.
02:23:35.000 But still, it's so nuts that he was so close.
02:23:38.000 He was running a military dictatorship, essentially a boat ride away.
02:23:42.000 Yeah.
02:23:42.000 I was just in Moscow a few months ago for a conference, and so I went to visit their World War II museum, what we would call a World War II museum.
02:23:49.000 It's a massive building.
02:23:51.000 And they call it the Great Patriotic War Museum.
02:23:55.000 And the whole thing is kind of a tribute to Russia liberated Europe from the Nazis.
02:24:02.000 What?
02:24:03.000 Yep.
02:24:03.000 This is current?
02:24:04.000 Oh, yeah.
02:24:05.000 Yeah.
02:24:05.000 I mean, this is their – from their perspective, they lost 27 million people.
02:24:10.000 You Americans, you know, 500,000, nothing.
02:24:13.000 Right.
02:24:13.000 And from their perspective – and you go to Berlin right next to – The Victory Museum.
02:24:18.000 Look at that.
02:24:19.000 Yeah.
02:24:20.000 It's called the Victory Museum.
02:24:21.000 Well, there it is.
02:24:22.000 The Museum of the Great Patriotic War is a history museum located in Moscow.
02:24:26.000 Yeah.
02:24:27.000 And they have this room with these chains hanging down with little crystal balls at the end of them that represent the 27 million people.
02:24:35.000 And it's very moving.
02:24:37.000 Go back to that.
02:24:38.000 That right there is good.
02:24:39.000 Look how beautiful that place is.
02:24:40.000 Yeah, it's quite stunning.
02:24:42.000 And each of those rooms...
02:24:44.000 That you go into, it's like a diorama of some battle that they fought.
02:24:48.000 I think it's good for us to know this, to recognize from their perspective, they won the war, not the British, American, and French.
02:24:58.000 We did a little bit, from their perspective.
02:25:01.000 But the fact that they lost so many people, 27 million.
02:25:04.000 What's going on with that picture?
02:25:05.000 I don't remember that.
02:25:07.000 Fucked up looking trees?
02:25:08.000 I don't remember seeing that.
02:25:10.000 That's a weird picture.
02:25:13.000 I mean, they have a point in terms of their contribution, in terms of the loss of lives.
02:25:17.000 Yeah.
02:25:19.000 I mean, every country has its perspectives in that regard, which is why it's good to know some history so you know what other people are thinking and what they went through.
02:25:27.000 Well, it's again, though, it's very similar to what we were talking about earlier in terms of the distribution of the news.
02:25:33.000 It would be very nice if there was one absolute news source you can trust with no slant on it whatsoever.
02:25:39.000 When it comes to the distribution of history, it's of course always written in a way that favors the people that are writing it.
02:25:47.000 Yeah.
02:25:48.000 I was just talking to Rachel Kleinfeld.
02:25:51.000 You know, I have a podcast now.
02:25:53.000 How long have you had?
02:25:54.000 A few months.
02:25:55.000 About six months now.
02:25:56.000 Congratulations.
02:25:57.000 Science Salon podcast.
02:25:58.000 Glad you hopped on.
02:26:00.000 It's sort of an extension of our old Caltech lecture series, but instead of lectures, we're now doing dialogues.
02:26:05.000 What's it called so people can get it?
02:26:06.000 Science Salon.
02:26:07.000 Science Salon.
02:26:08.000 Yep.
02:26:09.000 So just skeptic.com.
02:26:10.000 It's on there.
02:26:10.000 So I'm interviewing or dialoguing with Rachel Kleinfeld.
02:26:14.000 She has a new book called A Savage Order.
02:26:17.000 And it's about failed states and what happens to them and why corruption spreads so quickly and then how to basically squelch that.
02:26:24.000 So like after the Soviet Union fell apart, you know, all these mobs basically took over and it's like the Russian mafia, the Republic of Georgia fell apart fairly quickly.
02:26:34.000 And then, you know, so one of the reasons people apparently like Putin is he kind of came in and squelched all that.
02:26:41.000 And maybe one of his points of popularity is that at least we have one bad guy who's kind of keeping order instead of all these little mafioso-type gangs.
02:26:52.000 Yeah.
02:26:52.000 And then I said, so if he actually held an election, he might win.
02:26:56.000 It's hard to say because we don't have a good source of what the Russian people really like.
