Alec Baldwin is suing a script supervisor for negligence, the VAX mandate is suspended, and Mike Cernovich joins the Temcast crew to talk about the Rittenhouse case and much, much more! Guests: Alec Baldwin's lawyer, Michael Malice; Mike Crenovich, founder of The Mindset Mindset Podcast and author of "The Mindset"
00:00:33.000Basically what happened is the prosecution had high-res video and gave the defense low-res video, which is worse than just withholding evidence.
00:00:42.000I guess the judge, this is kind of crazy, the judge said he's not going to make a decision on a mistrial with prejudice, but he told the prosecutors, I warned you there would be a reckoning on that video.
00:00:55.000But we're gonna wait to see what the jury comes back with in the terms of their verdict.
00:00:58.000The judge very well may just let Rittenhouse off because of a mistrial with prejudice that was filed.
00:01:20.000The script supervisor, the person who knows what's supposed to go down, has filed a lawsuit against Alec Baldwin saying he knew he was improperly handed the gun, he knew he shouldn't have trusted the AD said, and he wasn't supposed to aim it, cock the hammer, or pull the trigger.
00:03:43.000And there's a funny song, a funny story Bowie had where he said he played The Man Who Sold the World on set and two teenage girls were like, that was so cool how you covered Nirvana.
00:04:01.000You're a lawyer, so you're gonna have way more understanding of a lot of this legal stuff with Alec Baldwin and with the Rittenhouse stuff, so I'm excited you're here.
00:04:08.000And Michael Malice, of course, is here, but I guess he introduced himself.
00:04:51.000Welcome, beautiful and amazing human beings.
00:04:53.000My name is Luke Rudowsky of WeAreChange.org, and I once again wanted to thank YouTube for demonetizing me and making me a very humble t-shirt vendor.
00:05:00.000The t-shirt that I'm wearing right now is one of the shirts that I sell, and it's a picture of A prophet and a saint, Mr. Dr. Ron Paul, and it says, if I told you so, it was a person.
00:05:11.000And you can get yours exclusively on thebestpoliticalshirts.com, and that's the way to support me.
00:05:37.000I'm hoping to have a super cool conversation, as we always do.
00:05:39.000Mike Cernovich is not only one of my favorite people, but there's a handful of people in my life where I'm comfortable outsourcing my decision-making on certain issues, and he's one of them.
00:07:11.000We're gonna have a members-only segment going up around 11 or so p.m.
00:07:14.000tonight and as a member you're helping support our fierce and independent journalism.
00:07:18.000There's actually a story we have It's graphic, I can't show you, but it's an exclusive report from Cassandra Fairbanks about Fauci's NIAID funding what's called Maximum Pain Research on primates.
00:07:51.000That's why I'm like, I can't scroll down right now.
00:07:53.000Maybe we need, like, a graphic filter for, like, because not everybody wants to see this stuff, but this is the kind of stuff that the NIAID was funding under Fauci.
00:08:03.000Not to be too much of a Debbie Downer.
00:08:06.000But, uh, become a member, support that independent work, because I gotta be honest, we take risks with big exclusives like this, because you are making direct accusations, and there's real risks to reporting, people want to come after you.
00:08:17.000But go to TimCast.com, don't forget to like this video right now, like this episode, subscribe to the channel, share it wherever you can, because that really, really does help, taking the URL, putting it wherever you can.
00:08:29.000Rittenhouse is really, really big, you know, and we're waiting on this verdict, but we really are just waiting on this verdict, so I wanted to lead with something in a similar vein that's big and political, so we decided to talk about the Alec Baldwin stuff because... I was right!
00:08:47.000Rust Script Supervisor breaks down in tears as she sues Baldwin over Helena Hutchins' death because he cocked and fired the gun even though the scene didn't call for it.
00:08:57.000She says Baldwin knew the gun should have never been given to him and that he could not rely on the assistant director about whether or not the gun was safe to use.
00:09:05.000Mr. Baldwin chose to play Russian roulette when he fired a gun without checking it and without having an armorer within his presence.
00:09:14.000A couple weeks ago, everybody started this story saying it was a misfire from a blank, that shrapnel hit this woman, and I wonder, I can't remember who was telling us this, but maybe that was a PR response, a crisis management company for him leaked that story, because they were like, if we start with the premise that it was an accident, everyone will believe it was an accident no matter what.
00:09:34.000And last week I said, why are we assuming it's an accident?
00:09:38.000We'd have to assume the armorer screwed up, the assistant director screwed up, that Alec Baldwin screwed up, and then he pointed it in the right direction.
00:09:46.000How come we're not starting from, Alec Baldwin pulled the gun, pointed it, cocked it, pulled the trigger, and then from there we can walk it back?
00:09:52.000Now, this is big, the script supervisor, the person who knows exactly what's supposed to go on, on scene, says, he wasn't supposed to have a gun.
00:10:02.000He should have checked it and he didn't.
00:10:04.000He certainly wasn't supposed to pull the hammer and pull the trigger.
00:10:08.000That to me sounds like a good argument for intentional homicide.
00:10:12.000I'm not a huge gun person, but every time I've handled a gun,
00:10:16.000the person handing it to me, who's actually a gun expert, or just someone who's an aficionado, gave me a speech.
00:10:21.000And part of that speech is, you do not point a gun at anything that you do not want to
00:10:46.000That's important here specifically for Baldwin.
00:10:48.000Because if we're still operating under the premise that he was pointing it at the camera for a scene, he wasn't paying attention to what was behind his target.
00:11:06.000Why am I then going to assume this wasn't murder?
00:11:08.000Because you've got an angry crew, you've got people threatening to walk off set, Baldwin says, I had a dinner with her just that Friday!
00:11:16.000Sounds to me, and I said this before, she was actually negotiating him with him, or arguing with him, and then he goes on set, takes the gun and says, BAM!
00:11:27.000That's like pure psycho, if he did that.
00:11:29.000You're saying that the rumor that went around, that he jokingly said, how about I just kill you both, that that was a false rumor, correct?
00:11:34.000Yeah, someone, someone... That was clever, that was a clever hoax.
00:11:39.000I actually recorded a video, and then someone responded with the clip, and I was like, whoa.
00:11:44.000Cause I'm like, I'm like showing the article, I'm showing the tweet, and then I see that, and I was like, I don't know if that's true, I gotta check.
00:11:49.000Someone took a news article, and then, I wouldn't be surprised if it was his PR team in order to muddy the waters because a lot of times with this information we see fake information being brought out to the general public to make everyone confused about what's really going on there.
00:12:05.000And you saw Baldwin right after the incident.
00:14:03.000It's called brandishing, it's a legal term, brandishing a firearm and it definitely depends on the context.
00:14:09.000So if I were just here with you guys and one of you, you know, brandished a firearm without some kind of intent, then it wouldn't be, but it all depends on the context.
00:14:18.000But then, if you came to a bank and you just tapped a gun, that would be brandishing, even though you're not even pointing it.
00:14:25.000Yeah, so it's all based on the context of... And it also depends on the state laws, because in some states like Ohio, what the state prosecutor did in the Kyle Rittenhouse case, that's a chargeable offense.
00:14:59.000So I don't think that would apply here.
00:15:01.000They say involuntary manslaughter consists of manslaughter committed in the commission of an unlawful act not amounting to a felony or in the commission of a lawful act which might produce death in an unlawful manner.
00:15:12.000uh... or without due caution or circumspect that's about the both alice
00:15:17.000and that the reason i ask is i'm wondering if by simple so first we can call an accident
00:15:21.000an accident would be like you said you drop it it goes off and you're like oh
00:15:24.000no and you might still get in trouble because you're responsible for that
00:15:27.000but this is a guy who pulled it out and aimed at the woman if is is so can we even argue this is manslaughter if he
00:15:33.000pointed the gun at her and pull the trigger
00:15:36.000you would have some voluntary manslaughter So the way they would say, they could say, well, an
00:15:46.000It's an accident, but who was negligent?
00:15:48.000Were you looking at your cell phone at the time?
00:15:50.000So involuntary manslaughter, the textbook case of that is if you're drinking and driving, it isn't a felony to drink and drive, but somebody dies, you didn't intend for them to die.
00:15:59.000So that's usually when that would apply is there was no intent for you to do gross bodily harm or injury to someone else.
