The Michael Knowles Show - May 26, 2021


Daily Wire Backstage: The Mask Is Off


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 38 minutes

Words per Minute

214.48946

Word Count

21,130

Sentence Count

1,465

Misogynist Sentences

6

Hate Speech Sentences

129


Summary

Join Ben Shapiro, Andrew Klavan, Matt Walsh, and God King Jeremy Boring as they discuss everything from John Cena groveling to the Chinese Communist Party, to all the freaky alien videos the government keeps releasing.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hey, Michael Knowles here. The latest episode of Daily Wire Backstage, The Mask is Off,
00:00:04.100 is around the corner. Seems like every time you check your newsfeed, it looks more and more like
00:00:08.600 science fiction. We will unpack all of it. Be sure to join me, Ben Shapiro, Andrew Klavan,
00:00:14.020 Matt Walsh, and God King Jeremy Boring as we discuss everything from John Cena groveling to
00:00:18.260 the Chinese Communist Party to all the freaky alien videos the government keeps releasing.
00:00:22.700 Do not miss it. Nobody? Welcome to the Daily Wire Backstage. The mask is off. I'm Jeremy Boring,
00:00:31.580 known as the God King, lowercase g, lowercase k, and we are glad you've tuned in. Can Biden's daily
00:00:36.940 regimen of Gatorade, peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, and Flintstone vitamins really
00:00:40.680 keep him in the tip-top cognitive shape we've come to expect? Is there a certain number of
00:00:44.960 rockets fired by Hamas and Israeli citizens that would actually convince the left that they're on
00:00:48.760 the, quote, wrong side of history? Because clearly 3,500 isn't the number. And when the UFOs playing
00:00:55.100 peekaboo with our military do finally land, will John Cena apologize to our alien overlords for
00:01:00.180 Hollywood's shame that is The Last Jedi, Battlefield Earth, and Howard the Duck, let's hope he does
00:01:04.980 the right thing in whatever language we all end up speaking. Roll intro graphic.
00:01:18.760 Is there anything more shameful than that John Cena video apologizing in Mandarin for calling the
00:01:30.260 country of Taiwan a gun? Wait, wait, wait. I want to say something about this. It's an actual
00:01:34.300 Maoist struggle session. You know, I want to say something about this. Everybody, it's fun to blame
00:01:38.060 him, but it's universal. It's Universal Studios. No, I blame him. No, you blame Universal Studios. He's not
00:01:43.800 doing that on his own, and Universal Studios is insisting on that because they made more money
00:01:47.480 off this new Fast and Furious thing in China than they're going to make here. That's his fault for
00:01:52.800 going along with it, though. That's right. Universal can tell him to do that. He did it.
00:01:56.840 But he's just a big face, you know, and he's fun to make fun of. And I'm not saying he's not to
00:02:00.460 blame. I'm not saying we shouldn't make fun of him. I'm just saying that we should understand that
00:02:04.020 this is when those Hollywood people get up and they make speeches about how evil we are for voting
00:02:08.800 for Donald Trump when they do all this stuff. They cut scenes of gay love out of movies for different
00:02:15.000 countries. You heard it here. Andrew Klavan does not think John Cena did the wrong thing.
00:02:19.420 The Daily Wire Backstage is sponsored by ExpressVPN. For peace of mind, whenever you go online,
00:02:25.260 visit expressvpn.com slash backstage. Joining me with all the correct opinions, Andrew,
00:02:32.400 Ben Shapiro, Andy Klavan, Matt Walsh, and Michael Knowles. We are so glad that you're joining us
00:02:38.320 tonight, and we want to take just a quick moment to say, if you want to get your question in,
00:02:42.120 head on over to thedailywire.com and become a member. We take questions from our audience,
00:02:48.020 particularly from our members when we do this show, because they are the reason we are able
00:02:51.260 to do the show in the first place to get access to the box where you can submit your questions.
00:02:55.540 Go become a member, dailywire.com slash subscribe. You can even get 20% off your membership and get
00:03:01.160 automatically entered to win a trip to our studio to meet Candace Owens and the rest of us.
00:03:06.860 All you have to do is use the code VIP. This is the last week you can enter to win,
00:03:13.100 so hurry up before the opportunity slips sliding away. Dailywire.com slash subscribe. This thing's
00:03:18.840 still going. That's the entire promo. You heard it here first. Code VIP, and Andrew Klavan thinks
00:03:26.960 that John Cena did. That's basically the whole show. Does he have a deal with China, too?
00:03:31.940 Does he have a deal that we sell out? You know, this is Hollywood. It's the whole industry.
00:03:37.380 Of course. Wait, Hollywood are whores? What's that? Hollywood are whores.
00:03:41.280 Wow. You're talking about Hollywood who took the actual remake of Red Dawn,
00:03:46.840 and instead of it being the Chinese, a global superpower. Took the Taiwan patch off Tom Cruise.
00:03:52.060 I mean, come on. It's unbelievable. And it is unbelievable. It's unbelievable that they're
00:03:55.880 making speeches to us while supporting these communist jackbooted oppressors who are literally
00:04:01.580 putting people in concentration camp. I'll do one better. So it is the fault of Hollywood that
00:04:05.300 they've decided. There are two things. One is doing business with China. The second is overtly
00:04:09.480 kowtowing to China. They're not the same thing, right? Doing business with China, but saying that
00:04:13.460 China is an authoritarian garbage state, which it is, I really don't see a huge problem.
00:04:18.060 Well, we all do business with China because we live in a world. Like, a lot of people like to
00:04:21.640 complain sometimes that our leftist here stumblers are made in China. And I always think,
00:04:27.160 are you writing this hateful comment to me on your iPhone, which was made in China,
00:04:32.000 or on your laptop, which was made in China, or on your desktop computer, which was made in China?
00:04:35.460 So my broader point is that if you really want to get to the root of the problem here,
00:04:39.840 the root of the problem is that the West made the fundamental miscalculation that if it could get
00:04:47.280 China to engage in market transactions, this would moderate China. And instead,
00:04:51.020 it just made itself dependent on China via market transactions. And what should happen
00:04:54.640 right now, and what should have always happened, is that the West should be economically isolating
00:04:57.800 China. And that has to be an act of collective action, because you can't have American products
00:05:01.640 saying, okay, American manufacturers can't make in China, but we'll still import products from other
00:05:05.260 manufacturers who are making in China, and then undercutting them by 20% on the price.
00:05:08.560 That's not going to work. There has to be an actual move by the government to prevent people
00:05:12.520 from doing business in China, if you actually want to hamstring the Chinese government.
00:05:16.140 Absolutely. In fairness, I don't think that it was a bad experiment. I don't think it was a bad
00:05:20.400 notion that opening up China economically could have led to liberalization.
00:05:24.560 It just didn't work out.
00:05:25.480 It just didn't work out.
00:05:26.120 You know, Joe Biden, so we're probably not going to get much of this anytime soon,
00:05:30.280 because Joe Biden very famously, I think it was only about five years ago, said,
00:05:34.320 a rising China is good for everybody, and a rising China will lead to prosperity. And it just
00:05:40.400 didn't happen. That was the argument for letting...
00:05:42.000 How much money did his son make for his...
00:05:43.560 I know. He waited for the check to clear before that happened. But that was the argument for
00:05:47.160 letting China into the World Trade Organization. And what did China do? They start... Immediately,
00:05:51.040 they start cheating. They start undercutting us. And they obviously don't change the government.
00:05:54.880 But it's also the argument Obama used in Iran. It's always the wrong argument that if we let these
00:05:59.680 people into the community of nations, they will act as if they're part of the community of nations,
00:06:03.700 as if they're not grownups with a philosophy of their own. They have a philosophy. That philosophy is what
00:06:08.480 we're fighting. We're not fighting Chinese people. We're fighting the philosophy of the...
00:06:11.640 I guess what I would say, though, is that sometimes when I think about FDR, just for example,
00:06:15.200 and obviously I disagree with almost every piece of FDR's domestic, in particular,
00:06:19.380 domestic policy as president. But I have a little bit of sympathy. I have a little bit of sympathy for
00:06:24.320 very early 20th century communists as well.
00:06:29.020 Me too. Yeah, so do I.
00:06:29.960 And they didn't know.
00:06:31.120 That's right.
00:06:31.620 I have absolutely no sympathy for modern-day communists because you have 100 years of
00:06:36.740 oppression and mass murder that you can look immediately to. And so we know that a lot of
00:06:41.960 those ideas are bad. I'm not sure at the time that Nixon or Kissinger were opening up China.
00:06:45.260 There are also real politic concerns. I mean, part of the argument was that opening China would
00:06:49.920 make China more moderate. But the other part of it was take China off the table so they're not
00:06:52.880 an ally to Russia, right? That was really the real politic concern involved in the opening of China.
00:06:57.240 But the issue now is how do we shut down China? Because China is indeed an aggressive authoritarian
00:07:03.460 enemy of the United States that is pursuing global power, threatening Taiwan. They just
00:07:07.820 subjected the free state of Hong Kong and nobody cared to complete tyranny over the course of two
00:07:11.500 years. Unbelievable. So quickly.
00:07:12.920 They just took it right over. It's the first reversal, total reversal, for a free country since
00:07:16.580 the end of the Cold War. It's an amazing, amazing thing. The world just did not give any craps at all.
00:07:21.380 That's not fair. The NBA cared.
00:07:22.820 And so the real problem I see right now is now, what's amazing right now, is that now you have
00:07:29.960 a unique opportunity for the West to mobilize in opposition to China. Why? Well, because we now
00:07:34.220 have fairly good information that this Wuhan virus probably started in the lab in Wuhan, right?
00:07:40.160 Whoa, whoa, whoa.
00:07:40.740 I want to know, are we going to get a video of Ben Shapiro saying,
00:07:44.980 Hong sai, Hong kai kai, Hong kai, kai, kai, kai, kai.
00:07:47.820 Yeah, start speaking Mandarin to apologize for all of this. But the reality that, you know,
00:07:53.720 this story was cudgeled to death for a year, right? If you said this in social media, they
00:07:58.600 would literally take you off of Twitter and off of Facebook because it was a conspiracy
00:08:01.660 theory. It was fact-checked false by PolitiFact. And they just had to reverse the fact-check
00:08:05.240 because PolitiFact, of course, is a garbage partisan organization designed only to shut down
00:08:08.720 conservative outlets.
00:08:10.160 Like all fact-checkers.
00:08:11.220 Pretty much. But this is such an opportunity for the United States and for the rest of the
00:08:16.140 world to say, okay, so China did two things, both of which are unbelievably egregious and
00:08:20.000 led to the deaths of millions of people, right? Number one, this thing in all likelihood began
00:08:24.620 through a gain-of-function research failure at a Chinese laboratory. And it was allowed to escape
00:08:30.040 the lab in November, 2019, which brings you to the much bigger thing because mistakes get made.
00:08:34.240 The much bigger thing is that they then hid this all the way until the end of January, right?
00:08:38.920 So to be fair, once the DNA sequencing on COVID-19 was released, within one weekend,
00:08:46.200 the scientific community had created the vaccine. One weekend, by the end of the weekend,
00:08:50.080 the mRNA vaccine sequencing was done. Literally, they released it at the beginning of the weekend.
00:08:54.480 By the following Sunday, everybody had sequenced the mRNA vaccine. And then it took all the way
00:08:59.000 until November to get it ready for market. Okay. Although if you'd cut out all the middlemen
00:09:02.440 and you really accelerated, maybe you're ready by September, October.
00:09:05.520 And if there hadn't been a presidential election, for sure by October, 100%. But if this is started
00:09:10.080 in November, say you use the exact same timeline and they release the DNA sequencing on COVID-19
00:09:14.640 in November or December, and you push the entire timeline up by two months, how many lives get
00:09:20.140 saved? That last wave happened in September, October, November. It killed like 200,000 people.
00:09:24.420 I also have a question of this gain-of-function research that they claim makes it easier to study
00:09:29.480 these viruses, but it also essentially weaponizes the virus. I mean, do we know that the
00:09:35.440 Wuhan lab is not sitting around making viruses for germ warfare? I mean, I think we probably
00:09:40.420 can suspect that that's what they're doing. Right. We in the United States have known for
00:09:44.840 decades. Except for Anthony Fauci. But I had a mask on and I was facing the wall.
00:09:49.360 And now when Fauci is being caught, you know, Rand Paul is now accusing him of perjuring himself
00:09:53.420 because Anthony Fauci said the United States has not in any way funded gain-of-function research
00:09:57.700 that was done in Wuhan. And Anthony Fauci very cleverly denied. And he said,
00:10:01.580 we did not send any money to Wuhan for gain-of-function research, but we did fund gain-of-function
00:10:06.600 research that was done in cooperation with Wuhan. Exactly.
00:10:09.660 I'm just, one thing I'm wondering through all this is, first of all, what is gain-of-function
00:10:13.420 research? But secondly, when you look at the fact that for a year we weren't allowed to talk about
00:10:21.800 the lab in Wuhan and now all of a sudden we can, I think the assumption among a lot of conservatives
00:10:25.660 is that, well, it's the media was covering for China. I think that's part of it. But I also think
00:10:30.140 a bigger part of it is just that it was a common-sense conclusion that anyone could draw. Once you
00:10:37.380 realize this came from Wuhan, they have this lab there. Gee, that's a coincidence.
00:10:41.440 That coronavirus is.
00:10:42.920 And there are so many common-sense judgments that people have been making for a year that the media
00:10:47.720 said, no, no, no, wait, hold on a second, wait for us to tell you you're allowed to draw that
00:10:51.860 conclusion, and then you can. So now, yeah, you're allowed to talk about it, but just because they
00:10:55.920 don't want regular people to go off on their own thinking about things.
00:10:59.080 And the Washington Post, as much as said, we denied it because Trump said it.
00:11:02.920 Right. They said, basically.
00:11:04.200 Margaret Haberman, Maggie Haberman, she said that on national TV. She said, well, because Trump was
00:11:09.760 talking about it, obviously we couldn't take it seriously. And it's like, well, actually, that would
00:11:12.980 mean that you should take some of those New York Times reporters and maybe, you know, go research this
00:11:16.860 sort of thing.
00:11:17.620 You don't have to take the president at face value. You could go check it.
00:11:21.080 But the thing that's truly amazing is that why isn't the Biden administration taking this
00:11:25.500 opportunity? I mean, literally half a million people died in the United States of COVID-19.
00:11:30.260 Like, why isn't he taking the opportunity to say, OK, now is the time for us to crack down on China?
