The Joe Rogan Experience - January 24, 2017


Joe Rogan Experience #904 - Gary Taubes


Episode Stats

Length

2 hours and 21 minutes

Words per Minute

180.66353

Word Count

25,594

Sentence Count

1,906

Misogynist Sentences

28

Hate Speech Sentences

15


Summary

In this episode, I talk with Nobel Prize winner and science writer Gary Sick about his new book, The Case Against Sugar, and how he became a science writer, and why he thinks sugar should be banned. We talk about how he got into science, why he started writing about it, and what it s like to be a Nobel Laureate. And we talk about why he decided to quit eating sugar. This episode was produced and edited by Annie-Rose Strasser and Alex Blumberg. Our theme song is Come Alone by Suneaters, courtesy of Lotuspool Records. Our ad music is by Build Buildings. The music for this episode was made by Micah Vellian and Haley Shaw, and our ad music was written and performed by Mark Phillips. It was edited by Matthew Boll. Music by Ian Dorsch. Additional music written and produced by Daniel Gulati. Special thanks to Mark Phillips and his band, The Electric Light Orchestra. Thanks to our sponsor, Zapsplat Records, for providing the sound design and engineering, and to my good friend, Kevin McLeod, for producing the music for the intro and outro music, and thanks to the production of the theme song, "Sugar" by the band, "Goodbye Outer Space" by Jeff Perla, and the rest of the band "Incomptech" and "I'm Too Effing Highlight" by The Weakerthans, for the beatboxing, and "Feat. and "The Case Against" by Dervish, and we're All Outtropeepers, for sending us out to you! and we hope you enjoy it. Thank you for listening to this episode of Gimlet, we really appreciate it. We really do. -- Thank you so much for tuning in, we appreciate you, we're so much, we'll see you, you're amazing, we can't do it, we love you, thank you, Thank you, We're So Good, We'll See You, Thank You, We Love You, and We'll Talkin' You, You're Great, We've Got it, We Say It, We Can't Do It, Good Luck, and You're Good, Good Relationships, Good Night, Good Blessings, Good Life, Good Morning, Good Day, Good Talk, Good Love, Good Nights, Good Dreams, and Goodbye, Goodbye, Good Rest, Good Thoughts, Good N Night, and Good Night.