00:16:06.000So with the Alec Baldwin case, we don't have enough Facts to know whether it be voluntary or involuntary because and you there's a whole I mean you could do a whole week of this in law school and then there's all kinds of cases on it where you go from What's the difference between reckless versus negligent?
00:16:22.000What's the difference between willful and again, negligent?
00:16:25.000And there's a lot of things that depend on the facts.
00:16:28.000I would, my instinct from day one was that it would have been involuntary manslaughter.
00:16:33.000He was recklessly, he was acting with callous or reckless disregard for another person's
00:17:04.000But he came out and was talking about this specific case and said that it was infuriating and insane that this happened as he's accusing Alec Baldwin of ignoring decades And Adam Baldwin also corroborated that.
00:18:42.000I walk into the middle of the street and there's a person filming me with a camera.
00:18:46.000I pull out a gun, cock the hammer, shoot him and kill him.
00:18:49.000Oh yeah, that would be intentional murder.
00:18:52.000So Alec Baldwin, this is why I ask, if we're approaching it from the context of he wasn't supposed to have a gun, That means he walked up, pointed the gun at a woman for no reason, which he wasn't supposed to have, and decided to shoot her.
00:19:03.000Why would we operate as if that was, like, manslaughter?
00:19:06.000Because it's the context of the relationship.
00:19:08.000It's the same thing where if you were on a first date with a girl and she fell asleep and you, you know, looked for some action, that would be sexual assault, potentially, but if it's your wife or your girlfriend, then there's a pattern of consent, so it's different because of the relationship.
00:19:24.000So the law That's why the law is hard.
00:20:33.000Another thing to really consider here is that Alec Baldwin went to anger management before because of his rage issues and because of other court proceedings that he had related to, of course, blowing up and getting really angry and, you know, committing acts of either harassment or assault against other people.
00:20:51.000There is a long history here of someone who isn't in control of his emotions to the point where he has sought professional help.
00:21:21.000But that's a cartoon character, right?
00:21:23.000I think it's very hard to make the case that Yeah, he's not disturbed by seeing someone he was at least if one of you right now God forbid something happened.
00:21:31.000We'd all be you're making assumptions You're making assumptions that this is the issue.
00:21:35.000We don't know they were friends I didn't say they were friends even if it's just some random almost said they were friends.
00:21:39.000You're about to say they were friends Alex said they were friends, on the record.
00:21:42.000He said that, but what I'm saying is even if it's someone like, you know, a person you had just a conversation with at a party, and in front of you you saw them get shot and bleed out, I think the vast, vast majority of people will be traumatized for life.
00:21:55.000Especially if you're the one who pulled the trigger.
00:21:57.000The DA says they know who put the bullets in the gun.
00:22:14.000And Alec Baldwin would fall into that category.
00:22:18.000You think they'll charge the assistant director of the armor?
00:22:21.000So that, I think a lot of money will exchange hands, and, cause Alec Baldwin's gonna owe millions of dollars to the family, you know, cause if they're, either way, if it's your friend, like if you accidentally killed a friend of yours, you would go to the family and be like, look dude, you don't have to sue me, like, what do you need?
00:23:10.000has bag men who go to the Middle East, and when we accidentally kill children, we write them out the check to these families, and if it's a boy, they get a lot bigger of a check than if we accidentally kill one of the girls.
00:23:23.000And there's actuarial tables for how much you pay off these poor people in the Middle East who basically lost their son or daughter for no reason, depending on what country, what neighborhood and the age of the child and how many other siblings they had.
00:23:35.000And it's and it's this is where your tax dollars are going.
00:23:38.000Sometimes I wish this was a cooking show, and we could be like, the cherry goes on the whipped cream, and then we all enjoy a nice strawberry shortcake.
00:23:44.000Instead, we're like, after they kill the child, they send someone to pay off the family.
00:23:47.000And then, real quick, yeah, real quick also too is, if you're a prosecutor, and you have a case that's going to be hard to prove anyway, so you're a prosecutor, you can file a case that's going to be hard to prove, and then the victim's family says, we don't want you to file it, then you're not going to file it.
00:24:38.000Day two, defense files for mistrial with prejudice.
00:24:41.000You can see image from the drone footage.
00:24:43.000If the prosecution presented the drone footage in court, the defense would have went, whoa, whoa, whoa, we've never received this evidence, your honor.
00:24:50.000So the prosecution instead gives them grainy low-res video.
00:24:54.000Now, I think it was on Mercatus stream, they played the different videos side-by-side, and if you pulled up on the TV and you were given that, the defense had no way of knowing that this was not the video.
00:25:07.000They're given the video, they play it, they say it's a video, it's drone footage, makes sense to me.
00:25:11.000Only when the defense played the video in the jury instructions did the state go, our version is much clearer.
00:25:26.000If the prosecution was attempting to pull a fast one on the defense to make sure they had no way to analyze the video to form a defense, That means they need the jury to see their version of the evidence, which is clearer.
00:25:37.000When the defense played it, they went, oh crap.
00:25:40.000We need the jury to only see our version, and the reason the defense is given the low-res version is so they can't formulate a defense on time.
00:25:48.000So he had no choice but to say, our version is clearer, let's play that instead.
00:25:52.000Now, normally I'd say it was an accident.
00:25:55.000The argument is they texted the video to the defense team, which compressed it.
00:26:11.000They've ignored rulings from the judge.
00:26:14.000The judge says he's going to hold this in his back pocket until a verdict, but he very well may come back out and say, mistrial with prejudice, Rittenhouse is free to go.
00:26:23.000Wait, can I ask Mike a question because you're an attorney?
00:26:27.000Like there was a video file and it's in a drawer and it's like, oops, I forgot, I have it now, and I'm a prosecutor in good faith and the jury's already deliberating.
00:26:35.000What can I do at that point as a prosecutor who would be acting in good faith?
00:26:39.000Yeah, that would, so tech, there's a, they call those Brady violations.
00:26:42.000Brady is information that could go to guilt or innocence or deal with sent, um, information at sentencing.
00:26:49.000So in other words, it shows you as, um, maybe a better person, a more innocent person than you thought.
00:26:54.000So if it's a good faith error on something like that, you could get a mistrial with, without prejudice and retry it.
00:27:01.000Um, that, that would be the remedy if you wanted it.
00:27:04.000The defense, I don't know if they would, Oh.
00:27:06.000depending on how the case you're making a guess right the defense lawyer would
00:27:08.000would say hey I think we're gonna win anyway and not take it.
00:27:30.000He'd warned them there would be a day of reckoning over this drone video, and then says he's not going to make a decision now, inclined to see what the verdict is going to be.
00:27:39.000On the 15th, the defense filed a motion for a mistrial with prejudice, which means they cannot bring the charges back.
00:27:45.000But it seems like the defense is so upset over the cheating that they're like, just do a mistrial.
00:28:31.000Because people don't want to come back quick from jury and convict, right?
00:28:35.000Because then it looks like you're just a bad person, like, oh yeah, we heard the evidence, 30 minutes, guilty, boom.
00:28:41.000You take longer, but if it's not guilty, you come back right away.
00:28:45.000Now the Rittenhouse, there's all this speculation that there's a couple of holdouts, they're left-wing activists, and that it's going to be hung.
00:29:08.000Okay. Will Chamberlain had some interesting comments about this.
00:29:10.000He said earlier that, quote, "...pretty clear that Rittenhouse lawyers are getting jittery.
00:29:15.000Moving for a mistrial without prejudice indicates a serious worry that a guilty verdict is coming back and that they want to get in front of it."
00:29:23.000So that could be a possibility here as well.
00:29:25.000So here's the way you would game it out if you were, you know, if you're a white born again.
00:29:34.000We don't know if it's going to be hung because it was 10 to guilty, and 2 not guilty, or if it was 10 not guilty, 2 holdouts.
00:29:40.000They're going to hang it, but you're thinking it's already going to hang, so then why would you even take a choice that it might be hanging because it's going to be guilty, or that they're going to convince those two other jurors to to change their vote to being guilty. So you're thinking
00:29:53.000the odds would just say let's just do a redo and we have all this information now that we can use.
00:29:58.000But they still filed a motion for mistrial with prejudice and a verbal motion for mistrial.
00:30:03.000Are both motions available to the judge?
