Timcast IRL - Tim Pool - May 16, 2023


Timcast IRL - Durham Report CONFIRMS Soft Coup Against Trump, Dem Media PANICS w-Natalie Winters


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 59 minutes

Words per Minute

206.58853

Word Count

24,677

Sentence Count

1,754

Misogynist Sentences

27

Hate Speech Sentences

26


Summary

On this week's show, Alex Blumberg talks about the new report from the Justice Department s investigation into the Trump administration, and what it means for the future of the country. Plus, the latest in the Bud Light vs. Bud Light debate, and more!


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Last night, the Durham report was released and it basically confirms what most of us
00:00:25.000 knew, that there was a soft coup staged against the Trump administration, first to stop him
00:00:31.000 from winning, then to stop him from actually being president.
00:00:34.000 This wasn't three days of chaos, it was three years intended to disrupt the presidential administration in this country.
00:00:42.000 It was so damning, this report, that even CNN came out and Jake Tapper's like, It essentially, it almost exonerates Trump!
00:00:51.000 Like almost, like it literally does.
00:00:53.000 The report says that there was no evidence, no corroboration, and the FBI was pursuing this anyway.
00:00:59.000 This is, in my opinion, criminal.
00:01:02.000 Now, of course, the argument from the FBI is there's no evidence of anything criminal, but I think that's letting them off the hook lightly because it's all about criminal interpretation, so I definitely want to get into greater detail as we go into the Durham Report's findings, but I do want to point out even CNN saying like, This looks bad.
00:01:18.000 And that's bad because CNN doesn't want to do it.
00:01:20.000 Here's a funny thing, though.
00:01:21.000 Newsmax is now beating CNN in the ratings.
00:01:23.000 So, yeah.
00:01:25.000 Sorry, CNN.
00:01:25.000 You're out.
00:01:26.000 We got more news, however.
00:01:28.000 Bud Light is going to be changing their cans.
00:01:30.000 They're freaking out.
00:01:31.000 Their sales are getting worse.
00:01:32.000 Down 27.7%.
00:01:35.000 So, a lot of good news.
00:01:36.000 A lot of good news.
00:01:37.000 A lot of crazy news.
00:01:38.000 And I want to talk about Patriot Front because Joe Rogan, on his show was basically like, those guys are feds, no
00:01:44.000 question.
00:01:45.000 And my favorite point someone made was that, you know, Patriot Front is feds because not a single person in the
00:01:50.000 group is obese.
00:01:51.000 And they're like, everybody knows that when you see a bunch of like,
00:01:54.000 right wing Patriot dudes with guns and armor, they're overweight.
00:01:58.000 And so, right, yeah, Seamus, he can't help himself.
00:02:00.000 That's actually really funny.
00:02:01.000 But it's a fair point.
00:02:02.000 These guys are all fit.
00:02:04.000 They're wearing khakis and boots.
00:02:06.000 So we'll get into all that.
00:02:07.000 But before we do, my friends, head over to castbrew.com.
00:02:10.000 And I have news.
00:02:12.000 This show is sponsored by us, our own coffee brand, and we have now in stock only a few hundred bags of Rise with Roberto Jr.
00:02:21.000 In fact, I think it may only be about 100 bags of Rise with Roberto Jr.
00:02:26.000 We are trying as hard as possible to get this back in stock to the point where we can keep up with the demand.
00:02:33.000 But I know you will love our Rooster Roberto Jr.
00:02:36.000 You've bought this coffee out.
00:02:36.000 so much.
00:02:38.000 We oversold.
00:02:39.000 We put in a new order to roast some more.
00:02:41.000 It sold immediately.
00:02:42.000 We have like 100 bags left.
00:02:44.000 So get it while you can.
00:02:45.000 With every bag of Rise with Roberto Jr., With every purchase, you get a picture of Roberto Junior on the back.
00:02:51.000 And we're actually going to be launching collector's editions with unique pictures of Roberto Junior that you can collect.
00:02:57.000 So that'll be coming soon.
00:02:58.000 The simple version of the real ad is we're launching our own companies.
00:03:03.000 Because we want to stand up for American values that we believe in, that you believe in.
00:03:06.000 We want to make companies that won't back down.
00:03:08.000 We want to sponsor ourselves.
00:03:09.000 We want to build the parallel economy, and this is phase one.
00:03:12.000 The purpose of Cast Brew Coffee is that we can set up coffee shops all over this country to create cultural hubs where people can have a cup of coffee.
00:03:19.000 They'll see a TV screen on the wall, and what's on that TV screen?
00:03:22.000 It's going to be Tim Cast IRL.
00:03:22.000 It's going to be Crowder.
00:03:24.000 It's going to be Viva and Barnes.
00:03:25.000 It's going to be people that you know and trust, instead of CNN and MSNBC and other garbage, and even Fox News.
00:03:31.000 Then when some random person walks in that coffee shop, saying, I just want a cup of coffee, up on the TV, they're going to be hearing Steven Crowder.
00:03:36.000 They're going to be hearing us.
00:03:38.000 That's how we build cultural hubs throughout these cities.
00:03:40.000 So, go to casparu.com, support us if you'd like, but you could also go to timcast.com.
00:03:46.000 Click join us in the menu bar.
00:03:47.000 Become a member to support us directly if you like the work we do.
00:03:50.000 And if you sign up at the $10 level for six months or the $25 level, you will instantly get access to submitting questions to call into the uncensored members-only show that goes up Monday through Thursday at 10, 10 p.m.
00:04:03.000 We will have one of those up for you tonight.
00:04:05.000 So sign up today if you'd like to submit some questions.
00:04:08.000 Smash the like button.
00:04:09.000 Subscribe to this channel on YouTube.
00:04:10.000 Share the show if you like it.
00:04:11.000 Joining us tonight to talk about this and so much more is Natalie Winters.
00:04:15.000 Hi, thank you so much for having me.
00:04:17.000 I'm so excited to be here with you guys.
00:04:19.000 Thanks for being here.
00:04:20.000 Who are you?
00:04:20.000 What do you do?
00:04:21.000 So I am the co-host and executive editor of Steve Bannon's War Room.
00:04:25.000 Used to be and still sort of am an investigative reporter primarily focusing on Chinese Communist Party.
00:04:31.000 Infiltration, which of course dovetails with the origins of COVID, did a lot of reporting on Hunter Biden's hard drive.
00:04:37.000 I like to kind of footnote a lot of the statements that people make about really the amazing extent to which the Chinese Communist Party curries influence and favor in the United States.
00:04:48.000 Well, thanks for joining us.
00:04:48.000 Right on.
00:04:49.000 It should be fun.
00:04:50.000 Thank you.
00:04:50.000 We got Seamus.
00:04:51.000 Got Seamus over here.
00:04:52.000 My name's Seamus Coghlan.
00:04:53.000 Who's laughing throughout the whole intro.
00:04:54.000 I'm sorry, dude.
00:04:55.000 That's hysterical.
00:04:56.000 That's such a good point.
00:04:57.000 That's such a good point.
00:04:58.000 But I have a YouTube channel called Freedom Tunes where we upload cartoons.
00:05:01.000 We're going to have one on Thursday that I think you all are going to enjoy a whole lot.
00:05:05.000 And if you want, you can become a member at freedomtunes.com to support my work.
00:05:10.000 Pretty based.
00:05:11.000 Cool.
00:05:12.000 And I'm Hannah-Claire Brimlow.
00:05:13.000 I'm a writer for timcast.com.
00:05:15.000 And I am back today.
00:05:17.000 Kellen has stopped bullying me, so I'm on the air.
00:05:19.000 I also have some news.
00:05:21.000 I see that someone super chatted saying they want official Tim Pool beanies.
00:05:25.000 We actually do now have a large supply of official Timcast beanies.
00:05:30.000 However, we decided we're not going to be selling them.
00:05:32.000 We're only going to be giving them out to select members on a certain case-by-case basis.
00:05:40.000 We're going, right now, I think we'll be sending all of our elite members these unique Tim Castabini's that we have.
00:05:46.000 It says TimCast on it and it's got a picture of a little gorilla wearing headphones.
00:05:50.000 And the reason is, I don't know if we're equipped to do actual large-scale merchandising just yet, so for the time being, we do have them, and we want to send them to members, starting with elite members, and then probably, uh, somehow, just basically sending these people as a thank you, and then try and figure out how we can make them special, limited edition, because we only have, I think, like 200 or something like that.
00:06:14.000 That's why it's like we can't just sell them, because they'll be gone instantly, and we want to make them special so that you can only get them in certain ways, so, Take a look, look out for that if you're in the elite, if you're an elite member.
00:06:24.000 But let's jump into this first story.
00:06:25.000 We have this from humanevents.com.
00:06:28.000 Durham report reveals FBI Democrats staged soft coup of Trump administration by Libby Emmons.
00:06:35.000 And I would like to stress, I believe this is NewsGuard certified human events.
00:06:39.000 That means it is true facts information.
00:06:42.000 The Durham report begun in May 2019.
00:06:45.000 was intended to investigate allegations that President Trump had engaged in collusion
00:06:48.000 collusion with Russia to alter the 2016 presidential election.
00:06:52.000 What it what it found instead was an effort to undermine Trump's presidency,
00:06:55.000 the confidence of the American people in his administration, and to fuel media and Democrat
00:06:59.000 resentment and hatred for the man they would sooner have shot on Fifth Avenue than seen
00:07:03.000 take the White House. That's some pretty good writing, Libby.
00:07:06.000 They say, quote, Our investigators determined that the crossfire hurricane
00:07:09.000 investigators did not and could not corroborate any of the substantive allegations contained in
00:07:15.000 the Steele reporting, not not was Steele able to nor was Steele able to produce corroboration
00:07:21.000 for any of the reported allegations, even after being offered one million dollars or more by the
00:07:26.000 FBI for such corroboration.
00:07:28.000 The report reads later.
00:07:29.000 It goes further to say that the information was known to be rumor and speculation.
00:07:34.000 Democrats planted fake evidence and then used it against Trump in order to justify their assumptions about his guilt.
00:07:40.000 The FBI used that for probable cause to further an investigation without any basis at all.
00:07:46.000 Within days of their receipt, the report reads, the unvetted and unverified Steele reports were used to support probable cause in the FBI's FISA applications targeting Page, a U.S.
00:07:55.000 citizen who, for a period of time, had been an advisor to Trump.
00:07:58.000 As discussed later in the report, this was done at a time when the FBI knew that the same information Steele had provided to the FBI had also been fed to the media and others in Washington D.C.
00:08:08.000 I'd like to give you a simplified version so you can understand what's going on.
00:08:12.000 The FBI says no criminal culpability for a lot of these people.
00:08:15.000 I think they're saying like, you know, Hillary Clinton, nothing was overtly criminal.
00:08:20.000 Here's how I see it.
00:08:21.000 Imagine one day a guy is walking past a bank carrying a burlap sack and he walks up to the bank steps, drops the bag and walks away.
00:08:30.000 Did he commit a crime?
00:08:32.000 He just threw a burlap sack on the stairs of a bank.
00:08:32.000 Of course not!
00:08:36.000 Another guy walking into the bank to cash a paycheck sees the burlap sack and says, oh, somebody must have accidentally left it outside.
00:08:42.000 Picks it up, carries it inside, throws it on the ground in front of the counter, cashes the check and leaves.
00:08:47.000 Another guy crumples up a note walking past the bank and throws it through an open window.
00:08:51.000 You get where I'm going with this.
00:08:53.000 One by one, each of these individuals did a small thing.
00:08:56.000 No single person walked into that bank, demanded money, filled a bag full of cash, and fled.
00:09:02.000 But each of these individuals did one thing that, if you were to analyze in and of itself, was not criminal.
00:09:09.000 But altogether, After all this goes down, the bank teller did fill the burlap sack with money, and then somebody did carry it outside, then someone else put it in the back of a truck, then someone else drove that truck away, and when the FBI comes and interviews all of these individuals, they'll say, look, I don't know any of these guys.
00:09:26.000 This was just in the public, and I stumbled upon it, and the money was taken from the bank and driven to a secret hideout.
00:09:32.000 What happened with the Trump-Russia collusion was that Democrats who wanted Trump destroyed, members of the media who wanted Trump destroyed, all claimed they used publicly available information to destroy Donald Trump's presidency, from the FBI claiming it was in the media so we had to look into it.
00:09:52.000 But the story in the media came from speculation from people in the FBI.
00:09:55.000 It was one big circular scheme.
00:09:57.000 And I think the only reason Durham's saying it's not criminal is because he's going easy on these people.
00:10:02.000 Criminal indictments are interpretable.
00:10:04.000 And I think anybody looking at what these people did could say, if Adam Schiff goes on TV, and he did, and says he has more than circumstantial evidence proving this, Then there should be some kind of criminal referral.
00:10:18.000 And we should not sit back and allow all of these people to destroy a presidency.
00:10:23.000 Because I'll tell you where we're at right now.
00:10:25.000 If nothing comes of this, if the extent of the Durham Report is, yes, they all did something bad, but it wasn't criminal, then there's no country anymore.
00:10:33.000 Because what's to stop any political party from doing the exact same thing to make sure no other person can have a presidential administration again?
00:10:39.000 Yeah, exactly.
00:10:40.000 So if nobody here broke the law, that is an indictment of our laws as they currently stand.
00:10:46.000 So just to go over some of the points that were made in the Durham report.
00:10:51.000 Significant reliance on investigating leads that were funded by Trump's opposition occurred.
00:10:58.000 They did not and could not corroborate any of the substantive allegations made by the Steele report.
00:11:03.000 The investigation was not properly opened.
00:11:05.000 Information was not properly vetted.
00:11:07.000 It was carried out in an improper manner.
00:11:10.000 FBI officials So people can say, well, in the Durham report, there isn't any statement explicitly saying that there was an attempt at a deep state coup.
00:11:15.000 do their basic due diligence and the FBI warned the Clinton campaign of potential Russian
00:11:20.000 interference during the 2016 election, but did not warn the Trump campaign.
00:11:25.000 So people can say, well, in the Durham report, there isn't any statement explicitly saying
00:11:30.000 that there was an attempt at a deep state coup.
00:11:33.000 He's just saying that basically everyone who handled this investigation was behaving improperly
00:11:37.000 because of their bias against a sitting president.
00:11:39.000 Well, that's just a distinction without a difference.
00:11:42.000 I don't care if they all met in a cigar room and rubbed their hands together and laughed about the fact that they were trying to subvert the U.S.' 's democracy and the fact that we had a democratic election and people chose an outsider.
00:11:51.000 The fact is, what they were doing is functionally identical.
00:11:54.000 They were trying to use bad evidence to attempt to remove somebody from office who hadn't committed a crime.
00:11:58.000 I think to me, the most startling aspect of this whole story is that the Durham report with this Russia hoax that really was just the opening salvo of the deep states attempt to really nullify the Trump presidency.
00:12:10.000 So I think it's interesting if you sort of analyze the Trump term through this paradigm, what I mean by that the first impeachment attempt, the second impeachment attempt, the fact That the people who were running, you know, PPO, the presidential personnel office, the equivalent of HR in the White House, were a bunch of Bush Romney types, were very establishment Republicans.
00:12:29.000 So while it's important to focus on the Russia hoax angle of it, I think it also shows you the extent to which they were willing to go to.
00:12:38.000 To thwart the Trump presidency before he even became president, right, while he was still a candidate.
00:12:44.000 So you can only imagine how much they ratcheted up those efforts to go after Trump once he actually assumed office and assumed all the leverage, the powers that comes with being president.
00:12:55.000 So I think it's just it's such an interesting kind of paradigm to view all of the ways that the deep state Really did go after Trump.
00:13:04.000 I mean, I think he's facing so many different types of lawsuits and investigations.
00:13:09.000 It's hard to count them all.
00:13:10.000 What's a seditious conspiracy?
00:13:12.000 Seamus, do you know?
00:13:13.000 Well, I would say just based on the words, it's people conspiring to oppose legitimately elected authorities.
00:13:20.000 So if, like, I don't know, a group of people had a plan to, say, like, disrupt a presidential administration, something like that, I mean, over the period of three years before his election, is that seditious?
00:13:33.000 I'm not gonna mince words here.
00:13:35.000 They convicted Proud Boys of seditious conspiracy.
00:13:38.000 Why?
00:13:39.000 Because they were at a protest riot on January 6th.
00:13:43.000 That's it.
00:13:44.000 A one-day thing.
00:13:45.000 The left has done the same thing, except instead of laundering their talking points through groups like the right does, say the Proud Boys or Patriot Run, all these different federally incited groups, They just do.
00:13:57.000 And I think sort of more highbrow, more high class through NGOs.
00:14:01.000 This was three years of the FBI and Democrats and the media all working together to stop a presidential administration.
00:14:13.000 That is the biggest conspiracy this country has ever seen.
00:14:18.000 And the only thing The only, there's only one thing that they're claiming make, that makes it not a conspiracy is it was all an accident.
00:14:26.000 That's right.
00:14:27.000 Every lie from Schiff, every lie from the media, every action taken by the FBI, all coming together to create a massive Russia collusion investigation with Pulitzer Prizes.
00:14:38.000 Whoops!
00:14:40.000 All of the reporters, all of the Democrats, and all of the Feds slipped on a banana peel at the exact same time, did a backflip, landed perfectly, and won awards for it.
00:14:47.000 And it was just one big accident.
00:14:49.000 And are the awards going to be withdrawn?
00:14:51.000 I mean, this is what bothers me the most.
00:14:52.000 I know it's important to confirm to Revelations that the Durham Report produces, but...
00:14:57.000 Nothing's going to happen, right?
00:14:59.000 The Proud Boys are going to have to go back to court to argue that the text messages where they're saying, where should we meet up on January 6th, prove that they didn't have a plan for that day.
00:15:08.000 Meanwhile, no one involved in this is going to face conspiracy charges.
00:15:12.000 And I hate to turn this into grim cast, but it really is incredibly frustrating and disheartening.
00:15:17.000 There is no punishment for what happened.
00:15:19.000 There can be.
00:15:20.000 When Trump gets reelected, I expect him to have an AG Start issuing these indictments.
00:15:27.000 Start convening grand juries.
00:15:30.000 Grand juries, they say, can indict a ham sandwich.
00:15:33.000 Bring it on.
