Ep. 479 - When Democracy Fails
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
172.93181
Summary
A giddy Nancy Pelosi pretends to be somber while signing the official impeachment resolution against President Trump, and simultaneously doling out souvenir pens to her jackal colleagues. Meanwhile, Vladimir Putin moves to consolidate power in Russia, we will examine how and why democracy fails, then President Trump wins big in the trade war with China, and even left-wing outlets have to admit that his strategy, specifically his tariffs, worked. While we all celebrate the economic and geopolitical victory, we take a look at the more important win, the overthrow of conventional wisdom. Then CNN releases the audio from the post-debate Warren-Burney exchange at Tuesday's Democratic primary debate, because CNN is still trying to make Elizabeth Warren happen. Finally, the mailbag.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
A giddy Nancy Pelosi pretends to be somber while signing the official impeachment resolution against
00:00:06.340
President Trump and simultaneously doling out souvenir pens to her jackal colleagues.
00:00:12.280
Meanwhile, Vladimir Putin moves to consolidate power in yet another blow to democracy in Russia.
00:00:17.540
We will examine how and why democracy fails. Then President Trump wins big in the trade war
00:00:24.460
with China and even left-wing outlets have to admit that his strategy, specifically his tariffs,
00:00:31.480
worked. While we all celebrate the economic and geopolitical victory, we will take a look
00:00:36.680
at the more important win, the overthrow of conventional wisdom. Then CNN releases the
00:00:42.540
audio from the post-debate Warren-Burney exchange at Tuesday's Democratic primary debate because
00:00:48.240
CNN is still trying to make Elizabeth Warren happen. Stop trying to make Elizabeth Warren happen.
00:00:53.780
Elizabeth Warren is not going to happen. Finally, the mailbag, all that and more.
00:00:57.900
I'm Michael Knowles and this is the Michael Knowles Show.
00:01:07.080
All right, she's impeaching him. And there have been like seven different moments where this is
00:01:12.500
the official impeachment. Pelosi announced months ago, she said, we're starting the official
00:01:17.580
impeachment inquiry. Then they do the inquiry. Then they take the official impeachment vote,
00:01:22.920
but it wasn't totally official because she wouldn't deliver the articles of impeachment to the
00:01:27.100
Senate. Then she signed the official impeachment resolution. And then her seven house managers
00:01:32.500
delivered the official impeachment resolution. And the fiction that they're all living under right
00:01:40.040
now is that this is a very somber, serious day for America. These house Democrats, they don't want
00:01:45.800
to impeach the president. They just have to because of that thing he did. And we can't get too specific
00:01:50.960
about it because, you know, it's very complicated, but he did something. He, the orange man was bad.
00:01:58.280
And so we have to impeach him, but we don't want to, except they're giddy about it and they're eager
00:02:02.860
to do it. And they were ready to do it before they even figured out a tenuous reason to impeach him.
00:02:08.700
The impeachment managers include representative Hakeem Jeffries from New York, Val Demings from Florida,
00:02:14.900
Jason Crow from Wisconsin, Sylvia Garcia from Texas, and Zoe Lofgren from California. And then of course,
00:02:22.220
the two, the two impeachment stars, Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler. Those are the people. Now it's,
00:02:30.320
it's worth pointing out of the impeachment managers of the seven impeachment managers,
00:02:35.420
six of them supported impeachment before the Ukraine whistleblower complaint. So they're all saying
00:02:43.560
that they don't want to impeach the president, but this matter on Ukraine that none of us can really
00:02:48.580
describe because it's completely murky and a hoax and BS. Nevertheless, this, this incident with Ukraine
00:02:56.480
is the reason that they have to impeach Trump, except six of the seven impeachment managers
00:03:00.620
supported impeachment publicly before the whistleblower complaint, before anybody knew anything
00:03:06.980
about this Ukraine phone call. So it's completely disingenuous. It's insincere.
00:03:14.200
The most interesting person here of, of all of the impeachment managers is Zoe Lofgren. The reason
00:03:21.800
she's most interesting is Zoe Lofgren has been involved in three different impeachment processes.
00:03:28.860
It's pretty amazing. She's involved obviously in this one. She's an impeachment manager on Trump.
00:03:32.880
She was in the house since 1995. So she voted on the impeachment of Bill Clinton. And she was
00:03:38.880
actually working on the staff of representative Don Edwards in the 1970s when they, when Edwards and
00:03:47.060
she helping him were preparing the articles of impeachment against Richard Nixon. Lofgren shows the
00:03:55.060
problem here, the, the increasing problem with impeachment and with our democracy or our representative
00:04:02.020
democracy or our Republic. We'll get to the difference in a little bit. She shows the problem. We're
00:04:08.880
impeaching too much. We're impeaching too frequently. This is not the, what the framers and the founders
00:04:16.080
of our country had in mind. We shouldn't just be throwing out the president every time there's a new
00:04:23.400
Congress in charge and they don't like the guy. Democrats are pretending to be upset about the whole
00:04:28.700
thing. They love it. And that is a big danger to our Republic. We'll get to that in just one second.
00:04:34.380
First, I got to thank our friends at Robin hood because you know, we just got an excellent trade
00:04:40.080
deal signed today. That's actually the big news of the day. We'll get to that wonderful trade deal and
00:04:44.360
what it means for all of our bottom lines. But you got to think about your personal bottom line. 2020
00:04:48.460
is the perfect time to start thinking about 2040. And with Robin hood, you can invest in stocks,
00:04:55.300
options and ETFs right from your phone. You can even spend and earn interest on uninvested cash.
