Ep. 727 - Gaslighting The People
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
174.64673
Summary
Kamala Harris laughs at a reporter who asks her a question about the immigration crisis on the southern border. Is it a laughing matter? Or is it a crisis for the American people? And why does she find it so funny?
Transcript
00:00:00.000
The crisis on our southern border elicits a lot of reactions, a lot of emotions, frustration,
00:00:07.280
anger, compassion, all sorts of things. Or if you are Kamala Harris, maniacal laughter.
00:00:18.420
Not today, but I have before and I'm sure I will again.
00:00:24.220
Yeah, visit the border. Isn't it so funny? Isn't it so hilarious? I don't know. To me,
00:00:33.780
the establishment assault on our liberties, on our way of life, on the American nation itself
00:00:39.640
doesn't seem like a laughing matter. I'm Michael Knowles. This is The Michael Knowles Show.
00:00:43.620
Welcome back to the show. My favorite comment from yesterday is from A.I. Howard, who says,
00:00:56.180
guess what, Michael? Harry's lost a customer and you gained a subscriber. So interesting that you
00:01:01.960
would say that. It seems like just another way of saying get woke, go broke. I've gotten a lot of
00:01:07.660
emails from you. So thank you for those of you who have CC'd me on emails to Harry's Razors,
00:01:14.780
which just appears not to want your business if you are a conservative. They don't really want your
00:01:20.120
business. But some of the emails that you have sent to Harry's and to us have been very funny.
00:01:26.220
And we've seen obviously thousands and thousands of tweets on this point. Probably not a great idea
00:01:31.400
idea for companies to insult their customers. Not a great idea at all. You know, I've got great
00:01:39.520
memories of so many of those things. So many of the emails. I've got great memories that I want to
00:01:46.180
preserve forever. And when I want to preserve memories, I head on over to Legacy Box. Legacy
00:01:51.760
Box is a way for you to easily and affordably digitally preserve your past. The process is
00:01:56.920
extremely easy from start to finish. First, you pack and send your physical media. Then their
00:02:02.520
team digitizes everything by hand. Then you enjoy it. They use Premiere scanners and playback decks
00:02:07.880
to ensure that each memory is mastered to the highest quality. Plus, they keep you up to date with
00:02:12.720
regular email updates throughout the digitizing process. Legacy Box is the world's largest digitizer
00:02:18.300
of home movies and photos and has helped over 850,000 families digitally preserve their past,
00:02:23.880
including my family. You know, I unfortunately lost all the photos that I had had of a very beloved
00:02:29.540
family member who had died. Fortunately, I then came in through another relative to some more photos,
00:02:34.180
sent them off to Legacy Box. Now they are future-proof forever. Get started future-proofing
00:02:38.520
your memories today so you can gather the family and begin the trip down memory lane. Go to
00:02:42.560
LegacyBox.com slash Knowles, K-N-A-W-L-E-S to get an incredible 40% off your first order. Buy today to take
00:02:48.640
advantage of this exclusive offer. Send in when you're ready. Go to LegacyBox.com slash Knowles
00:02:53.300
and save 40% while supplies last. The cackling is Kamala's tell. She's, she's not a complex politician.
00:03:01.080
She's a, actually a rather talented politician. She has made it up the food chain, up the political
00:03:08.800
ladder in ways that some might consider to be a little bit unethical, but she really has done it.
00:03:13.460
She was the first candidate that was booted out in the 2020 Democratic primary, but somehow she
00:03:18.720
winds up being VP to an elderly, doesn't seem all that well president. As a purely political matter,
00:03:27.120
she's done well for herself. But she shares this, this characteristic, this tick actually with Hillary
00:03:33.640
Clinton, which is that when she gets nervous, she starts to laugh. You remember, you remember Hillary,
00:03:38.720
they said, Hey, Hillary, did you, um, did you wipe your private email server that had all sorts of
00:03:44.380
nefarious stuff on it? She goes, ha ha ha, what wipe? Like with a cloth? And it, it, it isn't
00:03:53.000
particularly attractive when, when people do that sort of thing. When Kamala is laughing in this case,
00:03:59.920
she is literally laughing at the reporter. She is laughing at the question, but more so she's
00:04:05.340
laughing at us because the reporter asks a very fair question. Hey, the biggest issue by far that,
00:04:11.560
that your administration is facing right now is this crisis that you have caused at the Southern
00:04:17.360
border that even Mexico says you've caused that the illegal aliens themselves have said that you've
00:04:22.320
caused. Are you going to go down and visit and gather some information? You clearly don't have
00:04:26.760
enough information and try to figure out how to deal with it. And she laughs. She laughs because
00:04:32.860
of course, she's not going to do that. Why would she? It's a crisis for the migrants. It's a crisis
00:04:40.440
for the American legal system. It's a crisis for the American people, but for the liberal establishment,
00:04:45.420
this is exactly what they want. They want more and more illegal aliens to come into this country
00:04:50.200
because they think that it will give them an electoral advantage. And they don't think that
00:04:53.640
the United States ought to have a right to national sovereignty. Jen Psaki was just asked about this,
00:04:58.760
our favorite current press secretary, Jen Psaki, a Peter Doocy, great, great reporter there.
00:05:05.400
One of the few who's allowed into the briefing room, who's, who's really tough. Jen Psaki was asked
00:05:11.260
if the illegal aliens are being released without the COVID tests or often without a court date,
00:05:17.600
even to reemerge. What are they, are they just being trusted with the honor system of immigration?
00:05:23.440
She has no answer. So now that border patrol agents in the Rio Grande Valley are letting adult
00:05:30.340
migrants go without even issuing notices to appear, is the immigration policy just becoming more of
00:05:39.500
like the honor system? That is an inaccurate depiction of what's happening at the border. So
00:05:46.140
there's no change in policy. The border remains closed. Families and single adults are being expelled
00:05:51.820
under Title 42 and should not attempt to cross illegally. So if families are going to be,
00:05:57.160
going to be deported and they're awaiting deportation, they don't need a court date
00:06:02.520
and they don't need a notice to appear because it has already been determined that they will be
00:06:06.840
sent back to their home countries. So hold on, hold on. What you're telling me now is that the
00:06:11.460
Biden administration is being really, really tough on illegal immigration because what we've just been
00:06:16.040
hearing for the past several days is that these illegal aliens are being released into the country
00:06:20.680
without a court date and without any expectation that they're going to show up again and leave the
00:06:25.880
country. We're seeing record numbers of people at the Southern border now, and we're being told even
00:06:30.360
by people on the left that that number is expected to swell even more. So are you, you're telling me
00:06:34.700
just don't believe my lying eyes. Don't believe the reports that we're getting from left-wing outlets,
00:06:42.020
even don't believe the, the statements of Biden administration officials, because actually everything's
00:06:47.360
totally hunky-dory and the illegal aliens are not getting in. Is that, is that right? Peter Ducey
00:06:52.380
presses the question. But if Secretary Mayorkas says the border is secure, the border is closed,
00:06:57.560
how is that the case if these migrants are being processed on this side of the border and then put
00:07:02.860
on a bus to points on unknown on this side of the border? Well, again, there are limited cases
00:07:09.260
where, uh, there are families, uh, because they can't be held in Mexico, uh, who are, uh, who are
00:07:16.200
processed, tested, considered at, at the border. Most of them are sent back to their home countries.