Transcript

00:00:03.000 Three, two, one.
00:00:08.000 Boom.
00:00:08.000 And we're live.
00:00:09.000 Hello, Gary.
00:00:09.000 Hi, Joe.
00:00:10.000 Thanks for coming, man.
00:00:11.000 Appreciate it.
00:00:12.000 My pleasure.
00:00:12.000 The case against sugar.
00:00:14.000 Yeah.
00:00:14.000 This is, for me, this is a...
00:00:16.000 I don't know how to put this any other way.
00:00:20.000 I've...
00:00:21.000 I've kind of consumed sugar most of my life until the last couple of years, and I slowly sort of tapered off, and about a year ago, maybe last February or so, I just pretty much cut it all out, except for the occasional dessert here or there.
00:00:37.000 Infinitely better quality of life.
00:00:39.000 I feel much better.
00:00:40.000 I have more energy and then I started really getting into it and then I came across your work and What I want to know is first of all, how did you get involved in this and how much resistance have you faced?
00:00:52.000 Okay, this being the sugar case this being the whole obesity diet nutrition We can get into all of it, but the Sugar one, to me, is absolutely fascinating when you go down.
00:01:03.000 I mean, have you seen that Sugar movie?
00:01:05.000 Yeah, yeah, and I'm probably in it, I think.
00:01:08.000 I think you are.
00:01:08.000 I think I'm one of the talking cereal boxes.
00:01:10.000 Oh, okay, right.
00:01:12.000 I watched it with my kids.
00:01:14.000 I made my kids watch it, and it's amazing when a six-year-old watches something like that, and then they go, why is Sugar in everything?
00:01:21.000 Yeah.
00:01:22.000 You know, it's funny, because my kids live with this all the time, right?
00:01:27.000 We had just come back from spending the holidays with my grandmother, who pumps them up with sugar while we're there, and there's nothing I can do with it.
00:01:34.000 And then we get back, and I'm making my boys dinner.
00:01:37.000 They're 8 and 11, and my wife's out.
00:01:40.000 And after the dinner, my 8-year-old says, are we getting dessert?
00:01:43.000 And my 11-year-old goes, Nick, it's Dad, man.
00:01:46.000 Are you crazy?
00:01:48.000 Yeah.
00:01:50.000 Wake up, son.
00:01:52.000 Anyway, I got into this, you know, I Okay, I was a physics major in college.
00:01:57.000 I was like hard science, and then I wasn't any good at it.
00:02:00.000 I got a C- in quantum physics, and my advisor suggested I find another career.
00:02:04.000 So I went into journalism, started doing science writing in the early 80s because it was the only work I could get.
00:02:10.000 And then my first book, I went to live at CERN, the big particle accelerator lab outside of Geneva, and I was what we would call today embedded with the physicists.
00:02:20.000 And I thought I was going to be following and making this great discovery, which is what the Nobel laureate who ran the experiment was predicting.
00:02:27.000 And instead, I spent 10 months watching them figure out how they had screwed up, okay?
00:02:31.000 And it was a learning experience in how to do science right, and I was obsessed with how hard it is to do good science.
00:02:37.000 And I had a lot of the physicists in the world really didn't like this Nobel laureate, so they were happy to point out to me how he was screwing up, and how he had screwed up in the past, and how he had even screwed up the work that he won the Nobel Prize for.
00:02:51.000 After I came back, I thought that was actually page six in the New York Post when my book came out.
00:02:57.000 The headline was, Egghead Squabble Over Nobel Prize, and this Nobel laureate was quoted calling me an asshole in the newspaper, and I'm 29 years old, and I assume my career's over.
00:03:08.000 What was he calling you an asshole over?
00:03:09.000 Well, because I ended up writing an expose about what a bad scientist he was and about the politics of science.
00:03:14.000 You know, I thought I was...
00:03:15.000 I went to Stockholm with this guy when he won the Nobel Prize.
00:03:19.000 I mean, we got our tuxes fitted together.
00:03:21.000 I was his guest at the Nobel dinner and the Nobel banquet and the party that follows, which is the most fun I've ever had in my life.
00:03:29.000 Students of Stockholm throw a party for the laureates, and it's...
00:03:33.000 Back then, it was crazy.
00:03:37.000 Anyway, so he was...
00:03:39.000 I'm justifiably pissed off that I just wrote what I saw instead of what a great man he thought he was.
00:03:44.000 And I thought my career was going to be over, right?
00:03:47.000 You're called an asshole in the papers when you're a 29-year-old journalist by a Nobel laureate.
00:03:51.000 But instead, everybody I would interview in science would say, oh, you think that guy was bad?
00:03:56.000 You should write about this guy.
00:03:57.000 And I just started covering different aspects.
00:04:01.000 And it turns out...
00:04:02.000 You could get a long way in science if you're willing to sort of cut corners.
00:04:07.000 It's not actually cheating.
00:04:09.000 It's just you could discover a lot of stuff if you're not willing to do the rigorous, hard, critical, skeptical work to demonstrate that what you say you've discovered is wrong.
00:04:19.000 Okay, so I wrote a book about something called Cold Fusion, which was a great scientific fiasco of the 20th century, except for the stuff I'm writing about now.
00:04:30.000 And some of my friends in the physics community said, if you're interested in bad science, the book was called Bad Science, they said you should look at the stuff in public health because it's terrible.
00:04:39.000 And so I moved into public health, beginning with this idea that electromagnetic fields from power lines will cause brain cancer or leukemia.
00:04:47.000 And everything I had learned about how rigorous and meticulous and skeptical and thoughtful you had to do to get the right answer in physics, the public health people didn't think you had to do.
00:05:00.000 They thought it was kind of a luxury because their science is harder.
00:05:03.000 And it is kind of harder.
00:05:04.000 You're dealing with, like, Chronic diseases that happen over decades, and people, and messy systems, and you can't measure anything.
00:05:12.000 And everything I had learned was that if you don't do this stuff, you get the wrong answer.
00:05:16.000 So by the late 90s, I had stumbled into nutrition research.
00:05:21.000 And this is maybe a longer story than you wanted.
00:05:23.000 No, go ahead.
00:05:25.000 I was living here in Venice, California.
00:05:28.000 I was freelancing for the journal Science.
00:05:30.000 I was what's called a contributing correspondent and I needed a paycheck to pay my rent.
00:05:35.000 So I called my editor and I said, what do you got?
00:05:37.000 What kind of story could I turn over quickly?
00:05:40.000 And he said there was a diet study that was coming out in the New England Journal of Medicine in two weeks, and they wanted to do an article about it.
00:05:48.000 And what I didn't know was that this diet study had been leaked to science in advance.
00:05:52.000 And the person who had leaked it had given him a list of sources to talk to.
00:05:57.000 And who leaks a diet study, right?
00:05:59.000 And this was a DASH diet, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension, which is the most...
00:06:05.000 Today, U.S. News& World Report says it's the healthiest diet in the world, based on You know, like force studies that did not demonstrate anything.
00:06:17.000 The way you do those stories as a journalist is you interview the principal investigator and you ask him who to talk to, and he gives you a couple names to talk to who can talk about the study even though it's published, and then you get three interviews, which is enough to justify a page in the magazine, and you get your paycheck.
00:06:33.000 So I interviewed the PI, and then I interviewed one of the people on the list of documents that had been leaked to science.
00:06:40.000 And that was a former president of the American Heart Association, and she told me she couldn't talk about the study or she'd lose her funding.
00:06:48.000 And I said, come on, man, this isn't Lysenko-era Soviet Union.
00:06:52.000 People don't lose their funding for talking to a journalist about a diet study.
00:06:56.000 And she refused to talk to me.
00:06:58.000 I said, let's go off the record, complete confidentiality.
00:07:01.000 If I'm going to miss the story, That you're not telling me that's bad.
00:07:05.000 Couldn't get her to talk.
00:07:07.000 And then I call one of the people that the PI told me to talk to.
00:07:10.000 And he sounded exactly like Walter Matthau on the other side of the telephone.
00:07:14.000 It was very weird.
00:07:16.000 And Walter starts yelling at me that there's no controversy over salt and high blood pressure.
00:07:21.000 And I'm going, but Walter, I'm not calling about salt and high blood pressure.
00:07:24.000 I'm calling about this DASH diet coming out.
00:07:27.000 And he keeps going on.
00:07:29.000 There's no controversy.
00:07:30.000 There's no evidence that salt doesn't cause high blood pressure.
00:07:33.000 So I get off the phone.
00:07:34.000 I call up my editor.
00:07:35.000 I say, I'm going to finish the story.
00:07:38.000 But I had this former AHA president say she couldn't talk to me and she'd lose her funding.
00:07:42.000 And then I had Walter Matthau yelling at me that there's no controversy over salt and high blood pressure.
00:07:49.000 There must be a controversy over whether salt causes high blood pressure, right?
00:07:53.000 So I'm going to turn this story in, pay my rent, and then I spent the next nine months doing an investigation for science.
00:07:59.000 I interviewed, I think, 85 sources for one magazine article.
00:08:03.000 Got paid for like six weeks.
00:08:05.000 Pissed off my fiancee at the time because she thought if she's going to date someone, they should have a better sort of, you know, work efficiency ratio.
00:08:17.000 The conclusion was that the only way you would believe that salt causes high blood pressure from the studies that had been done to that point was if God told you so personally.
00:08:27.000 So you could ignore all the evidence and all the randomized controlled trials, even the observational evidence, But that's what everyone had done.
00:08:36.000 Well, how did this start?
00:08:37.000 Because I had heard that before as well.
00:08:40.000 Everybody's heard that before.
00:08:41.000 And I had read a long time ago that that was bullshit.
00:08:43.000 And that salt is actually an essential mineral, and it's important for your body, and it doesn't cause high blood pressure, and there's a host of other factors that should be considered.
00:08:52.000 So it was, yeah, that's the thing.
00:08:54.000 It was kind of intuitively, it was an interesting idea.
00:08:57.000 It made biological sense.
00:08:58.000 When you consume salt, you also have to take in water.
00:09:01.000 That's why they feed you pretzels and, you know, salty peanuts at bars because you want to take in liquids so that you can maintain the same sodium concentration in your blood because you're...
00:09:13.000 The cells, like the chemical reactions that drive your cells, are dependent on the sodium ratio in the cells.
00:09:19.000 So if you take in more salt, you're going to drink more fluid, and you're going to have more fluid in your circulation.
00:09:26.000 That's going to increase your blood pressure.
00:09:28.000 And it does happen in a very short term.
00:09:31.000 But the question is, is this a chronic cause of high blood pressure and hypertension?
00:09:37.000 And once the researchers decided it was, and these guys are terrible scientists.
00:09:41.000 I mean, I hate to say this, but in my first book, Good Calories, Bad Calories, in the epilogue, I point out, I say, you know, I never use the word scientist to describe any of these people doing research, except for a few specific examples, because they don't really understand what science is and how to do it.
00:09:57.000 And they weren't, to their defense, they just were never taught how to be scientists.
00:10:01.000 They were like physicians and scientists.
00:10:04.000 Nutritionists who, you know, had a sloppy scientific training and they thought it was easy and you get a hypothesis and you confirm the hypothesis.
00:10:11.000 And when they didn't confirm it, they thought it must be true anyway.
00:10:15.000 And then you find the data when people talk about cherry picking.
00:10:18.000 That means you find the data that does sort of confirm and you ignore the rest.
00:10:25.000 So, anyway, that was it.
00:10:26.000 I wrote this article.
00:10:27.000 It was called The Political Science of Salt.
00:10:29.000 You know, won some awards.
00:10:31.000 And while I was doing that, this Walter Matthau character took credit not just for getting Americans to eat less salt, putting us on this low-salt diet, he took credit for getting us on the low-fat diet that we were all eating in the 90s.
00:10:45.000 And I got off the phone with them, called my editor of science, and I said, when I'm done writing about salt, I'm going to write about fat.
00:10:51.000 I have no idea what the story is, but this guy's clearly one of the five worst scientists I've ever interviewed in my life.
00:10:58.000 And everything I learned in my physics period was that bad scientists never get the right answer.
00:11:05.000 So I spent a year doing an investigation for the journal Science on dietary fat.
00:11:10.000 That paid for about two months.
00:11:13.000 Seems to be a trend here.
00:11:15.000 Yeah, it was bad.
00:11:17.000 No, it's good.
00:11:18.000 Well, it's good.
00:11:19.000 You've got to do that to get the right answer.
00:11:21.000 And that's why so much journalism is so shallow, is because if you're going to put in the time you get paid for, all you can do is a shallow job.
00:11:29.000 Nobody can afford to do that.
00:11:31.000 I actually had corporate jobs that allowed me...
00:11:34.000 You know, like writing speeches and press releases for IBM that, you know, I really hated doing, but that paid well.
00:11:41.000 Like, that was my corporate work, so I could do the pro bono stuff I cared about.
00:11:45.000 Anyway, that story was the same, unless God told you personally.
00:11:50.000 So, I end up doing this cover story for the New York Times Magazine called What If It's All Been a Big Fat Lie, which came out July 2002. It was probably...
00:12:01.000 One of the top five most controversial articles they ever ran.
00:12:05.000 And the idea was, I wanted to see what caused the obesity epidemic.
00:12:09.000 That was what I pitched to the editor.
00:12:12.000 But we had this idea that you get fat from eating dietary fat.
00:12:15.000 That was actually the primary logic behind putting the country on low-fat diets.
00:12:20.000 They thought it might help heart disease, but they hadn't been able to show it in trials.
00:12:24.000 But they just assumed if we ate less fat, we'd lose weight, because fat's denser calories.
00:12:30.000 And there was always this competing hypothesis that had been buried and swept aside and ignored and, you know, inhibited, which was that the problem is the carbohydrates, particularly sugar and refined grains.
00:12:43.000 And so when I got this cover story, I got a big book advance.
00:12:47.000 Finally, I could afford to do the book I wanted.
00:12:50.000 It paid for four years of my life.
00:12:52.000 The book took five.
00:12:54.000 Again...
00:12:56.000 Same financial issues, but...
00:12:58.000 And I love it, because people accused me of, like, I was just going to write anything I could find for a paycheck, and I finally got a big paycheck, and so now...
00:13:06.000 One of the ideas there that emerged out of my research...
00:13:12.000 So even when I wrote the 2002 piece, I thought that we got fat because we ate too much.
00:13:16.000 You know, there's a line in that article, obesity, of course, is caused by consuming too many calories, more calories than we consume.
00:13:24.000 So...
00:13:25.000 By the time I was done with this book, I thought that was one of the most inane scientific ideas that had ever come along.
00:13:31.000 I mean, it's almost incomprehensible to me.
00:13:33.000 Even though I know exactly the history of the idea and where it came from and why we believed it, it's just crazy naive.
00:13:40.000 So that's the one that I get the feedback on.
00:13:45.000 Because I'm out there saying, so 99% of obesity researchers and nutritionists and all our public health policy is based fundamentally on this concept that we get fat because we eat too much or we're too sedentary.
00:13:59.000 And what I was saying was not only is that naive and meaningless, it's a description, it's not an explanation, and we could go into that.
00:14:08.000 Clearly obesity is a hormonal metabolic defect, and in fact the best scientists of the world prior to World War II, the best, far and away the best medical science was done in Germany and Austria, in Europe.
00:14:18.000 Like the U.S. was a backwater of medical science until post-war.
00:14:22.000 It was a backwater of virtually all science.
00:14:26.000 And these guys had concluded that obesity had to be a metabolic hormonal defect.
00:14:31.000 But the American doctors were saying, oh man, saying obesity is hormonal is an excuse for fat people to not eat in moderation and run marathons like a saline people do.
00:14:43.000 And what I did is I brought that hypothesis sort of—it vanished with the war, literally evaporated with the war.
00:14:50.000 The German-Austrian medical community evaporated.
00:14:52.000 We wanted nothing to do with these researchers.
00:14:55.000 The Ivy League universities had policies in place to keep from being overrun by Jewish academicians from Europe.
00:15:02.000 So in physics, we embraced them because we had bombs to build and a Cold War to fight.
00:15:06.000 But in medicine and public health, we wanted nothing to do with them.
00:15:09.000 So this hypothesis evaporates.
00:15:12.000 And post-war, you get this creation of basically obesity research created de novo by these young doctors who have no scientific training, who are lean, who hate the Germans.
00:15:25.000 So they're not going to quote the German literature, even if they read it.
00:15:29.000 We're good to go.
00:15:39.000 The overconsumption problem.
00:15:40.000 By the 1960s, the field is dominated by psychologists and psychiatrists who are studying ways to get obese people to just stop eating so damn much.
00:15:50.000 They didn't try to make them exercise back then.
00:15:52.000 That was a kind of torture they would push later.
00:15:55.000 So this was the thing I get feedback on.
00:15:57.000 This is where I'm saying, you know, the entire medical, nutritional, obesity, diabetes dogma is based on just a bad idea.
00:16:09.000 You know, a failed paradigm.
00:16:11.000 And, you know, who's going to accept that coming from a journalist?
00:16:15.000 So the answer is either, you know, I'm an idiot or I'm self-interested and I'm only making this up to get a paycheck or, you know, I'm just wrong.
00:16:25.000 When you see what's going on now where it's pretty much common knowledge that sugar is terrible for you and that added sugar is a huge factor in diabetes and hypertension and heart disease and obesity and it's pretty much across the board now.
00:16:43.000 Do you feel vindicated?
00:16:45.000 Here's the thing.
00:16:47.000 Even though there are public health organizations that are now saying, you know, got to cut back on the sugar and putting limits on sugar consumption, the logic is still that it's just empty calories.
00:16:59.000 The logic by who, though?
00:17:00.000 The public health authorities, the researchers...
00:17:04.000 Why do they lag so far behind?
00:17:06.000 Because this is fascinating to me because I understand that there must be a guy like you who does what's kind of ridiculous and spends nine months on six weeks worth of pay and does that kind of shit because otherwise once an idea is clearly established and gets repeated like salt causes hypertension I mean,
00:17:23.000 goddammit, if you ask the average person on the street, hey, does salt cause high blood pressure?
00:17:27.000 Oh, yeah.
00:17:28.000 They just say it because it's like sort of this peripheral idea.
00:17:31.000 They hear it in the distance.
00:17:32.000 They don't research it.
00:17:33.000 They don't really look into it very far other than maybe they read something somewhere at one point in time and then they just decide it's dogma.
00:17:40.000 Right.
00:17:40.000 And they repeat it.
00:17:41.000 It's incredibly difficult once an idea like that gets established in our society to eradicate it.
00:17:49.000 Right.
00:17:50.000 I mean, this is the thing.
00:17:51.000 It's sort of when you live in a community, in an institution where everybody believes exactly what you do.
00:17:56.000 And so the people you respect, I mean, think about it.
00:17:59.000 The people you respect are the people who think like you do, who agree with you on the important points because you think, oh, they're smart.
00:18:04.000 They get it just like I get it.
00:18:06.000 So institutions sort of...
00:18:09.000 Collect groupthink.
00:18:09.000 It's just a natural emergent phenomenon from institutions.
00:18:13.000 And now, if you look at the data, you're somebody like me and you come along and you say, I don't really buy this idea.
00:18:20.000 It's just empty calories.
00:18:22.000 So I'm going to look at the data and see what it says.
00:18:24.000 And now you try to convince You're friends that they're wrong, and now you're the heretic, and you're the one who's saying, and you know, you're getting in arguments with people, and they make people uncomfortable because you're trying to get them to change their minds about something they all believe.
00:18:39.000 And they've all been, you know, they're successful, they're promoted, they're leaders in their field because they believed this, and now you're telling them it's that.
00:18:49.000 And people do it.
00:18:51.000 But the this just keeps going and going and going, and even to the point...
00:18:55.000 I mean, just when my sugar book came out, there's a book called The Secret Life of Fat, written by a PhD, and it's...
00:19:04.000 It's as though everything I've done in the past 15 years just was never done.
00:19:08.000 Like somehow she managed to do an entire book on dietary fat where if anyone said to her, talk to Taubes, even if he's wrong, his ideas are worth hearing because they're provocative and interesting.
00:19:20.000 I'm not so sure he's wrong.
00:19:21.000 She decided not to do it.
00:19:24.000 So it's sort of...
00:19:25.000 Do you have the...
00:19:25.000 To what was her conclusion?
00:19:28.000 Effectively, it all comes back effectively to energy balance.
00:19:32.000 You could talk about overconsumption.
00:19:39.000 This is what dogmas do.
00:19:41.000 They reproduce themselves.
00:19:43.000 They continue to grow.
00:19:45.000 They're like tumors for that fact.
00:19:46.000 They basically fight off all challenges.
00:19:49.000 They absorb around them.
00:19:51.000 You know, so somebody starts saying it's something else.
00:19:55.000 Eventually, ideally, everything changes.
00:19:57.000 So we're definitely winning the sugar battle.
00:19:59.000 So in sugar, even though the official word is it's empty calories, we just have to consume less because they have this dogma that obesity is caused by consuming too many calories.
00:20:10.000 So the way that a food influences your body mass is through its caloric content or how much of those calories you digest and absorb because if it's got fiber, you'll excrete some.