00:05:03.180
I know I look, I never took any sort of financial literacy courses. I don't know anything about
00:05:07.880
the financial services industry. Robin hood makes it easy. They make it easy to get started and learn
00:05:13.580
as you grow with an intuitive app experience and no commission fees on trades. None zip nada
00:05:19.940
stock prices. Don't have to hold you back. You can buy a piece of a company that you love
00:05:24.700
for as low as $1 and build your portfolio a little bit at a time by one share by half a share
00:05:30.280
by three and a quarter shares by whatever you want. It's up to you. It's up to your budget. It's up to
00:05:34.260
your goals. Your first stock is on the house. Thanks to Robin hood. When you set up a free
00:05:39.200
account, go to knolls.robinhood.com to learn more and claim your free stock. Annual percentage
00:05:46.680
yield on uninvested cash is paid by program banks and is variable. Robin hood financial
00:05:51.740
is not a bank. The free stock offer is subject to terms and conditions. All investments involve
00:05:55.520
risk. Other fees may apply. Visit rbnhd.co slash feeds. All right.
00:06:04.740
So they're giddy to do it. They're so happy to deliver the impeachment resolution. Nancy Pelosi
00:06:10.060
was so happy to sign it. As Nancy Pelosi is signing this impeachment resolution, so excited,
00:06:15.320
President Trump was signing the trade deal with China because after two years of a trade war with
00:06:21.040
China, we were told we're going to lose. This is terrible. The American people are getting killed
00:06:25.300
in this and what a dumb strategy. It actually worked. We got a very favorable trade deal.
00:06:30.060
So the Democrats, the best they can do is throw out the president who's doing a good job and the
00:06:34.460
president is delivering. I mean, what an amazing two weeks for Trump. Not every two weeks of his
00:06:41.520
presidency has been like this. Okay. There have been a few moments that I've not been so thrilled
00:06:45.680
about some policy moves that I haven't been so happy with, but the last two weeks, oh my gosh,
00:06:53.640
he, that first of all, we get attacked by Iran twice. Kills, Iran kills an American contractor
00:07:00.580
and hits our Baghdad embassy. Very perilous situation. I mean, we're being attacked by a hostile
00:07:06.080
foreign power. Trump takes out their top guy. Trump takes out the number two guy. He, we now have
00:07:13.440
heightened tensions with Iran. They back down. So we establish deterrence, major geopolitical win.
00:07:19.140
And then on the heels of that, we finally ink the trade deal, which is beyond all of the foreign
00:07:24.280
affairs issues, the single most important issue right now facing the United States abroad. More
00:07:30.620
important than Iran, more important than North Korea, more important than anything in the Middle East,
00:07:34.140
China. China is the adversary. China is the threat. It's the threat to our economy. It's a threat to
00:07:39.520
our national security. And finally, after so many years of nothing, we've got a deal on this. It's
00:07:46.320
really great news. We'll get to that in a second, but first I just have to show you the hypocrisy of
00:07:51.300
the Democrats. Well, Trump is actually helping out our economy, helping out our national security.
00:07:56.940
All they can do is try to throw him out and they're happy to do it. So Pelosi a little while ago
00:08:02.360
was giving an interview about impeachment. And she said, it's a somber, serious, difficult,
00:08:10.280
terrible, sad day for America when they have to impeach him. Here she is.
00:08:15.360
This is a very sad time for our country. There's no joy in this. It's sad. We must be somber. We must
00:08:26.120
be prayerful. There's no joy in this. There's no joy in this, Nancy. Then why are you smiling,
00:08:30.860
grinning, grinning ear to ear while you sign the resolution? You can see, if you saw the clip
00:08:36.780
yesterday, she's, she's signing this impeachment resolution and she's got all of the Democratic
00:08:43.980
colleagues around her. Oh, and there she just looks up. She's so happy. She's never felt this
00:08:49.320
way before. Yes, she swears. It's true. And she owes it all to those Democrats. How happy she is.
00:08:56.080
She gave away commemorative pens. When presidents sign important pieces of legislation,
00:09:04.920
the Affordable Care Act, right, Obamacare, or major pieces of legislation like that,
00:09:10.240
they will sign their name only a little bit at a time, a little part of one letter and then another
00:09:15.180
letter and then another letter because they want to switch the pens because they want to be able to
00:09:19.880
give out those souvenir pens to people to help remember this joyous occasion. And it's a great
00:09:26.140
piece of political swag in Washington. Nancy Pelosi is doing that for impeachment. She's giving out an
00:09:33.540
actual celebratory souvenir for this somber, serious, sad day. They're thrilled. Why shouldn't
00:09:41.160
they be thrilled? For radical Democrats, impeachment is a huge win. And I mean Democrats with a capital D
00:09:46.580
and I mean Democrats with a lowercase d. Both, both kinds of Democrats, the Democrats of the party and
00:09:53.020
the people who support pure radical democracy, both should be thrilled with impeaching the president.
00:09:58.180
If you're a purist Democrat with a lowercase d, you should hate, you should hate this particular
00:10:04.680
president. You might hate the president in general, but you should hate this one in particular.
00:10:08.640
He was elected without the popular vote, right? So right, right away, that's a problem. And generally
00:10:16.160
speaking, people who are pure lowercase d Democrats who want more power to the people hate the executive
00:10:21.840
branch and often hate a lot of our constitution. You know, if you're a purist Democrat, if you really
00:10:30.660
believe that 50% plus one should decide how we're governed, you should despise the constitution
00:10:37.880
constitution. Because the constitution limits the rights or it limits the power of the people
00:10:44.260
to define our rights. I know that's a little confusing, right? Because it gives rights to the
00:10:48.780
people. It acknowledges rights that the people have, but it also limits the people's power to change
00:10:55.020
those rights willy nilly. If, if half the population plus one decides to do it. I mean, look at our gun
00:11:00.880
rights, for instance, Democrats are so upset, generally speaking, the left liberals so upset
00:11:07.540
that if the majority of liberals in any given area want to take away our gun rights, they can't do it
00:11:14.500
because they're reined in by the constitution. How about the judiciary? The judiciary is very
00:11:19.900
undemocratic. Unfortunately, you'll often have bad judges try to legislate from the bench,
00:11:27.460
but as it is set up, the judiciary is there to put a hold on the will of the people, to put a hold on
00:11:34.520
democracy, to restrain the desires of democracy and not let them do whatever they want. How about the
00:11:40.500
executive? The executive is not beholden to the will of the people like the legislature is. Executive
00:11:46.080
gets elected every four years and it's elected through this mechanism of the electoral college. So
00:11:51.240
the votes are weighted a little bit differently and smaller states have just as much of a say
00:11:57.080
as larger states when it comes to part of the electoral college vote, but not the whole
00:12:02.200
calculation. It's a very complicated process set up by our founders and framers, unlike the
00:12:07.960
legislature, which is up for election every two years and is the expression of the will of the
00:12:12.500
people. It is the expression of democracy, the nearest that we've got to it in our government.
00:12:18.280
What the founding fathers knew is that too much democracy can be a terrible thing. We see that here,
00:12:25.120
we see that in Russia. We'll get to that in a second because Vladimir Putin just dissolved his
00:12:29.540
government. But before we get to that, I've got to thank our friends over at Rock Auto. I like Rock Auto
00:12:35.580
because the quality of the products is unmatched. It's super easy to navigate and I don't know anything
00:12:42.020
about cars, so that's important for me. It's always fair prices, but the thing I really like about them
00:12:48.960
is they're a family business. Family business serving auto parts customers online for 20 years.
00:12:53.600
Go to rockauto.com to shop for auto and body parts from hundreds of manufacturers.
00:12:59.640
They just have a legacy, right? They've got a family legacy. They've got a great reputation.
00:13:04.920
They've been doing this for as long as anybody on the internet and they always do a great job.
00:13:09.400
They've earned that reputation for a reason. They've got engine control modules, brake parts,
00:13:13.620
tail lamps, motor oil, even new carpet. Whether that's for your classic or your daily driver,
00:13:19.380
you get everything you need in a few easy clicks delivered directly to your door. When you go to
00:13:23.440
the auto parts store, the brick and mortar, you go there, they never have your part, right? You just
00:13:28.020
go there and then they go online and they order the part and they mark it up a lot and you pay a lot
00:13:32.220
more money. You don't need to do that. The rockauto.com catalogs, very easy to use, very easy to
00:13:37.620
navigate. You'll save money. You'll always get a fair price. Head on over there. You can
00:13:43.440
choose your vehicle. You can choose your brand, specifications, prices you prefer,
00:13:47.520
always reliably low prices. All the parts your car will ever need. Rockauto.com. Go there right
00:13:53.020
now to see all the available parts for your car or truck and then write Knowles, K-N-W-L-E-S in the
00:13:58.820
How Did You Hear About Us box? That's most important so that they know that we sent you. Rockauto.com.
00:14:03.680
All right. Our founding fathers knew that too much democracy is a terrible thing. We have a great
00:14:13.380
republic. Another term for a republic you could say is a representative democracy. It's not a pure
00:14:20.840
democracy. In many cases, it's not even super duper democratic. It's a representative democracy,
00:14:28.060
a republic. What's the difference? We have representatives in place that express our desires.
00:14:34.380
We don't do it directly. What's another difference? We have constitutional limitations
00:14:39.660
on our democracy. If the majority of the people, if 99% of the people, if 100% of the people want
00:14:47.380
to ban guns from America, they can't do it because we have a constitution.
00:14:56.440
If 100% of the people in this country want to ban free speech or want to establish a national
00:15:04.500
church or want to eliminate freedom of the press, they can't do it because we do not have this pure
00:15:12.060
democracy. Because if we did have that pure democracy, it would be much, much worse, a much
00:15:16.920
worse form of government than the republic that we have. The current threat to our representative
00:15:23.180
democracy is not too little democracy. It's too much democracy. We have been hacking away at our
00:15:32.360
constitutional safeguards for over a century now. We started it, well, we started it a long, long time
00:15:38.960
ago. But 1913, direct election of senators takes away the right of the states to elect the senators,
00:15:46.080
takes away some of the delicate balance of our federal government, of our constitutional system.
00:15:51.300
Then in 1942, you get the Supreme Court decision, Wickard v. Filburn dramatically increases the regulatory
00:15:57.300
power of the federal government, reduces the power of the states, reduces that balance of power.
00:16:03.940
Another example that was just in the news, the War Powers Resolution in 1973, unconstitutional power
00:16:09.660
grab by the Congress to take the constitutional power away from the executive. What you're seeing is the power
00:16:18.120
moving from state and local up to the federal government. And within the federal government, you're seeing power
00:16:23.260
coming into the legislature, constant power grabs. And now that is culminating in this impeachment,
00:16:29.400
which has no legal basis, no constitutional basis. It is simply a power grab from the legislature
00:16:36.820
against the executive. It is an attempt at congressional supremacy. It's the idea that the president serves
00:16:44.720
at the pleasure of the Congress. And if the Congress, if there's an election and the Congress becomes
00:16:49.780
democratic, then the Republican president's getting impeached. And I guess the threat is vice versa.
00:16:56.820
If a Republican Congress gets elected, then the Democrat president is going to be impeached.
00:17:03.260
That's a system similar to the United Kingdom. The UK has this parliamentary system. So it's just
00:17:09.000
whatever party wins, they control the whole government. It's very European. It's very unstable. It's
00:17:14.160
not, not, not befitting a free American people. Conservatives have a different idea than that.
00:17:20.580
Conservatives' idea is that we know there are costs to overthrowing our legal and political tradition
00:17:29.140
like this. The, the tradition that we've inherited from the founding fathers throughout all of the history of our
00:17:35.040
country, it's not a simple system. It's not totally clear. You can't write it down on a little,
00:17:40.200
little napkin, right? It's complex. It involves institutions like the electoral college, which
00:17:46.160
few people seem to be able to understand or articulate. It involves this balance of power
00:17:51.300
between the local, state, and federal, and the judiciary, and the executive, and the legislature.
00:17:54.880
It's very complicated. We realize that there are costs to overthrowing all that and having a simple
00:18:02.900
democracy or, or simply saying the legislature gets to pick the president, simply saying the majority
00:18:07.860
rules. When you, when you overthrow that tradition, you are overthrowing a more important democracy
00:18:16.140
than the democracy everybody talks about. Chesterton explained this very well. He said,
00:18:21.580
tradition means giving votes to the most obscure of all classes, our ancestors. It is the democracy of
00:18:31.060
the dead. Tradition refuses to submit to the small and arrogant oligarchy of those who merely happen to
00:18:38.800
be walking about. It's a great way to think about the tradition. It's the democracy of the dead.
00:18:45.740
You and I are here walking on this earth for a little blip of time. We're the arrogant oligarchy of
00:18:51.560
people who want to overthrow everything, but what a power grab that would be. What a tyranny
00:18:56.160
to deprive our ancestors, once we're gone, of that great tradition. What a tyranny it would be to
00:19:03.420
disenfranchise the people who come after us and the people who have come before us. For, in order for
00:19:09.020
a country to be stable, to thrive, to flourish, you need to have that sort of continuity. And maybe you
00:19:16.000
have to respect the wisdom of the ages because very likely your feeble powers of intellect are not
00:19:23.860
enough to recreate the whole country from scratch. Lots of people in the West right now are paying
00:19:32.100
attention to another democracy falling apart. Compare what's happening in the U.S. to what's
00:19:37.360
happening in Russia. Vladimir Putin right now is amending the Russian constitution and it's
00:19:43.020
overthrowing his entire government. So the prime minister, the putative prime minister, Dmitry Medvedev,
00:19:48.720
and his entire cabinet resigned yesterday. I say the putative prime minister because when you think
00:19:54.340
prime minister, you think somebody has a lot of power. Nobody has power in Russia other than
00:19:58.400
Vladimir Putin. And Putin was the president. Then he was briefly the prime minister. Then he was the
00:20:05.440
president again and he switched roles with Medvedev. But Putin's been in charge for a very long time.
00:20:10.080
This move is a way for Putin to consolidate power. All right. Medvedev has been prime minister since
00:20:16.460
2012. Before that, he was president in 2008 to 2012. But it was really just a trick of the Russian
00:20:22.280
constitution so that Putin could stay in power without violating the constitution. Now Putin wants
00:20:28.160
to install some technocrat nobody who doesn't have a power base as prime minister and amend the
00:20:32.560
constitution to give himself more power when he retires as president. Lots of people in the West are upset
00:20:38.540
about it because it's another blow to Russian democracy. My response to that is, what Russian
00:20:46.640
democracy? When has Russia ever had a democracy or a republic or a representative government?
00:20:55.140
Never. Never have they had a functioning democracy. There was a brief period after the fall of the Berlin
00:21:01.200
Wall during the 1990s when there was this guy Boris Yeltsin. Boris Yeltsin was the nearest thing that Russia
00:21:07.840
has had to a democracy or a representative government. And he was a drunk crook who left office with a 2%
00:21:14.140
approval rating. There's a story that he was visiting in Washington one time. He somehow snuck out of the
00:21:18.560
White House and was found carousing drunkenly on the streets of Washington. All right. Didn't work out
00:21:23.860
very well. Other than that, what do you have? You have now Putin, who is the autocrat in Russia. He just
00:21:30.340
keeps himself in power. He had a little blip of, of Boris Yeltsin. And then you had the communists,
00:21:36.520
communist dictators, and then you had the czars. At no point have you had a functioning representative
00:21:42.920
government. All right. Russia has always governed at the whims of czars. And one reason that we pride
00:21:49.460
ourselves in the West on being better than Russia is because we have this superior system of government.
00:21:54.340
And yet increasingly we are governing on the whims of czars too. A tyranny of one is no worse than a
00:22:04.060
tyranny of many. It's tyranny all the same. We will get to how we can fix that. Then we'll get to the
00:22:09.380
excellent Trump China deal. And most importantly, the Bernie Warren moment at the end of that debate
00:22:16.280
when they were very intense. Well, CNN has leaked the audio because CNN is in the tank for Elizabeth
00:22:21.160
Warren. We'll get to what it means. First, I got to thank our friends over at Ring. Ring's mission
00:22:25.520
is to make neighborhoods safer. Now you probably already know about their smart video doorbells
00:22:31.260
and cameras that protect millions of people everywhere. How do you know that? Because
00:22:34.960
I've told you about it. Ring helps you stay connected to your home anywhere in the world.
00:22:39.680
So if there's a package delivery or a surprise visitor, you'll get an alert and be able to see here
00:22:44.120
and speak to them all from your phone. You know, I've told you before about my friends who I gave,
00:22:47.620
I gave them ring as a housewarming gift and they thought there was some guy kind of sneaking around
00:22:52.000
their house at night. They look on their ring and they realized it was a possum. Well, I have an
00:22:56.800
update for you. They heard someone sneaking around the house again a few weeks ago and they were very
00:23:04.360
nervous. They hadn't really heard this sound before. So they look on their ring. It was two possums
00:23:09.380
mating. So they, they got an answer on that. They felt safe and they saw the miracle of life happening,
00:23:15.440
albeit in a possum. That was thanks to the HD video and they have two-way audio features on
00:23:20.480
these ring devices. So you can talk to people, see, hear, and speak to them. As a listener right
00:23:24.060
now, you have a special offer on a ring starter kit with video doorbell and motion activated floodlight
00:23:29.300
camera. The starter kit has everything you need to start building a ring of security around your
00:23:33.800
home. Go to ring.com slash Knowles. That is ring.com slash Knowles, K-N-O-W-L-E-S.
00:23:39.300
A tyranny of one is no better than a tyranny of a million or two million or 300 million.
00:23:49.340
They're both tyranny. Our founders set up a superior system that you can't boil down to
00:23:55.940
slogans or bumper stickers, democracy, freedom. You can't, you actually can't do that. It's much
00:24:00.800
more complicated. We don't need to destroy our representative democracy. We don't need to be
00:24:07.540
in a situation where the Congress is just throwing presidents out willy-nilly. What we need to do is
00:24:14.120
respect our traditions, our norms, our constitution, and perhaps most importantly of all our fellow
00:24:19.300
countrymen. If we don't do that, we are headed for a disaster. But before we get to disaster,
00:24:24.780
in the meantime, we got some great, great news yesterday that the mainstream media don't want
00:24:30.420
to report on. Donald Trump just won a major victory in the trade war with China. Two-year
00:24:38.440
trade war with China and 20 years of hostilities with China. Ever since we let China into the World
00:24:45.160
Trade Organization, they've been ripping us off, stealing our intellectual property, putting spyware
00:24:50.260
in our software that they manufacture, taking our jobs, illegally subsidizing steel and aluminum,
00:24:56.400
devaluing their currency. I mean, they've been cheating left and right. And this strategy seems
00:25:01.900
to have worked. When Trump said, I'm going to institute tariffs, we're getting into a trade war,
00:25:05.520
baby. Everybody, actually with the exception of Chuck Schumer, in Chuck Schumer's defense,
00:25:10.140
Schumer was supportive of a tough strategy with China as he had been for 20 years. But it was pretty
00:25:15.440
much Trump against the world, Trump against the Democrats, Trump against the libertarian types,
00:25:21.220
Trump against the never-Trump Republicans, a lot of squishy people in his own party. He said,
00:25:26.400
I'm putting on tariffs. They all said it'll never work. China will back down. Guess what? The
00:25:33.320
tariffs worked. U.S. and China signed a trade deal. This will lead to a sharp increase in the sales of
00:25:40.660
U.S. goods and services to China. They got to do it fast. Within the next year, China has to purchase
00:25:48.080
an additional nearly $200 million worth of goods and services and provide strong new protections for
00:25:59.720
trade secrets and intellectual property. This is an eight-part agreement. There will now pause the
00:26:06.520
trade war. Major, major deal. Now it does leave in place U.S. tariffs on about $370 billion of Chinese
00:26:13.160
goods or about three-quarters of the Chinese imports into the United States. So it's billion with a B.
00:26:19.140
Sorry. I was confused in my notes. Billion with a B. Here is Jim Cramer, who is on CNBC, so not exactly
00:26:28.600
a right-wing network. This left-wing network, Jim Cramer, comes out and he says what we're all
00:26:34.560
thinking and what none of the experts knew. Trump's tariff strategy worked.
00:26:39.540
Jim, Mnuchin's appearance this morning did bring us something new, and that was
00:26:43.320
the notion of phase 2A, phase 2B, phase 2C. So stories evolving rapidly.
00:26:50.860
Look, I think that the takeaway for me is the tariffs worked. If you go back in time,
00:26:55.840
people just said, listen, tariffs won't work, won't change them. The Chinese are all powerful.
00:27:00.260
Tariffs will hurt our consumer. The consumer is going to see a lot of inflation,
00:27:03.780
both at the producer level and the consumer level, ultimately, which is going to hurt the
00:27:08.520
U.S. economy. None of that happened. The whole narrative is that China caved,
00:27:13.540
and China's going to continue to cave because we didn't take the tariffs off. So I keep wondering
00:27:18.100
when people are going to recognize that it is historic that tariffs did succeed. They weren't
00:27:25.240
supposed to work. The Chinese are supposed to be able to get around them. It didn't happen.
00:27:28.720
But the Chinese were kind of accepting that they had to do something in order to keep the American
00:27:35.280
market. Absolutely right. This is my favorite thing about the trade deal. Not even that it's
00:27:42.840
good for our economy. It's good for our geopolitical standing. Not even that it's 20 years in the making.
00:27:49.620
Not even that the guy in my political party was right and everyone else, including people in my
00:27:55.560
political party were completely wrong. That's not even my favorite part of it. My favorite part of
00:28:01.020
this trade deal is that it overthrows stale conventional wisdom. Every 30, 40 years or so,
00:28:09.460
you get this kind of ossified, stale, conventional wisdom. You know, politics, because politics comes
00:28:17.640
from ideas and then you've got to distill it and enact it and communicate it to people.
00:28:21.080
This leads to talking points and bumper stickers and slogans. And then people repeat these bumper
00:28:27.040
stickers and slogans so often that they start to believe that that is the totality of politics. So
00:28:34.660
one of these being tariffs don't work. If you asked five years ago, everybody, you polled 100% of
00:28:41.900
Americans, do tariffs work? Left, right, and center, 99% of them would have told you tariffs don't work.
00:28:49.060
Tariffs never work. Tariffs are a bad idea. Beep, boop, beep, boop. None of these people have
00:28:54.480
an education in economics. None of these people know particularly much about global history or
00:28:59.360
economic history. And yet they would have said that because we just had decided as a, as a
00:29:03.640
political people, tariffs are always bad. There's never a use for tariffs. Then Trump comes in there.
00:29:08.940
He goes, yeah, I don't, sorry, I didn't go to all your fancy lunches at those think tanks and I
00:29:13.520
haven't been politically programmed on the same level as all you guys for the last 50 years. So
00:29:18.540
I think tariffs are going to work and we're going to slap a ton of tariffs on China and then they're
00:29:22.080
going to get on their knees and then we're going to get a good trade deal. They said it'll never
00:29:27.380
work. It can't work because our slogans told us it wouldn't because our narrow ideology and our
00:29:32.000
conventional wisdom told us it wouldn't. Yeah, well it did. So reality as always contradicted
00:29:36.920
the narrow ideology. Same thing on trade deficits. We were told trade deficits don't matter. That's
00:29:43.580
not a big deal. Well, if trade deficits don't matter, why do other countries work to reduce
00:29:47.540
their trade deficits? Trade deficits seem to seem like they would matter, right? What is a trade
00:29:52.780
deficit? It's how much you sell to another country versus how much that country sells to you.
00:29:58.900
There's got to be some effect of that, right? If, if China is buying X amount of money,
00:30:04.680
X amount of product from our country, and then they suddenly buy double that amount of product,
00:30:10.700
I think that's going to help us, isn't it? If we get to sell more of our product to this huge
00:30:14.320
market in China, why, why do we even want to get into these markets in the first place if it doesn't
00:30:18.080
matter? Of course it matters. And Trump just knocked over this conventional wisdom. It's very
00:30:22.780
important in politics to get out of slogans, you know, from, from Nancy Pelosi's signing the,
00:30:31.800
the impeachment resolution to Donald Trump signing the trade deal. You can see the kind of ossified,
00:30:39.180
cold, conventional wisdom, and you can see opening up your mind to the possibilities of politics.
00:30:44.720
What do I mean by that? Nancy Pelosi has one guiding star in politics right now,
00:30:51.320
and that is orange man bad. They're not, the Democrats are really not considering the
00:30:57.460
danger to the country of pursuing this path of impeachment, but they're just doing it because
00:31:02.760
that's all they know. Orange man bad, orange man bad. What if orange man isn't so bad?
00:31:06.340
What if the American people have the right to pick their own president? What if the Congress doesn't
00:31:09.600
have the right to overthrow a presidential election just because they want to? What if there are
00:31:14.120
constitutional safeguards? What if there is a legal basis for impeachment? What if tariffs work?
00:31:18.120
What if all these things that the left is not considering right now?
00:31:21.520
If we get down this narrow path and we try to oversimplify and oversimplify our government,
00:31:27.940
we're headed for disaster. If we appreciate the tradition that we have, if we respect the norms
00:31:32.400
that we maybe can't rationally articulate, but we know they've served us well for a long time,
00:31:36.920
maybe that will help us. And if we crack out of this stale conventional wisdom that crops up every
00:31:42.660
couple decades, I think we'll have a much better chance looking at the whole body of our American
00:31:48.060
political inheritance. Before we get to the mailbag today, I have just got to get to this wonderful,
00:31:55.060
wonderful Bernie and Elizabeth Warren clip from the debate. So you saw they were kind of angry.
00:32:01.580
They weren't shaking hands at the end of the debate. CNN, because they had their lavalier
00:32:05.760
microphones, just leaked the audio of that exchange. Here it is.
00:32:11.740
What an amazing exchange. The best part of it being Tom Steyer, who is just like that kid,
00:32:36.380
like when you're staying over at your friend's house and the two parents start fighting with
00:32:39.920
each other and you're just in the kitchen, like trying to get a glass of water. That's what Tom
00:32:43.560
Steyer was. Hey, hey, I just wanted to say hi, Bernie. He seems like a pretty nice guy and he
00:32:48.800
wears that nice tartan tie, Tom Steyer. He's also the richest guy on that stage by far. So you'd think
00:32:53.980
Bernie would say like, Hey Tom, please give me a donation later. But it's very charming moment at
00:32:59.000
the end. The meat of that exchange though, of course, is at the beginning. Elizabeth Warren comes
00:33:04.600
over. She's, I think you called me a liar on TV. Bernie said, what are you, what?
00:33:12.060
You, you called me a liar, right? You, we had a, we are describing different things that happened.
00:33:21.180
We're describing one event and you're saying this happened and I'm saying not this happened.
00:33:27.080
So you called me a liar too, but let's not do this here, Elizabeth. Why would you want to do this
00:33:30.700
on stage with our microphones on? You could have done it during the debate too. You, it doesn't
00:33:35.400
make sense until you realize that Elizabeth Warren is a liar and CNN is in the tank for her.
00:33:42.680
This is obviously a setup. Why would CNN release this audio if it weren't a setup for Warren? The
00:33:49.220
way, the way you can tell who is telling the truth here is that one, Elizabeth Warren leaked it right
00:33:58.660
before the debate and they, and she leaked it to CNN because CNN was hosting the debate.
00:34:03.020
And then at the very end, she approaches Bernie. She didn't get her good hit in during the debate
00:34:08.540
itself. She didn't get a good clip from that. So she walks up and very, very awkwardly sets him up to
00:34:14.600
have to respond. Doesn't sound natural. She walks up very awkwardly and says, uh, what's, what does my
00:34:20.640
script say? Uh, you, I think you called me a liar on TV. Huh? What do you say now? What are you going to
00:34:27.360
say now, Bernie? And he's so caught off guard by this. You called me a liar. Why are we doing this
00:34:32.280
here? See you later, Liz. I have to give it to Bernie on this occasion. I think he's the one
00:34:38.020
telling the truth and I think she's a liar. Why do I think that? She is one of the most notorious
00:34:45.920
liars in the country. And if she's not lying, let's say that, let's give her the benefit of the
00:34:50.200
doubt. Let's say that this meeting took place two years ago and Bernie said, I don't think a woman
00:34:54.580
could win in 2020, which I don't believe for a second, but let's say that happened. Still, we have to
00:35:01.580
believe Bernie here because Elizabeth Warren is the boy who cried wolf. Elizabeth Warren said she was
00:35:10.360
a native American Indian for her entire career for professional benefit. Complete lie. She just recently
00:35:17.920
said that her child went to private school. That was a lie. She said that she was fired from her
00:35:28.000
teaching job because she was pregnant. That was a lie. She contradicted it herself. She lies all the
00:35:36.100
time. All the time. And yet Bernie Sanders, when you think of all of the false statements he's made in
00:35:43.900
his career. And there are many of them. All the crazy ideology he's spattered in his career. There's a lot of
00:35:49.440
it. You can't find too many lies. He doesn't lie very much. And there's a video of Bernie decades ago saying
00:35:57.880
he thinks a woman could be president. You got to give it to Liz Warren. Even if this, if in this actual event,
00:36:04.580
Bernie Sanders was the, what actually did say what she said, he said, you got to give the liar award to
00:36:14.120
Elizabeth Warren. It's just, that's, that's the only rational judgment you can make. And the CNN set up
00:36:21.240
here, total stab in the back setup is classic. You know, last go around 2016, CNN gave the, uh, gave the
00:36:30.920
debate questions to Hillary Clinton when she was debating Bernie Sanders. They did that because the
00:36:37.780
corporate media hates Bernie Sanders. I don't like Bernie Sanders either, but we have different
00:36:42.080
reasons for it, but the corporate media certainly hates him. They're trying to pick Elizabeth Warren.
00:36:46.480
They're now calling her a snake in the grass. And I have to say that the democratic base,
00:36:52.840
left-wing base that calls her a snake in the grass is clearly pretty right. All right, let's get to the
00:36:57.580
mailbag. First, I got to say about Facebook and YouTube, head on over to dailywire.com.
00:37:00.920
You get me, you get the Andrew Klavan show. If you're not a subscriber, you're missing out.
00:37:05.920
You get the Ben Shapiro show. I mean, right now using promo code NOLS, K-N-W-L-E-S,
00:37:10.140
you get 10% off any plan that you choose. That's my gift to you. Head over to dailywire.com
00:37:16.340
slash subscribe, pick the plan that's right for you for as little as 10 bucks a month. Members get
00:37:20.460
our articles ad-free access to all of our live broadcasts and show library, three hours of the
00:37:25.780
Ben Shapiro show, bonus content, access to the mailbag and more. And then our all access to your
00:37:30.580
gets you into exclusive live online Q&A discussions with me, Ben, Drew, Matt, a ton of dailywire
00:37:36.820
writers and special guests. And don't forget, you will also get the Leftist Tears Tumblr. You will
00:37:42.120
get all of that plus 10% off when you use promo code NOLS. Stop depriving yourself. Join in on
00:37:47.760
the fun. Go to dailywire.com. We'll be right back with a lot more.
00:38:02.340
All right. We've got the mailbag, so let's get right into it. I always run late, so we've got to
00:38:07.360
hurry up. From Sam. Hi, Michael. I've worked at a summer camp for the past five years. Today,
00:38:13.980
I got my contract for the upcoming summer and they've given me a demotion and a pay cut.
00:38:20.160
I feel like I should start looking for jobs at other camps, but the reason I wanted to
00:38:23.660
run a camp in the first place was for these kids. I've been working with the same group of kids
00:38:28.580
since they were eight and now they're 14. Am I abandoning the principles that made me want to
00:38:33.640
go into the camping industry if I take a job at another camp? Thanks for all you do.
00:38:36.860
No. You should get another job. I mean, it's great to support the kids. It's great to love
00:38:43.920
what you do. It's great to enjoy the work that you're doing, but you can't be disrespected like
00:38:48.460
that. If you're really taking a pay cut, if you're really being demoted, that's showing a disrespect
00:38:53.220
from your employers. Now, maybe it was your fault. I mean, let's entertain that possibility. Let's say
00:38:59.160
you weren't doing your job that well, so they bumped you down a little bit. Okay. Maybe that means you
00:39:05.560
got to work a little bit better at your job, get a little better at your job, figure out how you
00:39:10.260
can thrive in that role. I guess you could do that at your current camp or you could do it somewhere
00:39:16.080
else. Or in the other situation, maybe they just don't, they're not showing you respect as an employee
00:39:22.300
and you've got to move on. That's the way life works. They're great jobs, but sometimes you just got to
00:39:27.560
move on and you'll find another group of kids and you'll be stronger in your profession. From Grant.
00:39:33.140
Hello, Michael. I recently took your advice and parted ways with my ex-girlfriend of five years
00:39:38.080
who didn't want kids in the future. She blocked me after I deleted her pictures from my social
00:39:42.440
media. I miss her dearly and I don't know how to get over it. You mentioned reading Ovid's Remedy
00:39:47.200
for Love and I simply cannot comprehend it. Any advice on how to read Ovid and or get over my ex?
00:39:52.600
Thank you for all you do and for your consistent spreading of the word of Christ. Well, I'm sorry,
00:39:57.420
you know, you're going through this difficult situation. I do remember your question, Grant,
00:40:01.160
from last time, which was, if I'm remembering correctly, it was that you and your girlfriend
00:40:05.900
had broken up, but you kept seeing each other and she was kind of stringing you along. But she said
00:40:11.400
that you guys have to take some time off and she didn't know if she wanted to, you know, have kids
00:40:17.800
or kind of live the life you want to live. And my advice last time was don't let your ex-girlfriend
00:40:23.420
string you along. Never do that. Never, ever do that. It won't, it won't help you win her back
00:40:28.780
and it will degrade you. So if you still really like her a lot, I guess there's a chance you could
00:40:33.660
get back together. That happens. But it's not going to happen if you keep seeing your ex-girlfriend all
00:40:38.500
the time and hanging around and saying, you're my best friend and I love you so much. Ain't going to
00:40:42.820
work. It's true that Ovid is a little tough for the modern audience. And yeah, I don't know, you know,
00:40:51.780
it's even more difficult because it's translated from Latin and okay, how can you, how can you take
00:40:57.300
Ovid's advice for getting over an ex-girlfriend? Well, you're already doing it. Ovid has a lot of
00:41:04.300
advice. He says, stop seeing her. Don't see her. Destroy all her pictures. That's another piece of
00:41:11.020
advice. He says, destroy all her portraits and you're deleting her Facebook pictures. Okay. That's
00:41:14.860
about the same thing. Another bit of advice that Ovid, a pagan, gives is to sleep around with a lot of
00:41:21.020
women right away. Now you're a Christian, so you probably don't want to do that, but you could
00:41:24.740
start going on dates. You could start pursuing other romantic relationships and you should do
00:41:31.140
that immediately. You must move on. If you're really going to break up, you don't want to be
00:41:38.440
in that middle ground. Either be together and get married and have a life together or completely break
00:41:43.420
up and move on. And by the way, if you do completely break up and move on a year or two years from now,
00:41:49.180
you might end up getting back together because she's going to realize she made a huge mistake
00:41:52.240
and come running back to you. But what, what is not going to work is if you are in this middle
00:41:56.380
ground where you're kind of hanging around saying, please, please love me, love me. That is, that is
00:42:02.120
not going to help anybody. It's not going to help you win your girlfriend back. It's not going to help
00:42:05.200
you move on. You should operate from the position that this relationship is over. It's not going to work.
00:42:12.020
No knock on her. You just want different things in life and you are going to move on
00:42:17.300
and then see what happens from there. Best of luck, my friend from Ian. Hi, Michael. Since the
00:42:24.080
Democrats are pushing for taxpayer funded abortions over reproductive rights, should Republicans push
00:42:28.800
taxpayer funded firearms for second amendment rights? Yes. Yeah. I mean, not seriously. I don't,
00:42:35.040
I don't want the government involved in, in giving me guns because I don't trust the government to do
00:42:40.700
that. And I don't want to expand the government in that way, but it's the same argument. I mean,
00:42:45.480
they say we have a right to abortion. So the taxpayers have to pay for it. We have a right to
00:42:50.140
condoms. So the taxpayers have to pay for it. First of all, you don't have a right to either of those
00:42:54.740
things. But second of all, even if you did, there is a difference between positive rights, which require
00:43:00.460
somebody else's effort and labor and money and the government to pay for it and negative rights,
00:43:06.680
which is freedom from interference, freedom from you punching me, freedom from you taking my life,
00:43:13.880
freedom from you infringing on my property. When our government was set up and we talk about rights,
00:43:22.840
our founding fathers had a particularly negative view of rights, freedom from. And so a great,
00:43:30.000
a great way to highlight that hypocrisy for, for the left would be to say, okay, great. You're right.
00:43:36.040
You have a right to birth control or abortion. You're right. We should, the government should
00:43:40.920
provide that. But I have an actual constitutional right to a gun. So give me my AR-15, baby. See
00:43:45.980
what they say to that. From Deb. Do you think Salami Man, Soleimani, will replace Che Guevara as the
00:43:53.220
liberals' new poster boy for decades to come? Honestly, maybe. I mean it. I know it seems insane
00:44:01.820
that you could get this Islamic terrorist, you know, killed thousands of civilians to be
00:44:07.260
a poster boy and have them on t-shirts for the left. They did it to Che Guevara. Che Guevara was a,
00:44:15.600
wasn't an Islamic terrorist. I guess he was a Latino terrorist, but he killed a ton of civilians.
00:44:20.700
He was responsible for untold human misery. He was a total sociopath. And they put him on their
00:44:26.740
shirts. The left, particularly the intellectual left, has always loved the violence. They love
00:44:33.100
violence. They, they usually don't fight themselves, but they love the idea of violence. You see this in,
00:44:38.700
in all of the despotisms of the 20th century supported by top intellectuals, Jean-Paul Sartre,
00:44:45.400
Bertolt Brecht, all the way back to the enlightenment. These guys support violence. And so I wouldn't be
00:44:53.600
surprised if the left does it too. It's totally perverse. And the key is the left doesn't know
00:44:57.580
the history of Che Guevara and they don't know anything about Sula Barney. They're already crying
00:45:01.400
over his death. So I wouldn't be surprised if they threw him on a t-shirt. Last question, Taylor,
00:45:05.940
Michael, what are the names of your ancestors who came over on the Mayflower? Our Christmas break,
00:45:11.660
my wife found out that she has an ancestor who came over on the Mayflower too. I want to know if
00:45:14.960
you're distant cousins. I have four. The pilgrim was Dr. Samuel Fuller. The other three were what's
00:45:21.700
known as strangers. So they weren't the pilgrims. They were the other guys who came over on the
00:45:25.180
Mayflower. And that is Stephen Hopkins. He was a mutineer and he was actually on the shipwreck
00:45:32.760
in the Caribbean that Shakespeare's play The Tempest is based on. Francis Eaton. He was a sort
00:45:38.880
of ne'er-do-well, but got along just fine in Plymouth. And John Billington, who was the first
00:45:46.100
man executed for murder in the New World. So, you know, we had that one good pilgrim doctor and then
00:45:52.340
a bunch of derelicts and degenerates. And they may be the derelicts and degenerates from whom your
00:45:59.320
wife comes as well. Maybe we're cousins. All right, that's our show. Unfortunately though,
00:46:03.740
by the way, if your wife and I are cousins, then she's also cousins by law with Hillary Clinton.
00:46:08.660
So sorry to be the bearer of bad news. That's our show. I'm Michael Knowles. This is the Michael
00:46:12.780
Knowles show. Have a good weekend. I'll see you on Monday.
00:46:20.800
If you enjoyed this episode, and frankly, even if you didn't, don't forget to subscribe.
00:46:26.000
And if you want to help spread the word, please give us a five-star review and tell your friends
00:46:30.420
to subscribe. We're available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and wherever else you listen to podcasts.
00:46:36.420
Also, be sure to check out the other Daily Wire podcasts, including The Ben Shapiro Show,
00:46:41.060
The Andrew Klavan Show, and The Matt Walsh Show.
00:46:43.500
The Michael Knowles Show is produced by Ben Davies.
00:46:47.080
Director, Mike Joyner. Executive producer, Jeremy Boring. Senior producer, Jonathan Hay.
00:46:53.420
Supervising producers, Mathis Glover and Robert Sterling. Technical producer, Austin Stevens.
00:46:59.200
Assistant director, Pavel Widowski. Editor and associate producer, Danny D'Amico.
00:47:04.500
Audio mixer, Robin Fenderson. Hair and makeup, Jesua Olvera. Production assistants,
00:47:09.740
McKenna Waters, and Ryan Love. The Michael Knowles Show is a Daily Wire production.
00:47:16.180
If you prefer facts over feelings, aren't offended by the brutal truth, and you can still laugh at the
00:47:20.600
insanity filling our national news cycle, well, tune in to The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:47:24.380
We'll get a whole lot of that and much more. See you there.