00:07:22.540
Those are very limited cases, and it's certainly not a depiction of the overarching policy.
00:07:26.700
So vague as that answer was, it's, it's also not true. You, you had people like the secretary of
00:07:35.120
the department of Homeland security who refused to say that, that people are being tested for the
00:07:40.140
coronavirus a hundred percent of the time when they come in. So that, that part just isn't true.
00:07:44.720
Now you're saying, well, there are some limited cases where people are being, they make it to this
00:07:50.160
side of the border and they're being, you know, they're being held in some facilities at record
00:07:53.940
numbers, way over capacity and some limited cases where they're being shipped to other parts of the
00:07:58.900
country in record numbers. Well, those limited cases don't seem very limited. I mean, this is
00:08:03.940
as close to an outright lie just about as it gets in politics. Jen Psaki is telling us to, to disbelieve
00:08:14.380
what we can see with our own two eyes. This is a, a policy of gaslighting. And speaking of gaslighting,
00:08:22.500
there is a terrible event occurred a couple of days ago. We did, we did not get to it on the show
00:08:26.320
yesterday. This was this terrible shooting in Colorado. 10 people were killed in a grocery store
00:08:31.860
in a shooting in Boulder, Colorado, after a man walked in to King super store and opened fire.
00:08:38.240
And before you heard any details about this shooting, you saw prominent left-wingers tweeting,
00:08:46.640
posting, posting, commenting about the perils of white supremacy and how this is just more evidence
00:08:52.600
that evil white Americans need to, I don't know, have their liberties curtailed or need to be dealt
00:09:00.240
with as a public health problem. And then, then it turned out it was not white supremacy. The shooter's
00:09:06.400
name, we have a policy at the Daily Wire where we, we do not say the shooter's name. So I won't say the
00:09:11.280
full name. Uh, the first name's Ahmad. So, you know, use your mind from there. It's not like John Smith.
00:09:19.860
Okay. It's not, it's not a name you would associate with, uh, say white supremacy. Uh, actually this,
00:09:25.920
this guy was a Syrian immigrant. His family came here in 2002. He's not Christian. We, we hear this talk
00:09:32.760
about Christian nationalism. Now this is another silly phrase that's being conflated with white supremacy.
00:09:37.420
Uh, he wasn't Christian. He is Muslim. So now we've gone from blaming the shooter and everything he was
00:09:46.260
going to represent back when the liberals thought that he was a white guy. Now we're talking about
00:09:51.700
the guns and it's so, it's so bigoted. It gets to something we, we talked about it yesterday. We've
00:09:58.940
talked about it several times in the past few weeks. According to the left's racial ideology,
00:10:03.620
only white people are fully people. According to the left's right, actually specifically only white
00:10:09.460
men, only straight white men, only straight white men who know that they're men, that narrow group,
00:10:14.420
those are the only people with agency, with will, and with intellect. Every other group of people
00:10:20.380
is some sort of passive entity that, that is merely a victim of whiteness and white supremacy.
00:10:28.500
So when they thought it was a white guy, oh, well, that's his fault and, and everything that he
00:10:34.940
represents. When they find out he's not a white guy, oh, well, we got to ban guns. Or some people
00:10:41.540
actually persisted. We, we played a clip yesterday on the show where some millennial gal came out and
00:10:47.880
said that even if a racial minority perpetrates a crime against another racial minority, that can be
00:10:55.380
part and parcel of white supremacy. How? I don't know. That's the premise that they're,
00:11:01.120
that they're beginning with. Now they're blaming the guns. Identity politics actually does have
00:11:08.600
something to do with this shooting, according to the Denver Post and according to people who
00:11:13.760
apparently knew the guy. Denver Post, very interesting article said that this guy Hernandez,
00:11:19.640
who knew the shooter, said that the shooter apparently appeared to be paranoid about perceived
00:11:25.420
slights against him. And another person who knew the shooter said that he was often concerned about
00:11:31.520
being targeted because of his Muslim faith. So, so one of these guys says he would talk about him
00:11:37.140
being Muslim and how if anybody tried anything, he would file a hate crime and say they were making
00:11:41.120
it up. It was a crazy deal. I just know he was a pretty cool kid until something made him mad. And
00:11:46.720
then whatever made him mad, he went over the edge way too far. So according to people who,
00:11:50.680
who knew the shooter, he, the shooter recognized that grievance was social currency, that the racial
00:11:58.980
and religious identity politics that now pervades our culture could be used as a weapon, could be used
00:12:08.140
as a political tool. And apparently he was rather taken with this kind of grievance politics.
00:12:13.080
The same sort of grievance politics that had people jumping to the conclusion based on nothing other
00:12:19.420
than bigotry, I suppose, or prejudice that the shooter was a white guy. But then the minute he
00:12:25.720
wasn't, nevermind, back to business as usual, back to our regular old identity politics. And we're
00:12:31.580
supposed to pretend that that never happened. I think it is important to learn the motivations of
00:12:39.260
these shootings. Very often they're just completely senseless. They're just some lunatic. Sometimes
00:12:44.000
there is a kind of perverse sense to them. And whenever there is a perverse sense to these shootings
00:12:50.640
that the left thinks it can make, get some sort of advantage out of, say it was white supremacy or
00:12:56.780
something like that, then they will harp on that ad nauseum. And, and it's actually interesting to try to
00:13:03.840
figure it out, to see what role these ideologies play. But the minute, and this is a more frequent
00:13:09.280
occurrence, the minute that the ideological underpinnings and motivations for these crimes
00:13:14.880
in any way touch on what the left is mainstreaming today. Well, then we got to forget about that.
