Action4Canada - Climate Change Fraud： Money, Corruption, and Control & Live Q&A

00:00:00.000 Hello and welcome back! For those of you who are new to the show, we play this orientation

00:00:08.040 every week in order to introduce you to some of the resources available on the Action for

00:00:13.280 Canada website. By listening to this orientation over and over again, you will become familiar

00:00:19.760 with what's available on the website, which in turn will empower you to speak confidently

00:00:25.440 as you stand up for your rights and freedoms. The orientation as well as recordings of each

00:00:31.520 week's Empower Hour are available on our website for you to re-watch or to share with your family

00:00:37.920 and friends. I'd like to remind you right now to send out an invitation to your family and friends

00:00:42.880 for tonight's meeting. You still have lots of time. The link will be posted in the chat. Be sure to go

00:00:50.320 to our website to watch previous episodes of the Empower Hour. Last week's guest was Ted Kuntz,

00:00:56.640 President of Vaccine Choice Canada. And next week's guest is Rocco Galati. The Zoom doors for next

00:01:04.480 week's meeting will be open at 3 55 PM Pacific Time. There will be no orientation and we'll start

00:01:11.040 the Empower Hour at 4 PM Pacific Time. Look for more details in next week's email. Tonight, Tom Harris,

00:01:19.760 the Executive Director of International Climate Science Coalition, Canada, will be our special guest

00:01:26.320 speaker. If you haven't joined an Action for Canada chapter yet, please be sure to do so. This is such

00:01:33.920 a valuable way to connect with other like-minded, supportive people, and it will provide you with an

00:01:40.080 opportunity to be a friend and to make new friends. Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday at 7 AM Pacific

00:01:48.080 time, you can join us for a time of prayer on Zoom. We also have a place for you to submit your

00:01:54.800 specific prayer requests. The information you share will be kept confidential. Taboo Talks with Tanya is

00:02:03.280 taking a break for the summer, but you can still go to our website to watch previous meetings. Some of

00:02:09.360 the topics Tanya has covered 5G, EMF wireless technology and the impact on our health, the

00:02:16.080 World Economic Forum, the erosion of parental rights and freedoms, and much, much more. Taboo Talks will

00:02:23.840 resume on September 13th, so be sure to mark that date on your calendar. For our youth, coming up on

00:02:32.160 Friday, July 29th is the first Games and Talent Night, so be sure to practice up on whatever talent

00:02:39.040 you're going to share. Don't be shy, and remember you're among friends. This event will be open to the

00:02:45.360 youth who participated in the Youth Leadership Course, and we will be sending out an email invite for this.

00:02:52.880 Many thanks and much love to everyone who donates to Action for Canada. Every gift, whether big or small,

00:03:00.160 makes a huge impact, and we appreciate you coming alongside us and partnering with us. Thank you

00:03:06.800 also for keeping us in your thoughts and prayers throughout the week. We value and appreciate your

00:03:12.960 commitment to holding us up in prayer. I would also like to honor all the incredible people I have the

00:03:20.640 pleasure of working with at Action for Canada, the Empower Hour crew, the core team, all the various

00:03:26.720 volunteers and behind-the-scenes people, the techies, the photographers, media people, and of course,

00:03:32.880 Tanya Gaw, the founder and leader of Action for Canada. And now, it's time for the Empower Hour.

00:03:46.640 Hello and welcome to tonight's Empower Hour. It's July 13, 2022, and we are so happy you can join us.

00:04:03.600 Coming up is Action for Canada's founder, Tanya Gaw, with her weekly updates. And tonight,

00:04:08.480 she'll be joined by Tom Harris, the Executive Director of International Climate Science Coalition,

00:04:14.640 Canada. Action for Canada is a grassroots movement reaching out to millions of Canadians

00:04:21.600 and uniting our voices in opposition to the destructive policies tearing at the fabric of

00:04:27.120 our nation. Through call to action campaigns, we equip citizens to take action. We are committed to

00:04:34.400 protecting faith, family, and freedom. I'm so honored to introduce you to Tanya Gaw, the founder of

00:04:42.880 Action for Canada. Seven years ago, Tanya started bringing awareness and truth to Canadians about

00:04:49.440 the destructive government policies damaging our nation. Through calls to action, relevant resources,

00:04:55.600 and timely campaigns, Tanya has inspired and empowered citizens to stand up for their rights

00:05:02.400 and freedoms. She's an activist, a freedom fighter, and above all, has an unshakable faith in God,

00:05:09.200 and believes in the power of prayer. Welcome, Tanya, and thank you for the countless hours of work you

00:05:15.120 do on behalf of Canadians all across this land.

00:05:21.840 Hi, Heather. Thank you. Thank you and welcome everybody for being on the show here with us again

00:05:27.040 tonight. Heather, this is going to indeed be an interesting evening. This is an incredibly important

00:05:33.760 topic, so I am excited to get to our guest, but first I'll dig in and do a quick update and just

00:05:41.760 do a little bit of a review over the web page and a few things, some things I'm a little bit excited

00:05:46.560 about to show you tonight. So Terenzio, if we're good, I will share my screen and head right in.

00:05:53.440 We are good. All right. Super. Thank you.

00:05:56.320 Thank you. Okay. I just want to encourage everybody because each week when I am sending out a weekly

00:06:03.920 action, as I've always said, Action for Canada is not just about educating you and I say scaring the

00:06:10.640 bejeebers out of you. We want to tangibly give you resources to help equip you and empower you for

00:06:18.480 you to get involved in, uh, defending your freedom. And so, um, in order to find Action for Canada's

00:06:26.000 chapter page, you would just go under join to A4C chapters. You'll come up with this page. And I

00:06:31.200 always love to highlight, uh, this map because I think it's really important to see what the power

00:06:36.640 of people can do across a nation. And, uh, you know, we've been growing very quickly with that come a few

00:06:42.400 bumps. We've said that every week that some of our chapters are not as active as they could be,

00:06:47.120 but we are bringing more people on to give greater support to our leaders provincially.

00:06:52.960 So we've now got provincial chapter leaders to oversee the people with the boots on the ground,

00:06:58.240 trying to create communities. And so every week I am appealing to you to get involved with a chapter,

00:07:04.160 to be a leader. And, um, you know, if you want to view this page and go and look at a province and

00:07:09.360 see what's available, you can see that it's really quite amazing when you take a look at Alberta,

00:07:14.800 considering we had no chapters there a year ago in British Columbia. And, uh, we're pretty much

00:07:20.640 everywhere in the country as the map is, uh, revealing. So we're very excited about that.

00:07:25.920 Uh, being involved in a chapter, building up thousands, hundreds or thousands of people in

00:07:31.040 a community is important because as you know, we are focused on taking back every level of government,

00:07:37.200 the school board trustees and the municipalities. There's elections in BC, Manitoba, Ontario, and PEI

00:07:46.000 this fall. And I believe we can do this. I believe that we can get rid of these fascists that have

00:07:52.400 come into our school boards and who are harming our children with all these ridiculous, uh, programs, 0.99

00:07:58.480 critical race theory, the fear of climate change, the trans agenda. It all needs to go. We need to clean 1.00

00:08:04.400 house, but it's going to start within our communities and each one of us taking some responsibility. So

00:08:10.000 I just want to encourage you there, get involved. We're trying to make it as easy on you as possible

00:08:15.680 and to educate you along the way as best we can on all the important topics.

00:08:21.920 The plan and the strategy against citizens around the world has been very thoroughly and well thought

00:08:29.280 thought out every step of the way. And, uh, so we've been, you know, announcing and, uh, really

00:08:35.760 diving in and doing a lot of research on important topics. As you can see under call to action on our

00:08:41.520 weekly emails, you could just scroll down and see the type of things that we're bringing to people's

00:08:46.560 attention and then also helping them to get involved. For instance, this is, this is going to keep,

00:08:53.200 we're going to stay on this topic about getting all this sexualization of our children and the 0.97

00:08:58.240 critical race theory and everything out of our schools. And as well, we are exposing the RCMP

00:09:04.320 and the corruption, their silence from the RCMP leaders is corruption in our eyes. And we're going

00:09:10.720 to make sure that those who are quiet at the top, um, and not stepping up and stepping out are going to be

00:09:17.040 exposed. So this week we dug in again, like I say, and boy, oh boy. Um, every time I put the time in

00:09:25.200 to create these actions, myself and my team, we get so well educated as well. And so we want to take

00:09:30.800 copious amounts of information and, and break it down into eight minutes. You can imagine how

00:09:36.400 difficult that is in order to give Canadians a good view of what is transpiring. So many of you may

00:09:44.240 start to see on, you know, the mainstream media, they may be talking about the Netherlands, you know,

00:09:49.520 and how horrible these radical people are that are opposing, you know, the government trying to take

00:09:55.120 away their farmland. And of course, if you go to independent media, you see the other story that

00:10:01.280 it's part of the global agenda to interrupt our food supply and to gain global control over humanity 0.89

00:10:09.520 and also cause a lot of people, a lot of starvation. So that's why we made up this image,

00:10:14.800 stop supporting climate alarmism. It's flea feeding the globalist beast, and it is literally

00:10:20.800 creating world hunger. Look at some countries, their shelves of Western nations, their shelves

00:10:26.480 are actually empty. Uh, so we have a responsibility to be aware and we have a responsibility to take

00:10:33.360 action. But as I've said here, do not be discouraged because we come with solutions. And so I can't wait to

00:10:40.640 get to Tom tonight, we always provide an empower our invite. And you know, the best thing you can do

00:10:46.720 is help us out by sharing all of our social on all of your social media, our weekly actions, as well as

00:10:53.600 our empower hour. And then within the document, as always, I'm sure most of you know, and are familiar

00:11:00.080 that we try to provide pertinent information. So it's an eight minute read, but you could spend a couple

00:11:06.080 of hours on this page listening to the videos and being educated. I know somebody in the chat had

00:11:11.200 said that they watched this video. This is 15 minutes long, but the full version is about two

00:11:17.200 hours and it is so interesting. And I walked away from this having absolutely no doubt that it is

00:11:24.480 nothing but individuals with very nefarious, a very nefarious agenda who are behind all of this.

00:11:31.040 Just to make it very clear, cows are not hurting the environment. All right. It is the government

00:11:39.360 that is creating this illusion. And because CO2 levels, they could no longer exist on climate change

00:11:48.160 with this scare that carbon dioxide was killing us all, because all the evidence is showing that is

00:11:54.240 absolutely false. So now all of a sudden, they want to say it's fertilizer, it's nitrogen that's now

00:12:00.320 interfering. And so we've got to shut down all agriculture. It's ridiculous. These people should

00:12:05.440 be so ashamed of themselves. And one day, I am very, very hopeful that we're going to bring them

00:12:11.520 all to account and that justice will prevail. This is no joke. They are wanting you and I to eat bugs.

00:12:21.040 And we have the largest cricket processing plant right here in Canada, in Ontario, the world's

00:12:29.840 largest cricket plant. So I don't know about you, but I'm not going to the garden to eat worms.

00:12:35.040 And I'm not going to be eating crickets and bugs. That's just not on the menu. And you could see here

00:12:41.360 as well that the WEF, they ended up saying the five reasons why eating bugs could reduce climate change,

00:12:49.520 not will reduce it, but could possibly, maybe. That's not a good enough reason to start eating

00:12:55.840 bugs. And I asked a good question, if you could picture Klaus and his little cabal there with Trudeau

00:13:01.760 and Gates and the rest of them sitting around the table, you know, coming up with this nonsense and laughing

00:13:08.560 at us. And I can definitely believe that they have had those opportunities where they've been sitting

00:13:13.840 there with their little hands and their little fists and all as they've, you know, planned and strategized

00:13:20.400 against the citizens of the world. Justice is coming. Anyways, I did a comparison here of, you know, this,

00:13:28.160 this lady here, she is such a ninny, you know, Christia Freeland. Every time I just can't even 0.99

00:13:34.720 really listen to her, but I had to force myself to listen to her in this instance. And as we consider

00:13:40.040 fossil fuels versus electric, she is a big fat liar. She is lying to you, telling you that we need to 1.00

00:13:48.000 reduce fossil fuels and go electric. Because as I prove in this report, electric cars are, are cost causing

00:13:57.200 more harm to the environment than, uh, gas engines. And so here's a lithium mind and, uh, lithium ion

00:14:05.840 batteries are what run electric vehicles. And you cannot tell me that this is not causing harm to our

00:14:12.120 environment. This is only one image. If you Google lithium ion batteries or sorry, mines, you will see

00:14:19.080 hundreds of these images around the world. All right. It's destroying our landscape. I don't know what

00:14:25.420 they're going to make, uh, maybe a big lake. I don't know. We have the Ogopogo here in, uh, in,

00:14:31.280 in BC. Possibly, you know, they might put some sea serpents or something in there. I I'm just disgusted

00:14:37.120 when I researched and look into this every week. We are still highlighting one of our wonderful youth

00:14:44.140 and giving them a voice. And it was very timely this week because, um, after our eight week training

00:14:49.920 session with the youth program, helping kids to, uh, learn how to, to speak and be leaders, uh, Ava did

00:14:57.860 one on geoengineering chemtrails and, and, and the timing was just perfect. And so I would really

00:15:03.520 encourage you. I was months ago, I was never one that believed that, um, our weather was being

00:15:10.280 manipulated. But after reading this report and seeing how long back they have been talking about

00:15:16.120 weather modification to 1891, they have the proof and the history on it. And I would recommend that

00:15:23.840 you watch the video once again, spend the time investing and knowing and learning and being

00:15:30.600 educated. And then I love, I love Michelle Sterling and she really digs into defending our kids. And she

00:15:39.340 brings awareness to the fact that we actually have ad standards against exploiting children. And you can

00:15:45.140 read these two sections here. I would encourage you to copy and paste those and send them to your

00:15:51.280 local school boards and tell them to knock it off. Stop scaring the heck out of our kids with these

00:15:57.120 programs in the school that are scientifically unfounded. And then we close off in a section here

00:16:03.260 at the end with solutions, join an action for Canada chapter, help us recruit Canadians to learn

00:16:10.300 about action for Canada because we are literally one of the only organizations with a national program

00:16:16.580 that has chapters that have been implemented to grow communities within communities, but also to

00:16:23.280 provide them the resources in in able to do that. And make sure that no matter who you are or what

00:16:29.720 you're facing, employee, teacher, student, elected official, we have support for you. So help us out with

00:16:36.980 that. All right, I want to get to the show. But I want to let you know, we are going to have Rocco on next

00:16:42.960 week. I'm very excited about that. There was this verse I came across today from the Bible. It says, do what is

00:16:49.620 good and run from evil. That means live a good life, do what is right, so that you may live. Then the Lord God of

00:16:56.820 heaven's armies will be your helper. Just as you have claimed, hate evil and love what is good. Turn your courts into

00:17:04.840 true halls of justice. Perhaps even yet the Lord God of heaven's armies will have mercy on the remnant

00:17:11.380 of his people. So we need to pray that God will have mercy on this nation. We need to support incredible

00:17:16.920 legal initiatives like what we have commenced with Rocco. We look forward to having him on next week and

00:17:23.380 that he is finally back. So I just want to, this was the encouragement, around the world in nations,

00:17:30.960 hundreds of thousands of people are showing up in opposition against their government. And this was

00:17:37.460 one with 367,000 views of people in Italy. So that's a lot of people. The other one was a wave,

00:17:49.640 a sea of hundreds of thousands of people in another nation, in another country. And I'm just so delighted.