00:30:05.000Well one would supersede the judge can do whatever he wants.
00:30:08.000So the initial reason they filed it, the motion with prejudice, so there was that set of
00:30:14.000questions where the prosecutor had said this is your first time talking since August 25th 2020. Now
00:30:21.000there's this is black letter law that you cannot make a comment about a person exercising
00:30:33.000If you take the bar exam and you read that transcript, there's actually a right answer.
00:30:38.000Now, the prosecutor tried to say, well, I wasn't commenting on his silence.
00:30:43.000I was just saying that because he was able to watch the whole trial, He could key up his story, and you technically can make that argument, but you can't say, this is the first time you've talked.
00:30:54.000You can say, you can skip that line and say, hey, isn't it true, Tim, that you've been sitting here for this whole trial?
00:31:00.000Well, isn't it true that you've watched every witness testify?
00:31:13.000Yeah, you would say, no, I'm here to tell the truth, and there's all this back and forth, but the idea, too, and the prosecutor's not very competent, Binger is not competent at all, is when you're cross-examining, you just give a person a yes or no answer.
00:31:28.000There's so many just basic tactical blunders that he made, but that would be the idea, because then you would say, isn't it true that you could come up with any story you want, and you would say, no, I'm here to tell the truth.
00:31:37.000And then it doesn't matter because you're just imposing your narrative on the witness in cross-examination, which is the way it's supposed to be.
00:31:45.000You don't get to tell your narrative on cross-examination, the Inquisitor gets to, and everything has to be a leading question, yes or no, just keep it yes or no, isn't that true?
00:31:54.000So fortunately Binger is incompetent, unethical.
00:31:57.000And I tweeted out even, you know, quoting Michael Maus, that to be blackpailed is to think that Binger's gonna beat us, right?
00:32:05.000Yeah, like that these aren't unstoppable foes.
00:32:18.000You know that someone... Are you serious?
00:32:20.000And someone... I know, I didn't believe it myself.
00:32:22.000Someone filmed the jury from their bus pickup and the judge went, well, we'll just make sure that doesn't happen again when we deleted the footage.
00:32:33.000And there's no Merrick Garland's not going to issue a memo saying that we need to go after people who are trying to tamper with the jury, even though that's how they get the mob for jury tampering.
00:33:37.000I want to address what you were saying, you know, look, zombies have no morality, and zombies are stupid, but when you get a whole lot of them, you're in trouble.
00:33:43.000At least figuratively, because no one's ever actually been attacked by zombies.
00:33:47.000No, they out- and that's the- that was strategically, is they outnumber us, they're evil, and they're dumb, but that's how you have to war game it out.
00:34:21.000And Joe was like, no, man, he's like, he's not evil.
00:34:23.000Like these guys are just doing production and they're not paying attention.
00:34:25.000And I said, it's the banality of evil.
00:34:27.000Chris Cuomo pretended to be in quarantine to trick people into thinking he was locked down when he wasn't, when he was going to his private property and got into a fight with some guy or verbal altercation.
00:34:37.000And I said, it's evil to willfully deceive the people.
00:34:42.000We're talking about people whose lives are being destroyed by this, and he's acting as an agent to make sure they don't resist, as their businesses, their homes, their families, and everything's destroyed.
00:35:05.000But isn't it still the banality of evil?
00:35:07.000That we knew that the Foxconn labs were so horrifying, people were committing mass suicide, and we were like, but we accept this because we want it.
00:35:41.000Banality of evil would imply that he's just like, um, hey, I'm going to get vaccinated for my job and I'm going to show my vaccination pass to people and I'm just going to kind of cooperate because this is what I have to do.
00:35:53.000Ian actually had, I think, one of the best responses because we were talking about whether or not the NPCs, the zombie hordes, are truly evil.
00:36:00.000And so I asked Ian, I was like, Ian, are zombies evil?
00:36:03.000And he immediately was like, Uh, well, in D&D, yes, they are chaotic evil, but I like- Well, they're not, they don't have an alignment anymore, Ian.
00:36:24.000I wanna talk to all of you about the Rittenhouse trial and what we can see as reasonable mature adults evil.
00:36:32.000Did you know that Gage Grosskreutz in January 2021 had a drunk driving offense?
00:36:37.000And the prosecutor said we'll make that go bye-bye six days before the Rittenhouse trial?
00:36:42.000Let me show you here from New York Post.
00:36:44.000Sole survivor has criminal past, they say.
00:36:47.000Grosskreutz28 was in court just six days before Rittenhouse's murder trial where he was a star witness to have a recent drunk driving charge dismissed on a technicality.
00:36:57.000So weird yeah I mean we talked about this a little bit when ...
00:37:00.000Rogan came on I kind of went off and talked about all of his ...
00:37:03.000criminal charges the Daily Mail called them a career ...
00:37:05.000criminal but this wasn't his first DUI this was his second ...
00:37:08.000DUI now I don't know anyone who had a DUI had a second one ...
00:37:11.000and was able to get off of it when when the consequences are ...
00:37:14.000so serious when when you have a second DUI I mean I we could ...
00:37:17.000look up exactly the ramifications of it but the ...
00:37:20.000first DUI in some states they take away your car they take ...
00:37:23.000away your car they take away your car they take away your ...
00:37:25.000license and you face a very long jail term because of that.
00:37:33.000A second one on a longer criminal record of domestic abuse, prowling, trespass, felony Burglary?
00:37:39.000Two counts of carrying firearms while intoxicated on top of these two DUIs?
00:37:46.000I mean, we're talking about someone who's definitely not an upstanding citizen, but yet he's treated like some kind of celebrity on Good Morning America, which he had his first interview on, and I think the nerds want to nerd out about something.
00:37:58.000Yeah, we're getting to the important stuff right now.
00:38:03.000You were just talking about how these people are NPCs, they're zombies, and the question is, are zombies evil?
00:38:11.000As of 5th edition Dungeons & Dragons, yes, they are neutral evil.
00:38:15.000They don't tend towards law or chaos, they're kind of in the middle, but they're definitely evil.
00:38:20.000For context, for people who don't understand, We're just making an analogy to, you have all of these people who will vote Democrat, who will go along with lockdowns and mandates and restrictions on civil liberties, they'll go along with the Rittenhouse prosecutor presenting false evidence and they will just say, I don't care what happened, I'm on their side no matter what, we call them zombies.
00:38:43.000And then the question was, but is that evil or is that just being a zombie?
00:38:46.000Ian told us last week that in D&D, zombies are evil, but Michael contested this, and you have been fact-checked, sir.
00:38:58.000Because zombies are actually actively hunting.
00:39:00.000And this suggests that their neutral evil suggests that they will betray the law at any moment for their own self-serving purposes, and they'll also side with the law at any moment for their own self-serving purposes.
00:39:12.000Zombies don't have an opinion on the law.
00:39:14.000Yeah, I mean, you can get, you know, what is evil, does evil require intent, does it require outcome, what if you're in good nature, and that's why I don't use, and I really used to not use it, but my rhetoric has probably gotten a little more fiery over the years, I very rarely say someone's evil.
00:39:33.000And I'd be very philosophical, like, a lot of these people are just not paying attention, but when we get to the point where Binger, the prosecutor, introduces fake evidence, CGI evidence, commits constitutional violations, defies the rulings, the problem is the judge let him get away with it!
00:39:52.000Well, I don't think that... I agree with Mike, but I think NPCs aren't evil per se, but the ones who are running the show are the evil ones.
00:39:59.000Right, the Chris Cuomo's evil, Don Lemon's evil, the Lemmings who watch CNN, they're just Lemmings.
00:40:06.000They would fall off a cliff, they would literally, if Chris Cuomo told people to do anything, they would fall off a cliff to their own detriment.
00:40:13.000And if they were born in Idaho, they'd be watching Fox and they'd be NPCs in that class.
00:41:16.000I'm kind of with you about, I'm reticent to call people good and evil because the way, especially the way D&D works, it's a scale from like, let me reference the Bible real quick.
00:41:25.000You have a rating from 1 to 100, evil being 1, good being 100, and you're somewhere on that scale, 78, say.
00:41:30.000Every act you do, maybe it's an evil act, might drop that from a 78 to a 74.
00:41:35.000And then you might do a good act to a tone, and then you might do something horrible, like kill someone, and it drops to a 5.