00:20:22.000 And that's the wisdom.
00:20:24.000 If a calorie is a calorie, then the worst you could say about sugar is that it's empty calories.
00:20:28.000 It's got no vitamins and minerals, micronutrients attached, and so we consume too much of it.
00:20:33.000 People say it's the low-hanging fruit.
00:20:36.000 So it's not that it's uniquely toxic, because if it's uniquely toxic, if it actually causes disease, and we could talk about clearly what I'm saying it causes, Then a calorie isn't a calorie.
00:20:47.000 When you started doing this research and you started writing this book, The Case Against Sugar, when this was all unfolding in front of you, were you shocked?
00:20:58.000 I mean, is this something that you were saying, how am I, a guy who got a C plus and a C minus, sorry.
00:21:05.000 I'm trying to pump you up.
00:21:07.000 I'm trying to pump you up.
00:21:09.000 I mean, how am I the guy who's figuring this out?
00:21:12.000 How is this?
00:21:13.000 Okay, so I understood why, but it is weird, because again, you know, sometimes I was in Washington on my book tour, and I had dinner with the former chief science medical officer of the American Diabetes Association.
00:21:27.000 It's a very, you know, influential, high-ranking, successful man.
00:21:31.000 He's completely convinced that I'm wrong.
00:21:34.000 And I said, but you believe this thing that obesity is caused by eating too much, and you have no idea why you believe it.
00:21:40.000 So I can tell you exactly the history of that belief.
00:21:44.000 Just like if we were talking about relativity, we could go back to Einstein, and you would know about Einstein.
00:21:50.000 And even if we were talking quantum physics, we'd go back to Heisenberg and Schrodinger and, you know, Bohr, and you'd know about them.
00:21:56.000 But this belief that you're fundamentally arguing is right, you don't understand where it comes from, and I can tell you that.
00:22:03.000 And I'm going to give you the documents.
00:22:04.000 I'm going to give you the papers where it out-competes the hormonal metabolic idea.
00:22:08.000 And I'm going to give you the competing hypothesis that you didn't even know existed until you and I talked.
00:22:15.000 You started reading my stuff.
00:22:16.000 And it has zero influence on how this guy thinks.
00:22:19.000 He's so convinced he's right.
00:22:21.000 That's terrifying.
00:22:22.000 That's terrifying when someone has that kind of influence over the American people.
00:22:25.000 Well, and this is the thing.
00:22:26.000 You want somebody to at least say...
00:22:30.000 Jesus, you know, I never thought of that.
00:22:31.000 Let me, at least have, let me read these and get back to you, is what you want him to do.
00:22:36.000 The problem, of course, is that if he agrees to this, and then he agrees that you're correct, everything that he's been saying up until now has been bullshit, and he's been misleading people.
00:22:44.000 He has to apologize, he has to...
00:22:46.000 Well, then once you do that, you don't, you lose your credit.
00:22:49.000 Like, ideally, in science, you're, you know, the best scientists are the ones who say, you know, I was just wrong.
00:22:54.000 Right.
00:22:55.000 And then, but...
00:22:55.000 How rare are they?
00:22:57.000 Rare.
00:22:57.000 Actually, when I was growing up, the estimate was 5% of the scientific community actually does good science, and the other 95% are sort of the chaff out of which you've got to get the wheat.
00:23:09.000 Yeah, I mean, it's a problem.
00:23:11.000 I used to joke, imagine the American Heart Association writing the press release to say, like, we were wrong about putting everybody on a low-fat diet, and it was a mistake, and we're sorry, and we apologize, and maybe we killed some of your relatives prematurely, maybe the reason you're fat and diabetic now is because of our advice,
00:23:29.000 but...
00:23:30.000 We got it right now.
00:23:31.000 They won't do it.
00:23:32.000 You can't do it.
00:23:33.000 That's fucking crazy.
00:23:34.000 Public health, it's just they can't do it.
00:23:36.000 It's an untenable, I mean, I'll say the same thing.
00:23:39.000 If I'm wrong in my book, I used to have this argument with my co-founder of this nutrition science initiative, this not-for-profit, and I'd say, you know what I'm saying?
00:23:48.000 If I'm wrong in the major arguments in this book, I mean, clearly I'm going to be wrong in some of the minor ones and, you know, Chip away here and their bad scholarship that I should have triple checked.
00:23:58.000 But if I'm wrong in the major arguments, I need a new line of work because I can't trust my judgment.
00:24:03.000 And everything I do as an investigative journalist is dependent on me being able to trust my judgment.
00:24:09.000 And if I'm wrong about this, like if I'm wrong about energy balance, I got to go sell shoes.
00:24:14.000 You know, there's no way around it.
00:24:16.000 But this is I lost track.
00:24:22.000 What were we saying?
00:24:23.000 What was the question?
00:24:25.000 I talked too much.
00:24:27.000 Well, I was asking you, first of all, what is it like to have this understanding that all of what's being told to the American people is wrong, and then you having this conversation with this guy.
00:24:40.000 How do I do it?
00:24:41.000 How do I get in this?
00:24:42.000 So, let me tell you why.
00:24:44.000 I was able to do it.
00:24:45.000 And again, I was the first person who ever did it.
00:24:48.000 It's just that simple.
00:24:49.000 No one had ever done before what I'd done.
00:24:52.000 It was the timing.
00:24:53.000 First of all, I'm an obsessive researcher.
00:24:56.000 As you know, the 145 people I interviewed for the fat story for one magazine article, I just keep asking questions and probing and probing until every...
00:25:05.000 I also don't like writing, so it's a great research.
00:25:07.000 It's a procrastination tool.
00:25:09.000 But when I started this in 2002 and I got the money to do the book, the internet had come along.
00:25:14.000 And the internet made it possible to find every single primary source going back to the 19th century.
00:25:21.000 Like now you can almost download them.
00:25:23.000 But back then I had researchers, young students in Boston, New York, LA, whose only job was they'd get an email from me with 50 citations.
00:25:32.000 And then they'd go to the library and have to find all 50 and Xerox them and then ship them back to me.
00:25:38.000 Sometimes entire books from like You know, a 1917 diabetes textbook that I couldn't find or I couldn't buy.
00:25:47.000 And used bookstores had put their catalogs online.
00:25:52.000 So you could find all the books and, you know, some 1947 obesity conference.
00:25:59.000 The library that has it doesn't see any purpose for that anymore, so they basically give it to the local bookstore and you can buy it for seven bucks.
00:26:06.000 So I was able to recreate the history of obesity research from conference proceedings Where the only people doing research in the field would show up and they would present their findings and then they would do a proceedings of the findings and I could recreate all the thinking in the field and nobody had ever bothered to do it before.
00:26:25.000 And it's kind of, if they were good scientists they would have.
00:26:30.000 Because they would have been obsessed with where their beliefs came from, and they would have been questioning them, and one of the things they would have done is gone back to do all this to see if some assumption they believe is true is really based on fact.
00:26:43.000 But again, they didn't really know what science was.
00:26:46.000 They weren't all that curious, is one way to put it.
00:26:50.000 That's so terrifying.
00:26:52.000 It is.
00:27:20.000 Well, and you also rely on, I mean, so they read the review articles.
00:27:24.000 And the reviewers, the editors of the journals want to get influential review articles.
00:27:29.000 So they ask influential people in the field to do the review articles.
00:27:32.000 And those people are very busy, but they're going to do it.
00:27:35.000 And they're going to basically, they became influential by believing the conventional wisdom and propagating the conventional wisdom.
00:27:42.000 When you have committees do investigations, so every five years you get the dietary, the USDA puts together a committee to reassess the dietary guidelines that they give out.
00:27:53.000 So the way that committees are formed, the USDA picks a very influential person, the most influential they get to be the head of the committee, and that's somebody who's believed that conventional wisdom has propagated their whole life.
00:28:05.000 That's how they became influential.
00:28:06.000 And that person picks people they respect To be on the committee, and of course the people they respect are the people who believe what they believe, because they're the ones who seem smart.
00:28:15.000 They're not the heretics, they're the believers.
00:28:19.000 So you end up with a, you start out just with a natural quest.
00:28:22.000 We want to know if the guidelines are correct.
00:28:24.000 And through this completely natural human process, you end up staffing the guide, creating a committee that's going to recapitulate the Convention of Wisdom.
00:28:33.000 Almost a hundred percent.
00:28:34.000 And it's just the way things happen.
00:28:38.000 You need people like me to come across every once in a while, assuming I'm right.
00:28:43.000 It's better when the people like me are right than when they're wrong, but you're going to get both types.
00:28:47.000 And we've got to come along.
00:28:48.000 We have to have the persistence, you know, to basically just keep doing what we do.
00:28:53.000 I was lucky that I also had this podium.
00:28:55.000 The New York Times Magazine editors trusted me and liked my work.
00:28:59.000 The science editors trusted me and thought I was really good so I could get in influential publications.
00:29:04.000 I didn't have to You know, publish, do a blog, and try to win people over.
00:29:12.000 But from their perspective, I mean, it's just, what do you do with someone like me?
00:29:17.000 And I argue, look, I've done this research.
00:29:21.000 You haven't.
00:29:21.000 I mean, another way to think about it, I once said, look, you know, we've got these obesity and diabetes epidemics worldwide.
00:29:27.000 I mean, it should be horrifying to people, okay?
00:29:32.000 And fairly recent, in terms of human history.
00:29:35.000 In terms of human history.
00:29:36.000 So, again, one of the things I did in the case against sugar is I went back To find the very beginnings of the epidemic in the United States.
00:29:43.000 Because if you've got an epidemic, like if we had a Zika epidemic, Ebola, what do you do?
00:29:47.000 You don't try to figure out what's causing Ebola by looking at the patients who are getting off the airplane in Houston or showing up in the hospital in New Jersey.
00:29:55.000 You go back to Africa where it's densest and where it started and you could follow it to whatever animal got bit by whatever insect in whatever cave.
00:30:04.000 And that's a natural process of understanding an epidemic.
00:30:08.000 So you go back here, and you go back to the 19th century, and there are hospitals in the United States that, you know, date to pre-1850 or 1864 in the case of Philadelphia Hospital in Pennsylvania, and that their records,
00:30:24.000 anyway.
00:30:24.000 And you can ask the archivists to go back.
00:30:27.000 They still have their case records from the 19th century.
00:30:31.000 And you can have the archivist pull up the case records and they will tell you how many cases of diabetes were diagnosed in the hospitals.
00:30:41.000 Any year for me.
00:30:43.000 Like in Mass General Hospital in Boston, the records start in 1824. Today, one in 11 Americans are diabetic, okay?
00:30:51.000 And there are some populations, like Native American populations, where one in two adults are diabetic.
00:30:57.000 Jesus Christ.
00:30:58.000 In Boston, in Mass General Hospital, the leading hospital in the country, in Massachusetts in the 19th century, there were year after year after year where they had zero cases of diabetes.
00:31:08.000 And this is a terrible disease without insulin.
00:31:11.000 It's not a pleasure with it, but before insulin was discovered, I mean, you go blind, kidney failure, gangrene, amputation.
00:31:18.000 It's not a difficult diagnosis.
00:31:21.000 Now, there are other reasons to explain the absence.
00:31:24.000 I mean, You know, the only people who showed up in hospitals back in the 19th century were poor people, and poor people ate a lot less sugar than rich people.
00:31:33.000 And rich people got their own private doctors, so they might not have shown up in the medical records.
00:31:39.000 So you've got to always be skeptical of what you think you're learning, because that's what science is.
00:31:45.000 But, you know, the point I'm making is I went through the effort to do this one way or the other.
00:31:51.000 And that gives me a certain advantage that they don't have.
00:31:55.000 And if they're good scientists, regardless of what they believe, they'll say to themselves, geez, you know, I never thought of this.
00:32:02.000 I never did that.
00:32:02.000 I could think of Ray's Taubes as wrong, but maybe I should look into it.
00:32:07.000 So where did it all start?
00:32:08.000 So in the U.S. it starts again in the second half of the 18th, 19th century.
00:32:13.000 And it starts coincidental with an explosion in sugar consumption, not just in how much sugar we're consuming, but who's consuming it, which is what's fascinating and scary.
00:32:25.000 Go back, say, 200 years, 1810, 1815, we were probably eating about five pounds of sugar per capita.
00:32:34.000 In the United States.
00:32:35.000 So that's about...
00:32:36.000 Five pounds over a period of...
00:32:38.000 Of a year.
00:32:38.000 Per person per year.
00:32:40.000 So that's the equivalent of about the sugar, one Coca-Cola, 12-ounce Coke's worth of sugar every six days.
00:32:47.000 And it was the head of the head.
00:32:49.000 That's hilarious.
00:32:51.000 It's frightening because it's expensive back then.
00:32:54.000 Right.
00:32:54.000 And what would they add it to back then?
00:32:56.000 Um...
00:32:57.000 You know, they would bake it.
00:32:59.000 Dessert courses hadn't really been invented yet.
00:33:02.000 Really?
00:33:02.000 No.
00:33:03.000 I mean, again, the wealthy would have desserts.
00:33:06.000 And the wealthy were the ones who would get diabetes and obesity and gout back then.
00:33:12.000 So sugar has this curve where it goes from being very rare and just sort of the luxury of royalty.
00:33:19.000 To, you know, the wealthy using it and then finally with the beginning of the Industrial Revolution and late 18th century and then refining processes are improved and sugar starts to get cheaper and then during the Napoleonic Wars like 1812 when France is cut off from their sugar supply by the English blockades.
00:33:44.000 Napoleon says, look, we've got to figure out how to create our own sugar.
00:33:47.000 And this clever Frenchman figures out how to get sugar from sugar beets.
00:33:52.000 And the beet sugar industry takes off around 1850. And then with the beet sugar industry, you can grow sugar in the northern hemisphere in the temperate climates.
00:34:01.000 And you can also grow sugar cane only in tropical climates.
00:34:05.000 So now sugar prices start to plummet.
00:34:10.000 Meanwhile, you think about all the ways we consume sugar today, so candy, soft drinks, ice cream, chocolate, low-fat milk, low-fat yogurt, none of that existed until 1840. So 1840, you see the start of the candy industry,
00:34:26.000 the start of the chocolate industry, the Lindt brothers in Switzerland figure out how to make chocolate bars.
00:34:32.000 You can still buy Lindt chocolate today, and it's pretty good actually.
00:34:37.000 Ice cream industry starts in the 1840s.
00:34:40.000 Soft drinks start in the 1870s with Dr. Pepper, then Coca-Cola, then PepsiCo.
00:34:46.000 Dr. Pepper was first?
00:34:47.000 Yeah, Dr. Pepper was first.
00:34:48.000 How weird.
00:34:50.000 That's like an afterthought.
00:34:52.000 Yeah, yeah, I know.
00:34:53.000 Well, I didn't have the marketing brilliance of the Coca-Cola people.
00:34:59.000 So sugar starts becoming like women are targeted, because it's now cheap enough.
00:35:05.000 So the men get their alcohol and their cigarettes, and the women get sugar, and the kids get sugar.
00:35:10.000 So the first time in history suddenly we have all these industries created to basically target children as customers.
00:35:17.000 If you think about it, nobody's drinking cold drinks at home.
00:35:22.000 No refrigeration.
00:35:23.000 No refrigeration until the 1930s.
00:35:26.000 And no vending machines until the 1930s.
00:35:29.000 I love this because I'm a science guy, but in doing my books, you have to become a historian, and you just don't think about this stuff.
00:35:36.000 So with the vending machines and the refrigerators, suddenly Coca-Cola and PepsiCo and these start targeting, you know, you start getting six packs and cartons, cases of sodas and big bottles of soda that you could take home,
00:35:52.000 put in your refrigerator and drink all day long.
00:35:54.000 Couldn't do it before that.
00:35:55.000 Couldn't get ice cubes easily before that.
00:35:58.000 You couldn't even, you know, cool it down in the summer.
00:36:03.000 Fruit juices come in in the 1930s.
00:36:07.000 California orange growers.
00:36:08.000 That's a big one, right?
00:36:09.000 Because that's one that people think is totally innocuous and actually healthy.
00:36:12.000 Yeah, because it's got all that vitamin C. Just explain to people right now that if you're drinking a big-ass glass of orange juice, you might as well be drinking a Pepsi.
00:36:20.000 Effectively.
00:36:21.000 That's what I believe.
00:36:22.000 Those are the two.
00:36:23.000 You've got these competing nutritional paradigms.
00:36:25.000 One says if it's got vitamins and minerals in it, it's healthy.
00:36:28.000 It's a Pepsi with vitamins and minerals.
00:36:29.000 It's a Pepsi with vitamins and minerals.
00:36:31.000 So take a vitamin pill and then drink a Pepsi and it's the same goddamn thing.
00:36:35.000 Effectively, yeah.
00:36:36.000 That's so crazy.
00:36:37.000 Effectively, yeah.
00:36:37.000 We always thought, like, it's fresh squeezed.
00:36:39.000 Look, it's got pulp in it.
00:36:40.000 Well, this is when...
00:36:41.000 So the California orange growers formed Sunkist.
00:36:44.000 That was a consortium of California.
00:36:46.000 They had all these extra oranges they couldn't sell.
00:36:48.000 You know, the oranges all come along in one season, so back then with that refrigeration and cars so you could keep fruits kind of alive for like a year by freezing them, you know, you had all these extra oranges you couldn't sell, so they said, let's get people to turn into orange juice.
00:37:04.000 And we'll advertise that the vitamin C is good for them.
00:37:08.000 The new nutrition of the 1920s and 1930s was all about vitamin deficiency diseases.
00:37:13.000 And so scurvy is caused by the absence of vitamin C and berry buried by vitamin B. And that was the big news.
00:37:20.000 So the orange growers started pushing orange juice on us because of its vitamin C content.
00:37:25.000 So now we're drinking fruit juices for breakfast every day.
00:37:28.000 And then post-World War II, concentrates are created.
00:37:31.000 That was actually a defense, you know, World War II program to try and figure out how to create foods that soldiers could take into battle and get their vitamins from it.
00:37:41.000 So that comes along.
00:37:43.000 And then the last one is sugary cereals.
00:37:45.000 So the cereal industry was created by Post and Kellogg, who were health nuts.
00:37:51.000 They ran sanatoriums in Minnesota, right?
00:37:54.000 And they knew their health nutritionists didn't want to put sugar in anything.
00:37:59.000 They had some huge fights over this.
00:38:03.000 But 1948 Post releases sugar crisps, and it's, you know, 30% sugar by calories or something.
00:38:11.000 It's the first sugar-coated cereal.
00:38:12.000 And for the next decade, you can watch the cereal industries have these internal battles where the marketing people are saying, we need a sugar sweetened cereal.
00:38:20.000 We've got to compete.
00:38:21.000 We're going to be run out of the business.
00:38:23.000 And the health people are saying, no, no, sugar is bad for you.
00:38:26.000 And in every case, the marketers won.
00:38:28.000 By the 1960s, not only do you have like all these, some of these cereals were 50% sugar by calories, still are.
00:38:36.000 But you've got all these iconic TV shows that were created just to sell sugar.
00:38:42.000 I mean, Rocky and Bowling, which was my favorite.
00:38:45.000 This was heartbreaking.
00:38:46.000 I mean, those guys were created to sell cereal to us.
00:38:49.000 Wait a minute.
00:38:49.000 The comic?
00:38:50.000 The comic.
00:38:51.000 The TV show, Rocky and Bowling.
00:38:52.000 That was created?
00:38:53.000 That was created as a vehicle to market.
00:38:56.000 I forget which cereal it was, which company, but all of these things.
00:39:01.000 So the cartoon was an afterthought?
00:39:03.000 The cartoon was a method.
00:39:06.000 To sell, so the cereal industry would hire, you know, these brilliant public relations men who would create these characters and then get, you know, Hollywood to create animated TV shows with these characters and then they would always sell the same sugar sweetened cereals.
00:39:24.000 Wow!
00:39:25.000 And so now we're just, you know, think what happened to kids.
00:39:29.000 Okay, so the obese and diabetic people in the world are the ones who started, we all started as children, right?
00:39:37.000 You know, 1805, 1810, up to 1850, maybe they see sugar once a week.
00:39:43.000 You know, they steal into the country store, and when Uncle Ed is turned the wrong way, they, like, stick their hand in the sugar barrel and lick their fingers and run out.
00:39:52.000 By 1960, it's like orange juice, cereal, you know, sugary cereal, sugar on the sugary cereal for breakfast, you know, a Coke for a snack, a candy bar, the same kind of foods for lunch.
00:40:06.000 I mean, I bet most Americans didn't go more than three hours without a sugar dose, whereas 150 years earlier, they'd have gone a week between doses.
00:40:17.000 And as this happens, you see these explosions in obesity and diabetes that, you know, they're slow to build.
00:40:24.000 And I think that can be explained, too, by the fact that mothers pass this on to their kids when the kids are in the womb.
00:40:32.000 Is there a difference, how much of a difference is there, if any, between dietary diabetes or diabetes that's directly attributed to diet and genetic?
00:40:42.000 Well, again, first of all, there are different types of diabetes.
00:40:45.000 Type 1 diabetes, type 2. Yeah, type 1 is the acute form that hits mostly in childhood.
00:40:50.000 It has a strong genetic component.
00:40:52.000 It's an autoimmune disease, but that doesn't mean it's not fundamentally caused by sugar.
00:40:57.000 And by that, I mean if we never got around to eating sugar, we wouldn't have type 1 diabetes.
00:41:03.000 Really?
00:41:04.000 So people that think that type 1 diabetes, which is something that people I know have, and, well, it's just genetic, it's just something you were born with, that's not necessarily true?