02:27:00.000 We have the Russian media saying, the Russian people love Putin.
02:27:04.000 Okay.
02:27:06.000 Do we know that's an accurate survey?
02:27:08.000 It is pretty astonishing what kind of a control he has over that country, though.
02:27:14.000 Yeah, it's powerful.
02:27:15.000 I went to visit – well, I saw Lennon's tomb in the mausoleum there.
02:27:19.000 He's still – he's looking pretty waxy to me.
02:27:22.000 Oh, that's right.
02:27:22.000 You can actually see his body or what's left of it.
02:27:26.000 You can see his body, yeah.
02:27:26.000 Yeah, what's left of it, yeah.
02:27:28.000 Another Netflix series I just binge-watched, Trotsky.
02:27:31.000 It's called Trotsky, and this is a Russian-made movie.
02:27:34.000 It's a drama and it's really good and it really shows – it's interesting because Trotsky was on the outs all the way until just recently because Stalin had him assassinated and then Stalin had him literally airbrushed out of photographs because for a while it was Lenin,
02:27:52.000 Stalin and Trotsky as the big three.
02:27:55.000 And then when Lenin had a stroke, it was like, okay, so Stalin and Trotsky, who's going to take over when the boss is gone?
02:28:03.000 And so they kind of showed how that happened.
02:28:05.000 And again, conspiracy.
02:28:06.000 It's all conspiracy.
02:28:08.000 No one knows what's really going on here.
02:28:10.000 You've been in this business, this debunking conspiracies in the skeptic business for quite a long time.
02:28:15.000 Do you feel like there is any improvement in the critical thinking skills of people and their ability to recognize the falsies and the flaws and the way they're approaching these things?
02:28:29.000 Hard to say.
02:28:30.000 Confirmation bias.
02:28:31.000 They're less of that now than before.
02:28:33.000 I like to think we're having an influence.
02:28:36.000 There are some studies that show fewer people believe in these pseudosciences and quackery and paranormal, but the declines are not that dramatic over, say, the last few decades.
02:28:48.000 There are deprogramming, biased deprogramming studies and programs in which you can teach people about the confirmation bias and the hindsight bias and so on.
02:28:58.000 The problem with those is they work really well to teach people how to spot the biases in other people.
02:29:03.000 They're really good at that.
02:29:04.000 But then you say, well, what about you?
02:29:06.000 Oh, you know, fortunately, I'm above all that.
02:29:08.000 So there's a blind – that's called the blind spot bias.
02:29:11.000 You can't see your own bias, but you can see it in other people.
02:29:14.000 The reason these studies are done is because we have a problem with climate change.
02:29:19.000 We have climate deniers.
02:29:21.000 How do we get people who don't know anything about it to shift from I'm a skeptic to I'm a believer?
02:29:28.000 And it turns out just piling on facts isn't going to do it.
02:29:32.000 No, people's identity are trapped in their initial beliefs.
02:29:36.000 Their initial statements.
02:29:37.000 If they think that 9-11 was a conspiracy, their identity is somehow inexorably connected to this conspiracy being a fact.
02:29:46.000 And then you argue it as if you're arguing your own value.
02:29:50.000 It's a really weird thing that happens when people start talking about ideas.
02:29:56.000 You very rarely find people that are disconnected from their ideas to the point where you could point out that something's incorrect and they go, oh, thank you, I didn't know that.
02:30:06.000 Like, most people aren't that confident.
02:30:08.000 No.
02:30:09.000 Or they just look at it the wrong – it feels like a personal attack on them.
02:30:12.000 Also, if it's a belief or claim or theory or whatever affiliated with a political or moral or religious value – The people auto-correct in their brains when they hear global warming, they hear liberalism, communism, anti-capitalism,
02:30:28.000 control of the market, big government, and I'm against those things, so that global warming thing has got to be false.
02:30:33.000 Yeah, that is one of the weirder aspects of tribal thinking, right?
02:30:37.000 Pinker makes the point that Al Gore's film, An Inconvenient Truth, was a terrible thing for the environmental movement because it associated global climate change with liberalism, the Democrats, And all that.
02:30:48.000 And it's like, okay, I see what's going on.
02:30:51.000 It's that Al Gore left liberal stuff.
02:30:53.000 Yeah, that's right.
02:30:55.000 Yeah.
02:30:55.000 Well, in a sense, he's right.