00:11:34.120 By the way, there's wide bipartisan approval for this. If you look in the polling on whether
00:11:37.340 Democrats and Republicans are kind of, there's like the only thing we agree on is that China is an
00:11:41.300 actual threat and that China screwed the pooch on COVID. And the fact that Biden instead is saying,
00:11:47.140 well, you know, let's let the WHO do their investigation and we don't need an independent
00:11:51.320 investigation. We don't need to put any pressure. Like this is the we were told if you remember
00:11:55.980 what Michael said, because Biden believes that a rising China is right. He still holds his view.
00:12:01.260 They're not bad people, folks. They're not bad people.
00:12:02.780 It's not even just that Biden's not taking this seriously. He's impeding the investigation.
00:12:07.680 Yes. There was a State Department investigation launched under the Trump administration.
00:12:11.020 And Blinken, the new secretary of state, shut it down when he got into office.
00:12:15.500 Well, this is a hallmark of their entire foreign policy, right, which is never let the facts get
00:12:18.580 in the way of your ideology. But it's also also the racial stuff just makes it impossible,
00:12:22.860 I think, for modern day Democrats. That's why we didn't we've heard some people in the media saying
00:12:27.460 they deleted some of the tweets, but saying that, of course, it's racist.
00:12:30.660 They were saying that for a year, but some are still saying it's racist.
00:12:33.220 Right. Just just today. So so the fact that Chinese people are not white is a big political
00:12:39.640 problem for for Joe Biden and the Democrats. I think in some ways it's as simple as that,
00:12:44.280 that, you know, this came from a place where these are not white people.
00:12:46.980 And so this is getting very offensive. I was in Washington's D.C.'s Chinatown the other day,
00:12:52.100 and there's a big lit poster, electric poster telling us not to hate Asian people.
00:12:57.340 I'm beginning to be offended by these signs telling me not to hate people.
00:13:01.220 You know, it's like, first of all, screw you. Who the hell are you to tell me?
00:13:04.480 I'll hate whoever I want. No, but I will hate whoever I want.
00:13:07.680 And why what makes them think this country that has been so welcoming to everybody has been so
00:13:13.680 welcoming to everybody needs a lecture from corporate toadies who are doing business with
00:13:17.740 the Chinese and doing business to the point where they won't criticize them. Why? Why are they
00:13:21.940 lecturing me? Anybody who can afford that sign shouldn't be lecturing me.
00:13:25.320 Put a sign about how we shouldn't hate Asian people up at the Harvard admittance.
00:13:28.840 Right, right. That's a question from a dailywire dot com subscriber for the group.
00:13:34.040 If the Wuhan virus was manmade, how should the U.S. respond? Not how will they,
00:13:38.620 which is not at all. How should they respond?
00:13:41.200 Well, I mean, the really the big question is whether it was manmade is whether the leak was
00:13:46.080 was the responsibility of the lab and whether they then covered that up for months. Right.
00:13:49.760 Because without without the cover up, you even there, you would understand, OK,
00:13:53.100 this is the stand. Right. Something escapes a military facility. It's not the first time
00:13:56.100 this sort of thing has happened before, actually. But once it starts getting covered up,
00:13:59.860 that's the real moral responsibility, because they knew for months, for sure, 100 percent that
00:14:04.200 this thing was transmitting human to human. They were lying about their casualty statistics.
00:14:09.020 They knew 30,000 people probably died in Wuhan. They said 3,000 people died in Wuhan.
00:14:12.960 What should the punishment be? The punishment should be
00:14:14.340 massive economic sanctions against any company that is based in China. I mean, that should be like
00:14:20.760 take on the entire economic regime of the Chinese. What's amazing to me is that the Biden
00:14:25.660 administration is willing to sacrifice the American economy so that we can blow out the dollar
00:14:29.820 by borrowing money from China, essentially. Right. But if you are actually going to make
00:14:33.520 economic sacrifices, you should do so for perhaps the higher purpose of getting rid of the
00:14:38.420 authoritarian regime in China, which is threatening all of its neighbors and threatening the freedom
00:14:42.960 of the United States eventually, because we can lose this thing by default. That's the part that I'm
00:14:47.020 afraid of. You know, this is this is why I don't think it's the worst idea in the world for
00:14:50.520 there to be a union of democracies. You know, instead of the United Nations, which I think we should
00:14:55.040 walk out of tomorrow, if not yesterday, I think this should be a union of actual free peoples that
00:15:00.240 they can stand together against threats like this. You know, one of the things I thought Trump did
00:15:05.540 that was was reckless was when he got rid of that Asian, you know, the United. Trans-Pacific
00:15:09.560 partnership. Because we do need to act together against this. TPP had problems with it, but this
00:15:14.060 was a big mistake. He should. Yeah. TPP was. No, he had legitimate problems, too. But I agree.
00:15:18.720 There are certainly problems with the TPP. It gave too much power to international institutions,
00:15:22.560 but it should have been corrected in the same way that Trump tried to correct NAFTA, right?
00:15:26.280 I do not think it would be a terrible thing to have an international union of democracies. I think
00:15:31.100 this is this is the thing. We keep talking about globalism as if it's somehow going to go away. It's
00:15:35.460 a global world. It's a global world. I can pick up my take the phone out of my pocket and call
00:15:39.460 Afghanistan and and get put directly through. It's a global world. We need to unite the people who
00:15:44.340 actually believe that the people should rule. But is the issue here that we want instant regime change
00:15:50.220 in China or is the issue we want to contain China and stop them from aggressing on Taiwan,
00:15:56.800 aggressing in Hong Kong, aggressing on our interests in the South China Sea, aggressing on us
00:16:00.300 economically? We have to cut off their leverage. Right now, they have way too much leverage over
00:16:04.720 America's ability to operate, whether it is through the number of American treasuries they hold or
00:16:10.120 whether it is over the number of American businesses who are doing serious business. The property they
00:16:13.880 steal. Yes, I do want a regime change in China. But if you're asking me if I want
00:16:17.820 some sort of military regime change or some sort of instantaneous regime change, no. But I think
00:16:23.520 that if you're a if you love the idea of human freedom, then your long term objective would be
00:16:28.800 to see China liberated from this mess that they've made or this. Yeah. As long as it's not going to
00:16:34.400 cost me five dollars more for my iPhone. Forget the whole thing. And the thing is that we have the
00:16:39.100 model of this, right? The United States did not engage in large scale trade with the Soviet Union in
00:16:43.940 the middle of the Cold War. The United States basically cut them off at the knees economically. And then we
00:16:47.600 outcompeted them because their system was not capable of functioning. I do want to push back
00:16:50.940 on that, though, because I think what you just said reinforces a bad idea out there that people
00:16:55.020 have, even on the right, about how economics work. Your iPhone is not five dollars cheaper because
00:17:00.140 it's manufactured in China. Your iPhone exists at all because it's manufactured in China. Yeah,
00:17:05.720 that's true, but that shouldn't be true. I agree that it shouldn't be true, but it is true because
00:17:09.880 it isn't just that it's cheaper in China. It's that in America, you can not manufacture at
00:17:17.300 the rate of innovation because of things like environmental regulations, because of all of
00:17:24.560 the just all of the rules that impede trade. The precious the precious minerals that they
00:17:29.580 use to make this stuff. We have those available and you can't get out of here. And this is but
00:17:33.880 this is something that needs to be addressed, that actually, when you're saving the environment,
00:17:37.760 which is not in any trouble, really, which is not a crisis at all, you are enslaving people
00:17:42.540 and you're making it easier to enslave people. We've outsourced all of our pollution at the
00:17:45.620 world countries. Right. Yeah, I was I my I was in the car recently with my son. He was peppering
00:17:50.940 me with all these questions about how different things are made. And of course, you know, as a
00:17:54.480 parent, you realize how stupid you are. I can't answer most of them. But at one point,
00:17:57.720 he asked me, how long did it take to build the Empire State Building, which was built 90 years ago or so.
00:18:02.880 Yeah. And so I thought, you know, OK, maybe 10 years or something like six days. Yeah, I looked
00:18:07.620 and I looked it up. And so I said, OK, let's look it up. And it was built in a year. Yeah. And of
00:18:13.320 course, you you try to build the Empire State Building today. I mean, look at the at the building
00:18:17.560 that replaced the World Trade Center. It took them it took them 15 years to even get even get started.
00:18:20.860 I've been doing the big dig in Boston since Ted Kennedy was wandering around leaving women in rivers.
00:18:25.460 Right. And that's that's back when you wanted to build a building. You just built the building. But now
00:18:29.140 it would take five years to even get the permits to even start. So right.
00:18:32.240 Yeah. What you need to do while you're trying to figure out, well, if everything is going terribly,
00:18:36.620 what what should I do? What can I do, Jeremy? You can go to Policy Genius and you need to go to
00:18:41.160 Policy Genius. We laugh. I like to have fun with the ad reads. But you have a responsibility to the
00:18:46.060 people in your life. What will happen if you are gone and unable to care for them? The answer is you
00:18:51.220 need a life insurance policy like all other kinds of insurance. You need to be a responsible adult
00:18:55.000 and make sure that you are insured against the worst possible outcomes. Policy Genius makes it easy
00:18:59.700 to compare quotes from over a dozen top insurers all in one place. Why compare? Because comparing
00:19:05.100 lets you save. You can save 50 percent or more on life insurance by comparing quotes at Policy Genius.
00:19:10.660 The licensed experts at Policy Genius work for you, not the insurance companies, so you can trust them
00:19:15.120 to help navigate every step of the shopping and buying process. That kind of service has earned Policy
00:19:19.760 Genius a five star rating across thousands of reviews on Trustpilot and on Google. And from me,
00:19:25.420 I've told you guys before, I've gotten three life insurance policies on PolicyGenius.com,
00:19:30.260 one for myself to provide for my wife and for my child in the event of my, I shouldn't say the
00:19:35.900 unlikely event, it's the very likely event of my untimely demise. One on my wife because, you know,
00:19:42.520 she also has responsibilities to our child. And the most important one is the one that I carry
00:19:46.240 on Ben Shapiro. Head to PolicyGenius.com, get started right now. Policy Genius, when it comes to
00:19:52.820 insurance, it's nice to get it right. It's even more nice to do the right thing. PolicyGenius.com.
00:19:58.300 Okay. You forgot the one you took out on Knowles because of the murder plot.
00:20:01.320 Wait, hold on a second. That can be evidence. The problem with getting a life insurance policy
00:20:07.660 that would give me the kind of confidence it would take to murder Knowles is that he would have to
00:20:12.380 have a medical exam first. And there's not even PolicyGenius.com. No, he'd be gone.
00:20:18.840 Could never deal with all of this. It's too healthy.
00:20:22.440 Deal with all of this. China bad. Another thing going on in the world that's been bad since the
00:20:26.840 last time we were together is this horrible conflict going on in the Middle East. Hamas
00:20:31.420 deciding to fire 3,500 rockets. 4,500. Yep. Indiscriminately into Israel and Israel responding
00:20:38.940 the way that any first world power would, which is with very expensive, very technological,
00:20:45.020 very directed, but very lethal force. And to see the reaction both in the news media and
00:20:54.140 in the left politics in this country has just been unbelievable. I want to talk about it for
00:20:58.860 a little bit. You know, someone this week, our very own Candace Owens made this great point.
00:21:05.000 She said, you know, there are people on the left who are sending me pictures of dead Palestinians,
00:21:10.200 children even saying, you know, if you don't speak out against this, then you don't deserve
00:21:13.800 to have your platform. And there are people on the right who are saying, you know, if you don't
00:21:16.680 stand up for Israel, you don't deserve to have a platform. And Candace rightly said,
00:21:20.220 we can't all be experts on everything all the time. She said, I'm reading books about this. I'm
00:21:25.280 trying to get educated. She has a history of doing this on other issues in the past where she doesn't
00:21:29.000 want to speak out until she really knows. And I appreciate that. At the same time, I don't think
00:21:34.220 that one has to be an expert to understand the immorality of firing rockets indiscriminately into
00:21:41.380 civilian areas. It seems to me that what the left has been saying during this conflict is essentially
00:21:47.920 because Israel is better at war than the Palestinians, Israel is evil, which A, makes me
00:21:56.020 understand why we do so badly in wars in this country if 50% of Americans actually think that
00:22:01.380 the purpose of war is equal destruction. Well, no, we need equity. It's equity in warfare is what we're
00:22:07.860 looking for. Equitable outcome. Equitable outcome in warfare. But essentially they're saying Israel
00:22:13.540 would be a lot better if more Jews died in these conflicts. Well, Israel is also the West and they
00:22:17.640 seriously hate the West. It is amazing to me. I read on the air Hamas's charter, which is just a
00:22:25.500 series of anti-Jewish filth. They blame them for the French Revolution. I'm not making this up. I wish I
00:22:33.100 were making this up. They blame Jews for the French Revolution. They blame Jews for World War I. They blame
00:22:37.080 Jews for World War II. Their clever plan to exterminate themselves in order to take over
00:22:41.600 the world. I don't know what that was about. But, you know, this is the kind of stuff.
00:22:44.820 They quote the hadiths about Jews hiding behind rocks and trees and Muslims being called to kill
00:22:48.820 them. It is everything, everything. But the blood libel is in it. But I'm sure they would believe in the
00:22:52.740 blood libel too. Surely, surely, if somebody tells you, you know, my philosophy is that I believe
00:22:58.960 Jews should be exterminated because of this. We should believe them. We should believe that this is a
00:23:03.460 a genocidal terrorist movement that was elected, was duly elected by the Palestinian people.
00:23:10.820 Somewhere along the line that has to be addressed and somewhere along the line has to be addressed
00:23:14.240 that the Jewish state is the freest, most multicultural, most successful state in the
00:23:20.420 Middle East and should be imitated. The thing that drives me about this, and it goes back to what you
00:23:24.460 were saying, it goes back to what you were saying about no policy result is going to change their
00:23:30.900 philosophy. The Iranian deal by Obama, one of the great disasters of his administration,
00:23:37.860 was overturned by Donald Trump, and he instituted the first actual advance in Middle East peace that
00:23:43.780 I have seen in my lifetime, which now goes back to 1776, right? So this is the first time I ever saw
00:23:48.620 anybody do anything, just a little bit of a change in the strategy of going into the Middle East.
00:23:53.040 They have gone directly back to the Iranian deal. I mean, when you bring this terrorist state,
00:23:59.220 Iran is a terrorist state, when you bring it back into the center of power in the Middle East,
00:24:04.080 you encourage all the bad actors to climb on board. They're the ones who are funding Hamas.
00:24:08.360 They're the ones who are sending them the missiles. It's just incredible to me that no fact can
00:24:13.360 penetrate their ideology. To give a two-minute synopsis for people who don't know the modern origins of
00:24:18.400 this particular conflict, first of all, what Drew said. Do not go back to the exodus.
