The footage from the January 6th protest in Washington, D.C. has been released, and it's pretty shocking. Plus, Michael Rapoport says he's considering voting for Donald Trump, and Elon Musk says it's a call for genocide.
00:00:25.000In fact, they're even removing flex cuffs from people who are, for some reason, detained.
00:00:30.000And they're seen walking through the halls with these people.
00:00:33.000And there's way more footage still to come.
00:00:35.000These are just the first few clips that have gone up.
00:00:38.000I think this debunks the insurrection narrative wholeheartedly.
00:00:42.000I know most of us already knew that that narrative was absurd, but now it's going to be interesting how this affects people who are currently on trial, because we can see a lot of the narrative that has been put forward about violence doesn't apply to a large portion of these people who were charged with obstructing a government proceeding.
00:00:59.000In fact, in Dinesh D'Souza's police state, one woman mentions that her son, I believe it was her nephew, Who went into the Capitol was there an hour after the violence and the breach.
00:01:09.000And you walk up to the Capitol, there's no barriers, there's no signs, the doors are open, cops are waving to people, shaking their hands, taking selfies.
00:01:16.000How could they charge this person with a crime?
00:01:18.000And they're doing it, but now the footage is out.
00:01:21.000In other news, in one of the more shocking bits of news, Michael Rapoport, comedian, hates Donald Trump, still hates Donald Trump, and says he is actually considering voting for Donald Trump.
00:01:33.000Likely because of his support for Israel.
00:01:36.000And what we are seeing now, we saw this in D.C., and we saw it today, far leftists rioting in support of Palestine, in opposition to Israel, and this is freaking out a lot of the never-Trumpers and anti-Trumpers, and so, uh, Democrats are in trouble.
00:01:52.000What matters is that if the Democrats come out and outright just say they're in support of Israel, they're going to lose 10% of their voting base, which is 18-29.
00:02:45.000I've got to be very careful how I phrase this, but we are working on a very big plan.
00:02:49.000If you like the idea of physical locations where people can hang out and us moving into the physical space, so that when you come into a coffee shop to have coffee, what do you see on the TV?
00:05:03.000Next week, we are not going to be here Thursday and Friday.
00:05:06.000We will have a Culture War episode up Friday.
00:05:08.000But this is the perfect time to drop on a Tuesday, right before Thanksgiving, so when everyone is at their home with their liberal aunt, they can be like, what do you mean, all the footage just got released?
00:06:13.000However, the point is, a large majority of what happened, happened well after the violence, on the other side of the building, and the police not only allow it to happen, but were actually... Look, people, they were allowed to leave.
00:07:44.000He walks around and then he leaves, and they've given him all of these charges, they want to lock him up forever.
00:07:48.000I met a woman who said her and her husband showed up an hour or so after all the violence to this exact story.
00:07:54.000There were no barricades, they'd been removed.
00:07:56.000The doors had been propped open by the police, the police had waved people in and they showed up, waving little flags, having no idea what was going on.
00:08:04.000Now they're being sent to jail over this.
00:08:07.000Was there any follow-up to that reporting from a few days ago about those buses that allegedly had, like, undercovers?
00:08:27.000Just like the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
00:08:28.000We'll figure out about, you know, shortly.
00:08:30.000Look, I mean, I think that anybody that's followed this story closely has known for since day five after day six that this was largely overblown, so I'm not exactly surprised.
00:08:42.000But I just hope that this helps in bringing justice.
00:08:45.000I would like an explanation from Johnson, the new speaker, as to what was the holdup.
00:08:50.000I would like to know actually from the old guard.
00:08:53.000Why did it take two and a half years for us to get this information?
00:08:56.000It seems so obviously necessary that we get to see it.
00:08:59.000I feel like there's been People in Congress, like, there's enough information where you can kind of say, yeah, the federal government is behaving outside of what is legal, right?
00:09:09.000Like, it's pretty clear that they're using, you know, false pretenses to punish political dissidents and punish people for their political agendas.
00:09:19.000And I don't know why there aren't more people in Congress that are actually saying it.
00:09:23.000There's a handful of people that are actually talking about it, but most of them don't actually want to make a firm statement about the violations of the law and violations of American's rights that the current administration is doing.
00:09:44.000My thesis would be that people, you know, representatives in Congress or in Senate have watched the FBI worked Surreptitiously to try and undermine Donald Trump.
00:09:55.000I mean, they tried to impeach him twice off of totally faulty information.
00:09:58.000You had false affidavits that were filed by FBI agents.
00:10:02.000These people are scared to death of speaking out against the FBI, CIA, the entire intelligence agency apparatus, and I don't blame them.
00:10:21.000They lied, manipulated to steal political power, and the sad thing is we all know it, we've always known it, and these changes will not come.
00:10:30.000However, that being said, the What happened in Israel has really been a lightning bolt on this country.
00:10:40.000An earthquake of such tremendous magnitude.
00:10:46.000And seeing these people say they're going to vote for Trump, we'll get into this a little bit later, but I'm actually more optimistic than I've ever been when I see hardcore never-Trumpers being like, I'll vote for the guy.
00:10:56.000No, I gotta tell you something really crazy about that.
00:10:58.000January 6th was supposed to be an insurrection, where they tried to overthrow the United States and take it over, and now you've got people not- they don't care anymore because of Israel?
00:11:07.000Again, I know, I know, we'll get into this a little bit later, but my point is, when it comes to January 6th subcommittee, their goal was insurrection.
00:11:14.000They sat in those committee hearings withholding information, lying about what was going on.
00:11:34.000It began, I mean, it may have even begun earlier than this, but the most obvious example to me is when you have, you know, the spying that's happening on the Trump campaign before he's even elected president, you know?
00:11:47.000Yeah, and that was directed by Obama and Hillary Clinton.
00:11:50.000But Biden also was riding shotgun for much of that, so it just seems absolutely bizarre to me that the representatives in Congress aren't willing to actually speak out about how perilous these circumstances are, if they're not addressed.
00:12:12.000And so Obama said, if I am going to engage in a seditious conspiracy after murdering American citizens and bombing children of other countries, he said, if I am going to try and steal power and destroy the United States government and this country and the lives of the American people, I will have to own the press before I do it.
00:12:34.000And the reason why he has not gone down as one of the worst presidents in history is because the press has just kept lying in his defense.
00:12:41.000But I truly hope, I hope that within seven, within eight years, the narrative has flipped on the horror that was the Obama administration.
00:12:53.000Deranged and evil things that man did.
00:12:55.000Let's just talk about the killing of Abdul Rahman al-Awlaki.
00:12:57.000Let's talk about the extrajudicial assassinations of several others.
00:13:01.000Let's talk about the National Defense Authorization Act, indefinite detention provision, in which Obama said he had the right to take you in secret in the middle of the night to an offshore military vessel, a naval vessel, and torture you.
00:13:32.000He was given a Nobel Peace Prize, he didn't win.
00:13:36.000But let me just add one more item that's in my wheelhouse as to reasons to not like Barack Obama.
00:13:44.000He was responsible for the executive order that implemented diversity, equity, inclusion in every federal department across our government.
00:13:53.000The last month of Trump's presidency, he tried to undo it, and then the very first day of Biden's presidency, they redid it.
00:13:59.000That's how important this is to them, that they are able to essentially divide and conquer, which is exactly what DEI is, even though it's about diversity, right?
00:14:08.000But really what it is is about oppression Olympics, and it's dividing and making us all become at each other's throats.
00:14:15.000Why did Trump wait till the end of his tenure to do that?
00:14:57.000And I think Trump is clearly in the catbird seat, if you will, to win again.
00:15:02.000But I'm still holding out hope that if Vivek broadens his horizons and he's willing to consider a VP slot with Trump, I think that would be probably as good as I could hope for.
00:15:14.000In terms of a winning ticket that would actually deliver much of what the libertarians would like to see.
00:15:29.000Yeah, I mean, there's this misunderstanding about libertarians and anarcho-capitalists that, like, we don't want, you know, we don't believe in the state, so we don't want to see criminals put behind bars.
00:15:39.000Like, couldn't be further from the truth.
00:15:49.000If there's one group of people that all libertarians agree ought to be behind bars, it's corrupt politicians that are ruling over us against our will, you know, from Jump Street.
00:15:58.000Well, I'm not a libertarian, but... No, but from your perspective, in your opinion, you said people don't like talking for libertarians, but you think libertarians want to see the corrupt politicians locked up?
00:16:33.000But if you've got people that are entrusted with creating law, then I think that the policing
00:16:40.000of those people is among the most important things that a state can do.
00:16:44.000I'd like to point something very important out.
00:16:46.000You know, these videos are not the only videos we have proving the Capitol Police were aiding
00:16:52.000and abetting the January 6th insurrection.
00:16:55.000There's videos of them opening the doors.
00:16:57.000There's videos of them waving people in.
00:16:59.000There's a video of one of them wearing a MAGA hat and waving people in.
00:17:02.000There's a video of them shaking hands.
00:17:04.000Now there's more videos of them shaking hands, releasing people from flex cuffs, giving them directions to insurrectionists.
00:17:11.000And the most important thing, the Capitol Police have been expanded under the Biden administration into new locations, which would mean the Capitol Police, the principal and most powerful organization involved in facilitating the January 6th insurrection, have been given more power by the Biden administration, which would mean Joe Biden himself is engaged in an insurrection by aiding and abetting insurrectionists and therefore is disqualified under the 14th Amendment.
00:17:44.000Look, if they're going to claim Donald Trump did this, that, or otherwise, it's all BS nonsense, I just gave you all your novel legal theory.
00:17:53.000Yes, they're losing, but do it anyway.
00:17:56.000You had Lauren Day Laguna on your show last week, and she made an interesting point that Sometimes you you people are guilty of crimes.
00:18:04.000You don't want to prosecute them for the betterment of society Like that's a legal philosophy and there are times and places when you would not prosecute even though they've done something wrong I thought that was interesting considering our current political paradigm and the whole tit-for-tat I'll get your guy and in four years you're gonna get me and then four years after that someone's gonna come and get you back like maybe there's a See, this is the problem with that, because I am a very forgiving person and I'm also a Buddhist meditating type like yourself, so the issue that I have is that it's not tit-for-tat.
00:19:15.000But yeah, I mean, we've got two, three million illegal immigrants that are coming across the border.
00:19:19.000Many of them are making their way to New York and their infrastructure is basically being overran.
00:19:26.000And he's doing his job, but just because that goes against the The kind of neoliberal narrative about open borders and that immigration at any magnitude is acceptable.
00:19:36.000Well, then you can't talk about it, even though it's going to bankrupt his city.
00:20:20.000I'll still call him slob dick Donald Trump, pig dick Donald Trump, and all that.
00:20:27.000But we need to get this whole fucking situation under control!
00:20:31.000And you know what that situation is he's talking about?
00:20:32.000He's talking about far leftists that are trying to storm the DNC.
00:20:36.000They're storming into I think a university a few hours ago.
00:20:40.000He's talking about the far left protesters in New York City cheering on Hamas and I just think it's absolutely hilarious.
00:20:47.000That this guy, who hates Donald Trump, and I'm not going to speak to him as to what he said about January 6th, but the fact that so many people are moving in this direction, despite screaming that Donald Trump is a fascist, Hitlerian psychopath who tried to overthrow the US government, They genuinely claimed, they claimed that Donald Trump was a threat to this country!
00:21:16.000As long as we get what we want over there, huh?
00:21:17.000Kind of shows what his priorities are, but I'm just heartbroken.
00:21:20.000I'm heartbroken because this guy was in True Romance, which is one of my favorite movies ever, and he's now just like, you know, a caricature of himself.
00:22:14.000Well, look, that's fair, but I just don't, I don't look at Rappaport and his unhinged behavior over the past four years and go like, like this is an ally in any form or fashion.
00:22:25.000Yeah, he may vote for Trump, he might, but he's still, he's just as crazy as the people that are marching for Hamas.
00:22:31.000But look, he can say whatever he wants, he can believe whatever he wants, but if we truly believe, and you probably don't, but I'm saying for me, that Donald Trump is our best path forward in 2024 for a variety of reasons, if this guy's saying he's gonna help me out with that, I say yes.
00:22:48.000Here's the way, I was talking to Scott Horton after the show, great dude, we had him on Culture War, and I said, look man, if I see Donald Trump and he's having a snowball fight with Hillary Clinton, And he's just whipping them at her and she's getting hit and she's about to be knocked off her balance into a nice snow pile.
00:23:24.000We're having a very fun, family-friendly game of a snowball fight, and Hillary falls down, and then she giggles and laughs, and everyone's happy, but Trump wins.
00:23:32.000Look, I've said before, you know, I'm not a Trump supporter, but I don't disagree with you that he's probably the best bet at getting me any closer to what I want to see.
00:23:43.000But I just don't have any confidence in him because of what happened during 2020 and that's the reason I don't support him.
00:23:49.000But yeah, I think that obviously, if it's Gavin Newsom, I would be out of my mind not to prefer Trump over Newsom.
00:24:12.000Well, I mean, it went very hard for DeSantis, but it's been a swing state historically, so... Not even for... No, I think for Trump it was even better.
00:24:18.000Okay, well then if my vote doesn't matter, then you know who I'm voting for.
00:24:23.000But if there's some theoretical possibility that my vote will actually swing things, then yeah, maybe I'd consider Trump.
00:24:29.000But look, you're putting me in a corner, Tim!
00:24:37.000You can even outright say he's awful, but man, like I said, if Donald Trump is the one who's engaging in that snowball fight against the establishment machine and the war machine, I'm like, look, no new wars.
00:24:48.000That dude tried so hard to get us out of Syria.
00:24:51.000I'm just like, I was saying this to Dave Smith, not yesterday, but the last time I was here, I was like, come on, man.
00:25:01.000He tried getting our troops out of Syria.
00:25:03.000If I can take an inch from anybody back towards pulling our troops out, I will take it.
00:25:09.000To your point there, and this is one of my frustrations with libertarians, is they're so frequently looking for purity.
00:25:19.000To look at the United States government and the US empire, global empire with military bases in 120 or something countries around the world, the idea that you should throw away Someone that is trying to trying to pull back on the US government trying to actually make real cuts because they were unsuccessful when literally you're going to have the most powerful government in all of human history
00:25:50.000Working against you because that government has incentive to stop you from making cuts.
00:25:57.000So for libertarians to say things like, oh, you know, that guy's total garbage because there were some wars, or there were still wars going on, or he didn't end all the wars.
00:26:06.000It's like, think about the task that you're demanding this person do immediately or within four years with the amount of resistance that they're going to have to deal with.
00:26:21.000It is outside of realistic to say this person was elected and they didn't undo 250 years of encroachment on your liberties and blah blah blah in four years so they're all bad.
00:26:38.000I'm saying there are a lot of libertarians like that.
00:26:40.000You're absolutely right but here's the reality.
00:26:42.000He did not try to shrink the size of the government.
00:26:45.000He did try to end some unconstitutional legal wars, and God bless him for that.
00:26:49.000But he also increased the size of the federal government significantly.
00:26:53.000And he stood by during the most catastrophic decision of any president in my lifetime in terms of domestic policy, which was the COVID lockdowns.
00:27:00.000And that's, that is the, like, honest to God, if it weren't for 2020, I probably would have supported Donald Trump.
00:27:10.000I view it this way, like the libertarian argument.
00:27:13.000You've got two guys who go back and forth whacking you with a stick, and then finally you get a guy who's like, no, no, no, he hit you ten times.
00:27:20.000I'm gonna hit you eight times, so vote for me.
00:27:23.000And the reformist argument is, just take the eight whacks instead of the ten, and then the libertarian argument is, screw you all, I'm not playing your game.
00:27:32.000My attitude is just, I think the best, I choose the reformer position of, man, I know Trump is far from perfect, but he was a net positive, and that's all that matters.
00:27:42.000I think on domestic policy and changing the dialogue amongst the American people, he was largely a net positive.
00:27:48.000The issue is that for whatever reason, being a businessman, being a businessman myself, I don't understand why he doesn't understand Fed policy more, why he doesn't understand that his browbeating of, I don't know if it was Powell at the time, I think it was, but trying to drive down interest rates even lower, You know, wanting to pass trillions of dollars in stimulus spending during the COVID era without votes, without roll call votes, trying to evict Massey, who's the greatest congressman of the past decade, out of power because he wanted to have a roll call vote to have people on record for a three trillion dollar spending bill, which is something that historically we would have never even considered as being feasible.
00:28:25.000There's just a lot of behaviors from him that goes counter to this narrative that he is actually a small government guy.
00:28:54.000It really comes down to, for me, I mean, typically the most important thing is foreign policy.
00:28:59.000And my attitude has long been, I mean, this is just how I grow up, that the United States bickers amongst its own people about the things we deserve and the things we've done wrong, while everyone ignores the bombing, the humanitarian crises, the arming, the massacres.
00:29:16.000I mean, and this is why, I mean, it's kind of crazy to think, it was Obama before Donald Trump.
00:29:23.000So we get Donald Trump and I'm like, what's going on?
00:30:00.000And so when Donald Trump comes in and he's like, no new wars, timeline for getting our troops out, get our troops out of Syria, and we watch the deep state lie to the American people and Trump to keep troops in Syria, The only, like, I'll tell you, Trump should not have fired 59 Tomahawk missiles at Syria.
00:30:13.000That's the one time the press started praising him.
00:30:17.000So I look at anything else, and my view really is, and y'all can disagree with me, by all means, spam in the chat ones, my attitude is, My priorities over my view of say like COVID lockdown stuff and Donald Trump's role in it is a much lower priority to the United States spending American taxpayer dollars or what I should say is extracting our buying power in order to wage war in foreign countries so when someone says yeah but Trump did this COVID thing I'm like you know what I gotta be honest I'd be willing to accept penance
00:30:50.000In terms of some detriment to my quality of life if it means the U.S.
00:31:04.000That's a really important point because there's this...
00:31:07.000kind of myth that I think that the American people have been sold, that in some way we have benefited.
00:31:14.000The average American has somehow benefited from the empire.
00:31:18.000It couldn't be further from the truth.
00:31:19.000Our purchasing power is declining very rapidly.
00:31:22.000All of the people that have actually benefited from it have been the worst corporations, if not in modern era, then maybe in all of human history.
00:31:29.000Some of the worst actors out there the boeings and all these other companies that are actually literally just profiting by the billions based off of uh death and destruction of innocent people it's horrific um but there's this there's this belief that like we have to police the world to kind of make it safe for the global economy that people people don't consider the fact that all of these other nations have the same imperative they have the same desire to have safe shipping lanes it's there is no
00:31:57.000There is no actual requirement that the American government be the policeman of the world.
00:32:34.000People are expressing this in polls at the same time that Donald Trump is actively working against the war machine.
00:32:42.000And I'm not saying I can definitively prove one for one, that's what it's all about, but I would like to just live in that reality.
00:32:48.000So by all means, please knock me out of it.
00:32:50.000Prove to me that our economy doing well in this time frame and Donald Trump's positions on rejecting wars are totally unrelated, but I will accept it and I will roll that dice again.
00:33:02.000If Donald Trump can recreate 2018 and 2019 and further those missions, it's just, it's
00:33:10.000And let him say all the naughty things, let him say all the nasty things.
00:33:13.000And all of my views on how bad 2020 was, I'm just like, if the end result is we go through
00:33:19.000a hard period, but four years later, our borders are more secure, manufacturing has come back,
00:33:25.000we're no longer doing these insane trade deals with China, the American economy has dramatically
00:33:30.000improved and the foreign wars have been whittled down.
00:33:33.000The US, now our allies are actually paying their fair share as we pull our troops back because they shouldn't be in many of these countries.
00:33:43.000I don't think that Donald Trump is a genie who can make it all just perfectly come true, but we had a little taste of it in his first term.
00:33:54.000Because I come from the Austrian economics backdrop and because I was a finance guy, I look at this and I look at the The elevated inflationary pressure that we're dealing with nearing on $34 trillion in our national debt, you have all of the debt carry that's necessary for that debt that is ultimately going to really put a damper on growth, GDP broadly.
00:34:16.000I think that we're facing a very severe recession.
00:34:19.000The other thing that people aren't really privy to is that because of the elevated interest rate cycle, All of the long-term debt instruments that the banks filled their books with over the past couple of years when the interest rates were at record lows, those are now upside down to the tunes of billions and billions and billions of dollars.
00:34:38.000So you have a potential banking contagion coinciding perfectly with a potential national debt and fiat crisis.
00:34:48.000And then you also have the potential for a global recession.
00:34:51.000So we're The reason I bring all this up is to say, if you don't have someone who's in power soon, very, very soon, that is actually equipped to handle this, we're in a lot of trouble.
00:35:04.000And that's the primary reason that I can't give any sort of real endorsement for Donald Trump, is that he has not demonstrated a capacity to wrap his head around the severity of the situation that approaches us.
00:35:31.000Just because, you know, obviously I would still rather a libertarian get in there, that's setting that aside.
00:35:36.000Because I understand how severe the financial situation is, and because everyone I know and love lives here, and I know that their retirement is on the line, and their way of life is on the line, their safety and security is ultimately on the line with all of these potential fronts for World War III, It's super important that we get someone in there that is both non-interventionist, but also a fiscal hawk.
00:35:55.000We need both of those things very, very soon.
00:35:57.000We cannot continue to wait for a hero, but we need real changes on the most important things right now.
00:36:04.000But that's why it's a great argument to say support Vivek, and when it comes to Trump, accept Trump.
00:36:08.000Yeah, well, and if Vivek is actually there to advise him, I would have a lot more faith in Donald Trump.
00:36:14.000I hope and I beg and I pray that the very least, whatever happens, Vivek has some kind of advisory role with the Trump administration.
00:36:21.000If he doesn't, it would be a huge miscalculation.
00:36:23.000In fact, it would demonstrate that Donald Trump hasn't learned anything from filling his cabinet with some of the worst war hawks on earth.
00:37:24.000Listen, not for nothing, but all of the people that are pro-Palestine in the US, they're not pro-Palestine because they have an affinity for Islam.
00:37:35.000They're pro-Palestine because they understand it as a colonizer versus colonized dynamic.
00:37:45.000And decolonization just means kill the people that have the power now.
00:38:12.000So I don't entertain any of the framing from the left that isn't directly in Gaza.
00:38:23.000I get why the people in Gaza are pissed off.
00:38:25.000When you're dealing with Westerners that are taking the side of Gaza or taking a side against Israel, it's all because of leftist decolonization garbage, and that stuff will come here if we allow those arguments to be made.
00:38:41.000Let me pull up this tweet from Elon Musk.
00:38:45.000We got this tweet here from Elon himself.
00:38:47.000He said, As I said earlier this week, decolonization, and from the river to the sea, and similar euphemisms, necessarily imply genocide.
00:38:56.000Clear calls for extreme violence are against our terms of service and will result in suspension.
00:39:00.000This is also in response to Swipe Right, he's responding to himself.
00:39:04.000Yes, decolonization necessarily implies a Jewish genocide, thus it is unacceptable to any reasonable person.
00:39:10.000And this is what Colin Wright had said, to which Elon Musk responded, decolonization is the woke version of jihad, and it should be viewed and treated that way.
00:39:18.000He responded to Elon by saying, exactly, when Hamas slaughtered Israeli civilians in the
00:39:42.000I think that it should be looked at just like any other time when someone calls for violence.
00:39:48.000So if you have a platform that says, we don't allow calls for violence, then talking about decolonization and stuff, then that's considered violence in my opinion.
00:39:58.000If you don't, if you allow anything, then fine.
00:40:01.000You know, if X allows other calls for violence, and then they specifically say we don't like this, that's what I feel like too.
00:40:09.000Calling people to commit violence is a crime.
00:40:12.000Now the question is, decolonization sits at that nexus point between academic rhetoric and instructing people to go and commit acts of violence.
00:40:26.000Even if they called for violence, if it's not an imminent threat with a day and a time, it's not illegal.
00:40:31.000The question is, knowing that this is not illegal, should it be banned?
00:40:35.000But there's been selective enforcement of calls for violence and things that are and are not violence.
00:40:42.000The left does tend to swear up and down that things are not calls for violence, that clearly are calls for violence.
00:40:49.000They say that the protests and the riots, they say that those aren't violence.
00:40:53.000There is an ambiguity that the left continues to rely on when they're talking about things that they would call direct action or... Riots are the cries of the unheard.
00:41:27.000Direct action literally means breaking the law or committing acts of violence.
00:41:31.000I'm not going to be cute and I'm not going to defend the left.
00:41:34.000I have been at way too many leftist protests.
00:41:36.000When they talk about peacefully protesting, that's not what direct action is.
00:41:40.000Direct action is a phrase they come up with when they're referring to either blocking streets, blocking doors, fighting with cops, or throwing things.
00:41:47.000Is that just Antifa that does the direct action stuff?
00:41:51.000So, in the early days, I don't want to say early days, because this goes way back, but I do want to give a shout out to our good friends who participated in the battle in Seattle, which was a protest against the WTO, by the way, by the left, for some reason, now they're on the other side of this.
00:42:07.000In New York, we didn't call them Antifa, we just called them the Black Bloc.
00:42:10.000And we didn't call them anarchists either.
00:42:11.000Sometimes the word anarchist gets thrown around because it's used to convey the idea that everyone understands.
00:42:17.000Like if someone says the anarchists, we know they're referring to the people wearing all black.
00:42:20.000However, considering that half the people... I don't claim them.
00:42:23.000But considering half the people we were friends with were literal anarchists who rejected that false philosophy of authoritarianism, we knew that wasn't correct, so we just called them the Black Bloc leftists, or Black Bloc extremists, or the Black Bloc...
00:42:34.000Now everyone refers to it as Antifa, because the game they played back then was, there is no black block!
00:42:49.000Antifa is just an idea, it's not a group.
00:42:51.000There's cells, there's chapters, they engage in violence.
00:42:54.000This is exactly why I, or this is, this is indicative of the actual Vulnerability that liberalism has.
00:43:04.000Liberalism takes the opposing view or the argument from someone else, takes it at face value, and treats every argument as if it is an honest argument.
00:43:16.000If you're dealing with progressives or socialists, people that essentially disregard or reject the Enlightenment values, they don't see a reason to be honest because power is the goal, not honesty.
00:43:29.000So if they're looking to win and they want to go ahead and cover up violent actions or, you know, See, my interest at this junction, being that I'm not really on the left or the right, is that I just want to see this deescalate and I don't want to ever endorse censorship protocols.
00:43:56.000Particularly if they are kind of vague platitudes, like from the river to the sea or decolonization.
00:44:01.000That is just clearly not explicit enough of a threat for it to be illegal.
00:44:39.000Where he said, if it's lawful... Well, I don't think in any court in the country you could actually get a conviction for someone saying that.
00:44:43.000I don't think Elon ever said all lawful speech would be permitted on the platform.
00:44:46.000Well, I thought, I took the lawful, uh, awful but lawful as being like, that was where the gray area.
00:44:52.000So, that was a direct reference to what they would censor.
00:44:56.000Things that were lawful but awful would be censored.
00:45:38.000Look, Elon's whole claim for why he purchased Twitter or X was that he understands, allegedly, how important open dialogue and conversation are.
00:45:52.000When it was the left that was in control, that was absolutely banning anybody that was even like one degree to the right.
00:45:59.000All my libertarian friends got banned too, so I took this personally.
00:46:03.000The issue is that we understand that we're prepared in the battle, in the arena of ideas, we fear no man.
00:46:57.000The vulgarity is what ends up getting people in trouble.
00:47:02.000You're never gonna see Martyr Maid get booted from X because of the way that he talks about stuff.
00:47:10.000The whole fear and loathing in New Jerusalem, that whole thing, if he didn't come at the stories the way that he does and articulate them the way that he does, if he did it loosely and he was shitposting and stuff, all that stuff would be like, anti-Semitism, get out of here!
00:47:26.000If he was approaching it by being vulgar and stuff.
00:47:30.000But the idea It's completely fine to share those ideas on X, just so long as you're not shitposting about it.
00:47:38.000Because the shitposting is what ends up offending people.
00:47:59.000The Wuhan Institute of Virology, I got suspended for that, so I know that was a big deal.
00:48:03.000But the point was, it was about not preventing the sharing of ideas, not about not saying things that were offensive.
00:48:10.000Well, but see, this is the issue, is that this is still an idea.
00:48:13.000Because what you're talking about, from the river to the sea, as you know, there are lots of people that don't feel that it is a call for genocide.
00:48:27.000You think every single person that has said that wants to see a genocide?
00:48:32.000Not a genocide, but they think that it's fine to say it should be a democracy where everybody there gets a say, and it should be a one-state solution, and the Jews would end up getting Slaughter!
00:48:49.000I'm sorry, people are going to get mad at me for this, but I don't care.
00:48:51.000If people started marching around doing Roman salutes while, you know, doing a Sieg Heil, are you going to be like, not everybody actually believes?
00:49:00.000When Hamas puts out their charter, and they include, we read this this morning on The Culture War, Hamas' original charter included the, I think Phil mentioned it, it was one of the Hadiths, which quite literally says, the trees and the stones will call out, there's a Jew hiding behind me, so that the Muslims can come and hunt them and kill them.
00:49:17.000And their charter actually says that there will not be Judgment Day until they've killed the Jews.
00:49:25.000Like, you can, it's fair point, not everybody may mean that, but that would be akin to, you know, people going around doing a Roman salute.
00:49:33.000I've seen, I've seen, I saw a family, extended family member of mine do the red salute at a march.
00:49:39.000And I'm just like, it's so funny how many- That's the fist?
00:49:41.000The fist where you show the fingers forward.
00:49:43.000And the reason why they do that, so there's the victory fist, where you can like hold your fist in the air and shake it, but the red salute is when you hold your fingers forward, and I'm not gonna make the fist on camera, and it's because it represents that each individual finger is weak, but together is strong, and you show your enemies.
00:49:59.000So when I see people doing that, I'm like, I understand they don't literally want to massacre and slaughter a bunch of people, and they don't literally want a communist takeover, chanting from the river to the sea.
00:50:11.000By all means, we can say maybe that person doesn't really know, but nonetheless, you have a large group of people expressing the idea of Hamas, and Hamas's stated goal of wiping out Jews.
00:50:20.000I don't disagree with... What would you think about if they let people say it with video chat, but if you type the words on the network, that gets blocked or banned?
00:50:47.000Because of the ambiguity of the statement in question, right?
00:50:50.000If you were expressing the idea, I think that Israel should actually be Palestine, and there shouldn't be any Jews there.
00:50:58.000Like, if you express that idea... But many of them don't believe that.
00:51:02.000They do believe that there shouldn't be an Israel, they believe it should be Palestine, but they also believe that the Israelis should just be folded into Palestine.
00:51:22.000Every time I ask the question, what would happen if the barriers around Gaza were removed, and all Palestinians were allowed free reign in Israel?
00:51:32.000Will Chamberlain says outright this morning, the most devastating pogrom we've ever seen.
00:51:37.000And the first thing Scott brings up is something of the right of return, and then... I gotta be honest.
00:51:46.000I don't see how a person could argue the land belongs to them, it was stolen from them, and then someone would say, but if we allow them all free movement within this territory, there would not be conflict of some sort.
00:52:21.000And the weakness we face is that the classically liberal American ideals, and I don't mean modern liberal, but the, like as Phil mentioned, we take their arguments in good faith and try our best to live and work together.
00:52:34.000We are just, they just run us over the coals every single time.
00:52:50.000You just said the left lies about everything all the time and then you made it like that's a fact, now let's move forward in a conversation based on this- The needless- what you're saying is completely needless.
00:53:50.000Yeah, it's like, you can't pin it on the left.
00:53:52.000This is what I wanted to ask Tim about because he's made this point a few times over the past couple weeks and it's like, I agree, I'm very upset.
00:53:58.000In fact, I had to put out an apology tweet about that hospital one because I felt so bad that I was misled.
00:54:04.000But this was major news organizations that were putting this out.
00:54:09.000The New York Times, to this day, has an article up saying that Brian Sicknick was killed by J6 protesters.
00:54:15.000Look, I understand your anger towards them.
00:54:17.000What I don't understand is why that mislead is so offensive to you, which I agree with, but then the IDF's misleads... When did I say it wasn't?
00:54:26.000Well, but you've brought up the left is constantly lying.
00:54:29.000It's like, but hasn't the IDF lied a lot too?
00:54:33.000I care about in the United States, American media, American universities, American leftists, and liberals, and people like Adam Schiff, and if I go down the list of every single thing they've lied about, and how it is... So it's the domestic policy side is what you care about?
00:55:09.000But when the New York Times, to this day, has a story up that says Brian Sicknick was killed, and that story is totally false, and the Capitol Police issued a statement saying it was natural causes, meaning non-external, meaning it was not homicide, and we know for a fact that's true.
00:55:32.000How come you've got, and I'm not going to give all the Republicans credit, but it is consistently That you will read prominent conservative publications that will be fair even to their own detriment, and liberal publications lie the majority of the time.
00:55:46.000In terms of domestic policy, sorry, the reason I asked to clarify is because, you know, from my vantage point, we have had fog of war deception on both sides of the Israel-Palestine war.
00:55:55.000If you want to talk about just broadly who's the most foolish shit when it comes to domestic news, yeah, it's clear.
00:56:03.000I mean, this is why Trump came to power, was he was telling fake news.
00:56:06.000And I want to point out, we're going to jump to this next story in a second, but I have to point this out as well.
00:56:16.000And they were actively working with the United States intelligence agencies to suppress legitimate information in order to win political power.
00:56:25.000Donald Trump, in my opinion, would be president today if not for the intelligence agencies going on Twitter and Facebook and YouTube and telling them explicitly you will not allow people to share information pertaining to the Hunter Biden story.
00:57:18.000And that was their justification to slander my name, even though I said Donald Trump did not win, and because, typically, my story's led with, here's the lawsuits, and the merits must be heard.
00:57:29.000And that is a threat to their manipulation.
00:57:46.000BitChute, a video hosting social media platform, is calling on Jim Jordan to investigate the deplatforming of Parler, another social media website popular with conservatives, as part of his House panel on government weaponization.
00:57:56.000In a letter to Jordan, Bitchute's chief policy officer and former Parler chief policy officer, Amy Pykoff, wrote that Parler was likely de-platformed via the same sort of coordinated effort that were alleged in the select subcommittee on weaponization of the federal government's recent report on the censorship industrial complex.
00:58:14.000This is explosive and is so far an allegation, but I believe it is fair to say that the probability lies in them being correct.
00:58:23.000Why did Parler get unilaterally removed, instantly, from all these companies, smeared by the media, instantly, all at the exact same time, and it was all fake news?
00:58:34.000They argued that Parler needed to be removed because January Sixers were using it to coordinate, despite the fact they actually used Facebook, and despite the fact the new evidence that's emerged shows the police were widely facilitating what was happening.
00:58:48.000government was threatened by the fact that large amounts of political individuals in the United States were leaving Twitter for a rival platform for which they had no control.
00:58:57.000And we now know thanks to Elon Musk, whose purchase of Twitter is one of the greatest acts of heroism, shout out Elon Musk, because we're learning this, and when he leaked the emails revealing that Twitter, with its left biased, was heavily influenced specifically by the U.S.
00:59:31.000I would like to see Jim Jordan, Matt Gaetz, and anyone else.
00:59:34.000I want to see the documents relating to Parler, because I'm willing to bet we are going to see something like an email that goes, we're really concerned about Parler.
00:59:42.000And hey, Apple, by the way, you do know that facilitating terrorism is a crime in this country, right?
01:00:09.000But I'm saying that they had to actually migrate their servers because AWS stopped doing business with them because of the allegations that were fraudulent from the federal government.
01:00:18.000The federal government has demonstrated time and time again that they have their tendrils into every social media network of any magnitude whatsoever.
01:00:26.000And Parler came about, kind of had this fast rise that looked like it might actually be a competitor for Twitter or something else.
01:00:35.000We have our We have fought long and hard to get our hands of the FBI, the CIA, DHS, everybody else into Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, across the board.
01:00:45.000And they're like, we can't have you guys having another outlet.
01:00:51.000And people think that, like, this is where I get pissed is that instead of us just talking about that, like, I appreciate Tim's anger about this because We ought to be furious.
01:00:59.000Do we, I mean, do we know what we're actually talking about?
01:01:19.000Think about how, how far, I almost cussed, how far we've transitioned, if you will, Remember when that there DNI guy lied to Congress about spying on the American people?
01:02:10.000It is not necessary that we suffer this forever.
01:02:15.000I don't go much into birthright type of stuff, but if there is a birthright of every American, it is that we can speak freely, we can defend ourselves, You know, there's a handful of, like, really sacrosanct type of beliefs and ideals that we uphold.
01:02:30.000And it seems like very few people take that seriously.
01:02:33.000They look at their politicians that are constantly infringing upon them, and they accept it.
01:02:37.000They just go, it is what it is, Clint.
01:02:43.000If you expect the America that we knew and loved to actually sustain itself, to be there 10, 20, 30 years from now, we have to actually Vocalize our anger towards the system and actually demand that it change.
01:02:58.000And I appreciate your kind of, you know, Buddhist outlook on it, but I really think that there needs to be some anger demonstrated.
01:03:05.000Even if it puts the sights on me, I just don't care.
01:03:36.000In the rise of a social media network, there's the exponential growth phase that you have to hit if you're going to succeed.
01:03:44.000And if you don't hit it, or if you're derailed mid That exponential rise?
01:03:50.000So all the federal government has to do from here on out, like exactly what they're doing with TikTok, threatening that they're going to ban TikTok.
01:04:10.000Because we already have the precedent.
01:04:12.000He's allowing some sort of CCP propaganda to be pushed.
01:04:16.000Clint, do you think on a long time frame, you know, 100, 200 years, do you think that there is the possibility that we're going to not have constant monitoring and constant, you know, the government or Maybe not even just the government, but constant overwatch from a large entity, because I know that there's a lot of people that now are speaking very, you know, we can't let this happen and blah blah blah blah blah, etc.
01:04:52.000Because this is still new stuff, I don't think in two generations anyone's gonna even think about not being monitored all the time.
01:05:01.000Well- Because I don't think that- I don't think the option- I think that there are teenagers now that just accept it as part of reality.
01:05:11.000Like it's a part of the- like it's a part of living in modern society.
01:05:15.000And I don't see how That's going to be... Again, I don't see the off-ramp.
01:05:22.000I don't see how we convince people that the convenience is not worth it, because that's really what it's about.
01:05:32.000Oftentimes the pendulum doesn't swing back until the pain is great enough, right?
01:05:35.000And I feel like the reason I'm so loud about this stuff is that you're right.
01:05:39.000Phil, that, like, the vast majority of young people... Because we've got forever!
01:05:44.000Like, just barring some kind of, like, extinction event, it's this problem never goes away for the rest of the time that there are human beings.
01:05:55.000Well, the surveillance capacity never goes away, but that doesn't mean that you can't have rules and regulations that apply to the government as far as what they're allowed to do and what criminal punishment they have to pay if they violate them.
01:06:07.000I don't see how we get any kind of rules or regulations.
01:06:10.000Well, it's going to happen in some countries.
01:06:14.000You don't think it'll happen anywhere on Earth?
01:06:17.000I don't think that there's going to be, I don't think that there's any society that currently has the ability to force their government to do anything anymore.
01:06:30.000I know, that's honestly, I mean we've had this conversation, Tim.
01:06:34.000Once you get, you know, chips that are implanted in most people's brains, and again, these are problems that don't go away.
01:06:42.000This isn't like, oh, we'll solve it this generation, and then we don't have to worry about it in the next generation, or the following generation, or three generations down.
01:06:51.000Once this genie is let out of the bottle, it is something that for as long as there is industrialized You know, modern society, this problem does not go away.
01:07:05.000I see, like, the law evolving to computer software code.
01:07:08.000So, like, instead of having a law on a paper somewhere, like, I hope we're all abiding by that thing.
01:07:12.000It's actually part of the structure of our ability to communicate.
01:07:15.000The laws are written into the way things work, so there's no ability for a government or foreign entity to violate the law or the code of the system.
01:07:28.000You're neglecting to think about real meat machines that don't want to... It's kind of like saying, hey, send me an ice cream cone on Twitter.
01:07:37.000You can't because it can only send certain types of things because the code is such that only certain types of things can be transmitted.
01:07:43.000So if that's your system, you can like...
01:07:46.000You know, observing from the outside isn't part of that code.
01:07:49.000Considering the conversation that we've had so far tonight, talking about what was done to Parler, what makes you think that that will ever be a possibility?
01:08:50.000I'm saying opinions shift dramatically and things could change.
01:08:54.000I've noticed if you spend a lot of time with autistic software developers, you'll get a lot more hope, because they all already know that it's possible.
01:09:00.000It's just, you're just constantly going to be chasing the tail.
01:09:02.000It'll be, we'll create new systems that can't be tampered with and then... I just wanted to add something as a total aside.
01:09:09.000Because you mentioned something that made me think of this and I checked.
01:09:20.000And so it's not ubiquitous, but the products exist where you might not realize that the cheesy puffs you bought will say in the ingredients, you know, like corn flour, cheese enzymes, acheta, yada, yada, yada.
01:09:32.000And then you're like, oh, and you don't realize that they put cricket in there without telling you.
01:09:39.000So I saw this on Facebook, you mentioned something about where we're headed and eating the bugs and all that stuff, and you look it up and it's like, yeah, the ingredients list will say a cheddar.
01:09:47.000See, I am totally unprepared to accept the inevitability that I will be eating crickets for the rest of my life, or being surveilled for the rest of my life.
01:09:56.000I reject it outright, I will not go along with this no matter how challenging it is.
01:10:00.000I'm saying that this problem doesn't stop because we think we found a solution for this generation.
01:10:38.000It is entirely possible that it is not our fault that young people on TikTok are doing these things.
01:10:43.000If you're walking down the street and someone lobs a snowball to the back of your head and it hits you, is that your fault that happened, right?
01:10:50.000China, TikTok, influence operations, we may have just been caught off guard.
01:10:55.000So you can make the argument, well, you should have known it was possible, and that's fair.
01:10:59.000If you're walking down the street in a neighborhood and it's snow everywhere, You should realize there's a chance someone might throw a snowball at you, and so you should be, you know, vigilant, I suppose.
01:11:07.000Though getting hit with a snowball's not the biggest deal in the world.
01:11:09.000Should we have been prepared for Chinese-run influence operations in this country?
01:11:14.000But I do think it's fair, it's possible we could say, it's not any generation's fault, they just attacked us.
01:11:19.000I still haven't seen, like, much along the same lines of these Iranian-backed militias and these Iranian-backed, funded, trained... Every time the U.S.
01:11:28.000or Israel is struck, it's always Iranian-backed.
01:11:30.000Like, that's immediately what they report.
01:11:51.000So hold on, when at the start of the Israel-Palestine conflict, there were 10 to 1 pro-Palestine posts versus pro-Israel, yet the pro-Palestine posts were getting no views.
01:12:03.000After almost like a day into the next week, the views went tenfold.
01:12:09.000And so that's indicative of an algorithmic change.
01:12:55.000Look, the United States does bad things all the time, but we're being actually attacked by a foreign adversary to destroy our future generations.
01:13:04.000Well, no, it is, but the difference between you and I is that I perceive the federal government's manipulation of us as also an attack of our future generations and our current one.
01:13:13.000I view the federal government in America as a far greater threat than any foreign government on earth.
01:13:43.000Do I think that the Feds... Well, okay, fine.
01:13:46.000In the periphery, but I'm saying the Feds could actually put me behind bars tomorrow because I said something on my podcast that's... But this is the worrying thing.
01:13:53.000Okay, we see this every day with TikTok.
01:14:03.000The list of things you're not allowed to talk about on TikTok, it's basically if you are an LGBTQIA2 plus communist, you're fine.
01:14:13.000Anything else so we actually have a list of because because we follow the rules doesn't matter if you follow the rules There's on there's secret tick-tock rules.
01:14:21.000And so we're we're we have like we have a social media list of like, okay Here's the things that if no matter what no matter what you say you mention it they ban you.
01:14:45.000But yes, in terms... I don't even want to bring up X because it's kind of a given, but considering it was originally part of the big three.
01:14:58.000This is why I'm surprised that Phil was okay with banning of the River of the Sea and the decolonization, because it's like, we fought so hard, we were so thrilled to see Elon take over X to kind of liberalize the speech dynamics there, but yet this is such a danger that you're okay with it?
01:15:15.000It is the greatest danger to the United States.
01:15:22.000The cultural revolution that we're going through right now is unquestionably the greatest threat to the United States and to society, the people that live in the United States.
01:15:32.000I think the more imminent threat is World War III, but I will agree with you that the Marxist revolution is a close second from my perspective.
01:15:38.000That doesn't change the fact that I don't believe censorship actually addresses a Marxist revolution.
01:15:54.000That's the exact argument they make against the alt-right.
01:15:57.000They say, you can't radicalize them, they're already radical.
01:15:59.000Then they go over to, you know, Pepe Central, and then they get a lot more radical.
01:16:05.000Yeah, but when you go to, when you deal, like right now on Twitch, there are people that constantly have conversations.
01:16:11.000What do we do with the police after the revolution?
01:16:15.000Right, they're like, what do you do with the cops once you've dissolved the state you're gonna need the cops They're already talking about the the precursor con conversations to Put them in the gulags.
01:16:30.000Like these are the precursor conversation.
01:16:31.000What do you do with the police when you've when you've got rid of the state?
01:16:35.000Well, you got to do something with them because they're all these people that know how to carry out direct action stuff Yeah And what do you do with them?
01:16:43.000Well, what the communists historically have done is killed them.
01:16:47.000And so these conversations... But who's going to enforce these censorship protocols, and who are they actually going to go after?
01:16:52.000Are they going to go after these black block kids, or are they going to go after you and me?
01:16:55.000So they're not going to go after... The federal government, I don't think the federal government should be doing any of that, because I haven't said the federal government should do any of it.
01:17:02.000I'm talking about, if you're talking about like Platforms and stuff like that.
01:17:09.000And when it comes to the actual, like, how do you stop the spread of it, it's get out of schools.
01:17:16.000Get rid of critical pedagogy in schools.
01:17:57.000This is a really shocking thing to hear.
01:18:00.000And the question is, how do you get to the point where LeVar Burton doesn't know and doesn't care about pornographic material being given to children?
01:18:09.000I want to give a shout out to Taylor Hanson.
01:18:28.000So, how do you have someone Like LeVar Burton.
01:18:33.000I view this as the banality of evil, right?
01:18:35.000This is, to me, the same thing as the guy doing the salute to Hitler without knowing why he's saluting or caring about what Hitler's plans were.
01:18:41.000This is a guy who is saying he is threatening physical violence.
01:18:45.000Call it a joke, call it whatever you want.
01:18:47.000He actually said, we don't gotta throw hands.
01:18:49.000In reference to moms who are like, please don't show my kids porn.
01:18:54.000The name of the group is actually Moms for Liberty and he's like, I don't have to throw hands with these moms.
01:18:59.000It's like, you think you're the good guy?
01:19:02.000How crazy is it that we've gotten to this point where people are just like, yeah, we're going to threaten violence against women because of the ideology.
01:19:08.000And by the way, that ideology that they uphold, they're like, fans of the Bill of Rights.
01:19:28.000And the reason you don't is because it is illiberal.
01:19:32.000Because we're a liberal country, and if you're going to actually engage with ideas, you don't get to say, I don't like your ideas, so I'm gonna punch you.
01:19:42.000And that, it started out with punching Nazis, and everyone was afraid to say, no, you don't want to punch Nazis, because everyone's afraid of sounding like they're defending Nazis.
01:19:50.000You don't punch Nazis, but you also don't censor commies, Phil.
01:20:20.000But yeah, so I lost my train of thought there.
01:20:22.000Well, let me just add something real quick because kind of real breaking news was that Paramount Global is also now suspending advertisement on X. So you now have Disney, Warner, Paramount Global, and Lionsgate.
01:20:34.000Basically everybody that makes movies in this country is suspended.
01:21:00.000This is like another iteration of the same ESG dynamic that I was kind of talking about very aggressively a couple years ago, is that You have this manipulative, these tools now where the federal government is able to influence private business to circumvent our God-given rights, the Bill of Rights.
01:21:20.000That's exactly why the ESG framework exists.
01:21:22.000That's exactly why DEI exists, is that there are constitutional protections that they can get around as long as they use these allegedly private entities to do so.
01:21:32.000And this is why I don't support any sort of censorship on social media, especially when you realize that it's not usually a private entity that is making these decisions.
01:21:41.000There is a lot, a lot of this is happening from a very high level where they're essentially manipulating the broader public, and they're controlling the dialogue and the dynamic between us as human beings.
01:21:52.000This is the whole reason Elon allegedly bought X, was that he understood that if we didn't have conversations with one another, we would end up fighting each other in the streets.
01:22:00.000And we're headed back towards that because these people are trying to force him into a course correction by absorbing his advertiser revenue.
01:22:13.000No, it's just that the idea that phrases can't be said is one thing.
01:22:21.000It's different when you're talking about ideas that can't be shared.
01:22:24.000So the idea behind, and I think that it's okay to say you can't say from the river to the sea, because that is a shorthand, essentially a slang term for an idea.
01:22:50.000And then they go, it means that Palestinians will have equal rights.
01:22:54.000Well, but then it's dragged out into an actual conversation, and you can talk to them, which is again, the problem isn't we need to ban these ideas from being shared when you say, we don't want these phrases.
01:23:09.000What you're saying is, we don't want you to be able to hide.
01:23:14.000And that's essentially what it boils down to, is they hide behind these phrases.
01:23:18.000But banning these phrases is actually how you force these people back into hiding.
01:23:30.000He's talking about saying that if you're genocidal... Fair point to Phil.
01:23:37.000They will now have to explain what their argument for decolonize is instead of just saying decolonize.
01:23:43.000And every time we hear- I guess that's a fair point.
01:23:45.000Every time we talk about from the river to the sea, people talk about, no, well it means this, and it doesn't mean that, and then it gets all real, you know, real tough to nail down what they're talking about, which is something that the left thrives on.
01:23:58.000It's part of the reason why they don't- Instead of censorship, you're like- It's part of the reason why they don't have a, that's part of the reason why they use the same vocabulary, but don't use the same dictionary, because they want to be able to hide their intent.
01:24:19.000So what do you think, I mean, like, I just don't understand how, oh, now we've banned these four words in this particular order, so now they have to explain it differently, and that's going to somehow help us?
01:24:29.000Like if they type from the sea to the river, will that help?
01:24:47.000It's really neurotic when you see like the F word with a star where the U is just because they're like, I'm afraid that daddy's going to demonetize me.
01:25:23.000If I want to do a story where I say, police officer accused of killing teenager, I'm demonetized instantly.
01:25:29.000If I say, I have to come up with very clever ways to explain it because it's not a human being that is telling me what to do, it's a machine that doesn't understand anything.
01:25:37.000So you've got to use clever things like, teens life lost after police officer fires weapon.
01:25:44.000And then it's like, people know what I said, but the algorithm doesn't.
01:25:47.000I'm basically having to do a cap chat with every title I make in a video.
01:25:50.000I kind of align with letting the network owners ban whatever they want.
01:26:17.000He freed but I don't know according to Bill who I talked to CEO minds calm bill up and he said there's like 80% more to do well, I mean Yeah, I I think that I think that that's part of my problem with your your Your take on freeing the code and stuff Most people don't know and they're gonna have to go to someone else to ask any even if it was freed You're gonna look at and be like, what is this?
01:26:41.000And most people, so you're still going to outsource the information to someone you trust.
01:26:47.000But what happens is if Clint's got the network and he's abusing it because he's banning people that are typing the word OK, but then you spin up the same network and you don't ban people that say, OK, I'm going to switch off his and go to your network, and it's going to be seamless because the code's interoperable, so I can just go to whatever network has better terms.
01:27:03.000How much does it cost to hire a coder to make a version of Twitter?
01:27:07.000One guy to probably take about 17 years and about 900 million.
01:28:00.000Okay, so if he could just build it for $200 million, well then obviously the network effect and all of the users matters tremendously, so that's the premium he's paying.
