On today's show, we talk about the First Republic Bank scandal, Tucker Carlson being fired from Fox News, and the possibility of the U.S. Government seizing control of a major financial company. Plus, we hear from a call-in question from a listener about the censorship industrial complex.
00:00:35.000You don't gotta worry about that one, thank.
00:00:36.000Well, now we gotta worry about that one bank.
00:00:38.000It's, uh, First Republic, and not only are we getting reports that they've basically mismanaged funds, they're being sued, uh, I think it's like 72 billion dollars, something like that.
00:00:48.000We're hearing now from a Fox Business reporter that the U.S.
00:01:24.000Then there's the Fox News losing $1 billion in market value after firing Tucker Carlson.
00:01:30.000You'd think they'd hire Dylan Mulvaney.
00:01:32.000Fox News, they got a great opportunity there, but now we're hearing that they're losing a bunch of Fox Nation subscribers, which is all just completely obvious.
00:01:38.000And I think one thing people haven't mentioned is that maybe the reason Rupert Murdoch wanted to get rid of him is simply because he was becoming the face of Fox News, and that's a threat to Fox News.
00:01:48.000They want Fox News to be the brand, not Tucker Carlson.
00:01:51.000So we'll talk about all that stuff, but before we do, my friends, we have an amazing sponsor tonight, Cast Brew Coffee!
00:01:56.000Head over to castbrew.com and pick up your coffee today.
00:02:32.000Sleepy Joe, because, you know, Joe Coffee and Sleepy because there's no caffeine.
00:02:36.000And then Stand Your Grounds, which is going to be another roast.
00:02:39.000So those are going to be rolling out in the next month or so.
00:02:41.000But once we get the official production line rolling, which is about May 5th, when you start receiving your coffee, we are going to launch coffee subscriptions.
00:02:48.000We are going to be having this as our principal product at our coffee shop in West Virginia, and we're going to be expanding a lot more.
00:02:53.000So with your support, Cast Brew Coffee will be a coffee company that is not scared to be associated with good, honest young men who believe in their community and things like that, if you get my drift.
00:03:04.000Don't forget to also head over to TimCast.com, click that Join Us button, become a member to support the show directly, and you'll get access to our Discord server where you can hang out with like-minded individuals, share ideas.
00:03:18.000You can actually call into the show, the Uncensored Members Only Show, which as a member you get access to Monday through Thursday at 10.10pm.
00:03:26.000You can actually submit questions and be one of our callers if you've been a member for at least six months or sign up at the $25 per month level.
00:03:32.000So smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share the show with your friends.
00:03:36.000Joining us today to talk about this and so much more is Leighton Woodhouse.
00:07:33.000I told my wife we don't know what's happening with our money.
00:07:36.000I mean, we're well under the FDIC cap, so we'll get insured for that.
00:07:40.000To be fair, you've had like a month to prepare for this because we knew First Republic was in dire straits.
00:07:45.000I believe their PR statements, they were like, we're secure.
00:07:47.000I actually think that, I mean, I don't know anything about this, but I do think that they're just taking backsplash from what happened with Silicon Valley Bank.
00:07:53.000So I kind of doubt that this is a fundamental issue with a bank.
00:07:57.000I think that this is part of a panic, which is a reason why I should have joined the panic and taken my money out myself.
00:08:03.000Or maybe by not panicking you may have helped them.
00:08:13.000Wouldn't it be cool to wake up, everybody listen, you wake up one day and you get a phone call and they're like, you know that mortgage you had on your house?
00:09:12.000It was like, I think the best I can make of it is like, there was nobody who actually owned the house because these were all securitized loans.
00:09:17.000It was like, you know, some Chinese sovereign wealth fund and pension fund or whatever.
00:09:21.000So nobody actually had equity in the house.
00:09:22.000But the bank that was holding the debt on it was just losing money every month that was on the market.
00:09:27.000So they just wanted, it was a toxic asset.
00:09:29.000They just wanted to get off the market.
00:09:30.000And what they were afraid of is if they took the offer that I accepted, The appraiser would come in, who used to be super corrupt and hand-in-glove with the realtors, but all of a sudden they were super honest.
00:09:45.000And so they were afraid that the appraiser was going to come in and say, no, this is not worth as much as you're offering, and then the deal would fall apart, and then they'd have it on their books for months longer.
00:09:53.000So that's the best I can make sense of it.
00:09:56.000First Republic said Monday it lost a net total of $72 billion in deposits during the first quarter, an outflow that would have topped $100 billion if not for a rescue from 11 of the nation's largest banks.
00:10:06.000So this is like people are... It's a run of the bank.
00:11:54.000So if you got First Republic or PNC, I guess the challenging thing is, does reporting on it just contribute to a run on the bank and make everything worse?
00:12:05.000The banking system, though, it was a matter of time, because the whole thing operates on confidence and faith, right?
00:12:10.000I mean, they have a system of fractional reserve lending where if you put in 100 bucks, you know, the bank can lend out 90 of it and only hold 10.
00:12:18.000And the only thing that's holding the system together is everybody not going to the bank at the same time to take their money out, which is exactly what's happening right now.
00:12:56.000My understanding was that you put $100 in the bank, they create $90 in loans, so they still have the $100 and now there's another $90, and then someone who gets that $90 deposits it in a different bank, so now there's $100 here, $90 here, that bank then loans out, you know, $81 or whatever, and so $100 turns into $1,000.
00:13:11.000$81 or whatever and so $100 turns into $1,000 and that's inflation. Yeah
00:13:17.000No, but I actually think because you only have to have 10% on hand, they can literally say we have $100, therefore we're able to lend out $900 as opposed to $90.
00:13:25.000I think you guys are saying the same thing.
00:13:59.000Or do they just actually issue it out because a lot of these banks don't have the cash on hand when people come to withdraw, and that's why they collapse.
00:14:05.000So I think they actually do pass the money out.
00:16:40.000But I've actually argued this for a while, that Bitcoin was the most convenient way to get anti-establishment, conspiracy-type individuals to embrace global currency.
00:16:49.000You have people like Alex Jones being like, I want a one world government with one currency,
00:16:53.000And then all of a sudden around the time he's complaining about the Amaro,
00:16:56.000an American single, a North American single currency, Bitcoin pops up, no one knows who made it.
00:17:01.000And then immediately it's all of these people who want to buy it.
00:17:05.000So it's like, convince the one group of people who would reject a global currency
00:17:08.000to adopt the global currency, and you've won.
00:17:11.000You've controlled opposition to your way through the barricade, you know?
00:17:15.000Yeah, well, and this is part of what is very confusing.
00:17:18.000I mean, conservatism doesn't have a solid definition or solid footing at the present moment.
00:17:23.000It's a little bit of, we're just going to do the opposite of what the left is doing, and a little bit of, we're just going to do the opposite of what the establishment is doing.
00:17:30.000The idea of Bitcoin is certainly not a conservative idea, right?
00:17:33.000That's a very new, interesting, innovative idea.
00:17:38.000But, conservatism is supposed to be about conserving.
00:17:41.000Yeah, I would say it's more libertarian.
00:17:42.000And it's not to say that conservatives can't have any thinking, which overlaps with libertarianism, and it would be reasonable to say because this government is so horrible and does things so badly and is destroying our currency, it makes sense for conservatives to look into crypto if that's the particular heads they've chosen.
00:17:58.000But we don't have a cohesively defined movement.
00:18:01.000Well, I guess we'll see what happens with these banks, and I'm not going to give anybody financial advice, but I'll just tell you I've already been looking at means of storing value elsewhere, because with PNC closing, I think it was at 47 branches.
00:18:51.000So, I don't know what conclusions to draw from the fact that it's these, like, elite banks that are falling, but In Australia, they announced that some of their big banks are going to stop giving out cash.
00:19:00.000You go to the bank, you're like, I'd like money, but you can't have it.
00:19:17.000I've actually wondered many times what that, what this means for pay and handlers.
00:19:22.000You're going to tap your card, you're going to walk up and go boop, and then they're going to be like, thank you sir, and they're going to hold out the keypad, and you're going to go boop, and you're going to type in the number.
00:20:06.000So you're saying I could go to a big city and just sit in a lawn chair and put up a sign with a cash app and say, give me money, and then people will just send me money.
00:20:15.000We should, you know, we should do, we should put a cash app thing on Timcast, like right down here in the corner and just like, please give me your money.
00:20:23.000I know this isn't on the docket, but did you guys read this report?
00:20:25.000It was like a month ago or something about how Cash App and the entire, what's the name of it?
00:21:18.000It was like, I don't know, it was maybe like 10 years ago or something, or 8 years ago?
00:21:22.000Someone told me this rich dude who lived in New York, I was hanging out with Max Keiser and he was just like, you got to buy square stock because everything's going digital transactions.
00:21:58.000And then Jack Dorsey, I think I remember from this report, at one point in an interview was talking about how grateful he is to all the publicity he's gotten from these rappers.
00:22:08.000Oh my gosh, this is the guy who thinks that using the offensive pronouns for person on Twitter makes them unsafe, and he's like, come use my murder app.
00:22:23.000From the Post Millennial, Fox loses $1 billion after parting ways with Tucker Carlson.
00:22:29.000The Fox Corporation stock plummeted as much as 5% on Monday, wiping out $930 million in market value following the announcement that Fox News had parted ways with Tucker Carlson.
00:22:40.000According to Business Insider, shares of the media company recovered slightly after, so it ended up at like $29.
00:22:46.000The decision to part ways with Carlson announced less than a week after the Fox Corporation diminued
00:23:34.000But I sort of mentioned this yesterday, that CNN is the network that tells you what you're supposed to believe, and then Fox is the network that tells you what you're allowed to believe.
00:23:42.000So if you don't want to buy into what CNN is saying, they'll push you over to Fox, and that's still within the realm of acceptable opinion, but Tucker's a little bridge too far.
00:23:51.000Yeah, he's a bridge a little too far for them.
00:23:56.000You know, cable news commentators, they're all buzzwords.
00:23:59.000Apparently now they got this thing, he launched this thing on his website where it's like you can text some number to, like, Tucker to 4-4 or something or whatever, and then they'll send you information on what he's planning to do or something like that.
00:25:14.000All the people doing these like end zone dances about Tucker being fired from Fox like didn't we just go through this a couple years ago when Barry Weiss would left the New York Times and the same people were doing the same end zone dances and then she went on to create the Free Press which is like dwarfs any Oh, and she's probably so rich now.
00:25:33.000I mean, I think she already comes from like a well-off family, and now the rich have gotten richer because the New York Times decided to unleash her.
00:25:51.000I appreciate the optimism I'm seeing from a lot of conservatives on this.
00:25:54.000Part of my concern is, and I voiced this yesterday, is that because Fox tells people what is acceptable, it was great to have Tucker there to help shift that Overton window and introduce a new audience to ideas that the rest of us are familiar with or have been reading up about online, but that that audience wouldn't give credibility to seeing it on the internet as opposed to cable television.
00:26:14.000I certainly have no doubt that Tucker Carlson's going to be extremely successful.
00:26:19.000He's going to be fine. It's a question of, is his message going to spread as far and wide?
00:26:23.000I hope so. I'm not saying it won't. I'm just saying that having that platform was definitely
00:26:27.000very good for America. Having someone on cable television saying the things Tucker was saying
00:26:30.000was very good for America. I think they also had to pay out his contract.
00:26:33.000Meaning if he was getting, like, they can't just sever his contract.
00:26:37.000So I imagine they went to him and said, we're terminating your show, and he was like, then you owe me 30 million dollars for the rest of the year, and they went, okay.
00:26:50.000Because you- Unless they're like, this is the crazy thing about these contracts with these big networks, is they give themselves morality clauses to terminate you in violation of what the contract is supposed to do.
00:27:01.000It's like, hey, we're gonna hire you for three years, we're gonna pay you X amount of dollars for three years.
00:27:05.000Then buried in it says, we can fire you for this specific reason, then they just wait until they can justify whatever that reason is, and then you're gone and they don't pay you for it.
00:27:53.000And then he got a summer internship at the CIA, which he abruptly left and then went to, I think, Iraq to report on the Iraq war, and then got a job working for CNN.
00:28:02.000Anderson Cooper had a still at the CIA?
00:28:06.000I think it was for two years, a summer internship.
00:29:35.000That's got to be behind it at some point.
00:29:36.000I mean, I don't exactly know how it twists and turns to get us to that point, but I think that's a safe bet.
00:29:42.000I mean, isn't this just kind of a reckoning?
00:29:45.000Both the legacy media and these new upstart media outlets that came out around 2013 or so, you know, your Vices and your BuzzFeeds and stuff.
00:29:54.000I mean, the legacy media has been on the deathbed for a long time, and those New Jack ones have too.
00:30:00.000I mean, they've been like, maybe they had a little bit of lead time over the cable news channels, but like, I mean, does anybody read BuzzFeed News?
00:30:12.000I spoke with somebody earlier today who expressed some concerns of, well, they know a lot of people within the Republican establishment who are sort of expressing some concerns over Whether or not the audience that Tucker had on Fox is actually going to follow him to a smaller network or an independent network or any of his next projects.
00:30:28.000So maybe they're just sort of trying to take him off the board again ahead of the 2024 election.
00:30:32.000He's too big of a figure to cancel completely, but the thinking is that some of the people who watched him on Fox may not follow him to any other platform and get the information that he was putting out.
00:30:41.000That's my fear, and that's basically what I was saying yesterday.
00:30:45.000I think the basic conversation is that Brian Kilmeade is going to be a much more based version of Tucker Carlson.
00:30:52.000Everyone thinks Brian Kilmeade is the new Tucker.
00:30:55.000Yeah, that's what I keep hearing the kids say on Twitter.com.
00:32:01.000Couldn't have happened to a better guy.
00:32:07.000What I will say, though, is while I'm very glad that the person that was arguably responsible for the Some of the largest, driving some of the most amounts of death threats and violent threats, not just to my office, but to plenty of people across the country.
00:32:25.000I also kind of feel like I'm, like, waiting for the cutscene at the end of a Marvel movie after all the credits have rolled.
00:33:27.000Everyone else on Fox does as well, and Tucker is also anti-war, and he speaks out against corporate greed, but she is on the side of a lot of the corporations that he speaks out against, so it's not convenient, and I don't really think she's all that anti-war.
00:33:40.000Tucker Carlson had that famous moment where he was doing the handoff with Hannity, And he was complaining about Amazon exploiting its workers or something like that.
00:34:15.000But in all seriousness though, I think that was a moment where it was fairly obvious Tucker was getting the views and they liked it, but he was at odds with the GOP machine.
00:34:27.000I wonder if this play is more so because they want to get away from Trump and away from MAGA.
00:34:33.000Like, people were saying it's clearly about the Dominion lawsuit.
00:34:35.000It's like, well, Hannity and other personalities were talking a lot about the same thing, too.
00:34:39.000And Tucker actually was rejecting the 2020 narrative from Trump.
00:34:44.000And he got attacked for it by Trump supporters.
00:35:01.000I mean, it would be, I gotta be honest, it would be like the coolest thing ever if, like, within the next two weeks, every single Fox personality is fired.
00:35:15.000Now he knows how the Amazon workers feel, he's just never sleeping and he's like, maybe there should be labor laws or something, I don't know.
00:37:07.000I really recommend the show because it's hilarious, but it's very obvious that... So it's basically like Justice League, Batman, Superman, etc.
00:37:15.000But they make the characters flawed or something like that.
00:37:18.000And Homelander, basically Superman, is Trump.
00:37:21.000And so he has rallies and stuff like that.
00:37:35.000Like, I think they actually tried getting a character who looked like her and made the character Stormfront and then were trying to, like, basically... I don't think the show was directly making a statement about Laura Loomer.
00:37:47.000I think they were inspired by the media reports.
00:37:59.000And then they said, I think now we have, like, the reporting is, they actually were trying to base Homelander off Trump.
00:38:06.000But here's the thing, in the show, Homelander at the end of the last season is like, he's got a song with him and he's at a rally, and then some liberal throws a water bottle, hits his kid, and then Homelander just laser beams him and blows him up or whatever, and then everyone cheers for it.
00:38:21.000And I'm like, I'm fairly certain that if Donald Trump did do something like that, people would not be cheering.
00:38:39.000If Donald Trump went on a murderous rampage, people would be like, yo, I don't know about all that.
00:38:45.000But like the way the liberals view it is they make this TV show where Trump is basically Superman, which is also a weird insinuation to make.
00:38:51.000Like they think Trump is literally Superman and they don't like it.
00:38:54.000And then he kills a guy and they think Trump supporters are like, yay!
00:38:58.000They live in a very, very strange, scary world.
00:39:00.000But anyway, before Seamus got all excited about superheroes... The point is, in an interview, AOC was asked about if America's heading for another civil war, and she's like, well, there's a part of history that's similar to this.
00:39:12.000Captain America, when him and Iron Man fought in the... I'm sorry, I'm not gonna let go of this.
00:39:39.000And my point was, AOC was supposed to be this insurgent character who was coming into the Democrat Party and being like, I am here for young people and we don't like the machine!
00:40:13.000You know, so before World War II, superheroes usually just kind of, like, solved problems in their own communities in the comics.
00:40:20.000Like, they would beat someone up who was doing bad things in their cities.
00:40:22.000And then it was during World War II that they started making all the comics about, like, the superhero saving the world.
00:40:27.000Yeah, so the industrial military complex changed the narrative of superheroes.
00:40:32.000I don't know if, I'm not saying it was a concerted effort by them, but the military industrial complex, whatever we want to call it today, Tim.
00:40:38.000My point is just that the war effort changed the way that people saw superheroes, which I find interesting.
00:41:10.000Tucker Carlson offered jobs at... Okay, let's get out of here with this stupid video.
00:41:16.000Tucker Carlson is out of Fox News, but welcome on Russian TV.
00:41:19.000The ousted anchor was offered work by the state-run news channel in Moscow that echo much of his conspiratorial rhetoric on the war in Ukraine.
00:41:40.000It was, um, I can't remember the exact story, but they included somebody, some leftist activist, this is my understanding of what happened, made a super, you know how they have those activists who will take clips of you and then mash them together to make it seem like you said something different?
00:41:54.000But they're meant to be humorous, so it'd be like a weird color.
00:41:56.000It's like someone made a video accusing me of saying a thing that was like out of context and combined with other things, and then he ran the story, and then it got picked up by a bunch of other outlets.
00:42:05.000that ran it saying like, hey, you can't get mad at us, NBC News reported it. NBC News then removed
00:42:09.000the citation. So it created a dead citation. So a bunch of other media outlets were all referencing
00:42:15.000each other, referencing something with no source. That's how they play the game.
00:42:20.000Ben Collins wrote a piece, I wish I could remember which piece it was. It was something about Russian
00:42:23.000disinformation and bots that in the Twitter files, Michael Schellenberger found the email where
00:42:28.000they're like, Yul Roth, the head of trust and safety, is calling bullshit on this story about
00:42:33.000Ben Collins, like in the emails, he's like, this is fraudulent.
00:44:16.000So we'd have to say, let's, I want to see the emails from, all the emails from Vajayagadi between this date and this date, you know, say a five day span or something.
00:44:27.000And then they would go and run the search.
00:44:29.000They would go to another room and run the search.
00:44:31.000And the reason why they were doing this stuff in another room is because they were extremely paranoid about our seeing any user data, because that's a serious liability for Twitter.
00:44:39.000So they had to do everything they could to make absolutely sure that what we were getting back was just internal stuff, nothing with user data.
00:44:46.000And then when they would come back with thousands of emails, thousands of Slack messages, depending upon what we're asking for, and then we'd spend days going through them.
00:44:56.000So there was no way for, I've heard the accusations that they were like, Well, I like what they're doing, but I think Elon needs to hire an internal liaison.
00:45:07.000Basically, they need to hire you directly for Twitter so that you, as an employee, are able to see user data.
00:45:13.000Then you can choose what to search for without limitation.
00:45:17.000It's very, very difficult to know what you don't know.
00:45:21.000It's impossible to know what to look for if you don't know what exists.
00:45:25.000And so a good component about going through these documents is going to be just sifting through at random raw data and
00:46:02.000The Daily Mail coming out exclusive Hunter Biden laptop reveals, you know, Joe Biden was involved in this deal and like a year after the laptop came out because you have to go through, you know, 50,000 emails and then you have to find the context.
00:46:14.000So there might be an email being like, hey, I confirmed that meeting with the big guy you asked about.
00:46:19.000Then you can't search for Joe Biden doing deals.
00:46:31.000If you went to someone with a laptop and said, search for Joe Biden in the emails, you wouldn't find that one.
00:46:37.000But that one, combined with another one, proves he was involved in certain business dealings, which is, you know, news that came out a year later.
00:47:25.000They were trying to hold this company together with duct tape and bubble gum while running these very time-intensive searches for us.
00:47:33.000They didn't actually want to be helping us.
00:47:35.000They wanted to be doing their regular jobs, but this was kind of a task to them.
00:47:39.000So first of all, nobody knew what was in there before we saw it.
00:47:43.000I mean, maybe some old guard Twitter people, but all these folks were new, were just as fresh to this as we were.
00:47:49.000And then it would be obvious if there was stuff missing because we would see email threads that would just suddenly No, we saw no evidence of anything missing.
00:48:00.000Like, you would expect to see email threads starting with nothing, like, out of the blue.
00:48:08.000Is Elon still giving you access to all the files?
00:48:10.000Not at the present moment, but we hope to be back in.
00:48:41.000But that's also part of my point, like, without being able to just get free reign, so much is limited, and the Alex Jones thing could prove collusion between the networks at the same time.
00:48:51.000I mean, we did have free reign while we were in there, and we hope to be back in there, but to your point, yeah, we would need to be in there camped out for months.
00:48:58.000I mean, like, here's a hard drive, start digging.
00:50:59.000Except for now that access is basically shut off.
00:51:02.000Yeah, but it's not, no, it's not shut off.
00:51:04.000It's not like he said you can't come back in.
00:51:06.000It's just like we had our time, we did our reporting, and then we have to be kind of like invited back in.
00:51:11.000You know, it's not like we can't just walk in there.
00:51:13.000We don't have like passes that we can just use any time of the day.
00:51:17.000So, you know, I don't think we've been shut out.
00:51:20.000It's just, I think we'll be back in there, is what I'll say.
00:51:24.000But you know, speaking of conspiracies, like this stuff, the Hunter Biden laptop stuff, it was just reported that the origin of the Russian disinfo meme came from the Biden campaign.
00:51:37.000And this has been reported by like two outlets.
00:51:40.000It's like this is a huge story that spells out a literal PSYOP.
00:51:46.000We put all these pieces together about how the Hunter Biden laptop story was.
00:51:53.000Those were both published in the New York Post.
00:51:55.000So the FBI definitely had the computer, and yet they were running around to these platforms saying, we think that there's going to be what appears to be a Russian hack and leak.
00:52:04.000dump in a couple of days. This is just like, within days of the New York Post story breaking
00:52:09.000going to the to the platforms and warning them of a of a hack for information that they
00:52:15.000knew to be true, assuming that they were talking about the Hunter Biden laptop, which seems
00:52:18.000like it'd be a big coincidence if they didn't. Then meantime, in the meantime, the there
00:52:23.000was a the Atlanta Council had organized like a tabletop exercise a few weeks before the
00:52:28.000story dropped, where they invited like national security reporters from the New York Times,
00:52:33.000all these big wigs to run a tabletop exercise.
00:52:37.000What would happen if there was a Russian hack and leak operation intended to affect the election involving Hunter Biden?
00:52:43.000And then they all gamed out, well, we would suppress that and we would call it disinformation.
00:52:48.000So all this stuff was already like, and this has all been documented, and it looked like a big conspiracy and PSYOP.
00:52:54.000And then we find out, because Jim Jordan released this letter, that Tony Blinken had called
00:53:02.000Michael Morell, the former acting director of the CIA, and didn't ask for, but said,
00:53:10.000you know, we're very concerned about this New York Post story.
00:53:14.000And then Michael Morell went on to organize all those intelligence officers who signed that letter, saying that this has all the hallmarks of Russian disinformation, which kicked off the entire thing of discrediting the story.
00:53:26.000And it was at the past of the Biden campaign.
00:53:29.000And this has now been reported, verified.
00:53:33.000Yeah, so we actually covered that on my podcast yesterday, and it's so insane that somebody from a presidential campaign could reach out to connections in our intelligence agencies to get them to fabricate a letter with The names of 50 different intelligence officials on it saying that this is Russian disinformation, so now you have the added element of them blaming a foreign power for something which is unbelievably irresponsible so that they can try to get their candidate elected.
00:54:03.000And Trump is indicted because his campaign supposedly, you know, paid off Stormy Daniels at his behest and they should have disclosed that?
00:54:12.000Like, that's a greater example of corruption than the deep state operating at the behest of a member of a presidential campaign?
00:54:36.000They say last week it was revealed that shortly before the 2020 election, Joe Biden's presidential campaign conspired with 51 former spies to discredit the New York Post discoveries from the Hunter Biden laptop.
00:54:46.000That is to say a person running for office conspired with Because you can get away with it, right?
00:56:02.000But also, the thing is, if they do go after the kids and really normalize pedophilia, as they're clearly starting to do and gearing up to do, then there's no way for us to win.
00:56:10.000Once that is taken from you, once they win that, there's nothing.
00:56:15.000I mean, there's too much required to get to that point where a conservative can't just move to the middle of nowhere and keep their kids away from this stuff.
00:56:24.000Yeah, but the fact that you'd have to move to the middle of nowhere to get away from people trying to abuse your kids means you have lost the society.
00:56:30.000You actually can't do that now because now California and I forget what other state but another state as well have passed laws.
00:56:45.000So they passed laws that if you're in a marital dispute over your child transitioning, One parent can take that child and go to California and then that case will be adjudicated in California, not in the state of the other parent.
00:57:06.000And then there was another law that was passed in California.
00:57:10.000Um, that was, I can't remember if it passed or if it's set to be passed, but that's basically instructing judges that when they hear these kinds of cases, essentially telling them to lean in favor of transitioning being in the welfare of the child.
00:57:24.000So in other words, you can move to wherever you want to, but if you're in the US, um, and you have a dispute with your, with your spouse over this, your spouse could just take your kid to California.
00:57:36.000And there was also something else I saw the other day about, I'd have to pull up the state again, but they just passed legislation saying that these shelters don't have to report runaways to their parent if they identify as trans and that's why they've run away.
00:57:49.000Your kid can check into a residential rehab facility without the consent of their parents.
00:57:55.000It just takes like a social worker or a psychologist saying, yeah, I think that this is in the kid's best interest.
00:58:00.000And undergo abortion services and also gender transition hormone therapy.
00:58:05.000I don't know if surgery is included, but some hormone sex change procedures are without the consent of either parent.
00:58:10.000Well, and this is the new paradigm, right?
00:58:12.000Historically, our understanding was parents have the final say over what happens to their child, and if the government is going to get involved, they need to prove that they have a very good reason.
00:58:21.000They need to demonstrate that this child is being abused to the point where the state has to step in.
00:58:27.000The state has the final say over what your kid gets to do.
00:58:30.000The parent has to prove that they should have their concerns heard about their own child.
00:58:35.000The law in California that is just referred to, actually, the law was they took the existing statute which said that a kid can check into a residential rehab facility If, number one, a psychologist or social worker or something recommends it, and number two, that that kid has been abused or a victim of incest in the household.
00:58:53.000In those cases, the prior law was, in those cases, that kid could go to a residential rehab facility without the parent's consent.
00:59:25.000It's the state is allowed to kidnap your kid.
00:59:27.000So like, I didn't watch the full video with what Biden said, I'd watch the little segment where he's talking about, you know, your, you don't own your kids or whatever.
00:59:33.000So I don't want to speak to what what the context was, I don't want to be surprised by with, but it is sort of like in the context of these laws that are being passed.
00:59:41.000I feel like, I tweeted about this, like 20 years ago the religious right used to talk about how the left wanted to destroy the nuclear family.
00:59:50.000And at the time I thought that was ridiculous and hyperbole, and it probably was ridiculous and hyperbole at the time.
00:59:56.000But now it's like, it's hard to—it's like, well, that's actually what these laws amount to.
01:00:01.000They're saying that the parent shouldn't have—doesn't need to give consent, that the biggest threats to the children come from the parents, and that the state and psychologists and social workers need to take custody of that kid to protect them from their parents.
01:00:14.000We've got sanctuary states now for sex change surgeries.
01:00:17.000What did Joe Biden just say today, Seamus?
01:00:19.000He said that you don't- basically that you don't own your child, the nation does.
01:00:23.000He's like, it's not your kid, it's not someone else's kid, it's the nation's kid, to paraphrase.
01:00:29.000How I get to sniff- you can't tell me not to sniff their hair, man.
01:00:32.000Where do you get those hairs in my nostrils?
01:00:36.000But I think, to what you're saying, that it's probably true that your average liberal person 20 years ago wasn't going about the revolutionary change that they were trying to instate by saying, I want to destroy the family.
01:00:49.000But all of the intellectual thought leaders of the left going back decades did openly say that that was their goal.
01:00:56.000I mean, yeah, the radical fringe of the left was definitely saying those things, like the nuclear family is an oppressive structure, blah, blah, blah, blah.
01:01:07.000Because there's a radical fringe on the left, there's a radical fringe on the right, and they're all crazy, and we can just, like, ignore them for the most part.
01:01:14.000And now, I mean, so that's the difference, right?
01:01:16.000It was like normal, normie liberals, and it remains the case that normie liberals don't want to destroy the nuclear family.
01:01:24.000But we are in a situation in which those radical fringe activists now can't be ignored anymore because they have power over state legislators and they have power over federal legislators, arguably, but certainly state legislators in California.
01:01:42.000It's going to spread because what's happening on the left right now, too, is they're working with younger people to get them elected into these offices.
01:01:49.000Moms Demand Action, some of the anti-gun organizations, are working with 18 to 24 year olds to teach them and train them how to get into these positions so they can start changing the law from the inside and expanding that agenda.
01:02:09.000We can talk about all the things they want to do to kids and how they want to create these sanctuary states, but the reality is if you keep your kids away from this cultural influence, they've lost.
01:02:17.000So I think part of what you're saying is that when people do the right thing and have good ideas and behave virtuously, in the long run they win because people who are doing bad things and behaving in vicious ways end up eating themselves alive and their society collapses.
01:02:31.000But if the rot spreads so far within your culture that it completely usurps it, well, then your entire civilization collapses before that good can eventually win out once people try to rebuild from the ashes.
01:02:45.000And I'm not saying that that's a guarantee here.
01:02:47.000What I am saying is I agree with you that in the long run good wins, but that doesn't mean America is still around 100 years from now.
01:02:54.000America will be around, it just won't be the same.
01:02:56.000And I'm not saying that there won't be a collapse, a longfall, or a civil war or whatever, I'm just saying... I know you're not saying there won't be a civil war or a collapse.
01:03:15.000But you still can't compare a soy boy to, like, a military veteran.
01:03:19.000And the left likes to show these big, fat militia guys, and they're like, haha, like, that guy could go toe-to-toe with a National Guardsman, and it's like, dude, the National Guard would be split the same as any other part of this country.
01:04:19.000Long story short, I just don't see how the left can possibly win if they don't have kids.
01:04:23.000I mean one thing to pay attention to is that a lot of the stuff with the trans stuff, and I want to stipulate this by saying I do not have a problem with adults transitioning.
01:04:37.000But a lot of the, it's the bluest cities in the bluest states where a lot of this, where the most affirming is happening, both not just at the medical level but also in the schools and just at the general culture.
01:04:48.000So it's parents of kids who are gender questioning or whatever in your Brooklands and in your San Francisco's who are coming face-to-face with the stark reality of how deep and pervasive this stuff is.
01:05:04.000and they're getting red-pilled. Like, when they see this happening to their own kid,
01:05:07.000their kid is questioning. They're supportive, right? They're like,
01:05:10.000being super supportive, they know the right things to do.
01:05:13.000But then they go to the therapist, and their therapist is like, oh, well, your kid is
01:05:17.000definitely trans, and we need to put him on hormones. They're like, wait, what? You can have a
01:05:21.000They emotionally blackmail these guys and mutilate your kid.
01:05:23.000And they might go further even, but then the kid starts to regret it, and then it becomes this whole mess, and then the parents are studying this stuff along the way.
01:05:29.000They're looking up, you know, these are like, you know, upper middle class, laptop class people.
01:05:35.000They're looking up the medical studies.
01:05:58.000And so they started talking like to him and to each other like, you have no symptoms of this,
01:06:03.000you've shown nothing of this, why are you saying this?
01:06:06.000When they brought the kid into counselors and stuff, the counselor said, no, he's definitely trans.
01:06:10.000And then they said, these things aren't true though.
01:06:12.000Basically like the kid was saying, oh yeah, I used to do this, I used to do that, I used to do this.
01:06:16.000And the parents were like, no, no, no, that's not true.
01:06:17.000And they were like, you're just denying your son's lived experience and all of these things.
01:06:22.000And the family then basically said, we realized a lot of this stuff was being pushed on our kid who was just trying to fit in and going along with it.
01:06:28.000And it was freaky to see the whole machine pushing in this direction.
01:06:42.000And so when someone says, this is what's socially acceptable, they just agree.
01:06:46.000Right, it's easy to blame all your problems, you know, if you were abused, you have trauma, whatever, you have other mental disorders, all this stuff, and it's like somebody comes to you with a solution.
01:06:56.000They're like, oh, well, all of this is a clear sign of gender dysphoria and all you have to do is take this drug and everything will be okay.
01:07:02.000That's just a very seductive proposition to a kid who's...
01:07:05.000Let's jump to this story, actually, and then we'll carry on this conversation, because this is epic.
01:08:20.000Let me watch my basketball game without being pushed with a political message, whichever side it comes from, although it only comes from one side.
01:08:31.000People are still willing to play a video game that gets politicized if they're like, yeah, okay, fine, whatever.
01:08:34.000People are still willing to watch certain TV shows that are like, moderately woke to a certain degree, so long as it's not that in your face.
01:08:42.000But when it comes to beer, I think what they did was they just made the beer.
01:08:46.000They got a very effeminate Individual don't move any to sponsor it and that's the image associated with it now Yeah, well, so if you are a bud light drinker, it's you know, it's like does some 40 year old dude at a ballgame want to be Seen as like a dude at a nightclub with a frilly pink dress Probably not
01:09:08.000Yeah, you made a point a moment ago about how people will watch something on television even though it's woke because they find it entertaining.
01:09:16.000Part of the difference is you advertise the things you consume in terms of food or beverage differently than you advertise what you see on TV.
01:09:24.000You can kind of have a TV show that other people don't know you watch, and so you're watching something a little more woke than people would expect from you, but if that's the beer you order at the bar, or even if you want to drink that beer in secret, It's in your fridge, dude.
01:09:51.000Tim is once again smearing me because Luke was in his DMs crying about the fact that I'm stealing his thunder, and so I'm competition that has to be taken out.
01:10:04.000See, this is the kind of racism I have to tolerate every single time I'm here.
01:10:08.000You were talking about the fact that we were just talking about how people can hide the media that they consume.
01:10:14.000Right, when you're out in public and you're drinking a Bud Light, you're making a political statement now.
01:10:19.000How, like, I guess, I feel like you have to ask this about every story now, like, how much of this stuff has pervaded regular people in your life?
01:10:47.000It used to be that people would be like, I mean, people used to ask the question, or I still ask the question that I just asked, which is like, is this just for the terminally online or Normie's getting this?
01:10:55.000And actually, we're in an age where everybody's terminally online.
01:10:58.000So if it's pervading your bubble, it's pervading a lot of people's bubbles.
01:11:02.000But even so, I mean, your average person, you don't need to be terminally online to say, why is this guy in a dress and makeup on my beer?
01:11:10.000And when you talk to a lot of people at the casino, or just in general, I can't speak to your casino experience, but you ask them, how did you feel about that Bud Light thing?
01:11:19.000You know, maybe if they're more online, like we are, more into politics, they'll sort of launch into their explanation of why it's bad for the culture.
01:11:26.000But your average person is just like, No, I don't support that.
01:12:49.000Frat guys, they're embodying toxic masculinity, and they're bigoted.
01:12:54.000There's just all sorts of baggage tied up with anything that's involved with fraternity or manhood.
01:13:00.000And, of course, Dylan Mulvaney, it's new, trendy, and supportive of transgenderism, which is the most trendy thing on the planet right now.
01:13:10.000And those people are just better than you.
01:13:11.000And that's why we want their money and not yours.
01:13:18.000No, they know that they screwed up, but I think, I'm at the point where, I was saying this earlier, that if they don't issue a formal apology by this week, and I'm not saying to fire anybody, I'm not saying to write a 500 page manifesto, I'm saying outright just be like...
01:13:33.000I think a lot of people wouldn't though.
01:14:05.000Their unwillingness to say anything close to that says to me, they literally don't care about you, and they don't care if they get you back.
01:14:12.000So I'm like, at this point, I'm not a Bud Light guy.
01:14:15.000I actually really like Modelo, but I don't drink a whole lot.
01:14:18.000But I will have no problem saying, I will never forgive the company if they've gone this far without just being like, hey, we're sorry about this.
01:14:27.000So what I would like to say is I will never buy another Bud Light again if they don't apologize this week!
01:14:33.000But I really don't buy Bud Light, so it's kind of meaningless.
01:14:36.000I will say this, the events we're doing, we did this in Texas, we pulled all Anheuser products from the show.
01:15:58.000The thing is that, while I can understand why Bud Light Drinkers would be insulted by the company, Dylan Mulvaney himself—I'm just going to say himself—is just this walking insult to half the population of the country of women.
01:17:06.000Dylan Mulvaney is the opposite of what you'd actually expect from a person suffering gender dysphoria, singing songs about his bulge.
01:17:12.000What he's done is he's capitalized on the algorithm.
01:17:15.000He's exploited the left, who will support this to no end, to create a mockery of trans people and women and then get corporate protection and sponsorship to do it.
01:17:24.000It's really remarkable where we're at.
01:17:29.000I don't know if he has—I'm not saying that he has contempt for trans people, but I'm saying that the character that he plays is hateful to trans people.
01:17:36.000Right, like— That's the impact, even if it's not the intent.
01:17:40.000And I think he's—I mean, yeah, I think his intent is he's a theater kid who found a shtick that's making him rich and getting a lot of attention.
01:17:46.000I don't think it's anything more complicated than that.
01:17:48.000And Dylan Mulvaney has not posted since the controversy started.
01:17:52.000So we're now going into week three of no posts from Dylan Mulvaney.
01:17:55.000And I've said this the other day, the people who are in Dylan's life, family members over, need to give him an intervention and be like, stop this.
01:18:07.000Like I mentioned this the other day, there are trans YouTubers pointing out that Dylan's not doing things typically associated with being trans, doesn't appear to be taking estrogen, doesn't appear to be getting actual feminization.
01:18:18.000So Dylan got facial surgery, but people are pointing out not laser hair removal, which is the cheaper and faster procedure, but permanent.
01:18:25.000And so the insinuation is Dylan expects this to run its course at some point.
01:18:30.000Absolutely, and then it'll be on to the next thing.
01:18:32.000Right, and then Dylan will just be a de-transitioner.
01:19:06.000But there's going to be a lot of middle-aged dudes who don't want to be that.
01:19:11.000You know, it's like, why do people dress a certain way?
01:19:14.000Why do people choose to wear certain clothes?
01:19:16.000They want to portray an image to other people.
01:19:18.000Social acceptance is extremely important to people.
01:19:21.000So for a suburban middle-class dad who wants to be seen as a strong man around his friends, who doesn't want to be seen as weak, pathetic, and effeminate, he ain't drinking Bud Light anymore, probably never again.
01:19:34.000The thing I would take issue with the way you described it before, though, or the thing that I think is just a little bit outdated, is that the idea that you're right, that his performance is completely at odds with the idea of somebody with actual gender dysphoria, but the discourse has moved on to a point where you don't have to have gender dysphoria.
01:19:53.000In fact, it's considered insulting by some trans activists to insist that somebody needs to have gender dysphoria to be trans, because It's gone from what was considered a mental disorder to what was considered just kind of like a condition that you could be treated for and healed from to essentially a lifestyle choice, right?
01:20:21.000Well, part of the utility of gender dysphoria for the transgender movement and that label is it also did place a pathology on it that a person could be suffering with and trying to escape, whereas the view of them as autogynephiliacs, for example, which many of them are, who knows how you can quantify it, but which is just a person who's sexually aroused by the thought of themselves as the opposite sex, is something people are far less comfortable with.
01:20:48.000Oh, yes, yes, yes, exactly, which is the female variant, the woman who's aroused to conceptualize herself as a man, because then what you have to admit is that you are being forced to participate in someone else's sexual fetish.
01:20:59.000Which is a lot harder to justify to the public in the short term.
01:21:02.000Now, in the long run, if they really do continue to win the culture war in the ways that they have and we don't keep pushing back, they're eventually just going to start openly admitting, yes, there is autogynephilia and autoandrophilia.
01:22:17.000What's going on is the continuation of the, what, five year now saga we have of the Get Trump Mafia, who are looking at any other way to try to get this guy and stop him from returning back to the White House.
01:22:27.000I mean, we got the case in New York with... Alvin Bragg.
01:22:33.000We've got the special prosecutor in D.C.
01:22:35.000who's after him, and now we've got, you know, Fannie Willis in Georgia, and I think they're trying to throw a bunch of stuff to the wall and see what sticks.
01:22:42.000And the federal indictment now, where they got his Secret Service testifying against them.
01:23:21.000And again, it's, I mean, if you follow the case at all, you know, it's very clear that he wasn't Intent on engaging in any sort of fraud but they had thought that fraud had occurred because there were so many anomalies and problems that occurred in the election and so many questions that were raised but obviously you know one of Trump's greatest flaws and this has been the case since he ran for office is that he's very imprecise and he says things that are allow you to easily misinterpret what his actual intent is.
01:23:51.000So, you know, in his pursuit for what was really a sort of a righteous cause and saying, hey, you know, we think that there was a mistake that was made with a certain number of votes.
01:24:02.000They're misinterpreting the entire tenant of his phone call, his team's investigation, to frame it as though he was trying to rig the outcome of the election when he wasn't.
01:24:10.000He was simply trying to discover whether or not election fraud had actually occurred.
01:25:38.000Do what you need to do to, you know, do what you need to do.
01:25:42.000And I don't want to I don't want to know what it is, is basically what he's saying.
01:25:46.000But you're going to find the votes to deliver George to me.
01:25:48.000That's what I think he was trying to communicate.
01:25:50.000But you reported this out, so I'm not... Well, I mean, we have the full transcript of the call, so we know exactly what was said.
01:25:57.000And again, it's one of those things where Trump is Trump, he says some things that oftentimes can be misinterpreted, and I think that's what happened.
01:26:03.000And you have liberal media establishments that run with these narratives, and the truth makes it around the world before the... excuse me, a lie makes it around the world before the truth has its boots on.
01:26:11.000And I think there were so many stories that were being pushed through the mainstream media regarding this particular story that framed it in a certain way, it didn't even matter what the truth was at that point.
01:27:25.000You think he's going to try to swing an election when everything he's doing is recorded and he's in a room full of advisors?
01:27:29.000But it's not just that, I mean, what he's saying right here is... Maybe?
01:27:34.000If, let's just remove it from Trump, if an individual says, I believe there was impropriety here and I think you should allow us to check for it, is that above board or, you know, nefarious?
01:27:45.000The problem is that, like, we could, you know, this would be like how it would go in a courtroom where we would be parsing these words and trying to figure out the literal meaning.
01:27:54.000Let me read you the full quote from Donald Trump.
01:27:55.000evidence, which is how you should litigate. But like really this is an
01:27:59.000exercise just right here in mind reading, right? We like we have no idea but my so
01:28:04.000it's totally intuitive. But so here's the let me read you the full quote from
01:28:08.000Donald Trump and I'll stress too I think he's wrong about the fraud narrative. I
01:28:13.000do think there's issues with you know in Time magazine they wrote the shadow
01:28:18.000campaign You see the article, the shadow campaign to save the election?
01:28:21.000They wrote what they did and how they did it.
01:28:23.000It was procedural, it was through government, it was with deals over a year, and it was shutting down entertainment, which resulted in a mass amount of mail-in ballots.
01:28:33.000Then I think the question is, How do I phrase this?
01:28:39.000People are saying it's fraud when in reality it may be just like lower standards.
01:28:44.000Meaning ballots came in through mail-in voting and they were just like, this one's probably fine.
01:28:49.000As opposed to in the past, they'd be like, we're going to scrutinize the signature.
01:28:54.000He says, um, let me see if I have to read more because, well, whatever.
01:28:58.000He says, you're going to find that they are, which is totally illegal, is more illegal for you than it is for them because you know what they did and you're not reporting it.
01:29:06.000That's a criminal offense and you can't let that happen, blah, blah, blah.
01:29:09.000He says, and they were moving machinery and they're moving it as fast as they can, both of which are criminal fines and you can't let it happen and you are letting it happen.
01:29:16.000You know, I mean, I'm notifying you that you're letting it happen.
01:29:21.000I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have because we won the state.
01:29:27.000And flipping the state is a great testament to our country because, you know, this is a testament that they can admit to a mistake or whatever.
01:29:33.000You want to call it if it was a mistake?
01:29:35.000A lot of people think it wasn't a mistake.
01:29:40.000But it's a big problem in Georgia, and it's not a problem that's going away.
01:29:43.000I mean, you know it's not a problem that's going away.
01:29:46.000So this one snippet in context is Trump saying, I believe there was criminal action in your state, and I want you to actually have an investigation of it.
01:29:59.000And he says, Look, I'm just saying we need to I want to find 11,000.
01:30:02.000The context that I see there is for one, I think Trump pushing the criminal thing was a was was was like a heavy handed threat claiming fraud was to try and scare them into actually doing it.
01:30:15.000But Trump is basically saying to them, I believe there are ballots with bad signatures, I believe that if you investigate, you will see hundreds of thousands, and I just need to find 11,780 of them to win.
01:30:29.000I mean, it's possible that it's both of what we're describing, because he could have truly believed that he won the state, and he could have truly believed that there was fraud, but the way he went about But he also was single-mindedly focused on flipping the state, which he says in the statement, and he's leaning on the Secretary of State in a totally inappropriate way, saying, in light of all this, do what you need to do to deliver the election to me, because I deserve it, because I actually won it.
01:31:00.000There's no reason to get any more votes than you actually need to win.
01:31:07.000So when it comes to these lawsuits, one of the big things we found was that you can't actually file a lawsuit unless you can justify just enough votes to actually have won.
01:31:16.000So there's an argument that suing for a number to an extreme degree would be deemed like Gratuitous.
01:31:26.000It's like if you file a lawsuit, if you can prove one more vote than you needed to win, you have standing.
01:31:32.000But my point is this, let me ask you, if you were involved in a competition, let's call it an origami competition, And then you folded 1,000 paper cranes, and then noticed that a bunch of the paper cranes on the other side you believed looked suspicious.
01:31:49.000What's the appropriate way to go about checking to make sure your opponents were on the level?
01:31:54.000If you go to the judges and say, hey, I think those cranes are fake, well, by your standard, you're saying that you're putting undue pressure on the judges to allow you to win.
01:32:03.000Do I, in this situation, am I somebody who has... You're the reigning champion.
01:32:07.000...real power over the judges, though?
01:32:09.000Well, as the reigning champion and the fan favorite, you know, there's a concern that if you don't win, people are going to be mad.
01:32:15.000But this is, he's leaning on somebody who is in his political party, who's part of the political apparatus that he's the head of.
01:32:22.000But he has no power over Georgia state election officials.
01:32:25.000The issue I take with your argument is that if there ever is any impropriety, the only thing you can do is give up and submit to those I'm not saying that.
01:32:33.000What I'm saying is that I think that he was doing something inappropriate and that he was—I think that his intent was to basically bully his way into having Georgia delivered to him.
01:32:44.000I'm not making any, like, judgments about— You don't think that mind reading is a bad legal standard?
01:33:06.000Well, it seems like you're asking me to take my standard and apply it as a universal standard, and I'm not prepared to do that.
01:33:14.000What I'm saying is, if I don't know and don't have the evidence of an outcome, I would expect certification and confirmation If a woman goes to the police and says, this man committed a crime against me, I would expect the police to actually do some kind of preliminary investigation.
01:33:32.000Not necessarily condemn the guy or charge him or arrest him, but to be like, we'll look into it.
01:33:37.000If a politician goes to the police and says that their daughter had been brutally assaulted and raped and the cops were like, well, I'm not going to do anything about it.
01:33:44.000And the guy says, look, I'm just asking you to go and investigate the guy.
01:33:47.000That is not, in my opinion, undue pressure.
01:33:50.000For a politician to get some kind of legal outcome, it's literally what everyone is supposed to do if they feel something bad happened.
01:33:57.000I don't know what happened in Georgia.
01:34:00.000I think Trump's fraud narrative is wrong.
01:34:02.000I think they explained exactly how they won with the shadow campaign changing procedural rules.
01:34:07.000Trump's argument here is that they were lax on signature verification.
01:34:13.000And that if they looked into it, they would probably find hundreds of thousands.
01:34:20.000The issue is they didn't actually check.
01:34:22.000And the only way you'd actually seek to rectify a problem like that is to go to them and say, do it.
01:34:28.000So my issue is, while I disagree with Trump, I don't see any other way to seek remedy other than asking someone to do a verification of it.
01:34:36.000Well, this is obviously not a hill I'm prepared to die on, but I would say that what you guys are saying is totally fair.
01:34:42.000I think that this is the basis for a case.
01:34:44.000Because if it's as you say, and it's all in the up and up, then that's going to be the defense's position.
01:34:52.000But if it is the case that he was trying to sway the election inappropriately, that's a serious offense.
01:34:56.000So I'm just saying that it's a serious case, unlike, for example, Stormy Daniels, which is totally frivolous.
01:35:49.000So your point is, since it didn't amount to anything, then there's no real—it's not—it's like an attempt to— Well, it's like, look, if you have two people who are standing before a judge and one saying X and one saying Y, I think it's inappropriate to be like, how dare you ask that question, Person A, when a judge should be like, okay, show me your evidence.
01:36:09.000And then the person will be like, here's a list of things I think justifies my claim.
01:36:13.000And the judge should then be like, person B, do you have a counter claim to refute this?
01:36:18.000And then if investigation is like, if there's probable cause, then a court should be like,
01:36:22.000okay, we're going to grant a signature verification request to see if these claims are accurate.
01:36:28.000**Matt Stauffer** I mean, it's sort of like, okay, to take an extreme example,
01:36:31.000if you were to, if you're an elected official and you went to somebody and you're like,
01:36:34.000you're like, listen, you know, it seems like you might need help with your
01:36:40.000daughter's private school education. And like, like, does that have interest to you?
01:36:44.000And oh, by the way, I'm looking for this particular favor and you're saying everything short of, You know, directly offering a bribe.
01:36:51.000You could have the same litigation around whether this was entirely—maybe he was just trying to help out the person's daughter who was going to private school, you know?
01:36:58.000Like, it would come down to this mind-reading thing, or you could look at the totality of the circumstances and say, this looks a lot like a bribe.
01:37:06.000But I think that situation, it's easier to make a quid pro quo, right?
01:37:09.000Because Trump doesn't say specifically, I could do this thing for you.
01:37:13.000Yeah, he just said, hey, I think this thing happened.
01:37:21.000And then your attitude is like, how dare Trump ask for a remedy to a perceived problem?
01:37:26.000If someone... So there's a few questions around this.
01:37:30.000I mean, if we're dealing with matters of public interest, then I don't think the Fourth Amendment plays a role.
01:37:35.000If the government is involved in something, then the government has a right to publish to the people the results of a search.
01:37:42.000I don't see how it makes sense that... I'll put it this way.
01:37:45.000If someone came to me, if someone to the cops and said, you know, Tim Poole stole my spoons, The cops would be like, we'll talk to him and we'll see what's going on.
01:37:55.000And then if they can't get any probable cause to get a warrant, too bad, so sad, have a nice day.
01:38:22.000If a politician did it, it doesn't matter.
01:38:24.000The fact is, we're dealing with an election.
01:38:26.000The smartest thing in the world to do would be for Georgia to be like, you know what, Trump?
01:38:30.000So that we can throw out all confusion.
01:38:33.000We absolutely will do the check and prove to you you're wrong.
01:38:37.000Instead, they said, we're going to arrest you and criminally indict you for daring to ask.
01:38:41.000I'm applying the same standard that I would apply to the situation that we discussed earlier in which Tony Blinken called Michael Morell and he said, I'm very concerned about the possibility of Russian interference in the election around the Hunter Biden laptop story.
01:38:58.000But he never asked, according to Morell's testimony, He never said, could you write this letter?
01:39:05.000But Michael Morrell took his marching orders and like you could say, maybe Blinken was just concerned about Russian disinformation.
01:39:11.000But you're insinuating that Trump was secretly instructing them to fabricate ballots.
01:39:32.000I don't want to dogpile, but I just want to make a point about the analogy.
01:39:36.000I think part of where it breaks down is with Blinken.
01:39:40.000They all came out and said this was Russian disinformation, even though it wasn't.
01:39:45.000I think that's what makes that situation different and really egregious, is they ended up saying something that wasn't true for a political campaign.
01:39:55.000Well, let's go to Super Chats, because we're not going to resolve that one, but I think we made our points.
01:39:59.000And then, if you haven't already, would you kindly smash that like button, become a member at TimCast.com, click to join us on the website, you'll get access to our Discord server to hang out with like-minded individuals, and access to the members-only Uncensored show, which will be on the front page at about 10.10pm.
01:40:15.000But for now, we will read what y'all have to say in the Super Chats.
01:40:55.000SA Federali says, Tim, Steven Crowder says, Rumble is under DDoS while they grow.
01:40:59.000You need to get Tucker and Zero Hedge under that umbrella and pay at least $20 a month or $40 for a good option to show the hand the market beats communism.
01:41:11.000Max Reddick says, Tim, I know you and Crowder are friends, but can we put that aside for a minute to acknowledge that he was crappy to Daily Wire and Dave Landau, accused Candace Owens of extortion, and now he used his divorce as a grift, crappy.
01:41:25.000I don't know at all what's going on, man.
01:41:27.000Earlier there was a video from Crowder talking about a divorce and insinuating, he played like a clip of Candace Owens and insinuated he was being extorted or something, then Candace Owens said that he's accusing her of extortion.
01:41:36.000It's like, dude, I ain't got nothing to do with that, nor do I know.
01:41:41.000And there's, you know, we talked about the Landau thing, and then I'm hearing other people comment that it's not true.
01:41:49.000Crowder was shouting out Landau's comedy dates and stuff, and I'm like, look, man, I'm not here to get into fights with people like Crowder or Candace or whatever, because I got no idea what their thing is.
01:43:52.000I think it was like 300 to 400k or whatever.
01:43:54.000And I'm like, this dude got raided by the feds, is doing some of those consequential journals in the world.
01:43:59.000If anyone deserves to be wealthy off their job, it's James O'Keefe.
01:44:02.000So the fact that they were like, and he used the money to set up a corporate party, but it was really because he couldn't get a refund back for a wedding.
01:44:19.000Yeah, he was filming them the entire time when he wanted to, like, live out a whole marriage with some lefty so he could really, really expose them.
01:44:26.000That's why they were allowed to have Veritas pay for the wedding.
01:44:43.000All right, Scrubby McScrubberson says, Tim, Eamon Bundy put on FBI Most Wanted List, issued default judgment by judge, and Pop Property was surrounded.
01:44:50.000He held a massive barbecue to avoid a standoff.
01:45:56.000it to him. That's the weirdest thing. Why would you do that?
01:45:59.000I don't know. You don't have a right to this. He was like, they were saying they'd
01:46:02.000replace the product and they're trying to figure out how it got out. And what he said was
01:46:06.000he thinks someone sent it out by accident. But I don't care.
01:46:09.000If I legitimately purchase something, and a private security company shows up to my house, the first thing I'm going to say is, by entering my property, you're already committing burglary because we have a physical barrier, so you can GTFO right now, or I will defend my property.
01:46:22.000Dude, is this the nerd John Wick who ends up fighting a bunch of private security task force people to the death over the cards he got?
01:46:29.000Yeah, it'd be better if it was like Yu-Gi-Oh cards, though.
01:47:36.000So, and there's a lot of cryptocurrencies that are centralized.
01:47:39.000Like Ethereum is, I believe Ethereum for the most part is centralized.
01:47:42.000I actually have a question about, I was asking a friend who knows much more about this than I do, and you guys do too, but about the new currency.
01:47:49.000So isn't the whole purpose of blockchain that you don't create anymore, right?
01:47:54.000There's only a finite amount out there?
01:48:02.000And although it's based on a meme, people need to understand like, it's kind of legit.
01:48:07.000I do own a little bit, full disclosure, but the idea with Dogecoin is that the monetary supply increases by a certain percentage every year, so that there is a controlled volume increase, which does make sense.
01:48:17.000So with this new currency, would the Feds still have the ability to be able to create money?
01:48:26.000They would never issue a currency that they couldn't create, manipulate, make more of.
01:48:30.000So then what exactly is the difference between what we're talking about and just Cash.
01:48:34.000Or like cash in the form of numbers on a screen.
01:48:37.000Every transaction is tracked in a ledger so they can see everywhere you've gone, plug it into an AI and then follow you every step of your existence.
01:48:43.000Well, CVDCs are also programmable so they can prevent you from spending your money on certain purchases like guns.
01:49:14.000So, what they'll do is, they'll say, if a person moves 3 meters in, you know, within a span of 20 seconds, and then stops and pauses, and it's between the time period of 7am and 9pm, there is a 73.9% chance they'll go to the bathroom within 10 minutes.
01:49:32.000Because the AI can see patterns we can't see.
01:49:35.000So now plug in a CBDC, a Central Bank Digital Currency.
01:49:41.000They will say there is a 97% chance that when someone goes to this location and to that location, a day later they will purchase a narcotic from this location.
01:49:52.000And they will be waiting for you with pre-crime agents and an old man being like, precogs have found that you are going to buy drugs.
01:50:01.000So then you'll be like, ah, this is something for people to understand about the censorship industrial complex.
01:50:06.000Because I think people probably think of it as like a bunch of, you know, spies and home monitors, just like doing Google, Google searches, looking for people spreading this quote, unquote, disinformation or Twitter searches, whatever.
01:50:47.000The future that we're afraid of with the censorship industrial complex stuff is that, you know, it's all going to be run on AI and the AI is going to dwarf what we have now.
01:50:58.000Everything that you see, everything that you read, everything that you post is going to be filtered through AI that either increases it or throttles it for viewers and controls what you see.
01:51:11.000And that's what they're trying to construct.
01:51:14.000I think it's already been constructed.
01:53:19.000Sam says, in Back to the Future 2, in 2015, Marty is asked to donate to a charity by thumbing $100 by scanning his thumb for a funds transfer.
01:53:27.000Isn't it funny that Back to the Future 2 took place in 2015?
01:53:31.000And it was exactly, it was exactly like that.
01:53:33.000I know, I mean it's crazy because in 2015 I was riding around Times Square on a hoverboard while like sharks and dinosaurs were coming out of the ads.
01:57:30.000We'll have him out when he wants to come out.
01:57:31.000Maybe when he's launching his show, he'll come here and announce it, and we'll have like a big thing where he's like, you know... Here's my new show!
02:00:23.000Alright everybody, if you haven't already, would you kindly smash that like button, subscribe to this channel, share this show with your friends, become a member at TimCast.com.
02:00:29.000We're gonna have a members-only uncensored show coming up live in about 10 minutes on the front page of TimCast.com.
02:00:35.000To watch it, just become a member at TimCast.com by clicking join us.
02:00:39.000There will also be instructions on how to join the Discord server so you can hang out with like-minded individuals.
02:00:44.000Don't forget to also purchase some Cast Brew Coffee because pre-orders are about to hit and they will be shipping out by May 5th.
02:00:51.000First come, first served, so there's a lot of people who have already purchased.