00:24:20.860 I definitely do. I have a video coming out that's like a full hour going all the way back to the
00:24:25.280 exodus, but no joke. But what Drew says about Hamas is not only correct. The fact is that what
00:24:31.860 just happened over the past few months, what actually drove this, what started this, is that
00:24:35.760 in late April, Mahmoud Abbas is the head of the Palestinian Authority. He's currently in the 16th
00:24:39.480 year of a four-year elected term, because the last election in the Palestinian Authority was held in
00:24:44.260 2005. So he's now, you know, 85 years old. Kind of like our 15 days. Kind of like 15 days to slow
00:24:50.180 the spread. Exactly. Exactly. So he was elected. So he won in the West Bank in very contentious
00:24:55.980 circumstances. Then Hamas won the next year in the Gaza Strip. So he called another election because
00:25:00.360 the Biden administration said, we would love to see you guys do an election. So he called an election
00:25:03.740 and then he looked at the polling and he realized he was going to lose to Hamas because Hamas right now
00:25:07.380 rules the Gaza Strip. And they're at war, literal war, like people killing each other
00:25:10.320 with the Palestinian Authority and Islamic Jihad. So he called these elections and then he canceled
00:25:14.640 the elections in late April. He said, oh, you know what? Bad idea. No more elections. And so in order
00:25:18.920 to distract Palestinians from the fact that he had just canceled an election that would have allowed
00:25:22.500 him to be replaced in power, he decided to launch essentially a terror campaign against Israel. He
00:25:27.540 started posting videos on Fatah TV about how it was good to stab Jews. He started encouraging Fatah
00:25:32.480 members to go up to the Temple Mount and fling rocks and projectiles at Israeli police to start a
00:25:36.980 conflagration on the Temple Mount that could then be treated as though it was
00:25:40.120 a mutual conflict on the Temple Mount. And he started propagandizing about what was happening in
00:25:44.520 Shikshara, which is a suburb of Jerusalem. There's a 50 year, literally 50 year legal case that has been
00:25:49.660 winding its way through the courts about, I kid you not, four houses. These four houses were basically
00:25:54.400 owned by Jews before 1948. Jordan won this territory between 48 and 67. They handed deeds over to a bunch
00:26:00.060 of Arabs in that area. Israel respected the deeds that were handed over, but there were four houses
00:26:04.140 where Jordan hadn't handed over deeds. So the Jews came back in 67 after they won. And they said, okay,
00:26:09.500 well now these houses, we have the title, it's our house. The courts came up with the solution. You
00:26:13.180 guys pay rent and you get to stay. The Palestinians didn't pay rent for 50 years. And so finally the
00:26:17.440 Jews were like, well, you didn't pay rent, so we're evicting you. That was the eviction crisis.
00:26:21.120 Four houses in Shikshara. Okay. There are 1.9 million Israeli Arabs living in the state of
00:26:25.900 Israel. So when people talk about ethnic cleansing or moving people out, there are 1.9 million Arabs
00:26:30.500 living in Israel. There are zero Jews living in Gaza. There are zero Jews living under the Palestinian
00:26:34.320 authority. There's only one apartheid regime in this particular conflict. And it is
00:26:37.900 not Israel by any stretch of the imagination. Hamas had to get in on the business. Once Fatah
00:26:41.840 started the conflict in order to generate more publicity for themselves, Hamas couldn't be
00:26:45.300 left out. Now it's a party, right? So they start firing rockets at Israel in order to not be left
00:26:49.320 out and to outflank Fatah. And you can see, by the way, all of this play out after the ceasefire
00:26:53.340 was signed. There's this big, the riots on the Temple Mount have continued. In Al-Aqsa Mosque,
00:26:57.900 you have thousands of Muslims who have gathered. And they actually shouted out the Grand
00:27:01.860 Mufti of Jerusalem, who's a Fatah member, a member of Mahmoud Abbas's party. They shouted him out,
00:27:05.720 shouting, we are Mohammed Daif's men, meaning Mohammed Daif is the spiritual leader of Hamas.
00:27:10.260 We are with Hamas. So all of this is basically just an internal Palestinian conflict that was
00:27:14.880 then projected outward at the Israelis. And the Israelis were like, OK, listen, thank God for
00:27:18.740 Iron Dome. We can prevent 90 percent of these projectiles from hitting Israelis. But we're going
00:27:23.580 to have to take out like a bunch of your stuff. When we say that any state did what Israel would
00:27:27.840 have done, that's not true. Any state that was hit with 4,500 rockets in the middle of, for example,
00:27:32.860 its capital city or Tel Aviv or Washington, D.C. or New York, let me put this, of 1,000 rockets at
00:27:36.920 San Diego, which is not a top 10 American city in terms of population, the American flag would be
00:27:42.060 flying in Mexico City by tomorrow morning. And we all know this. I also wonder from just the
00:27:46.720 perspective of the American interest. I think there are plenty of good moral arguments to be made
00:27:50.760 about the problem itself in Israel and Palestinian Arabs. But just from the American interest,
00:27:56.380 I'm confused as to how it would serve the American interest to back Hamas or to back the
00:28:02.320 national pretensions of a people that would elect Hamas. When people say Hamas doesn't represent
00:28:06.720 the Palestinians, Hamas does, in fact, represent the Palestinians. Hamas won an election. They're
00:28:10.880 about to win another. Yeah. So I just don't understand. I suppose the argument would be
00:28:15.220 that Israel, you know, relatively young nation, that's the big problem. And so we've got to give
00:28:21.080 more power to the Palestinian Arabs who are calling for, by the way, from the river to the sea,
00:28:25.960 Palestine to be free. So they're calling for the eradication of Israel. Does anyone believe
00:28:29.460 that that is a tenable, taking the moral arguments aside, that that's a tenable thing,
00:28:34.000 you're going to wipe out a nuclear power, that the world would tolerate that? That doesn't seem
00:28:37.360 like such a good idea. So now we're going to back Hamas? You know what's heartbreaking about
00:28:40.500 this? When I was a kid, we were really not that far from the Holocaust. And I used to call us,
00:28:46.300 I actually wrote this, that we were holiday Jews. We were taking a holiday from a history,
00:28:51.620 a relentless history of anti-Semitism. I mean, the nonstop hatred of the Jewish people that has
00:28:57.120 really been going on before the year dot, as they say in England, it's been going on forever.
00:29:02.340 We have this holiday and the holiday's over and it's heartbreaking. It is heartbreaking to see
00:29:07.020 Jewish, ordinary Jewish people attacked on the street and no one said.
00:29:11.640 As with all racism in America, we all lived in this beautiful period where it wasn't happening and
00:29:17.000 now it's back. I do want to pick up though, briefly on what Michael is bringing up because
00:29:20.580 there are a lot of voices on the right today that call into question our relationship with Israel.
00:29:26.880 some very ugly voices. I think it's important to say that when we, I'm very critical of the
00:29:31.560 America First movement. There are two distinct America First movements.
00:29:35.900 Yeah, there's Lindbergh's.
00:29:36.980 Well, there's Trump who uses America First to mean that America must put America's interest
00:29:42.320 ahead of other interests. And then there's the America First movement, which is online jolly
00:29:49.240 right-wing trolls who actually are racist and actually do despise the state of Israel and actually do
00:29:55.840 want an American, a white ethno state in this country. It's unfortunate because they're
00:30:01.120 sophisticated online trolls that they've used the language of Donald Trump's, hey, wouldn't
00:30:05.380 it just be nice if we put America's interest ahead of other interests? But they have. And so when I'm
00:30:09.960 critical of America First, I'm not being critical of Donald Trump. I'm being critical of the people.
00:30:14.020 First of all, Donald Trump was the most pro-Israel president of America.
00:30:16.000 Pro-Israel is going to tell me that for Israel, right, yeah.
00:30:18.460 But you do have this America First movement, this Internet America First movement,
00:30:22.840 very, very hostile to Israel. And they say a lot of things. You know, they're angry about
00:30:28.840 the bombing of the USS Liberty in 1967.
00:30:33.080 I used to get this, people would ask me that question. They're like, really?
00:30:36.460 Yeah. They apparently haven't heard that, you know, England burned the actual White House
00:30:41.800 during the War of 1812. Why can't Israel be? Allies don't ever get mad at each other. Anyway.
00:30:47.640 But I sort of think, like, you're right. There's this distinction. As with all these terms,
00:30:52.400 they're used in lots of different ways. But let's take it totally seriously for a second.
00:30:56.120 Let's say this is just from the American interest point of view.
00:30:58.940 This is where I'm going.
00:30:59.680 Right. The claim, I guess, is that it is in the American interest to ditch Israel,
00:31:06.620 that we've got a sort of Israel First foreign policy. And, you know, like so many of these
00:31:11.660 online movements, first of all, you got to remember, a lot of these guys are very, very
00:31:15.260 young. A lot of them are pushed to the fringes. A lot of them are told you're evil because you're
00:31:19.740 a white person or you're a man or whatever. So, like, I was young once. I remember the sort of
00:31:24.340 crazy, extreme things 18-year-olds say. But what does that mean? I mean, just because you're
00:31:33.020 reacting, it's like, you know, when we're told that men are evil. Take Israel out of our present.
00:31:36.560 We're told men are evil. One way that men react when they're 18 years old and they're just so
00:31:41.480 sick and tired of this is they become sort of performatively sexist or chauvinist or misogynistic
00:31:46.440 or whatever. That's not the answer, right? That's just sort of the flip side of the coin. So I think,
00:31:50.340 sure, if these guys are saying, we've been told our whole lives that Israel is the greatest ally
00:31:57.060 of the United States ever in the history of the world. And now we found out it's only like a fine
00:32:00.960 ally, but it's not like the greatest one ever. I think, well, okay. So your answer is to back
00:32:05.340 Hamas? What are you talking about? I think just to take up a little bit for them, not really, but I
00:32:12.840 think obviously from a moral standpoint, morally, it's clear. And all you have to do is apply like just
00:32:17.800 war theory to this. And, uh, you know, one thing in waging a just war is first of all,
00:32:22.260 there has to be a chance of success. And when you have Hamas just firing rockets randomly at
00:32:26.140 the civilian centers, nothing's going to happen from that, except that you kill a bunch of civilians
00:32:30.720 maybe, and then get destroyed yourself. So, right. But at the same time, I think one thing,
00:32:36.140 the people that you're talking about, one thing that, uh, annoys them is when they see,
00:32:44.540 I think, I don't remember who tweeted, someone tweeted something like, if you're an American
00:32:47.400 patriot, it means you're pro Israel or something like that. Um, this, this idea that like it is
00:32:53.060 your patriotic duty to have this particular feeling about another country, no matter what
00:32:58.100 the other country is, I don't care what country it is. Um, so that, that goes too far on that side
00:33:02.260 of it. And I think they're kind of reacting. It's kind of what you're saying. Yep. They're reacting
00:33:05.440 to that. I do think, um, I do think that there is something patriotic about supporting our
00:33:10.960 allies because we form alliances because it's in our national interest to form alliances and having
00:33:16.480 formed those alliances. And, and if we're all operating in a kind of good faith where those
00:33:20.500 alliances are concerned, then there is a kind of pay. Yeah, but you don't have a, you don't have
00:33:25.040 a patriotic, you don't have a patriotic, you do not have a patriotic duty to support any country
00:33:29.780 that is not your own. Well, it's, so I will say that, that I think that what that statement is
00:33:34.580 missing is the phrase at the end right now. Okay. So I don't think that you have a patriotic
00:33:38.920 duty to eternally support any other country because circumstances change the country. I
00:33:43.140 mean, how many times we've seen alliances change and people end up on the other side of those
00:33:45.860 alliances. But the, the idea that in a conflict between a democratic ally and an actual terror
00:33:51.760 group, that it, that it doesn't connect to any sort of, we're not talking about nationalism now,
00:33:56.640 which is just attachment to country. We're talking about patriotism, which goes to underlying
00:33:59.300 principle that you have no duty at all to, to support a fellow democracy that is an ally in its own
00:34:06.280 battle for survival. That seems to me to, to raise some patriotism principles in the same way they
00:34:11.440 would raise patriotism principles to say that if Hitler were about to overrun Britain, people who
00:34:15.720 are saying, well, you know what, it doesn't implicate the United States at all or patriotism
00:34:19.840 at all to watch Hitler overrun Britain. And it seems like it kind of implicates patriotism to watch
00:34:23.620 Hitler overrun Britain. But you know, the other side of this is that no matter who does this,
00:34:27.180 it helps the left, whether the right does it or whether the left does it. It's the same,
00:34:30.680 it's the same thing with blacks. If, if the left so encourages black violence in cities that some
00:34:37.020 white people start to say, well, those blacks are being violent, that all helps the left. They want
00:34:40.860 us fighting with each other. They want us fighting with our fellow citizens. They want us to hate
00:34:44.580 people who are different than us. They want, and they don't care. They don't care if they inspire
00:34:49.500 blacks to have hostility against white people. But if that then inspires white people to have
00:34:53.920 hostilities against black, they don't care because we're fighting with each other instead of fighting
00:34:57.940 with the people who are usurping power from the people. And that's, that is all happening at the
00:35:03.160 top. That's always happening at the top. I sort of am even kind of of your opinion, Matt, to,
00:35:09.840 to give, give the critics here even more of, of the benefit of the doubt, just to make the
00:35:16.400 realpolitik argument, which is, you know, during Trump, we were told that we had to back the Kurds.
00:35:22.060 The Kurds are our greatest ally. The Kurds are the most wonderful people in the world.
00:35:24.820 And Turkey was aggressing against the Kurds, but this creates a problem is Turkey has been a NATO
00:35:30.060 ally for how many decades at this point? So now do we reflexively back our ally Turkey in this battle
00:35:35.080 with the Kurds? I don't know. That raised a lot of problems on the right. So I understand there
00:35:39.340 were nuances. But we, but we should have, we are no longer allies of Turkey. And the fact that we,
00:35:44.500 the fact that we are unprepared to move with haste to, to address the changing realities that Ben
00:35:50.780 refers to. And this, and this context is completely different in the sense that we were never,
00:35:54.760 we're allies of Hamas. There's no world in which we are allied with Hamas.
00:35:57.920 This is sort of my point is I just mean, you know, granting that, that people are just
00:36:02.520 rebelling in this very, I think, emotional and reactionary way against these sort of extreme
00:36:08.380 statements that we, you know, it's your patriotic duty to be an ally of Israel or something to just
00:36:12.220 say, look, in this case, we just should back Israel. Israel's the better.
00:36:17.720 I can understand the principle of argument. I'll give people this. I can even understand the
00:36:20.780 principle of argument that the United States should just be hands off completely in terms of
00:36:23.360 foreign policy. I think it's wrong, but I think that, but I can understand the complete isolationist
00:36:27.340 argument. Why are we involved anywhere in the world, right? I think that it's an ignorant argument
00:36:31.220 that's based on a failure to understand the realities of the world, which is that vacuums
00:36:34.400 exist and that bad States fill them. If we leave those vacuums open, which is the lesson of the
00:36:37.940 last century and a half. But if it, but I can at least understand that argument, what I cannot
00:36:42.340 understand is the situational application of that argument, right? Which is, okay, well, we should be
00:36:47.800 involved here and we should be involved there, but this particular one, we should definitely not be
00:36:52.000 involved in it. And I have real objections to these Jews firing, firing, you know, at Hamas
00:36:57.020 batteries that are located in civilian areas to protect themselves. I've, I've heard people this
00:37:01.440 week say, you know, if Israel, you know, Israel might be our ally, but why are we giving them
00:37:06.200 military aid? We, you know, England is our ally and we don't give them military aid. It's like, well,
00:37:11.100 no, the last time England was in a war, not only did we give them military aid, we gave them a
00:37:17.820 significant percentage of our GDP. And then when things got bad enough, we gave them hundreds of
00:37:22.400 thousands of our sons. And then when it was over, we gave them the Marshall plan and rebuilt their
00:37:26.520 entire country. It's important to, I think with a conversation like this to get really specific
00:37:31.660 because one of the, one of the issues here is that there are so many things caught up in it.
00:37:36.840 So we could talk about what's in America's interest to support Israel. What's, what's,
00:37:41.340 what's the morally, what the morality of it, but then also there are other things that caught up in
00:37:46.460 this. Like for example, evangelical, um, conservatives tend to also believe that it's
00:37:52.260 our religious duty. We're biblically called to support Israel. And that, and that brings in a
00:37:57.100 whole other aspect of the conversation. And then you have people that kind of react against that
00:38:00.820 and are saying, well, no, we don't, you know, I think it's a misinterpretation of Christian doctrine.
00:38:04.180 And, you know, so I think we have to, you have to be really specific in this conversation.
00:38:08.420 Here's one place where I think that we should all be able to agree. And frankly, I think that
00:38:12.020 people of any level of good heart should be able to agree in a conflict between a thriving,
00:38:17.440 diverse democracy that upholds humanitarian values and an actual honest to God, genocidal
00:38:21.860 terror group. That's not a moral choice. Whatever you think are the practical applications as to
00:38:26.600 whether the United States should be involved or should provide aid or any of that sort of stuff
00:38:30.520 on a moral level, the New York times is specifically saying that Israel is in the wrong,
00:38:34.360 that Israel should not be defending itself, right? You have them literally printing op-eds from people
00:38:38.400 who are activists for Hamas, downplaying the evils of Hamas. You have the entire Democratic Party
00:38:42.460 right now. By the way, that's how I know that it's morally right. Right. You have the entire
00:38:46.920 Democratic Party right now basically covering for the open anti-Semitism of Rashida Tlaib and
00:38:52.100 Nohan Omar, who spread blood libel. When they say that Israel is targeting Palestinian children,
00:38:55.580 that is just an abject lie. Israel has been participating in the most pinpointed attacks
00:38:59.660 of any military I have ever seen, including the United States military. They are dropping
00:39:02.900 knock bombs. Rashida Tlaib is saying this fight is not just in Israel. It is the fight
00:39:08.320 against for all minorities everywhere. Which, by the way, is why you're seeing Palestinian
00:39:12.200 activists go to Jewish areas in the United States and protest there. If you thought this was a
00:39:16.560 foreign policy problem, why are the protests not happening in Washington, D.C.? Why aren't they
00:39:20.100 happening next to the Congressional? They're not. They're going down to a restaurant a quarter
00:39:24.440 mile away. They're going down to Brooklyn and they're beating Jews in the streets. Or they're
00:39:27.980 going down to areas in Miami where there are lots of Jews who live there. They're driving through in
00:39:31.840 trucks with Palestinian flags on the back. Are those the policymakers? No, these are not. I'm sorry,
00:39:35.780 that's the Nazis marching through Skokie. But you know, Jeremy makes a great point here. I can't
00:39:39.360 believe I said that. I need to wash my mouth out with soap. Jeremy makes a great point, which is
00:39:43.400 if you are not an expert on the past, I don't know, what, 3,000, 4,000 years of this conflict
00:39:49.000 in the Middle East, there is a rule of thumb. I know we're not supposed to appeal to authority,
00:39:53.380 but when I see AOC and Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib and Bernie Sanders and the New York Times and CNN
00:39:59.980 and just all of them lined up on one side of the issue, I'm going to have to go in on the other side.
00:40:05.680 Maybe my opinion will change as I learn more, but I think it's a good rule of thumb.
00:40:08.940 That's a very reasonable judgment. Especially Rashida Tlaib, these people are really vile,
00:40:15.540 evil. I don't think we can emphasize that enough. It's not a political disagreement.
00:40:18.700 The New York Times is too, by the way. The New York Times supported Castro, which supported Che,
00:40:22.200 which supported Stalin. Yes, these are bad people, and when they're all uniformly agreeing,
00:40:29.420 don't wear your mask. The New York Times printed a graphic today that was such an
00:40:35.440 abject lie. It was a graphic depicting the state of Israel, but it said Palestine across,
00:40:39.640 and then it showed how Palestine was shrinking. This graphic is so bad. In 2015, when MSNBC ran it,
00:40:45.260 they had to issue an overt apology saying that this was an anti-factual map. The New York Times
00:40:49.660 ran it today. I mean, the media are so all in on us. It's insane.
00:40:52.800 But other than the moral and other than the political, I also do want to address this sort of
00:40:57.440 idea on the right that America first means that we're somehow completely disengaged in the world,
00:41:03.300 and it doesn't. We have alliances. We give aid because we believe, maybe sometimes inaccurately,
00:41:10.820 but because we believe it is in our interest to do so. We want to contain openly hostile powers like
00:41:19.400 Iran and North Korea. We want to constrain rival powers like Russia and China. We want to incent
00:41:27.080 economic activity around the globe, which is in America's interest. Those are the reasons. Now,
00:41:32.380 you may disagree with specific examples of us doing this. I disagree with specific examples
00:41:37.140 of us doing this, but the idea that we're just a piggy bank charity out there giving people money
00:41:41.680 because it's great. When you hear people say, we're not the world's policemen, they're usually
00:41:45.440 denying that there's any American interest that exists outside of our own borders. I think that
00:41:50.300 that's a complete mistake. That's never been true. We have interests, and you have to pursue your
00:41:55.500 national interest in a very messy world with shifting alliances, with shifting realities on the ground.
00:42:00.720 Again, I'm not saying that any individual conversation is out of line. Israel itself,
00:42:06.780 a nation that I am very fond of, has its own national interests, and Israel's national
00:42:12.600 interests will not always in every United States. Sometimes it's in conflict with America.
00:42:15.520 That's right. Align with America's interests. Being allies doesn't mean that we're in
00:42:18.540 some sort of perfectly symbiotic relationship.
00:42:21.100 Isn't there a problem with the foreign aid thing? I agree, situationally, we have allies,
00:42:27.440 and we should support them in situations. My issue with foreign aid as a concept, no matter what
00:42:32.160 country we're talking about, is that this is American taxpayer money you're taking from American
00:42:38.400 families, and you're giving it to a foreign government. And those American families have
00:42:42.080 absolutely no say over what happens with the money. They do not directly benefit from it anyway,
00:42:46.500 and they also don't know what happens. The American family sitting around their dinner table,
00:42:51.520 that money comes from them, it goes to the government.
00:42:52.620 First of all, this is true of almost all taxes, that you don't get a direct say of what happens
00:42:58.020 with the money, and you don't really know what happens with most of it. I don't agree that you
00:43:01.840 don't get a direct benefit from some foreign aid. You don't get a direct benefit from some domestic
00:43:07.860 spending. There's a lot of domestic spending that they take your tax money and you get no direct
00:43:11.580 benefit. Some of it's in contravention of your interest. But there is an interest in spreading
00:43:18.960 America's influence around the world. So one thing that has given us the wonders of America's 20th,
00:43:24.880 the American century, the 20th century, is that America essentially controls the waterways of the
00:43:29.620 entire earth. And that's a remarkable thing that exists and has allowed us to have huge advances in
00:43:35.920 technology, huge economic advances. You have that in part because of an expression of America's
00:43:42.320 military might, and in part an expression of America's economic might, and in part because
00:43:46.640 America has crowded out rivals who would break parts of that off and keep us from being able to
00:43:51.860 access it if they could. And a lot of Americans, listen, sometimes you just give charity, there's an
00:43:56.520 earthquake in some country and we decide we want to help them out. A lot of our aid, though, the majority
00:44:00.520 of our aid is about keeping influence in strategic places around the country, where if we don't,
00:44:06.660 China will. And of course, that's true. I mean, the notion in the United States seems to be that
00:44:10.380 foreign aid is a form of charity. That is certainly not the notion in China. That's right. China does
00:44:14.220 not give a crap about charity. This is not a charitable democracy. This is a country that has used its
00:44:18.840 Belt and Road program as a way to bootstrap itself into influence in a variety of countries around the
00:44:23.040 world. Russia is doing the same thing. So again, you can make the argument that you don't care,
00:44:26.560 right? That's okay. You can make that argument that you don't care if China expands its
00:44:29.320 sphere of influence, or you didn't care if the Russians do it, or you didn't care even back
00:44:32.500 when it was the USSR and the USSR was expanding its sphere of influence. But that begs a further
00:44:37.200 question, which is what do you think America's role in foreign policy ought to be? If you think
00:44:40.980 that America's role in foreign policy is that we stay within our own borders and only when somebody
00:44:45.220 knocks over a tower in New York, do we respond and militarize? Well, that is one view of foreign
00:44:50.220 policy. I think that it's a very short-sighted view of foreign policy, and I think that it leads to
00:44:53.860 a much more difficult world for the United States to navigate with a lot fewer allies available for us
00:44:59.280 to fight back against some of the worst people on earth. But what exactly do people think is the
00:45:04.560 fundamental role of American foreign policy? I guess with foreign aid, I would say,
00:45:08.940 I think, again, going back to American families that have to, this is, this isn't, you know,
00:45:13.080 this money is coming from people, from us. I think you should be able to give a really specific
00:45:19.480 answer. Like, we're going to take this money, we're going to give it to this government
00:45:22.100 for a specific reason. I think, I think the families are taking the money from, have a, have a right to
00:45:27.120 know specifically, what is this money going to? And I'm not saying there could never be a good
00:45:31.480 reason, but you should be able to give a specific reason. And I think when, when, when you are giving
00:45:35.320 billions and billions every single year to countries across the world, and the answer is
00:45:39.680 American influence, uh, that's just not quite specific enough. Um, but I would, I would only
00:45:46.340 argue that foreign aid is a very small part of the budget and that most of what we steal people's
00:45:51.560 money for and do in contravention of their interests actually happens domestically. And what bothers me
00:45:55.980 about this sort of America for sure is that quite often they say, we don't need to be giving our
00:45:59.840 money overseas. We need to be taking care of our own right here at home. And I go, no, for God's
00:46:03.760 sake, give all the money overseas rather than continuing to prop up huge socialist spending
00:46:08.880 programs at home that actually do take away my freedom far more than just not only take away my
00:46:14.440 money, but also constrain my freedom. We'll talk a little bit more about this. First, I want to talk
00:46:18.060 about our friends over at express VPN. You don't need me to tell you that people are, that big tech is
00:46:23.220 clamping down on freedom of speech everywhere that isn't apparently Ron DeSantis, governed by Ron
00:46:28.620 DeSantis. Those are the only places where big tech isn't clamping down on free speech. You should
00:46:33.580 have the right to express yourself freely online, but unfortunately big tech has monopoly on what you
00:46:38.600 can say. And they've opted for silencing tactics and censorships to fight back on big tech's control
00:46:43.540 of the internet. I use express VPN. When you use express VPN, the app on your computer or your phone,
00:46:49.040 you anonymize much of your online presence by hiding your IP address. That makes your activity
00:46:53.860 a whole lot more difficult to trace and it makes selling your information to advertisers even more
00:46:58.900 difficult still. What's more, express VPN encrypts 100% of your network data to protect you from
00:47:04.240 eavesdroppers and from cyber criminals. You have an obligation to yourself. You have an obligation to
00:47:09.340 your family to protect your data. We live in a digital age. You have absolutely no idea the power
00:47:14.700 that you're giving to these companies when you loosely let them have access unnecessarily
00:47:20.040 to your data. Revoke big tech's right to your data. Secure your internet with a VPN that I trust for
00:47:26.280 online protection. Visit expressvpn.com slash backstage. That's expressvpn.com slash backstage.
00:47:33.640 You'll get three extra months free with this exclusive link. Go to expressvpn.com slash backstage
00:47:38.980 right now to learn more. Expressvpn.com slash backstage. That's right. We got our own promo
00:47:44.600 code backstage. You know what strikes me about this at the heart of kind of this disagreement over
00:47:50.980 projecting American strength abroad. And I don't just mean a disagreement among us. I mean among
00:47:55.200 the American people and among the right too. I understand one argument, one sort of more novel
00:48:00.900 argument against projecting American strength abroad, which is some years ago there was broad
00:48:06.280 consensus on what it meant to project American strength abroad. The American, truth, justice,
00:48:11.040 and the American way, the American cultural exportation around the world, right? There was,
00:48:15.000 we were broadly in agreement and in support of that, but that largely Christian, you know,
00:48:20.620 unique, but American kind of version of that has fallen away into this broad global liberal empire.
00:48:27.480 And so I think there are a lot of people who say, why I'm all for projecting American influence
00:48:31.900 abroad, but I don't want to promote transgenderism in Namibia. That's not the, where I want my tax
00:48:37.480 dollars. But I also don't want to find Black Lives Matter flags at American embassies.
00:48:41.720 Exactly. Exactly. I think none of us think we shouldn't have embassies.
00:48:44.600 Right. But that is the influence that's being pushed. The fact that our government is out of
00:48:47.640 control, but it's unconstrained, that it is in no way limited, that it believes that what it needs
00:48:51.720 to be promulgating around the globe and at home is socialism and leftism and critical race theory and
00:48:57.820 this incredibly anti-Christian modernist worldview. I agree that all of that needs to be fought. And to
00:49:04.840 the extent that you say that we need more transparency and how the government spends our
00:49:07.800 money, I agree with that. But there's an attitude on the right. That's what I'm kind of pushing back
00:49:12.980 again. Well, the, the, the question is to, you know, you mentioned when we say that what we're
00:49:16.940 getting in return is American influence, that's been true of all American foreign interventions ever.
