Action4Canada - Bio-Weapon： Mass Genocide, 17 Million Deaths With Tanya Gaw & Dr. Denis Rancourt

00:00:00.000 they vaccinate an elderly group in a given country very quickly with a new booster,

00:00:04.580 well, immediately there is an immediate peak in excess all-cause mortality that surges up

00:00:11.480 right in response to that booster rollout. And this is seen quite clearly everywhere that you

00:00:17.700 have these boosters being injected into elderly people. And so we saw this in Australia, we saw it

00:00:25.160 in Israel, we saw it in Chile, we saw it in Peru, everywhere where you had good data where you

00:00:30.720 could actually see this, it came out very clearly. And so that allowed us to quantify how deadly is

00:00:39.960 an injection by age, depending on your age. And we were the first to do this. And we showed that

00:00:47.920 the toxicity of the vaccine increases exponentially with your age. So meaning that for every four or

00:00:57.620 five years of age, additional age, your risk of dying per injection doubles every four or five years.

00:01:06.260 So it shoots up exponentially like that. So by the time you get into the 90 plus age group,

00:01:13.380 you're looking at one death per 20 injections. So that it's a 5% risk. And so it's massive.

00:01:22.900 And what this showed was that the policy to prioritize the elderly for injection is criminally negligent.

00:01:34.280 We are so honored to have Denny Rancourt joining us this evening. Denny has Bachelor of Science,

00:01:43.700 Master's of Science and PhD degrees in physics. And he has held postdoctoral research positions

00:01:49.660 at prestigious institutions in France and the Netherlands. He was a physics professor and lead

00:01:56.420 scientist at the University of Ottawa for 23 years, where he attained the highest academic

00:02:02.880 rank of tenured full professor. He is currently a co-director of Correlation Research in the Public

00:02:10.100 Interest, which is a registered nonprofit organization that conducts independent science,

00:02:16.460 scientific research on topics of public interest. He's a sought after speaker and media commentator,

00:02:23.420 and his medical, political and social theory articles and interviews are published in many

00:02:29.720 respected venues. Will you all please help me welcome Denny Rancourt to the Empower Hour this

00:02:35.260 evening? Denny, welcome to the Empower Hour this evening. Denny, welcome. We're so pleased to have

00:02:40.860 you on the show. Hello, I'm happy to be here with you. Thanks for inviting me. And I'm looking forward to

00:02:48.120 telling you all about my research and so on. Yeah, thank you, Denny. It's so good to see you.

00:02:53.840 That's been a while. We were on some meetings with Ted Kuntz some years ago and with Rocco. And I don't

00:03:00.880 think I've seen you personally since then, although we've been in contact. But I am just so grateful for

00:03:07.360 the information that you have made public, for the research that you're doing. And really, what I'd like to do

00:03:14.280 right now is hand the floor over to you and you tell us more about that. Oh, my. Okay. Well, as soon as

00:03:22.780 the COVID pandemic was declared by the World Health Organization back in March of 2020, and it was all

00:03:31.740 over the media, I thought to myself, is this real? I mean, it sounds like there should be people lying

00:03:38.920 dead in the street, and I don't see any. So the first thing I did was to go and look at actual

00:03:44.360 mortality data. So not just what the MDs and the hospitals are telling us, but the government has a

00:03:51.940 legal obligation to register all actual deaths, irrespective of cause. So this is so-called

00:03:58.520 all-cause mortality, just counting deaths. And so that's the kind of data I went to because you can't

00:04:05.180 fudge it. And it's not, you know, polluted with bias in relation to what the cause was.

00:04:13.260 And so I looked at that data, and I immediately saw that there was nothing happening in any of the

00:04:18.740 countries that had data and that was putting out data quickly. There was virtually no anomaly,

00:04:23.820 except a very unusual sharp peak in some hotspots, which was all synchronous with the announcement of

00:04:34.240 the pandemic. So it looked like deaths were a response to a political announcement, not anything

00:04:40.420 else. And so I wrote a first paper that was published way back on the 2nd of June 2020, in which

00:04:48.180 I explained that the mortality statistics were incompatible with the idea of a spreading disease

00:04:55.080 or pandemic. It didn't add up, and it disproved that this could be the cause of any excess deaths.

00:05:02.200 And so that paper was put out there, and then we just kept working on it. I started collaborating

00:05:09.160 with more people. And between that first paper and the present, we've written more than 30 papers

00:05:16.140 about COVID-related matters, especially all-cause mortality. And so by looking at this kind of data

00:05:22.500 very carefully, as a function of time by week or by month, and by age group and by country or by state

00:05:30.720 in the United States or province in Canada, we just examined all the data that is out there. And we

00:05:37.600 were able to, as much as you can prove something in science, we were able to prove that this couldn't

00:05:43.200 possibly be understood or interpreted as being due to a viral respiratory disease. There is no way. It was

00:05:51.760 incompatible with that. So it was contrary to it. Because if you believe the narrative of this spreading

00:05:58.480 disease, it's impossible that the mortality would refuse to cross borders between countries,

00:06:04.400 for example. So there are many countries where there's absolutely no excess mortality that is

00:06:09.880 neighboring with a large land border with another country that has significant excess mortality, but

00:06:16.240 excess mortality that is due to how the vulnerable citizens are being treated in those jurisdictions.

00:06:23.440 So we started seeing this, we started seeing that their story doesn't make sense. And the only way to

00:06:29.440 understand all of this data is to say, one, this is not compatible with the new pathogen that all of a sudden

00:06:36.400 came onto the planet, and that is spreading. We disprove that. Two, every time we see excess mortality,

00:06:44.240 it's due to something that was done to the population, especially vulnerable groups.

00:06:50.560 So at the very first, at the beginning, there were these large peaks and hot spots that were New York

00:06:56.000 City, Paris, some large hospitals in Paris, Northern Italy, Madrid, even Copenhagen. And these were due to

00:07:05.920 very aggressive hospital treatments. Generally, one of the big causes was novel treatments for anyone who

00:07:13.680 appeared to maybe have a respiratory condition, was immediately diagnosed as possibly being

00:07:20.480 affected by this new disease, and therefore was treated too aggressively with novel treatments that had

00:07:26.640 not been sufficiently validated or tested. And they really killed a lot of people that way. So

00:07:34.640 every time we saw a bump, a peak,

00:07:38.400 it was due to what was being done, it could be the lockdowns of care homes, it could be the lockdowns of

00:07:43.920 people where mentally disabled are institutionalized, it could be all kinds of things like that. But

00:07:50.080 those were the causes of the deaths. So no, nobody, virtually no young people were dying in this period.

00:07:58.240 There was excess death of young groups, but it's not as large as what was happening to truly vulnerable

00:08:05.600 and elderly people. So that's how we came to understand what was going on. And for example,

00:08:11.600 in the United States, when we studied state by state, we saw that the excess death in the period of COVID

00:08:19.040 correlated exactly, perfectly with poverty in the state. So the more poverty you had, the more excess

00:08:28.880 deaths you had, it was clear. And it wasn't just a correlation, it's what we call a proportionality.

00:08:36.240 So in other words, in a state that had no poverty, you would have had no excess deaths.

00:08:41.280 So this is not, you know, a virus doesn't choose to kill only poor people. If it's, if it's a new

00:08:48.000 virus, supposedly, that you have no immune protection against, it doesn't select to kill only disabled

00:08:56.000 people, elderly people, vulnerable people, it doesn't do that. And poor people, and people who

00:09:03.360 are obese, these are the people who mostly died in the places where there was a lot of excess death,

00:09:09.440 such as in the United States. And then when you look at Canada, the death rate, or the death rate,

00:09:16.800 the excess mortality that occurred in Canada during the same period was virtually nothing. So there's

00:09:23.840 this huge thousands of kilometers of land border, two of the biggest exchange partners in the world,

00:09:29.520 and the supposed virulent pathogen refused to cross the border into Canada. So it's just made

00:09:36.160 no sense whatsoever. So at one point in our research, we drew a map of Europe, and we showed in color

00:09:42.080 different intensities of excess death. And there were countries that had, that were white on the map,

00:09:47.280 that had no excess deaths, and other countries right beside them that had large amounts of excess deaths,

00:09:52.720 where they were doing certain things that were not being done in the countries that didn't have any.