00:41:40.000And all of a sudden, but that doesn't mean it's- Like Alex Baldwin.
00:43:07.000So can you never not... There's even that joke that the guy said he fornicated with the goat once and now for the rest of his life he's a goat fornicator.
00:43:16.000And my belief, generally speaking, is that there's a redemption period.
00:43:53.000But what I'm saying is, what we're basically saying is based on our personal views of morality,
00:43:57.000we're willing to give someone redemption and not call them a name by their worst moment.
00:44:01.000If someone murders someone, they're always a murderer.
00:44:03.000Alec Baldwin is always a murderer, but Reza Aslan is no longer a cannibal?
00:44:06.000I don't think eating human brains is a problem.
00:44:09.000Like I said, with stuff that happens with kids is a little different.
00:44:12.000I don't like to reduce people to their lowest moment.
00:44:17.000Generally speaking, that's not how I view humanity, because my fundamental view is that we're all, whatever's in our hearts and minds, if that were published to the world, what would that look like, right?
00:44:27.000And then you would say, well, that's the evil thought, that's different, the actions are different, and there's a whole sliding scale to this, but my view, generally speaking, is That you don't hold, you don't define a person by their worst moment, with the exception, again, with, you know, if you're a serial child molester, you know, that's a little bit different than a guy who loaded up maybe something, a video or something that he shouldn't have.
00:44:48.000There could be a period of redemption after that.
00:44:50.000But in the familiest, friendliest way, I want to make sure we stress that he was beyond that.
00:44:54.000Rosenbaum was committing atrocities against children.
00:45:04.000Because a lot of people have like, Alec Baldwin's done a lot of great work as an actor, but if he does some horrible crime, I don't want to be like, well, he's a good guy, so let's let him go.
00:45:23.000I think there's a sliding scale, too, because are we talking about someone like Henry Kissinger, Jeffrey Epstein?
00:45:29.000Because they're in a different realm of evil, comparatively to, of course, you know, low-level criminals, petty criminals, arsonists.
00:45:37.000There's a big difference between the two.
00:45:38.000That's a good way, if you think of every action in your life as weighting the scale of one to a hundred.
00:45:42.000If you've done a million things that have given you a hundred, and then you do one thing that gives you a one, it's barely going to move the needle to 99.9.
00:46:34.000Obama's national security advisor said he takes his daily orders from Henry Kissinger, and Obama has a lot of influence in the Biden administration, so I would say he's still in charge.
00:47:02.000Well, that's what I was talking about earlier.
00:47:04.000If I were his lawyer, what I think it would mean is that if you can get a mistrial without prejudice, you want to roll the dice again.
00:47:12.000Because the only outcome for you at that point is it's tending towards bad.
00:47:16.000If I had to guess, I would say that there's one or two holdouts to convict.
00:47:21.000It's the vast majority of people who are not guilty.
00:47:23.000A couple of activists got on that jury.
00:47:25.000And they're going to hang, because usually you hang the jury the other way.
00:47:28.000Usually your challenge is getting one or two people, usually need two because one person is always going to back down, to vote not guilty and get the retrial.
00:47:37.000This I think is the opposite because he's so clearly, like if we were the left and he were convicted, my god, because he's so clearly not guilty, it's not even up for reasonable discussion.
00:47:49.000If they were to get a mistrial without prejudice, would they get a new jury?
00:47:54.000Good luck finding an untainted jury at this point.
00:47:56.000But on top of that, do they recall all the witnesses?
00:48:00.000Yeah, so what you do, and this is why if you're Rittenhouse's lawyer, you're thinking, man, I have indigestion, things have been going on for a long time, looking like we're not going to get a not guilty.
00:48:11.000If we roll the dice again, we have every witness now, we know what they're going to say, so we know what our opening argument, our closing argument is going to be.
00:48:21.000The judge, when they, the Rittenhouse defense filed a motion for mistrial with prejudice because it had, but they did that before deliberations even started.
00:48:29.000But now we're a day into deliberations and they came back on day two and said we'll take a mistrial with no prejudice.
00:48:36.000So the judge has to know they're sweating.
00:48:39.000Yeah, he knows and the odds have changed.
00:48:41.000So the way things are going now, you think, let's roll again, we have everybody on the record now, all the evidence that the prosecutor had hid we have, it can only get better for the defense in a second trial.
00:48:54.000So if I'm them, I'm thinking, it can only get better for us if we retry this mofo.
00:49:33.000So a lot of people, you can't do this in criminal trials because you can't afford them, but in big high injury, personal injury, they do mock trials and they bring in juries and then they say, well, you know, or they'll even have like buttons where they're like, if you think something's really good, like you push the button.
00:50:08.000So if I'm them, and I could get a mistrial without prejudice, I know that people are going to second guess me, but I take that in a second.
00:50:16.000I gotta tell you, the reason why I don't think I could probably ever be on a jury is that there is almost, almost, no circumstance in which I would say guilty.
00:50:31.000There's something called Grand Jury, and what Grand Jury is, is like I think 25 or 30 people, you're impaneled for two weeks, and you all have to sit in, and this is where you get charges put forward.
00:50:42.000Like they say, a Grand Jury will indict a hand sandwich.
00:50:44.000I said to them, this part I can't say, I'm an anarchist, I won't convict under any circumstances.
00:50:51.000They said, too bad, you're on the grand jury.
00:50:53.000I'm like, alright, now that I'm under these circumstances, I have to work within the system.
00:50:58.000It is very easy, I'm giving this advice to everyone, especially on drug charges, juries want to be led.
00:51:05.000So if you are in a possibility of being in a jury, and you say to people, look, we have no duty to convict, Do you really want to ruin this kid's life because he had some weed or was selling some weed?
00:51:16.000That's going to be on your conscience.
00:51:18.000Then talk about slavery and how... I made this up.
00:51:22.000Like, you know, they wouldn't convict on slave charges back in the day.
00:51:24.000Probably didn't, but I was pulling out of my ass.
00:51:44.000But it's not just that people want to be swayed, it's that many are NPCs.
00:51:48.000A lot of people are there like I don't want to be here, I gotta go to work, the game's
00:51:51.000But they do want to do the right thing, for sure.
00:51:53.000And your job is to tell them what that is.
00:51:55.000As a leader, when you say, we should not return an indictment.
00:51:58.000So my point was, if I'm on a jury, and they say, you know, like, here's a guy who was in his home, he defended himself, and the state says, we think that he actually intended to commit harm, I'd be like, not guilty.
00:52:13.000Because I'm not I'm like very similar to your ideology However, I say almost none because if I'm gonna jury and it's very very.
00:52:21.000Yeah, very clear-cut like Rosenbaum I'd be like guilty guilty guilty or there's cases where like if someone like literally raped or killed someone it's it's well It depends if there's victimless In New Hampshire I've heard stories about the Free State Project whenever they have gatherings that whenever they find out someone has jury duty they all celebrate and get really happy because they know it's an opportunity to nullify whatever laws they don't believe in personally and you know a lot of people they get the jury duty notice they're like oh crap I don't want to do this they feel bad about this but you have an opportunity to raise your voice and actually make an argument that could have severe ramifications
00:52:57.000And I will never convict on a drug charge.
00:54:34.000In questions of individual choice, those kinds of trials, and I'm almost never going, you'd never get me to convict on anything.
00:54:41.000And this is a great opportunity for everyone to save a life.
00:54:44.000Not only that, that's true, but with Kyle Rittenhouse, you know why there's no argument they could make in court to convince me to convict?
00:54:52.000I'm not saying you can't convince me that Kyle was wrong, I certainly don't think he was wrong, Yes.
00:55:55.000Yes, I agree with you to a great degree, but when we had a very, very small, when our communities were very, very small and everyone knew each other, it was very different.
00:56:03.000Judge Smith was not sending Walter's kid to prison for the rest of his life because he was in possession.
00:56:08.000He's gonna be like, aren't you Billy- aren't you Walter's kid?
00:56:10.000What are you doing coming down here with this stuff?
00:56:13.000If I see your- I see your dad down at the pub, I'm gonna tell him what for.
00:56:16.000We're giving you probation or whatever.
00:56:18.000Today, the cop walks over and says, I don't know you, I don't care, tell the judge.