00:49:22.320 Yes. I mean, true of like, including wars, right? What were, what were the American interests that
00:49:26.800 were threatened when the Soviets threatened to take over Berlin and we participate in the Berlin
00:49:30.700 airlift, which was an act of foreign aid, right? I mean, we actually flew supplies into Berlin,
00:49:34.840 who maintained Berlin as a free city. Why exactly did we bother doing that? And Soviets could have
00:49:39.200 just taken Berlin. We didn't rule it. Didn't have anything to do with us. It was very far away across
00:49:43.120 the water. Right. And that's been true of literally all projections of American power ever. So the answer
00:49:48.060 was always that American influence is important because we understand that the, uh, the opposite
00:49:52.240 of American influence is not a vacuum. The opposite of American influence is very bad people increasing
00:49:56.960 their own sphere of influence and then using that sphere of influence in order to threaten true
00:50:00.620 American interests. So to take an example in the Middle East, for example, if Israel were to
00:50:03.800 disappear tomorrow, what that would mean is that authoritarian states would take probably, they'd
00:50:07.520 threaten control of the Suez Canal. We saw the Suez Canal blocked recently by a giant shipping
00:50:12.260 container. Right. And that giant ship basically cut off all world trade for a significant period of
00:50:17.460 time. Like the gas lines in the United States. Right. And if the, if the straits of Hormuz are cut
00:50:23.340 off, oil supplies falter. If the South China Sea falls to complete Chinese domination, then the
00:50:27.860 shipping of products. But these are specific, you're giving specific cases of this is what America needs to do
00:50:32.820 in this particular situation for this reason, which is great. Um, and you know, I'm sure I could pull
00:50:38.480 up on my phone a list of all the countries we're giving aid to, how much money we're giving. And I,
00:50:43.500 and I suspect that if I were to do that, I'm going to find dozens that equals billions of dollars
00:50:48.920 where there's not going to be necessarily that really specific answer. So that's my question is
00:50:54.020 whether you're in disagreement with the general concept. That's right. That's why I said what I'm
00:50:56.880 pushing, what I'm pushing back again is an attitude, not specifics. So if you're suggesting that
00:51:01.020 government should be more efficient, that we should be more strategic with what we do and don't do,
00:51:04.900 of course, I agree. I just, just the idea, the, the idea of the, of the government, of our government
00:51:08.740 sort of in perpetuity, having all these other, other governments on the dole. Um, that's what,
00:51:14.320 that's what I'm pushing. Well, I mean, Japan's been on the dole for what, some 80 years with
00:51:17.840 American military presence in Japan. And thank God for that. Yeah. I mean, some of them need to be on
00:51:21.840 the dole for a while. Hey, you know, I'm kind of amazed. I say something controversial
00:51:27.020 because I only come to the show to try and give Ben a heart attack before I have one,
00:51:31.460 but I'm kind of amazed we could have this entire conversation about Israel without really talking
00:51:37.480 about the Jews, without actually talking about the fact that the Jews are special. This is the
00:51:41.340 thing that anti-Semites get right. They get right. They think the Jews are special because they're evil.
00:51:45.620 That's crap. But, but the Jews are special. They're special in our history. They're special in our
00:51:49.820 religion. Matt was talking about the evangelicals. I think the evangelicals have a point. You know,
00:51:54.220 these are the people with, with the Athenian Greeks who basically inform everything we think and
00:52:00.120 believe. And there are no Athenian Greeks. There are, you know, the Athenian Greeks are gone,
00:52:04.100 but the Jews aren't. And that's a really important fact. When one of the things the left is really
00:52:08.620 objecting to is that this is a Jewish state and that offends them because it is racially specific,
00:52:13.580 but the world has proved that it can't tolerate Jews unless they have a state. If Jews don't have a
00:52:18.420 state, they will, they'll be killed and chased from pillar to post. And so it seems important to me
00:52:23.980 that someone stands up and says, you know, these, these people are important because they're us.
00:52:28.940 They're saying there's some way the source of who we are and we need to defend them and their
00:52:32.960 values. One of the amazing things that happens when you're in Israel, and you've been in Israel a lot
00:52:36.540 more than I have, but I've only been three times actually. Okay. Well, I was there and I opened the
00:52:41.060 newspaper and read the editorials and the, the fineness of the ethical and moral conversation that was
00:52:49.160 going on in their newspapers made me embarrassed for our newspapers. I mean, we have a good op-ed
00:52:54.100 section in the wall street journal, the James Toronto, Toronto should win the Pulitzer prize.
00:52:58.480 Yeah. There's nothing like the ordinary editorials that are going on in an Israeli newspaper because
00:53:04.020 they're Jews and they say it in the things, well, wait, you know, other countries could do that,
00:53:08.560 but we can't because we're Jews. I mean, what they did in this war is something that Israel has,
00:53:12.640 has long-term, right? Which means purity of arms. They literally write it into the military code. This,
00:53:17.540 this attempt to prevent civilian casualties. Again, I point out the fact that everybody's
00:53:22.060 saying, look at that wild disproportion between the number of people who died in Gaza and the
00:53:24.880 number of people who died in Israel. Yes. Israel fired massive ordinance into Gaza and only killed
00:53:29.320 200 odd people after experiencing 4,500 rockets fired at it. But there's something else there.
00:53:34.240 There is an underlying idea, and this has taken root mostly on the left, but a little bit on the
00:53:39.140 right. And that is the idea that the world would be a more peaceful place if Israel ceased to exist.
00:53:43.340 And you can see this in the way that so many people on the radical left actually talk about the
00:53:47.200 state of Israel, right? The idea is that, because first it was, Israel has to have a two-state
00:53:51.760 solution because if there's no two-state solution, we can't solve all the problems in the Middle East.
00:53:54.800 Now you're starting to see people openly say, well, maybe there shouldn't be a two-state solution.
00:53:57.920 Maybe there should be a one-state solution in which the Israeli Jewish demographic majority
00:54:02.140 just disappears. And it just becomes a complete one state, which of course means that the Jewish
00:54:06.840 state ends. Well, the notion that seems to be out there is that antisemitism, and this is being
00:54:11.960 really pushed by the media right now, antisemitism, right? And this, this headline right here is it,
00:54:16.040 right? From Michelle Goldberg, attacks on Jews over Israel are a gift to the right.
00:54:19.620 The basic idea here is that when, when it comes to antisemitism, that antisemitism is an outgrowth
00:54:29.300 of anti-Zionism, right? Or rather of Zionism. If it were not for the state of Israel, antisemitism
00:54:34.400 would just disappear, which ignores all of human history between 136 CE and 1948. There's a lot of
00:54:39.440 intervening history right there. The same people who are beating Jews on the streets with polls in
00:54:43.020 Brooklyn are shouting at them that they're only beating them because of Israel. And it's like a
00:54:46.600 random Jew in Brooklyn. Yeah. I have a feeling that's not true. I have a feeling that if Israel
00:54:50.820 didn't exist, there'd be a lot more Jews who are getting beat. When Jesus said, you are the salt of
00:54:55.440 the earth, you're the light of the world, he was talking to the Jews. He was talking specifically to
00:55:00.000 the Jews. God doesn't break those covenants, you know, that's still in place. And when we look at
00:55:04.240 these people, we're seeing where our ethics come from, where our ideas come from. One of the great
00:55:08.320 evidences, by the way, for the truth of the Bible, to me, for the truth of the New Testament. Sorry,
00:55:13.260 Ben. You're complimenting my folks, so continue. The New Testament posits that in the future,
00:55:21.360 there will be an Israel. And Christians believe that. They believe that the Bible is true.
00:55:27.180 It's very hard for, I'm fascinated by this notion that it's almost impossible for us to ever separate
00:55:31.640 ourselves from this moment. And that connection to this moment really blinds us to the experiences
00:55:38.320 of almost all humans across all time. And it's a fun thing. Maybe we'll talk about it on this or
00:55:42.420 a future episode more generally. But specific to the topic at hand, it's easy for us to imagine
00:55:48.140 being Christians and thinking that in the future, there's Israel. Because there's Israel. But for
00:55:54.120 almost 2,000 years, every single Christian who ever lived, like the vast majority of time that there
00:55:59.960 has been Christianity, Christians had to believe in that future. And there was no Israel. You talk
00:56:07.120 about the Athenian Greeks, the reemergence of Israel in the land that God gave to the Jews
00:56:14.700 is a quirk of human history that has absolutely no corollary. Almost 2,800 years later,
00:56:23.920 no people has ever been scattered from their home, continued to exist, and then come back into
00:56:28.980 possession of that home across 1,800 years. Odd, what? Yeah. Another strange thing about the
00:56:36.760 Jews, if I may, is one of the criticisms is... That they control the weather. That they control
00:56:42.140 the weather, for goodness sake. Top three weird things about the Jews. Space losers. Very peculiar.
00:56:48.340 But one of the arguments against the United States support of Israel is, I don't even think it's
00:56:54.720 particularly, I hate to call it an argument, but one of the impulses is to say, well, it's just Jews,
00:56:59.720 you know, who are in positions of power in the government. And there are plenty of Jews in
00:57:02.480 positions of power in the government. And they're really behind this whole thing. But then I couldn't
00:57:05.720 help but notice, Ben, when you were reading that headline, it was by, what was that name?
00:57:09.020 Michelle Goldberg. It's not an Italian name. It's not an Irish name. It's in the New York Times.
00:57:13.500 Bernie is wildly anti-Israelian. Bernie. So, you know, it's a bit strange, isn't it, that so many
00:57:17.800 American Jews seem very anti-Israel. I will say you bring up the evangelical support of Israel. And
00:57:22.960 I'm, Drew and I are the two potentially evangelical. I don't think either one of us is truly in the
00:57:29.380 category of evangelical, but the closest evangelicals on the panel. I don't support Israel because of a
00:57:35.840 belief that the Bible commands me to support Israel. That's not part of my, I do think that
00:57:42.640 I have a kinship with the people of the Bible, with the Jews. I think that we share common history,
00:57:51.800 we share common ethics, not the exact same ethics. The Judeo-Christian worldview, that term makes
00:57:57.580 people mad because Christians and Jews believe very different things in places. Yes, of course.
00:58:02.340 Saying Judeo-Christian doesn't mean I believe Jews and Christians believe the same things. It means I
00:58:06.180 believe that there's a foundational framework that we share. Book one, we share, that takes on distinct
00:58:14.540 characteristics. But all of that to say, the existence of the state of Israel today actually
00:58:21.280 convinces me that it's not up to my support. God doesn't need me to support Israel. If he decides
00:58:27.200 there's going to be an Israel, there's going to be an Israel. And as an American, what I'm more
00:58:31.200 concerned with is who should I support? With whom do I share values? God doesn't need much from me.
00:58:38.100 He's God. He's the uppercase GK. I am but a lowly lowercase GK. And so my support of Israel is
00:58:47.220 premised completely on that shared set of values, completely on a shared set of interests. I believe
00:58:52.280 national interests, and I believe ideological interests. That really is the limit of my...
00:58:58.200 So you don't feel biblically compelled? I do. I feel biblically compelled both through commands
00:59:07.640 from the Bible and through the values that I've derived from the Bible or the beliefs that I've
00:59:13.280 derived from the Bible to support in a broad sense the Jewish people. But that doesn't mean if the
00:59:21.500 Jewish people are wrong that God wants me to say that they're right. So as an example, if Israel had
00:59:27.920 gone into the Gaza Strip and started rounding up people like the Germans did in the 30s and putting
00:59:33.140 them into ghettos or rounding them up like they did in the 40s and putting them onto boxcars,
00:59:38.420 I would tell you that this was wrong. I wouldn't feel like, I don't know, yeah, they're killing,
00:59:42.920 they're indiscriminately killing Palestinians, but God does say be nice to the Jews. Of course I
00:59:46.800 wouldn't take that position. Right. But nobody, nobody ever said that Germany should cease to exist. I
00:59:51.580 mean, this is the thing. The only, the only country on earth, literally the only country on earth that
00:59:55.700 has to argue for its right to exist is the Jewish state. And that is biblical. It's also worth noting
01:00:01.460 here that when we talk about, you know, foreign aid to Israel, particularly in this context, a lot of
01:00:04.600 that foreign aid is going for the Iron Dome. Okay. If you are a believer that Palestinians should not be
01:00:10.200 mistreated, you should thank God every single day for the Iron Dome. Because if it were not for the Iron
01:00:14.400 Dome, Israel would have eviscerated the place. And everybody understands this. Yeah. Right. The fact that
01:00:18.020 that 90% of the rockets being shot from the Gaza Strip were shot down by this miraculous technology
01:00:22.440 that is located in all of the population centers of Israel, that you can fire for, I mean, the simple
01:00:26.620 statement that 4,500 rockets were fired at civilian areas and 12 people died is a demonstration of just
01:00:31.500 how effective the system is. If those rockets had all hit in civilian areas and killed hundreds or
01:00:35.300 thousands of Jews, Israel would not exist. And also the, the, the idea that, well, if you get rid of
01:00:40.800 Israel, then the Middle East is a peaceful place is of course absurd because first of all, these Islamic groups
01:00:46.180 are killing each other anyway. They're going to continue to do it. I think with the, with the
01:00:50.080 biblical thing, it doesn't bother me, you know, evangelicals that feel spiritually inclined to
01:00:55.600 take this position. It doesn't bother me at all. Um, I, I do think my theological difference with
01:01:00.680 them, which doesn't sound like this is your position, but the idea that our salvation is still
01:01:04.660 somehow tied to a particular geographic place or even worse to it, to a government. Um, you know,
01:01:11.820 that, that to me is a problem because we, yeah, we know that now it's, that that's the whole idea.
01:01:16.440 It's universal. Go preach to all nations. Salvation has existed from a Christian point of view
01:01:20.300 for the past 2,000 years. And for 1800 of those, there was no, uh, state of Israel and there was
01:01:25.860 no particular government. And so it just wouldn't, I almost reject any theological notion that requires
01:01:31.920 you to live in a specific time in a specific place in order for it to be true. And so tying
01:01:37.060 salvation to support of Israel, I would just see as another one of those. But you know, I, I do wonder
01:01:41.620 too, if some of the recent uptick against Israel or let's rephrase it in defense of say the Palestinian
01:01:49.120 Arabs is actually caused by radical leftism because for much of my young life, right? Certainly since
01:01:55.620 nine 11, there has been this sense on the right that the Muslims are out to get us. You know, they've
01:02:00.660 been, and there have been a Muslim incursions on Western Christendom for roughly, Oh, 14 centuries
01:02:05.760 now. So obviously there's historical precedent for this, but I think a lot of people are looking now
01:02:10.360 and they're saying, well, you know, I don't think I exactly want to live under Sharia, you know, look,
01:02:14.340 I don't want to live under Hamas or anything like that. But there is a sense among not these insane
01:02:19.620 radical extremist Muslims, but among Muslims more broadly that at least we're, we can talk about God,
01:02:27.060 right? We talk about how Judaism, you know, sort of writes the first book and then, uh, then
01:02:32.120 you get Christianity. And from that there is this derivation. Let's not forget Islam is the product
01:02:38.380 of an encounter between Muhammad and a, and a heretical Christian monk. And this is not even
01:02:41.900 disputed by Muslims. And so there is obviously a lot of commonality there. And when you look at the
01:02:46.560 radical left, which says God doesn't exist, boys can really become girls. We need to kill the babies.
01:02:51.100 We need to do this all for freedom or something. And then you look over at the Muslim world, which has
01:02:56.060 different answers than we do, but they still recognize that God exists, that there is a moral order,
01:03:00.040 these sorts of things. I think that might explain a little bit of the rapprochement you've seen in
01:03:04.260 the last four or five years. I completely agree with that. I think there's more connection between
01:03:07.880 the transgender mania and the hatred of Jews than anything else. Absolutely.
01:03:13.240 Yes. Yeah, really. Well, I mean, one of the things- Today. Yeah, today.
01:03:17.400 It's sort of like, you know, Jesus says, I've told you, I asked this before that Jesus says,
01:03:20.840 they'll hate you for my namesake. And anytime I meet some Christian and people are mad at them,
01:03:24.860 they always say, well, you know, the Bible told us that they'd hate us for his namesake. And I said,
01:03:28.260 no, no, no. They hate you because you're an asshole. They would hate you for his namesake
01:03:33.620 if it ever came down to you. And it's the same with the Jews today. But yes, today they hate the
01:03:40.980 Jews because of leftism. I agree with that. But they've always hated them for something.
01:03:45.440 I honestly think that the most important point was actually the one that Jeremy made at the very
01:03:48.640 beginning, which is that most of the conversation around this is not circulated around what Hamas
01:03:54.400 believes. Because if you had that conversation, then this moral conversation would be over,
01:03:57.200 Hamas is a terrorist group that believes in genocide. So end of story. What it has circulated
01:04:01.080 instead around is a particular leftist point of view, which is that power is inherently evil and
01:04:05.740 corrupt and that the powerless are inherently victimized. Yes. And so you see BLM tweeting out,
01:04:10.760 I mean, and they said this in the BLM manifesto, that they were in favor of Palestine. You thought
01:04:15.180 to yourself, what in the world do these two things have to do with each other? But you see Rashida Tlaib
01:04:19.580 saying it's the same conflict that black people are having with police in the United States
01:04:22.660 and Palestinians are having with Jews in the Middle East. And it's just a matter of power
01:04:27.140 imbalances. What this really is about for the left and the reason why they are covering for
01:04:30.900 anti-Semitism at this point is because they share a lot of the basic principles of anti-Semitism. A
01:04:34.780 lot of the left's point of view, the hard left's point of view, is a conspiracy theory about how
01:04:39.220 power works. The intersectional hierarchy, all the systems of power are geared toward the most
01:04:43.620 powerful. And so therefore, if you are powerful, it is because you sit at the top of the hierarchy
01:04:47.160 in order to achieve equity. These hierarchies must be torn down. Now you look to the Middle East and you
01:04:51.220 say, OK, look, here's this very powerful, small, tiny Jewish state. And then you see these Palestinians
01:04:55.700 and they're living in privation and horror. And you don't look to, OK, maybe they're doing that
01:04:59.180 because terrorist groups run them. Instead, it becomes, well, the people who are really doing
01:05:02.980 well over there, they must be the ones who are responsible for all of this. And then you obfuscate
01:05:07.140 in order to conceal basically what's going on. They'll say things like, well, it really is a color
01:05:12.420 thing. First of all, that demonstrates such unbelievable ignorance of what Jews are, that it's almost
01:05:16.700 beyond the pale. Number one, Jews are not white. Number two, the Jews in Israel are super not white.
01:05:21.220 Like if you've ever been to Israel, over 50 percent of the population is from Arabic countries.
01:05:25.460 Right. Like my wife's family, they're entirely from Morocco. Right. All of their ethnic
01:05:29.300 derivation. They participate in whiteness. Yeah, exactly. Whatever that means. That's what you're doing.
01:05:34.960 They participate in whiteness. And what the left means by they participate in whiteness is they are
01:05:38.720 successful under the current system and the current system needs to fall. And so when they and so this is
01:05:43.520 why you see. I don't know, Ben, I wish it was as rational as this. If all they were doing,
01:05:47.300 trying to do is attack power centers, I'd almost have some sympathy for them. But I think they have
01:05:51.520 overturned the moral order. Yeah. It's going, they're just going up the line to anybody who has
01:05:55.840 morals. Yeah. So we've talked about China. We've talked about Israel. You may be wondering,
01:06:02.200 when are we going to talk about America around here? We're not, but we're going to go even further
01:06:06.380 afield and talk about that final frontier. Yep. But before that, I want to tell you about all the
01:06:13.100 time you could save by not going to the post office. I, as aforementioned, and but a lowly
01:06:18.620 lowercase god king, I am not omniscient. I'm not omnipotent. I can't be in all places at once.
01:06:24.980 And I did not spend time itself into existence with my spoken word. As a result, I am an impatient.
01:06:30.840 You've been lying to us all this time. There's a lot of false advertising in the title I'm going
01:06:35.340 to grant you. If you're still going to the post office, you are wasting your time. I was wasting
01:06:41.040 my time for many years because I did not know about our friends at stamps.com. Don't pay full
01:06:45.940 price for postage. Go to stamps.com and you don't have to do either of them anymore. You can mail and
01:06:51.140 ship anytime, anywhere, right from your computer. Send letters, ship packages, pay less, a lot less
01:06:56.780 with discounted rates from the USPS, UPS, and more. Stamps.com saves businesses like ours,
01:07:02.420 thousands of hours, and tons of money every year. Here at Daily Wire, we've used stamps.com
01:07:07.160 since 2017. No more wasting our time. And back in 2017, there were very few of us, so it was quite
01:07:13.060 often my time. Now, if we had to go to the post office, it wouldn't so much be my problem,
01:07:17.660 but it still saves us a ton of money. Simply use your computer to print official US postage 24-7
01:07:22.800 or any letter, any package, any class of mail, anywhere you want to send. Once your mail is
01:07:28.000 ready, just schedule a pickup or drop it off. It's that simple. With stamps.com, you get discounts
01:07:33.820 up to 40% off post office rates and up to 66% off UPS shipping rates. Not to mention, stamps.com
01:07:40.340 is a fraction of the cost of those expensive postage meters. Stamps.com is a no-brainer. It saves you time.
01:07:46.220 It saves you money. You want to go because you owe yourself your time. You owe your business your time.
01:07:51.620 You owe your family your time. You owe me a little bit of your money. Go over.
01:07:55.940 Stop wasting your time by going to the post office and instead go to stamps.com.
01:07:59.940 No risk. With promo code BACKSTAGE, you get a special offer that includes a four-week trial plus
01:08:05.000 free postage and a digital scale. No long-term commitments. No contracts. Stamps.com.
01:08:10.300 Click on the little microphone at the top of the homepage. Type in BACKSTAGE. At stamps.com,
01:08:15.240 promo code BACKSTAGE. Never go to the post office again.
01:08:18.240 Because where we're going to go, my friends, out there, somewhere.
01:08:27.280 Obviously, earth-shaking news coming out of the Pentagon on 60 Minutes this last week.
01:08:32.940 Matt's been covering the story since long before 60 Minutes got in on the action.
01:08:36.740 There are unidentified aerial phenomena being observed by United States military aircraft.
01:08:42.540 Apparently, it's happening with some frequency. Our former Senate Majority Leader, the Right
01:08:49.920 Honorable Harry Reid, and that's how you know it's true, the Right Honorable Harry Reid became
01:08:55.060 very concerned about this. And because of him and others in the government, a task force was
01:09:00.600 formed within the Pentagon to track these unidentified aerial phenomena, or as you may know them,
01:09:05.540 unidentified flying objects. And now we're starting to see a lot of gun cam footage, a lot of sensor
01:09:14.780 footage, a lot of radar footage coming from military aircraft, primarily F-18s, things that are flying
01:09:20.340 over the water. And the question I have for the panel is, are we alone or are geese just getting
01:09:28.580 fast? Can I, can I just, just to open this up? I believe I'm the only alien believing American on
01:09:37.680 the panel tonight. Okay. So you haven't committed yet, but I am the representative of our people and
01:09:42.920 culture. And I do feel marginalized and frankly unsafe sometimes in this workspace. But so just,
01:09:50.760 I think there are two things here. Okay. First of all, obviously we don't know exactly what that is
01:09:56.380 or what those things are. And in order to, to, to come up with any kind of like probability that
01:10:01.260 it's aliens, we need some background information that we don't have. Like for example, we need to
01:10:07.060 know, are there aliens in the universe and how many such civilizations are there and where are they
01:10:12.880 and what sort of technology do they have? We don't know any of that. But what that tells us,
01:10:17.560 first of all, is that you can't just rule out, you can't basically rule out as a possibility or even
01:10:21.480 as a plausible possibility that those are aliens. Because for all we know now, if, if we're the only
01:10:25.640 intelligent civilization, even just in the galaxy, then that's definitely not an alien.
01:10:29.740 But if there are, if there's intelligent civilizations and all of our surrounding
01:10:32.620 solar systems, let's just say, or in the, in some of the nearest ones, then the probability goes up.
01:10:37.400 So we don't know that at all. So, so we kind of have to put that to the side and then we just look
01:10:41.420 at that. And now we have to say to ourselves, what the hell is that? Yeah. But we've been hearing
01:10:46.840 these UFO reports for a long time, for decades really. And I think the objection that a lot of
01:10:51.780 people had, including myself, is that we said, well, if, if there were actual UFOs, like alien
01:10:56.900 spaceships in the sky, then we should get better evidence. Then why is it always a farmer in Kansas
01:11:02.180 that sees them? It's kind of like Bigfoot. You know, the only person that sees Bigfoot is someone
01:11:05.760 who has a camera from like the, the, the, the battlefield reporter at Antietam had, you know?
01:11:10.680 So why is that always the case with aliens? And that was always my objection until in the last few
01:11:15.320 years, we're getting trained observers up close. There were, there were four Navy pilots who observed one of
01:11:21.040 these things up close, four of them for five minutes. They watched it and corroborating their
01:11:26.840 testimony. We have radar data and video of that one thing, this tic-tac shaped thing that was flying
01:11:31.820 around, breaking the, you know, the, the speed of sound and doing things that seem physically
01:11:35.240 impossible. So that's exactly the kind of evidence that for decades we said, well, if alien, if they
01:11:40.040 were really UFOs, we should have that evidence. Now it's here. And so, um, I feel like that should at
01:11:45.400 least get us to reassess our original Mickey. I hate to pour water on this. Okay. I've got a couple
01:11:51.600 other theories beyond the Martians. One is that this is foreign technology. Now you say we've never
01:11:59.800 seen technology like this. Right. I said it's foreign technology. Now there's another possibility.
01:12:04.740 Maybe it's our own technology, but Michael, you say the government says that it's not. I know the
01:12:10.680 government would never lie to you. I know the government's always totally above board, but maybe
01:12:14.900 it is our technology. Maybe this whole PR campaign is a bit of a fake out to our adversaries, but
01:12:19.480 let's say it's not. Let's say we have no clue what that is up in the sky. Do the aliens exist on
01:12:26.780 other planets? Is there intelligent life? I'll go even further. Is there life at all on other planets?
01:12:32.400 The one argument that drives me the craziest is this one. They say, Michael, it's just, it's just
01:12:38.460 probable. It's just probability. The universe is a gazillion light years across. It's so big.
01:12:44.420 So it's just probable that there is life somewhere else. And I say, you know, to ascertain a
01:12:49.200 probability, you need to know literally anything about the subject that you're talking about. And
01:12:55.200 when it comes to the origins of life, we, there are a few, there are actually, I don't know, six or
01:12:59.080 seven main hypotheses. There was the Miller-Urey hypothesis of the primordial soup. This was in the
01:13:03.880 fifties, but the experiment didn't work out that well because they didn't have the right chemicals.
01:13:07.160 Then there was the clay hypothesis that there are actually these crystal structures within
01:13:10.800 clay that could form the basis of sort of organizing genetic information. But there's
01:13:15.060 really no way to describe how it goes from that to nucleotides, right? So that kind of
01:13:19.620 fell apart. Then there's the idea that it was actually formed in the sub, sub-oceanic vents.
01:13:24.700 Then there's an idea that it was actually the opposite. It was filmed, formed underneath frozen
01:13:29.300 oceans. Then there's this idea that it came here from Martians, you know, from outer space,
01:13:33.140 which only pushes the question off and says, well, how the hell did life form there?
01:13:37.600 My point is in modernity, we're told we're not, we're not special. We not look, there's
01:13:42.640 probably a zillion other of us. And my only point is maybe that's true, but we have no
01:13:47.260 evidence. We have no reason to believe that we're not special.
01:13:50.360 This is my whole, my whole approach to this is, you know, the philosopher Wittgenstein, who
01:13:54.560 may have been an alien, said of that which we cannot speak, we must remain silent. And the
01:13:58.660 philosopher Clavin says that which we don't know, we don't know. And this is the thing,
01:14:03.060 you know, the arguments against the aliens always take the form of, well, would aliens
01:14:08.100 do this? Would aliens do that? How the hell do we know? First of all, if anybody who has
01:14:12.580 the technology to send actual objects across the galaxy to us is, is in another sphere than
01:14:19.040 we are, the things that they do may seem illogical to us and may be logical, but even more so,
01:14:23.720 they may be stupid. They may be incredibly technological proficient and stupid. We, we
01:14:28.660 can build phones. We can, we can build, we can build phones where we can talk across the,
01:14:34.200 the, uh, the planet. And we still elected AOC to Congress. We, you know, you can do incredibly
01:14:40.040 stupid things. So they may be coming down here with these tic-tacs from outer space and building
01:14:44.440 little rock statues. And you say, well, would they do that? How the hell do we know? So all
01:14:49.800 I would say is we now have information, which I, this is where I agree with Walsh. We now
01:14:53.640 have information, which we said nobody had. And all the people who were conspiracy theories
01:14:59.520 and it was zone, whatever it was, 50, what is it? Two in Nevada? Zone, no, area 51. Area
01:15:04.560 51. You know, we now have these pictures of things that are really interesting, really
01:15:09.580 different, worth stopping for a minute and saying, gee, what is that? And the point you
01:15:15.540 make is actually really important. We don't know how life began. We don't know whether we
01:15:20.560 are in fact, the special thing that happened on this one planet, or if this is something
01:15:25.260 that would happen on any planet, uh, uh, near, you know, equally distant from a star.
01:15:29.920 I read your piece that you wrote, which I found incredibly offensive and hate that, uh, where
01:15:34.640 you said, there's no, there's no reason to believe that aliens exist, right? That was your,
01:15:38.740 yeah, that's the headline. But you could easily flip that around and say, there's absolutely
01:15:41.820 no reason to believe they don't exist. When you, when you live in a universe with trillions
01:15:45.480 trillions and trillions and trillions of planets. And we have seen, we have visited none of
01:15:51.620 them and we've sent, we've sent probes to a few, but we've, we've actually visited none
01:15:54.620 of them to sit here. And, and it seems to me the problem, it is a probability thing.
01:15:59.360 Well, this is my problem. It's like walking in to me, it's like walking into a, to a 50 bedroom
01:16:06.660 mansion and you get to the foyer and you don't see anybody there. And you say, well, I guess
01:16:11.080 the place is, it doesn't make any sense. Somebody had to build the mansion and that, that person
01:16:15.460 who built the mansion would be a person, right? But we, and we would, we have some idea of
01:16:19.680 how the person got like, you know, someone got there, he probably took a car. I don't
01:16:22.320 know how you look for the car. We have no clue how life, we don't have any idea. There
01:16:28.000 are going to be a lot of people in the comments.
01:16:29.180 But we do know.
01:16:30.060 How?
01:16:30.900 Well, we, you and I, we all know how, how life started. We don't know the exact
01:16:34.520 man formed Adam out of clay.
01:16:35.960 Right. We know God created it. I mean, that, that, that, that might seem like a shortcut,
01:16:39.100 but we all know that. So I actually think, so when you introduce God into the equation,
01:16:42.880 which of course you have, you can't take them out. Um, a lot of, uh, believers think
01:16:47.400 that this is a challenge to their faith and it just doesn't make any sense. How can you
01:16:50.100 have intelligent civilizations? Well, I, I actually think that, that when you, when you, when
01:16:54.240 you factor in God, which again, you must, it makes the probability higher because you,
01:16:58.580 then, then there's a purpose, there's a purpose element.
01:17:00.500 Like, are there aliens fallen?
01:17:02.860 Well, I don't know that, but there's a purpose.
01:17:05.780 Mustn't they not be fallen for Christianity?
01:17:08.240 I don't know why. I don't know the answer to that, but all I know is that there's a
01:17:10.620 purpose for all these billions of galaxies.
01:17:12.100 Well, here's why. Because the Christian idea is that there's a Godhead, it's Trinity,
01:17:16.280 Father, Son, and the bond of love between the Father and Son, which is the Holy Spirit.
01:17:20.140 The Son saves mankind by taking on human nature and dies on the cross and is resurrected three
01:17:25.360 days later, right? Ascends up into heaven, seated at the right hand of God, the Father
01:17:27.920 Almighty. Is he all, is he like, is he, so he's fully human and fully God and also fully
01:17:33.540 Martian? We don't even know, we don't even know whether Martians are exactly like us
01:17:36.760 or not. Are they human? I really want to, I want to, I'm trying to filibuster Ben because
01:17:41.840 I know he has a good argument. I don't want him to jump in.
01:17:44.200 It's not that great. I mean, go ahead.
01:17:46.140 Okay. So here's my not that great argument. So I agree with what you are saying, and it's
01:17:51.000 a burden of proof question, obviously. Is the burden of proof on the people who are
01:17:54.320 trying to provide the idea that aliens exist, or is the burden of proof on the people
01:17:58.040 who are saying that aliens don't exist? But that doesn't change the balance of the
01:18:01.060 evidence, which is that we have no idea, right? And so we were all saying the same
01:18:04.020 thing. We have no idea. Do aliens exist or do aliens not exist? What I think is that
01:18:08.380 the likelihood that aliens not only exist, but have been floating around the planet in
01:18:14.420 what seemed to be bizarrely bird-like shapes and also are behaving in ways that seem to
01:18:22.300 conflate with, and also seem to conflate with optical illusions that we have seen
01:18:28.240 before, suggests to me that, because human beings have a very long time of describing-
01:18:33.100 When have you ever seen a tic-tac bird? Tell me that.
01:18:35.900 And they're kind of far away.
01:18:37.540 Where did that come from, then, I asked.
01:18:40.720 I mean, it could be very far away. That doesn't look like amazing pixelation. It's not, like,
01:18:45.280 right up on it. Like, I don't know, but it doesn't seem to me that the most plausible
01:18:48.780 explanation for that-
01:18:49.680 But four people saw the tic-tac.
01:18:50.880 But this reminds me-
01:18:52.740 And from far away, it might look like a tic-tac. I mean, like, just because things refract off
01:18:58.240 surfaces of clouds differently. Like, David Blaine also isn't cutting coins out of his
01:19:02.060 arm. Like-
01:19:03.020 Whoa, whoa, whoa.
01:19:04.080 The skepticism on the scale.
01:19:05.520 It's illusion, Michael.
01:19:08.040 Here's my position on it. The burden of proof is on people who want to say that there are
01:19:12.060 aliens.
01:19:12.940 Yes.
01:19:13.020 Not on people who say that there aren't. You never- The burden of proof is never on a person
01:19:17.080 who is maintaining the status quo, or who is maintaining what we know.
01:19:21.360 Oh, I don't-
01:19:21.740 The idea-
01:19:22.340 I don't agree with that principle.
01:19:24.340 The idea of aliens is a novel concept rooted in fiction. The fact that this is even in our
01:19:31.560 minds is a possibility. When we see something moving across that screen, the only reason
01:19:35.140 we even ask ourselves, is that extraterrestrial life? 200 years ago, that would- no one would
01:19:40.180 have- you could have seen it in the sky, and your thought wouldn't have been, is that
01:19:42.880 extraterrestrial life? Because that idea had not been broadly introduced
01:19:47.000 into the American psyche. We have a frame of reference now, largely programmed in us
01:19:51.780 by fiction, that causes us to see certain things and judge them according to that frame
01:19:58.160 of reference. What is the tic-tac? I don't know. What I know is that our government is
01:20:03.580 testing technology decades before we know about that technology. The first time we ever
01:20:08.760 saw an F-117 stealth fighter, it was almost 20 years old before Americans even knew that
01:20:14.220 that existed. It had been not only in existence, it had been flying around our country nonstop.
01:20:19.260 There's a reason that the pilots you're referring to keep seeing these things in restricted airspace.
01:20:24.000 Why in restricted airspace? Why is that airspace restricted? Because that's where we test things.
01:20:28.240 That's where our government goes to test things.
01:20:29.400 Also, we keep trying to figure out what is the thing, but there are so many examples of- you can't paint
01:20:36.180 with a broad brush. Some of it may not even exist. You may be looking at something on one of these cameras,
01:20:40.720 and that something is nothing. It's not a goose. It's not a tic-tac bird that do exist.
01:20:46.260 It's not a weather balloon. It's literally a nothing because these airplanes,
01:20:51.620 their sensory mechanisms are programmatic. They're so software-driven now, and we're constantly
01:20:56.900 updating and refining that software. It could literally be tracking something that doesn't
01:21:01.440 even exist because of an update that happened to the firmware. It could be foreign governments
01:21:05.780 hacking our systems to show us things that aren't there. It could be foreign governments testing
01:21:09.240 technology. I think that's actually unlikely. I think it's far more likely there to be us testing
01:21:12.920 technology. It could be hackers in some basement in Tuscaloosa hacking our equipment.
01:21:18.520 But of all those theories, the least likely is that it is something from another planet.
01:21:22.980 The reason I don't agree with it-
01:21:24.280 Because we know all those other things exist that you just said.
01:21:26.520 This is like ghosts. Whenever I have more than 10 people in a room, I always ask anybody who's
01:21:31.020 seen a ghost. Always, always, never fails. Somebody has seen a ghost. Some sane, rational person
01:21:36.260 has had an experience that's inexplicable.
01:21:37.800 First of all, it's a weird dinner question.
01:21:39.880 It's not.
01:21:40.400 But you do get a yes answer.
01:21:42.180 Because it's been true through history. It's been true through history. The reason we don't
01:21:45.580 believe in ghosts is because we don't believe in ghosts. That doesn't mean that the burden of
01:21:50.240 proof is on somebody who does believe in ghosts. I mean, more people have seen ghosts through
01:21:54.860 history than have seen Brazil. I mean, there's plenty of reason to believe in ghosts. And I think
01:22:02.520 the same thing is true here. The fiction that you're talking about is extrapolative fiction. It's
01:22:07.160 people extrapolating from life on Earth to life on other planets. That's not illogical.
01:22:11.500 Do you believe in ghosts?
01:22:12.580 What? Do you believe in ghosts? I'm actually unsure what I believe.
01:22:17.080 But let's hold on.
01:22:17.820 I mean, all I can say, all I can say is-
01:22:18.920 As long as we're going here, we're going to go full our bell here.
01:22:20.680 But I don't want to get off on ghosts. You can't say that what I just said, which is
01:22:23.920 that the least likely of all of those options is that it's extraterrestrial life. You can't
01:22:28.440 say that I'm wrong about that. Of course, the least likely explanation is that it's extraterrestrial
01:22:32.400 life. No, I think-
01:22:33.180 Definitionally. Not just by a little. It's not 5% less likely that it's a software glitch than
01:22:38.600 extraterrestrial life. It's not even 100% less likely that it's a software glitch than
01:22:43.100 extraterrestrial life. Definitionally, what I'm saying is true.
01:22:45.960 Because what-
01:22:46.920 I'm saying the thing definitionally true.
01:22:48.480 No, what Knowles was saying about probability is only a half-truth, right? It's true.
01:22:53.520 I only-
01:22:54.160 You only deal with it.
01:22:55.220 Hold on.
01:22:56.300 Based on what you're saying right now, it could be a time machine.
01:23:01.040 And it could be.
01:23:02.080 It's at least equally, I would say it's even more likely that it's a time machine.
01:23:05.360 No, no. I don't agree with that.
01:23:06.480 But it's at least as likely that it's a time machine that it's alien.
01:23:09.840 It's far more likely that it's a fun spot.
01:23:10.880 But the thing that Knowles is saying about probability is right in the sense that we
01:23:15.280 have no idea. We have no idea how to calculate the probability.
01:23:18.180 And that's why we need to know. That's what I'm saying. You can't talk about probability.
01:23:20.420 No, this is not true.
01:23:22.620 But there's a theory.
01:23:23.580 But there's a theory under which it's probable that there's life-
01:23:26.620 This is not true. The probability of seeing something and not understanding what it is,
01:23:32.640 every human has that happen all the time.
01:23:35.140 The theory that a software glitch happens in military hardware that's being updated
01:23:39.480 happens all the time. It is far more likely. And I'm saying you can't paint with a broad
01:23:46.280 brush about this. I'm not even saying there aren't aliens. I'm not saying we didn't see
01:23:49.520 an alien. If we saw an alien, it's one single instance of these things. This is another thing
01:23:54.880 when we talk about, are they aliens? Every one of them is different. If we had 50 pilots all the
01:24:00.760 time and they were all seeing something that looked exactly the same-
01:24:03.280 Can I just say one thing? Can I just say one thing? I'm not saying the alien is the most
01:24:09.100 likely explanation. For example, there could be civilizations under the ocean.
01:24:13.300 And that-
01:24:14.420 You make a good point.
01:24:15.500 But hold on a second.
01:24:16.760 That is at least as likely or more likely.
01:24:18.480 That's actually more likely.
01:24:19.260 The alien is not the most likely. I also don't think it's the-
01:24:21.380 More likely.
01:24:21.480 It's not necessarily the least likely.
01:24:22.380 We know there's life here.
01:24:23.520 Like you said, we have to look at each individual case. So the Tic Tac, for example.
01:24:27.080 I would say that the alien is more likely than the seagull, okay? Because I have never seen
01:24:31.940 a seagull that can go to the speed of sound and that doesn't have wings.
01:24:35.460 I've never been to Atlantic City.
01:24:36.760 I've never been to Atlantic City.
01:24:38.460 So I would say that-
01:24:39.620 So, like, I would put it above some other options. I do think it's not the most likely,
01:24:44.480 but it is a- it's a plausible- here's what I would say. It's a plausible explanation,
01:24:48.440 and it's more plausible- it should be judged more plausible today than we would have 50 years ago,
01:24:54.080 given that the evidence has-
01:24:55.160 I don't believe there's any reason to say that it's a plausible explanation.
01:24:57.160 It is certainly, because definitionally it is true, that it is possible. It is a thing that
01:25:02.820 could be. But Occam's razor tells us that the vast majority, the most likely, it is far more
01:25:11.000 likely that it is something known than that it is something unknown.
01:25:14.080 But the thing about not knowing-
01:25:16.120 And it turns out that those are just things living in-
01:25:18.320 The thing about not knowing-
01:25:19.740 That's it.
01:25:20.120 No, but the thing about not knowing is that you really don't know. Just to go back to
01:25:23.380 Knowles' point about probability.
01:25:24.420 But not all things that you don't know are equal is probable.
01:25:25.620 Wait, just let's go back to Knowles' point about probability. It is genuinely true that
01:25:30.960 we don't know how life began, and we don't know how special it is on Earth. So we have
01:25:34.860 no way of calculating the probability. But if you start with a theory that things happen
01:25:40.080 physically basically the same way, then it's very probable that there's life on other planets.
01:25:45.180 It's also probable that some of it is more advanced than ours. And it could be. Because
01:25:49.340 we don't know, we literally don't know. We don't know how probable-
01:25:52.540 Well, hold on. But what is the probability-
01:25:53.800 We don't know how probable-
01:25:54.600 When you say it's not probable.
01:25:56.100 Here's how you could tell.
01:25:56.840 Yes, because we've all had software malfunctions, and we haven't all interacted with aliens.
01:26:01.620 Correct. What is the probability that birds exist? 100%.
01:26:05.140 It's 100%.
01:26:05.600 What is the probability that software exists?
01:26:06.940 I think they were all replaced by drones.
01:26:09.000 I mean, there's some people who don't believe that birds exist.
01:26:12.120 Right.
01:26:13.380 All I can say is that aliens are going to have great graphics.
01:26:15.300 Let's use a less controversial. What is the probability that chemtrails and lizard people exist?