00:13:21.620
Stop it. We're not allowed to talk about it. We have to stay quiet. We got to talk about the guns.
00:13:26.440
You know, when you want to really, really get to the heart of a problem, it helps to have
00:13:34.240
really good employees, which is why you got to check out ZipRecruiter. If you're a business owner
00:13:38.380
who's hiring, you probably face a lot of challenges when it comes to finding the right person for your
00:13:42.860
role. That is why hiring can feel like trying to find a needle in a haystack, which is why you got to
00:13:48.760
try ZipRecruiter for free at ZipRecruiter.com slash Knowles, K-N-W-L-E-S. When you post a job on
00:13:55.100
ZipRecruiter, it gets sent out to over 100 top job sites with one click, but it doesn't just stop
00:14:00.680
there. It's not just like throwing spaghetti at the wall. ZipRecruiter's matching technology then
00:14:04.680
finds people with the right skills and experience for your job and actively invites them to apply.
00:14:09.940
It's no wonder that over 2.3 million businesses have come to ZipRecruiter for their hiring needs.
00:14:16.060
So while other companies will overwhelm you with way, way too many options,
00:14:20.640
ZipRecruiter finds what you are looking for, that needle in the haystack. Right now,
00:14:26.980
you can try ZipRecruiter for free at ZipRecruiter.com slash Knowles. Remember to go to this unique URL
00:14:33.860
so they know we sent you, ZipRecruiter.com slash K-N-W-L-E-S. ZipRecruiter, the smartest way to hire.
00:14:40.440
Senator Alex Padilla, who is a Democrat from California,
00:14:45.060
is uttering a typical Democratic Party line. You're going to hear a lot more people parroting
00:14:52.800
it for the next, parroting it. It's a parody of itself, but parroting this line for the next
00:14:57.820
several weeks, which is that in this country, it's easier to get a gun than it is to vote.
00:15:04.400
You know, for most states, the age required to legally purchase a rifle and the age required
00:15:12.200
to cast a ballot are both 18. However, there's some shocking disparities in legal state requirements
00:15:21.700
for obtaining a weapon versus casting a ballot. In 25 states, voters must be registered and have
00:15:31.400
specific forms of ID in order to cast a ballot. But those same states allow people to buy rifles
00:15:38.120
without permits and require no background checks for some sales. Additionally, in a majority of states,
00:15:46.500
new voters are able to obtain a rifle quicker than they're able to cast their first ballot.
00:15:53.580
It seems to me that we have our priorities entirely backwards when it comes
00:16:00.300
to this, when we make it easier to buy a gun than we do to cast a ballot.
00:16:06.760
So the guy's wrong on the particulars, but he's wrong on the philosophy and the constitutionality as
00:16:12.460
well. The right to keep and bear arms, the right to defend yourself is a more fundamental constitutional
00:16:20.100
right than the right to vote. You also have a right to vote. Not everybody, by the way,
00:16:24.980
people under 18, for instance, do not have a right to vote. Thankfully, thank goodness,
00:16:29.340
though Democrats are trying to change that right now. Some people, depending on your state, felons,
00:16:34.440
for instance, in some places do not have the right to vote. Totally up to the states to do that.
00:16:38.940
Now, the right that is given to you and that is, pardon me, that is enshrined in the Second Amendment,
00:16:48.900
a right that our founding fathers supposed us to have inherited, which is why the language says
00:16:54.500
shall not be infringed. That is a more basic constitutional right. However, the factual claim
00:17:01.560
he's making here that it's easier to get a gun than it is to vote is simply not true. First of all,
00:17:06.500
when he says it's easy, it's quicker to go buy a gun than it is to vote. I suppose that's true in
00:17:12.320
the sense that there is an election day. So, you know, if you want to go buy a gun on a Tuesday in
00:17:17.340
March, you can go do that unless you're in a place like California, then you have to wait actually
00:17:21.920
quite a while to get that gun. But if you want to go vote on the Tuesday in March, you probably have
00:17:25.720
to wait until November. Okay, fair enough. But that's what we have election days for that sort of
00:17:29.480
thing. And by the way, the Democrats are extending election day into election months. So that seems to be
00:17:34.500
changing too. The reason that the Democrats are pushing this argument, pseudo argument now in
00:17:42.560
particular, is because they're trying to push through the Corrupt Politicians Act. This is the
00:17:47.800
name some Republicans have given to H.R.1, Democrats' top priority to steal power over elections for
00:17:55.880
themselves. Incumbents in Congress trying to steal the right to set all the election rules from the
00:18:04.560
states and give it to themselves. Gee, what could go wrong when the present office holders get to write
00:18:11.000
all the rules for their own elections? And what this would do is prohibit states, prohibit the people
00:18:16.820
from making their own election laws in many cases, prohibit voter ID in elections anywhere. So not even
00:18:25.560
just saying that you don't need a voter ID, but actually saying that in these elections, it is not
00:18:30.660
permissible for states to pass laws requiring voter ID, all based on some demagogic, ridiculous arguments
00:18:39.900
about racism or something. Now, if the Democrats manage to do that, it will be very, very difficult
00:18:46.080
for Republicans to win elections, which is the entire point of it. There will be legal challenges because
00:18:51.080
it would appear to me quite clear that the law is unconstitutional, but it doesn't really matter,
00:18:55.100
I don't think, because ultimately what that law is going to come down to is the raw exercise of
00:18:59.420
political power. And if the Democrats get it through, they're going to be able to exercise
00:19:02.360
that power. And Republicans, frankly, are too cowardly to exercise political power, even when
00:19:07.740
they're given it. But make no mistake, the arguments here for the Corrupt Politicians Act,
00:19:13.360
the arguments about voting rights that people like Padilla are making, completely bogus. Basically,
00:19:18.780
what it boils down to is that if you have any restrictions on voting, if you have any voter
00:19:23.240
integrity measures for that matter, that that is somehow evidence of racism and white supremacy.
00:19:27.700
Well, there's a new poll out. It's out from HEP that shows that a majority of Americans,
00:19:34.600
including a majority of black and Hispanic voters, overwhelmingly support voter ID, which is a
00:19:41.000
central election integrity measure. So 77% of Americans overall support laws that require you to
00:19:50.060
show an ID before you cast a ballot. That's compared to just 15% who oppose the idea. 92% of Republicans
00:19:57.560
support voter ID, 75% of independents support voter ID, 63% of Democrats, according to this survey,
00:20:05.680
support voter ID. But how about black and Hispanic voters? Because we're talking about race, right?
00:20:10.220
Isn't this all about white supremacy? Well, among black voters, 64% support voter ID compared to just
00:20:17.620
22% who do not. And 78% of Hispanic voters support voter ID compared to 16% who do not.
00:20:26.900
If we're actually talking about racial groups defending their rights or how, how they're going
00:20:34.080
to be able to interact in our Republic, voter ID is a totally winning issue. But Democrats don't care
00:20:40.220
what, what those voters think about voter ID because they know that without voter ID, it will be much,
00:20:46.040
much easier for them to steal elections. There are a ton of other measures in the Corrupt Politicians
00:20:51.020
Act that will do this too. Automatic voter registration, which they know 100% guaranteed
00:20:56.920
will result in the registration of millions of illegal, illegal voters. Many, many other measures
00:21:05.100
too. We went into it a little bit when the, when HR one was proposed and it, it's actually quite
00:21:10.480
plausible that it makes it through the Senate because it looks like Joe Manchin is going a little
00:21:14.520
squishy. He would have been the, the semi-moderate Democrat to say no to this. Uh, we'll go more
00:21:19.900
into it in the future, but suffice it to say the arguments they're making on white supremacy,
00:21:26.500
on guns, on voting completely 100% without merit. They're just gaslighting us and they're gaslighting
00:21:35.480
the black and Hispanic voters that they're pretending to speak for. Even our cereal companies are gaslighting
00:21:41.960
us these days. Yes. Our breakfast cereal companies are gaslighting us. If you missed this yesterday,
00:21:48.000
you missed the most enjoyable thing on the entire internet. A guy with a blue check mark named Jensen
00:21:53.720
Karp discovered shrimp tails in his cereal, in his cinnamon toast crunch. And it's gross. And you can
00:22:02.940
see the shrimp tails are covered up, covered up in cinnamon sugar. He tweets out, um, cinnamon toast
00:22:10.060
crunch. He tags them. Why are there shrimp tails in my cereal? This is not a bit. Cinnamon toast
00:22:14.800
crunch responds and says, we're sorry to see what you found. We would like to report this to our,
00:22:19.460
to our quality team and replace the box. Can you please send us a DM to collect more details? Thank
00:22:24.860
you. It wants to replace the box. So, uh, this guy, Jensen Karp responds and says, guys, I'm not sure
00:22:31.240
I'm ready for another box. I don't finding like gross shrimp tails in my cereal. I don't,
00:22:35.980
another box is the last thing I want. Cinnamon toast crunch response says, we understand your
00:22:40.440
concern. We promise you that our team will look into this and get to the bottom of it. But in the
00:22:44.120
meantime, we want to do everything we can to make this right. We need further details. Then they come
00:22:47.960
back and he keeps joking with them. They come back and say, after further examination with our team,
00:22:51.740
that closely examined the image, it appears to be an accumulation of the cinnamon sugar that
00:22:56.280
sometimes can occur when ingredients aren't thoroughly blended. We assure you that there is no
00:23:00.740
possibility of cross-contamination with shrimp. So if you look at the picture though, it,
00:23:05.640
they're just obviously shrimp tails. They're, it is not physically possible to make cinnamon sugar
00:23:11.100
look like these shrimp tails. It is, there is no, there is cinnamon sugar on the shrimp tails,
00:23:17.060
but it's just very clearly shrimp tails. So then this, this guy responds and says, okay, uh, well,
00:23:23.500
after further investigation with my eyes, these are cinnamon coated shrimp tails. You weirdos.
00:23:28.380
I wasn't all that mad until you tried to gaslight me. Then the cereal company offered him some coupons
00:23:34.140
for cereal and the saga has, has been on pause there. Uh, this is not to go after cinnamon toast
00:23:41.740
crunch, even for putting shellfish in people's cereal. Uh, that's unfortunate, but one suspects
00:23:46.600
they didn't do that intentionally. Maybe some little rodent dragged them into some cereal vat or
00:23:51.160
something. I don't know. Accidents happen. Uh, it's a pretty gross accident. It's probably going to
00:23:56.140
have me pausing on eating cinnamon toast crunch for some time. It's a good cereal. Uh, but the real
00:24:02.840
issue here is the gaslighting. We've actually been talking about this for several days now. The,
00:24:09.460
the late conservative philosopher, Roger Scruton, he said, civilization requires confession and
00:24:14.980
forgiveness. I need to be able to say when I've done something wrong and you need to be able to
00:24:18.700
forgive me and I need to sacrifice my pride and you need to sacrifice your resentment. And we both
00:24:23.160
sacrifice something that we cherish and then we move on in our present culture. You might call it
00:24:29.840
a cancel culture. You can't ever admit that you're wrong. I actually have some sympathy here for
00:24:35.620
cinnamon toast crunch because there is no forgiveness in our culture anymore. So that the
00:24:41.620
natural inclination here is to say, no, that's not true. It's not whatever you're seeing. It didn't
00:24:45.320
happen. That is a culture of gaslighting where we're not even allowed to acknowledge basic truths.
00:24:53.020
This is true in our politics more broadly. If you say that a man is not a woman to go back to this kind
00:24:59.500
of most obvious example, that is something that no one is allowed to acknowledge in our culture
00:25:05.000
anymore. We're not allowed to acknowledge basic truths because of, of the implications they might
00:25:10.660
have. We're all so on the defensive. We can't even call the shrimp tails in our cereal like we see
00:25:16.720
them. If you want to deepen your knowledge and wisdom and education beyond this kind of silliness,
00:25:22.340
you got to check out the great courses. They are fabulous. With the great courses plus you have
00:25:27.400
unlimited access to thousands of video and audio courses on hundreds of fascinating topics. Learn a
00:25:33.380
new language, discover what Einstein got wrong, even gain valuable insights into your own public persona.
00:25:39.040
There really is something for everyone here. You know me, I don't want to learn about anything
00:25:43.840
practical. I want to learn about, for instance, their, their great new course, 1066, the year that
00:25:49.160
changed everything. Maybe, maybe we'll talk about that. The battle of Hastings, Bishop Odo, all these
00:25:54.380
great things, but really you can learn just about anything you want. I also find when I'm sitting up
00:25:58.940
with my cute little screaming son in the middle of the night, it's kind of fun to throw on something
00:26:02.880
educational rather than just keep burning my mind on the same, you know, episodes of whatever.
00:26:07.440
The courses are taught by the best professors, the top experts in their fields. Plus with the great
00:26:12.240
courses app, you're free to watch, listen, and learn on any device at any time. Switch between
00:26:16.080
devices. It's really terrific. I'm really glad that I found a more productive way to spend my free time.
00:26:21.700
I want you to try the great courses plus to get started with a free month of unlimited access by going
00:26:26.920
to the great courses plus.com slash Knowles. That's a whole month to learn anything you want for free.
00:26:32.860
So remember to sign up right now at the great courses plus.com slash Knowles, K-N-W-L-E-S.
00:26:40.300
Also, we're going to hear a lot more about the left's lies on whiteness and gun control in Ben's show
00:26:47.520
today. So head on over, check out the Ben Shapiro show. And also most importantly of all, you got to
00:26:54.120
check out the Candace Owens show coming up this Friday. Candace Owens has a brand new talk show.
00:26:58.340
It is exclusively available for Daily Wire members. Now, Candace is also a podcast that you
00:27:04.980
can listen to on Apple, Spotify, or anywhere else that you get your podcasts. The Candace podcast
00:27:09.780
features a bunch of breakout segments from the full length show, including interviews, panel
00:27:15.060
discussions, and her advice corner. It's so good, in fact, that it reached number two on the Apple
00:27:19.960
podcast charts just after the first episode. So head on over. I am reliably informed that Candace is
00:27:24.960
going to have a very sophisticated, intelligent, extremely handsome guest on her show this week.
00:27:31.160
I won't say any more than that, but it should be a lot of fun. So head on over. I'll leave a five-star
00:27:35.000
review on the podcast if you wouldn't mind. We'll be right back with a lot more.
00:27:37.700
Cinnamon Toast Crunch is gaslighting customers over shrimp tails and their cereal. But Cinnamon Toast
00:27:56.860
Crunch is not the only sugary treat in the news. Krispy Kreme is in the news right now because as part
00:28:04.260
of a broader effort to encourage Americans to get vaccinated, Krispy Kreme has announced that they
00:28:10.060
will be giving out one free glazed donut every single day to anyone who brings in their vaccination
00:28:18.340
card into any store in the United States for the rest of the year. This is the difference between the
00:28:25.140
stick and the carrot, right? This is the difference in incentives through punishment and incentives through
00:28:30.900
reward. The public health apparatus in this country really, really, really wants you to get
00:28:35.980
this vaccination. Not just if you're 85 years old or you're greatly at risk, but even if you're a young,
00:28:42.920
healthy person who really doesn't need it and is not really personally all that much at risk,
00:28:48.560
they really want you to get the vaccination. Now Krispy Kreme is going to be offering people
00:28:52.140
donuts every single day for the whole year if they do this. I mentioned that, you know, getting a vaccine
00:28:58.620
makes sense if you are 85 years old or something like that. It also makes sense if you are extremely
00:29:04.760
overweight because obesity is one of the strongest predictors of vulnerability to coronavirus.
00:29:12.860
What Krispy Kreme is doing here is such a perfect example of what our public health apparatus has done
00:29:22.600
from the very beginning of this virus, which is to constantly undermine its credibility
00:29:27.760
and many, many public health measures. I would understand if like the juice company or the
00:29:37.260
health food company were offering this and say, come on in and, you know, you'll get,
00:29:41.340
you'll get a smoothie or something every day if you have the vaccine. But it would seem counterproductive
00:29:47.660
during a pandemic that disproportionately affects overweight people to give them donuts every single
00:29:54.640
day to try to stop the pandemic. A classic example of, of our benevolent bettors out there, our experts,
00:30:03.800
our geniuses, totally botching the response. Also, I like to think that I'm, I'm a little more expensive
00:30:12.380
than a donut. You know, if you're trying to get me to do something that maybe I'll do, maybe I won't,
00:30:16.840
maybe I'm a little reluctant to do it. I like to think that I can, I have a higher price. I can't be
00:30:22.600
bought off for one glazed donut, no matter how delicious it is. There's that old, old line,
00:30:28.080
old joke about a guy who walks up to a woman and says, hey, I want to, want to pick you up for the
00:30:33.280
night. You know, treats her like she's a prostitute. And I'll give you a hundred dollars if you go back
00:30:37.660
and sleep with me. She slaps him across the face and says, how dare you? That's outrageous. And he
00:30:43.180
says, okay, how about a million dollars? Then she thinks about it. She says, well, okay,
00:30:49.120
a million dollars. Maybe I'll, I'll, I'll think about that. He goes, okay, how about 200? She
00:30:55.080
slaps him again. How dare you? You said a million dollars. And he says, look, I was just trying to
00:31:00.220
figure out what you are. Now we're just haggling over the price. I, I think that I would like to be
00:31:05.380
bought for a little bit more than a Krispy Kreme donut. And I think that if we're going to have public
00:31:10.740
health measures, they should probably be coherent. They should probably make sense. Speaking of things
00:31:16.420
that people eat when they are very high. Lest I never be accused of giving Joe Biden credit for it,
00:31:23.520
for anything. I have to report on this very underreported story from the New York Times.
00:31:29.420
Joe Biden is firing potheads. He is. Joe Biden is tossing out five people who used marijuana in the
00:31:39.900
past, which will call now into question his new guidelines that say that if you smoke pot,
00:31:45.900
it doesn't really matter. You can work in the white house. I'm not saying this because I have
00:31:49.420
some personal grudge against pot or because I've never, never puffed on the devil's lettuce in my
00:31:53.400
life or anything like that. But I don't think that we should further legalize that sin spinach,
00:31:59.320
you know, that Jamaican oregano. I don't think that it's some matter of profound constitutional,
00:32:06.040
natural rights even that you should be able to, to puff on a blunt or anything like that.
00:32:13.000
It's like, it's not the worst thing in the world, but it isn't good. And, and unlike say alcohol or
00:32:18.140
other intoxicants that are, are much more natural to our culture, much more traditional rather in our
00:32:25.160
culture, a marijuana is relatively new to the culture. And I just don't see any reason to introduce
00:32:30.520
it. Also, I noticed that most of the people clamoring to legalize marijuana, like their life
00:32:35.340
depended on it are big libs. And I just, I don't see any reason to, to suspect that they're right
00:32:41.600
about that. My, my gut just tells me that's wrong. Also, it is still the law, right? I mean,
00:32:48.480
there are now contradictory laws at the local level, the state level and the national level on,
00:32:53.520
on, on the gange, you know? So I think we need to get those laws in order. We need to sort this sort
00:33:00.420
of thing out. And I actually get a real kick that Joe Biden is taking this issue seriously. Don't
00:33:06.080
forget just 20 years ago, you could really not admit that you'd smoked pot. When Bill Clinton
00:33:12.440
in the nineties was, was asked about whether or not he'd smoked pot, he had to come up with this
00:33:17.260
ridiculous, totally Clintonian, obviously dishonest answer. He said, I smoked it, but I did not inhale
00:33:23.480
until I, no, I just kind of mulled it around in my mouth and then I puffed it out like a cigar.
00:33:30.240
Speaking of cigars, well, nevermind. We'll get to that later. And now of course, if you don't smoke
00:33:36.680
pot, you'll be like a square. You probably couldn't be elected if you, if you say that you've never
00:33:41.020
smoked pot. That is a seemingly trivial cultural change, but it shows, it shows the development of
00:33:48.740
what, what you might call the permissive society. This is a phrase used by the historian Paul Johnson
00:33:54.480
among other people. This idea that we should be allowed to do whatever we want, at least as long
00:34:01.820
as it doesn't harm anybody. And for a while it was really just leftists who were pushing this idea.
00:34:07.440
Then for some reason over the past 10, 20 years, conservatives have started to buy into this idea
00:34:11.760
too. But it's ridiculous. It actually gets, gets into the heart of something we're talking about
00:34:16.280
a lot these days, which is political correctness, how it advances. This is the subject of my upcoming
00:34:20.740
book, Speechless, Controlling Words, Controlling Minds, available now for pre-order until it gets
00:34:25.140
canceled. These debates over, I don't know, drug policy or over speech even, it's not a debate between
00:34:33.760
freedom and censorship, right? All speech regimes, all drug regimes, all, all these sorts of policies
00:34:41.320
are finite things where you can do some things and you can't do others. The question is really
00:34:45.780
over standards. What are we going to support? What are we going to discourage? What are we going
00:34:51.060
to include? What are we going to exclude? And I, I got to tell you, I got to give Biden a little bit
00:34:57.040
of credit. He's, he's drawing kind of a strange line in the sand for someone who's now importing
00:35:01.380
illegal aliens into the country in record numbers. But nevertheless, he, he is drawing a little bit of
00:35:05.880
a line in the sand and a good on him for it. It gets into this question even of, of say academic
00:35:10.680
freedom. There's, there's an organization right now, the Academic Freedom Alliance, which is supporting
00:35:17.180
some right-wing professors, some, I guess some left-wing scholars are involved in this too.
00:35:22.700
But they've come to the defense of Tom Smith, who is a professor who is now under investigation
00:35:28.560
for a blog post in which he criticized the Chinese government. And a lot of conservatives are upset
00:35:34.220
about this. And even this organization that specifically supports academic freedom is going
00:35:38.780
after it too. Wonderful. We should welcome their support. That's great. So glad that they're
00:35:43.220
supporting professors who criticize China. However, academic freedom is not a conservative
00:35:50.920
virtue. It's not, not a conservative value. Actually, the modern conservative movement founded
00:35:57.980
by Bill Buckley was started with a book called God and Man at Yale. The subtitle of which was
00:36:02.940
The Superstitions of Academic Freedom, a book in which Buckley called academic freedom,
00:36:07.780
a hoax, a hoax because it is a hoax. It's just, it is a dishonest instrument that is used almost
00:36:15.500
exclusively by the left to push their ridiculous and subversive and, and dangerous and, uh, what other
00:36:23.640
words can I use? Destructive ideas into universities. We all know this and conservatives, I don't think
00:36:29.860
we actually support academic freedom. I think we want to kick all the crazy, radical, anti-American
00:36:34.440
professors out of the universities. I think we want to kick them out of Hollywood. I think when we say
00:36:38.200
we need to take back the culture, what we are saying quite obviously is we want to exclude
00:36:43.540
certain views, certain, certain curricula, but then we feel uncomfortable with that. And so we say,
00:36:48.460
but we support academic freedom. No, you don't be honest with yourself. I don't, I don't support it
00:36:53.300
either. One, because it doesn't ever really exist. Curricula are finite things. The semester is only
00:36:58.280
so long. You're going to teach some things. You're not going to teach other things. You're going to
00:37:01.560
include some books. You're going to exclude other books. So this academic freedom pie in the sky
00:37:07.560
abstract notion doesn't really have much practical effect. What we have to get down to defending as
00:37:15.300
conservatives is not just the abstract procedures of politics, you know, free speech in the abstract,
00:37:22.360
religious liberty in the abstract, academic freedom in the abstract. We have to get down to what
00:37:26.300
we're, we actually want to say, what we actually believe, what we actually think ought to be taught.
00:37:32.340
I don't think any conservative who supports academic freedom thinks that universities should
00:37:36.860
be holding classes promoting the 1619 project, which is based on a lie. I don't know. Nobody would
00:37:43.980
support that. Of course not. We should exclude lies from the university and we should include good,
00:37:50.200
edifying, truthful education. The, the, the issue here with this professor who's under investigation
00:37:57.280
is not that his academic freedom has been compromised. If he had written blog posts talking
00:38:04.620
about how evil the country is and how he wants to overthrow the American way of life, I wouldn't
00:38:09.080
defend him. The issue here is that he's talking about China. He's criticizing China and he's being
00:38:14.140
punished for criticizing China. By the way, if the guy wrote his blog posts criticizing America,
00:38:19.500
he'd probably be promoted. He'd probably be the dean of his department by now. But because he was
00:38:23.460
criticizing China and now he's, he's under fire. That's the problem. The, the, the, I think underlying
00:38:29.700
premise to all these really abstract arguments is that we really can't differentiate between right
00:38:37.100
and wrong, between good and bad, between China and America. We can't, between drag queen story hour
00:38:42.660
and going to church on Sunday. We just can't differentiate. And so every, we have to support all of these
00:38:47.180
things and we have to have no standards at all. Give me a break. If you can't rely on your moral
00:38:52.080
conscience to make the most basic judgments of reason between good and bad and right and wrong
00:38:58.380
and true and false, then you can't have self-government. The whole premise of self-government
00:39:02.860
is that we consider these ideas. We, we distinguish between good and bad and right and wrong. We make
00:39:08.580
judgments and then we enact those judgments in our politics. That's the point of self-government.
00:39:13.120
If you say that we can't do that anymore for whatever reason, because you have a skeptical
00:39:18.380
view of knowledge or of conscience or whatever, then you can't govern yourselves. And increasingly,
00:39:24.500
it would appear that we're not able to do that. Speaking of self-government and speaking of exclusion,
00:39:31.020
there is a movement underway to make Washington DC, the federal district, to turn it into a state.
00:39:38.980
The left has been pushing this for a while. It's completely incoherent. And now they're going
00:39:44.700
after one expert on this, Zach Smith, who is testifying about some of the reasons against
00:39:51.240
DC statehood. And they're saying he's making ridiculous, frivolous arguments. Take a listen
00:39:57.240
Framers also wanted to avoid one state having undue influence over the federal government.
00:40:03.500
There's no question that DC residents already impact the national debate.
00:40:07.880
For the members here today, how many of you saw DC statehood yard signs or bumper stickers
00:40:13.840
or banners on your way to this hearing today? I certainly did. Where else in the nation could
00:40:19.680
some such simple actions reach so many members of Congress?
00:40:24.640
So the left went after this guy, Zach Smith, and said, this is ridiculous. He, he wants to
00:40:30.940
claim that DC has special representation because what lawmakers look at yard signs. Give me a break.
00:40:38.320
Well, that's true. Lawmakers spend a lot of time in Washington DC and the things that happen in
00:40:45.620
Washington DC disproportionately affect the national conversation. That's just obvious. That's just
00:40:51.160
common sense. I was in DC two days ago and this is why we refer to the swamp, right? This is why we
00:40:56.640
refer to the DC bubble is because the people are there living in a particular place and they're having
00:41:00.780
the conversations and debates that will affect our national politics. And the point he made at the very
00:41:05.960
top of that is true too. The founders did not want any particular state to dominate all the other
00:41:12.540
states. That is specifically why they said, no, it's not going to be Maryland that has the nation's
00:41:19.000
capital. It's not going to be Virginia. It's going to be this kind of area that we carve out from these
00:41:24.040
places and it's going to be a federal district. There is no argument, not one single argument for DC
00:41:33.460
statehood other than inclusion. And this is this silly slogan, this bumper sticker that the left is
00:41:42.240
really pushing that unfortunately a lot of people on the right have, have fallen for the trap of,
00:41:47.720
of parroting, right? They'll say, well, come on, let people in DC, they deserve a vote.
00:41:53.840
Well, they vote on certain things, but the federal district is a very special, specific place.
00:41:59.180
If the DC residents want to live in a place that's governed under different rules, then they can move
00:42:06.220
to Maryland or they can move to Virginia. But if you're in DC, you got to play by the rules of DC.
00:42:10.880
DC, we actually need to exclude Washington DC from statehood. If you want to preserve the integrity of
00:42:20.720
statehood. It's a great line from Chesterton. He says, there's a thought that stops thought,
00:42:25.700
and that's the only thought that ought to be stopped. The inclusion of all the states in the
00:42:31.080
federal government, in the United States of America relies to some degree on the exclusion of
00:42:37.080
Washington DC. Because if Washington DC remains a federal district and not a state, then all the
00:42:43.580
other states have equal dominance over the nation's capital. Namely, none of them have any dominance
00:42:50.540
over the nation's capital. If Washington DC becomes a state, now we have truly a hierarchy of states
00:42:57.300
in the matter of lawmaking, in the matter of the federal government. Cannot, cannot do it. But something
00:43:03.920
tells me that the inclusion argument is going to continue to persuade people who are not thinking
00:43:10.640
very clearly. Those sweltering summer nights that leave you tossing and turning, desperately kicking
00:43:15.500
off the covers, don't have to ruin your sleep. Crafted from the finest 100% organic cotton,
00:43:20.000
Bowling Branch's premium sheets feature a soft, breathable weave that's built to last. Get the best
00:43:24.720
savings of the season during Bowling Branch's annual summer event. Get 20% off plus free shipping on
00:43:29.460
your first set of sheets at BowlingBranch.com slash DailyWire. That's BowlingBranch, B-O-L-L-A-N-D
00:43:35.760
Branch dot com slash DailyWire to save 20% off and unlock free shipping. Limited time only, exclusions
00:43:41.840
do apply. What the left is doing with inclusion is trying to turn this into a race issue. So they're
00:43:48.540
saying, well, you know, a lot of, a lot of black people live in DC. So if you want to exclude it from
00:43:53.020
statehood, it's because you're a white supremacist, you know, and they'll just continue to use this
00:43:56.900
phrase white supremacy as long as it's in any way plausible. I remember this when David Webb,
00:44:02.160
the, uh, the political commentator was interviewing a leftist on the radio and she accused David Webb
00:44:08.600
of, of, uh, only holding his views and having certain, certain benefits because of his white
00:44:13.120
privilege. And David Webb said, ma'am, I think if you knew me better, uh, you would not accuse me of
00:44:18.680
that. She said, no, you do. You've got white privilege. And he said, uh, ma'am, I'm, I'm a black
00:44:23.500
guy. I'm, I'm like, it's not even like that ambiguous. I'm pretty clearly a black guy. And
00:44:29.240
she said, oh yeah, okay. All right. Nevermind. And then she, she moved on, but it's just, it's
00:44:32.120
just the sort of line that you throw at people, uh, without any evidence. You don't need any evidence.
00:44:38.380
Tammy Duckworth Democrat is taking this racial politics even further. She has now said that she
00:44:46.880
will not vote for any Biden nominee who is a white guy, a straight white guy.
00:44:54.600
Tammy Duckworth says, quote, I am a no vote on the floor on all non-diversity nominees. You know,
00:45:02.000
I will not vote for racial or I rather, I will vote for racial minorities and I will vote for LGBTQ,
00:45:09.160
but anybody else I'm not voting for. This of course rank bigotry. It, you know, it's become
00:45:18.620
cliche. I almost don't even want to say it. If the situation were reversed, you know, this person
00:45:22.920
would be cast into outer darkness where there were wailing, where there was wailing and gnashing of
00:45:27.020
teeth. In as much as there is any sort of white identitarian movement cropping up on the fringes
00:45:34.740
of our political discourse. And I suppose there's always something like that on the fringes,
00:45:38.760
but in as much as it's cropping up anymore, it's because of Tammy Duckworth. That's why
00:45:44.700
Tammy Duckworth and her fellow travelers are the only people to blame for this sort of thing.
