The Joe Rogan Experience - April 08, 2021


Joe Rogan Experience #1631 - Brian Greene


Episode Stats

Length

2 hours and 41 minutes

Words per Minute

167.37003

Word Count

27,100

Sentence Count

1,957

Misogynist Sentences

24

Hate Speech Sentences

10


Summary

In this episode of the Joe Rogan Experience podcast, I sit down with the world's foremost quantum physicist, Dr. Neil de Grasse Tyson. We talk about his journey to becoming a professional physicist, how he got into the field, and what it's like being a nerd in the 21st century. We also talk about the importance of quantum mechanics, and why it's important to understand what we know about the universe and the laws of nature. This episode was produced and edited by Alex Blumberg. Additional editing was made by Annie-Rose Strasser and Matthew Boll. Our theme song was written and performed by Micah Vellian and our ad music was provided by Mark Phillips. Additional music was mixed by Ian Dorsch and produced by Patrick Muldowney. Additional engineering and mixing was done by Matthew Boll and Christian Bladt. Additional production assistance from Matthew Boll, who provided production assistance to the show. The show was mixed, edited, and mixed by Matt Boll, with additional engineering assistance from Mark Boll, and additional mixing and mastering by Patrick Moffat. Additional mixing by Patrick Boll. Music by Mark Boll and Patrick Boll, additional mixing by Christian Boll, Matthew Boll Additional mastering and mastering of the show by John Rocha, and music production by Peter Kuchta, and Mike McLennan, and Bobby Lord, and Jeff Perla, and Matthew Keyser, and Patrick McKirdy, and Alex Blanell, and Rachel Ward, with assistance from Patrick McEliza, and Ben Kacz, and Mark McElton, and James Ransom, and Andrew McKirden, and Michael Horschig, and Chris Clark. , and with additional assistance from Ben Kuchter, and John Cawthorne. Joe Rogans , we discuss quantum mechanics and quantum physics, and how to understand the universe, and the challenges we face as a human experience, and its impact on our understanding it, and our relationship with it, as well as what it means to be a scientist, and so much more, and we talk about how we can make sense of it all, and learn from it, and how it affects us all, and what we can do better, and more. and more, we hope you enjoy it! Thank you for listening to this episode, and tweet us what you think about it? Tweet us to let us know what you're learning and share it on social media!