01:26:19.160 That's 100%.
01:26:19.820 That's 100%.
01:26:20.120 That the frogs aren't making the frogs, yeah.
01:26:21.440 This is the thing. Is it possible that there are aliens? I doubt. I think it is possible. I think
01:26:29.140 it is incredibly unlikely. I base this on the fact that we've picked up no radio signals from
01:26:33.540 space. I base this on the possibility that we don't have anything, that the best thing that
01:26:38.020 anybody can come up with to tell me that aliens did, aliens with so much sophistication that they
01:26:42.680 were able to traverse interstellar spaces that they came here a long time ago and stacked rocks on
01:26:47.460 top of rocks in the Sahara. That's crazy. If we had opened Pharaoh's tomb and it had been air
01:26:51.880 conditioned, I would have gone, you know, there's a real possibility that somebody else built this
01:26:57.520 besides slaves in Egypt a thousand years ago. The very fact that we don't commonly encounter aliens
01:27:03.840 and we do commonly encounter myriad other things that this could be means that the most likely
01:27:08.700 answer to every one of these individual things is that it has a chance. So you're saying there's a
01:27:13.360 chance. That's my whole argument, really. I'm also saying, Drew, that it's far more likely that
01:27:19.880 you'll die of a heart attack than that you'll be killed by an alien. You can't say that's not true.
01:27:23.100 It's far more common that I will have a heart attack. But the thing is, if I'm killed by an
01:27:27.340 alien, then that's a thing, right? All I'm saying is we have no way of calculating the probability.
01:27:33.000 No, but you do. I mean, you do. It's the same question as ghosts. There's no hard evidence
01:27:37.000 that ghosts exist, right? Okay. So if suddenly you're a freak and a door shot in your house,
01:27:41.420 what does that even mean? What is the probability? Isn't the probability tied to the number of
01:27:44.480 alien civilizations in the universe? Don't you need to know that? No, you don't. Well,
01:27:48.500 because if there's zero, then... If it's zero, then that would be an answer. We'll never know if
01:27:52.680 it's zero. But if there are... Above zero, any number above zero actually doesn't factor into our
01:27:57.220 equation at all. I guess I don't see how that could be... It actually doesn't factor into our
01:28:00.200 equation. Because when you're in a 747 and you look out the window and you see a 737 going by,
01:28:07.680 is it an alien spacecraft? I mean, it damn well could be. I once thought it was. They could
01:28:11.700 have technology that makes them mimic the look of our technology. But of course, while that is
01:28:17.180 possible, it is the least likely of all the possible... It's more likely that you didn't see
01:28:23.000 anything than that the 737 that you probably saw is an alien spacecraft. But when you say there's
01:28:27.240 no hard evidence that ghosts exist, all those people, the sane, rational people who have had
01:28:31.920 really convincing experiences, why isn't that evidence? Yeah, I think... Because lots of people
01:28:36.680 have experiences of things that don't happen all the time. That's true, but... I don't think aliens and
01:28:40.160 ghosts are related. Let me introduce you to a discussion about systemic racism, my friend. I'm not talking
01:28:43.180 about aliens and ghosts being related. I'm talking about the probability of things being
01:28:46.600 true and what you need to calculate those probabilities. But you're not asking what the
01:28:50.580 probability that aliens exist is. You're asking me what the probability that things being observed
01:28:55.240 on gun cameras by American pilots are aliens. There's also ways... That's a different...
01:28:59.320 There is just on the... That requires you to answer a bunch of probabilistic questions, by the way.
01:29:02.380 No, it isn't because it's... Because even if there were to be alien civilizations, you then have to
01:29:07.100 multiply that by the probability that those alien civilizations are sophisticated enough to build
01:29:11.580 technological spacecraft. Multiply by the probability that millions of years ago, literally millions of
01:29:16.180 years ago, they launched these spacecraft to reach... Not necessarily. I mean, we don't know...
01:29:19.760 We don't know what... Well, if you believe that the laws of physics hold, they're not traveling
01:29:22.880 faster than the speed of light. They could have a wormhole. These are only the laws of physics we
01:29:25.820 know. They could have a wormhole. That's a thing. You know, that's... Have you guys never seen
01:29:29.660 ancient aliens? I also watched Interstellar, okay? It was cool. But like, the probability that things
01:29:33.320 are traveling through wormholes to the United States... Well, I know, but to Drew's point...
01:29:36.420 To Drew's point here, there is a far greater likelihood... Unbelievable.
01:29:40.180 That's how Trump got elected, guys. There is a far greater likelihood that the ghost of Donald Trump will run in 2024.
01:29:44.740 No, there's a far greater likelihood that ghosts exist because we know people exist. We know...
01:29:50.080 We're fairly certain that souls exist. We're fairly certain, at least I am, that angels and demons
01:29:54.520 exist. So we're like... We can sort of extrapolate from our own understanding of these things. But I
01:30:00.100 don't know that E.T. exists, goodness gracious. And that's why I think it's a lower problem.
01:30:03.800 And we're not talking about the probability of whether or not life exists. You are a little bit,
01:30:06.960 and I like your argument. But I'm not actually talking about the probability that aliens exist.
01:30:10.900 I'm talking about the probability that when we see something on radar in an F-18...
01:30:16.240 Yeah.
01:30:16.620 That it is more likely that it is...
01:30:19.120 Can I ask a question?
01:30:19.800 When a pilot says, I saw this thing happen and it moved up in a way that I've never seen
01:30:23.320 before, and he's obviously not crazy. Maybe he is crazy, but we don't know that. I mean,
01:30:27.820 and it came up in front of me and then it vanished. I don't know. Maybe he's seen an illusion,
01:30:34.120 but wouldn't...
01:30:35.240 The other day I played three-carbante with a guy and the dude totally made me believe.
01:30:38.180 Can I ask a serious question? Can I ask a serious question? So would you agree that
01:30:44.700 we would all agree, if we know that there's no aliens out there in the universe, then the
01:30:48.080 probability is zero for any of these encounters. If we knew that, let's say, there was one
01:30:52.580 intelligent civilization per galaxy, that still makes 100 billion civilizations, but the chances
01:30:57.320 of crossing a galaxy is very slow, very slim. But if we knew, for example, that there was an
01:31:02.800 intelligent civilization in 20 of the 30 nearest stars to us, would you say that that makes the
01:31:09.620 probability more likely that one of these unexplained situations is alien in order?
01:31:15.620 Yes, but by so fine a margin that it's like saying that buying two lottery tickets makes you more
01:31:20.840 likely to win the lottery than buying one. It is true as an absolute statement of fact that you have
01:31:26.260 twice as much of a chance of winning the lottery if you buy two tickets. But it is not true by any
01:31:31.040 statistical actual reckoning. You are still overwhelmingly not going to win the lottery.
01:31:38.480 Doesn't mean you won't. Overwhelmingly not going to win the lottery. Your odds have changed only by
01:31:43.500 the most minute of margin. If I knew for a fact that there were aliens, if we had even heard radio
01:31:49.900 transmissions from aliens, even Elon Musk says there's something wrong that the universe is so quiet.
01:31:55.100 He obviously believes in aliens. He says he thinks that there's something that happens
01:31:59.080 that actually destroys civilizations before they can become interstellar travelers or we would
01:32:06.340 have been aware of them long before we saw them on a gun cam because we're listening,
01:32:10.480 we're looking, we observe, we watch the sky. Obviously the things aren't invisible if our
01:32:13.800 pilots are seeing them. In fact, in a funny way, we're capable of making aircraft that can't be seen
01:32:21.340 by these same sensors that apparently the aliens who can travel interstellar space aren't capable.
01:32:25.600 But how do you explain? It's more likely that America, and I don't think this is what it is
01:32:29.580 either, but it's more likely that we're testing some sort of drone vehicle that can actually become
01:32:34.340 invisible, that can refract light and cloak itself. I know that's more possible because it's possible
01:32:39.220 and there are humans and we're making things all the time.
01:32:41.280 Yeah. Can we just use, I just want to go back to the tick tock, tick tock, not tick tock.
01:32:45.080 I want to go to the tick tock.
01:32:46.240 The aliens might be on tick tock for sure. Just let's use the tick tock example because we have
01:32:51.960 their four eyewitnesses up close. They, they, they observed it for five minutes. Plus we have radar
01:32:57.220 data. Plus we have video of all this same thing. That's really compelling evidence that at least,
01:33:00.780 so we know.
01:33:01.720 Something was observed.
01:33:02.740 Right. It was not a, it was not a glitch or anything. It was, there was a real thing that was
01:33:05.780 there that they saw. Um, so that is likely, although still not completely.
01:33:11.300 So what is, what is, uh, what, what, what are your theories on what that thing was?
01:33:16.640 Well, I wouldn't begin to know what it was. As I said, they could have seen, uh,
01:33:19.940 it's literally called an unidentified flying object. There are unidentified flying objects.
01:33:23.200 This is where we agree. I agree with you completely about this. I have no idea what it was.
01:33:26.500 But the, but there are far more likely scenarios than that it is extraterrestrial life,
01:33:30.780 which we don't even know exists. Far more likely that these pilots observe
01:33:35.120 some man-made, because we know there are men and they make things, craft operating in
01:33:39.580 restricted zones where we know we test those kinds of crafts. Hypersonic missiles that move
01:33:43.800 at speeds we've never seen. Drones that are capable of breaking, uh, Gs that would have
01:33:48.660 killed humans. Unpiloted vehicles can do things that piloted vehicles never could because piloted
01:33:53.440 vehicles kill people if they make certain hygiene maneuvers. Testing with speed, testing with
01:33:59.460 shapes, testing with, uh, automated control, maybe even testing with, um, uh, electronic hacking,
01:34:07.040 where once we are observed, we're able to send false data to, to the radar of our enemy to tell
01:34:12.600 them what we're observing. I'm saying that any of those things are possible and more likely than
01:34:19.000 what was observed was a flying tic-tac UFO, uh, flying tic-tac full of aliens. Um, although I will grant
01:34:24.980 you that like winning the lottery, it is, there is a numeric possibility that they observed.
01:34:30.480 But I will also say that it is no more likely that what they observed is an alien than that
01:34:36.400 one of us is an alien. It's no more likely that what they observed is an alien than that there
01:34:40.460 are invisible aliens standing over our shoulders, documenting this conversation to figure out how
01:34:44.500 much more, how much we know. Like whether they can subscribe or whether nothing was most
01:34:49.840 importantly, you know, it's also, we, we keep forgetting the, the communications element of
01:34:55.740 this. So we, we've been talking now for, for our entire lives about how messaging is not accidental.
01:35:02.640 Generally speaking, there are strategies to communication, especially when it's coming from
01:35:06.120 the government. Does no one think it's like a little bit weird that the government and the
01:35:11.300 mainstream media, which is in cahoots with the federal government is just like all pushing this
01:35:15.760 one story right now. Is that not, is that what you're saying? Like a distraction.
01:35:19.840 Attraction or it's a. Yeah. Possibly. Very possibly. That's more. I don't know if that's
01:35:24.780 true, but it's more likely than that. I find it very unlikely that the government would use all
01:35:28.500 this, all of a sudden decide to use UFOs as a side. You know what? The only reason I mention it
01:35:32.480 right now is because I realized we've come to, you know, almost the end of the show and I haven't
01:35:35.940 yet once plugged my book, which is about, it's called speechless, controlling words, controlling
01:35:39.600 minds. There we go. There's the bell. Okay. I just wanted to make sure we got at least one in
01:35:42.980 during the, you know, but I also think it's possibly true. I also think that, you know, we're just like
01:35:48.280 the government does this and they probably buy your book. Usually when there is very quickly
01:35:53.120 a bunch of confirmation that the thing has happened. So say for example, that you're a
01:35:57.300 native American living, you know, in America before the settlers arrive and suddenly you
01:36:03.120 see a boat on the water. You've never seen a boat on the water before, right? There's a crazy thing.
01:36:05.960 What is this thing? So you go and you tell all your friends and your friends are like, that's crazy.
01:36:09.640 That doesn't exist. Nobody's ever had anything like that. Okay. And then the next day the boat arrives
01:36:13.620 on the shore and a bunch of settlers get off and they're like, Hey, now you've had some more
01:36:17.320 confirmation. Okay. If the boat just went away, sure. It could have been a boat, but like, usually
01:36:24.080 that's not how things go. Usually within a fairly short period of time. And we've been talking about,
01:36:27.560 as you say, these UFOs for like what, 50 years, 60 years at this point. Yeah. They didn't go away.
01:36:32.080 They're here, Ben. Where's the, where's the cascade of information that confirms your belief that
01:36:36.400 they are here. Well, we're getting the cascade of information right now. You just ruined your own
01:36:40.320 argument. No, what is the, what is the cascade? All of these, you're like, you're like, you're
01:36:45.840 like, you're like, you're like the native Americans going, there's no ship out there.
01:36:49.920 What is it? Eventually the ships from other lands get off and then proceed to destroy the
01:36:55.900 worst thing to do. If in 10 minutes they get off the pill and get pregnant and 10 minutes they get
01:37:06.900 off the pill and they start lecturing to us about communal anarchism, then I will fully admit that
01:37:14.000 the, you guys are going to be in trouble when they come. Just solving this as anybody. I mean,
01:37:17.660 the Jews are in trouble with everyone. They may as well get early on the bandwagon. Everyone hates
01:37:21.720 us anyway. May as well get on board with other civilizations, you know. I for one welcome our new
01:37:25.880 Tic Tac. Thank you for tuning in. As always, we're very happy to have you join us and we'd like to
01:37:31.060 invite you to become a member to enjoy the full Daily Wire experience. Head over to
01:37:34.420 dailywire.com slash subscribe. Use promo code VIP for 20% off and the chance to get a free trip to
01:37:40.040 come meet Candace herself and whichever of the rest of us happens to be here on that day. Don't miss
01:37:45.540 out. This is the last week to enter the sweepstakes. Thanks for joining us tonight. We will see you
01:37:49.620 next time, assuming that we haven't been probed.
01:37:52.200 Daily Wire Backstage is produced by Mathis Glover. Executive producer is me, Jeremy Boring. Our
01:38:06.960 technical director is Austin Stevens. Our production manager is Pavel Wadowski. Studio and equipment
01:38:12.280 management is by Patrick Kennedy and broadcast engineering is by Mark Herman. Editing is by Jim
01:38:17.600 Nickel. Audio is mixed by Mike Coromina. And our audio assistant is Israel McFarlane. Playback is
01:38:23.160 operated by McKenna Waters. Hair and makeup by Nika Geneva. Daily Wire Backstage is a Daily Wire
01:38:28.600 production. Copyright Daily Wire 2021.