00:41:16.000 Well, they could be born with it.
00:41:19.000 I mean, it could be, and it could be genetic, but it still has to be triggered, could be triggered by something in the environment.
00:41:25.000 So if these people with type 1 diabetes didn't have a poor diet, didn't consume sugar, didn't eat the average American diet, it probably would never manifest itself?
00:41:33.000 If they're mothers, maybe even more importantly.
00:41:36.000 In the womb?
00:41:37.000 In the womb, yeah.
00:41:38.000 Jesus Christ.
00:41:44.000 Third to last chapter of my book.
00:41:45.000 Two of the last three chapters before the epilogue are called the If-Then Problems.
00:41:50.000 So let me lay out what I'm proposing here.
00:41:54.000 The case against sugar.
00:41:55.000 So there's a crime.
00:41:57.000 Think of it as we're in a courtroom.
00:42:00.000 And there's a crime that's committed.
00:42:02.000 And the crime is epidemics of obesity and diabetes that happen whenever a population transitions from their traditional diet to a Western diet and lifestyle.
00:42:11.000 So it doesn't matter what the population is.
00:42:13.000 They could be the Inuit living on caribou and seal meat.
00:42:16.000 They could be Maasai living on the blood, milk, Meat from the cattle they herd, they could be agrarian populations, they could be South Pacific Islanders living on coconuts and, you know, pigs.
00:42:30.000 Aborigines in Australia, Middle Eastern populations, African populations, European populations, it does not matter.
00:42:39.000 Eventually, they transition.
00:42:41.000 You see these epidemics of obese and diabetes.
00:42:43.000 That's the crime.
00:42:44.000 So the argument I'm making is that sugar is always at the scene of the crime on a population-wide level.
00:42:49.000 So there's a lot of things that happen when you transition to Western diets.
00:42:52.000 For instance, a lot of populations eat more meat.
00:42:55.000 But some populations, like the Inuit, they don't eat more meat, because they're the Native Americans of the Plains Indians.
00:43:03.000 They don't eat more meat, because they were living on meat to begin with.
00:43:07.000 But they also get obesity and diabetes epidemic.
00:43:09.000 So I'm willing to rule out meat on that level.
00:43:13.000 And other people did as well.
00:43:14.000 You know, they become more sedentary when you westernize.
00:43:17.000 You get more labor-saving devices.
00:43:18.000 You drive places instead of walking places.
00:43:20.000 So maybe it's sedentary behavior.
00:43:22.000 But you can find populations that are incredibly physically active.
00:43:27.000 Cane cut it.
00:43:28.000 In the Natar region of South Africa, in the 18th century, they used to import Indians from India as indentured laborers, effectively slavery, but they call them indentured laborers to work in the sugar plantations.
00:43:45.000 And the cane cutters in the sugar plantations, that's one of the most energy intense jobs you can imagine.
00:43:51.000 One estimate was they burn 9,000 calories a day.
00:43:54.000 And yet these Natal Indians had among the highest rates of diabetes ever seen.
00:44:01.000 Ancestors, the population from which they were drawn in India had virtually no diabetes, and the primary difference in their diet was the sugar consumption.
00:44:10.000 So you could play this game where you isolate out populations, and what I found is there's no population where you get an obesity and diabetes epidemic where sugar, recent increases in sugar consumption haven't occurred.
00:44:23.000 And by recent, it could be 20 years ago, it could be 50 years ago.
00:44:27.000 So it's always at the scene of the crime.
00:44:31.000 Type 2 diabetes, the common form that associates with excess weight, is fundamentally a disorder of what's called insulin resistance.
00:44:40.000 So type 1, your pancreas doesn't secrete enough insulin.
00:44:44.000 Type 2, your body is resistant to the insulin that your pancreas secretes.
00:44:50.000 So you got to pump, you got to secrete more and more to keep your blood sugar under control and the idea is eventually your pancreas gets exhausted and it can't do it anymore and then you have a deficit of insulin and it looks like the results are pretty much similar to type 1. Insulin resistance is also very closely associated to obesity,
00:45:12.000 and we could discuss that as well.
00:45:14.000 You could look at these epidemics, obesity, diabetes, heart disease, cancer, Alzheimer's, dementia, basically as manifestations of insulin resistance happening all around the world.
00:45:26.000 In different ways, in different people, but they're all related to insulin resistance and insulin.
00:45:32.000 And then you ask yourself, what causes insulin resistance?
00:45:35.000 So the best researchers in the world who study insulin resistance, the leading hypothesis is that it starts in the liver.
00:45:42.000 And it starts in the liver with the conversion, with the accumulation of fats in liver cells.
00:45:49.000 And in fact, we also have an epidemic of what's called non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in this country right now.
00:45:55.000 It used to be 20, 30 years ago, if you got fatty liver disease and you saw your doctor and you told them you didn't drink, they would just assume you're lying.
00:46:04.000 Because clearly alcoholics got fatty liver disease, but suddenly people started showing up who swore they didn't drink, and then kids started showing up with fatty liver disease who clearly didn't drink alcohol.
00:46:16.000 So we got this concept, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
00:46:20.000 It's basically indistinguishable from the alcoholic kind.
00:46:23.000 And the CDC estimates 40 million Americans have this.
00:46:28.000 And if it progresses, it could progress to what's called NASH, which is non-alcoholic stereohepatitis, and eventually to the need for liver transplant.
00:46:41.000 So, sugar.
00:46:44.000 What are we talking about when we're talking about sugar?
00:46:48.000 So sugar, cane sugar, beet sugar are technically sucrose.
00:46:53.000 It's a molecule of glucose bonded to a molecule of fructose.
00:46:56.000 Fructose makes it sweet.
00:47:01.000 High fructose corn syrup is 45% glucose, 55% fructose.
00:47:06.000 Same chemical constituents.
00:47:08.000 They're not bonded together.
00:47:09.000 I don't think that makes a damn bit of difference.
00:47:11.000 Some people do.
00:47:13.000 The fructose is metabolized in your liver.
00:47:16.000 So the glucose gets into your bloodstream just like any other glucose from any other carbohydrate.
00:47:21.000 The fructose goes to your liver.
00:47:24.000 And if your liver gets it in a high dose, like say from an apple juice or something...
00:47:30.000 It has trouble dealing with that much fructose.
00:47:33.000 It never evolved to see a glass of apple juice or a can of Coke's worth of fructose be delivered over the course of 5, 10 minutes, probably even 30 minutes, so it converts it into fat.
00:47:45.000 So we have a condition, insulin resistant, that's epidemic worldwide, that's The leading research in the country, I think, is caused by the accumulation of fat in liver cells.
00:47:56.000 And we've got a substance, sugar, that's been exploded in use worldwide in which half of it is metabolized in the liver and is converted into fat in liver cells.
00:48:09.000 So it's like it's at the scene of the crime in populations and it's at the scene of the crime in The body.
00:48:19.000 And it's got a mechanism.
00:48:20.000 It's got the gun.
00:48:23.000 Necessary.
00:48:24.000 You know, you can match the bullets almost, but we don't have a smoking gun.
00:48:27.000 That's where the research falls short.
00:48:29.000 And so this is the case I'm making.
00:48:31.000 And then if sugar causes insulin resistance, there are all kinds of downstream effects, including what mothers will do to their children if they are insulin resistant and have high blood sugar when they're pregnant.
00:48:45.000 Jesus Christ.
00:48:46.000 And that's why my argument is, you know, it's almost too much.
00:48:50.000 It would be easier if I just said it's empty calories because, you know...
00:48:55.000 What pushback against your book and against your research have you experienced?
00:48:59.000 Well, I mean, there are people who just object to my existence.
00:49:04.000 Have you debated these people?
00:49:06.000 I'm in the process of debating two of them online now.
00:49:10.000 Cato Unbound, it's called.
00:49:13.000 I wouldn't have, by the way, done this if...
00:49:15.000 I'm not a fan of debates in science because I don't think they settle things.
00:49:19.000 I'm a fan of people getting together and saying, look, you believe this, I believe this, what experiment can we do to find out who's right, not who's the better rhetorician.
00:49:29.000 Yeah, I know what you're saying.
00:49:30.000 Who's more charismatic?
00:49:31.000 Who can get the point across more?
00:49:33.000 The obesity society and the nutrition societies once a year, they'll have their annual conference.
00:49:41.000 They'll have a debate over this.
00:49:43.000 Everybody, oh yeah, I thought you did better.
00:49:45.000 But nobody walks out of the debate saying, what experiment can we do to settle this?
00:49:49.000 And I think it's, you know, again, we have these epidemics.
00:49:51.000 They're tragic.
00:49:52.000 The cost of obesity and diabetes in the U.S., direct cost to the medical system is estimated as a billion dollars a year.
00:49:59.000 I mean, excuse me, a billion dollars a day.
00:50:02.000 What?
00:50:03.000 Like, direct cost to the...
00:50:06.000 Healthcare system.
00:50:07.000 $365 billion a year just because of obesity.
00:50:10.000 And diabetes.
00:50:11.000 Jesus Christ.
00:50:12.000 And if you think about it, so that's $365 billion.
00:50:15.000 It is a direct cost.
00:50:16.000 It's a burden on the healthcare system, but it's tremendous for the pharmaceutical industry, right?
00:50:22.000 And the physicians and the hospitals that are getting that money.
00:50:25.000 So they don't have quite as much motivation as might to stem this tide.
00:50:30.000 Because they're profiting from it tremendously.
00:50:32.000 Well, also, are they even aware of the causes of it?
00:50:35.000 I mean, if your work is so controversial, and there's so many people out there that are disputing it, or disputing this link between sugar and all these horrible diseases, and they're calling it empty calories, is this even something that, in the medical community, where they spend a ridiculously short amount of time in school learning about nutrition?
00:50:53.000 Well, thank God for that, because if they learned more, they would learn the wrong thing, right?
00:50:57.000 Then they'd be even more dogmatic.
00:50:58.000 Right.
00:50:59.000 Good point.
00:50:59.000 Yeah.
00:51:00.000 Well, these people, they don't really have the information.
00:51:04.000 You can go ahead and blow your nose, man.
00:51:05.000 Don't worry about it.
00:51:06.000 You've been struggling with it for a while.
00:51:08.000 Gary's sick because he hasn't had enough sugar, ladies and gentlemen.
00:51:11.000 Yes, exactly.
00:51:12.000 It's a low-carb diet I ate.
00:51:15.000 But...
00:51:16.000 I mean, it seems to me like they don't have the time.
00:51:19.000 I mean, I don't have the time to do the research that you did.
00:51:22.000 Very few people do.
00:51:24.000 It really takes someone like you.
00:51:25.000 It takes a maniac to go out there and stretch your finances and put yourself in a bad position and really be obsessively chasing this down.
00:51:34.000 Yeah, no, it's true.
00:51:35.000 But again, that doesn't mean you're supposed to believe somebody like me.
00:51:39.000 And again, you can't...
00:51:40.000 You know, I'm a journalist.
00:51:41.000 I used to think, how would I... You know, imagine some...
00:51:45.000 Plummer came up to me one day and he said, you know, I just spent like the last 10 years of my life studying how to do journalism.
00:51:53.000 And I've written this book and you're doing it all wrong.
00:51:57.000 That's a good point.
00:51:58.000 You know, and I'm like, okay, yeah, sure, I'll take the book, you know, and I can't wait to read it.
00:52:03.000 And I'm going to go home and I'm not probably even going to throw the book out because the odds that that's a waste of time for me are enormous.
00:52:14.000 When did diabetes first sort of emerge in medical records?
00:52:21.000 Well, in medical records, you see it 2,000 years ago in like Hindu medical documents.
00:52:27.000 Coincidentally, with the beginning of the sugar industry.
00:52:31.000 Really?
00:52:31.000 Yeah, I mean, just give or take 200 years.
00:52:35.000 Holy shit!
00:52:36.000 And even back then, they speculated that it was caused by sugar, although I think for the wrong reasons, because the diabetic urine, you're pissing out a lot of glucose, right?
00:52:45.000 Because your body can't handle it, so it's sweet and it'll attract flies.
00:52:48.000 And back then, even up until the 17th century, part of classic medical practice was for the physician to have his assistant We're good to go.
00:53:12.000 It's all they had.
00:53:14.000 Science is determined by the technology available.
00:53:17.000 That was one of the lessons when we get into this.
00:53:19.000 Because all my books are about good science and bad science.
00:53:21.000 And I hope I understand what I'm doing.
00:53:24.000 Like I said, if I don't, it's really bad.
00:53:28.000 It's embarrassing.
00:53:29.000 I wake up at 3, 4 in the morning and I'm thinking, why am I so obsessed about this calorie issue?
00:53:34.000 Nobody else seems to care.
00:53:36.000 But people do now.
00:53:37.000 Don't you feel like that?
00:53:39.000 We live in a very small world.
00:53:41.000 You know, it's hard to understand.
00:53:43.000 I mean, even with your, whatever, 20 million downloads a month and all your followers.
00:53:48.000 It's a lot more than that.
00:53:49.000 Yeah.
00:53:49.000 I mean, think about how many of those voted for the current president, for instance.
00:53:53.000 I mean, it's just, it's a very, I'm glad to hear it's a lot more than that.
00:53:57.000 Well, I am too, because I want to get this out, you know?
00:53:59.000 I mean, even if it's just for this one particular subject, which I think is probably the most important subject today, when in terms of health and wellness and just optimizing your existence, cutting out sugar and changing your diet, I think, is one of the most important factors in living a healthier,
00:54:17.000 more productive life, and also mental clarity.
00:54:20.000 Well, now let me ask you a question.
00:54:22.000 When you cut out sugar, so you said you cut it out slowly.
00:54:24.000 Yeah.
00:54:26.000 What were you eating at the time?
00:54:27.000 I never ate bad, but I ate pastas and I ate bread.
00:54:32.000 I always supplemented with vitamins, I always worked out hard, and I was always lean because I worked out so much.
00:54:39.000 So I never thought I had an issue with fat.
00:54:41.000 I never thought I had an issue with any of those things.
00:54:44.000 But I would get that crash.
00:54:45.000 I would get that late afternoon crash, and it was a fucking insulin dump.
00:54:49.000 Yeah, I used to say, I don't take naps, they take me.
00:54:53.000 You know, like an hour after lunch, and I'd be interviewing some Nobel Prize winner, and I'd have to think of an excuse to get off, because I was falling asleep doing the interview.
00:55:03.000 I mean, that doesn't happen to me anymore.
00:55:05.000 No, it's fascinating.
00:55:06.000 It's unbelievably fascinating.
00:55:08.000 I would never have guessed.
00:55:09.000 I would have thought you needed some sort of a stimulant to keep you going like that.
00:55:12.000 Although, in honesty, we're both drinking Bulletproof coffees right now.
00:55:15.000 Yes.
00:55:15.000 So we are getting some sort of a stimulant.
00:55:17.000 We are, but I didn't have to have that.
00:55:20.000 I did, but that's the book tour.
00:55:21.000 Well, you're sick.
00:55:23.000 But here's the thing, when you cut out the grains, the bread, the pasta, that's still, that's glucose.
00:55:28.000 So, were you eating sugar?
00:55:30.000 Were you drinking Gatorades?
00:55:31.000 No.
00:55:32.000 Very rarely.
00:55:33.000 Very rarely.
00:55:33.000 I was still eating pretty clean.
00:55:36.000 Like, I would have dessert every now and then, but it wasn't more than a few times a week.
00:55:41.000 I wasn't eating candy bars during the day, but I was eating the occasional protein bar that was loaded with sugar that I didn't even think it was.
00:55:47.000 I thought it was eating healthy.
00:55:48.000 That's what gets me.
00:55:49.000 So once we got into this diet, to this idea, so one of the things, and this was the second article I read, so is there evidence to support this idea we should be eating a low-fat diet?
00:55:58.000 I mean, the second article I wrote.
00:56:00.000 And I recreated the history of that and it was fascinating because once these people got this idea that fat caused heart disease...
00:56:07.000 So remember, science is determined by what you can measure.
00:56:09.000 So the technology you have tells you what you can measure and what you can measure is what you can ask questions about and then that gives you the answers.
00:56:17.000 And if you're a bad scientist, you forget that it's completely limited.
00:56:21.000 To the technology.
00:56:22.000 So there's this old joke in science called the drunk in the streetlight problem.
00:56:27.000 Do you ever hear about that?
00:56:27.000 No.
00:56:28.000 So a guy's walking down the street and he comes upon a drunk who's crawling around on his knees under a streetlight.
00:56:34.000 And he says to the guy, what are you doing?
00:56:36.000 And the guy says, I'm looking for my keys.
00:56:38.000 And the guy says, so is this where you lost them?
00:56:41.000 And the drunk goes, I don't know where I lost them, but this is where the light is.
00:56:45.000 Okay.
00:56:45.000 So in science, it's like what you could measure is where the light is.
00:56:49.000 And you got to remember that there's a universe out there that you can't see yet.
00:56:53.000 But most scientists don't realize that.
00:56:56.000 They're just not good scientists.
00:56:58.000 So in heart disease, the light was on cholesterol.
00:57:01.000 That was at 1950s, 60s.
00:57:03.000 That's what they could measure.
00:57:04.000 And they got this idea that it's caused by dietary fat.
00:57:07.000 And because of that...
00:57:10.000 We just, you know, again, they tested and tested, and this hypothesis kept being failed in the test, but they didn't care because they thought it had to be true.
00:57:19.000 And by the 1980s, we lock it in as a dogma.
00:57:23.000 And now we have this idea that the healthy way to eat is a low-fat diet, and you start making products where you take the fat out of it.
00:57:30.000 And once you take the fat out of something, it doesn't taste all that good.
00:57:34.000 Like yogurt's a classic example.
00:57:35.000 I mean, it is fat and some, you know, modest amount of lactose.
00:57:40.000 I don't even know if there's lactose in it.
00:57:41.000 I should know this stuff because then people say clearly you're not a nutritionist.
00:57:46.000 So the candy bars, instead of eating Snickers bars, which is a high-fat, high-sugar thing that we grew up on, you create Cliffs bars and Nature's Whey bars and all these low-fat health food bars that we think are healthy.
00:58:02.000 Because they're low in fat, they're loaded with carbs, and they fill them up with sugar.
00:58:06.000 And then to this day, I'm wondering, like, should I just let, you know, we have a drawer with these health food bars, and my wife, I'm not the only parent of the family, so my kids aren't tortured by my food beliefs.
00:58:19.000 Would they be healthier if they just ate Snickers bars like we did when we were kids?
00:58:24.000 And I don't know what the answer is.
00:58:25.000 I literally, I could argue it either way.
00:58:27.000 How could you argue that they would be healthier if they had all that sugar?
00:58:30.000 Well, they both have the sugar.
00:58:32.000 What do you mean both?
00:58:33.000 Like Laura bars versus...
00:58:35.000 Yeah.
00:58:35.000 You ever seen one of those Laura bars?
00:58:36.000 I really love those.
00:58:37.000 They taste good, but they're 19 fucking grams of sugar or something crazy, and it's only like the size of your thumb.
00:58:42.000 Yeah, so basically, I don't know what the sugar content is.
00:58:46.000 You can probably Google it while we're talking about, you know, regular size Snickers bar.
00:58:50.000 It's probably more than 19 grams, but it's also got all that fat in it, which will slow down I found the digestion of the sugar.
00:58:55.000 So, a Snickers bar arguably is better for you than some of these really super sugary, what we think, air quotes, are healthy snacks, like trail bars.
00:59:04.000 Yeah, and the key word there is arguably.
00:59:07.000 Here we go, 20 grams of sugar, and what is that, a Snickers bar?
00:59:10.000 That's a lot.
00:59:11.000 Okay.
00:59:11.000 Jesus Christ.
00:59:12.000 Yeah, but it's a bigger, it's gonna be a big, way more.
00:59:14.000 So what about the Laura bar?
00:59:15.000 It's gonna weigh more?
00:59:16.000 Well, it's 44 grams.
00:59:18.000 Right.
00:59:19.000 Okay.
00:59:20.000 Okay.
00:59:24.000 Yeah, those things, Larabars.
00:59:26.000 Find out what the fuck is in those bad boys.
00:59:29.000 Because I had one.
00:59:30.000 I bought one once.
00:59:32.000 This is before I had gone on my crusade against sugar.
00:59:35.000 Wait, there's no added sugar, it says, in the Larabars.
00:59:37.000 Wait a minute.
00:59:38.000 But they're fruit and nut bars, so the question is how much sugar are in the fruit.
00:59:42.000 Maybe it's a different one.
00:59:45.000 Which one are you looking at here?
00:59:46.000 Yeah, that's it.
00:59:47.000 What does it say here?
00:59:49.000 How many grams?
00:59:49.000 20 grams!
00:59:50.000 20 grams, so it's the same as a Snicker.
00:59:52.000 So why the fuck are they lying?
00:59:53.000 No added sugar.
00:59:54.000 Well, it could be because it comes from fruit.
00:59:56.000 Yeah, but it's still fucking sugar.
00:59:58.000 Your body doesn't know that.
00:59:59.000 You're playing a goddamn game.
01:00:00.000 Yes, you're playing a game, exactly.
01:00:03.000 That's crazy.
01:00:04.000 Let's see, I'm just curious.
01:00:05.000 Using natural fruits and nuts in their bars.
01:00:08.000 The World Health Organization's recommended daily sugar intake for adults.
01:00:11.000 5% of daily caloric intake for a normal-weight adult eating 2,000 calories a day.
01:00:15.000 That's 25 grams.
01:00:18.000 So...
01:00:18.000 Now, is that added sugar per day?
01:00:21.000 I mean, when you're talking about lactose, when you're talking about fruits?
01:00:24.000 Well, it's funny.
01:00:25.000 A friend just sent me an article today on a European Journal of Clinical Nutrition where they were looking at sugar content of children's diets in Europe.
01:00:34.000 And at age one, they were 30% of their calories from sugar.
01:00:39.000 Jesus Christ.
01:00:40.000 But, I was trying to make sense of it, I'm pretty sure that included lactose from milk.
01:00:45.000 Right.
01:00:46.000 Which was a primary source.
01:00:47.000 He said the primary source of the sugar were dairy products.
01:00:49.000 It could also be from artificial formulas.
01:00:54.000 People never take that into consideration, right?