Transcript

00:00:01.000 Joe Rogan Podcast, check it out!
00:00:04.000 The Joe Rogan Experience.
00:00:06.000 Train by day, Joe Rogan Podcast by night, all day.
00:00:28.000 It's a human story, too.
00:00:38.000 Yeah, the human species.
00:00:39.000 What have we been around for, what, 300,000 years, 400,000 years?
00:00:42.000 It depends how you define the species.
00:00:44.000 But yeah, that's not a bad number.
00:00:45.000 Some people will go back to a million or so if you go back to early human species.
00:00:49.000 But yeah, and compared to the length of time scales that compose reality from the beginning to the end, that's zero.
00:00:57.000 That's nothing.
00:00:58.000 When you – being a physicist, being a person that really does have a much greater grasp of the concept of infinity and of time and of the – just the length that the universe has existed in its current form,
00:01:14.000 how do you just get through your day and not freak out?
00:01:17.000 Well, it's because my wife says, you know, you've got to cook dinner.
00:01:21.000 So, I mean, there are things that you have to actually get done.
00:01:25.000 But it does change your perspective in a significant way because you recognize...
00:01:32.000 That the things that we consider to be oh so vital and important are just this blink of an eye on the cosmological landscape, on the cosmological timeline.
00:01:42.000 And it does change the way you approach the world when you pay attention to it.
00:01:47.000 It's hard to always pay attention to it, though.
00:02:04.000 Right.
00:02:05.000 Because life is too powerful in its intrusion on the way you actually behave in the world.
00:02:11.000 But because of your perspective and because of your education on this, do you feel like almost an obligation to try to expand people's perspective?
00:02:20.000 I'd say that's part of what my goals of life is, to do just that.
00:02:25.000 You know, I don't want people to not live their lives the way they have, but I want them to be able to broaden the experience by recognizing that everyday phenomenon is a small slice.
00:02:39.000 Of the way the world is actually put together.
00:02:43.000 And when you can see your life and your experiences, just a tiny sliver of a reality that's like bizarrely strange and utterly wondrous when you understand everything from black holes to time dilation to quantum tunneling to all that stuff that we have discovered over the last couple hundred years.
00:03:00.000 Yeah, it changes things.
00:03:02.000 Is it a difficult thing to get across to people?
00:03:06.000 Like, do you try to think, like, what is the best way that people are going to absorb these ideas?
00:03:10.000 Because they are so...
00:03:12.000 They're not abstract, but they're so outside of the norm in terms of the way people view the world.
00:03:19.000 You kind of, like, go, hey, I know you're concentrated on this, but look at that!
00:03:24.000 Yeah.
00:03:25.000 I mean, the real difficulty is not so much getting people interested.
00:03:29.000 You might think that that's the big hurdle.
00:03:31.000 People are like, ah, don't talk to me about that stuff.
00:03:33.000 It doesn't matter to my life.
00:03:34.000 But that's, no, people are very curious and interested in what physics has found.
00:03:39.000 What's hard is getting them to not just take it in, but to take it in correctly so that they don't take the ideas and twist it into something else that suits whatever weirdness they may have encountered in the world.
00:03:54.000 The number of times that I see people take the concepts of quantum mechanics And turn it into utter nonsense.
00:04:01.000 Because they're like, hey, oh yeah, probabilities.
00:04:03.000 Okay, you know, that describes this quality of my world.
00:04:06.000 Or, you know, the weirdness of time.
00:04:08.000 Yeah, that's why I had this, like, mind meld with my best friend on the other side of the...
00:04:12.000 You know, that sort of thing.
00:04:14.000 And I don't fault people for that.
00:04:18.000 These ideas are difficult.
00:04:19.000 But if you ask me what the challenge is, the challenge is breaking through that and getting people to really understand what it is that we found.
00:04:26.000 And it's weirder than many of the things that the human imagination would go to.
00:04:30.000 But it's harder because it's very specific and rigorous and mathematical, ultimately, and that's unfamiliar.
00:04:36.000 Do you think it's the complications of quantum mechanics?
00:04:40.000 It's such a bizarre field of study that it sort of lends itself being sort of occupied by people like the what-the-bleep-do-we-know type folks that kind of co-opt it and then spread nonsense?
00:04:56.000 It's exactly right.
00:04:56.000 I mean, that film is an unfortunate but very good example of people who took the ideas and usurped them for their own purpose, right?
00:05:09.000 I had friends that were in that film who were deeply disheartened by the way their words were twisted.
00:05:15.000 Well, they were tricked.
00:05:15.000 They were tricked.
00:05:16.000 They thought they were doing a documentary on quantum mechanics and it turned out to be essentially a cult documentary.
00:05:21.000 Exactly.
00:05:22.000 And so there is a sensibility of that sort, which is volitional.
00:05:28.000 That's like a choice, I think, that was made.
00:05:30.000 In fact, I think I mentioned to you once The director of that film had called me to be in it and I was like, well, what are you doing?
00:05:36.000 Because I couldn't tell what they...
00:05:37.000 And then he called me like a year after the film came out and kind of apologized and said, you were right.
00:05:43.000 Oh, so he didn't know.
00:05:44.000 Yeah, he didn't know.
00:05:46.000 We should stop just so people that don't know what we're talking about understand what's happening.
00:05:50.000 There is a person in that documentary that calls themselves Ramtha that...
00:05:57.000 They don't explain it in the documentary, but they claim to be like, what is it, a thousand-year-old?
00:06:03.000 35,000-year-old sage from the lost land of Lemuria, I believe it is, which is like another lost land with Atlantis.
00:06:13.000 They were like at war with Atlantis or something like that.
00:06:16.000 So, yeah, it's a pretty deep cult.
00:06:19.000 Yeah.
00:06:20.000 And, yeah, I think I mentioned to you once, I actually accidentally found myself at one of their headquarters in, I think it was in Washington State, gave a talk at a gathering, and it was so sad at some level because I saw people searching for truth but being misled by a charismatic speaker who's basically coming up with this nonsense,
00:06:43.000 you know?
00:06:44.000 Yeah.
00:06:44.000 And so that's one way in which these ideas are usurped.
00:06:48.000 But others, it's less by design.
00:06:52.000 It's just more you hear quantum mechanics is weird, and then you hear something else is weird, and you say, oh, that must be quantum mechanics, because there's this general sensibility that the world is weird.
00:07:03.000 But quantum mechanics is weird in a very specific way.
00:07:07.000 I mean, Schrodinger, Erwin Schrodinger wrote down an equation, a mathematical equation that actually quantifies the weirdness in a very specific way that makes mathematical predictions that we can test in the laboratory.
00:07:20.000 So that's not just like, you know, people in their minds coming up with crazy stuff and saying, wouldn't that be curious if that was part of reality?
00:07:27.000 This is stuff that has emerged from careful study.
00:07:31.000 So when you learn that the world evolves according to a game of chance, it's as if there's a throw of the dice that determines how things evolve from one moment to the next.
00:07:42.000 That's deeply unfamiliar.
00:07:44.000 We don't go around the world thinking that there's a chance that something bizarre will happen.
00:07:50.000 But there is such a chance in every moment in every experience of your life.
00:07:54.000 The chance is so small in the big everyday world that we don't experience these things.
00:07:59.000 But if you were an electron, yeah, you'd be having the weirdness of being two places at once in some sense.
00:08:05.000 You'd have the weirdness of passing through solid barriers.
00:08:08.000 You know, these kinds of curiosities would be an everyday phenomenon if you were as small as a particle like an electron.
00:08:15.000 That's sort of what lends itself to the woo-woo people, right?
00:08:19.000 Yeah, totally.
00:08:19.000 Because when you talk about things being in superposition, or you talk about spooky action at a distance, you talk about these bizarre things that they sound like magic when you're talking about something that's both moving and not moving.
00:08:32.000 It's in two places at the same time, or there's a probability of it being in these...
00:08:37.000 Describing stuff like that, especially to the average person that doesn't have a background in this, they go, what is the world then?
00:08:45.000 What are you saying?
00:08:46.000 And I have to say, though, we physicists come to the very same place.
00:08:49.000 We say, what is the world then?
00:08:51.000 What are we talking about?
00:08:52.000 And the difference is we can then look back at the equations and say...
00:08:57.000 If we're talking about quantum attainment, we can see how two particles far apart in space will have behaviors that are correlated.
00:09:04.000 You do something on this particle, And we'll have some instantaneous correlation with what happens at that particle regardless of how far apart they are in space.
00:09:13.000 Einstein himself called this spooky.
00:09:17.000 Spooky action at a distance.
00:09:18.000 You do something in New York and it affects in some quantum mechanical way a particle in California.
00:09:23.000 How could that be?
00:09:25.000 How can that be?
00:09:25.000 Good.
00:09:26.000 So I don't know at some level if I'm trying to answer you human to human, but if I'm answering as a mathematician, as a physicist, I can see it in the equations.
00:09:35.000 I see it in the mathematics.
00:09:36.000 I see how this particle has a quantum wave which has a piece that stretches all the way out to California and way beyond.
00:09:45.000 And when I interact with this particle, I affect that probability wave instantaneously.
00:09:50.000 Therefore, I change the wave in California even if my action is in New York.
00:09:54.000 So I see that in the mathematics.
00:09:57.000 I understand these words you're saying, but I don't understand it.
00:10:00.000 Neither do I. That's the point.
00:10:03.000 So what level of understanding are we talking about, right?
00:10:08.000 If you're talking about intuition, like a deep intuition, the way we understand two plus two is four, right?
00:10:13.000 I don't have to explain that to anybody.
00:10:15.000 They get it.
00:10:15.000 They see two apples and two apples, four apples, they got it.
00:10:18.000 But when it comes to quantum entanglement, I don't feel it that way.
00:10:23.000 I don't have that intrinsic understanding of what it is.
00:10:28.000 And so if you push me to say, well, what is it?
00:10:30.000 I ultimately fall back on the math.
00:10:33.000 And ultimately I say the reason I believe the math is the math makes predictions that we can test in the laboratory.
00:10:40.000 And then you say, well, then what kind of understanding is that?
00:10:44.000 And some people would say that's the deepest understanding.
00:10:47.000 All we really want of a physical theory is for it to give a rigorous mathematical articulation of what happens out there in the world, and it's the human brain struggling for some kind of intuition.
00:11:00.000 That's our problem.
00:11:01.000 That's a human problem.
00:11:02.000 That's not a problem of physics.
00:11:04.000 That's a problem of us being satisfied.
00:11:06.000 A problem of perception and understanding.
00:11:07.000 Perception and understanding, yeah.
00:11:08.000 So, this spooky action at a distance.
00:11:11.000 Why was it first?
00:11:13.000 Was it a hypothesis?
00:11:15.000 Or was this something that was proven by math first?
00:11:20.000 Yeah.
00:11:21.000 So, Erwin Schrodinger, one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, a curious fellow, a very interesting life, but he realized, looking at the equations, that there was this quality of the math That if two particles come together and they interact for a little while and then they separate,
00:11:40.000 they can no longer be thought of as independent or autonomous.
00:11:44.000 I mean, the very basic quality of autonomy, you and I are autonomous because we can separate.
00:11:50.000 We can go our separate ways and do whatever we want at our respective locations.
00:11:55.000 So you would think that if two particles separate, they will also be autonomous.
00:12:00.000 But he saw in the mathematics that they would not be autonomous.
00:12:04.000 That what you did to one would have an effect in some quantum mechanical way on the other.
00:12:08.000 Now he saw that in the mathematics.
00:12:10.000 He called it out as the central feature of quantum mechanics.
00:12:15.000 And that's a big statement coming from him because there are a lot of other weird qualities of quantum physics.
00:12:20.000 Einstein then comes along.
00:12:22.000 1935 with two colleagues and leverages this idea.
00:12:26.000 Writes a paper where he tries to prove that quantum mechanics cannot be the full story of the world because of this weird quality of what you do here affecting something over there.
00:12:35.000 It's not until the 1980s that people really start to test this idea and by today this is used all the time in the laboratory.
00:12:43.000 Quantum computing makes use of this quality so this is no longer an idea that's abstract It's something that's applied.
00:12:52.000 Applied quantum entanglement gives us things in the real world in the laboratory.
00:12:57.000 So this is beyond question real, even though Einstein thought it couldn't be, and Schrodinger considered it to be the strangest feature of the math of all.
00:13:05.000 So beyond question, it's real.
00:13:07.000 But what do you think is happening?
00:13:09.000 Well, so...
00:13:10.000 If you're going to allow for the most exotic possibilities, some would suggest that you are probing the many worlds of quantum mechanics.
00:13:22.000 So in quantum mechanics, all you ever do is predict the probability of this happening or that happening.
00:13:27.000 Electrons, you know, 70% chance here, 30% chance here.
00:13:30.000 If you measure the electron and you do find it over here, what happened to the other possibility?
00:13:35.000 Some say it happens, but just in another world.
00:13:39.000 In one world, you find the particle here.
00:13:41.000 In another world, there's a copy of you that finds the particle over there.
00:13:45.000 Each of you's doesn't know about the other and thinks you are the unique version of you, the unique Joe Rogan, but now there are two of you, each thinking that the particle is found in one location or another.
00:13:55.000 If that's the way quantum mechanics actually works, and some people do think this, Then quantum entanglement is, in some sense, less weird.
00:14:03.000 Because what happens is that in one world, you have a certain correlation between the particles.
00:14:09.000 In another world, you'd have a different correlation between the particles, and that's just what happens.
00:14:14.000 So that's one, but you're allowing multiple universes in this explanation.
00:14:21.000 That's pretty weird in its own right.
00:14:24.000 The fundamental way that we...
00:14:40.000 We're good to go.
00:14:49.000 But Quantum Mechanics is saying that that's an intuition built up from everyday experience and everyday experience is grossly misleading.
00:14:57.000 Ooh.
00:14:57.000 When it comes to this kind of an idea.
00:14:59.000 Severely limited.
00:15:00.000 Severely limited.
00:15:01.000 And this concept of many worlds.
00:15:04.000 So the idea is that there's multiple versions of you and multiple versions of everything that you've experienced, all the things you see that you consider to be Austin, Texas, or the United States, or the world itself.
00:15:19.000 There's multiple versions of this happening simultaneously.
00:15:22.000 How many?
00:15:23.000 Well, in some sense, infinite.
00:15:24.000 Oh, boy.
00:15:25.000 Because the basic idea is that any outcome that is allowed by the laws of quantum physics, any outcome will take place in its own separate world.
00:15:35.000 And so when you think about every decision you've ever made, every possibility that you've ever encountered, all of the outcomes happen, and that would happen throughout all of time.
00:15:47.000 So in some sense, there's an Unending number of realities that are in the grand landscape of the quantum description.
00:15:56.000 Now, you hear that and you say, that's nuts!
00:16:00.000 That sounds nutty, right?
00:16:02.000 We experience one world.
00:16:04.000 But if you look at the mathematics as a guy named Hugh Everett did in 1957. He was a graduate student at Princeton, unknown.
00:16:12.000 He looked at the math and he said, I want to look at the math and give it the most straightforward, intrinsic interpretation.
00:16:19.000 And the most economical, intrinsic interpretation of the math is this one.
00:16:23.000 It sounds grossly uneconomical, all these universes, but that's an output.
00:16:29.000 The input is incredibly economical.
00:16:32.000 You look at the equations, and this is the most straightforward interpretation.
00:16:35.000 Every outcome does happen.
00:16:37.000 It happens in its own world.
00:16:39.000 Now, I'm not saying that I believe this, but it's definitely a worthy contender for the way that we should think about quantum mechanics.
00:16:47.000 So do you guys get together and bounce these ideas off each other on a regular basis?
00:16:52.000 It depends who you mean by you guys.
00:16:54.000 You physicists, fellas.
00:16:57.000 Only some.
00:16:59.000 So some physicists, when they hear about this kind of talk, they roll their eyes.
00:17:04.000 And they say, just use the mathematics.
00:17:07.000 Make predictions for what we'll see at the Large Hadron Collider.
00:17:11.000 Make predictions for what we'll see in this or that laboratory.
00:17:14.000 Don't try to understand it.
00:17:16.000 Just do it.
00:17:17.000 You know, it's the so-called shut up and calculate approach to quantum mechanics.
00:17:22.000 And Niels Bohr.
00:17:24.000 Who is, again, one of the founding pioneers of quantum mechanics.
00:17:27.000 This was his perspective.
00:17:29.000 I mean, Bohr basically said the goal of physics is not to tell us how the universe is in the sense of understanding.
00:17:37.000 It's just to make predictions that we're going to see in experiments.
00:17:39.000 That's all that you should ever expect to do.
00:17:42.000 There are other physicists who don't feel that way.
00:17:45.000 And there are other physicists who think physics is a matter of telling us what's happening.
00:17:49.000 It's got to give us the story.
00:17:51.000 It's got to like peel back the curtain and give us a clear glimpse of what's happening behind the scenes.
00:17:57.000 And so those of us who do have that as the goal do get together and do talk about these things.
00:18:03.000 Well, I'm glad you guys exist because those shut up and do the math.
00:18:08.000 Those guys, they're not going to help me.
00:18:10.000 I'm not going to be able to understand that.
00:18:12.000 You are a bridge to someone like me having the slimmest grasp of an understanding of what this stuff is all about.
00:18:19.000 Although those guys would say that I am doing you a disservice.
00:18:22.000 How so?
00:18:23.000 They would say that I should convince you That there is no deeper intuition that you're missing.
00:18:31.000 That the only way to understand what's going on is you learn the math, you do the calculations, and looking for anything else is looking for too much.
00:18:39.000 Now, I don't feel that way.
00:18:41.000 I feel that in the end of the day when we understand the world deeply, it does give us insights into what's actually happening.
00:18:48.000 The question you asked, What's happening in quantum entanglement is, in my view, the right question to ask.
00:18:55.000 Unfortunately, I can't give you a good enough answer today, even though mathematically we understand it perfectly.
00:19:02.000 I think one day we'll go beyond that.
00:19:04.000 And there is work happening today.
00:19:06.000 There are people who suspect...
00:19:08.000 That quantum entanglement is nothing but another idea of Einstein's in disguise.
00:19:14.000 Wormholes, right?
00:19:16.000 You've encountered wormholes, probably if you've ever watched any like Star Trek, Deep Space.
00:19:20.000 These are tunnels from one point in the universe to the other, kind of shortcuts through the fabric of space.
00:19:26.000 And some suggest that when two particles are entangled, there's actually a secret wormhole.
00:19:33.000 Connecting them.
00:19:34.000 And that wormhole means that they're secretly close together because of the shortcut.
00:19:39.000 So they look like they're far apart, but there's actually a shortcut through a wormhole, so secretly they're actually right next to each other.
00:19:47.000 And then when you do something on one and it affects the other, perhaps it's not so surprising because through the wormhole, they're right next to each other.
00:19:55.000 Anybody that would discourage you from discussing these kind of very strange ideas and expressing them that way, you're going to discourage curiosity.
00:20:05.000 I think so.
00:20:05.000 Which is going to discourage interest in the field, which is going to discourage people to become physicists because it is fascinating.
00:20:12.000 And when you're talking about this concept of spooky action at a distance, you're talking about wormholes connecting things together at far distances and things that we don't truly understand but that you can show mathematically are correct.
00:20:27.000 Like, that's amazing.
00:20:28.000 I agree.
00:20:29.000 I agree.
00:20:29.000 And you have to look at the history, though.
00:20:32.000 There was a period of time When people who thought about what's really going on got sidetracked, in the early days of quantum mechanics, what really needed to happen was develop the math, develop the equations, make predictions, go into the laboratory, have this We're good to go.
00:21:07.000 But we're beyond that.
00:21:08.000 We have quantum mechanics, at least as a working theory that we can use to do wondrous things.
00:21:15.000 And so more and more people are thinking now about these kinds of questions.
00:21:21.000 So I think it's kind of a pendulum has swung toward the more philosophical, toward the more what does it all mean?
00:21:28.000 How can we describe what's really going on here?
00:21:30.000 Whereas if we were having this conversation 10, 15 years ago, I would say virtually no one is really thinking about things in the language that we're talking about.
00:21:40.000 That's really strange, because if you think about how long people have been trying to understand the reality of the universe itself and how recent some of these discoveries are, it really makes you think, like, what are we going to be able to show and prove is true 50 years from now,
00:21:58.000 60 years from now?
00:21:58.000 Because if you go back 100 years ago, you go to 1921, the understanding of the world itself is so grossly different than what we understand today.
00:22:08.000 Yeah, yeah.
00:22:09.000 No, totally.
00:22:10.000 And the other side of that observation, which is exciting and daunting, is think about what science has done more or less to date.
00:22:20.000 It's tried to understand things in the world that naturally form.
00:22:25.000 Stars, planets, black holes, living systems.
00:22:29.000 But from more or less now going forward, we're entering a realm where we are going to start to create the new things that we're going to try to understand as we modify the genome, as we perhaps create artificial life, as we use physics.
00:22:51.000 We're good to go.
00:23:05.000 We're good to go.
00:23:22.000 It's going to be understanding the stuff that we create.
00:23:25.000 And that's an interesting, exciting, but also frightening prospect.
00:23:30.000 So that's the concept of using these principles and this understanding of quantum mechanics to manipulate reality itself.
00:23:37.000 Yeah.
00:23:38.000 How do you anticipate that playing out?
00:23:40.000 That's a tough one.
00:23:41.000 I don't know.
00:23:45.000 It'll certainly be something that we approach in an incremental way.
00:23:49.000 I'm not suggesting that tomorrow we're going to be developing terraforming new worlds or creating parallel universes, but there's a pattern that we certainly see playing out throughout the history of science, which is this.
00:24:03.000 You're presented with some quality of the world.
00:24:05.000 You don't understand it.
00:24:06.000 You then experiment.
00:24:07.000 You observe it.
00:24:08.000 And then little by little you begin to understand that you develop theories, mathematical ideas being the most precise ones to describe whatever it is that you're talking about.
00:24:16.000 And once you have those ideas nailed down, you can then use them to manipulate the world.
00:24:21.000 That's what we do with quantum mechanics.