01:29:10.000And this is why the concept of freeing the code to the extent that someone could create their own version is impossible because like every other attempt, this has been attempted before too, what you're describing, it results in companies abandoning the project because of a lost investment.
01:29:25.000Right. Yeah, you would just be implicated if the code. I mean, if they did that, that would be
01:29:30.000bad for that because then someone would just pick it up and keep keep it running.
01:29:33.000No, they abandon it. There's tons of like if Elon abandoned Twitter,
01:29:35.000someone would pick it up and keep running it. But he would abandon it. What happens is if
01:29:40.000someone's like, it's not about saying we're going to stop the company and cease to exist. It's
01:29:43.000hey, how much does it cost for us to spin up a company?
01:29:47.000It's going to cost about $200 million, and then once we do, the government will seize all of our intellectual property and give it away for free.
01:30:14.000I'm not going to give up billions of dollars of investment and man hours to the government No, no private entity is going to want to give up power to the government, but that's not what antitrust laws are for.
01:30:27.000It's not about, oh, sir, may I take your power from you?
01:30:30.000You've developed something that we the people utilize, so we the people are taking control of it.
01:30:34.000And the point is, people would look at the investment and say, so the company, in the initial investment round, when they're discussing their plans, they're going to say, the project we have in mind is called Twixer.
01:30:45.000Where you can post these photos, videos, and share ideas.
01:30:48.000The growth period we're looking at is going to be over 5 to 10 years.
01:30:51.000The initial investment we're seeking is going to be around $200 million.
01:31:34.000Everyone who's pitching to investors has to also include, here are our risks.
01:31:39.000And they're going to say, well, as you know, the U.S.
01:31:40.000government has implemented a law... At a 1 billion user count.
01:31:43.000After 100 million users, your code becomes public property.
01:31:46.000Therefore, we avoid this by putting a cap at 99 million.
01:31:49.000And then the other guys don't, and they go up to 900,000 million, 9 billion users, or 4 billion users, and they're still getting ad revenue, even though their software code's free.
01:31:57.000Here's where I think you're both probably a little bit off base, is that, in reality, Once you get to 99 million users, you would just buy off a politician to give you a cutout, and then you would grow above that threshold anyways.
01:32:08.000I gotta be honest, it's actually much simpler than that.
01:32:11.000They say once we start exceeding 99 million, we start having a runoff room called Twoxer2, which is a separate company that will have a networking through Mastodon, which will connect the users, and we will avoid the regulation.
01:32:23.000The fundamental problem that you're just glossing over, though, is once you have Insecure property rights, like you're describing, right?
01:32:33.000So it becomes, once it hits a certain level, then it becomes nationalized.
01:32:38.000If you have insecure property rights, those kind of problems- I'm not talking about nationalizing anything, but continue.
01:32:44.000So if you can't invest and then take the result, the benefits of the investment, that kind of insecure return on investment, It travels through your whole economy, and it screws up your whole economy.
01:32:58.000That's one of the reasons why socialist countries don't work.
01:33:01.000No one wants to invest in a socialist country if they're not going to get the return on their investment.
01:33:06.000But you don't lose the code when it becomes free.
01:33:08.000You still have your network, it still functions exactly.
01:35:05.000But this means that if you're on the road and the private company deems you to be in violation, they have your car towed and they can have it destroyed.
01:35:21.000The ultimate point here is that when you say, at a certain level, the IP of the company should be released to the public for use, the issue becomes...
01:35:31.000One, it's an impossible standard to uphold.
01:35:33.000People will just bypass this in various ways.
01:35:35.000Like, I think you brought this up, that when Rockefeller's Gold, was it Rockefeller's?
01:36:00.000Once you get to a certain level of power and wealth and influence, it's basically impossible
01:36:05.000to use the government to actually crush these people because they own the government.
01:36:09.000It becomes a situation where they're in conjunction with the government.
01:36:14.000The fact that there is FBI desks at Facebook and at Google and stuff, that is essentially
01:36:23.000having the federal government involved in the day-to-day operations of these companies.
01:36:29.000If you open up a dictionary to fascism, it would be a photo of an FBI agent sitting in Facebook's headquarters.
01:36:35.000And it's the same thing that the CCP does.
01:36:37.000There's a person that represents the CCP So this is why I talk about freeing the code, because I think that if you wanted to prevent these companies from getting richer after their stuff is broken apart, you allow the world access to the software itself so that
01:36:56.000That would, that would, that would, the government and the company no longer have it anymore.
01:37:12.000All social media companies must publish the algorithm code.
01:37:16.000Their recommendation algorithms must be public.
01:37:20.000The proprietary IP for how the system functions outside of that, they can keep.
01:37:23.000They also have to make it AGPL3, which is Afro-General Public License 3, meaning that any changes made to the code are also publicly available.
01:37:32.000So that someone can't just take the newly public code into private and change it and make it better.
01:37:37.000It always stays like an ever-expanding...
01:37:41.000These are all laws that would take the government to enforce, and as soon as you have government working with companies, you invariably get collusion.
01:37:54.000That's the reason why you have all these problems with banks and the government, because the Federal Reserve and the banks work together hand-in-hand, and as much as from the outside it looks like they're working together to take care of each other, They're trying to do what is going to harm the fewest amount of people.
01:38:14.000Like, the reason that they bailed out the banks in in 08 and stuff was because they were trying to trying to lessen the damage to the economy, which would have hurt everybody.
01:38:26.000So as much as I am for cutting the ties between government and the private sector, I don't think that it's as easy as we wish it was, is honestly my perspective.
01:38:40.000So if you haven't already, would you kindly smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share this show with your friends, head over to TimCast.com, become a member by clicking join us to watch the infringed documentary in our documentary section.
01:38:49.000It is produced by Lauren Southern and John DuTois, and executive producer was TimCast.
01:38:55.000You gotta check it out, it's about gun rights and gun culture, and why you should keep in bare arms.
01:39:00.000But we're gonna read your Super Chats.
01:39:01.000Now we got Fix Bayonets with the first Super Chat saying, hi.
01:39:35.000I mean, that's a good start for the insurrection-y guy, apparently, though.
01:39:40.000Jason Dixon says, on Discord only, Kellen and Serge, TimCast member only on Discord, tomorrow at 10 p.m.
01:39:45.000Eastern, join the Discord and join the community.
01:39:47.000That's right, when you become a member at TimCast.com, go to TimCast.com, click join us.
01:39:51.000The instructions on joining the Discord server are there, and you can hang out with like-minded individuals who watch the show, and they run their own shows.
01:40:00.000There's morning shows, there's after shows, there's pre-shows, so there's a lot of stuff going on.
01:40:04.000You should definitely hang out, because building community and building culture is the mission.
01:40:37.000I don't know what it entails either, but I can just tell you, based off of the phrasing being used, it's almost certainly a DEI style framework, which is diversity, equity, inclusion.
01:41:12.000If they want to make that argument, then I will side with AOC and say, yeah, all the Capitol Police who are hunting these people down and building up these offices around the country are insurrectionists.
01:41:57.000If the GOP actually went to those cops and said, because of what is going on with law enforcement, we are going to make sure that each and every one of you gets 20 years, J6 would be over.
01:42:26.000And this is the problem with having a two-tier justice system is that ultimately there is no justice.
01:42:31.000So we need to start advocating that these Capitol Police with these new release tapes get two decades in prison because what will happen is the likes of AOC, the Young Turks, will agree with us.
01:42:41.000There will be a tremendous pressure on Democrats, Merrick Garland, to start indicting police officers, which he will not be able to do.
01:42:48.000The police unions, the Capitol Police, they will lose it!
01:42:52.000And then you're going to see a massive government institution say, ain't no way you're locking us up!
01:42:57.000But uh-oh, the Democrats base and the right are unified on wanting that to happen.
01:43:04.000The system will not allow those cops to get arrested.
01:43:06.000My concern is that we have a real weaponized DOJ at this point, and once you get there, plus you have a real weaponized intelligence agency apparatus with both the FBI and the CIA, it's like, how do you put that genie back in the bottle?
01:43:20.000I mean, this is the type of stuff that you saw in USSR days, you know?
01:43:24.000And it doesn't go in a direction that is favorable to people that value walking freely at all, or eating adequately.
01:43:32.000Like, this heads in a very, very dark direction, and I feel like people aren't really facing it.
01:43:35.000We all, like, we look at it on the day-to-day, we kind of realize it's headed in the wrong direction, but we don't actually appreciate how precarious and how imminently dangerous all of this is.
01:43:45.000And I'm not to freak people out, but it's like... No, they should be freaked out!
01:45:04.000Jimmy Dore was saying, when the same thing was happening with Democrats, when they took the House, challenge them, do not give Pelosi the speakership, unless they give you concessions.
01:45:14.000And Cenk was like, no, the Republicans will get in and you'll get Kevin McCarthy, don't do it!
01:45:17.000And that's just, it's not what happens.
01:45:19.000There is not a single Republican who would sacrifice their career Over a vacant speakership.
01:45:32.000So what happens is, the Democrats go to them and say, don't you want to be a defector?
01:45:36.000And the guy's like, here are my options.
01:45:38.000I can say nothing and no one knows my name, or I can destroy my entire life and career and go home as an enemy of my own neighborhoods and my own district.
01:46:06.000What bothers me is that the narrative has been America first and that has been what really Trump and all of the new modern iteration of the Republicans I don't despise have rode into power on the back of has been the America first narrative, right?
01:46:21.000But then, you oust McCarthy, who I agree is a total traitor and scumbag, but then you put in Mike Johnson, whose very first priority is funding for Israel.
01:46:33.000And it's like, can I ever get someone who actually means it when they say America first?
01:47:16.000When the show started, people may have noticed this, Scott asked if he could do a 10 to 15 minute opening statement.
01:47:22.000And I was like, well, it's entirely up to Will, who's debating to decide.
01:47:26.000I mean, the problem is that you're going to say a bunch of things that will be challenged.
01:47:29.000And if you just say them and you're asking no one debate you, I mean, this creates an issue.
01:47:33.000And that actually came up a couple of times where it's like, You know, Scott would say, it's, it's, it's, I would call it an unintentional gish gallop.
01:47:41.000I, I, I warned him of this before the show.
01:47:43.000I said, are you familiar with the debate tactic gish gallop?
01:47:45.000It's where you say as many things as possible at once, so your opponent can't respond to them.
01:47:50.000And so, this is the trouble with saying five things, and then saying wait, and then changing the subject, and adding another thing, and saying wait, and then adding another thing, because now we have to stop, and then, you know, Will is trying to write it all down, and... But you know, it is what it is.
01:48:53.000As soon as he did, a group of about six or seven rushed in.
01:48:58.000The total group you can see on camera that are beating him probably is between, you know, it's probably six or seven, it may be around six.
01:49:04.000And I watched the video, I got the full clips where you can see Jonathan Lewis throwing the first punch.
01:49:38.000There's two guys who are described as swarthy, meaning they could be Asian, they could be Middle Eastern, they could be Hispanic, we're not entirely sure.
01:49:55.000I'll probably lose some listeners over this one, but I gotta say it anyways.
01:50:00.000I've been really disturbed, and look, let me start by saying, yes, there are crimes that are perpetrated against white people that don't go reported because that doesn't fall into the category of the victimhood hierarchy that people are talking about these days.
01:50:13.000However, I don't like how You will have these viral videos of a one-off act that is perpetrated by a black person against a white person, and then you'll see just the reply segment is just filled with people that are like hardcore, you know?
01:50:30.000I mean, white supremacist I think is a fair thing to say, but certainly abiding by the white grievance politics type of mindset, and I just think it's very unhealthy.
01:50:39.000I'm not interested in going the opposite direction from black people are always oppressed and the white people are always the oppressor and now we're going to flip that and it's white people are oppressed and I don't want to go down this path.
01:50:50.000And I think there are a lot of people that jumped on the 15 black kids beat a white kid to death story because it was... It fits that role.
01:50:57.000Well we can attack the leftist narrative.
01:51:08.000The video that went viral on Twitter is a short clip that doesn't show you the fight starting.
01:51:12.000The full video actually does exist and you can watch it.
01:51:15.000And then you have conflicting statements.
01:51:18.000And then the police issued their statement.
01:51:20.000So, I'm not telling you who to blame, who is right, who is wrong, or whatever.
01:51:25.000I'm telling you what the police and the news and several different sources, like between them, have stated.
01:51:31.000And let me add one more point is that it's not at all empowering to start to get people that have your skin color to feel as if they're victims just because of how they were born.
01:51:41.000I think that this is extraordinarily destructive to the black community and I think that if you take on that that belief system and you apply it to white people it's also destructive.
01:51:49.000I would not advise it for either side and in fact come together if you could.
01:52:22.000If you actually listened to it, I was saying that his grievances are shared by many people that are not scumbag terrorists that live in the Middle East who have had their lives destroyed by the military-industrial complex of America.
01:52:33.000That is a valid and reasonable claim that the American population ought to consider
01:52:39.000given that we have been robbed blind to pay for the military apparatus that has destroyed
01:53:41.000Jim Anson says, Clint, we dispatched Iranians in both Afghanistan and Iraq regularly, and their training is responsible for the... Emptied thread, is that what you're trying to say?
01:55:09.000Twitter had all the same functionality.
01:55:12.000I don't know if that's necessarily true.
01:55:14.000As far as anyone on the front end could tell, it was the same thing.
01:55:17.000A government powerful enough to force a company to free its code is also a government powerful enough to put out of business every competitor to any particular singular business that they want to be in a monopoly position.
01:55:33.000A government that's powerful enough to lock a man up for murdering another person is a government that's powerful enough to lock up an innocent person and claim they murdered someone.
01:55:44.000It's like basically saying, like, we want the government to stop murderers, but oh no, then the government might arrest innocent people.
01:55:49.000Okay, so we'll create a robust system that tries to preserve the rights of the innocent.
01:55:52.000Okay, fair, but there's still a valid argument to be made that if you have a government, if you empower the government to strip their IP protection, right, you're saying that they have to free the code.
01:56:10.000It means that they get to choose winners and losers, which means that they could ultimately dictate who gets to be the dominant lead in any industry.
01:56:18.000And so the issue with this argument is it implies corruption has nothing to do with the argument about whether or not we regulate.
01:56:23.000So to say a government that can arrest a man for murder has the power to lock up its political opponents.
01:56:36.000Okay, but my argument is that both sides of it are bad, though.
01:56:40.000If you're actually going to try and use, what's it called, antitrust protections to shut down some of these monopoly actors, it's totally fruitless.
01:56:51.000They ultimately end up being in a, even if they get split up, they still end up being in a very dominant market position because they own the politicians that are dictating that separation from the get-go.
01:57:01.000Yeah, I don't want to shut down the companies or break them up.
01:57:04.000I want their code to be accessible to the common man.
01:57:07.000So the government no longer has that kind of power and authority over what that network does because the network is now proliferated.
01:57:15.000I mean, they could try and send out 600,000 cease and desist to 600,000 different Twitter clones, but You know, that's a lot more robust defense mechanism than having one of them.
01:57:26.000Yeah, well, I mean the network effect is really why these social media companies prevail anyways, because so many people have accounts there, so it's not really the code, it's the fact that people are using the app, right?
01:57:57.000Let's see what else we have in the old, uh, old superchats.
01:58:01.000Spoonlicker says, if we end up stuck with a 4,000-page omnibus spending bill, someone needs to add a line to repeal the Patriot Act and dissolve the Department of Education.
01:58:08.000I'm saying, is what I said when they wheeled out the 5,000-page omnibus and said everyone just approve it?
01:58:14.000I'm like, can't someone just slide in, like, Trump 1 and just, like, put it right in the middle?
01:58:21.000That's how the Chinese do contracts, apparently.
01:58:23.000When you send back red line stuff, they'll send stuff back and they won't show you what they changed.
01:58:27.000They just expect that you're going to reread it every time.
01:58:30.000I'm feeling very reflective thinking about someone who's watching this right now just had their first child be born and how beautiful that is.
01:58:48.000As a total aside, just because, I don't know why I thought about this, I realized that every day we do a show where I'm in the thumbnail, I'm taking a picture every day like those people who do like a picture every day.
01:58:58.000So you could theoretically take... I mean, how long have we been doing it this way?
01:59:25.000That's pretty dope, though, that you get to like be exactly how you are at 35 or whatever to 70.
01:59:30.000And then you just become... To be fair, though, that myth comes from So, you ever notice that in cartoons, when a guy gets, like, if a kid gets turned into an old person or whatever, their pants go way up?
01:59:53.000Yeah, Asians don't look normal, and then at 70 shrink, it's that 70-year-old Asians grew up in an era where they were shorter, and now the younger generation of Asians are aging more gracefully.
02:00:06.000Alright everybody, if you haven't already, would you kindly smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share this show with your friends, head over to TimCast.com, become a member, click join us, and watch Infringed, the new documentary by Lauren Southern.
02:00:17.000We're gonna be making many more documentaries, so a lot of really cool stuff is to come, and you can also join the Discord server.
02:00:22.000We also have uncensored members-only shows up Monday through Thursday at 10 p.m., where you as a member can actually call in and talk to us and our guests.
02:00:29.000Smash the like button, subscribe to the channel.
02:00:31.000You can follow the show at TimCastIRL.
02:00:32.000You can follow me personally at TimCastClint.
02:01:56.000And today, I interviewed Dewey Long, who actually discovered the flash graphene process, where they're hitting carbon with electricity and turning it into graphene.
02:02:29.000I don't know what's going on with the whole thing on Discord, but I think Colin has worked some situation out where we're going to be chatting with people that are on Discord.
02:02:36.000So if you're not a member of Discord, please, like Tim said, become a member.