00:15:34.000 Present the evidence and say, did these people conspire?
00:15:38.000 You know what?
00:15:39.000 Tit for tat.
00:15:39.000 I'll tell you this.
00:15:40.000 Let's play tit for tat.
00:15:41.000 If you're going to accuse Donald Trump of working for the Soviet Union, then we're going to accuse you of conspiracy because y'all did say these things.
00:15:49.000 Let's just go ahead and assume you did it on purpose.
00:15:51.000 Yeah.
00:15:51.000 Well, remember, Tim, what they're going to try to argue is that you're an insane conspiracy theorist for thinking that basically every relevant person within the deep state being tilted against Trump and trying to unseat him on bad evidence Isn't an actual coup, or is an actual coup, I'm sorry.
00:16:06.000 That's a bridge too far.
00:16:08.000 But them believing that the President of the United States literally colluded with Russia to rig the election, and he was an asset of Putin the entire time, is just reasonable thinking.
00:16:18.000 And without any evidence, they could say that on national television to the American people.
00:16:23.000 Let's slow down there a second, Seamus.
00:16:24.000 Do you think the Democrats did what we know they did?
00:16:27.000 You know, it's a tough one, man.
00:16:29.000 I gotta be honest.
00:16:30.000 Yes or no?
00:16:31.000 I'm going to speak with my lawyer?
00:16:31.000 Yes or no?
00:16:32.000 Yeah, of course.
00:16:33.000 Conspiracy theory!
00:16:34.000 Ah!
00:16:35.000 I got you!
00:16:35.000 And by the way, I just have to say, I said, you know, a lot of my early career had to do with focusing on Chinese Communist Party infiltration.
00:16:42.000 If Donald Trump's cardinal sin was, you know, collaborating with the Russian government, which we know never happened, I mean, the people who are accusing him of doing that, that is like textbook projection in the sense that all of these, I actually used to do this, this can tell you what kind of social life I have, but if you used to look at the headlines that they would write on CNN, the New York Times, Washington Post, Fun, fun.
00:17:00.000 and linking him to Russia, you could basically cross out Trump and replace it,
00:17:04.000 often with Democrats, sometimes establishment Republicans, and then cross out Russia and put in China, because the
00:17:10.000 connections exist.
00:17:11.000 So this whole idea that there's this, you know, collaborating and collusion
00:17:14.000 with foreign governments, I'm like, Democrats, you guys wrote that playbook
00:17:18.000 when you started taking cash from Chinese Communist Party influence groups.
00:17:21.000 Exactly.
00:17:22.000 And so we see how much the goalpost has moved over the years, right?
00:17:25.000 Back in 2016, Donald Trump colluded with the Russians.
00:17:28.000 We know he colluded with the Russians.
00:17:30.000 The entire thing is a farce.
00:17:31.000 The president is owned by the Kremlin.
00:17:33.000 And then, okay, well, maybe he colluded with them.
00:17:37.000 Okay, so, well, there's no evidence that he colluded with them, but the investigation was done in good faith.
00:17:41.000 Okay, well, the investigation wasn't done in good faith, and there were a lot of biases in it, and the FBI clearly played favorites by warning the Clinton campaign, not the Trump campaign, and they launched the investigation on bad information, but it wasn't a coup!
00:17:51.000 It was not an intended coup!
00:17:53.000 It's like, okay, I'm sure.
00:17:55.000 You know, every single thing you have said along the way since this investigation first
00:17:59.000 began since this Russiagate farce was incepted has been completely wrong.
00:18:03.000 And now you expect us to believe you when you say this wasn't a coup?
00:18:06.000 I'm sorry, we've run out of good faith.
00:18:08.000 The lawyer involved in the first impeachment tweeted out when Trump, right before his inauguration,
00:18:13.000 we are going to impeach you.
00:18:15.000 Yep.
00:18:15.000 Like they expressed their intent before there was any criminal accusations or any any potential wrongdoing or anything they could accuse him of.
00:18:24.000 They said, we will do it no matter what.
00:18:25.000 And meanwhile, in the same exact time frame.
00:18:28.000 The FBI, the Treasury Department was getting suspicious activity report after suspicious activity report based off the business dealings of Hunter Biden and all, you know, dozen Biden family members.
00:18:38.000 And they were actively suppressing that.
00:18:40.000 These are obviously politically exposed personnel's PEPs.
00:18:42.000 So they knew what Hunter Biden was doing from the financial transactions.
00:18:47.000 And it just shows you it's not even a double standard of justice, because that implies that we're in the same realm of standards.
00:18:54.000 It's otherworldly.
00:18:55.000 It's just ridiculous.
00:18:57.000 Yep, and I think that there's a lot to what you're saying, Hannah-Claire, about the fact that our institutions probably will not punish themselves for their wrongdoings.
00:19:06.000 I also hear what you're saying, Tim, about the fact that Trump being re-elected could mean that he actually would go after these people and they would be duly punished for their crimes against this nation.
00:19:17.000 But I will say one thing.
00:19:20.000 I believe that the real black pill is not that people who have information that could lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton die.
00:19:30.000 It's that no amount of information will ever lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, right?
00:19:36.000 And that applies overall to this deep state.
00:19:39.000 Maybe Trump does get in.
00:19:41.000 Maybe he is able to appoint investigators.
00:19:44.000 It's certainly going to be an uphill battle, man.
00:19:46.000 We should have titled today's episode Maybe it will.
00:19:50.000 Maybe it will.
00:19:50.000 will lead to the arrest of Hillary.
00:19:52.000 Like see what happens, you know?
00:19:54.000 Maybe it will.
00:19:55.000 Maybe it will.
00:19:56.000 Maybe when Trump gets back in office, he will finally follow through with locking up Hillary
00:20:02.000 Clinton because, I mean, this is it.
00:20:04.000 It was the Democrats.
00:20:05.000 It was the Clintons.
00:20:06.000 It was Obama.
00:20:07.000 They were trying to intentionally smear Donald Trump to win an election, and they framed him as a traitor to this country.
00:20:15.000 And the headlines are going to be, Donald Trump uses justice system for his own vindictive means to an end.
00:20:21.000 I mean, even if we were to get some of these officials behind bars to have to publicly face what they have done to the American people, not just Donald Trump, but to the people who supported him, right?
00:20:34.000 There is no way that the media lets this go, right?
00:20:39.000 Even now, I mean, I think part of this time is exactly what you're saying, the timeline you laid out of being like, there definitely was a problem all the way to like, well, there wasn't anything and also we are biased and we're sort of admitting it.
00:20:50.000 By now they're gonna be like, well but he just got found guilty in this case and he's being investigated over here and let's talk to Alvin Bragg and it almost doesn't matter because they were just waiting to come up with something else to try and hold against Trump and it is honestly astounding.
00:21:04.000 I don't know that we'll ever see anything like it in our lifetime of someone they hate more than Donald Trump.
00:21:09.000 I mean it's truly unbelievable the lengths that mainstream media and the deep state will go to fight against him.
00:21:15.000 Well, I will say, I think there is someone, or more accurately, a group they hate more than Donald Trump, and that's the American people.
00:21:22.000 And they see Donald Trump as representative for the actual interests of the American people, and that bothers them because they're used to seeing politicians who are only interested in representing the elite.
00:21:31.000 And so, while it may be the case that none of these people face any actual punishment at any of these media establishments or anywhere in the deep state, with respect to public opinion and people waking up to their nonsense, the one thing I can say is the walls are closing in.
00:21:43.000 I'm just imagining, like, High profile Democrat fundraisers holding auditions to recruit actors to play Democrats.
00:21:51.000 And they're doing the interview and they're like, all right, give me populist.
00:21:55.000 And they got like AOC and she's saying like, I think we should tax the rich.
00:21:58.000 Like, this is really great.
00:21:59.000 You're really good.
00:22:00.000 Now, if you take this job, we have to warn you, you will have to shake hands.
00:22:05.000 And touch these people and then she shudders, oh, I think I can do it.
00:22:09.000 All right, you got the job.
00:22:10.000 We'll get you elected and then you can be a Democrat.
00:22:13.000 And that's how I view all the Democrats and the Republicans, to be completely honest, except for like five people.
00:22:19.000 They just despise and are disgusted by Americans.
00:22:21.000 Yeah, no, well, that's exactly what it is, right?
00:22:23.000 It's funny.
00:22:24.000 So there's this idea of loving the sinner and hating the sin.
00:22:27.000 You know, the Democrats, they like love poverty and hate the poor.
00:22:33.000 They really do.
00:22:34.000 They have this entire idea in their heads that they're these champions for the working class and they hate everything that the working class stands for.
00:22:42.000 And they'll even claim that, it's funny, it applies to other things, like they really, they like love immigration and they hate the immigrant.
00:22:48.000 When you talk to people who come here from Mexico about their values and like how they feel about gay marriage and abortion, the left is disgusted by it.
00:22:55.000 They hate everything they stand for.
00:22:56.000 I mean, all of the counties along the border in Texas where there are levels of illegal immigration, are red, right?
00:23:03.000 They are populated by people whose families have migrated from Mexico.
00:23:07.000 They have conservative values.
00:23:09.000 But you see that theory play out to I think even with the Russia hoax because I also never sort of bought what they were pushing, right?
00:23:15.000 It's like, oh, because a random Facebook account that was somewhat linked to Russia shared an article that was attacking Hillary Clinton on
00:23:22.000 false terms just because some random Americans read it. That now influenced their vote. They're
00:23:27.000 now voting for Donald Trump.
00:23:28.000 And I think, you know, if you unpack that whole narrative that they were pushing, it
00:23:32.000 really shows you how dumb they think the American people are, right? And how really influenceable
00:23:37.000 and just dumb.
00:23:40.000 It's like, oh, because you read an article now, your entire conviction, the reason why you support Trump, it can't be because you actually support his policies on trade and you want to take this country back and you despise Hillary Clinton to your core.
00:23:53.000 It's because you read an article about Hillary Clinton actually being related to Who knows?
00:24:00.000 It's actually absolutely ludicrous conspiracy theorizing.
00:24:05.000 What they argued was that non-government Russian actors spending $46,000 worth of money on Facebook ads that weren't even all targeted towards one specific party Was an act of war.
00:24:20.000 We had actual elected leaders saying that that was an act of war from Russia interfering in our election.
00:24:27.000 This is how delusional these people are.
00:24:29.000 The best part too is if you look, I remember there was a press release that Twitter had put out probably like two years ago.
00:24:34.000 They were talking about what they were doing to mitigate foreign influence and they had ranked all the different numbers of bots that they had from different countries and overwhelmingly I think it was by Like a 10% increase, or rather, like, chasm between bots from China and Russia.
00:24:51.000 The Chinese Communist Party influence on Twitter dwarfed that of Russia.
00:24:56.000 So it's so funny, if you want to play with this foreign influence narrative, it's like, sure, I'll take you at your word on that, even though I don't believe the American people are smart enough to be immune to that.
00:25:04.000 Even if you want to take them at their word, the Chinese Communist Party, their influence still prevails over Russia.
00:25:11.000 So it's just bizarre.
00:25:12.000 Yeah!
00:25:13.000 Taking over.
00:25:13.000 Right?
00:25:14.000 So let me jump to this story.
00:25:15.000 We have this tweet from Benny Johnson.
00:25:17.000 Elon Musk calls the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story election interference.
00:25:22.000 Quote, some of these conspiracy theories have turned out to be true.
00:25:24.000 I'll play this clip for you.
00:25:25.000 I just want to stress this one point.
00:25:27.000 As we're talking about the Durham report, And the interference in our election and Trump's presidency from 2016 till 2020.
00:25:35.000 We also get to talk about the second election interference from intelligence agencies when they sought to suppress and did suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story.
00:25:43.000 Here's Elon Musk giving an interview on the matter.
00:25:45.000 I mean, you know, you do some tweets that seem to be or at least give support to some who would call others conspiracy theories.
00:25:55.000 Well, Yes, but I mean, honestly, you know, some of these conspiracy theories have turned out to be true.
00:26:05.000 Which ones?
00:26:07.000 Well, like the Hunter Biden laptop.
00:26:10.000 Yeah.
00:26:10.000 That's true?
00:26:11.000 Yeah?
00:26:11.000 So, you know, that was a pretty big deal.
00:26:15.000 There was Twitter and others engaged in active suppression of information that was relevant to the public.
00:26:22.000 That's a terrible thing that happened.
00:26:23.000 That's election interference.
00:26:25.000 And also, what wasn't mentioned by Elon was that the intelligence agency signed off on this letter, which was then weaponized by people in the media who willfully lie to manipulate.
00:26:35.000 This is, once again, a very similar story of election interference from intelligence agencies, Democrats, and the media.
00:26:42.000 There is no country unless these people are criminally charged, arrested, and removed from polite society because they're criminals who engage in criminal activity.
00:26:51.000 But have you considered that it's just an accident and they're sawy?
00:26:54.000 Oh, they're sorry?
00:26:56.000 Well, now I feel bad, Seamus!
00:26:58.000 Let him go!
00:26:59.000 It was a mistake!
00:27:00.000 That's why pencils have erasers!
00:27:02.000 See, I feel like they're not sorry, they're just like, we did some stuff wrong, and we changed our own rules so we won't do anything wrong again.
00:27:09.000 But we don't know that they've changed the rules to permit them to act the way they did.
00:27:13.000 They've just legalized their actions, probably.
00:27:15.000 And I love this rationalization that you get from the left, where they'll say, okay, like, yes, we were vehemently wrong about this every step of the way, and we did try to ruin people's lives, and we did misinform the American people, but, like, we didn't mean to, you know?
00:27:26.000 Pandemic amnesty.
00:27:27.000 Yeah, exactly.
00:27:28.000 We saw it during the pandemic, we saw it during Russiagate, we see this with the left all the time.
00:27:31.000 It's like, okay, well, if you're wrong about everything all the time, I kind of don't care if you were lying or not.
00:27:37.000 I know that I can't trust you ever.
00:27:39.000 They're just sorry you figured it out, they're not sorry they didn't.
00:27:42.000 Exactly, and this is how it works.
00:27:43.000 You never admit you're wrong, you move on to the next scam.
00:27:46.000 That's how scammers work, right?
00:27:47.000 A scammer doesn't go like, okay, so like, I wasn't really a Nigerian prince, but I am trying to call you about your car's extended warranty.
00:27:55.000 They just move from the Nigerian prince thing to your car's extended warranty without ever talking to you about the first thing or admitting that they were wrong, yeah.
00:28:02.000 It's like, you're not a Nigerian prince, click.
00:28:04.000 The phone rings again, I'd like to talk to you about your car's extended warranty.
00:28:07.000 Really?
00:28:08.000 It's like, oh, well.
00:28:09.000 I feel like we should just start our stopwatches and see what big revelation is going to come out to distract us from this.
00:28:15.000 Because that's, I feel like, how you can tell time in America.
00:28:17.000 Well, more importantly, I wonder what the next big election interference is going to be in 2024.
00:28:22.000 What lie will they push next?
00:28:25.000 Well, and this is what's so wild, right?
00:28:27.000 So over 10% of Biden voters, according to surveys, Not only did not know that the Hunter Biden laptop story was a thing, because of how suppressed it was, they said if they had known about it, they would not have voted for Joe Biden.
00:28:40.000 Okay, the idea that 10% of Biden voters surveyed, if that really does apply to the rest of the voting population, would not have swayed the election.
00:28:47.000 What's your source?
00:28:48.000 Washington Examiner.
00:28:49.000 There was a poll that they published right after the election.
00:28:51.000 I just want to make sure we have the number correct.
00:28:52.000 Yeah, and I actually think it might have been more than 10%, so I can pull this up.
00:28:56.000 I remember Rasmussen had one that was like 6% or 7%.
00:28:59.000 Either way, it's a substantial amount.
00:29:01.000 It's enough people to theoretically swing the election depending on where they're centered or where they're based.
00:29:07.000 Now, that is evil.
00:29:10.000 That is clear corporate interference in American elections.
00:29:14.000 And I would say that that's actually more heinous than non-government actors in Russia spending $46,000 on Facebook ads, not all of which were from one single partisan perspective.
00:29:27.000 On top of that, we had actual elected leaders referring to that as an act of war.
00:29:33.000 An act of war!
00:29:34.000 So what do we call it when American corporations do the exact same thing on a much larger scale, which there's actually good polling data to indicate did sway the election?
00:29:45.000 Well, and they're doing it on a much larger hundred, multi-hundred million dollar, almost billion dollar scale when it comes to groups like the Center for Tech and Civic Life, getting money from the Chan Zuckerberg initiative.
00:29:55.000 When you talk about the lie that they're going to peddle, I think universal mail-in voting.
00:29:59.000 I'm sure there'll be some sort of public health emergency that necessitates rolling that up, but it's interesting.
00:30:03.000 I put a story up today.
00:30:05.000 So obviously, the Center for Tech and Civic Life, the Zuckerberg-funded election group, they had to sort of rebrand since they came under a bunch of scrutiny during the 2020 election.
00:30:15.000 But one of their new groups, it's called the Alliance for Election Excellence.
00:30:19.000 It's a very good name.
00:30:20.000 But they're now giving, they have an $80 million war chest, and they're now giving And if it's not altruistic, it was an accident.
00:30:27.000 And he's really sorry.
00:30:27.000 election offices across the country and they're buying them, catch this, office
00:30:32.000 space to store mail-in ballots and to also store election tabulation machines.
00:30:39.000 So they're up to their old tricks. So I know I'm sure very altruistic.
00:30:43.000 Anything Mark Zuckerberg does is marked by by altruism. And if it's not
00:30:47.000 altruistic, it was an accident. And he's really sorry.
00:30:52.000 Sorry you found out.
00:30:54.000 They all just simultaneously slipped on- Remember, he said he wasn't gonna give any money to the 2024 election, so I was like, yeah, me and my wife, like, peace out, we're done.
00:31:01.000 But no, they just use another shady nonprofit, dark money.
00:31:04.000 He's not giving it to the election.
00:31:05.000 He's giving it to someone to give to the election.
00:31:07.000 Do you remember when he reportedly... It's like Fauci and EcoHealth Alliance and COVID.
00:31:11.000 Zuckerberg reportedly gave all his money away or something like that.
00:31:14.000 But it turned out he put it in an LLC to avoid the death tax and then It was like the Patagonia thing.
00:31:14.000 What?
00:31:19.000 Their founder was like, we're gonna give all our money away!
00:31:22.000 And it's like, oh actually they get a huge tax credit for doing this.
00:31:25.000 when he dies it doesn't get taxed at 50%.
00:31:27.000 It was like the Patagonia thing.
00:31:29.000 Their founder was like, we're going to give all our money away.
00:31:31.000 And it's like, oh, actually they get a huge tax credit for doing this.
00:31:34.000 They're not here to save the planet.
00:31:36.000 They're here to help themselves.
00:31:37.000 And the sad thing is if he said it, he was doing it to avoid taxes.
00:31:40.000 It would be way cooler, right?
00:31:42.000 Like, I might actually appreciate that.
00:31:44.000 If he's gonna lie about giving it to the poor, okay, well, you're a slimy guy.
00:31:47.000 You're lying about giving money to the poor.
00:31:48.000 If he was just honest about it, look, this horrible government that does horrible things and is gonna spend this money on nonsense isn't gonna get a penny of it.
00:31:55.000 I'd go, Yeah, I get it.
00:31:57.000 I understand.
00:31:58.000 They all do this.
00:31:59.000 These wealthy individuals will be like, I'm gonna donate 99% of my money.
00:32:03.000 And then like, you'll get a guy named, you know, Seamus Coghlan, who's a billionaire.
00:32:07.000 Yeah.
00:32:07.000 And he'll be like, I'm gonna donate $999 million to charity.
00:32:10.000 And then he'll start a charity called the Seamus Coghlan Foundation, and I'll donate it to himself.
00:32:14.000 Exactly.
00:32:15.000 That way he can write off all of the income and then have it as a nonprofit and then keep the money.
00:32:19.000 Well, fun fact, there are actually studies that show inheritance taxes increase income inequality because the lower classes inherit a larger percentage of their net worth than the upper class does.
00:32:31.000 And so usually what inheritance taxes actually do is just completely screw farmers over because a person has a farm.
00:32:37.000 Yeah, that's why a lot of firms go into trust, right?
00:32:38.000 working on and yeah like the farm and the farming equipment are rather
00:32:41.000 expensive but a lot of these people are just making a normal middle-class
00:32:45.000 living and then they have to pay this insane inheritance tax before they can
00:32:48.000 pass it on to their children so they end up having to sell their their land off
00:32:51.000 yeah that's why a lot of firms going to trust right they do it right having to
00:32:55.000 go through the process or LLCs but trusts Clever ways they avoid paying taxes.
00:33:02.000 But for those who can't avoid it, or for those who don't know better than to avoid it, or even people, you know, outside of the context of farming who just have a house and they don't know how to leave it to their kids without avoiding the taxes, they end up getting screwed.
00:33:12.000 Millionaires and billionaires are gonna find their way around any set of taxes, right?
00:33:16.000 Just like Zuckerberg did, but poor people are not.
00:33:18.000 Buying things as a rich person is not the same as buying things as a poor person.
00:33:21.000 Nope.
00:33:22.000 If you're a poor person who needs a car, You save up 10%, you go to the car dealership, you say, I want this $20,000 car.
00:33:28.000 They say, okay, it's $2,000 down, and then you take out a loan for the other 18, and then you gotta pay a certain percentage on it.
00:33:35.000 So you are losing money on your asset.
00:33:38.000 By the time you finally get that asset, you end up paying double for it.
00:33:42.000 So you've lost tens of thousands.
00:33:43.000 If you're rich, you walk in, write a check, boom, you have the car.
00:33:45.000 The car's value effectively stays the same.
00:33:48.000 Let's use a better example, like land or property.
00:33:50.000 If you're poor and you're buying a house, you get a loan, you pay interest, you lose money to the banks to acquire this.
00:33:57.000 After 30 years or whatever, you finally pay it off.
00:33:58.000 You're like, I did it!
00:33:59.000 I paid off my house!
00:34:00.000 And you've lost twice the value of the house in the purchase.
00:34:03.000 So basically, you only retain half of the value of your own money.
00:34:07.000 You're rich and you got cash.
00:34:08.000 Snap your fingers, you buy it, you retain all of the value.
00:34:11.000 Not the same thing.
00:34:12.000 And then they do these tricks where, you know, they can give the money to their own kids.
00:34:17.000 And who gets the value?
00:34:18.000 The rich!
00:34:18.000 The banks!
00:34:19.000 Yep.
00:34:20.000 The Federal Reserve, I guess.
00:34:22.000 But I guess this isn't supposed to be Occupy Wall Street cast.
00:34:24.000 We are talking about election interference.
00:34:28.000 But hey, you know, Steve talks about this stuff all the time.
00:34:30.000 I was gonna say.
00:34:32.000 He wants to tax all these people.
00:34:33.000 I don't agree with this wealth tech stuff, but Steve's...
00:34:37.000 He's adamant on the wealth tax.
00:34:38.000 Well, you have to, because if not, they're going to use the money to fund all of these groups, like election rigging groups, whatever you want to call them.
00:34:46.000 And I've always supported, that was one of the first policies that Steve had pushed back when I was in high school, watching him speak, I think at the Oxford Union.
00:34:53.000 And I was like, this is so right.
00:34:56.000 And what's so funny is, you know, put aside, I always love talking to Uber drivers, Democrat, Republican, and like, that's the one issue that they can always get behind, is that taxing the rich But actually taxing them substantively and meaningfully and making the policy so it's not just that the hyper-connected rich get, they don't have to pay their fair share, but it's everyone.
00:35:16.000 But then the government gets the money and gives it to the FBI.
00:35:19.000 Yeah, exactly.
00:35:20.000 So therein lies the problem.
00:35:21.000 And you have to defund the FBI.
00:35:22.000 Well, yeah, that's my concern.
00:35:23.000 I always gotta win.
00:35:24.000 Not the child of the sex trafficking operation, but the rest of the FBI, yes.
00:35:28.000 Yeah, well, like, with the FBI, with all of these institutions, and it's not even just the deep states, the government overall, as Tim alluded to, it's all incredibly corrupt.
00:35:37.000 They spend our money horribly.
00:35:39.000 I understand what you're saying.
00:35:40.000 Wealth taxes make me nervous for a number of reasons.
00:35:43.000 I think, you know, in principle, my main belief, I would say economically, is in property ownership.
00:35:49.000 And I don't just mean that in, like, a strictly laissez-faire sense.
00:35:52.000 I think the more people who own property, the better off we are as a country.
00:35:56.000 I think it gives Everyone a stake in the future, you know a country of property owners is obviously better than a country of renters I'm a very big believer in the middle class and lower class being able to own property And I think a lot has to be done in order to make that a realistic possibility for people in the future but
00:36:15.000 With wealth taxes, I mean, the issue is with unrealized capital gains, you're taxing something that doesn't actually exist yet, so then someone has to sell off a portion of their company, and if it was just people who were ultra, ultra, ultra wealthy, I could sort of understand, but that always trickles down, right?
00:36:31.000 Anytime the government says we're only going to tax people above a certain limit, they end up lowering that bar until eventually we're all paying that wealth tax.
00:36:38.000 The initial income tax was like 3%, and it was only for the ultra wealthy, and now here we are with poor people paying 20%.
00:36:44.000 Yep.
00:36:44.000 I want to jump to this next story.
00:36:46.000 We got this tweet from Mario Noffoli says breaking CNN on Trump's exoneration.
00:36:52.000 Quote, it is regardless devastating to the FBI and to a degree it does exonerate Donald Trump, Jake Tapper.
00:36:59.000 He says, is CNN becoming less biased?
00:37:01.000 Will other mainstream media followers certainly play this clip of Jake Tapper for you?
00:37:05.000 Regardless, the report is now here.
00:37:06.000 It has dropped and it might not have produced everything of what some Republicans vote for.
00:37:10.000 It is regardless devastating to the FBI and to a degree it does exonerate Donald Trump.
00:37:17.000 To a degree.
00:37:18.000 They're still so scared.
00:37:18.000 To a degree!
00:37:23.000 They're still so scared of liberals.
00:37:25.000 They can't just say, Trump did not collude with Russia.
00:37:29.000 He says, to a degree, it proves he didn't collude with Russia.
00:37:32.000 No, it literally proves he didn't collude with Russia.
00:37:35.000 They can't let their dream die.
00:37:36.000 They want this to be true so badly.
00:37:38.000 Exactly.
00:37:39.000 No, it does not exonerate Trump to a degree.
00:37:42.000 Trump was exonerated about all of this long ago.
00:37:45.000 What it does to a degree is indict you and everyone else in the media who is parroting this nonsense.
00:37:52.000 And the mainstream media language around this is so funny to me.
00:37:55.000 AP put out this article about it and said, the findings aren't flattering for the FBI.
00:38:00.000 It's not looking good.
00:38:03.000 We don't want to say anything, but it's not great.
00:38:05.000 And they say that the investigation was done without adequate bias and they routinely ignored or rationalized evidence that undercut the premise.
00:38:16.000 So the whole time they were aware that this was not worth it.
00:38:19.000 And they were like, but we're going to keep going.
00:38:21.000 Literally what happened was they said Trump has a p-tape and we said, care to elaborate further?
00:38:26.000 And they said, no.
00:38:27.000 Do you guys remember the Huffington Post story about somewhere, some video of Trump doing something at the time?
00:38:32.000 Yes, I saw that!
00:38:33.000 Let me see if I can pull it up.
00:38:34.000 I saw that.
00:38:35.000 That was killing me.
00:38:36.000 That was killing me.
00:38:38.000 But no, that's literally what happened, right?
00:38:39.000 And they're never going to admit they were wrong.
00:38:41.000 As I said, it's just one scam after another.
00:38:44.000 Move on.
00:38:44.000 Doesn't matter.
00:38:45.000 Doesn't matter how many times they're proven wrong.
00:38:46.000 Does not matter.
00:38:47.000 Here's the story from 2018, the hunt for every Trump reporter's white whale, the elevator tape.
00:38:53.000 It says, there it was, some 1,500 words into a story published in the Daily Beast, the infamous Donald Trump elevator tape, not the tape itself, but the first reference, the bombshell tape of Trump in an elevator.
00:39:03.000 The Wall Street Journal, the AP, and others had chased a tape that may not even exist.
00:39:08.000 A certain contingent of journalists who'd spent months searching for something worth publishing, all that really mattered was the formal unveiling of the tape rumored to the public.
00:39:16.000 It was basically nothing.
00:39:17.000 A story about literally nothing.
00:39:19.000 And they all chased after it.
00:39:21.000 The famous quote was the tweet where it was like, somewhere, something exists.
00:39:25.000 What it is, we don't know.
00:39:27.000 What it's about, not sure.
00:39:28.000 But Trump was there.
00:39:29.000 We believe it.
00:39:30.000 Trump took the elevator.
00:39:31.000 It's not healthy.
00:39:31.000 He's not taking the stairs.
00:39:32.000 This is a real scandal.
00:39:34.000 They were desperate to find anything.
00:39:35.000 And we still are!
00:39:38.000 It was very difficult to attack Trump on the basis of his policies because they tended to be unpopular.
00:39:44.000 Alvin Post tweeted, A tape might exist of Trump doing something in an elevator.
00:39:48.000 Though exactly where that somewhere is and what that something might be, no one in media can say.
00:39:52.000 That's because no one in media seems to have seen the tape or is even confident it exists.
00:39:57.000 What?
00:39:59.000 They were writing articles about this.
00:40:01.000 Imagine somebody walks into the newsroom and they're like, I got huge news.
00:40:04.000 What is it?
00:40:06.000 Trump may have been an elevator at some point with a camera doing something.
00:40:10.000 I don't know what he did, when he did it, or why it was filmed.
00:40:12.000 And they're like, whoa, can we find that tape?
00:40:15.000 Yes.
00:40:16.000 I just want this to have been someone on his campaign who was like, I know one liberal journalist.
00:40:20.000 I'm going to start this rumor.
00:40:21.000 Just see where it goes.
00:40:22.000 And they read these tweets and they're like, I started that.
00:40:25.000 They can't tell anyone because somewhere there is a video of Donald Trump.
00:40:28.000 They're like their children.
00:40:31.000 It is embarrassing that a news outlet would publish that.
00:40:35.000 Yeah, something, you know, it happened somewhere.
00:40:38.000 This is literally when you were in third grade and didn't read the book and then you got
00:40:41.000 called in front of the class to do your book report.
00:40:43.000 You're like, yeah, something happened when somewhere they would like to sit.
00:40:47.000 I got big news.
00:40:48.000 A video may exist of Seamus Coghlan.
00:40:52.000 No, no.
00:40:54.000 Now what he was doing, I don't know.
00:40:55.000 In an elevator?
00:40:56.000 Where it happened, I'm not so sure.
00:40:58.000 But a video exists of Seamus doing something somewhere.
00:41:01.000 In fact, quite literally what you're watching right now is a video of Seamus doing something somewhere.
00:41:05.000 That exists somewhere.
00:41:06.000 It's not bad, it's just literally Seamus talking about politics.
00:41:09.000 It's plausible deniability.
00:41:10.000 But imagine this, imagine this.
00:41:12.000 You could literally play the, the media was so insane, I could- I could claim there is a shocking video of Seamus Coghlan doing something somewhere, and then everyone's like, whoa, I wonder what it could be, and they imagine Seamus, like, juggling bowling pins or skydiving.
00:41:28.000 Who knows?
00:41:29.000 When in reality, I'm referring to Tim Guest-Iroh.
00:41:31.000 My biggest scandals were juggling bowling pins and skydiving.
00:41:33.000 Who knows?
00:41:34.000 We didn't say it was a scandal, we just said you were doing something.
00:41:36.000 Exactly and then everyone turns into a scandal by imagining the craziest thing.
00:41:40.000 It really is bizarre as I guess I'm technically a journalist and it pains me to say that because I reject it.
00:41:46.000 I know whenever I'm meeting new people and I'm introducing myself like, what do you do?
00:41:49.000 I'm like, I'm a journalist.
00:41:51.000 I'm sorry, I'm not going to like smear you.
00:41:54.000 But it really is bizarre to me, right, like running with a story like that when there's really nothing to report.
00:41:59.000 And I think what we're going to see start to kind of unfold, which obviously we all know here, but obviously the Hunter Biden hard drive story in terms of the collusion with big tech and the FBI, the CIA, that letter, I think that really proves that there is sort of a merger, really, I'd call it an axis of evil between these assets of the deep state And tech platforms.
00:42:21.000 But I think the third component to that really is the mainstream media.
00:42:25.000 And I think we've always known they've laundered talking points on behalf of the federal government.
00:42:29.000 But I think this case again, yes, it's vindication.
00:42:31.000 Yes, we know Trump didn't collude with Russia.
00:42:33.000 But this is like clear, incontrovertible evidence that I don't think we typically get to see it so plain front and center, at least, you know, us mere American people, us mere mortals, Non-elites.
00:42:44.000 So I think we're going to start to see just like that Hunter Biden story has sort of started to unfurl and you get good tidbits every now and then.
00:42:51.000 I think there's going to be a lot more coming out about how the media has really just taken, whether it's FBI, CIA, you name it, their talking points and just repeated that mindlessly.
00:43:01.000 I got good news, though.
00:43:03.000 Take a look at this.
00:43:05.000 CNN's ratings are now below Newsmax.
00:43:09.000 Newsmax has surpassed CNN.
00:43:09.000 Amazing.
00:43:12.000 Look at this.
00:43:13.000 8 p.m., 9 p.m., 10 p.m.
00:43:13.000 slot.
00:43:14.000 Newsmax is like, yes, we knew we could do it!
00:43:16.000 We're beating CNN!
00:43:18.000 I mean, to be fair, CNN's been collapsing.
00:43:21.000 But look, Newsmax is considered more conservative, right?
00:43:25.000 They get smeared and attacked by the corporate press, and now they're displacing them.
00:43:29.000 CNN tried to play dirty games and now they will cease to exist.
00:43:33.000 But have you considered that somewhere someone might have done something and CNN may possibly have some of that footage?
00:43:40.000 Also, they're sorry.
00:43:42.000 Actually, I'm sorry.
00:43:44.000 I can confirm.
00:43:45.000 Sorry.
00:43:46.000 There is a video of Anderson Cooper doing something somewhere to Well, the thing is, I'm not sure.
00:43:53.000 And where it is, I don't know.
00:43:54.000 But the video does exist.
00:43:56.000 And if we can find it, oh boy.
00:43:57.000 Oh, that'll be really bad.
00:43:58.000 Yeah.
00:43:59.000 That'll be really bad for him.
00:44:00.000 Let's write 27 articles about it for the next three years.
00:44:02.000 Every day.
00:44:03.000 The White Whale.
00:44:04.000 A video that no one knows anything... Like, do you know how many videos of Trump in an elevator there are?
00:44:09.000 Probably 17,000.
00:44:09.000 Yeah, really a lot.
00:44:10.000 Because all of these different casino elevators have cameras.
00:44:14.000 Most big, high-security, like high-rises and penthouses have cameras.
00:44:18.000 Every time Trump got in an elevator, there's a video of him in an elevator doing something.
00:44:22.000 I just want to know how many journalists spent hours watching leaked or footage they finagled away from someone.
00:44:28.000 It's Trump just standing in the elevator like, any second now he's going to do something crazy.
00:44:34.000 There's no commitment to truth.
00:44:35.000 There's no commitment to reality or honesty.
00:44:37.000 I'm a cartoonist.
00:44:39.000 I'm not a cartoonist.
00:44:39.000 I make jokes and I do political commentary.
00:44:41.000 I'm not a journalist.
00:44:43.000 Not anything of the sort.
00:44:45.000 And I, given my state in life as someone who makes jokes, I could never imagine grabbing a story like that and repeating that to people.
00:44:53.000 Because you've got to be responsible with your platform.
00:44:55.000 I think it speaks to the two-sided nature of journalism today, right?
00:44:59.000 They believe there is a reality that they live in and they are here to disprove your reality.
00:45:04.000 They don't believe we all live in a common, shared reality.
00:45:06.000 No.
00:45:08.000 Create enough evidence of their own belief system you have to admit that their worldview is right and you have to conform to it.
00:45:14.000 I think that's the the strange thing about so much of essentially content creation that gets passed off as journalism today.
00:45:22.000 It's about arguing that the things you believe are wrong because my worldview is is necessitated on the fact that these things I know to be true.
00:45:30.000 That Trump is evil, that he colluded with Russia, and that if we vote for him, the country's falling apart.
00:45:35.000 And in reality, even if you don't like everything Trump does, he is not this, like, you know, terrible person that should send you into hysterics.
00:45:42.000 Well, yeah, I mean, none of these journalists are journalists.
00:45:46.000 Like, 98% of the people who call themselves journalists are political commentators or they're bloggers or something like that.
00:45:50.000 They write opinion pieces or they give you your perspective about something on television.
00:45:54.000 While claiming they're real journalists and you're not.
00:45:56.000 While claiming they're real journalists and you're not.
00:45:57.000 And this is the thing.
00:45:59.000 I am saying this, and I actually am willing to stand by this.
00:46:02.000 There is a large percentage of the people who call themselves journalists who, minus running a business and producing animation, do kind of the same thing I do, which is read articles, learn about the issues, do a bit of research, and then comment on them.
00:46:18.000 They don't actually go investigate issues on the ground, they don't do interviews with people, they don't try to find the truth, and, like, granted, I do try to find the truth, so that's one difference, but they will just read things online on, like, their newsfeed, or maybe they have someone who looks at articles for them, and they'll start commenting on it, but they're not, like, investigating the way you want a journalist to, they're just reading things so they can give an opinion about it.
00:46:42.000 Well, I think they cherry-pick facts so that they can serve their own reality.
00:46:46.000 I mean, that's the only way to describe it.
00:46:48.000 They will say, well, we think there's a video of Trump, so therefore he's a suspicious character, so therefore you should trust us when we say he did all of these things wrong.
00:46:56.000 I think they are completely blind to their own bias because it's so deeply embedded in their worldview.
00:47:05.000 Do you think that, like, yeah, you know what?
00:47:08.000 I'm actually going to Google this right now.
00:47:09.000 I want to see, like, what the bare minimum is for referring to yourself as a journalist.
00:47:12.000 There's nothing.
00:47:13.000 So I could just say I'm a journalist, because, you know, I, like, I did go to the March for Life for Tim Kast and interview people and guess I'm a journalist.
00:47:13.000 There's nothing?
00:47:19.000 I mean, I interviewed people about why they were at the March for Life, so I guess I'm a journalist.
00:47:22.000 I'm going to change my Twitter bias and I'm going to add journalist to it right now.
00:47:26.000 I think there used to be a standard, right?
00:47:27.000 Like a journalist is different than a reporter, which is different than a writer, which is different than a columnist.
00:47:31.000 No, no, no.
00:47:32.000 But now it's a blanket term for anyone who pushes disinformation.
00:47:37.000 Or publishes something that resembles news.
00:47:40.000 News adjacent, we might call it.
00:47:42.000 So I'm adding journalist to my bio.
00:47:44.000 In fact, I'm adding journalist first and foremost.
00:47:48.000 Oh, I don't have enough words left.
00:47:49.000 All right, I'm just gonna put journalist in my bio.
00:47:51.000 There, boom.
00:47:52.000 Yeah.
00:47:52.000 It's done.
00:47:53.000 I'm literally a journalist now.
00:47:54.000 Where's my blue checkmark?
00:47:56.000 I don't know.
00:47:57.000 I think you have to create one.
00:47:58.000 I think you can buy one.
00:47:59.000 The blue checkmark is something you just buy.
00:48:01.000 I know.
00:48:01.000 Now you just buy it.
00:48:02.000 I should have done some journalism on that.
00:48:05.000 Don't be too hard on yourself.
00:48:07.000 Is Serge the only non-journalist here right now?
00:48:10.000 That's so embarrassing.
00:48:10.000 I'm currently doing journalism right now.
00:48:12.000 That's so embarrassing.
00:48:13.000 Mind you, I'm always doing journalism just by being alive.
00:48:16.000 I do, no, I'm just kidding.
00:48:17.000 I think that's the hard thing.
00:48:18.000 We have moved, one of the benefits of the digital age is how quickly we can get new information out there and the new formats that we get to discuss news and have commentary.
00:48:28.000 I mean, this podcast exists essentially like Four different opinion writers talking at the same time, giving your opinion, as opposed to reading four different opinion columns written around the same time about an issue.
00:48:41.000 And that's more fun.
00:48:42.000 On the other hand, we have, I think, sort of grade the classifications of news media because anyone can be a journalist and also no one truly has any journalistic ethics or obligations.
00:48:56.000 I mean, I think people do.
00:48:57.000 I don't want to be too hard on all reporters.
00:48:59.000 There are some great journalists who do fantastic work.
00:49:01.000 But like, I don't think you should just be like, I'm out here with my cell phone recording the street, therefore I'm a journalist, unless you are putting some effort in, you're researching, you're trying to find the truth, you're talking to people whose opinion you don't like.
00:49:13.000 I think that's what bothers me the most.
00:49:14.000 So many people go into this sphere just to talk to people who they like themselves and who produce talking points similar to the ones they would produce if they were the one being interviewed.
00:49:24.000 I feel like you can really cross-apply that critique to virtually every industry in America in the sense of this whole refrain of, you know, trust the experts, right, the expert journalists at the New York Times and the CNNs and the Washington Posts of the world.
00:49:38.000 They're actually not our intellectual betters and superiors, and I think the house of cards, right, this ability to Enforce narratives like the Russia collusion hoax like rests on this sort of worshipping this idea that oh Because you work for the New York Times and you have journalists in your bio and you have a blue checkmark We must believe what you say because you're from the federal government and you're telling us how to mitigate a pandemic We must listen to you and what you're saying and I I think it's sort of they just want the American people again who are so dumb because they see an article on Facebook and
00:50:09.000 They're just going to start supporting some candidate.
00:50:11.000 But I really think they just want us to blindly put our faith in every aspect of our life, right, over our bodies, what we believe, what we think, what we eat, you name it, into our, you know, intellectual superiors, into this elite ruling class.
00:50:25.000 And I think, frankly, that was what COVID proved, that this elite ruling class that is so smart.
00:50:31.000 And Joe Biden, who, you know, that class of people used to mock.
00:50:34.000 I always thought they'd always say, oh, Donald Trump made a fool of America.
00:50:38.000 On the world stage.
00:50:39.000 And I always like this concept of the world stage, like they care so much what their, you know, globalist brethren think of them and what America looks like.
00:50:47.000 But then you take a step back and you're like, okay, well, even if I'm going to run with that paradigm, Joe Biden has made us look like a complete idiot and dismal failure on the world stage.
00:50:57.000 I just want to point out, as you all were talking, I was I was doing journalism.
00:51:01.000 Oh my gosh, you found the footage!
00:51:03.000 I found the footage.
00:51:04.000 This is a still image of Donald Trump in the elevator.
00:51:07.000 Look how shocked everyone is.
00:51:08.000 Oh my gosh.
00:51:09.000 Hard-hitting journalism.
00:51:11.000 They're so surprised at his behavior as Trump is yelling about something.
00:51:15.000 It's so shocking, this footage, that I can't even describe to you what actually happened in that elevator.
00:51:20.000 That is horrifying.
00:51:20.000 But trust me, I've seen it.
00:51:21.000 That is legitimately right.
00:51:22.000 It's real, Tim's a journalist.
00:51:25.000 This is of course an AI-generated image of Donald Trump in an elevator.
00:51:30.000 I just typed it in the mid-journey.
00:51:31.000 Don't give away the secrets, Tim!
00:51:32.000 AI-generated journalism is what it was.
00:51:36.000 One of my favorite things, you were mentioning a lot of the things they were saying about Trump, when they had an anonymous source Reporting that Trump said something completely insane on Veterans Day, like, I frankly hate all veterans.
00:51:49.000 It was the most absurd nonsense in the world.
00:51:53.000 Like, okay, he didn't say this, and it was from an anonymous source.
00:51:56.000 It couldn't help but laugh because, you know, an anonymous source only works if you're a trustworthy person, right?
00:52:02.000 If there's any reason to trust you.
00:52:04.000 I have seen the stories that you guys tell when you have a named source.
00:52:09.000 So no, I don't trust your anonymous sources.
00:52:12.000 And frankly, I think you probably made it up yourself.
00:52:14.000 Well, theoretically, if you had professional standards, you'd call the Trump White House or campaign wherever we were in the timeline and say, hey, do you care to comment on this?
00:52:22.000 We're going to run with this story.
00:52:23.000 You should have a chance to respond.
00:52:24.000 That's supposed to be ethical, but they probably won't.
00:52:26.000 And even if they do, they'll say, you know, the Trump campaign categorically denied this while they shook in their boots because they're so scared of our amazing anonymous source who we can't tell you anything about.
00:52:37.000 It's real.
00:52:37.000 Trust us.
00:52:38.000 I think that it was important to acknowledge that this does happen in all walks of life.
00:52:42.000 That's a really good point.
00:52:43.000 I think there are so many institutions that people point to when they want to use authority to back up their arguments.
00:52:49.000 I mean, we see this a lot.
00:52:50.000 I am loathe to bring it up because I know we talk about a lot, but with the transgender ideology movement, people will point to the American Association of Pediatrics and say, Well they say there are certain things you are supposed to do.
00:53:00.000 They'll point to all kinds of medical establishments and I think we have to look back and say why do we trust these institutions?
00:53:06.000 Some of them may do good work, I don't know, but you should look into the institutions.
00:53:11.000 Who's on the board?
00:53:12.000 How do they assemble themselves?
00:53:14.000 Are they elected?
00:53:15.000 Do you have to have a certain qualification?
00:53:16.000 What is their mission statement?
00:53:17.000 If you just throw out the name like this is the authority Then you are either A, trying to hide the bias, or B, you are not aware of the bias, which in and of itself is dangerous if you're putting yourself in a position where you're supposed to be giving out solid information.
00:53:31.000 Dude, Mid Journey's crazy.
00:53:33.000 It is wild.
00:53:34.000 I just, I got another one.
00:53:35.000 Dude, you're doing some real journalism tonight, huh?
00:53:37.000 I'm tweeting another one.
00:53:38.000 Let me, uh, let me try and, let me try and pull it up for you.
00:53:41.000 So, Natalie, personally, as a journalist, I've never used an anonymous source.
00:53:44.000 Have you ever?
00:53:45.000 I'm trying to think if I've actually ever unironically used it or not.
00:53:49.000 You know, most of my reporting, well, I guess either comes from the Hunter Biden hard drive or publicly available data that the mainstream media won't report on when it comes to Chinese Communist Party infiltration, because usually I'm reporting on how the mainstream media is compromised by the Chinese Communist Party.
00:54:04.000 It's a very good niche market, I've found.
00:54:07.000 But no, it really is funny though, and like you guys are saying, people I think for the most part hate journalists.
00:54:14.000 I get that whenever I'm introducing myself to people and telling them what I do for work.
00:54:18.000 I have never had a positive interaction with someone.
00:54:21.000 Then when they find out that I'm technically not really a journalist because it's Steve Bannon and he's great, then they're like, oh, you're normal.
00:54:27.000 You're not one of them.
00:54:28.000 But people hate journalists.
00:54:30.000 Journalists, I didn't realize.
00:54:33.000 But my experience is, I don't know if you've ever had this happen, but if you talk to someone who is like progressive or left and who is a journalist and they like proudly introduce themselves as a journalist, like they are the bearers of truth, I find this very fascinating.
00:54:46.000 Like it is definitely a cultural shift.
00:54:48.000 Some people do not trust the media, and for good reason.
00:54:51.000 But there are some people who wear it as a badge of honor, and that is also worrisome.
00:54:56.000 Yes, and of course, I feel like we have to give an honorable mention to the fact-checkers of the world and the media matters, the media watchdog types, because they're obviously in on the same grift.
00:55:05.000 But no, they attack me all the time for working with Steve, saying that I'm not actually an investigative reporter.
00:55:12.000 It's like, fine, then point to one of my stories that's not true.
00:55:14.000 Investigate me.
00:55:15.000 Prove it.
00:55:16.000 Right.
00:55:16.000 I've never been sued.
00:55:17.000 I've never published or printed anything incorrect.
00:55:20.000 Frankly, a lot of my investigations have led to people wiping their Twitter accounts, getting fired, getting removed from boards.
00:55:26.000 So the evidence is there, right?
00:55:28.000 There's obviously action occurring from my reporting.
00:55:30.000 So it's just I think, you know, you brought up the transgender movement.
00:55:34.000 A lot of this just, I think, has to also just do with, like, distorting words, right?
00:55:38.000 Like, journalist doesn't mean what it used to mean, because definitions don't really, they're not rooted in reality, because everyone can have different, really, versions of reality.
00:55:48.000 And that's, of course, amplified by the fact that if you turn on CNN, they say, oh, to a degree.
00:55:54.000 Well, what does that mean?
00:55:55.000 You know, it's not even doublespeak.
00:55:57.000 It's just, it's a whole different language.
00:55:59.000 I want to jump to the story about Patriot Front.
00:56:01.000 We have this from Newsweek.
00:56:03.000 White supremacist march on DC sparks conspiracy theory.
00:56:07.000 FBI was involved.
00:56:09.000 So the group is called Patriot Front.
00:56:11.000 And I've seen a bunch of people on the right say that journalists, as well as personalities, that I think Elijah Schaefer was saying that he's really well connected on the right.
00:56:18.000 He knows a lot of people from various different groups.
00:56:20.000 He's talked to them.
00:56:21.000 He's interviewed them.
00:56:22.000 And he knows no one associated with Patriot Front.
00:56:25.000 I thought that was very interesting because You know, I've been to a lot of these events.
00:56:29.000 I used to go on the ground and do a lot of reporting.
00:56:31.000 I've interviewed a lot of people, and I've never met a single person who was associated with whatever this group is.
00:56:36.000 Not that I'm on the ground in the past few years anyway, so maybe it's new, I guess, in the past five years or so.
00:56:42.000 But the funniest thing about it is, we have this clip from the Joe Rogan experience of the Patriot Front March.
00:56:48.000 I want to show you an image of these individuals.
00:56:51.000 You can see they all have these hats.
00:56:53.000 They have these masks.
00:56:54.000 They have shields.
00:56:54.000 They all wear masks.
00:56:56.000 They all wear the same things.
00:56:58.000 Like, somebody ordered the same blue jacket.
00:57:00.000 Like, 300 of them.
00:57:02.000 They all wore the same thing.
00:57:03.000 They ordered the same white neck gaiters, the same khakis, the same boots.
00:57:07.000 So, really well organized, I suppose.
00:57:09.000 And then I want to show you what Joe Rogan had to say in response to seeing this video.
00:57:13.000 I think he was on a show with Matt Taibbi.
00:57:15.000 Look at these guys.
00:57:17.000 Where's the fat people?
00:57:20.000 They're all wearing the same clothes!
00:57:22.000 What the fuck is this?
00:57:22.000 Do that again.
00:57:24.000 Is that- Have you ever seen anything that looks more like feds?
00:57:26.000 Where's the fat people?
00:57:27.000 Tell me that doesn't look like feds.
00:57:29.000 Right?
00:57:30.000 It's like the 101st Airborne.
00:57:32.000 Bro, look at this!
00:57:32.000 These guys are all runners!
00:57:34.000 These guys look like they just got out of buds!
00:57:36.000 I mean... The fuck out of here!
00:57:39.000 Look at this!
00:57:40.000 The fuck out of here!
00:57:42.000 So I saw someone comment, you know it's not real because whenever you see an actual right-wing militia group, they're all morbidly obese.
00:57:49.000 Or at least a handful of them are, not all of them.
00:57:51.000 And it's like...
00:57:52.000 That's actually fairly interesting.
00:57:54.000 Now, I have seen people push back and say, don't underestimate them.
00:57:57.000 They like that they're being called feds.
00:58:00.000 The reality is, someone posted an image from an internal FBI report where the FBI actually warns that among the FBI, half of the agents are morbidly obese.
00:58:10.000 So it's actually the other way around, and the argument is the actual white nationalists do fight and train, and so it may be real.
00:58:19.000 I don't know.
00:58:20.000 Honestly, I don't know what to think.
00:58:22.000 All I know is it's weird this group has police protection.
00:58:26.000 They did this march where they then were given an escort to the subway.
00:58:30.000 Which was cleared for them, right?
00:58:31.000 It was cleared for them and no one was allowed to go in after them.
00:58:33.000 They've loaded into trucks under police watch and guard and then left.
00:58:37.000 So Joe Rogan may be right about this.
00:58:40.000 I like when he said, where are the fat people?
00:58:42.000 Funny story, I was actually walking through DC and I stumbled upon them while they were doing this.
00:58:48.000 So I was being an unintentional journalist.
00:58:51.000 I was doing my journalistic duties, and I had thought they were patriot-front because I have obviously been to a lot of Trump rallies and, you know, been around, and I know this isn't necessarily evidence or fact-based, but you can get a vibe from people who are there to protest for the right reasons.
00:59:06.000 You know, there's just sort of a vibe to the Trump crowd or people who are there, whatever the issue is, because you can tell that they really want to be there and they're talking to other people who aren't necessarily there to attend the rally, but they're trying to sort of proselytize and, like, spread the cause and spread the word.
00:59:21.000 And it was such an odd vibe, and I know that's not, again, doesn't mean much, but I had just never seen a group of people protesting, who are allegedly so patriotic, acting the way that they were, just walking in formation.
00:59:35.000 Where's Antifa?
00:59:35.000 It was so weird.
00:59:36.000 Where's Antifa?
00:59:37.000 How come Antifa's not protesting any of these guys?
00:59:37.000 It was bizarre.
00:59:40.000 No serious question.
00:59:41.000 Yeah.
00:59:42.000 Why do they have a police escort, right?
00:59:44.000 Like, when I first saw a picture, someone was like, oh, it's like Charlottesville and like the Unite the Right walk.
00:59:49.000 I was like, this looks way more organized than that did.
00:59:52.000 Zeke Arkham on Twitter had this, his thing, and I guess he's in law enforcement, he was saying like, there's photos of them being arrested theoretically except they all still have their masks on and they're kneeling and he's basically going through being like you wouldn't let them continue to wear their masks because you have to make sure they're breathing when they're in police custody like you wouldn't have them kneeling in this position like none of this makes sense it's almost like you're waiting to hear like oh actually the whole thing was staged for a movie and they're filming it and this is what they think this is like like it it seems so strange especially since there are
01:00:23.000 That was funny when Joe was like, where are the fat people at?
01:00:27.000 I don't know, what do you guys think?
01:00:29.000 extremists or not, uh, demonstrating publicly. They usually have very little police, police support.
01:00:34.000 That was funny when Joe's like, where are the fat people at?
01:00:36.000 That's, it's, it's real though. That's very real.
01:00:38.000 I don't know. What do you guys think? Feds?
01:00:43.000 Look, I mean, I have no idea, but it's not something that would be
01:00:48.000 shocking if it came out right.
01:00:50.000 Like, my instinct is just to assume that something's up at this point.
01:00:54.000 I mean, there are... It's almost foolish to not actively distrust them, right?
01:01:00.000 So I don't know.
01:01:01.000 I don't trust the Antifa stuff.
01:01:04.000 There's stories about these Antifa guys getting picked up, driven around the block, and then let go.
01:01:08.000 That's what they do with informants.
01:01:10.000 I wouldn't be surprised.
01:01:11.000 I mean, there were federal FBI informants on the ground on January 6th, which apparently was also planned, so therefore the FBI knew about it, question mark.
01:01:19.000 None of it makes sense.
01:01:20.000 The thing about this is like, it's just so uniform.
01:01:23.000 They all are like In the sunglasses, in the hat, in the exact same jacket, like, I just really don't think there's... it's too precise for it to seem like an organic movement.
01:01:33.000 And how it just immediately hits, like, the left-wing social media machine, the, you know, blue checkmark, the angry blue checkmarks on Twitter and the mainstream media, it just... I don't know, I feel like it's not even... it wasn't even about the march itself, it's how it gets rolled out and then it's used as a pretext to start a broader narrative about how White supremacy and nationalism and xenophobia are on the rise, and so we, you know, but then they made the jump we need to crack down on, you know, random Twitter user 123.
01:01:59.000 Right.
01:02:00.000 Were there any chants?
01:02:01.000 Like, was there any chanting?
01:02:02.000 Was there any demands?
01:02:03.000 What was the message?
01:02:04.000 Like, I don't understand, other than the fact that it's a patriot front, like, what is the theoretical racial messaging behind this activity?
01:02:10.000 There's almost no media about it.
01:02:12.000 They don't have any media presence.
01:02:13.000 I don't see anything about Patriot Front other than stuff that's very nicely curtailed.
01:02:16.000 Well, in this specific demonstration.
01:02:17.000 Yes, exactly.
01:02:19.000 Where is the chanting?
01:02:20.000 We got some great sound bites from previous events.
01:02:22.000 It's so convenient.
01:02:23.000 It's really fishy, right?
01:02:25.000 But the media has declared that it's a White Supremacist event, so therefore it has to be.
01:02:28.000 Almost as fishy as the whole Russia hoax.
01:02:29.000 Right.
01:02:30.000 That's what I think, yeah.
01:02:33.000 I feel like the FBI's gonna come out and be like, it was actually just a drill, we were just practicing to see what would happen.
01:02:37.000 The FBI headquarters was literally just, I mean, a block away from where they were marching, so... No, hold on.
01:02:42.000 I'm not some kind of conspiracy theorist lunatic who's gonna say that these guys are feds.
01:02:51.000 I'm not some conspiracy theory lunatic who's going to say this is Feds.
01:02:55.000 The obvious explanation is these are Russian agents from the Kremlin trying to support a democracy because Putin wants to reform the USSR, yes.
01:03:04.000 No, they're Soviet and they were sleepers.
01:03:08.000 And when the Soviet Union collapsed, they didn't know because they were brainwashed.
01:03:13.000 And then, because Putin wants to bring the Soviet Union back, he activated the radio signal Which triggered all of them into acting for the Soviet Union.
01:03:22.000 Just like as a journalist, I could never say that the United States government did anything wrong.
01:03:26.000 Because being a journalist means defending the United States government.
01:03:29.000 Yeah, my anonymous source told me that.
01:03:31.000 So you think about how insane that story is about Trump in the elevator where it said somewhere something Trump did something like that?
01:03:39.000 Yes.
01:03:39.000 That starts with like some rumor and then a bunch of journalists who are psychopaths chase after this insane rumor.
01:03:45.000 Imagine what's going to happen when someone gets an AI generated image on their phone And they go to a journalist, and intelligence agencies will do this, and they'll be like, journalist, I can't give you the photo because I'll get arrested because it's classified, but take a look at this.
01:03:57.000 And they'll show a low-res, AI-generated image of Donald Trump, you know, juggling bowling pins or something.
01:04:03.000 And then they'll be like, it's real.
01:04:05.000 And then they'll be like, but I can't give it to you, but, you know, keep it on the DL.
01:04:09.000 That journalist then goes and tells their boss, I saw the picture, it was Donald Trump juggling bowling pins, I swear.
01:04:14.000 You know, this source is good.
01:04:16.000 I've checked his credentials.
01:04:18.000 They're gonna go, wow, maybe we should run it.
01:04:20.000 And then just like BuzzFeed News released the Steele dossier, they will report, source at FBI confirms Donald Trump juggled bowling pins, and they'll just walk right into fake news.
01:04:31.000 That's where we're going.
01:04:32.000 I think that we should start doing this on purpose, though.
01:04:34.000 Like, you should write down a piece of paper, hold it up to a video camera with today's date, the story you're gonna tell every left-wing journalist that you know, and then wait until it becomes mainstream news.
01:04:43.000 And then be like, by the way, that was false.
01:04:45.000 Like, I know that sounds like spreading disinformation, but you should just point out that there are leaks, that there are people who take this information and intentionally try to paint everyone you know in a bad light.
01:04:56.000 I think it's only a matter of time before those Tucker Carlson leaked videos get revealed to be deepfakes.
01:05:03.000 Or at least one of them.
01:05:05.000 Because I think about this, Media Matters will publish anything.
01:05:08.000 And so, what someone could theoretically do is take ten real videos, make one deepfake video, give them all to a leftist organization who will publish them all, then definitively prove the deepfake one by showing a video of them making it and say, you're fake news and you make up stories, then what happens?
01:05:27.000 The subject of those deepfakes can file a massive defamation lawsuit for the publication of a deepfake.
01:05:33.000 With proof.
01:05:34.000 And then what's gonna happen is, they're gonna say, we didn't know it was a deepfake, and they're gonna have to argue to the court, they thought it was real because of a source giving it to them, and then the argument can be made, no, they're lying, we want discovery, we think they made it themselves, and then the question is, where did they get it?
01:05:50.000 They're gonna have to reveal a bunch of information, and it's gonna destroy whatever smidgen of credibility they may have had with anybody.
01:05:55.000 Someone tweeted at me.
01:05:56.000 I can't watch right now since we're on air, but they tweeted something to me that has 55,000 likes.
01:06:00.000 It was posted yesterday, and it's, a Fed gets recognized and called out at their staged Patriot front march.
01:06:06.000 Who tweeted it?
01:06:07.000 This is from... Did you retweet it?
01:06:10.000 No, no, I have not retweeted it.
01:06:11.000 I can send it to you.
01:06:13.000 Just retweet it.
01:06:14.000 It looks like a MAGA account.
01:06:15.000 I have no idea if it's legitimate or not, but someone just tagged me in this so it could be fun to watch.
01:06:21.000 I just don't understand, like, what this protest is.
01:06:24.000 Like, I'm sorry, they just walked through DC and they didn't say anything and then they got on the subway and left?
01:06:30.000 They had a banner and it said something to the effect of, I think, like, reclaim or rebuild the family.
01:06:37.000 So they're a pro-family group.
01:06:40.000 Hold on, hold on, I like this.
01:06:42.000 It's not a white supremacist group, it's just a pro-family group.
01:06:44.000 Reclaim families or something.
01:06:46.000 What does that mean?
01:06:48.000 They're just a pro-family group.
01:06:49.000 This is a pro-family extremist group, so they're getting it wrong.
01:06:52.000 Must reclaim them.
01:06:54.000 Oh, Seamus just retweeted it.
01:06:55.000 I got the video here.
01:06:57.000 Let's play it.
01:06:58.000 You're video-saving us?
01:07:02.000 That's not acceptable.
01:07:05.000 You're trying to get us in trouble, sir.
01:07:07.000 Go find one.
01:07:08.000 I'm deleting the video.
01:07:09.000 No, you're not gonna touch my phone.
01:07:11.000 You're not taking a video of us.
01:07:14.000 Look, dude, I recognize you.
01:07:16.000 Yeah, I know you do.
01:07:17.000 I'm deleting the video.
01:07:19.000 This guy literally walked up to him and said in the most licensed and registration tone I've ever heard in my life.
01:07:27.000 Give me that camera.
01:07:28.000 You cannot film that video.
01:07:30.000 Going to delete this.
01:07:31.000 No, you're not gonna touch my phone.
01:07:33.000 You're not taking a video of us.
01:07:35.000 I mean, a lot of cops would do that.
01:07:36.000 I don't understand this.
01:07:38.000 He's taking a video even though you're not supposed to be recording?
01:07:42.000 Where's, uh, so this is from yesterday.
01:07:45.000 Where, where, uh, James O'Keefe's trying to get a whistleblower.
01:07:47.000 Where, where's Antifa, man?
01:07:49.000 Antifa, the one time we actually need your help.
01:07:51.000 You know what I mean?
01:07:51.000 To go out and film these guys and figure out who they are.
01:07:53.000 Y'all, y'all are nowhere to be found.
01:07:55.000 But maybe that's the litmus test.
01:07:56.000 Antifa is not there, and therefore this is not real.
01:07:58.000 Like, fed on, fed violence.
01:08:00.000 Yeah, exactly.
01:08:01.000 The feds aren't going to go film themselves.
01:08:02.000 Why would Antifa go film Patriot Front?
01:08:04.000 Dude, fed-on-fed crime makes me so sad.
01:08:07.000 I wish they got along better.
01:08:08.000 You ever hear those stories about the FBI and the DEA stinging each other?
01:08:12.000 Yes.
01:08:12.000 Like the DEA is trying to sell drugs to the FBI, and they're like, freeze!
01:08:15.000 Federal law enforcement!
01:08:16.000 Wait, so were we.
01:08:17.000 Wait, what's going on?
01:08:18.000 So, when I was a kid, there was a car... That's three million dollars.
01:08:21.000 When I was a kid, there was a car at the end of our block being super sketchy.
01:08:25.000 And so my mom called the police.
01:08:26.000 She's like, look, there's something really weird going on.
01:08:28.000 I don't know what it is.
01:08:30.000 And then the police came and it turned out that they were undercover cops, like, pretending to commit a crime to, like, try to entrap somebody or catch them or something.
01:08:38.000 So we turned the feds against each other, I guess.
01:08:42.000 On accident.
01:08:42.000 Your mom reported the police to the police?
01:08:44.000 My mom called the police on the police.
01:08:47.000 When they are actually terrorizing the neighborhood by pretending to be criminals.
01:08:51.000 No, they weren't, like, terrorizing, but they were up to something really, like, fishy that she did.
01:08:54.000 Yeah, but I'm sure your mom was not the only mom in the neighborhood who was like, um, what's with this lurking car?
01:09:00.000 Yeah, yeah, she was not, like, she did not call the cops often, but it was, uh...
01:09:06.000 Let's, uh, we'll jump to this next story.
01:09:08.000 We got this from TimCast.com.
01:09:10.000 Bud Light to release camo print bottles in attempt to recover from Dylan Mulvaney fiasco.
01:09:17.000 They're doing this on the eve of Pride.
01:09:20.000 They're going with camo for Pride.
01:09:26.000 Bud Light sales at the end of May 6th was down 27.7%, and you can see all of Anheuser-Busch's brands, ABI brands, Anheuser-Busch, InBev, have dropped.
01:09:42.000 And this is what The Street says.
01:09:44.000 New Bud Light data suggests outrage against company is waning.
01:09:48.000 What does that really mean?
01:09:50.000 The reason why sales aren't getting any lower is because they've lost already around 30% of their sales.
01:09:56.000 So close to one third, let's just say a quarter, of their customers have dropped them.
01:10:03.000 As this spreads, it will probably stay around this number.
01:10:07.000 A lot of people don't care.
01:10:10.000 I went to a grocery store, they had Bud Light right in front.
01:10:13.000 I didn't even think twice about it.
01:10:14.000 It was like, have a barbecue, go out and grill and have tacos.
01:10:19.000 And then it was a bunch of stuff like taco shells, and I was like, whatever.
01:10:22.000 And then the whole row with both sides was all Bud Light.
01:10:27.000 And coolers, and I thought it was funny.
01:10:28.000 I was like, oh, look at that, all the Bud Light.
01:10:30.000 And I didn't realize it until later.
01:10:30.000 I was like, oh, wait, they moved all the Bud Light to the front of the store.
01:10:33.000 And it was on sale.
01:10:34.000 I just, I love how... Sorry, I always kick this thing.
01:10:38.000 I'm a hazard.
01:10:39.000 I love just the blatant, hysterical overcompensation.
01:10:43.000 Like, no, we're not gay.
01:10:45.000 We're army guys.
01:10:46.000 Yeah, no, we're army guys now.
01:10:47.000 Yeah, for sure.
01:10:49.000 Look at us.
01:10:49.000 I got camo beer.
01:10:50.000 We're camo now.
01:10:50.000 It'd be funny if... No, but hold on, hold on.
01:10:53.000 You were wearing a dress last week.
01:10:55.000 Camo?
01:10:56.000 Is it Navy camo?
01:10:58.000 No, I was gonna say they didn't do a Navy thing, though.
01:11:00.000 The brand is blue, so they might go for the Navy blue.
01:11:03.000 I love the thing everybody was mentioning, like, the Navy made blue camo.
01:11:07.000 It's like you fall in the water and no one can see you.
01:11:09.000 Oh my gosh.
01:11:10.000 Like, what's the point of that?
01:11:11.000 They're like, hold on, we have to push away from this reputation.
01:11:14.000 Let's do something manly, military service.
01:11:17.000 I got it!
01:11:17.000 It cuts to their commercial.
01:11:18.000 In the Navy!
01:11:20.000 Like, what is the best military brand?
01:11:22.000 We have a great idea.
01:11:23.000 No, I think this is sort of a crazy answer.
01:11:25.000 I hope that anyone can see that this is such a gross way to try to sell your product off the military.
01:11:32.000 Stolen power!
01:11:33.000 It's a little bit stolen power.
01:11:35.000 I think if Bud Light really wanted to sell their products, this is what they should do.
01:11:38.000 And I know it's going to sound insane, but I think they should just start infiltrating Pinterest with like a thousand ways to cook using only Bud Light.
01:11:50.000 It's cheap, you can get Bud Light, it's not expensive right now, some places you can get it for free, and you can cook it in your slow cooker, you can do all those things but you have to use Bud Light.
01:11:58.000 Eventually that's the only way to sell your product, you have to pretend that you're not actually a drink, you're just actually some random ingredient.
01:12:04.000 I am getting more and more angry reading about this.
01:12:07.000 I am seriously pissed off reading this.
01:12:10.000 Anheuser-Busch will produce bottles of the camouflage print and images of the Folds of Honor program, which provides educational scholarships for children and spouses of fallen and disabled American military service members and first responders, according to the executive.
01:12:23.000 No, no, no, no, no.
01:12:25.000 Earmuffs, if your children are in the room, you have been warned.
01:12:29.000 Fuck you, Bud Light.
01:12:30.000 Go fuck yourselves.
01:12:32.000 This is probably ten times more offensive than anything they could have done.
01:12:35.000 They spit in your face, they mock you behind the scenes, they talk in private about how they know you're mad and they refuse to apologize, and then they say, I know, let's shove disabled military veterans in their faces as if that will absolve them of their responsibilities.
01:12:50.000 This is the most offensive way, in my opinion, to respond to the backlash.
01:12:55.000 Dude, well the first thing they did was bring up 9-11.
01:12:57.000 Seriously!
01:12:57.000 Which is wild!
01:12:59.000 They're like, uh, we're not gay, 9-11 ARMY!
01:13:03.000 America!
01:13:04.000 Don't you see that Clyde Stale?
01:13:05.000 We're the good guys!
01:13:06.000 With a horse!
01:13:07.000 We ride horses and we ride horses 9-11 army.
01:13:11.000 Also this foundation I feel sad for them because they're going to also get backlash like even if they're legitimately doing trying to do good work like why would you accept a partnership with Bud Light right now like I don't care how much you think they're worth this is a bad idea.
01:13:27.000 Yeah.
01:13:29.000 If a company wants to align themselves with Bud Light, that the only thing this European company is doing, it's not an American company, is repeatedly kicking us in the stomach over and over and over again.
01:13:41.000 just don't buy their products. I mean, trying to placate American consumers. And I think it
01:13:47.000 dovetails honestly, kind of perfectly with the whole Russia hoax. It's like, we're gonna lie to
01:13:51.000 you. We're gonna offend you and your values for this long period of time. But you still need to
01:13:56.000 like, buy into the American system. You still need to trust the authorities. You still need to trust
01:14:00.000 the FBI, you still need to buy our products. We're not going to change anything. Yeah, we'll give you
01:14:04.000 the Durham report will vindicate you slightly. Yeah, we'll partner with like, you know, some 911
01:14:09.000 charity. But it's like, no, we're done with you. Like you said, I won't use the word but it's
01:14:15.000 corporate America. They need to come out and be like, Hey, look.
01:14:20.000 We're really sorry about this.
01:14:21.000 We had a marketing VP who wanted to endorse, and we think the campaign was not appropriate for our audience.
01:14:28.000 We didn't mean to offend anybody, so we hope you'll stick with us.
01:14:31.000 We will not be pursuing campaigns like this in the future."
01:14:33.000 I'd have been like, oh, that was really straightforward and very nice of them.
01:14:35.000 Instead, they just keep laughing behind the scenes, and they're doing these tricks to try and make it seem like sales are returning.
01:14:43.000 And all they keep doing is, instead of assuming responsibility, they absolutely refuse to say, we were wrong.
01:14:51.000 We were wrong, sorry guys!
01:14:52.000 We were wrong.
01:14:53.000 And they're digging deeper and deeper and deeper.
01:14:56.000 I gotta be honest, I think saying they're wrong still would not undo the damage.
01:15:00.000 I think a lot of dudes are just going to see this as a gay brand from now on.
01:15:03.000 It's going to gross them out for that reason.
01:15:05.000 They're not going to want to be seen as gay, or they're not going to want to support it, so they're not going to buy the beer.
01:15:10.000 That's it.
01:15:10.000 If they came out and were like, hey, Sawi was an accident, like our wonderful elected leaders do, and the people at the FBI, it still wouldn't do anything for them.
01:15:19.000 I think these woke marketing executives, though, their brains are so infested, like they have drunk the Kool-Aid on all of these social issues, that I also think that they also don't even actually want to make money for their companies, right?
01:15:31.000 That's not in their DNA, right?
01:15:33.000 Doing that is another cardinal sin that you can't engage with.
01:15:36.000 And so I think these people have always used these platforms to push social agendas, so they're not gonna apologize because they're like, no, we're using this venue, this avenue, for the explicit purpose that we were hired for, and I'm sure they have CEI beyond belief in terms of their hiring processes.
01:15:54.000 So you're self-selecting for these loons.
01:15:56.000 They already disavowed Dylan Mulvaney behind the scenes, but they refuse to do it Up above the fold.
01:16:03.000 They refuse to do it in a statement.
01:16:05.000 They're going to their investors.
01:16:06.000 They're going to the distributors and saying, we don't have anything to do with this.
01:16:09.000 We disavow.
01:16:10.000 But then the customers who are angry, they're like, ignore those people.
01:16:13.000 They don't matter.
01:16:15.000 Instead, we'll make a camo print and say disabled veterans over and over again.
01:16:18.000 There you go, that'll get our customers back.
01:16:20.000 They want it to be like, now, if you aren't drinking our beer, it's because you hate disabled veterans.
01:16:24.000 You're like, I just haven't forgiven you for the past.
01:16:27.000 I mean, I wish they would just go dark, you know what I mean?
01:16:29.000 I wish they would just stop for a while.
01:16:31.000 Let yourself fade into the evil man.
01:16:33.000 I think people won't forget, I think you're right, but I think trying to start another campaign is only digging further into the hole, right?
01:16:40.000 Like, now it seems like you are just acting in the most smarmy way.
01:16:46.000 You're insulting military veterans, you're insulting the people who want to support military veterans, you're insulting your audience, and you're not making yourself more likable in the process.
01:16:54.000 Like, nothing is going to repair this.
01:16:56.000 The best thing they could do is to just stop talking for a while.
01:16:59.000 Something funny, Seamus?
01:17:01.000 No, nothing.
01:17:01.000 Something you want to share with the rest of the show?
01:17:03.000 No, nothing!
01:17:04.000 Serge just gave me a piece of paper with an idea on it that I also had earlier, by the way.
01:17:08.000 So you admit that you steal his ideas?
01:17:10.000 Nothing.
01:17:11.000 No, it's a cartoon that might be worthwhile.
01:17:14.000 It's about Bud Light.
01:17:16.000 I'll mention after the show.
01:17:17.000 You wouldn't want to spoil it.
01:17:19.000 But they've totally tanked themselves.
01:17:21.000 It's really embarrassing.
01:17:22.000 What they're doing is... It was super gross, but they've continued to be disgusting.
01:17:27.000 I don't see a way out of this for them, man.
01:17:29.000 I really don't.
01:17:30.000 If they're unbelievably fortunate...
01:17:32.000 people will forget, but that's probably not going to come up.
01:17:34.000 No, it's just they keep, they keep, you know, the best thing could have done is nothing.
01:17:38.000 If they did nothing, if they made no commercial, no Clydesdale, no 9-11, no Folds of Honor,
01:17:43.000 and just literally said, guys, shut up, and we just drop all marketing, and we're just going to sit
01:17:48.000 back. And then everyone would be like, well, you know, they did that thing that one time, I'm not
01:17:53.000 And then it would have just tapered off.
01:17:54.000 Instead, they're like, can we, every week, punch our customers figuratively in the face?
01:17:59.000 Well, it's also, yeah, it's just wild.
01:18:02.000 Like, as if that's... They're going for this low-hanging fruit, right, that they know people will agree with, which is really insulting.
01:18:08.000 Like, 9-11 is something you're supposed to have reverence for, because...
01:18:12.000 A lot of people died.
01:18:13.000 It was an attack on American soil to be like, oh, you know what?
01:18:15.000 We'll come out as like anti 9-11 or caring about the fact that 9-11 happened and that'll make up for the fact that we pissed off all of our customers and they'll start to relate to us again is insanely insulting.
01:18:25.000 It's like insanely insulting.
01:18:27.000 It's cultural to not buy this product.
01:18:29.000 Yeah.
01:18:30.000 There's video.
01:18:31.000 Someone posted a photo at a CVS where it's on sale.
01:18:34.000 They brought all the beer to the front.
01:18:35.000 They're like on clearance.
01:18:36.000 Please take this.
01:18:37.000 I went to a liquor store, and I was like, ooh, are they gonna put a Bud Light?
01:18:40.000 I didn't say, I'm like, where's the Bud Light, dads?
01:18:42.000 And then right there, right by the door, it said Bud Light sale, sale, sale.
01:18:45.000 All of it on sale, and you walk in, and they have a big shelf trying to get rid of it.
01:18:48.000 The product won't move.
01:18:49.000 Yeah, it's crazy.
01:18:50.000 I saw somebody send me something on Twitter.
01:18:52.000 It's like $4.95 for a 30 rack of Bud Light.
01:18:55.000 Wow.
01:18:56.000 That's crazy.
01:18:58.000 Some of the staff here were mentioning that they were at a local bar, and they asked the bartender.
01:19:01.000 Bartender said they can't move it at all, so they took it off tap and put Coors Light in, because nobody will buy it.
01:19:07.000 You can't move a product, what are you going to do?
01:19:08.000 And this is what people don't realize, though, and this is part of why it's been so effective.
01:19:11.000 Everyone's arguing, oh, this is such a good move by conservatives on the part of the culture war, or this is such a huge victory in the culture war on behalf of conservatives.
01:19:21.000 I don't know how much of this is actually culture war in the sense that people who are invested in culture and politics are paying attention to it and strategizing, so much as it's just normal people being grossed out.
01:19:31.000 Well, I think that's part of it.
01:19:32.000 It's a grassroots indication of the culture war, that it's not just about people who are in positions that are adjacent to the media.
01:19:40.000 It is about what the public actually will tolerate and what they won't.
01:19:44.000 I mean, we talk about all the time voting with your dollar.
01:19:46.000 This is the ultimate vote with your dollar moment.
01:19:49.000 They don't want companies like Bud Light.
01:19:52.000 Essentially making fun of them and assuming they'll take whatever advertising is doled out to them and they'll go along with it.
01:19:58.000 And I think that's a really powerful moment.
01:20:00.000 I mean, in some ways, it is, I think, something a lot of conservatives will look back on and say, like, we had an influence.
01:20:06.000 Like, yes, I'm sure Anheuser-Busch is suffering.
01:20:09.000 They're about to face massive layoffs.
01:20:10.000 There are probably really serious financial repercussions.
01:20:13.000 And there are people at Bud Light who don't deserve that, right?
01:20:15.000 Who didn't, who were never in a position to make these decisions.
01:20:18.000 On the other hand, I'm really grateful that as a culture there was something that we drew a line at.
01:20:26.000 I think a lot of this just boils down to the fact that a man in a dress is very off-putting.
01:20:31.000 It's a very off-putting thing.
01:20:33.000 And it's not so much people going, I'm insulted by the fact that this advertiser is trying to shove this down my throat and doesn't understand who I am as an advertiser or as a customer.
01:20:41.000 I think it's just them going, gross.
01:20:43.000 I don't want that.
01:20:44.000 It doesn't have to be one unanimous decision.
01:20:46.000 They just all collectively decided this was too far.
01:20:48.000 That they don't want to keep going with this.
01:20:50.000 And they think that's something that You know, people talk about the pendulum swing and with cultures we become more progressive or, you know, whatever else.
01:20:58.000 Like, this is one of those moments where I start to feel like it's swinging back the other way.
01:21:01.000 We're going to start slowly moving towards center after years and years of pushing everyone to these extremes.
01:21:07.000 They went too far.
01:21:09.000 I want to jump to this story here.
01:21:10.000 We got a tweet from Gwyn Hogan.
01:21:12.000 Outside PS17 in Williamsburg, kids chant, quote, we support asylum seekers but not on school grounds.
01:21:19.000 You've got to hear it to believe it.
01:21:20.000 We support asylum seekers, not on school grounds!
01:21:30.000 You hear that? They're kind of just like trailing off, like muttering.
01:21:33.000 Let me just say, this is, there's a few ways I see this, and this is, these kids, one, probably were told to chant this, have no idea what's going on.
01:21:40.000 Two, it's like basically them chanting, thank you government for hitting me twice instead of thrice.
01:21:46.000 Like, the government is forcing illegal immigrants into your schools, and you're like, that part's okay, just not in my school, please.
01:21:53.000 Do it to somebody else, not me.
01:21:55.000 Also, this is so embarrassing, this is why conservatives lose, right?
01:22:00.000 They're buying into the framing.
01:22:02.000 That you're buying into their framing by apologizing in your statement.
01:22:07.000 We're like, look, we're not against asylum seekers, okay?
01:22:10.000 This is New York!
01:22:12.000 I understand that.
01:22:13.000 These are New York liberals saying, thank you government, can I have another?
01:22:17.000 I know, but they're arguably debating from like a conservative position.
01:22:20.000 This is something people would call right-wing, like, oh yeah, you don't want them on school grounds.
01:22:25.000 How bigoted of you.
01:22:26.000 Well, they're coming out and saying they're against that, but they still feel this need to apologize.
01:22:31.000 I think you guys are all mixed up, Seamus.
01:22:32.000 These are urban liberals who are standing outside, cheering for quote-unquote asylum seekers, and then being like, but like, why in my school?
01:22:41.000 Yeah, maybe it's just cocked.
01:22:42.000 You should do it to someone else.
01:22:44.000 Maybe more like the Martha's Vineyard thing.
01:22:46.000 Yeah, I feel like for me, it's like, Don't we get mad at the left when they make young children who are confused about their gender identity testify before their state legislature saying, like, if you don't allow this medical intervention to be passed then I will personally suffer?
01:22:59.000 Like, don't we not like it when we use children for our talking points?
01:23:02.000 Why are we bringing small children out here to say, please don't send adult, I assume they're adult, asylum seekers to our school?
01:23:10.000 Like, why are they having to have this battle?
01:23:11.000 Why is no adult fighting for them?
01:23:13.000 Also, I mean, just the fact that you would have to preface this with, I'm not bad, I don't have the bad opinion, but I don't want them here.
01:23:21.000 Well, you're gonna lose, because you're already starting from a position of, sorry.
01:23:26.000 Sorry, I'm sorry.
01:23:28.000 Yeah.
01:23:29.000 Thank you, Governor, may I have another?
01:23:32.000 I'm sorry.
01:23:33.000 So this is what happens.
01:23:34.000 I think this story is actually a really great example of modern politics in that these urban liberals say, it's okay that the government does bad things, just please do it to other people.
01:23:45.000 Yeah.
01:23:45.000 So the government says, we want to do a bunch of bad stuff.
01:23:47.000 They say, okay, so long as it goes over there.
01:23:49.000 Yeah, I think you're right.
01:23:50.000 Instead of just saying, no, don't do the bad thing to anybody.
01:23:52.000 Well, it's like, um, it's like what we saw with Martha's Vineyard.
01:23:57.000 That was hysterical.
01:23:58.000 They were freaking out, like, we can't handle all of these people!
01:24:01.000 Really?
01:24:02.000 It was like four dozen.
01:24:03.000 Exactly.
01:24:04.000 Like, how could you do this to us?
01:24:06.000 If any community in the country could handle it, it was Martha's Vineyard.
01:24:10.000 They're like, round them up!
01:24:11.000 Get rid of them!
01:24:12.000 But you know there's like no organic support for the issue when they roll out the children.
01:24:16.000 I remember they would always do the school walkouts at first.
01:24:19.000 It started with the gun violence and I remember at my high school, I forgot what shooting it was, but they staged a walkout out of class except the administration like sanctioned it and literally gave them a special space to hold it.
01:24:33.000 It was like, who are you walking out on?
01:24:35.000 The school I work for put it on the official schedule for Exactly.
01:24:39.000 And then they did the same thing with the climate change walkout.
01:24:42.000 And to be frank, I think that's why they're pushing a bunch of this transgender, you know, gay stuff on kids, because I think they realized the way that they sort of mainstreamed a lot of these climate change and school shooting issues was by getting the kids behind it and having them do these walkouts and mass protests.
01:25:00.000 They're like, if we can get the young kids You know, drinking the Kool-Aid on this issue.
01:25:04.000 It's the Greta Thunberg effect.
01:25:05.000 Right, exactly.
01:25:06.000 I can't tell you how many teachers were like, she's so inspirational.
01:25:08.000 Like, what a bizarre sign.
01:25:09.000 It's like South Park, when they're like, what's going on, we're protesting the war?
01:25:13.000 Okay, yay, no school.
01:25:15.000 This looks like the teacher said, kids, at 11, we're all gonna go protest.
01:25:18.000 The kids are like, okay, I guess.
01:25:20.000 And the funny thing is, the kids don't even have any enthusiasm.
01:25:23.000 They don't even know what asylum means.
01:25:26.000 We've been they like they really don't care to say words and some of the kids are laughing clearly not paying
01:25:31.000 attention Just like I'm not in school. What a crazy proposal. I don't
01:25:35.000 know that the specifics but to even have like asylum seekers on school
01:25:39.000 grounds like the fact that that's something that we're even Debating that there needs to be a protest about I mean
01:25:44.000 But there but there aren't any asylum seekers anywhere because none of these people are asylum seekers
01:25:50.000 They're adult male economic migrants.
01:25:54.000 I doubt a single one of them is an asylum seeker.
01:25:57.000 They are men who are told online that they can come to the United States because the borders are open and there are jobs.
01:26:02.000 They go to the border and they talk to reporters and the reporter's like, why are you here?
01:26:05.000 And they're like, because there's jobs.
01:26:09.000 No, I think that is what happens.
01:26:10.000 Sorry, I can't fix this UFO.
01:26:13.000 I think, again, I have to go back to we don't like it when the left trots out children to argue their talking points.
01:26:19.000 So even if you're trying to say, like, this is slightly, you know, an immigration restrictionist talking point, Why are we making the children do it?
01:26:27.000 We have to hold ourselves to the same standards that we hold other people to.
01:26:31.000 And I think you're right.
01:26:31.000 I don't think these kids, these kids were like, hey, we can go outside.
01:26:35.000 You're gonna film us for social media?
01:26:36.000 Haha, hilarious.
01:26:37.000 Like, they don't care.
01:26:38.000 And I appreciate that about them, right?
01:26:40.000 Like, they're children.
01:26:41.000 They just want to go to school and hang out with their friends.
01:26:43.000 That's why we don't drag them into our political battle.
01:26:45.000 The feds probably didn't incite this protest.
01:26:47.000 We can't be sure.
01:26:48.000 But yeah, just No, it's just some social studies teacher who's like, I'm going to tell you about civic disobedience and we're all going to come outside.
01:26:56.000 I made these signs for you to hold.
01:26:58.000 I had a teacher once who needed to get exercise so she would just turn it into a school thing where she's like, we have to go outside for science!
01:27:05.000 And then she would just like walk around and get real sweaty.
01:27:07.000 I'm like, we're not doing anything for science.
01:27:09.000 It's like we're in a city walking around the block.
01:27:11.000 At least you got to go outside though.
01:27:13.000 That was nice.
01:27:13.000 Yeah, we didn't care.
01:27:14.000 We were like, yay, outside, woo!
01:27:16.000 And then the teacher was like, trust me, it's for science.
01:27:19.000 Okay, girl, we believe you.
01:27:20.000 Like, I think that's part of it, right?
01:27:22.000 Our education system is not extremely effective, especially these look like there are a ton of young boys.
01:27:27.000 Young boys don't benefit.
01:27:28.000 Those signs don't look too good.
01:27:29.000 Well, they don't benefit by sitting at a desk all day.
01:27:32.000 That's not the optimal learning situation for like, what are these, middle school boys?
01:27:37.000 I think that We can all agree it's good to have students get learning about the news and being engaged in cultural events, but like, I think this is some teacher saying, come on, let's organize something.
01:27:48.000 I think it's, I don't know, I get frustrated with stuff like this because it will see this video and nothing will happen, right?
01:27:55.000 If there are really adult men that are being inserted into the school, the fact that these kids are theoretically upset about it won't mean anything to the school board.
01:28:01.000 That's kind of hilarious.
01:28:02.000 They were like, we got a bunch of adult men who need to sleep in your school kids.
01:28:06.000 It's like, well, all right.
01:28:07.000 Let me show you this other follow-up video.
01:28:10.000 This really exemplifies everything very well.
01:28:12.000 Listen to this.
01:28:12.000 Families who fled war is what she's saying.
01:28:17.000 Fleeing.
01:28:17.000 Families who fled war is what she's saying.
01:28:32.000 This woman should right right away there should be like there should be a group of people
01:28:37.000 who go to her and say ma'am I'm sorry but you can't vote anymore.
01:28:40.000 We're just not allowed.
01:28:41.000 We've all agreed.
01:28:43.000 Alright, so this is one massive problem with the discourse.
01:28:46.000 Whenever anyone tries to set any standard, no matter how reasonable, they're met with a million different concerns about the level of culpability there might be for people who want to violate that standard.
01:28:58.000 So, what she's essentially saying is, well, why did they flee?
01:29:02.000 Why are they here?
01:29:03.000 Okay, it doesn't matter.
01:29:05.000 They shouldn't be at that school.
01:29:06.000 That's it.
01:29:09.000 Either explain to me why that's an appropriate place for them to be and change my mind, or stop engaging with this conversation.
01:29:16.000 Don't give me a million and one reasons why we should feel bad for them.
01:29:19.000 We can feel bad for a lot of people, but we need to have rules as a society.
01:29:23.000 For this woman, you don't approach her and argue with her and let her ask why you're blocking.
01:29:28.000 Say, why do you want adult men in the school?
01:29:32.000 Just give me a reason.
01:29:33.000 And then when she goes, their family's fleeing war, I'd be like, okay, well, that's not what we're talking about.
01:29:39.000 I'll say, okay, ma'am, if you came to me with a family and said this family fleeing war needs a place, I'd be agree with you.
01:29:45.000 But my question to you is, why do you want adult men By themselves, looking for jobs, sleeping in my kid's school.
01:29:53.000 And also, since you're so enlightened and empathetic and understanding, why don't you go buy some hotel rooms for him?
01:29:58.000 Why don't you take care of it instead of putting it on the children of the community by placing them in their schools?
01:30:02.000 I proposed, I said, you know, let's get the Republicans on this one, a bill that says all You know, all these asylum seekers, you know, if someone comes into this country and applies for asylum, they should be placed inside the home of an urban liberal Democrat voter.
01:30:20.000 Go to New York and say they applied for asylum so they get to live in your house.
01:30:23.000 Sorry.
01:30:24.000 You voted for it, because you know what happened?
01:30:27.000 These people would vote for border security in two seconds if we did that.
01:30:31.000 The issue is, this video exemplifies how people in Democrat cities vote to bring in illegal immigrants and then try and force them on poor people, saying, not in my backyard, in your backyard.
01:30:41.000 No, no, no, no.
01:30:42.000 We're going to put them in your backyard from now on.
01:30:43.000 Let's get that bill.
01:30:45.000 These people go to cities and they put them in your house.
01:30:47.000 This lady who's like, their family's fleeing war.
01:30:49.000 Let's get two of these adult men and put them in her home.
01:30:51.000 And it's not just force them, it's then guilt and shame them if you dare to reject the, you know, hypothesis that just dozens of, you know, fighting age men should just be able to basically invade your country, invade your house.
01:31:04.000 And I think immigration is one of the issues that the elites really, really, really love to lie to us the most about.
01:31:09.000 And I know there are a lot of issues that could compete for that spot.
01:31:12.000 But I think they just love the issue of immigration, in part because I think at their core they hate this country, they don't think there's nothing to actually being American to them.
01:31:20.000 But the fact that they have the gall to stand up there, whether it's Democrats holding press conferences, you know, on the Hill saying that immigration is actually a boon to America, it's actually great for American workers, they're doing the jobs that Americans want.
01:31:33.000 It's such a lie.
01:31:35.000 It's so ridiculous when it's depressing the wages of American workers.
01:31:39.000 Particularly the people that Democrats purport to protect the most, minority communities, I just think they really get off on lying to the American people about immigration, and it's one of the issues.
01:31:49.000 Honestly, that red-pilled me.
01:31:50.000 I was born and raised in Los Angeles, and I saw firsthand how hypocritical these people were when it came to not just immigration but to every issue.
01:31:58.000 It was fine if it was happening elsewhere, you know, somewhere where they weren't impacted.
01:32:02.000 But the second it encroached, not even necessarily in their backyard, but just a little too close for
01:32:08.000 comfort, suddenly they reversed, at least in private, on the issue and they would do everything
01:32:13.000 they could to make sure it didn't affect them. I mean, you can very easily predict whether
01:32:18.000 someone is going to be liberal or conservative based on whether they're going to pay the price
01:32:21.000 for liberal policies. And people who have to pay the price for liberal policies inevitably become
01:32:25.000 conservative. And people who do not have to pay any price for it keep spouting their liberal
01:32:29.000 talking points and then shaming anyone who has to suffer because of their policies for not embracing
01:32:35.000 the suffering with absolute joy.
01:32:37.000 Yeah.
01:32:37.000 I mean, it's crazy as well.
01:32:38.000 If you go to LA, and you know this as well, if you're in Beverly Hills, the town police there, or like the area police, keep that little area very nice and very clean and very tidy.
01:32:46.000 You drive about 10 minutes down the street and you're on 6th Street, and it's a totally different story.
01:32:50.000 Remember the guy who was cheering on on Twitter, the riots?
01:32:52.000 And then once the riots started heading towards Beverly Hills, he was like, No!
01:32:55.000 Why are you coming?
01:32:55.000 He's tweeting like, Don't come here!
01:32:57.000 Go downtown!
01:32:58.000 Go where the poor people live!
01:32:59.000 And then he said, Sorry!
01:32:59.000 No!
01:33:00.000 To go back to the Martha's Vineyard example, they immediately removed them.
01:33:04.000 None of the migrants stayed on Martha's Vineyard.
01:33:06.000 They shipped them to Cape Cod, where they stayed on a military base.
01:33:09.000 They were willing to get rid of this problem as soon as it was inconvenient to them.
01:33:12.000 That's why, again, I said this before, but- We're going to go to Super Chats!
01:33:16.000 So if you haven't already, would you kindly smash that like button?
01:33:18.000 I'll take credit.
01:33:20.000 It's running perfect for me.
01:33:21.000 There's no issues here whatsoever.
01:33:22.000 It's because I talked about Cape Cod.
01:33:24.000 They're so touchy on the internet about that.
01:33:26.000 Yeah, on our end, everything is totally fine.
01:33:29.000 It's literally just YouTube.
01:33:30.000 Lag spike.
01:33:31.000 Glitch.
01:33:32.000 Sorry, I was stepping on a cable.
01:33:32.000 Yep, that's YouTube.
01:33:35.000 It's the FBI.
01:33:36.000 It's like frame jumping now.
01:33:38.000 We've got no dropped frames, we've got perfect connection, we've got high-speed internet, so... Yep, just nothing wrong.
01:33:43.000 Anyway... Blame YouTube.
01:33:45.000 If this UFO was a thing that kept the show running and you guys sat me near it, I'm gonna be real mad, because I don't need this kind of pressure.
01:33:52.000 Let's, uh, let's read some Super Chats.
01:33:54.000 Raymond G. Stanley Jr.
01:33:55.000 says, Tim, local distributor.
01:33:56.000 Stacked of pallid, uh, pallets of beer everywhere.
01:33:59.000 Bud Light in back corner nearly empty.
01:34:01.000 Me to clerk, dang, you selling lots of Bud Light?
01:34:03.000 Him, nope, it's the only beer we didn't restock.
01:34:07.000 Yeah, I mean, if you can't move it.
01:34:08.000 This is what John Rich said when he, at first he was like, look, we're not moving it.
01:34:12.000 We're not, we're not moving Bud Light.
01:34:14.000 That's, we're not getting rid of it because the boycott.
01:34:15.000 It's just nobody's buying it, so what are we supposed to do?
01:34:17.000 We're gonna, we're gonna stock a different beer if nobody wants it.
01:34:19.000 Yeah, it's gonna go bad otherwise.
01:34:20.000 Yep.
01:34:22.000 Holistic Patriot says, we want official Tim Pool beanies.
01:34:25.000 Big boxes of official beanies.
01:34:26.000 Actually, I got one right here.
01:34:27.000 Whoa, whoa.
01:34:29.000 Hold on.
01:34:29.000 I'm a journalist now.
01:34:30.000 Give me a beanie.
01:34:30.000 There you go.
01:34:32.000 Seamus is going to put on the official TimCast beanie.
01:34:35.000 Should I have, like, which logo facing forward?
01:34:38.000 This one?
01:34:38.000 Well, it can also be worn like a slouch beanie if you unfold it.
01:34:41.000 Oh, no way.
01:34:42.000 Yeah, so you can wear it however you want to, as long as it's frozen.
01:34:44.000 And then I can see on our back and everything seems to be fine.
01:34:48.000 Alright, where are we at?
01:34:50.000 Wrath of Paul says, you were talking about bear attacks yesterday, and my first thought was I'd rather take my chances with the bears in the middle of nowhere than live among humans in some of these big cities.
01:35:00.000 Completely agree.
01:35:01.000 We do need bear wrestlers, that's what I learned yesterday.
01:35:04.000 As a journalist, I believe it is the case that more people are harmed by other people than bears.
01:35:10.000 That is a fact.
01:35:12.000 From you, a journalist.
01:35:13.000 The fact-checkers agree.
01:35:14.000 Thank you.
01:35:14.000 That is, I've learned.
01:35:15.000 The fact-checkers in the room, they're consenting.
01:35:17.000 The fact-checkers all agree with me.
01:35:18.000 I am correct.
01:35:20.000 It's funny because it's slightly, it's sort of your Tucker Carlson voice, just not quite so extreme.
01:35:25.000 This is how I talk.
01:35:27.000 It's your journalist voice.
01:35:28.000 This is my journalist voice.
01:35:30.000 All right, Mad Max says, Derm Report in six words.
01:35:32.000 They all got away with it.
01:35:33.000 Watch Greg Gutfeld's epic rant about the Derm Report.
01:35:36.000 Very interesting.
01:35:39.000 All right, where are we at?
01:35:40.000 Unwoke says, I like the name of your decaf coffee.
01:35:42.000 Sure do wish I thought of it first.
01:35:44.000 Talk about seditious conspiracy.
01:35:46.000 So we have two decaf brands or blends.
01:35:49.000 There's a light and a dark decaf.
01:35:52.000 Sleepy Joe and Unwoke.
01:35:54.000 That's right.
01:35:55.000 And those were the names came up were thought of by our members.
01:35:59.000 If you want to buy our coffee go to castbrew.com.
01:36:02.000 You'll be able to buy them there.
01:36:03.000 Like you're actually part of this.
01:36:04.000 Seamus can't do it.
01:36:05.000 He can't impersonate.
01:36:06.000 I'm getting close.
01:36:07.000 See, practice makes perfect.
01:36:08.000 Practice makes perfect.
01:36:09.000 As a journalist, I will learn.
01:36:11.000 But you're but like You're just talking.
01:36:14.000 That's how you're talking.
01:36:16.000 But you're not changing your voice.
01:36:18.000 We sound so similar.
01:36:19.000 Uh-huh.
01:36:20.000 It's that- that famous Garfield- Joe Rogan is also hard to do an impression of.
01:36:24.000 I know.
01:36:25.000 I'm getting- I'll nail yours down eventually.
01:36:28.000 Like Trump is a little difficult.
01:36:30.000 But he has that nasally, you put your tongue over your nose.
01:36:33.000 You put your tongue over the back of your mouth when you talk to get that nasally kind of thing.
01:36:38.000 And then you gotta get that country.
01:36:40.000 You go down when you say it.
01:36:42.000 Everyone in the chat, tell me, do I sound like Tim?
01:36:45.000 Let me know in the comments below.
01:36:47.000 You don't.
01:36:48.000 They will decide.
01:36:48.000 They'll decide.
01:36:49.000 That was more like Tucker Carlson.
01:36:51.000 You don't sound like him, but I can understand what cadence you're almost picking up on.
01:36:55.000 Does that sound like it makes sense?
01:36:57.000 No, I know what you mean.
01:36:57.000 I'm like, that's what I have so far.
01:36:59.000 We'll work on it.
01:37:00.000 I'll keep doing the Tim voice, and then eventually I'll have a Tim impression down.
01:37:03.000 No!
01:37:04.000 How could you guys say no?
01:37:05.000 Eventually I'll get the Tim impression down, and then on days where you're sick, I'll just put the beanie on, and I'll... Here's my point, look.
01:37:12.000 Jordan Peterson has this thing where he's like, psychologist.
01:37:15.000 He's got this, like, way of speaking to him.
01:37:17.000 Exactly.
01:37:18.000 And then, like, for whatever it is about me or Joe, it's just generic, perhaps?
01:37:23.000 Like, Joe has a unique voice, you know when you hear it, but impersonating it's like, how do you You can't.
01:37:29.000 It's tough.
01:37:29.000 You can't get it.
01:37:30.000 Well, Joe Rogan's voice is, it's, it's like, I think you could probably get his cadence down, but his actual intonation, like his voice, I'm sorry, you could get his intonation too, but the voice itself is so unique.
01:37:43.000 We gotta send one of these beanies to Michael Malice.
01:37:46.000 Because he did that one episode where he wore the same clothes as me, and then he kept the beanie, and he hung up on his wall.
01:37:52.000 Right, I literally got asked on Twitter what I like about Michael Malice, and I said that he's a showman and he's not afraid of costumes.
01:37:57.000 Yeah.
01:37:58.000 He also has the... I think we gave him the aluminum foil hat that Alex Jones made.
01:38:02.000 No way.
01:38:03.000 I mean, those are artifacts, man.
01:38:04.000 You know what I mean?
01:38:04.000 Definitely.
01:38:05.000 All right, where are we at?
01:38:06.000 Where are we at?
01:38:08.000 What do we have on these here super chats?
01:38:10.000 Let's find a good super chat.
01:38:13.000 One day I'll get my impression of Tim down.
01:38:15.000 Do you practice?
01:38:16.000 And then you'll all be sorry.
01:38:18.000 You'll all be sorry.
01:38:19.000 Well, clearly not.
01:38:20.000 If I did, it would be A+.
01:38:22.000 But you do?
01:38:22.000 What if you've been practicing for years already?
01:38:24.000 It's just that difficult.
01:38:25.000 It's a really hard one to crack, but I'll get it.
01:38:28.000 Let's grab some.
01:38:29.000 What do we got?
01:38:29.000 Sporkwich says, they're not conspiracies, they're spoilers.
01:38:34.000 I've heard people try and do Joe Rogan, and they just, they can't get Joe Rogan.
01:38:38.000 Maybe that's what the video of Trump in the elevator was.
01:38:41.000 It was Trump impersonating Joe Rogan.
01:38:45.000 Oh my gosh.
01:38:46.000 I do want to see that video then.
01:38:47.000 Seamus, as a journalist, please find Trump doing an impression of Joe Rogan.
01:38:51.000 I will.
01:38:52.000 I think it's my duty.
01:38:52.000 As a journalist.
01:38:55.000 Joe Hill says, don't forget Ukraine also interfered in the 2016 election by helping Clinton with Steele dossier.
01:39:01.000 Ukraine, I think it was Manafort documents, wasn't it?
01:39:05.000 I thought it was Manafort.
01:39:08.000 And then even Politico said that they were scrambling after interfering to help the Clintons.
01:39:15.000 And then Politico wrote another article later claiming that their article was disinformation from Russia.
01:39:21.000 Just hilarious.
01:39:22.000 Politico is Russian disinformation, says Politico.
01:39:25.000 But they told you themselves, so you can't be mad at them.
01:39:28.000 Joshua says, once again, Seamus is rolling 20s.
01:39:31.000 He's literally the reincarnation of Midas at this point, because everything about him is pure gold, even the potatoes.
01:39:36.000 You are so kind, thank you.
01:39:38.000 Except my Tim impression.
01:39:39.000 But, I do appreciate the compliment.
01:39:41.000 It's very kind.
01:39:42.000 Amish Man says, incredible guest.
01:39:43.000 I was a huge fan of yours growing up watching you on Boy Meets World.
01:39:47.000 Please tell Ben Savage to come on TimCast IRL next.
01:39:50.000 Do you hear that a lot?
01:39:51.000 I get that a lot, and I actually didn't know who she was at first.
01:39:55.000 I don't know her name.
01:39:56.000 Topanga.
01:39:56.000 I know the character is Topanga, but I don't know the actress's name.
01:40:00.000 I should know.
01:40:00.000 Topanga?
01:40:01.000 Well, like, they were stoned when they were writing that show.
01:40:03.000 They were like, it's like a show about a kid in school, and, you know, his name is... What was his name in the show?
01:40:08.000 Cory, right?
01:40:08.000 I think Cory, but there's also... Cory's a good name, and then you got like John, Mike, Bill, and Topanga, and they're like, what was that last one?
01:40:15.000 And her explanation is like, I've never really seen the show, but it's like, her parents are hippies, and let's not talk about it again, right?
01:40:19.000 Well, there's Topanga Canyon.
01:40:20.000 Yeah they're saying like she's named after like above Malibu yeah.
01:40:25.000 But the thing is like some TV shows names that are in them become popular sort of trend as baby names but I don't think anybody picked up on the Topanga trend.
01:40:33.000 I think it's kind of a cool name.
01:40:34.000 Is this what you're gonna name your daughter?
01:40:35.000 Maybe.
01:40:36.000 Oh future Topanga.
01:40:38.000 Too on the nose.
01:40:40.000 No people always say that and I never Do you watch the show?
01:40:43.000 No.
01:40:45.000 Honestly, growing up, I never really watched movies or TV, so I never understand pop culture.
01:40:51.000 I was on War Room once on an episode, and Steve turned to me.
01:40:55.000 He was asking me how I do a lot of my reporting, and I said, well, primarily pattern recognition.
01:41:00.000 And he goes, you're just like Rain Man.
01:41:02.000 And I didn't know what he meant by that, so I was like, Thank you?
01:41:06.000 And then I later looked it up and I was like, oh, I think you just called me, like, autistic.
01:41:10.000 Which I could, I don't know.
01:41:13.000 But Rain Man was really good at playing Blackjack.
01:41:16.000 Yeah, he's really good at math.
01:41:17.000 So, take me to a casino.
01:41:19.000 I hadn't seen Rain Man.
01:41:21.000 I only saw it passively when I was a kid.
01:41:23.000 But I know the trope is like, they go to Vegas and they play Blackjack.
01:41:25.000 So I was like, I really want to watch this movie.
01:41:27.000 And it's barely about that.
01:41:28.000 It's literally just a story about a guy who comes to love his brother that he had just met for the first time.
01:41:32.000 And I was like, oh.
01:41:33.000 I thought it was like about- It's a sweet film.
01:41:35.000 It is.
01:41:36.000 I thought it was gonna be about, like, I thought the movie was literally a guy takes his brother to Vegas to win a bunch of money and get super rich, when it was really a guy finds out he has a brother, at one point goes to Vegas one time, gets kicked out, but then decides that he loves his brother, even though his brother is developmentally disabled, and then tries to fight for custody, but then eventually just ends up visiting him periodically, and I'm like, oh.
01:41:59.000 That's not at all what I thought the movie was going to be.
01:42:01.000 I read the Wikipedia summary and thought it's not at all what I gathered from that.
01:42:06.000 I thought it was just about gambling.
01:42:07.000 That's the part people remember.
01:42:11.000 Isn't there a movie about some guy at MIT who's then part of a secret poker league?
01:42:17.000 Yeah, and they're counting cards.
01:42:18.000 This happens though where you'll remember a movie being about something and you remember that being the whole movie and it turns out that's just like a 10 or 15 minute sequence.
01:42:26.000 Like I remember I rewatched Home Alone a couple years ago and the sequence where he's like beating up on the burglars with his booby traps I think is like 10 to 20 minutes.
01:42:33.000 It's really, most of the film is just about him like running around being stupid while his parents are gone.
01:42:38.000 And when he's in New York, you know, he just meets Donald Trump.
01:42:41.000 That's the whole movie.
01:42:42.000 It's just two hours.
01:42:42.000 It's literally just the same movie twice.
01:42:45.000 It's the exact same movie twice.
01:42:46.000 Like, every plot point is just copying New York.
01:42:48.000 It's the only time I understood sequels, right?
01:42:50.000 They're like, this format worked.
01:42:51.000 Children loved it.
01:42:52.000 We'll plug in slightly different variables.
01:42:54.000 We'll do it again.
01:42:55.000 That makes sense to me.
01:42:56.000 Who's even the same criminals in New York, you know?
01:42:58.000 Well, sure.
01:42:58.000 Who else would be after him?
01:42:59.000 Exactly.
01:43:00.000 We don't want to create too many bad guys.
01:43:01.000 We don't want to freak children out.
01:43:02.000 That's true.
01:43:03.000 There aren't that many bad people in the world.
01:43:05.000 Sean Austin says, Tim, deepfake Trump in an elevator picking his nose and release it as the elevator tape ultimate troll.
01:43:10.000 I saw that so I went on mid-journey and I just made Trump screaming and then Trump crying and then it's Trump holding his neck going like in an elevator and I just quote tweeted the Huffington Post thing like there it is there's your there's your I found it.
01:43:22.000 Best journalist ever!
01:43:25.000 I tried a couple and I couldn't get it to work because they violated the TOS.
01:43:29.000 I wrote like, Trump firing a gun into the air, yelling, and it wouldn't make it.
01:43:34.000 Well every time I tried to make Joe Biden or Trump, Uh, it would say rejected, and I'd have to click appeal, and then it would say your appeal has been approved, and it would make the image.
01:43:45.000 And then the weirdest thing is, I tried doing some very basic images.
01:43:50.000 What I was trying to do was take a picture, an existing picture, and then write something like, a woman standing in this picture, and then it would be like, rejected, this is inappropriate content, and I was like, what?
01:44:00.000 You know what I think was happening?
01:44:02.000 So Mid Journey is trained on the internet, and I think the issue is, the prompt discovered, like, my prompt was innocuous.