00:24:23.000 At first we just wanted to understand atoms, right?
00:24:26.000 Particles and things of that sort.
00:24:28.000 Now we can manipulate the quantum world to create, you know, all sorts of technological wonders, the integrated circuit, which is at the core of every technological gadget that has transformed life on planet Earth.
00:24:41.000 This is quantum mechanics in the hands of human beings.
00:24:45.000 And so that pattern of going from lack of understanding to understanding to manipulation Is the pattern that will continue to play out going forward?
00:24:54.000 So that manipulation, what will it be?
00:24:57.000 Well, I think we're going to come to a time when we understand the structure of space far better than we do now.
00:25:03.000 The structure of time far better than we do now.
00:25:06.000 Does that suggest that we'll manipulate space and time?
00:25:09.000 If the pattern persists, yeah.
00:25:11.000 Now what does that mean?
00:25:12.000 Will we build our own wormholes?
00:25:14.000 I don't know.
00:25:15.000 I don't know.
00:25:15.000 That's starting to go into crazy land, the woo that we were talking about before.
00:25:19.000 But maybe it won't be woo a hundred years from now.
00:25:21.000 Or a thousand years from now.
00:25:23.000 If we stick around long enough, if the pattern persists, that understanding ultimately gives you the lever to manipulate, Right now, if you ask me what's happening at the cutting edge of string theory, quantum mechanics, it's understanding black holes.
00:25:35.000 It's understanding how quantum mechanics and black holes talk to each other.
00:25:38.000 And what is black hole?
00:25:39.000 A black hole is a weird region of space-time.
00:25:42.000 So we're trying to understand space-time itself at the deepest possible level.
00:25:47.000 And so the next step would suggest that we will manipulate it at some point in fairly significant ways.
00:25:56.000 So the ways we've used it so far, you mentioned integrated circuits.
00:25:59.000 How is quantum mechanics used to form integrated circuits?
00:26:05.000 So an integrated circuit, in essence, is a little device where you want an electron to follow a very specific trajectory.
00:26:13.000 To carry out this or that computation or process.
00:26:16.000 Now if you want to control electrons with that level of fidelity, you've got to use the mathematical laws that describe electrons with that level of fidelity.
00:26:26.000 Newton's equations from the late 1600s, they won't work.
00:26:29.000 If you think of the electron as a little baseball or a little billiard ball, totally inaccurate.
00:26:33.000 It will not allow you to manipulate their motion.
00:26:35.000 But with quantum mechanics, you can manipulate the motion of the electrons because you understand their mathematical underpinnings.
00:26:43.000 And so it was only by applying quantum mechanics to materials, to structures that could give rise to this kind of control over little particles, that we could build these microscopic circuits.
00:26:53.000 And they work!
00:26:54.000 I mean, that's the proof in the pudding, right?
00:26:57.000 And so that's a key example of quantum mechanics transforming the world as we know it.
00:27:06.000 And right now, there is work in string theory that is suggesting That this notion of quantum entanglement that we were talking about before, that may be the key to understanding the fabric of space-time itself.
00:27:21.000 I mean, we use this metaphor, fabric of space-time, right?
00:27:24.000 But any piece of fabric, it's stitched together by threads, right?
00:27:29.000 So what are the threads of the spatial fabric if we push this metaphor and try to really understand it more fully?
00:27:35.000 And one of the suggestions is the threads of quantum entanglement That tie distant objects together, those may be the threads that hold together the fabric of space-time itself.
00:27:48.000 So that would mean that everything is somehow connected, even if it's 13.7 billion light-years away, these things are somehow or another directly connected.
00:28:00.000 Yes.
00:28:01.000 Now, to avoid that turning into the Wu, you have to realize that When you have a lot of material and when you have a lot of time and a lot of space, these quantum entangled connections become so spread out that they become diluted.
00:28:16.000 So it's not as though someone can say, you know, I thought about my best friend in California and then the phone rang.
00:28:23.000 We must be quantum entangled.
00:28:25.000 That's the sort of stuff that this kind of talk can lead to.
00:28:28.000 But fundamentally what you're saying is correct.
00:28:31.000 It may be the structures in space.
00:28:34.000 Maybe fundamentally connected through these quantum entanglements.
00:28:38.000 And it may be that the substrate, space itself, we don't usually think of space as something because it's kind of invisible.
00:28:46.000 But we're within the fabric of space-time itself.
00:28:49.000 And that arena may be stitched together by these threads of quantum entanglement as well.
00:28:55.000 So this quantum entanglement will be diluted at a distance?
00:28:58.000 So what is the mechanism behind that?
00:29:02.000 It's more diluted by the number of particles that are involved.
00:29:06.000 So if you just have two particles in a pristine environment, like a total vacuum, and they're entangled, you can move them arbitrarily far apart, and the entanglement will not dilute.
00:29:17.000 That's the craziness.
00:29:18.000 You could have two particles on opposite ends of the universe, and you measure one and the other.
00:29:23.000 How is that done?
00:29:24.000 Yeah, good.
00:29:25.000 How do you do that?
00:29:27.000 And there are a number of experimental protocols, procedures, but one concrete one is you take an atom.
00:29:34.000 Like an atom of calcium is one example.
00:29:36.000 You fire some laser on it and that excites the electron in the calcium atom to a higher energetic state.
00:29:44.000 When that electron falls back down to a lower energetic state, it emits photons back to back.
00:29:51.000 And because those photons were emitted from the same process, the electron falling down to a lower energy state, those photons will be entangled.
00:29:59.000 So that's a concrete way where you can have back-to-back photons that will travel arbitrarily far apart if they don't encounter anything else.
00:30:06.000 That will be quantum entangled.
00:30:09.000 Now, you were talking about integrated circuits.
00:30:12.000 Now, I hear a lot of talk about quantum computing.
00:30:16.000 And I don't understand what that is, but everybody's telling me that it's going to revolutionize computing.
00:30:21.000 How so?
00:30:22.000 Well, as with everything, you have to interrogate precisely what one means by revolutionize everything.
00:30:29.000 Maybe in some rough sense that's true.
00:30:32.000 But let me just first say what it is and then say what the possibilities are.
00:30:35.000 So, imagine...
00:30:38.000 That you have a computer that can access the many worlds of quantum mechanics.
00:30:47.000 Now when you're carrying out a calculation, you don't Have the calculation solely take place in one universe.
00:30:55.000 You have it take place in a whole collection of parallel universes.
00:30:59.000 Allowing in some sense to divide up the calculation and in parallel have it take place across this spectrum of universes.
00:31:07.000 Clearly that will rapidly speed up the calculation because now it's no longer happening in one universe.
00:31:13.000 You split it across many universes.
00:31:15.000 So in some sense Quantum computing is trying to leverage that quality of quantum mechanics.
00:31:22.000 Now, that's one language, using the language of many worlds.
00:31:26.000 You don't have to use the language.
00:31:28.000 You can also use just the language of probabilities.
00:31:30.000 So, if you have a particle, like an electron, normally in a classical world, you'd say it's either here or there.
00:31:38.000 In a quantum world, our world, it can be in a mixture of here and there.
00:31:43.000 If it's in a mixture of here and there, you can do calculations here and there.
00:31:49.000 Whereas in a classical world, you could either do the calculation here or there.
00:31:53.000 So it's basically substantially increasing the places where calculations take place, thereby substantially decreasing the amount of time that it takes these calculations to be accomplished.
00:32:09.000 But by what mechanism?
00:32:11.000 What separates quantum computing from regular computing?
00:32:14.000 So in regular computing, you have quantum qualities, because like I said, the integrated circuit, you need it to understand quantum mechanics to guide the motion of the particle through the integrated circuit.
00:32:25.000 But in the end of the day, A traditional computer, a classical computer if we will, stores information as bits, zeros and ones.
00:32:36.000 So you have one bit that's either a zero, another bit that's either a one, and through that you can store information and manipulate information, and that's what computation is all about.
00:32:45.000 The quantum computer changes the bit to the so-called qubit, What is a qubit?
00:32:50.000 A qubit is a specially defined and constructed digit that can be in a mixture of zero and one.
00:33:00.000 And specifically, the way we usually do this is we have what are known as spin systems.
00:33:04.000 So an electron has a spin, like a little top.
00:33:08.000 And it can either spin counterclockwise that we call spin up or clockwise that we call spin down.
00:33:14.000 In a classical world, the electron is either this or this.
00:33:18.000 In the quantum world, it can be a mixture.
00:33:21.000 And so, literally, these quantum computers have these spin systems that are in these mixtures of up and down simultaneously.
00:33:28.000 And that allows them to do multiple computations simultaneously.
00:33:32.000 That allows them to decrease the time it takes to carry out the computation.
00:33:38.000 That's the essence of the idea.
00:33:40.000 Is the structure of the computer different?
00:33:42.000 Totally.
00:33:42.000 So a regular computer has a motherboard, it has a processor, it has a hard drive.
00:33:47.000 What is a quantum computer structured like?
00:33:49.000 You know, if you see some of these things, they look – I've heard them described.
00:33:52.000 It's not a bad description.
00:33:53.000 It's sort of like chandeliers.
00:33:55.000 You've got spin systems in arms of the chandeliers and you have cooling systems that are vital to these computers because – If there's heat that comes into the system, it can destroy this delicate mixture of up and down simultaneously.
00:34:12.000 So they're far more delicate, and it is much more difficult to, at this stage, have the number of bits.
00:34:21.000 So an ordinary computer can have as many bits as you want.
00:34:24.000 As you say, just, you know, put more boards, expand, you know, the random access memory.
00:34:29.000 You know, it's all up to you, the user.
00:34:31.000 For quantum computers, you've got to make sure that all these qubits are working together in order that they can perform these calculations.
00:34:41.000 And it's very hard to have a whole lot of qubits maintain the so-called quantum coherence that allows them to work together.
00:34:49.000 So the maximum number of qubits in quantum computers that have been built is only at 50. I think?
00:35:14.000 And in that way, in principle, being able to do calculations exponentially more quickly.
00:35:18.000 That's the rough idea.
00:35:19.000 How far away are we from implementing quantum computing in daily life?
00:35:23.000 Is it a cooling issue?
00:35:26.000 Is it an issue of just expanding our understanding of how to construct these things?
00:35:32.000 Yeah.
00:35:33.000 There are those in the field who are careful to say that they don't think that we'll ever have quantum computing in everyday life.
00:35:43.000 And the reason for that is largely the cooling issue.
00:35:47.000 And it has to do with the...
00:35:50.000 Difficulty in maintaining the stability of these devices.
00:35:54.000 They're so delicate.
00:35:55.000 Whereas, you know, you drop your laptop, you may crack it or something.
00:35:59.000 But, you know, for the most part, you drop your phone and it's fine.
00:36:02.000 And so there are those who say that we will never have these things in daily life.
00:36:07.000 They'll always be highly specialized, you know, in laboratories that we somehow make use of as opposed to carry around in our pocket.
00:36:13.000 But the same was said about ordinary computers, you know, 60, 70, 80 years ago when a computer in those days filled an entire room with all these vacuum tubes.
00:36:22.000 Whoever thought that we'd be walking around in our pocket with something more powerful than that kind of device?
00:36:28.000 Just 50 years later.
00:36:29.000 Yeah, so I'm skeptical whenever I hear people say, never, never, never.
00:36:32.000 But in this case, I'm almost open to the idea because these systems are...
00:36:37.000 So incredibly delicate.
00:36:38.000 And in fact, one of the hurdles right now in quantum computing is they're not reliable.
00:36:43.000 These qubits, they can flip from one state to another, ruining your calculation very easily.
00:36:50.000 So what some of the quantum computer specialists are developing are what is known as quantum error-correcting codes, redundancies in the information in the quantum system so that when this kind of Spin flip should happen.
00:37:04.000 You can correct it down the line and not have to start the calculation from scratch.
00:37:08.000 What's causing the inconsistencies?
00:37:09.000 Well, it's just the delicacy.
00:37:11.000 You know, the way in which these spins are talking to each other can be disrupted by Any kind of environmental influence at all.
00:37:20.000 So it's just...
00:37:21.000 Power surge.
00:37:22.000 Power surge, heat, you know, any kind of environmental influence.
00:37:25.000 And so it's just a technological hurdle.
00:37:30.000 It's not really a theoretical hurdle.
00:37:32.000 We understand what's going on.
00:37:33.000 It's quantum mechanics, after all.
00:37:34.000 But it's a technological hurdle to realize this possibility.
00:37:38.000 But getting to the other question you said, like, what will it give us if we have these quantum computers?
00:37:43.000 And there are certain calculations...
00:37:46.000 That on a quantum computer you can do in the blink of an eye that might take years or centuries on a classical computer, such as there are certain encryption ideas that have been applied to securing information in banks and things of that sort.
00:38:03.000 In the old days it was basically you'd build these huge prime numbers and you'd multiply them together And it would be the challenge of the person trying to hack your system to have to factor this big number and virtually impossible to do in any reasonable period of time.
00:38:17.000 There's an algorithm that people have come up with that works on a quantum computer that can factor these numbers instantaneously.
00:38:25.000 So that doesn't sound so good, right?
00:38:27.000 It means that information that was secure might not be secure but of course then quantum computer scientists come along and they come up with a new encryption mechanism that's quantum mechanically based And that one would be unbreakable even with a quantum computer.
00:38:41.000 So that's the kind of development which is actually already starting to happen.
00:38:47.000 You know, a student of mine actually works for a company that generates quantum random numbers.
00:38:52.000 You need random numbers in order to be able to have the security that nobody's gonna know what number you actually have.
00:38:59.000 And there are quantum mechanical devices that have already been built to generate those kinds of quantum numbers.
00:39:06.000 But the overarching from 30,000 feet view is that we'll be able to take on calculations that we could never even imagine doing before, and that could revolutionize artificial intelligence.
00:39:19.000 I mean, what is general artificial intelligence about?
00:39:22.000 Looking out at the world and seeing patterns, right?
00:39:25.000 AlphaGo, this wonderful system that learned The game of Go and could beat masters in the world.
00:39:33.000 How did it do it?
00:39:34.000 It looked at a huge number of games and saw the patterns in that huge number of games and with that gained an expertise that allowed it to become the champion Go player in the world.
00:39:45.000 So it's all about pattern recognition.
00:39:47.000 It's all about finding patterns.
00:39:48.000 And that's what a quantum computer in principle could be incredibly powerful at.
00:39:54.000 So artificial intelligence in principle could take an incredible leap forward, simulating various quantum systems that we want to understand better.
00:40:06.000 Now, when we simulate them on a computer, we're simulating them on a classical computer trying to mimic quantum mechanical behavior.
00:40:13.000 Now, if you had a quantum computer, you could actually simulate it with the very physical ideas that are happening in the real world.
00:40:22.000 So now you have a confluence between the methodology of the quantum simulator and the real world allowing you to do things that you couldn't do before.
00:40:29.000 So it's just to say that in principle there's a whole lot of understanding of the external world that these devices could give us and that's why people have become so excited about it.
00:40:40.000 I think it's so interesting that we look to games to find out how intelligent and how powerful computers really are.
00:40:48.000 Like for the longest time is could a computer beat a chess master?
00:40:51.000 And now that problem has been solved.
00:40:55.000 Like not only can a computer beat a chess master, but they always will beat a chess master now, which is really fascinating to people.
00:41:01.000 It totally is.
00:41:01.000 And there's a way in which that makes a lot of sense because what is a game?
00:41:06.000 A game is an artificial universe with very simple rules.
00:41:11.000 And therefore it's a simplified version of reality.
00:41:15.000 And it's also a well-posed game.
00:41:18.000 I mean, tic-tac-toe versus chess, right?
00:41:21.000 The difference is in tic-tac-toe, it's so simple that there's no creativity involved.
00:41:26.000 You know, if you play it correctly, you'll always have a draw, right?
00:41:29.000 But in chess, because of the great number of possibilities, there's a lot of creativity that comes into play.
00:41:35.000 It's a universe with a fixed set of rules, it's simplified, and it has the opportunity for human beings to be creative.
00:41:41.000 And so it's a wonderful testing ground for computers because if a computer can beat a human in that domain, now we can say, aha!
00:41:50.000 That computer, in some sense, is creative.
00:41:53.000 And the thing that we usually look to to define ourselves as human beings, how do we differ from other things in the world, the inanimate world?
00:42:02.000 We're creative, right?
00:42:03.000 We can come up with ideas.
00:42:05.000 We can come up with novel ideas.
00:42:07.000 Innovative ideas.
00:42:08.000 That's kind of how we define ourselves.
00:42:10.000 And so when a computer starts to do that, it starts to challenge our humanity.
00:42:16.000 And I think that's a good thing, right?
00:42:18.000 I don't think that we are as different from the external world as we perhaps like to think.
00:42:25.000 We are collections of particles governed by the laws of physics.
00:42:30.000 And I think it's spectacular that a collection of particles under the ironclad rules of physics can be creative, can come up with ideas, can figure out quantum mechanics and general relativity.
00:42:42.000 Like, how spectacular is that?
00:42:43.000 But all we are are big collections of particles governed by those laws.
00:42:48.000 And all a computer is big collection of particles governed by those rules.
00:42:53.000 So I... Full well anticipate the possibility for a computer to get to our level of cognitive power and beyond.
00:43:04.000 And I full well anticipate that there will be the artificial systems that say to us, I have an inner world.
00:43:12.000 I have conscious awareness.
00:43:15.000 Now, how will we test that computer to see whether it was programmed to say that or whether it actually is having that inner world?
00:43:21.000 I don't know.
00:43:22.000 That's a tough one.
00:43:23.000 But it's a question we face all the time.
00:43:25.000 Like, I assume you have an inner world inside your head.
00:43:29.000 I don't know that for a fact.
00:43:31.000 You, I assume, are making the same assumption about me.
00:43:34.000 How do we come to that?
00:43:35.000 We come to it based on the fact that we're having a conversation and we observe each other's behaviors and all of that comes together to suggest that we are each roughly the same and therefore I assume that what's happening inside your head is roughly the same kind of processes that happen inside of mine.
00:43:50.000 We have to infer it.
00:43:51.000 And we're going to have to infer it for artificial systems too.
00:43:55.000 And, you know, if you walk down the street and there's an artificial system sitting on a park bench, you know, hand on its head saying, I'm so worried.
00:44:04.000 What's it all about?
00:44:05.000 You know, what's life?
00:44:07.000 And if it's real, you're going to say, wow, that computer's having an existential crisis.
00:44:12.000 And there's a real inner world happening in there.
00:44:15.000 What other conclusion could you draw, you know?
00:44:18.000 Yeah, I think we have an internal bias about our own uniqueness in terms of our – because we're so unique in comparison to all the other animals and our ability to manipulate the world and our environment and our use of creativity.
00:44:33.000 Yeah.
00:44:34.000 But it's really just variables.
00:44:36.000 Yes.
00:44:37.000 And if you took into a computer, specifically a super powerful computer like what we're assuming a quantum computer could become – Could take into account all the things that have ever been said by any human being ever, the motivations for those things,
00:44:54.000 whether it's love or emotions or jealousy or narcissism or whatever these weird human quirks are, and they could figure out a way to create works of art.
00:45:07.000 They could figure out a way to do things that are uniquely moving to us.
00:45:12.000 And that's what's going to be really weird.
00:45:14.000 If a computer can write a book that blows you away, a computer can write a better version of The Great Gatsby.
00:45:21.000 Yeah, I agree.
00:45:23.000 And I think it will happen.
00:45:25.000 Because look, what is it that distinguishes us as a species?
00:45:29.000 Many people will point to different things, but one certainly is that we are deeply social as a species, and because of that we've been able to learn from each other And therefore not had to start each generation from scratch, right?
00:45:44.000 Many other animals in the animal kingdom, they basically each generation kind of start from scratch.
00:45:49.000 They don't have books that they can read about discoveries of an early rage.
00:45:53.000 They don't have teachers.
00:45:54.000 I mean some do, but they don't have teachers that can give them the corpus of knowledge going back hundreds of years.
00:46:00.000 They probably don't have universities where they can learn about what happened over the last 500 years and therefore not have to start from scratch.
00:46:06.000 And so When you talk about the capacities of artificial systems, they will be far more social than we.
00:46:15.000 Why?
00:46:15.000 For exactly the reason you're saying.
00:46:17.000 We typically learn from a handful of masters that had, you know, Albert Einstein's work, all physicists learn about it.
00:46:25.000 You know, artists maybe learn about the work of Rembrandt or Picasso, you know, the masters.
00:46:31.000 But an artificial system can learn from every single other artificial system.
00:46:36.000 There's no limit to the connectivity between those systems.
00:46:40.000 So whatever pattern a given artificial system figures out, they'll all know about that pattern simply by communicating among themselves.
00:46:49.000 In our environment, we only communicate with a small number of other human beings over the course of our lives.
00:46:55.000 And again, some of that knowledge is stored and therefore it becomes widely accessible.
00:46:59.000 All knowledge gleaned by any artificial being within the network will be immediately shared by every other artificial being within the network.
00:47:08.000 And therefore, the very thing that makes us special, the collective culture that allows us, each generation, to build on the insights of the previous and not have to go back to the beginning, that will be amplified enormously for artificial systems.
00:47:23.000 So why wouldn't they be able to create the greatest work and the greatest novels?
00:47:28.000 I think that will absolutely be the case.
00:47:31.000 Yeah, we have information that somehow or another passed from parent to child, somehow, through genes.
00:47:38.000 And we see it not just in us, but we see it in the animal world.
00:47:42.000 Like, you can have a dog, and for whatever reason that dog knows it's supposed to lift its leg to pee on a tree, and no one has to teach it it.
00:47:51.000 I have a golden retriever.
00:47:53.000 He loves bringing things back.
00:47:55.000 He throws things, he gets them and he brings them right back.
00:47:58.000 Some dogs it's hard to get them to bring things back.
00:48:00.000 Not golden retrievers.
00:48:02.000 He's got it somehow or another in his system to bring things back to you.
00:48:07.000 It's natural.
00:48:08.000 There's this whole area of evolutionary psychology which applies the ideas of evolution by natural selection Not just to the physical system.
00:48:17.000 That's where we normally learn about it in school.
00:48:19.000 You know, we see how a given species changes over time because there's a random mutation and that mutation allows that individual to better adapt to the environment and therefore that particular morphology, that change, spreads widely through subsequent generations.
00:48:36.000 That's normally how we talk about evolution by natural selection.
00:48:39.000 But as you're saying, it also applies to behaviors.
00:48:41.000 There are certain behaviors that allows an individual to better navigate in the ancestral world, and that behavior If it had some genetic basis, can be passed on to the next generation and passed on to generations still.
00:48:56.000 So yeah, lifting up the leg to pee is one example of that, but there are many other behaviors.
00:49:01.000 I mean, a canonical example is we have a predilection.
00:49:04.000 We like sweet things.
00:49:05.000 We like fats, right?
00:49:07.000 Why?
00:49:08.000 Well, the evolutionary psychologists have noted that in the ancestral world, those of our forebears We're good to go.
00:49:39.000 We are able to store culturally information and breakthroughs from an earlier generation that may not have any relevance to our DNA, and yet we can pass that knowledge on, right?
00:49:53.000 So Newton's ideas and Einstein's ideas, we will continue to pass these ideas on, and I presume they're not going to be imprinted in anybody's DNA. Maybe one day they will be, but certainly at the moment they're not.
00:50:04.000 Your golden retriever, that kind of dog, you're saying it was a golden?
00:50:07.000 Yeah.
00:50:08.000 It can't do that.
00:50:09.000 The mother of your golden retriever and the mother of that mother and going all the way back, they pretty much all lifted up their leg and peed.
00:50:20.000 And there wasn't a whole lot else that got passed through.
00:50:23.000 From sort of cultural heritage of things that one dog discovered that could then pass on to subsequent generations.
00:50:32.000 So what makes us special is we certainly have behaviors that are passed through the lineage in this manner of evolutionary psychology, but we also have culture.
00:50:41.000 And culture allows us to store the insights, the breakthroughs of an earlier age, allowing us to get to where we have gotten.
00:50:49.000 I mean, I've often wondered if I got stuck on a desert island, How much of the world would I be able to recreate?
00:50:55.000 Even how much of the world of physics?
00:50:58.000 Not much, right?
00:50:59.000 Because I have assumed so much from earlier generations.
00:51:04.000 I don't know that I couldn't build an integrated circuit.
00:51:07.000 I couldn't recreate a computer.
00:51:08.000 I could write down the laws of general relativity and quantum mechanics, and I could work out for them the mathematics of black holes and entanglement, that sort of stuff I could do.
00:51:17.000 But there's so much of the culture that I... I have no capacity to reproduce.
00:51:23.000 And that's our collective socialization that we're able to benefit from the fact that we all talk to each other and we all know about things that happened in an earlier age.
00:51:33.000 And that is what makes us special.
00:51:36.000 And that is what we will also pass on to artificial systems because they're going to be able to do that too.
00:51:42.000 It seems like almost a race in time to see if we can get to this quantum computing level in a personal way that you can use before we destroy ourselves.
00:51:54.000 Because if you go back to think about culture and the way we interact with information, how much it's changed since the 1700s, the 1500s, Things had to be written down, then the invention of the printing press, and then all these different steps that have allowed us to access information more readily and easily to the point where we're at now,
00:52:11.000 where you have a phone in your pocket you literally ask a question to, and it'll Google it and come up with the answer for you, and it's amazing, right?
00:52:18.000 I mean, when we were kids, that would have been just a mind-blower, a device in your pocket that you could ask a question to, and it literally has Like, knowledge beyond your wildest dreams, access to scientific papers, thousands of years of people pondering the universe,
00:52:34.000 and you can have the answers to almost any subject right there in your hand, but that's the tip of the iceberg.
00:52:41.000 Yeah, no, it's crazy.
00:52:42.000 In fact, when I was a kid, not to bring up Star Trek again, you're going to sound like a Trekkie.
00:52:46.000 I love Star Trek.
00:52:47.000 Oh, you do?
00:52:47.000 Well, I'm not actually much of a Trekkie, but just one more reference.
00:52:51.000 When I was a kid, I remember thinking about what...
00:52:55.000 Aspects of this television program are the least likely to ever happen.
00:52:59.000 Okay, you got the transporter, you got the faster-than-light trial.
00:53:02.000 To me, it was the computer that you could ask any question, and it would give you the answer.
00:53:07.000 Wow.
00:53:07.000 I was like, that will never, ever happen.
00:53:10.000 And here we are.
00:53:11.000 Did they ask it?
00:53:13.000 Like, did they say, computer?
00:53:14.000 Yeah.
00:53:15.000 That's right.
00:53:15.000 You did it.
00:53:16.000 In fact, Kirk would do it just like that.
00:53:18.000 Computer.
00:53:19.000 Computer, you know.
00:53:20.000 That's right.
00:53:20.000 And the computer would, yes, jump, you know.
00:53:23.000 You know, Jane Smith from 1920. You know, they just come up with the answer.
00:53:26.000 And I was like, that's crazy.
00:53:28.000 That will never happen.
00:53:29.000 I love using Siri to make notes.
00:53:31.000 I always feel like I'm in the future when I can use Siri.
00:53:35.000 Siri, make a note.
00:53:36.000 What would you like it to say?
00:53:38.000 Geez, I've never used Siri that way.
00:53:40.000 How about this?
00:53:40.000 We'll do it right now.
00:53:43.000 Hey Siri, make a note.
00:53:48.000 See, it's a quantum Siri.
00:53:49.000 Oh wait, go ahead.
00:53:50.000 Do it again.
00:53:51.000 Oh, okay.
00:53:51.000 Here, I'll do it again.
00:53:55.000 Hey Siri, make a note.
00:54:00.000 Oh, why didn't I do that?
00:54:02.000 You know why?
00:54:02.000 Because I didn't do Hey Siri, I pressed the button.
00:54:05.000 Hey Siri, make a note.
00:54:08.000 Fuck, bitch.
00:54:11.000 Hey Siri, make a note.
00:54:14.000 Alright, now it's not working.
00:54:15.000 See, I stepped on your demonstration.
00:54:17.000 Hey Siri, make a note.
00:54:22.000 It's not saying it.
00:54:23.000 Wow.
00:54:24.000 We gotta call the Genius Bar.
00:54:25.000 But it did it before, right?
00:54:27.000 Yeah, it did hear it.
00:54:28.000 Maybe it's...
00:54:29.000 Oh, maybe the phone has to be closed.
00:54:30.000 Hey Siri, make a note.
00:54:34.000 Jesus.
00:54:35.000 Wow.
00:54:35.000 Useless sack of shit.
00:54:37.000 Here's Captain Kirk's.
00:54:38.000 Oh!
00:54:39.000 Wait a minute.
00:54:39.000 Okay.
00:54:40.000 It's on Do Not Disturb mode.
00:54:42.000 Hold on.
00:54:43.000 Let me take it off of that.
00:54:44.000 See if that'll help.
00:54:46.000 Hey Siri, make a note.
00:54:49.000 Nothing.
00:54:50.000 What the fuck?
00:54:51.000 Which iPhone is that?
00:54:53.000 Maybe it has to be on...
00:54:54.000 It's a broken one.
00:54:55.000 It's a piece of shit one.
00:54:56.000 It's a brand new one.
00:54:57.000 God damn it.
00:54:58.000 Hey Siri, make a note.
00:55:00.000 Hey Siri, make a note.
00:55:05.000 Hey Siri, make a note.
00:55:14.000 Mine is not listening.
00:55:15.000 It's because it knows I'm talking to Brian Greene.
00:55:17.000 It's like, fuck you, bitch.
00:55:19.000 How do you turn that on and off?
00:55:21.000 Is that in general?
00:55:22.000 I did it.
00:55:24.000 Where do you find Siri?
00:55:26.000 Yeah, it's in settings.
00:55:27.000 I don't know.
00:55:29.000 Mine did it the right of way.
00:55:31.000 But mine did it too, and then it stopped doing it.
00:55:33.000 It's like, you're just too weird.
00:55:34.000 Man, if I would have just shut up, we would have gotten through this.
00:55:36.000 I know.
00:55:37.000 Oh, Siri in search.
00:55:39.000 Here it is.
00:55:42.000 Listen for Hey Siri.
00:55:43.000 Let's shut it off and turn it on.
00:55:45.000 Continue.
00:55:47.000 Hey Siri, make a note.
00:55:51.000 Hey Siri...
00:55:54.000 Hey Siri.
00:55:56.000 Oh my god, you bitch.
00:55:59.000 Hey Siri, make a note.
00:56:01.000 Oh my god, it's useless.
00:56:03.000 Wow.
00:56:04.000 Hey Siri, make a note.
00:56:07.000 What do you want it to say?
00:56:08.000 There you go.
00:56:10.000 Tell Brian Green that he's gotta start eating eggs and he should exercise to strengthen his back.
00:56:23.000 I see it.
00:56:24.000 Super helpful.
00:56:25.000 Okay.
00:56:26.000 Super helpful.
00:56:27.000 Real convenient.
00:56:28.000 So I had to shut it off and turn it back on again.
00:56:31.000 Can Kurt do it?
00:56:33.000 History files.
00:56:37.000 Subject, former Governor Cotus of Tarsus IV, also known as Cotus the Executioner.
00:56:44.000 After that, background on actor Anton Caridion.
00:56:49.000 What?
00:56:51.000 So slow.
00:56:52.000 Piece of shit.
00:56:53.000 It's like Siri.
00:57:14.000 You should be able to get that for Siri, that voice.
00:57:17.000 You know, because Siri could be like an Australian lady.
00:57:19.000 You could have her be a bunch of different things.
00:57:21.000 That'd be a good app, yeah.
00:57:23.000 Yeah.
00:57:23.000 Before we go too far away, did you see...
00:57:25.000 You were talking about this.
00:57:26.000 This is the very crude version of what you're saying.
00:57:28.000 Did you see this come out the other day?
00:57:30.000 What is it?
00:57:31.000 This team created four new songs.
00:57:33.000 Oh, no.
00:57:34.000 From Using AI, from Amy Winehouse, Kurt Cobain, Slash Nirvana.
00:57:39.000 Oh, my God.
00:57:41.000 Did you listen to them?
00:57:42.000 No.
00:57:42.000 Yes.
00:57:43.000 The Nirvana one sounds a little bit like shit, to be honest with you, but the Amy Winehouse one did sound pretty good.
00:57:48.000 Can you play us a little bit of it?
00:57:50.000 Let's see.
00:57:51.000 I guess, yeah.
00:57:51.000 See if we get sued.
00:57:53.000 I'll play the Amy Winehouse one.
00:57:54.000 Yeah, give me a little bit of it.
00:57:57.000 Yeah.
00:58:15.000 Holy shit.
00:58:16.000 That's pretty good.
00:58:17.000 Right.
00:58:27.000 But that's all computer...
00:58:29.000 So the way I read that they did this was they took MIDI files, which would just be a computer-based audio, to recreate the music you're hearing.
00:58:40.000 And then they did what we've heard done to your voice with fake speech patterns.
00:58:45.000 It took like 30 songs to create the lyrics.
00:58:48.000 Jesus.
00:58:49.000 They mixed those together to create a decent-sounding song.
00:58:51.000 So how do they construct the way the song is put together?
00:58:56.000 That's with MIDI. So they took, I don't know, I think it said like 30 to 40 different Amy Winehouse songs.
00:59:01.000 Yeah, and you find patterns.
00:59:03.000 You find patterns, you manipulate the patterns to create a new version of that kind of pattern.
00:59:08.000 You splice them together.
00:59:09.000 So I'll just say the Nirvana one we can play, you've heard a lot more Nirvana songs, so it sounds a little bit less.
00:59:14.000 I'm a big Amy Winehouse fan.
00:59:15.000 That's why I thought, I haven't heard enough of her to know.
00:59:18.000 Play a little bit more of her, because that is bizarre to me.
00:59:24.000 It's showing with this song.
00:59:44.000 That's amazing.
00:59:45.000 That could pass.
00:59:46.000 There you go.
00:59:47.000 Fuck yeah, it could pass.
00:59:48.000 That's good.
00:59:49.000 You hear the Nirvana one for a second?
00:59:50.000 Yeah, let me hear it.
00:59:51.000 Let me hear some of the Nirvana.
00:59:52.000 I just thought this was a little...
00:59:53.000 They gotta be able to recreate heroin and suicidal thoughts.
00:59:57.000 The music doesn't sound as solid.
00:59:59.000 It sounds a little more like a computer.
01:00:07.000 That sounds like a shitty Nirvana cover band from Portland.
01:00:10.000 It's not as good, that's why I didn't want it to say that.
01:00:11.000 But you had the doors there too, right?
01:00:13.000 Yeah, let me hear it.
01:00:14.000 There's a Hendrix one too?
01:00:15.000 I did not listen to that at all.
01:00:16.000 Give me some Hendrix, because I'm a giant Hendrix fan.
01:00:20.000 I'll tell you if this is horse shit.
01:00:51.000 Welcome to my show.
01:00:53.000 Welcome to my show.
01:01:13.000 That's pretty fucking good.
01:01:15.000 They may have had an audio engineer, someone that knows how to mix music to add to how good this sounds.
01:01:20.000 Maybe.
01:01:21.000 But even that, that is again pattern recognition and putting things together.
01:01:25.000 That's a great example.
01:01:27.000 That's all that we do, right?
01:01:28.000 That's what we do.
01:01:29.000 All we do is mix match patterns, modify patterns.
01:01:34.000 That's all that we do anyway.
01:01:36.000 If I'm being cynical, and I often am, that is what's going to lead us to become some sort of a symbiotic creature, some sort of an integrated computer-slash-biological entity.
01:01:48.000 And is that a bad thing?
01:01:49.000 I don't know if it's a bad thing.
01:01:50.000 Yeah, I see.
01:01:51.000 I don't think it's necessarily a bad thing.
01:01:52.000 Oh, you're one of those!
01:01:54.000 LAUGHTER I don't know.
01:01:57.000 You might be right.
01:01:57.000 Look, man, you know more about this shit than I do.
01:02:00.000 Well, all I'm saying is we've been on a particular evolutionary trajectory and for a long time it's been thoroughly biological and thoroughly by random mutations.
01:02:10.000 If that now moves to a new phase in which we've got new kinds of materials and new kinds of ways of modifying the system that's not just random mutation and natural selection, So be it.
01:02:22.000 It seems like that's inevitable when you think about how we have this insatiable desire to innovate.
01:02:28.000 It seems like it's inevitable.
01:02:30.000 I'm sure you're aware of Elon Musk's Neuralink.
01:02:34.000 They're initially going to use it for people that have injuries and diseases and neurological conditions.
01:02:39.000 That's how it always begins.
01:02:42.000 But it seems inevitable.
01:02:45.000 It seems like if we can manipulate matter and, you know, with CRISPR we're manipulating genetics, it just seems inevitable that we're going to one day be something unrecognizable.
01:02:56.000 Right.
01:02:58.000 Yeah.
01:03:20.000 I often wonder about social trends, and there's almost a frantic desire to escape from a lot of the biological constraints that human beings are saddled with.
01:03:33.000 Yeah, of course.
01:03:34.000 One of them being...
01:03:36.000 Death being one of them.
01:03:37.000 Death is a great example, right?
01:03:39.000 The other one being aggression, what we call toxic masculinity.
01:03:44.000 We've never heard of toxic masculinity 20 years ago.
01:03:47.000 It was a desirable trait.
01:03:49.000 And now it's considered toxic.
01:03:52.000 When we think about aggression and war, it's more abhorrent now than ever before in human history.
01:03:59.000 And as we move further and further, not just that, but even cruelty, bullying, there's all these things that are in the forefront of the conversation that we have about what's desirable and not desirable, what we tolerate and what we won't tolerate, and that these things...
01:04:15.000 Bigotry, racism, homophobia, misogyny, but if you break down what they are, they're singling out individual groups for what some people who are ignorant deem as undesirable characteristics.
01:04:32.000 And a lot of it's biologically based.
01:04:34.000 And we're moving away from that.
01:04:36.000 We're less tolerant of that than ever before, even within recent memory, right?
01:04:41.000 And this is moving towards...
01:04:43.000 And also, people are really concerned with mindfulness, being in the moment, being not externally motivated by negative thoughts and feelings.
01:04:54.000 And we're moving towards some weird understanding of what we would deem to be We're good to go.
01:05:24.000 What if they come up with some new method of replicating?
01:05:29.000 Some new method that doesn't involve biological sex?
01:05:33.000 I think it'd be helpful to many physicists.
01:05:35.000 You'll get more work done?
01:05:38.000 Or you'll be able to find mates easier, or it'll no longer be a problem.
01:05:42.000 I think I'll be above.
01:05:44.000 But the other question that that brings up, at what point do you see decision-making?
01:05:50.000 What point do you see decision-making to another structure, an artificially intelligent structure?
01:05:56.000 As soon as it's far better than what we're doing, right?
01:05:58.000 When do you stop walking across a mountain when you can fly over it in a plane?
01:06:02.000 Right.
01:06:03.000 But the difficulty, of course, I mean, now we actually face this in a concrete way.
01:06:08.000 I mean, do you allow an artificial system to have the right to choose who it kills?
01:06:12.000 If there's systems of that sort.
01:06:14.000 Well, once the thing that it's deciding to kill are the other, like the old representation of a human being that is damaging the ocean, polluting the atmosphere, all these different things that come along with being a person who has access to these incredible technologies that we don't have the discipline to utilize these things fully.
01:06:37.000 And one of the reasons for that, I think, is that we haven't invented them personally.
01:06:41.000 Like, you can just get a gun, right?
01:06:44.000 And you just go randomly running around shooting people.
01:06:47.000 Maybe if you developed the concept of gunpowder and figured out how to put it inside a shell casing and figured out a bullet's trajectory and figured out rifling on a gun and all these different...
01:06:58.000 Maybe you would have a greater understanding of what you've created and you'd feel more responsibility to be more cautious with it.
01:07:09.000 Yeah, I feel that same way, though, when it comes to the stuff we were talking about before, being vegan.
01:07:14.000 I feel like so many people eat meat, but they're not part of the process by which that meat gets to their table.
01:07:22.000 And I think if they were, they would probably approach it differently.
01:07:26.000 I think so, for sure.
01:07:29.000 That's why I started hunting.
01:07:31.000 I went from...
01:07:31.000 Do you hunt your own meals?
01:07:33.000 Yes, I hunt.
01:07:34.000 I do it every year.
01:07:36.000 I hunt elk, which is a large animal.
01:07:39.000 So when I get one of those, I can eat it for most of the year.
01:07:42.000 See, I just hunt tofu.
01:07:44.000 That's all I do.
01:07:45.000 It just frees it up and you had it for the whole year.
01:07:47.000 That's so processed.
01:07:49.000 You have to have some processed protein, right?
01:07:52.000 What do you take powders in?
01:07:55.000 I do have a lot of protein powder.
01:07:59.000 But tofu, peanut butter, And, you know, I think the amount of protein that people think that you need, and if you don't have it, you're somehow going to fall apart.
01:08:07.000 I don't know.
01:08:07.000 I don't think that much about it, and I've survived to this point.
01:08:11.000 Now, maybe inside I'm corroding.
01:08:12.000 No, I don't think.
01:08:13.000 You can do it correctly.
01:08:15.000 If you do it correctly, it can be done.
01:08:16.000 You really do need to have some algae, like we were talking about before the podcast started.
01:08:20.000 That's a big one for B12 or supplements somehow or another.
01:08:23.000 For B12. The thing is, like, what are your requirements?
01:08:26.000 Like, if you're trying to maintain a lot of muscle mass, it's very difficult to do that.
01:08:30.000 But clearly I try to do that a lot.
01:08:32.000 Obviously.
01:08:33.000 Clearly.
01:08:33.000 Getting jacked.
01:08:34.000 But that...
01:08:35.000 It's depending upon what you're trying to do.
01:08:37.000 Most people that go vegan slim up.
01:08:39.000 Like, they lose muscle mass and...
01:08:41.000 But some of them, they feel better that way.
01:08:43.000 Like the more mass that you have, one thing that it's got more of a cardiovascular requirement.
01:08:48.000 So it's more difficult to do long distance things when you have more mass.
01:08:52.000 And there's a lot to be said for slimming down depending upon like what your activities are that you enjoy.
01:08:59.000 Sure.
01:08:59.000 What you're trying to do.
01:09:00.000 Yeah, yeah.
01:09:01.000 Yeah.
01:09:02.000 And for me, it's mostly sitting at the desk, typing away, doing physics.
01:09:07.000 As long as you have energy.
01:09:09.000 Most certainly can be done correctly.
01:09:11.000 But that's why I was encouraging you to get eggs.
01:09:14.000 Because eggs are really...
01:09:15.000 If you have your own chickens and you live in a place where you can do that...
01:09:20.000 Chickens, it's a really great deal you have with the chickens.
01:09:23.000 They're like your pets, but they give you food.
01:09:26.000 And you don't have to hurt them or coerce them.
01:09:29.000 In my chickens, I would just come up to them and pick them up.
01:09:31.000 And they would be cool.
01:09:32.000 I was picking them up since the time they were chicks.
01:09:34.000 So they'd be like, oh, is that dude going to pick me up?
01:09:36.000 There was no weird issues.
01:09:38.000 I'd pick them up, take an egg, touch them on their little head.
01:09:40.000 Everybody was good.
01:09:42.000 And they got food from me, and they gave me food.
01:09:44.000 They made food.
01:09:45.000 How many chicks did you have?
01:09:47.000 At one point in time, I had 22. They were killed by my dog and by coyotes.
01:09:51.000 It's a long, complicated story, but the coyotes, at one point in time, honey-potted my dog and tricked him into killing chickens.
01:10:01.000 Because I had a huge dog at the time.
01:10:03.000 I had this Mastiff.
01:10:04.000 His name was Johnny Cash.
01:10:06.000 And he thought the coyotes was his friend.
01:10:09.000 I thought it was a dog.
01:10:10.000 He's like, hey, little friend.
01:10:11.000 And he was so big, the coyote knew, I can't kill this motherfucker.
01:10:15.000 But I think I could trick this dummy into breaking into that cage.
01:10:18.000 Because he's so big, he broke through the chicken coop.
01:10:21.000 Wow.
01:10:22.000 Two times.
01:10:23.000 One, chickens do a thing called molting.
01:10:26.000 Do you know what that is?
01:10:27.000 I think I do.
01:10:28.000 Isn't that when all the feathers?
01:10:30.000 Yeah, not molting.
01:10:31.000 Brooding.
01:10:32.000 Brooding.
01:10:32.000 And what brooding is, a chicken gets this idea that this egg that they're laying, even though there's no rooster, because chickens lay eggs with no rooster and those eggs never become an actual chick.
01:10:43.000 But the chickens get this idea in their head that this egg they're sitting on is going to become a live chick.
01:10:50.000 Because that's what they're supposed to be doing.
01:10:52.000 They're supposed to breed with the rooster and the rooster gives them a chick and it comes out of the egg.
01:10:56.000 So the chicken will just decide this.
01:10:57.000 They'll pull their feathers off and they'll sit on this egg and they'll do it.
01:11:01.000 They want to do it for like a long time.
01:11:03.000 And if you come anywhere near that, they'll peck at you.
01:11:05.000 So you have to take them out of their little cage where they're sitting on this egg.
01:11:10.000 They were in a large chicken coop that was bigger than this room.
01:11:14.000 And they also free range.
01:11:15.000 Like I would open the chicken coop in the morning and they would run around the yard.
01:11:18.000 But I'd have to take them out and put them in a separate smaller cage where they have to stand on a rail.
01:11:23.000 And you'd have to do it for a couple of days so they get it out of their head that they're raising a chick.
01:11:28.000 It's just some weird process.
01:11:30.000 And if you don't go through that process then it takes them like a full cycle of like 20 something days before they get out of it.
01:11:36.000 But they injure themselves.
01:11:38.000 They pluck all their feathers off.
01:11:39.000 They get real weird.
01:11:41.000 It's like some system happens in their head.
01:11:43.000 So I had to put them in a smaller cage.
01:11:46.000 And the coyote tricked the dog into smashing this cage.
01:11:50.000 So me and the kids and my wife were playing some board game.
01:11:53.000 I forget what it is.
01:11:54.000 We're sitting in the living room.
01:11:55.000 And I see this fucking coyote run through the backyard with a chicken in its mouth.
01:12:00.000 Really?
01:12:02.000 I'm telling you, dude, I had a fence that was like six feet tall, and this coyote jumped over that thing like it didn't exist.
01:12:09.000 It was so elegant, so graceful.
01:12:12.000 I never saw a coyote do that before, so I thought, well, fucking six foot fence, we're not getting through this.
01:12:18.000 Dude, it was like this.
01:12:19.000 Boing!
01:12:20.000 To the top.
01:12:21.000 Bing!
01:12:21.000 Their feet landed on the top of like a cast iron fence or a wrought iron fence rather.
01:12:27.000 Landed on the top and bounced right over it like it didn't exist.
01:12:30.000 And then I go, how the fuck did he get the chicken?
01:12:32.000 And I open up the door and I go in the backyard and there's Johnny Cash, the Mastiff, standing in front of this smashed box.
01:12:39.000 And I'm like, you dumb motherfucker!
01:12:41.000 You smashed that so the chicken could get...
01:12:43.000 The coyote could steal the chicken!
01:12:45.000 So then, unfortunately, he had it in his head that it's fun to kill chickens.
01:12:50.000 Because the coyote did that.
01:12:52.000 And then he looked at the chicken coop, not that day, but like a couple months later, he's like, I think I can just run right through that fucking thing.
01:12:58.000 Because he was big.
01:12:59.000 And so he just used his paws and smashed a hole through the chicken wire.
01:13:04.000 Because chicken wire is not going to stop a 140 pound mastiff.
01:13:08.000 And he just tore a hole through and just went on a rampage.
01:13:11.000 And he killed them?
01:13:12.000 He killed a bunch of them.
01:13:13.000 Really?
01:13:13.000 But then we fixed the cage and then kept him from that part of the yard and then a fire came.
01:13:20.000 And then the fire burnt the chicken coop down and there were some chickens remaining.
01:13:24.000 They didn't die in the fire.
01:13:26.000 They actually escaped.
01:13:27.000 Once the fire started burning the chicken coop, it kind of fell apart and they actually lived.
01:13:32.000 But then we put them in a smaller chicken coop.
01:13:34.000 This is a long fucking story.
01:13:35.000 Then the coyotes figured out how to get into that chicken coop and they killed them all.
01:13:39.000 So that was it.
01:13:40.000 But that fire that you referred to right there, going back to our evolutionary story, that's a critical moment.
01:13:45.000 I mean, fire, you say, what made us human?
01:13:47.000 Fire made us human, right?
01:13:50.000 With fire, all of a sudden, we could outsource digestion, cook the food externally so that we could have the amount of calories and nutrition that otherwise...
01:13:59.000 Kill off parasites as well.
01:14:00.000 Yeah, totally.
01:14:01.000 A lot of things became edible.
01:14:03.000 So just another example of these...
01:14:07.000 Moments in our history that are pivotal that you don't focus attention on is necessarily that thing that made us ultimately who we are.
01:14:16.000 So what things are we doing today that generations of the future or millennia in the future will look back and aha, that's when we went through the transformation.
01:14:23.000 It's very hard to know.
01:14:24.000 But these things can have a ripple effect that is of profound consequences.
01:14:29.000 And computing, for sure, has the biggest ripple effect of our lifetime.
01:14:33.000 I think that's for sure.
01:14:35.000 And the other thing is, I don't know if you're familiar with this, but there's now a connection between quantum computing and black holes.
01:14:43.000 Yeah.
01:14:44.000 What's that connection?
01:14:45.000 It's a weird one.
01:14:46.000 It's all weird.
01:14:47.000 Well, this is like weird squared or something.
01:14:51.000 But work over the last 20 years has established that When you have a black hole, actually even more general systems, but talk about a black hole, there's an alternate description of a black hole in terms of what's known as the holographic description.
01:15:05.000 It's as if there's a two-dimensional world that surrounds any given three-dimensional world that has exactly the same physics as the three-dimensional world that we're familiar with and yet it describes it in a completely different language.
01:15:19.000 So a black hole gravity is obviously essential.
01:15:22.000 That's how a black hole forms.
01:15:24.000 But in this dictionary that physicists have developed, there's a description of a black hole that doesn't involve gravity, only involves quantum mechanics.
01:15:32.000 And the beautiful thing is the quantum processes in that quantum world Mimic the kinds of processes that people have been developing for quantum computing, quantum error correction code.
01:15:45.000 And there's a dictionary that people have proposed for that quantum language on the holographic boundary with physics in the interior.
01:15:54.000 And the dictionary shows that the quantum error correcting code may be the reason why space-time itself holds together.
01:16:02.000 So there's this bizarre way in which everything that we know about in the world around us has a translated dictionary version in a different world that lacks gravity but has quantum mechanics.
01:16:13.000 And so people are using some of the insights from quantum computing to understand questions about black holes in space-time.
01:16:24.000 Is that strange?
01:16:25.000 That's so strange.
01:16:26.000 So as quantum computing expands, much like as computing expands, if you go back to the early NASA computers that filled up a whole room, we can extrapolate that as we get better at this and you look 50 years down the line from now, quantum computing will be the standard, it will be the norm.
01:16:42.000 And it will probably radically alter our understanding of everything.
01:16:47.000 Including black holes.
01:16:48.000 Including black holes.
01:16:49.000 That's right.
01:16:49.000 So there's a real possibility that the language that we use for space-time and black holes may bear a profound imprint of the language that we are developing to understand quantum computing, quantum computers.
01:17:04.000 I was just reading some article about black holes roaming through the universe and that some of them, they're detached from galaxies, right?
01:17:11.000 They can be.
01:17:12.000 I mean, oftentimes people think about black holes as these gargantuan structures that form from collapsed stars.
01:17:19.000 There's a big one in the center of our Milky Way galaxy, weighs four million times out of the sun.
01:17:24.000 The photograph of a black hole in the galaxy M87 that got the world excited a couple of years back, 55 million light years away, billions of times the mass of the Sun, but the reality is Anything, if you compress it enough, becomes a black hole.
01:17:40.000 If you take an orange and you squash an orange down sufficiently small, according to Einstein, it becomes a black hole.
01:17:46.000 So these things don't have to be gargantuan.
01:17:49.000 The flip side of it is we also typically have an intuition that black holes are really dense, right?
01:17:55.000 That's usually the way we think about them.
01:17:57.000 But if you make something sufficiently large, regardless of how low its density is, it will also become a black hole.
01:18:03.000 So you can make a black hole out of air.
01:18:06.000 By just having enough air.
01:18:07.000 If you have enough air, sufficiently large sphere of air, it would become a black hole too with the density of air.
01:18:16.000 So all the intuitions that we typically have about black holes, that they have to be dense and they have to be gargantuan, not right.
01:18:24.000 So black holes are just a part of the elemental structure of reality itself.
01:18:30.000 Yeah, when you look at Einstein's equations, right in his mathematics, there's a little formula that you can see where it says if you have any mass m, whatever mass you want, And you squeeze it into a radius, r, that's less than 2 times Newton's constant,
01:18:46.000 2g, times m, divided by c squared.
01:18:49.000 Speed of light squared.
01:18:50.000 A formula.
01:18:51.000 Details don't matter.
01:18:52.000 But you take any mass, if the radius within which that mass sits is less than 2gm over c squared, it is a black hole.
01:18:58.000 Period.
01:18:59.000 End of story, according to Einstein.
01:19:01.000 Now, Einstein left out quantum mechanics.
01:19:04.000 Weirdly, right?
01:19:05.000 Because his Nobel Prize was for quantum mechanics.
01:19:09.000 It was for a paper he wrote in 1905 about the photoelectric effect.
01:19:12.000 But he never really believed that quantum mechanics was the true description of the world.
01:19:19.000 And when he was developing the general theory of relativity, he was just thinking about gravity and not quantum mechanics.
01:19:24.000 Stephen Hawking came along in 1974 and started to inject quantum mechanics into our understanding of things like black holes.
01:19:31.000 And that's where Hawking proved that black holes are not completely black.
01:19:35.000 He showed that black holes allow a certain amount of radiation to leak out of their surface, leak out of the event horizon, or leak out from just beyond the edge of the event horizon.
01:19:45.000 And so, yes, when you think about black holes, as far as we can tell, they are a fundamental quality of the world, but you have to include quantum physics to truly understand them, and that's the cutting edge of what's happening right now.
01:19:58.000 So they're a fundamental quality of the world but they're also in the center of every galaxy.
01:20:04.000 It seems to be the case.
01:20:05.000 The Sloan Digital Sky Survey did a wonderful study of a vast number of galaxies and I've seen these wonderful images where they put like a little red circle around all those galaxies that have a black hole in their center and there are red circles all over that imagery.
01:20:23.000 So it seems to be a ubiquitous quality.
01:20:26.000 That black holes are at the center of galaxies, and those are typically gargantuan black holes, millions or billions of times the mass of the Sun.
01:20:35.000 Do we know why they exist at the center of the galaxy?
01:20:38.000 You know, there's still a lot of uncertainty about galactic formation.
01:20:43.000 You know, some have suggested that Early stars, which were quite large compared to more modern stars, when they exhausted their nuclear fuel and they collapsed in on each other, they created black holes that were large, and then they continued to suck in more material from the environment,
01:21:01.000 and they grew larger and larger still.
01:21:02.000 So that's sort of one rough way that people think about how these massive, enormous black holes may have formed, but it's uncertain.
01:21:10.000 LIGO, this laser interferometer gravitational wave observatory, gravitational waves, it took headlines a few years ago when it detected the first ripples in the fabric of space.
01:21:21.000 It detected them from two black holes that were 1.4 billion light years away, like 1.4 billion years ago, rotating around each other, going near the speed of light, slamming into each other, creating a tidal wave in the fabric of space,
01:21:36.000 That rippled outward at the speed of light.
01:21:39.000 Part of it raced toward planet Earth.
01:21:41.000 There wasn't anybody on planet Earth to see it at that moment, but it had a 1.4 billion year journey to traverse.
01:21:47.000 It raced toward planet Earth.
01:21:49.000 When it's about 100,000 light years away, it grazes the Milky Way galaxy.
01:21:53.000 It continues to race toward Earth.
01:21:55.000 When it's 100 light years away, a guy named Albert Einstein writes down equations that suggest there could be these gravitational waves, unknown that one is already racing toward the planet, right?
01:22:05.000 Wow.
01:22:05.000 And it continues to race onward two light days.
01:22:08.000 It's two light days away when they turn on the newly refined version of the LIGO detector.
01:22:13.000 And two days later, that wave rolls by.
01:22:16.000 Planet Earth shakes the two detectors, one in Louisiana and the Washington State, giving us the first direct detection of ripples in the fabric of space and establishing that the story that I told you is true.
01:22:26.000 Wow.
01:22:27.000 So these things are real.
01:22:29.000 They're out there.
01:22:31.000 That is wild.
01:22:32.000 And before the direct radio-telescopic imagery from the Event Horizon Telescope of the black hole in M87, that ripple in the fabric of space was the most direct evidence that black holes are real.
01:22:44.000 Because when you took the way that the machine in Louisiana and Washington, it twitched for just a tiny fraction of a second...
01:22:51.000 When you figured out, using supercomputers, what the cause of the wave must have been, you are led to two black holes that are 28 and 31 times the mass of the Sun, or 36 times the mass of the Sun, numbers of that sort.
01:23:06.000 And that was the only explanation for the data.
01:23:08.000 And so there's this beautiful indirect proof that these stellar-sized black holes are actually out there.
01:23:16.000 And then, of course, we take a photograph of one in a nearby galaxy.
01:23:19.000 So do we know why black holes would collide with each other?
01:23:23.000 Are they attracted to each other because of their mass?
01:23:26.000 It's a good question.
01:23:26.000 Yeah, so certainly that is part of it.
01:23:29.000 So binary star systems are not uncommon.
01:23:33.000 They're fairly common where two stars will be orbiting around each other.
01:23:44.000 We're good to go.
01:24:03.000 A black hole whose mass is the same as the sun has the same gravitational pull as the sun.
01:24:08.000 It doesn't pull any harder than the sun.
01:24:11.000 It's just that you can get closer to it because it's so small and therefore you can experience the gravity more strongly.
01:24:18.000 But, you know, a brick of mass M and a black hole of mass M, they exert the same gravitational pull.
01:24:24.000 Okay, so we have this misconception that black holes are always these supermassive objects that have incredible amounts of gravity, and they're sucking in planets and stars and churning them up.
01:24:35.000 Because we're thinking of massive black holes, like the supermassive black holes are at the center of the galaxy, which is like, what, one half of one percent of the mass of the galaxy?
01:24:43.000 Well, let's see.
01:24:44.000 So if our galaxy has, say, 100 billion suns, you know, and that guy is about 4 million times the mass of the sun, yeah, you're talking about, you know, a thousandth or something of that sort.
01:24:57.000 Isn't that crazy when you say that, 100 billion suns, and you have to wrap your head around the idea of 100 billion stars?
01:25:04.000 And that's just our little puny little galaxy.
01:25:07.000 Isn't that crazy?
01:25:08.000 There are at least 100 billion galaxies.
01:25:10.000 At least.
01:25:10.000 And this is just in the observable universe.
01:25:13.000 I mean, do you know if you take your thumb and you put your thumb on a nice clear night and you block out a thumbnail worth of the sky, you're blocking out about 10 million galaxies.
01:25:25.000 It's so crazy.
01:25:26.000 It's so crazy because those numbers, I hear you say those numbers, I can repeat those numbers, but I don't think I'm really internalizing them.
01:25:35.000 You can't because they're so non-human scale, right?
01:25:38.000 We've just never experienced anything like that at all.
01:25:42.000 And it could be that it's infinite.
01:25:44.000 Space could go on infinitely far.
01:25:46.000 It could be that the galaxies continue onward infinitely far.
01:25:50.000 And therefore the numbers we're talking about could be minuscule on the scale of the fullness of reality.
01:25:57.000 And of course that leads people to the conclusion, well, there must be other life out there.
01:26:03.000 There are all these planets around all of these stars, all of these suns that are out there.
01:26:07.000 Yeah.
01:26:08.000 I'm sympathetic to that perspective, but on the other hand, there are some pretty iconic qualities of our environment that allowed life to form, and intelligent life to form is yet another special event on top of the unlikeness of life itself forming.
01:26:28.000 So who knows?
01:26:29.000 You know, if a meteor hadn't slammed into the earth 65 million years ago, it'd still be the dinosaurs walking around, and who knows, maybe they'd Yeah.
01:26:55.000 Yeah, it's one of those things that are—it's probably one of the biggest questions that the human race has ever contemplated.
01:27:02.000 Are we alone?
01:27:03.000 And if we are alone, is that good?
01:27:06.000 Is it bad?
01:27:08.000 Like, is it sad?
01:27:09.000 Is it lonely?
01:27:09.000 Like, if life really is so difficult to cultivate to the point where it gets to be able to alter its environment the way we do, if this really is a one in a hundred trillion opportunities— Well, to my mind,
01:27:25.000 that gives us a certain profound responsibility.
01:27:29.000 Yeah.
01:27:29.000 Right?
01:27:29.000 I mean, we could be.
01:27:31.000 We could be the only intelligent life in the cosmos, and what are we doing with our time?
01:27:36.000 Well, some people are making quantum computers that may revolutionize what it means to be a person.
01:27:40.000 But if that's happening all throughout the galaxy, that's when things get really strange.
01:27:44.000 If there's multiple examples of this, but not where we are, maybe 500 years ago, and maybe 500 years from, and maybe a million years from, dependent upon the vulnerability of their solar system, right?
01:27:57.000 Yeah.
01:27:57.000 Yeah, and some people find that frightening, right?
01:28:00.000 Some people worry that—I mean, you know, the James Webb Space Telescope is supposed to launch in October, I think it is.
01:28:08.000 And it's going to have this refined capacity to look at planetary atmospheres.
01:28:14.000 As planets go by their host star, they're going to observe the spectra of light that's absorbed by that planet's atmosphere— And so there's a chance that you might find biomarkers.
01:28:24.000 Right, like nitrogen.
01:28:25.000 Yeah, you know, methane and carbon dioxide and so forth.
01:28:29.000 And so the question then is, let's say there's some unmistakable signature that there's some life.
01:28:35.000 Now, first of all, it may not be intelligent life, but do you take a chance that it is?
01:28:39.000 Do you try to, you know, make contact?
01:28:42.000 I mean, you know, Stephen Hawking famously was like, don't contact the aliens, right?
01:28:46.000 He was like, every time...
01:28:49.000 A civilization encounters another civilization that's not good for one of them, right?
01:28:54.000 We see that on planet Earth, you know?
01:28:56.000 But we're crude.
01:28:58.000 Like, when we're saying that, we're talking about crude territorial apes encountering other crude territorial apes throughout history, right?
01:29:06.000 When human beings have encountered other human beings, they've gone, what do you have?
01:29:09.000 You have gold?
01:29:10.000 I'll take that.
01:29:11.000 Give me your women, give me this, give me that, and, you know, I'm gonna light everything else on fire.
01:29:15.000 But that's just humans.
01:29:17.000 If we can get past this, like what we were discussing before, that the human race itself, culturally, is moving pretty far away from where we were when we had to worry about pirate ships pulling up through our docks.
01:29:28.000 And that if we continue to go on this path, and we get to the point where we all look like those gray aliens with the little feeble bodies and the giant heads, I think that iconic image, I think that's almost like we understand where this is going.
01:29:43.000 Right.
01:29:44.000 So the benign alien that we will one day become, if that's who we'd be contacting at some distant planet, then maybe it would be fine.
01:29:52.000 And look, how spectacular would it be to encounter another life form?
01:29:57.000 First, to see whether the biochemistry is the same.
01:30:01.000 Is life this one-off chance it happened only once?
01:30:04.000 On these two planets because there's some coincidence, or is it that there are many ways to get living systems and many ways to get intelligent living systems?
01:30:13.000 That is the first data that we'd ever have of that sort, for sure.
01:30:18.000 But, yeah, I mean, the question is, will we get to a place where they're not afraid of us, you know, if perhaps they're that much further ahead of us at the moment?
01:30:29.000 Have you paid attention at all to the Pentagon's disclosure of these unidentified flying objects or what do they call them?
01:30:37.000 Unidentified aerial phenomenon?
01:30:39.000 Yeah, anytime I hear that stuff, my eyes glaze over, I have to tell you.
01:30:43.000 Because it's not that there can't be alien life.
01:30:48.000 It just feels to me so unlikely that they'd come all that way and hide.
01:30:53.000 They come all that way, and just as we're about to make contact with them, they turn on the cloaking device or something of that sort.
01:31:01.000 If they're able to travel that interstellar distance, they're not going to be afraid of us.
01:31:06.000 They may not be interested in us.
01:31:07.000 But why would you assume that they're afraid of us?
01:31:08.000 Why wouldn't you assume that they're curious and observing and making sure we don't blow ourselves up?
01:31:14.000 If they're able to do that, I think that they'd be better at cloaking themselves, that we have no evidence that they're here whatsoever.
01:31:23.000 Wouldn't you think that the best way to acclimate people to the concept of extraterrestrial life is to slowly expose people to things purposefully?
01:31:35.000 Yeah, I don't know that I would do it in sort of a mystery manner if I was designing that level of sort of aversion therapy, you know, to try to get them used to this idea that there's other life in the universe.
01:31:50.000 Nor would I take the approach, say, of, you know, the Twilight Zone episode, you know, the famous one, you know, to serve man.
01:31:58.000 It's a cookbook.
01:31:59.000 You know, I think...
01:32:01.000 That's the other approach.
01:32:03.000 But the other thing to bear in mind that I think puts us in a slightly funky context and brings us full circle, if space goes on infinitely far, which is certainly a real possibility, then you can mathematically argue that not only is there other life definitely out there,
01:32:18.000 there are copies of us.
01:32:22.000 An infinite number of copies.
01:32:24.000 An infinite number of copies, because in any finite region of space with a finite amount of energy, there are only finitely many ways that the particles can be arranged.
01:32:33.000 And therefore, if you go on infinitely far, the particle arrangement has got to repeat, right?
01:32:39.000 I mean, it's like you have a deck of cards.
01:32:41.000 As you shuffle the cards, you get this order, that order, the next order.
01:32:44.000 But you and I know you shuffle it enough times, it has to repeat because there are only a finite number of different orders of the cards.
01:32:50.000 So if you shuffle it enough times, you're going to have to come back full circle.
01:32:53.000 Similarly, you're going to have to come back full circle with a particle configuration if you go sufficiently far away.
01:32:59.000 And so that would say that, yeah, of course there's other intelligent life out there.
01:33:04.000 We are out there.
01:33:05.000 I mean, literally, we have.
01:33:08.000 In the sense of our configuration would be among those particle arrangements out there in this infinitely large universe.
01:33:15.000 So it's a very strange idea.
01:33:17.000 There's an infinite number of you and I having this conversation.
01:33:19.000 In fact, in some of those there's a difference between What we observe here and what's happening out there.
01:33:27.000 Infinite variability.
01:33:28.000 Infinite.
01:33:28.000 Again, it's anything that's allowed by the laws of physics.
01:33:31.000 Any configuration allowed by the laws of physics in principle would happen out there.
01:33:34.000 So, you know, some would argue that that means that space does not go on infinitely far because the conclusion's too absurd, you know, to accept.
01:33:42.000 But the world...
01:33:43.000 I don't think that's absurd because the world's absurd.
01:33:45.000 Well, I would say that the world isn't constructed...
01:33:49.000 By our definition of absurdity, right?
01:33:51.000 The world just doesn't care.
01:33:53.000 It is what it is.
01:33:56.000 But it's a mind-bending possibility, which doesn't really reflect on the question of whether there's life out there in the usual sense, because we mean in the observable universe that we have direct access to, and these regions would be too far away.
01:34:10.000 But in that sense, we would be guaranteed.
01:34:13.000 That there would be life out there in this wider landscape.
01:34:17.000 As we talked about, the concept of hundreds of billions of suns is so difficult for us to wrap our brain around.
01:34:23.000 But that's nothing in comparison to the idea of an infinite number of universes.
01:34:31.000 Yeah.
01:34:31.000 An infinite number of the exact same thing that's happening on Earth happening all over the universe.
01:34:39.000 Because it's so big.
01:34:40.000 Yeah.
01:34:44.000 A hundred billion is impossible to wrap your head around, but that is beyond impossible.
01:34:49.000 I'm saying it, but my puny little brain is just spitting out the words in the correct order.
01:34:54.000 That's all I'm doing.
01:34:55.000 But it's kind of the best that we can do.
01:34:59.000 Because again, the only things that we have intuition for are the things that we have experienced.
01:35:04.000 And infinity is something that we have never experienced.
01:35:07.000 So it's a concept that we kick around Fairly freely, but it's a hard idea to really wrap your mind around.
01:35:14.000 But we're talking about in terms of distance, right?
01:35:17.000 We're talking about infinite distance, and through this infinite distance, there's infinite possibilities, and through those infinite possibilities, there would be what we're experiencing here in infinite forms and infinite variabilities all throughout the universe.
01:35:29.000 But when you're talking about the many worlds theory, you're talking about it Occurring not in a distance, but you're talking about it almost like in a...
01:35:41.000 It's sort of a separate realm, that's how we normally talk about it, and those parallel worlds are somehow in existence but they're not touching us, they're not like directly connected to us.
01:35:51.000 And even those parallel worlds have infinite universes attached to them that are different but connected.
01:35:58.000 That's right.
01:35:59.000 Now the weird thing that happened some years ago, and it's an idea that's still in development, Some physicists have suggested that the infinite worlds of the many worlds interpretation and the infinite worlds of infinite space,
01:36:15.000 you know, that we're talking about from just having reality extend infinitely far, they may be connected.
01:36:21.000 There may be a connection.
01:36:22.000 I think we're good to go.
01:36:44.000 So the same idea described differently.
01:36:46.000 So somehow or another, these infinite versions of us that appear all throughout the galaxy are us.
01:36:53.000 And they are the worlds demanded by this particular version of quantum mechanics.
01:36:57.000 And somehow or another, we're interconnected.
01:36:59.000 Yes.
01:37:00.000 With those worlds.
01:37:01.000 Yes, through this sort of quantum wave function that would have all these possibilities.
01:37:05.000 But that's when people get real woo-woo, they open up this possibility that every decision you make changes reality itself because you're now in a different timeline, you're now in a different version of what the universe is doing.
01:37:17.000 Yeah, but for any individual experience, as far as we know, each individual psyche It's not something that...
01:37:36.000 Impacts me in a profound way because my experience is limited to the particular trajectory that I follow.
01:37:42.000 Your day-to-day.
01:37:43.000 My day-to-day.
01:37:44.000 So is it a mind-slapper to imagine that there's a version of me out there?
01:37:50.000 Yeah.
01:37:51.000 If I allow myself to fully take that in, it can even be distressing.
01:37:56.000 It's like, who am I? You're being to wonder what kind of...
01:38:00.000 Identity, what kind of personal identity you have in a universe where there are multiple versions of you out there in the wider cosmos.
01:38:06.000 But who can keep that in mind for more than a split second?
01:38:10.000 Again, we go back to, Brian, make the dinner.
01:38:14.000 Brian, take out the trash, man.
01:38:16.000 Reality intrudes.
01:38:19.000 But there's also this faith that we have to have that the reality that we experience when we wake up every morning is the reality that we've been experiencing our whole life.
01:38:28.000 Yeah.
01:38:34.000 Yeah.
01:38:36.000 Yeah.
01:38:46.000 When we lose that capacity to hold on to memories, we lose everything, right?
01:38:51.000 We lose everything that defines who we are.
01:38:54.000 And that's one of the saddest things about people that have memory disorders, when you start to see them slipping away and not recognize their own children and not understanding what's going on or where they are.
01:39:04.000 My wife's mother, I hope it's not too personal, but she has Alzheimer's.
01:39:12.000 And yeah, she no longer recognizes her kids.
01:39:15.000 And it's profoundly sad.
01:39:19.000 There's a shell of an individual who's left, but without memory, there's no sense of who you were as a person any longer.
01:39:26.000 Right, you're just sort of existing in this fragile state, dependent upon all the people around you to use their memory to sort of keep you going.
01:39:35.000 And if you think about it, again, it's a whole distinguishing quality of being a human, right?
01:39:41.000 Lives in the moment.
01:39:42.000 Sure, I mean, all life has some degree of memory, and I'm not saying anything other than that, but most life lives in the moment in terms of the goal-oriented behaviors are fixated on solving an issue of the moment.
01:39:57.000 Get the food, get the shelter, escape that predator, right?
01:40:01.000 We are among the few species, and certainly we have the most refined version, where we can lift ourselves out of the cosmic timeline.
01:40:10.000 We can imagine the distant past, we can make predictions about the far future, and we can see our lives within a temporal narrative that most other animals just have no awareness of.
01:40:22.000 And to my mind, that comes with power.
01:40:26.000 We can understand things so much more deeply, but it's also tragic because we're also the sole species who really understands death, right?
01:40:36.000 I mean, some people say to me, what about elephants?
01:40:37.000 And I say, yeah, elephants, they do have morning rituals.
01:40:40.000 I'm not saying that they don't respond to death of a member of their group, but that is, again, responding to something of the moment.
01:40:49.000 And sure, they, for a few days, will carry out a ritual behavior.
01:40:53.000 We live our lives constantly aware of the fact that our time is limited.
01:40:59.000 Our time is finite.
01:41:01.000 That drives this search for meaning that many of us are on.
01:41:05.000 That drives this search for purpose.
01:41:08.000 That singular capacity of our brains to stand outside of the timeline is what, to my mind, defines what it is that makes life worth living.
01:41:21.000 Artificial intelligence can replicate that and do it in a much better, more efficient way.
01:41:25.000 That's right.
01:41:26.000 So we may be at an inflection point where we're no longer the special species in that way.
01:41:32.000 You're absolutely right.
01:41:33.000 I've always said that I think that human beings are the electronic caterpillar that gives way to the butterfly.
01:41:39.000 Yeah, it could be.
01:41:40.000 We're doing something.
01:41:42.000 You know, a caterpillar doesn't know what it's doing.
01:41:43.000 It's making a cocoon.
01:41:45.000 We're buying iPhones and new televisions and this constant need for the newest, best stuff.
01:41:52.000 And even materialism in general.
01:41:54.000 Materialism in general fuels innovation because materialism makes you want the newest, greatest things.
01:42:02.000 And the newest, greatest things are pushed by the fact that people are purchasing them.
01:42:07.000 It becomes the big industry.
01:42:08.000 If you looked at...
01:42:09.000 Human beings from afar.
01:42:11.000 Like if you were objective and you looked at us like if we were something completely different than a human being observing us.
01:42:17.000 Well, what do these things do?
01:42:18.000 Oh, they make stuff.
01:42:19.000 They make newer, better stuff.
01:42:21.000 So they're things that they desire and that they create are better and more efficient every year.
01:42:26.000 That's what they do.
01:42:27.000 So they're just constantly...
01:42:30.000 Whether they're innovating personally or whether they're using their labor to fuel the monetary success that they have from their labor and using that to fuel this innovation, but overall the species.
01:42:43.000 Just like bees make beehives, people make things.
01:42:46.000 Yeah, and that will ultimately be our undoing in a way that may be positive.
01:42:51.000 Or doing.
01:42:51.000 Or doing in the sense that it may be positive.
01:42:53.000 We may transform to another level of being and we can look back at this era As the caterpillar stage that allowed that to happen.
01:43:01.000 Or we'll just be gone.
01:43:02.000 Yeah.
01:43:03.000 How did Marshall McLuhan say it?
01:43:05.000 He said, human beings are the sex organs in the machine world.
01:43:09.000 I have to think that one through a little more.
01:43:11.000 Yeah.
01:43:12.000 That's a good one.
01:43:13.000 It's a good one.
01:43:13.000 And I think he said that in the early 60s.
01:43:17.000 Really?
01:43:17.000 Yeah.
01:43:19.000 Was that Media Matters?
01:43:22.000 What was his...
01:43:22.000 I forget the book.
01:43:23.000 Yeah, that does ring a bell.
01:43:25.000 I forget the book.
01:43:26.000 Yeah.
01:43:27.000 But there's something going on.
01:43:29.000 And if we keep going, you say, well, where does this lead to?
01:43:32.000 It leads to like a Dr. Manhattan from like the Watchmen.
01:43:36.000 It leads to some super powerful version of what a human being is.
01:43:41.000 It's almost unrecognizable from a god.
01:43:43.000 Yeah.
01:43:44.000 Well, it's all a question of what energy we're able to conquer and bring within our capacity to control, right?
01:43:51.000 I mean, when we controlled fire, we had a new energy source, and a new energy source allowed us to cook food, as we were talking about.
01:43:58.000 That cooked food allowed the brain to grow, and as the brain grew, it allowed us to work together in groups to get bigger animals, and in that way, there's this wonderful cyclical There's a loop whereby there's this relationship between energy control and evolutionary development,
01:44:16.000 right?
01:44:17.000 So right now, where are we?
01:44:18.000 Well, we're able to use some of the sun's energy.
01:44:22.000 We haven't been able to use all of the sun's energy.
01:44:24.000 Most of it goes off into space.
01:44:27.000 We'll fully be able to use the sun's energy.
01:44:30.000 Maybe we'll surround it with, I don't know, a Dyson sphere, this sphere that would capture all the energy and then beam it to wherever we needed it.
01:44:36.000 So that will be a solar system level energetic control.
01:44:40.000 And then at some point, we may go beyond that and be able to control the energy of many suns, maybe all suns in a galaxy.
01:44:49.000 Is that really feasible to control, to make some sort of a sphere around the sun?
01:44:54.000 Well, Freeman Dyson, who is a very...
01:44:56.000 Creative and brilliant physicist.
01:44:59.000 Again, one of the pioneers of quantum mechanics.
01:45:01.000 Yeah, he imagined either you build a sphere or he also imagined a version where you'd have all these satellites in a spherical configuration around the Sun.
01:45:10.000 So maybe it wouldn't be a solid sphere, but it would be a spherical configuration.
01:45:14.000 And so the Sun's energy, which is mostly just radiating radially outward from the Sun, could be captured.
01:45:21.000 And if you could capture all of the Sun's energy, then The things that you'd be able to do with that energy are radically different from the things that we're able to do with the energy sources that we now have.
01:45:34.000 In fact, there have been, at times, it was always hype, I thought, but there have been times when people suspected that certain anomalous Yeah,
01:45:53.000 I've seen those.
01:46:01.000 The species by the energy that it can control.
01:46:05.000 So fire, then we can control the energy of an atom, right?
01:46:09.000 We can certainly control that through fission.
01:46:11.000 We'll at some point maybe get to a place where we can truly control through fusion.
01:46:16.000 Now we've built stars in the laboratory, if you will.
01:46:19.000 Then we'll control fusion on stellar scales, say through a Dyson sphere, and then we can keep on going.
01:46:25.000 Now where does that stop?
01:46:26.000 I don't know.
01:46:27.000 But if it doesn't stop, the ways in which we will evolve—I mean, just think about what fire did for us, right?
01:46:34.000 The ways in which we're going to evolve, I think, are going to be utterly stunning.
01:46:37.000 And, of course, we'll be controlling that evolution by that point through the control over genomic systems or through our merging with artificial systems.
01:46:47.000 So, yeah, you're right.
01:46:48.000 Do you ever contemplate what that looks like, our merging with these artificial systems?
01:46:52.000 You know, I— Not in any particularly creative way.
01:46:56.000 I mean, I follow what people have done, and it's jaw-dropping, the interfaces that people have developed between brains and artificial computational systems.
01:47:09.000 So where is that headed?
01:47:11.000 I don't know.
01:47:12.000 It's enormously exciting, potentially frightening, but...
01:47:16.000 You know, that's what we'll have to see where that goes.
01:47:19.000 I think ultimately we have to release our grasp on who we are now versus who we're going to be.
01:47:25.000 We will have to do that.
01:47:26.000 Because it seems inevitable.
01:47:26.000 Yeah, right.
01:47:27.000 Exactly.
01:47:28.000 I mean, you can fight it.
01:47:29.000 And I'm not by any means saying that we shouldn't.
01:47:36.000 I think we need to be mindful of that in order that we perhaps can have the most fruitful partnership as we go forward.
01:47:50.000 But yeah, I do think at some point we'll have to give up an An archaic sense of who we are, in light of the capacities that these partnerships, these collaborations, to put in the most positive light, will yield.
01:48:04.000 In a way, that's what the Unabomber was terrified of, right?
01:48:07.000 Is that true?
01:48:08.000 Yeah, he wanted to stop technology.
01:48:10.000 He thought that human beings were being foolish in their advancement of technology, and that technology, I'm pretty sure, that was part of his manifesto, that technology was going to replace us.
01:48:20.000 Yeah, he had an interesting way of expressing himself.
01:48:22.000 Well, he was...
01:48:23.000 A mess in a lot of different ways.
01:48:25.000 There's a great documentary about him that I just watched recently.
01:48:27.000 What's his name?
01:48:28.000 Ted Kaczynski.
01:48:29.000 Ted Kaczynski.
01:48:30.000 Yeah.
01:48:30.000 Right.
01:48:30.000 You know, he was a part of the Harvard LSD studies.
01:48:32.000 Is that true?
01:48:33.000 Yeah.
01:48:33.000 They dosed that guy up with acid.
01:48:35.000 Are you kidding me?
01:48:36.000 No.
01:48:36.000 Not at all.
01:48:37.000 No.
01:48:37.000 And they did that to quite a few people, and a lot of them went mad.
01:48:40.000 And he was one of them.
01:48:41.000 He became a professor, but just for a short period of time, so he could gather up the money to buy this cabin and then start his attack on people that created technology.
01:48:51.000 Huh.
01:48:52.000 All the people he blew up, all the people that he sent these bombs to, they were all related, I think most at least, were related to the propagation of technology.
01:49:02.000 That is fascinating.
01:49:03.000 It's crazy.
01:49:04.000 And he had all the elements too, like very hateful, like from the time he was young and was abandoned by his parents.
01:49:11.000 Not abandoned in a way, but left alone because he had some sort of a disease when he was young.
01:49:16.000 And so he's left in this hospital system with no contact with human beings for weeks and I believe even months at a time.
01:49:23.000 And it apparently really fucked up his personality.
01:49:26.000 Really?
01:49:38.000 To FBI, yeah.
01:49:53.000 Yeah, and he relayed the thing that his brother had gone through with his parents.
01:49:57.000 He had very cold parents, and the whole deal was really...
01:50:00.000 There was a lot of elements that were in play to create a Ted Kaczynski, but one of them was that he was a part of the Harvard LSD studies.
01:50:08.000 I mean, it's sad and tragic, but I don't know how you feel about it, but the fact that we...
01:50:16.000 You've got this incredible paranoia about psychedelics, and maybe it was stories I didn't hear, I didn't know about the Ted Kaczynski connection, but certainly there was this irrational paranoia that emerged, you know, I guess in the 60s and 70s and shut down what was incredibly promising research.
01:50:36.000 I'm not saying the Timothy Leary approach, but I'm saying there were people who were taking a very considered approach to psychedelics to deal with very specific issues.
01:50:45.000 And now it's starting to come back, which I think is enormously powerful.
01:50:50.000 Because look, I mean, you know, everything that we've spoken about here today, everything that we know about the world is filtered through the human brain, right?
01:50:59.000 So when we talk about quantum mechanics and general relativity, we're talking about we look out at the world, we process it through this particular...
01:51:06.000 Conscious state and using that we're able to come up with ideas that explain things that we observe.
01:51:12.000 But there are other states of consciousness.
01:51:15.000 I mean ultimately I think that we create, I mean I believe there's a real external reality, but we create our own narratives about that reality.
01:51:26.000 And if with some additional substances we can Modify or enhance or enlarge the kinds of narratives that we're able to tell, the kinds of coherent stories that we're able to overlay on our experience.
01:51:42.000 I think that's a vital thing.
01:51:43.000 And psychedelics can help us get to that place.
01:51:45.000 I think that's a vital role that they can play.
01:51:49.000 I think the problem with psychedelics is when they're utilized without an understanding of the consequences of utilizing them.
01:51:57.000 Of course.
01:51:57.000 Without discipline, without...
01:51:59.000 You know, that's where we've really been robbed, is that if they didn't pass the Sweeping Psychedelics Act...
01:52:05.000 Of 1970, where everything turned into a Schedule 1, even things that weren't psychoactive.
01:52:09.000 If they didn't pass that, we would have most likely entered into a stage of our history where we were running legitimate studies, and we got an understanding of the benefits of them like they're doing now with PTSD studies with MDMA,
01:52:25.000 where they're realizing like, well, you know, this ecstasy stuff is not just a party drug.
01:52:29.000 It actually can really help soldiers recover from some of the psychological wounds they have from combat.
01:52:35.000 And then you've got what Johns Hopkins has done with psilocybin.
01:52:40.000 There's psilocybin studies and they're about to enter into some of them with UFC fighters now.
01:52:45.000 Oh, is that right?
01:52:46.000 Guys who have had traumatic brain injuries and been knocked out and had head injuries.
01:52:51.000 Because neurogenesis that occurs through psilocybin, it's very unique.
01:52:57.000 Like psilocybin allows the brain to regenerate neurons.
01:53:01.000 It's one of the rare things that does that.
01:53:03.000 And they think there could be some therapeutic uses of that for people that have been in car accidents, soldiers, again, who've experienced head injuries, football players, the like.
01:53:13.000 Anybody that's had problems with cognitive function, maybe even neurodegenerative diseases.
01:53:18.000 There you go.
01:53:19.000 Yeah, and all these things are just, we know that there are some mushrooms like lion's mane that have some cognitive benefits and neurogenesis properties, and they're hoping that there's some real therapy to these things, and they were denied the use of them for decades and decades,
01:53:35.000 and based on ignorance.
01:53:37.000 Yeah, no, I totally agree.
01:53:38.000 It's interesting, you know, when people hear me espouse my view that all we are are particles governed by physical law, A number of people who have had psychedelic experiences contact me and say, I've got proof that that's not right.
01:53:56.000 And of course they'll communicate some kind of experience they've had.
01:54:01.000 Under the influence of some kind of psychoactive substance.
01:54:06.000 And it's interesting because, you know, I usually don't respond, but on occasion I felt the need to respond.
01:54:12.000 And it all comes down to, do you view what happens during a psychoactive experience as tapping into some other deeper reality?
01:54:20.000 Or do you view it, again, as just some product of this amazing thing inside of our head when it is influenced in an unusual way by some kind of psychoactive substance?
01:54:43.000 I think we're good to go.
01:54:55.000 But to me, that's the miracle of the brain as opposed to tapping into some other kind of reality.
01:55:02.000 I guess that's the sticking point for people who think that there's got to be something more than this physicalist perspective of stuff and loss.
01:55:10.000 That is a bias that we have.
01:55:12.000 We want there to be something more.
01:55:13.000 We don't know what that experience is.
01:55:15.000 However, it's indistinguishable from the experience of entering into another realm.
01:55:20.000 Like, the problem...
01:55:23.000 I think?
01:55:45.000 Like, if you are really being transported into another dimension and communicating with other entities and then coming back to Earth, or whether or not you're imagining it, the experience is the same.
01:55:57.000 That's where it gets really weird.
01:55:59.000 Yeah.
01:55:59.000 So, like, maybe everything happens in the mind.
01:56:04.000 Right.
01:56:04.000 And so there are versions of...
01:56:07.000 Theories of the world where the only thing that's real is consciousness.
01:56:10.000 Yes.
01:56:11.000 And the only thing that we do is we overlay experiences within our own subjective consciousness and we weight them as real or not real.
01:56:20.000 But that's all artificial because it's all just in the mind.
01:56:23.000 That's what I was going to get to next.
01:56:24.000 Yeah.
01:56:25.000 What do you think about that?
01:56:26.000 I think it's nonsense.
01:56:29.000 And it's not that it's crazy talk, right?
01:56:32.000 In principle, you could imagine the world being constructed that way.
01:56:37.000 But I do firmly believe that there is real stuff that's governed by real laws.
01:56:43.000 We may not have those laws.
01:56:44.000 We may not fundamentally know what the stuff is.
01:56:47.000 But I think there's a real external stuff.
01:56:49.000 And when that stuff is configured in the right pattern, such as a human brain...
01:56:54.000 It can begin to have an inner world and inner experiences which is itself wondrous and mysterious, don't get me wrong, but that inner world is not tapping into Anything beyond its own inner experience.
01:57:09.000 It's just this inner experience is infinite in its possibilities.
01:57:12.000 It's infinite in its possibilities or nearly infinite in its possibilities.
01:57:15.000 I mean – and so where do you draw the line I think is the real question between reality as experienced in the human brain and experiences in the human brain that you want to call reality?
01:57:26.000 And it's a tough question.
01:57:27.000 It's a very tough question.
01:57:29.000 You have to at some point have a means of saying – There is real stuff in the world that our brain is experiencing and filtering in some way versus stuff that's generated from the inner world itself.
01:57:47.000 And that distinction is hard to make precise, but I think it's utterly profound.
01:57:52.000 Have you had any psychedelic experiences yourself?
01:57:55.000 Yeah, we discussed this once a little bit.
01:57:57.000 Don't forget your answer, though.
01:57:59.000 Yeah, so a couple.
01:58:01.000 I don't consider myself well-versed in this world.
01:58:05.000 Do you feel like that's something you're missing out on?
01:58:08.000 I do, actually.
01:58:09.000 And I think as I get older and I become more aware of my own finite nature as the curtain begins to start to roll down from the rafters, I do hunger for a distinct kind of experience.
01:58:28.000 There's a book that I think everybody should read.
01:58:30.000 Maybe you've read it.
01:58:32.000 William James' book, Varieties of Religious Experience.
01:58:35.000 It's old, written back in 1902. William James, great psychologist.
01:58:38.000 He gave some lectures in Scotland, I think it was, at the turn of the century.
01:58:43.000 And he interviewed a whole host of people in order to get a feel for the kinds of religious experiences, but really the kind of spiritual experiences that people would have.
01:58:53.000 And some of them were generated through Some kind of psychoactive substance that people were using at the time.
01:59:00.000 And his descriptions are so vivid that I feel like I've been there on some of these excursions, these mental excursions.
01:59:10.000 But I do have a hankering.
01:59:14.000 I do have an urge to enlarge my own sense of what reality is through that experience.
01:59:21.000 And look, the thing that we once discussed was You know, something that happened in Amsterdam and it was probably very mild compared to other things because I don't really drink.
01:59:31.000 You know, I don't eat meat.
01:59:32.000 I'm pretty clean in that way.
01:59:34.000 So I'm pretty susceptible to these kinds of influences.
01:59:39.000 And I did not enjoy the experience that I had.
01:59:44.000 It was pretty awful.
01:59:47.000 However, back when I was in college, I had some other experiences on other substances, again, all relatively mild, and those were far more enjoyable and mind-expanding.
02:00:01.000 And I can see both sides, and I'm definitely, I feel compelled to explore more, and I think the world's getting to a place where it will become more amenable to people doing that.
02:00:14.000 Yeah, they're starting to legalize psilocybin in a lot of states.
02:00:18.000 That's the real gateway to these experiences.
02:00:21.000 Once they make that legal, and then you develop...
02:00:26.000 What we really need to do is develop places where you can, in a professional setting, where people actually understand the dosage based on your weight, based on how much psilocybin is in whatever substance you're taking, or whether it's synthetic, or whether it's in mushroom form...
02:00:42.000 Because there's very strong psilocybin-based mushrooms and other ones that are more mild.
02:00:46.000 And once there's real legalization, like you can go into a marijuana store, for instance, in Los Angeles, and you could buy marijuana based on the THC content.
02:00:57.000 So you could say, what do you have that's mild?
02:00:59.000 And they go, oh, we got some of this.
02:01:01.000 What do you have that's like crazy?
02:01:02.000 And they have space weed that really fuck you up.
02:01:05.000 And then they have edibles, which are a totally different animal because your body processes through the liver and it produces a completely different psychoactive substance.
02:01:14.000 So we know all that now because marijuana has been essentially legal since the 90s and legal legal since 2016 when it was voted in in California.
02:01:25.000 So we have much more of an understanding of the real psychoactive effects and you can actually control it much more.
02:01:34.000 We need that with everything.
02:01:36.000 I've read in some of these studies, the people who are newcomers to this, they actually have an individual who's experienced that sits with the individual and guides them on their journey.
02:01:48.000 Oh yeah, they have services like that.
02:01:50.000 California is much more advanced, and so is Colorado, and so is Washington State, and there's a lot of states.
02:01:57.000 But here in Texas, it's still illegal, which is kind of fucking hilarious.
02:02:01.000 Yeah, you see, my view is, so what do we do as physicists?
02:02:04.000 We tell one particular story of the world at the level of particles and laws.
02:02:08.000 The chemist comes along and takes our understanding and builds molecules and atoms from it.
02:02:13.000 The biologist comes and takes those structures and builds cells and living systems and that kind of domain.
02:02:20.000 Ultimately, you get up to the neuroscientist who studies the brain and the philosopher who's trying to see meaning that the brain is striving for and so forth.
02:02:28.000 What it all amounts to is a variety of stories that discuss distinct qualities of the world.
02:02:35.000 And the richest experience you get is from layering all those stories on top of one another so you can see the biggest possible narrative of all.
02:02:42.000 Now, if these kind of psychoactive substances can give you new stories...
02:02:48.000 That you wouldn't have access to through the traditional means, the academic means of, say, of science or through the philosophical means or artistic forays.
02:02:58.000 If these psychoactive substances can bring in a new narrative, how wonderful could that be for all of us to be able to Layer an additional story or multiple stories upon our understanding of the world.
02:03:11.000 Well, you know who had that belief?
02:03:13.000 Carl Sagan.
02:03:14.000 Is that true?
02:03:14.000 Carl Sagan was a giant fan of marijuana.
02:03:16.000 I did know that, but I've never seen any quotes where he's actually speaking about the experience.
02:03:24.000 Yeah, see if you can find Carl Sagan on marijuana, because he had a direct quote that was very similar to what you were just saying, that he believes there's certain...
02:03:33.000 Thoughts that you achieve and states that you achieve on marijuana that are impossible to get to without it.
02:03:39.000 I see.
02:03:39.000 Paraphrasing.
02:03:40.000 Right, yeah.
02:03:40.000 I mean, that's a basic idea.
02:03:42.000 He was a heavy-duty pothead.
02:03:44.000 As you can imagine, someone is fucking staring at space all the time like, man, this is crazy.
02:03:48.000 Well, not everybody does.
02:03:50.000 He's in it from a different time where he's traveling in all these circles with all these musicians and artists and all these different people.
02:03:59.000 Because he was not just an astronomer.
02:04:02.000 He was also like a Neil deGrasse Tyson.
02:04:05.000 Yeah, a statesman of science.
02:04:06.000 Yeah, exactly.
02:04:07.000 Someone who's promoting it in a way.
02:04:10.000 And he did a brilliant job of doing that, obviously.
02:04:13.000 Yeah, totally.
02:04:13.000 I was inspired by him.
02:04:14.000 I mean, Neil obviously was.
02:04:15.000 I was inspired by him, too, as a kid.
02:04:18.000 You know, this idea of the wonder and the majesty of the cosmos as opposed to just sort of, you know, the test that you had to take in third grade on, you know, something that you're meant to memorize.
02:04:29.000 Also his elegant use of the language to describe it in a way that was so inspiring and so it was so moving the way he would describe the cosmos.
02:04:37.000 Here it is.
02:04:38.000 The cannabis experience has greatly improved my appreciation for art, a subject which I had never much appreciated before.
02:04:44.000 The understanding of the intent of the artist which I can achieve when high sometimes carries over to when I'm down high.
02:04:52.000 I guess that's what they would call back then when I'm down.
02:04:54.000 This is one of the many human frontiers which cannabis has helped me traverse.
02:04:58.000 A very similar improvement in my appreciation of music has occurred with cannabis.
02:05:02.000 For the first time I've been able to hear the separate parts of a three-part harmony and the richness of the counterpoint.
02:05:08.000 I have since discovered that professional musicians can quite easily keep many separate parts going simultaneously in their heads.
02:05:16.000 But this was the first time for me.
02:05:19.000 He also thought it dramatically helped improve his sex life, as he analytically explains here.
02:05:25.000 Cannabis also enhances the enjoyment of sex.
02:05:27.000 On the one hand, it gives an exquisite sensitivity.
02:05:30.000 The actual duration of orgasm seems to lengthen greatly.
02:05:34.000 But this may be the...
02:05:59.000 This is only one of many quotes that he's had on cannabis because this is not...
02:06:04.000 Scroll up to the top of that.
02:06:05.000 Yeah, he had an essay on it.
02:06:06.000 Yeah.
02:06:06.000 There's a bunch of stuff.
02:06:07.000 Yeah, so that was...
02:06:08.000 Oh, he had a book called Marijuana Reconsidered.
02:06:11.000 He did?
02:06:12.000 An essay.
02:06:13.000 Oh, no, for a book he wrote in it.
02:06:14.000 Oh, an essay in a book.
02:06:15.000 Yeah.
02:06:15.000 Okay, so it was someone else's book.
02:06:17.000 Hold on, scroll back up.
02:06:18.000 He called himself Mr. X. Oh, he wrote under a pseudonym.
02:06:22.000 Interesting.
02:06:23.000 Huh.
02:06:24.000 Huh.
02:06:25.000 I mean, I agree with the conclusion about legalization.
02:06:27.000 I'm not sure the argument there is the strongest one.
02:06:30.000 What argument?
02:06:31.000 Well, I don't know if Carl Sagan's sex life and his ability to hear art and music is the best argument for legalizing marijuana.
02:06:39.000 No, it's not the best argument, but it is an argument for not just the use, but the enhancement of life through it.
02:06:49.000 Yeah.
02:06:50.000 But the other argument is it's something that we can control as a society as opposed to eliminate.
02:07:01.000 And if there is an option of that sort in general, that's the right way to go.
02:07:05.000 Well, the war on drugs has been lost.
02:07:09.000 Thankfully.
02:07:10.000 Well, part of it, I should say.
02:07:11.000 Part of it, yeah.
02:07:12.000 Part of it was misguided.
02:07:14.000 It was a misguided war.
02:07:15.000 In fact, I think New York just legalized, if I'm not mistaken.
02:07:21.000 I was wondering, is that retroactive?
02:07:24.000 It should be.
02:07:25.000 Yeah, but is it?
02:07:26.000 Yeah, no, it's not.
02:07:27.000 There's a lot of people that are in jail for the rest of their lives for trafficking marijuana, which is incredible.
02:07:32.000 Look, it's just a plant, folks, and it's not toxic, and it doesn't kill anybody, and it's not even addictive.
02:07:40.000 In very rare cases, there seems to be some people that purport some physical addiction to cannabis, but there's no real mechanism for it that's widely understood, like We're good to go.
02:08:20.000 Prescription drugs.
02:08:20.000 No, I mean, cigarettes are a great example.
02:08:22.000 Yeah.
02:08:22.000 You know, it just doesn't make any sense.
02:08:24.000 And I think now 12, 13 states, it's legal if I'm not mistaken.
02:08:28.000 Yeah.
02:08:28.000 Look, I'm an enthusiast.
02:08:30.000 I love the stuff.
02:08:31.000 It's heading in the right direction, I think.
02:08:32.000 Yeah.
02:08:32.000 I don't.
02:08:33.000 I don't.
02:08:34.000 I mean, it happened in so long.
02:08:35.000 Well, maybe that's the problem, bro.
02:08:37.000 Maybe we should have sparked one up.
02:08:38.000 We should go in New York now.
02:08:39.000 We should have a trip.
02:08:40.000 It's legal in New York now?
02:08:41.000 It is.
02:08:42.000 Yeah, but you gotta fucking have a vaccine passport to go anywhere now.
02:08:45.000 They're doing weird shit in New York.
02:08:48.000 That Mario Cuomo guy, or Andrew Cuomo, his son.
02:08:52.000 That guy.
02:08:53.000 Jesus Christ.
02:08:56.000 It's amazing how people are exposed in their ability to navigate or not navigate the pandemic and what it's done in terms of different cities and how different places in the country have embraced freedom or embraced regulation and what it's done in terms of the impact that it's had on the businesses.
02:09:19.000 Yeah, but the thing to bear in mind too is everybody's situation is different that will impact their views.
02:09:24.000 So for instance, if I told you what we did, you'd probably think I was an extremist.
02:09:29.000 We left New York City.
02:09:30.000 We went up to the mountains and the Catskill Mountains.
02:09:33.000 We cut ourselves off.
02:09:34.000 But, you know, as I mentioned, I was with my 92-year-old mother.
02:09:37.000 And I was with my son, who has an autoimmune issue.
02:09:41.000 Well, that sounds like a great thing, though.
02:09:43.000 Right.
02:09:44.000 That's what I'm saying.
02:09:44.000 So one has to always gauge responses based upon uncircumstance.
02:09:49.000 That's not what my concern is.
02:09:51.000 My concern is government overreach.
02:09:52.000 My concern is not personal decisions.
02:09:55.000 I think your personal decision was an excellent one.
02:09:57.000 First of all, I think if you can go to the Catskills and live there, that's a good move, period.
02:10:02.000 I mean, it's beautiful up there.
02:10:04.000 Yeah, though my kids are hankering to come back to civilization.
02:10:07.000 Oh, I'm sure.
02:10:08.000 Yeah, I'm sure.
02:10:09.000 Ultimately, I think when they look back on that experience, they're going to look back on it fondly.
02:10:14.000 I think so.
02:10:15.000 My son already realizes that.
02:10:18.000 The fact that you have a year to spend in an unusual circumstance where you rely on each other in a different way, when do you ever have that possibility?
02:10:28.000 For instance, we never would eat dinner as a family.
02:10:31.000 It would always be this chaotic thing in Manhattan.
02:10:33.000 Everybody would just eat at their own moment.
02:10:35.000 We ate every meal together.
02:10:37.000 And I cooked every meal for 350 some odd or 70 days or something.
02:10:42.000 Wow.
02:10:42.000 So it was different.
02:10:44.000 It was definitely different.
02:10:45.000 So you got to expand your culinary skills.
02:10:47.000 I did.
02:10:47.000 Absolutely.
02:10:49.000 Is everybody vegan?
02:10:50.000 The whole family vegan?
02:10:51.000 They're not, but when I cook, I cook vegan.
02:10:54.000 So they are eating vegan, even though, you know, if they make their own meal.
02:10:59.000 And we had things in the refrigerator that are not vegan, so it's up to them.
02:11:03.000 Yeah, my family got together every night for movie night.
02:11:06.000 We went through the entire Adam Sandler catalog in the first couple months.
02:11:10.000 See, we said we were going to do that movie night.
02:11:12.000 Somehow it never fully happened.
02:11:14.000 It was great.
02:11:15.000 And I got to introduce my kids to movies that I saw.
02:11:17.000 You know, like Zohan, which is one of my favorite movies.
02:11:21.000 Yeah, I know that movie.
02:11:22.000 Oh my god, you've never seen that?
02:11:23.000 No.
02:11:23.000 Oh my god.
02:11:24.000 It's one of Adam Sandler's greatest movies.
02:11:27.000 Really?
02:11:27.000 Don't mess with the Zohan.
02:11:28.000 It's fucking amazing.
02:11:29.000 Alright, we're going to have to watch this.
02:11:30.000 It's hilarious.
02:11:31.000 I think it's his best movie.
02:11:32.000 Really?
02:11:32.000 Other than Uncut Gems, which I think is fantastic, but in a completely different way, Uncut Gems is just this wild, chaotic movie that gives you anxiety.
02:11:41.000 Did you see Uncut Gems?
02:11:42.000 No, no.
02:11:43.000 My son saw it.
02:11:44.000 I knew it.
02:11:44.000 That's fairly recent, isn't it?
02:11:45.000 Yeah, a couple years ago.
02:11:46.000 It gives you anxiety.
02:11:47.000 You watch it going, Jesus!
02:11:49.000 It's about a guy who's a hardcore gambling addict.
02:11:52.000 I don't want to spoil it, but it's amazing.
02:11:55.000 It's a really good movie.
02:11:56.000 But it's so different than all of his other films, which are these light-hearted, silly movies.
02:12:02.000 Yeah, of course.
02:12:02.000 Don't mess with the Zohan.
02:12:03.000 It's fucking hilarious.
02:12:05.000 It's really funny.
02:12:06.000 Gonna check that out.
02:12:07.000 Yeah, I'm a giant Adam Sandler fan.
02:12:09.000 Because his movies are just silly.
02:12:12.000 They don't have some crazy message to them.
02:12:15.000 There's no wokeness or no social responsibility.
02:12:18.000 They're just madness.
02:12:19.000 What about Jim Carrey?
02:12:20.000 I love Jim Carrey.
02:12:21.000 Yeah, me too.
02:12:23.000 Yeah, I love especially some of the early stuff.
02:12:25.000 Dumb and Dumber?
02:12:26.000 Oh, yeah.
02:12:27.000 It was great.
02:12:28.000 Great.
02:12:28.000 I heard the new one sucked, though.
02:12:30.000 Did you see the new one?
02:12:30.000 They got an East Contour 3 in the works.
02:12:32.000 No.
02:12:32.000 Oh, really?
02:12:33.000 Do they?
02:12:33.000 Oh, wow.
02:12:34.000 That was two.
02:12:34.000 Was two any good?
02:12:35.000 Yeah.
02:12:36.000 When did you show close?
02:12:37.000 I never saw two.
02:12:38.000 Yeah.
02:12:38.000 Oh, that was recent.
02:12:40.000 No, no, no.
02:12:41.000 I mean, not recent.
02:12:42.000 Next to the original one.
02:12:44.000 Oh, yeah.
02:12:44.000 Close to him.
02:12:46.000 Yeah, yeah, yeah.
02:12:46.000 Yeah.
02:12:47.000 No, I never saw that.
02:12:48.000 Dumb and Dumber 2 supposedly sucked, though, right?
02:12:50.000 Correct.
02:12:50.000 Correct.
02:12:51.000 Well, the opening was a good scene.
02:12:53.000 Dumb and Dumber 2?
02:12:54.000 The catheter scene, wasn't it?
02:12:55.000 Oh, Christ.
02:12:56.000 Is that Dumb and Dumber 2?
02:12:57.000 Maybe I'm getting my films wrong.
02:12:59.000 I don't know.
02:13:00.000 But it was just interesting to expose my kids to different things.
02:13:03.000 Yeah, sure.
02:13:04.000 But limited.
02:13:05.000 The 10-year-old's not into anything scary.
02:13:08.000 I have to be careful.
02:13:10.000 Right.
02:13:10.000 Yeah.
02:13:11.000 So their experience of the pandemic was fairly ordinary because they were going to school and you were here?
02:13:18.000 Well in the beginning they were not because we're in California and they were going to zoom classes and then once we moved to Texas this year has all been in school and they both got COVID eventually.
02:13:28.000 But mild?
02:13:30.000 Very mild.
02:13:30.000 Like one of them barely knew she had it I was like I want to get you checked because like you gotta like She had a headache.
02:13:37.000 And I'm like, why do you have a headache?
02:13:38.000 Like, what's going on?
02:13:39.000 And so, because I have access to testing, I have access.
02:13:42.000 I have a machine at my home.
02:13:44.000 Oh, you do?
02:13:44.000 And I have a machine here.
02:13:46.000 Yeah, because when people come over the house to do work and stuff, I was like, let's just test everybody.
02:13:50.000 Because, you know, if you have someone coming over the house or someone doing things, and this way also...
02:13:54.000 I knew, like, if my parents were going to come over, I wanted to make sure that everybody, my wife's parents, make sure that, you know, everybody's okay.
02:14:02.000 So we tested her, and like, bingo, she had COVID. And then eventually my other daughter and my wife got it, but I never got it.
02:14:12.000 But did you quarantine them at all?
02:14:14.000 Did you change anything when that happened?
02:14:15.000 Yeah, I kept them.
02:14:16.000 Yeah, we quarantined them and made sure that we tested them up until the point where they were negative.
02:14:22.000 And then when they were negative, we gave them three days of testing in a row to make sure that they're, you know, you want to make sure they're actually negative before you re-entry.
02:14:30.000 But it was quick.
02:14:31.000 I mean, my one daughter, the first daughter, she had a headache for a day.
02:14:34.000 And that was it.
02:14:35.000 Yeah, yeah.
02:14:36.000 I mean, I don't think I've had it.
02:14:38.000 But the curious thing is, I was in China in December.
02:14:41.000 And then in January, I suddenly got 104 fever.
02:14:45.000 And I went to, you know, Columbia Presbyterian Hospital.
02:14:50.000 And they asked me, you know, where have you been?
02:14:53.000 I said, China.
02:14:53.000 They kind of freaked out.
02:14:54.000 And they put me in an isolated room by myself.
02:14:58.000 And this is when I had the backache.
02:15:00.000 That was actually before our previous conversation.
02:15:03.000 Did they even have COVID tests then?
02:15:05.000 They may have had the possibility to send a sample someplace else, but they didn't.
02:15:09.000 Did you ever get tested for the antibodies?
02:15:10.000 No, I have not.
02:15:11.000 My wife keeps telling me I should, just out of curiosity.
02:15:15.000 But that was like early January-ish.
02:15:17.000 Shit, we could have tested you here.
02:15:19.000 You got an antibody test?
02:15:20.000 Yeah, we had an antibody test.
02:15:21.000 Yeah, the nurse would have tested you for that as well.
02:15:24.000 I mean, the nurse who did the navel swab?
02:15:25.000 Yeah.
02:15:26.000 Jamie still has antibodies.
02:15:27.000 He got COVID in October.
02:15:29.000 Look at him strong.
02:15:30.000 Jamie's got strong antibodies.
02:15:32.000 In October.
02:15:32.000 Yeah, I mean, it's amazing.
02:15:34.000 His antibodies are strong.
02:15:35.000 Like, you look at it, it's a thick line.
02:15:37.000 Because some of my friends who have had COVID, their antibody tests, we've done it with them, and their antibodies are pretty low.
02:15:43.000 I see.
02:15:44.000 And without the vaccine?
02:15:47.000 No vaccine, yeah.
02:15:48.000 No, Jamie's fucking bulletproof with it.
02:15:50.000 He's got a thick, fat line for the antibodies, for whatever reason.
02:15:54.000 And it varies so much, you know, depending upon the individual.
02:15:59.000 And how was your wife's case?
02:16:01.000 Not bad.
02:16:01.000 My wife has allergies, and she gets these shots, and that's what did her in.
02:16:06.000 The shots always get her exhausted, because she's allergic to fucking everything, like grass and horses and all kinds of shit.
02:16:12.000 So she goes to an allergist to get shots, and it's radically improved her ability.
02:16:17.000 But every time she goes, that day she's wrecked.
02:16:21.000 She's like, ugh.
02:16:22.000 Because your body's overwhelmed.
02:16:24.000 So your immune system is overwhelmed, and that's what develops is the resistance to these allergies.
02:16:31.000 But that night, she started feeling like shit.
02:16:34.000 But before that, she worked out that day, felt great, and then we tested her the next day, and she had it.
02:16:39.000 Hmm.
02:16:40.000 Yeah, but it's obviously, you know, it's dependent upon your health, depending upon how much you exercise, what you eat, how well you take care of yourself, and then also what pre-existing conditions are.
02:16:53.000 Yeah, now it's going to be which variant, too, right?
02:16:55.000 Yeah, that's what's weird, is this variant coming out of Brazil they're worried about.
02:16:59.000 Apparently this variant coming out of Brazil is virulent.
02:17:03.000 Yeah.
02:17:04.000 So some people say we should consider it sort of a separate disease.
02:17:10.000 I think we're going to probably deal with this shit every year from now on now.
02:17:13.000 Yeah.
02:17:13.000 But look, I mean, January of last year, they had the vaccine, right?
02:17:17.000 I mean, isn't that an amazing thing?
02:17:18.000 A few days after sequencing the virus, they were able to develop a vaccine.
02:17:23.000 So that, I mean, it wasn't available.
02:17:25.000 But now we have that knowledge, presumably next go around, the duration of time between Identification and delivery will be much shorter.
02:17:35.000 Yeah, I would like them to really concentrate on...
02:17:37.000 I mean, it would be really nice.
02:17:39.000 I know this is a time where no one wants to fat shame because everybody's worried about body positivity and letting people think they're okay no matter what you are, but you're not.
02:17:47.000 Your body, when it's obese, is much more likely to be susceptible to all sorts of ailments, and 78% of the people hospitalized for COVID were obese.
02:17:56.000 I didn't know that number.
02:17:57.000 It's a terrible number if you think about it that way.
02:18:01.000 Presumably, you could have avoided 78% of the hospitalizations.
02:18:05.000 I mean, because it is a thing that a person can avoid.
02:18:09.000 It is physically possible that you could not be obese.
02:18:13.000 It's not something like you're born blind or you're born with leukemia.
02:18:17.000 This is something that you, by virtue of your actions or your diet or your genetics, you're more predisposed to being heavy.
02:18:26.000 It's unfortunate there's no emphasis on that, that all the emphasis was about stay inside, wear three masks, keep away from each other.
02:18:36.000 That's all well and good, but there should have been more emphasis on taking care of your body, taking care of your health, and it's just, there was almost none.
02:18:44.000 Almost none.
02:18:45.000 The CDC didn't even have anything on their website about vitamin D until fairly recently.
02:18:49.000 Is that true?
02:18:50.000 Yeah.
02:18:51.000 Well, until recently, the CDC was neutered.
02:18:54.000 Yeah, isn't that crazy?
02:18:55.000 Yeah.
02:18:56.000 It's really crazy, the former CDC director coming out and saying that it's more likely than not that this was an accidental release of something that they were working on, the Wuhan lab.
02:19:06.000 And, you know, this is because of Trump, because that guy's such a...
02:19:10.000 Polarizing figure.
02:19:11.000 Anything that he said, everybody was like, well, fuck whatever he said.
02:19:15.000 If that wasn't the narrative, if he didn't have this constant desire to call it the China virus and that people didn't hate him so much, people would have probably looked into that much more readily.
02:19:28.000 You're talking about a level four lab that is in the same area where the breakout occurred.
02:19:34.000 And in that level four lab, they work on, wait for it, Coronaviruses, you know, and then Newsweek now entertaining the idea and the CDC director, former CDC director, he comes out and says it's much more likely than not.
02:19:47.000 Yeah.
02:19:48.000 It's interesting.
02:19:49.000 Yeah, I don't know.
02:19:49.000 I don't know anything about it, but all I can say is that as a scientist, the move from an era when nobody paid attention to facts or denigrated facts or denigrated expertise, at least moving in the direction of Where hopefully these facts and expertise actually matters.
02:20:08.000 I think that's a vital move.
02:20:10.000 It would be really nice if the facts only, and that's it, were what we discussed and expressed.
02:20:18.000 Do you think that...
02:20:21.000 Is there enough funding for the type of research that you do, for the type of things that you're interested in?
02:20:28.000 Would we be better off as a civilization if there was more money allocated to the study of...
02:20:35.000 Yeah, absolutely.
02:20:37.000 I mean, it's not as though the kind of science that we do is particularly expensive.
02:20:41.000 I mean, those of us on the theoretical end of the universe Don't need big equipment.
02:20:47.000 But we do need students.
02:20:49.000 We need the next generation.
02:20:50.000 We need the postdocs and the graduate students.
02:20:53.000 And now we find ourselves in like a zero-sum game where we're like, well, if we take that student, we can't take that one.
02:21:01.000 Or if we take that student this year, then for the next two years, we can't take any other students.
02:21:05.000 I mean, these are the kinds of calculations that literally are being done right now.
02:21:10.000 Really?
02:21:10.000 Yeah.
02:21:11.000 And, you know, compared to the amount of funds that we spend, you know, I hate to frame it as a zero-sum game, but, you know, you divert some military funds to this kind of research, they would never know the difference,
02:21:26.000 and it would make an enormous difference To the ability of our kind of science to train the next upcoming generation.
02:21:35.000 So the answer is absolutely no, there's not enough funding.
02:21:39.000 And it's a tragic situation because there are these brilliant young minds who want to pursue these kinds of ideas.
02:21:45.000 And look, some will say, some in government will say, well, look, that's all esoteric stuff, right?
02:21:51.000 But those very same congresspeople or senators, if they were...
02:21:56.000 In their position in the 1920s, I have little doubt they would have said the same thing about quantum physics.
02:22:01.000 It's just esoteric.
02:22:03.000 It's just these guys and women who want to understand strange things about particles.
02:22:07.000 But then 80 years later, quantum mechanics is driving a significant fraction of the economy, right?
02:22:13.000 Quantum mechanics, as we're talking about, integrated circuits and all manner of electronic gadgetry.
02:22:18.000 So it's incredibly short-sighted to not recognize that fundamental basic science is the engine Of economic growth.
02:22:27.000 That's not why I do it.
02:22:28.000 I'm not that interested in economic growth.
02:22:30.000 I'm interested in the ideas and the insight.
02:22:32.000 But put that all to the side.
02:22:34.000 From a pure dollar and cents standpoint, it's a cheap investment for an incredible potential payoff.
02:22:41.000 And we're being short-sighted by not funding it at the level that it should be funded.
02:22:45.000 What do you think could enhance the public's perception of these things other than what you're doing, which is a great thing, by these speeches and going on podcasts like this one or by writing your books?
02:22:56.000 What can we do to sort of allow people to understand the significance of this work and how it's really impaired by these decisions that you have to make to choose one student over another student or to be limited in the amount of students you could accept?
02:23:10.000 I mean, it's tough.
02:23:11.000 I mean, certainly, as you're saying, you know, books and lectures, you know, television documentaries, I mean, all these things are really good for getting these ideas out into the public, into the culture, into the zeitgeist.
02:23:22.000 But ultimately you've got to catch kids at an early age because it's the kids at an early age who are open to these ideas without having to be convinced that they might be of interest.
02:23:33.000 And it's only when they get to fourth or fifth or sixth grade that their attention starts to turn away from science, which feels abstract and difficult usually because of the way it's taught in the classroom.
02:23:44.000 So one of the things that we do, you know, I have this non-profit World Science Festival, it's all about creating experiences for kids and adults that allow them to immerse themselves in all of these ideas, from quantum mechanics to cosmology to nanoscience to personalized medicine,
02:24:00.000 the whole gambit, without it feeling like school.
02:24:03.000 Right, making it exciting and fun.
02:24:04.000 And without it feeling like it's all about assessment.
02:24:07.000 So much of our educational system, I know this is an overgeneralization and all you teachers out there who are doing a great job, you know, fantastic, but it's so much of our educational system is focused on assessment.
02:24:20.000 I mean, my kids, so much of their learning of science and other subjects too, it's all about get to the next quiz, get to the next exam, and once they're through it, the material is gone.
02:24:30.000 It's not there for the joy, it's not there for the wonder of it, and so if we can create experiences that For kids and adults, so it's a full family experience where it's just so thrilling to learn about black holes and the Big Bang and quantum mechanics and entanglement and all the stuff that we're talking about,
02:24:48.000 then I think you've got a chance that the next generation looks at science in a different way.
02:24:53.000 Yeah, like what do you think could be done to make it more exciting for kids?
02:24:58.000 Like a documentary for sure is always a good one because a really good documentary excites people in an entertaining way.
02:25:06.000 Yeah.
02:25:06.000 And one that's structured well and it's got a good pacing to it that sort of stimulates people's fascination with the subject.
02:25:13.000 What do you think about, I mean I don't know if you've done any work with this stuff, but have you ever messed around with virtual reality?
02:25:20.000 So I was about to answer virtual reality before you said it.
02:25:23.000 So we have a nice partnership, it turns out, with Verizon.
02:25:29.000 They have this new 5G network, and they're trying to find ways to revolutionize things using that.
02:25:35.000 And so we won a nationwide competition.
02:25:38.000 We won a handful of groups to create a virtual reality experience for middle school kids using the 5G network.
02:25:44.000 So it's fast.
02:25:45.000 There isn't latency in the system.
02:25:46.000 And we created a virtual reality experience of planet formation and star formation.
02:25:52.000 So the kids, you know, they put on the headset and they go in there.
02:25:54.000 And they have these controllers where they can cause little dust particles and rocks to coalesce into a planet.
02:26:01.000 And then they can try to shoot the planet into orbit.
02:26:04.000 You have to have the right angle and the right speed, you know, or else it goes crashing into the star.
02:26:08.000 And then they can accelerate the life cycle of the star using their controller and cause it to go supernova or turn into a black hole.
02:26:17.000 So kids who go through this...
02:26:19.000 It's a full body experience of the cosmos.
02:26:23.000 And so if you had a whole bunch of these experiences, this is just like a pilot experience.
02:26:28.000 Yeah.
02:26:29.000 Imagine doing one of these for quantum mechanics.
02:26:31.000 Yeah, that's what I wanted to get to.
02:26:32.000 You know, where you can sort of see the quantum entanglement and feel the quantum entanglement.
02:26:36.000 Or imagine doing one for relativity where you can experience time slowing down at high speeds or time slowing down to the edge of a black hole.
02:26:45.000 Then I think if that was an intrinsic part of the experience, Science would be taken in like a visceral way.
02:26:53.000 And that's why we call this visceral science for that reason because it's a way in which science can kind of come into you not just through like studying but through experience.
02:27:03.000 Yeah, that would be an amazing thing.
02:27:05.000 How would you represent entanglement?
02:27:09.000 Like, what visual representation of entanglement would you use and how would you make it accurate?
02:27:15.000 Because you're talking about something that we don't really, air quotes, see.
02:27:20.000 Yeah.
02:27:20.000 You're just measuring it.
02:27:22.000 Sure, totally.
02:27:23.000 I wish I had an answer for you.
02:27:24.000 And that would be part of the development process, you know, to try to find a way.
02:27:28.000 Because you can't literally represent it because, as you say, like the quantum probability wave is not something that we literally see.
02:27:36.000 But there might be a way of representing it visually that would not be misleading and yet would give kids a sense of, aha!
02:27:44.000 That thing that I used to consider to be a particle as a dot It actually has a spread out character from this probability wave.
02:27:51.000 Now, those words would be hard to take in.
02:27:53.000 They're abstract.
02:27:54.000 But if you just saw the wave and it was represented in a vibrant manner, a kid might be able to take in the gist of the idea, not be able to do like calculations, but to take in the gist of the idea.
02:28:09.000 And moreover, imagine you have kids that...
02:28:12.000 Go into this system, and it's a real well-developed system 20 years from now, say, and they do it from a really young age.
02:28:19.000 They might develop a quantum intuition that you and I don't have.
02:28:23.000 Like, you were earlier asking me, so what's the intuition?
02:28:26.000 Like, how does entanglement work, you know, in a way that allows me to wrap my brain around it?
02:28:31.000 Maybe you can't do it because your brain is too old.
02:28:34.000 But maybe if you catch a young brain...
02:28:37.000 And they experience these weird ideas from the get-go and may become part of their way of thinking of the world.
02:28:44.000 And it may be much easier for them to visualize and get these ideas than without this kind of virtual reality experience.
02:28:51.000 So I think there's a huge potential in there.
02:28:55.000 Do you remember there was one of the things from What the Bleep that a lot of people took umbrage with was the Dr. Quantum cartoon.
02:29:03.000 Actually, those were not bad.
02:29:04.000 Not too bad, right?
02:29:06.000 Yeah.
02:29:06.000 They kind of got it right in a way.
02:29:07.000 Kind of got it right, yeah.
02:29:08.000 But something like that that shows the weirdness of quantum reality or quantum physics.
02:29:16.000 Yeah.
02:29:16.000 And the thing that I thought was good about those two is, especially for the younger kid, it put it in a bit more of a narrative.
02:29:24.000 It wasn't just pedagogical.
02:29:26.000 It was like this weird superhero character, I think is what it was.
02:29:30.000 Dr. Quantum.
02:29:31.000 Dr. Quantum or something.
02:29:32.000 So I'm a great fan of putting scientific ideas in a narrative form.
02:29:38.000 Again, going back to evolutionary psychology, there are many reasons why we learn things better when they're framed in a story.
02:29:46.000 Because experience is story.
02:29:48.000 And so we've gotten very good at extracting information from story-like experiences.
02:29:53.000 So rather than...
02:29:54.000 Abstractly teaching, you know, i h bar d psi dt equals minus d2 over dx squared psi plus v of x psi of x, rather than writing out the Schrodinger equation in this abstract piece of language, mathematics, if you can frame it in a narrative, if you can frame it in terms of how it was discovered,
02:30:11.000 you can frame it in terms of maybe you follow the life cycle of an electron governed by this equation, whatever, if you can put it into a story-like environment, Kids and adults are going to get it more fully.
02:30:25.000 What if you can take it and put it inside of a video game that's exciting to play?
02:30:31.000 So the lessons of quantum mechanics and quantum entanglement and quantum physics inside some crazy video game where you kind of have to understand what's going on in order to advance.
02:30:43.000 Yeah, so you're speaking my language and you're taking away all my punchlines, which is really good.
02:30:48.000 So right now we're working on a little video game where the player goes in and they manipulate the speed of light and they manipulate it by performing certain tasks.
02:31:01.000 And to carry out the tasks, you have to get an intuition for special relativity.
02:31:06.000 How the world behaves at high speeds, or in our case, as the speed of light gets lower, the relativistic effects become more manifest in the everyday world.
02:31:14.000 So a game-like setting, where you have to gain an intuition for the weirdness of physics, I think is a powerful combination.
02:31:21.000 Yeah, that would be amazing if there was some sort of a way where you could kind of Give them these little hurdles that they have to solve in order to advance.
02:31:32.000 Exactly.
02:31:32.000 But make it surmountable.
02:31:35.000 Yes, make it surmountable so it's not frustrating, but make it challenging enough and interesting enough that you try to get to that point.
02:31:42.000 In some sort of a visual and exciting way.
02:31:45.000 Yeah.
02:31:46.000 And for instance, when you go near the speed of light, the world around you looks very different.
02:31:50.000 It curves in on you.
02:31:52.000 Buildings in a cityscape become compressed in one direction and angled in a different direction.
02:31:57.000 It's very weird.
02:31:59.000 But if you then have a challenge that requires you to have an intuition about that weirdness, like maybe firing a laser down a street, but the street is now angled and curved because of the high speed, you can imagine that you get a feel for it.
02:32:13.000 You get an intuition for it.
02:32:15.000 Yeah.
02:32:16.000 And so, again, with the World Science Festival of Verizon, we're in the midst of building an experience of that sort.
02:32:22.000 And we'll see how well it does at giving folks a sense of these ideas in a game-like setting.
02:32:28.000 I would imagine putting something like that together would be incredibly involving.
02:32:34.000 It is.
02:32:36.000 Our journey is helped along by an earlier iteration of this idea that a group at MIT put together.
02:32:42.000 I think it was called Slower Than the Speed of Life.
02:32:44.000 It was a pretty rudimentary video game.
02:32:47.000 How long ago was this?
02:32:48.000 Maybe 10 years ago, I think.
02:32:50.000 And so what we're doing is in a virtual reality environment, upping the experience.
02:32:56.000 And in that way, I think that version, I mean, maybe the MIT folks, if they're listening, can chime in.
02:33:02.000 I don't think it really caught on.
02:33:03.000 But I think in a virtual reality setting where it's immersive, it can be really, really powerful.
02:33:10.000 Those things must be incredibly difficult to code, right?
02:33:14.000 Like a virtual reality thing.
02:33:15.000 What kind of a timeline are you on to do something like this?
02:33:18.000 Well, we created the version of planet formation and stellar formation.
02:33:24.000 That was about one year, I guess it took.
02:33:27.000 And how long is the experience?
02:33:30.000 You can be in there.
02:33:31.000 It branches out, so there's a lot of stuff that you can do, but a typical kid will be in there 20 minutes, 25 minutes.
02:33:38.000 More than that, it becomes sickening.
02:33:42.000 I don't know how much virtual reality.
02:33:43.000 Oh, really?
02:33:43.000 Yeah.
02:33:44.000 I mean, I'm particularly sensitive to motion sickness.
02:33:47.000 I get sick on, like, the Staten Island ferry.
02:33:50.000 And most of these things I'm pretty okay with, but after a while, you just start to feel uncomfortable.
02:33:55.000 Is this it?
02:33:57.000 Uh...
02:33:58.000 Hey, there it is!
02:33:59.000 Verizon Demo Day!
02:34:00.000 Well done!
02:34:01.000 It's up there on the screen.
02:34:02.000 Yeah, so this is from the perspective of a player.
02:34:07.000 And that player goes...
02:34:08.000 And again, of course, this is on a flat screen.
02:34:10.000 Imagine you're in this 3D environment, you know, and using these controllers, you can grab hold of those little dust particles and rocks.
02:34:17.000 You can use it to create a planet, as is happening right here.
02:34:22.000 And so a protoplanet is forming, and ultimately the user will have that planet, and they then try to send the planet into orbit.
02:34:30.000 You know, there we go.
02:34:31.000 This is wild!
02:34:33.000 Yeah, yeah, exactly.
02:34:35.000 And as the planet goes into orbit, it then sweeps up more debris as it grows larger and larger, gravitationally pulling in the other rocks and dust in its environment.
02:34:46.000 So this is really our phase one version of this project.
02:34:52.000 We are refining the visuals on this right now.
02:34:55.000 And the black hole has formed.
02:34:57.000 Do you see a black hole?
02:34:57.000 And those are the other players?
02:35:00.000 Yeah, exactly.
02:35:00.000 Oh, wow.
02:35:02.000 This is cool.
02:35:03.000 Cool.
02:35:04.000 That's the way to do it.
02:35:06.000 That's going to get people excited about it.
02:35:08.000 Yeah, and we were supposed to roll this out in many schools, but then the virus hit.
02:35:12.000 So it got put on hold.
02:35:14.000 But at some point, this will be in a lot of middle schools.
02:35:16.000 We rolled it out in Cleveland in a couple schools.
02:35:18.000 The kids love it.
02:35:21.000 So there's a real opportunity here to transform the way kids engage with these ideas.
02:35:27.000 That's really badass.
02:35:28.000 I love that you're doing that.
02:35:29.000 I think that's such a great way to do it, to do it through virtual reality.
02:35:32.000 Because virtual reality is so exciting as it is.
02:35:35.000 And to have it in some sort of a game form like that.
02:35:39.000 And that this being one of the first ones of those, it could probably expand.
02:35:43.000 Like if you can get it to the point where something like a Fortnite game involves, you know what I mean?
02:35:48.000 Something of that level of popularity.
02:35:50.000 That would be amazing.
02:35:51.000 That would be transformational.
02:35:53.000 Yes.
02:35:55.000 But it seems like it's not impossible.
02:35:57.000 No, I agree.
02:35:58.000 I agree.
02:35:59.000 It is not impossible.
02:36:00.000 One of the obstacles, of course, is that there's not a huge uptake on virtual reality equipment yet.
02:36:06.000 That's starting to change as the prices come down.
02:36:09.000 The Quest, Quest 2, Oculus.
02:36:12.000 This was all done on a machine that would require a couple thousand dollars for you to invest in the computer and the headset.
02:36:18.000 But all that will change.
02:36:19.000 Yeah.
02:36:19.000 You know, in the not too distant future.
02:36:21.000 But the other hurdle is you really do have to make sure that kids don't get sick.
02:36:25.000 Like my wife, she has epilepsy.
02:36:27.000 She had a brain tumor and the end result was that she has epilepsy.
02:36:31.000 And she went into one of, not this experience, but a different virtual reality experience.
02:36:35.000 And about a minute or two in, she started to have a seizure.
02:36:38.000 So from strobing?
02:36:39.000 Was it strobing?
02:36:40.000 Not even strobing.
02:36:41.000 It was somehow that there was a mismatch between your movements in the real world and your movements in the virtual world.
02:36:48.000 Because there was all sorts of stuff flying at her.
02:36:51.000 This is an experience around like the rings of Saturn or something.
02:36:54.000 And it was the disparity between her sense of movement in the real world and her sense of movement in the virtual world, and she had to immediately get out of the headset and go sit down and get out of it.
02:37:04.000 That's crazy.
02:37:05.000 Yeah.
02:37:06.000 Now, I was uncomfortable, but I wasn't sick in that experience.
02:37:10.000 I had a friend whose wife couldn't look at like a strobing image online.
02:37:15.000 Yeah.
02:37:15.000 Like if she saw something strobing online, all of a sudden her brain would short circuit.
02:37:20.000 Well, my wife similarly will close her eyes if ever there is any strobing of that sort.
02:37:25.000 That is so crazy.
02:37:25.000 You know, it was a tumor that they took the tumor out when she was 29 years old.
02:37:29.000 So it was, you know, almost three decades ago.
02:37:31.000 Wow.
02:37:32.000 So she's fine, but there's this remnant effect.
02:37:36.000 Or maybe she had this beforehand.
02:37:38.000 No one knows cause and effect when it comes to this, but the bottom line is, yeah.
02:37:41.000 So for kids, you just have to be careful that you're not creating something.
02:37:48.000 And that's the other thing that you have to be very mindful of.
02:37:51.000 Maybe as virtual reality gets more and more involved, or more and more accurate, it'll be less and less weird.
02:37:59.000 You know, because there's that thing, that uncanny valley...
02:38:03.000 Yes, of course.
02:38:04.000 With visualizations and so on.
02:38:06.000 But the difference here is, If you're not actually moving in the real world, but you are experiencing motion in the virtual world, that disparity, for my wife sent her into a seizure space, but for other people, it does make them feel sick.
02:38:21.000 So the challenge is to find a way.
02:38:23.000 Because what you really want is you want to go into the virtual world and zip around.
02:38:27.000 You want to go near the speed of light.
02:38:29.000 You don't want to go to a black hole.
02:38:31.000 But most of these systems, they have to be constructed so that the environment...
02:38:37.000 It appears around you as opposed to you zip into it and zip through it because of the feeling of nausea.
02:38:43.000 What about some sort of a chair that appears to, like, haptic feedback where it makes it feel like you're actually going?
02:38:49.000 There is a version of that one, and my wife did that one in a virtual reality setup that they had in California, and that worked okay.
02:38:58.000 For her.
02:38:59.000 I didn't want to get on it because, again, if I get sick on Staten Island Ferry, if I get in a chair and I'm on like a roller coaster, forget about it.
02:39:06.000 You know, I'm dead.
02:39:08.000 But yes, that may ultimately help.
02:39:11.000 And so, yeah, if you could somehow create a consonance between your sense of movement in both the real world and the virtual world, then yeah, I presume you'd be okay.
02:39:22.000 But look, I mean, there's a museum in New Jersey, Liberty Science Center, and they have one of these devices, these spaceships that you go into, hydraulic motion and 3D visuals around you to give you a sense of...
02:39:35.000 And as they're closing it up, they say, oh, by the way, if anyone feels sick or panicked...
02:39:41.000 You know, there's the escape button at the top, and it was all kids, and I was just in there with my kids.
02:39:45.000 It closed up.
02:39:46.000 It started to go immediately.
02:39:48.000 I had hit the goddamn escape button, man, because I started to panic.
02:39:53.000 I started to feel sick.
02:39:54.000 And so I walk out of the thing, and there's a line of 100 kids waiting for the next ride.
02:39:59.000 And I'm the sole person who walks out of the thing because I couldn't handle it.
02:40:04.000 That's hilarious.
02:40:05.000 There's a ride like that at Disneyland where it's a Star Wars ride.
02:40:08.000 Yeah, I think it's a similar thing.
02:40:09.000 It's pretty wild.
02:40:11.000 It's really fun.
02:40:12.000 There's actually a new one where you're in the Millennium Falcon.
02:40:15.000 I think this was the Millennium Falcon, actually.
02:40:18.000 That's the newer one.
02:40:18.000 There's an older one called Star Tours that's been around for a few years.
02:40:22.000 And then the new one is in, you know, they have a whole section of Disneyland that's all Star Wars experience that they spent fucking billions of dollars on.
02:40:31.000 It's really incredible.
02:40:32.000 But the Millennium Falcon ride is incredible.
02:40:35.000 And I used to be able to do it.
02:40:36.000 I mean, 20 years ago, I went to Universal Studios.
02:40:38.000 I don't know if they still have a theme park down there.
02:40:40.000 It was near Disney.
02:40:41.000 And I went on a Back to the Future ride.
02:40:44.000 Yeah, yeah.
02:40:45.000 So that is the Millennium Falcon.
02:40:46.000 Is that the same thing?
02:40:47.000 No, the Back to the Future is different.
02:40:49.000 Oh, that's Star Wars.
02:40:50.000 I'm getting all mixed up.
02:40:51.000 But anyway, so I went on that and I loved it.
02:40:53.000 It was spectacular.
02:40:54.000 But somehow I've changed.
02:40:56.000 Oh, no.
02:40:57.000 Yeah, I can't.
02:40:58.000 I freaked out.
02:40:59.000 I totally freaked out.
02:41:01.000 I mean, my heart started palpitating.
02:41:03.000 And I was like, Brian, hang on.
02:41:05.000 Like, for the kids, just hang on.
02:41:07.000 I was like, I can't do it.
02:41:07.000 I can't do it.
02:41:08.000 Boom!
02:41:09.000 I hit the escape hatch.
02:41:10.000 Wow, that sucks.
02:41:11.000 That sucks.
02:41:12.000 Well, listen, Brian, I really appreciate you coming in here.
02:41:15.000 That's my pleasure.
02:41:16.000 And I appreciate your work.
02:41:17.000 And you're an amazing communicator of science.
02:41:19.000 I really think it's awesome the way you describe things.
02:41:22.000 You make it very accessible.
02:41:23.000 And it's really fun.
02:41:25.000 Well, thank you so much.
02:41:25.000 I enjoyed the conversation.
02:41:26.000 And your book is out right now.
02:41:28.000 Paperback.
02:41:28.000 Tell everybody.
02:41:29.000 Until the end of time, mind, matter, and our search for meaning in an evolving universe.
02:41:34.000 Did you do the audiobook as well?
02:41:35.000 I did the audiobook as well.
02:41:36.000 Oh, that's so important.
02:41:37.000 I hate when actors do other people's stuff.
02:41:40.000 Thank you.
02:41:40.000 Thank you, Brian.
02:41:41.000 Appreciate you, man.
02:41:41.000 Thank you.
02:41:42.000 Bye, everybody.
02:41:55.000 Thank you.