00:17:56.460 But what the heck is wrong with Canadians? Where are they? Right? We should have 3,000 people on this 0.57

00:18:03.520 call. We need you to help us out in getting the word of Action for Canada out there. It's just not

00:18:09.800 Action for Canada. It's other organizations. They are just not seeing that a match is lit under

00:18:15.280 Canadians. They haven't actually had to suffer tyranny throughout my generation. But I learned from my

00:18:23.260 parents who came from Europe and we're in big trouble in Canada and we need to not put anything

00:18:29.780 on pause, not become complacent over the summer, but we need to get out there and be on the front lines

00:18:34.920 and fighting this war and strategizing before the fall hits when they're really going to bring it down

00:18:41.460 and really begin to crush Canadians once again. All right. Okay. So again, go to join under Empower Hour

00:18:50.600 under this chat links. You will find next week Tom Harris is listed here. We will have his

00:18:56.600 presentation that he's going to give tonight as well on this page and for any past guests that we've

00:19:02.020 had on. All right. Heather, would you please come on and let's bring Tom into the room. I'm excited

00:19:09.860 about his presentation. And thank you, Tanya, for your updates. There are so many great resources on

00:19:16.360 the Action for Canada website and I never get tired of hearing what you have to share with us.

00:19:22.680 It's my pleasure to introduce for the first time on the Empower Hour, Mr. Tom Harris. Tom is the

00:19:29.860 Executive Director of International Climate Science Coalition, Canada, and is a well-respected

00:19:35.860 man of many talents and extensive knowledge. He has 30 years experience as a mechanical engineer

00:19:42.720 and project manager. He is a science and technology communications professional as well as a technical

00:19:49.540 trainer and S&T advisor to a former opposition senior environment critic in Canada's parliament.

00:19:56.780 For the past 14 years, he has been working with a team of scientists and engineers to promote a

00:20:02.760 sensible approach to a range of energy and environmental topics, in particular, climate change.

00:20:10.120 At one time, Tom believed that our world was facing a carbon dioxide-induced climate emergency.

00:20:16.820 But over time, he realized he was wrong in this assumption and he changed from a climate alarmist

00:20:23.840 to a climate realist. Tom now does radio and TV interviews and gives presentations regarding his work

00:20:31.300 as well. His work is regularly published in newspapers across the world. Please help me welcome Tom Harris.

00:20:39.620 Tom, we're so excited that you can join us today and welcome to the Empower Hour.

00:20:45.740 Great to be on, that's for sure.

00:20:48.980 Fantastic. Well, Tom, welcome. I don't want to take up any more time, so we just want to hand the floor

00:20:55.780 over to you. We want to thank you so much for being here tonight and to help educate us further on this

00:21:01.220 very important topic.

00:21:03.420 Sure. Well, you know, I think many people in the world actually think that we have a climate emergency.

00:21:08.520 There's all kinds of other motivations we can talk about, things like world government, of course,

00:21:13.340 things like, you know, basically reducing the strength of the West.

00:21:16.600 But many people believe, like I used to believe, that the media were telling us the truth.

00:21:23.160 And it's interesting because at the time, I mean, I was an aerospace engineer. I was trained in mechanical

00:21:28.160 engineering and my subspecialty was aerospace. So I was actually looking at things like heat transfer

00:21:34.180 and thermodynamics and fluid mechanics, which made me think that I actually understood the climate

00:21:39.920 because the climate, of course, is a big thermofluid system.

00:21:43.200 But what I didn't realize was that, in fact, I was being deceived. And that's the whole point of my

00:21:48.940 presentation today. So it's my journey from climate alarmism to climate realism. And, you know,

00:21:54.420 if somebody with a master's in engineering and aerospace specialization can be deceived,

00:21:59.160 then I think lots and lots of people can be deceived. I believe that headlines like this were

00:22:04.280 actually realistic. Climate, you know, this is a Time magazine one from fairly recently,

00:22:08.480 how the pandemic can lead us to a better and greener future. And we'll talk about that later.

00:22:14.320 But I believe things like this. The Washington Post just recently said,

00:22:18.240 Earth is approaching a key climate tipping point. The world is on track to blaze,

00:22:23.440 love those words, a blaze, past a crucial climate target within eight years. Now, of course,

00:22:28.760 they've been saying that for a long time. And we'll show you that actually going back to 1970.

00:22:33.360 We've been almost on the verge of our climate emergency within a decade many times. But of

00:22:38.900 course, nothing's happened. So I actually changed my presentations. I was a professional speaker as a

00:22:44.280 hobby. And I changed my presentations to actually talk about space exploration, environment and human

00:22:50.740 survival. And I talked about how we were actually saving the home planet through space travel. And in

00:22:57.320 particular, by exploring other worlds, we actually could apply many of the lessons that we were

00:23:02.740 learning to the Earth. And that they call that field comparative planetology. And the example I

00:23:09.140 used actually, was how the runaway greenhouse effect on Venus was something that could happen on the

00:23:15.520 Earth if we weren't careful. And, you know, that sort of thing was coming in the future. And I actually

00:23:20.060 took part in Earth Day 1990 and 1991, giving this kind of a message to the public. I spoke to Kiwanis

00:23:27.820 clubs, I spoke to service clubs all over the Ottawa region and other places. And I gave presentations

00:23:33.880 to many organizations as well. And the whole focus of my talk was saving the home planet

00:23:39.140 by exploring other worlds. Now, part of what I was saying, I still think is true. And that is that by

00:23:45.740 exploring other worlds, we come to appreciate the Earth more. And it gives us a psychological change,

00:23:51.260 which allows us to be better stewards of our environment. But I use the example of the runaway

00:23:56.180 greenhouse effect on Venus. And in fact, I had an article published in the Ottawa Citizen. And it

00:24:02.580 was liked so much by Professor Tim Patterson, that he used it in his course at Carleton University. And

00:24:08.100 here is the page where he put up my article. And I was talking about how environmentalists should be

00:24:13.500 boosting climate change. And in particular, I was talking about the Cassini mission to Saturn.

00:24:18.340 But a little later in the article, I used this example. And I'll just read it out to you,

00:24:23.460 because it's actually quite wrong. But this is what I was saying. And it sort of allows you to sort of

00:24:29.860 forgive people, you know, for actually thinking that there is a climate emergency. And I have here

00:24:35.200 actually the text of a speech I was giving around that time. So I'll just read about a minute of it.

00:24:40.180 Other planets provide us with full-scale laboratories to not only test out our environmental theories,

00:24:45.800 but also to show what can happen here if we do not properly take care of the Earth.

00:24:49.920 There are many good examples of comparative planetology. However, for today, I have chosen

00:24:55.280 to speak about just one, which comes from the robotic exploration of Venus. Starting in the late 1950s,

00:25:02.320 radio telescopes were used for the first time to measure radiation coming from Venus. These emissions

00:25:08.660 indicated that the planet's surface temperature was about 460 degrees Celsius. That's hot enough to melt

00:25:14.880 lead or tin, by the way. So it's not a place you want to spend your summer holiday.

00:25:18.680 This was also significantly hotter than Mercury. And of course, Mercury is the closest planet to the

00:25:24.840 Sun. So it was quite surprising to scientists that Venus would be actually hotter than Mercury.

00:25:31.000 But they also thought that it actually, Venus should be cooler than the Earth, even though Venus is

00:25:36.460 closer to the Sun, because Venus has many more clouds than we do. They're covered totally with clouds,

00:25:41.880 which reflect back into space, the incident sunlight.

00:25:44.980 Yet strangely, Venus was by far the hottest world in the solar system. Many scientists thought that

00:25:50.820 something must be wrong with the instruments, or perhaps they just didn't understand the physical

00:25:55.040 science well enough. The answer to this mystery was finally supplied in 1962, when the Mariner 2

00:26:02.000 robot spacecraft flew by Venus. It found that the planet really was about 460 degrees, and that its massive

00:26:09.300 atmosphere was mostly carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide is, of course, a greenhouse gas which

00:26:14.260 effectively traps heat on a planetary body. The fact that this world was so incredibly hot due to the

00:26:20.420 greenhouse effect, and remember, I'm saying this in ignorance, was a sobering example of what can

00:26:26.660 happen on a planetary scale if the amount of carbon dioxide becomes too high. So I went on to use that

00:26:33.300 in an article, as I say, in the Ottawa Citizen. Now Professor Tim Patterson liked the article so much,

00:26:38.820 he put it up on his course web page for the students, and he said, however, the part on Venus

00:26:44.500 was wrong. And the reason it's wrong is this. Venus is actually very hot for several reasons. Obviously,

00:26:51.140 the CO2 contributes to that, but you have to realize not only is Venus closer to the Sun than the Earth,

00:26:57.180 but a day on Venus is something in the order of a half a year. So the planet is spinning very,

00:27:04.060 very slowly. On the Earth, every 24 hours, we're in night, and a lot of heat is dissipated away from

00:27:11.580 the Earth at night. So we cool off every 24 hours, which is one of the reasons the Earth isn't hotter.

00:27:16.380 But Venus, because it spins so slowly, gets really hot. And there's another reason, too. It turns out

00:27:24.300 Venus does not have oceans, of course. You're not going to have oceans at that kind of temperature.

00:27:28.700 But it also does not have plate tectonics, which Earth has. So what happens on Earth is the carbon

00:27:34.780 dioxide, and this is what Tim Patterson explained to the students. What happened on Earth is that carbon

00:27:39.980 dioxide is absorbed by the oceans. That's the major absorber of carbon dioxide, aside from the actual

00:27:45.980 rocks. But what happens is then sea creatures, shelled sea creatures, use the local environment

00:27:55.500 to make their shells. They die. They fall to the bottom. And what happens is the carbon dioxide

00:28:01.020 effectively is absorbed in the shells while those sea shells are being made and deposited on the ocean

00:28:07.340 floor. Now, ordinarily, the ocean floor would eventually become saturated, and it wouldn't be able

00:28:11.740 to absorb any more of the carbon dioxide that's being taken down by the dead sea shells. But because

00:28:18.460 the Earth has plate tectonics, it constantly replenishes the surface of the Earth with new

00:28:25.740 material. So that combination, the greenhouse gases closer to the sun, a very long day, and the fact that

00:28:34.540 Venus does not have oceans or plate tectonics, that is the combined reason why Venus is so high.

00:28:42.140 So I heard that Dr. Patterson was using my article from The Citizen, but that he told the students that

00:28:47.420 I was wrong on the Venus issue. So I wondered, you know, who is this right-wing denier, oil-funded, you know,

00:28:55.980 who is this guy? So he invited me into his lab, and I got a big surprise. Tim Patterson was a bushy,

00:29:02.940 bearded black beard, and he rode his bicycle to school every day. He adopted a baby from China. He

00:29:09.980 didn't sort of fit into the mold that I had in my mind of this right-winger. And what he showed me was

00:29:17.340 that in the geologic record, and remember, today's computer models are the foundation of the climate

00:29:24.700 scare. It's not the actual record. We'll look at the record in a few minutes. But what he showed me was

00:29:30.140 things like this. Now this is a graph that shows up to 600 million years ago. That's about the time

00:29:36.860 when the first hard-shelled sea creatures existed. So they go back in time that far, and they get

00:29:43.100 pretty good fossils. They grind them up, and they do oxygen isotope analysis, and they can actually get

00:29:48.700 an indication of temperature. We can talk about that in the question period afterwards, how they do it.

00:29:53.500 And atmospheric CO2 is measured in other ways. So let's take a look at this. I have a little bit of a

00:30:00.700 video to play, which will show how the two go together. And this totally astounded me when Dr.

00:30:06.860 Patterson showed me this kind of information.

00:30:11.500 So here we see average global temperature staying pretty constant. But then look at that, a big spike in

00:30:17.660 carbon dioxide. And by the way, have a look at the levels of carbon dioxide we're talking about.

00:30:23.020 Remember, in today's atmosphere, we're around here, 420 parts per million. At a half a billion years

00:30:30.220 ago, we were up around 4,000 to 7,000. And there was an explosion of life. So the whole idea that high

00:30:37.020 CO2 is threatening to life is obviously wrong. We can see that in the geologic record. But we can also

00:30:43.100 see that this big change in carbon dioxide resulted in no change to the global average temperature.