00:57:46.000Then they have grand juries, which is, okay, we're going to impanel regular people to see if they agree we should bring charges, and it's all broken.
00:57:56.000When people go to jail, they come out way worse.
00:57:59.000Jail is usually a university for criminals where they learn how to do more criminal activities and network with other people, and they come out of that place a lot worse than they came in, and they become more destructive towards society, and it's a cycle where they keep going in and out, in and out, and the system not only tortures them, not only deprives them, and especially with the January 6th people who were sent to jail, the inhumane situations that they're put in, cells that are flooded with sewage, denied basic medical attention, denied even proper food, getting beaten by guards.
00:58:36.000We're talking about a system that corrupts a human being and robs them of their life.
00:58:43.000And again, there are some really bad people out there, they deserve punishment, but a lot of times what they get in the prison system is not that.
00:58:51.000I think it's very unfortunate that when you talk about having better prison conditions for prisoners, a lot of people who are conservative be like, well, they shouldn't have done this, lock them up, throw away the key.
00:59:01.000God help you if whatever this prosecutor's name decides you should be throwing away the key.
00:59:07.000They're called the January 6th people.
00:59:10.000I don't like the idea of deserved punishment.
00:59:13.000I don't like a justice system that is actually just a punishment or retribution system.
00:59:18.000I look at people who do bad things and say, how can we make them not do a bad thing in the future and then welcome them back into the warm, loving bosom of society?
00:59:25.000But then you guys were just saying that you define people by the lowest moment, though.
00:59:46.000Some people are not worthy of redemption.
00:59:48.000And I think we can try, or we can say of people like Rosenbaum who committed atrocities, we say this guy should probably be locked up forever.
00:59:55.000Because look what happens when someone like that does get released.
00:59:58.000Well that's why if you asked me and other people, like, you know, people have thought about these issues, we send way too many people to prison, but we don't send violent criminals away long enough.
01:00:41.000I have no excuse as it was indefensible, contrite QAnon shaman Jacob Chansley is sentenced to 41 months in prison for his role in the Capitol riots.
01:00:49.00041 months, and I will tell you this, there's one reason why he got 41 months.
01:04:12.000So it's basically like asking prisoners to choose their own corrections officers.
01:04:16.000Are they going to pick corrections officers that are going to restrict their freedoms, or are they going to pick the COs that let them do whatever the heck you want?
01:04:21.000And that's exactly what you see with the Senate and the Supreme Court, where the Supreme Court gives them basically a blank check to do whatever they like.
01:04:27.000To be fair, the President, you know, nominates them, and then it has to go to the Senate for confirmation, so they don't just get to choose whoever they want, they have to agree and say, we'll accept Right, but they are giving the rubber stamp.
01:04:39.000They're not going to give the rubber stamp on someone, historically speaking, who's going to tell them you at Congress can't pass whatever laws you want.
01:04:46.000Yeah, but also we have way too many laws.
01:04:48.000We have way too much of a bureaucracy.
01:04:51.000According to Harvard University professor Harvey Silvergate, he estimates that on average the American each day commits three felonies a day.
01:05:51.000Is that, did that say your average person commits three felonies per day?
01:05:54.000Yeah, so that would mean that some people might do nine and then two other people might do zero.
01:06:02.000Lying on your resume is technically wire fraud because you commit fraud because you're trying to get money or a thing of value from an employer.
01:06:11.000You transmit it via interstate commerce via the internet.
01:06:28.000No, that's why lawyers are always, you know, paranoid because you realize that if they want to get you, like the way I describe it to people is if they want to get you, they will, but don't give them your head.
01:07:05.000Yeah, and if you're, if you were just some, like, maggorube who came out from Ohio because you believe in QAnon, you don't, you don't know, if you're not pushing forward, you're just, like, following the model.
01:07:35.000Well, you add three felonies a day with the constant surveillance that happens on the average American with almost everything being tracked, traced, and database with the FBI using their counter-terrorism division to investigate parents who go to PTA meetings.
01:07:51.000When you add all of that up, you have a recipe of disaster.
01:07:53.000You have essentially the KGB going after political dissidents who of course disagree with the current political structure and dare challenge the narrative that they're trying to invoke onto everyone.
01:08:04.000And look, conservatives are the law and order people.
01:08:07.000Like, I was always a... Like, you can go back.
01:09:24.000So why don't you give me the money that you have?
01:09:25.000Give me the money that you have right now, because I've got a knife on me, and I want to do the right thing, and you want to do the right thing, and we don't got to get things bad.
01:10:03.000So when he went up to me and tried shaking me down, but my attitude in Chicago has always been like, you know, maybe it's from being depressed in that city.
01:11:05.000Within an hour or so of the raid, the New York Times calls for comment
01:11:08.000on some of these journalists, meaning someone tipped off the New York Times.
01:11:12.000Information, electronic devices were seized from James O'Keefe.
01:11:16.000Privileged legal communications were then leaked to the New York Times.
01:11:19.000It is widely believed the FBI were leaking privileged communications to the New York Times.
01:11:24.000The New York Times stated that in those communications, James O'Keefe was discussing with his lawyer the extent to which they could undercover record federal law enforcement.
01:11:33.000On October 20th, I believe it was, an FBI whistleblower sent documents to the Republicans outlining how Merrick Garland was using counter-terror tactics against parents.
01:11:45.000The FBI must have found out, and this is my theory, my hypothesis, that they had a leaker within the Bureau, and that James O'Keefe, I believe they knew someone was communicating with him, but they didn't know what he was giving.
01:11:57.000So they said, we can't let him release this.
01:12:01.000So they raided him under false pretext, seized his communications, activists within the Bureau said, give it to the New York Times and destroy them.
01:12:35.000The fact that he didn't even have the diary.
01:12:37.000But they assumed he would because I guess that's what they would have done if they'd been in his position.
01:12:42.000This is not a conspiracy theory to me.
01:12:44.000This just sounds to me like what happened.
01:12:47.000So I don't know when the leak happened, so this is a correction.
01:12:50.000Fox News reports, an October 20th internal email from the FBI's Criminal and Counterterror Divisions released Tuesday by House Republicans instructed agents to apply the threat tag EduOfficials to all investigations and assessments of threats directed specifically at education officials.
01:13:21.000I think the FBI went after James O'Keefe because they were scared that O'Keefe had information on them.
01:13:25.000And I will stress, the New York Times said in the legal communications that Veritas was asking about the extent to which they could secretly record FBI agents.
01:13:55.000The FBI plainly like, I don't know if they admitted to it or what, but they were like forced causing that to happen.
01:14:00.000You have... Before social media, if this was 20 years ago, all of this would sound ridiculous and crazy.
01:14:08.000Well, now there's enough evidence in a paper trail that people are like, all right, this is plausible.
01:14:11.000Well, 20 years ago we had the FBI scandal with the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, which also put them in a very questionable situation.
01:14:20.000So when you look at the history of the FBI, Colonel Tell Probe, and all the other things that they have done, there's a long history of doing things that were absolutely illegal in the name of fighting the law.
01:14:33.000So this is nothing new what the FBI has been up to throughout their entire existence anyway.
01:14:38.000This is a scary and nightmarish reality, you know?
01:14:42.000It's like we were in the Matrix the whole time.
01:14:45.000You know, you're talking about how 20 years ago we went to figure this out, but the internet basically, for lack of a better term, red-pilled everybody.
01:14:58.000I feel like the humanity's been under the boot since the beginning, and then the Founding Fathers were like, yo, the war, they didn't actually, well, Washington fought, but That sacrifice to kind of get us out from under the boot.
01:15:10.000But at what point did they put the boot?
01:15:34.000The signers of the Declaration of Independence who sat down and could have just went, guys, it's a tax, it sucks, But I want to make sure my kids have food, so I'm not going to war.
01:15:45.000And I will throw it to Mel Gibson in one of the best movies ever, The Patriot, where he says... Is that the one where he is with the beaver?
01:16:25.000And then Mel Gibson, one of his kids, he's got a bunch of kids, runs to try and save the older brothers being arrested, and the British officer shoots and kills him.
01:16:33.000Mel Gibson then uses his American frontier war training and goes on like a one man, not a one man, he has like a
01:16:41.000group of militiamen and he goes and starts raiding the British.
01:16:44.000But anyway, I digress. That was an excellent scene.
01:16:47.000Where you see a guy who doesn't want to fight, he doesn't want to go to war,
01:16:51.000then I think back to the Founding Fathers and what really happened.
01:16:54.000They all said from young ages of like, what, 26 to like 50s or whatever,
01:16:58.000I will say to the king, I declare war on you.
01:17:15.000So these were guys who were like, I am so pissed off at them quartering in our homes, taking our belongings, Telling us we can't defend ourselves.
01:17:24.000That I am willing to say I will fight you and lose.
01:17:50.000And the other thing that they're not taught in a high school civics class is how what a huge percentage of the American population were loyalists.
01:17:57.000That's right. That they wanted nothing to do with this nonsense. We're loyal British subjects. Shut the f up
01:18:02.000George Washington. Leave us alone You're making we're not revolutionaries. This is crazy. So
01:18:07.000victory is never a function of persuading the majority They're always gonna follow the leaders
01:18:12.000So I've read I've tried to do a lot of I've done a decent amount of research not a historian probably people know
01:18:16.000better than Me on the percentages of so yeah, I've looked into it
01:18:20.000There's a famous misconception where, I think it was Ben Franklin, someone said, a third are loyalists, a third want independence, and a third want to be left alone.
01:20:17.000So all these Founding Fathers are sending letters to each other, and it takes a few weeks for the letter to arrive in Virginia and then to go back.
01:20:23.000So the communication around independence is taking years.
01:20:27.000They have their Continental Congress, they have their meetings, and they say, OK, we're going to send a letter to the king with our list of demands, because they sent demand letters first, several.
01:20:36.000How long did it take to get back to the king?
01:20:46.000And then a year goes by, and then I'm like, I'm thinking, I've talked about how funny it is, you know, he's like, Thomas Jefferson says, we hereby declare independence, haha!
01:20:55.000They fold it up, hand it to the guy, he gets on his horse, he rides to the boat.
01:20:58.000Everyone goes back to work, they go farm, and they forget all about it.
01:21:01.000And then a year later, a boat arrives and they're like, Look, big British vessels are coming and they're angry with
01:21:22.000The regulars show up, they're bombarding the coast and they're like, remember that night a year ago when we all got drunk and we're like, I think we should be independent.
01:21:50.000I'm just imagining the king, like, three months later gets the Declaration of Independence, and he's like, they've already been acting as an independent country for three months, you know?
01:21:59.000So then he's like, okay, I guess, you know, go quell the revolution.
01:22:02.000And then he's like, what a coincidence this would be dated the same day as Independence Day.
01:22:22.000I think it was like they mailed it out on the fourth or whatever or something like that.
01:22:27.000I don't know if that's true, but I remember reading that there was a quote from, like, John Adams, where it's like, July 2nd will be the day that America declared independence, and it's July 4th.
01:22:33.000So if we have the boot on the neck now, kind of riding the metaphor, is it like the global banking system?
01:22:38.000And we're like, we will use Bitcoin and all crypto, and that's our way of saying we don't respect your authority, King George?
01:22:48.000Yeah, I think people need to realize that as much as we can talk about the Founding Fathers saying, like, hurrah, and then taking up arms, we're not in that era anymore.
01:22:55.000You know, first of all, we're joking about the time gap between sending a message.
01:22:58.000Now you can literally be like, yo, we declare independence, MF, or ha-ha, and they'll get it instantly.
01:23:02.000Anything's triggered, it all happens, everything's ready to go.
01:23:08.000Fifth generational warfare is the most important point.
01:23:11.000The liberty-minded individuals, whatever you want to call this group, have been winning because we've been very persuasive and peaceful.
01:23:17.000When Black Lives Matter rioted, Black Lives Matter lost tons of support among the politically uninitiated.
01:23:23.000When we start winning hearts and minds and change the culture, that's how we actually win, and you don't win by freaking people out with violence.
01:23:35.000It empowered the federal government to create a national capital police force and torture people, and you get 80 million people going like, oh no, an insurrection, and these politically uninitiated buy into it.
01:23:46.000So I often tell people, there's this funny episode of Frasier I saw a long time ago.
01:23:49.000I don't watch Frazier, but it was when I was a kid, where something happens where Frazier
01:23:53.000is sitting down for coffee, he gets up, someone takes his seat, he gets angry and says, this
01:23:58.000is my seat, I was sitting here, and the guy says, shove off.
01:24:01.000Frazier, having a bad day, grabs him and throws him out of the seat.
01:24:52.000So when you look at what's going on with Antifa violence, we might be upset that the feds aren't charging these
01:25:00.000people, but rest assured, regular Americans saw all of that. And one by one, they
01:25:05.000started figuring out what was going on.
01:25:06.000Now, the media narrative was strong, and a lot of people didn't realize the truth about the Rittenhouse case, but now we're seeing the Young Turks, we're seeing Chris Hayes, we're seeing progressives.
01:25:28.000I'm not saying he said Reynolds is not guilty.
01:25:30.000I'm saying his attitude is now he's gonna get acquitted versus he's just, you know, like he's put, like, it's a lightening on the narrative.
01:26:25.000And it keeps piling on and piling on and piling on.
01:26:27.000But when you get to January 6th, that reinforces the narrative from the corporate press, from the cathedral and the establishment.
01:26:34.000So we need to make sure If we tell, if we are saying ten things, and we are all honest individuals trying our hardest, but we get one wrong, people will say, they made some bad predictions, but the stuff they said I found out to be true.
01:26:49.000They say ten things, and nine things are wrong, and people finally get fed up and say, this is BS, they're lying to me, and then they say, I come to you for a solution.
01:26:58.000So we were talking about how you would weight something, like a moral weight, whether someone does something bad.
01:27:05.000And I was going to say, one of the things that we should take into account is whether or not this is a pattern.
01:27:10.000And I would say that this is the same case with the media.
01:27:13.000If they're making a pattern of lying to us egregiously about everything all the time, then they decide maybe they might throw in a truth every now and then.
01:27:39.000A truck driver in New Jersey wins his election against the incumbent Democrat after only spending $153 because we're getting to the point where people will elect a ham sandwich over an establishment Democrat.
01:27:49.000This also happened with Dave Ball when he took out Eric Cantor, the House Majority Leader at the time that no one saw coming.
01:29:19.000We'll take a... I'm sure there's a lot of people who are eager to get questions in for you, but if you gotta bounce... There's a couple for me.
01:29:25.000I'll hit them real quick and then hit it and forget it.
01:30:45.000That was when I said he... That's my whole thing about he kind of sold you out.
01:30:49.000So I have a lot to say about this real sorry real quick the context is Dave Rubin started locals a subscription platform He recently sold it to rumble.
01:30:58.000I don't know the full details on what he got for it stock and rumble according to his announcement video so I I hate when people online are like, explain yourself or how you're friends with this person.
01:31:09.000I always usually block them or ignore them.
01:31:11.000It's different when someone is friends with me and I know them and so on and so forth.
01:31:15.000So because it's you guys and we're all friends, I've hung out with Lydia one-on-one, hung out with Tim one-on-one.
01:31:20.000Luke and I are basically cousins because of our views and our backgrounds.
01:31:23.000And Ian, you and I have never hung out one-on-one.
01:31:24.000We've had pretty intense conversations.
01:31:26.000So I'm perfectly receptive to something like that happening.
01:31:30.000Here's the story with why I'm at Locals, why I'm happy to be at Locals.
01:31:33.000I was on Patreon, and I was unhappy with Patreon for a couple of reasons.
01:31:37.000One is, the bonus thing I had was like a Facebook Michael Malice group, but then I'm at the risk of getting zucked at any minute, right?
01:32:47.000Fine, but the point is, there's no upside for me being on Patreon, and these are some very specific upsides that I could have for being on local.
01:33:31.000They had their access to online financial services terminated from a couple companies.
01:33:36.000And people pointed out, I'll say in my opinion, because I want to be careful on legal issue, following the exodus from Patreon, all of a sudden these rival companies started losing their access to online financial services and it was very Very obvious what was going on.
01:33:53.000I think it is great that a rival service emerges, like locals.
01:33:57.000But my belief is that if we are to succeed in terms of freedom, liberty into the future, we must empower individuals to have access to this technology at their own fingertips.
01:34:08.000Immediately, my response was, I'm gonna start a non-profit that creates a decentralized, open-source Patreon that anyone can have for free to install on their own server or a server where they pay for it.
01:34:20.000So instead of going to someone else, instead of giving away a percentage of their income and being beholden to someone else's political whims, they can say, it's my server.
01:34:28.000I upload, I press enter on the software, instantly networked with all of the other sites that
01:34:34.000use this, have their own privately controlled subscription service, and give money, percentages,
01:34:50.000And what Dave Rubin's solution was is, and it's also equally valid, was, I'm going to create a service to offer up to people a safer position with their subscription platform, and for this I will get a premium.
01:35:03.000The reason I disagree with that and don't like it is that Dave Rubin then has the ability to sell those promises to someone else off of the names he's collected, and he has.
01:35:13.000Rumble, I also think is fantastic, and we use Rumble fans.
01:35:22.000So what it says to me is that we had this great crisis moment, and instead of solving the problem, individuals of merit said, we will just recreate the same problem and profit off of it.
01:35:32.000That's fine, because I believe in free market and all that stuff.
01:35:35.000But I actually think the solution to this will be to create a perpetual, open-source, community-based, free networking software to give to everybody.
01:35:41.000I agree that that is the solution, but I'm also saying that if there is a problem, and there's something that mitigates the worst aspects of the problem, that is clearly a concrete improvement.
01:35:51.000I'm actually all about people creating proprietary tech and selling it.
01:35:54.000But the reason I went after Dave so hard is because he's very vocal about big tech and the problems and kind of beating big tech.
01:36:00.000And what he did, whether he realizes or not, is he built big tech.
01:36:04.000He built proprietary social networking and sold it to another proprietary social network, which can now sell to Microsoft for $6 billion and own it all.
01:36:12.000So look, I think that we need competition.
01:36:16.000I think that Silicon Valley's monopoly is horrifying.
01:36:19.000I think that Rumble buying locals is massively beneficial towards freedom liberty because it creates competition and then puts these other companies on notice.
01:36:28.000Rivals are emerging, they're powerful, and they're taking away large portions of your market share.
01:37:00.000I think it's still a net positive across the board.
01:37:03.000But it's just for me, my personal worldview is we should be working towards decentralized solutions.
01:37:09.000That being said, it's a net positive what Locals is doing, what Rumble is doing.
01:37:13.000And I think nothing is stopping us from doing what we're doing.
01:37:16.000So in the end, everyone's just doing well.
01:37:18.000And I'm just gonna say one more thing.
01:37:19.000You know, you said he had sold me out.
01:37:21.000That site's giving me peace of mind, because people contribute five bucks a month, and I don't have to worry about being homeless, and I don't have to worry about being cancelled, because if my Twitter goes away, if my YouTube goes away, I know I can make rent.
01:37:31.000And that is really a big deal for someone who's unemployable and doesn't have a job, that I can sleep at night not worried about, am I gonna wake up tomorrow, is my life gonna be ruined?
01:37:40.000My question for you is why didn't you just spend the three hours to install WordPress with the free membership plugin?
01:38:23.000And then, how much does the, you can get like a membership plugin for a couple hundred bucks.
01:38:28.000And then the website is basically done and people can do the exact same thing and you never pay a cent of percentage to anyone else ever again.
01:38:35.000Because this is the first I'm hearing of this because I'm a fucking boomer.
01:38:40.000My issue is I feel like people got worried they were gonna have their lives destroyed by Patreon and along comes the person saying give me 10% of all of your money and I'll make it all go away when he could have said Why are you yelling?
01:38:53.000Because I I am I am not not not not yelling at you You're not yelling me
01:38:57.000But yeah Because I tell people this all the time you give me one day
01:39:01.000and I will give you your own subscribe your own patreon your
01:39:03.000Own subscription platform and you will never have to give away your revenue to anyone else
01:39:07.000But they go around and collect those who are scared. They say I see a crisis people are scared. Their livelihoods
01:39:14.000will be destroyed Lauren Southern, Carl Benjamin.
01:39:16.000It is time for me to go to them and assuage their fears by telling them if you give me 10% of all the revenue you make in perpetuity, and it is in perpetuity, then I will make that go away.
01:39:26.000And when they called me and asked me that, I said, I've run tech companies before.
01:40:03.000I believe that convincing someone to hand over a portion, 10% of their business And it only cost me a couple hundred bucks to operate their infrastructure is wrong.
01:40:15.000It is free enterprise, and I can respect entrepreneurial behavior, and if people make those choices, it is individual choice.
01:40:21.000I feel like I am actively combating things like that, trying to convince the good people, like Michael Malice, we can make you powerful, and we can make sure that money stays in your pocket, because I don't want your money.
01:40:31.000I don't want to be in charge of you, I don't want control over your revenue, I want to help you, I want you to be bigger, and I want you to have all the money in the world that you earn.
01:40:50.000Now Dave Rubin made you those promises, but he doesn't have control over whether or not you get banned.
01:40:54.000And I assure you, Locals will ban certain people who sign up, and we all know it.
01:40:59.000So, what effectively happens is, you have built up your subscriber base on someone else's platform, once again, just like Patreon, and if you leave, it will be very difficult for you to inform all of those fans where to go.
01:41:10.000They're getting a cut of your money, and it is a massive amount.
01:41:14.000I know the costs, I know the expenses.
01:41:17.000We host members-only content, and it is expensive because we have a lot of members.
01:41:21.000But if you were to host everything you were doing on your own website with your own couple hundred bucks members plugin, you would be paying 99% less than you'd be paying now.
01:41:37.000And if you're on the right and you're a libertarian ANCAP type, you probably are fine with it.
01:41:42.000That's where I differ and I believe I would rather decentralize and give away the tech and the power for you.
01:41:47.000Well, the tech has been out there for over 10 years, so I had my own website.
01:41:50.000I called it Members Lounge, Subscribers Lounge.
01:41:53.000I call it lukeuncensored.com right now.
01:41:55.000It's been around for a very long time, and instead of giving 10%, instead of giving your audience, because also people who follow you are going to go on that website, and they're going to stay, and they're going to sign up to other people's, you know, different kind of locals and groups.
01:42:09.000You could keep your own in-house group directly to you.
01:42:14.000You keep a larger portion of your audience and what you pay for is payment processing and hosting, which if you do it intelligently is 1-2% compared to 10%.
01:42:25.000And real quick, Odyssey has... Oh, I gotta link my stuff to there, I keep forgetting.
01:42:30.000But I believe they have... Because, look, there's video hosting services that are decentralized, torrent-based, and the costs for them are minuscule.
01:42:39.000And you can get a membership... You can get member-locked videos on some of these platforms.
01:42:44.000I'm not sure if Odyssey does it open to the public, but I believe it's a business thing they do.
01:42:48.000And it's... We'll call it effectively free.
01:44:06.000And then Dave Rubin starts a business and with all the good intentions, again I think it's a net positive, and it's the same narrative.
01:44:12.000And now he's got you, your members are locked on his platform, and he sold it.
01:44:17.000The promises he made to you no longer matter, because you don't know who's in control of the investments into Rumble.
01:44:22.000Which means tomorrow night you could be banned and you could lose everything.
01:44:25.000More importantly, 10% of your revenue, or whatever percentage they take, is substantially higher than if you just took a day to do it yourself, and that's what Ian and I are dead set on.
01:44:34.000Ian's been running the An Foundation stuff much more than I have, but there is a team of people doing this for free.
01:44:39.000People who used to work for big software development firms who are excited to produce a decentralized, networked software.
01:44:46.000So when you install this on your server, all of a sudden you're connected to all of the websites like a big social media platform.
01:44:52.000No one can access your data because it's on your server.
01:44:55.000No one can ban you because it's your server.
01:44:57.000No one can take a cut of your revenue because it's going to your financial accounts.
01:45:09.000Then we're going to be able to start paying developers and kick this into overdrive and make a metaverse that is free software so that you can watch the algorithms and see what they're doing.
01:45:17.000And it's not going to be spying on you, the technology, and it's going to be awesome.
01:45:23.000I don't want one red cent from any of you.
01:45:25.000I want people to have the right to free speech, to be safe in their careers, and things they build.
01:45:31.000And after you build up your site, and through your hard work and dedication and merit, you end up with 100,000 paying members, zero will ever go to any of us who built it.
01:45:43.000Now, if you're an ANCAP, you're a capitalist, you know, whatever, and you believe that if you create it, you deserve a cut, I do not disagree with you.
01:46:02.000And it was Lauren that I got hit first, and I guess what we're trying to say here in the short, concise way is decentralize and build your infrastructure.
01:46:55.000And so what happens then when a financial service goes to a subscription service and says, if you don't ban this one person, we will shut down your network.
01:47:05.000They go, oh no, oh heavens, what do we do?
01:47:10.000They go to the one person they don't like, and they suspend his service, and he opens a new account with a merchant account from another bank.
01:47:17.000And it's whack-a-mole, but they can't ban anyone else, and they can't put the network at harm because it's decentralized.
01:47:44.000No, I'm not saying I got beef with Peter Thiel.
01:47:46.000He's actually done some things I agree with, but that being said, it's the same people who are owning the same projects and who have the same control, and now that control's been relinquished back to Silicon Valley.
01:47:54.000So, all it's done is tricked you, in my opinion, into staying within their ecosystem, but giving you a false sense of security.
01:48:02.000Now that the rights have been transferred over, they've, you know, you build your platform up on YouTube.
01:48:08.000They could ban us at any moment, and all those years of hard work has been just annihilated, so we're very, that's why I'm like, we gotta do our own TimCast.com, become a member, because that's where we persist in the event they try to shut us down.
01:48:18.000When we start demoing, we could try it out.
01:50:20.000This is because the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal, I believe Circuit Court of Appeals, the appellate court, said, unconstitutional, for now, we're putting a stay.
01:50:28.000But they say they will move forward with it as soon as the litigation passes through, and they said they think they'll win.
01:53:39.000The feeling of sadness and depression and anger was one of the greatest feelings I ever had because that was all of the happiness and joy that my dog had brought to me just bursting from me at that one moment randomly and I was crying because I was remembering the love and the happiness.
01:53:58.000I was crying because it was gone but it was a memory of the good and all of those great things and I would never give up any of it.
01:54:06.000So in those moments when I would cry, remembering that my dog had passed, I would know, as I'm crying, that it was actually tears of happiness for the gift I had been given.
01:54:18.000We all hung out on Saturday, and I told you, on Sunday, one of the great honors of my life, I went out with my friend Matt to different kennels to help him pick out a dog, and we picked out a beautiful girl, and she's very smart, she figured out how to open the garbage, she figured out twice how to get out of the kennel.
01:54:33.000And she just goes into her crate by herself.
01:54:38.000I always had dogs my entire life and my family always had dogs their entire life and there's incredible stories of dogs protecting them.
01:54:46.000There's dogs that saved my grandmother's life and I wouldn't be here if it wasn't for the relationship that my family and my lineage had with dogs.
01:54:54.000So there's I have crazy insane stories with with just yeah, there's something else to them.
01:55:00.000Shout out to Lily the cutest Frenchie on earth.
01:55:46.000Because the way I crafted the question.
01:55:48.000But it was basically a question about the sex-positive feminist view of sex work, and there's a really, really good question that I thought needed to be... I was... It was a shower thought.
01:55:57.000I was just like, you know, not a literal shower thought.
01:56:00.000But I was just like, they said, you know, sex work is work.
01:58:15.000That doesn't mean we throw away all of the good things they fought for.
01:58:18.000It means we denounce the evils of slavery and we criticize, to an extreme degree, the horrors that were perpetrated by founding fathers who were slave owners, which is almost
01:59:38.000In the member segment, because it's all not family-friendly, but the Ryan Long segment comedian, you guys probably know him, was hilarious.
01:59:46.000The way he talks to people on the street and asks them the same question is just... Well, let's read some more.
02:01:19.000Good is the visible light spectrum which warms our skin and we enjoy, and evil is the ionizing radiation which destroys our DNA and kills us.
02:02:26.000When you are not allowing someone to make their own mistakes, and you're saying, I'm going to make the choices for you, and those choices are genuinely good, you are committing some act of evil because this person is not having a sense of self.
02:03:05.000Nerdius Maximus says, how can Kyle be tried as an adult on murder when the foundation of the state's case was no self-defense because he illegally had the gun as a minor?
02:03:13.000That wasn't the premise of their case.
02:03:15.000The state wasn't arguing that it wasn't self-defense because of the gun.
02:03:23.000Yeah, I think it was a mistake a lot of people made when they were like, the left was saying it.
02:03:28.000And I said it early on, too, and was corrected, that he's in the commission of, he's in the act of committing a crime, therefore he can't be in self-defense because he's committing a crime, and people were quickly like, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, that's not true, that's not true.
02:03:40.000So, it turns out anyway, the gun charge was dismissed.
02:03:43.000He was legally allowed to possess it, so it's moot anyway.
02:03:45.000If there's a mistrial now, with or without prejudice, can they reintroduce the gun charge or is that completely unadmissible evermore?
02:04:39.000Kyle Patey says, please ask the lawyer about the prosecutor advising the investigator to use Marcy's law as an excuse to not fulfill the warrant to obtain Bicep Man's phone.
02:05:30.000The judge would not sustain this, and it was wrong.
02:05:34.000What they said was the defense cannot call the Zeminskis, the guy who fired the gun in the air, because he has a right to remain silent and doesn't want to implicate himself.
02:05:44.000But the state controls whether you have a Fifth Amendment right or not, because they can offer immunity, which means the state could have called the Zeminskis, Given him immunity, and then gotten evidence against Rittenhouse.
02:05:57.000But they didn't, likely because their narrative was not true.
02:06:00.000The judge should have said, you can't claim they have a Fifth Amendment right, because you can take it away with immunity.
02:06:07.000If the state comes to you and says, you're testifying, and you say, I plead the Fifth, they say, you've been subpoenaed and you have immunity, you have no choice.
02:07:23.000He figured it out because that was what was required.
02:07:26.000He was only promoted in the French and Indian War because his CEO fell off his horse and died.
02:07:30.000The Founding Fathers were all just humans who rose to the occasion.
02:07:33.000Dude, I watched this great documentary about the Congress and building up to the war and everything, and Washington would go in every day to Congress.
02:07:41.000Every day he went in in his military uniform.
02:07:44.000Before war had ever been discussed, just letting everyone know without saying a word, I'm ready.
02:07:58.000And then the Congress voted, they were like, we got to pick somebody to lead this thing, and they picked him.
02:08:02.000And because he was a statesman, he didn't become a Napoleon.
02:08:05.000I think a big part of those because he understood law, and maybe because he was friends with the other fathers, but I think it was more that he just understood judiciousness and law, like Napoleon was just a military guy.
02:08:14.000And he also wanted very clearly have the precedent, the precedent is very different from a king.
02:08:18.000Because they didn't know what to call him, His Excellency, Your Majesty, he goes, no, no, Mr. President is what they settled on.
02:08:24.000All right, Matthew Fumey says, actually, the Pennsylvania senator spent near $8,000 on his campaign.
02:08:30.000The $153 was what was spent during his primary, which he ran unopposed.
02:08:34.000He was on Crowder today and talked about this.
02:08:37.000The guy we're talking about is in New Jersey.
02:10:39.000Alright everybody, here's what we're gonna do.
02:10:41.000We're gonna have a members segment coming up where we talk about naughty things, and it's gonna be really, really funny, so I hope you're ready.
02:10:46.000Go to TimCast.com, become a member, it should be up around 11 or so.
02:10:49.000You can, uh, don't forget to subscribe to this channel, smash the like button, share the URL of this video wherever you can, because that's how we fight the censorship, it really does help the show.
02:10:58.000And follow us at TimCastIRL, basically everywhere, you can follow me personally, at TimCast.
02:11:04.000Michael, you want to shout anything out?
02:11:05.000Sure, you can follow me on Twitter at MichaelMalice.
02:11:08.000I got Robert Barnes discussing the Rittenhouse case on YouTube.com slash MichaelMaliceOfficial and of course SheathUnderwear.com, promo code Malice.
02:11:15.000I think you also have a book, isn't that the case?
02:11:17.000The Anarchist Audiobook, which Tim read a chapter of.
02:11:45.000In yesterday's video, you could see me translating German, and if you're interested in that, you will go to youtube.com forward slash WeAreChange.