01:00:56.000 If you eat a piece of cheese, you're getting some sugar.
01:00:58.000 Yeah.
01:00:59.000 Although, again, once you process it, you lose the lactose.
01:01:06.000 But yeah, it's sort of, but even the lactose is metabolized differently than the fructose.
01:01:11.000 I would argue that we evolved to consume lactose, at least until we were, you know, out of, you know, weaning.
01:01:17.000 Right.
01:01:18.000 A few, three, four years old.
01:01:20.000 Do you drink milk?
01:01:21.000 No.
01:01:21.000 I actually gave up dairy, but for a different reason.
01:01:24.000 Not because I, for me, it has unfortunate gastrointestinal side effects that my whole family could live without.
01:01:36.000 If you go into a low-carb, high-fat diet, which I think is a, you know, certainly those of us should be eating who are predisposed to get fat or diabetic, cheese is a very valuable item of the diet.
01:01:49.000 And clearly, like the French and the Swiss and even the Greeks eat enormous amounts of cheese and they live...
01:01:55.000 Do you believe in raw milk?
01:01:58.000 Have you attempted to try that?
01:02:00.000 Or raw cheese?
01:02:01.000 I don't think it.
01:02:02.000 My gut feeling, remember, I focus obsessively on one subject, and it's the carb content, and it's the sugars, and the refined grains, and what's the cause of obesity.
01:02:13.000 Raw milk doesn't enter into that discussion.
01:02:16.000 What I meant about it is just from the gastrointestinal issues, because a lot of people believe that raw milk with all the natural enzymes in it is easier for your body to process.
01:02:25.000 Yeah, that's quite possible.
01:02:27.000 But again, as a...
01:02:29.000 If you're gaining weight easily, then I wouldn't be recommending liquid carbs of any kind, including the lactose and milk.
01:02:37.000 So you look at the low-carb diets traditionally and historically, they never allowed for milk.
01:02:44.000 I mean, you might go for heavy cream or cream, you know, the sort of Atkins thing.
01:02:49.000 The bulletproof coffee thing.
01:02:51.000 Yeah, I know a lot of people who are on the ketogenic diet that will actually drink heavy cream.
01:02:58.000 My friend Kyle, who actually was one of the first people that turned me on to it, Kyle Kingsbury, he carries around this little fucking pint of heavy cream, but he's a savage.
01:03:08.000 Yeah, no.
01:03:09.000 My former collaborator, Peter Attia, whose internet handle at one point I think was Ketogenic Man, and he used to drink olive oil and cream.
01:03:20.000 Well, because you've got to really up the fat content on those diets for a lot of people to get ketonic, not everyone.
01:03:27.000 Yeah.
01:03:28.000 It's interesting.
01:03:29.000 I heard you were trying it.
01:03:31.000 Yeah, I did.
01:03:31.000 I'm on it.
01:03:33.000 Essentially.
01:03:34.000 So tell me your diet.
01:03:35.000 Well, a lot of avocados, a lot of coconut oil.
01:03:39.000 I might eat a little bit more protein than I'm supposed to, which unfortunately does convert back to sugar in your body, glucose, but much more easily processed, obviously, than high fructose corn syrup, right?
01:03:54.000 Very, very little pastas or grains or breads or anything.
01:03:57.000 It's a rare thing that I eat that stuff.
01:03:59.000 Do you actually measure ketones?
01:04:00.000 I've done it before, but I have a problem with those things.
01:04:04.000 When you jab your finger, it's too hard for me to get blood out.
01:04:08.000 I do a lot of kettlebell stuff, and so I have calluses on my fingers and my hands.
01:04:12.000 So I have to actually go into the side of my hand to get the blood.
01:04:15.000 I have to go, like, above the fingerprints into the upper skin area and squeeze out the blood.
01:04:20.000 It's fucking annoying.
01:04:21.000 So I know when I'm in it.
01:04:23.000 And also I take ketogenic supplements.
01:04:26.000 I'll take, like, exogenous ketones.
01:04:28.000 Like, there's this stuff called Kegenix.
01:04:30.000 Is there anything that tastes decent?
01:04:32.000 Yeah, Kegenix tastes really good.
01:04:33.000 It tastes good.
01:04:34.000 It's a good drink.
01:04:35.000 It's made by Dom D'Agostino.
01:04:37.000 Do you know who he is?
01:04:37.000 Yeah, sure I know.
01:04:38.000 So he's one of the...
01:04:39.000 I'm a premier research scientist that's devoted to a ketogenic diet, and I heard about him from Tim Ferriss' podcast, and I've read some of his work online and listened to some of his lectures and talks.
01:04:51.000 And I find it, first of all, as far as appetite suppressing, it's fantastic.
01:04:57.000 Once your body starts burning fat, you don't get that weird hunger thing.
01:05:01.000 Yeah, that's the thing, because you're just mobilizing your fat and burning it.
01:05:05.000 It's all coming out.
01:05:07.000 Your body isn't trying to hold on to it.
01:05:09.000 You're not freaking out.
01:05:10.000 That's the thing.
01:05:11.000 When I was on a heavy carb diet, because I love pasta.
01:05:15.000 God, I love lasagna and linguine with clams.
01:05:19.000 I just love it.
01:05:20.000 It's fantastic.
01:05:21.000 Occasionally, I'll indulge as a rare treat now, but when I was eating it all the time, I would have this two or three hour post-eating thing where that stuff would be gone, it would all be digested, and then I'd be fucking starving in the next hour or so.
01:05:35.000 I remember the old joke about You know, Chinese food, right?
01:05:38.000 Like, two hours later, you're starving.
01:05:40.000 Yeah, I mean, that's really what it is.
01:05:41.000 Your body starts craving those carbohydrates, the simple carbs.
01:05:45.000 Well, that's the thing, because you're burning the sugar, so the carbs are converted to glucose, you're burning the glucose, you're secreting insulin, and the insulin's telling your fat to hold on to fat.
01:05:55.000 This is my theory, anyway, and it's backed up by the evidence.
01:05:58.000 So, as the blood sugar starts coming down, Your fat tissue is supposed to release the fat and allow it to come out and be oxidized by the same cells and the mitochondria in your cells in this famous Krebs cycle that we're all supposed to learn in like 11th grade biology and can never remember.
01:06:15.000 The Krebs cycle is just as happy to burn fat as carbs.
01:06:20.000 But if the insulin's high...
01:06:22.000 It's telling your mitochondria to burn carbs, not fat, and it's telling the fat cells to hold on to fat, and now you've just got a dearth of fuel.
01:06:31.000 It's actually telling your lean tissue to hold on to protein.
01:06:35.000 So now your blood sugar is coming down, but the insulin is still elevated, and there's no fuels replacing the blood sugar.
01:06:43.000 You bonk.
01:06:44.000 You bonk, or you start to panic.
01:06:46.000 This is why once we instituted this low-fat thing and people said, well, Americans get fat because they snack all the time.
01:06:55.000 They're constantly grazing.
01:06:56.000 Well, they're constantly grazing because their cells are running out of fuel.
01:06:59.000 No matter how much they're eating for breakfast of their low-fat stuff, if their insulin is elevated, their cells are going to want to burn carbs.
01:07:06.000 And this is one of the observations you found in the literature in the 1830s.
01:07:09.000 There was a Hungarian endocrinologist working at Northwestern University who talked about some of his obese pain.
01:07:16.000 He said he had a patient who was an obese laundress who used to eat laundry starch.
01:07:21.000 Oh, Jesus Christ.
01:07:23.000 What the fuck is laundry starch?
01:07:25.000 It's starch.
01:07:26.000 It's a carbohydrate, man.
01:07:28.000 I had no idea.
01:07:30.000 But the point is, if your insulin is elevated, carbohydrates are your fuel.
01:07:35.000 It's signaling your cells to burn glucose and not to burn fat and not to burn protein.
01:07:43.000 So carbs are your fuel.
01:07:45.000 That's what you need.
01:07:46.000 So when you start to get hungry, you crave that because that's the only thing your cells are going to burn.
01:07:51.000 Right.
01:07:52.000 So then if you try a ketogenic diet or low-carb, high-fat diet, whatever you want to call it, you get rid of the carbs and you get enough fat, your insulin comes down, then you get in this natural thing where you eat, you store some of the fat, you're burning fat.
01:08:06.000 When you're done burning the fat in your bloodstream, the fat comes out of your cells.
01:08:10.000 There's this nice cycle that's supposed to happen.
01:08:12.000 You always have enough fuel available that you're not hungry.
01:08:17.000 That's one of the common phenomenons.
01:08:20.000 The idea that suddenly I have breakfast, the next thing I know it's 2, 3 in the afternoon, and I'm thinking, maybe I should eat lunch just because I should eat lunch.
01:08:28.000 Not because I'm hungry, not because I'm starving.
01:08:31.000 And then you eat lunch, you don't fall asleep afterwards.
01:08:33.000 Because your body has a fuel supply.
01:08:35.000 Because your body has a constant fuel supply.
01:08:36.000 Your cells are being fueled whether you're eating or not.
01:08:39.000 You've got enough fat in your body to live for like a month, even if...
01:08:42.000 You're relatively lean.
01:08:44.000 Now, I should point out that some high-level athletes are having an issue with this.
01:08:49.000 Some people that are used to burning off massive amounts of calories through the day, like mixed martial artists and things along those lines, some of them adapt to it fine and are having a great time with it and find it easier to make weight and easier to train.
01:09:01.000 But other ones say that they have just a lack of that extra gear in training.
01:09:06.000 Now, I don't know if they're doing it Some of the earliest studies ever done on this was by a guy named Steve Finney, who's co-author of two books,
01:09:21.000 Ardent Science of Low Carb.
01:09:24.000 Living in the art and science of low-carb performance.
01:09:27.000 And Steve, back in the late 70s, early 80s, he was at, I think it's Vermont, where there was a team of people studying, doing some interesting diet experiments.
01:09:35.000 And he put professional bike racers on ketogenic diets and measured their performance versus their sort of traditional high-carb diets.
01:09:45.000 And he keto-adapted them, so they were fully adapted to burning fat for fuel.
01:09:50.000 And from his studies, basically, he said they're more efficient until they have to push that last sort of 5% out, like up a mountain or a marathon or getting to Heartbreak Hill in the Boston Marathon, and then they lose that extra push.
01:10:07.000 See, that's what makes sense, because that extra push is all what mixed martial arts is about.
01:10:11.000 Yeah.
01:10:12.000 That extra push is all about...
01:10:13.000 I mean, in MMA, it's all about exploding when you're tired.
01:10:16.000 It's all about being able to manage your endurance over the course of five minutes, but figure out these sprint times and being able to squeeze the most out of those to break your opponent.
01:10:26.000 Yeah, yeah.
01:10:27.000 A lot of times, it's based on how much you have in the tank.
01:10:29.000 Yeah, well, that's the thing.
01:10:30.000 And I mean, a lot of it, you should still...
01:10:32.000 You can still...
01:10:33.000 Even the...
01:10:33.000 It's funny, carb loading, when it was first...
01:10:36.000 Sort of perfected was developed in Scandinavia back in the 50s, I think it was, by the coaches of cross-country skiers, which is incredibly physically burdensome.
01:10:51.000 Brutal.
01:10:52.000 Brutal.
01:10:52.000 And they trained all year long on low-carb diets.
01:10:56.000 So they would train on low-carb diets, and the idea was they would eat the plate of pasta the day before the race, and they would maximize their glycogen stores in their liver and in their cells, and then when they needed it, it was there.
01:11:08.000 And has that been proven efficient?
01:11:09.000 I mean, it was a great way for them, but again, the point is they were eating the low-carb diets the rest of the year.
01:11:15.000 Up until then, yeah.
01:11:16.000 And then once marathoners started doing it, everyone thought, well, marathoners should eat carbs the night before a marathon.
01:11:23.000 We should all eat carbs.
01:11:25.000 And then this idea that carbs are heart-healthy came in and they just took over the world.
01:11:29.000 But my area of expertise is by no means like high-performance athletes.
01:11:35.000 There are people out there who could talk to you for, you know, and I'll recommend some when we get off.
01:11:43.000 You know, it's interesting because even when you read the debates about this stuff, what the high-performance athletes, I see this in like Outside Magazine and Runner's World stuff, so there's this fundamental argument that, look, we don't get fat because we eat too much.
01:11:55.000 We get fat because the carbohydrates in our diet cause this hormonal metabolic dysregulation that makes us store calories of fat in our fat cells.
01:12:05.000 And that implies that the healthiest diet, for those of us who get fat, are diets absent easily digestible carbs and sugars.
01:12:14.000 But if athletes, very high-performing athletes, eat those diets and don't perform better than before, it's not a good diet and therefore all the rest of it is wrong.
01:12:24.000 And that's just crazy.
01:12:26.000 You know, it's sort of what Lance Armstrong needs to win the Tour de France, whatever it is, doesn't tell me a hell of a lot about why, you know, Shirley McClintock weighs 300 pounds and can't lose that weight unless she gives up carbohydrates.
01:12:42.000 Right.
01:12:44.000 You know, and all of that gets confounded in these discussions.
01:12:47.000 And one of the things I'm constantly doing when I talk about this stuff is saying, you've got to keep your eye on the question.
01:12:53.000 Because we were all given different answers to different questions.
01:12:56.000 So what's the best diet for winning the Tour de France or MMA fight?
01:13:03.000 Probably got a lot of the same themes that I'm talking about.
01:13:07.000 But even then, Funny, when sugar came in, beginning around the 1890s, and it was cheap and easily available, and beet sugar was available in Germany, the German army started testing sugar as a performance enhancer, and actually doing sort of trials where they would send troops out with or without sugar for,
01:13:26.000 you know...
01:13:27.000 30-day marches and then they would see when they came back which ones had more energy and the ones who ate more sugar had more energy and some mountain climbers started using it.
01:13:37.000 Crew coaches started testing it on the crew.
01:13:41.000 Like rowing back then was among the most popular sports in the world and so they would give their We're good to go.
01:14:06.000 I have girls.
01:14:07.000 Okay, not an issue.
01:14:09.000 Boys, circumcise them, give them a little bit of sugar.
01:14:11.000 Jesus Christ, I've never heard of that though.
01:14:13.000 Sugar kills pain?
01:14:14.000 Yeah, it's a distraction.
01:14:16.000 It's a painkiller.
01:14:17.000 I mean, it's wonderful psychoactive properties.
01:14:21.000 No short-term side effects.
01:14:24.000 I mean, you must be talking about a very minor killing of the pain.
01:14:26.000 Well, also, if you start with populations that never consume sugar, so babies never consume it before, you give them a little sugar, like on day three, you can circumcise them, and they're just tripping.
01:14:36.000 They're fine.
01:14:37.000 Hey, cool.
01:14:37.000 Take it off.
01:14:38.000 I don't need to live with that.
01:14:39.000 What am I going to use that for?
01:14:41.000 I mean, when you're three days old, you've got no imagination.
01:14:45.000 Wow.
01:14:47.000 We could talk about that.
01:14:53.000 Yeah, so anyway, that's the thing.
01:14:56.000 It's that it could be a performance enhancing drug.
01:15:00.000 That would enhance the performance of athletes at the highest level doesn't mean it doesn't have long-term chronic effects just like any other performance enhancing drug.
01:15:11.000 So there's a big difference between people that are like say climbing K2 that needs something to push them forward versus the average person who likes to play racquetball and works a day job and you know and that kind of a diet.
01:15:24.000 Yeah, and think about, I mean, the athletic trainers who have been telling you, I mean, the guys you work out with, you know, the lean, muscular guys who never had an ounce of fat in their lives, and they're saying we should all eat carbs or we should all eat sugar because look how well I process it.
01:15:41.000 And my argument is like, if you think your body works the same way as your cousin who weighs 300 pounds and the only difference is you exercise more, Like, that's a serious delusion.
01:15:52.000 And, you know, we're different people.
01:15:55.000 I don't know, do you have siblings?
01:15:56.000 Yes.
01:15:57.000 Are you all built alike?
01:15:58.000 I have a sister.
01:15:59.000 Okay.
01:16:01.000 Yeah, I mean, she's lean.
01:16:02.000 I mean, she works out a little bit.
01:16:04.000 Not like I do, but, you know, we have good genes in that regard.
01:16:08.000 But, I mean, when I was a kid, my older brother, mathematician, brilliant guy, but he was...
01:16:16.000 Always taller, leaner, like you could see the veins on his arms and the ripples on his stomach when he was seven years old.
01:16:22.000 It wasn't genetic because I clearly had the same genes in a different body type.
01:16:26.000 But they vary.
01:16:27.000 Yeah.
01:16:27.000 So when he got to college, he was a rower.
01:16:30.000 He couldn't get over 195, no matter how much he ate.
01:16:33.000 And he used to say, I'll never forget this.
01:16:37.000 I never get stuffed.
01:16:38.000 I just get bored of eating after a few hours.
01:16:41.000 And I was shorter, thicker.
01:16:44.000 You know, I put on weight relatively easily.
01:16:47.000 By the time I was in high school, I weighed 195. When I was playing Division II college football, I could get up to 237. No matter how much I ate, I could not get above 237, and I was three inches shorter than he was.
01:17:01.000 We just had different body types.
01:17:03.000 I built muscle easier than he did, and I put on fat easier than he did.
01:17:08.000 It had nothing to do with how much.
01:17:09.000 We both ate as much as we could.
01:17:12.000 In fact, dinners in our family lasted like 18 minutes because it was, you know, my mother put down like, you know, enough for four, eight people and if I didn't eat it fast, my brother, yeah, exactly.
01:17:22.000 Start at seven over at 718, no matter what she served.
01:17:28.000 When you're looking at all this data and you're putting together this book and you realize that you're going to drop this mind blower on people that We've been essentially misled by almost every established organization when it comes to health and diet.
01:17:47.000 How are you feeling when you're about to release this?
01:17:50.000 Are you hesitant?
01:17:51.000 Is this like one thing where you're like, Jesus Christ, am I just...
01:17:53.000 I mean, did you have this incredible desire to double-check, triple-check, quadruple-check?
01:17:59.000 No, but I should have.
01:18:04.000 Okay, so the first time this happened...
01:18:06.000 So the articles in science, for whatever reason, didn't create all that much controversy.
01:18:13.000 I mean, they won awards and reporting awards, and they were in books about the best science writing, but nobody really cared.
01:18:21.000 I mean, there was enough controversy about whether this low-fat diet, for instance, was the right thing.
01:18:27.000 Then I do this New York Times Magazine article where The idea was to go out and find out that this was pitched in 2001 and our awareness of the obesity epidemic was only about three years old.
01:18:42.000 And you could pinpoint it in time, from between the late 1970s to the early 1990s, two surveys that were done.
01:18:49.000 And during those two surveys, the prevalence of obesity almost doubled the United States, the percentage of Americans.
01:18:57.000 So you'd ask the question, what caused it?
01:18:59.000 And I had two hypotheses.
01:19:01.000 One was we had shifted.
01:19:02.000 In the 1960s, the conventional wisdom was that Carbohydrates are uniquely fattening.
01:19:09.000 One line I quote in two of my books was the first sentence of a British Journal of Nutrition article in 1963, written by one of the two leading British dieticians, was, every woman knows carbohydrates are fattening.
01:19:22.000 And every woman knew this car, you know, bread, pasta, potatoes, rice, beer, sweets, you know, they'd go right to your hips.
01:19:28.000 That was a lot.
01:19:29.000 And then we turned them into heart-healthy diet foods by the 1980s.
01:19:33.000 And that happened between, was institutionalized between 1977 and 1984. And by 84, like the New York Times health reporters writing her best-selling Diet, you know, health cooking book called the Good Food Book,
01:19:49.000 and she's saying, yeah, we used to think carbs are fattening, but now we should eat pasta and bread all the time.
01:19:55.000 So that was one hypothesis.
01:19:56.000 The other was high fructose corn syrup, which came in in 1977 and had sort of replaced sugar and Pepsi and Coke by 1984. Anyway, as I'm doing that piece, I realize I stumbled upon five studies of the Atkins diet.
01:20:10.000 The Atkins diet is what scientists call the anomalous observation.
01:20:15.000 What you're always looking for in science is the anomalous observation.
01:20:18.000 That's the thing that doesn't fit with any of your beliefs.
01:20:23.000 You've got a theory that says this and then you find that.
01:20:28.000 And now you've got a way to come up with a better theory because you've got something else you have to explain that your present theory doesn't.
01:20:34.000 And it's the anomalous observations that move science forward.
01:20:37.000 It's the thing that just doesn't fit with your belief.
01:20:40.000 So here's the diet trials where you've got the Atkins diet, high in fat, high in saturated fat, so it should give you heart disease.
01:20:47.000 You know, double quarter pounder with cheese, no bun, lobster, Newberg, you know, eggs, bacon, sausage.
01:20:55.000 And you're allowed to eat as much as you want.
01:20:58.000 Okay, so it's not a calorie-restricted diet.
01:21:01.000 It's ad libitum.
01:21:02.000 As long as you don't eat carbs, you could have eight eggs for breakfast and a rash for bacon and, you know, whole chicken for lunch.
01:21:09.000 So the other theory, one theory is that fat is going to cause heart disease and the other theory is that the eat as much as you want, you tell a fat person to eat as much as they want, they're going to get fatter, right?
01:21:18.000 Because we think they got fat to begin with because they ate too much.
01:21:22.000 And then you compare those people to people you put on an American Heart Association low-fat diet and you tell them to calorie restrict.
01:21:30.000 Am I repeating myself?
01:21:32.000 No, go ahead.
01:21:34.000 You know, the ice cream scoop size of tuna salad on the lettuce patty thing that we all went through at some point in our life.
01:21:42.000 Maybe not you if you were naturally lean.
01:21:44.000 Anyway, in all five of these trials, and they'd been done but not published yet, and they'd been presented at conferences, the people on the Atkins diet not only lost more weight than the ones on the calorie-restricted American Heart Association low-fat diet that all American people were supposed to eat,