00:45:52.900
Because I think if you polled all the white people in America and you said, hey, do you want to have
00:45:57.760
a politics based on racial identity primarily? I think overwhelmingly the white people would say,
00:46:03.960
no, no way. But if the left forces a politics of racial identity,
00:46:11.900
then there is no choice, right? This is the problem with war and it's a problem with politics
00:46:17.680
is your opponent, your enemy gets a say. So if Tammy Duckworth is saying, yeah, we're going to have a
00:46:23.940
politics primarily, exclusively perhaps of racial identity, then you're going to create the phantom
00:46:31.240
problem that you're pretending exists right now. The white nationalist, white identitarian,
00:46:37.580
a total contrivance, a total creation of the left. Speaking of racial identity politics,
00:46:44.960
have to get to this today. The first U.S. city ever has approved slavery reparations to black people.
00:46:55.400
Not the first U.S. city that was ever created, but the first U.S. city to approve
00:46:59.440
reparations for slavery has just voted on. Evanston City Council voted eight to one Monday night
00:47:05.620
to approve the first phase of reparations, allocating $400,000 to be paid out in homeownership
00:47:12.280
and improvement grants up to 25 grand. The housing assistance is the first part of a $10 million
00:47:17.680
plan for reparations to be paid to black people. The black people will have to prove that their
00:47:22.660
ancestors lived in the city between 1919 and 1969 when discriminatory policies were in effect.
00:47:30.040
Applicants must also be able to trace their lineage back to any of the black racial and ethnic groups of
00:47:34.440
Africa. How are people going to do that? They're going to spit in a swab, you know, they're going to take
00:47:43.340
one of these DNA tests and prove it. What happens if the documents are not particularly strong? What if
00:47:49.860
they're not reliable? What if they're being forged? What if there's corruption that creeps in? What if the
00:47:54.520
politicians who are just doling out money willy-nilly to people based on how dark their skin is, what if they get
00:48:00.940
a little bit crooked about it? What if this is just the beginning? What if this is the beginning of a
00:48:07.820
politics primarily of racial identity in the modern political era in this country? Certainly would seem
00:48:15.160
that way. I don't think this is the end. I think other cities are going to vote on this too. And I
00:48:20.000
think that a lot of conservatives, the squishy ones, are going to go along with it and they'll say,
00:48:24.540
well, you know, I just don't want to be called a racist. And hey, and you know what they'll do?
00:48:29.920
The only argument they'll make is maybe we should have reparations for other groups.
00:48:35.000
You know, anyone who's ever suffered any kind of grievance or discrimination, why is this,
00:48:38.660
why is this one grievance? Horrible though it was, why is that the only grievance that anyone is
00:48:45.220
allowed to claim some justice for? Why, why not if you were, if you're a Japanese American and your
00:48:52.600
parents were interned or your grandparents were interned during World War II, are you not entitled to
00:48:58.220
some reparations for that? What if you're an Italian American? You were treated, you were treated in
00:49:04.360
parts of the South, just like black people were treated. Largest mass lynching in American history
00:49:08.860
was against Italian Americans. Where's my money? Where, give me those reparations. What if you're
00:49:14.420
an Irish American? You had signs on the windows that say Irish need not apply to jobs. Where are your
00:49:19.580
reparations? What I could see, I don't think any Republicans, very, very few prominent Republicans
00:49:24.000
are going to have the spine to say, no, no reparations. You don't get it. I don't,
00:49:28.960
I just don't want to hear about horrible historic grievances. Not because I deny that they existed,
00:49:37.800
but because everyone can claim grievance because this is a fallen world and some people certainly
00:49:43.140
can claim it worse than others. But the way to have a country moving forward is not to go back and
00:49:47.600
relitigate things that happened 200, 300 years ago and to try to extort money out of people through
00:49:53.260
corrupt government programs. The way to move forward as a country is confession and forgiveness,
00:49:57.880
a little bit of grace and love of your country. It's an extension of your family and your community.
00:50:04.180
That's, that's going to be the way forward. Right before we go, I have to mention this article,
00:50:10.120
it's in CNN, speaking of people's physical characteristics, to shave or not to shave,
00:50:15.820
how beards may affect COVID-19 health. The idea that if you have a beard, your mask might not be as
00:50:22.580
effective and therefore you need to shave. All I have to say on this particular story is
00:50:28.980
nice try, Harry's. Nice try. You know, I know you've got a, you're facing a very difficult
00:50:36.160
news cycle right now because you insulted hundreds of millions of conservative Americans and you said
00:50:42.320
that you don't want their business and now they're, they're canceling your product by the thousands
00:50:46.880
because you know, I'm seeing the emails and the tweets. Nice try, Harry's PR team. I'm not buying
00:50:52.740
this COVID-19 stuff. Okay. Sorry. Sorry, pal. I think people can grow beards. Absolutely. If they
00:50:59.360
want to, uh, the, the credibility of not just corporate America, but of a lot of our egghead
00:51:05.020
bureaucrats very much in question right now because they've been gaslighting us more and more each day.
00:51:10.420
I'm Michael Knowles. This is the Michael Knowles show. See you tomorrow.
00:51:18.280
If you enjoyed this episode, don't forget to subscribe. And if you want to help spread the
00:51:22.720
word, please give us a five-star review and tell your friends to subscribe. We're available on Apple
00:51:28.220
podcasts, Spotify, and wherever else you listen to podcasts. Also be sure to check out the other
00:51:33.780
daily wire podcasts, including the Ben Shapiro show, the Andrew Klavan show, and the Matt Walsh show.
00:51:38.860
The Michael Knowles show is produced by Ben Davies, executive producer, Jeremy Boring. Our
00:51:44.140
technical director is Austin Stevens, supervising producers, Mathis Glover and Robert Sterling,
00:51:49.880
production manager, Pavel Vidovsky, editor and associate producer, Danny D'Amico, audio mixer,
00:51:56.120
Mike Coromina, hair and makeup by Nika Geneva, and production coordinator, McKenna Waters.
00:52:02.020
The Michael Knowles show is a daily wire production, copyright daily wire, 2021.
00:52:06.380
Today on the Matt Walsh show, the media scrambles to change the narrative after the mass killer in
00:52:10.980
Boulder turns out to be an Arab man who killed white people. Also five headlines, including the
00:52:14.800
U.S. Senator who announced her intentions to only vote to confirm nominees of a certain race.
00:52:19.560
And a man finds shrimp tails in his box of cinnamon toast crunch. What's the lesson we can
00:52:23.440
learn from that story? There is a lesson. I'll tell you what it is. Finally, in our daily cancellation,
00:52:27.140
we'll deal with the claim made by a democratic Senator and many others that buying a gun is somehow
00:52:31.820
easier than voting. Is that true at all? Talk about that and much more today on the Matt Walsh show.