00:30:50.140 Let's go along here. What you notice is sometimes they're in sync, sometimes they're not in sync,

00:30:56.940 and sometimes they're completely the opposite. So what I started to realize was that, at least from

00:31:03.260 the geological perspective, there was no meaningful consistent correlation between CO2 and temperature.

00:31:11.100 And if you go up to this point here, you see where we're up at today. What you notice is that carbon

00:31:17.020 dioxide and CO2, sorry, CO2 and temperature are among the lowest in the record. Okay, we're actually in

00:31:25.580 a carbon dioxide famine right now. Most plants on the earth actually evolved at a time when CO2 was much

00:31:31.740 higher, you know, back in these kinds of regions, a Jurassic where we had, you know, lots and lots of

00:31:37.020 massive plants. And so right now we're actually at a CO2 famine. If you actually look down here at the,

00:31:43.980 now we're up to probably about, I guess around there, because it's gone up a little since this

00:31:48.460 graph was made. But when people talk about a 30% or 40 or 50% rise in the last century, the answer to

00:31:55.500 that question is, so what? I mean, a 50% rise from a starvation level of CO2 for plants is actually a

00:32:04.700 good thing. We'll talk about that a little bit later. So that was the first indication I had that, oh,

00:32:11.180 maybe I'm wrong. Well, Dr. Patterson actually exposed me to lots more scientists and introduced me to much

00:32:18.860 more research that showed that in the real geologic record, there's no correlation between CO2 and

00:32:25.580 temperature. And here's what you basically conclude from the geologic history. Scientists note that

00:32:32.220 geologically speaking, the era that we're in right now is a CO2 famine. The geologic record reveals that

00:32:39.980 ice ages and ice houses, ice houses, you know, are much, much colder periods. For example, 440 million

00:32:46.460 years ago, the whole earth was so cold that some scientists are saying that there may have been

00:32:51.980 no surface of the earth not covered with ice. In other words, even the oceans were covered with ice.

00:32:57.260 They call it the ice ball earth theory. And some scientists think that may have been the case

00:33:01.900 at some point in the past. And yet at those times, ice ages and ice house periods, look at that CO2 levels,

00:33:08.860 2000 to 8000 parts per million in comparison with today's measly 420.

00:33:15.820 Temperatures have been similar to the present day when carbon dioxide were up to 20 times higher than

00:33:20.780 today. So the interesting thing about the climate scare is that when you go to meetings or you see

00:33:25.580 interviews on television, notice how often they interview geologists. The answer is usually zero.

00:33:33.100 Because geologists know that in the history of the world, there is simply no indication that CO2 is a

00:33:39.260 problem. Yet Al Gore showed us things like this. He showed us how the temperature rose suddenly to,

00:33:45.420 well, what was here. Now it's up about here. And how this was the forecast for the future. And this

00:33:51.180 was the greatest and a half, you know, 600,000 years. Here's a graph that shows it a little further

00:33:56.380 back. And this is correct. 800,000 years ago. And we look at today's levels. Oh my God, look,

00:34:02.060 2100. It might be as high as 940, which would be double today's level. But yet again, the answer

00:34:08.860 to that is to look at the original graph here and say, so what? You know, so it's important to keep

00:34:16.140 perspective. And this graph actually shows the black line being the CO2 level millions of years

00:34:23.740 in the past. The worst forecast for the 21st century or the end of the 21st century is this

00:34:29.740 red line here, which is still very low. Okay. So that would be like around 940 parts per million in

00:34:36.220 comparison with today's 420. So, so really CO2 is not a problem from a climatic point of view. I mean,

00:34:43.660 it's very clear. So you have to ask, where does the scare come from? And we'll talk about that in

00:34:48.780 a second. And as you can see, Al Gore showed us part of the graph. He didn't show us what it was

00:34:55.260 in longer timeframe. And the interesting thing also is that if you're concerned about rising CO2,

00:35:01.740 then all of these different UN climate agreements are completely pointless because they're not

00:35:06.140 actually accomplishing anything. You can see CO2 has been rising year after year. All these agreements,

00:35:12.060 Kyoto, and then up here, the Paris agreement, and then the lockdown on and on and on. I was at the

00:35:16.940 Copenhagen agreement. I was at Paris talking all about how we're going to reduce CO2 to save the

00:35:22.140 planet. Meanwhile, CO2 just goes up and ignores us completely. It doesn't matter what agreements we

00:35:27.660 make, how much money we spend. CO2 is just going to do what it does. And you have to remember that

00:35:33.740 carbon dioxide is a plant food, okay? And greenhouses force carbon dioxide levels up to 1200

00:35:41.900 or 2000 parts per million, three to five times greater than the 415 or 420 that we see in today's

00:35:48.940 atmosphere. And that's, of course, because plants grow bigger and they need less water when you have

00:35:53.900 more CO2. Worldwide food harvests are up more than 30 percent in the last 30 years. And this is thanks to

00:36:01.660 more CO2. I mean, really, CO2 increase has no downside. It's not driving climate change. That's

00:36:09.740 pretty clear. CO2, of course, is benign. It's invisible. It's odorless. It's not a toxin unless

00:36:16.780 you get it up to levels far higher than it's ever been in Earth's history. And of course,

00:36:21.660 the reason why CO2 could be a problem eventually is that it would displace oxygen. But nothing has

00:36:28.300 occurred in the last half billion years to indicate that we are anything like that today. We're not

00:36:34.380 just simply, stuff just cannot happen. And yet we have these headlines constantly appearing. 1972,

00:36:40.540 10 years to stop catastrophe. 1982, oh, 10 years later, an environmental catastrophe, you know,

00:36:46.540 et cetera. We shall win or lose the struggle in the first years of the 1990s. You would think that

00:36:52.060 if somebody calls Wolf that many times, that eventually somebody is going to sort of wake up.

00:36:57.740 Well, some people are. Some people are waking up. And I'll talk more about that later.

00:37:02.620 Here is the temperature graph that we're almost always shown. And people say, oh my goodness,

00:37:06.380 look at how temperatures soared over the last 30 or 40 years. But what people don't really notice is the

00:37:12.860 incredibly tiny increments. We're talking about a half a degree and one degree. Since 1880,

00:37:19.500 temperature's gone up if you average the Earth's temperature, which is kind of a useless statistic,

00:37:24.300 because nobody lives in an average of the Earth. They all live in regions. But the temperature

00:37:28.940 average has gone up about 1.2 degrees. And even the UN admits that. So when I have Greenpeace tell me,

00:37:35.820 oh my God, we have a climate emergency, I ask them, and this is a question you might want to ask

00:37:40.540 people who tell you that there really is an emergency. How much has it warmed in the last 140 years? And they

00:37:45.900 say, oh, it must be 10 degrees. I say, no, 1.2. And in fact, it's funny because climatologists say,

00:37:53.100 if there weren't climatologists and meteorologists around to tell us about this warming, the warming is

00:37:59.100 so small, you would not even notice it in your lifetime. Okay. And this is what it looks like if

00:38:05.340 you plot it properly. Okay. So we're going all the way from zero degrees Fahrenheit up to 110. You know,

00:38:11.980 that's the kind of a range that you'd see in many parts of the world. And you can see, yeah,

00:38:16.700 there is some rise. It's pretty tiny. And let's take a look at the United States. Here's the mean,

00:38:23.580 how the mean has changed. Okay. You can see the mean here is the increasing. Oh, wow. That's a climate

00:38:30.700 emergency. It's ridiculous. And here's the best measurements of temperature. It's actually not 0.99

00:38:38.460 measured directly. It's measuring from radiation from satellites. And you can see that the amount

00:38:43.820 of warming that has occurred from the average from 91 to the year 2000, we're only at six one hundredths

00:38:51.900 of a degree, six one hundredths of a degree. I can't even measure that with a normal thermometer.

00:38:58.380 And that's a climate emergency, according to our extreme environmentalist friends.

00:39:04.780 This is the source of the climate scare. It's not present data. It's not past data. It's future

00:39:12.140 forecasts of computer models. Okay. Now, computer models over the last 30 years, you can see it is,

00:39:18.860 they have over forecast the warming by about 300 percent. Okay. So you've got, here's the model

00:39:25.580 forecast for this time period. And these are all different models. And you can see that's the average

00:39:31.340 of the models. And you can see the actual observations way down here. Now, I don't know about

00:39:35.820 you, but if I had a stock broker who every time he gave me a stock to buy and he forecast what was

00:39:40.700 going to happen, he was out by 300 percent, I might change stock brokers. This model, this also shows

00:39:48.540 that the average of the computer models, which is this red line, is far, far higher than what they're

00:39:54.300 actually measuring down below. Okay. Now, finally, many people talk about, oh, but it's extreme weather.

00:40:02.540 You know, we have much more extreme weather. Well, actually, no. The very best database of its kind

00:40:07.500 in the world, put out by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and this one here as well,

00:40:13.420 it records things like record snowfall, you know, record minimum, record maximum temperature, record

00:40:19.420 precipitation. These are based, these are statewide. This is a number of all-time records in the

00:40:25.740 historical climate network. And you can see that the records for maximum temperature, for example,

00:40:30.700 were mostly set in the 1930s. And that today, there's really nothing going on. So you have to say,

00:40:37.020 well, what's going on? We do seem to be noticing extreme weather a lot more. And there's two reasons.

00:40:42.220 First of all, there's an observational bias. If a major tornado hit Oklahoma 100 years ago,

00:40:47.580 there was a good chance that nobody would have seen it at all. Whereas now, we have a much denser

00:40:52.380 population. So not only would we see it, we'd probably have cell phones actually taking pictures.

00:40:57.820 And the second reason is that there's a huge densification of infrastructure. Over the last

00:41:03.420 century, infrastructure has increased by about 13-fold around the world. So in Florida, for example,

00:41:11.180 if you had one hotel on a stretch of beach and a hurricane hit, that one hotel might be damaged.

00:41:17.420 But now you've got 13 hotels. And while we do a good job of hurricane forecasting and warning people

00:41:23.660 and building things to be more robust, fact is you have a lot more things in harm's way. So those are the

00:41:30.460 things that are really happening. This also is very revealing. This is a global deaths from natural

00:41:36.380 disasters. And you can see that it's gone way, way, way down. Now, in the time period before we had

00:41:42.540 satellites, we did have these huge spikes. People killed because of extreme temperature, extreme

00:41:48.780 weather, droughts, wildfires, volcanic activities, earthquakes. We're much better now at forecasting

00:41:55.180 and warning people, getting people out of harm's way. We're also building structures in a much more

00:42:00.860 sensible fashion. But so you actually see that from the point of view of temperature,

00:42:05.820 from the point of view of CO2, extreme weather, and I can go on to the other ones, ice cover and

00:42:10.620 polar bears and ocean pH, all the rest of them, there is no evidence in the real world outside of

00:42:16.620 computer models that we actually have a climate emergency and natural disaster deaths are way,

00:42:22.860 way, way down. Now, I think just to end off, I think you find the following story a little bit funny.

00:42:29.980 The thing that really solidified my belief in climate realism was a presentation by David Suzuki.

00:42:38.060 And, you know, I agree with Suzuki on some things, but I went to a presentation,

00:42:43.020 oh, I don't know, it was around 1990 at the Congress Center in Ottawa. And I brought with me papers from

00:42:49.100 leading climate experts from MIT, from Harvard, from Yale, you know, from Canadian universities as well.

00:42:55.740 And I went to the microphone in front of about 1000 people. And I said,

00:42:59.500 you know, Dr. Suzuki, there are many scientists who specialize in this field. And of course,

00:43:03.900 you have to remember Suzuki was a fruit fly geneticist. But I said, there's many scientists

00:43:09.260 who disagree with what you're saying about climate change. And he said to me, who are these scientists

00:43:15.420 who disagree with me? It's like God was speaking. So I reached over and I pulled out of my briefcase,

00:43:22.620 some of the papers, and I started to read it. Well, they instantly turned off my microphone.

00:43:26.860 Well, I used to work in AV, so I saw how to turn it back on. So I reached over, I turned it back on.

00:43:31.020 And I said, Dr. Suzuki asked me a question, I have a good answer. To which Suzuki then turned to the

00:43:38.300 moderator and said, then I withdraw the question. And they pulled the power to the PA system until I sat

00:43:45.420 down.

00:43:45.660 So it was interesting, because in a way, he did me a favor, because not only did it actually

00:43:52.220 encourage me to realize that something's being hidden here. But there were people who came up to

00:43:57.660 me after the presentation, curious to see what were these papers that were disagreeing. So people

00:44:03.100 actually had more interest because he shut me up. But you know, we're hearing more and more statements

00:44:09.580 like this. You're a climate denier, if you disagree with any of the climate, you know, mantra,

00:44:17.740 and you belong in jail. And believe it or not, in California, they actually were trying before

00:44:22.220 the previous election, they may bring it back again, I don't know. But before the state election,

00:44:26.300 they were trying to make it illegal, actually have it as a crime to deny what they said was known

00:44:33.340 climate science. And so it's pretty wild. It's like something right out of 1984. So that's my

00:44:41.420 journey from climate alarmism to climate realism. And I'm really glad I made the move.

00:44:45.980 And since then, I've come in contact with so many thousands of scientists. You know,

00:44:50.940 these documents, for example, these are massive documents. I'll just hold it up in such a way you

00:44:55.420 can see it. You can see there's 1000 pages. And these are the climate change reconsidered reports

00:45:02.700 of the non-governmental international panel on climate change. And they include literally

00:45:08.060 thousands of references from peer-reviewed journals all over the world, things the media are purposely

00:45:13.180 suppressing, things that Facebook are suppressing, things that Twitter are suppressing, things that

00:45:17.500 our government are suppressing. And I gave this book, this big book, to Catherine McKenna when she was

00:45:23.420 Environment Minister. I met her in the hall after a meeting, and I had a little bit of a talk with her.