01:22:02.000 so that refutes the eating too much hypothesis, because these guys on the Atkins diet can eat as much as they want, but their heart disease risk factors are better.
01:22:14.000 Okay, so they're supposed to die of heart disease.
01:22:17.000 You know, you eat the bacon, it clogs your arteries, you fall over dead, but they were healthier.
01:22:23.000 So it refutes the heart disease thing too.
01:22:25.000 So there's the anomalous observation.
01:22:27.000 How do you explain that?
01:22:29.000 If dietary fat causes heart disease and eating too much causes obesity.
01:22:35.000 So I write this article.
01:22:37.000 I lead it with this young Harvard endocrinologist, pediatrician who's feeding low-carb diets to his patients at Boston Children's Hospital.
01:22:48.000 He's like politically acceptable.
01:22:49.000 He's sincere.
01:22:50.000 He's at Harvard.
01:22:51.000 I want to ease people into it.
01:22:55.000 And then I talk about the Atkins thing down below and how Atkins had gotten pilloried back in the late 60s, early 70s for telling people they could eat these high-fat diets because we thought, you know, and what these studies showed.
01:23:08.000 And the editors of the New York Times Magazine said Atkins is the elephant in the living room.
01:23:14.000 Like, get rid of this Harvard guy.
01:23:17.000 Put him down below.
01:23:18.000 Lead with Atkins, okay?
01:23:20.000 I mean, they know how to get people to read an article.
01:23:23.000 So I write this lead.
01:23:25.000 I read it to my wife, and it's, you know, if the American Medical Association, the American Heart Association, have a find yourself standing naked nightmare in Times Square, excuse me, find yourself standing naked in Times Square nightmare, It's that all the advice they've been giving to the American people about a healthy diet for the last 50 years is wrong,
01:23:45.000 and maybe Atkins was right all along, and maybe both.
01:23:49.000 And I read it to my wife and I say, they will never run this in a million years.
01:23:53.000 And I email it to the editors and they don't change a word.
01:23:58.000 And that's the lead of the magazine article.
01:24:00.000 And then they put this picture on the cover of the magazine, which is this kind of cheap-looking porterhouse steak.
01:24:06.000 They didn't go to, you know, the photographer to make a delicious, you know, and it's got a pat of butter.
01:24:13.000 And the headline is, What If It's All Been a Big Fat Lie?
01:24:18.000 And I didn't stop them from doing it.
01:24:20.000 But I didn't know what to expect.
01:24:21.000 I knew it was going to be controversial.
01:24:23.000 Getting back to your question, I tend to answer long-winded.
01:24:27.000 I knew it was going to be controversial.
01:24:30.000 I knew it was going to be the most controversial article they'd run since a friend of mine ten years earlier had written an article about how recycling is a complete waste of time and money.
01:24:40.000 I had no idea what was going to happen.
01:24:43.000 No idea.
01:24:44.000 And I compare it to my boxing career.
01:24:48.000 When I was younger, when I was at Harvard, my best friend was a boxer.
01:24:53.000 He was a street fighter from Manhattan, a Puerto Rican kid, and a wonderful guy.
01:24:58.000 I mean, everyone in school loved him.
01:24:59.000 And then he taught me how to box, and we used to, you know, box in the gym, and I would do this sort of Muhammad Ali imitation, because that's what I thought boxing was in 1977. Then he actually had an amateur fight in Lomas in March 1977, and got killed in the fight.
01:25:17.000 And of course, me being young and stupid, it's not enough to prevent me from Continuing, so when I moved to New York...
01:25:24.000 Did you watch the fight?
01:25:24.000 Yeah, we were there.
01:25:25.000 You were there?
01:25:26.000 We didn't know.
01:25:26.000 What happened to him?
01:25:28.000 He danced into a right hook and went over backwards like it was frozen, like it was a plank of wood, and his head bounced off the mat.
01:25:37.000 That is how I remember it.
01:25:38.000 God knows if my memory is right.
01:25:40.000 It's one of the scariest things is when the head bounces.
01:25:43.000 Yeah.
01:25:44.000 It's one of the worst ways to get knocked out.
01:25:46.000 Yeah, and we knew it was bad, but we didn't know.
01:25:49.000 He didn't die.
01:25:50.000 He was in a coma.
01:25:52.000 They took him to the hospital.
01:25:53.000 We went all home.
01:25:55.000 And then a week later, there's just no brain activity.
01:25:58.000 This is how I remember it.
01:25:59.000 I hope I'm doing him justice by getting the memory right.
01:26:03.000 Of course, nowadays you can Google it and read about the article on the Boston Globe, and it was an article.
01:26:09.000 Anyway, I moved to New York.
01:26:10.000 I go to journalism school.
01:26:11.000 I have a friend who is Norman Maller's nephew.
01:26:15.000 And Norman Mailer had a group of people who used to get together at the Gramercy Gym on Saturday mornings in New York.
01:26:22.000 This is another long-winded answer to your question.
01:26:24.000 I mean, talk about shaggy dog story.
01:26:27.000 So every Saturday morning, we'd meet at the Gramercy Gym, which is 14th and around Lexington.
01:26:32.000 Back then, it was a very seedy neighborhood, and it was...
01:26:36.000 Classic Jim.
01:26:37.000 Yeah, classic Jim.
01:26:39.000 And some really, like, Ryan O'Neal's buddies with Norman would show up once every three months, and there was a guy who ran, I forget, it was a porn magazine that was sold in a brown paper bag.
01:26:51.000 He would show up, and then, you know, a half dozen other people, I had this friend, Steve Chow, went on to I'd become Barry Diller's right-hand man, and yeah, Hollywood, who had actually been the valedictorian of our class at Harvard.
01:27:06.000 And we would spar, and I enjoyed it, and I got into it, and it was getting the crap beat out of me first.
01:27:15.000 But eventually, I kept doing it, and then I decided to fight in the New York Golden Gloves and write about it for Playboy.
01:27:21.000 So the piece was called Life is a Standing Eight Count.
01:27:26.000 I'm sorry, but this is after your friend died.
01:27:28.000 This is after my friend died.
01:27:29.000 Wow.
01:27:30.000 So, anyway, the point is, kind of like going from sparring to your first match.
01:27:36.000 Now, you had a much more successful career than I did.
01:27:40.000 I had two fights.
01:27:41.000 Wow.
01:27:42.000 I won the first one because the Irish cop I was fighting got tired of punching me, and I finally thought if I hit him back, maybe that'll slow him down.
01:27:50.000 It worked.
01:27:53.000 But that transition from sparring to being in the ring and having someone want to beat the crap out of you is like you just can't.
01:28:02.000 You cannot conceive of what it's going to be like until you do it, right?
01:28:06.000 Right.
01:28:07.000 I mean, if you can remember back to your first fight, and you might have been more of a natural animal than I am.
01:28:12.000 I'm kind of a cerebral guy.
01:28:13.000 I think too much.
01:28:15.000 But that's what it was like getting this article published.
01:28:18.000 Like, I knew it was going to be controversial.
01:28:20.000 You want me to tell you the end of the boxing story?
01:28:23.000 Sure.
01:28:23.000 I won my first fight.
01:28:26.000 I knocked out this cop from Staten Island, and I was done.
01:28:30.000 I didn't want to do it again.
01:28:30.000 I didn't enjoy winning.
01:28:31.000 I did not enjoy knocking him out.
01:28:33.000 I didn't like anything about it.
01:28:35.000 This nose was not built for getting pummeled, and I was not a very good defensive fighter.
01:28:40.000 And then the second fight, I went up against the guy who won it.
01:28:44.000 This was not the open category, the 10 fights or less category, and he knocked me out in a minute and 37 seconds.
01:28:52.000 I had a friend who, a photographer for life, who came.
01:28:56.000 Norman Mailer was at the fight, too.
01:28:57.000 Like, Norman's sitting there watching me get the crap beat out of me.
01:29:00.000 And my friend, who was a photographer, didn't have time to get her lens cap off, basically.
01:29:07.000 So I have a photo that ran in Playboy with the article, which was, you know, you could see ring level and you see these two big feet sticking up and this body prone on the ring, you know.
01:29:18.000 Did you get knocked unconscious?
01:29:19.000 Yeah.
01:29:20.000 When you woke up, how terrified were you?
01:29:23.000 Were you thinking at all about your friend who died?
01:29:25.000 No, that's the funny thing.
01:29:26.000 Not at all.
01:29:27.000 But I thought about it afterwards.
01:29:29.000 So it's interesting.
01:29:32.000 Apparently, you know, I woke up in the ring.
01:29:33.000 I mean, I stood up.
01:29:34.000 They raised the other guy's hand.
01:29:36.000 I don't remember any of that.
01:29:37.000 Do you remember the fight at all?
01:29:39.000 A little bit.
01:29:40.000 A little bit of, like, these roundhouses whizzing by my head.
01:29:45.000 And I had this tendency I would, like, pull my head back, so I'm pulling my hands down instead of...
01:29:50.000 Terrible instinct, but natural for some strange reason.
01:29:52.000 It's very difficult to teach people to not do the worst thing.
01:29:56.000 Yeah, and you know, if my career had lasted past that fight, my very good coach would have broken it out and he would have said, don't ever do that again.
01:30:04.000 Anyway, my memory is I'm sitting outside the ring and a doctor is saying to me, do you know what your name is?
01:30:12.000 So there's a period in my life where I was clearly conscious, but I have no memory of it.
01:30:17.000 Um, then they, they make you go to the hospital afterwards to make sure you're not going to die overnight.
01:30:22.000 And I was in the emergency room and there was a guy next to me who had had a motorcycle accident and a cab had cut him off.
01:30:30.000 And he had the same, we were talking, he was about my age, Hispanic.
01:30:34.000 And he, um, you know, this thing where there's You know, the way you say the next thing I remember.
01:30:41.000 Right.
01:30:42.000 And then there's this awareness that there could very well have never been a next thing I remember.
01:30:48.000 You know, the moment could have just ended there, and that's when I started thinking about my friend.
01:30:53.000 But I was too busy getting mad at the hospital attendant who kept telling me that my nose was broken.
01:30:59.000 And I kept saying, my nose isn't broken, asshole.
01:31:01.000 This is the nose I was born with.
01:31:03.000 Oh, man, that's a broken nose.
01:31:05.000 I know a broken nose when I see one.
01:31:07.000 But...
01:31:09.000 Anyway, that was a little bit.
01:31:10.000 So I published this article.
01:31:12.000 I've got no idea what's going to happen.
01:31:15.000 And, you know, it was like just the universe.
01:31:19.000 I mean, first of all, there's an enormous amount of media attention.
01:31:22.000 So I'm doing TV shows and radio shows and people are writing about me.
01:31:25.000 But people are attacking me because the implication is not just did the nutrition, obesity community screw up.
01:31:33.000 But my journalist friends who have been covering this field screwed up.
01:31:38.000 They got the wrong story.
01:31:39.000 They missed the story that I found.
01:31:43.000 And nobody wants to think like that.
01:31:45.000 You don't want to think you're bad at what you do, right?
01:31:47.000 Right.
01:31:47.000 So, you know, friends are writing articles about me.
01:31:52.000 You know, one woman journalist in Boston who used to be a good friend who thought I was one of the five best...
01:32:00.000 Writers in the country, science journalists in the country, until I wrote a piece that came to a different conclusion than a book she had written on obesity.
01:32:08.000 And the headline in Newsweek was, it's not the carbs, stupid.
01:32:13.000 The Center for Science and the Public Interest did a piece called Big Fat Lies, cover of their newspaper, basically explaining how I had screwed up on everything I had screwed up.
01:32:24.000 A journalist who had written a book on obesity did a piece for Reason magazine about all the ways I had screwed up.
01:32:31.000 Luckily, I hadn't screwed up in any of them, so I could get back at them and take them down.
01:32:35.000 But when you did get back at them and take them down, you're talking about a time where, I mean, what year was this?
01:32:40.000 This was 2002. So you had a blog?
01:32:43.000 How did you get back at them?
01:32:45.000 Did you publish a response?
01:32:47.000 The Center for Science and the Public Interest piece, they wouldn't even let me respond.
01:32:53.000 Reason Magazine was interesting.
01:32:56.000 I called up the editors and I said, look, this is just complete bullshit and you've got to let me respond.
01:33:03.000 And they said, okay.
01:33:04.000 They didn't care because they put it online.
01:33:07.000 So if Albus is going to write for him for free, let him write for him for free.
01:33:10.000 And more controversy brings more readers.
01:33:13.000 So I... I spent the weekend, I remember I wrote like a 9,000 word response and there's still some great stuff in there where, you know, even the very end of this thing, I was pointing out every way this guy had screwed up, like taken down my article by saying I made mistakes when he was the one making mistakes and the last line was something like,
01:33:32.000 he had called my editor and Who had now bought this book for a lot of money.
01:33:37.000 He had called my editor, I think he used the last name, he called him Richard Siegel or something.
01:33:42.000 So the last line of the book was in just the final word.
01:33:46.000 My editor's name is not Richard Siegel, it's John, period.
01:33:50.000 9,000 word takedown.
01:33:52.000 This guy ended up never writing for Reason Magazine again.
01:33:56.000 Congratulations.
01:33:57.000 Yeah.
01:33:57.000 He got rid of an asshole.
01:33:59.000 And also, the human ego is shocking and horrifying.
01:34:03.000 Because that's the only reason why someone would look at what you wrote...
01:34:08.000 We're good to go.
01:34:25.000 Think about the hundreds of thousands or maybe even millions of people that have read articles from these people that gave them poor advice, and that advice adversely affected their health directly.
01:34:37.000 Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
01:34:37.000 But instead, they cover their ass.
01:34:40.000 We're not programmed to do that.
01:34:41.000 They are we.
01:34:42.000 We need mushrooms.
01:34:43.000 That's what you always got to remember.
01:34:44.000 Dietary mushrooms.
01:34:45.000 Yeah.
01:34:45.000 Remember of my...
01:34:46.000 Well, this is a low-dose diet.
01:34:48.000 Yeah.
01:34:48.000 Acid thing.
01:34:49.000 Sounds like I could really transform my personality.
01:34:52.000 I could become a different person.
01:34:54.000 Have you tried it before?
01:34:55.000 No, no.
01:34:56.000 I'm a little scared that I'll become a...
01:34:58.000 I'm going to try it now.
01:34:59.000 Is that what's going to happen?
01:35:00.000 I have to...
01:35:02.000 Let me know after the show.
01:35:03.000 I have to be able to get to Burbank and catch...
01:35:06.000 Oh, you can get to Burbank on acid.
01:35:07.000 It's the best way.
01:35:08.000 Yeah, there we go.
01:35:09.000 Thank you, Joe.
01:35:09.000 You'll instinctively know where Jay Leno's garage is.
01:35:11.000 It'll be like a beacon.
01:35:13.000 You'll see it above.
01:35:14.000 You know how you have a 3D map and it's got that little balloon where your location is?
01:35:18.000 Yeah, okay, we're there.
01:35:20.000 You know, hey, I live in Oakland.
01:35:22.000 We don't need help with psychoactives up there.
01:35:25.000 We're good.
01:35:26.000 Anyway, what was I saying?
01:35:27.000 So yeah, it's just a natural human tendency.
01:35:29.000 But you wish somebody would say...
01:35:35.000 Jesus, I never thought of this.
01:35:37.000 That's all they need to say.
01:35:38.000 They have to say, we never thought of this.
01:35:40.000 This is an interesting take.
01:35:42.000 Clearly, the editors at the New York Times Magazine are really smart people, thought this was interesting.
01:35:49.000 The fact-checkers fact-checked it.
01:35:51.000 There's no mistakes.
01:35:52.000 That's why at least I was safe there, because they're really good fact-checkers.
01:35:55.000 It didn't rely on me.
01:35:57.000 Why don't we...
01:35:59.000 And it just doesn't happen.
01:36:02.000 I mean, it was funny, even...
01:36:05.000 Afterwards, I start doing this book, and now I'm going to interview hundreds more people, and you would expect that a lot of the scientists aren't going to talk to me, because they're going to be so mad at me about this article, but most of them actually were good.
01:36:17.000 There was one scientist I wanted to talk to specifically, because a guy I was talking to said he hated your article.
01:36:22.000 He thought it was total crap.
01:36:25.000 So I sent him an email, and I said, you know, I'd like to interview you.
01:36:29.000 He thought the article was total crap, and I'd like to know why, because if it was, I want to make sure I don't make those mistakes again.
01:36:36.000 And he said, sure, as long as you make sure you check on my quotes, because I don't trust you to get my quotes right, because that was another story that was going around at the time.
01:36:45.000 And two weeks later, we get on the phone, and he says, you know, I've got to apologize.
01:36:54.000 When I read your article, I was so pissed off by the title, what if it's all been a big fat lie and you're holier than thou, smarter than we are attitude, that I never actually thought deeply about what you were saying.
01:37:08.000 And I pretty much agree with you.
01:37:10.000 Wow.
01:37:11.000 Now that I've read it again, and context is everything in these things.
01:37:16.000 And I notice that when I lecture, so I give a lot of lectures.
01:37:19.000 I talk grand rounds in medical schools.
01:37:21.000 If somebody introduces me to a room full of doctors, as this is a very well-respected journalist, he's won all these awards, including these influential public health awards, he's written this incredibly thoughtful, provoking book.
01:37:34.000 And we managed to get them here to give you the arguments.
01:37:39.000 Doctors will be completely receptive to everything I say.
01:37:42.000 I've also had people introduce me as, yeah, here's this guy Taubes.
01:37:45.000 He wrote this big book.
01:37:46.000 He says everything we say is wrong and he's going to give a lecture.
01:37:50.000 And now it's like they're tuned out from day one.
01:37:53.000 From the moment I open my mouth, they're looking for reasons not to believe a word I said.
01:38:07.000 By making this article as controversial as it could, with putting Atkins in the lead, and Porterhouse steak on the cover, and what if it's all been a big, fat lie?
01:38:16.000 And I actually wasn't calling it a lie.
01:38:18.000 There's a lot of mistaken assumptions, a lot of bad science, but nobody lied.
01:38:23.000 Did you create the title?
01:38:24.000 No.
01:38:25.000 That's always what happens, right?
01:38:26.000 I didn't reject it either.
01:38:29.000 It's a great title.
01:38:30.000 Well, that's the thing.
01:38:30.000 So it got me a big book advance.
01:38:33.000 It made it exceedingly controversial, but it turned a lot of people off because they were being accused of things they didn't want to think of themselves, especially the lie.
01:38:44.000 Well, perhaps them initially, but over the course of time, it's got a lot of support behind it now by so many people.
01:38:52.000 You've been recommended to me by at least a half a dozen people that I deeply respect.
01:38:55.000 Yeah.
01:38:56.000 Well, this is the thing.
01:38:57.000 It's an extraordinarily powerful thing.
01:39:01.000 What you experienced, and you weren't even overweight.
01:39:04.000 You know, this is...
01:39:05.000 Yeah, that's a good point.
01:39:06.000 Yeah.
01:39:06.000 Two things that, you know, when I talk to my colleagues about this, I say it's like you're playing in a poker game with a thousand people in the establishment, and they cheat because they all talk to each other, and they share cards, and they show each other what they get,
01:39:22.000 and they tell them what they're going to bet.
01:39:24.000 But God keeps dealing you four aces.
01:39:27.000 You've got the best hand.
01:39:31.000 And the best hand is you shift your diet, you get rid of the carbs and you replace them with fat and it does remarkable things to most people, not all.
01:39:41.000 Okay.
01:39:41.000 But I want to talk to the people that it doesn't work on.
01:39:44.000 I really do.
01:39:45.000 I want to know what they're actually doing.
01:39:47.000 The problem with people, when they, you know, it's so subjective.
01:39:52.000 It's also, you don't exactly know how they're doing it, what their diet is like, in terms of, like, how are they cutting out carbs?
01:40:00.000 What kind of nutrients are they taking in?
01:40:01.000 What's their rest like?
01:40:03.000 How much sleep are they getting?
01:40:04.000 That's the thing.
01:40:05.000 I mean, I have a friend...
01:40:08.000 Diet book author, I think one of the smartest doctors out there.
01:40:11.000 Whatever he says, it's always worth listening to.
01:40:14.000 He believes that when people fail on the diet, it doesn't matter what age they are, what sex they are, when the diet doesn't return them to a relatively healthy weight, he believes it's because they're not conforming to the diet.
01:40:29.000 I disagree with him, actually.
01:40:31.000 He's talking about any diet, period?
01:40:33.000 No, the low-carb, high-fat diet.
01:40:35.000 So, you know, maybe they're eating too many nuts and there's carbs in nuts, or maybe they're lying to him about what they're doing, or they're still having the occasional sweet, and clearly there are people...
01:40:45.000 Who try to compromise on these diets.
01:40:47.000 By compromise, I mean, you've been hearing so long that fat is bad for you.
01:40:51.000 I'm sure I'm going to restrict sugar and grain and starches, but I'm also going to restrict fat.
01:40:57.000 Now you're eating skinless chicken breasts with green vegetables, and you're not even putting butter on it, and it tastes awful, and nobody's going to stick to that diet anyway.
01:41:07.000 And in order to give the skinless chicken breasts some flavor, you've got to marinate it in some sugar marinade.
01:41:14.000 So, and the protein, you don't want to eat a high protein diet because you're going to convert the protein to glucose, some of those amino acids, and that's going to raise blood sugar and that could be a problem.
01:41:24.000 So, maybe they're just doing it wrong.
01:41:29.000 But there are a lot of hormones that influence fat accumulation.
01:41:32.000 So this is, remember I said the Germans and Austrians had concluded, maybe I didn't say this, I can't even remember what I, you know, I've been doing this book tour.
01:41:40.000 I got it.
01:41:41.000 Germans and Austrian research said, look, this has got to be a hormonal metabolic issue.
01:41:46.000 The whole idea that it's just calories in, calories out is...
01:41:49.000 It's an explanation.
01:41:51.000 It's like somebody gets heavier, they take in more calories than they expend.
01:41:55.000 We know that.
01:41:56.000 It's like somebody accumulates energy in their fat tissue, they're accumulating energy in their body, which means they're taking in energy more than they expend.