01:44:10.000 A woman standing in a forest.
01:44:11.000 I was like, here's, and then you can upload the picture and then it'll render it.
01:44:15.000 I think Midjourney was trying to make sexual images because of what the internet is when you search for women.
01:44:21.000 Maybe like sports bras or like women in bikinis and stuff like that.
01:44:25.000 So the AI was like, nope, this is making something naughty, we can't show it to you.
01:44:28.000 And I was just like, wait a minute.
01:44:30.000 Like, I did not ask for anything bad.
01:44:32.000 I'm trying to just see what Midjourney can do here.
01:44:35.000 So a bunch of the stuff I tried doing, I would put like, here's the trick, you put High-res photograph, caption, Getty Images.
01:44:44.000 And then what that'll do is it'll imitate a Getty image, which is typically like news footage of an event.
01:44:51.000 And that's how I made Donald Trump running with Sonic the Hedgehog, and it looks actually like Trump is running.
01:44:55.000 Sonic looks totally fake, because of course Sonic's not a real thing, but Trump looks like he's actually running.
01:44:59.000 And then I wrote America's back.
01:45:01.000 So those are some of the tricks.
01:45:03.000 You'll also notice if you go into the mid-journey rooms in Discord, there's this huge wall of text people use that lists a whole bunch of camera and file formats to force the AI to make high-resolution, high-dynamic range photographs that look really, really good.
01:45:17.000 Yeah, it's crazy what they can make when you put in that massive prompt.
01:45:20.000 It's cool stuff.
01:45:21.000 Yeah.
01:45:23.000 Cain Abel says, Seamus, if you want to be a journalist, just copy the mainstream by making bull crap up.
01:45:28.000 That is pretty much all they do now.
01:45:30.000 You can just add a twist to it to make it funny.
01:45:32.000 I'm excited to start doing that.
01:45:34.000 Yeah, so like, let's do this.
01:45:36.000 You don't want to get sued, so Seamus put on this beanie, right?
01:45:40.000 Well, as we know, news outlets have claimed Tim Pool is far-right.
01:45:45.000 We can now write, Seamus Coghlan dons offensive far-right costume on air, considered deeply offensive by many, shocking display, etc, etc, and then, you know, people can start to imagine.
01:45:57.000 After you tweet that out, I am shocked by Seamus Coghlan donning such a racist and far-right costume that's deeply offensive to marginalized people.
01:46:06.000 Someone else can then say, summarizing, Seamus Coghlan was accused of wearing racist outfit.
01:46:11.000 So you can keep changing the story.
01:46:13.000 This is what they do.
01:46:13.000 And then it's me dressed as a leprechaun.
01:46:15.000 But it's all, it's all, you can't sue over it because it's, it's, this is what's happening to our society.
01:46:21.000 It's the bank robbery analogy I used.
01:46:23.000 A guy walks up to a bank and throws a burlap sack on the steps and keeps walking.
01:46:27.000 That's not illegal.
01:46:28.000 Another guy walks in, picks up the burlap sack and throws it in the lobby, carries out his business.
01:46:32.000 Another guy brings the burlap sack to the counter and says, I think someone dropped this and then leaves.
01:46:36.000 Another guy throws a note, a demand note, onto the steps.
01:46:39.000 Someone brings it in.
01:46:40.000 No one knows who wrote it or where it came from.
01:46:42.000 The guy who picked it up on the ground didn't do it.
01:46:44.000 And then all of these people did one little thing.
01:46:47.000 So when the money is removed from the bank and then thrown into a truck, not a single person robbed the bank, no one goes to jail.
01:46:53.000 This is what's happening right now in society.
01:46:55.000 Journalists will say something like, I heard Seamus was racist.
01:46:59.000 And then someone will write, Shameless, comma, a deeply racist individual, or a man accused of being deeply racist, comma, and then someone else will see that and be like, Shameless Coughlin is known as a deeply offensive racist who makes racist comments.
01:47:15.000 They'll just keep changing the story until they make up and fabricate their own sources, and then they can write whatever they want.
01:47:22.000 They can be like, Seamus, you're a controversial figure who's been accused of being a racist.
01:47:25.000 What do you say to that?
01:47:25.000 And you're like, when?
01:47:27.000 By who?
01:47:28.000 And then it's this huge chain of fake news written by the same people over and over again.
01:47:31.000 Exactly.
01:47:31.000 Well, we have this source, this source, this source, this source, this source.
01:47:34.000 It's idea laundering.
01:47:34.000 It's several Google page results deep that they have this, but there's no supporting evidence.
01:47:40.000 All right.
01:47:41.000 KJ Seeth says, Tim, I have grown towards Vivek's message.
01:47:44.000 Do you think his campaign is real or is it for book sales?
01:47:47.000 I think it's real.
01:47:50.000 I think a reasonable person can conclude that Vivek probably won't win, but a lot of people run for messaging purposes.
01:47:57.000 I'm not going to tell you.
01:47:58.000 I think Vivek really does want to win.
01:47:59.000 I genuinely think so.
01:48:01.000 I would argue that he probably knows he wouldn't, but I'm not going to say that because I don't know what he's thinking.
01:48:05.000 I think he's a smart guy.
01:48:07.000 He knows his likelihood of winning is very low.
01:48:09.000 I would imagine his intent is to force a message on ESG onto the debate stage and to push this into modern politics.
01:48:18.000 However, I think he's trying to win and he wants to win.
01:48:22.000 I think even Trump was surprised that he won.
01:48:24.000 What was the story like on election night when the results came in?
01:48:26.000 He was like, did we win?
01:48:27.000 Did that really happen?
01:48:29.000 Like, wow.
01:48:30.000 He didn't think it was gonna happen.
01:48:32.000 But I think Vivek's great.
01:48:34.000 I think he's great.
01:48:36.000 What do we got here?
01:48:37.000 AbsintheX says, Seamus, Catholic Church has commands as don't covet your neighbor's wife and things, but Exodus only says don't covet anything, so which commandment was removed so the count still comes out as 10?
01:48:50.000 Wait, hold on.
01:48:50.000 You're saying Exodus says... So, Exodus does list a number of things you can't covet there.
01:48:56.000 But, if you actually read Exodus 20, it's a number of different statements.
01:49:01.000 So, Jewish people and Protestants number it a little bit differently than Catholics.
01:49:07.000 So, for example, at the end, we break up the 9th and 10th commandment into, Thou shalt not covet your neighbor's goods or covet your neighbor's wife.
01:49:15.000 I'm sorry, covering your neighbor's wife is the 9th commandment, covering your neighbor's good is the 10th commandment, but yeah, there are other things listed.
01:49:22.000 I guess I'm not entirely sure what he's asking, like what was... I don't know if I understand either.
01:49:27.000 Yeah, could you re-read that?
01:49:30.000 He's basically saying that... I honestly don't know.
01:49:35.000 Some say don't cover anything, some say don't cover your neighbor's wife and things.
01:49:38.000 Oh, okay, so there are a number of differences, right?
01:49:41.000 So, for example, if you—and I have this pulled up here—but, you shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything in heaven above, or on earth beneath, or in the waters below.
01:49:51.000 You shall not bow down before them or worship them, for I am the Lord your God.
01:49:54.000 I am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sins of the parents.
01:49:57.000 to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me but showing love to a thousand generations of love for those who love me and keep my commandments okay so yeah that's that's compressed into you shall not make graven images the way protestants some of the ten commandments as catholics we lump Taking other gods before him as something that also prohibits making graven images and then worshipping them.
01:50:21.000 So there are different ways that these things are numbered.
01:50:25.000 But that's not something that people don't acknowledge.
01:50:27.000 That's not a secret, I guess, is my point.
01:50:29.000 We should do an episode of The Culture War with you and Ian.
01:50:31.000 Because you guys were supposed to do that long-form conversation that never happened, so we should get together on that one.
01:50:37.000 Alright, Noah Sanders says, where is the TimCast fact-checking non-profit company?
01:50:40.000 We're all still waiting to have fact-checkers we can trust, keep up the great and hard work, in the process of filing.
01:50:46.000 So, I think it takes like years?
01:50:49.000 Yeah.
01:50:50.000 The problem is, typically a non-profit will start in a state, get their federal number, and then file in the state to do everything.
01:50:58.000 These systems were created back before the internet.
01:51:00.000 So typically, if you start a non-profit, it was just in one state, and you filed, and then you'd operate.
01:51:04.000 Now, we have to file in every single state because our audience exists all over the country.
01:51:09.000 Which brings up another issue.
01:51:10.000 A lot of people are asking, you know, their members, and they were asked to update their address or information.
01:51:15.000 It's because We have reached a threshold now where we have members in every different state and territory, so we have to collect that information for tax purposes.
01:51:23.000 It's a legal requirement.
01:51:24.000 And then, we have to pay those taxes.
01:51:27.000 So, that's reality.
01:51:28.000 As for the fact-checking non-profit, we've got some prominent individuals who have said they're committed on donating to help fund this operation.
01:51:36.000 We're really excited for it.
01:51:38.000 We probably need to figure it out.
01:51:40.000 The challenge for us is managerial because of how many different states
01:51:44.000 and how many different regulations there are.
01:51:46.000 But I think we might be able to hire somebody and then get some revenue from a single state
01:51:53.000 where we filed so far and then use that to kickstart the process.
01:51:56.000 So, it just, it is what it is.
01:51:57.000 We're working on it.
01:51:58.000 You know?
01:51:59.000 Ben Keith says, The judge for tomorrow's Kerry Lake trial gutted Kerry's case in a ruling today.
01:52:04.000 Now, Kerry's lawyer cannot question if the signature verification process was fraudulent, only if a check took place for questionable ballots.
01:52:12.000 So, I think, based on what I read, Carrie Lake still has a decent case.
01:52:18.000 If she can show that signatures don't match, you can make the argument that the process did not take place, right?
01:52:24.000 So, Katie Hobbs, I went over this, this is really funny.
01:52:26.000 So, Katie Hobbs has a guide as Secretary of State, this is from 2020, on how to verify signatures and what makes something questionable.
01:52:34.000 I pulled up the New York Times, where it's like, here's 11 signatures, which ones match?
01:52:38.000 And then based on Katie Hobbs' signature verification guidelines, I successfully chose the two signatures that matched out of 11.
01:52:45.000 I was actually surprised I was able to pull that off.
01:52:46.000 I thought I was going to get it wrong, but I got it right.
01:52:49.000 Based on that information, if Carrie Lake says, here's a handful of ballots that do not adhere to Katie Hobbs' guidelines, she could argue this shows they did not signature verify.
01:53:04.000 They might argue, no, it just means the verification was poorly done.
01:53:07.000 I think, well, hold on, if the guideline says, if it does this, this, or this, it's not verified, and these things don't adhere to the guideline, you can argue they didn't verify it, not that it was poorly done, they just didn't even do it.
01:53:20.000 I think that's what she's gonna have to argue.
01:53:21.000 But I've not seen the evidence.
01:53:23.000 We've gotta see her present the evidence, we'll see.
01:53:25.000 She posted photos of 2020 ballots, right?
01:53:28.000 Let's see what they got.
01:53:30.000 Let's grab some more super chats.
01:53:33.000 The TJ Drummer says, Bud Light launching this campaign so close to Memorial Day 2.
01:53:36.000 Rolling a huge one, guys.
01:53:38.000 Oof.
01:53:39.000 Yup.
01:53:41.000 Kevin Cosnahan says, Heineken's cheers to all the fans commercial seems to have taken shots at Bud Light at the end of the commercial.
01:53:47.000 Ooh, I haven't seen that one.
01:53:49.000 I gotta check that one out.
01:53:50.000 Let me write that one down.
01:53:51.000 Heineken commercial.
01:53:56.000 I'll check that one out when we wrap.
01:54:00.000 What do we got?
01:54:01.000 Lama says, hey Tim, for those of us who don't drink coffee, maybe you could start a line of teas, a fun Roberto-inspired line of teas, maybe something like Cock Teas.
01:54:10.000 It's very, very clever.
01:54:12.000 We are currently working on, for Casper.com, supplements, but like protein powder and MCT, so probably we're never going to do any kind of vitamins or weird brain blast stuff.
01:54:22.000 I don't, I'm not into that stuff.
01:54:24.000 But what I am into when exercising is like a protein powder, an MCT powder.
01:54:27.000 We're big fans of that stuff.
01:54:28.000 So we're thinking of creating our own blends and launching our own.
01:54:31.000 We're looking at what we can do in terms of proprietary blends and mixes and the regulations and all that stuff.
01:54:38.000 But we think we might actually be able to launch that very, very soon.
01:54:40.000 Very excited for that.
01:54:41.000 And then for Roberto-inspired lines of teas, we're talking about Roberto Jr.
01:54:47.000 Now, as for Roberto, the original king, maybe we'll make, uh, uh, you know, a medium roast called, like, Return of the King Roberto, you know?
01:54:54.000 I like that.
01:54:55.000 Yeah, Return of the King.
01:54:57.000 But also, Roberto Jr.' 's getting close to retirement.
01:54:59.000 That's right.
01:55:00.000 Who's his successor?
01:55:02.000 I don't know.
01:55:03.000 We don't know yet.
01:55:03.000 Do they have to audition?
01:55:05.000 What's the, like, how does it work out?
01:55:07.000 No idea.
01:55:07.000 No clue.
01:55:08.000 But we don't want Roberto Jr.
01:55:10.000 So we're incubating a whole bunch of Roberto Jr.
01:55:12.000 babies right now.
01:55:13.000 I think like 30-something.
01:55:15.000 He's a rooster.
01:55:16.000 I was gonna say, who is this?
01:55:18.000 Yeah, we're gonna have a whole bunch of babies.
01:55:20.000 You don't know who Roberto Jr.
01:55:21.000 is?
01:55:21.000 No, I know.
01:55:22.000 I'm exposing myself.
01:55:23.000 Oh my gosh.
01:55:24.000 He's very famous.
01:55:25.000 He's not from our world.
01:55:26.000 Who vets these people?
01:55:31.000 After he has the babies we don't want, just like with Roberto, where Roberto banged his daughter and it's because chickens do this.
01:55:37.000 Okay, I'm glad you established that we're talking about chickens because if I thought we were talking about humans and you said that I would have been concerned.
01:55:43.000 He's a complicated character.
01:55:44.000 Roosters do this.
01:55:46.000 Chickens do this.
01:55:48.000 You can only do it so much and so we remove Roberto and bring in his son, which still does have Roberto genetics in there.
01:55:54.000 I think War Room needs to start a farm.
01:55:56.000 I don't know if we have the space in D.C., but I'm very impressed.
01:55:59.000 Are you jealous of the chicken empire?
01:56:01.000 I really am.
01:56:03.000 We don't have anything to show.
01:56:04.000 Yeah, we have like 50-something.
01:56:05.000 We're going to have like 70 chickens.
01:56:07.000 Oh, and also, they had babies.
01:56:10.000 The Silkies had four babies, and the Cochin had two.
01:56:13.000 They've just decided to take it upon themselves to make more of themselves.
01:56:18.000 and uh they decided they are reclaiming the family it is it is the radical pro-family i gotta tell you it is horrifyingly magical to see the chicken with like the little chickens underneath it and then you open the thing and it looks at you and it goes like Like if you come near my babies.
01:56:40.000 It's a chicken insurrection.
01:56:41.000 But you can lift up the mom and she looks around and you can see the little babies going like, and then she tries to keep them warm and stuff.
01:56:46.000 It's very, it's very cute.
01:56:47.000 And when it's like raining, the chick mom will like cover the babies to keep them dry.
01:56:51.000 And it's great when you like that at war room.
01:56:54.000 Yeah, it's great when they when they have their own babies because they'll protect them.
01:56:58.000 Whereas if you incubate them, you have to protect them because chickens don't care.
01:57:01.000 They're like, I am my baby.
01:57:02.000 No.
01:57:04.000 Let's grab, uh, we'll grab one more super chat here.
01:57:06.000 What do we got?
01:57:07.000 In the old, uh, super chat as YouTube, YouTube's breaking down.
01:57:10.000 So, uh... We finally broke YouTube?
01:57:12.000 Hooray!
01:57:13.000 Clayton Webb says, ordered coffin April 22nd, haven't shipped.
01:57:16.000 Any ideas when to expect?
01:57:17.000 It should be soon.
01:57:18.000 So, um...
01:57:20.000 We sold way too much way too quickly and it overloaded, so I apologize.
01:57:25.000 Nice humblebrag, Tim.
01:57:28.000 We didn't expect it.
01:57:28.000 I mean, I think we had several thousand of each available and then it all just sold basically instantly and we're like, oh man, and we had to like rush and try and sell more.
01:57:38.000 And then I had to put in a bunch of personal money to try and cover the costs.
01:57:41.000 So it is making money, but it's selling too quickly, so we can't keep up with orders.
01:57:45.000 We're hoping to get to that point of equilibrium, and then it'll stabilize.
01:57:49.000 But yeah, so thank you for buying Cast Brew Coffee, and the coffee shop is currently underway with A lot of work being done and it's taken a long time because inspections, plumbing, just a whole bunch of crazy stuff to get it up and running, but it's coming.
01:58:04.000 So if you haven't already, would you kindly smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share the show with your friends, become a member at TimCast.com.
01:58:09.000 That members-only show will be up in about 10 minutes on the front page of TimCast.com.
01:58:14.000 You can follow the show at TimCast IRL.
01:58:16.000 You can follow me personally at TimCast.
01:58:18.000 Natalie, do you want to shout anything out?
01:58:20.000 I'm Natalie G. Winters on Twitter and all the social media platforms and of course tune in to War Room 10 to 12 and 5 to 7.
01:58:28.000 My name is Seamus Coghlan.
01:58:29.000 I'm a journalist.
01:58:31.000 I am also a political cartoonist and satirist.
01:58:34.000 I run a YouTube channel called Freedom Tunes.
01:58:36.000 If you guys want to support that channel and what I do, then go over to freedomtunes.com and become a member.
01:58:42.000 You'll get an extra cartoon each week that only members get.
01:58:45.000 We're also going to be uploading more stuff like behind-the-scenes podcasts.
01:58:48.000 There are perks like being entered in raffles to be a background character in videos.
01:58:52.000 So please head over there, check that out.
01:58:54.000 Thank you very much.
01:58:56.000 I'm Hannah Clare Brimlow.
01:58:57.000 I'm a writer for TimCast.com.
01:58:59.000 You should 110% follow at TimCastNews on Twitter and Instagram.
01:59:03.000 It's great.
01:59:04.000 If you want to follow me personally, you can follow me on Instagram at hannahclare.b and on Twitter at hcbrimlow.
01:59:10.000 Thank you so much.
01:59:11.000 And I am Serge.com.
01:59:13.000 Sorry about the audio.
01:59:14.000 It's not me.
01:59:15.000 So yeah, follow me at twitter.com.
01:59:18.000 I had a lot of fun arguing with you guys yesterday.
01:59:21.000 It's always great.
01:59:22.000 I love it.
01:59:23.000 We will see you all over at TimCast.com for that uncensored members-only show in a few minutes.