00:45:27.820 She was very pleasant, but she was completely clueless. She didn't have any idea that there were even

00:45:32.300 any scientists who disagreed with what she was saying. And when I gave her this big book,

00:45:37.180 her main comment was that it was heavy to carry back to her car. And within a week,

00:45:43.340 she was back to calling us climate change deniers. So it seemed to have no impact at all on her.

00:45:48.060 Maybe I should have hit her over the head with it. That might have had some impact. But, you know, 0.97

00:45:53.420 our politicians, those who actually understand what's really going on, especially in the Conservative Party,

00:45:58.860 are far too frightened of the media to actually bring it up. And that's a real shame, because

00:46:04.540 there is, in fact, a great opportunity for the Conservative Party of Canada to lead Canada out of

00:46:10.060 this disaster. Since 2015, according to the current Environment Minister, believe it or not, Canada has

00:46:18.540 spent $110 billion on what Stephen Goubeau calls the energy transition to stop climate change. $110 billion.

00:46:29.180 This is one country in, what, seven years. I mean, it's incredible. And so, yeah, we've got to fight

00:46:34.620 against this because it's also going to be used to take away our freedom through lockdowns. And we can

00:46:38.780 talk about that as well. So that's my intro. Wow. Stop sharing screen. I'm sitting here taking

00:46:46.540 notes and listening. I like your sense of humor, although it's not a laughing matter. But we know

00:46:53.900 that absolutely, you know, that all of this is meant to harm citizens around the world. They're

00:47:02.140 walking in lockstep. And when you talk about Catherine McKenna, she's another ninny. And she's 0.99

00:47:07.500 ridiculous. And to think that a book is too heavy, rather than the content being too heavy. Right? 0.99

00:47:14.140 What can you say about that? And, and so one, I want to ask our viewers, if you have a question,

00:47:20.860 now is a great time to raise your hand, go down to the bottom, and you'll see the icon to raise hand

00:47:26.860 there. There's a section for Q&A. And I think we'll dive right into that. You know, I, as well,

00:47:36.380 what I was thinking about is when you're talking about David Suzuki, and it's like, oh, oh, you know,

00:47:40.460 I withdraw the question. And it goes back to that movie. It's like, you can't handle the truth.

00:47:47.900 That's right. And it was interesting, because the audience were more interesting what I had to say,

00:47:52.620 because I wasn't allowed to say it. Well, yeah, that can be very intriguing as well, right? But it

00:47:58.860 needs to be said. I agree as well, that this is one of the reasons we've really got to press in,

00:48:05.020 because the conservatives have been such a huge disappointment in not having the backbone to stand

00:48:11.500 up and not fear, ooh, the media, and rather, you know, move towards gaining a good public opinion,

00:48:20.380 based on truth and facts. So I really appreciate you standing up, telling the truth, educating people.

00:48:29.420 It is so important, Tom. Yeah. And, you know, I find that many people, when you show them the basic

00:48:35.820 facts, first of all, they're shocked. You know, when I taught Tim Patterson's course for four semesters

00:48:42.060 at Carleton, I taught a total of 1,500 students by television as well as in person. And the first

00:48:49.020 reaction from the students is they were shocked. Man, you know, this is all being hidden from us.

00:48:54.780 And as time went by, I mean, there were some who were very upset. They didn't like this being told

00:48:59.580 to them. But when I showed them the actual data, they were just so surprised. And they were actually

00:49:04.860 very happy to learn about it, because I think students, generally speaking, like to be contrarians.

00:49:11.100 But, you know, it's funny, because some of them, they just hated it so much that I was telling

00:49:15.580 them something different. I remember during the final exam, believe it or not,

00:49:19.420 I was walking around and helping students as they needed questions answered. And one of them

00:49:24.220 put up her hand and this is what she said. She said, should I put down what you told us or what is true?

00:49:33.980 And so I said, what I told you.

00:49:36.540 Yes, that is true. I wasn't going to argue with her in the middle of the exam as to what was true.

00:49:45.100 Well, and this is the problem right now, right, is that our children are so impressionable. They've

00:49:51.340 got all of this climate alarmism right within the classroom. Parents, I've had so many reports,

00:49:59.180 this was a few years ago, when I was writing on this subject, that parents would pick their kids

00:50:04.060 up from school, they'd get in the car and the conversation was, mom, you ruined the planet. 1.00

00:50:09.980 And like, literally, they had been taught that their generation has not taken care of the planet

00:50:17.340 and were doomed for destruction. And that's why I appreciated Sterling's view on this to bring

00:50:25.020 awareness that, you know, our kids, there are rules against instilling fear in them based on lies,

00:50:33.180 first of all, and then using another child like Greta Thunberg to market all of this nonsense in 1.00

00:50:41.660 order to get them all stirred up. Because that stir up is that what you were just mentioning about

00:50:48.540 them is kids like to be contrary. They want a cause to get behind. And we on the right, I'll call it the

00:50:56.060 right. But the right, you know, the side of truth. Yeah, we've not been good about stirring up our

00:51:02.700 students in, you know, and so we're working on that, because we understand that our kids are vital

00:51:07.500 to the future, you know, of our country. Well, yeah, exactly. And I used to speak at high schools

00:51:12.780 quite often. And, you know, it's interesting to see the reaction of the different levels of my

00:51:16.860 audience, the students were very interested. And they actually liked it. Because as I say,

00:51:21.660 they like questioning authority, the teachers were so so about it. The principal was really against

00:51:27.180 it. And it's interesting, because I was due to speak at a local Ottawa high school a little while

00:51:31.740 ago. And the principal got a message from the school board. And they were told that I was to,

00:51:38.780 my presentation was to be canceled, because what I was saying was against government policy. And of

00:51:43.980 course, they worked for the government. So, so I didn't get to speak. And so now I'm not getting any

00:51:49.580 engagements, because they've put a kibosh on the whole thing, because they don't want the students

00:51:53.380 to hear this. No, and it's what they're doing is very damaging and very effective. And that's why

00:51:59.260 at the onset, I always take time to show, you know, the map of Canada, where Action for Canada

00:52:05.540 chapters are going in, because we're also working with pastors. And we're asking and appealing to

00:52:10.440 business owners and churches to open their doors, so that we can pull kids out of the cesspools

00:52:15.860 of indoctrination, the public school systems, and even some private schools, and get them into a

00:52:20.500 safe learning space where they can learn the truth, the facts based on science. It wouldn't

00:52:25.700 that be refreshing? Right? Yeah. All right. You know, it's funny, I find that, you know, I reread the

00:52:33.240 book 1984, just a couple years ago. And so much of what's in that book is coming true, is actually

00:52:39.680 reality now. And I encourage people, if you don't have time to read the whole book, at least look at the

00:52:44.500 10 page appendix. At the very end, it's on Newspeak. And what they've done in 1984, of course, is they

00:52:51.540 change the language, so that it affects the thinking pattern of the population. And sadly, the

00:52:57.080 conservatives are buying into that. You know, Pierre Polyev, for example, talks about carbon

00:53:02.000 sequestration to stop climate change. And it's not carbon, carbon is soot, or graphite, you know,

00:53:08.240 things like that. That's real pollution. So, you know, the first thing the conservatives should stop

00:53:13.360 doing is stop supporting the climate scare through their use of language, calling wind and solar green

00:53:20.200 power, for example, whereas in fact, it's arguably the most dirty power on the whole planet. You know,

00:53:26.240 we can talk about that later. But I mean, the conservatives, sadly, are promoting the climate

00:53:31.420 scare just with their use of language. Yes. Yeah. Okay. Can you actually explain what you mean by

00:53:37.380 that this green is a dirty, dirty energy? Or how did you frame that? Yeah, it's arguably the most

00:53:45.700 dirty energy on the planet, green and, you know, wind and solar power. And the reason is this. First

00:53:52.120 of all, people look at the wind, they see the results of the wind and the sun, and they say,

00:53:56.220 oh, it's free and it's clean and everything else. And yeah, that's true. But to try and get the energy

00:54:01.100 out of it is very, very high technology intensive. And, you know, the transition in energy use

00:54:08.460 throughout human history has been from very diffuse energy sources like wind, when we had wind windmills

00:54:15.200 in Holland, for example, to more and more dense energy, eventually going to wood and then to coal

00:54:21.000 and then natural gas and oil and finally nuclear. It's becoming more and more dense, the energy sources.

00:54:27.480 And that's a great thing, because of course, the environmental footprint is much smaller

00:54:31.240 than if you have to, you know, basically tear up a forest to put up wind turbines. You know,

00:54:37.800 here in Ottawa, for example, they want to put up and you will find this hard to believe,

00:54:41.820 they want to put up 710 industrial wind turbines taller than the Peace Tower. And what's going to be

00:54:48.240 required is they're going to have to cut down a lot of the green belt, because the trees, of course,

00:54:53.320 give a wind shade. You can't put a wind turbine behind a big group of trees, because you don't

00:54:58.980 have much wind. And the turbines themselves have to be spaced apart sufficiently that, you know,

00:55:04.820 you can't put a turbine in the wind shadow of another turbine. So they've got to be a kilometer

00:55:09.640 or so apart. The other point is, of course, in Ontario, they have to only be 550 meters from a

00:55:15.820 dwelling, which is too close, by the way, because they do cause infrasound, which penetrates the

00:55:21.500 home, goes right through your body, causes headaches and all sorts of things. In Europe,

00:55:26.080 for example, they're talking about two kilometers setback. So you have to say, well, where would

00:55:29.840 they put 710 turbines taller than the Peace Tower with a two kilometer setback? Well, as I say,

00:55:36.060 they'd have to cut down a lot of forest. They'd also have to get the turbine somewhere. And this

00:55:40.920 is the interesting thing. In turbines, in batteries, in solar power, there are a fair amount of rare earth

00:55:47.700 materials that are required, as well as things like cobalt. And cobalt's a good example of why

00:55:53.020 these are very dirty energy sources. In the case of cobalt, the Congo is the primary source in the

00:55:59.120 world for cobalt. And most of the mines there are owned by China. So you can be pretty sure that they

00:56:04.420 have pretty horrible human rights standards. And in particular, 40,000 children, some as young as

00:56:10.820 four years old, are going into these tiny small spaces and pulling out the cobalt. They're being

00:56:17.120 subjected to incredible, well, first of all, danger from collapse and things. Because if you look at

00:56:22.400 these mines, they're certainly not using high technology. They're also exposed to radioactive

00:56:26.860 dust and, you know, just really a filthy environment. Then those cobalt that's mined in the

00:56:33.460 Congo is shipped to China, where they're then used to make batteries and other things in the green

00:56:39.100 green energy field, where, of course, they dump all their effluents into the rivers and everything

00:56:43.900 else. And they're even using slave labor, the Uyghurs, to construct a lot of these things. So, 1.00

00:56:49.700 I mean, the same thing with lithium. I mean, for lithium batteries, for example, a lot of it comes

00:56:55.700 from the lithium triangle in South America, where they're using water that's already scarce. They're

00:57:01.140 taking it away from the indigenous people. You know, I wrote an article a little while ago, and I think 1.00

00:57:05.660 you put it on your website, about how progressives should actually look at where these energy sources

00:57:11.260 are coming from, where the raw materials come from. And the same thing with, and, you know,

00:57:16.340 a really good movie to watch is Planet of the Humans by Michael Moore, Planet of the Humans.

00:57:22.720 Now, Michael Moore is a dedicated left winger. And so, for that reason, he became public enemy number

00:57:28.380 one among progressives when he put this film out. Because what he showed, while he thinks there is a

00:57:33.760 climate scare, he shows that we are destroying the earth even faster by the conversion to wind and

00:57:39.600 solar power. And the interesting thing, Tanya, to realize is that although we've spent, I mean,

00:57:45.380 literally trillions of dollars over the last couple of decades on wind and solar power, subsidizing it

00:57:50.540 all over the place, it still represents about the same fraction of world energy use as it did,

00:57:57.100 say, 20 years ago. We've been staying, we've been hovering at around 80% of world energy use is

00:58:02.880 hydrocarbons for a couple of decades. And despite all this money that's being spent, 300,000 wind

00:58:10.480 turbines around the world, industrial turbines, a third of a million, despite all of this building,

00:58:15.560 we're still getting most of our energy about 80% from fossil fuels. So, I mean, like the attempts to

00:58:21.420 reduce CO2, where all these treaties are being passed, we're not succeeding. Even if you did believe

00:58:27.120 that we were causing a climate crisis, it's not working. And the last thing I wanted to point out

00:58:32.160 was the bird deaths, birds and bats. There's a wind farm in California that's been going for a few

00:58:38.460 decades now. It's called the Altamont Wind Farm. And it's killed something in the order of 3,000

00:58:44.240 golden eagles, 3,000 golden eagles. So, when people say to me, well, you know, cats kill more birds

00:58:50.420 than do wind turbines. Yeah, that's true. But they don't kill golden eagles.

00:58:55.300 No, some of the protected species. Yeah, raptors may be killing the cats, but the

00:59:01.640 cats are certainly not killing them. And the other fact is the bats. It's interesting because not only

00:59:06.920 bats are killed, not only when they are hit by the turbine blade, but even if they go in the low

00:59:11.840 pressure zone behind a turbine blade, their lungs burst and they actually suffocate, they drown

00:59:17.940 basically in their own blood. I mean, it's a very gruesome death for these bats. And twice as many bats

00:59:23.080 are being killed by wind turbines than birds. In fact, I have a friend who works for a conservation

00:59:28.100 center and he's a lover of bats. And he talks about how important they are because they control

00:59:32.640 our mosquito population. He says that we're going to see the extinction of some species of bats if we

00:59:39.180 keep expanding wind turbines as quickly as we are. And he's very angry about that. So, when you add all

00:59:44.700 this up, it's not green energy. I mean, it's ridiculous to call this green energy. It's actually

00:59:49.940 highly destructive and very ineffective on top of it.

00:59:54.860 Well, you know, I'm so glad that you've clarified some of that because I know when I travel to the

00:59:59.660 interior, I pass this section and there's these three wind turbines. They're massive. I always say

01:00:05.320 they remind me of like an alien invasion. They're like the 4G, 5G towers that they're putting in. And

01:00:11.080 I get frustrated. I actually get angry when I see them because I'm like, how can that be better for our

01:00:17.760 environment than the sources of fuel, the natural fuel that we've been using? And this bottom line

01:00:25.040 is like, I know that they want to destroy a great deal of the world population, but as they go to

01:00:30.120 the climate change, it has become a money-making business. And there's lots of dollars to be had

01:00:36.620 there. When you talk about $110 billion of Canadians' hard-earned tax dollars being spent since Trudeau got

01:00:44.480 into office on this nonsense, it makes me just want to drive there, say, how can we just take

01:00:50.040 this individual and put them all in jail, right? Because they are squeezing the noose on the

01:00:56.260 population. They're destroying our economy on intentionally. They're making themselves rich

01:01:02.320 and it's got to stop. And it's only through awareness and people getting irate enough.

01:01:07.760 Now, Tom, what I want to do is we've got a couple of people with their hands up and then get to some of

01:01:11.440 the Q&A. This is such an interesting conversation with you. I love it because I've been really put

01:01:17.940 out, you know, about all this climate alarmism years ago when I was dealing with this, seeing

01:01:24.180 that they're using Thomas the Train in cartoons to exploit our children and get them early in the

01:01:30.600 homes convinced there's a climate problem. And then my friends in Alberta, you know, all of us have,

01:01:37.740 you know, our community, our fellow Canadians in Alberta have had their livelihood shut down over

01:01:43.160 this, you know, nonsense from the government. People are committing suicide. This was pre-COVID

01:01:49.320 and it's only been impacted even greater because now the jobs that they did have, trying to work

01:01:55.880 three jobs to make up for the jobs that they'd had in the resource sector, now those jobs are gone

01:02:00.740 because they won't get double back. So, Terenzio, can we bring some people on with their hands up,

01:02:06.140 please? Yes, absolutely. Just another friendly reminder for those that would like to ask a

01:02:11.700 question, if you go to the bottom of your Zoom and just raise your hand virtually and we'll make

01:02:16.200 sure we put you in the queue. Just while we're waiting, I'll point out one more thing. In the

01:02:20.040 United States, believe it or not, they give what's called a kill permit. You're allowed to kill a 0.99

01:02:25.300 certain number of endangered species if you're running wind turbines. And so what the turbine companies do

01:02:32.560 is before dawn, they scurry around the wind farms and they clean up all the dead birds so the

01:02:38.540 tourists don't see them. So you have to ask, I mean, if these are so environmentally friendly,

01:02:44.160 why do they give kill permits for endangered species? Absolutely. I wouldn't have known that

01:02:50.260 if you hadn't mentioned it. Okay, Terenzio, who have we got? All right. First is from Darlene.

01:02:55.340 Darlene, did you see a message pop up on your screen? Sometimes we can't get people unmuted. So

01:03:04.820 Darlene, are you able to connect? In the meantime, we can move to the next question. And next question

01:03:11.120 is from Ken. Hi, Ken. Can you, there you go. Okay. I've got a two-part question. Have you heard of

01:03:23.480 Peter Ridd's idea of setting up an office of science that would be independent from the

01:03:29.180 government? It would be answering only to the Auditor General, which would be responsible for

01:03:33.560 doing quality assurance that would involve testing, checking and replicating any of the science

01:03:38.340 before it gets put into government policy. And the second part to that question is, are you aware of

01:03:44.420 any level of government that has done any due diligence on this climate change claptrap? Because

01:03:49.960 I've been looking everywhere. The only place that I found anyone doing any kind of diligence at all

01:03:54.800 is the Senate. And they didn't come to any conclusions. The only conclusion I can draw is that

01:04:00.060 the only, that all of this climate stuff is coming from the policy generating platforms in the political

01:04:06.560 parties. And they're not doing any science. They're just trying to decide on what gets votes.

01:04:12.920 You know, it's interesting. First of all, one of our top scientists actually went to meet with the

01:04:18.360 Environment Minister. I won't say who it was, because it was a confidential meeting. But

01:04:22.520 the scientist was going on and on about, you know, the science of climate change. And the particular

01:04:28.680 Environment Minister, I won't say who he was, it was a he. It wasn't Catherine McKenna. He said,

01:04:35.060 Dr. X, he said, you realize that science plays no role on this file. And my friend was so ticked off.

01:04:42.460 He came home. He came home and he withdrew from the party because I guess he was a member before

01:04:48.380 that. But no, I don't know of any particular move that you're describing to establish some sort of

01:04:54.260 independent assessment. We actually arranged for several scientists to meet with Dr. Carty, who was

01:05:00.500 a previous science advisor to the Prime Minister. And it didn't get anywhere. I mean, Dr. Carty came in

01:05:07.400 and was very surprised when all these, you know, we had several four or five scientists go in and talk to him

01:05:11.940 and show him, you know, the other side of the story and the fact that there's lots of science to support

01:05:17.960 the climate realist position. And he was shocked, but he didn't do anything about it. So, so far, we've been

01:05:24.340 totally unsuccessful at getting governments to actually have this kind of an independent audit. I think the reason

01:05:30.460 certainly with the current government that that won't happen is because, of course, their statements would be 0.98

01:05:35.260 revealed as ridiculous. One of our scientists, again, I can't say who he was, but he works, used to work for fisheries and

01:05:42.700 oceans. And he had just finished a policy paper that showed that the North Atlantic was cooling. Now, this scientist

01:05:50.000 being published all over the world, I mean, he's a really leading expert. And the director was holding up the report

01:05:56.160 before sending it to the publishing journal. And finally, my friend cornered him in the washroom and said, what's going on?

01:06:03.240 Why aren't you sending my report to be published? And the director sort of patted him on the shoulder and said, well,

01:06:09.500 you've had lots of papers published, haven't you? He said, yes, I have. And he said, well, you wouldn't mind if we

01:06:15.820 didn't publish this one, would you? He said, yes, I would. It was a lot of work. Because you see, the director told him,

01:06:22.920 he said, but you're saying the opposite to what the minister has just said. And so what it is, and it's interesting,

01:06:29.200 because I've seen other examples of this too, it's not evidence-based decision-making, it's decision-based

01:06:35.860 evidence-making. In other words, the minister makes a statement, you know, the North Atlantic is getting

01:06:40.760 too hot or something. The fact is, of course, the research doesn't support that. So scientists are

01:06:46.100 more likely policy wonks are given the job of finding research to support what the minister said.

01:06:52.460 And I think it really goes back to what this previous environment minister said, namely,

01:06:56.300 science just plays no role on the decision-making process. So they really don't care what the

01:07:03.380 science says. It was quite remarkable, as you were saying, that the Senate actually did do some good

01:07:07.980 work in this area. Nancy Green Rain, when she was a senator, I worked with her actually to bring those

01:07:13.300 scientists in. We have the hearing that they did, you know, with Dr. Patterson, Ian Clark, Jan Weiser,

01:07:19.540 and Ross McKittrick. And they did a really great event. You know, the Senate actually did very useful

01:07:24.480 work. And they've done that two or three times, actually. So that may be our solution, because

01:07:29.140 the MPs are just so frightened, you know. And sadly, with the exception of Roman Barber,

01:07:34.980 who has yet to commit himself on the climate issue, all of the other candidates are all promoting the

01:07:41.020 climate scare in one way or another. You know, it's funny, because I'll send an email to Pierre

01:07:45.600 Polly, for example. And, you know, I like Pierre, I think he's got a lot of attributes that are great. But on

01:07:50.300 this issue, he's terrible. He keeps saying, oh, we're going to have no carbon tax. But we're going

01:07:54.940 to do, you know, we're going to sequester carbon dioxide, carbon, as he calls it, underground.

01:07:59.900 We're going to have more electric vehicles. We're going to get developing countries to go off coal 0.99

01:08:05.020 and switch to natural gas to so-called save the climate. But, you know, it's interesting,

01:08:10.320 because with Aaron O'Toole and his previous plan, there were various economists that showed that

01:08:15.640 his regulation-focused plan, instead of a carbon tax plan, was actually more expensive. So the

01:08:22.820 conservatives are very disappointing on this. And, you know, I think they're very much going

01:08:27.820 against the grassroots. We had a booth set up at the Strong and Free Networking Conference here in

01:08:35.140 Ottawa. And it was just amazing. Hundreds of grassroots conservatives were coming around and saying,

01:08:40.080 yeah, we really like what you're saying, but none of our leaders will say this.

01:08:43.740 And when you talk to the leaders, they keep telling about, well, you know, I have to get

01:08:48.220 into power first. So, yeah, but, you know, the first step to become conservative leader is that

01:08:52.480 you get the support of the grassroots. I mean, they're the ones who make you conservative leader.

01:08:56.980 And if the grassroots wants you to support climate realism, if you're the only one doing it,

01:09:02.160 you have a much better chance of winning. And I've told this to a number of the candidates,

01:09:06.040 but they're just so frightened. You know, they seem to think that they have to follow public

01:09:11.000 opinion. They can't lead by actually showing people what the truth is.

01:09:16.880 And Tom, this is exactly, you know, what the issue has been in the last years. The conservatives

01:09:21.020 have been infiltrated. They're no longer a friend of the free world in Canada. Pierre

01:09:27.240 Polliver, I'm convinced, is part of this. And that's why, you know, he can talk a good talk,

01:09:32.640 but he's been silent for two years. He hasn't raised his voice at all on behalf of Canadians

01:09:39.680 or the hundreds of thousands of businesses that have been shut down. And there was not one

01:09:44.480 conservative that was doing that. If they did, they were removed from the party. You know,

01:09:50.320 if we take a look at Maxime Bernier, he has been speaking up against climate change and,

01:09:56.340 you know, the other things that are creating problems. So it's not based on science. It's based

01:10:01.940 on political decisions. And that's what we're seeing throughout, you know, the major parties

01:10:07.820 on everything, whether it's an experimental injection, whether it's 5G being harmful because

01:10:14.220 they haven't updated the harms of electromagnetic fields with Health Canada. They don't care about

01:10:20.620 the science. This is about putting forward objectives, right, that the globalists have designed

01:10:29.380 to cause basically the most amount of harm they can to citizens. And that's why bottom line,

01:10:34.780 I keep coming back to, we have to get a coalition of Canadians who are actively involved in removing 0.95

01:10:41.440 the current elected officials and replacing them with people that agree. We can't convince

01:10:47.580 backbone, like people without a backbone in office right now to have a voice and stand up for media.

01:10:54.180 If it's not in them, they're not going to do it. And why would we want to reelect them?

01:10:59.400 And I can tell you where some of this originates. You know, when there was a Canadian Alliance party,

01:11:05.400 that was the group I was working for actually as a legislative assistant back around 2002.

01:11:12.000 The Canadian Alliance was a truly conservative party. I mean, it was actually supporting conservative

01:11:17.100 values. And in particular, on the climate issue, they were saying very, very sensible things. And I

01:11:22.220 guess I'm a bit biased because I was writing them. You know, I was writing the speeches for my boss,

01:11:26.340 who was the environment critic. That was Bob Mills. And then you had the progressive conservatives who

01:11:31.300 were existing at the same time. And I always have a joke. You know, I always think that's a funny

01:11:34.780 name. It's like the left right party. But anyway, the progressive conservatives only had two MPs left

01:11:40.660 after Kim Campbell's destruction. And when the two parties merged, we assumed it was going to be a

01:11:47.460 truly conservative party because there were far more Canadian Alliance MPs than there were two, you know,

01:11:53.180 from the progressive conservatives. But what we didn't count on was this. And this is what people

01:11:58.320 have to understand. The backroom people, the strategy people, the communications people, the head of

01:12:03.640 these different departments, they were all red Tories. They were not true blue conservatives. And sadly,

01:12:10.180 they hijacked the party. So even though a very conservative group, namely the Canadian Alliance MPs,

01:12:16.460 merged with the red Tory progressive conservatives, the party became just like the old red Tory

01:12:23.180 party. You know, and I think that's what's going on behind the scenes. And I talked to people who

01:12:28.000 are current legislative assistants within the party. And they're told point blank, you cannot bring up

01:12:33.780 this issue. So sadly, it's these behind the scenes people. And you sort of have to wonder,

01:12:38.280 do they not want their party to win? Well, I'll tell you something interesting. I think if they were

01:12:43.880 given the choice between having a true blue conservative conservative party of Canada,

01:12:49.020 and a red Tory conservative party of Canada that, you know, kind of flounders and doesn't really

01:12:54.100 stand for much, they would choose the second one. They would choose to lose the election rather than

01:12:59.780 be true blue conservatives. And the reason is this, they're looking ahead to their careers in the

01:13:06.480 communications sector, working for public relations firms, which in Ottawa are almost exclusively left

01:13:12.160 wing. So what's happening, I believe, is that many of the people that control the direction of the

01:13:18.360 Conservative Party of Canada are actually betraying the party. And a lot of it is because of their own

01:13:24.020 personal desire to work in a field that requires them to not be conservative. So sadly, the, you know,

01:13:30.960 the MPs themselves are told to shut up, you know, I mean, look at Brad Trost.