01:42:04.000 That's just a description of what happens.
01:42:06.000 It says nothing about why.
01:42:09.000 Clearly hormones play a huge role in fat accumulation or men and women would look identical.
01:42:16.000 Boys go through puberty, they lose fat and gain muscle.
01:42:21.000 Girls go through puberty, they gain fat in very specific places.
01:42:25.000 Not everywhere.
01:42:26.000 Places designed to drive the boys crazy and get some procreation going.
01:42:31.000 And that's all hormonal.
01:42:33.000 It's all estrogen in the girls, testosterone in the boys, you know, little mix going on.
01:42:38.000 It doesn't matter how many calories they're consuming.
01:42:42.000 So these Germans and Austrians would say it's, you know, it's clearly a hormonal thing.
01:42:47.000 I mean, the only way you could explain obesity is a hormonal dysregulation.
01:42:52.000 And then in the 60s, we learned that insulin controls fat accumulation, dominant hormone.
01:42:58.000 But these other hormones play a role as well.
01:43:00.000 So stress hormones...
01:43:04.000 So estrogen and testosterone both inhibit an enzyme called lipoprotein lipase that, when it's on your fat cells, basically pulls fat out of the circulation and into the cell.
01:43:19.000 That's a simplistic way to put it.
01:43:22.000 So when you're pumping out estrogen and testosterone, you're inhibiting this enzyme, which inhibits fat accumulation.
01:43:27.000 Then you get older.
01:43:29.000 You secrete less that these Hormones, women go through menopause, they secrete less estrogen, the lipoprotein lipase is upregulated on their fat cells, so you get more of it, so it just starts accumulating fat, no matter how much the woman wants to eat or exercise.
01:43:46.000 And this is why they put on fat when they get older.
01:43:49.000 I think women are programmed to put on fat when they're pregnant.
01:43:52.000 Men are never really programmed to put on fat, but women have a fat accumulation program when they're pregnant, and it sort of kicks in a little bit.
01:44:01.000 As they go through menopause.
01:44:03.000 And so I think historically, when you look at the anecdotal evidence, you know, older women have a much harder time losing excess body fat, even on very calorie, carbohydrate-restricted ketogenic diets.
01:44:16.000 And it would be completely understandable.
01:44:19.000 And the argument I make is that this would still be the best diet, still be the leanest they could be.
01:44:28.000 You know, for all intents and purposes by getting rid of carbs, but it does not mean that it's going to work or it's going to work as much as they want it to because of these other sex hormones and the influence on, you know, body fat as well.
01:44:41.000 And perhaps the only way to adjust that would be extreme exercise, right?
01:44:45.000 Like they don't have to go crazy CrossFit or start running up hills with weights on or something.
01:44:51.000 And that's a question I don't know.
01:44:53.000 And that wouldn't address it.
01:44:54.000 That would be sort of a temporary fix.
01:44:57.000 You know, so you might be able to, A, stimulate some more, even testosterone production.
01:45:03.000 I mean, but...
01:45:06.000 Temporary fix unless you continue that activity.
01:45:08.000 Yeah, but the problem is if it may be virtually, you know, again, I... Here's my issue with...
01:45:14.000 I... I don't know.
01:45:18.000 There was a Harvard psychologist in the 40s and 50s named William Sheldon who came up with this idea.
01:45:27.000 I'm going to need some Googling here, by the way, of three different fundamental body types.
01:45:33.000 So there's an ectomorph, some mesomorph, and what was the third one?
01:45:37.000 Endomorph.
01:45:37.000 Endomorph.
01:45:38.000 Which is the obese one?
01:45:39.000 Endomorph.
01:45:40.000 Endomorph.
01:45:40.000 And he said, and which is the thin one?
01:45:42.000 Ectomorph.
01:45:43.000 Ecto.
01:45:49.000 You can starve an endomorph, you don't turn them into an ectomorph, you turn them into an emaciated endomorph.
01:45:56.000 I don't know if it was his metaphor or mine, I forget now, you can't starve a basset hound and turn it into a greyhound, you just end up with an emaciated basset hound.
01:46:06.000 So are these genetic factors determined by the environment where their ancestors developed?
01:46:10.000 And the environment in the mother's womb and the, you know, and it's not necessarily, like I said, genetic.
01:46:17.000 It's certainly biological factors.
01:46:19.000 Who knows?
01:46:19.000 Maybe the gut biome is involved.
01:46:21.000 I doubt it.
01:46:22.000 But there's also the shapes of the bodies are radically different, too.
01:46:24.000 Well, that's the thing.
01:46:25.000 The width of the shoulders for the lesomorphs.
01:46:27.000 Yeah, yeah, yeah.
01:46:27.000 My brother was an actor.
01:46:29.000 I mean, he was always tall and thin.
01:46:31.000 And he got, you know, at 195, he was buff, but he wasn't.
01:46:36.000 I could put on muscle much easier than him.
01:46:38.000 I could put on fat.
01:46:39.000 I had a friend who was a taekwondo champion in the 80s, and he was 6'2", 6' maybe 3", and he fought at 147 pounds.
01:46:48.000 Jesus, yeah.
01:46:49.000 And you couldn't even get anywhere near him.
01:46:51.000 I'm like 6'2", and I'll starve to death at 175. But it was in his hands, it was in the shape of his face, he was very narrow, his feet, everything.
01:47:00.000 And that's how his body...
01:47:01.000 So part of this alternative hypothesis, which I find...
01:47:04.000 So, you know, we believe today is, you know, the conventional thinking is...
01:47:10.000 How much you eat and exercise drives how much fat you accumulate.
01:47:14.000 And the alternative hypothesis is that how much fat you accumulate is very well regulated by the human body, although you can change that regulation by changing the macronutrients.
01:47:24.000 So, people who fat tissue doesn't want to accumulate fat, who are constitutionally lean, like your buddy, When they eat a meal, they can't store it as fat temporarily.
01:47:34.000 They've got to burn all those calories.
01:47:36.000 The way they'd burn it, prior to the 1950s, a clinician studying obesity used to talk about the impulse to physical activity.
01:47:44.000 Lance Armstrong eats 1,000 calories of pasta, and his body doesn't want to store it as fat.
01:47:52.000 It wants to burn it, so he goes for a three-hour bike ride after lunch.
01:47:56.000 Because his body's trying desperately to get rid of those calories and it doesn't want to store him as fat.
01:48:02.000 I have the thousand calories of pasta.
01:48:04.000 My body's happy storing it as fat and I'm asleep an hour later.
01:48:07.000 But I'm not thicker and fatter than Armstrong because I'm asleep.
01:48:12.000 I'm asleep because that's the way my body processes the carbs by storing calories.
01:48:17.000 But is that a case of nature or nurture?
01:48:21.000 That's nature.
01:48:23.000 No, it's not because the nurture part is how the diet influences.
01:48:28.000 So if I have exclusively fat and protein, if I'm eating a ketogenic diet, then I'm minimizing fat accumulation and my body wants to burn more of those calories.
01:48:38.000 So I am closer to being a Lance Armstrong.
01:48:42.000 So Lance Armstrong can be lean on his high-carb diet.
01:48:46.000 I am closer to being Lance Armstrong-like, closest on a diet to absent all carbohydrates.
01:48:53.000 But I'm still, you know, now I'm just a bigger individual.
01:48:57.000 I mean, it's interesting.
01:48:58.000 We were talking about, you know, I was talking to a friend of mine who was the freshman manager of my college football team.
01:49:07.000 So this was Harvard, okay?
01:49:09.000 It was Division II football.
01:49:10.000 It was a lot of smart people.
01:49:13.000 You know, guys who couldn't make it in Division I. We had kids who went to Harvard because they didn't get scholarships at Holy Cross, so they went, okay, I'll play football for Harvard.
01:49:21.000 They were local.
01:49:23.000 1976, my senior year, the biggest kid on our team, Danny Jiggetts, weighed 265 pounds, 6'5".
01:49:32.000 From our standards, he was enormous.
01:49:34.000 He went off to play for the Chicago Bears for five or six years.
01:49:38.000 I think we had one other offensive lineman who was 265, also 6'4", 6'5", maybe two.
01:49:48.000 This year, Harvard football team, smart kids, same socioeconomic status.
01:49:54.000 The entire offensive, they got, I think, 12 players over 300 pounds.
01:49:58.000 Jesus Christ.
01:49:59.000 And these guys are enormous.
01:50:00.000 I mean, they're 6'7", 300 pounds.
01:50:03.000 They didn't grow people that big when I was growing up.
01:50:07.000 I mean, I could say maybe I didn't see them.
01:50:10.000 Maybe they weren't around.
01:50:11.000 Maybe they were 6'7", and they only weighed 230 because they weren't being bulked up, so they were playing basketball instead of football.
01:50:18.000 I mean, I could imagine ways that that's confusing, but from our perception, if you look just what happened, when I was a kid, In the early 1960s, as far as I know, there was one 300-pounder in the NFL and AFL,
01:50:36.000 two different leagues back then, Bob D. I remember his name.
01:50:38.000 He played for the Boston Patriots, and his head was small compared to his body, and he was a big, fat guy.
01:50:46.000 You know, what is there now?
01:50:47.000 20, 30 per team?
01:50:49.000 Well, here's a good example.
01:50:51.000 Big George Foreman from 1970, whatever it was, when he fought Joe Frazier.
01:50:56.000 He only weighed 217 pounds.
01:50:59.000 Is that?
01:50:59.000 Yeah.
01:51:00.000 George only weighed 278 pounds?
01:51:01.000 When he came back, he got really fat.
01:51:03.000 When he came back, when he took a long time off, he ate himself to be well over 300 pounds, but he was extremely obese.
01:51:10.000 Draining all the fat from the George Foreman grill.
01:51:14.000 That was even after that.
01:51:17.000 But back in those days when he was a terror, before he fought Muhammad Ali, he was relatively small by today's standards.
01:51:23.000 I mean, if you look at UFC heavyweight champion Stipe Miocic, I believe Stipe walks around at about 240 pounds.
01:51:30.000 And he's small compared to Brock Lesnar, who's 285 pounds.
01:51:35.000 Like, here's a good example that Jamie just pulled up from 1927. God, blow your nose, man.
01:51:41.000 You're freaking me out.
01:51:42.000 Don't be scared.
01:51:42.000 You're the only one who can hear it.
01:51:44.000 Everybody can hear it.
01:51:45.000 Trust me.
01:51:45.000 They can hear it.
01:51:47.000 And then 190 pounds Morris Red Badgro.
01:51:52.000 How do you say that name?
01:51:53.000 B-A-D-G-R-O. Badgro.
01:51:56.000 Badgro.
01:51:57.000 He's growing bad.
01:51:58.000 That's why he's only 190. Exactly.
01:52:00.000 He's six foot tall, 190. And this is 1927. He played offense and defense for the New York Giants.
01:52:07.000 So that guy's 10 pounds lighter than me, and I'm 5'8".
01:52:12.000 He's six foot tall, and he's a pro football player, which is fucking terrifying to me.
01:52:16.000 And then you go to 1967, and you got Alan Page.
01:52:20.000 He's six foot four, 245 pounds, a relative giant in comparison.
01:52:25.000 Then you go to 2006, and you have, boy, say that name.
01:52:30.000 Haloti Nagata.
01:52:31.000 Haloti Nada.
01:52:33.000 Nada?
01:52:33.000 You say Nada?
01:52:34.000 I think it's...
01:52:35.000 You don't pronounce the G? You don't pronounce it.
01:52:36.000 Okay.
01:52:37.000 G is sign on.
01:52:38.000 Haloti Nada.
01:52:39.000 Okay, and he is 6'4", 335 pounds.
01:52:43.000 He's got a big old gut on him.
01:52:45.000 He could lose some weight.
01:52:46.000 Look at his 40 time, under five seconds.
01:52:48.000 Wow, that's insane.
01:52:50.000 So he's a giant.
01:52:51.000 I mean, people are just much larger.
01:52:53.000 Can you pull up the starting left tackle for the Dallas Cowboys right now?
01:52:56.000 I forget his name.
01:52:57.000 Just Google left tackle Dallas Cowboys.
01:53:00.000 Well, even heavyweight boxers today.
01:53:03.000 Tyrone Smith.
01:53:04.000 That's it.
01:53:04.000 Get a picture of Tyrone.
01:53:06.000 312-65.
01:53:07.000 Get a picture of him.
01:53:09.000 Whoa!
01:53:09.000 That's a big fella.
01:53:11.000 Okay.
01:53:11.000 Get the one with the shirt off.
01:53:12.000 Yeah, without the shirt off.
01:53:14.000 Let's go pornographic.
01:53:15.000 Okay, so they're not...
01:53:16.000 I mean, people didn't exist like that.
01:53:18.000 Right.
01:53:18.000 When I was growing up.
01:53:19.000 Yeah.
01:53:19.000 There's this new heavyweight that's fighting for the UFC. His name is Francis Ngannou.
01:53:25.000 And he's one of the most exciting prospects in the UFC right now.
01:53:28.000 He's a heavyweight.
01:53:29.000 He's undefeated.
01:53:30.000 And he is fucking enormous.
01:53:33.000 And he is probably...
01:53:35.000 Yeah, go to that picture right there.
01:53:36.000 The far left.
01:53:37.000 Far left.
01:53:38.000 Jamie, upper left.
01:53:38.000 Yeah.
01:53:40.000 I mean, that is a giant, man.
01:53:43.000 Ridiculous, brutal knockout artist, too.
01:53:46.000 And go see if there's a Wikipedia on his size.
01:53:50.000 But I'm pretty sure he's super lean at around 245, something like that.
01:53:56.000 What does it say there?
01:53:57.000 It says 6'4".
01:53:58.000 It doesn't say his weight right there.
01:54:00.000 Does it say his weight anywhere there?
01:54:03.000 257. 257. Jesus!
01:54:06.000 Okay, so he's 40 pounds heavier than Big George Foreman.
01:54:10.000 That may or may not be correct.
01:54:11.000 As far as the weight, but it's close, and I wouldn't be shocked.
01:54:15.000 He's one of those guys where he walks into the octagon, and when I do commentary, I sit at a desk that's touching the octagon.
01:54:22.000 So I'm sitting here, there's a desk, my notes are on it, he's in front of me.
01:54:25.000 When he walks in the octagon, I can feel his footsteps on my hands.
01:54:30.000 He's like he's made out of stone.
01:54:32.000 And then when he hits people, just Jesus Christ, you see the look on their face when he hits them.
01:54:37.000 See if you can find just a quick highlight reel of this guy.
01:54:42.000 Now, what's interesting is some of that, I mean, training has changed dramatically.
01:54:45.000 Oh, for sure.
01:54:46.000 Like even when George, I mean, you know, boxers didn't...
01:54:49.000 Lift.
01:54:50.000 They didn't do resistance training.
01:54:51.000 They didn't do any of that back then because they didn't want to slow them down.
01:54:55.000 Yeah, that's what they thought back then.
01:54:56.000 Yeah, look at this.
01:54:57.000 Boom!
01:54:59.000 He's a giant dude.
01:55:00.000 French, too.
01:55:01.000 Yes, French, but I believe originally from Nigeria, I believe.
01:55:08.000 Really, look at that.
01:55:09.000 Boom.
01:55:09.000 Big, powerful guy.
01:55:11.000 Terrifying guy.
01:55:12.000 So here's the thing.
01:55:13.000 One of my pet theories I don't talk about.
01:55:15.000 This is why I let my kids have sugar, by the way.
01:55:18.000 Ouch.
01:55:22.000 Okay, so one of the things that happens when you increase insulin, so sugar, the idea is sugar causes insulin resistance, that results in chronic increases in insulin levels.
01:55:30.000 So insulin stimulates fat accumulation, but it also stimulates secretion of what's called insulin-like growth hormone, which is similar to growth hormone.
01:55:38.000 So the reason we grow is not because growth hormone drives tissues and skeletal muscle to grow, but it drives insulin-like growth factor, which then works on a local level.
01:55:48.000 So if you have more insulin in your system, you're going to have more insulin-like growth factor, and it's going to be more bioavailable.
01:55:54.000 There's these proteins called binding proteins that float around the bloodstream, and they'll bind to IGF, insulin-like growth factor, and make it so it can't get into cells or can't bind to the receptors.
01:56:06.000 So you would expect...
01:56:10.000 As populations become more insulin resistant, you would expect them to grow, to be taller as well as thicker and fatter and more diabetic.
01:56:18.000 One of the classic observations, as populations become westernized, they get taller.
01:56:24.000 You look at medical records or army records from the Civil War and all the men were like 5'6".
01:56:33.000 You know, now clearly the average height has gone up and it's kind of leveled off a bit in the United States, but there's still countries in Europe where it's gotten higher.
01:56:41.000 And one of the things that freaks me out is when I go to Europe nowadays and walk around a lot of Scandinavians and I feel petite.
01:56:48.000 Oh, in Holland.
01:56:49.000 The average man in Holland is over six foot tall.
01:56:51.000 Yeah, when I was growing up, I was definitively tall and now I haven't shrunk, I don't think.
01:56:57.000 I might be getting there.
01:56:58.000 And now it's just like everyone seems 6'4", 6'5".
01:57:02.000 The conventional thinking is they get more calories, they get more protein, you need the protein for the growth and the calories, and that's kind of the explanation.
01:57:12.000 But it could be that they get more sugar, and that drives vertical growth as well as horizontal growth.
01:57:19.000 Well, that makes sense because don't bodybuilders, like in extreme situations, don't they take insulin in order to gain muscle?
01:57:25.000 Yeah, because it'll drive muscle development as well.
01:57:29.000 I mean, again, it works as a growth hormone.
01:57:31.000 An IGF is a growth hormone.
01:57:33.000 So could there be an argument for bodybuilders to consume a diet that's high in sugar?
01:57:38.000 In order to spike up that insulin?
01:57:41.000 You know, now you're getting out of my area of expertise again.
01:57:44.000 But it's funny, when Arnold came over in the 60s, one of the advantages he had, other than massive amounts of steroid consumption, was...
01:57:55.000 I forget who his mentor was back then, but they put him on a very low-carb diet because that definitely cuts the fat.
01:58:01.000 Again, this is far out of my area of expertise, but you get a bodybuilder and they'll tell you how they oscillate between high-carbs for...
01:58:13.000 Development high fat to cut the fat and get down to...
01:58:16.000 I had this debate.
01:58:17.000 Do you know Alan Aragon?
01:58:19.000 Yeah, I know who that guy is.
01:58:21.000 Yeah, so Alan, we had a debate.
01:58:23.000 Yeah, he's very skeptical.
01:58:25.000 Oh, it's a kind way to put it.
01:58:26.000 And I think it's a bit of a...
01:58:28.000 I don't get it.
01:58:29.000 I always wanted to ask him, like, Alan, you know...
01:58:32.000 That this isn't...
01:58:33.000 You know, I'm arguing that...
01:58:35.000 Well, define his position, because he doesn't think there's any issue with sugar.
01:58:39.000 His position is all about calories.
01:58:40.000 It's just all about calories, and you get people to exercise enough, you'll turn an obese person, lean, and, you know, I mean, the implication...
01:58:46.000 Well, that can happen, but, you know, who the fuck is going to do it the way you would have to do it?
01:58:51.000 You would essentially have to starve your body.
01:58:53.000 Well, but this is the point.
01:58:55.000 It's like I could...
01:58:56.000 It can be done that way.
01:58:57.000 I know, but it doesn't say anything about why they got fat to begin with.
01:59:01.000 It doesn't say anything about the damaging effects of sugar.
01:59:03.000 Yeah, and I could inhibit your kid's growth.
01:59:08.000 By starving them.
01:59:09.000 Right.
01:59:09.000 You know, and they're going to be stunted.
01:59:11.000 But that doesn't mean they're growing because they get to eat as much as they want.
01:59:14.000 They're growing because their brains are secreting growth hormone, stimulating IGF, and that makes them hungry.
01:59:20.000 So what is he denying about the...
01:59:22.000 I don't know.
01:59:22.000 We were in a debate in England that it was about...
01:59:28.000 I don't quite understand what he was denying.
01:59:30.000 That was the interesting thing.
01:59:32.000 He basically was denying that...
01:59:34.000 It was about that obesity was a hormonal metabolic disorder.
01:59:38.000 He had to deny that a journalist knows something that he doesn't and that the advice he's been giving and what he's been voicing over the years is right.
01:59:48.000 What is his medical background?
01:59:50.000 He's got no medical background.
01:59:52.000 He's a physical trainer.
01:59:53.000 Maybe he's an exercise physiologist.
01:59:55.000 He's no more doctor or nutritionist than I am.
02:00:00.000 The point is I was looking for ways to debate him, so I found a clip on the internet, one of his lectures, where he was talking about how there was one particular athlete he was training, a bodybuilder, he had to get, you know, maximum cut for the competition,
02:00:16.000 so he cut his carbs down.
02:00:19.000 And if you cut the carbs preferentially, you do that because you're going to reduce insulin and you're going to mobilize maximum amount of fat and you're going to get the most possible fat out of the fat tissue by doing it.
02:00:30.000 It clearly meant he believes what I believe.
02:00:33.000 But some people just, you know, you've got to establish that.
02:00:35.000 How do you respond to that?
02:00:37.000 He laughed.
02:00:38.000 Everybody laughed.
02:00:39.000 He got kind of embarrassed.
02:00:40.000 But it was a, you know, it was an interesting debate.
02:00:42.000 It was a fitness expo in, I forget what, you know, red brick town in England, you know, one of these...
02:00:51.000 The reason why I keep bringing him up is because I've been...
02:00:54.000 I've been...
02:00:57.000 I've been contacted by fans of his.
02:00:59.000 I've been in communication with him at one point in time, and I didn't realize how strongly against this proposition he is, or this concept he is.
02:01:07.000 Well, you should get him to do the show.
02:01:10.000 I mean, he's a very chatty, talkative guy, and he'll explain it to you, and then you could argue, and we could argue.
02:01:15.000 But what does he say about the impact of sugar?
02:01:19.000 Does he deny all these things that you're talking about in terms of diabetes?
02:01:23.000 We did not say this in the debate, and I would hate to get Alan's position wrong, but if he's implying that obesity is an energy balance problem, it's calories in, calories out, that seemed to be the argument he was defending vociferously when we debated.
02:01:40.000 That, in turn, means that the only way that foods can influence your body weight is through their Caloric content.
02:01:48.000 And that means sugar is, you know, an empty calorie.
02:01:53.000 The worst you could say about it.
02:01:55.000 But that's clearly not true if sugar actually does affect your hormonal state and that affects the way your body processes fat and insulin.
02:02:04.000 If he were to believe that, then he would have been conceding that I won the debate.
02:02:08.000 So I'm going to say...
02:02:10.000 Which he clearly doesn't think I did.
02:02:13.000 And frankly, I didn't because the crowd was 100% with him when we started and it was like 95% with him when we left.
02:02:21.000 Well, that's still pretty good.
02:02:23.000 That's what I would argue.
02:02:26.000 And I learned my lesson that you can't win a debate when you're going in and everyone sides with your...
02:02:32.000 Now, why did they all side with him?
02:02:34.000 Because they love sugar?
02:02:36.000 Remember, it wasn't about sugar.
02:02:38.000 It was about the cause of obesity.
02:02:39.000 We were actually debating different things.
02:02:42.000 It was a weird situation.
02:02:43.000 I may have blocked it out of my head, but we were debating.
02:02:47.000 Again, my argument, obesity, what I thought we were supposed to be debating.
02:02:54.000 Was whether or not obesity is caused by consuming too many calories or the macronutrient contents influencing this sort of hormonal metabolic regulation of fat accumulation.
02:03:05.000 What we ended up debating was whether or not the people in the audience would rather be trained by Alan Aragon, the physical trainer, exercise physiologist, or Gary Taubes, the journalist.
02:03:18.000 Well, that's kind of ridiculous.
02:03:20.000 It is kind of ridiculous, and it was a bizarre experience, and it was an interesting trip, and you learned your lesson.
02:03:28.000 I've had those conversations with people before, and the problem with those conversations is you're taking a very simplistic approach to a very complex scenario.
02:03:37.000 If you did work out more and if you did do all these different things, you're going to affect your body and your hormone levels.
02:03:43.000 If you start doing deep squats with heavy weights, you start doing deadlifts, you start putting a weight vest on and hiking up hills, you're going to massively affect the way your body produces hormones.
02:03:54.000 Your body's going to ramp up.
02:03:56.000 It's going to deal with these new demands.
02:03:58.000 It's going to change the way you partition fuels.
02:04:01.000 Things are going to happen.
02:04:02.000 See, it's not as simple as a lot of people like to point it out.
02:04:05.000 And the people, they seem to want to do it as a math problem.
02:04:09.000 You know, calories in, calories out.
02:04:12.000 I just had, I was in Altadena on Sunday talking at a skeptic society meeting.
02:04:18.000 Why don't they all go to Altadena?
02:04:19.000 Is it Michael Shermer?
02:04:21.000 Michael Shermer, yeah.
02:04:21.000 Everybody's in fucking Altadena.
02:04:23.000 Yeah, yeah, yeah.
02:04:23.000 And it was during the torrential rainstorms.
02:04:26.000 It was touch and go getting there because the roads were flooded.
02:04:29.000 But, um...
02:04:31.000 There's one guy sitting in the audience in the front row who's a calorie restrictor.
02:04:36.000 You know, one of these guys who eats like, he lives on 1,800 calories a day because he thinks he's going to live longer.
02:04:43.000 Ask him if he wants to spar.
02:04:46.000 Yeah.
02:04:47.000 Guy will get tired in about 20 seconds.
02:04:49.000 Yeah, I know.
02:04:52.000 There's not a lot of...
02:04:53.000 Well, the other thing with those guys, there's not a lot of muscle tone, right?
02:04:56.000 Because they don't have enough calories to support the muscles anyway.
02:04:59.000 I'm going to live forever as a skeleton.
02:05:01.000 Yeah, this is...
02:05:03.000 I did give a talk to the Calorie Restriction Society.
02:05:07.000 I'm digressing again.
02:05:08.000 This is in Novato, north of San Francisco.
02:05:11.000 And I got one of the guys in the email afterwards said, and I was explaining that I thought all the benefits of calorie restriction come from carbohydrate restriction because there's a lot of evidence suggesting that what makes it, if it is beneficial, it's because these guys minimize insulin and IGF secretion.
02:05:28.000 And you can minimize insulin and IGF by just not eating the carbs, and then you get to fuel the rest of your body, so you get the calories you need, you get the protein you need, you get the fat you need, you just don't eat the thing that stimulates insulin and IGF. And after the lecture, I got an email from a guy in the audience who was part of this society who said,
02:05:45.000 you know, I'm going to experiment.
02:05:46.000 I should get back with him to see what happens.
02:05:49.000 It was like four years ago.
02:05:50.000 He said, you look so much healthier than all of us.
02:05:53.000 And your argument was compelling.
02:05:55.000 And I'm going to experiment to see if maybe there's something to what you say.
02:05:59.000 And I'm going to shift over from eating 1,800 calories of like 50% carbs to 1,800 or maybe 2,500 or who knows how many of protein and fat.
02:06:10.000 I had Dr. Rhonda Patrick on the other day, and she was discussing some pretty compelling evidence about the amount of time that you eat during a day, and intermittent fasting, and the importance of only eating within a 10-hour period, from the morning you wake up to the time you stop eating,
02:06:26.000 no more than 10 hours, and then the rest of your day, the remaining 14 hours, no food.
02:06:31.000 Well, and it's interesting because even...
02:06:34.000 But she was talking about the massive benefits of that in terms of gaining and lean muscle mass just from doing that, losing body fat just from doing that.
02:06:43.000 Yeah, you know, I'm skeptical of everything.
02:06:46.000 I try to be as skeptical of my ideas as others, although people say I fail.
02:06:51.000 But I haven't read those studies closely.
02:06:55.000 Well, I'll get them to you.
02:06:55.000 I'll get them to you after we get out of here.
02:06:57.000 I'll send them to you and send you the actual podcast itself.
02:07:00.000 I think you'll find them pretty fascinating.
02:07:01.000 Yeah, and the issue is I don't doubt it works.
02:07:05.000 I know people who had trouble losing significant weight on low-carb diets and then switched intermittent fasting and broke through their plateaus.
02:07:16.000 There's some people I know in the field who I like who think that you might get excessive stress hormone stimulation from the fasting so that the long-term effects may not be as beneficial as a ketogenic diet where you're not...
02:07:30.000 Is there evidence of that?
02:07:32.000 Increased stress hormones?
02:07:33.000 You mean cortisol?
02:07:34.000 That would be, yeah, my understanding.
02:07:36.000 I haven't paid a lot of attention to it.
02:07:38.000 But is this based on people with a carbohydrate-rich diet or people who are on a fat-rich diet?
02:07:43.000 Let's Google Steve Finney, P-H-I-N-N-E-Y, and fasting.
02:07:50.000 I love this, by the way.
02:07:51.000 It's like having...
02:07:51.000 Pretty awesome, right?
02:07:52.000 I don't need a memory.
02:07:53.000 All those concussions, you know?
02:07:54.000 It doesn't matter anymore.
02:07:55.000 How many concussions did you have, buddy?
02:07:57.000 I I think between football and...
02:07:59.000 As soon as you say, between football, I start thinking about it.
02:08:02.000 Between football and boxing, I'd say five or six.
02:08:05.000 That's it?
02:08:06.000 You got off light.
02:08:07.000 I did get off light.
02:08:09.000 Steve and Jay Finney on making a low-carb diet sustainable.
02:08:12.000 But we want to do Steve Finney, try intermittent fasting.
02:08:22.000 Let's see if we pull up low-carb preserves.
02:08:26.000 Well, that's obvious.
02:08:31.000 Cutting-edge fat-burning.
02:08:33.000 This doesn't make for very good podcasting.
02:08:34.000 Yeah, yeah, yeah.
02:08:35.000 Okay, we're done.
02:08:35.000 There you go.
02:08:36.000 Hold on.
02:08:38.000 The truth between the world's most cutting-edge fat-burning performance meal plan, the keto diet.
02:08:43.000 Okay.
02:08:44.000 Well, folks can get into that.
02:08:45.000 You don't have much time left because you're going to have to bail soon to catch your flight.
02:08:48.000 Yeah.
02:08:49.000 So I don't want to make you miss your flight.
02:08:51.000 But this is another thing that people can look into once they're done listening to this.
02:08:56.000 So anyway, the interesting thing, even the intermittent fasting, the interesting thing is there's two ways to think of it.
02:09:01.000 One is, okay, you're eating fewer calories, and that's why it works, right?
02:09:05.000 And the other is you're maximizing the amount of time during the day when insulin and IGF are low.
02:09:10.000 But not necessarily when you're saying eating fewer calories because that's not necessarily what they're talking about.
02:09:15.000 What they're talking about is taking time, allowing your body to process all those nutrients and not using the resources that could be developing muscle and building your body up.
02:09:25.000 So that would account for the increase in lean muscle mass simply by following this intermittent fasting program.
02:09:31.000 Although it's interesting.
02:09:32.000 I don't know if you had this experience when you went on the ketogenic diet.
02:09:37.000 Because you often read, people say, well, you lose.
02:09:38.000 I was looking at a study today that was done, a one-week study done in like 1967, where they lost more protein on the ketogenic diet than a calorie-restricted diet.
02:09:49.000 They were all calorie-restricted.
02:09:51.000 But when I went on this diet, it was interesting.
02:09:53.000 My waist size went down and my jacket size went up.
02:09:57.000 And I'm probably, my upper body, I mean, my lower body doesn't work because of, you know, cartilage and the knees and You know, the other wonderful things football left me with.
02:10:08.000 But, you know, I'm stronger now than I was when I was in college.
02:10:11.000 I was working out three hours a day.
02:10:13.000 And how old are you now?
02:10:14.000 60. You look great.
02:10:16.000 Thank you.
02:10:17.000 You're welcome.
02:10:18.000 You look good too, Joe.
02:10:19.000 Thank you.
02:10:21.000 But, anyway, so what's the point?
02:10:23.000 The point is...
02:10:25.000 You know, by changing the time of what you're eating.
02:10:28.000 And I believe you could probably eat just many calories.
02:10:31.000 Maybe you could eat more calories by doing it.
02:10:32.000 It's not a calorie thing.
02:10:33.000 It's a how does your body respond to having more time at low insulin levels, basically, and more time at low IGF levels.
02:10:42.000 And I could imagine, even in the low-carb diets when people were prescribing them, 50 years ago, 60 years ago, they used to prescribe a walk before breakfast, which is interesting because that's the time when your insulin levels are lower, so that's the time when you're really mobilizing the most fat from your fat tissue.
02:11:00.000 So, in that sense, skipping breakfast, prolonging the amount of time before your first meal in the day, Would actually maximize his time when you're mobilizing fat.
02:11:10.000 A lot of people prefer fasting cardio.
02:11:12.000 They enjoy that.
02:11:14.000 Waking up in the morning and having hard cardio or some sort of a hard workout first thing in the morning.
02:11:18.000 Well, it's interesting because that's the point of the day when they're most likely to be burning fat rather than glucose.
02:11:23.000 If they're not drinking a juice or a soda beforehand, I could never do it.
02:11:28.000 I always wanted to be able to do cardio first thing in the morning.
02:11:31.000 Well, you certainly could.
02:11:31.000 You just don't want to.
02:11:32.000 No, I end up, I'm just enervated the whole day.
02:11:35.000 It's like I'm dragging my ass all over.
02:11:38.000 I cannot wake up afterwards.
02:11:40.000 It's just my body doesn't do it.
02:11:41.000 But it's even, I got, you know, I got two kids.
02:11:43.000 I got two boys, 11 and 8, and I feed them breakfast in the morning and I cook them dinner maybe three times a week.
02:11:52.000 My wife's kind of a vegetarian, so I gotta cook the meat if I want them to eat animals.
02:11:58.000 They have, their body clocks are entirely different.
02:12:01.000 They have very different body types.
02:12:03.000 My youngest is not hungry in the morning, and my oldest is, and my youngest at night, like if you put pasta in front of him, he would just keep eating it and eating it and eating it until you finally just say no more, you're going to blow up.
02:12:17.000 My oldest in the evening doesn't care.
02:12:20.000 He's not interested.
02:12:21.000 You know, he'll eat a little bit.
02:12:22.000 He could skip dinner even.
02:12:24.000 Like entirely, not just body types, but timing of their hunger, which has got to be related to insulin secretion, other hormones, you know, biorhythms.
02:12:34.000 So...
02:12:37.000 Everyone's different in that way.
02:12:38.000 Yeah, biodiversity is a very important consideration when you're talking about any kind of diet, whether it's a vegan diet, a vegetarian diet, ketogenic diet.
02:12:46.000 Everybody's body responds differently to different things.
02:12:49.000 But what I'm saying about getting back to the case against sugar is we got obese and diabetic because of the sugar and the processed grains.
02:12:58.000 The people who became obese and diabetic...
02:13:02.000 Did so because of the sugar and the processed grains.
02:13:05.000 In that sense, their bodies all responded the same regardless of what their genotype was.
02:13:13.000 And now when you want to get them back from the edge, That's where individual variation plays a role.
02:13:20.000 I mean, that guy McDougall who pushes the starch diet, he's got people on his website who swear that they lost 100 pounds eating only potatoes.
02:13:27.000 Don't you think though that a lot of people, when you start concentrating on losing weight and concentrating on being healthy and concentrating on your diet, you make a concerted effort sort of across the board.
02:13:38.000 So if you just go, I'm only going to eat sweet potatoes and, you know, I'm going to...
02:13:42.000 Like, just the very act of considering your diet and being conscientious has an effect.
02:13:49.000 Well, it has an effect in many ways.
02:13:51.000 One of them is you do consistent things that you don't do.
02:13:56.000 So, like, McDougall puts people on a starch diet, and Atkins puts them on a ketogenic diet, and Ornish puts them on a 10% fat, mostly vegetarian diet, and Esaltine is, you know, a low-carb diet, and none of them All of them say don't eat sugar,
02:14:13.000 don't drink sodas, don't drink fruit juices, don't eat white bread.
02:14:17.000 And they all do it for the same reason because it's going to stimulate insulin.
02:14:20.000 And then when they benefit, you don't know if they benefited because they didn't eat meat or they didn't eat...
02:14:28.000 You know, gluten or they didn't eat sugar and white bread and, you know.
02:14:33.000 So the question then would become, and even if the ones who benefited, like on the McDougal diet, the thing that makes me suspicious is the people always say, I tried Atkins and it didn't work for me.
02:14:45.000 Did they really try it?
02:14:47.000 Did they try it, lost 60 pounds, and then went back to eating carbs and gained it back and said the diet failed?
02:14:54.000 Did they just find it too hard to live without their pastries?
02:14:58.000 But once McDougall came along and put them on a potato diet, or did he just tell them to say that because he wants to point out that this works for people that low-carb doesn't?
02:15:08.000 You just never know.
02:15:09.000 It's crazy.
02:15:12.000 Crazy world.
02:15:13.000 Yeah, it's very hard to tell when you're dealing with anecdotal evidence, right?
02:15:16.000 It's very hard to tell when you're dealing with personal experiences about what someone says they did versus what they actually did.
02:15:22.000 Yeah, well, that's what nobody knows.
02:15:24.000 And one of the great flaws, I mean, there's tons, if we could talk about the flaws in nutrition research for, you know, another three hours.
02:15:31.000 That'll be our next podcast.
02:15:32.000 No, it's interesting because I'm doing this talk with you.
02:15:34.000 I've never done a, like, two-, three-hour podcast before, and you're, like, still laser-focused.
02:15:39.000 And I could imagine.
02:15:40.000 I think, I wouldn't want to get in the ring with you.
02:15:42.000 I could see it happening, that exact thing that we discussed earlier about that, you know, you're needing that, like, five minutes of energy to overwhelm your opponent.
02:15:50.000 And I could see it happening here.
02:15:52.000 And I'm thinking, okay, if I didn't have a cold and I could breathe through my nose, I could take Joe.
02:15:55.000 We could go for seven hours.
02:15:57.000 I could wear him out.
02:15:58.000 And if it gets bad, we'll take out the drugs and the tequila and we'll see, you know.
02:16:02.000 Although he's probably got, you know, I've got to get back in shape there.
02:16:05.000 But anyway, it's interesting.
02:16:07.000 Get back in drug shape?
02:16:08.000 Yeah.
02:16:09.000 It's been a long time.
02:16:11.000 I got a certain, you know, establishment veneer that I gotta present to the world.
02:16:17.000 I understand.
02:16:18.000 I'm responsible.
02:16:18.000 I gotta get people who wear jackets and ties and, you know, button-down shirts from Brooks Brothers to take me seriously.
02:16:24.000 Believe me, as weird as it sounds, a lot of those fuckers are listening right now.
02:16:28.000 That's good.
02:16:28.000 And have been for a while.
02:16:30.000 This is a really important subject, and let's just wrap this up here because I just want to thank you very much for writing that book and taking the time To put in that research against probably a lot of people's advice.
02:16:43.000 Just my wife.
02:16:44.000 Well, it worked out.
02:16:46.000 And my in-laws.
02:16:48.000 Overall, you've made a substantial impact.
02:16:51.000 And like I said, at least half a dozen people that I deeply respect have recommended your work.
02:16:55.000 And I'm really glad we got a chance to sit down and talk about this.
02:16:58.000 And I think a lot of people are going to benefit from this podcast.
02:17:00.000 And this is one thing that's just sort of piling on top of a massive amount of data that's now available to people.
02:17:08.000 That lets them make better food choices.
02:17:10.000 Well, that's the one thing I was going to say is what's really been the Trump...
02:17:15.000 I can't use that word.
02:17:16.000 Whoops!
02:17:17.000 Jesus!
02:17:18.000 He fucked up Trump card!
02:17:19.000 Yes, he's out.
02:17:21.000 What's really pushed, you know, what allows us to win, okay, which we couldn't win 50 years ago as the internet.
02:17:28.000 Yes.
02:17:29.000 And that and people can try these diets.
02:17:32.000 Remember I said, you know, we're dealt four aces.
02:17:34.000 The fact is you go on these diets, it helps people and it helps them a lot.
02:17:37.000 Not everyone.
02:17:38.000 And we got distracted and some people, I don't know, maybe some people just have bad reactions to cutting out all the carbs.
02:17:43.000 But for most people, some significant proportion, they give up the carbs, they're healthier.
02:17:48.000 And then they can talk about it on the internet and they can share with people and they don't have to live in the same town or go to the same school.
02:17:54.000 And so the word gets out and then other people want to be And, you know, even with physicians, it's like I got these doctors saying, you made medicine fun for me again because I can help people.
02:18:05.000 And that, too, gets spread around the Internet.
02:18:08.000 And, you know, you create clusters and Facebook groups.
02:18:12.000 You create momentum.
02:18:14.000 And you break out of the gatekeepers.
02:18:16.000 It's no longer just, did I or did I not get into the medical journal?
02:18:21.000 Was I influent enough to write this review?
02:18:24.000 It's like, wait a minute, you said this, but...
02:18:26.000 Look at what happened to my neighbor.
02:18:28.000 I want that to happen to me.
02:18:31.000 And so you get this kind of revolution.
02:18:33.000 It's slow, and it takes time, and there's a lot of resistance.
02:18:39.000 And the vegetarian community, they resist it because the implication is That a lot of people will be healthier if they eat animals.
02:18:47.000 It's micropollens, you know, eat food, not too much, mostly plants.
02:18:50.000 And for the obese, diabetic individuals in the country, which represent virtually 50% of Americans, maybe mostly animals.
02:19:00.000 Well, I'm hoping, though, that with...
02:19:01.000 I mean, there's been some really significant breakthroughs over the last few years with factory-produced meat that does not involve any animals dying.
02:19:09.000 I mean, they can take initial meat from a dead animal and reproduce it in factories.
02:19:13.000 And I think we're probably just a couple of years away from mass production or something like that.
02:19:17.000 You know, it's interesting.
02:19:19.000 One of the things that worry me is they're going to make low-fat meat, right?
02:19:21.000 I don't know.
02:19:22.000 I mean, maybe with what's going on right now and the understanding that people have today versus what they had only five or six years ago, I mean, I think there's probably going to be a market for high-fat meat.
02:19:33.000 Yeah, I hope so.
02:19:33.000 Well, I'm going to wait for you to try it and tell me.
02:19:37.000 I'm not eating that shit.
02:19:39.000 I have the benefit of being a hunter, so I kill my own meat, and it's as healthy as it gets.
02:19:44.000 But I sympathize.
02:19:46.000 I completely understand where the vegetarians and the vegans come from.
02:19:49.000 Yeah, I get it, and I admire them.
02:19:51.000 More the vegetarians, because I really feel like anybody could eat naturally sourced eggs.
02:19:57.000 Like, I have chickens, and they don't get harmed by me eating their eggs at all.
02:20:01.000 They live a natural life, and everything's fine.
02:20:04.000 There's no cruelty involved whatsoever, and those eggs are extremely healthy and beneficial.
02:20:08.000 Well, that's some of the best emails I ever got were from vegetarians who said, you know, I read your stuff.
02:20:14.000 I didn't want to like it.
02:20:15.000 I thought I'm intellectually open.
02:20:16.000 I'll read a couple chapters, decide it's full of shit, and then I'll be able to close it.
02:20:21.000 And much to my dismay, I found your argument compelling.
02:20:24.000 Some of them start eating meat again.
02:20:27.000 Some of them just add eggs back to their diet and get rid of the sugar and the crap and find that they're healthier and happier and they feel better.
02:20:35.000 That, to me, when you see somebody say, hey, I get it.
02:20:41.000 I do see your point.
02:20:43.000 I can change.
02:20:44.000 Well, I feel like for people, eggs are the best compromise because you can easily digest them.
02:20:50.000 There's very few issues whatsoever with that.
02:20:53.000 And again, if you have a yard, you could have your own chickens.
02:20:56.000 Well, not only that, you can make it quick.
02:20:59.000 I mean, you could scramble four eggs in the morning in almost as much time as it takes to pour cereal into a bowl and get the milk out of the refrigerator.
02:21:05.000 Absolutely, yeah.
02:21:07.000 So it's not like I don't have time to eat.
02:21:10.000 They don't take a lot of work to be good.
02:21:12.000 Some people, I mean, my oldest son, I can't get them to eat an egg unless it's got matzo mixed in and maple syrup poured on it.
02:21:18.000 But I don't know what it is.
02:21:20.000 Again, it's one of these things that's like it's poison to them.
02:21:22.000 Listen, Gary, thanks so much for being here.
02:21:25.000 I really, really appreciate it.
02:21:26.000 And I urge anyone listening to this to check out Gary's book, The Case Against Sugar.
02:21:31.000 And anything else?
02:21:33.000 No, that's it.
02:21:34.000 Thank you, Joe.
02:21:34.000 Thank you.
02:21:35.000 I really appreciate it.
02:21:35.000 It's cool.
02:21:36.000 Alright folks, we'll be back tomorrow with Shane Smith from Vice.
02:21:39.000 Holla!