02:30:58.000 And then in another sense, it was also the amount of profit that Al Gore made, both from that and from some other endeavors that he has.
02:31:04.000 They said that he's one of the first green billionaires.
02:31:07.000 It's like, oh, Jesus.
02:31:10.000 What's his carbon footprint?
02:31:12.000 He flies around on a private jet everywhere.
02:31:14.000 He's talking about the world...
02:31:16.000 Yeah, it's like, it's screwy.
02:31:19.000 But that's, you know, everything's messy.
02:31:21.000 People are messy.
02:31:23.000 Right.
02:31:23.000 So we're very tribal.
02:31:24.000 We commit to political parties and religious beliefs, and we stick by them pretty closely, pretty tightly.
02:31:31.000 And the facts get filtered through those, understandably.
02:31:35.000 You know, what to do about it, you know, that's under debate.
02:31:40.000 It's the same thing with the atheist debating.
02:31:41.000 How do we get people to leave religion?
02:31:44.000 Well, there's a hundred ways.
02:31:46.000 You know, Leah Remini doing her show on Scientology.
02:31:49.000 Anyone watching that would think, okay, I'm not joining this church.
02:31:53.000 And so if you had a thousand of those for bad beliefs, hopefully we'd see that shift.
02:31:58.000 I would love it if there was some sort of a secular option, a community-driven, ethics-driven, morality-driven, friendship-driven thing where people could go and instead worship, maybe just appreciate life.
02:32:14.000 And sort of confirm some of the best aspects of community and culture and who we are and do it in a place where it makes you really conscious of it.
02:32:24.000 So, because I think there's some real benefit to people going to church and everyone in the community dresses up nice and you're sort of agreeing, hey, we're committed to being civil and to being kind and to worshiping.
02:32:38.000 And that this belief in a higher power, if...
02:32:43.000 It empowers people to think this way, and it gives people a motivation to be kind.
02:32:49.000 It would be nice if there was a secular option like that that is decentralized.
02:32:53.000 It's not run by one person who winds up banging everybody's wife and taking all the money, because that's what happens, right?
02:32:58.000 It always happens.
02:32:59.000 You can set your clock by these guys.
02:33:01.000 It's unbelievable.
02:33:03.000 Well, Joe, the humanist movement is something like that.
02:33:06.000 What is this?
02:33:06.000 I'm not aware.
02:33:07.000 Secular humanists are just humanists.
02:33:09.000 There's groups all over the world.
02:33:10.000 Do they have churches?
02:33:11.000 Well, they have meeting places.
02:33:13.000 I don't want to call them churches.
02:33:14.000 More broadly, the kind of universalist Unitarian Church is a church, and it's a religion, but they're pretty secular.
02:33:21.000 They're like secular Jews.
02:33:22.000 You know, they believe in the culture and the ceremony and the rituals.
02:33:27.000 I've been to a number of these humanist and universalist Unitarian churches, ceremonies.
02:33:32.000 They light candles.
02:33:33.000 They sing hymns to Newton.
02:33:35.000 They have testimonials about how I lost my religion.
02:33:39.000 And to me, I didn't really like it that much because I was never crazy about church in the first place.
02:33:44.000 But a lot of people clearly get value out of this, atheists and humanists that don't believe in God.
02:33:51.000 The gathering together once a week and being with fellow like-minded people, that has a lot of psychological value.
02:33:59.000 It connects people.
02:34:00.000 That's one of the great things about community centers and neighborhoods.
02:34:03.000 It just connects people and like, hey, we're all in this together.
02:34:06.000 All right, Bob, see you tomorrow.
02:34:08.000 Bye, Mary.
02:34:09.000 Social capital, yeah.
02:34:10.000 There's something great about that with church.
02:34:14.000 I mean, I was having this conversation with Bill Burr about this recently.
02:34:17.000 We were talking about it, and he's like, I don't really want to go to church, but I think there's something to that, to go into a place and putting your faith in all the people around you and the higher values and morals and ethics that you're all agreeing to.
02:34:33.000 Yeah, that's right.
02:34:35.000 It's back to the self-help thing.
02:34:36.000 It's sort of a reminder every week, be a good person.
02:34:39.000 Don't forget to donate to charity.
02:34:41.000 Here's some local charities here.
02:34:43.000 These are our causes.
02:34:44.000 Be good.
02:34:45.000 Be nice to your spouse and your children.
02:34:48.000 So people kind of leave a little charged up for the week on Sunday, back to Monday.
02:34:53.000 And that's probably a big draw of those big Tony Robbins things, too, right?
02:34:56.000 There's a community of us together.
02:34:57.000 We're all trying to do better.
02:34:58.000 We're all trying to better ourselves and optimize our lives.
02:35:02.000 That's right.
02:35:02.000 There's nothing wrong with it.
02:35:03.000 Same thing back to Jordan Peterson.
02:35:04.000 That's right.
02:35:05.000 He's given a message.
02:35:06.000 People like to hear that.
02:35:07.000 And, okay, so what?
02:35:09.000 Why is that bad?
02:35:10.000 It's not bad.
02:35:11.000 Now, of course, people like Richard Dawkins will point out, yeah, but can we decouple all the supernatural nonsense from the social community?
02:35:19.000 Yes, we can.
02:35:20.000 But don't you think that there's less of an acceptance to the supernatural nonsense than there was, say, 50 years ago, 100 years ago?
02:35:28.000 And it seems to be a trend towards secularism.
02:35:29.000 Those numbers are getting better.
02:35:31.000 The percentage of nuns, people tick the box for no religious affiliation.
02:35:36.000 That used to be in the single digits.
02:35:37.000 It's now 25% of all Americans, 33% of millennials, those born after 1991. And it looks like probably with iGeners it's going to be closer to 50%, people born after 1995. Now, they're not necessarily atheist, agnostic skeptics, but they don't affiliate with any religion.
02:35:54.000 And that's good because in the sense that, you know, it's religious behavior that causes some of these social problems that we are encountering now with Islam, for example.
02:36:06.000 You know, so if somebody privately believes in God or whatever and they don't act on it, okay, I guess I don't care in that sense.
02:36:13.000 It's the acting on your beliefs that causes the problem.
02:36:15.000 Well, when you enforce those beliefs on other people in particular.
02:36:17.000 That's right.
02:36:18.000 So when it spills over in politics, education, science education in particular.
02:36:22.000 Well, that's one of the real problems they're having in Europe when they're dealing with people that are coming over from other countries where they have a different set of values and they're seeing women in skirts and they're calling them whores.
02:36:31.000 And it's like, oh, bro, you're in England.
02:36:34.000 Right.
02:36:36.000 Different set of rules over here.
02:36:38.000 Come to California, you won't believe it.
02:36:40.000 And they think that God has, you know, God has dictated these rules.
02:36:45.000 In their eyes, they're seeing some horrible sin.
02:36:47.000 They're seeing the decay of the moral fiber of their environment.
02:36:53.000 These are primitive beliefs having to do with men wanting to control women's reproductive rights.
02:36:59.000 There's evolutionary reasons for this.
02:37:01.000 You had Brett and Heather on here, and they explained that beautifully.
02:37:06.000 But we have to overcome that.
02:37:07.000 Just because it's an evolved tendency for men to want to control women's reproduction doesn't mean we should do that.
02:37:13.000 In fact, it's the opposite.
02:37:15.000 And so I make the case in one of my Scientific American columns on abortion that You know, if our mutual goal between pro-lifers and pro-choicers is to reduce the amount of abortions, we know the formula.
02:37:29.000 Educate women, empower women, birth control, access to birth control, and so on.
02:37:34.000 It just happens automatically.
02:37:36.000 The pregnancy rates go down, therefore abortion rates are going to go down.
02:37:40.000 We know how to do this.
02:37:42.000 But still, people, the pro-lifers, just glom on to it.
02:37:47.000 But it's a moral issue.
02:37:48.000 Take the moral out of it.
02:37:49.000 I understand it's a human life or potential human, whatever you want to argue about that.
02:37:53.000 I get on that.
02:37:53.000 Take that out.
02:37:54.000 Let's just work to the common goal of reducing the number of unwanted pregnancies.
02:37:59.000 My favorite one that still exists is abstinence.
02:38:02.000 The idea that they're trying to push this on these, essentially, especially when you're talking about really young people that are just getting horny for the first time.
02:38:10.000 Yeah.
02:38:11.000 I mean, they're on drugs!
02:38:12.000 To say no?
02:38:14.000 What?
02:38:14.000 What are you talking about?
02:38:16.000 You take the average 17, 18-year-old kids, and they get them together and no one's in the room, and they're raging!
02:38:24.000 Raging with hormones!
02:38:25.000 And they're both supposed to keep their clothes on.
02:38:27.000 Like, look, man.
02:38:28.000 It's not going to happen.
02:38:30.000 It's just not going to happen.
02:38:32.000 You've got to let that go.
02:38:33.000 And this idea that you're going to tell them that God wants them to be abstinent.
02:38:36.000 Like, are you sure?
02:38:38.000 Why did he give us these goddamn hormones?
02:38:40.000 What's happening here?
02:38:42.000 There's studies on how effective abstinence-only programs or chastity pledges and these sorts of things.
02:38:47.000 How effective?
02:38:48.000 Not only are they not effective, they're worse, because then people go into a date or something unprepared.
02:38:54.000 And then the hormones kick in, and they start going at it, and then they don't have protection.
02:39:00.000 Well, there's also the thing where Catholic schools, like when I was a kid, we always knew, and we're talking about in the 80s, everyone knew that girls who went to all-girls Catholic schools were freaks, because they were never around boys,
02:39:17.000 because they were all in just a school with girls, and everything is suppression, suppress, suppress, suppress.
02:39:23.000 They just can't wait.
02:39:24.000 They get out, they find a boy, and they go crazy.
02:39:27.000 Like, everybody knew it.
02:39:29.000 I mean, this is not something that I knew as a comedian or as a person who studies culture.
02:39:33.000 This is something I knew as a 14-year-old.
02:39:36.000 Everyone knew that girls who went to all-girl Catholic schools were freaks.
02:39:42.000 It just has the opposite intended effect.
02:39:44.000 There was a study, a British study I found, that found some small, it was like 1.5% or whatever, of 10,000 women who said they got pregnant without having sex.
02:39:55.000 Oh, that happens.
02:39:55.000 How did that happen?
02:39:57.000 It does happen.
02:39:58.000 It's immaculate.
02:39:59.000 It's in the Bible, bro.
02:40:00.000 It's an immaculate conception.
02:40:01.000 That's right.
02:40:01.000 It's hilarious.
02:40:03.000 Yeah.
02:40:03.000 Or they do everything but, or they have anal or whatever, and say, well, we didn't actually have sex, you know, like Clinton.
02:40:08.000 Well, what do you mean by sex and have?
02:40:12.000 Right.
02:40:12.000 Sexual relations.
02:40:14.000 I did not have sexual relations.
02:40:16.000 That woman.
02:40:18.000 Yeah.
02:40:18.000 Sex is intercourse.
02:40:20.000 Penis, vagina, that's it.
02:40:21.000 Everything else is just hanging out.
02:40:23.000 Right.
02:40:25.000 Yep.
02:40:26.000 Well, it's – the need for belief systems is – it's so – I mean, it helps people to have belief systems if they're positive and they're objective and they're well-reasoned and they're – you know, these are, you know, backed by facts and knowledge.
02:40:43.000 It helps.
02:40:44.000 But the need for belief systems is so strong that we'll take a belief system that's wonky.
02:40:51.000 It's because we have the desire.
02:40:53.000 That's right.
02:40:54.000 Yeah, the brain abhors a vacuum of belief.
02:40:58.000 That's the way I put it, and something's going to be in there.
02:41:01.000 So let's try to put in those brains rational, science-based values.
02:41:06.000 And we have those.
02:41:07.000 I mean, humanist values, the humanist movement is now almost a century old.
02:41:13.000 Universal Human Rights, the Universal Human Rights Declaration just celebrated its 50th anniversary.
02:41:19.000 You can get diverse people to agree.
02:41:22.000 You don't have to have the correct philosophical arguments to get there, but, you know, just everybody should be treated equally under the law.
02:41:28.000 Can we at least agree on that?
02:41:30.000 Yes, okay.
02:41:31.000 I mean, if you start off with – Pinker makes this point in Enlightenment Now – if you start off with, Jesus died for our sins, that's the most important value to me, you're not going to get agreement in a room full of, you know, UN diversity.
02:41:44.000 You've got to start with something super basic in general.
02:41:47.000 Everybody deserves equal rights.
02:41:49.000 Okay, yeah.
02:41:50.000 And then you start to build from there.
02:41:51.000 And we can do that.
02:41:53.000 You've been in this for a long time, and you've done some really valuable work.
02:41:57.000 It's so nice that there's someone like you that really has dedicated their life to really illuminating truth, exposing all the flaws in people's thinking.
02:42:07.000 Do you feel like the reception of this is...
02:42:11.000 It's easier now, or there's momentum behind this kind of thinking?
02:42:16.000 I do, yeah, for sure it's more open.
02:42:19.000 Part of my – I have a distorted view.
02:42:21.000 I'm from California.
02:42:22.000 I grew up in Southern California.
02:42:23.000 We're a pretty liberal society here, so I'm empathetic to people that write me from Oklahoma or Arkansas, and I'm in this little town, everybody.
02:42:31.000 The only question is, which Christian church do you go to?
02:42:34.000 You know, the Baptists or the Presbyterians?
02:42:36.000 Right.
02:42:37.000 And, you know, everyone in his family, everyone at work is a believer, and he's an atheist.
02:42:42.000 Okay, so I haven't faced anything like that.
02:42:45.000 You know, when I'm a middle-aged white guy, you know, I do have white privileges, I know.
02:42:50.000 And so I am sympathetic to others.
02:42:53.000 But I do think, across the board, things are more tolerant.
02:42:57.000 You know, we know this from studies on interracial marriage, for example.
02:43:01.000 That's not even an issue anymore.
02:43:02.000 The gay rights thing has changed very rapidly.
02:43:05.000 I mean, that was It's stunning how quickly social attitudes changed after the Supreme Court.
02:43:10.000 Well, we have to remember, in 2013, Hillary Clinton was still saying that she didn't believe in gay marriage.
02:43:14.000 That's right.
02:43:15.000 Because that was a political position.
02:43:16.000 That's right.
02:43:17.000 Obama in 2011. Although you never know when a politician says something.
02:43:20.000 Of course.
02:43:21.000 But now, so I predict, you know, like the gay marriage thing, no one will even be talking about it in another year or two.
02:43:27.000 It'll change so quickly.
02:43:29.000 And so across the board, the acceptance now of atheists, humanists, secularists, agnostics, whatever, has become much better.
02:43:37.000 In most places, there's still some, of course, Islamic countries where Not only would they burn me and you, they'd burn Catholics because they picked the wrong religion.
02:43:46.000 So there's still that.
02:43:48.000 I wonder if there's some improvement there in those countries because of the internet with younger people when they're being exposed to these new ideas.
02:43:54.000 Yeah, maybe.
02:43:55.000 I'm not sure on that data.
02:43:56.000 The last time I saw a big poll was on how supportive you would be of Sharia law.
02:44:02.000 And these were pretty scary, like a third to a half.
02:44:05.000 Of Muslims living in Muslim countries said they would support Sharia law.
02:44:09.000 And if you look at Sharia law, as you know, it's pretty scary.
02:44:12.000 Very anti-democratic, illiberal attitudes about rights and women and things like that.
02:44:19.000 So there, I think the prediction would be, yes, millennials and iGeners, when they get into power, then maybe – not just political power, but like controlling talk shows, radio shows, TV shows, scripts, things like that.
02:44:33.000 I think most moral change happens in people's minds from inculcating it from culture, pop culture, of just how you talk about other people.
02:44:43.000 Dawkins makes this point that you can tell pretty much down to the decade when a book was written by the way they talk about women, like a novel, talk about women or blacks or whatever, going back, say, a century.
02:44:54.000 You can say, well, that was 1930s, the way they're talking about Jews, you know?
02:44:58.000 And that's the kind of thing that shifts very slowly.
02:45:01.000 You hardly notice it.
02:45:02.000 But from people like you, comedians, you tell certain jokes or you say certain things and it becomes more acceptable.
02:45:08.000 Scripts for television shows and films.
02:45:12.000 And all of us kind of watch it and absorb it and just think, yeah, you know, we shouldn't be saying those kinds of things about women and Jews and blacks or whatever.
02:45:19.000 Stop doing that.
02:45:20.000 Not consciously.
02:45:20.000 You just kind of soak it in.
02:45:23.000 So I think you still need laws.
02:45:26.000 We have to sometimes change the law and just say, okay, it's now illegal to discriminate against Jews or whatever.
02:45:31.000 You can't do that.
02:45:32.000 Now, people may still want to do that.
02:45:34.000 How do we change their thinking?
02:45:35.000 Well, that's the bottom-up thing that takes the course of decades or maybe a century.
02:45:40.000 And it takes generations sometimes because the new young kids have to see the flaws in the way their parents are thinking and have access to this information and form their own opinions on these things, hopefully based on objective reasoning and reality and all the awesome stuff that's available now.
02:45:57.000 My stepdad was in the Pacific War, and the way he talked about Japanese, you know, when I was a kid in the 60s, I'm like, whoa.
02:46:06.000 And then by the time I became an adult, I'm like, Dad, don't say this stuff.
02:46:10.000 Don't say it out loud.
02:46:11.000 When you think about 1947 to 1960, that's a tiny period of time.
02:46:16.000 It's so short.
02:46:17.000 I mean, it's really like, you know, we're talking about the early 2000s.
02:46:21.000 Imagine if World War II happened during the early 2000s.
02:46:25.000 Yeah, it's hard to remember.
02:46:28.000 It's hard to put it into perspective.
02:46:30.000 I think pop culture, the media, social media, and so on is going to accelerate moral progress.
02:46:35.000 It'll happen faster.
02:46:36.000 Like, it happened faster for women than it did for blacks.
02:46:39.000 It happened faster for gays than it did for women.
02:46:42.000 Maybe whatever's next, animal rights or something like this will accelerate even more, maybe trans rights or something like that.
02:46:48.000 What do you think about the pushback against this idea that we are living in the safest time ever and that there is an absolute trend?
02:46:54.000 Like Pinker gets criticized about this, where people say, no, the world is still not safe for these people, for this group, for that group, and for you saying that the world just shows your white privilege and this white male perspective and...
02:47:09.000 I'm on board with Steve across the board on these things.
02:47:12.000 He's got the data.
02:47:13.000 It depends on the question you're asking.
02:47:15.000 It's like if you say, yeah, but my life is not better.
02:47:18.000 We're not talking about your life.
02:47:20.000 The question is, is society getting better?
02:47:22.000 Of course there's ups and downs, and this group is doing better than that group, and yes, there's still some racial discrimination, and yes, there's still clearly anti-semis, as we've seen recently.
02:47:32.000 But across the board, if you take the last 200 years, Which direction are the trend lines going?
02:47:38.000 They're all going in the right direction.
02:47:40.000 So again, it's scale.
02:47:42.000 The question is, what's the scale we're talking about?
02:47:44.000 So it's a little unfair to Pinker to say, well, you're blind to that thing over there.
02:47:48.000 He's not talking about that one thing there.
02:47:50.000 He's talking about just across the board.
02:47:53.000 Yeah, I agree.
02:47:54.000 Listen, man, thanks for everything.
02:47:56.000 Thanks for everything you do.
02:47:57.000 You're welcome.
02:47:58.000 Thanks for all your articles and your books, and thanks for coming on here.
02:48:01.000 And please let people know your podcast, once again, is called Skeptic Salon.
02:48:06.000 Yeah, Science Salon.
02:48:07.000 Science Salon.
02:48:07.000 Sorry, Science Salon.
02:48:08.000 You can just go to skeptic.com and it's posted there.
02:48:11.000 And yeah, so Skeptic is still going.
02:48:13.000 Social media.
02:48:15.000 Michael Shermer is my Twitter feed.
02:48:17.000 You have Instagram as well?
02:48:18.000 I don't do that.
02:48:20.000 How dare you?
02:48:21.000 You don't do Instagram?
02:48:22.000 That's MichaelShermer1.
02:48:23.000 Oh.
02:48:24.000 Do you have an Instagram?
02:48:25.000 I do.
02:48:25.000 I do.
02:48:25.000 I'm going to start posting as of today, okay?
02:48:28.000 Oh.
02:48:28.000 We'll take a photo of you.
02:48:29.000 I always click on yours because you always have interesting photographs from wherever you're at.
02:48:33.000 And it is kind of fun.
02:48:35.000 It's fun.
02:48:36.000 Just take an extra minute or two.
02:48:37.000 Giant waste of time, though.
02:48:38.000 Don't get sucked in.
02:48:39.000 I'm already wasting so much time on Twitter.
02:48:42.000 Well, thank you, Michael.
02:48:42.000 Appreciate it, man.
02:48:43.000 Thank you.
02:48:43.000 Thanks for having me.
02:48:44.000 Bye, everybody.