00:09:56.640 So for example, at the beginning of the pandemic, Germany did not use those aggressive protocols

00:10:01.840 in hospitals and had no excess death at the beginning of the pandemic whatsoever. So this is

00:10:08.480 how we've come to understand it. And I've come to a firm conclusion that there was no particularly

00:10:14.160 virulent pathogen, and that all the excess deaths were due to response, and also lack of treatment,

00:10:22.000 because they refused to prescribe antibiotics in the Western world. Antibiotic prescriptions went down

00:10:27.680 by 50% across the Western world, at the same time that because of all the stress and everything,

00:10:34.080 people were getting bacterial pneumonia. And bacterial pneumonia needs to be treated by antibiotics,

00:10:39.840 and they were not prescribing them. So there was a huge epidemic of bacterial pneumonia in the United

00:10:45.680 States that correlated with these poor people who always get more bacterial pneumonia, getting it

00:10:51.680 again, and not being treated for it. So these are the kinds of things that were happening. So therefore,

00:10:59.680 the lockdowns, especially of institutions, actually locking people down, and preventing human contact,

00:11:07.520 and isolating them, and when you're mentally disabled, or very elderly, and you need that contact,

00:11:16.560 and the very aggressive treatments, and then the refusing of treatment in the community of a lot

00:11:21.840 of people who are getting bacterial infections. So that combination of things caused all of the deaths

00:11:28.240 until the vaccines rolled out. And then when the vaccines rolled out, they, the vaccines,

00:11:35.200 the injections contributed significantly to additional deaths on top of that, okay? So you have to

00:11:42.160 understand that there are many, many countries in the world, and we showed this in great detail with

00:11:47.440 many graphs and lots of examples. There are many, many countries in the world that had absolutely no

00:11:54.000 detectable excess mortality when they declared the pandemic, and for the first year of the pandemic,

00:12:00.080 until they rolled out the vaccines. And then there was a surge of mortality, and we entered a new regime

00:12:08.800 of high excess mortality that accompanied these vaccination campaigns. So that should tell you

00:12:15.680 something that there are many jurisdictions that did not, were not overly aggressive, or didn't have as

00:12:22.480 many very fragile people that could be killed by these aggressive measures, had no excess mortality,

00:12:28.560 until the vaccine was rolled out. And the first example that we saw of that, that really convinced

00:12:33.920 us that the vaccines were in fact deadly, is India. So the first country that I wrote about in detail

00:12:42.320 was India, because India is a case where there was, is exactly a case like that. You cannot detect excess

00:12:49.680 mortality in India until the vaccines were rolled out. And that's interesting because in India,

00:12:54.880 the vaccines were rolled out about three months later than most other places. And there was still

00:13:00.240 no excess mortality. But then when they rolled out the vaccine, they killed 3.7 million people in India.

00:13:07.040 That's the excess mortality directly associated with the rollouts of the vaccines. They were very

00:13:12.960 aggressive with the vaccines. The Prime Minister of India called it a vaccine festival. He said,

00:13:19.040 we're going to vaccinate everyone. The government had a list of 12 comorbidities, and they went after

00:13:24.240 those people that had these comorbidities to vaccinate them. And they said, everyone needs to

00:13:29.840 participate in all the villages everywhere, go out and get the people who don't want to be vaccinated,

00:13:34.400 and make sure they get vaccinated. And there are many videos online of them going into places and

00:13:39.920 people screaming and not wanting to be vaccinated, and they hold them down and they vaccinate them

00:13:43.920 against their will. So India was very aggressive. And you can quantify 3.7 million deaths directly

00:13:52.000 due to this vaccine in India. So that was the the case study that really convinced me that this was a

00:13:58.720 real problem. And so then we went and looked at all the data we could where we had good data. And we

00:14:05.120 and we kept seeing this repeatedly. What we saw was even in Western countries, we saw that there was

00:14:12.000 a death rate or an attack rate from the vaccine that was approximately 0.05% or 0.1% in that range,

00:14:23.280 meaning that one in 2000, all the way to one in 1000, one in 800 injections will cause a death.

00:14:32.560 All ages combined. Okay, so it was definitely causing 1000. It's 1000 times more deadly than what the CDC

00:14:43.040 will admit. Okay, it's definitely causing this death. We see this everywhere that we look. And

00:14:51.840 more also equally importantly, is that there are some countries that have such good data that you can

00:14:57.680 look at what happened by age group. So you can look at when they when they target the elderly,

00:15:05.280 and they roll out a booster, let's say, well, as soon as you roll out that booster very quickly,

00:15:11.040 they vaccinated an elderly group in a given country very quickly with a new booster. Well,

00:15:15.840 immediately, there is an immediate peak in all in excess all-cause mortality that surges

00:15:22.240 up right in response to that booster rollout. And this is seen quite clearly everywhere that you have

00:15:29.040 these boosters being injected into elderly people. And so we saw this in Australia, we saw it in in

00:15:36.800 Israel, we saw it in Chile, we saw it in Peru, everywhere where you had good data where you could

00:15:41.840 actually see this, it came out very clearly. And so that allowed us to quantify how deadly is an injection

00:15:52.480 by age, depending on your age. And we were the first to do this. And we showed that the toxicity of

00:16:00.080 the vaccine increases exponentially with your age. So meaning that for every four or five years of age,

00:16:10.960 additional age, your risk of dying per injection doubles every four or five years. So it shoots up

00:16:18.640 exponentially like that. So by the time you get into the 90 plus age group, you're looking at one

00:16:26.640 death per 20 injections. So that it's a 5% risk. And so it's massive. And what this showed was that

00:16:36.640 the policy to prioritize the elderly for injection is criminally negligent. They did not have the data

00:16:47.920 to develop that policy. They did not look at the fragile groups that are elderly, and their comorbidities,

00:16:56.560 and their life conditions to see if if you recommend this on all the elderly, how many people will it kill,

00:17:04.960 compared to not, you know, younger people of different age groups, they didn't do an analysis,

00:17:12.080 a risk analysis by age group, including the conditions that people really have at those ages.

00:17:19.520 And therefore, when you rolled it out in the entire population, the kind of study that we do,

00:17:25.680 we can see what actually happened. And what actually happened was something they should have foreseen,

00:17:31.360 something they should have tested before they actually did it. And this means that the policy

00:17:36.720 of injecting elderly in this way was wrong, dead wrong. And that's something that's a huge lesson

00:17:44.160 that vaccination of the elderly, at least in this case, was tremendously more dangerous than

00:17:51.440 vaccinating anybody else. Now, that doesn't mean that it wasn't dangerous to vaccinate children,

00:17:56.000 teenagers, young adults, and so on. I mean, the myocarditis conditions that develop are very real,

00:18:03.520 and they're very dangerous. And the vulnerability of the heart of everyone who gets this thing is very

00:18:10.320 real. But in terms of numbers of death, which is what we look at, the main factor is age.

00:18:18.800 As I said, it goes exponentially with age. So we have discovered and quantified all of these things

00:18:25.200 in the last three or more years. And we've, as I said, we've written more than 30 reports on this.

00:18:31.520 I'll be talking at an international conference in Bucharest, Romania this month, and in about a week

00:18:37.600 from now, we'll be talking in the parliament building. And there's many members of parliament

00:18:42.720 who have invited us. That'll be an interesting conference. I'll get to see a lot of these people

00:18:48.720 in person that I've been working with, even my collaborators who live in different countries

00:18:52.720 are going to show up there. But we're trying to make politicians and the public aware that the actual

00:19:01.680 fatal risk of these vaccines is a thousand times greater than governments are willing to admit.

00:19:08.080 So that's, that's been the nature of our work.

00:19:12.000 Thank you, Denny, for going over that. I was making notes as you were speaking, because

00:19:17.920 you know, this is such an incredible, incredibly important show to have tonight. A lot of people

00:19:24.720 that have been given a lot of information over the years, and it's been called, you know,

00:19:29.120 conspiracy theories and the rest of it. But you've come up with a tangible report doing the research

00:19:35.600 by country. One of the things that I've been saying lately, though, you know, a lot of people will

00:19:41.040 refer to it as an experimental vaccine, but I don't think it was experimental at all. I really do believe

00:19:48.240 that this was, you know, a targeted offense against citizens that potentially they knew that it was going

00:19:55.440 to be most harmful to the elderly and to the people with compromised immune systems and disabilities

00:20:01.600 and whatnot. How do you feel about that?

00:20:05.520 Well, there's no doubt that the main delivery technology is these cationic lipid nanoparticles.

00:20:15.600 And there is no doubt that the cationic lipids themselves are extremely toxic, okay? There's

00:20:22.560 animal studies that have demonstrated this amply. And that in itself, irrespective of what you might

00:20:28.960 put in those nanoparticles, irrespective of what you might do in order to create what you might put

00:20:33.840 into those nanoparticles, the nanoparticles themselves, these cationic lipids will damage cells

00:20:39.600 and are very toxic. And if in some individuals, they will be spread around the body. So that's the

00:20:49.040 thing. In all of this kind of work, you very quickly realize that the response is very, very different

00:20:59.280 from individual to individual. And that's why you'll get a lot of deaths, but you'll also have a lot of

00:21:07.440 people who will be multiply vaccinated and they claim that they haven't suffered any health

00:21:13.040 consequences, okay? And that's normal because toxicity is like that. When we wrote our latest

00:21:20.960 paper, we explained that you have to understand the vaccine as a toxic substance that was injected

00:21:26.320 into your body. So the nature of toxicity, we know a lot about toxins and being poisoned and overdoses and

00:21:34.480 so on. And the fact is, the response, the risk is very different from person to person.