01:13:37.880 Yeah, yeah, I know Brad Trost personally, actually, and had many conversations, you know, with him. And to me,

01:13:44.540 it's the Brad Trost, it's the Derek Sloan, it's the Maxime Berniers, who the ones that are making

01:13:50.140 the difference. And so if these poor victims of MPs can't speak up in their party, why don't they

01:13:55.900 create a coalition to step out and be independents and represent the constituents that, you know,

01:14:02.040 trusted their vote to them. So that would be my question. What do you have to say about the fact

01:14:07.260 that they have so much, the government has so much money for all this climate change nonsense,

01:14:12.580 but not for clean water? Oh, yeah, that's crazy. I mean, that is a social justice issue. And it's

01:14:18.540 one of the things that left wingers should be very upset about, because you have native reserves across

01:14:23.900 Canada who still have boiled drinking water orders. Okay, so we can't give them a clean drinking

01:14:29.800 water, but we can spend hundreds of billions on affecting climate, perhaps, maybe someday. 0.91

01:14:36.980 And, you know, we actually had a cartoon made up about this, an editorial cartoon,

01:14:41.060 and I'll send it to you because you might want to share it with people. What it shows is the divide

01:14:45.660 between the rich West, relatively rich, and the poor people in Africa. And the African is asking 0.99

01:14:52.620 for help. And behind him, you can see the crosses of his children who've died in famine or drought or

01:14:58.940 whatever. And the UN guy on the other side is looking at his cell phone, and he's taking a selfie,

01:15:05.120 and he's saying, well, don't worry, we're stopping carbon dioxide global warming, so this won't happen to

01:15:10.460 your grandchildren. And, you know, the point is, he won't have any grandchildren.

01:15:15.060 So, you know, it's interesting, Tanya, because many people in developing countries recognize this.

01:15:20.300 When I was at the Copenhagen Climate Conference, the Africans were furious. They were saying, look,

01:15:25.400 you are arguing about how to reduce carbon dioxide to maybe affect climate in 50 years.

01:15:30.600 We need help today from real climate change, independent of the cause. And, of course,

01:15:36.000 climate always changes. I mean, if it weren't for climate change, I'd be sitting under two kilometers

01:15:40.400 of ice right now. So, thank God, climate changes. And in some cases, people need help adapting to

01:15:46.300 natural climate change. But in the Copenhagen Conference, despite the UN saying we want half

01:15:51.440 of it to go to adaptation, and half of it to go to mitigation, trying to stop climate change,

01:15:56.720 almost all the money was going to try to stop climate change. Very little was actually going to

01:16:02.220 the boots on the ground approach needed to help real people today. And there's a good reason. 0.60

01:16:07.500 To access water. Yeah. Sorry to interrupt, but to access water and good health. And instead,

01:16:12.260 Justin Trudeau, for instance, is sending $600 million for abortions to the African people. And

01:16:18.660 they're saying, we don't want abortions. We want to be able to take care of our children and have

01:16:22.900 facilities to get them the medical care they need. Now, when you talked about ICE, can I ask you a

01:16:28.660 quick question on that one? A lot of people, you know, a lot of the hysteria has been around,

01:16:33.380 you know, that the ice is melting and the polar bears have nowhere to go. What's your comment on

01:16:37.960 that? Well, first of all, if, you know, it's funny, Bob Carter, who used to be our chief scientist,

01:16:42.680 he's just passed away a little while ago. He used to show a slide of polar bears on the ice. And he said,

01:16:49.200 you know, this must be virtual reality. It can't be real polar bears. Because if polar bears were as

01:16:54.660 fragile as people think, then they would have gone extinct. And he then shows the temperature

01:16:59.220 graph and times in the past, when the Arctic truly was ice free, many times in the past. I mean,

01:17:04.860 polar bears have been around for something like 70,000 years. And in that timeframe, there were

01:17:09.800 periods where the ice in the Arctic was pretty well gone. And he says, well, they must have gone

01:17:14.260 extinct, you know, so there are no polar bears alive today. And of course, Susan Crockford, who's 0.96

01:17:19.260 somebody you might want to interview from the University of Victoria. She's a polar bear expert. She wrote a

01:17:24.100 book called The Polar Bear Catastrophe That Never Happened. And right now, we have something like

01:17:29.860 25,000 to 30,000 polar bears, in contrast to the 1960s, when we had about 5,000. So the reduction in

01:17:37.840 sea ice is certainly not hurting them at all. In fact, what hurts polar bears are two things. One,

01:17:43.060 we conquered, and that was excess hunting. That's the main reason why the polar bear populations have

01:17:48.600 recovered, because we've cut down on the excess hunting. But the other thing that hurts polar bears is

01:17:53.620 when it's too cold, because the ice is too thick, and the seals don't break through, they go somewhere

01:17:58.200 else. And so their food source disappears. But you know, polar bears are a very, very robust animal. You

01:18:05.140 know, when they were considering declaring them an endangered species in Washington, DC, quite a number

01:18:10.840 of the Inuit went down. And they actually said, there's too many polar bears, you know, don't declare them

01:18:16.820 the only endangered species is Inuit children, because they've that polar bears are so many of them, they

01:18:22.380 wander into the town. And they've actually been issuing a lot more hunting licenses, or sorry, rifles,

01:18:27.740 actually, to people just to protect them from all the polar bears. But you know, the interesting thing

01:18:33.660 about the Arctic, there are parts of the Arctic where the ice is decreasing, yes. But then there's other

01:18:39.120 parts like in the Western Arctic, where there's no problem at all. Dr. Patterson, the fellow who was my,

01:18:44.400 you know, inspiration to change sides, he does a lot of research in the Western Arctic of Canada.

01:18:50.760 And in particular, he's paid to try and find out if the ice roads are going to be viable for decades in the

01:18:58.280 future. Because for a diamond miners and other people who are developing resources up there, they want to know that

01:19:04.500 the roads are going to still be usable for many, many years to come. Otherwise, they don't want to build the mines,

01:19:10.040 because they'd have to be bringing in almost everything by helicopter for the whole year. And

01:19:14.960 he found that he found that in the Western Arctic, the ice roads have 30 years ahead of them with no

01:19:22.320 problems at all. So of course, you know, National Geographic, they don't send people to that part of

01:19:26.900 the Arctic to take pictures, they send it to the part of the Arctic, where, you know, ice is decreasing.

01:19:32.160 And in some places, you know, if permafrost is melting, houses may in fact be falling down. And so,

01:19:39.460 I mean, it's kind of like that cartoon we had, you're going to have a guy from Ottawa go up to

01:19:44.400 that part of Canada and say to the native whose home is falling down, well, we're working to stop 1.00

01:19:50.700 climate change for 50 years from now. Well, how about helping them now? And you know, Tanya,

01:19:56.120 this is a problem all over the world. Right now, the climate policy, it's the climate policy

01:20:02.380 initiative out of San Francisco, they track how much money is being spent on what's called climate

01:20:08.280 finance around the world. And that can include adaptation, it can include mitigation, it includes

01:20:13.420 alternative energy, which supposedly is stopping climate change, which of course it isn't. And

01:20:18.400 they've tracked over a billion dollars US a day, a billion a day. And that's all they've tracked.

01:20:25.100 It's probably a lot more than that. And of that, 91% of it is going to try to stop climate change.

01:20:32.560 91%. Remember, the UN wanted it 50-50. But the reason is this, if you actually look at where the

01:20:38.540 money is going, it's going to alternative energy companies primarily. And they make an absolute

01:20:43.480 fortune because of the climate scare. The adaptation actions, which constitute only about 7%, there's some

01:20:50.580 of it that's part adaptation and mitigation together. But the 7% that goes adaptation,

01:20:56.100 it doesn't make much money for the big international companies. You know, if you're building wells for

01:21:02.580 people, or you're helping them move, you know, to an area that's away from encroaching deserts, then,

01:21:09.280 you know, this just doesn't make big money. So the driver in all this is money. And it's the same

01:21:14.420 thing in the case of the media. A leading Canadian editor, I can't say his newspaper, because I would

01:21:21.440 identify who he was. But I asked him, you know, they used to publish us, say, around 1999, 2000, 2005,

01:21:29.900 they would publish this all the time. And now they won't publish this at all. So I asked him,

01:21:35.000 why do you not publish both sides of the climate debate and let the reader decide which they agree

01:21:40.380 with? He said, oh, well, we agree with David Suzuki. So I said, well, that's interesting. But do you have

01:21:46.840 anybody on staff who even has one side of the argument? That is the other side. Yeah. So I asked him, I said,

01:21:54.600 do you have anybody on staff who even has a Bachelor of Science so they can judge between the two sides? He

01:21:59.300 said, no. So I said, come on. So why are you really not publishing Dr. Patterson or Ian Clark from Ottawa U or

01:22:06.160 Ian Weiss or all these others? He said, well, Tom, don't tell anybody. But if we publish your point

01:22:13.060 of view, our advertisers wouldn't like it. And I thought about it. And I realized, yeah, they like

01:22:18.100 negative news that sells media and increases their circulation. But there's another reason.

01:22:23.000 If you have some car company or a printing company that has a big $10,000 ad, okay, because they're very

01:22:29.620 expensive in these newspapers. And they're talking about how they're reducing greenhouse gases to save the

01:22:35.260 climate. So buy our printer. The last thing they want is to turn the page and have Dr. Patterson

01:22:40.260 saying, you can't control climate. I mean, get real. So it's money, again, that's driving it in the case

01:22:46.960 of the media as well. I mean, a certain amount of ideology there, too, because they're mostly left

01:22:51.420 wing. But sadly, it is the money, you know. It is. It is a great driving force. As I was going

01:22:57.980 through investigating this, I mean, we're even experienced something when we set up chapters,

01:23:02.600 we send them printed materials. Again, I won't say who we're using right now, because we're definitely

01:23:08.240 going to find a Canadian printer that is on our side. But we have certain mask flyers. And they

01:23:14.800 have refused to, you know, print these mask flyers, because they sell masks. They don't care about the

01:23:20.760 truth. They don't care about the destruction of our nations. They just care about making that almighty

01:23:25.200 buck. So let's get to, we'll do one or two more questions. And then we're going to need to come to a

01:23:30.260 close here. This has been fantastic. You know, I believe truly that God is the absolute controller

01:23:35.900 of the weather. I do believe as well that climate is always changing, it will continue to change,

01:23:40.720 that we do need to take care of the earth and do our part to get rid of all these plastics. And

01:23:44.620 you'll notice Trudeau was like frantic, ooh, we got to stop with all the straws. But he hasn't minded

01:23:50.140 the billions of pounds of crappy gloves and masks that have gone, you know, into our oceans and into

01:23:57.480 our landfills. And so the other side of this is the geoengineering. So I believe that God controls

01:24:06.460 the weather. But I truly believe as well that there are those who are trying to play God on

01:24:12.000 multiple levels. And so what do you have to say about geoengineering? Have you looked into that at

01:24:19.520 all? Yeah, geoengineering is very dangerous. I mean, first of all, you know, it's like giving tools to a

01:24:26.900 four-year-old taking the back off your computer and saying, here, now fix my computer. Because we

01:24:32.740 don't really know how the climate system works. I mean, truly, we don't know if it's going to be

01:24:38.120 hotter or colder in the future. The Russians out of the Polkerville Observatory in St. Petersburg, 0.98

01:24:44.140 for example, they say that we're approaching a grand solar minimum when the sun is going to be as

01:24:49.800 weak as it was in the 1600s. And at that time, the Earth was so cold, there was a meter of ice,

01:24:56.260 a meter thick ice on the Thames River in London, and they had frost fairs and oxen on the ice.

01:25:01.900 And the Russians are saying that we're headed back towards that kind of condition,

01:25:06.120 that kind of cooling. So the whole idea that we're going to put up particulates in the atmosphere,

01:25:11.420 essentially creating an artificial volcanic shield. That's what a lot of this is about.

01:25:16.640 They want to shield the Earth from sunlight so that we can supposedly stop global warming from

01:25:21.920 occurring. I mean, this could trip us into the next ice age, quite frankly. I mean,

01:25:26.880 if the Earth is heading into a global cooling period anyways, and many scientists are now saying that

01:25:31.900 because of the sun going into this grand solar minimum, if you're putting up material to purposely

01:25:37.100 cool the Earth, we could trip the Earth into the next glacial period. And that is a huge threat.

01:25:43.900 I think that the whole concept of geoengineering is completely insane. It's totally dangerous,

01:25:49.640 because until we understand the climate system, we should just be adapting to whatever nature

01:25:55.400 throws at us next. Because trying to cool the Earth artificially, which is what this is doing,

01:26:01.180 and that's a big topic because it gets into chemtrails and all sorts of things,

01:26:05.120 this is very, very dangerous. We've written a number of articles on this, actually.

01:26:09.080 I should just encourage people, have a look at americaoutloud.com. It's a pretty outstanding

01:26:16.980 website. It says many of the same things that you're saying. Dr. Jay Lehrer and I actually have

01:26:22.160 been writing for them for a couple of years now, and we have a radio show. One of the radio shows I

01:26:27.600 think people should really have a look at is the recent one that we did. It's on the homepage of ICSC

01:26:32.980 proper. There's two ICSCs. There's ICSC International and ICSC Canada. If people go to

01:26:39.260 icsc-climate.com, you'll see right on the homepage is an interview we have with one of the absolute

01:26:46.720 leaders in the world on radiation physics. He studies how much warming could occur if carbon

01:26:53.540 dioxide doubled or nitrous oxide doubled or methane doubled. What could happen under those conditions?

01:27:01.800 And what he shows is that a doubling of CO2, for example, from our current 420 to 940 wouldn't

01:27:08.860 even cause a one degree temperature rise. Okay, so that's a very interesting interview for people

01:27:13.820 to look at. Will Happer, he's from Princeton University, one of the leaders in the world in

01:27:18.680 this field. And of course, he's being censored out regular. They just don't want him to talk

01:27:23.240 because nobody can refute him. He's done the proper studies, the empirical and theoretical studies

01:27:29.120 to actually show that we do not have a climate emergency right on the homepage, icsc-climate.com.

01:27:38.140 That's excellent. And we'll make sure that we post that link in the chat. So I love it because we

01:27:44.860 have a team and they send me questions. And so I want to just ask one final question because I know

01:27:51.060 that it's getting to 630 here, well, 930 your time. And we appreciate you staying up late.

01:27:56.480 I hear you're a late owl though anyway, so you do research. Okay, that's awesome. So what is a

01:28:04.500 consequence though? We've talked about if nitrogen and carbon dioxide increase, but for instance,

01:28:11.320 what if nitrogen decreases or the CO2? What will happen to the environment if they're effective? And do

01:28:18.600 they have another nefarious plan behind actually reducing nitrogen and carbon dioxide?

01:28:26.020 Yeah, that's an interesting question. I mean, carbon dioxide, you know, we're much closer to the level

01:28:31.240 at which plants start to die. You know, you get down to like in the last glacial period, we got down to

01:28:36.660 around 180 parts per million. At 150, plants start to die. And that's the beginning of the end of life

01:28:42.840 on earth. I mean, literally. And it's interesting because we've just had Dr. Patrick Moore join our

01:28:48.240 group, ICSC Canada. He's now one of our directors and he gives a presentation that's stunning. And

01:28:53.540 you remember, Patrick Moore is a PhD in biology and ecology. Okay. So he's no joker. He really knows

01:28:59.700 what he's talking about. He shows how carbon dioxide over the millions of years has been decreasing.

01:29:05.300 And if humans hadn't come along and released carbon dioxide from the rocks, he was forecasting that we

01:29:12.140 were headed down to a dangerously low level of carbon dioxide where plants would start to die.

01:29:18.460 So his presentations actually focus on, thank God, we're increasing carbon dioxide. We may someday get

01:29:25.000 up to the levels that are optimal for plants. But if we hadn't come along, the low CO2 levels could

01:29:32.000 very well start to, well, it would definitely reduce crop yield, no question about that. But it could

01:29:37.100 also lead to mass starvation and death around the world. And you know, it's interesting because

01:29:42.200 as carbon dioxide has risen, areas of the earth that were too dry to support crop growth are now

01:29:49.260 growing plants. So CO2 has nothing but bad. In the case of nitrogen, I mean, most of our atmosphere

01:29:54.980 is already nitrogen. Nitrous oxide, N2O anyway, it's not a problem. And in fact, the interesting

01:30:04.080 thing is that Patrick, Will Happer actually analyzes N2O. He looks at methane, CH4. He looks at carbon

01:30:13.280 dioxide. And he shows that in no case are any of those gases a significant danger to climate. Now,

01:30:21.320 if nitrogen gets too low, of course, you don't have as much action in plants. I mean, nitrogen is important

01:30:28.320 to make plants actually operate. And that's, of course, why they put nitrogen in, that's why the

01:30:33.300 fertilizer, of course, is injecting nitrogen. So I'm not sure of the long-term effect of a reduction in

01:30:38.840 nitrogen, but I suspect it would be similar to what's happening in the case of carbon dioxide, that it would

01:30:44.260 interfere with plant growth and would be a threat if it becomes too low. But from a climate perspective, which is the

01:30:50.600 main concern about N2O, that's nitrogen, nitrogen oxide, we don't have to worry about it because it

01:30:57.900 just is not a threat, not at all. And Dr. Happer shows this very, very clearly. But, you know, when

01:31:04.620 people talk about CO2 rising, I say, hooray, bring it on. Yeah. Bring it on. There's a group in the United States out of

01:31:11.940 Tampa, Arizona, called co2science.org. People should check it out, co2science.org. And they show very, very clearly that we should be hoping that CO2 continues to rise,

01:31:23.440 so as to actually feed the billions of people yet to be born. So, yeah, it is, in many ways, an anti-human movement. And I'll just end by saying one thing.

01:31:34.560 To give you an idea of how extreme these movements can become, there is a group in the United States that has thousands of members that's called the voluntary human extinction movement, if you can believe that.

01:31:46.420 And what they're saying is they're saying that we should stop having children completely and the human race should die out. That's the extreme to which some environmentalists are going.

01:31:56.340 So, yeah, it's crazy. Yeah. So pushing a reduction in CO2, it's actually in that direction. We should want CO2 to go much higher. And indeed, it's nothing but good for the planet.

01:32:08.920 Yeah, well, thank you. You know what, I feel so encouraged by speaking with you about these things and just reaffirming, you know, what I've been learning over the last weeks as I've been preparing for tonight.

01:32:21.220 Then can you help me to figure out then with all of the hysteria as well regarding vehicles that are fueled by diesel or gas? What do you have to say about that?

01:32:35.260 Is that a better fuel system than the electric vehicles, considering all of the harm that lithium batteries, etc., you know, pose to the environment?

01:32:45.620 Yes. In fact, the whole EV thing is driven by the climate scare, the idea that somehow using electric vehicles is going to reduce our carbon dioxide emissions.

01:32:53.840 But that's not true, actually. Engineer Ron Stein out of California, he's energy advanced.

01:32:59.740 He's a very advanced energy engineer, and he looks at these things, a complete life cycle analysis when you count making the battery, making the EV, making the vehicle itself.

01:33:10.220 He shows, believe it or not, that in the life of an electric vehicle, it produces more greenhouse gases than in the life of a typical gas-powered car.

01:33:19.460 So even the rationale, even if you believe that we do have to reduce CO2, there's no point in going to electric vehicles.

01:33:26.760 I mean, electric vehicles are also terrible for Canada.

01:33:29.540 I mean, we're talking about moving all of our buses, for example, in Ottawa to electric vehicles.

01:33:34.880 And the Auditor General of Ottawa, she was very critical of the city.

01:33:38.460 She said, you've done your trials in the spring, summer, and fall.

01:33:42.420 You've never done it in the winter.

01:33:43.820 So Ottawa's spending hundreds of millions of dollars buying electric buses when they haven't tested them in the winter.

01:33:51.220 In Berlin, Germany, they moved over to electric buses, and many of them broke down halfway around their roots, and people had to be rescued by internal combustion engine buses.

01:34:02.320 And, you know, Germany doesn't get anywhere near as cold as Ottawa.

01:34:05.540 So EVs are a huge mistake.

01:34:07.680 And, of course, the question then becomes, how do you get the electricity to run the EVs?

01:34:12.280 Oh, we're going to have wind and solar power.

01:34:14.360 Oh, yeah, sure.

01:34:15.500 And you're going to have to have natural gas stations everywhere.

01:34:18.240 The other point, I'll just say one quick point, because this is below your mind.

01:34:21.860 It takes about 30 minutes at least to charge an EV from flat to full, and sometimes a lot more.

01:34:28.740 It depends on how you're charging it.

01:34:30.500 It takes five minutes to fill up a gas-powered car.

01:34:33.680 So that's at least six times more.

01:34:36.000 So what that means is you'll need six times as many EV stations, because people are sitting there for half an hour.

01:34:42.460 Instead of sitting there for five minutes and then Zoom, they're off.

01:34:45.060 They're sitting there for at least a half an hour.

01:34:47.820 So a city like Ottawa that perhaps has 300 gas stations would have to have six times as many stations.

01:34:54.320 Okay?

01:34:54.700 Yeah.

01:34:54.820 Where are you going to find the space for all these?

01:34:57.420 You know?

01:34:57.640 So, I mean, the whole EV push is completely insane from a safety point of view in the winter, from a pollution point of view, from a land point of view.

01:35:06.920 Where do you get your power?

01:35:08.320 You know, one of the jokes is that wind power, when you get it from China, when you're building, you know, you're buying components from China,

01:35:15.720 how do you think they generate the power to make the wind turbines?

01:35:20.160 They use coal.

01:35:21.740 They use coal.

01:35:22.800 So you're not getting away from fossil fuels anyways.

01:35:25.480 All you're doing is crippling the West by forcing us to use these inefficient energy sources and enriching the Chinese, you know, 1.00

01:35:33.560 because they don't care about the environment.

01:35:35.160 They'll make all the wind turbines we want. 0.61

01:35:37.780 Yeah.

01:35:38.060 They're not doing anything to help us out.

01:35:40.320 They're not shutting down all their coal mines.

01:35:42.660 And, you know, all of this, you know, getting the electric vehicles, the buses, it's all part of the UN's 2030 agenda, the World Economic Forum, the smart cities, right?

01:35:53.680 How smart is that, where they can't keep the buses going in the middle of the cold winter?

01:35:58.900 And so are you saying, and I'm blown away, too, because I have a Volkswagen Touring I drive, and it's a diesel,

01:36:05.520 and I'm going to the pumps, and it's less expensive to produce diesel,

01:36:10.680 and yet, you know, you're paying 30 cents more per liter to get diesel right now,

01:36:16.780 which I believe is part of interrupting the food supply.

01:36:20.460 It's sticking it to the truckers.

01:36:22.700 It's causing, you know, the inflation of food prices to rise.

01:36:26.920 So can you explain to me, just one more time, touching on gas engines and diesel,

01:36:32.860 I'm taking it that by all of this, that even gas engines are not harming the environment.

01:36:40.120 It's not a pollution.

01:36:41.680 It's a carbon dioxide, and it's not the frightful use of fuel that the government is trying to convince us of.

01:36:51.800 Yeah, that's exactly right.

01:36:53.340 There's a couple of points there I'll bring up quickly.

01:36:55.520 First of all, the pollution from a car today, a typical car, because of catalytic converters, is 1 20th of what it was, say, in the 1950s.

01:37:03.960 So a typical car today puts out very, very low real pollution.

01:37:08.220 Carbon dioxide is another question.

01:37:09.880 I mean, it puts out just as much CO2.

01:37:11.820 Whenever you're burning anything, it puts out CO2.

01:37:14.260 So if you don't care about CO2, the actual pollution produced from modern cars is very, very low.

01:37:20.280 And, in fact, it's interesting, if you look at the pollution levels in cities across Canada, with the exception of ozone that's gone up very slightly,

01:37:27.640 our pollution levels have gone down now for decades.

01:37:31.120 I was at a presentation a little while ago, and I got up to the mic, and I told the people this.

01:37:36.020 And the Green Party were there, and they were quite upset.

01:37:38.240 But to their credit, they came up to me afterwards, and they said,

01:37:41.680 Well, what are you talking about?

01:37:42.800 Pollution's rising.

01:37:43.820 I said, Well, no, it isn't.

01:37:44.980 And I laid out the graphs all over the table, and they looked at it and said, Oh, can we take these with us?

01:37:52.060 Oh, wow.

01:37:52.720 Good for you.

01:37:54.000 That's a win.

01:37:55.040 You know, my dad used to say, if they spent more time in the library or actually doing some research, they might not be on the protest line.

01:38:02.880 So, yeah, today's modern car is very, very clean.

01:38:05.820 There's no reason to get away from gasoline at all.

01:38:08.480 The only reason prices are going through the roof is because companies are scared about this net zero target,

01:38:15.560 and they're reluctant to invest properly in further production of oil and natural gas.

01:38:21.100 And, you know, they don't want to build any of these facilities because they don't want to be left with them all left high and dry.

01:38:27.280 So our high gas prices are being caused by our governments around the world.

01:38:32.640 100 percent.

01:38:33.320 Yeah, not only is Trudeau taking something like 37 percent, 37, what is it, 37 percent, I think it is, on just tax.

01:38:42.320 So, I mean, he loves it when the price goes through the roof.

01:38:44.560 But they're also scaring the petrochemical industry, so they're not investing properly.

01:38:50.040 And that's the major reason.

01:38:51.600 It has nothing to do with Russia.

01:38:52.780 If you actually look at the gas prices, they were going up before the Russian invasion of the Ukraine.

01:38:57.320 And they will continue to rise as long as our government does not have responsible policies towards development of our fossil fuel industry.

01:39:06.320 We really should be developing that.

01:39:08.360 I mean, it's one of the major sources of revenue for all of Canada.

01:39:12.060 We're going to just simply bankrupt our country.

01:39:14.680 I mean, look what's just happened in Sri Lanka.

01:39:17.140 I mean, Sri Lanka has gone bankrupt, quite frankly.

01:39:19.760 They can't give gasoline to average people.

01:39:23.380 You know, their stores are out of food.

01:39:25.300 I mean, the whole presidential palace, et cetera, was completely invaded.

01:39:29.300 Now, I'm not saying that's going to happen tomorrow in Canada, but we're headed down a very dangerous path with this energy transition that they keep talking about.

01:39:37.760 First of all, it's impossible.

01:39:39.680 OK, you cannot run an industrial society on wind and solar power.

01:39:43.400 But secondly, as they try to do it, as they spend hundreds of billions of dollars more, it's going to make our prices go literally through the roof.

01:39:52.140 It's going to lead to massive job loss.

01:39:54.320 And eventually it's going to lead to massive blackouts.

01:39:57.580 And this is something to be very scared about as we approach winter here in Canada.

01:40:02.020 In Texas, in February of 2021, Texas was...

01:40:08.880 Oh, we've had a freeze.

01:40:10.660 There we go.

01:40:12.360 Oh, sorry.

01:40:12.700 So you froze for a brief moment.

01:40:15.300 You said Texas?

01:40:16.680 Yeah.

01:40:16.980 Now, this is really important.

01:40:18.220 I know we don't have much time, but this is such important, maybe the most important point of the whole discussion.

01:40:23.580 Texas, in February of 2021, had 58% of its electricity coming from wind power a few days before the big storm hit when it got really cold.

01:40:35.240 Then two things happened.

01:40:36.820 First of all, the wind died.

01:40:38.360 And it went from 58% to essentially zero.

01:40:41.920 Imagine a state the size of Texas lost 58% of their electricity in a matter of a day or so.

01:40:49.900 The other thing, of course, that happened was it got very, very cold.

01:40:53.000 And so they suddenly had a much greater demand for natural gas.

01:40:56.660 And this will completely blow your mind.

01:40:58.580 It sounds like something out of Dr. Seuss.

01:41:00.300 I mean, you wouldn't think this would actually happen in the real world.

01:41:03.460 But to appease the environmentalists, the Texas government decided to run the pumps and valves on many of the natural gas lines with wind power.

01:41:13.400 So even though a lot of these gas lines had gas in them, many of them couldn't actually move their gas around because of the wind had died.

01:41:21.920 So media, mainstream media, are trying to hide this.

01:41:25.400 They're saying that the 700 people, 700 people died because of the Texas frees, okay?

01:41:32.460 They're saying this was caused because of the failure of natural gas.

01:41:36.160 Well, of course it failed.

01:41:37.400 Not only did it get very cold, but it had to compensate for 58% of the electricity that was suddenly lost because wind power went offline.

01:41:45.200 And as I say, some of the gas lines couldn't even pump their gas because they were run on wind power.

01:41:50.620 So, no, it was natural gas was the savior, at least prevented them from having an even worse catastrophe.

01:41:58.040 But the real cause of the problem was trying to green, you know, make the state supposedly a supporter of green power and moving more and more to wind.

01:42:06.800 So, you know, Dr. Jay Lair, who's my co-author at America Out Loud, he thinks that what happened in Texas has to happen over and over and over and over all across the Western world before people wake up.

01:42:18.840 It's sad.

01:42:19.500 Yeah, and realize.

01:42:20.680 Yeah.

01:42:20.980 Yeah, we are in for some difficult times.

01:42:23.940 And, you know, that's why one of the things that we're going to do is we're going to start lobbying as much as we can behind the scenes with conservatives and others in the government to say, look, you guys have got to wake up because you're going to be responsible for a literal catastrophe in Canada.

01:42:39.560 Not just a reduction in our standard of living, but you're going to be responsible for many deaths.

01:42:44.640 So, yeah, that's one of our plans going forward is we're going to start meeting with them privately.

01:42:49.180 So if people want to learn more about us, ICSC-Canada.com.

01:42:54.680 Yeah, well, thank you so much, Tom, and we'll be sure to get that out.

01:42:58.380 And let me know if there's, you know, an action that you're taking that you need support on.

01:43:03.660 I love to do the calls to action and get the citizens nationwide.

01:43:07.800 I said we're giving the silent majority a voice and we're getting them active because I don't think that necessarily we should be silent in the back rooms doing this as well.

01:43:17.840 We've got to be out here in the public.

01:43:19.780 We've got to be bringing awareness and talking about these issues, which we're doing.

01:43:23.420 And I'm concerned as well about what it's doing to not only, you know, the workers in Alberta who have lost their job, but what this does to Canadians, you know, what's coming in the cold snaps, the cold season.

01:43:38.440 And it's always frustrated me.

01:43:40.940 I drive to my sister's now and she's up in the mountains and it's a couple of hours drive away.

01:43:46.920 And now I'm seeing the pipeline.

01:43:49.180 At first I was thinking, what's all the construction, the trees going down and, you know, all of this massive work that's being done.

01:43:54.820 But it's the pipeline going through as they promised.

01:43:58.000 And when we consider that our fuel in B.C. is shipped to Washington across the line, you know, and then coming back to Canadians as fuel at the pumps, why are we going through this?

01:44:14.600 We could be completely self-sustained in the fuel industry.

01:44:19.340 We could be providing fuel to others and yet they would rather bring it from overseas and yet they're all worried about the climate, yet they're willing to ship it and overseas rather than just managing, you know, what the resources we have within Canada.

01:44:35.340 You know that this is an assault against Canadians and the problem is, is that people have stopped thinking critically.

01:44:43.520 They don't see past the flashy advertisements, you know, about these battery operated vehicles and, you know, how they're going to do, you know.

01:44:54.620 I think sometimes it makes them feel better about buying a battery operated vehicle because they feel like they're doing something noble when they're actually not only hurting themselves, they're hurting all of Canadians by buying a battery operated vehicle right now and accepting this and not doing the research.

01:45:13.100 I'm tired of it.

01:45:14.140 I'm tired of lazy Canadians who are just sitting back and going along with the mainstream media and we got to do something about it and we got to get noisy.

01:45:23.500 And so, again, I just want to ask you in closing, you know, if you could appeal to the people on the call and to Canadians, what would that appeal look like?

01:45:35.540 Well, the appeal would be to not be afraid to stand up and say what's true, okay, to actually call in to talk radio.

01:45:42.040 That's a good source because if you write letters to the editor or, you know, they can just cancel it out.

01:45:47.900 They just don't publish.

01:45:50.020 You write letters to your MP, they don't publish.

01:45:51.980 But call in to talk radio, support groups like yours, support groups like ours that are actually out there making things change, okay?

01:45:59.760 We're actually telling people about what's, you know, the Ottawa climate plan, completely insane, almost $60 billion.

01:46:06.600 The climate plan for Calgary, over $80 billion.

01:46:09.720 I mean, people have to be made aware of this because not only is it going to make Calgary and Ottawa and eventually other cities places you don't want to live because property taxes in Ottawa, for example, are going to go up almost 40%, if you can believe that, just to pay for the climate plan.

01:46:24.700 But also, these are going to become dangerous cities to live in because you won't have a steady supply of power.

01:46:30.920 So, yeah, I encourage people to support our group.

01:46:33.120 We'll keep you totally up to date with what we're doing.

01:46:35.600 We are published in some media, the Sun Chain, National Post just recently.

01:46:40.240 And, of course, we're always on Rebel News.

01:46:42.040 I'll be on Rebel News actually a week from today.

01:46:44.840 And we'll be talking about something called the Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty, which is totally ludicrous.

01:46:51.900 They're trying to make it out to be like nuclear weapons.

01:46:54.680 And the city of Ottawa just signed it, just signed this treaty last week.

01:46:58.740 And they're pushing for cities all across Canada to sign this.

01:47:02.520 And, I mean, it's really a suicidal treaty, quite frankly.

01:47:06.540 It's not, you know, they're acting like it's protecting us from fossil fuels.

01:47:11.100 No, no.

01:47:11.440 No, it's actually a suicidal treaty.

01:47:13.720 It'll kill us all if we let them go to the extremes.

01:47:16.880 I mean, it'll basically get to the point of being a disaster.

01:47:21.080 Right.

01:47:21.640 Well, thank you.

01:47:22.460 Thank you.

01:47:23.020 Thank you, Tom, for coming on the show and for educating us.

01:47:27.500 And thank you also for advising us about this fossil fuel treaty.

01:47:32.120 I know that in Ontario, I thought it was Toronto that was going to be one of the first smart cities.

01:47:37.860 And, you know, they were well on their way with the planning, but it was because of the public backlash that they ended up closing it down.

01:47:48.260 And so I just want to encourage everybody on the call right now.

01:47:52.720 You are an individual, but you become a force.

01:47:55.940 You have a voice.

01:47:57.080 Use it.

01:47:57.760 And you can absolutely 100% create change.

01:48:02.120 The other thing we all need to be aware of is that as far as these smart cities are concerned and the environmental changes, they actually provincially have individuals that are part of the climate change, the World Economic Forum.

01:48:17.020 And they have these committees that are planning on how to initiate this within the cities.

01:48:22.420 And the UN 2030 agenda has very clearly said that we're going to use the municipalities to implement these changes because they're closest to the people.

01:48:34.220 And I've had city councillors come to me with great concern.

01:48:37.860 One of them was involved in B.C. on one of these committees, and she had direct communication that had come from Trudeau to these individuals on the committee.

01:48:49.080 And as far as I'm concerned, what took place is treason against the citizens of this nation.

01:48:54.620 And a police report was filed.

01:48:57.340 I don't know.

01:48:58.220 I haven't had feedback if anything is being done.

01:49:00.740 But we are serious.

01:49:01.800 We're in a war and we need to get involved and we need to get these globalists out of our government offices. 1.00

01:49:09.620 And again, so, Tom, thank you for bringing so much to our awareness tonight.

01:49:14.740 We look forward to being in touch with you further.

01:49:17.640 Yeah, that was fun.

01:49:18.580 Thank you.

01:49:19.940 All right.

01:49:20.500 Super.

01:49:20.980 Thanks so much.

01:49:22.160 Well, I always go, whoo, when we're finished, you know, an event like this.

01:49:26.820 I was just so thrilled to create the call to action this week because I believe in the issues that Action for Canada is writing on.

01:49:37.620 And the beauty about Action for Canada is we report on many issues that we believe are important to all of our tens of thousands of followers.

01:49:48.100 But what we appreciate behind our reporting is that there's individuals like Tom who are taking on these issues full time.

01:49:57.580 And we like to highlight who they are and those organizations.

01:50:00.720 And we're so grateful that they are on the front line of the fight.

01:50:05.480 And so what Action for Canada likes to do is we like to come behind these organizations.

01:50:09.520 We like to get behind them.

01:50:11.120 We like to do the calls to action.

01:50:12.800 And together, we are bringing greater awareness to all Canadians.

01:50:18.140 All right.

01:50:18.760 So next week, I'm super pleased, as we mentioned at the onset, that Rocco Galati will be on.

01:50:24.800 And I want to bring to your attention that it's going to start only next week because Rocco has struggled with his health somewhat.

01:50:33.740 And he's three hours ahead in Ontario.

01:50:36.320 We are starting a little bit earlier.

01:50:38.760 We're going to forego the orientation next week.

01:50:41.980 We'll be starting at 4 p.m. Pacific Standard Time, 7 p.m. Eastern Time.

01:50:47.780 And the call to action, we're going to send it out this week because I want to make sure that everybody possible is aware of this Empower Hour invitation.

01:50:57.160 And I'm adding a little bit of information about the legal actions.

01:51:00.540 And I spent today writing up a really nice bio on Rocco.

01:51:06.520 And I'm just so impressed with this man.

01:51:09.700 And he comes from Italy.

01:51:13.200 His family suffered under the Mussolini regime.

01:51:17.000 His father particularly paid a high price for that.

01:51:20.760 And so Rocco is no stranger to tyranny.

01:51:23.860 He came to Canada.

01:51:25.500 He has seen for many years the writing on the wall, what was coming our way.

01:51:30.160 And he tried to warn Canadians.

01:51:31.380 And he has taken on some of the toughest cases in Canada against the government.

01:51:38.260 He doesn't spend time on just plaintiffs having difficulty.

01:51:42.840 If it involves the government, Rocco has been willing to take those cases on.

01:51:46.720 And it has always been in defense of our Constitution, our Constitution, our Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

01:51:53.240 So we're so grateful to Rocco.

01:51:55.100 He is a force.

01:51:56.220 And we look forward to that.

01:51:57.940 And then the week after, I'm excited.

01:52:00.440 Dan Vachon, he happens to be one of our chapter leaders in the East.

01:52:04.080 He is going to come on and we're going to talk about food preparation.

01:52:07.280 It's summer.

01:52:08.320 Some of you have your gardens going.

01:52:10.020 We're going to talk about gardens within your home, how you can do that and grow things.

01:52:14.160 And then preparing, preparing for the fall and for the winter and for potential food shortages.

01:52:20.040 And so we think this is an important topic as well.

01:52:22.920 And we're excited to have Dan on and his presentation.

01:52:26.420 So I just want to thank you so much.

01:52:28.580 I'm just so grateful to all of you who join us on Wednesday nights.

01:52:32.860 We continue to ask you to be a part of the solution.

01:52:36.700 Share Action for Canada's weekly actions.

01:52:39.880 They're so power-packed with information and more Canadians need to be aware.

01:52:44.120 And you could be a part of that.

01:52:45.320 So thank you.

01:52:46.800 God bless you.

01:52:47.740 And God bless Canada.

01:53:09.880 I'm going to thank our founding fathers for giving their lives and sacrificing so much for our freedom.

01:53:23.840 And I'm calling on you today.

01:53:27.240 Don't put them to shame.

01:53:29.440 Don't waste what they did.

01:53:31.780 We have guaranteed rights in this country.

01:53:35.080 We are putting chapters across the nation.

01:53:45.780 We are going to be in every town and every city.

01:53:49.620 And we are going to build communities within these communities of like-minded people

01:53:53.980 who are actually going to care for one another again and love on each other

01:53:57.840 and give each other the help when they're down.

01:54:00.220 We are going to use the teams and the people that build within chapters to support our businesses.

01:54:08.780 The government's actions are completely, 100% unlawful.

01:54:15.220 Judgment will again be found on justice.

01:54:19.420 And those with virtuous hearts will pursue it.

01:54:23.700 You have a virtuous heart if you are here today pursuing freedom and righteousness.

01:54:30.880 And then verse 23 comes along with a promise.

01:54:35.820 God says he will turn the sins of evil people back on them.

01:54:41.280 He will destroy them for their sins.

01:54:46.520 I take great comfort in that because I serve a mighty living God

01:54:52.780 who has allowed us to go through this season of discomfort

01:54:58.340 because we as a nation have turned our backs on him.

01:55:02.680 And we need to get right.

01:55:05.360 So I am just going to thank you so much.

01:55:09.220 I'm going to say God bless you and God bless Canada.

01:55:13.000 God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you.

01:55:30.160 I want to thank you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you.

01:55:32.940 I thank you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and I love you.

01:55:38.320 I bring God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and I love you and God bless you and God bless you God.

01:55:39.660 Thank you.

01:56:09.660 Thank you.

01:56:39.660 Thank you.

01:57:09.660 Thank you.

Action4Canada - July 14, 2022

Climate Change Fraud： Money, Corruption, and Control & Live Q&A

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript