The Joe Rogan Experience - June 25, 2021


Joe Rogan Experience #1673 - Colin Wright


Episode Stats

Length

2 hours and 42 minutes

Words per Minute

171.32071

Word Count

27,911

Sentence Count

1,966

Misogynist Sentences

59


Summary

In this episode of The Joe Rogan Experience, we're drinking mead. Distilled mead made from honey and honeyed with a touch of turpentine. Also, we discuss whether there are only two sexes, and why there is no such thing as a gender spectrum. And we discuss why we should not even make the distinction between males and females, because there is a difference between a boy and a girl. And why the difference between male and female flies is not a big deal. We also talk about how testosterone levels are higher in flies than they are in humans and why that matters. And we talk about why we shouldn't even have a sex and gender spectrum, because we can't have a boy or a girl, because it's not a spectrum. We can't even make a distinction between a girl and a boy, because they're different from each other, right? Joe and Colin talk about this and more on this week's episode of the podcast. The J.R.E. Experience: A Podcast by Day, A Podcast By Night, All Day, All by Night. by Night, by Day. All Day All Day by Night by Night All by Morning, All By Sea, by Sea, By Day, By Night by Sea by Sea. By Sea by Sea by Sky, By Air, by Air, By Beach, by Beach, By Land, By Water, By Stream, By Ground, By Moon, By Sky, by the Sea, by the Bay, By the Stream, by Sunset, By The Sea, and by the Moon, by Ground, by Mars, by Space, by The Moon, and Beyond, by Earth, by Pluto, by Stars, by Venus, by Avernus, by Neptune, by Jupiter, and so much more, we're all about the things we love to talk about, and we don't even know what we're talking about, but we're not going to stop talking about it, so why not do it? Why Reality's Last Stand? by Mars and Mars are not a Spectrum? , Why Reality is Not a Spectrum, by Science, Why There's a Spectrum by Mead, Why We Can't Have a Sex and a Boy or a Girl? and Why There Are Only Two Sex? by Colin, Why They're Not a Spare Sex Is Not A Spectrum? by My Subscriber, we Can't Do This? by Meade, we'll Talk About It?


Transcript

00:00:03.000 The Joe Rogan Experience.
00:00:05.000 Train by day.
00:00:07.000 Joe Rogan Podcast by night.
00:00:08.000 All day.
00:00:14.000 Hello, Colin.
00:00:15.000 How's it going, Joe?
00:00:16.000 Well, first of all, it's going great.
00:00:18.000 Thank you very much, first of all, for this bottle of...
00:00:21.000 This is distilled honey.
00:00:25.000 Distilled mead.
00:00:26.000 Distilled mead.
00:00:26.000 Yeah, so...
00:00:27.000 So mead is like a beer made out of honey...
00:00:29.000 Well, kind of.
00:00:30.000 Yeah, it's like a honey wine.
00:00:31.000 So when you make rum, that's basically just like a distilled fermented sugarcane product and whiskey is a distilled beer.
00:00:40.000 And then if you want to have...
00:00:42.000 Brandy, that's sort of a distilled fruit wine of some sort.
00:00:45.000 So this is sort of a unique thing.
00:00:47.000 This is distilled mead, so straight from honey.
00:00:50.000 So I think it's one of the most crafty spirits there are because good luck replicating all the stuff that the bees did to make that honey and then the fermentation process.
00:00:59.000 And then I was put in a pot still by myself.
00:01:02.000 Well, I had mead for the first time last weekend, actually.
00:01:05.000 Okay.
00:01:06.000 I was at Maynard Keenan's place in Scottsdale, Arizona.
00:01:10.000 Merkin Vineyards.
00:01:11.000 You know Maynard from Tool?
00:01:13.000 Yeah, yeah.
00:01:13.000 For sure.
00:01:14.000 You know, he's actually a wine guy.
00:01:16.000 He makes wine.
00:01:17.000 What would you call that?
00:01:19.000 A... What is a wine producer?
00:01:22.000 Viticulturist?
00:01:22.000 Enologist?
00:01:23.000 Winemaker?
00:01:24.000 That's probably...
00:01:25.000 Well, whatever he is, he makes mead as well.
00:01:28.000 It was interesting.
00:01:29.000 I was like, oh, this is tasty, like a weird sort of wine-ish kind of thing.
00:01:35.000 Yeah, I'm sort of halfway interested in actual drinking mead itself.
00:01:40.000 I'm more into, like, distilling that product and making a spirit.
00:01:44.000 And for some reason, so the first time I had Honeyshine was in Wisconsin.
00:01:48.000 I was at a conference there, and just something I never had before.
00:01:52.000 And you can actually taste the honey and the floral notes that come through at the very end.
00:01:57.000 And you made this?
00:01:58.000 I did.
00:02:00.000 How'd you make it?
00:02:02.000 I have a copper pot still.
00:02:04.000 And you just basically make five gallons of mead, wait till it's really dry, so all the sugars have been converted to alcohols, pour it in the pot still, and then there you go.
00:02:14.000 How strong is it?
00:02:15.000 It's 100 proof.
00:02:24.000 There you go.
00:02:25.000 Whoa, that's intense.
00:02:26.000 Can you taste the honey in the flower?
00:02:29.000 Or no?
00:02:29.000 Sort of.
00:02:31.000 Now that you told me that, I would go, no, it's like a fucking strong turpentine taste.
00:02:37.000 There's a review.
00:02:39.000 It's rough.
00:02:40.000 If you want to get fucked up, try this.
00:02:42.000 It's good over ice.
00:02:43.000 I'm sure it can make a good mixed drink, too, so feel free to experiment here.
00:02:46.000 Why Reality's Last Stand.
00:02:49.000 Yeah, so that's the name of my substack, and that has to do with...
00:02:55.000 I talk a lot about the whole sex and gender debate and about why there are only two sexes and why sex is not a spectrum.
00:03:03.000 Stop!
00:03:04.000 Cancel this podcast.
00:03:06.000 Turn it off.
00:03:06.000 We can't do this.
00:03:07.000 Hit stop.
00:03:09.000 What are you saying?
00:03:10.000 There's only two sexes?
00:03:12.000 That's the current...
00:03:14.000 Well, I would say it's the current consensus, but you might not know by actually talking to a lot of academics in science right now because there seems to be sort of a chilling effect that's going on for people actually saying there are only two sexes and that it's not a spectrum.
00:03:29.000 I know you've talked a lot about the trans women in sports debate and all that stuff.
00:03:33.000 Yeah.
00:03:33.000 I'm not sure if you know the roots of where that comes.
00:03:37.000 It's not just people who are confused about if men are stronger than women.
00:03:41.000 There's a more fundamental ideology that's sort of denying the existence of male and female as stable biological categories.
00:03:51.000 I've had an argument with a professor about that on this very podcast who was trying to say that we shouldn't even make the distinction between males and females.
00:03:59.000 To which I was like, okay, if you go to a store to buy a puppy, you go to like a pet store and you buy a puppy and you want a boy and they give you a girl, like what was happening there?
00:04:12.000 Is there a difference between a boy and a girl there?
00:04:15.000 There is.
00:04:16.000 So in every other animal, there's a difference between a male and a female, but not with humans?
00:04:22.000 They do play this game where a lot of these scientists who you'll talk to, if you look at their own research papers, they're studying fly behavior or something, and you'll see them talk about male and female flies.
00:04:33.000 And it's like, and how are they classifying the male and female flies?
00:04:37.000 I think?
00:04:55.000 Low testosterone.
00:04:56.000 Some females have higher testosterone.
00:04:58.000 Some, you know, can't quite be sex chromosomes.
00:05:00.000 They'll try to make it like sex is some multifaceted, multifactorial property, and that it's like a statistical equation that you can just feed in some inputs and then you can find out where on the sex spectrum you might reside.
00:05:14.000 When in reality, that's just not the case at all.
00:05:18.000 You have the two camps of people.
00:05:19.000 You have the sex spectrum slash the sex social constructivists.
00:05:25.000 I kind of lump them into this category of they're for the abolition of sex altogether.
00:05:31.000 Then you have the other people who are sort of the sex expansionists, and they want to insist that there's just more than two sexes.
00:05:38.000 And what they all have in common is this allergy to the number two.
00:05:43.000 They need to break up binaries anywhere they see them.
00:05:46.000 It's based on queer theory, which is from the whole critical theory field in academia.
00:05:54.000 And what I find is fascinating is you don't hear the activists who are arguing for there being three, four, five, six, or seven sexes argue with the people who think sex is a spectrum and that sex isn't even a real thing.
00:06:06.000 It's all of them versus people like me who are just saying that there happens to be only two sexes.
00:06:13.000 It's clearly a spectrum inside each two sexes, right?
00:06:18.000 Yeah, so if you were to look within males and females, there are, in a sense, a spectrum of characteristics that each sex has.
00:06:26.000 And one thing they'll point to is the existence of, like, an intersex individual, which correspond to, you know, one out of every 5,000 humans is born with genitalia that are pretty ambiguous, who might not be classifiable as either male or female at a glance.
00:06:44.000 And they'll use that and suggest that just because this individual exists somewhere in between, therefore sex is a spectrum, that it's a social construct.
00:06:55.000 You can't really draw the line anywhere specifically between male and female exists.
00:07:01.000 And this suggests that everyone is sort of just varying degrees of maleness and femaleness and that like you wouldn't necessarily, Joe B., be a 100% male.
00:07:12.000 Rather, you would just be somewhere on the spectrum and presumably we could look at someone else who had less masculine characteristics and they would be less male than you are.
00:07:22.000 So that's sort of where the sex spectrum tends to lead the arguments to.
00:07:27.000 But really, it's not less male.
00:07:29.000 It's just less testosterone or less what we would consider to be, like, manly characteristics, right?
00:07:36.000 You're still dealing with someone who can impregnate a female.
00:07:39.000 Like, that should be where we draw the line, right?
00:07:43.000 Like, one of them has XY chromosome.
00:07:44.000 One of them has double X. Yeah.
00:07:47.000 So there's sort of two levels that you can look at when we're referring to biological sex and what that is.
00:07:54.000 There's sort of a population level way to look at it where you can say, like, well, what is biological sex as a concept?
00:08:00.000 And this has to do with having two different types of gametes, two different sizes.
00:08:06.000 And the organisms that have produced sperm, the smaller gamete, they're considered males.
00:08:11.000 Organisms that produce the larger gametes, the ova, they're considered females.
00:08:16.000 And that broadly speaking, this is how we classify a population and the individuals within it.
00:08:22.000 But if we're going to actually...
00:08:24.000 If you try to assign a sex to flesh and blood individuals, then you'll hear objections from people.
00:08:30.000 They'll say something like, well, if you're an adolescent male, you're not actually producing sperm at the time, so can we classify them as male?
00:08:37.000 Or if you have some sort of reproductive condition where you just don't have any, you don't produce any gametes whatsoever, but otherwise your sexual anatomy is perfectly intact, can we classify them as male or female?
00:08:49.000 So this is sort of the game that gets played along that.
00:08:54.000 And so basically when we're identifying whether or not an individual is a male or female, we're not looking at whether they actually produce gametes in any given moment.
00:09:03.000 It really comes down to whether or not your reproductive anatomy is sort of organized around the production of either sperm or ova.
00:09:11.000 And that's just sort of makes the intuitive sense to what most people seem to understand.
00:09:20.000 It's what they think sex is when they sort of observe males and females.
00:09:23.000 It has to do with the reproductive anatomy.
00:09:26.000 What is going on today where this is such a hot topic?
00:09:30.000 What has been the shift in our culture?
00:09:34.000 Can you find a patient zero?
00:09:37.000 Was there an initial explosion that led to the domino effect?
00:09:41.000 What is it?
00:09:43.000 That's leading to such an utter fascination culture-wide about gender and sex now.
00:09:51.000 It's like these are the big hot topics of today.
00:09:55.000 It's gender, sex, race.
00:09:57.000 And those things seem to...
00:10:00.000 I guess also sexual orientation.
00:10:02.000 Gender, sex, race, sexual orientation.
00:10:04.000 Those three...
00:10:07.000 I mean, those four, it's just unprecedented in our time that these are the most widely talked about subjects across the board with young people and people that are virtue signaling and people that want to be, you know, air quotes, woke.
00:10:22.000 Like, what's causing this, Colin?
00:10:24.000 Help us out.
00:10:25.000 You know, it's something I've been tracking for quite some time.
00:10:29.000 Like a bounty hunter?
00:10:30.000 Yes, exactly.
00:10:32.000 Well, I was always...
00:10:33.000 So I started off in, like, the new atheist movement, and I was arguing against creationists and stuff and defending biological realities.
00:10:40.000 And then that movement kind of anticipated, or at least is not nearly as prevalent, and they don't hold as much power.
00:10:46.000 I think they just lost the argument.
00:10:49.000 Yeah.
00:10:50.000 I mean, there's actually an interesting segue between Atheism Plus and the modern social justice movement as we see it now.
00:10:56.000 Oh, yeah.
00:10:56.000 For sure.
00:10:57.000 Atheism was the first movement to be infiltrated by all the language we're hearing now of appropriation and the whole check your privilege and all that stuff.
00:11:06.000 Well, I remember that.
00:11:07.000 I remember watching Atheism Plus conferences online going, This is like the craziest virtue signaling event that I've ever seen in my life.
00:11:17.000 Because it's people that don't just want to talk about the concept of agnostic thinking or atheism.
00:11:23.000 They want to also attribute a bunch of social values to this movement that makes it kind of like a religion.
00:11:32.000 Have you heard of Elevator Gate?
00:11:34.000 Yes.
00:11:34.000 With Richard Dawkins involved in that home?
00:11:36.000 Yes.
00:11:37.000 Yeah, that was sort of the thing that sparked off, in a big way, the rise of a lot of social justice stuff and the fall of the New Atheism.
00:11:44.000 Could you explain it to people that don't know what it was about?
00:11:46.000 Yeah, it was a while ago.
00:11:47.000 Let me see if I can outline it a bit here.
00:11:50.000 So there had been some complaints at a lot of atheist conferences where there had been people complaining of sexual harassment.
00:11:59.000 And there was one specific example.
00:12:01.000 There was a speaker.
00:12:02.000 Her name was Rebecca Watson.
00:12:04.000 She went by Skepchick.
00:12:05.000 And she was giving a talk at this conference specifically addressing sexism and the atheist movement.
00:12:12.000 And I think she might have said that she wasn't interested in hooking up at conferences or whatever.
00:12:18.000 And then on the way back to her hotel later that night, she went into the elevator, and then someone went into the elevator with her.
00:12:26.000 It was a guy.
00:12:27.000 And as they were going up in the elevator, he looked over at her and just asked her if she'd like to come back to his room for a cup of coffee.
00:12:32.000 That's literally what he said.
00:12:35.000 That's a euphemism for, you want to come back and...
00:12:38.000 Netflix and chill.
00:12:39.000 Netflix and chill, yeah.
00:12:41.000 And so she said no.
00:12:44.000 He didn't pursue anymore.
00:12:45.000 They went off to their separate rooms.
00:12:47.000 Everything was fine.
00:12:48.000 The next day on social media, she blows up the internet trying to say how terrible this was, how she felt so uncomfortable in the elevator.
00:12:55.000 It was in a tight spot, you know, a small elevator.
00:12:59.000 And this is how threatened that she was.
00:13:02.000 And it became a really big sort of fissure in the atheist movement because some people were saying, like, nothing really happened.
00:13:08.000 They just used a euphemism for, you know, they asked you politely if you wanted to come back and do more.
00:13:12.000 You said no.
00:13:13.000 Like, that's the end of the story.
00:13:14.000 Yeah.
00:13:17.000 Yeah.
00:13:24.000 Yeah.
00:13:39.000 Dear Muslima, you have no right to complain about how you're treated, you know, having your genitals mutilated or whatever, because haven't you heard this one woman?
00:13:48.000 Her name is Skepchik.
00:13:49.000 You know, she was offered coffee at an elevator, and she said no, and the guy didn't do anything after that.
00:13:54.000 So it was a very sarcastic way he approached that.
00:13:57.000 And then that just made the whole atheist woman just get engulfed in flames immediately.
00:14:02.000 It was all the factions split up between the super woke people and the classic skeptics.
00:14:08.000 And, yeah, it never recovered, really.
00:14:11.000 And right after that is when Atheism Plus came out, which was Atheism Plus Social Justice, which really just was woke Democrats who happened to be atheists, basically.
00:14:21.000 And all the new conference topics were just, like, intersectionality and maybe some vague reference to, you know, disbelief or something.
00:14:29.000 So...
00:14:30.000 The atheist movement never recovered from that.
00:14:32.000 It's gone downhill.
00:14:33.000 And now we've seen how the same type of activism has moved in and taken over Evergreen State College and has led to what Brett and Heather have gone through and then sort of erupted all over the country and what we're seeing now.
00:14:47.000 So that was sort of the canary in the coal mine for a lot of what we're seeing now.
00:14:51.000 What do you think is causing it?
00:14:54.000 A lot of people have theories on this, but I want to know your personal one.
00:14:58.000 Why is this a thing today?
00:15:02.000 Yeah, well, there's so many different aspects to the ideology.
00:15:06.000 So in the specific area of, I guess, the whole sex denial thing, I think there's this sort of this allergy to the word discrimination, in a way, where we've been told that discrimination is a terrible thing,
00:15:21.000 always.
00:15:22.000 But, I mean, it might sound controversial, but discrimination just means that we're distinguishing between two different things in a certain context.
00:15:30.000 We think of discrimination as prejudice.
00:15:33.000 I'm discriminating in this certain thing.
00:15:36.000 I mean, if you have a children's sports league, that discriminates against adults, and most people would say that that's a good type of discrimination.
00:15:43.000 But we've just sort of adopted this idea that discrimination is really bad, and so now when we talk about Trans women in sports or something.
00:15:51.000 They think they're being discriminated against.
00:15:53.000 And what you'll see in the headlines is women and girls who are trans are not able to play in sports for women and girls.
00:16:01.000 What they fail to mention is that it's not the fact that they're trans.
00:16:05.000 That is the reason why they're not being able to compete.
00:16:08.000 It's the fact that they're, you know, biologically male.
00:16:11.000 And that's the thing that's being kept, that we're trying to discriminate against.
00:16:16.000 Not the fact that they're trans, because trans is just like a state of mind that they can have.
00:16:20.000 They declare that they're trans.
00:16:21.000 You know, you can't verify it empirically in any way.
00:16:24.000 And so there's no reason to segregate sports by just a state of your mind, basically, anymore that you would want to segregate sports by Political ideology or something else that's completely irrelevant.
00:16:37.000 So I think an aversion to the concept of the idea that discrimination is bad just across the board is holding us back from having more productive conversations.
00:16:49.000 And then I know you've had people like James Lindsay on and they talk about just the critical theory, the queer theory that's out there where it's just meant to just pick apart Anything.
00:17:00.000 Anytime they see a binary, they need to deconstruct it and deconstruct it.
00:17:05.000 It's based on this epistemology of relativistic, relative truth, blurring borders between other things, systems of power.
00:17:15.000 This is sort of the ideology that has taken root in a lot of different areas in society, and it's really been coming to a head in the last few years on many topics, too, on the whole sex and gender Debate.
00:17:27.000 We have the critical race theory stuff.
00:17:28.000 We have the post-colonial, you know, decolonize the curriculum.
00:17:32.000 And, you know, it's just spreading out of control.
00:17:36.000 And then people who are not the postmodern type, people who are, you know, have the enlightenment values and we're modernists in the way we approach the world.
00:17:46.000 We think that, you know, if something's true, if it corresponds to reality and there's certain truths that can't really be denied by anybody, A lot of us are pushing back, and because we seem to have lost a foothold in the institutions, it's now resulting in people getting canceled.
00:18:04.000 Yeah, it's a strange time in that regard where it seems like no one knows exactly what our cultural framework is anymore for discussing things.
00:18:14.000 And every time it gets pushed further and further along, you have to kind of catch up with what you're allowed to say and what you're allowed to talk about and what's okay.
00:18:24.000 It didn't used to be controversial to say there are two genders.
00:18:28.000 There's only two genders.
00:18:30.000 But if you say it today, you could get fired from your job.
00:18:33.000 I mean, that's a real thing.
00:18:35.000 You can get discriminated against.
00:18:37.000 Not that discrimination's bad, as we've discussed, but you know what I mean?
00:18:41.000 This is a new thing to get to a position where talking about biological facts You really shouldn't.
00:18:50.000 You have to discuss the societal agreement, the cultural agreement we have about, like, how we view or, you know, what the push is, you know, this idea of compliance, forced compliance into this ideology.
00:19:07.000 You have to accept what we view now as sex and gender.
00:19:13.000 There's like a language takeover.
00:19:16.000 And even when you said just earlier, a second ago, that there's two genders, well, they've just co-opted that word, gender.
00:19:24.000 And so what used to be the case, and this is something that I was on board with, I considered myself progressive, Was a lot of people would say that sex and gender are different things.
00:19:35.000 Sex referred to your reproductive anatomy, your biology, and gender referred to just the way you identify.
00:19:40.000 You can identify as a man or a woman, or if they want to expand that, whatever that means, it has to do with identity.
00:19:47.000 It's sort of like sex is your hardware, gender is your software, where you can be a male and identify as a woman.
00:19:54.000 And that was something that I was sort of willing to get on board with, and I was like, okay, why do we need to have...
00:20:00.000 We already have male and female to refer to sex.
00:20:03.000 Why do we need to also use man and woman?
00:20:05.000 Maybe we can just let those people have that.
00:20:10.000 Because as a biologist, my defense didn't really go up because as long as we know what sex is, then that's fine.
00:20:21.000 I'll be willing to manage that.
00:20:23.000 And then slowly over time, that distinction became more and more blurry.
00:20:28.000 Where now they would say instead of identify as a man or a woman, they say identify as a male or a female.
00:20:34.000 And they're using the sex terms where they used to use gender terms.
00:20:37.000 And then I'd started seeing on my Facebook popping up people with PhDs in biology sharing articles like there are five sexes or there are seven different sexes or sex is a social construct.
00:20:48.000 And this was...
00:20:50.000 As I started pushing back against that, I thought they must have been talking about gender identity, but it became very clear that they're talking about actual sex itself and that there's every different chromosomal arrangement that someone can have.
00:21:04.000 Like if you're a Klinefelter male or something, you have sex.
00:21:06.000 X, Y, Y chromosomes.
00:21:08.000 Your own unique sex now rather than just a variation within the male sex.
00:21:15.000 Do you have a theory as to what caused all this or as to why it seems to be progressing?
00:21:21.000 It's not like they reached a point and they went, okay, I think we made our point.
00:21:26.000 Let's sort of normalize this and have it be accepted into the Right.
00:21:41.000 Right.
00:21:43.000 Right.
00:21:43.000 Right.
00:21:52.000 Like I did, they get called names.
00:21:55.000 I was looking for tenure-track positions and I had people post on job boards in my field that thousands of biologists look every day that I was a transphobe and a race scientist that they just threw in on top of things just to throw a bunch of slurs at me and see what sticks and try to poison the well for my potential hiring.
00:22:15.000 And so people see that that happens and then they just They just don't want to do it.
00:22:19.000 They stay quiet.
00:22:20.000 Right.
00:22:20.000 And then so all you hear is the loudest voices, the most activists, they come out and they'll just say this type of stuff.
00:22:27.000 And then a lot of people don't want to say anything because they're generally confused because of the jargon that's being used.
00:22:32.000 And then they kind of do a human shield aspect where they're portraying themselves as sort of the next evolution of LGBT rights or in the terms of critical race theory where this next civil rights movement And so no one wants to be on the wrong side of history, even though they don't understand what people are saying.
00:22:50.000 Sounds nuts, but who are they to really judge what this is?
00:22:52.000 They don't want to be called a racist because that's the worst thing you can be called.
00:22:55.000 They don't want to be called a transphobe because we all want to be accepting people.
00:23:00.000 And fortunately, I think a lot of people are sort of...
00:23:04.000 Beginning to see that, and they're willing to stand up a little bit more now and at least call it like it is, saying that these people have a really bad concept of what biological sex actually is.
00:23:15.000 No, there's not seven sexes.
00:23:17.000 No, sex isn't a, you know, a bimodal distribution where we're just varying degrees of maleness and femaleness.
00:23:23.000 We can definitively say for 4,999 people out of 5,000 that they are unambiguously male or female.
00:23:33.000 And we can account for the 1% that's not, but that doesn't make all of us sort of in question of what our sex is.
00:23:42.000 So did you start—you're saying you were a progressive.
00:23:45.000 You started out thinking in terms of like a progressive ideology, but then— I was pro-gay rights movement, and yeah, for sure.
00:23:54.000 And what, if anything, has changed?
00:23:57.000 Nothing has really changed with me.
00:24:00.000 I think a lot of just the discourse has moved into a realm that I was no longer sort of comfortable with.
00:24:06.000 When as soon as that wall between sex and gender started being broken down, that's where I had drawn the line, because now we can't talk about what sex is.
00:24:17.000 And, you know, this is, you know, having the consequences we're seeing for, like, women's sports and males getting admitted into female prisons, being able to self-identify.
00:24:28.000 Including male sexual abusers.
00:24:30.000 Oh, yeah, yeah.
00:24:31.000 Which is really so crazy.
00:24:32.000 We were promised that would never happen.
00:24:35.000 But apparently that is.
00:24:37.000 Laurel Hubbard, the trans woman who's the first Olympic athlete who just qualified for New Zealand.
00:24:45.000 So that's a new thing coming out.
00:24:47.000 This is a 43-year-old trans-identified person who's...
00:24:55.000 You know, 43 is incredibly old to be competing in the Olympics for this powerlifting for her weight class.
00:25:04.000 And I think she's favored to win the whole thing, given her biology.
00:25:13.000 Given her biology.
00:25:15.000 Given their biology.
00:25:17.000 I'm the type of person who...
00:25:19.000 What's this, Jamie?
00:25:20.000 It's a picture I just stumbled across of where Laurel Hubbard falls in line with...
00:25:28.000 I think the orange line is women.
00:25:31.000 I think M35 is the age.
00:25:33.000 And then she slides right in there at...
00:25:36.000 Where all the males are.
00:25:37.000 Yeah, I think there's actually a time thing, so 2010 to 19. Yeah, correct.
00:25:41.000 And so, just a few years ago, Laurel Hubbard's total lift would have been just right in line with the male category that she's currently lifting in.
00:25:52.000 So, it's quite a big jump.
00:25:55.000 Yeah, it's a huge jump.
00:25:58.000 I wonder, how many people support this?
00:26:02.000 I mean, you read comments when there's an article that's written and they post it on Twitter about this kind of stuff.
00:26:10.000 It seems overwhelmingly that most people think it's a bad idea and that most people think it's unfair to biological women.
00:26:16.000 But then there's people that just go all in on the woke side and they want to say, no, it's just transphobic to think that way and that there's a spectrum.
00:26:28.000 In every single category, like if you look at males or females, you're going to look at like there's going to be your LeBron Jameses on the high end, and then on the low end there's going to be some completely unathletic people, and that's the same with females as well.
00:26:42.000 And when you add trans into that mix, you're not really messing up the curve any more than you ordinarily would be by having exceptional female athletes in there.
00:26:53.000 Yeah, a lot of the arguments for including trans women in female sports sort of go along the lines of that bodies come in all shapes and sizes.
00:27:03.000 We all kind of...
00:27:04.000 Yeah, exactly.
00:27:04.000 We know some women out there, like you've met them in your life every day.
00:27:09.000 Maybe not every day, but you've experienced women who are much stronger or faster than most of the guys you know.
00:27:15.000 Like there's really exceptional women out there.
00:27:17.000 Or maybe in your high school football team, like maybe you were on a school and you had a woman that made it on your team, like a girl made it on your team.
00:27:23.000 So people sort of have this everyday idea of sex differences and there's like, you know, a woman can make it on a man's team every once in a while.
00:27:30.000 And they fail to take into account just like, as you kind of move up in how elite you are, the proportion of, or the representation of women just gets diminished and diminished until, you know, when you're in the top 0.1% of athletic performance, there's just no women up there anymore.
00:27:46.000 Are there any trans men that are competing against biological men successfully in sports?
00:27:53.000 Not that I know of.
00:27:54.000 There might have been, like, one example of a boxer, but not, like, on any elite level or anything like that.
00:28:01.000 Yeah, so we have this idea of what constitutes unfairness.
00:28:05.000 So we'll say that, you know, Laurel Hubbard, this seems unfair.
00:28:08.000 And people will say that, like, well, you know, you might have some woman somewhere in the world who can lift that amount of weight.
00:28:15.000 Or sometimes there'll be trans women in a competition and they won't win a medal.
00:28:20.000 And so people will say...
00:28:22.000 That shows that it's fair because they're not winning.
00:28:25.000 And I think an important thing to recognize, when we talk about fairness in sports, what they're doing is they're comparing fairness to other athletes.
00:28:35.000 Like, what is your performance relative to somebody else?
00:28:38.000 And by that standard, you could look at someone like LeBron James and say, well, he's not fair.
00:28:43.000 He's this athletic freak.
00:28:44.000 He can...
00:28:45.000 Jump five feet in the air or whatever.
00:28:47.000 You can dunk.
00:28:47.000 He's just extremely strong, fast, everything you need.
00:28:50.000 I wasn't born with that, so is it unfair for me?
00:28:56.000 Where I think when we talk about whether something's fair in sports, it's not relative to other athletes.
00:29:02.000 It should be relative...
00:29:05.000 I think?
00:29:27.000 These were categories specifically designed to control for the effects of male puberty on your body.
00:29:35.000 And so when we talk about someone like Laurel Hubbard, well, why is it unfair for this individual to compete?
00:29:41.000 It's not because she's just stronger than most women.
00:29:44.000 It's because they're stronger than they would have been had they not gone through male puberty.
00:29:49.000 And that's what female sports is meant to control for.
00:29:52.000 And so that's why, even if she gets last place in the Olympics, she still took that last place away from a woman who would have been there.
00:30:02.000 I'd get last place in a powerlifting competition.
00:30:04.000 So what is happening, though?
00:30:06.000 Why do you think the International Olympic Committee is choosing to do this?
00:30:11.000 Because it seems to me that if I was...
00:30:13.000 A biological woman, I would be furious.
00:30:16.000 I would be thinking, I can't believe I spent so many years training for this and preparing my body for this, and now a biological male is going to take my spot.
00:30:26.000 Inclusion.
00:30:27.000 That's just the buzzword of the day.
00:30:29.000 Everyone, diversity, equity, inclusion.
00:30:32.000 If we had an overall vote, though, is the issue that...
00:30:37.000 More people who support these things are in the camp of air quote activists, people that will complain and write letters and emails and call and do something to try to cancel or get rid of something versus people that disagree with it and they don't do much about it.
00:30:59.000 They just go, well I don't think it's right that a biological male competes against a female but what am I going to do?
00:31:07.000 They're not organized in that regard.
00:31:08.000 If it was a vote, it would be pretty unanimous.
00:31:12.000 We're pretty close.
00:31:15.000 I don't think it would be pretty close.
00:31:16.000 I think...
00:31:17.000 No, that's what I meant.
00:31:18.000 I meant close to unanimous.
00:31:19.000 Yeah, yeah, yeah.
00:31:20.000 I think there would be a few knuckleheads in there that are in denial.
00:31:23.000 Yeah, and you're going to get all the woke activists are going to vote for yes, but most of the people who are outside of that small percentage are not going to.
00:31:31.000 But the result are ad hominems, too.
00:31:34.000 They just...
00:31:38.000 The idea is that you have to be a bigot if you think this is unfair.
00:31:43.000 That's the only solution or the only possible explanation for why you don't think it's fair.
00:31:49.000 Unfortunately, it's not up for a vote.
00:31:51.000 And they've found a way to sort of get their ideology through without people voting on it by, again, manipulating the language behind it.
00:31:59.000 Well, you look at the WNBA, and that's the Women's National Basketball Association.
00:32:04.000 And, you know, they'll talk about what a woman is, is a gender identity.
00:32:09.000 And so, you know, even though everyone knows that the WNBA and all the women's categories in the Olympics, that they were created, you know, for biological females, but if they can just insist that a woman is now not an adult human female but is instead...
00:32:37.000 Yeah, I just wonder what's going on at the Olympics.
00:32:40.000 It's like, are they trying to appeal to woke people?
00:32:43.000 Do they think that this is the thing to do with the current cultural climate?
00:32:48.000 That the wind is blowing in that direction, so they're just going to go with it?
00:32:51.000 Because if anybody should be concentrating on fairness, it's the damn Olympics.
00:32:56.000 I mean, the whole thing about the Olympics is supposed to be no drug testing, no this, no that, no advantages, no EPO, no...
00:33:07.000 Blood, doping.
00:33:09.000 You're supposed to just be natural.
00:33:11.000 And if you can be competing in the Olympics but competing as a gender that's not represented by your chromosomes or a sex, like whatever you want to call it, gender or sex there...
00:33:24.000 It's just weird that they chose to do that in the Olympics.
00:33:27.000 It just shows you that I think part of it is a marketing thing, too.
00:33:31.000 I think part of it is they just think that this is the way the wind is blowing and that people like it, regardless of whether or not it's fair.
00:33:38.000 They put up this facade as though they're sort of being informed by the science, by, you know, if you're going to compete as a woman, you need to self-declare that you are a woman.
00:33:48.000 And then they say you need to lower your testosterone to, I think it's five nanomoles per liter right now for one full year before you compete, and you need to have that down while you're competing as well.
00:34:01.000 And so that sounds scientific.
00:34:02.000 Most people hear that and say, like, oh, so that's what it takes to get rid of the male advantage that you've had.
00:34:09.000 But the advantage that a lot of males have isn't just the circulating levels of testosterone.
00:34:14.000 It's not like you just all of a sudden remove my testosterone and I don't have advantages.
00:34:17.000 You know, what we should be focusing on is the effects of past testosterone that has guided, you know, male bodies through puberty and has making us stronger upper bodies, made us taller, made our grip strength a lot stronger.
00:34:30.000 And before, a lot of the activists said, you know, where are the studies Showing that a trans woman who's on hormone suppression is actually stronger and more athletic than a cis woman.
00:34:44.000 And then the studies came out.
00:34:46.000 I have them right here.
00:34:48.000 So this year, there's one by Emma Hilton and Tommy Lundberg.
00:34:54.000 And this is transgender women in the female category of sports.
00:34:57.000 And, I mean, I'll read their description.
00:35:01.000 This is looked at all the longitudinal studies, so over time, before and after hormone suppression.
00:35:07.000 So, we report that the performance gap between males and females becomes significant at puberty and often around 10 to 50 percent depending on sport.
00:35:36.000 And given that the gap in strength is usually anywhere between like 30-40%, a 5% reduction off that is minimal.
00:35:46.000 And what study is this from?
00:35:58.000 This is from Sports Medicine.
00:35:59.000 This is the number one sports medicine journal in the world.
00:36:03.000 This is a recent study?
00:36:05.000 2021, yeah.
00:36:07.000 What does the Olympics say about that?
00:36:09.000 Oh, stop.
00:36:09.000 They don't say anything about it.
00:36:10.000 We're trying to sell granola.
00:36:16.000 They'll say that, you know, she's clearly biased because she had written on not having trans women play in sports before.
00:36:23.000 And so there's a conflict of interest or something because she's clearly just an anti-trans activist, even though that's not really what a conflict of interest is, really.
00:36:32.000 I mean, unless you're like, my interest is as a female person, not wanting my sports to be, you know, taken over by males.
00:36:40.000 But then, so there's a good retort to, you know, the bias thing, because there's another study in the, what is it, the British Journal of Sports Medicine, another top article, top publication, and the first author is a trans woman herself who has previously argued for inclusion of trans women,
00:36:58.000 and in some sense still does, even though she found the exact same results here.
00:37:04.000 Notwithstanding values for strength, lean body mass and muscle area in trans women remain above those of cisgender women even after 36 months of hormone therapy.
00:37:13.000 So these are the biggest studies that we have right now.
00:37:16.000 And you'll still get people saying, like, where's the data?
00:37:19.000 And I think it's pretty clear that they never really cared about the data to begin with.
00:37:24.000 It was an expedient way to make you shut up at that given time.
00:37:31.000 It seems to me that we're operating in this new realm where people think this way or people are discussing these things in a way where there's a cultural acceptance.
00:37:57.000 I mean, there's not a lot of overwhelming overt Discrimination against people who are trans, like,
00:38:12.000 publicly, other than the sports thing.
00:38:15.000 The sports is the big one.
00:38:17.000 Other than, and prisons.
00:38:19.000 So, I mean, people are mostly okay with the whole social accommodation of trans people.
00:38:24.000 More so now than ever before, right?
00:38:26.000 Which is progress.
00:38:28.000 Absolutely.
00:38:28.000 I mean, I myself am happy to use their preferred pronouns in public.
00:38:32.000 What if they get into the weird ones or the invent ones?
00:38:35.000 Some of the non-binary ones are a little out there.
00:38:37.000 I won't use those.
00:38:38.000 What about the xers and all that stuff?
00:38:40.000 Like, come on.
00:38:41.000 I might make an attempt, but if I fail, then I'm not going to feel too bad about it.
00:38:45.000 What about they's, they's and them's?
00:38:47.000 Like, I was reading this thing about Demi Lovato.
00:38:50.000 What does he even mean, though?
00:38:50.000 I mean, to not identify...
00:38:52.000 I can imagine people, like...
00:38:55.000 Identifying or thinking that having this anxiety, they feel that they've been born in the wrong body, they feel masculine when they're female.
00:39:02.000 The Demi Lovato thing.
00:39:04.000 But to just identify out of sex altogether, it's just like...
00:39:07.000 Well, they just don't want to have a specific sex, but the Demi Lovato thing was like, now, giving insight on how to address they.
00:39:18.000 That's how they made the sentence.
00:39:21.000 Like, they're trying to explain that there's a way to do this.
00:39:24.000 But you're butchering English, and you've got a real problem, because there's no reason to do that.
00:39:32.000 Well, if you look at what they're actually doing, though...
00:39:35.000 Like Demi Lovato and a lot of like the non-binary crowd.
00:39:39.000 The way that they're identifying as trans has nothing to do with like your biological sex anymore.
00:39:44.000 It's just like What is your...
00:39:47.000 How do you identify?
00:39:48.000 And does that differ from...
00:39:50.000 And then their jargon is the gender or sex you were assigned at birth as though it was, you know, some doctor just made an opinion based on something.
00:40:00.000 But a they is not even saying that, right?
00:40:02.000 Yeah.
00:40:02.000 It's still considered in the umbrella of transgender.
00:40:05.000 Is it?
00:40:06.000 Even if you're non-binary, you still don't identify with the gender you were assigned at birth.
00:40:12.000 And so I got in trouble on this because...
00:40:15.000 Basically, when you say you identify as a man or a woman or a boy or a girl, what you're assenting to is that you identify with these stereotypes of masculinity and femininity.
00:40:25.000 And most people, I mean, there's some people who, to varying degrees, do sort of identify with those.
00:40:31.000 I mean, you've got like...
00:40:32.000 Randy Macho Man Savage on the super far end of males.
00:40:35.000 And because I don't identify with this hyper-masculine aggressive male type, in a way, I'm sort of maybe more towards the feminine scale than Randy Macho Man Savage, so I'm not quite binary in that sense.
00:40:50.000 I don't even know what it means to identify as a man.
00:40:52.000 There's not something that I'm identifying with Who told you that?
00:41:16.000 I mean, according to their own ideology, I am.
00:41:19.000 And then there was a situation where they've redefined what it means to be a homosexual, where it's not being attracted to the opposite sex anymore.
00:41:28.000 It's being attracted to the same gender identity, regardless of your sex.
00:41:33.000 And so I was told that I was bisexual because—this is insane stuff—because I said I would still be attracted to Scarlett Johansson If tomorrow she just came out and said that she identified as a man, but otherwise changed nothing else about her biology,
00:41:49.000 you know, the way she presents.
00:41:49.000 That would make you bisexual?
00:41:51.000 Because I would be willing to have sex with someone who identifies as a man.
00:41:56.000 And that's my same gender identity.
00:41:58.000 And so they said I'd be bisexual.
00:42:00.000 And then, I mean, you can even go further.
00:42:04.000 No, don't.
00:42:05.000 Please don't.
00:42:06.000 Because to me, I don't even care what Scarlett Johansson would identify as.
00:42:10.000 She could identify as a forklift and I would still be attracted to her.
00:42:14.000 So that would make me a pansexual transgender person.
00:42:19.000 Whereas in the realm of reality, I'm just a straight white guy who's just pretty off the shelf.
00:42:27.000 Yeah, but if you call yourself a straight white guy, you don't get any social brownie points.
00:42:30.000 You should think about going pansexual transgender.
00:42:33.000 You could.
00:42:34.000 Apparently I am.
00:42:36.000 I'm self-hating.
00:42:37.000 I don't know that yet.
00:42:38.000 But does everybody who doesn't recognize as being ultra macho, are they all trans?
00:42:45.000 I mean, there's a spectrum of masculinity versus femininity.
00:42:50.000 If you look at the UFC heavyweight champion of the world, his name is Francis Ngannou, who's this gigantic super athlete of a man.
00:42:57.000 And if you look at him versus a regular person, most men are going to identify as being far less masculine than that.
00:43:07.000 Yeah, yeah.
00:43:07.000 That's the perniciousness of the whole gender ideology.
00:43:11.000 Like, most people, if you take the ideology seriously, are non-binary.
00:43:16.000 I mean, most people...
00:43:17.000 Most people.
00:43:17.000 Yeah, most people don't.
00:43:18.000 I mean, probably everyone.
00:43:20.000 I mean, who really...
00:43:20.000 I mean, there's probably someone out there who would just...
00:43:23.000 All the knobs for masculinity are turned to 11. Do you know what Tom Segura is?
00:43:27.000 Yeah, I've seen him on your show.
00:43:28.000 Yeah, Tom used to do this, he had a character that he'd play called DJ Dadmouth.
00:43:34.000 Just he would get bored and he was doing like morning radio or morning television and they made him do these ridiculous morning TV shows.
00:43:42.000 So he decided to do them with like a fur coat on and a gold chain and he would tell these people that he identifies as non-binary.
00:43:49.000 That was like his thing.
00:43:51.000 I just came out as non-binary and you could see that they were confused.
00:43:54.000 And this was like, how many years ago?
00:43:56.000 Five years ago?
00:43:57.000 Yeah, yeah, yeah.
00:44:00.000 So five years ago, he just decided it'd be funny to just say something that nobody understood.
00:44:06.000 Because five years ago, no one knew what the hell he was talking about.
00:44:10.000 He would go, yeah, you know, I'm just coming out as non-binary.
00:44:14.000 And they'd be like, okay, what does that mean?
00:44:17.000 So all this activism, air quotes...
00:44:21.000 It's super common.
00:44:45.000 It's common, but I still don't think people know what they're talking about when they say it.
00:44:50.000 I think they had to, right?
00:44:51.000 It tends to...
00:44:52.000 I mean, you'll talk to the activists who are saying this stuff about, well, what does it mean?
00:44:58.000 Like, just ask anyone who's of this ideology, what is a woman?
00:45:03.000 And you will get just insanity back.
00:45:07.000 Anyone who lives and identifies as a woman.
00:45:10.000 Okay, how do you live as a woman?
00:45:13.000 I think.
00:45:29.000 Right.
00:45:39.000 There's no other option.
00:45:40.000 That's clearly what's going on in these situations.
00:45:43.000 And then you get these gender non-conforming kids that are being told that, oh, you're behaving very boy-like.
00:45:50.000 Maybe you're a female.
00:45:52.000 Maybe you're a tomboy.
00:45:53.000 Maybe you're actually trapped in the wrong body or something.
00:45:56.000 It's just completely insane the way this is infecting a lot of kids' minds who are just confused about what their sex is.
00:46:05.000 Yeah.
00:46:06.000 I mean, that's why...
00:46:07.000 I mean, I talk a lot about this stuff and the whole sex spectrum and stuff on my Substack, Reality's Last Stand, because I do feel like if we can't get these questions right on what sex is, that there's only two sexes,
00:46:23.000 male and female, there's just not many more levies after this that can hold back the flood of insanity.
00:46:30.000 I mean, what's going to be...
00:46:32.000 What's after...
00:46:33.000 Male and female aren't real.
00:46:34.000 I mean, what's downstream from that?
00:46:36.000 Yeah, that's my question.
00:46:36.000 Because it does seem to be going in that direction where it's getting more crazy and more frantic, right?
00:46:43.000 It doesn't seem like it's getting better, like we've reached some sort of a plateau.
00:46:48.000 And we're like, yeah, you know what?
00:46:49.000 Maybe we're wrong about this.
00:46:50.000 And maybe there are some people that are on this weird biological spectrum.
00:46:55.000 But for the most part, it's clear.
00:46:58.000 Male versus female, or, you know, there's two clear, distinct differences.
00:47:03.000 Yeah, I usually try to liken it to a coin flip, because that seems to help in people's minds.
00:47:10.000 Because if you get, there's been studies like, how many times can you flip a nickel before it lands on its edge?
00:47:15.000 And it turns out to be about one out of 6,000 flips.
00:47:18.000 You'll get a nickel that lands on its edge, because they've got, like, the flat edge to them.
00:47:21.000 And that's very close to the percentage, the probabilities of someone who's born intersects.
00:47:27.000 And so, yeah, you can have people land on an edge.
00:47:30.000 They can be sort of an ambiguous case.
00:47:32.000 But for the most part, a coin flip is unambiguously heads or unambiguously tails.
00:47:38.000 Tails doesn't come in percentages.
00:47:40.000 It's either 100% or 0%.
00:47:43.000 And that's just kind of how human bodies are put together.
00:47:47.000 Most of us are just unambiguously male or female.
00:47:49.000 And just because we have an edge case doesn't mean that male and female are just sort of these ambiguous categories anymore.
00:47:56.000 But the thing is, people don't want you to say that because they feel like somehow or another you saying that is eliminating progress.
00:48:04.000 And my question is, where is it progressing to?
00:48:07.000 Like, where does reality completely dissolve?
00:48:12.000 That's what I'm trying to hold back the levy there.
00:48:16.000 I mean, have you seen the gender-bred person?
00:48:20.000 No.
00:48:21.000 Oh my.
00:48:22.000 I'm scared.
00:48:23.000 Pull it up, James.
00:48:26.000 Actually, if you go, there's an article, there's a version of it that's, if you go to, it's an article I wrote on Quillette, it's called J.K. Rowling is Right, Sex is Real and Not a Spectrum.
00:48:37.000 I have the good version on there.
00:48:39.000 They've updated the version a little bit, but they're still, this is being shown in classrooms.
00:48:45.000 It's amazing how aggressive people are if they disagree with you on this stuff too.
00:48:49.000 This is like one of the most aggressive subjects.
00:48:54.000 You got it?
00:49:00.000 The gender-bred person.
00:49:01.000 So this is my article in Quillette that basically debunks the sex spectrum.
00:49:06.000 Now, it starts off with J.K. Rowling on this thing, but actually I have another version on my substack, Reality's Last Stand, that doesn't start off with J.K. Rowling because people told me that they can't show this to their relatives because they hate J.K. Rowling because she's a transphobe.
00:49:21.000 So can you write me another version that doesn't start off with a J.K. Rowling thing?
00:49:25.000 What did she say?
00:49:27.000 She said what I said.
00:49:29.000 That sex is real.
00:49:31.000 So, we can ignore the identity stuff and the attraction, but when you look at biological sex here, they have femaleness and maleness.
00:49:43.000 Not male or female, just femaleness and maleness.
00:49:48.000 And there's a bar that you can slide, you know, the spectrum.
00:49:51.000 And then if you look at the text beneath it, it says, describing what biological sex is, the physical sex characteristics you're born with and develop, including, I mean, genitalia is okay, but then body shape, voice pitch, body hair,
00:50:07.000 hormones, chromosomes, etc.
00:50:11.000 So, if you have a deep voice, that will move you somewhere on the sex spectrum, apparently.
00:50:17.000 If you are a hairy woman, you're less female now than you would have been if you had been hairless.
00:50:25.000 Body shape, if you're just, you know, a very square woman, you're maybe less of a female.
00:50:32.000 You're more male now.
00:50:34.000 This is what they're teaching kids in classrooms.
00:50:38.000 Even in college classrooms, this thing shows up.
00:50:42.000 So what they're confusing here is the difference between primary sex characteristics, which is like your genitalia and your gonads, and secondary sex characteristics, which are all the differences that happen in your body when you go through puberty.
00:50:57.000 Like, men get more upper body strength, they get hairier, voice gets deeper.
00:51:04.000 An analogy that I have for this that helps it stick with people It's kind of out there a little bit, but if you think about bikers, people who ride motorcycles, and cyclists, what defines a biker and a cyclist as the type of thing that they're riding?
00:51:23.000 Is it a motorcycle or a bicycle?
00:51:25.000 But then there's all these cultural things that are kind of overlaid, like there's biker culture, which might correspond with people wearing tattoos or wearing leathers, more protective gear because riding on your bike, your motorcycle, is more dangerous.
00:51:40.000 And then if you go to the cyclist, you know, they have the more lightweight, streamlined, different types of helmets.
00:51:45.000 And so all the helmets and all the other stuff, that's sort of like the secondary sex characteristics, the analogy goes.
00:51:52.000 So what these people are essentially saying is that if you're riding a motorcycle but you're wearing like a spandex bodysuit and you have like the cyclist helmet on, that you would actually be more of a cyclist, even if you're riding a motorcycle.
00:52:08.000 Anyway, the analogy is looking at the motorcycle versus the bicycle.
00:52:14.000 That's your primary sex.
00:52:16.000 That defines your sex, basically.
00:52:18.000 Whereas the secondary sex characteristics, if you have breasts, if you have deep voice and stuff, those are sort of analogous to the other things that go along with riding a motorcycle.
00:52:27.000 More padded outfits and things like that.
00:52:30.000 So they're confusing the outward expression, how big people's breasts are, how hairy they are, with sex itself.
00:52:39.000 And that is just completely not the case.
00:52:42.000 They try to break sex down into these multivariate phenomena where you have, you know, we can presumably plug in all these things like voice pitch and how much hair you have into some equation and then out pops where you are on the sex spectrum.
00:52:54.000 And it's just a complete...
00:52:58.000 I mean, it just gets the biology.
00:52:59.000 It's like, it's not even wrong.
00:53:00.000 It's just completely wrong.
00:53:03.000 And deceptive, it seems.
00:53:05.000 Yeah, I mean, it is, totally.
00:53:06.000 I mean, it's, I liken it to just like the playground bully logic that you'll get on the playground.
00:53:11.000 Like, I've seen this before in grade school where you have the boy who might have more feminine features, they have a higher voice, and you get the bullies going along and telling them that, you know, what are you, a girl?
00:53:24.000 And they'll bully them.
00:53:25.000 And then, according to the sex spectrum, You'll have this chart and some teacher might try to break up a fight like, what do you call Billy a girl?
00:53:32.000 Well, he might be, according to the sex spectrum.
00:53:35.000 This validates that type of bullying where Billy might actually be more of a female because he's got a high voice.
00:53:43.000 That's just completely insane that this is the type of stuff we're teaching kids.
00:53:51.000 Where does this go?
00:53:52.000 Have you ever tried to extrapolate?
00:53:54.000 Have you ever tried to look at how nutty this has gotten over the past five years and then five years before that and then look to five years in the future, ten years in the future?
00:54:04.000 Because, again, like you said, it doesn't seem like there's any breaks on this thing.
00:54:09.000 Yeah, I mean, I don't know where it's going to go, and that's why I'm doing my best to not let it get past this final levy.
00:54:19.000 I mean, honestly, it could go to just complete chaos.
00:54:24.000 Like, what do you do?
00:54:24.000 People identifying as different ages and animals?
00:54:28.000 Well, they've tried.
00:54:30.000 Some people have tried.
00:54:30.000 People would say that's like a slippery slope, but like...
00:54:33.000 I would have said where we are right now is the end of the previous slippery slope I was accused of thinking might exist.
00:54:39.000 Like, we've already gone so down the slippery slope, like, going down a little further is not even...
00:54:43.000 And the problem is it normalizes it, right?
00:54:46.000 Like, that slippery slope.
00:54:48.000 The crazier you get, the more you identify with things, the more you get away with whatever your wacky new thing is.
00:54:54.000 Yeah, everyone thinks this is normal now, like, what we're doing.
00:54:57.000 Yeah, exactly.
00:54:58.000 Yeah.
00:54:58.000 And this, I mean, the problem...
00:55:01.000 Is when people, like, you know, you just had Brett on a second ago, and he's speaking up about some stuff that's, you know, I wouldn't even say it should be that controversial.
00:55:08.000 He's more just talking about certain matters of medicine and stuff.
00:55:11.000 And I'm talking about, I'm saying the most boilerplate things I can possibly imagine that a biologist could possibly say.
00:55:19.000 Where's all this woke shit coming from?
00:55:21.000 Have you thought about that?
00:55:22.000 Have you tried to figure out, like, what's the origin story and where does it go?
00:55:26.000 I mean, it's coming from a lot of the humanities departments and the women's studies departments, queer theory, the whole...
00:55:33.000 But why have they shifted culture so much?
00:55:37.000 Well, it's sort of always...
00:55:39.000 Well, since like the 60s it's been in the humanities departments, but it's sort of kept...
00:55:45.000 The lid has been kept on it for a long time, but they've just slowly sort of permeated outside and just gotten to people's minds.
00:55:53.000 And then the piggybacking off of the LGBT rights and the civil rights movement, they've just sort of attached on.
00:56:02.000 They're like ambulance chasing, basically, their ideology through.
00:56:06.000 Through our institutions, and no one wants to say anything about it.
00:56:11.000 I mean, we have...
00:56:12.000 I'll bring up the book real quick here from Colette.
00:56:16.000 Can I see it?
00:56:17.000 Panics and persecutions, yeah.
00:56:19.000 So, what this really does in this book, it covers a lot of the stories that don't really make it out of the academy or people's lives, because...
00:56:36.000 There's this sort of this narrative that you see in people like AOC and Charles Blow from the New York Times.
00:56:45.000 They would say something like cancel culture doesn't exist.
00:56:47.000 This is just made up.
00:56:49.000 The people who are getting, quote unquote, canceled are people who have a lot of power.
00:56:53.000 They'll point to JK Rowling, who's too big to fail.
00:56:55.000 They'll point to you.
00:56:56.000 They'll say, you know, even if...
00:56:57.000 Even if Joe gets kicked off of whatever network he's on, he's got a big enough audience, he'll go somewhere else.
00:57:02.000 These people can't really be canceled.
00:57:05.000 And the people who might be in the process of getting canceled, will they get an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal?
00:57:12.000 And so there are these coddled pundits now.
00:57:15.000 And so they think it's just not a big issue.
00:57:17.000 And so what we did in this book, so for the magazine Quillette that I work at, we get a lot of these people that submit these essays to us about sort of just how...
00:57:27.000 The cancel mob came for them in just these small little nooks and crannies of society that you'd never think that this would matter.
00:57:35.000 So there's this double standard you have where the people who get canceled that are too small to make the news that you never hear about, well, they never show up as a blip.
00:57:44.000 They're never a data point.
00:57:46.000 And then you get a lot of the people who never speak up in the first place because they see what happens to bigger-name people when they do speak up, and so they don't even have the chance to get canceled.
00:57:55.000 They just self-censor beforehand.
00:57:57.000 And so there's like a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation where, yeah, we can only point to the big people who people hate, like J.K. Rowling and yourself.
00:58:07.000 So what we did is this is a...
00:58:09.000 It's got 20 different essays of people.
00:58:11.000 I've got an essay in there of just sort of people's everyday lives and how the cancel mob came for them.
00:58:19.000 Something as esoteric as like an Instagram knitting community where they came after...
00:58:35.000 Yeah.
00:58:50.000 I think it's been in the lexicon for a while.
00:58:53.000 Oh, I'm out of the loop.
00:58:54.000 And then people come to their defense and then they get canceled and then people who are silent about it who have a big platform.
00:58:59.000 But have you thought about, like, what's the origins of this behavior?
00:59:02.000 Like, why is this behavior emerging?
00:59:04.000 Is it just a function of...
00:59:07.000 What's going on with the internet, where you have a lot of it is text-based, where there's no social interaction, there's no social cues, you're not looking in each other's eyes, you don't feel any empathy, you're just writing things down, and you're trying to be as either provocative or as aggressive as possible so that people like what you're saying.
00:59:27.000 Social media has made it a lot easier to sort of organize these These flash mobs that seem like they're intense.
00:59:36.000 And it seems like there's so many people coming at you.
00:59:40.000 But in reality, sometimes it's just like a small group of dedicated trolls that will just be sending emails to departments and things like people sent emails to departments that I was applying to for a job, saying that, you know, we're just sharing your work more broadly and calling me a bigot and don't hire this guy.
00:59:56.000 But just a few online dedicated trolls can actually wreak a lot of havoc on people because they've just never had that mechanism before where people are actually somehow paying attention to what they're getting back on Twitter.
01:00:09.000 Especially if they have multiple accounts.
01:00:10.000 But one of the things that I've been thinking of lately is like, The ability to sway people one way or the other in terms of the way they feel about either a political issue or a social issue, a lot of times it's based on the way the crowd is reacting.
01:00:27.000 It's based on what you're seeing from your peers or from the people that follow you, the people that are in your mentions.
01:00:33.000 If China wanted to do this, and I'm sure they're doing it, just like the Russian Internet Research Agency was doing it, They would create a gigantic amount of fake accounts, use those fake accounts, and they can shift the public narrative on a lot of different issues just by attacking people and by getting multiple other people to attack people in a really personalized way.
01:00:58.000 Where it's personal, where these people feel terrible, and then you don't want that to happen to you.
01:01:04.000 So again, self-censorship.
01:01:05.000 But if they just decide to do this as a concerted effort, you can erode democracy.
01:01:11.000 You really can.
01:01:12.000 You can erode the way people communicate with each other.
01:01:14.000 You can erode our culture.
01:01:16.000 And you don't want to be cynical, but you've got to wonder, like, what are the wings of the butterfly that start the storm?
01:01:23.000 Like, where is this engineered?
01:01:26.000 Because if someone was going to engineer some sort of a deterioration of society, boy, you couldn't really do any better than what's going on because morale is at an all-time low in a lot of places.
01:01:36.000 The way people communicate is really weird right now.
01:01:40.000 And it's just—it doesn't show any signs of there being, like, an end of this road.
01:01:47.000 Like, where does this road stop?
01:01:49.000 Yeah, I mean, the institution's getting captured, and once you get to a certain threshold, it just sort of spirals down where, you know, the institution's 50 percent— Ideologically based, that might, you know, it's pretty sustainable.
01:02:01.000 But once it gets past, like, it's 90%, you know, Democrat or something, then if they're, especially if they're influential on who gets hired, they can sort of self-select.
01:02:11.000 And it's never been easier to go on social media and Google someone you're hiring and saying, you know, does this person, what's their politics like?
01:02:19.000 You know, that happens in academia all the time, where people are actually Googling who they're hiring on their departments.
01:02:25.000 If you're wearing a Trump hat, you know, I'm not a Trump supporter or anything, but good luck ever getting a job as an academic scientist if you have a Facebook picture of you wearing a Trump hat and you're not being ironic about it.
01:02:36.000 Even if you're joking about it.
01:02:37.000 Yeah, you can't even have it ironic.
01:02:39.000 You actually paid for that hat?
01:02:40.000 Yeah.
01:02:40.000 And so they take...
01:02:42.000 Once the institutions sort of get captured in this way...
01:02:45.000 Yeah, there's not a way to get them out.
01:02:47.000 I mean, I talk about when I used to argue against the creationism and intelligent design.
01:02:52.000 It was so easy because I was in universities.
01:02:56.000 None of the biologists around there are creationists.
01:02:59.000 At my community college, we had one.
01:03:01.000 And he was, you know, he didn't teach carbon dating because it was like the devil or something.
01:03:05.000 Really?
01:03:06.000 Yeah, yeah.
01:03:06.000 He was completely young earth creationist.
01:03:09.000 I would stay in touch with that guy.
01:03:11.000 Let's see how his life keeps going.
01:03:12.000 But for the most part, if I'm arguing against creationists and intelligent design people, this is like, if you're getting support from your colleagues, they're like, oh yeah, get them.
01:03:21.000 No one says you're too strident when you're writing an essay against them.
01:03:24.000 But then when I started seeing a lot of this ideology bubble up around my colleagues, and then I started pushing back a little bit, well now the craziness is inside the walls of the university.
01:03:37.000 Because before, Christians didn't have any major presence in the university, at least not the ones who were creationists and intelligent design people.
01:03:43.000 So there was no chance of them taking over the university, and now creationism is in all the textbooks and that type of stuff.
01:03:49.000 But now this thing is happening within the universities, and then I would just make my straightforward argument about There's two sexes and it's important to acknowledge them in certain situations.
01:04:01.000 And then it's just a wave of hate.
01:04:03.000 And it's not even a you're wrong.
01:04:06.000 At least the creationist and intelligent design people told me, Colin, you're wrong.
01:04:09.000 Maybe they called me stupid.
01:04:10.000 Whatever.
01:04:11.000 But now it's you're not even wrong.
01:04:14.000 You're just a bigot.
01:04:15.000 You're a horrible person.
01:04:16.000 You're literally leading to the lives of trans people getting killed.
01:04:20.000 You're making students on Penn State when I worked there feel unsafe on campus because I'm working on my ant experiments there or something and I had an opinion that got published somewhere.
01:04:31.000 Like, that's the situation in the universities.
01:04:36.000 It's like it's been infiltrated by a religion.
01:04:39.000 Oh, yeah.
01:04:40.000 I mean, I'm all there.
01:04:42.000 It really does.
01:04:42.000 It does seem like a religion.
01:04:43.000 And having argued with creationist and intelligent design people for a good part of my life, I mean, that's what got me into wanting to be an evolutionary biologist in the first place, is knowing that these people are nuts and not really knowing, having the knowledge and tools to sort of combat this,
01:04:58.000 the insanity that I was seeing.
01:05:00.000 So I just decided to read a bunch about evolution and then it just made it my job, basically.
01:05:04.000 But again, I'll ask you, where's this go?
01:05:08.000 I don't know.
01:05:09.000 How's it end?
01:05:10.000 That's why I'm here talking to you.
01:05:11.000 That's why I want to let people know that this is scary stuff.
01:05:15.000 This is like, where do you go?
01:05:17.000 I mean, I don't know.
01:05:18.000 We go to scary places, I think, and I don't want to find out where that is because if we lose this foothold, there's just no more footholds to have.
01:05:28.000 We're just going to be scraping down as we fall.
01:05:30.000 It doesn't seem to be an alternative model to what we're going through.
01:05:36.000 You know, it's not like they're saying, what we'd like society to look like is this.
01:05:40.000 No, it's just they want to break down all of the systems that are in place.
01:05:44.000 Whether it's our monetary system, they want to break down capitalism itself, they want to break down the patriarchy, they want to break down male-dominated blank and this and that and toxic male that and this and female stereotypes and gender stereotypes and just like Oh my god,
01:06:01.000 Christ.
01:06:02.000 Where does this go?
01:06:03.000 Where is this going?
01:06:05.000 You keep breaking things down.
01:06:06.000 Do you have an alternative model?
01:06:08.000 Do you have a better version of what you would like society to be?
01:06:11.000 And does it make sense?
01:06:13.000 Is it tenable?
01:06:13.000 I think where we were going before was sort of the way Just live and let live.
01:06:33.000 Gay rights in the U.S., you know, they can get married.
01:06:35.000 That'll happen before the major woke takeover of a lot of the institutions.
01:06:40.000 Like, that's good progress.
01:06:42.000 I just say, more of that is what I think we just need to do.
01:06:45.000 But what is the attractiveness?
01:06:47.000 This is like, I just don't...
01:06:49.000 I'm trying to figure out what happened.
01:06:51.000 Like, what started out this whole...
01:06:55.000 What was the first step of the parade?
01:06:58.000 It's hard for me to say as someone who considers himself an atheist, but I think a lot of the new atheists got something really wrong.
01:07:07.000 I'm a big fan of Sam Harris and Richard Dawkins, but a lot of the narrative back then was, well, what do you replace religion with when you get rid of it?
01:07:15.000 And people like Richard Dawkins would say, well, what do you replace a tumor with when you remove a tumor?
01:07:20.000 That was sort of the way that they would talk about this thing.
01:07:23.000 And at the time I was like, yeah.
01:07:26.000 Religion's all bad.
01:07:27.000 There's nothing good that can come of it.
01:07:28.000 It's just people who believe silly things.
01:07:30.000 But I think what...
01:07:32.000 And I think people like Jordan Peterson are addressing this is...
01:07:36.000 Not necessarily do you need to believe in God or something, but you need some sort of meaning-making, overarching thing to your life.
01:07:44.000 And if you just get rid of that meaning, whether it's a God or something, which I'm all for people not believing in God anymore, but I do sort of realize there's...
01:07:53.000 Maybe there needs to be some sort of replacement that can fill a meaning void in your life, because I think a lot of people are less and less religious, which I would think is a good thing, but I think you can probably plot the prevalence of, you know,
01:08:08.000 as religion goes down, like how many pronouns and bios are going up as the complete opposite of that.
01:08:15.000 Yeah, it seems like we almost have like some sort of a gene for religious ideology.
01:08:21.000 Yeah, we have a hyper focus on identity as well.
01:08:26.000 And if there's anything I can recommend for people, it's to really try not to identify with as many things as possible.
01:08:33.000 Try to keep your identity as small as you possibly can.
01:08:36.000 Because before, you know, I don't identify as a man, I just happen to be a male.
01:08:40.000 And that's how I live my life, because I'm acknowledging Biological reality.
01:08:45.000 People who are gay, do they identify as gay?
01:08:47.000 Well, no.
01:08:47.000 They just are gay.
01:08:48.000 They just are attracted to the opposite sex.
01:08:51.000 This is, I think, where we need to go because now we're getting people who are identifying with political beliefs, with conclusions to arguments, And that means that if you were to attack their argument, you know, about what it means to be about sex and gender or something,
01:09:07.000 it's not just an intellectual disagreement anymore.
01:09:10.000 To them, it's, you know, if they cede any ground, that means they have an identity crisis because they've made this part of their identity.
01:09:19.000 It's part of who they are, and they're identifying with conclusions to arguments.
01:09:27.000 Whereas that's just not the way to go about things if you ever want to be corresponding to reality as much as possible.
01:09:35.000 So this hyper-focus on identity, I think that needs to go.
01:09:40.000 But how do you fix that?
01:09:43.000 Everybody knows there's a problem.
01:09:45.000 Nobody seems to have any solution, nor does anybody see an end of the road.
01:09:49.000 No one says, oh, if you go just five miles down, there's a brick wall.
01:09:53.000 They're just going to slam into that, and that's it.
01:09:55.000 They're just going to get to this ideological choke point where, like, okay, this stuff doesn't make any sense anymore because of blank.
01:10:02.000 There's none of that.
01:10:03.000 It's just no one knows where it goes.
01:10:05.000 I try to use some of their empathy against them in a little way and try to show, like I had an article in the Wall Street Journal with Emma Hilton, who was a co-author on one of these studies here, that would outline what biological sex is.
01:10:23.000 But then it went into these other things about how replacing sex with gender identity across the board How this actually harms people, how it harms women, how it's, you know, rolls back sex-based rights and makes sex-based rights impossible to enforce.
01:10:40.000 How this also harms the gay community by, you know, we've successfully normalized a lot of aspects of the gay community and gay marriage and things like that.
01:10:49.000 But how now identifying being gay with being attracted to the same gender identity instead of sex, well, then there's just insanity beyond that point.
01:10:58.000 You know, I'm pansexual now because, you know, all the stuff with Scarlett Johansson.
01:11:04.000 And how that harms, it risks the future normalizing of homosexuality when people are being called bigots because, you know, a trans woman...
01:11:16.000 We're good to go.
01:11:35.000 I know.
01:11:36.000 It's nuts.
01:11:39.000 Where you need to be okay with lady dick is what they would call it.
01:11:44.000 Like, you know, it's a female penis.
01:11:46.000 And so now you get the gay community that's all pissed off about this because they know what it means to be gay.
01:11:51.000 They're not attracted to your gender identity.
01:11:53.000 They're attracted to your sex.
01:11:55.000 And then it harms children, too, with confusing them about what sex and gender is and identifying gender with stereotypes of masculinity and femininity.
01:12:03.000 So I just try to highlight, like, look at all these harms that you're actually doing to these groups that you had previously We've supported endlessly all the women's movements that have gotten them the right to vote and everything.
01:12:17.000 I mean, this is just turning back the clock on so much progress.
01:12:20.000 And if you can just use their empathy against them in a certain way and also accompany that with some scientific facts, That's all we can do.
01:12:30.000 I mean, there's nothing else to do.
01:12:31.000 It just seems like...
01:12:32.000 It needs to be conversations.
01:12:33.000 Without conversations, there's nothing else on the table besides just, like, violence and stuff, and that's not where I want to go.
01:12:39.000 Well, also, the conversations we're having are all on social media, and they're all these little short, little, just, bites of text without context.
01:12:49.000 And even when you do describe the context, it's inefficient because it's like talking to people the way you and I are doing it right now is the way to go.
01:12:56.000 This is the way people understand how you get a look in each other's eyes and talk to each other and you understand where that person's coming from.
01:13:04.000 But you could say so much crazy shit on Twitter and the person doesn't even know you're a knucklehead.
01:13:11.000 No one knows how dumb your life really is and what you're like and what kind of an emotional mess you are and how you fall apart.
01:13:18.000 But if they read your text, your text just looks like an irrational person's text.
01:13:23.000 It's just print.
01:13:25.000 It's just like it's right there.
01:13:26.000 It's like you don't get the context of who that person is and how screwed up they really are.
01:13:31.000 Yeah, I mean, I get accused of my essays coming across as being, like, overly strident, and I come across as an asshole in it.
01:13:37.000 I was going to talk to you about that.
01:13:39.000 But at the same time, I get people who agree with what I write.
01:13:43.000 They tell me that, you know, I like the way you're just the facts.
01:13:46.000 You don't, like, editorialize.
01:13:48.000 You don't do any—not a lot of flourishes.
01:13:50.000 And it's what Richard Dawkins approached when he was criticizing religion before.
01:13:54.000 Like, if you're criticizing these core— Well, Dawkins was attacked because he compared Rachel Dolezal,
01:14:10.000 like someone identifying with another race, As someone identifying with another sex.
01:14:19.000 He just offered that up as a thought experiment.
01:14:21.000 Exactly.
01:14:22.000 Exactly.
01:14:22.000 But when he did that, they're like, enough of you.
01:14:25.000 You know, he got his 2001 or something Humanist of the Year Award taken away from that.
01:14:31.000 Exactly.
01:14:31.000 I think it was a 25-year-old award.
01:14:34.000 How do you take that away, by the way?
01:14:35.000 Just take him off the website.
01:14:37.000 But you've got to go back in time 20 years?
01:14:39.000 I mean, if he has a plaque, do they seize the plaque?
01:14:41.000 Yeah, they come to his house, jackbooted thugs, kick down the door.
01:14:45.000 Hey, old man, you're a piece of shit now.
01:14:47.000 Well, the thing is, Dawkins had mentioned that he said he didn't even remember winning it.
01:14:52.000 Ah, that's funny.
01:14:53.000 I guess I didn't care about it that much.
01:14:56.000 It is fucking stupid because they probably took it back from him just to make a stink for publicity and to virtue signal and let everybody know they're on the right page.
01:15:05.000 Yeah, they got a whirlwind of hate, though, because people like Steven Pinker and a couple other people who had also won the Humanist Award from the same Humanist Association, they wrote these letters just blasting the Humanist Association saying, what does that mean?
01:15:20.000 This is the most anti-humanist thing ever.
01:15:22.000 Like, this could have been a teaching moment or something if you want to actually put your argument of what is the difference between transracialism or transsexualism.
01:15:30.000 And it is an interesting conversation because, look, I believe in transgender people.
01:15:35.000 I think there are, for sure, there are people that, for whatever reason, they feel way more comfortable being a different gender other than their biological sex would indicate.
01:15:45.000 Absolutely.
01:15:46.000 It's real.
01:15:46.000 It's 100% real.
01:15:47.000 And they should be able to transition and make themselves feel better if that's what they need.
01:15:52.000 What is going on with race?
01:15:56.000 Like, if anything, that's a more slippery one because we're all from Africa.
01:16:04.000 They think primates, the latest information is they think primates originated in Asia, made it over to Africa, evolved into humans.
01:16:13.000 So every single human being has an origin in Africa.
01:16:18.000 So if someone just decides that they identify with African-American and they're American and they hang out with a bunch of African-American people and they just decide, you can't do it.
01:16:29.000 But it's like there's one bridge that we will not let you cross.
01:16:35.000 You cannot...
01:16:36.000 There's people that are willing to let people identify as fairies or wood elves or foxes.
01:16:42.000 You could be a fox kin.
01:16:44.000 They're cool with that, right?
01:16:46.000 But if you say, I'm transracial, no one's going to accept that.
01:16:51.000 There was a guy that was doing that on Twitter as a joke.
01:16:55.000 God, I'm trying to...
01:16:57.000 Elwick?
01:16:59.000 What the hell was his name?
01:17:01.000 But they kicked him off Twitter for parody.
01:17:03.000 Because he was too close.
01:17:05.000 Like what he was doing was too close to social justice warriors, but he was transracial and he would always write hashtag wrong skin and like say some really ridiculous shit.
01:17:15.000 And they just decided that he was mocking protected groups and they got rid of him.
01:17:20.000 But he was mocking everything.
01:17:22.000 Like his whole account was a parody account of like ridiculously woke people.
01:17:28.000 But this is like pre-woke the word.
01:17:30.000 When did WOKE show up?
01:17:32.000 WOKE was like four years ago?
01:17:34.000 Something like that?
01:17:34.000 I think it has an origin in some literature about Racism and stuff.
01:17:43.000 Usually woke originally was not just what we refer to now as just all the social justice stuff.
01:17:49.000 It was sort of more innocuous about just like a racial awakening to injustices around you and things like that and seeing different systems.
01:17:58.000 So it had like a valid origin.
01:18:01.000 But now it's sort of used pejoratively and I do it myself because it does sort of describe all of that.
01:18:10.000 I saw a whole thing about people, Furious, that people are using woke as a pejorative and to not let people do it.
01:18:18.000 It's like, okay, well, that's where the problem is.
01:18:20.000 The problem is, like, what your little game is, is forced compliance.
01:18:24.000 Like, you want everybody to comply.
01:18:25.000 It's a weird power game.
01:18:27.000 And that's one of the things about woke ideology and one of the things about this whole movement to shame people and shut people down and cancel people.
01:18:36.000 It's like a lot of it is like forced compliance.
01:18:39.000 And if you attack one person and it's effective and they back off, then other people that might have similar controversial ideas are going to shut the fuck up because they don't want to have that emotional pain of having the group pile onto them.
01:18:52.000 Yeah, and the word woke is something that those activists used themselves to describe themselves.
01:18:58.000 Still?
01:18:58.000 I don't know if they do anymore.
01:19:00.000 They think it's a majority.
01:19:01.000 I think they didn't like the fact that we started, okay, we'll call you woke because it's...
01:19:05.000 Because it sounds corny.
01:19:06.000 It does sound corny.
01:19:07.000 It sounds very cultish, you know?
01:19:09.000 It's just like, I'm so enlightened.
01:19:11.000 You sound like a fraud.
01:19:12.000 Yeah, it's like in the atheist movement, Dan Dennett had a movement called the Brights, where it was just like, oh, it was so pretentious.
01:19:19.000 The Brights, they're brighter than other people?
01:19:21.000 Yeah, because the other side of it is like, they didn't specifically say the other people are dim, but that's sort of implied.
01:19:27.000 And I just hated the Brights.
01:19:29.000 It was just so corny.
01:19:30.000 So on the nose.
01:19:31.000 And it makes atheism sound culty, too.
01:19:34.000 It's just like, we're the brights.
01:19:35.000 And I see the same thing with, like, woke.
01:19:36.000 It's just...
01:19:37.000 That's just such a culty thing.
01:19:38.000 It's so unironic to call yourself the brights.
01:19:41.000 Like, that should be, like, a joke.
01:19:43.000 Yeah.
01:19:43.000 It's just like an own goal, big time.
01:19:44.000 It's just...
01:19:46.000 The Brights.
01:19:47.000 I think they still have a website, but I don't think they're still tabling.
01:19:52.000 It went the way of Atheism Plus?
01:19:55.000 Probably the whole atheist movement is just, to the degree that it exists, it's something you can Google, it's just all woke right now.
01:20:01.000 It's really bad.
01:20:03.000 I got blocked by some of my old atheist heroes on Twitter just because I said, I think you've taken J.K. Rowling out of context.
01:20:10.000 Block us.
01:20:12.000 Blocking people is another win.
01:20:14.000 That's a weird one.
01:20:14.000 When you're interacting with someone and you disagree with them and it's like a respectful disagreement and then you block them.
01:20:19.000 I've seen people do that.
01:20:20.000 Like, look, somebody wants to insult you and you don't want to deal with that.
01:20:23.000 You just like rather not have that in your life.
01:20:25.000 I get the blocking thing.
01:20:26.000 But blocking people for just disagreeing with you?
01:20:29.000 Like, I've seen it.
01:20:30.000 I've seen, like, intellectual discussions where someone will say something that's outside of the ideology, and then next thing you know, blocked.
01:20:38.000 It's a one-way street.
01:20:39.000 You can't be talking to people, sharing a platform because you're legitimizing them by your proximity to them.
01:20:44.000 Colin, it's so exhausting!
01:20:46.000 This is what I deal with every day.
01:20:50.000 But isn't it exhausting to you?
01:20:52.000 It's exhausting to me.
01:20:53.000 It is exhausting.
01:20:54.000 You're saying this and I'm like, God, I don't know how anybody can tolerate this.
01:20:58.000 I can't imagine working for a corporation that's gone full woke because there's quite a bit of them, right?
01:21:04.000 There's quite a few of them where you're in that corporation.
01:21:07.000 You had better be woke.
01:21:10.000 And then if you want to move up the corporate ladder, which I'm sure you do, don't you want to get ahead?
01:21:14.000 Don't you want progress?
01:21:16.000 Well, you're going to have to adopt that ideology and then you're going to have to be just like everybody else.
01:21:21.000 It's really hard for me to come up with, like, new and exciting ways to say the same thing over and over again about there being just two sexes.
01:21:30.000 Yeah.
01:21:30.000 Well, I think you don't have to.
01:21:32.000 I think the people that you're arguing against, like, what— If I shut up, there's this—no one's going to be— I don't think there's other people out there beside you.
01:21:42.000 There's a few other people talking about it, but...
01:21:43.000 We got, like, Heather Hying.
01:21:45.000 We got Emma Hilton on Twitter.
01:21:47.000 Yeah.
01:21:47.000 There's a few others who are doing their thing, but really, it's actually quite shocking how few people are even, like, saying anything about this.
01:21:55.000 But then, listen to what you just said, though.
01:21:56.000 It's Twitter.
01:21:58.000 Twitter's a fucking mental institution with a bunch of inmates throwing shit at each other.
01:22:03.000 It's just such a...
01:22:04.000 Occasionally...
01:22:05.000 I don't see people talking about it in my daily life, either.
01:22:07.000 I mean...
01:22:08.000 But does it come up in your daily life?
01:22:12.000 Not really, but we're seeing the way the ideology is actually...
01:22:16.000 I mean, people say, you know, it's just online, but like...
01:22:18.000 It trickles over.
01:22:19.000 They're pretty effective.
01:22:20.000 I mean, it's more than a trickle, I think.
01:22:22.000 I mean, they've successfully mobilized people getting fired.
01:22:26.000 They've mobilized getting transformed in sports through these ideologies.
01:22:30.000 I mean, it's...
01:22:30.000 I don't know where else...
01:22:31.000 I mean, I'd like to go on more programs and talk about this type of stuff.
01:22:36.000 If I was an evil genius looking to deteriorate society from within, I would do it the way these woke people are doing it.
01:22:44.000 I would attack the structure.
01:22:46.000 Yeah, it really is.
01:22:47.000 Like, if you wanted to go full tinfoil hat, you would say, like, how many of these people that are doing this are actually really who they think or who they are?
01:22:56.000 Say they are and how many of them are like Russian agents and Chinese agents and how many of them are just constantly trying to fuel the fires of strife and disagreement online?
01:23:07.000 It's almost like a Darwinian process of how they've been able to like modify their arguments and what they do to just make this like perfectly adapted earworm that just like it just takes over.
01:23:19.000 I mean we had the previous you know the Sokol hoaxes this Alan Sokol wrote those papers For these physics journals or something about...
01:23:28.000 He just wrote a bunch of nonsense, like postmodern jargon, and he got it published in these journals that were supposed to be...
01:23:33.000 Like Boghossian.
01:23:34.000 Yeah, kind of like what they did.
01:23:35.000 But he was like the OG. Oh, was he?
01:23:38.000 First round.
01:23:38.000 They often call the one that Lindsay and Boghossian and Pluckrose did as like the Sokal Square, just like the new version of it.
01:23:45.000 But he was just arguing with people who had this relativistic notion of reality, and he used a bunch of jargon.
01:23:51.000 But that was stamped out really quickly because it was just...
01:23:54.000 Clearly insane, and there wasn't a lot people did with it, but they've now sort of morphed where they're using that same jargon, the same ideology, but they're doing that ambulance chasing now, as I mentioned, with the gay rights, LGBT rights, and the civil rights movement.
01:24:11.000 And so they're using the same insane relativistic, you know, everything's a social construct, everything's power dynamics, using that same language, but now they're just using the shield of Of people's, you know, empathy towards these movements,
01:24:27.000 but these are not natural extensions of civil rights or LGBT. It's just, it's a completely new ideology.
01:24:34.000 It's illiberal, it's very authoritarian, and people need to be speaking up against this stuff because it's not what they claim to be.
01:24:44.000 It's Hannibal with the mask on, you know, just pretending to be the dead cop.
01:24:48.000 Well, unfortunately, too, a lot of the people that combat against this, they find themselves stuck in a place where the only people that take them in are the right-wingers.
01:24:56.000 That's where I found myself.
01:24:58.000 I mean, no one's...
01:24:59.000 I went on very early when I started writing about this.
01:25:02.000 I went on Glenn Beck's show briefly to talk with him, and how dare you go on Glenn Beck's show?
01:25:08.000 It's like, well, CNN's not contacting me.
01:25:10.000 Sorry.
01:25:11.000 I'd be more than happy to submit my articles to the New York Times if I thought they'd print them, but...
01:25:15.000 When you went on Glenn Beck's show, did he bring out one of them big crazy charts and connect everything?
01:25:20.000 It's amazing how he's evolved over time.
01:25:22.000 He actually says reasonable things nowadays.
01:25:25.000 How's that possible?
01:25:26.000 Did he change his medication?
01:25:28.000 I don't know, but he was a little nuts before.
01:25:31.000 Yeah.
01:25:32.000 Sorry, Glenn.
01:25:32.000 I think you're better now.
01:25:33.000 Well, when the Obama administration was in, that's when he was at full nutty.
01:25:40.000 He decided that Obama didn't like white people, and he was like, charts and graphs and shit.
01:25:44.000 Expanding circles with insanity.
01:25:47.000 Whenever dudes do that, when they have these ideas and they branch out, they have the brains and connect their...
01:25:54.000 Yeah.
01:25:55.000 Okay.
01:25:57.000 He's come a long way.
01:25:58.000 Has he?
01:25:59.000 I mean, from what I've heard, I've seen him interview some other people that I respect, and he seems to be pretty reasonable.
01:26:06.000 And he just does stuff online now, right?
01:26:07.000 That's like his whole thing.
01:26:08.000 I think he's got his podcast and the show.
01:26:12.000 I think it's a live.
01:26:13.000 It's kind of like this.
01:26:14.000 Interesting.
01:26:15.000 Because he was one of the big guys over at Fox News, but even back then they decided that he went a little too crazy.
01:26:21.000 Yeah, too nuts for Fox.
01:26:24.000 He had some sort of come-to-Jesus moment or something.
01:26:28.000 Yeah?
01:26:28.000 Yeah.
01:26:29.000 Well, he had a legit come-to-Jesus moment, right?
01:26:31.000 Didn't his wife turn him into a Mormon?
01:26:33.000 I thought he was a Mormon for a while.
01:26:35.000 I'm not even...
01:26:35.000 I think he became a Mormon in his 40s.
01:26:37.000 Okay.
01:26:38.000 Was that pre-Fox?
01:26:41.000 I'm not sure.
01:26:43.000 I tend not to have much of an issue with him.
01:26:46.000 I'm sure we disagree on religious stuff because he's a Mormon.
01:26:48.000 But apart from that, he does seem to be liberal in the classical broad sense that I tend to be partial to nowadays.
01:26:59.000 Yeah, it does seem like more and more people who find themselves politically homeless at least find that they can get an audience on the right.
01:27:09.000 Whether it's the Ben Shapiro show or now Dave Rubin is right wing and there's a few of these places where you can have these kind of conversations.
01:27:17.000 Even if you disagree with the host, at least they'll give you a platform to discuss it.
01:27:23.000 Whereas the left seems completely closed off to the idea of rational discourse with someone with either a competing, opposing, or varied ideology.
01:27:35.000 You have to stick to the orthodoxy, or they don't want to talk to you.
01:27:39.000 And then you don't want to platform someone who has harmful or hurtful ideas.
01:27:46.000 And as a comedian, it becomes a real problem because then people start conflating.
01:27:51.000 They start pretending that jokes are true statements.
01:27:58.000 I've always said, you can only do that with comedy, where you can pretend someone isn't joking.
01:28:05.000 You don't really think Bob Marley shot the sheriff, right?
01:28:09.000 You know he didn't.
01:28:11.000 I shot the sheriff.
01:28:13.000 Oh, you piece of shit.
01:28:14.000 You shot a sheriff.
01:28:15.000 You're like, no, no, no.
01:28:16.000 It's just a song.
01:28:19.000 If you say something crazy on stage, like I used to have this bit about...
01:28:25.000 It was one of the things that people got mad at me during that whole thing where I said I'd probably vote for Bernie Sanders and they took a bunch of jokes out of context.
01:28:33.000 You piece of shit.
01:28:35.000 And one of them was saying that women who wanted to be president were greedy.
01:28:41.000 And it was a whole joke about a conversation that I really had with my mom, where my mom was telling me that she wanted Hillary to be president.
01:28:49.000 But my mom's not paying attention to politics.
01:28:51.000 I mean, she might peripherally watch MSNBC. But her thought was, and she actually said this, I think it's about time that a woman does the most important job in the world.
01:29:00.000 And I was like, okay.
01:29:02.000 I see what you're saying.
01:29:03.000 But, you know, you already make all the people.
01:29:06.000 I'm like, you make all the human beings.
01:29:08.000 That's not the most important job in the world.
01:29:10.000 We're looking at things crazy.
01:29:12.000 There's more than 7 billion people in the world.
01:29:15.000 All of them came out of a woman's body.
01:29:17.000 You guys make all the people.
01:29:19.000 You guys, you make food with your breasts.
01:29:23.000 Like, literally the most nutritious baby food known to man.
01:29:26.000 Changes a child's IQ. Changes a child's immune system.
01:29:29.000 I go, you do that.
01:29:31.000 And you want to be president, too?
01:29:33.000 You fucking greedy bitches.
01:29:35.000 I go, what else you want?
01:29:36.000 You want a big dick?
01:29:37.000 You want all the money?
01:29:38.000 Like, it's a joke, right?
01:29:39.000 But in quotes, they put it in an article as proof that I am a sexist.
01:29:45.000 Because I think that women who want to be president are greedy, in quotes.
01:29:49.000 Like, that kind of shit...
01:29:52.000 Why people go on to Tucker Carlson show they're like I give up I can't talk to you fucks because you guys you're playing games with the truth You're not even interested.
01:30:04.000 It's like there's so much frantic crazy thinking on the left that people are scared of being left now and they're going off to it and I'm clinging Nailing tooth and claw, just clinging to all of my progressive ideas,
01:30:21.000 even though I'm consistently labeled as some alt-right person because I talked to Milo Yiannopoulos seven years ago or whatever.
01:30:30.000 It's like there's this weird forced compliance on the left that's at a fever pitch, and I've never seen anything like it.
01:30:39.000 It's like a religious fanaticism that doesn't seem to exist right now on the right.
01:30:45.000 We're all in the realm of impact over intent.
01:30:48.000 You might have heard that slogan all the time where they'll diminish the use, mention, distinction between things like the N-word or something.
01:30:59.000 Even in a mention context for an academic thing, you can't even mention the word.
01:31:03.000 Otherwise, it's equivalent of saying it.
01:31:06.000 It's almost that you called someone that word.
01:31:08.000 Right.
01:31:09.000 And so, I mean, it's...
01:31:10.000 After a while.
01:31:11.000 Even if you're making a joke on stage as a comedian, it's, well, the impact of that joke, that still hurts somebody, and you did them wrong in some way, so you need to make it better to them.
01:31:22.000 It's just...
01:31:23.000 Yeah, I've heard that argument, too.
01:31:25.000 And it's hard to even know what's considered left and right anymore because the magazine I work for, Quillette, I consider them very centrist.
01:31:35.000 You guys are Nazis, I heard.
01:31:36.000 I mean, we get accused of that daily.
01:31:39.000 I've heard it.
01:31:40.000 I've seen it.
01:31:41.000 It's so crazy.
01:31:43.000 It's just rational discourse.
01:31:44.000 Almost everyone on the editorial board is left of center, I would say.
01:31:49.000 There's maybe two people that identify as conservative, and I think we're all atheists.
01:31:54.000 And yet, if you talk to people on the woke left, we're far right, alt-right, race science, all that stuff.
01:32:03.000 But if you talk to people on the far right, they think we're just left, you know, communist, everything.
01:32:09.000 So, yeah, so there's nothing we can do.
01:32:12.000 I think that's kind of where we want to be, I guess, because we really just try to stick to publishing stuff that's...
01:32:18.000 Well-argued.
01:32:20.000 You can start from the ground up.
01:32:22.000 First principles.
01:32:24.000 Get your argument out there.
01:32:25.000 We'll publish controversial stuff as long as it's doing its job.
01:32:30.000 The right has been much better at embracing the other side's ideas and having conversations with them.
01:32:38.000 Yeah, it's insane.
01:32:40.000 I never thought...
01:32:41.000 I mean, the left has always been the free speech people.
01:32:45.000 That's why I considered myself on the left for so long.
01:32:47.000 I just sort of...
01:32:49.000 I can't eschew any of these political labels now.
01:32:52.000 My philosophy now is just ask me what I think on any topic and I'll tell you what it is.
01:32:57.000 I'm not going to say I'm on the left or the right or I'm on this or that.
01:33:01.000 I can't tell you what I believe with one label and it makes no sense.
01:33:05.000 Right.
01:33:06.000 Well, there's certain things that, no matter what you believe, if you believe that, they won't have you on the left.
01:33:18.000 Second Amendment is a good one.
01:33:21.000 Gun rights.
01:33:22.000 Yeah.
01:33:25.000 Yeah.
01:33:28.000 Yeah.
01:33:41.000 God damn it.
01:33:43.000 They're so different.
01:33:44.000 Like when a guy has a car and he drives into a crowd and just starts running over people.
01:33:50.000 You don't equate that with a reasonable use of...
01:33:54.000 responsible use of an automobile.
01:33:56.000 You don't, right?
01:33:57.000 Because it's a malicious intent thing.
01:33:58.000 It's a tool.
01:33:59.000 It's what it is.
01:34:00.000 But...
01:34:02.000 There's certain things, like on the right, you have to have pro-life.
01:34:08.000 Like pro-life is on the right.
01:34:10.000 Pro-choice is on the left.
01:34:12.000 And if you are open to all left-wing ideologies, all left-wing ideas, whether it's gay rights, civil rights, go across the board, women's rights, but you get to abortion, you go, man, I think that's a baby.
01:34:26.000 They'll go, what?
01:34:27.000 You fucking Nazi!
01:34:29.000 And they'll want you out.
01:34:30.000 You can't even say, you can't even have the reasonable argument like, okay.
01:34:35.000 When is it a baby?
01:34:37.000 Is it a baby at seven weeks?
01:34:39.000 When it has a heartbeat?
01:34:41.000 Ten weeks?
01:34:42.000 What about three months?
01:34:44.000 Is it a baby at three months?
01:34:45.000 Like, they'll get super uncomfortable and start getting angry at you.
01:34:49.000 Like, is it five months?
01:34:50.000 Like, when's it a baby?
01:34:51.000 When's it a baby when it exists out of the womb?
01:34:54.000 Or when it can exist out of the womb?
01:34:56.000 Like, when's it a baby?
01:34:58.000 Nobody likes that.
01:34:59.000 It's interesting how a lot of their ideologies on the left, though, they're very much for...
01:35:04.000 Breaking down binaries and thinking in terms of spectrums, but then they have such a black and white view of so many issues like pro-life, pro-choice.
01:35:15.000 And I'm the first one to say that I think there's actually maybe a spectrum there.
01:35:20.000 Maybe past a certain point, maybe I'd be less comfortable or completely uncomfortable with aborting that What do you call it?
01:35:32.000 The fetus?
01:35:32.000 The fetus, yeah.
01:35:33.000 Sorry.
01:35:34.000 The biologist.
01:35:35.000 Thank you, Joe.
01:35:37.000 And in reality, I think there is sort of a spectrum there, but we just get lumped into these two sides, and I see the right dude all the time, too, where you need to be pro-life, and that means the moment of conception.
01:35:48.000 Yeah.
01:35:49.000 Even though, like, we're just talking...
01:35:50.000 It really is...
01:35:51.000 Yeah, it's technically a human cells, and people don't like the whole bundle of cell thing, but it is technically human, but is it a person?
01:36:00.000 You know, there's...
01:36:01.000 That's a philosophical question.
01:36:04.000 Right, like the morning after pill.
01:36:05.000 Is that the same as a six-month-old abortion?
01:36:07.000 A fly is more sentient than a fertilized zygote.
01:36:11.000 I have no problem swatting a fly.
01:36:14.000 Right.
01:36:16.000 Yeah, like, or people that are pro-life and pro-war, you know, especially interventionist foreign policy wars that are completely avoidable where thousands, if not millions, of civilians die.
01:36:29.000 Like, there's a lot of people that are pro-life but also pro-drone attack.
01:36:35.000 And pro-capital punishment, too.
01:36:36.000 That's a big one.
01:36:37.000 I think there's probably a big overlap between pro-life and pro-capital punishment.
01:36:41.000 My friendship with Josh Dubin and his work with The Innocent Project and having Jason Flom on the podcast and Josh and discussing these cases where people are unjustly accused and spend decades behind bars and the feverish attempt It's
01:37:13.000 amazing.
01:37:16.000 The people that want an eye for an eye, I get it.
01:37:19.000 If you're talking about very specific people, like monsters, like a Ted Bundy type character or something like that, and you say, hey, that person shouldn't be alive, they shouldn't be on this planet.
01:37:30.000 If you're fucking really sure, if you're really sure that that's the person that did that, if you're real sure, but man, people get accused of things all the time.
01:37:38.000 And then, you know, one of the things that Josh Dubin was talking to me about is cops that think that a person's guilty, and so they come up with a justification for planting evidence.
01:37:55.000 They don't even think they're doing anything bad.
01:37:57.000 So they'll leave some hair.
01:38:00.000 And they're like, look, found some hair.
01:38:02.000 And they left it themselves.
01:38:04.000 And meanwhile, it comes out 10 years later, 16 years later, that this bad cop did this.
01:38:09.000 And this guy's been in jail this whole time.
01:38:11.000 He was completely innocent.
01:38:12.000 And then the actual real perpetrator's out on the street.
01:38:16.000 Because...
01:38:17.000 They're playing a game.
01:38:18.000 The game is you're trying to win.
01:38:20.000 I'm trying to prosecute.
01:38:21.000 He's trying to defend.
01:38:22.000 I want to beat him.
01:38:23.000 I'm undefeated in that courtroom.
01:38:26.000 I'm going to get in there and I'm going to lay down to smack on this motherfucker.
01:38:29.000 Because it becomes part of your identity is you're a successful prosecuting attorney.
01:38:34.000 Or you're a successful defense attorney, even though you know the guy's guilty.
01:38:37.000 Like the people that represented O.J. Simpson.
01:38:40.000 You know there had to be...
01:38:41.000 When they said not guilty, they had to be like, what have we done?
01:38:45.000 What the fuck have we done?
01:38:47.000 Both those things.
01:38:49.000 But the fact that we know that there's a massive problem with people unjustly accused of crimes, put in jail for long periods of time, we don't even know how many of them there are, but the Innocence Project has uncovered countless numbers, right?
01:39:04.000 I guess you can count them.
01:39:05.000 There's a lot.
01:39:06.000 I think the going number was in a paper in PNAS that said around 4%, but they said that was a fairly conservative estimate.
01:39:14.000 That's a fucking lot, man.
01:39:16.000 That's a lot.
01:39:16.000 That's a lot.
01:39:18.000 That's a hundred people.
01:39:19.000 Four of them are going to go to death and they didn't do shit.
01:39:22.000 That's crazy.
01:39:23.000 That alone makes you go, man, this fucking...
01:39:27.000 But then you hear about people getting out of jail really early for things that are terrible and you go, whoa, hey...
01:39:35.000 Like, that's not good either.
01:39:37.000 It's not good to be too lenient.
01:39:39.000 Like, I was reading about the new Los Angeles district attorney, the one they're trying to recall, who put someone in jail for a fucking gang murder for nine years.
01:39:50.000 And everybody's like, what?
01:39:51.000 Nine years?
01:39:52.000 Like, that's someone's kid.
01:39:54.000 Someone's kid, someone's baby got murdered.
01:39:56.000 And you're going to give this guy nine years?
01:39:59.000 What are the chances the gang member is going to get out of prison and just resume a normal life?
01:40:06.000 Prison is going to make him less of a gang member.
01:40:09.000 Yeah, dude, nine years ago is not that long ago.
01:40:12.000 I mean, go back nine years ago.
01:40:16.000 That ain't shit.
01:40:18.000 I was just starting down the pathway to become a science professor.
01:40:25.000 It's 2012. I mean, that's not that long ago.
01:40:29.000 That's when I just started you going back to college, yeah.
01:40:32.000 We thought that the Mayan calendar was going to be the end of the world.
01:40:35.000 Were you one of those people?
01:40:36.000 I wasn't.
01:40:37.000 I had a rapture party on that day.
01:40:41.000 Did you?
01:40:41.000 Yeah, we did.
01:40:42.000 We did a rapture show.
01:40:43.000 We did an end of the world show.
01:40:45.000 It was me, Doug Stanhope, Joey Diaz, and Honey Honey, the band.
01:40:49.000 We did a show at the Wiltern in Los Angeles.
01:40:51.000 Did you have a plan for the countdown?
01:40:53.000 Well, we were hoping the world would just blow up or something, and then we wouldn't have to have a countdown.
01:41:00.000 Or not.
01:41:01.000 It turns out it was just, what they call it, like a...
01:41:03.000 The long count.
01:41:05.000 Everyone thought it was going to be the judgment, but then when nothing happened, it was like, well, he passed judgment then, but then it was...
01:41:12.000 That's when we were judged.
01:41:14.000 Well...
01:41:15.000 I thought it was supposed to be just the end of the count.
01:41:18.000 Oh, I'm thinking of the Harold Camping.
01:41:21.000 There was another one in 2012 where that old preacher Harold Camping thought that there was going to be the rapture.
01:41:29.000 Yeah.
01:41:29.000 I think that was before 2012. Because that guy had billboards out.
01:41:34.000 Because I remember he took out these billboards in L.A. And I was...
01:41:40.000 Standing there once at this Thai food restaurant that I go to, staring at this fucking billboard going, what is this guy going to do the day after this date and the world's still around?
01:41:50.000 I remember they had businesses that people were paying to take care of your pets.
01:41:54.000 There it is, May 21st.
01:41:57.000 Yeah, a little bit before.
01:42:01.000 That's it.
01:42:02.000 Judgment Day.
01:42:03.000 Cry mightily unto God.
01:42:06.000 They had those geniuses that made money just taking care of people's pets if they were to get raptured.
01:42:10.000 Look at the gold star!
01:42:12.000 The Bible guarantees it!
01:42:15.000 That's convincing.
01:42:16.000 It's official.
01:42:17.000 But I mean, the way...
01:42:18.000 It's just so corny.
01:42:20.000 It's so corny with that sticker.
01:42:22.000 The Bible guarantees...
01:42:24.000 Oh, what do you want to put in the upper left-hand corner?
01:42:27.000 We have an empty space.
01:42:28.000 How about a nice little sign that says the Bible guarantees it?
01:42:32.000 Yeah, you know, there's going to be a few people that are on the fence, but once they see that the Bible guarantees it sticker, that gold sticker in the upper left-hand corner, yeah, that's going to be convincing.
01:42:43.000 That's nice.
01:42:44.000 I do miss the atheist movement and what it used to be.
01:42:46.000 Yeah?
01:42:47.000 I still, that's stuff I wish I could still talk about, but it's just like, no one gives a shit about that anymore.
01:42:52.000 But let's talk about this.
01:42:52.000 Like, why do things like that get corrupted?
01:42:54.000 They start off good, and they start off where, you know, the atheist movement and the skeptics movement, it's essentially, there's a real place for those things, right?
01:43:06.000 Skepticism is important because so many people go down these rabbit holes, and I've been guilty of it many times, Where you believe nonsense because you haven't looked at the evidence correctly or maybe you're looking at it, you have a biased perception and you're confirmation bias and you're only looking at things that go along with this stupid idea that you have in your head.
01:43:27.000 You know, like flat earth people.
01:43:28.000 Like, have you ever gone down the rabbit hole and done a flat earth search?
01:43:32.000 Not too much, but I know that it's...
01:43:34.000 Oh my goodness.
01:43:35.000 I watched a video last night.
01:43:37.000 Last night I watched this video where this guy was explaining all these different things that indicate that the world is flat and how stupid it is for anybody to think that we're going a thousand miles an hour and X amount of thousand miles an hour through space and yet...
01:43:51.000 Everything's staying on the table.
01:43:52.000 Yes.
01:43:52.000 And that the water's flat even though we're on a globe.
01:43:55.000 Come on.
01:43:56.000 The water's flat and calm even though we're on a globe.
01:43:59.000 You know how stupid that is?
01:44:00.000 And the way they say it is like, if no one who understands why all these things work, Says it to him.
01:44:08.000 He goes, like, don't you think you'd be able to feel it if you're going 1,000 miles an hour?
01:44:12.000 I'm like, okay.
01:44:13.000 And the people that were agreeing with him, like, yeah, yeah.
01:44:17.000 It's like if you're in a car and you're going fast and then you maintain your speed.
01:44:20.000 Or a plane.
01:44:20.000 You don't feel like you're going.
01:44:21.000 And you're on a plane.
01:44:23.000 You're on 500 miles an hour and you get up to go to the bathroom unless you hit turbulence.
01:44:27.000 You don't even notice it.
01:44:28.000 I'm trying to reboot the atheist movement a little bit.
01:44:31.000 Just don't.
01:44:32.000 Just leave it alone.
01:44:33.000 There is one anti-woke atheist movement out there.
01:44:37.000 They're called Atheists for Liberty.
01:44:40.000 And it's run by a guy named Tom Sheedy.
01:44:42.000 And he had me on their board of advisors.
01:44:45.000 So I recommend going there.
01:44:47.000 Atheists for Liberty.
01:44:48.000 I just think the problem is with groups.
01:44:49.000 I really do.
01:44:50.000 I think that's the same problem we have in this country when it comes to political parties.
01:44:54.000 Like, there's...
01:44:56.000 There's ideas, but when ideas get coalesced, when they get sectioned off into categories, then you get tribalism.
01:45:05.000 And as soon as you get tribalism, you get a dehumanizing of the other.
01:45:12.000 You know, those fucking idiots on the right, or those stupid liberals, like these fucking losers who are ruining America with their stupid ideas.
01:45:21.000 And it's so easy to do.
01:45:23.000 It's so easy for people to do where they categorize people as one or the other, as the good or the bad, and it's just infuriating.
01:45:32.000 That's when they just adopt, they turn it into identity.
01:45:34.000 So I'm for having there be an atheist movement, even if I don't want to make it about my identity, because part of the reason I want to have these conversations about atheism is because I want to hear the best arguments against it.
01:45:46.000 I'm willing to change my mind, and I won't have an identity crisis if someone were to show me, like, oh, here's some really excellent evidence.
01:45:53.000 Have you done psychedelic drugs?
01:45:55.000 I've done mushrooms a fair amount of times, maybe 10, 15 years ago.
01:45:59.000 When you say you've done mushrooms, how many grams?
01:46:02.000 I think I did an eighth of tea.
01:46:05.000 An eighth?
01:46:07.000 What is that in grams?
01:46:08.000 What's an eighth?
01:46:08.000 Like 3.5.
01:46:10.000 And in tea?
01:46:12.000 It hits you harder, faster, but it's not as long of a trip.
01:46:17.000 Oh yeah?
01:46:18.000 I had mind-melting experiences off that, so...
01:46:21.000 Yeah.
01:46:22.000 There's some certain psychedelics that leave you questioning all of reality itself.
01:46:28.000 Well, I remember having experiences where, like, I just felt so enlightened that, like, I know the keys to the universe.
01:46:34.000 And then, of course, you know, you come down often, you're just like...
01:46:37.000 No, I don't.
01:46:38.000 No, I just...
01:46:39.000 I was just...
01:46:40.000 It was just pure euphoria and whatever.
01:46:42.000 Yeah.
01:46:42.000 Well, I think there's...
01:46:43.000 There's certain moments where you grasp ideas that maybe aren't available to you.
01:46:50.000 Carl Sagan talked about that, about ideas that are available to you under the influence that just aren't, you're just not going to make those connections and pathways without it.
01:46:58.000 There's definitely a before and after psychedelics.
01:47:02.000 I know that what I'm seeing right now is being very stable.
01:47:08.000 Just a few little twists of a knob and things just kind of melt away in ways you never thought possible.
01:47:16.000 It's insane.
01:47:18.000 Well, that's the argument against atheism.
01:47:23.000 Particularly DMT. It's the argument like, okay, what is this?
01:47:26.000 Is this really enlightenment, enlightened beings you're communicating with?
01:47:31.000 Is this really another dimension?
01:47:32.000 Is this really a well of souls?
01:47:34.000 Or is this just massive hallucinations that are so spectacular that you can't discern between them and...
01:47:42.000 Yeah.
01:47:42.000 You're taking a chemical of some sort that we know interacts with your brain and it's going to cause things.
01:47:51.000 There is a one-to-one relationship between I'm taking this thing and it's altering my mind in a way.
01:47:58.000 The weird part is that your brain makes it, though.
01:48:00.000 That's what screws people up.
01:48:03.000 I would just be the one to say, well, you're taking a substance that alters your perceptions.
01:48:12.000 It seems like that makes sense.
01:48:15.000 I don't know if you have to say that it's attached on to something more cosmic or anything.
01:48:18.000 If I wasn't so lazy, I would try to get really good at kundalini yoga, because apparently the people that do kundalini, that really go deep with it, can experience DMT-like states.
01:48:30.000 What's the difference between normal yoga?
01:48:33.000 It's got some weird head bobbing.
01:48:36.000 There's a lot of, like, weird shit to Kundalini.
01:48:39.000 Just something about the movements, releases, certain kind of...
01:48:43.000 There's specific movements that they think are designed to accentuate the release of endogenous DMT. Because the people that I know that are into it that have done the actual drug and then done the yoga say you can get there.
01:48:57.000 You can actually get to a full-blown DMT trip with like, you know, an hour or two, two hours of kundalini yoga when you practice it on a daily basis.
01:49:07.000 Apparently it's like what they did was they figured out a way to physically trick your body into releasing that stuff.
01:49:16.000 You know, that we know your brain and your liver and your lungs and different parts of your body produce.
01:49:22.000 But in so many different religions, there have always been these sacraments that they take to get in touch with the gods.
01:49:31.000 And if you think of all of the different religions that have to do with betterment of the...
01:49:36.000 The mind, addressing the soul, the way we interface with each other, and there's like some real knowledge and wisdom in there that they think is coming from these psychedelic compounds, and then these psychedelic compounds are often equated to religion and religious sacraments.
01:49:52.000 Those are the real questions like, well, what is going on?
01:49:58.000 What is going on that so many different religions seek enlightenment through these substances and through these substances they believe that they're in communication with a higher power?
01:50:08.000 I mean, they create these, you know, crazy experiences that are, especially to, you know, some tribe or something, inexplicable.
01:50:15.000 And I wonder to agree what, how much sometimes the religions and the spirituality they put around their religion is based on the fact that they found that particular hallucinogen and they built a religion sort of around those experiences.
01:50:31.000 I'm sure.
01:50:31.000 Yeah.
01:50:32.000 Yeah, I'm sure a lot of them.
01:50:33.000 Rather than having the religion beforehand and then having that correlate with like their experience.
01:50:38.000 Well, I think with a lot of them, the ancient religions, it's so old, they don't even remember what came first, the chicken or the egg.
01:50:45.000 You know, like the Soma and the Rig Veda and, you know, the Amanita Muscaria in the ancient Christian religion, you know?
01:50:54.000 Yeah.
01:50:54.000 And the fact that we even know what plants do that, I mean, someone had to go out there and eat everything.
01:51:01.000 And nope, this one killed him.
01:51:02.000 Nope, this one, oh, he looks like he's having a good time on that one.
01:51:05.000 Yeah.
01:51:06.000 Put it in that bin.
01:51:07.000 Well, the really nutty stuff.
01:51:08.000 People have eaten everything.
01:51:09.000 Everything.
01:51:10.000 Everything.
01:51:10.000 Every animal, everything that moves, everything that stays still.
01:51:14.000 People ate rocks.
01:51:15.000 They've tried it all.
01:51:17.000 You know, when you're really hungry, like I've read this book recently called A Land So Strange about Cabeza de Vaca and the Spaniards that landed in Florida and they thought they were in the Gulf of Mexico and they tried to make their way across the country and just were literally starving to death and just eating fucking anything they could.
01:51:37.000 Deer dung, like, and anything they could eat.
01:51:40.000 And you just realize, like, what it must have been.
01:51:43.000 Some of them went to cannibalism.
01:51:45.000 And you realize, like, imagine what it's like when you have just this unstoppable desire to, like, stuff something in your mouth to stop this pang, this hunger pang that's literally torturing you.
01:52:00.000 And then you realize what it must have been like to be ancient man.
01:52:03.000 What it must have been like.
01:52:05.000 And then when you did find something, you know, whether it's some...
01:52:09.000 Fruit that kept you alive and sustained you, or the milk of a cow.
01:52:12.000 Like, you worshipped that animal.
01:52:13.000 You worshipped that food.
01:52:15.000 That food became your god.
01:52:17.000 Yeah, I mean, it makes sense.
01:52:19.000 They're so dependent on it that why wouldn't you?
01:52:22.000 I mean, you don't know where it came from.
01:52:24.000 It's magic.
01:52:26.000 Yeah.
01:52:27.000 The atheist movement has always been weird.
01:52:30.000 It's because some people, the same thing as the skeptic movement, some people don't want any wiggle room.
01:52:40.000 They don't want any room for weirdness.
01:52:43.000 But some things are weird.
01:52:47.000 There's room for weirdness.
01:52:49.000 I think a lot of them are okay with weirdness.
01:52:52.000 They're just not okay with the saying, this is weird, and then ushering in some other explanation that isn't justified.
01:53:00.000 I think a lot of skeptics are okay with, like, yeah, that was weird.
01:53:04.000 Let's wait to see what might explain it, or if nothing explains it immediately, we're willing to wait for more data to come in on it.
01:53:15.000 The UFO thing right now is fucking a lot of skeptics heads up.
01:53:19.000 Because the government themselves, like the Pentagon themselves, they're like going, look, we don't know what the fuck this is.
01:53:24.000 We have this video footage.
01:53:26.000 We don't know why it's moving this way.
01:53:27.000 We don't know how it's doing this.
01:53:29.000 We don't know how it goes in the water.
01:53:30.000 We don't know what this guy saw.
01:53:32.000 It went, you know, 50,000 miles an hour or whatever.
01:53:35.000 Like, we don't know.
01:53:36.000 I'm sorry.
01:53:37.000 We have no idea.
01:53:38.000 And the skeptics are like scrambling themselves to try to figure out what the hell these things are.
01:53:42.000 You should have Michael Schirmer on to talk about that.
01:53:44.000 Oh, I have.
01:53:45.000 Yeah, I've had it.
01:53:46.000 For the recent ones?
01:53:47.000 No, not the recent ones.
01:53:48.000 He wrote a good article for us at Quillette about, you know, what's it called?
01:53:52.000 Like something documenting the unexplained or something.
01:53:55.000 I think it might be the name of his essay.
01:53:56.000 But he kind of went through all the new films and just sort of, I guess, did a pretty big debunking on a lot of them.
01:54:05.000 Yeah, I doubt it.
01:54:07.000 I bet he didn't.
01:54:08.000 I bet he thinks he did.
01:54:10.000 He seemed pretty good, but...
01:54:10.000 Listen, man, that Commander Fravor footage where they went off the Nimitz in 2004, whatever that thing was, it went from more than 50,000 feet above sea level to 50 feet above sea level in less than a second.
01:54:23.000 They have it on video footage accelerating off at thousands of miles an hour.
01:54:28.000 They don't even know how it did it.
01:54:30.000 It was paused, dead stop, and then instantaneously took off going thousands of miles an hour with no visual propulsion system whatsoever, no heat signature.
01:54:39.000 You've got two different fighter jets looking at this thing.
01:54:42.000 You've got the people in the Nimitz say that they've been spotting these things every couple weeks.
01:54:46.000 They don't know what it is.
01:54:48.000 They have zero idea, and neither does Michael Shermer.
01:54:51.000 The reality is there's some shit that's happening right now in terms of unidentified flying objects or UAPs or whatever the new term they like to do, where legitimate scientists and physicists are shaking their head.
01:55:08.000 They're scratching their head going, what the fuck is that?
01:55:11.000 What is that?
01:55:12.000 I'm fine with head scratching.
01:55:14.000 What do you think it is?
01:55:16.000 Drones.
01:55:18.000 It's either someone's...
01:55:20.000 A human?
01:55:22.000 Yeah, it could be.
01:55:23.000 It could be some black ops that we don't know about, some military operation where they've developed some sort of nuclear-powered drones that can move at insane rates of speed, and there's some sort of an alloy that can protect it from going thousands of miles an hour,
01:55:39.000 and maybe they've developed some sort of a magnetic propulsion device.
01:55:43.000 Apparently, they were trying to work on something like that quite a long time ago.
01:55:48.000 They were trying to work on some magnetic propulsion device decades ago.
01:55:53.000 Who knows, man?
01:55:55.000 We have no idea what the fuck they're doing.
01:55:57.000 In the middle of the desert, some random crazy laboratory they've got carved into the side of a mountain and camouflage from the general public.
01:56:07.000 They could have some drones there that operate in some wild way that we just really are not aware of the technology.
01:56:15.000 We're not even aware it exists.
01:56:17.000 And maybe the great smokescreen is to tell the general public that these things are unexplained.
01:56:22.000 Maybe that's why the Pentagon is the one talking about it.
01:56:25.000 Like, we have no idea.
01:56:26.000 These things are beyond our control.
01:56:28.000 Meanwhile, maybe it's theirs.
01:56:30.000 It could be.
01:56:31.000 It could be.
01:56:32.000 Yeah.
01:56:33.000 I prefer the hypotheses of, you know, maybe it's a technology or something we just don't know about.
01:56:42.000 I don't.
01:56:43.000 But it's when people go for the, you know, must be aliens, it's where I kind of get lost.
01:56:48.000 Well, look at what we're doing, right?
01:56:49.000 We have a rover right now on Mars.
01:56:52.000 We have this thing just hovering around Mars, moving around.
01:56:55.000 We got little propellers that can work on propellers.
01:56:58.000 We got some that work on tracks and they roll around like a tank.
01:57:02.000 We can do that without any biological life powering it on the spot.
01:57:08.000 Why would we assume that these things have to have bodies in them?
01:57:13.000 Why would they want to have bodies in them?
01:57:14.000 If we could do that on Mars and do it remote control with our fucking crude little janky technology, imagine with some civilization that's a million times more advanced than us or a million years more advanced exponentially, imagine what they could do.
01:57:30.000 I think we talk a lot about just, like, driverless cars and driverless semis, but, I mean, I think we're, if we're not there already, driverless, like, F-16s or just, you know...
01:57:41.000 Oh, yeah.
01:57:42.000 All those types of things, or attack drones.
01:57:44.000 I mean, there's got to be...
01:57:45.000 You've seen those drone shows, the drone light shows, where they're all moved.
01:57:49.000 They can do the most insane things.
01:57:51.000 Like, imagine just putting guns on those things.
01:57:53.000 I mean, you know they exist.
01:57:54.000 Like, they have to be...
01:57:54.000 Some government has those things, and just imagine...
01:57:59.000 How easily they could just assassinate anybody they want to.
01:58:02.000 Just fly those things in.
01:58:03.000 Have you seen those speed drone competitions where they're just...
01:58:06.000 Yes.
01:58:06.000 Like, it's insane how fast they are.
01:58:08.000 It's incredible.
01:58:08.000 And so agile.
01:58:09.000 Agile.
01:58:10.000 Like, put a little gun on there in and out.
01:58:13.000 Well, you've seen those CGI robots that shoot guns where they pretend it's like an actual real robot, but it's not quite yet.
01:58:21.000 Have you seen those?
01:58:21.000 Just the ones that are like walking with the weird backpacks?
01:58:23.000 No, they run and shoot at things.
01:58:25.000 Like the Boston Dynamics?
01:58:27.000 Yeah.
01:58:27.000 They have the dogs and they have the...
01:58:28.000 But these are not real.
01:58:30.000 Like, a lot of people thought they were real, including me.
01:58:33.000 But it's fake.
01:58:34.000 But it's like, what it is, is it looks like a robot person that jumps and does flips and then shoots targets perfectly.
01:58:41.000 Ding, ding, ding!
01:58:42.000 And then they'll run up behind it and kick it.
01:58:45.000 And the thing falls down and it jumps up and perfectly hits the target every single time.
01:58:48.000 But it's not real.
01:58:50.000 Probably not too far away.
01:58:51.000 Not far.
01:58:52.000 No.
01:58:53.000 I mean, they already got for real, absolute, acrobatic Boston Dynamic robots where they do backflips and all kinds of like Cirque du Soleil type shit.
01:59:02.000 It's not hard to imagine them with guns.
01:59:05.000 Has this ever come up when we were talking about any of this UFO, UAP stuff?
01:59:09.000 What is this?
01:59:10.000 I stumbled across this recently.
01:59:12.000 This is from 1979, Washington Post.
01:59:16.000 It says during the first two weeks there's a string of low-flying objects that the Air Force tried to find and could not.
01:59:24.000 Yes, this was one of the things that was discussed in the movie, The Phenomenon.
01:59:30.000 There's been a few of these things that happened at missile launch sites where unidentified low-flying objects that they couldn't track or trace.
01:59:40.000 They didn't know where they were coming from.
01:59:43.000 But again, maybe that's drones.
01:59:48.000 I know there was a lot of headlines that were misinterpreted because the government would say, like, these are real videos.
01:59:54.000 You know, it's real.
01:59:55.000 Right.
01:59:55.000 And people would take that to mean these are real aliens.
01:59:59.000 But all they're saying is that, you know, the videos are not fabricated by some guy in a basement or something.
02:00:04.000 It's not like CGI or anything like that.
02:00:07.000 They're saying that the videos are real.
02:00:08.000 We don't know what's going on in them.
02:00:09.000 Like, they're authentic.
02:00:12.000 Footage.
02:00:12.000 Yeah.
02:00:13.000 But people sort of take that and run.
02:00:15.000 My favorite quote, was it, I don't know, was it a Harry Reid quote or who made it?
02:00:19.000 Off-world crafts not made on this earth.
02:00:22.000 That's my favorite one.
02:00:24.000 Instead of UFO? No, no.
02:00:26.000 They were talking about things that they've experienced, that they definitely have a knowledge of off-world crafts not made on this Earth.
02:00:35.000 How do they know they weren't made on the Earth?
02:00:37.000 They don't.
02:00:38.000 They don't.
02:00:39.000 That's why it's so silly.
02:00:40.000 But it's fun to think about it.
02:00:42.000 That's the problem with all this stuff, is that it's so intoxicating to think that something is visiting us from another planet.
02:00:49.000 And just checking up on us, making sure we don't blow things up.
02:00:52.000 That's horrifying, I think.
02:00:54.000 Well, it's good if it's, like, protecting us from nuclear bombs.
02:00:57.000 Just for what we talked about earlier, Michael Shermer, I'm looking through his article, the three main videos, he's just using Mick West debunking.
02:01:04.000 So he didn't have anything additional on that.
02:01:06.000 Oh, he adds Mick West's videos?
02:01:08.000 He's just talking about how Mick West debunked him.
02:01:10.000 He didn't, though.
02:01:11.000 Right, well, that's all I'm saying.
02:01:12.000 He didn't add anything to that.
02:01:13.000 Yeah, if you listen to people that actually, if you listen to Commander Fravor, there's actually video footage of actual fighter pilots debunking, Mick West debunking, because he doesn't understand the sophistication of the instrumentation on those things.
02:01:27.000 It's not as simple as you saw something, you thought it was a balloon.
02:01:30.000 No, they lock in on these things.
02:01:32.000 They can determine the altitude, the speed.
02:01:35.000 They know exactly where they're at.
02:01:37.000 If you look at, there's videos of, there's a fighter jet pilot debunks Mick West debunking.
02:01:47.000 And he's explaining, like, you have no idea what you're talking about.
02:01:51.000 Like, you don't understand the systems, the weapon systems that are on board on these crafts.
02:01:56.000 There's no room for misinterpretation.
02:01:58.000 And he said that trying to find one of these things through these weapon systems, just randomly coming across it and locking onto it, would be like trying to find something looking through a straw.
02:02:10.000 Like looking through a straw and looking at a mountainside and trying to pick out a very specific tree.
02:02:16.000 You're looking at the whole totality of the sky itself, and they're locking in on this thing that's going a thousand miles an hour or whatever the hell it's going.
02:02:25.000 He explains it the way the fighter pilot explains it by the very specifics of all the instrumentation and how it works and why these aren't errors or mistakes.
02:02:35.000 And the same thing that Commander Fravor said.
02:02:37.000 When Commander Fravor broke it down and described how these systems work, you realize, like, To the casual person that doesn't know anything about fighter jets, you can come up with all sorts of reasons why there's no way that that could be a UFO. But when you listen to these guys talk,
02:02:54.000 especially a guy like Commander Fravor that was there and experienced that thing and saw it and how it mirrored him and it mirrored his movements and then jammed radar.
02:03:04.000 It jammed tracking systems.
02:03:06.000 They don't know what the fuck these things are.
02:03:09.000 I mean, to say they're from another planet, It's kind of crazy because they're right there.
02:03:15.000 Why wouldn't you assume it's from here?
02:03:16.000 Yeah, they're on this planet.
02:03:17.000 Yeah, it's right here.
02:03:18.000 That's what we know.
02:03:20.000 But it's so fun.
02:03:22.000 That's the problem.
02:03:23.000 It's so fun to say it's from another planet.
02:03:25.000 It's really enticing.
02:03:26.000 If you see a Chinese sign on it, you're like, oh no.
02:03:29.000 You look really close.
02:03:30.000 There's a tiny little CCP. Sticker.
02:03:34.000 It'd be the most exciting thing ever to discover that extraterrestrial life is real.
02:03:40.000 Yeah.
02:03:40.000 I mean, I keep going sort of back and forth between whether or not I think it exists out in the universe.
02:03:46.000 Because when it comes down to it, we only have one instance that we know of, and that's us.
02:03:52.000 And so it's hard to, like, extrapolate from a single data point.
02:03:55.000 But then when you, you know, the whole Fermi equation and stuff.
02:03:59.000 Fermi paradox, yeah.
02:04:01.000 It's hard not to think that we're just, it's like teaming with life, but then there's the whole, like, where are they question.
02:04:06.000 Well, they're so far away.
02:04:08.000 The thing about just the distance between us and the closest stars, how far?
02:04:14.000 Hundreds of light years?
02:04:16.000 What's the closest star to us outside of our galaxy?
02:04:22.000 I mean, how many light years is it?
02:04:25.000 It's like a couple.
02:04:27.000 Four?
02:04:28.000 Four light years?
02:04:29.000 4.3.
02:04:30.000 So Alpha Centauri.
02:04:31.000 So that would be convenient.
02:04:33.000 Proxima Centauri.
02:04:34.000 Proxima Centauri.
02:04:35.000 So if something could go wicked fast and it was only four light years around, that's like living in San Antonio.
02:04:41.000 It's an hour away.
02:04:42.000 No big deal.
02:04:43.000 Right?
02:04:44.000 Four light years?
02:04:45.000 If you've got some kind of supersonic or super light powered faster than light jet, something that, you know, operates on gravity, Yeah.
02:04:55.000 I mean, even if you had a planet teaming with life, too, I mean, we're only one species out of, you know, a million or so that is even capable of doing anywhere approaching, like what we're able to do here.
02:05:07.000 So there could just be, how many planets?
02:05:08.000 There's just a bunch of, you know, dinosaur-like type things out there that will never...
02:05:12.000 That's a trillion, correct?
02:05:13.000 That number?
02:05:14.000 40 trillion miles wide?
02:05:16.000 Kilometers.
02:05:17.000 That's a trillion, yeah.
02:05:18.000 Yeah.
02:05:18.000 That's a lot.
02:05:19.000 It's a lot.
02:05:20.000 It's a ways...
02:05:21.000 Yeah.
02:05:21.000 Yeah.
02:05:24.000 Yeah, what you're saying is correct, but also the universe is infinite.
02:05:28.000 So, you know, the way Neil deGrasse Tyson explained it is like not only is there most likely life, there's you.
02:05:35.000 You're out there.
02:05:36.000 There's so much variety because the infinite means there's literally no end to any of it.
02:05:43.000 So every single combination of things has happened.
02:05:47.000 Even every single version of you.
02:05:50.000 It's the whole multiverse thing.
02:05:51.000 Yeah.
02:05:51.000 Well, it's not even multiverse, like just in this universe itself.
02:05:56.000 And then there's the multiverse.
02:05:57.000 But in this universe itself, if this universe really is infinite, if there's an infinite number of stars and an infinite number of planets connected to those stars, that means there's an infinite number of you and me and Jamie in a room somewhere having the exact same conversation with the exact same pauses.
02:06:15.000 And then there's an infinite number of varieties of Of ways we branch off from these conversations and disagree or agree.
02:06:22.000 I thought the consensus was that the universe is of a known size, you know, and mass and everything like that.
02:06:30.000 But I always get confused when they try to talk about, like, you know, there's no center of the universe.
02:06:36.000 And they'll use the analogy, they'll have like a...
02:06:39.000 A balloon with dots on it.
02:06:40.000 If you expand the balloon, all the dots are moving each other.
02:06:44.000 No matter what dot you're on, all the planets look like they're moving away from you.
02:06:50.000 With the situation we are in our universe, only we're in three dimensions, so you have to take that balloon analogy that is dots on a single dimension.
02:07:01.000 And you need to, like, upgrade that one other dimension, because we live in, you know, the three-dimensional or four-plus-time world.
02:07:08.000 And that's when I just can't wrap my head around, how do we have, how can we extrapolate, like, the surface of the balloon situation to a three-dimensional world situation?
02:07:18.000 That's just when people like Neil deGrasse Tyson, they just, they lose me.
02:07:22.000 Yeah, my brain just broke listening to you talk about that.
02:07:25.000 Well, then there's the black hole thing.
02:07:26.000 I probably didn't say it very well.
02:07:27.000 The black hole hypothesis that inside of every galaxy there's a supermassive black hole that's like one half of one percent of the mass of the galaxy itself.
02:07:40.000 And the thought is that inside that black hole might be a whole nother universe.
02:07:46.000 Like a gateway to an entirely different universe with hundreds of billions of stars and hundreds of billions of galaxies and each one has a black hole in the center and you go through that and each one of those is a whole another universe.
02:08:00.000 I mean, fractals.
02:08:01.000 Like we see in nature, we see, I mean, if that's what the universe is.
02:08:06.000 And people are like, oh, that's too crazy.
02:08:08.000 Well, what it is is crazy enough.
02:08:11.000 Everything's crazy when you like really look down on it.
02:08:14.000 You look inside just in the center of an atom.
02:08:16.000 I mean, things just get nuts.
02:08:17.000 Yeah.
02:08:17.000 It's like, what's going on here?
02:08:19.000 Things in superposition?
02:08:20.000 Yeah.
02:08:20.000 I mean, why would it be more crazy if there's an infinite number of universes that exist in an infinite number of black holes out there and each one of those has an infinite number of universes inside an infinite number of black holes like...
02:08:33.000 But why is that crazier than what you see?
02:08:36.000 When you look up at the sky and you see all those stars, those are fucking flying fireballs.
02:08:41.000 Yeah.
02:08:42.000 Everything's insane.
02:08:43.000 I think Dawkins calls that the anesthetic of familiarity, where people are just so used to things they're familiar with.
02:08:51.000 But then when you just start really thinking about anything, it's just insane.
02:08:57.000 That's a great expression, the anesthetic of familiarity.
02:09:00.000 That's great.
02:09:01.000 That is what it is, right?
02:09:02.000 You just get accustomed to it.
02:09:04.000 So people just need to go outside and look at the stars for a bit, or look in a microscope, or whatever.
02:09:09.000 That's one of the nice things that psychedelics do too, is they sort of reset that familiarity.
02:09:13.000 You start looking at things like, God, this is weird.
02:09:15.000 Every ordinary object you see, it's like brand new again.
02:09:18.000 Yeah.
02:09:19.000 Or you almost like look at the layer of clouds over the earth and you get a sense like, oh, this is a thin sort of crust of air and gases and vapor and the magnetosphere.
02:09:34.000 And then above that, you have the blackness of space and it's all right there.
02:09:39.000 It's all right there.
02:09:40.000 We're just accustomed to, oh, pretty clouds.
02:09:42.000 Like, pretty clouds?
02:09:44.000 That's the light reflecting off of the oxygen that's making it blue, and these clouds are just water vapor, and above that is fucking chaos!
02:09:53.000 You've seen, like, the original Carl Sagan Cosmos series?
02:09:56.000 Yeah.
02:09:57.000 That's what did it for me back then.
02:09:58.000 That's what made me want to be a scientist.
02:10:00.000 I had that on before I go to bed every night, and...
02:10:03.000 Blow my mind.
02:10:04.000 His version of UFOs was really bizarre, too.
02:10:07.000 His version of Aliens and that Contact film, that was great.
02:10:11.000 That was great stuff.
02:10:13.000 That was really interesting because that was so away from the beaten path of extraterrestrial contact and the whole way they traveled and what they did to get to wherever that other thing was that Jodie Foster got to.
02:10:35.000 Yeah, he was a great author.
02:10:37.000 Well, he was a great mind, right?
02:10:39.000 And it must have been even more difficult to have those controversial thoughts back then.
02:10:43.000 And by the way, he was a huge pothead.
02:10:45.000 Yeah, he talked favorably about it, helping him think and come up with ideas for physics.
02:10:51.000 I think he did it initially under a pseudonym.
02:10:53.000 Oh, really?
02:10:54.000 Yeah, I think the initial things that he, I'm pretty sure, we've pulled this up before, right?
02:10:59.000 The initial things that Carl Sagan wrote about cannabis, he wrote under a pseudonym, because he didn't want to be discredited.
02:11:06.000 I don't know.
02:11:09.000 I'm finding right now, but I feel like it was like Mr. X, Dr. X, something like that.
02:11:12.000 Something like that.
02:11:13.000 Dr. X. It's hilarious.
02:11:15.000 Like some X-Man shit.
02:11:17.000 Yeah, but I mean- Mr. X. Mr. X. Back then, I mean, talking about being a pothead and also being like one of the most, no, the most prominent public Sort of science influencer, at least when it comes to the cosmos and space.
02:11:34.000 That was the guy.
02:11:35.000 To find out he's actually just a dopehead, just a goddamn dopehead, out there teaching my kids.
02:11:42.000 He got a lot of flack for being the popularizer, too.
02:11:45.000 There's a stigma that you're either an actual scientist doing research or you're a popularizer, not a real scientist, even if you have the PhD and everything.
02:11:56.000 For a while, when he left doing actual academic science and became a popularizer, he got a lot of flack for that, even though that's clearly his calling.
02:12:05.000 He was also involved with, I think, a lot of the Extraterrestrial search like city and all that stuff.
02:12:10.000 So he's definitely left his mark.
02:12:13.000 Getting angry at someone for popularizing something is really hilarious.
02:12:18.000 Like that is like one of the purest forms of hate.
02:12:21.000 Or just jealousy.
02:12:23.000 Like how silly and how pompous, how arrogant do you have to be to think there's something bad about promoting science?
02:12:31.000 I mean, all of us, well, I can speak for myself, like, I got into science because of people like Carl Sagan and Stephen Jay Gould and, yeah, I mean, these people like Dawkins, Neil deGrasse Tyson, like, these are enormously influential,
02:12:48.000 and if we are not having these people...
02:12:50.000 And not having them promote real science, you know, that's based in fact and evidence, you know, who's going to fill that void is going to be the crazies.
02:13:00.000 I mean, that's what they're currently doing now.
02:13:03.000 Yeah.
02:13:03.000 And so, I mean, I'd like to write some more stuff about just popular science and, you know, I'd like to sort of move away from a lot of culture war stuff at some point because I can only write the same essay, you know, in Various forms so many times.
02:13:18.000 Is that mostly what you concentrate on now is culture or stuff?
02:13:22.000 Mainly sex and gender, yeah.
02:13:24.000 Although I will dabble in some of the critical race stuff, but no one wants to hear like I talk about critical race theory.
02:13:31.000 So I'll just, I stick to, and as a biologist, it's in my wheelhouse to talk about when people are conflating things in biology.
02:13:40.000 So that's what I stick to because that's kind of what I feel the most comfortable talking about.
02:13:44.000 Science entertainers are so important because it's hard for people to absorb otherwise.
02:13:50.000 Without a guy like Neil deGrasse Tyson or a guy like Carl Sagan back in the day, there's something about when someone can put it into an entertaining form that it'll at least get the sparks going of curiosity.
02:14:07.000 Oh, yeah.
02:14:08.000 I mean, Carl Sagan got me into, well, I thought I was going to be an astronomer at first, and then he got me into the science, and then it was the Dawkinses and Goulds that got me into evolution, and then the whole science and religion debates that erupted after that kind of just hooked me in the whole thing.
02:14:26.000 There aren't really that many science versus religion debates going on anymore.
02:14:29.000 Yeah, it's all woke, anti-woke now.
02:14:33.000 They've sort of realized there's a bigger battle to have.
02:14:37.000 And, you know, I find myself around more and more Christians.
02:14:41.000 Not that I'm agreeing with their ideas on God or anything, but we just...
02:14:45.000 It doesn't even enter the conversation.
02:14:47.000 We were just like...
02:14:49.000 Whatever.
02:14:49.000 We can table that for now.
02:14:51.000 We can just sit there because we'll have time to argue about that in the future, but at least we can all agree.
02:14:57.000 We're all modernists in the sense that we value science and evidence.
02:15:01.000 You might interpret the facts differently than I do, but at least we can make the same basic observations about the world.
02:15:08.000 Whereas with a lot of the other activists, we don't even have the same starting point.
02:15:13.000 If they're coming from a place of reality and truth is relative, we can't even connect out of the gates.
02:15:21.000 Whereas I'll talk to a religious person and they might have a lot of weird beliefs and sort of certain degree of magical thinking, but at least they're able to look around and things are where they are and we're making the same basic observations about things.
02:15:36.000 And so I can have a conversation with them.
02:15:39.000 And also, they're not going to think I'm a horrible person.
02:15:41.000 They might think I'm going to hell or something in the back of their minds, but that's only for the really extreme, you know, religious conservatives that are going to go down that route.
02:15:50.000 It's maintaining some of these ridiculous ideas.
02:15:53.000 It makes you wonder, like, how much of that could be fixed with hard labor?
02:15:59.000 Like, how much...
02:16:00.000 Like, these people, like, had to do something very difficult for a living.
02:16:05.000 Like, you know, when they say there's no atheists in foxholes, there's probably no woke people in foxholes either, you know?
02:16:13.000 It's like, you know what I mean?
02:16:15.000 If they've experienced some sort of strife in their life, like, then...
02:16:21.000 I know it's offensive to talk about them being infantile, but the reason you see a baby and they'll bump their arm on the table and they'll just wail.
02:16:32.000 And you'll think, you just barely touched your arm.
02:16:34.000 I've seen kids that have been babysitting.
02:16:36.000 But when you think about it, that might be the most painful thing they've ever experienced in their life.
02:16:41.000 Because if they're super small, they've only been around for a couple months or a year.
02:16:45.000 Hitting your head on a wall That might just be, you know, it's their relative pain.
02:16:50.000 It's the worst ever.
02:16:52.000 I think we're kind of getting to that point with a lot of some of the really far-woke activists where they've just never been challenged on their beliefs on anything.
02:17:01.000 And so I'll say something like, you know, sex is not a spectrum, and they'll just wail like it's the worst thing that's ever happened to them because it might actually be.
02:17:10.000 It does seem like I'm dealing with children on a daily basis.
02:17:15.000 Well, in a lot of ways you are, right?
02:17:17.000 Because there's an infantilizing of them in high school, and they're taught a lot of this stuff in high school, and then they go directly from that to college, and they go directly from that.
02:17:31.000 They attempt to enter the workplace with the same ideologies.
02:17:35.000 And a lot of times, like, these ideas have been nurtured rather than, like, when you get to college, instead of being challenged on these ideas, everybody agrees with you.
02:17:46.000 And they're like, you're not even taking it far enough.
02:17:49.000 There's actually no such thing as gender.
02:17:51.000 It doesn't exist.
02:17:52.000 You're like, oh, shit.
02:17:52.000 Is this a new thing?
02:17:54.000 And then you're just following this preposterous trail of breadcrumbs deep into the woods of Bananaville.
02:18:01.000 And then just things get more and more crazy.
02:18:04.000 Well, I think we used to tell them to wait until they get out in the real world, then they'll see.
02:18:09.000 Now there's no real world.
02:18:10.000 But then they've changed the real world.
02:18:12.000 We were wrong about that.
02:18:14.000 Now they're in the institutions, they're in the corporations, and they're just changing the rules.
02:18:22.000 They just need the power grid to go down for a few years.
02:18:24.000 I mean, you've had like, what, Coinbase and Basecamp and a few other places that have successfully done a purge by offering them big exit packages just to get politics out of the workplace and off the Slack channels because it's just turning into just these intra-corporation witch hunts for anyone who says anything that's not completely in line with what they believe it is,
02:18:47.000 even if it's nothing to do with crypto or whatever Basecamp does.
02:18:50.000 Do you feel like you're making any progress with all these essays that you're writing?
02:18:54.000 Do you feel like sometimes you're just spinning your wheels?
02:18:56.000 Does it get frustrating?
02:19:08.000 Parents call me and say that they, based on some of my writings, like their kid had decided for themselves that, yeah, maybe they were using stereotypes to identify themselves as male or female, and they're no longer deciding to go through with their transition.
02:19:22.000 So I've had one of those happen, and that was super powerful to hear someone say that based on something that I wrote.
02:19:29.000 I mean, that's like a life-changing thing.
02:19:32.000 And I think...
02:19:34.000 One big thing that I'm helping to do, along with a lot of other people, is get people to be more, I guess, bold and to see these arguments that are being made about sex and gender, or whatever it is, and have the tools to push back and to identify,
02:19:52.000 which before to them was just this firehose of jargon that they had no idea how to even respond to.
02:19:59.000 They would just stand like a deer in the headlights at it because, holy crap, there's just so much...
02:20:06.000 This ideology, this buttressing, and they try to sort of do this tactic where they just hit you with so many buzzwords that you possibly can.
02:20:14.000 It makes you feel like an idiot.
02:20:16.000 Nobody wants to feel like an idiot.
02:20:17.000 They need to go do the work, and then they read it, and they still don't understand what it is.
02:20:21.000 And they just, you know, like old religions, we're just going to let you interpret the text for us, and they just give it to these activists, and that's what they do.
02:20:30.000 Well, it's also in the way they promote these ideas.
02:20:31.000 It's so aggressive and so – it's an attacking form that makes you back off, which is a very effective strategy for getting people to not resist because you put them on a defensive.
02:20:44.000 You make them super uncomfortable.
02:20:46.000 You confront them and then they back – so it's like – It has all the elements of something that's not real, in that it's not really an intellectual debate.
02:20:56.000 What it really is, is you're trying to play a game.
02:20:59.000 And part of the game is forced compliance.
02:21:02.000 Part of the game is getting people to agree with these new demands or this new framework for how to view the world.
02:21:09.000 And the way they do it so aggressively, it's like they don't really want to know if their ideas can be challenged.
02:21:15.000 They don't really want to know if there's someone who has an opposing idea that might be even better, and maybe they might want to rethink things.
02:21:21.000 They go at it guns blazing with 100% confidence that they're correct.
02:21:27.000 But not really.
02:21:28.000 They're doing it that way because it works.
02:21:31.000 Because when you say something to a person and say that this person is a homophobe or a this-a-phobe or a that-a-phobe, when you do that and you get aggressive with them and then they feel the impact of it, they tend to back away.
02:21:47.000 And you enforce this idea on them.
02:21:51.000 They get all...
02:21:54.000 Scrambled by it.
02:21:55.000 It works.
02:21:56.000 It's effective.
02:21:57.000 So the more aggressive you are, the louder you are, the more shitty you are to people, the more sometimes it has an impact on them.
02:22:05.000 Yeah, I mean, they make people feel as much shame as possible.
02:22:07.000 Yes.
02:22:08.000 And no one wants to be yelled at or called those names.
02:22:12.000 Jamie likes it.
02:22:14.000 Sometimes.
02:22:15.000 Whatever he likes.
02:22:16.000 Sometimes.
02:22:17.000 Yeah, he likes when people spit on him, too.
02:22:18.000 I mean, a lot of times they have a conclusion that their ideology tells them they need to have.
02:22:24.000 Like, I brought up the queer theorists before, and they're all about breaking up binaries no matter where they exist, basically.
02:22:32.000 And so how this manifests in sort of the whole sex and gender debate...
02:22:37.000 Is you'll get the people who need there to be more than two sexes, or sex isn't even a thing, it's just a spectrum.
02:22:43.000 And so when I said there's like the sex abolitionists who think it's a spectrum or a social construct, then you have the people who think there's seven sexes or five.
02:22:51.000 They're actually not separate groups.
02:22:53.000 They're the same people who will use any of those arguments on any given day if they feel like one is just more convincing to get you away from the conclusion that there's only two.
02:23:03.000 Like, they don't care how many sexes there are as long as it's not two.
02:23:08.000 Don't you get the feeling, though, that when you're talking to people like that, that they're really playing a game?
02:23:12.000 Yeah, it's just, that's all it is.
02:23:13.000 They're playing a game, and they're trying to score.
02:23:15.000 They're trying to score on this game, and they're trying to say things that put you in some sort of an ideological checkmate.
02:23:22.000 And then you gotta go, ugh...
02:23:25.000 And then they win.
02:23:26.000 I just wonder how much of it is just purely driven by, you know, the whole virtue signal, how much they want people to see them with the right opinions.
02:23:33.000 There's a lot of that.
02:23:34.000 You know, did they actually believe these?
02:23:36.000 I mean, I had friends that were, I've co-authored papers with them, and early on they said, you know, they compared, you know, the statement trans women are biological women to, you know, flat earth type stuff, and That's where they were at one point,
02:23:51.000 and then they got a job later at a university, and then pronouns and bio went up the next week, and then now they're full-blown sex spectrum denial people.
02:24:03.000 And I just saw, and this is a person that I knew pretty well, and it's just like, what happened?
02:24:08.000 You can tell me, like, blink twice if they're behind you, if they're listening, because we were good friends, and we know if you were faking it, you could tell me, and I wouldn't tell anyone.
02:24:20.000 Do you think they're faking it or do you think it just changed their mind?
02:24:23.000 I think they might be a true believer.
02:24:25.000 I think it changes people's mind.
02:24:27.000 I think people are super malleable.
02:24:29.000 I mean, I think that's why cults exist.
02:24:31.000 Cults exist because people can talk people into all sorts of shit that doesn't make any sense.
02:24:36.000 And if your livelihood depends on you adopting an ideology, a lot of people just...
02:24:44.000 It does in the academy for sure.
02:24:46.000 I mean, just me saying there's two sexes and saying it loudly...
02:24:52.000 People came after for you, yeah.
02:24:55.000 But do you feel like there's an opportunity because something like Quillette, which is really appreciated by a lot of folks because it does have this unusual platform where it's not really ideologically driven and there's a lot of skepticism and there's a range of philosophies and ideas about the world that exist on Quillette that You know,
02:25:21.000 it's not quite all the way left and it's not all the way right.
02:25:26.000 It's very centrist in a lot of ways.
02:25:28.000 Yeah, we're trying to bridge that gap.
02:25:30.000 I mean, that's what I see.
02:25:31.000 But do you think that that can also move to the universities, that somehow or another that kind of thinking can eventually manifest itself in a university community?
02:25:42.000 We're actually going to be doing a series of articles addressing this question, like, can the university be saved or do we need alternative institutions?
02:25:50.000 And I think most of the people I talk to in this centrist position, they think the universities might just be screwed.
02:25:58.000 Is it a function of having to go to a location, though?
02:26:01.000 Would it be more difficult if people were taking courses online where, I mean, I'm sure you get some indoctrination, but maybe it would be less effective?
02:26:12.000 I always want to think, rather, that there's something about the experience of going to a place and enrolling in this school that's there and then Sleeping on the campus and all the different things that people do that bring them into this hive mind of a university.
02:26:31.000 Because I have so many friends where their kids go away to college and then they come back and start talking wacky, like, woke shit.
02:26:38.000 And they're like, oh my god, who are you?
02:26:40.000 Like, what happened to my daughter?
02:26:41.000 What happened to my son?
02:26:43.000 A lot of it started with, well, there's the faculty who are, I think they're in sort of like a spiral of, you know, they're going to be doing their search committees, they're going to be looking at the people who they're hiring, and a lot of times the HR has a first pass where you need to have a really good diversity,
02:26:59.000 equity, and inclusion statement.
02:27:01.000 And if you don't score high on just that statement, which is basically a political litmus test, you don't even get passed along to the department.
02:27:09.000 And so we're already making basically a political test before you can even apply for the university.
02:27:15.000 Not all universities do it, but it's happening more and more, especially in the wake of the George Floyd stuff.
02:27:20.000 Diversity, equity, and inclusion statements need to be almost everywhere.
02:27:25.000 And then you have the other administrators at the university, like the campus life people who, you know, are in charge of the dorms and all that stuff.
02:27:32.000 And they tend to be extremely woke, and they're involved in the day-to-day stuff of all the students there.
02:27:39.000 And there's just no...
02:27:42.000 There's no mediating force that's pushing it back.
02:27:45.000 It's just, I don't see a way where you could actually start getting more diversity of thought in the universities, given that social media is so ripe to people just, you know, Googling you and looking at your pictures on Facebook.
02:27:57.000 Whereas before, before the internet, for instance, if you were applying to university, you'd send in your application and I had, here's all the papers I published in Molecular Biology and Journal of Evolutionary, whatever.
02:28:08.000 And they would just see your CV that had everything on there.
02:28:10.000 They saw your name.
02:28:11.000 They didn't know your political views.
02:28:13.000 They didn't know anything about you.
02:28:14.000 You might go out for an interview.
02:28:15.000 But there's an agreement when you're being interviewed that people don't ask you about politics and religion because that's just not relevant to the job of a molecular biologist or something.
02:28:24.000 And so they would hire people who they had no choice, but because they were the most qualified candidate, they didn't know about their political views.
02:28:32.000 So you had more political diversity just organically in those departments.
02:28:37.000 They usually do skew left just because I think that's just people who are scientists usually skew left.
02:28:42.000 But now we're in the situation where people are being super screened before they get the job and they have not only the equity, diversity, inclusion statements, but People searching you online.
02:28:54.000 I mean, I applied for a university.
02:28:56.000 No, actually, not one I applied to.
02:28:57.000 I spoke to a dean, the chair of a department somewhere in the Midwest, and they said that they liked my essays.
02:29:05.000 I was applying to a bunch of university assistant professor jobs.
02:29:09.000 And he straight up told me that he liked my writing.
02:29:11.000 He uses some of my essays as just like debate things for his class.
02:29:15.000 He'll have the whole class read it and they'll debate the points on it.
02:29:17.000 And that he would like to hire me as an assistant professor and that he thinks the rest of the faculty would also probably be on board.
02:29:23.000 But...
02:29:25.000 HR has to look at the applications first.
02:29:28.000 And he said, there's almost a zero chance that your application will be passed along to the department to even be considered to be hired.
02:29:35.000 And so that's why I left.
02:29:37.000 Because of...
02:29:37.000 Once I heard, just because of my, you know, article in the Wall Street Journal talking about the dangerous denial of sex, articles I've written in Quillette, my Twitter presence where I'm talking about this stuff.
02:29:48.000 You know, you Google me and that's what you see.
02:29:50.000 And it's just a liability at some point.
02:29:52.000 I mean, students are going to say they feel unsafe.
02:29:55.000 And even if I were to get hired, what are my chances of getting tenure after six years if students are constantly saying they feel unsafe with me on campus?
02:30:03.000 And I disagree with the whole diversity and inclusion type stuff and they want you to have a whole diversity, equity and inclusion component to your research.
02:30:12.000 Even if I just...
02:30:13.000 I studied WASP behavior.
02:30:15.000 So, like, how am I going to include...
02:30:17.000 I'm going to dedicate my time...
02:30:20.000 Where I should be studying WASPs to doing a diversity, equity, inclusion project.
02:30:24.000 Do we really want Einstein's—I'm not saying I'm Einstein—but someone who's an Einstein figure, how much time do we want them dedicating to a diversity, equity, and inclusion project?
02:30:41.000 Right.
02:30:43.000 Right.
02:30:46.000 Right.
02:30:55.000 People of different colors, basically, where they don't account for ideological diversity, viewpoint diversity, which is what a university should be doing.
02:31:04.000 But the thing is they don't assume there is any ideological diversity once you get into college.
02:31:08.000 They assume everyone's on the left.
02:31:10.000 Yeah, and they do like a self-fulfilling prophecy by making that happen, essentially.
02:31:16.000 But that is pretty wild that they're able to do that.
02:31:20.000 Because colleges and universities in this country are basically left-wing factories.
02:31:26.000 They pump out these people.
02:31:31.000 That are left-wing ideologues, and then a few that are rebels that are resisting the gravity of everybody around them, and they figure out a way to be closet conservatives.
02:31:42.000 I was told to wait for tenure before even talking about this stuff, which would have been six plus years in the future.
02:31:50.000 But it sends such a weird signal because people claim to value tenure because you get to have academic freedom and speak your mind.
02:31:57.000 So they pretend that speaking your mind and being bold is a virtue.
02:32:02.000 But then if you happen to be the type of person that would need tenure because you have Bold views about things, you're weeded out before you even get a chance to get tenure.
02:32:12.000 So, like, they're specifically filtering out the people who could actually use tenure.
02:32:16.000 So the people who get tenure are the people who are just either just shut up because they're too scared and probably won't ever use the tenure that they have, or people who just fall online completely and have no use for tenure because all their beliefs fall perfectly within the norm.
02:32:31.000 Do you think there's any room right now for or demand or even the potential to have a centrist university and to promote it that way and to, you know, like if someone bankrolls it and says, listen, it's very clear what's happening in this country.
02:32:49.000 You've got your right-wing universities, which are always connected to religion, but there's no, like, legitimate, centrist, ideologically free university where they're not trying to pump out right-wing or left-wing people.
02:33:05.000 They're trying to allow people to debate ideas, and you give them free reign of thought and allow them to make up their own minds and draw their own conclusions.
02:33:14.000 Yeah, I mean, to me, a centrist university isn't like a university necessarily composed of centrists.
02:33:20.000 But as long as, like, you can have the Marxist professor as long as they're not training their students to be Marxist.
02:33:26.000 You know, they can talk about Marxism.
02:33:27.000 They could even say, this is the idea that I'm partial to, but here's other ideas.
02:33:32.000 Here's the best challenges to these ideas that Marxism faces or things like that.
02:33:36.000 Instead of just indoctrination.
02:33:38.000 Instead of just indoctrination.
02:33:39.000 And you hear from the people who take a lot of these gender studies classes that it's not a back and forth.
02:33:44.000 It's just like, here's the way it is.
02:33:46.000 Same with some of the diversity trainings.
02:33:49.000 You're not being taught to think, you're just being taught what to think.
02:33:52.000 And they're basically just preachers.
02:33:54.000 They're giving you the truth as revealed to them.
02:33:59.000 And there is one college that I know of.
02:34:01.000 It's called Ralston College.
02:34:03.000 And a guy named Stephen Blackwell, he's founded the college.
02:34:08.000 And they are dedicated to sort of the enlightenment values.
02:34:13.000 And I wouldn't say they're like anti-woke.
02:34:16.000 They're just pro-debate truth.
02:34:20.000 Let's hash things out.
02:34:22.000 And so I'm hoping it gets some traction over there.
02:34:25.000 I think most of it's online.
02:34:26.000 I think there might be campus coming.
02:34:28.000 They've got accreditation programs.
02:34:30.000 And I'm hoping it becomes something.
02:34:32.000 It's one step to the alternative institutions.
02:34:35.000 Do you see as things get more and more crazy, there becomes more of a demand for articles, like the kind of articles that you write, or at least more enthusiasm behind the people that do agree with you or that are interested in these thoughts?
02:34:47.000 Yeah, more and more people are being aware of the problem.
02:34:50.000 For a lot of the time, they just didn't think it was an issue.
02:34:53.000 But I think, for example, Laurel Hubbard playing in the Olympics, if they win gold, like...
02:34:59.000 If they win gold.
02:35:02.000 If she wins gold.
02:35:05.000 A lot of people are going to wake up for that.
02:35:07.000 People are going to realize how insane this is.
02:35:11.000 I mean, the world can only get too close to idiocracy before people just shake it off, and then hopefully they can see essays like the ones I've written and other ones at Quillette.
02:35:21.000 I hope you're right.
02:35:22.000 I'm skeptical, though.
02:35:24.000 I think you can keep sliding.
02:35:25.000 So there's like, and I'm getting more partial to this, is the accelerationist view where just like let the crazy go.
02:35:33.000 And then once people realize the insanity that's unleashed on the world, then it'll quickly be stamped out because no one's just going to stand for that craziness.
02:35:43.000 Right now we're sort of doing this.
02:35:45.000 The craziness is just getting trickled in.
02:35:47.000 You know, sometimes it's more of a quicker flow.
02:35:49.000 Sometimes it's just a trickle.
02:35:52.000 But it prolongs the change and it might actually be more difficult to get out if it's slower than if it's faster.
02:35:58.000 I'm not sure which one I actually think is true, but I can see the proponents of the accelerationist approach.
02:36:06.000 I'm becoming more and more partial to that every day.
02:36:08.000 Well, the craziness is now attached to violence with things like Antifa, like what they've done to Portland and what was going on in Seattle.
02:36:15.000 It's like now the left-wing, radical left includes fire and weapons and all the other crazy shit that Portland has sort of embodied.
02:36:28.000 Portland's a wild place now.
02:36:30.000 It's almost unreal.
02:36:31.000 I see Andy Ngo's Twitter feed where he's just documenting that stuff every day and it's just like, this is every day.
02:36:38.000 How are they trying to extract him from a hotel to beat the shit out of him?
02:36:41.000 Yeah, I saw that.
02:36:42.000 He had to hide in a hotel?
02:36:43.000 He went back.
02:36:43.000 Yeah.
02:36:45.000 He can't do that by himself anymore.
02:36:47.000 Well, I don't know why he thinks he can infiltrate and wear a mask and sneak around with those people.
02:36:52.000 All they have to do is hear him talk.
02:36:54.000 And they go, hey.
02:36:55.000 Yeah.
02:36:57.000 He's going to...
02:36:58.000 I mean, he could have got killed at that last one.
02:36:59.000 They were trying to get in the hotel.
02:37:01.000 Well, he certainly could have gotten the fuck beaten out of him.
02:37:05.000 I mean, I don't know if they would have killed him.
02:37:07.000 They might have accidentally killed him.
02:37:08.000 It's just strange that they've become violent.
02:37:13.000 Like, the left, far left, like they're embodying these Marxist ideas and what you would think of.
02:37:20.000 I mean, and inclusiveness, right?
02:37:22.000 They're all about non-cruelty.
02:37:25.000 A lot of them are even vegan.
02:37:26.000 And yet they're super violent to get their point across.
02:37:30.000 And now the Portland mayor is like, turn them in.
02:37:36.000 Fuck defunding the police.
02:37:37.000 Call the police.
02:37:38.000 Get their photographs.
02:37:40.000 We've got to arrest them.
02:37:41.000 We've got to do something.
02:37:42.000 Yeah.
02:37:42.000 We've done an about-face for sure.
02:37:43.000 Crazy about-face.
02:37:45.000 Are they still letting people off for riding?
02:37:49.000 That was the big thing is they'd let them in and then they would just release them even if they're about to burn down a bank.
02:37:55.000 I don't know.
02:37:56.000 Do you have hope?
02:37:57.000 I do, yeah.
02:37:58.000 I see a lot of more people speaking up about this.
02:38:01.000 I think it's going to get worse before it gets better, but more and more people are speaking up and they're identifying the problem, and they're able to articulate the problem.
02:38:10.000 And I think we're still going to see the crazy go, but there's at least this other force that's beginning to push back.
02:38:16.000 And at some point, I don't know if it's maybe five years from now, I think we might start seeing some real change.
02:38:23.000 Five years from now?
02:38:24.000 Progress.
02:38:24.000 We have to wait five years?
02:38:26.000 I always say that I think the ideology isn't stable on itself, too, so it'll either just eat itself or a combination of people pushing back and it eating itself.
02:38:36.000 I just don't know how it comes back around.
02:38:38.000 I do think it's eating itself.
02:38:40.000 They are attacking themselves, and you really can't be woke enough.
02:38:44.000 They'll find someone who's not quite as woke as they are, and they attack that because it's a little status game they're playing.
02:38:50.000 Oh, yeah.
02:38:51.000 Big time.
02:38:51.000 In the whole article in here on the knitting wars on Instagram.
02:38:55.000 I mean, it was just one-upmanship.
02:38:59.000 What's the knitting wars?
02:39:01.000 So it started, I mentioned it a little bit earlier about someone who made a post on Instagram that they were going to India and that there was this dream that they always had and it was to them, they mentioned that it was like going to Mars.
02:39:14.000 And then someone said, you know, you're othering people.
02:39:17.000 This is like colonialist language.
02:39:18.000 And then so someone came to their defense and then they got canceled and then some big person in the knitting industry just didn't say anything about it and they came after her because the silence is violence type thing.
02:39:30.000 And it's just this snowball effect of there's no right response.
02:39:35.000 You can either say something or if you're silent, you're going to get canceled.
02:39:38.000 So it's just, yeah, these stories are everywhere.
02:39:41.000 It's unsustainable.
02:39:43.000 I don't see how it could be.
02:39:45.000 I think more people are getting sick of it.
02:39:46.000 I think in a lot of ways it's pushing a lot of people that were in the center or even left, but left, reasonable left.
02:39:56.000 It's pushing them towards the right because it makes them angry.
02:39:59.000 They don't feel like they belong anymore.
02:40:02.000 And then, you know, they find that the right is more accommodating to their ideas and they're willing to talk to them and they seem more reasonable in a lot of ways.
02:40:10.000 Yeah, I mean, I'm more comfortable talking to right-wing people because I can disagree with them, and they're okay with that.
02:40:17.000 Yeah.
02:40:17.000 I mean, that's...
02:40:18.000 You don't become a Nazi instantly.
02:40:20.000 Yeah, yeah.
02:40:20.000 Yeah.
02:40:21.000 Yeah, I mean, I've voted for Democrat my entire life.
02:40:25.000 Even the last election, I voted for Tulsi Gabbard.
02:40:27.000 I couldn't bring myself to do the Biden or Trump dichotomy.
02:40:29.000 I did Joe Jorgensen.
02:40:32.000 What was she about?
02:40:34.000 Libertarian.
02:40:35.000 Oh, okay.
02:40:35.000 Okay.
02:40:35.000 Yeah, I mean, that's more open.
02:40:38.000 I'd appreciate that more.
02:40:39.000 But I'm right there.
02:40:41.000 I'm almost about to vote Republican.
02:40:43.000 I don't think I could vote for Trump if he was running again.
02:40:47.000 I couldn't vote for Trump if he was running again.
02:40:49.000 I think he's just a toxic figure.
02:40:51.000 But if someone like DeSantis was running, I would probably vote...
02:40:55.000 I would vote for him.
02:40:57.000 Yeah, he seems a really reasonable alternative to a lot of the nonsense woke bullshit.
02:41:04.000 Yeah.
02:41:05.000 And I haven't changed in my views either.
02:41:07.000 I used to be what I consider on the left, and then the left just expanded out, and now relative to where the left is now, I've just sort of crossed over the threshold.
02:41:18.000 But I still have the same beliefs and values that I've had when I was voting for Democrats.
02:41:24.000 Let's talk again in a few years and see if anything has changed.
02:41:27.000 I'll be a Trumper or something, huh?
02:41:29.000 You might be!
02:41:31.000 So the book?
02:41:33.000 The book is Panics and Persecutions by Quillette.
02:41:38.000 And it's various authors writing essays.
02:41:41.000 20 Tales of Excommunication in the Digital Age.
02:41:43.000 So just all the little nooks and cranny stories you've probably never heard of, of just how pervasive a lot of the cancel culture is.
02:41:50.000 Just because you don't hear the stories on the news doesn't mean it's not affecting people's lives.
02:41:54.000 And so it's an important book, I think, a compendium of just these everyday stories from people who might not make the news, but it's still big in their life and it's important to look at.
02:42:07.000 And then also, if anyone's interested...
02:42:10.000 On the whole sex and gender thing, I have a substack that's reality's last stand.
02:42:14.000 I do a weekly news write-up on the new stuff that's coming out in the realm of sex denial, which is getting hard to maintain because there is just so much insanity every single week.
02:42:26.000 But if you want to take a look at that, please subscribe to that.
02:42:31.000 You might want to drink this before you do it.
02:42:33.000 Drink some honey shine.
02:42:34.000 I wish I had enough to give everybody.
02:42:36.000 Do you sell it?
02:42:37.000 I don't.
02:42:38.000 No, it's already not allowed to be made.
02:42:41.000 And so if I sold it, it would be a double whammy.
02:42:46.000 Well, don't get double whammyed.
02:42:48.000 All right.
02:42:49.000 Thank you, Colin.
02:42:49.000 Appreciate it.
02:42:50.000 And tell your mom I said thanks for the beef jerky, too.
02:42:52.000 It was very nice.
02:42:53.000 She'll love hearing it.
02:42:54.000 All right.
02:42:54.000 Bye, everybody.