00:21:41.040 And we know that it increases with age. We know that from toxicity studies. So this should have been

00:21:48.160 foreseen. We knew that the cationic lipids were toxic. We know how toxicity works and that it can be

00:21:53.920 very different. And we went ahead and did it without a proper testing and so on. So that's how I would see

00:22:01.120 that. Now, but you asked a more, I guess, a more political question about motivation and so on.

00:22:07.920 And my view of that is that there is no doubt that the vaccine rollouts themselves, the vaccination

00:22:16.400 campaign, which was global, was a military operation and was decided and executed. And there was no

00:22:28.880 government that was going to get in the way of that. It was just done. And I think the leading

00:22:34.720 nation, if you like, that really led this was the USA. Now, Russia and China did follow with their own

00:22:42.960 vaccines. But the way I understand that, and I've looked into the chronology and everything, is that

00:22:49.120 they saw that the US was developing the capacity to inject whatever they want into everybody's arms.

00:22:57.520 And they were not going to be in this dangerous world without that developing that capacity for

00:23:02.880 themselves. So they needed to see if they could coerce their own citizens to receive these vaccines

00:23:09.440 and so on. Because I think the weapon is the is the fact that you can inject what you want in people's

00:23:15.520 arms, everybody's, in a military way, very quickly, with under the pretext that it's for your health,

00:23:23.520 and it's to protect you against this dangerous pathogen. So they have developed that from the

00:23:29.440 from the propaganda side, from government cooperation, from all the institutions cooperating,

00:23:35.200 all the scientists saying the right things, and everybody being convinced. And so they're able to

00:23:41.040 actually roll out these dangerous injections. And the thing that but the thing that happened is that,

00:23:48.160 and I don't know if they foresaw this or not. But the as you get into the more advanced boosters,

00:23:54.320 it actually becomes more and more toxic. That's one of the results of our study. So I think it's

00:24:01.360 understandable that people would start refusing the boosters and more injections more and more,

00:24:06.480 because they become more aware that more people suffer consequences, especially among the elderly.

00:24:12.880 So it is natural that if you're injecting several times someone with a poison, that there's going to

00:24:22.480 be more and more risk every time you do it. Because if your body hasn't repaired the damage from the first

00:24:28.000 injection, then you're just adding more damage onto that. And so it becomes more dangerous as you,

00:24:32.960 as you put more in that's just, that's just general toxicity, without getting into the details of how

00:24:39.120 this vaccine was designed, you see. And I think also, in their minds and their thinking, they have this

00:24:47.680 dream that they can design genetically designed something that will achieve the result that they want.

00:24:54.080 And, and then they want to be able to deliver that into your body whenever they want.

00:24:59.600 As a scientist, I don't believe that that's easy to do. And I don't think they've achieved it. But this

00:25:04.960 was a test run. And this was the part that they did achieve was to actually get it, get the vaccination

00:25:12.160 campaigns working, injecting everybody, irrespective of the risk, irrespective of the dangers,

00:25:17.520 they actually made it work. But I personally don't believe that they can genetically modify us to be

00:25:24.880 susceptible to an environmental toxin or whatever, you know, I don't, I don't go that far in my

00:25:32.240 understanding of what's going on. But irrespective of how far you want to go, it was very wrong,

00:25:40.160 a huge violation of our bodies, of our civil rights, of our political rights. It was massive.

00:25:47.760 And this is definitely a, there is no doubt now scientifically that these vaccines can cause

00:25:53.440 death. There are a multitude of autopsy studies, they're coming out every week, that show organ

00:26:01.440 damage on virtually every vital organ in your body, when people die soon after the vaccine.

00:26:08.960 And they do molecular characterization of the tissue under the microscope, and you can see that it

00:26:13.840 was really caused by the vaccine. So this is this is proven from an autopsy perspective. But we have

00:26:20.960 proven it from a mortality statistics perspective. So we're able to quantify the impact at the population

00:26:27.520 level. And others have proven the mechanism in terms of your organs, and so on. So it's,

00:26:34.240 it's a very dangerous product. Yes. Yeah, it is. And also, you know, the other thing, Tanya, is,

00:26:41.200 in all of our studies, we could not find a single example in any country or state or province,

00:26:47.920 where the vaccine appeared to reduce mortality.

00:26:53.440 Well, that's exactly it, right. And so that's why, you know, I feel very strongly, and I believe probably

00:26:59.120 everybody, you know, watching this program would agree that this was a somebody has said in the in

00:27:04.800 in the chat, they're a military operation, but it was it was partnered with a psychological military

00:27:11.280 style warfare, right, conditioning everybody first with fear, and so that they'd be lining up to take

00:27:18.720 the tests and then the jab and doing what was right. Emotionally, they were manipulating people do what's

00:27:25.760 best for grandma, your kids are toxic, don't let them go near grandma, you got to get get them the

00:27:30.320 shot. I mean, it just came in, it unfolded so strategically. But when you're also talking,

00:27:36.720 you know, about the doses and the toxicity increasing, the more that people get the boosters,

00:27:42.800 what I feel and I said from the very onset when they were just getting the injections going when

00:27:51.040 they were giving the jab, is that I believe that they had a placebo group, a group that was diluted,

00:27:58.880 and then the real strength, because if they had given everybody the, you know, the intended jab,

00:28:06.240 with all the toxicities in it at once, there would have been people dropping like flies.

00:28:12.080 And so you've got somebody, you know, who had blood clots, you've got somebody who had a heart

00:28:16.320 attack. Oh, well, nobody's going to think about that. That's just, you know, an underlying problem

00:28:20.480 that they had. And then you've got the Denmark report that came out some months ago that confirmed

00:28:27.040 that 4.2% of the batches were responsible for 71% of the adverse events. So it kind of goes in line,

00:28:34.800 you know, with supporting this strongly held theory.

00:28:38.080 Yes, we, well, I was critical of that study, I wrote to the authors, and I was also publicly

00:28:45.120 critical of that study. And the reason I was critical of the study is that you have to be

00:28:50.000 very careful. And they didn't, they forgot a factor that's very important, which is,

00:28:55.600 some of these batches were primarily given to more elderly people. And so our work shows that you're

00:29:01.280 going to kill elderly people exponentially more. So they didn't take age into consideration. And we

00:29:08.320 showed that when you do take age into consideration, there's no evidence statistically that there were

00:29:14.480 bad batches, or placebos. Okay, so I'm just putting it out there, I know that a lot of people have

00:29:22.160 talked about these bad batches, and the placebo effect, and so on. But we have looked at it more

00:29:28.560 than once on the basis of the virus data, and on the basis of that new paper. And our own conclusion,

00:29:34.400 I don't want to get into an argument, but our own conclusion is that there, sure, there are always

00:29:39.840 impurities when you manufacture something. And, but we don't, and there could have been very locally

00:29:46.640 bad batches that went bad because of transportation, and so on. Although I don't know of any good studies

00:29:53.360 of such cases. But overall, when you look at the overall, either the VARS data, the mortality data,

00:30:00.640 or how this study was done, we are our research group does not believe that there are bad batches

00:30:07.600 or placebo. But that doesn't mean that this wasn't a military rollout. And it doesn't mean that they

00:30:13.800 shouldn't have known that it was a toxic vaccine. And it doesn't, you know what I mean? It's just that

00:30:19.200 one has to be very careful, because the people who have been talking about bad batches from the

00:30:25.440 beginning, well, first, they made some mistakes about not understanding that there were typos in the

00:30:30.600 batch numbers. And therefore, there were very few batches that were causing death, but they were

00:30:36.120 actually typo batches. And then after that, they didn't take fully into account that the age factor.

00:30:43.000 So when we when we looked at toxicity by batch by age, we saw that it was exponential, just like it

00:30:49.880 should be. So I would take that with a grain of salt, you asked me the question, so I'm answering it,

00:30:56.040 but I'm not aligned with those ideas. Let's put it that way.

00:31:01.320 Okay. I want to ask you, recently, there was a report that came out that Health Canada has confirmed

00:31:08.040 the presence of DNA contamination in the Pfizer jabs, and that Pfizer had had what they would call referred

00:31:16.920 to as approved vaccines. And then yet they ended up using a different, I think it was referred to as

00:31:24.440 SV40. I'm not quite sure what that was, you know, I guess the makeup of to the delivery of the jab,

00:31:34.680 and that that was causing harms as well. So what do you know about that?

00:31:38.760 Well, there's no doubt that there that the vaccine that the content of these nanoparticles was not

00:31:46.920 their cartoon vision of what it should be. There's no doubt about that, that, you know,

00:31:50.840 that it was not the pure mRNA that they designed to go in there. There's no doubt there was all kinds

00:31:56.840 of manufacturing variability, let's say. But when we look at our studies across the world, you see

00:32:04.120 many, many countries use typically three or four or five or seven different types of vaccines. But overall,

00:32:12.200 country to country, manufacturer to manufacturer, we don't see big differences. Well, I mean,

00:32:17.800 there are differences in very careful studies in bars, for example, you can show that the Johnson

00:32:22.520 Johnson dose, which was a heavier dose, is more toxic than the other ones, you can show that.

00:32:28.440 So there are specific things you can show. But when we look at all the data across all countries,

00:32:33.720 on the basis of mortality, basically, the vaccines scale at about the same rate, no matter who the

00:32:39.400 manufacturer is. And it's always exponential with age. And it's always about the same rate of death. So

00:32:45.480 the my sense is from all of this, that the variability of your vulnerability to the vaccine,

00:32:53.320 your personal individual vulnerability, that the variability in that is greater than any effect

00:33:00.440 of variability in manufacturing. You see what I mean? So how old you are matters way more. And what your

00:33:08.280 co your co your co morbidities are matters way more, what your own health conditions are matters way

00:33:14.920 more than precisely what you're getting put into your body. That's my conclusion from looking at all of

00:33:21.720 this, you know, just trying to put it in a nutshell. Yeah, yeah, it's still very shocking diabolical.

00:33:29.000 I believe, I believe as well, you know, that they that well, there's been so public about it,

00:33:34.680 right? Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab and wanting to reduce the world population. And it's like,

00:33:41.080 how can they be so blatantly bold about, you know, stating this, and they're still walking around

00:33:46.280 Freeman. Now, with your report, you mentioned,

00:33:49.640 Tanya, let me wait, Tanya, let me respond to that. First, okay, if you don't mind.

00:33:57.080 These crazy globalists, these elite nutcases, they love to develop theories of the world and

00:34:05.000 what would be the ideal world for us and what would make it ideal for us. And within that discussion,

00:34:11.400 they love to talk about reducing the world population, they love to imagine how that could

00:34:16.200 be done covertly or directly, and that everyone would benefit. And that's been around for a long

00:34:22.280 time. Just like any political theory about what would be the ideal way to live, but it's always

00:34:28.200 to the advantage of the person making the theory that they've always done that. But this vaccine

00:34:36.120 from our study is not intended to reduce the population because it didn't have that big an impact

00:34:45.000 on the population. So, so what we calculated was up till now that this massive vaccination campaign

00:34:53.160 killed 17 million people around the world. Now that's 0.2% of the world population.

00:35:02.200 Okay. So one in about 470 people that were living have died in the last three years directly from the

00:35:10.280 vaccine. So you're not reducing the population. That's a lot. That's a lot.

00:35:15.960 Well, you know, I got to stop for a minute. It's because it's criminal and it's a lot, but they didn't

00:35:25.400 target a particular country. They didn't target their enemies. They didn't target a certain,

00:35:32.360 well, did they target the poor or did the poor, the poor don't die more from the vaccine. They die

00:35:39.320 more from the COVID imposed conditions and how they treated them and everything. But the vaccine

00:35:44.520 is really about how old you are. So you could say, did they, did they really think this is a toxic

00:35:50.920 substance? So for sure it'll kill elderly people more. So let's, let's just go there and let's

00:35:55.640 prioritize them. Did they do that? That's a hard one to, that's a hard one for me to swallow that

00:36:02.440 they would have. Well, they may feel financially they're a burden on society. As you get older,

00:36:07.080 they're not contributing, working with taxes. Uh, they're in care homes that are run by government

00:36:11.640 officials. I don't know. I, I still believe quite honestly, it's all very diabolical. And, you know,

00:36:17.720 I know early on when this started to happen, I was writing reports and the notices of liability and

00:36:23.560 trying to get people to be aware and not to take it for warnings. And I think it was Dr. McCullough

00:36:28.840 who'd come out or Dr. Bridle, who had said, you know, if there are 50 deaths, if there's a new, uh,

00:36:34.360 pharmaceutical product and there's 50 deaths, it's pulled from the market. It's when you start seeing

00:36:40.600 it on the TV, giving warnings and, you know, to contact your local law firm and actions being taken.

00:36:46.200 And I know for myself in British Columbia, I was right out the gates, you know, um, in contact with

00:36:53.720 the, uh, top commissioner, RCMP, uh, commissioner, assistant commissioner McDonald at the time,

00:36:59.000 but now he's deputy commissioner in June of 2020. I was sitting down across from, you know,

00:37:04.200 the desk from him at headquarters and explaining, you know, the harms, uh, the fact that, uh, they

00:37:10.200 weren't providing ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, that they were putting people on remdemsevir.

00:37:14.520 And I stayed in contact with them. That was June, 2020. And then moving into 2021,

00:37:20.760 I was sitting down with the assistant of the crimes division, talking about what Bonnie Henry

00:37:25.560 was doing. AstraZeneca had rolled out. Sean Muldoon, you may have heard, he got eight feet

00:37:31.000 of his intestines removed. The man's life was changed, uh, forever as well as another woman

00:37:37.160 here in BC. And so where other countries were banning AstraZeneca, Bonnie Henry was going on

00:37:43.720 promoting it and saying, Oh yes, yes. And you know, pregnant women should take it as well.

00:37:48.920 While there were reports in the United States of pregnant women taking it and, and, um, new mothers

00:37:55.240 with infants and the infants were having intestinal problems with bleeding. And so to, to me, there's

00:38:03.640 absolutely no doubt that this was an assault against society at all levels.

00:38:07.880 Well, it wasn't assault. The question is intent, but there's no doubt it was an assault. As we said

00:38:13.880 at the beginning, this was a military campaign run by the, at the top, at the highest level,

00:38:20.120 I believe it was mainly influenced and run by the CIA and military intelligence. And, and the U S has a

00:38:27.240 huge influence on all Western countries and most of the world that it occupies, basically Africa, Latin

00:38:32.840 America and so on. And so at the, at the highest level, it was a military campaign. They, they

00:38:38.280 wanted to do this irrespective of what governments or health agencies or MDs or anybody would say they

00:38:44.040 were going to do it. They were going to do it. If it killed people, it didn't matter. They just decided

00:38:48.440 this, this is what they were going to do. So I have no doubt about that. And I have no doubt that

00:38:53.880 they were given so much leeway in pushing this, that they also took leeway in doing crazy things with

00:39:01.720 treatments. There was a, there was a lot more leeway than, than should have been given for

00:39:06.600 treatments. There were none of the safeguards were present. This was a totalitarian military campaign.

00:39:14.360 It didn't matter what you did. And the, and the, and the, and the health authorities were,

00:39:19.960 were part of that. They were agents of that campaign. They were criminal. They were acting criminally.

00:39:26.520 They were not acting on the basis of science. They didn't care about science, no matter what they said.

00:39:31.720 They clearly didn't care about science or the truth or anything like that. So I, I'm totally on board

00:39:38.040 with agreeing with all of that. Um, I just think that they're going to, if they need to, that, that,

00:39:48.200 the organize, the organization that organized that is not also deciding to reduce the world population

00:39:55.320 down to 20% of what it is now. They're not doing that at the moment. Okay. Uh, because if they wanted

00:40:00.520 to do that, they're, they could be way more effective. Um, and it wasn't a weapon in the sense,

00:40:08.200 the usual bioweapon is delivered to a specific group that is your enemy and doesn't spread and

00:40:13.800 can't spread. Okay. It's a toxin or a very localized pathogen that cannot spread very far, but that's

00:40:20.840 very lethal and kills everybody that comes into contact with. And there are many examples of that

00:40:25.560 historically. And the Russian, uh, uh, the Russians have given examples of when the Americans did that.

00:40:34.280 Maybe the U S could give examples of when the Russians did it. I don't know, but the Russians

00:40:38.120 have been very, uh, transparent about examples in Africa where this was done and so on. Uh, and in,

00:40:43.960 in other places in the world. So that's what a bioweapon looks like. It, you, you target, uh, an enemy,

00:40:49.960 an enemy group or a very specific group. And you deliver this, this, this pathogen or this toxic

00:40:56.840 substance and it kills, um, and it doesn't miss anybody. And then it doesn't spread to your own

00:41:03.000 soldiers and to your own population. So this was, this was different from that. And it was, but I'll

00:41:10.600 give you this. It does make a lot of people sick and weak and dependent on the government. So it does

00:41:18.040 facilitate totalitarian control of the population. If you come to believe that you have to be

00:41:23.800 vaccinated to survive and the state is going to provide that to you and you have to get a card

00:41:29.720 and give up all your personal ID and, and, and line up nicely and everything. I mean, it's a,

00:41:35.320 it's a tremendous instrument of control of the population.

00:41:39.880 And we know that's where this is going to, right? Like towards digital ID and, you know,

00:41:44.980 digital passports and all the rest of it, businesses have to comply now. So yeah,

00:41:49.540 I understand there's a much bigger agenda and this was not just a test run, but it was to,

00:41:55.300 I think, initially get, uh, get it started through the lockdowns. They were putting up all the 5g and,

00:42:00.980 and the rest of it to accommodate, you know, sort of those next steps that are coming next, uh,

00:42:06.100 amping up the climate change, uh, crisis and propaganda.

00:42:09.940 And, uh, and, and, you know, and you know, these, these propaganda campaigns,

00:42:14.260 do you know where they work best? In the Western countries that we really gobble it up. And why do

00:42:20.980 we gobble it up? Because we've had decades of gutting the educational system and making everybody

00:42:26.660 stupid. Uh, you know, nothing matters anymore. You can, it's not important to think logically,

00:42:33.140 to be rigorous, to know about science and math. None of that matters anymore. You, you just have

00:42:38.660 to, uh, repeat what you're told and it's about indoctrination. And we've been doing that, uh,

00:42:44.900 for decades now, we've been completely gutting the educational system. Um, and so it's not,

00:42:50.740 it's not merit-based anymore. There's no more competition really. Um, you, you don't hire people

00:42:57.140 on the merit of what they've done scientifically. You hire them for political reasons, what their stances are,

00:43:02.580 just like they select judges now, not for their ability to analyze legal cases, but for, you know,

00:43:08.260 what, what they're going to say about, I don't know, some social, uh, aspect, right? Um, it's,

00:43:14.980 we have been gutting, um, our intelligentsia, the students, people, the, the, the smartest people

00:43:23.940 around are the people who didn't get exposed too much to university or as, you know, a decade of

00:43:30.660 university will just destroy you. They're the, they're the most independent thinking people

00:43:35.220 in Canada. I mean, the truckers, the workers, the everybody, we, we, we, we still know what

00:43:43.060 a person is and what a family is and, and, and what, what we need and what we want and the freedom

00:43:48.100 that we want. But the, as you get into the professional classes and as you get closer and

00:43:53.300 closer to the globalizing elites, they, they become just, just ideological morons. Um, and

00:44:02.100 they cannot judge the science. They're unable to, they're unable to.

00:44:07.060 I think that you're hitting on something very profound there. We look at all of the doctors

00:44:12.340 and a lot of them, you know, it's not even a matter. I, I think in many instances that they

00:44:17.380 don't know, uh, they want to turn a blind eye because they don't want to be reprimanded. They

00:44:22.020 don't want to lose their job. Uh, you know, there's so many reasons why people have complied and gone

00:44:27.220 along with this. Now I, I, if I'm remembering as well, don't you have a university or something that

00:44:33.620 you were, uh, creating or collaborating with? Was that yourself? Oh, yes. I was involved in an,

00:44:40.900 in an alternative kind of university educational campaign. Um, you know, I, I have to put all my

00:44:47.620 time into the scientific research, so I haven't been able to participate, but I was encouraging

00:44:51.780 them to do it, uh, to have an alternative like that, uh, of higher education, but I haven't really

00:44:58.260 been involved with it very much. No, no. And let's talk about your research. Uh, uh, your organization is,

00:45:04.020 uh, correlation, correlation, Canada.org, I believe is where people can find that.

00:45:09.540 And I remember one of the first reports that you did that, um, uh, that I thought was incredible

00:45:15.140 was, uh, providing statistics on how the lockdowns themselves did not save lives and be an advocate

00:45:22.580 for the elderly, what happened to our children. And, uh, I think that was one of your first major

00:45:28.820 reports as well as masks. You've done incredible research on the, uh, unaffectiveness of the masks

00:45:35.060 as well. Is any of your research, like, especially the report that you've just come up with, I know

00:45:40.740 that you've mentioned you're speaking in Romania and I know one of our viewers wants to know where

00:45:45.540 that's going to be in Romania, but are you, uh, sending this report to the RCMP? Are you sending

00:45:52.340 it to, uh, elected officials? Have you sent it to Trudeau and the health official? What, what's happening?

00:45:58.420 At the very beginning, we were, we were among the first to really react to this craziness,

00:46:05.060 right? And so at the beginning I was working with the Ontario civil liberties association

00:46:09.860 that I'm a founding member of. And before this is before our correlation corporation,

00:46:15.380 a nonprofit corporation was created. And at that point we were doing the research and we were

00:46:20.740 systematically sending it out to all the members of parliament, federal and provincial in Ontario.

00:46:25.620 And we were writing directly to the world health organization. And we were explaining that this

00:46:31.780 made no sense. Here's the, here's a review of the science. This is crazy. What you're doing,

00:46:36.260 what you said about masks is nuts. You're harming people. Please, would you explain yourself? How can

00:46:41.220 you possibly do this? And we would put all these letters on the website of the Ontario civil liberties

00:46:46.500 association. So if you go to OCLA.ca,

00:46:50.980 OCLA.ca and you look at the COVID section of that website, you will see all of our early efforts to

00:46:58.900 reach out to politicians and high executives like that. And when they responded, we put their responses

00:47:06.900 there and so on. So we were really making a lot of effort to do that. And it was, we didn't succeed.

00:47:13.860 The media were not covering it. They were not responding in a good way. So we decided,

00:47:19.460 well, then in that case, our role will be to do the best possible science, to really do rigorous

00:47:25.780 science and to go as far as we can doing good science, put it out there, and then let others

00:47:31.540 pick it up and do what they can with it, you know?

00:47:34.340 Right. I know some will be used in legal actions.

00:47:40.020 Right, right. So I have been an expert in legal actions, and a lot of experts have used our work and

00:47:46.820 have been inspired by it to write their expert reports in legal actions. So that's how we decided

00:47:54.340 to help. And as part of that, we also try and make sure that we embarrass the authors of bad science

00:48:01.940 that get published in the leading journals. We make sure and embarrass them as much as we can

00:48:07.540 using rigorous analyses. So, for example, one of our recent papers was to demonstrate that it's

00:48:14.420 complete nonsense to say that the Nobel Prize-winning vaccines saved tens of millions of lives. So we

00:48:21.620 wrote a report just on that, proving that that was complete nonsense. It can't possibly be true.

00:48:28.260 If you believe the study that argued that, you have to believe that mortality would have increased

00:48:35.540 tenfold, but due to the vaccine, it brought it back down exactly to normal, you know? You have to

00:48:42.740 believe these crazy scenarios if you're going to believe what they're saying in these articles,

00:48:47.140 which then the media and the Nobel Committee gobble up. And, you know, the Nobel Prize was a political

00:48:56.900 propaganda instrument, is all it was, to justify this vaccine. So we wrote a paper about that. So we

00:49:05.380 we try to have as much impact as we can. We try to attack the problems that are

00:49:12.100 going to be the most important, that are central to their argument. And we go after those.

00:49:16.740 Right. And you've written something like, was it 100 peer-reviewed studies?

00:49:21.860 Yes. Is that correct?

00:49:24.020 In my earlier days as a scientist, I wrote a lot of papers in many different areas of science,

00:49:30.980 everything from planetary science, to soil science, to environmental science, to theoretical physics,

00:49:37.140 about magnetism, to, I mean, I was a true interdisciplinary scientist when I was the

00:49:43.140 lead researcher in our laboratory at the University of Ottawa. So yeah, I've written more than 100 of

00:49:49.140 these peer-reviewed articles. And I used to be invited to conferences to be keynote speaker and

00:49:56.020 and so on quite regularly on these other topics. You know, what you're showing now are the COVID

00:50:02.180 articles that we've written, and that are on my website. And on that website, there's a research

00:50:07.780 section that shows all my research areas. And what if you go to research, you can see the

00:50:13.780 different research areas. And one of them is, for example, is climate science. And in there,

00:50:21.780 there is a very important paper that does the physics of CO2, which shows quite rigorously that

00:50:30.260 even doubling or quadrupling CO2 has virtually no effect on the mean global temperature. And it's done

00:50:37.460 in a very rigorous way. So we did that years ago. And I've also written about geopolitics,

00:50:45.380 we have a very large paper that came out, which would interest you a lot, Tanya, it came out in 2019.

00:50:52.980 And it showed the origin, the geopolitical origin of gender studies, of the climate, you know,

00:51:01.220 propaganda, and of, and so called anti racism, which was not the traditional anti racism,

00:51:10.820 it was about language, and it was about purifying the language as a solution to racism, you know,

00:51:16.980 and so we showed the geopolitical origin of that. And it really started in the early 1990s,

00:51:25.540 after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the globalists decided, all right, now we'll create

00:51:31.860 a new religion, we'll have a globalized education on, it won't be women's studies anymore, it'll be

00:51:38.500 gender studies, we'll have, you know, all this new ideology coming in, and it infiltrated all the

00:51:46.820 universities from that point on, all the hirings were done in that direction, and it transformed our

00:51:52.580 world. And so I wrote a paper about how geopolitically what how that serves the geopolitics,

00:51:58.980 and how that was enabled by the geopolitical changes that were happening in the world,

00:52:05.140 when the Soviet Union was dissolved.

00:52:08.500 Right? Yeah, I know. It's funny, because about a year ago, I had wanted you to come on the show,

00:52:12.580 and you'd been so busy, and it was going to be on geopolitics, I still have the image that I'd

00:52:17.460 created for it. Oh, yeah, they brought in this, you know, very much Marxist agenda. And as you say,

00:52:25.060 to create non thinkers that can only go in one direction, that become quite volatile, you know,

00:52:31.700 in the position, that's one of the things that they're being taught within the schools and

00:52:35.220 universities. And it really is having a very negative effect on Canada and the future. And that's

00:52:41.060 one of the reasons Action for Canada does youth events, speaker and leadership programs,

00:52:46.420 is because we want to raise up, you know, the next elected officials. And we have some tremendous

00:52:52.740 youth that have come on to the programs. And I'm really excited about that. But yeah,

00:52:57.060 we got to counter it, we can't just complain, you know, about what's transpiring, we got to work to

00:53:02.100 change it. And we're making some very good progress on it.

00:53:06.020 I've written in popular magazines quite a lot. And one of the things I attacked viciously is critical

00:53:12.660 race theory. That's just an obscene point of view. And it's, it's, it's poisonous. It's,

00:53:20.260 it's, it's disgusting. And but people don't realize that a lot of true anti racism people from,

00:53:28.740 you know, from, from the civil rights era, have been very critical of critical race theory,

00:53:33.540 and I've written about it, and we're really critical of it. And but it just gets covered over,

00:53:39.060 like, there's an agenda here, and they just keep pushing it. But it is, it is, it is very toxic

00:53:44.820 stuff. Yeah.

00:53:45.660 Well, I'm really excited, because down in the United States, there's 26 states that are now

00:53:51.620 overturning all of this global agenda and the Marxist agenda. You know, they are passing legislation

00:53:57.820 against the SOGI, against the drag queens and against critical race theory. And Christopher Ruffo has

00:54:05.620 had, you know, a huge impact in writing on this as well. And so I'm very excited in the weekly update

00:54:12.820 that I gave before the show, how there's now five provinces that are standing for parental rights.

00:54:19.940 And this is just the beginning of the unfolding, like we see in, in the United States now happening

00:54:24.860 in Canada, and Action for Canada is going to be taking some stronger steps against this,

00:54:29.540 as well on on the legal side of it. But I'd be interested in your paper on critical race theory,

00:54:34.900 because I'm coming up to a point where I want to deal with that again. I'm dealing, like I said,

00:54:40.660 again, in the pre-show in the weekly update is I've been attacked quite profusely by the natives,

00:54:48.740 by chiefs. And by them doing that, I was already very aware of UNDRIP and wanting to deal with it.

00:54:55.160 But I've done this massive report now on it to show that the chiefs are working with the government,

00:55:00.760 are working with the UN, they're exploiting all of the natives, and it's causing a lot of harm. And

00:55:05.900 the underbed of this is then to create, you know, the critical race theory theory, and put it in the

00:55:13.060 schools and pit everybody against each other. And yeah, so next week's show is going to be massive.

00:55:18.620 When I go through those reports, I was having an in-depth conversation with Rocco last night,

00:55:23.620 in, you know, addressing this as well. Something needs to be done because through all of this

00:55:29.380 support of the victimization of the natives, we have given them the idea that these chiefs and that

00:55:36.840 they as a community have greater power than they actually have. And it's been this tacit agreement

00:55:43.560 that's finally coming to an end. Canadians are finally, finally finding their voice on this issue.

00:55:51.100 And that's part of that military style, psychological warfare on all the issues that

00:55:57.640 you and I have been discussing tonight, and what you have been writing on.

00:56:03.720 Well, the only way to have democracy is to have a counter force against this, this, this dominance

00:56:12.380 of the state. And that counter force is individuals who want to fight for their rights,

00:56:18.460 and families who support individuals, and organizations of free individuals, and so on.

00:56:26.800 You need to have that. You need to, the individual fighting for his or her rights is the counter

00:56:35.620 to this disproportionate state power that wants to just completely, because there's a natural

00:56:42.460 tendency to want to go to a complete dominance hierarchy. That's another thing. I'm in contact

00:56:51.840 with scientists who study this, who show that society evolves that way, and how you counter

00:56:58.000 it. There's a theoretical physics paper that's very important in my view, and that I've talked

00:57:04.060 about a lot, that shows how society is structured, and that gives you a really clear idea of how you

00:57:10.060 move away from democracy. It's not the topic of today's show, but I've given interviews about

00:57:15.800 this. It's fascinating that theoretical physics can actually give us a framework to understand

00:57:22.480 the bad places that society will go if you let it slip in that direction. And it's almost

00:57:28.660 unavoidable. Yeah.

00:57:30.400 Yeah, it is. And then learning how to counter that. And one of the things Action for Canada

00:57:35.700 Canada is doing, and I know you've been very busy, so I don't know how up to date you are

00:57:40.080 on what, you know, part of our strategy is, is to get into every single community. We're

00:57:45.220 putting chapters in there. Within those chapters, we have parent groups, we have groups to reach

00:57:50.400 out to businesses, to reach out to churches, and the community at large working together

00:57:54.700 then, going to mayor and city council meetings, addressing the 15-minute cities, addressing the

00:58:00.720 school boards, and then getting elected officials from within those communities to run for

00:58:05.000 office and supporting them. And last year in the election, we had quite a number of our chapter

00:58:09.880 leaders get elected as school board trustees, for instance. And, you know, there's other groups

00:58:14.380 that are doing it, and we just really feel that this is an important part of our campaign.

00:58:19.040 Because Canada is so big, it's not just like the French resistance, right? Where they could just

00:58:23.760 do underground networks and, you know, pass information and do their newsletters. We've got a huge

00:58:29.180 country, and that we need to keep that communication going. We could go by horseback if Trudeau wants to

00:58:34.120 really censor us completely. We can go from chapter to chapter and get our message nationwide. And,

00:58:39.740 you know, that's part of the strategy of staying up. Speaking of censorship, you know, have you been,

00:58:45.860 have you found yourself being censored? Has your research been censored from, say, the Lancet?

00:58:52.660 Of course. Of course. Of course. I was barred from ResearchGate, which is a very important venue for

00:59:00.660 scientists. I was barred for life from it, because I wrote an article that was critical of the vaccines.

00:59:07.820 And it generated some discussion. And they said, Okay, we took down your article on masks,

00:59:13.800 we warned you. Now you're saying that vaccines are intrinsically dangerous. You know, we can't have

00:59:21.520 this. And you're gone. So they took me out of ResearchGate. LinkedIn is an important social

00:59:30.680 contact thing for professionals. They barred me from that. And so on. And Facebook censors so strongly,

00:59:39.460 I just, I just cannot tolerate to be on Facebook anymore. YouTube also took down so many of my

00:59:46.040 videos. They are very, very nasty. And Twitter has never taken me down. I was, I was more careful,

00:59:53.740 I didn't want to be taken down from Twitter. But I've never I've been very critical of many things.

00:59:58.580 I've never been censored on Twitter. So I still have that. And I've discovered Substack recently,

01:00:05.380 which is a wonderful community to communicate whatever you want. And there are a lot of there's

01:00:11.720 a lot of people on Substack that really like reading this stuff, and they really enjoy it,

01:00:16.000 and they look for it. So that's a good place to be as well. But yeah, sure, I've been censored a lot.

01:00:23.520 Especially trying to get our work published in scientific journals. There is, there's a mafia

01:00:30.620 there that prevents it. And but recently, we had one of our scientific articles published in a good

01:00:38.420 medical journal, that's called PLOS One. They have published an important study that we did with

01:00:44.500 Joseph Hickey, he's the first author. And that study is really quite groundbreaking. We showed that

01:00:51.740 using the government's own epidemiological models, that the worst thing you can do during an epidemic

01:00:58.840 to protect the elderly is to prevent their contact with the general society. Okay, that's the worst

01:01:07.080 thing you can do. If you try to isolate them. And if you try to prevent contacts with the general

01:01:13.860 population, then you increase the risk of them getting infected on the basis of the government's

01:01:20.740 own models. And so we prove that theoretically, and unambiguously using their models. And that was a

01:01:28.820 accepted for publication after a long battle. Right. Well, because it was understood that

01:01:34.140 children as well had strong immune systems, and it would be beneficial for them to be near the

01:01:39.360 elderly. And of course, the government was giving, you know, the completely opposite message to the

01:01:45.800 public. Well, this idea that if you're elderly, you're more likely to die if you're infected,

01:01:51.840 therefore, we have to prevent you from coming into contact with other people. That's a very strong

01:01:56.620 idea in the public health community. And we show that that idea, if you believe epidemiology and

01:02:05.140 the models that you claim to be using, that idea is wrong. When you look at how these things are

01:02:14.600 believed to spread, it's better to have the elderly in the community, living among the community and having

01:02:22.160 as many contacts as possible. That's actually better for them. Not to mention that, therefore,

01:02:27.780 they will not be isolated, and there won't be all the psychological harm of isolation, which is

01:02:33.200 tremendous. Right. Yeah, no, I agree. And so, Denny, we're coming up to the, we're just past the top of

01:02:41.620 the hour here. But can I ask a couple of rapid questions that I have that my team is sending me?

01:02:47.860 Somebody has said, I'm a retired physician. In the past three years, I've seen a large number of

01:02:52.980 people, including his sister, or his or her sister, who have been at stage four cancer at diagnosis.

01:03:00.120 I have not seen this in 40 years of practice. Is this due to the COVID jab?

01:03:05.520 Well, let me put it this way. I don't know. But I'm going to use all-cause mortality statistics to

01:03:17.280 the best of my ability to find out if I can detect and quantify that effect. So I'm very concerned

01:03:25.020 about turbo cancers. And we're trying to get as much data as we can. And one of our next projects

01:03:31.260 is to look at that in detail. And we've recently come across a very powerful database that may

01:03:38.160 help us in a significant way. So we are working on it. We're working on it.

01:03:43.360 Dr. Mackey, I believe, is providing a lot of information out there about the turbo cancers

01:03:47.720 and paying attention to it as well. And it's very compelling. His case studies and the things he

01:03:51.920 reports are extremely compelling. And so that makes us, the statisticians looking at mortality data,

01:03:59.040 makes us want to really look at it carefully and see if we can quantify it on the population level.

01:04:04.580 That's what we're going to try and do.

01:04:06.780 Okay, good. Well, we're going to look forward to that research. That'll be important.

01:04:11.300 Mariana is from Romania, and she wanted to know where it is that you're going to be

01:04:16.600 speaking at an event.

01:04:17.780 In the Parliament building in Bucharest, right in that massive Parliament building.

01:04:22.280 And when was that again?

01:04:23.820 Huh?

01:04:24.680 And when was that again?

01:04:25.880 Okay, so let me get my calendar here. So we are speaking, the conference is two days,

01:04:33.860 back to back presentations on the weekend of the, let me get this right, the 18th and 19th

01:04:44.020 of November in Bucharest.

01:04:45.360 There you go.

01:04:45.820 Yeah, and I'm speaking on the 18th. And so that is the, it was, it's the International

01:04:53.360 COVID Summit, the fourth one. And that's what we'll be doing. So they have a website, you

01:04:59.940 can find it if you Google International COVID Summit, you'll find the website and everything.

01:05:04.800 Okay, well, our Canadian contacts are going to let the Romanian contacts know that you're

01:05:10.080 going to be there and we'll get some people out. Okay, so I don't, I just want to review

01:05:15.800 my notes. I mean, we've covered a lot. I know one of the one things we were talking about

01:05:20.800 the journals and the Lancet has been so unreliable. But what upsets me, my doctor, I haven't seen

01:05:28.380 her in years, but she's, she's not awake, or at least she's seen now, she doesn't even

01:05:33.460 want to be in the hospitals anymore. I did have a phone conversation with her. But I take

01:05:38.220 a look at like, if medical professionals are going to the Lancet, you know, they see the

01:05:42.980 Nobel Prize winning jab as, as you know, and that how it saved all these millions of lives.

01:05:49.060 And that's why your research is so important to counter that. So I would really, really

01:05:54.180 encourage people, take the reports that Denny has, send them to, you know, your doctors,

01:06:00.440 help to educate them and counter the misinformation and the lies, because these groups cannot be

01:06:08.000 trusted. I don't know if they're globally controlled, but there's obviously a massive

01:06:12.820 influence to stop the information from being shared. So do you have any further to add to

01:06:21.800 that, right?

01:06:22.800 Well, it's so difficult. Most MDs, like most professionals, are looking after their careers

01:06:28.540 and are obedient and indoctrinated. And it's very hard to break that. They do not use logic and

01:06:37.640 science in order to decide what is the right position. They instead follow the lead from

01:06:42.980 their, from their directors. That's what they do. It doesn't matter what you say. Yeah. And

01:06:48.860 the only way that you're there for, yeah, individuals, whether they're MDs or not, have

01:06:54.460 to look at the clearly written science and decide for themselves. And often, if it doesn't make sense

01:07:01.640 to you, it's because it doesn't make sense. They, there's so much garbage science. It's just

01:07:06.940 terrible. Um, but, um, so that's, that's, that's all you can do is try to figure it out for yourself.

01:07:13.740 And then once you understand it, explain it to others and so on.

01:07:17.860 Okay. And, uh, to share, get, to get, uh, on the, um, power hour, uh, invite, I always write two pages.

01:07:26.240 There's the empower hour invite with the bio from our guest. And then there's a weekly update page

01:07:32.300 that I include to give you more information surrounding the topic. So please make sure that

01:07:37.240 you go to the bio page. And on that page is all of Denny's information, uh, regarding the sub stack,

01:07:45.380 his websites, where you can find his research. And we really encourage you to go on there.

01:07:50.360 Uh, this video is going to go out on rumble and we get tens of thousands of views. We're going to ask

01:07:55.820 everybody viewing this video to subscribe to our rumble page, to share, uh, this interview far and

01:08:02.620 wide as well. Okay. So one final question Sheila has posted for me, how does the trends and statistics

01:08:09.180 compare for those that have experienced COVID deaths versus those vaccinated deaths in the

01:08:15.940 context, context of all case mortality? Okay. That's, I understand the question. What I've tried

01:08:23.800 to explain, and I was very quick at the beginning and the, you know, it takes some time to really

01:08:28.280 demonstrate why we came to this conclusion, but I have come to the conclusion that there is no such

01:08:34.640 thing as a COVID death because there was no particularly virulent pathogen and the mortality

01:08:41.200 patterns and their temporal evolution. They demonstrate that there was no particularly

01:08:47.180 virulent pathogen. So all the deaths are due to what governments and the medical profession did to

01:08:53.620 people, all of them, whether it's vaccination, lockdowns, uh, bad treatments, denying treatments,

01:09:01.000 all the excess deaths are due to that. Right. I was going to say did or didn't do to people,

01:09:06.340 right? By not giving them, like you said, the antibiotics, hydroxychloroquine, uh, you know,

01:09:12.220 instead, uh, giving them the remdesivir and ivermectin, ivermectin, people don't know this

01:09:19.140 generally, but ivermectin is a very powerful agent against bacterial pneumonia. So even if it was

01:09:25.800 misdiagnosed and your respiratory, uh, difficulties are from a bacterial infection,

01:09:31.740 ivermectin is going to help you. Well, this is one of the reasons why I felt a hundred percent that

01:09:37.560 this was, uh, is a targeted attack as well, because they took what generally would have, uh,

01:09:43.860 historically been used to treat people with these ailments and they started to ban it. They started

01:09:50.060 to ban vitamin C, you know, and, and supplements and all the rest of it. Well, there's, there's also

01:09:54.200 legal reasons for that, Tanya, because if there is a treatment, then you cannot get emergency

01:10:00.600 approval of the vaccine. Exactly. Right. Okay. So they couldn't allow any treatments

01:10:06.640 until later. No, it is so wicked. Well, I actually have one last question that keeps popping in my mind

01:10:13.100 and I almost forget. Of the 17 million deaths, how many of those were elderly? Oh, the majority,

01:10:20.700 uh, because the, the deaths as we showed are exponential with age. So the great majority are

01:10:27.060 elderly. That's the whole point is. Yeah. I went on a speaking tour recently in, in, uh, Ontario back

01:10:33.860 in the summer. And every time one of my chapter leaders picked me up, they'd be telling me stories.

01:10:38.980 Oh, my three aunts and my uncle have died. And you know, it was really within that category. Sadly,

01:10:44.140 a couple of times, uh, the young girl here in BC, who I met January of 2021, who had basically

01:10:49.800 become paralyzed as soon as she had taken the jab. And, you know, there's other stories like that,

01:10:54.840 uh, that are definitely out there. We've only quantified actual deaths, but we haven't even

01:11:01.300 touched on the harms, permanent harms, disability, all kinds of harms. So many men have heart

01:11:08.360 conditions now that they would not have had. And it changes your life. You can't do certain things

01:11:13.620 and so on. And autoimmune. And, and the other thing is, is although you've given, you know, uh,

01:11:18.540 right now, uh, data of 17 million deaths, we believe that's going to exponentially increase

01:11:23.920 as you know, these, uh, terminal illnesses and, uh, other illnesses now begin to affect people.

01:11:31.680 We don't, we don't know the longevity of their life and they may last three years, have a heart

01:11:36.340 attack. And then, you know, the doctors will sign it, uh, you know, just say, you know, that it was

01:11:41.560 based just on a heart attack and never go back three years prior and find out that he'd been

01:11:46.440 jabbed and boosted. Whether or not that is true, Tanya, will be determined by analysis of the all-cause

01:11:52.360 mortality data. And both sides, whatever you believe, they'll have to accept the data.

01:11:58.560 This research is going to have to continue. I think that's what, that's what we're talking here,

01:12:04.380 right? So, and where would you say in closing, like, uh, final words, where would you say next

01:12:10.620 steps are moving forward? Uh, what would advice be to our viewers? Well, my final words are this,

01:12:16.460 um, I think, Tanya, your organization is doing fantastic work for Canadian society. And I'm very

01:12:23.560 appreciative of what you're doing. I'm very appreciative of the fact that you are fighting

01:12:28.140 for these positions and you're, you're, you're, you're holding true to those positions. And I can

01:12:34.440 see that there's real value in that because, um, the world has become crazy with all this

01:12:41.880 indoctrination and they've steered us in this crazy direction that is disconnected from community,

01:12:48.600 family, individual freedom, everything. So I'm just so appreciative of, of the work you do.

01:12:55.020 That's how I would end it. Thank you, Jenny. Well, I appreciate that. And I know myself and

01:13:00.840 the viewers, you know, if we were in a, in a, uh, real life situation right now, I, I believe people

01:13:07.440 would stand up and applaud and very much. Thank you for the work you're doing. Please continue it

01:13:12.100 because I believe that these legal actions are progressing that, you know, we're all going to

01:13:17.100 have our day in court. I believe that there's judges who care about their country now and are seeing

01:13:22.520 the bigger picture and they're growing a bit of a backbone. Uh, we've been out there taking the

01:13:27.180 bullets in the field so that they could come to a point. And, and I really hope and pray. And I

01:13:32.200 believe that, that we're going to see our day in court where all of this begins to fall apart and we

01:13:37.000 will, uh, seek, see justice. And I believe the research that you're doing is going to be an integral

01:13:42.920 part of that. So again, thank you for coming and joining us on the show. I'd love to have you back

01:13:48.560 and we'll talk maybe about geopolitics and some other things. And, uh, again, just thank you so

01:13:53.780 much. It was my pleasure. All right. No, thanks. Bye-bye. All right. Well, that was a wonderful

01:14:02.240 evening. We're so grateful, uh, to Denny for joining us on the show. The information is so important.

01:14:07.620 Please make sure that you look up, uh, Denny and his website also on those chat links under the

01:14:12.540 empower hour that I gave you at the beginning of the show. We will provide you, uh, links to access his

01:14:18.060 information there as well. Okay. As, uh, I had mentioned, I'm going to be the guest next week

01:14:23.180 on the show and I am going to uncover this whole fraud that's unfolding and, uh, regarding UNDRIP

01:14:31.800 and the UN's agenda and Klaus Schwab's agenda that, uh, you know, he says you're going to have nothing

01:14:38.080 and own nothing and be happy. And how, you know, what are the strategies going on in the background

01:14:43.420 that are quickly unfolding? And specifically my talk is going to be, uh, about the, uh, in indigenous,

01:14:50.580 the native community, how they're being exploited, how they're being used and manipulated to advance,

01:14:56.700 uh, the access of the UN and these global, this global cabal to, uh, take our property and to take

01:15:05.340 control of our water and our resources. I've written a really huge report. I am going to be launching

01:15:11.540 that on Sunday night. I'll have a preview that I did last week on the weekly update to touch a bit

01:15:17.080 on what it is that we're going to be exposing and these corrupt chiefs, what UNDRIP is about.

01:15:22.360 It's going to be a really, I think, uh, a very important topic and we got to shut this UNDRIP down.

01:15:28.380 We, we, we've got it to, uh, rise up in opposition to the treaties that are secretly

01:15:33.700 being, um, unlawfully passed, uh, they're non-binding agreements. So, uh, again, it's called

01:15:41.080 tacit agreement. If something is passed by the government's example of what's going on in the

01:15:46.920 background right now. And if you don't do anything about it, if you don't oppose it, you're in tacit

01:15:52.140 agreement and it's just going to unfold and you know what, you'll be complying. And we're going to

01:15:56.980 refuse to do that. I mean, at a recent school board meeting in mission, they're so corrupt in

01:16:02.360 mission. They're the ones really advancing the, uh, SOGI that had shut me down in January, uh,

01:16:08.320 because, um, on a zoom meeting, I had had the opportunity to bring up our PDF of the sexually

01:16:16.340 explicit and pornographic books. They shut me down. And then a month later, they ended up banning

01:16:22.100 action for Canada. It's all unlawful. It doesn't bear any weight, but the point is the next day in,

01:16:29.060 um, all of the news reports, it said we were banned for showing graphic material,

01:16:35.100 graphic slideshow. It always just kills me every time I deliver that message. It's a fact. It's

01:16:40.600 a hundred percent sure. I actually address it in the, uh, report that'll be unfolding next week

01:16:46.080 because, uh, all the newspapers on the island, Comax, Courtney, Port Alberni have all quoted the

01:16:52.680 Canadian anti-hate network in this horrible action for Canada and how it's banned from mission.

01:16:56.940 They don't provide the PDF. They don't provide the reason. It just sounds real good. If I was

01:17:02.220 banned from a school board, doesn't that sound so impressive, but we're going to expose them.

01:17:06.340 We're going to get the truth out there. Truth trumps lies. And the Bible says the truth shall

01:17:11.120 set us free. And we're on a mission of truth here at action for Canada. So I'm excited.

01:17:15.900 Make sure you join me next week. All right. The Bible verses in closing tonight are from Psalms,

01:17:21.140 uh, 37, 12 to 13, the wicked plots against the just and not, or sorry, the wicked plots against

01:17:29.100 the just, you know, we see that happening across Canada and around the world and it gnashes at him

01:17:34.500 with their teeth, but the Lord laughs at them for he sees that their day is coming. And I'm looking

01:17:40.920 forward to that. All right. The next verse is from Psalm 37, uh, verse 28, for the Lord loves the

01:17:49.380 just and will not forsake his faithful ones. Wrongdoers will be completely destroyed. The

01:17:54.960 offspring of the wicked will perish. And, uh, you know what, we're relying on the Lord of this.

01:18:00.280 We can't, uh, you know, we have to undo the lies of the left. We have to expose them. We're going to

01:18:06.120 be doing that. And we're going to ask Canadians to be real critical thinkers and to have open minds

01:18:12.440 about the messages and the information coming your way. So anyways, thanks for joining us tonight.

01:18:17.120 God bless you. And God bless Canada.

01:18:28.020 That's what I've got to say. Look at this crowd.

01:18:34.440 I'm going to thank God and God alone for the ground that I'm standing on.

01:18:41.640 I'm going to thank our founding fathers for giving their lives and sacrificing so much for our freedom.

01:18:57.100 And I'm calling on you today. Don't put them to shame. Don't waste what they did.

01:19:04.460 We have guaranteed rights in this country.

01:19:08.360 We are putting chapters across the nation. We are going to be in every town and every city.

01:19:22.600 And we are going to build communities within these communities of like-minded people who are

01:19:27.800 actually going to care for one another again and love on each other and give each other the help when

01:19:32.940 they're down. We are going to use the teams and the people that build within chapters to support our businesses.

01:19:42.100 The government's actions are completely 100% unlawful.

01:19:48.720 Judgment will again be found on justice and those with virtuous hearts will pursue it.

01:19:55.840 You have a virtuous heart if you are here today pursuing freedom and righteousness.

01:20:04.120 And then verse 23 comes along with a promise.

01:20:09.000 God says he will turn the sins of evil people back on them.

01:20:14.540 He will destroy them for their sins.

01:20:18.480 I take great comfort in that because I serve a mighty living God who has allowed us to go through this season of discomfort

01:20:31.480 because we as a nation have turned our backs on him and we need to get right.

01:20:38.500 So I am just going to thank you so much.

01:20:42.380 I'm going to say God bless you and God bless Canada.

01:20:48.480 God bless you and God bless you.

01:21:18.480 God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you.

01:21:48.480 God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you.

01:22:18.480 God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you.

01:22:20.480 God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and I ask you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and during harnesses you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you.

01:22:24.480 You

Action4Canada - November 09, 2023

Bio-Weapon： Mass Genocide, 17 Million Deaths With Tanya Gaw & Dr. Denis Rancourt

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript