Action4Canada - A4C EMPOWER HOUR with Tanya Gaw & David Lindsay Oct-27-2021

00:00:00.000 welcome it's wednesday october 27th 2021 and my name is heather fournier and on behalf of action

00:00:07.840 for canada i'd like to welcome you to our weekly empower hour action for canada is a grassroots

00:00:14.320 movement reaching out to millions of canadians and uniting our voices in opposition to the

00:00:19.120 destructive policies tearing at the fabric of our nation through a call to action campaigns

00:00:24.480 we equip citizens to take action we are committed to protecting faith family and freedom

00:00:32.000 the information presented at this meeting is for general information purposes only while we endeavor

00:00:38.480 to provide accurate and up-to-date information we make no representations or warranties of any kind

00:00:44.720 express or implied about the completeness accuracy reliability suitability or availability of the

00:00:51.760 information we provide any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own

00:00:57.440 risk the information we provide should not be used as a substitute for advice from a qualified legal

00:01:04.080 professional health practitioner or appropriate licensed professional it is not intended to

00:01:09.760 provide legal and or medical advice as we are not lawyers and or medical professionals

00:01:15.360 can i have time this photo up there we go for those of you who are new to the empower hour it's my

00:01:24.800 very great pleasure to introduce you to tanya god the founder of action for canada for the past several

00:01:30.240 years tanya has been working to expose destructive government policies that affect all canadians when

00:01:36.560 the unlawful shutdowns commenced last year tanya along with her team of passionate friends and volunteers

00:01:42.720 has been working to provide information and documents for the can action for canada website

00:01:47.840 these amazing documents empower citizens all across our nation to stand up for our rights and freedoms

00:01:53.680 tanya is a woman of courage and faith and her dedication is an inspiration to us all welcome tanya

00:02:02.160 thank you heather and now i'm on all right this is awesome welcome everybody i'm just so excited that

00:02:08.080 you're all here with us again this evening and as we were saying earlier on as people were signing on

00:02:14.400 to the orientation we know that this is a very difficult time for many people and action for

00:02:19.840 canada is super committed to coming up with the resources and answers that you need to protect

00:02:25.440 yourself your jobs and your family so i'm going to cover a few updates uh before we bring david on

00:02:31.760 and uh then we're gonna like i said continue to dig really further into viable actions that citizens

00:02:38.480 can take in response to the tyrannical and unlawful measures and actions of the government unions and

00:02:46.000 of course other citizens so we've got some good news tonight to report just as i was preparing today

00:02:53.040 i got a link uh stating that hamilton wentworth district school board said on tuesday the board has

00:02:59.520 removed a requirement that employees be fully vaccinated by november 30th he said that it was

00:03:06.000 a result of the advice from experts and employee management groups and then minutes apart uh one

00:03:13.280 came in from quebec the province has decided not to impose vaccinations on school staff in a statement

00:03:19.680 released on wednesday the province's health ministry said it strongly recommends staff get vaccinated

00:03:25.440 but it does not believe it is necessary to make it mandatory the quebec government explored the idea

00:03:30.960 of requiring vaccinations for school employees during legislature hearings that were held in august and

00:03:37.440 i happen to fully believe that this is because the power of the people and their voice uh and their

00:03:44.320 objections is having an impact and i'm going to have some more good news as well coming up i wanted to

00:03:51.360 mention that i was uh privileged to be actually at a rally that david had put on and set on saturday

00:03:57.040 up in colonna that's about a four-hour drive from me and it's just so amazing to be before people and

00:04:04.080 actually in person with the crowd and the love for for the action for canada but the it's because of truth

00:04:12.880 action for canada is is proclaiming truth and we're providing resources that just simply outline what your

00:04:19.760 guaranteed rights are and within that speech i really covered it uh very well as to going through

00:04:29.040 what i've been uh talking about in the last couple of weeks as far as your absolute 100 guaranteed rights

00:04:36.400 and we're going to repeat them repeat them repeat them until all of you it becomes just part of your

00:04:41.200 thought train and you'll be able to speak and proclaim your truth as well and walk out your guaranteed

00:04:46.880 rights but it does boil down to non-compliance to saying no to the tyranny and the unlawful measures

00:04:54.240 so that uh rally speech happens to be on our web page and it would be under i believe it's actually

00:05:01.200 under speeches or interviews in our menu and i'd highly recommend listening to it i've had some great

00:05:06.480 feedback i find that for myself as i've been learning throughout the years it was one thing to be

00:05:12.400 doing the research and reading another thing very helpful to me is actually writing about it

00:05:17.120 but um where it started to really be able to become a part of my thinking is when i was hearing somebody

00:05:25.200 else proclaiming it somebody else talking about it speaking about it and i would just listen over and

00:05:30.640 over to it again uh so that i could really feel educated when i was repeating this information and

00:05:36.240 giving it to others so if you learn that way as well do please listen to our past empower hours

00:05:42.720 rally speeches whatever you need to do to get educated and involved we have created a new page

00:05:50.160 providing personal testimonies of people who are serving the notices of liability and we're just

00:05:55.600 creating it we we really do have so many other uh reports of people giving their testimony of serving the

00:06:03.280 notice of liability whether beyond on behalf of their kids and getting the masks removed or employees

00:06:09.360 with their employer or with employers with other businesses who were trying to interfere with their

00:06:16.000 employment with them or their contractual agreements and so i'm really encouraged by this and i hope that

00:06:21.360 you will too if you have stories that you want to add please send them to call to at action for canada.com

00:06:29.200 and uh just put testimonies in the subject line and we're going to get to those um um so there was

00:06:37.120 i love it there's this nurse that i've been working with in bc and she is gung-ho she knew about the

00:06:42.480 notices of liability she says you just tell me who to serve and i'm going to do this and as you may know

00:06:48.400 in bc they've mandated the vaccines for health care workers as they've done in some other provinces

00:06:53.680 and this particular nurse they were going to have basically be put on leave if they didn't vaccinate 0.99

00:07:00.160 by tuesday and so on monday her manager brings her in and she says you know i really like my manager

00:07:05.680 and i hated doing it and i says but if you really like your manager enough then then you will serve

00:07:11.520 her a notice of liability because then she has something to go to her supervisors with and say look

00:07:16.880 i'm not going to get i'm not going to get involved in this because i don't want to take a chance of personal

00:07:21.520 liability so as she was sitting there human resources was in in on the phone with them it was

00:07:28.080 a telecom conversation and she let her manager know in no uncertain terms in this meeting that she was

00:07:35.600 going to hold them personally financially liable for any loss of income that she would experience

00:07:41.680 because of the unlawful actions of her manager and she expressed she'd already served her a notice

00:07:47.040 of liability this lady had a choice coming into this meeting to make human resources turns around 1.00

00:07:52.880 and they say oh that's not a that's not should not be directed at your manager that should be directed

00:07:58.480 at the health officer the provincial health officer bonnie henry and uh the nurse turned around and she

00:08:04.080 says oh absolutely not i'm directing it at the manager because she is the one that's personally

00:08:09.120 violating my rights by telling me that i need to take a jab or i am going to be put on on permanent leave

00:08:16.000 without pay and so the manager instantly shut the meeting down and she cancelled all scheduled 0.99

00:08:22.640 meetings after that so this is what i've been talking to you all about for months and months

00:08:29.520 it is going to come down to having to choose between what the government is asking individuals to do

00:08:37.120 and then what is the greater i hate to say it this way but what is the greater threat

00:08:41.520 what is the greatest risk of liability and and this is why we have david coming on as well because

00:08:48.080 there's many that are responding well to the to the notice of liability because in there we've

00:08:53.200 provided the law we've provided supreme court rulings we've provided evidence from doctors uh and

00:09:01.120 and rulings around the world for instance against the pcr testing it's a very compelling document as a

00:09:07.840 warning to say you need to cease and desist what it is that you're doing or i'm going to use this as

00:09:15.120 evidence if i decide to take legal action against you and when it comes to the next steps i have uh

00:09:23.440 created another statement that people are using effectively which i'll talk about in a minute in a

00:09:28.320 minute but then it comes down to a greater liability of actual legal action against this individual

00:09:34.880 not as the head or executive as a union not as the president of a company but as a citizen of canada

00:09:42.960 who is completely obliged absolutely 100 they have to uphold the rule of law in canada and they have

00:09:51.280 to respect your individual rights and freedoms so another good response from uh the notices of liability

00:10:01.840 is i've mentioned several times that we commenced campaign in bc where the minister of education is

00:10:09.280 named as a defendant in our statement of claim that we filed back in august and so she understands the

00:10:15.760 term of liability and the weight of that and because of it i believe that's the reason she's put the onus

00:10:21.680 on school boards to make a decision whether or not teachers should be mandated to be vaccinated

00:10:27.680 and as a result our campaign is having great success we have priscilla's head of the campaign

00:10:33.920 and we've had school board trustees serve throughout bc and as good news is is that two of those

00:10:42.320 trustees have decided to resign we've had two school board superintendents who have said that they

00:10:48.560 will be resigning as well and now what we want to do is step into that position and recruit people

00:10:54.000 to run as school board trustees in those regions this is what they've done this is what they've been

00:10:59.920 doing for decades is they've been getting themselves aligned into these positions where they would have

00:11:07.760 individuals that were far left radical aligned with the un getting into critical roles in our city

00:11:15.600 councils in our as school board trustees as mlas as mps and it's time to take this country back

00:11:22.720 and so what it is boiling down to is applying pressure these people are human beings in city

00:11:29.200 council and as school board trustees that thought they were above the law but as we voice our rightful

00:11:35.520 complaint against their tyrannical policies that's the pressure that they need to hear

00:11:43.280 because they have thought all along that they were covered and above the law that they're covered under

00:11:48.240 some sort of school act that they're covered under a health act and the truth is is that they are not

00:11:56.000 okay so i'll get on i'm gonna there there will be more i'll cover there so last week we launched the

00:11:59.840 notice of liability against unions this is a critical and a well that we've been waiting for it's very

00:12:05.760 timely right now as federal workers who are all union workers have been uh removed from their are being

00:12:11.520 removed from their positions if they don't double vax uh we're going after them personally as i said as

00:12:17.120 fellow citizens as they are committing a criminal offense by interfering with your right to gainful

00:12:22.400 employment by using extortion or coercion to force compliance this is against the law and nobody is

00:12:29.200 protected from that we also created a new group and this is critical information as well to represent

00:12:36.240 all sectors it's called the unionized workers unite and we know that there are large groups of health

00:12:43.280 care workers like the 25 000 that walked off the job in quebec i'd love to know who the head of that

00:12:47.920 is and have a conversation with them we know there's a group of 10 000 in ontario we know that there's also

00:12:54.400 groups of nurses and teachers who are panicking and forming small pods but we need to get them united

00:13:00.720 and the way they're going to get united is by coming to action for canada and joining our new unionized workers unite group we're not

00:13:08.480 taking away from what any other group is doing we're just wanting to be an umbrella group where we can

00:13:13.760 provide them the notice of liability against their employer against their union who is in violation of

00:13:19.520 their collective agreement against the uh pcr testing because of course you know what's coming

00:13:25.520 is that they say if you're not going to vaccinate then you have to go through uh rapid testing numerous

00:13:30.720 times throughout the week this is unlawful you do not need to submit forcefully to any medical treatment

00:13:36.720 anyways that's what action for canada wants to do in bringing this unionized workers group together

00:13:42.000 is we want to make sure that they are empowered when they decide to walk off the job united that

00:13:47.520 they have the material before them that is going to give them the confidence to do that and we believe

00:13:52.480 that our materials will i love it epoch times came down to vancouver on saturday we had mentioned

00:13:59.840 last week that there was going to be a rally for longshoremen it was fantastic epoch times news is one

00:14:05.520 of the ones on the front line that is honestly reporting the news it gives all size all sides to

00:14:11.200 the story and if you're not uh receiving epoch times news reports i would encourage you to do so as well as

00:14:18.880 with our good friends from life site news they have been absolutely amazing in supporting and reporting on

00:14:27.040 action for canada and our notices of liability and getting the word out it is amazing they are partners of

00:14:33.920 ours and um i just encourage everybody life site news apoc times look them up make sure that you're

00:14:41.200 receiving their information we are supporting independent uh media these are actually official

00:14:46.960 media but they're being treated as independent media as we know because the mainstream are just a

00:14:52.800 conglomerate uh of pretty much all the same propaganda coming from there um now i'm just going to quickly uh

00:14:59.840 go over as a reminder and as heather had already said there are no provisions in any orders of any

00:15:05.120 health minister doctor or provincial legislation that can nor pretend that any measures can override

00:15:10.640 your charter or other pre-charter rights i've repeatedly talked about section 52-1 of the constitution act

00:15:16.880 that says that any law that is inconsistent with the constitution is of no force and effect

00:15:21.840 i ended up before a city hall last night and mayor i was asked to come and support a group

00:15:26.400 and they said would you speak um on our behalf i said i'd be happy to do that i'd never done it before

00:15:31.840 uh somehow we weren't wearing masks but we were out of the way and it would have you get three

00:15:36.640 minutes to speak we could have been in and out of there but the mayor decided to and the council

00:15:41.040 made a really big deal of it and they ended up shutting down the meeting until such a time 45 minutes

00:15:47.920 later that the rcmp a mob of them showed up about seven and while we were waiting that 45 minutes

00:15:55.040 the city council were coming in and out without masks on then i've got photos of them uh sitting

00:16:01.760 there together having conversations and yet they wanted us removed for not wearing a mask

00:16:08.080 when the mayor came up and he spoke once the rcmp was there were had arrived he had said under the

00:16:14.960 municipal act and then he named it that uh he could close down any meeting uh if people were not complying or

00:16:23.360 or in violation of their bylaws and because we weren't wearing a mask even though that we have

00:16:28.720 legitimate reasons for not wearing a mask and that needs to be respected even under the orders

00:16:33.440 the police were going to remove us so i challenged them i challenged them saying that please tell me

00:16:40.080 where i'm breaking the law and i want you to name the law all they could do was name the bylaw but i

00:16:45.040 repeatedly said to them that there is no bylaw no statute no act that can be inconsistent with the

00:16:53.200 constitution it is of no force and effect so i again said please tell me what law that i am breaking

00:17:00.480 and they could not they could not come up with any specific law but they were insistent on removing me

00:17:06.960 and so i said what about the city councilors who are sitting here without a mask on prior to you coming

00:17:13.120 they said nope we don't want to see those photos we need you to be removed they did remove us i

00:17:19.760 continued to ask if i was under arrest and etc and i and they said no we really don't want to arrest you

00:17:25.920 we're trying to avoid that and uh you know give you an opportunity to be removed peacefully we weren't

00:17:32.000 acting in any other way we weren't there in protest we were just there to have our concerns heard

00:17:38.560 before the mayor and city council that's why they're hired by the people and they have a duty

00:17:42.720 and obligation to do that i was able to take that opportunity respectfully to everybody that was

00:17:47.600 present to to let them know this is the the future of your country that we're fighting for right now

00:17:53.120 this is tyranny this mayor and city council are running a tyrannical uh council meeting and they're

00:18:00.560 having us removed without giving us the opportunity to speak where they themselves were sitting without

00:18:06.400 mask this is hypocrisy so we did go outside and um as i was standing there one of the officers who

00:18:12.480 had been they really were you know they were very kind to us but the one officer i said look at that

00:18:17.760 there's the counselor again without a mask on and i showed him the photos that i had and he immediately

00:18:23.280 went back in and addressed the mayor but the mayor said no while we're in in session they can sit six feet

00:18:29.440 apart and without a mask i said i want the city councilors in this photo removed i said it's one

00:18:36.640 law for all there has to be equality anyways it didn't happen but our point was made and then i had

00:18:42.560 a 30-minute conversation that went extremely well with the sergeant and she actually said thank you so much

00:18:48.720 because citizens can do more than we can right now because our oic um officer in charge tells us that

00:18:55.840 that this that this is law and we need to um abide by it and i says there has to come a point when you

00:19:03.120 yourselves make a decision that under the constitution that i've just read to you here

00:19:09.280 that you make a decision that you will no longer violate the rights of your fellow canadians and so

00:19:15.520 there's big news happening across the country of police officers on mass who are stepping up and

00:19:21.200 there's going to be more good news coming on that i've had been privy to some conversations and i'm

00:19:25.360 very excited about what's happening so we've got lots of police we've got lots of officers on our

00:19:31.760 side who do not like the position that they're in but are feeling powerless i'm dealing with top rcmp and

00:19:38.640 i said this is a top-down problem now what i'm going to do is i'm going to cut everything short because i

00:19:43.840 know i'm taking up time but it is so critical my friends that you engage the police that you become

00:19:50.560 educated on your rights and that we do this right one person at a time if we have to i'm asking you

00:19:57.120 to get involved with chapters they are so active in showing up at school board meetings and walking

00:20:04.000 in and serving everybody in notice of liability before we left the mayor and city council the

00:20:09.200 action for canada team they ended up serving the notice of liability to the mayor and city council

00:20:14.800 so it was a successful meeting but we need all of you engaging and all of you getting involved

00:20:20.240 heather i'm going to put everything else aside right now and i'm going to ask you please to

00:20:24.000 introduce david david i'd like you to get straight to the point of how people can press charges get

00:20:31.040 into that and then we'll have some q a thank you so much tanya as always so much information to share

00:20:36.960 thank you joining us this evening is david lindsay a man who has been standing up for canadians rights and

00:20:42.240 freedoms for the past 30 years david is the co-founder of clear short for common law education

00:20:48.320 and rights and he teaches a correct understanding and application of common law david is the author of

00:20:54.560 the annotated criminal code procedure in canada in this amazing ebook david teaches how to file criminal

00:21:01.440 charges against other citizens to order his book you can email david at clear2012 at pm.me thank you for

00:21:11.200 joining us once again david thank you very much i'm grateful to be uh to be back thanks tanya thank

00:21:18.800 you um i i guess one of the things i really wanted to mention from the beginning is what etienne de

00:21:27.280 labwedy said 400 years ago in his book called the politics of obedience and ironically probably two of

00:21:34.560 the best books i've ever written were were written by uh by frenchmen and his comment was very clear

00:21:40.880 and he said why do people continue to follow and comply with the orders of these these little tyrants

00:21:46.880 in power when they all have the power to just simply say no and and literally walk away and um i think that's

00:21:56.160 never been more true today um then then it then certainly in the past where maybe all their uh

00:22:03.120 options might might not have been available but these people like bonnie henry and these health 0.98

00:22:08.080 ministers we do have the option to just say no and and we're not going to comply with them and saying

00:22:14.560 no can be one of two ways it can be a defensive measure or it can be an offensive measure and

00:22:22.080 one of the things that i promoted for years is the offensive measure of laying criminal charges against

00:22:27.280 people who are um breaking the law and need to be held accountable the um a lot of people have a

00:22:38.240 have the belief that you know well the police decided not to lay a charge and in many cops many

00:22:44.480 police officers come up and they say well we're not doing anything so there's nothing you can do about

00:22:48.960 it and that's simply not true if uh if police officers refuse to lay criminal charges then

00:22:55.840 you have the power to go and lay charges yourself and not only under the criminal code but um you can

00:23:03.280 lay it under other federal and provincial statutes as well the provincial statutes are a different

00:23:09.040 procedure but the criminal code procedures will apply for other federal statutes if you want to lay

00:23:14.480 charges on them as well um i know one person wrote earlier um can you lay criminal charges and still

00:23:22.080 do human rights at the same time and the answer is yes you can they're entirely separate proceedings

00:23:26.480 criminals completely separate from all civil proceedings completely separate but it's important 1.00

00:23:32.480 that people learn that you can go and lay your own criminal charges and the most important part of

00:23:38.640 doing that is to keep detailed records um of everything and as accurately and as time sensitive as possible

00:23:48.720 so if something happens now try and take notes within the next 5 10 20 minutes an hour whatever the

00:23:55.120 quickest is that you can take notes save documents and so on um if you're taking notes on the computer and

00:24:02.320 you save it as they say a word doc it's important you don't change it again because once you change

00:24:08.080 it the date on the on this that's that it was saved will change and then it looks like you altered the

00:24:13.520 original document so if you have changes then the best thing to do is to basically make a new file

00:24:21.600 or copy and edit at a different file so you've got two two files on it but you don't want to be altering

00:24:27.360 your evidence because you want it as accurate as possible as close to when it occurred as possible

00:24:33.680 so laying criminal charges is extremely important we uh we had somebody here in the okanagan recently

00:24:39.520 uh about two weeks ago actually about a month ago in september she was assaulted by two police officers

00:24:47.120 security called her and um called the police and they came down and took her out for not wearing a mask

00:24:52.880 notwithstanding that she had a valid medical exemption but told the police officers i'm not

00:24:58.320 required to to show you it's a privacy breach and a medical breach so the officers physically cuffed her

00:25:06.640 arrested her took her out under the guise of causing a disturbance and she got part of it on video

00:25:14.560 and that was enough that we went and laid criminal charges on the police i went and gave her a hand and

00:25:20.480 charged or a summons was issued to the police officers that they were charged with assault and

00:25:28.640 right now the crown's reviewing it and the point being is these officers now have criminal charges

00:25:34.960 sitting on their desk against them and whether they're suspended with or without pay we don't know

00:25:42.400 the unfortunate part of being in the public service is that they don't reveal

00:25:46.960 what punitive action they're taking against the uh their their people and i disagree with that somebody

00:25:52.960 once said years ago if you're a if you're a public officer we should know everything about you and as

00:25:57.920 private persons you should know nothing about us and i i couldn't agree more with that so but the

00:26:03.760 point i'm making is the charges can be laid and they can be laid successfully it's not a hard process

00:26:10.240 although there is a lot of details to be aware of and a lot of strategies to be aware of but it can be

00:26:15.600 done and has been done so when police not only when police officers are breaking the law but anybody

00:26:22.000 breaking the law in the government you can lay charges and if i can uh ask um tanny your friend 0.88

00:26:28.800 if we can go to section 265 of the criminal code if we have that available yep terenzi will work to

00:26:38.240 bring that up if uh okay yep sounds good thanks kindly um yeah we can scroll down a little

00:26:47.680 uh 265 1b is the section i'm going to refer to

00:26:53.120 right there thank you very much so if you notice there it says a person commits an assault when a

00:26:58.960 without the consent of another person he applies force intentionally to that other person directly or

00:27:04.240 indirectly and i think that's the assault that most of us are familiar with however look at section b

00:27:10.320 it says when he attempts or threatens by an act or gesture to employ force to that other person

00:27:16.320 if he has or causes the other person to believe on reasonable grounds that he has present ability to

00:27:21.840 affect his purpose so if a person is um is not only threatening or not on committing an assault but

00:27:29.760 threatening an assault on you threatening to arrest you for example uh when they can use force or

00:27:35.040 threatening to use physical force to throw you out of a building because you're not wearing masks

00:27:38.960 those are criminal offenses that definitely people can be charged with and um it's something that

00:27:45.840 the point being is you don't have to actually physically assault somebody if you're threatening and

00:27:50.560 you can carry it out then the point being is you can still be charged with us with an assault under the

00:27:56.800 under the criminal code and there's a lot of other sections that that um that apply that you might be

00:28:02.560 able to lay charges on as well so if your employer for example is telling you that you have to be and

00:28:11.840 and let's back up one second the the the act of getting vaccinated against your will is a criminal assault

00:28:19.520 it used to be called trespass to the person at common law today it's an assault and they're forcing you

00:28:26.480 to be criminally assaulted as a condition of employment that violates 265 and actually the

00:28:34.880 charging section is 266 but uh 265 sets out the test but it violates that section of the criminal code

00:28:43.280 and your employer any employer in canada who is forcing you to be criminally assaulted and you

00:28:50.800 believe that they have the power to do that because they're going to fire you or take other action

00:28:54.800 against you as a result um you can probably lay criminal charges if you're willing under the

00:29:00.000 criminal code and um that that force if you believe that they have the ability to uh to do that would

00:29:09.120 constitute grounds under 265 1b of laying criminal charges and there's many other sections i shouldn't

00:29:17.440 say many but there are other sections of the criminal code that that charges can be laid as well

00:29:21.920 and it's important that if you get fired or terminated from your employer because civil can take a long

00:29:30.960 time criminal is cheap there's no cost for filing a criminal charge and your hearing is generally heard

00:29:38.240 within a month your screening hearing and it goes pretty quickly your hearing usually will be half a day

00:29:45.200 day to a day at tops usually half a day um but again the most important thing is you need to keep

00:29:51.280 the evidence throughout the proceedings because when you go to court um you don't want to be relying upon

00:29:59.600 something that other people said and you don't want to be saying well my boss threatened to um

00:30:05.680 threatened to fire or terminate me and you've got no evidence to back it up it's just he said she said

00:30:11.360 because then you're not going to go very far so keeping records is is the most critical component

00:30:17.280 not only for for for this and laying criminal charges but for anything you're going to do

00:30:22.640 in any legal action civil or criminal everything always turns on evidence and the stronger your

00:30:28.400 evidence the better chance that you have of being successful and that's no more prevalent than when

00:30:35.120 you're laying criminal charges so what happens is you lay your charge and you go for a screening hearing

00:30:41.520 and they will look at your evidence at that time and the test is not very high it's not a strong test

00:30:48.960 to meet but you do have to have some evidence on each essential element of the offense and if you've

00:30:55.760 got some evidence you will get a summons issue and for government officials who sit behind

00:31:02.560 the shield of government immunity they believe they have getting a summons on their desk or serve

00:31:10.320 to them in front of all their buddies is a traumatic experience for them their whole career flashes

00:31:15.760 before their eyes they have no idea what to do and i'll give you an example many many years ago i was

00:31:22.160 in court as an agent with a friend of mine and i managed to get the judge to order a crown prosecutor to

00:31:28.320 take the witness stand it wasn't for long it was just to deal with one small issue for five minutes

00:31:34.720 and it caught him completely off guard in the middle of court and he didn't know what to do so

00:31:39.200 he took the witness stand and gave his evidence but i talked to him outside and i said to him it's a

00:31:46.240 little different when you're on the other side isn't it and he looked at me and he just and he said yeah

00:31:51.200 you know what it is so for the first time this this crown prosecutor this lawyer actually had to be on

00:31:57.120 the other side and take a witness stand and be cross-examined to feel what it's like to be on

00:32:01.680 the other side and that's the same for police officers government officials all of them who

00:32:07.760 get charged with an offense they're on the other side and they don't have a clue what to do and

00:32:12.800 absolute fear sets in even if their lawyers are saying look don't worry we're going to look after it

00:32:18.960 they're scared because their whole career is flashing and they don't know what's going to happen and

00:32:23.680 that uncertainty is what is the basis the grounds for all their fear so it's very effectively in

00:32:30.640 criminal charges but you need to have the evidence and that's why again i go back and i will stress it

00:32:36.080 repeatedly the importance of keeping records of everything you do documents emails notices tape

00:32:44.080 recordings audio recordings you can video audio record somebody and as long as you're party to that

00:32:49.520 conversation you don't have to tell them supreme court of canada was clear on that and it could be

00:32:56.560 very very effective for laying criminal charges against your employers and people who who do

00:33:01.840 terminate you so there's a lot of benefits to laying criminal charges it does take a little bit of

00:33:08.240 learning there there's no way i mean there's two options you can have a lawyer do all your work for you

00:33:13.280 or you can do it and i learned that 25 years ago and i made the decision then that i was going to learn

00:33:19.280 it and although it it kind of scares people a little bit they they sit back and they go wow i gotta i gotta

00:33:26.400 learn law and you do have to learn a little bit there's there's no way around it but it's not that

00:33:34.000 complicated and it's not that intimidating it really isn't you but you need to spend some time and learn it

00:33:39.760 how to fill out the forms properly and so on and um and once you've learned that and you overcome that

00:33:46.400 fear of uh being in the court system you can go a long way and uh and they treat you a lot with a lot

00:33:53.120 more respect as well um there was one oh um a lot of their decisions that they're coming up with today a lot

00:34:04.000 of the orders and so on people have a tendency to look to the charter and i want to emphasize although

00:34:11.200 the charter was there where did her majesty get the power to sign that charter and that power came from

00:34:17.520 the coronation oath and i want to emphasize that if they are breaking that coronation oath and i'm not

00:34:25.520 going to get into all the details today on it but you could do some research and i'll be talking about

00:34:30.080 it in much greater detail than months to come but if they violate that coronation oath then they can

00:34:36.400 still be the mad her mon her majesty and her officers can still be held accountable as well

00:34:43.120 i don't believe that parts especially section one of the charter i don't believe it's a force in effect

00:34:49.120 i believe section one violates her coronation so when they come in and they try to argue section one

00:34:55.200 uh and they can override your rights and freedoms i don't think they can do that but it's something

00:35:00.320 that has to get argued properly and i just emphasize that the supremacy of god is is supreme in our law

00:35:08.320 and if you get into court and they try and argue otherwise it's a good idea to be prepared for that

00:35:14.640 um when you're in court and you're laying criminal charges our book goes into detail on what tricks they

00:35:22.240 will play on you for example a judge may look at it and he may say you know what i just don't think

00:35:29.200 you're going to win a trial that doesn't matter and it's a prohibited consideration at your screening

00:35:36.080 hearing all that matters is if you have some evidence and that's because a lot of times more

00:35:42.640 evidence will come about in the future and a variety of other legal reasons but there's a variety of tricks

00:35:48.240 they play that we go into detail in our book to watch out for to make sure that the judge does

00:35:52.800 issue a summons for these people that have been criminally charged and it's important because you

00:35:58.560 don't want to be standing before a judge and something like that gets said and you don't know how to answer

00:36:02.480 and how to respond and these are points that um that i learned over 25 years uh both being in court

00:36:09.200 myself on laying criminal charges and um helping others do it as well as my own research on the matter

00:36:18.240 so um i don't think i i um have a lot more to offer i do want to emphasize though that

00:36:26.800 the ability to lay charges under the criminal code also extends to other federal statutes

00:36:33.760 so if somebody has violated um the narcotics act there unless there's a a prohibition in that act

00:36:41.600 which i haven't really looked at i think it's a narcotics act or drug act or whatever it may be

00:36:45.840 um you can use the provisions and the procedures in the criminal code to lay charges under those

00:36:52.080 federal statutes as well in other words it's not restricted to just the criminal code that you can

00:36:58.240 lay charges but again that requires a little bit of research on your part as to whether the other

00:37:04.320 statutes apply and whether you want to be able to to charge them under those statutes keeping in mind

00:37:09.520 the forms that we outline in our book the same forms will apply if you want to lay criminal charges

00:37:14.320 from other statutes as well and i think that's important because i don't want to restrict it to

00:37:19.120 just criminal code offenses i i want people to know if they violated other statutes we can still

00:37:24.480 go after them you can still go after them as well and it's not restricted to just criminal law

00:37:30.720 um i guess that's probably about all right now um one of the things the last couple of meetings i

00:37:38.320 know it went a little long and there wasn't very much time for questions and i'm just wondering tanya

00:37:43.040 if maybe it might be a little better to let a few more questions come through this time

00:37:48.240 right um i'm a hundred percent in agreement with that uh david and thank you for the information

00:37:54.000 that you're providing i know that uh to people it can seem overwhelming the thought to have to

00:37:59.440 learn a portion of the law or or you know take this on yourself uh one of the things i would encourage

00:38:05.840 is that um if you could uh collaborate with several other people put your heads together have study

00:38:12.400 sessions um and learn how to do this because it's incredibly important we can't rely on the courts

00:38:18.960 we're going to uh i'm not saying that we can't rely on the courts uh ultimately i'm just saying

00:38:24.640 because of the amount of time to get in with personal cases i think that uh this is the way to go

00:38:31.520 so uh david um heather did you want to come on do you have some questions prepared for david

00:38:38.720 yes and we're gonna get right into that okay so we have lots of questions i'm pretty sure that

00:38:45.440 you're gonna have your work cut out for you today i was advised by common law advocates to not make

00:38:52.080 mention of nuremberg code because the entire case has been thrown out before under claim that canada

00:38:58.160 did not sign it but rather asserted that it was for only for barbaric countries who didn't have regard

00:39:03.600 for their country's citizens rights and that's paraphrased please share if it is conclusively helpful

00:39:09.920 to our case or could it um would we risk it being thrown out due to claimed irrelevance uh interesting

00:39:19.280 question because many many years ago i went in winnipeg and i argued i think it was the international

00:39:25.040 covenant of rights in man or something similar to that it was it was an international document

00:39:30.000 and the court of queen's bench judge would not would not even hear it or rely upon it so he went to

00:39:35.360 leave the courtroom and i just said to him hey and he turned around and i said obviously you don't want

00:39:40.320 me to argue this again and he said no well i said you need to tell me why you're not applying because

00:39:45.840 canada is a signatory to this document and if uh otherwise i said i'm just going to keep coming back

00:39:51.040 and using it and using it so if you don't want to waste court resources and i'm wrong you need to tell

00:39:55.920 me where i'm wrong so he thought for a second came back reopened the record and he said the reason it

00:40:02.880 doesn't apply is because although canada is a signatory to the document it was never passed

00:40:09.920 through parliament all of a sudden my eyes opened and i said thank you very much you're not going to

00:40:17.360 hear about this ever again and i've learned a lot more since and i never will rely on international law

00:40:22.800 anyway but the the point being is with nuremberg i believe it was signed by canada the problem is it

00:40:29.040 was never passed by parliament and as a result it has no binding effect in law it certainly is a

00:40:35.280 consideration that the courts will consider and uh and and may um i don't know how much weight they

00:40:41.840 would give it but it is a consideration but it's not binding in court and you certainly can't lay charges

00:40:47.200 under it okay ready for another one yeah uh okay i work in healthcare and have seen several lawyers

00:40:58.880 videos some stating healthcare workers can be terminated for not complying while other lawyers

00:41:04.720 say they cannot cannot as you know fha has a huge legal representation so do i really stand a chance of

00:41:12.000 keeping my job how do i present common law information to them i don't want to risk my

00:41:17.920 pension over this i've heard they can hold back their share and just give me back the portion i've

00:41:23.920 contributed over the last 32 years well with retentions the contract govern supreme over that civil aspect

00:41:32.400 and um i mean if if you were to get fired for malfeasance or something else your your contract would

00:41:39.520 still require them to cover the the severance as the terms are in the uh and pensions as they are in

00:41:45.520 the contract so the fact that if you may get fired because you won't wear a mask or get vaxxed

00:41:50.960 doesn't alter the terms of that contract in any way and uh and they they shouldn't and couldn't really

00:41:56.480 be allowed to do that with respect to to getting um terminated ultimately um i guess it's the same

00:42:05.680 with any other criminal act the criminal always has the advantage because they know what they're

00:42:09.680 going to do in advance if your employer makes the determination that they're going to fire you

00:42:16.000 ultimately you got two options you can try to stop them before they do that and that's where tanya's

00:42:22.240 notices are incredibly effective they've done really really good and and putting the fear into them that

00:42:27.920 legal action will follow follow against them personally if they do it and it makes them know that

00:42:32.960 you've done some homework and some research they're just an awesome resource but ultimately if they

00:42:38.880 fire you then what do you do and you've as i said earlier you've got civil or criminal recourse and the

00:42:45.760 the criminal is the quickest cheapest and uh and easiest to to go through but you can also still do

00:42:52.400 civil at the same time but ultimately if they're going to fire you um and you're not able to stop them

00:43:00.880 then it all comes down to what you're going to be able to do afterwards the contract will cover

00:43:05.200 your pension and your severance pay and everything else that will be covered in the terms of your

00:43:09.040 contract and they have to comply no matter what terms they what basis they fire you upon but after

00:43:15.040 that uh legal action will come down to criminal or civil and that's where the records that you're

00:43:20.000 going to keep your documents and so on will be most important for you

00:43:23.040 i'm going to ask a question heather as i pop in there too people have been asking they're being

00:43:29.760 threatened uh that their pension would even be would be taken away from them i mean that that's not

00:43:35.760 even possible i i can't imagine that that would be lawful well they can't the pension is paid for by

00:43:41.600 the federal government based on the contributions of both parties if it's a federal pension uh for

00:43:46.560 example so they can't do anything on that um on the canada pension for example on a private pension

00:43:53.680 that's contractual and unless there's a specific term in the contract that says unless you get vaxxed

00:43:59.040 we can count if you don't get back we can cancel your uh our pension they're bound by the terms of that

00:44:04.480 contract and they can't get out of it okay and then what about bank time a lot of the nurses i'm 1.00

00:44:10.240 hearing are being told that they can't access their bank time yeah that's part of their benefits

00:44:17.840 that they have in their contract and that goes the same with all your benefits in your contract it's

00:44:22.080 not restricted to severance or uh or um or pensions if you have banked time say you have a week for

00:44:29.200 example of bank time that is a debt that was incurred prior to this even happening so it's a debt owing

00:44:37.600 on the from them it's owing on the day you're terminated it is a legal lawfully binding debt

00:44:43.360 as of that time period so you have a claim against them if they refuse to pay you that banked time

00:44:50.480 it's a debt owing and they cannot get out of it it's a contractual debt owing so what if they've got

00:44:56.800 you on unpaid leave saying that you can't access your vacation time or your bank time well unpaid leave

00:45:05.200 would start from the day they put you on unpaid leave going forward that doesn't alter what's

00:45:10.320 happened in the past the contract that's there all your benefits that have accrued are up and paid

00:45:16.000 until that date let me give you an example if if you're working uh 20 years whatever and you get paid

00:45:23.360 every two weeks you work two weeks then you wait a week or two weeks and then you get paid

00:45:27.360 if they you've worked two full weeks and say the following friday is payday after that two weeks is

00:45:35.200 over they fire you on the friday and normally you get paid the following friday they can't come up to

00:45:41.760 you the following friday and say sorry we're not going to pay you for those two weeks you will get

00:45:46.640 a check for those two weeks that in itself is an admission that all debts are owing pursuant to the

00:45:52.880 contract all debts whether it's bank time severance pay pension any benefits you have

00:45:59.440 are payable from the company to you at the date and time of termination so what would you suggest

00:46:05.920 because we know that um and heather i'm not we're going to have other questions prepared but just with

00:46:10.960 the amount of nurses i could just see you know professionals are uh sitting in the in on the 1.00

00:46:16.320 sidelines here saying oh man this is what's happening me i want to try to get those questions answered

00:46:20.880 because these have been posed to me repeatedly so uh say you know a lot of nurses in especially in bc

00:46:27.040 right now uh are going before their managers and they're being told that if they don't vaccinate

00:46:32.240 they're they're the time limit has been set now they've made the decision they vaccinate or they're

00:46:36.880 going to be uh put on unpaid leave if they've requested to have their vacation if they've requested to

00:46:44.400 have their uh banked hours uh put into place at that point but the employer refuses what recourse could

00:46:54.080 they have right now because the money's needed right now well the first thing is the terminology

00:47:00.800 if they owe you the money never ever use the word please do not use the word request always use the word

00:47:08.880 demand and if you see that in um uh collection agencies letters and so on the reason the word

00:47:16.320 demand is used is because it means you have a right to something and you're exercising that right

00:47:21.600 so why would you beg them for it in the first place i i would really if you were an employee

00:47:27.520 what could you do about it um if they owe you that money

00:47:36.160 civil is so time consuming um and there's so many options i mean you could sue them

00:47:42.880 could you file a um an application to the court

00:47:50.080 on an expedited basis of some kind to force them to pay you it's a lot easier of course if you have a

00:47:56.960 union even if the union's not upholding the termination they should be able to get you all

00:48:01.760 your your benefits that's what the union's for too um so the first stop with the union at first

00:48:07.520 start position is to go to your union if you have one but if you don't and the company's not doing it

00:48:13.600 um charge them with theft under 322 of the criminal code

00:48:18.720 charge them with theft and possibly fraud because if they know that they represented to you

00:48:29.360 uh and you have evidence that they represented that they would make these payments and uh knowingly

00:48:34.800 went and did not you you may have a case for fraud as well but definitely if they have bank time

00:48:40.960 servants and so on pension and they're not paying you and they just give you your last two weeks pay

00:48:45.840 and that money is owing in your contract charge them with theft give them a notice you owe the money

00:48:51.600 and charge them with theft if they don't pay you absolutely and that's even in a condition where

00:48:56.080 they haven't been fired but they're on unpaid leave because again again this is is really part

00:49:01.920 of the ploy to strong arm them and and hold that severance or not at severance i'm almost at

00:49:08.560 captive right that they're going to hold on to these funds they're still employed but they're just not

00:49:14.480 paying them these monies could they still go ahead then and charge them uh under section 322 of the

00:49:20.720 criminal code yeah if they're if they're on unpaid leave you don't know how long that's going to be

00:49:27.840 and um they may change their minds and come back say after three days and say okay we're we're

00:49:34.240 you're back at work again so the question is timing as to when you would uh when you would do that

00:49:41.920 if they're they're pretty clear you're not getting hired back and and you're already off

00:49:46.000 for a couple weeks and you've given them a notice demanding that money um

00:49:52.720 and yeah you can still charge them with theft while they're while you're still on unpaid leave

00:49:58.400 and um you know the the only reason i say that is because if you've only been off for two days

00:50:06.000 is it worth going all the way through the criminal process for two days pay on the other hand

00:50:09.680 if you're off for two or three weeks and they're not taking you back it definitely is worth it for

00:50:15.040 sure and i just want to verify that section i'm almost 100 positive it's 322 of the criminal code

00:50:20.880 that there's so many sections for theft yeah and while you do that because people are being put on

00:50:26.160 in indefinite right uh yeah at this point it's extremely stressful and we need to come together we

00:50:32.880 need to find the answers and while david's looking that up i just want to make sure that those of you the

00:50:37.680 majority of you um who have all of a sudden decided to to get on board and start taking action is is

00:50:44.560 because of course of the federal government's announcement that you needed to get double

00:50:48.160 vaxxed and we're grateful we're grateful that you're here we've had problems for 20 months and

00:50:52.960 you've been silent and we we understand that but we're grateful you're on board but you're parts of

00:50:57.680 unions the majority of you are a union member and if your union is not supporting you you need to file a

00:51:04.720 grievance and and then if they're not responding to your grievance there is a further step that you

00:51:11.200 can take against them and and you need to make sure that you're doing that applying the pressure apply

00:51:17.120 the notices of liability everything that you can do uh you know to uh fight for your job and your rights

00:51:23.600 okay david back to you yeah i agree um yeah 322 to roughly 333 in that area are different types of

00:51:31.040 theft 322 is the general section and i think 334 of the criminal code is the charging section

00:51:38.240 so you'd have to just look probably 322 is the section that sets out the test to be met for theft

00:51:44.560 and you would just go through that and uh and get the correct subsection and so on

00:51:49.200 for for laying that charge but um absolutely if uh if you have a contract and they're knowingly breaking

00:51:56.000 the contract and withholding benefits they owe it to you and if they're doing it on purpose it's

00:52:00.560 theft okay and in that instance it would not be uh towards your employer as a citizen that's actually

00:52:06.720 towards your employer right because uh your manager yeah all right the man or woman and then to clarify

00:52:14.000 um many times people will say that uh you know the notices of not notices of liability are no

00:52:21.680 good and that they spoke to an employment lawyer and what i remind people of is that uh this is a

00:52:28.880 constitutional issue so they need to talk to a constitutional lawyer not an employment lawyer

00:52:34.400 because there's no statute or act or bylaw that can supersede your rights under the constitution

00:52:39.600 would that be correct correct and you don't want to talk to an employment lawyer uh if you're taking

00:52:45.040 criminal action because they won't know nothing about criminal law anyway they're strictly related to

00:52:49.920 employment litigation okay great so i want everybody to hear that about these employment lawyers

00:52:56.560 bypass them tell them they don't know what they're talking about and they need to uh

00:53:00.080 learn about the constitution because they're not up and protecting you and you need protection right

00:53:03.920 now and you need a good lawyer if you're going to be in a position where you have to actually

00:53:08.160 hire one okay heather let's have another question okay david is there a time frame on laying a charge

00:53:15.520 um it depends most charges under the criminal code are hybrid it can either be indictable which are

00:53:23.200 your more serious ones or summary conviction offenses and summary conviction offenses are generally six

00:53:29.440 months and indictable there's no time period on indictable offenses so because most like theft for

00:53:35.760 example theft is is hybrid it can either be summary or indictable and all it all depends on what the

00:53:42.080 prosecutor chooses so um if the crown takes over the prosecution they will determine whether it's

00:53:48.400 going to be a summary or indictable offense so it all depends what type of charges being laid um 504

00:53:54.480 the criminal code does allow you to lay indictable charges and those there's no time period on them

00:54:01.680 okay so heather i was going to ask we're going to go and ask there's a couple people with hands up

00:54:06.640 and so david while heather is finding somebody there uh somebody's also asked the question i've heard this

00:54:11.440 quite a bit is that um if they're put in this position that they're not getting the vaccine

00:54:16.960 they can't even apply for ei what do you have to say about that if they're not getting the vaccine

00:54:27.920 and their employment is being ended they don't even qualify for ei which i can't even imagine but i

00:54:34.080 have heard this several times ended or just like terminated or suspended without pay i would say that

00:54:41.040 this isn't a situation where they got fired for not taking the vaccine which means they have the right

00:54:47.760 then to take action against their employer for for uh for firing them without cause but then they go to

00:54:55.280 apply for ei and i've heard some situations where they were not able because they got fired they weren't

00:55:01.200 able to collect ei yeah you know that's a um that's a really difficult situation because being a regulatory body

00:55:11.440 um these guys know how yeah because all they do is simply sit back and they go you know what we're

00:55:19.920 not going to cover you because you got fired for cause

00:55:24.560 and in order there is only one way to deal with that and that's go through their administrative process

00:55:30.240 which means you've got to file some sort of a dispute or an objection to them they have an internal

00:55:37.360 process to deal with it and then if you don't like it and you think that it was wrong then you have to

00:55:42.000 go through the court system it's kind of almost like tax you know if you don't like your decision

00:55:47.280 from the auditor or the assessor you you file in a notice of objection and it goes to the minister and

00:55:53.280 then if you don't like that then you go to tax court and then federal court of appeal so it's kind of like

00:55:58.080 that in a way um and if they're not going to if they're going to use the statute the ei statute as

00:56:05.280 a weapon against you and say sorry you're you were fired for cause you got to fight ahead of you because

00:56:11.040 they uh they will stand by it and the only way you're going to get around it because they will uphold

00:56:17.440 it in my opinion throughout the internal appeal system is to eventually work it into the superior

00:56:23.760 court of your province um or federal court as the case may be um that that's a really um unfortunate

00:56:33.360 and difficult circumstance you've got to be really strong with these people and do your homework so

00:56:38.720 if they're going to say you're being fired for cause then you need to demand from them the law that

00:56:45.040 says that they can back that up in the sense that show me the law that says the vaccines are mandatory

00:56:51.440 uh as a condition of work going back to what i said earlier it's a criminal assault and and i would

00:56:58.000 tell them that i don't wish to be criminal assaulted how is that termination for cause that you're saying

00:57:05.520 that if i don't agree to be assaulted i can't get my benefits and i think in the long run you would win

00:57:14.080 but the original administrators would be hard if you have a lawyer right off the beginning who's really

00:57:19.200 intending on pressing it and doing it effectively you may stand a better chance but it's going to be

00:57:24.320 hard at the beginning um if the ei takes the stance that um you know we're going to play head games and

00:57:30.240 say that you're not covered it it's going to make sure it require that you be informed right from the 0.81

00:57:35.440 beginning and fight them all the way through it right i've seen comments like this is ridiculous

00:57:42.000 i know we're living in uncharted waters here unprecedented you know we come together on on

00:57:47.520 this wednesday night to hope that you're feeling supported i hope that we're answering some of those

00:57:53.520 those questions what i am finding in uh testimonies of those who are having success is it is it is

00:58:01.040 it's those who have really asserted their right and um i was told a story today about a gentleman that

00:58:07.040 got on the plane in edmonton and as we know right now you can't get on a plane unless you've been

00:58:11.760 vaccinated and so they asked him what his vac status was and he says i'm not giving you that

00:58:16.400 information i'll tell you that i've had a tetanus shot and that's all you're getting and they said no

00:58:21.200 you're gonna tell us that you know you've been vaccinated he says i'm telling you that i've had a

00:58:24.960 tetanus shot and that's all you're getting anyways this guy got on the plane and he successfully

00:58:29.760 flew to his destination it there takes a special kind of uh uniqueness it seems right now um but

00:58:37.600 really what it boils down to is knowledge of the situation and really understanding your rights and

00:58:42.800 applying them we're making fact sheets um under the charter right resource i've got to get the new one

00:58:49.120 uploaded and it will be a resource for you to carry around with you so that no matter what your

00:58:55.120 what situation you're in we've got a mobility rights um uh notice uh right now it's not a notice

00:59:01.200 of liability it's just something that you can carry on you that if you're being prohibited from travel

00:59:06.560 right now people are saying well what if i'm going from one province to the other and please understand

00:59:11.120 we do not have borders between our provinces in canada there are boundaries and you have the right

00:59:16.160 to fully and freely travel throughout canada but but put the mobility rights one we'll put it in the

00:59:22.720 chat and make that available to you these are the kind of resources we're encouraging you to have

00:59:27.520 on your person so that you can stand for your rights in the moment because it is very difficult

00:59:32.640 i even have a hard time memorizing all of this stuff and i refer to my notes quite frequently so

00:59:38.560 we're trying to make those available to you please make use of them okay heather let's go to uh

00:59:42.880 some of the hands up here okay

00:59:47.040 we can take a few questions from raised hands i don't actually have the power to do that so i can do

00:59:51.120 that for you we have uh we have andy chase and um you can go ahead and say something

01:00:01.120 we just got to wait for them to click the button andy are you there

01:00:06.080 handy there's a guy on this call here andy chase on that's coming in

01:00:15.120 oh maybe terenzio will go to the next one there seems to be some confusion on that no problem donna vath

01:00:21.120 donna are you there

01:00:32.320 okay this is strange we've repeatedly had this uh this issue since changing to the new system where

01:00:38.240 we're not able to get people on right away who are speaking and asking a question can we try one more

01:00:44.160 trends if not we're going to go back to uh heather so be prepared heather margaret klitsch

01:00:54.480 and are you able to unmute them yes yeah margaret are you there

01:01:02.800 okay we're going to just go back to heather then we gave that a try my apologies we're not quite sure

01:01:08.000 uh why it is that uh people aren't asking actual questions so heather back to you if i press criminal

01:01:14.000 charges can the other party party counter sue for damages is a question as a general rule no if um

01:01:23.120 if you have gone and laid it knowing that you like if you've gone laid criminal charges knowing they're

01:01:28.960 false just to maliciously go after somebody they could sue you for malicious prosecution

01:01:35.040 but that test is really really really really really high and it's almost it's up for almost

01:01:41.040 impossible to to meet it's it's that high but um generally speaking if you believe and the criminal

01:01:47.600 code is clear 504 if you believe on reasonable grounds that an offense has been committed

01:01:52.640 you lay your charge so they would have to prove that you did not have a belief on reasonable grounds

01:01:58.960 and that you had another intention and that would be very very difficult to do so as a general rule

01:02:03.680 i would say no okay okay this one um this is an interesting one why has prime minister justin

01:02:12.320 trudeau not being criminally charged for his abuse of power and for violations of our freedoms of

01:02:18.240 rights evidence shows his words and actions on national tv well there's no criminal charge of abuse of power

01:02:26.560 um similar to um for example in the us they have charges of reckless or racketeering and there's

01:02:33.840 no racketeering charges in canada um so people think well they got charged racketeering in the

01:02:39.360 states why don't we charge them here and you can't because there is no such charge as for why

01:02:44.560 trudeau hasn't been charged as of yet i can't answer that um it it requires evidence not just uh coming up

01:02:53.200 and saying well look trudeau passed this um this order that says you have to be vaxxed in order to

01:02:59.200 fly and by the way he he hasn't even signed that order yet by the way but it it requires evidence of

01:03:06.400 criminal activity and um i think you're probably more able to charge bonnie henry with uh with that sort 0.99

01:03:13.600 of uh with offenses and you could with trudeau right now simply because although everybody knows what

01:03:19.760 what he's doing and uh and what he's done he's done it through the process um in parliament and

01:03:27.760 you need to have some evidence that what he's doing meets one of the criminal charges so if he was to

01:03:34.800 pass for example an order that said everybody has to uh be assaulted in order to get on an airplane

01:03:42.480 i think he could be charged for that and i think bonnie henry synonymously could be charged

01:03:47.040 um as well right now for her order because she can issue orders but she can't issue orders forcing 1.00

01:03:52.720 you to be criminally assaulted as a condition of exercising your rights i i think there's there is

01:03:58.240 grounds for laying a charge on bonnie henry um but again it it's the charging part is the easy part

01:04:05.120 it's having the evidence that's that's the difficult part having qualified evidence good evidence and

01:04:11.600 that's that can be hard to get especially from politicians because they keep everything so secret

01:04:15.600 right it can be very hard yeah they're surrounded by their little cabal and the problem is is that

01:04:21.520 when you present something to the crown uh they have the option to deny it i was talking to

01:04:27.760 an officer today and a woman had murdered her husband and she'd admitted to it confessed to it they

01:04:35.840 arrested her they brought her to to jail this happened in bc just recently and uh she was arrested

01:04:42.800 and the crown turned around she'd admitted to it they had the evidence full confession and the crown

01:04:49.760 turned around and said that they needed to provide more evidence and they released her

01:04:56.160 and in bc and new brunswick they have a very high threshold to prove liability that the rcmp

01:05:05.680 uh have to fulfill and so the rcmp in my conversation were saying that um it is it can be very difficult

01:05:15.120 for them because then the public is looking at them and saying what have you done but it was the crown

01:05:19.360 that made the decision and in newfoundland i'm not sure if you're aware this gal dana i spoke to her

01:05:25.680 this week and she has successfully she did a great job i've done something similar here but they're they're

01:05:31.200 they're not providing me a case number at this point because of the difference between the two

01:05:35.920 provinces and she successfully went to the rcmp and filed against the premier health officers uh

01:05:43.840 minister of minister of health etc for extortion and fraud um and crimes uh so uh what do you call that

01:05:53.600 criminal negligence and they've actually said this is very well put out we're giving you a case number

01:05:58.960 she had put a campaign forward and so somebody else went before the newfoundland police constabulary

01:06:05.680 same day and they also received a case number and he had said that he had started out there as an

01:06:12.960 officer 32 years ago in newfoundland and that um every but one he could he could uh arrest someone

01:06:21.120 he could put the case before the crown and the crown would decide all but one got prosecuted so it is

01:06:28.320 um it's a really difficult time that we're living in and unless you have extremely compelling evidence

01:06:35.280 which we think that we already have i mean we we hear from doctors and nurses who are talking about the

01:06:42.720 death of of infants i have had a report of three youth who were brought to one hospital just random

01:06:49.920 didn't know each other all died directly related to the covid vaccine and those doctors were not listing

01:06:56.000 at the covid that they had taken the covid vaccine now i think there's applicable charges to those

01:07:01.520 doctors and it was the nurse that went in and changes the documentation there's so much corruption

01:07:08.160 going on right now but unless you have that evidence documented videotape this is why we need

01:07:13.440 people to speak out and we need you to go to the rcmp we need you to file complaints it's incredibly

01:07:19.360 important that there is as much pushback and backlash as possible interesting that your your

01:07:25.680 comment about the uh the woman that had admitted doing the offense because in all provinces and federally

01:07:32.640 one of the criteria there's two criteria one of the main one is whether there's a reasonable

01:07:36.880 possibility for conviction and if there is that's a high degree of that they're going to go through with

01:07:41.920 the prosecution and if she's admitted it that tells me did some officer break the law along the way

01:07:50.880 somebody forced it out of her and uh extorted out of her or something or was there something else that

01:07:55.920 that eventually could nullify a conviction i don't know of course we don't know the details but that's a

01:08:01.040 very good point david see that's your that's your criminal mind working i like that okay all right

01:08:09.040 where did our heather disappear to i do i do have one question one final question here can you

01:08:19.200 possibly address a recent ruling from manitoba queen's bench justice joyle where in his statement

01:08:25.440 supporting his decisions regarding various church not churches non-compliance he stated that no citizen

01:08:32.320 has the right to even question any health order the actual decision concludes that it would be impossible

01:08:38.720 for the legislature to properly address the legality of any mandate in addressing an ongoing pandemic

01:08:45.680 regardless of the fact that it has been going on ongoing for 20 months well there's a number of

01:08:52.400 facets to it number one i haven't read the decision yet i am aware of it but i haven't read it um i know

01:08:58.320 people that have been in front of joyelle in the past and i'll refrain from keeping my comments about

01:09:03.520 him but um he's he's not the best having said that um it was a civil matter not criminal

01:09:12.160 and i believe when one of the things i learned years ago is a lot of times people get the decisions

01:09:20.320 the lawyers especially will get the decisions they want by framing the case in a manner that they will

01:09:25.280 get it let me explain that judges will rule on the issues before them that's all they can rule on

01:09:31.520 so if the lawyers are corrupt um they will phrase the questions or issues to the court in a manner

01:09:39.440 that it may look good but from a legal in-depth mind the real issues are not raised and they will they

01:09:48.000 were designed to lose the gst reference case there were six questions put to the court for example

01:09:53.760 i i was there uh or not the gst the firearms reference and i was there and i asked the lawyer the first day in

01:10:00.480 court why did you frame these questions in a manner you're gonna lose and he said well why would i do

01:10:05.680 that and i said well here's why you're gonna lose blah blah blah and i went through all the things with

01:10:09.920 them he looked at me for 10 or 15 seconds look back at the sheet threw it at me on a monday morning

01:10:16.560 and refused to talk to me the rest of the week the guy got caught and most people don't realize

01:10:23.840 these judges are bound by the pleadings that are before them so judge joyelle is bound not only by

01:10:30.080 the pleadings but by the evidence before him i'm worried because they had the manitoba

01:10:37.360 medical doctor on the stand and he admitted on stand the pcr tests don't work

01:10:43.200 so that alone tells me if the tests don't work how can you rely upon and say that there's a pandemic

01:10:50.640 and if he if the judge is coming up and he is saying that you can't question anything

01:10:57.680 because there's a pandemic then that tells me the lawyers didn't frame the case properly

01:11:02.080 they didn't they didn't attack the question or the sections of the relevant legislation they should

01:11:06.400 have attacked and uh it was the canadian justice center of a bird i forget their exact name

01:11:12.640 but they've lost several constitutional freedoms yeah they've lost several cases and i believe all

01:11:18.160 their cases unfortunately yeah because they're not they're not preparing properly and i i just you

01:11:24.640 know somebody had asked earlier david thank you for uh well heather thank you to the person that

01:11:30.160 answered that question that was a good question because it really is boiling down to uh

01:11:34.960 uh being before the courts and being extremely well prepared and action for canada the case that we just

01:11:43.600 filed in august the 391 pages rocco has retained the top experts in the world on the on the pcr testing

01:11:53.280 on the masking social distancing all things covet and when he gets before the courts i you know we could

01:12:01.040 say it's going to be in a year it's going to be in two years but what we need to understand is there's

01:12:06.160 many different ways that um people can uh put their energies into coming up against the tyranny that we're

01:12:13.760 facing one of the ways that action for canada is doing that is through the legal action and yes we know

01:12:20.320 that it's going to take time to actually get into court we've already given the good news report

01:12:26.080 that there are several defendants on there as we mentioned about bc ferries

01:12:29.840 who are not supporting the backs passes of the passengers they've totally eased up on people

01:12:34.720 with exemptions with their masks ever since we filed against them as their defendants and the

01:12:40.000 minister of education here in in bc so the legal action doesn't have to be in court but i tell you

01:12:45.920 when we get there we're not going to end up having the government's own witness against the pcr test

01:12:52.240 say the pcr test doesn't work and end up losing that case i i to me that is absolutely appalling

01:12:59.120 uh as david said i i don't know what the what the argument was in that case but it obviously

01:13:04.640 wasn't compelling enough uh because that should have been a slam dunk at that point and we were

01:13:09.040 very hopeful regarding that case uh as to the outcome i think bc's legislation is different too

01:13:15.440 because the acts here public health act requires a factual situation to exist before they can even

01:13:20.640 declare a pandemic and um last march of last year when bonnie henry first came up with her order 0.99

01:13:28.240 she had four facts that she relied upon and the problem is there was only three people that had

01:13:32.800 died in the province at that time and all four facts were the same facts that replied against the

01:13:38.000 flu and the common cold every year there was nothing different and two days later farnworth goes and says

01:13:43.680 where is a pandemic has been declared well not only is the the pandemic uh not included in the

01:13:49.680 emergencies it's all natural disasters but where did he get that from because there there is no facts

01:13:56.720 and bonnie henry didn't have any so the only thing i could surmise is he claimed an underworld

01:14:01.120 health organization or something and i suspect in manitoba if it had been done correctly they could have

01:14:06.880 argued the same thing there are no facts and there were none when it was originally declared in order to be

01:14:12.800 able to uh to get that judgment um in the first place and always always go back to the beginning

01:14:20.720 because that's that's where the corruption starts and if people bypass the beginning

01:14:24.720 or forget about it or get complacent they just build on it and you forget well hold on you never

01:14:30.000 had the power to do that in the first place that's where it starts isn't that just the case that we've

01:14:35.200 been saying right uh the reason justin trudeau never implemented um sorry invoke the federal

01:14:41.360 emergency act is because he would have been uh 100 necessary for him to demonstrably prove that's

01:14:48.480 the wording demonstrably prove give evidence of that we were in a pandemic that there that there was a

01:14:55.520 national emergency and as david just confirmed that was according to national uh or i'm sorry natural

01:15:02.000 disasters and a virus is not defined as a natural disaster that's hurricane flood storm and so the

01:15:11.120 un we've mentioned this many times is trying to amend natural disaster to include viruses but currently

01:15:17.920 it is not so the rule of law everything should be compelled to go by the rule of law which means that

01:15:23.760 they had to uh prove that we were in a pandemic no evidence was given he would have had to gone before

01:15:30.560 the legislature there would have had to be public input and debate none of that took place and so

01:15:36.400 every single province implemented a provincial a provincial emergency act which was done and passed

01:15:45.200 unlawfully because they as well did not demonstrably prove that we were in a pandemic and they bypassed the

01:15:51.760 legislature there was no public input and debate as soon as they heard people were showing up they

01:15:56.800 bypassed it and they pet first well here in bc it passed second and third reading and i don't think

01:16:02.480 there was any difference in any other province uh wherein these measures were passed last year

01:16:08.160 a year and a half ago so it all needs to be challenged and this is why we're telling you

01:16:12.480 what i don't want to say we're telling you this is why we're suggesting to you that uh non-compliance is the

01:16:19.280 only answer we have to say no to the unlawfulness by participating in it you are breaking the law

01:16:28.160 by supporting it you are breaking the law by non-compliance you are actually upholding the

01:16:34.720 constitution the charter rights and the rule of law in canada and you are respecting the individual rights

01:16:40.160 of uh the citizens of this nation so please you know consider really carefully the the the words that

01:16:47.760 and the wisdom that we are passing on to you tonight uh get active be part of this uh let me just see

01:16:55.040 it is uh 7 21 right now and uh david how are you doing for a couple of more questions oh i'm i'm fine

01:17:03.360 i'll just address one thing i saw in the chat box before you do if you don't mind somebody mentioned

01:17:08.480 about how do you serve an employer um because they won't release their address and i thought that was a

01:17:14.640 good point um generally follow them home um follow them home you can get a a bailiff or a private

01:17:22.560 investigator or somebody that will do it you can various ways online to find out where they live

01:17:26.960 using phone numbers addresses and so on uh ask people the easiest way is the best but there's a

01:17:32.640 number of ways that that you can find out where they live in order to uh to serve them with documents

01:17:38.240 and if you can't and you want to serve them with a document and they're at home you can hire a bailiff to do

01:17:43.680 it let them find it out and they'll find it yeah and i want to just stress to people there was a

01:17:48.880 one of our parents from the parent group i believe she was in ontario and she ended up there was uh she

01:17:55.440 was serving the individual that was giving the vaccine to children and she ended up getting the

01:18:02.480 address she served a notice of liability what she didn't know it was actually the address was to

01:18:07.360 it was her personal home address and this this uh nurse ended up calling the police as if this woman 1.00

01:18:14.640 was a threat to her and stalking and you know serving a document is not a criminal offense and

01:18:21.840 don't let anybody tell you otherwise so the police did show up at at this parent's home and and confronted

01:18:29.360 her on it and so of course she was quite frightened until she found out the fact that i've done nothing

01:18:35.040 wrong i served a notice of liability and i've done it you know according to the instructions even on the

01:18:42.560 government's website it can go to a personal address for those of you i've seen a couple in the chat as

01:18:47.840 well saying you know everybody's working from home in my office somebody comes and checks the mail there

01:18:53.520 is mail that is delivered so when you uh send it by registered mail i am positive of it that somebody is

01:19:02.000 receiving that mail and then they have an obligation to make sure that it gets to all of the employers

01:19:06.800 or executives and so go ahead it's only about 11 bucks to serve it registered mail and then just keep

01:19:13.680 an eye on it might take an extra you know five days to get delivered but that is a great way to have proof

01:19:19.920 the other thing and david correct me if i'm wrong but you can fax it as well so you can uh say to your

01:19:26.560 employer or you could put a read receipt i guess you could try it by by email as well it's not as

01:19:32.480 recommended but what about what about by fax david um i i wouldn't do it by fax simply because

01:19:39.680 especially in an office you have no idea and no control over where it goes it could get lost it

01:19:44.160 could get thrown on the floor mixed in with other papers go to the wrong person um i'm suggesting at

01:19:49.600 home i'm suggesting if they're if their supervisor is working from home then you know most often a lot

01:19:56.000 of these uh individuals have a fax number just request their fax number if you're communicating

01:20:01.360 you're obviously communicating with your your manager or supervisor we request their fax number and um i

01:20:07.680 would recommend sending it at night the middle of the night nobody could put a stop button on it or pause

01:20:13.600 they could do that um the problem with notices is that the whole purpose of the notice is to bring

01:20:19.200 it to their attention and if you fax it to them and they got their own fax at home there's a higher

01:20:24.880 degree of likelihood that it's going to get brought to their attention um the question is how do you

01:20:30.240 prove it you can say you faxed it and he could come up with a hundred different defenses i was on

01:20:34.560 holidays i did this i did that um so personal services on the originating documents is always the best

01:20:41.840 um if you're going to fax it you can always include a cover letter that says please fax me back

01:20:47.920 confirming it or please email me back confirmation that you got this and as soon as they they do that

01:20:53.440 then that is absolute proof that they got it that way as well yeah so you can try it various different

01:20:58.880 ways you can also in email you can hit a read receipt and you know if it doesn't work we we've had

01:21:04.240 elected officials you know where even those auto responders it shows it's proof that they received

01:21:09.680 the notice of liability it's kind of a beautiful thing uh but uh you know there are different ways

01:21:14.560 of doing it if it doesn't work one way try another way but make sure you get a response and and that's

01:21:19.600 as good as a done deal uh record everything as david said um we're not just talking about uh you know

01:21:25.920 recording voice what we're also recommending is that you have a file ready that you're printing off

01:21:32.320 every bit of information and uh really keeping track of this because if you do decide to take action

01:21:38.640 against them this is all going to bode well for you in a court of law as evidence

01:21:45.120 so can i just ask uh trenzio would you please bring up the uh david's book so that people can get an idea

01:21:54.400 of what they'd be ordering i think we have that in the queue we'll bring that up i also look at this

01:22:00.320 i also have a copy here let me go there we go i've got a copy as well and and there's lots

01:22:07.520 a good read here and i'm going to get myself educated and we just really encourage you that

01:22:14.000 if you feel up to the task order david's book uh you do it by email uh let me just see sheila could

01:22:20.800 you bring that up and uh post it once again in the chat so that people could pick up that information

01:22:28.960 are we having that posted okay we'll get that back up there trenzio were you able to to bring that up

01:22:40.880 there we go

01:22:43.840 david will you describe to us anna annotated tell us what that is annotated generally is um when you do a

01:22:52.800 legal book um you're referring to a whole bunch of supporting materials that back it up so in our

01:22:58.880 case uh in in our book here there's over 130 different case law books authorities um legal

01:23:05.520 treatises that have been written all kinds of supporting material that backs it up so if i'm

01:23:11.520 going to say for example um you have to lean information there'll be case line there to back

01:23:18.000 up the fact that you have to lean information the law in relation to it and so on and the the benefit

01:23:24.400 is that not only am i putting this forth i've got material to back up everything i'm saying

01:23:30.480 um and you'll find it in there every everything along the way that i say in there is backed up by

01:23:35.360 legal proof to back it up and that's the benefit of being annotated awesome well thank you i i needed a

01:23:42.320 definition on that one that's not a word that i'm familiar with and uh so i just want to encourage

01:23:47.840 everybody if you've seen it uh david's email is clear 2012 at pm dot me and uh he's his website is

01:23:59.200 available as well sheila if you want to post that a couple of times then people won't miss it because

01:24:03.760 i know that in this chat thread we're having hundreds of comments in there so it can get lost pretty

01:24:09.200 quickly um i just want to confirm with everyone like i say we're we're doing our absolute best

01:24:17.840 at trying to equip you and facilitate you with very effective resources to take the actions necessary

01:24:25.120 to uh you know defend your rights your job your family the notices of liability i can't say it enough

01:24:32.480 they're having a great effect but also what is having a great effect is our chapters and if you're

01:24:38.560 not already part of a chapter please join one um even if it's there's only one in your province and

01:24:44.640 it's hundreds of miles away just join that chapter be part of a community um i'm very concerned about

01:24:50.240 people right now who are losing their jobs uh there's a great deal of heightened depression

01:24:56.400 and anxiety and that's understandable and we feel that it's vital that you be part of a community and

01:25:01.760 action for canada wants to provide you that kind of support and our chapter leaders are aware of this

01:25:08.560 we have chapter leader meetings twice on mondays for the leaders at 11 a.m bc time and 4 p.m this is

01:25:16.000 happening with leaders across the nation our chapter page if you want to just scroll down a little bit

01:25:22.720 you'll see down below you can join a chapter you can register as a as a volunteer as a chapter leader

01:25:29.600 these are uh just some of the chapters that we have available but it isn't all of them uh we go

01:25:37.520 through a process that once somebody is approved to be a chapter leader our tech person then gets busy

01:25:43.200 and creates an email and so there's a little bit of a lag because of the amount of work on getting them

01:25:48.400 posted so there will be many many more chapters posted if you feel uh compelled to be a chapter leader

01:25:56.400 then please fill out the uh registration form and our uh great national coordinator ron will get a

01:26:03.600 hold of you he'll vet you he'll help you to understand you know what it is that it entails

01:26:09.680 to be a chapter leader and then we need probably about three we're looking for a president vice president 0.89

01:26:14.880 and a treasurer and then we get a chapter going and they start reaching out to their community and

01:26:20.000 then within that community we have uh teams that we will have for businesses for parents for nurses

01:26:26.880 for unionized workers for uh church community and those are the boots on the ground and as we've

01:26:33.680 mentioned before we want to be involved in every election at every level of government right now i

01:26:39.840 believe that as we put pressure on school trustees and mayors and city councils uh that they're going to

01:26:46.160 start resigning we need to be prepared and ready to support people to to um run in as as candidates

01:26:53.360 in those roles and they need a lot of support and so there's amazing reasons why we've got the chapters

01:27:00.320 going and then i as well want to just encourage you if you know anybody who is a unionized uh worker right now

01:27:08.320 we want them part of our unionized workers unite group we've got amazing resources to facilitate them

01:27:16.560 and embolden them to take these next steps against their employers and against the unions you are on

01:27:22.800 the side of right you are a hundred percent uh correct that you have the rule of law and the constitution

01:27:31.520 behind you and you need to hear that i think over and over again right now but you also need to have

01:27:37.280 the ability to have the resources in your hand to take those next steps if there are any critical

01:27:43.440 suggestions that you have of resources that uh that would really benefit a large group of the population

01:27:52.160 please try to get that message to us i know a lot of people were asking as well about the care homes

01:27:57.840 you're going to a care home and you're not able to go in and see your loved one and that would be

01:28:03.440 i think the best one we have right now is the notice of liability that is directed at business

01:28:12.000 owners who are demanding vax passes a care home is a business and they do not have the right to do

01:28:20.160 that i'm just grabbing the link as i was speaking so excuse me for being a smidgy distracted

01:28:25.360 and i'm going to pop that in there fight for our elderly please and don't take no for an answer

01:28:33.520 now another thing that i want you to know is we also have created a medical directive card and this

01:28:40.960 is a card that um if you were to be in a serious car accident for instance and you could you end up in

01:28:47.360 emergency i know for myself i was beginning to panic a bit thinking how you know what if i can't speak for

01:28:53.120 myself i have no family member there and what if i get the jab i i'm hearing about people who have

01:28:58.560 been put in a position where they ended up having surgery and they woke up from their surgery and a

01:29:04.080 nurse came in and said oh are you ready for your shot and they were completely thinking it was pain

01:29:08.400 medication and they were given the jab and once they woke up again they had a vax card saying they'd

01:29:15.040 been vaccinated and we can't allow this to happen and so this card is a non-consent and it

01:29:22.800 makes it very clear what your wishes are and you know i believe that anybody that's going to receive

01:29:30.400 this card as far as a medical personnel is concerned it is going to cause them to think twice it is a

01:29:37.840 warning to them so on the front of the card it says in case of emergency i tanya ga do not consent to

01:29:46.160 sorry any covid 19 vaccination testing ventilator or remdem severe which is ventilators and remdem severe

01:29:53.760 is what they're pushing in canada and so those are a death wish uh once somebody gets you on which

01:29:58.720 is my right it is an indictable offense to violate my right to refuse these treatments or to withhold

01:30:04.160 any medical care because of it if i need treatment for covid 19 i insist that the treating physician

01:30:10.080 use effective alternatives such as antivirals vitamin c and d3 quercetin zinc hcq ivermectin

01:30:16.800 and inhalers and then we've got math plus which is the protocol they're using with the doctors down

01:30:22.000 in the united states and i know people who have been treated with this new pneumonia in in canada and

01:30:28.000 they are recovering extremely quickly unfortunately the hospitals aren't providing this treatment so

01:30:33.680 people are having to sneak it in so get yourself ivermectin take it as a preventative load up on vitamin

01:30:39.840 d and vitamin c and and be ready so i'm just going to grab this card as well i'll slip it in here

01:30:50.880 and what you would do is you would tape that to your care card or whatever id you have in your wallet

01:30:56.560 that if you were an emergency they would end up uh you know taking a look at that we say put a piece

01:31:01.280 of tape on it because then it proves that they if they've taken the tape off that they did

01:31:06.080 uh actually view it so you would have some recourse if anything happens anyways uh those are my updates

01:31:13.840 we would request that if you could donate five dollars to action for canada for this resource

01:31:19.120 if you could become a monthly donor that would really help us carry the load uh we want to stay

01:31:24.160 up and running i need to pay our tech person full time for this and we'd really appreciate uh you know all

01:31:30.160 of our resources everything is for free because we know there are many people who are in a hard place

01:31:35.280 right now financially and we just want to make sure these resources are in your hand but if you can

01:31:40.560 donate to action for canada then we would request and then as well david i'm going to bring you back on

01:31:47.280 and uh it looks like my battery is going to die on my computer as well so this is probably a good time

01:31:53.440 to end this david we're so grateful to you david spent years uh preparing this book for you and and

01:32:02.720 so that we would ask that you would order that book uh use it as a resource maybe if you're in a chapter

01:32:08.800 order it for your chapter start educating yourself try to bring in lawyers who can assist people we can do

01:32:14.560 so much through the chapters we can do so much as a community supporting one another help that single

01:32:20.640 mom in your community go hug a grandma and really take care of one another so david do you have any

01:32:27.200 closing words uh just thank you very much for having me on and um you know on our email we're

01:32:32.640 open to questions as well at any time and the only thing i saw here is somebody was asking about your

01:32:39.120 card if it's available in every province in canada there were several comments about that i thought you

01:32:43.280 might want to address that too before you go but um yeah i'm just grateful to be on and um thank you

01:32:48.400 thank you very much thank you david well we're gonna have david on again and uh we love having

01:32:53.680 this time of casual chat with you and hope that this has been very informative every resource we make

01:33:00.720 we make sure that it's um um essential and effective in every single province and territory

01:33:06.880 so yes these medical cards it is according to um every health act uh provincially federally i try to put

01:33:15.040 any resource we make uh based on the constitution charter rights and the criminal code because it's

01:33:20.640 all federal instead of going uh meticulously by any provincial law which can vary province by province

01:33:28.240 so if we go federally we're pretty safe that we can launch it across canada and we're all covered

01:33:33.680 all of us are covered by the constitution the charter of rights and the rule of law applies to each of us

01:33:39.040 all equally and let's just remember that all right my friends thank you so much for joining us tonight

01:33:45.200 we're going to have dr hoff on next week so uh please join us for that he's a he's a brave doctor

01:33:51.600 who has been on the front lines and speaking out and exposing the corruption as well all right thank you god

01:33:57.520 bless you all

01:34:27.520 so

01:34:51.120 you

`witch hunt`	Both words, anywhere in the episode.
`"witch hunt"`	The exact phrase.
`witch OR hunt`	Either word.
`"alpha male" -"high value"`	The first phrase, but not the second.
`(feminist OR feminism) AND (marriage OR divorce)`	Parentheses group alternatives.
`"decline civilization"~5`	Both words within 5 words of each other.

`misogyn*`	Any word starting with "misogyn": misogyny, misogynist, misogynistic…
`feminizm~1`	Words one letter off: catches typos and transcription errors.

`person:"Andrew Tate"`	Episodes where they host, guest, or are mentioned.
`host:"Glenn Beck"`	Episodes they host.
`guest:"Jordan Peterson"`	Episodes they appear on as a guest.
`mentioned:"Andrew Tate" -host:"Andrew Tate"`	Talked about on other people's shows.
`show:"Bannon's War Room"`	Episodes from one show.

`topics:abortion`	Episodes tagged with a topic (see the Topics page).
`summary:"Andrew Tate"`	Words in the episode summary. Summaries are machine-written and can be wrong.

`"great replacement" AND episode_date:[NOW-1YEAR TO NOW]`	From the past 12 months.
`lockdown AND episode_date:[2020-01-01T00:00:00Z TO 2020-12-31T23:59:59Z]`	From one year. Dates need the full time, as shown.
`"high value" AND misogyny_count:[100 TO *]`	Episodes with 100 or more sentences flagged as misogynistic. Also: hate_speech_count, toxicity_count, word_count.

Action4Canada - October 29, 2021

A4C EMPOWER HOUR with Tanya Gaw & David Lindsay Oct-27-2021

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript