Action4Canada - Defying Tyrants - A Canadian Perspective With David Lindsay & Legal Case Update

00:00:00.000 Well, the one principle for all lawyers seems to be what's called the adjournment game.

00:00:06.360 And if it's not to their best interest to have a case heard, they will use a variety of techniques to make sure the hearing doesn't take place for an extended period of time.

00:00:19.940 What's happening is the lawyers don't want it heard.

00:00:24.120 So they're telling the court, I'm not available here.

00:00:28.120 I'm not available there.

00:00:30.000 And we're not available right up until the end of June.

00:00:32.800 We're not available.

00:00:34.120 And then, of course, the courts take July and August off at the Court of Appeal level.

00:00:37.920 Anyway, they take July and August off and then they'll say, well, we're not available here.

00:00:43.180 And these lawyers will work with each other.

00:00:45.400 So if you've got four or five lawyers on the other side, they'll talk with each other.

00:00:49.980 And one lawyer will say, I'm not free here.

00:00:52.080 And the other lawyer will say, I'm not free there.

00:00:54.040 And next thing you know, as is happening in your case, you can't get it down for hearing until sometime in the fall.

00:01:00.960 Thank you, Tanya.

00:01:06.140 We are always so delighted to have our good friend, David Lindsay, joining us on the Empower Hour.

00:01:13.020 David has been involved in freedom issues for over 30 years.

00:01:16.680 And he's the author of several books, including the Annotated Criminal Charging Procedure in Canada.

00:01:23.440 He is the co-founder of the Common Law Education and Rights, or CLEAR for short.

00:01:28.600 And many of you will recognize him as a passionate freedom fighter.

00:01:32.700 He has recently made available for purchase a 15-part webinar series entitled Common Law Made Clear.

00:01:40.160 David also teaches about the Coronation Oath, which is the original and longest standing constitutional document

00:01:47.200 that is crucial to restoring our rights and freedoms by undoing any legislation that is in violation of the oath.

00:01:55.440 We are so pleased that David can check in with us regularly to share his wealth of knowledge with us.

00:02:01.600 David, welcome to the Empower Hour. We're so glad you can join us once again.

00:02:06.460 Yeah, thank you very much. It's wonderful to see everybody again, too. Absolutely.

00:02:11.620 Super. Thank you, Heather. Welcome, David.

00:02:14.840 You're just such a delight to have on the show.

00:02:17.520 I love it because you're so well-versed on so many different topics.

00:02:21.840 And so here today, we're going to actually be talking about one of your favorite topics.

00:02:26.920 But first, we're going to just do a little bit of an update again on the legal action with Action for Canada and Rocco.

00:02:36.640 And so in the, well, it'll be on the weekly update.

00:02:40.680 I encourage everybody that watches the actual show, please watch the weekly update as well,

00:02:44.620 because I went into some detail on the website and brought up the information of the appeal that we filed last September

00:02:51.940 in response to Judge Ross's decision, August 29th, that our case has merit.

00:02:57.520 We have to file a shorter NOCC, which we'll be doing.

00:03:01.660 And David, let's talk about what's going on with the courts.

00:03:04.960 I know that you're experiencing yourself in these delays.

00:03:07.780 We're experiencing and being able to get before the court of appeal in a timely manner.

00:03:14.260 So explain to people what the process normally is when you do an appeal.

00:03:19.880 Well, the one principle for all lawyers seems to be what's called the adjournment game.

00:03:24.560 And if they can, if it's not to their best interest to have a case heard, they will use a variety of techniques to make sure the hearing doesn't take place for an extended period of time.

00:03:40.520 And normally when you file an appeal at the court of appeal, what you need to file is, the first thing you need to file is your notice of appeal, of course.

00:03:48.340 And then within 30 days, you have to file what's called an appeal record.

00:03:53.540 And the appeal record will contain all the relevant documents from the lower court, any affidavits that were filed, any transcripts from people giving evidence in the lower court, any exhibits that were there, of course, any motions or applications in that trial and judgments and so on.

00:04:13.840 All those documents go into one thing called an appeal record.

00:04:18.340 Once that is done, then the moving party, the person that's made the appeal, it's called the appellant, they file what's called a factum.

00:04:29.660 And that's the written argument.

00:04:31.700 And the other party's got another 30 days for them to file their factum.

00:04:35.800 And if there's more than one other party, they all have 30 days to file their written response factums.

00:04:41.040 And then from there, the moving party usually sends a requisition or some form of instruction to the court and says, let's set it down to be heard.

00:04:50.640 And normally that shouldn't take more than three, maybe four months tops, but usually around three months, somewhere in that area.

00:04:57.600 And you get heard before a panel of three judges at the court of appeal.

00:05:03.680 If the issue involved is extremely important, or it's clarifying another case in the past, sometimes you can apply to get five judges.

00:05:13.960 But 99% of the time, you get three judges.

00:05:18.300 And then it's set down for a hearing and everybody, all the lawyers in that show up and get their payday and so on.

00:05:25.480 And it gets heard.

00:05:26.660 And then the judges almost always reserve decision.

00:05:29.640 And you get it later.

00:05:31.160 So it shouldn't take more than three or four months to get this heard.

00:05:34.500 And I think in your particular case, what's happening is the lawyers don't want it heard.

00:05:42.820 So they're telling the court, I'm not available here.

00:05:47.040 I'm not available there.

00:05:48.560 And we're not available right up until the end of June.

00:05:51.760 We're not available.

00:05:53.000 And then, of course, the courts take July and August off at the court of appeal level.

00:05:56.800 Anyway, they take July and August off.

00:06:00.040 And then they'll say, well, we're not available here.

00:06:02.220 And these lawyers will work with each other.

00:06:04.300 So if you've got four or five lawyers on the other side, they'll talk with each other.

00:06:08.940 And one lawyer will say, I'm not free here.

00:06:11.080 And the other lawyer will say, I'm not free there.

00:06:13.260 And next thing you know, as is happening in your case, you can't get it down for a hearing until sometime in the fall.

00:06:20.980 And it's really frustrating, to say the least, to see that type of cooperation with people to make sure it doesn't get heard.

00:06:34.020 Or as long as possible.

00:06:35.200 But it goes back to what a lawyer told me years ago.

00:06:38.280 And he said, the first thing you do if you don't want something to be heard is to deny it.

00:06:45.120 Make sure it never gets heard.

00:06:46.700 You do a motion to strike, as you found out.

00:06:49.420 And that happens very, very regularly.

00:06:51.500 They'll do motions to strike or not to let the evidence on the record.

00:06:55.960 If the evidence is not on the record, you lose.

00:06:57.620 If the witnesses don't get there, you lose.

00:07:00.180 So that's what they go for first.

00:07:01.780 And there's a variety of techniques they'll try for that.

00:07:04.900 If that doesn't work, then their second line of defense is to delay everything.

00:07:09.660 Make sure it goes as long as possible so you ring up the cost for the other side in the hopes that they can't afford it and they eventually give up. 0.95

00:07:16.140 Or if they do win, the time and effort wasn't worth it anyway.

00:07:20.200 They'll be lucky to break even if they get that far.

00:07:23.240 And the third thing that I added to that is I said, what the judges do now is they mischaracterize your arguments and your evidence.

00:07:32.820 And if it all does get on the record, they will try and mischaracterize it in order to make sure you lose.

00:07:38.060 So if I was to argue, hey, everybody, I'm arguing the sun is yellow.

00:07:43.080 And they would say, Mr. Lindsay puts to the court that the sun is yellow.

00:07:47.580 But what I really mean is, interpret him to mean is that the sun is beige.

00:07:51.320 And they'll proceed on that basis.

00:07:53.920 But that's not what I put to the court.

00:07:56.000 And that's a lot.

00:07:57.620 Right there is a lot of, you know, ideas as to what the courts do and what these lawyers are doing, too.

00:08:03.560 And in your particular case, yeah, these lawyers are delaying it as long as possible by working with each other to say they're free, they're not free, and vice versa, to get it into the fall.

00:08:12.760 And so that's why it's, yeah, that's why it's good to have this conversation, David, to let people know, because we got a little squawk mob out there, you know, who are trying to say that our case was fully dismissed and that there's no merit, and that we're not going anywhere and that we're wasting people's money.

00:08:28.860 And they have no idea how hard we're working and how hard Rocco is working.

00:08:34.160 You know, he is trying to assert himself with the courts and demand a date to be heard.

00:08:40.140 And there's only so much you can do.

00:08:42.560 You know, we filed all of this last fall and then into December, and we were going to file our notice of civil claim.

00:08:50.980 And then we thought, well, we'll wait till the court of appeal.

00:08:53.040 But with the delays, we're going to re-strategize and we'll let people know.

00:08:57.740 But people don't understand even that with an appeal, that's additional money that your lawyer charges.

00:09:06.760 And it's not because they're trying to gouge you.

00:09:08.920 It's a separate cost from the constitutional challenge.

00:09:12.560 And I just want to thank, you know, our members in our community.

00:09:16.720 Because of it, we had a war chest, and I was trying to be incredibly careful with our finances.

00:09:22.300 And so we were able to cover those costs.

00:09:25.720 But I'm going to be reaching out to people in the near future and saying,

00:09:29.320 please go to Action for Canada and donate to our legal action,

00:09:34.160 because I want to make sure that our war chest remains full and that we exceed it.

00:09:41.720 Because we've also got other legal actions that we're going to be involved in with all this nonsense with school boards

00:09:47.480 and some other things that I can't mention here just because of strategy.

00:09:52.780 And so we've got to work together as a team on this.

00:09:56.180 But I just want to let people know right out, we've been working very hard in the background,

00:10:00.720 and Rocco continues to do so.

00:10:03.520 I said, we're in it to win it.

00:10:04.940 We're up against incredible corruption.

00:10:08.320 I believe these are murderers and, you know, that they're harming people. 0.94

00:10:13.700 These are traitors to our nation and to the people of Canada.

00:10:17.080 And all of us are putting ourselves out there to do this battle at a level.

00:10:20.960 And I also want to ask that people would respect that we're not going to always provide all of the information,

00:10:28.400 because when we provide that information, we're being watched.

00:10:31.940 Right now, there's individuals on this call who are recording and listening to every word that David and I are saying,

00:10:39.820 ready to use that as some sort of evidence against us.

00:10:43.520 When I went to Kelowna last week on this trip, I spoke at a rally,

00:10:48.300 and I then spoke at Pastor Art Lussier's church, and I gave my testimony in a sort of a hoorah message.

00:10:55.260 It was just a beautiful night.

00:10:57.080 And I find out that, you know, they were recording me and then sending it to school board trustees,

00:11:02.160 because I'm speaking publicly about what's going on at school boards.

00:11:07.300 And, of course, these people have been operating at a level where they've had control of the scenario,

00:11:14.580 and now they're losing it nationwide.

00:11:18.820 Citizens want these school boards, these school board members pulled.

00:11:23.080 They want them removed, and they want them replaced, and for good reason,

00:11:27.160 because our kids are being harmed.

00:11:29.500 We have records of harm.

00:11:31.000 And I'm going to make a public appeal to people that if you have been harmed by SOGI or the WINSEX ED,

00:11:38.460 please reach out to our chapters or at call2atactionforcanada.com

00:11:43.080 and provide us your impact statement.

00:11:45.480 Provide us the details of what you and your family or your child have gone through,

00:11:49.420 because we believe legal actions are going to be commencing,

00:11:52.440 and every single school board that has been served a SOGI or a WINSEX ED notice of liability

00:11:57.640 that one day could potentially be liable before the courts,

00:12:02.480 because they were warned that there was risk and harm to children,

00:12:07.040 and they refused to act.

00:12:08.900 And instead, they doubled down in support and tried to shut the concerns of parents out

00:12:14.700 by taking control of the school boards.

00:12:17.240 And so anyways, that's something that I want to encourage people.

00:12:20.700 I also want to alert the good people of Saskatchewan that under the radar,

00:12:25.220 the AHRQ Foundation's been very open that they want SOGI 123 nationwide.

00:12:30.260 And so they are lobbying governments,

00:12:31.940 and the Saskatchewan government has approved it without parental knowledge or the public's knowledge,

00:12:37.500 and it will be implemented in September.

00:12:41.320 So in the legal background, we're fighting on many different issues.

00:12:45.300 And so I would just appeal to you, I don't do that very often,

00:12:48.980 become a monthly donor with Action for Canada,

00:12:51.160 or make a one-time donation, but we're very serious about the business that we're into.

00:12:58.480 And okay, David, so thank you for that update.

00:13:01.360 I hope that's helpful to people, because I know they feel very discouraged

00:13:05.200 if they don't hear the update, and they don't understand the process of the courts, right,

00:13:11.260 and what we are able to and what we have control of.

00:13:14.380 Okay, so what I want to do now is, I know that this has taken a little longer,

00:13:19.300 I apologize, my update was a little longer tonight,

00:13:22.580 but sometimes that's going to happen because of the severity of what we're facing,

00:13:26.960 and how critical it is.

00:13:28.880 People are taking their foot off the gas pedal right now,

00:13:32.080 because we're moving towards summer,

00:13:35.080 they have their freedoms to travel to the United States,

00:13:38.160 and they can do what they want,

00:13:40.040 but they don't understand how the Bank of Canada and all the rest of it,

00:13:45.000 the 15-minute cities, are all being done.

00:13:47.700 This is all going on in the background,

00:13:49.540 and we need everybody to keep the foot on the gas pedal throughout the summer,

00:13:52.920 and to be with us on board with this.

00:13:55.500 And so, David, with that, part of what we're doing for the public, right,

00:13:58.880 is to equip them, and knowledge is power.

00:14:02.120 We've talked a lot about the Constitution and the Charter of Rights,

00:14:05.980 and now I'm really excited for your presentation on the Coronation Oath,

00:14:09.640 and what an incredibly important document that is to our freedom.

00:14:14.280 So I'm going to hand the floor over to you.

00:14:16.840 Okay, thanks.

00:14:18.400 You know, years ago, if you remember,

00:14:20.640 when they were bringing out GMO foods,

00:14:22.680 they had a term called frankenfoods that they were using,

00:14:26.120 and the media latched onto it, and it had such a profound effect.

00:14:30.400 They really got lobbied in the background,

00:14:32.840 and you don't see that word anymore.

00:14:34.360 It just had such an effect that people were not buying their GMO foods.

00:14:39.220 And similarly, with the 15-minute cities,

00:14:41.780 somebody came up with a really good word.

00:14:43.180 I prefer to call them prison cities, and that's exactly what they are.

00:14:47.180 And if they're not like in Oxford,

00:14:49.660 where they're prohibiting you from traveling under penalty of fine,

00:14:53.520 or any form of punishment, then you are in a prison city.

00:14:57.740 And that's what we need to start referring it to,

00:14:59.660 I think, as well in the future.

00:15:01.520 Now, I had the wonderful experience of listening to Matthew Tuella

00:15:09.240 a couple weeks back on your show,

00:15:11.820 and he had an absolutely awesome story to give

00:15:15.580 on the doctrine of the lesser magistrate.

00:15:17.900 And decades ago, I remember telling government officials

00:15:23.820 way back in Edmonton and Winnipeg,

00:15:26.260 why are you following orders if you know something is wrong?

00:15:30.600 And at that time,

00:15:32.260 I got the usual excuse, we're just following orders,

00:15:36.120 and you would try and talk to them,

00:15:37.560 and it never seemed to get anywhere.

00:15:39.100 So, basically, I want to explain

00:15:43.620 the nature of what we have in place for our government,

00:15:47.040 and especially in relation to the coronation oath,

00:15:49.280 and what that means for you,

00:15:51.220 that you can sit back and tell the government

00:15:53.580 we simply are not going to comply.

00:15:56.780 Terenzio, do you have the ability,

00:15:58.880 or do I have to share my screen with you?

00:16:01.300 Yes, David, all you have to do is just share your screen in Zoom,

00:16:03.560 and we'll take care of the rest.

00:16:05.420 Okay, I'm sure I got the right one.

00:16:09.100 Great to have you back, by the way.

00:16:11.660 Thank you.

00:16:12.560 It's good to hear you.

00:16:16.020 Okay.

00:16:18.740 Awesome, thanks.

00:16:21.320 If everybody can see the screen that we have here,

00:16:24.880 I've said, and it's one of the most important principles

00:16:28.140 that you can remember,

00:16:29.340 is that the most important part of everything

00:16:31.360 is the beginning.

00:16:33.040 And especially in the legal sense,

00:16:34.960 because governments, judges, lawyers,

00:16:37.240 they all want to talk way up here.

00:16:39.100 And as if the bottom foundation

00:16:42.060 has somehow been established already.

00:16:44.380 And that is almost never the case.

00:16:46.980 So let's look at the bottom foundation for our society,

00:16:50.380 how it relates to civil disobedience,

00:16:52.400 how it relates to government officials

00:16:55.240 and bureaucrats telling the higher-ups,

00:16:58.440 we're not going to comply with your orders.

00:17:00.780 And the legal, excuse me,

00:17:02.160 and the legal and constitutional basis for that as well,

00:17:05.020 here in Canada.

00:17:05.880 The first starting point, of course,

00:17:09.160 is that recognizing the supremacy of God

00:17:12.360 in our Constitution.

00:17:13.860 It's not only in the Charter,

00:17:15.940 but it's in every single constitutional document

00:17:18.660 in our history, going back to Magna Carta.

00:17:21.360 And it's the longest-standing principle in our law

00:17:24.640 that God is supreme.

00:17:25.700 And beginning on that basis,

00:17:29.140 God created us free,

00:17:30.560 and you have the power of free will.

00:17:32.960 And in that case,

00:17:34.380 you have a choice to make right off the bat.

00:17:36.800 You could have no government at all,

00:17:39.100 which is generally called anarchy,

00:17:40.660 or you can have some form of a government.

00:17:44.920 Anarchy, by the way, 0.83

00:17:45.780 doesn't always mean people smashing windows

00:17:47.680 and throwing Molotov cocktails everywhere and so on.

00:17:50.760 Anarchy simply means you do not have a government.

00:17:53.120 And without a government,

00:17:55.820 you do lose not only structure,

00:17:58.200 but you lose the foundation of law

00:18:01.700 that is going to control the people in your society.

00:18:05.040 Everybody just does what they want.

00:18:07.560 And those can and will infringe

00:18:09.200 on rights and freedoms of other people,

00:18:10.780 and then you have no redress.

00:18:12.360 So some form of government

00:18:13.520 is generally to be acknowledged as being better.

00:18:17.680 Once you recognize you have a government,

00:18:20.400 then you've got two choices.

00:18:22.200 You can have what's called an absolute government.

00:18:26.100 And by that, I mean this.

00:18:27.980 If God created you free,

00:18:30.580 then there's only two ways

00:18:33.560 for me or somebody else to tell you what to do.

00:18:38.900 One way is by force.

00:18:41.840 And that way is universally acknowledged as being wrong.

00:18:45.620 It's unlawful.

00:18:46.820 It's an assault.

00:18:47.620 It could be a variety of other criminal offenses

00:18:50.080 and a variety of offenses under God's laws as well.

00:18:53.040 So having an absolute government

00:18:55.380 which is being forced on you

00:18:57.280 is not an option.

00:18:59.380 As we mentioned right here,

00:19:00.700 it's simply not an option.

00:19:03.120 Consequently,

00:19:04.220 having a limited form of government

00:19:06.340 is the best option.

00:19:08.700 But what you want to do

00:19:10.120 is make sure

00:19:10.860 that the government you have

00:19:12.700 has the limited,

00:19:14.460 smallest number of powers available to it

00:19:17.020 to get the job done.

00:19:18.880 Whatever it needs to do,

00:19:20.560 whatever department you're in.

00:19:22.180 You don't want governments

00:19:23.600 that can maximize their power

00:19:25.300 because then you slowly lead into an absolute government.

00:19:30.260 Consequently,

00:19:31.080 if you're going to have a voluntary government,

00:19:34.500 the only way you can do that

00:19:36.060 is by some form of an agreement.

00:19:38.800 In our law,

00:19:39.940 going back to minimally 973 AD,

00:19:42.800 that agreement

00:19:44.700 is what's called the coronation oath.

00:19:47.340 And you've got one person in charge,

00:19:50.020 which is the monarch,

00:19:51.720 and that contract

00:19:54.720 is Blackstone,

00:19:55.800 Hallsbury,

00:19:56.660 Koch,

00:19:57.340 virtually every judge in England

00:19:59.680 has ever commented

00:20:00.660 is a contract.

00:20:01.980 And it has to be.

00:20:03.400 If you're going to put somebody in charge,

00:20:05.660 you either have an agreement,

00:20:07.060 which is a form of contract,

00:20:08.760 or they do it by force.

00:20:10.700 So you have to have a contract

00:20:12.900 that's going to be in place.

00:20:14.240 And that's it right here.

00:20:16.040 That coronation oath,

00:20:18.100 in our case,

00:20:20.080 recognizes by the king

00:20:22.000 the supremacy of God in our law,

00:20:24.940 amongst other things.

00:20:26.660 It recognizes that

00:20:28.400 the king will comply

00:20:29.820 with all previous customs

00:20:32.260 that we have.

00:20:34.800 That is our common law.

00:20:37.240 That's why I've said for a long time

00:20:39.260 the myth that common law

00:20:41.680 is changed incrementally

00:20:43.180 by judges

00:20:43.900 is a power shift

00:20:45.440 by the judiciary

00:20:48.080 to do what they cannot do directly

00:20:50.460 and change the law.

00:20:52.700 It's one thing to say

00:20:53.980 you have freedom of speech,

00:20:56.560 and today,

00:20:57.400 with all the methods,

00:20:58.440 that freedom of speech

00:20:59.360 encompasses all of them.

00:21:00.940 It's another thing

00:21:01.980 to say your freedom of speech

00:21:03.860 is limited

00:21:04.280 and you can't do something anymore.

00:21:06.940 And yet,

00:21:07.340 that's where the judges are going.

00:21:10.240 Consequently,

00:21:11.340 you have a limited form

00:21:14.080 of government

00:21:14.960 and they have the ability

00:21:16.160 to pass certain laws

00:21:18.560 called statutes

00:21:19.500 in provincial and federal senses.

00:21:22.460 And you also have

00:21:24.160 what's called fundamental laws.

00:21:26.560 That coronation oath

00:21:28.120 establishes the supremacy of God

00:21:30.080 as the fundamental power

00:21:32.040 or duty,

00:21:33.500 as the case may be,

00:21:34.460 with respect to the monarch.

00:21:35.540 And they cannot give royal assent

00:21:38.280 to any law

00:21:39.580 that violates that.

00:21:42.140 And if they do,

00:21:44.380 this is the starting point

00:21:46.040 for civil disobedience,

00:21:47.740 where I'll talk about shortly,

00:21:49.240 that you can refuse

00:21:50.840 to comply with them.

00:21:52.540 Not only because you don't like it,

00:21:54.760 but because you've got a contract

00:21:56.080 and they're breaking that contract.

00:21:59.680 Consequently,

00:22:00.340 you can tell them,

00:22:01.460 I'm not,

00:22:01.820 constitutionally,

00:22:02.980 you can tell them,

00:22:03.600 I am not complying

00:22:04.820 with that statute

00:22:05.800 that you've passed,

00:22:07.100 whatever it may be.

00:22:08.660 Now,

00:22:09.120 in order to do that,

00:22:10.060 you need to definitively point

00:22:11.980 to where in the Bible

00:22:13.660 they are breaking God's laws

00:22:16.020 or where they have

00:22:17.660 taken away the common law.

00:22:19.540 You can't swear

00:22:20.720 to uphold all our customs

00:22:22.020 and laws in the past

00:22:23.240 and then go and give royal assent

00:22:24.640 to break them.

00:22:25.240 One is diametrically opposed

00:22:27.700 to the other,

00:22:28.380 of course.

00:22:30.400 As a result,

00:22:31.900 you've got what's called

00:22:34.280 laws that are passed

00:22:35.380 by the government.

00:22:37.240 And as I talk about

00:22:39.160 in our webinar series,

00:22:41.080 a law,

00:22:41.900 fundamentally,

00:22:42.840 if you ask somebody

00:22:43.700 what is a law,

00:22:44.540 they can usually give you examples,

00:22:46.280 but they don't seem

00:22:47.180 to be able to define it.

00:22:49.140 A law is a command

00:22:50.740 and it's a command

00:22:52.520 to do something

00:22:53.400 or it's a command

00:22:55.040 not to do something.

00:22:57.020 So in our law,

00:22:58.540 we have limits

00:23:00.560 on what commands

00:23:01.780 the monarch can give.

00:23:04.380 Serious limitations

00:23:05.420 on what commands

00:23:06.580 the monarch can give.

00:23:08.260 And if no one's above the law,

00:23:09.900 then neither is the monarch

00:23:10.880 and they cannot go ahead

00:23:12.040 and break the law.

00:23:14.260 If the monarch

00:23:15.320 passes a law

00:23:16.800 that does not break

00:23:18.700 God's law,

00:23:19.340 then it is binding.

00:23:20.140 If it does break

00:23:23.240 God's laws,

00:23:24.060 then you are of the power

00:23:25.300 to say,

00:23:25.920 I'm not going to comply

00:23:26.720 with your commands.

00:23:29.900 So,

00:23:30.760 it's not just

00:23:33.380 a question of

00:23:34.420 whether a law

00:23:36.800 or a statute

00:23:37.680 is invalid.

00:23:39.520 It's a question of

00:23:40.620 does that statute

00:23:42.140 comply

00:23:42.840 with all the higher laws

00:23:44.340 above it,

00:23:44.920 including the coronation oath.

00:23:47.100 And if it doesn't,

00:23:48.700 then you can refuse

00:23:49.560 to comply with it.

00:23:51.440 And those basically,

00:23:52.580 and I'm going to get

00:23:53.240 into those shortly,

00:23:53.980 are going to be the limits

00:23:54.860 on the powers

00:23:55.780 of the monarch.

00:23:56.940 And if the monarch

00:23:57.900 does try and give you

00:23:59.320 royal assent,

00:24:01.440 you need to

00:24:03.400 either answer

00:24:04.080 to your conscience

00:24:04.820 or you'll obey them

00:24:05.860 and violate

00:24:07.600 your own religious beliefs.

00:24:10.460 In our law,

00:24:12.100 because you have

00:24:12.900 an agreement,

00:24:13.700 excuse me,

00:24:14.520 you can agree

00:24:16.740 to have

00:24:17.320 God as your law,

00:24:18.780 for example,

00:24:19.260 or you can agree

00:24:19.880 to have an atheist,

00:24:20.880 secular,

00:24:21.400 humanist state.

00:24:22.980 If you do that,

00:24:24.560 then the law

00:24:25.100 is going to be changed

00:24:26.020 by men

00:24:27.100 at any time they want.

00:24:28.800 You don't have

00:24:29.480 an immutable set

00:24:30.480 of fundamental laws

00:24:31.560 that remain there

00:24:32.680 no matter who's in power

00:24:34.040 and cannot be changed.

00:24:36.080 These people will change

00:24:37.240 it depends on

00:24:37.920 their power structure.

00:24:39.620 And if you don't believe me,

00:24:41.060 look at what

00:24:41.680 Pierre-André Paré

00:24:42.920 said in the Quebec

00:24:43.840 National Assembly

00:24:44.940 with Quebec

00:24:46.400 under civil law

00:24:47.200 and he said

00:24:47.720 all is a privilege

00:24:49.140 granted by the state.

00:24:50.980 Your car,

00:24:51.760 your house,

00:24:52.240 your profession,

00:24:53.320 in short,

00:24:54.160 your life.

00:24:55.620 And what the state gives

00:24:56.940 it can take back

00:24:57.800 if you are not

00:24:58.440 a docile taxpayer.

00:25:01.280 That is the nature

00:25:02.480 of virtually

00:25:04.280 every other country

00:25:05.380 in the world

00:25:06.000 that is not under

00:25:06.920 the common law

00:25:07.860 of England.

00:25:10.880 You don't want

00:25:12.200 that type

00:25:13.500 of a state

00:25:14.100 happening.

00:25:15.580 So that's not

00:25:16.500 an option.

00:25:18.560 And we have

00:25:19.660 the Christian religion

00:25:21.080 as the supremacy

00:25:22.400 of our law.

00:25:23.320 And it has been there

00:25:24.060 for over a thousand years.

00:25:25.340 And as Blackstone said,

00:25:26.960 the common law,

00:25:28.040 our Christian law

00:25:28.640 has been trodden down,

00:25:29.780 it's been broken

00:25:30.360 on occasion,

00:25:31.080 but people have

00:25:31.820 always come back

00:25:32.860 to it.

00:25:34.620 Unfortunately,

00:25:35.200 it's a circular thing.

00:25:36.120 People get lazy,

00:25:37.200 they come back

00:25:37.940 and they get lazy again

00:25:39.240 and they move from it

00:25:40.600 and then they come back

00:25:41.400 again.

00:25:41.740 It seems to be

00:25:42.600 a circular thing,

00:25:44.560 but notwithstanding,

00:25:46.060 that is what happens.

00:25:47.780 The fundamental basis

00:25:48.740 of our common law

00:25:49.680 is to do unto others

00:25:50.720 as you would have done

00:25:51.880 unto you

00:25:52.440 and not to do unto others.

00:25:54.300 How can you get

00:25:55.060 a better system

00:25:55.700 of law in the world?

00:25:57.580 For freedom,

00:25:58.460 that is.

00:25:59.960 And people have come up

00:26:01.020 and said,

00:26:01.400 you know, Dave,

00:26:01.800 the system's corrupt.

00:26:03.020 The system needs

00:26:04.260 to be fixed.

00:26:05.780 I don't believe

00:26:06.720 the system needs

00:26:07.480 to be fixed.

00:26:08.200 I believe it needs

00:26:08.840 to be tweaked.

00:26:09.820 For example,

00:26:10.260 we need to get rid

00:26:10.980 of political parties.

00:26:12.560 Completely get rid of them.

00:26:14.600 They have been around

00:26:15.640 for four or five hundred years

00:26:16.820 and the definition

00:26:17.920 of insanity

00:26:18.640 is doing the same thing

00:26:19.700 and expecting

00:26:20.220 different results.

00:26:21.260 Parties do not do anything.

00:26:23.620 Somebody gets into power

00:26:24.740 on benevolent promises

00:26:26.820 and so on

00:26:27.500 and as soon as they're in power,

00:26:29.060 they get corrupted

00:26:29.740 or they get bought out

00:26:30.900 by the money system

00:26:31.800 in the background

00:26:32.420 or they're compromised.

00:26:34.920 Somebody goes up

00:26:35.540 and says,

00:26:36.000 hey, you know,

00:26:36.780 while you weren't in power,

00:26:38.040 we've got these pictures

00:26:39.260 of you

00:26:39.660 or these videos

00:26:40.860 of you

00:26:41.260 and you're going to do

00:26:42.080 what you're told

00:26:42.760 or else

00:26:43.600 or they'll get threatened

00:26:45.740 or their families

00:26:46.420 will get threatened

00:26:47.240 or whatever it takes

00:26:48.480 to bring them into line,

00:26:50.600 unfortunately.

00:26:51.760 So political parties

00:26:52.820 are not the issue

00:26:53.780 and if they start

00:26:54.780 raising issues

00:26:55.540 about the usury money system,

00:26:57.240 the banks will pull

00:26:58.100 their loans in

00:26:58.700 and then the party's

00:26:59.420 got no loans.

00:27:00.540 It's got no money

00:27:01.080 and then the party collapses.

00:27:03.520 So for a variety

00:27:04.220 of reasons,

00:27:04.860 parties are not the answer.

00:27:05.900 So common law

00:27:06.680 in various areas

00:27:07.420 definitely needs

00:27:08.400 to be changed.

00:27:09.840 No system of law

00:27:11.040 is perfect

00:27:11.520 but the common law

00:27:12.540 comes as close

00:27:13.380 as possible

00:27:14.080 to doing that,

00:27:15.000 recognizing what God

00:27:16.060 gave you,

00:27:17.020 a freedom of choice.

00:27:20.360 And this agreement,

00:27:21.660 of course,

00:27:22.180 will have

00:27:22.800 at the apex

00:27:24.140 the king or queen

00:27:25.100 as King Chucky

00:27:27.100 did recently.

00:27:28.600 We'll be swearing 0.93

00:27:29.340 in his oath,

00:27:30.880 oath of office,

00:27:31.840 or I'm sorry,

00:27:32.380 coronation oath.

00:27:33.020 And underneath them

00:27:35.240 you've got parliament,

00:27:36.120 you've got the municipalities,

00:27:37.580 and you've got

00:27:38.080 the legislatures.

00:27:39.660 I want to clarify

00:27:40.660 right now

00:27:41.560 something for you

00:27:42.520 on those three aspects

00:27:43.720 right here.

00:27:45.520 Their,

00:27:46.040 not only primary,

00:27:48.440 their sole function,

00:27:51.700 their sole power

00:27:53.200 is to aid

00:27:54.140 and advise

00:27:54.940 the monarch.

00:27:56.580 That's it.

00:27:57.940 People think

00:27:58.620 we voted them in

00:27:59.420 and they can do

00:28:00.180 whatever they want.

00:28:01.120 They cannot.

00:28:01.720 Their whole goal

00:28:03.640 is to aid

00:28:04.140 and advise

00:28:04.620 the monarch.

00:28:05.600 And if they tell

00:28:06.440 the monarch

00:28:07.020 to give royal assent

00:28:08.860 to a statute

00:28:09.600 that violates

00:28:10.420 the monarch's law,

00:28:12.060 they are required,

00:28:13.320 the monarch,

00:28:14.520 in Canada,

00:28:15.220 vis-a-vis

00:28:15.760 the governor general

00:28:16.600 and lieutenant governor,

00:28:18.000 they are required

00:28:18.660 to tell parliament

00:28:20.040 or the legislatures,

00:28:21.560 we can't do it.

00:28:23.860 So when you think

00:28:24.580 about that,

00:28:25.080 who is really in charge?

00:28:26.300 It's not parliament.

00:28:27.400 If it was parliament,

00:28:28.220 they would simply pass it.

00:28:29.280 And what they've come up

00:28:32.000 with is a term

00:28:32.640 called convention.

00:28:34.000 Well,

00:28:34.380 we just kind of agree

00:28:35.320 in the background

00:28:36.240 that the governor general

00:28:38.220 is going to rubber stamp

00:28:39.160 them all

00:28:39.600 because parliament

00:28:41.080 represents the will

00:28:41.980 of the people,

00:28:42.580 which is a myth.

00:28:43.480 It does not.

00:28:48.620 And of course,

00:28:49.800 you've got all your

00:28:51.100 government officials

00:28:51.900 and judicial officers

00:28:53.000 below them.

00:28:53.600 If there's one thing

00:28:55.520 that links

00:28:56.060 all of these people

00:28:57.020 together,

00:28:58.140 it's what's called

00:28:59.320 the oath.

00:29:00.340 All of these people,

00:29:01.880 all of them,

00:29:02.780 that fill these offices,

00:29:04.940 all take oaths

00:29:06.360 to uphold the

00:29:08.080 coronation oath

00:29:08.760 of the monarch.

00:29:09.520 It's called an oath

00:29:10.120 of allegiance

00:29:10.600 and an oath of office.

00:29:13.220 And they cannot

00:29:14.280 do anything.

00:29:15.880 They have no more

00:29:16.720 powers than the monarch

00:29:17.780 has,

00:29:18.160 including the judges.

00:29:19.660 When you look

00:29:20.300 at the charter,

00:29:20.920 for example,

00:29:21.400 when Queen Lizzie

00:29:23.140 signed it in 1982,

00:29:25.640 where did she get

00:29:26.440 the power to sign it from?

00:29:29.320 Number one,

00:29:30.060 it's the only document

00:29:31.200 in our constitutional

00:29:32.520 history where the state

00:29:34.000 has said,

00:29:34.620 these are going to be

00:29:35.120 your rights and freedoms.

00:29:36.520 Every other one

00:29:37.260 has been us limiting

00:29:38.980 the powers of the monarch,

00:29:40.880 which is,

00:29:41.560 this should be

00:29:41.960 the starting point

00:29:42.780 because we were born

00:29:43.780 completely free.

00:29:45.140 We're just going to

00:29:45.800 limit their powers

00:29:46.600 more and more,

00:29:47.660 not allow them to tell us

00:29:49.020 what our rights

00:29:49.540 and freedoms are going to be.

00:29:51.400 And the starting point

00:29:52.500 then is the coronation oath.

00:29:55.080 And she got the power

00:29:57.060 to sign that charter

00:29:58.000 from the coronation oath.

00:30:00.880 And when you look

00:30:01.960 at the supremacy

00:30:02.580 of God in the charter,

00:30:04.820 that has to be

00:30:06.460 the exact same

00:30:07.500 as her oath

00:30:08.860 to uphold

00:30:10.080 to the utmost

00:30:10.640 of her ability

00:30:11.420 the principles

00:30:12.180 of the Protestant

00:30:13.000 Christian religion

00:30:13.820 in her coronation oath.

00:30:16.180 Because she doesn't

00:30:17.320 have the power

00:30:18.180 to recognize

00:30:20.460 in the charter

00:30:21.220 any other God.

00:30:23.460 She doesn't have

00:30:24.440 that power.

00:30:25.180 The king does not

00:30:25.980 have that power.

00:30:27.900 They're bound

00:30:28.740 by their oath.

00:30:30.020 And I'm going to talk

00:30:30.600 about Chucky's oath

00:30:31.420 here as well

00:30:31.940 in a minute.

00:30:34.200 Consequently,

00:30:34.980 the maxim is here.

00:30:36.640 All power,

00:30:37.640 all power flows

00:30:38.960 from the oath

00:30:39.600 in Canada.

00:30:40.820 Every single office.

00:30:42.500 Municipalities

00:30:42.980 are trying to get

00:30:43.700 away from it.

00:30:44.760 One minister in Quebec

00:30:45.740 tried to get away

00:30:46.500 from it.

00:30:47.040 And he did,

00:30:47.960 but only because,

00:30:50.100 on a technicality,

00:30:51.860 and only because

00:30:52.680 people aren't

00:30:54.400 enforcing it

00:30:55.320 anymore.

00:30:57.280 And that has

00:30:58.560 to change.

00:30:59.740 That fundamentally

00:31:00.500 has to change.

00:31:01.440 We cannot,

00:31:02.340 the requirement

00:31:03.320 for these oaths

00:31:04.060 has been around

00:31:04.720 since at least

00:31:05.300 1200.

00:31:07.000 And they need

00:31:08.120 to be maintained.

00:31:09.660 Otherwise,

00:31:10.140 these people

00:31:10.600 will start bringing

00:31:12.620 in other gods.

00:31:13.380 whether it's Allah

00:31:15.660 or money

00:31:17.520 or power,

00:31:19.700 whatever their god

00:31:20.560 may be,

00:31:21.580 they will start

00:31:22.360 bringing them in.

00:31:25.340 Now,

00:31:26.060 as you know,

00:31:27.620 Chucky took his

00:31:28.400 coronation oath

00:31:29.220 recently.

00:31:30.280 And I'm going to

00:31:30.880 chat to you here

00:31:32.020 a little bit about that.

00:31:33.140 Give me one second.

00:31:34.840 Let's bring this

00:31:35.640 on the screen.

00:31:38.800 Now,

00:31:39.420 this is the

00:31:39.940 Coronation Oath

00:31:40.560 Act of 1688.

00:31:41.740 And I go through

00:31:43.540 everything I'm telling

00:31:44.860 you today

00:31:45.380 in our webinar

00:31:46.220 series.

00:31:48.820 Generally,

00:31:49.420 it's about

00:31:49.880 two,

00:31:50.940 four,

00:31:51.500 six hours.

00:31:53.040 We spend

00:31:53.360 three,

00:31:53.840 two-hour shows

00:31:54.780 going through

00:31:55.420 everything on the

00:31:56.160 oath.

00:31:56.400 And clearly,

00:31:56.820 I can't get

00:31:57.260 through all that

00:31:57.780 today.

00:31:58.160 But I'm just

00:31:58.580 going to give

00:31:58.900 you a rough

00:31:59.500 synopsis.

00:32:01.440 Now,

00:32:01.920 the Coronation

00:32:02.520 Oath Act says,

00:32:03.320 and it opens

00:32:03.940 by saying,

00:32:05.300 the oath

00:32:05.660 heretofore

00:32:06.360 framed in

00:32:07.020 doubtful words.

00:32:09.020 But for as

00:32:09.820 much as the

00:32:10.380 oath itself

00:32:11.060 on such

00:32:11.800 occasion

00:32:12.280 administered

00:32:12.880 hath heretofore

00:32:13.960 been framed

00:32:14.560 in doubtful

00:32:15.160 words and

00:32:15.600 expressions

00:32:16.100 with relation

00:32:16.980 to ancient

00:32:17.560 laws and

00:32:18.160 constitutions

00:32:19.060 at this time

00:32:19.860 unknown.

00:32:20.980 To the end,

00:32:21.740 therefore,

00:32:22.640 that one

00:32:23.260 uniform oath

00:32:24.060 may be in

00:32:24.620 all times

00:32:25.200 to come

00:32:25.700 taken by

00:32:27.900 the kings

00:32:28.280 and queens

00:32:28.680 of this

00:32:29.100 realm,

00:32:29.800 and to them

00:32:30.400 respectively

00:32:30.960 administered

00:32:31.540 at the

00:32:31.940 times of

00:32:32.440 their

00:32:32.680 coronation.

00:32:34.840 What

00:32:36.420 they're

00:32:36.600 saying

00:32:36.880 here is

00:32:37.360 these

00:32:38.300 kings 0.96

00:32:38.680 in the

00:32:39.000 past

00:32:39.400 were

00:32:39.580 trying

00:32:39.820 to

00:32:39.960 change

00:32:40.280 the

00:32:40.500 oath

00:32:40.780 and

00:32:42.660 it

00:32:42.780 was

00:32:42.920 getting

00:32:43.300 garbled

00:32:44.220 and

00:32:45.040 nobody

00:32:45.460 knew

00:32:45.780 what

00:32:46.340 should

00:32:46.520 be

00:32:46.680 in

00:32:46.840 there.

00:32:47.320 So

00:32:47.420 they

00:32:47.580 said,

00:32:48.460 we

00:32:48.560 are

00:32:48.840 going

00:32:49.160 to

00:32:49.740 make

00:32:49.960 one

00:32:50.200 oath

00:32:50.420 that

00:32:50.780 every

00:32:51.020 monarch

00:32:51.340 will

00:32:51.560 take

00:32:51.860 in

00:32:52.100 the

00:32:52.240 future.

00:32:53.460 And

00:32:53.740 this

00:32:53.900 is

00:32:54.020 what

00:32:54.180 that

00:32:54.420 oath

00:32:54.620 is.

00:32:55.640 The

00:32:55.740 archbishop

00:32:56.240 will

00:32:56.580 say

00:32:56.980 to

00:32:57.200 the

00:32:57.360 king,

00:32:58.140 will

00:32:58.300 you

00:32:58.480 solemnly

00:32:58.960 promise

00:32:59.320 and

00:32:59.580 swear

00:32:59.800 to

00:33:00.000 govern

00:33:00.180 the

00:33:00.360 people

00:33:00.640 of

00:33:04.840 their

00:33:05.420 two

00:33:05.660 belonging

00:33:06.100 according

00:33:06.700 to

00:33:07.040 statutes

00:33:07.520 and

00:33:07.700 parliament

00:33:08.000 agreed

00:33:08.420 and

00:33:08.620 the

00:33:08.760 laws

00:33:09.000 and

00:33:09.160 customs

00:33:09.540 and

00:33:09.740 stuff

00:33:09.980 same.

00:33:10.620 What

00:33:11.100 are

00:33:11.320 those

00:33:11.580 laws

00:33:11.840 and

00:33:12.000 customs?

00:33:13.800 They

00:33:14.320 are

00:33:14.780 the

00:33:15.240 common

00:33:15.520 law.

00:33:17.220 Spooner

00:33:17.580 wrote

00:33:17.820 about it

00:33:18.280 in the

00:33:18.620 1890s.

00:33:19.920 He

00:33:19.980 did a

00:33:20.220 whole

00:33:20.360 chapter

00:33:20.680 in one

00:33:21.020 of his

00:33:21.260 books

00:33:21.540 specifically

00:33:22.320 on that

00:33:22.900 very

00:33:23.200 issue.

00:33:24.600 And

00:33:24.800 if

00:33:25.940 they're

00:33:26.100 going to

00:33:26.340 swear

00:33:26.540 to

00:33:26.700 uphold

00:33:27.060 our

00:33:27.260 laws

00:33:27.500 and

00:33:27.660 customs,

00:33:27.960 you

00:33:28.200 can't

00:33:28.560 go

00:33:28.840 violating

00:33:30.800 them

00:33:31.020 or

00:33:31.180 changing

00:33:31.580 them.

00:33:32.080 And

00:33:32.140 you

00:33:32.280 cannot

00:33:32.600 give

00:33:32.940 the

00:33:39.880 king

00:33:40.400 and

00:33:40.560 this

00:33:40.720 is

00:33:40.920 old

00:33:41.300 English

00:33:41.600 language

00:33:42.040 directly

00:33:42.440 from

00:33:42.720 the

00:33:42.900 act.

00:33:44.580 They're

00:33:45.020 not

00:33:45.220 spelling

00:33:45.580 errors

00:33:45.940 on my

00:33:46.300 part.

00:33:47.620 And

00:33:48.060 then

00:33:48.180 the

00:33:48.300 archbishop

00:33:48.720 will

00:33:48.940 say,

00:33:49.340 will

00:33:49.380 you

00:33:49.540 to

00:33:50.680 your

00:33:50.820 power

00:33:51.140 cause

00:33:51.500 law

00:33:51.860 and

00:33:52.160 justice

00:33:52.560 and

00:33:52.820 mercy

00:33:53.040 to

00:33:53.220 be 1.00

00:33:53.380 executed 0.98

00:33:53.860 in

00:33:54.080 all

00:33:54.220 your

00:33:54.360 judgments?

00:33:55.240 You

00:33:55.440 don't

00:33:55.540 want

00:33:55.660 to

00:33:55.760 get

00:33:55.880 a

00:33:55.980 parking

00:33:56.300 ticket

00:33:56.600 and

00:33:56.780 go

00:33:56.860 to

00:33:57.000 jail

00:33:57.180 for

00:33:57.380 20

00:33:57.660 years.

00:33:57.920 So

00:33:58.260 they

00:33:58.460 have

00:33:58.760 to

00:33:58.900 the

00:33:59.100 judges

00:33:59.540 who

00:33:59.980 are

00:34:00.060 agents

00:34:00.460 of

00:34:00.640 the

00:34:00.780 monarch

00:34:00.980 have

00:34:02.340 to

00:34:02.500 give

00:34:02.680 law

00:34:03.100 and

00:34:03.540 justice

00:34:03.900 in

00:34:04.140 mercy.

00:34:05.720 And

00:34:06.240 the

00:34:06.440 third

00:34:06.660 one,

00:34:08.700 will

00:34:08.880 you

00:34:09.020 to

00:34:09.180 the

00:34:09.380 utmost

00:34:09.720 of

00:34:10.120 your

00:34:10.240 power

00:34:10.740 maintain

00:34:11.360 the

00:34:11.800 laws

00:34:12.060 of

00:34:12.240 God

00:34:12.520 and

00:34:12.660 the

00:34:12.800 true

00:34:12.980 profession

00:34:13.420 of

00:34:13.620 the

00:34:13.740 gospel

00:34:14.100 and

00:34:14.520 the

00:34:14.660 Protestant

00:34:15.020 Reformed

00:34:15.640 religion

00:34:16.200 established

00:34:16.680 by

00:34:16.960 law.

00:34:17.520 Let's

00:34:17.840 stop

00:34:18.100 for a

00:34:18.380 second.

00:34:19.180 What

00:34:19.460 do

00:34:19.580 those

00:34:19.800 words

00:34:20.100 mean

00:34:20.360 established

00:34:20.780 by

00:34:21.120 law?

00:34:23.340 Somewhere

00:34:23.860 prior to

00:34:25.220 the

00:34:25.380 coronation

00:34:25.920 oath,

00:34:26.520 the

00:34:26.600 people

00:34:27.040 demanded

00:34:28.720 and

00:34:29.040 agreed

00:34:29.440 with

00:34:30.000 the

00:34:30.180 monarch

00:34:30.440 that

00:34:30.800 the

00:34:30.960 Protestant

00:34:31.280 religion

00:34:31.800 would be

00:34:32.760 the

00:34:33.320 religion

00:34:33.780 for

00:34:34.100 England,

00:34:34.900 not

00:34:35.460 Catholicism

00:34:36.260 or the

00:34:36.860 Catholic

00:34:37.140 religion.

00:34:38.760 Consequently,

00:34:39.600 the

00:34:39.700 Protestant

00:34:40.060 Reformed

00:34:40.600 religion,

00:34:41.460 as recognized

00:34:42.040 in the

00:34:42.560 Coronation

00:34:43.020 Oath Act,

00:34:44.000 already is

00:34:45.040 the law.

00:34:46.140 It's

00:34:46.640 recognized

00:34:47.080 by the

00:34:47.800 law.

00:34:48.860 And the

00:34:49.640 monarch

00:34:50.240 does not

00:34:50.880 have the

00:34:51.340 power to

00:34:51.920 change it.

00:34:53.460 And there's

00:34:54.280 no amending

00:34:54.960 formula in the

00:34:56.160 Coronation

00:34:56.640 Oath Act.

00:34:57.100 There's

00:34:57.600 nothing in

00:34:58.180 the

00:34:58.300 Act that

00:34:58.740 says the

00:34:59.140 king can

00:34:59.620 unilaterally

00:35:00.420 change these

00:35:01.300 terms and

00:35:01.740 conditions on

00:35:02.400 his own.

00:35:03.460 He doesn't

00:35:03.900 have that

00:35:04.360 power.

00:35:05.740 And neither

00:35:06.160 does the

00:35:06.560 Archbishop.

00:35:08.740 And it

00:35:09.300 then goes on

00:35:09.880 to say,

00:35:10.300 will you

00:35:10.540 preserve unto

00:35:11.200 the bishops

00:35:11.680 and clergy

00:35:12.340 of this

00:35:12.740 realm and

00:35:13.340 to the

00:35:13.640 churches

00:35:13.940 committed to

00:35:14.760 their charge

00:35:15.340 all rights

00:35:15.760 and privileges

00:35:16.300 as by law

00:35:17.560 do or shall

00:35:18.100 appertain to

00:35:20.400 any of them?

00:35:22.260 And then the

00:35:22.960 king will go,

00:35:23.520 all of this I

00:35:24.100 promise do.

00:35:25.200 They'll lay

00:35:25.560 their hands upon

00:35:26.220 the Bible and

00:35:27.800 they will say

00:35:28.560 the things I

00:35:29.640 have here

00:35:30.200 before promised

00:35:31.140 I will perform

00:35:31.920 and keep so

00:35:32.680 help me God

00:35:33.280 and then they

00:35:33.780 kiss the Bible. 0.83

00:35:35.260 That's a very

00:35:35.960 short synopsis of

00:35:36.920 it.

00:35:37.200 But it's most

00:35:37.800 important that

00:35:38.400 this is the

00:35:39.420 oath.

00:35:40.160 This is the

00:35:41.060 promises to

00:35:41.780 the people of

00:35:43.300 what they're

00:35:43.640 going to do.

00:35:45.340 And by the

00:35:46.100 way, laws and

00:35:46.920 customs, you

00:35:47.480 know what that

00:35:47.860 includes?

00:35:49.220 Yeah, it

00:35:50.500 includes your

00:35:51.160 property rights.

00:35:52.380 And you know

00:35:52.980 where property

00:35:53.580 rights are traced

00:35:54.320 back to?

00:35:54.840 The Ten

00:35:56.300 Commandments

00:35:56.920 where God

00:35:57.680 said thou

00:35:58.160 shall not

00:35:58.680 steal.

00:35:59.740 How can you

00:36:00.420 say thou

00:36:01.420 shall not

00:36:01.920 steal without

00:36:02.500 presupposing in

00:36:03.540 the first

00:36:03.900 place that

00:36:05.060 somebody owns

00:36:05.680 the property?

00:36:07.680 As of right,

00:36:09.340 not a

00:36:09.860 privilege.

00:36:11.140 That's where

00:36:11.840 it comes from.

00:36:14.720 Now, this is

00:36:15.840 what happened

00:36:16.460 recently when

00:36:17.700 the king got

00:36:18.300 sworn in.

00:36:19.700 The archbishop

00:36:20.760 says,

00:36:21.760 Your Majesty,

00:36:22.420 the church

00:36:23.460 established by

00:36:24.280 law whose

00:36:24.900 settlement you 0.78

00:36:25.780 will swear to

00:36:26.800 maintain is

00:36:28.220 committed to

00:36:28.840 the true

00:36:29.180 profession of

00:36:29.840 the gospel and

00:36:31.020 in so doing

00:36:31.740 will seek to

00:36:33.140 foster an

00:36:34.180 environment in

00:36:35.200 which peoples of

00:36:35.940 all faiths and

00:36:36.560 beliefs may live

00:36:37.640 freely.

00:36:39.080 This is what the

00:36:40.160 archbishop said to

00:36:41.240 the king.

00:36:43.080 He did not

00:36:44.280 swear this, but

00:36:45.500 he established

00:36:46.440 this as a

00:36:47.260 principle.

00:36:48.660 Now, number

00:36:49.160 one, the true

00:36:50.500 profession of the

00:36:51.140 gospel does not 0.97

00:36:52.140 recognize all

00:36:53.320 faiths and

00:36:54.200 beliefs.

00:36:55.300 As Tanya said,

00:36:56.400 it doesn't

00:36:56.880 recognize the

00:36:57.960 God that we

00:36:58.760 believe in does

00:36:59.700 not recognize

00:37:00.420 other gods.

00:37:02.560 And this is

00:37:03.640 wrong.

00:37:04.540 The archbishop

00:37:05.180 had no power to

00:37:06.280 insert this into

00:37:07.740 the ceremony.

00:37:09.100 He did not have

00:37:10.180 the power at

00:37:10.840 law to do it.

00:37:11.620 It's not in the

00:37:12.520 coronational act,

00:37:14.280 nor is it in

00:37:15.260 any of the

00:37:15.980 previous

00:37:16.520 coronational

00:37:17.900 ceremonies that

00:37:18.780 have taken

00:37:19.120 place.

00:37:19.580 So, the

00:37:21.520 first thing I

00:37:22.380 want to point

00:37:22.820 out, putting

00:37:23.200 that in was

00:37:23.740 wrong.

00:37:24.560 Second of

00:37:25.000 all, the

00:37:26.800 gospel, the

00:37:28.480 Protestant

00:37:28.800 religion, the

00:37:29.400 gospel, does

00:37:30.080 not recognize

00:37:31.260 other faiths and

00:37:33.160 beliefs and

00:37:33.680 other gods.

00:37:35.100 This is a

00:37:35.660 lie.

00:37:36.700 So, the

00:37:37.240 archbishop is

00:37:37.980 lying, possibly

00:37:40.100 committing deception

00:37:41.200 or fraud at the

00:37:42.180 very moment he's

00:37:43.340 telling the king

00:37:44.140 to obey the

00:37:45.160 law.

00:37:45.400 Now, the

00:37:48.300 king goes, puts

00:37:49.000 his hand on the

00:37:49.620 Bible, and the

00:37:50.500 archbishop again

00:37:51.260 says, will you

00:37:52.620 solemnly promise

00:37:53.640 and swear to

00:37:54.800 govern the

00:37:55.300 peoples of the

00:37:55.980 United Kingdom

00:37:56.680 of Great Britain

00:37:57.500 and Northern

00:37:58.640 Ireland and your

00:37:59.860 other realms and

00:38:00.600 territories to any

00:38:01.820 of them belonging

00:38:02.600 or pertaining to

00:38:03.780 their respective

00:38:04.360 laws and customs?

00:38:06.780 That's not what

00:38:07.820 the coronational

00:38:08.420 said.

00:38:08.940 Let me go back.

00:38:10.340 It says here,

00:38:12.200 right up at the

00:38:12.800 top, govern the

00:38:14.380 people of the

00:38:15.040 Kingdom of

00:38:15.560 England and

00:38:16.200 the dominions

00:38:17.040 thereto belonging

00:38:18.120 according to the

00:38:19.120 statutes of

00:38:19.680 Parliament, because

00:38:20.200 at this time,

00:38:21.140 Parliament statutes

00:38:22.320 applied throughout

00:38:23.240 the whole

00:38:23.680 dominion, everywhere.

00:38:25.340 It applied

00:38:25.800 throughout the

00:38:26.340 realm.

00:38:27.600 Now he comes

00:38:28.380 along and he's

00:38:30.120 telling the king

00:38:30.900 to swear that he

00:38:32.140 will govern

00:38:32.700 Canada according

00:38:33.640 to our laws and

00:38:34.520 customs.

00:38:35.220 Well, what are

00:38:35.740 our laws and

00:38:36.400 customs?

00:38:37.740 And by doing

00:38:38.780 that, he is

00:38:39.980 saying that he

00:38:41.420 will govern according

00:38:42.560 to what Parliament

00:38:43.460 tells him to

00:38:44.280 do.

00:38:45.020 But our law is

00:38:46.060 the other way

00:38:46.560 around.

00:38:47.920 He is the one

00:38:48.880 that swears the

00:38:49.720 oath, not

00:38:50.840 Parliament.

00:38:52.700 He is the one

00:38:53.300 that swears the

00:38:53.900 coronation oath to

00:38:54.680 uphold God.

00:38:56.440 By swearing this

00:38:57.700 in, he has

00:39:00.500 lied.

00:39:01.240 They've taken a

00:39:01.960 false oath that

00:39:02.700 is not authorized

00:39:03.560 by statute.

00:39:04.880 And I want to

00:39:05.680 further point out,

00:39:06.840 the first time

00:39:07.860 they changed this

00:39:08.800 oath was done

00:39:10.660 illegally in the

00:39:11.560 19th, I think

00:39:12.400 it was King

00:39:12.840 King George,

00:39:15.120 don't quote me,

00:39:15.860 1937, where

00:39:18.460 they made

00:39:19.040 similar changes.

00:39:21.520 And there's an

00:39:22.880 excellent set of

00:39:23.560 articles I go

00:39:24.240 through in our

00:39:25.440 webinar series for

00:39:26.560 Moon Ag Gay,

00:39:27.460 and she has done

00:39:28.880 incredible research

00:39:30.020 pointing out the

00:39:32.720 very same thing I

00:39:33.500 told you.

00:39:34.060 These people are

00:39:34.920 changing the law

00:39:35.920 at the very moment

00:39:36.820 they're telling the

00:39:38.860 king to obey the 0.90

00:39:40.020 law.

00:39:40.220 And what does

00:39:42.620 that say about

00:39:43.100 the priest, the

00:39:44.560 archbishop, who's

00:39:46.720 also lying, who

00:39:48.320 has sworn an oath

00:39:49.000 to God?

00:39:51.940 This should say

00:39:53.080 to swear and

00:39:54.680 govern the

00:39:55.140 peoples of the

00:39:55.720 United Kingdom

00:39:56.300 of Great Britain

00:39:57.040 and Ireland and

00:39:58.100 your other

00:39:58.520 dominions and

00:39:59.360 territories belonging,

00:40:01.320 and it should

00:40:02.000 basically almost

00:40:02.720 stop at that,

00:40:04.180 because the

00:40:05.740 supremacy of God

00:40:06.720 in Canada is

00:40:08.280 the same as it

00:40:08.900 is in England.

00:40:10.220 And then he

00:40:13.500 goes on to say,

00:40:14.240 will you to the

00:40:14.820 utmost of your

00:40:15.440 power maintain the

00:40:16.520 laws of God and

00:40:17.420 the true profession

00:40:18.140 of the gospel?

00:40:19.040 Will you to the

00:40:19.600 utmost of your

00:40:20.180 power maintain in

00:40:21.180 the UK the

00:40:21.840 Protestant religion? 0.79

00:40:22.780 How can you

00:40:23.480 maintain the

00:40:24.080 Protestant reform

00:40:24.860 religion when you're

00:40:25.640 lying at the same

00:40:26.360 time you're taking

00:40:26.980 it?

00:40:29.880 What faith are we

00:40:31.060 to have in a

00:40:33.320 king who's going

00:40:34.140 to uphold the

00:40:34.780 principles of a

00:40:35.600 law while he's

00:40:37.400 breaking them at the

00:40:38.160 same time?

00:40:38.700 But you'll

00:40:39.600 notice, despite

00:40:41.060 the fact here

00:40:41.980 where the

00:40:43.080 archbishop says

00:40:44.020 in so doing

00:40:44.960 that the church

00:40:46.340 will seek to

00:40:47.880 foster an

00:40:48.420 environment for

00:40:49.120 other people's

00:40:49.740 faiths and

00:40:50.280 beliefs, the

00:40:51.880 king does not

00:40:52.640 swear that in

00:40:53.640 to do that.

00:40:55.780 This statement,

00:40:56.840 this opening

00:40:57.280 paragraph, is

00:40:58.260 simply a statement

00:40:59.320 by the

00:40:59.820 archbishop.

00:41:01.640 That's all it

00:41:02.440 is.

00:41:02.840 It is not the

00:41:04.420 oath of the

00:41:04.960 king.

00:41:05.160 The oath of

00:41:07.060 the king

00:41:07.540 starts right

00:41:08.380 here.

00:41:09.100 Will you

00:41:09.440 solemnly promise

00:41:10.260 to swear and

00:41:10.980 govern the

00:41:11.360 peoples of the

00:41:11.960 UK according to

00:41:13.260 their realms and

00:41:13.840 territories?

00:41:14.540 That is where

00:41:15.280 the oath starts.

00:41:16.600 This here,

00:41:17.500 although the

00:41:17.880 archbishop did

00:41:18.580 not have the

00:41:19.160 power to do

00:41:19.760 this, does

00:41:20.700 not form part

00:41:21.740 of the oath

00:41:22.200 and is not

00:41:23.040 legally or

00:41:23.940 constitutionally

00:41:24.920 binding.

00:41:26.080 Period.

00:41:28.740 And now when

00:41:29.480 we get here,

00:41:30.480 this is his

00:41:31.060 oath to uphold

00:41:31.700 the Protestant

00:41:32.200 reformed religion.

00:41:33.360 This is what

00:41:33.880 Chucky swore

00:41:34.440 to, and

00:41:36.340 he's required

00:41:36.800 to do

00:41:37.160 that.

00:41:40.240 This oath

00:41:41.080 does not

00:41:41.800 say that

00:41:43.240 to the

00:41:43.520 utmost of

00:41:43.960 your power

00:41:44.460 he will

00:41:44.860 maintain the

00:41:46.400 Protestant

00:41:46.740 reformed

00:41:47.320 religion and

00:41:47.920 all religions.

00:41:49.100 He didn't

00:41:49.860 swear to

00:41:50.260 that.

00:41:51.400 So although

00:41:51.840 the archbishop

00:41:52.620 made a false

00:41:53.240 statement,

00:41:54.000 Chucky never

00:41:54.500 swore to

00:41:55.080 it.

00:41:55.860 It was not

00:41:56.660 an oath.

00:41:57.140 It was not

00:41:57.480 part of the

00:41:58.040 oath.

00:41:58.260 I want to

00:41:58.600 clarify that.

00:42:00.300 Okay?

00:42:00.580 And then he

00:42:03.300 goes on to

00:42:03.780 say,

00:42:04.040 Your Majesty,

00:42:05.320 are you

00:42:05.720 willing to

00:42:06.180 make,

00:42:07.460 subscribe,

00:42:08.380 and declare

00:42:09.640 to the

00:42:10.100 statutory

00:42:10.560 ascension

00:42:12.080 declaration

00:42:12.800 oath?

00:42:13.100 And he

00:42:13.320 says,

00:42:13.580 I am

00:42:13.760 willing.

00:42:15.000 I,

00:42:15.320 Charles,

00:42:15.760 do solemnly

00:42:16.440 and sincerely

00:42:17.080 in the

00:42:17.620 presence of

00:42:18.120 God,

00:42:18.580 profess,

00:42:19.440 testify,

00:42:20.040 and declare

00:42:20.560 I am a

00:42:21.460 faithful

00:42:21.840 Protestant,

00:42:22.960 and that I

00:42:23.760 will,

00:42:24.140 according to

00:42:24.600 the true

00:42:24.940 intent of

00:42:25.460 the enactments,

00:42:26.180 to secure

00:42:26.840 the Protestant

00:42:27.440 and succession

00:42:28.320 to the

00:42:28.760 throne,

00:42:29.520 uphold and

00:42:30.040 maintain the

00:42:30.680 set enactments

00:42:31.360 to the best

00:42:31.860 of my powers

00:42:32.440 according to

00:42:33.000 law.

00:42:33.760 You can't,

00:42:34.560 it's like having

00:42:35.000 two people in

00:42:35.740 a corporation

00:42:36.380 with 50%

00:42:37.420 power.

00:42:39.000 Nothing will

00:42:39.400 ever get done

00:42:40.040 if there's

00:42:40.400 conflict.

00:42:41.320 He cannot

00:42:41.940 agree to

00:42:42.800 uphold all

00:42:43.600 faiths and

00:42:44.120 at the same

00:42:45.080 time swear

00:42:45.720 that he's

00:42:46.500 going to

00:42:46.880 give to

00:42:47.760 the utmost

00:42:48.300 and best

00:42:48.820 of his

00:42:49.120 powers,

00:42:50.220 that he is

00:42:50.900 going to

00:42:51.180 give supremacy

00:42:52.260 to the

00:42:53.260 Protestant

00:42:53.580 Christian

00:42:54.060 religion.

00:42:55.980 One is

00:42:56.940 opposed to

00:42:58.060 the other.

00:42:59.720 But he

00:43:00.240 swore this

00:43:00.800 as part of

00:43:01.300 his oath

00:43:01.640 as well.

00:43:02.780 So he

00:43:03.280 is duty

00:43:03.960 bound to

00:43:04.460 uphold the

00:43:04.920 principles of

00:43:05.520 the Protestant

00:43:05.940 Christian

00:43:06.380 religion.

00:43:07.440 And in

00:43:07.720 so far as

00:43:08.540 that is

00:43:09.160 concerned,

00:43:09.660 what is

00:43:09.880 one of

00:43:10.120 those things

00:43:10.560 God has

00:43:11.020 told us?

00:43:12.180 You're not

00:43:12.540 supposed to

00:43:12.960 lie.

00:43:16.840 So

00:43:17.320 consequently,

00:43:18.360 this whole

00:43:20.400 ceremony is

00:43:21.740 founded on

00:43:23.060 fundamental lies

00:43:24.080 this time.

00:43:25.500 It was with

00:43:26.540 Lizzie the

00:43:26.960 Lizard and

00:43:27.820 the King

00:43:28.200 in 1937,

00:43:29.660 but not

00:43:31.020 to this

00:43:31.520 extent.

00:43:33.180 And we

00:43:33.960 need to

00:43:34.300 look at

00:43:34.840 getting back

00:43:36.300 to the

00:43:36.560 original oath

00:43:37.300 for several

00:43:38.420 reasons.

00:43:38.940 Number one,

00:43:40.000 the

00:43:40.140 Coronation

00:43:40.560 Oath Act

00:43:41.020 has not

00:43:41.480 been changed

00:43:42.140 since 1688.

00:43:44.760 Consequently,

00:43:45.520 they had no

00:43:46.100 statutory power

00:43:47.040 or constitutional

00:43:47.940 power to

00:43:48.580 change it.

00:43:49.440 And number

00:43:49.740 two, as

00:43:50.680 Blackstone

00:43:51.060 said,

00:43:51.880 every time

00:43:52.460 the common

00:43:53.040 law has

00:43:53.500 got trotten

00:43:54.020 down or

00:43:54.700 has been

00:43:56.600 beaten down,

00:43:57.720 the people

00:43:58.280 have finally

00:43:58.720 come back.

00:43:59.320 And that's

00:43:59.640 what we're

00:43:59.860 starting to

00:44:00.340 do now

00:44:00.720 is to

00:44:01.040 come back.

00:44:02.000 And we're

00:44:02.320 starting to

00:44:02.760 say, okay,

00:44:03.140 that's it.

00:44:03.900 We're not

00:44:04.280 accepting any

00:44:04.940 more changes,

00:44:05.740 any changes.

00:44:06.560 And you

00:44:06.920 will get

00:44:07.300 back to

00:44:07.980 the original

00:44:08.540 oath that

00:44:09.040 you swore.

00:44:10.180 All power

00:44:11.200 flows from

00:44:11.860 the oath.

00:44:13.360 And this is

00:44:13.900 Chucky's oath.

00:44:14.840 All power

00:44:15.680 that he has

00:44:16.520 through his

00:44:17.380 agents, the

00:44:18.500 judges and the

00:44:19.340 governor general

00:44:20.000 and lieutenant

00:44:20.520 governor, all

00:44:21.380 come from

00:44:21.940 this oath,

00:44:23.100 all of

00:44:23.460 it, including

00:44:24.980 protection of

00:44:25.800 your property

00:44:26.280 rights.

00:44:29.460 Again, I

00:44:30.020 went over

00:44:30.300 this.

00:44:30.700 I just want

00:44:31.100 to point it

00:44:31.520 out that

00:44:32.060 this is the

00:44:33.820 oath that

00:44:34.160 he is required

00:44:34.680 to take

00:44:35.200 according to

00:44:36.560 the laws and

00:44:37.200 statutes in

00:44:38.240 parliament and

00:44:38.920 the laws and

00:44:39.440 customs of

00:44:40.020 same.

00:44:40.580 That is our

00:44:41.180 common law and

00:44:42.160 that is your

00:44:42.600 property rights,

00:44:43.460 by the way.

00:44:44.660 And it's also

00:44:45.320 mentioned in

00:44:45.860 the Coronation

00:44:46.440 Oath Act that

00:44:47.520 the king is

00:44:48.040 required to

00:44:48.800 uphold our

00:44:49.400 property rights

00:44:50.060 in the opening

00:44:50.520 paragraph.

00:44:51.180 It's mentioned

00:44:51.600 in there as

00:44:52.100 well.

00:44:52.520 And I go

00:44:52.920 into a lot

00:44:53.300 more detail

00:44:53.800 in our

00:44:54.140 webinar series

00:44:54.820 about all

00:44:55.380 of this.

00:44:57.720 Now, once

00:44:59.000 you know,

00:45:00.400 and this

00:45:00.720 gets to

00:45:01.240 what Matthew

00:45:03.140 Truella was

00:45:03.800 talking about

00:45:04.420 on the

00:45:04.700 doctrine of

00:45:05.240 the lesser

00:45:05.600 magistrate.

00:45:07.820 Once you

00:45:08.420 know what

00:45:09.840 the king's

00:45:10.280 powers are,

00:45:10.760 what are you

00:45:10.980 going to do

00:45:11.280 about it?

00:45:12.240 You're a

00:45:12.620 cop on the

00:45:13.180 beat.

00:45:13.800 What are you

00:45:14.120 going to do

00:45:14.460 if you get

00:45:14.800 orders from

00:45:15.260 above that

00:45:15.820 violate the

00:45:18.180 laws of the

00:45:18.700 monarch, the

00:45:19.160 promises of

00:45:19.740 the monarch in

00:45:20.340 his oath?

00:45:20.780 What are you

00:45:22.000 going to do

00:45:22.660 if you're a

00:45:23.080 tax court

00:45:23.660 official?

00:45:26.920 Technically, I

00:45:27.520 think you should

00:45:27.920 resign.

00:45:28.540 I don't think

00:45:28.900 there is a

00:45:29.440 way to be in

00:45:30.020 the tax court

00:45:30.800 and comply with

00:45:31.700 God's laws at

00:45:32.400 the same time.

00:45:32.980 I don't think

00:45:33.400 you can do

00:45:33.940 it.

00:45:34.140 but the point

00:45:35.980 is working

00:45:38.900 your way up

00:45:39.440 the chain of

00:45:39.960 command, you

00:45:41.240 need to tell

00:45:42.020 those higher

00:45:42.680 up, because

00:45:43.720 all government

00:45:44.520 officials swear

00:45:45.300 an oath of

00:45:45.660 allegiance to

00:45:46.280 the monarch and

00:45:46.920 an oath of

00:45:47.360 office, so

00:45:48.200 they have no

00:45:48.740 more powers

00:45:49.300 than the

00:45:49.620 monarch, and

00:45:50.840 they need to

00:45:51.320 tell those

00:45:51.760 higher up the

00:45:52.320 food chain,

00:45:52.880 sorry, according

00:45:53.800 to my oath,

00:45:54.800 which is the

00:45:55.480 source of all

00:45:56.140 the power, I

00:45:57.300 can't do what

00:45:57.960 you're telling

00:45:58.360 me to do.

00:45:59.120 Not because I

00:45:59.960 don't want to,

00:46:00.720 not because I

00:46:01.520 disagree, which

00:46:02.400 may be true, but

00:46:04.040 because I took

00:46:04.700 an oath and

00:46:05.160 the oath says

00:46:05.660 I can't do

00:46:06.260 it, and I

00:46:06.860 can't break

00:46:07.520 my oath and

00:46:08.480 comply with

00:46:09.060 your orders at

00:46:10.000 the same time.

00:46:10.980 That is the

00:46:11.840 fundamental basis

00:46:12.800 in our law, in

00:46:13.660 our Canadian

00:46:14.400 English law, for

00:46:16.560 telling those

00:46:17.640 higher up the

00:46:18.480 food chain, I

00:46:21.200 cannot comply

00:46:22.200 with your

00:46:22.840 orders.

00:46:24.260 It's based

00:46:25.220 solidly in our

00:46:26.940 constitution, it's

00:46:28.500 based solidly in

00:46:29.520 contract law, and

00:46:31.820 these people

00:46:32.700 need to know

00:46:33.400 more and more

00:46:35.620 that they have

00:46:37.620 the power to

00:46:38.240 say no, and

00:46:38.720 they should be

00:46:39.120 doing that.

00:46:40.620 One of the

00:46:41.260 things I talk

00:46:42.220 about on a

00:46:43.500 regular basis

00:46:44.080 for years is

00:46:45.040 the four ways

00:46:45.680 to get justice.

00:46:46.580 You have

00:46:47.000 political, civil

00:46:48.860 disobedience, you 0.71

00:46:50.040 have the court

00:46:50.520 system, and

00:46:51.220 you've got war.

00:46:52.520 And war is

00:46:53.340 generally, of

00:46:53.880 course, not an

00:46:54.400 option for all

00:46:55.100 these reasons.

00:46:57.040 Here I'm just

00:46:57.800 pointing out, you've

00:46:58.960 got the courts on

00:46:59.800 one hand.

00:47:00.320 Now, the

00:47:01.360 problem with the

00:47:01.980 courts, you can 0.98

00:47:02.760 do it yourself, as

00:47:04.300 I do, it's

00:47:05.240 incredibly time

00:47:06.680 consuming, and

00:47:08.420 you learn a lot, but

00:47:10.060 it takes a lot of

00:47:11.180 time out of your

00:47:11.860 life, or you can

00:47:12.980 get a lawyer which

00:47:13.640 has a lot of

00:47:14.140 money.

00:47:15.220 There are places

00:47:16.260 for lawyers,

00:47:16.960 especially some

00:47:17.500 good lawyers.

00:47:18.220 There are, and I

00:47:18.920 have met some

00:47:19.480 good lawyers over

00:47:20.200 the years.

00:47:22.960 I've met lesser

00:47:23.880 good judges, but

00:47:24.900 there are some

00:47:25.440 good judges out

00:47:26.200 there as well.

00:47:26.760 And then you've

00:47:29.340 got to look at

00:47:29.700 the type of

00:47:30.180 action.

00:47:30.640 Is it a civil,

00:47:31.440 criminal?

00:47:32.020 Are you laying

00:47:32.500 your own charges?

00:47:33.440 Do you want an

00:47:33.880 injunction,

00:47:34.540 declaratory relief,

00:47:35.720 peace bonds,

00:47:36.440 prerogative relief?

00:47:37.240 Is it a

00:47:37.640 constitutional

00:47:38.280 challenge?

00:47:39.020 All of those get

00:47:39.880 factored in as to

00:47:40.760 what type of

00:47:41.300 relief you're going

00:47:41.980 to seek in the

00:47:42.600 court system.

00:47:45.140 The Human Rights

00:47:45.920 Commission, I am

00:47:46.560 not a believer in.

00:47:47.560 As far as I'm

00:47:48.100 concerned, they are

00:47:49.140 there to give

00:47:50.240 power to

00:47:53.800 recognize people

00:47:58.300 that are breaking

00:48:00.780 God's laws.

00:48:03.080 And I don't

00:48:03.420 think the

00:48:04.120 human, I don't

00:48:05.320 think that the

00:48:06.380 monarch had the

00:48:07.320 power to put

00:48:08.620 into effect at

00:48:10.420 least certain

00:48:10.880 portions of the

00:48:11.580 Human Rights

00:48:12.040 Act.

00:48:13.380 Nonetheless, it

00:48:14.240 is there right

00:48:14.880 now, and it

00:48:16.080 deals with

00:48:16.580 basically discrimination

00:48:17.640 issues.

00:48:19.680 You can also

00:48:20.660 negotiate if you

00:48:21.640 have problems,

00:48:22.360 Christ said that

00:48:24.380 there is going

00:48:24.880 to be a spot

00:48:25.540 for it to

00:48:26.220 negotiate before

00:48:27.060 they put you

00:48:28.000 in jail and

00:48:28.600 they don't let

00:48:29.040 you out until

00:48:29.520 you pay the

00:48:29.980 last penny

00:48:30.460 owing.

00:48:32.440 It's quick, but

00:48:33.520 there's no

00:48:33.820 accountability that

00:48:35.060 goes with it.

00:48:35.660 The people that

00:48:36.140 do it, just get

00:48:36.740 out and do it

00:48:37.260 again, right?

00:48:38.640 And of course, as

00:48:39.500 I said, war is

00:48:40.120 not an option.

00:48:40.980 So the best

00:48:41.660 thing is peaceful

00:48:42.320 civil disobedience.

00:48:44.300 That is where

00:48:45.440 your power comes

00:48:46.580 from.

00:48:47.660 And I've said

00:48:48.140 this for decades

00:48:48.840 now, say no and

00:48:50.660 don't comply to

00:48:51.400 them.

00:48:53.140 And Richard

00:48:53.740 Sullivan pointed

00:48:54.400 out in the

00:48:54.880 spirit of the

00:48:55.400 common law, he

00:48:56.080 said, if we

00:48:56.540 owe a duty to

00:48:57.920 a higher power,

00:48:59.460 confers a right

00:49:00.480 against the

00:49:00.980 lower power.

00:49:02.240 So if we

00:49:02.780 owe up duties

00:49:03.280 to God, then

00:49:04.160 we've got rights

00:49:04.880 against the

00:49:05.480 state.

00:49:06.640 And we can

00:49:07.340 tell the state,

00:49:08.180 I'm not

00:49:08.540 complying because

00:49:09.440 I've got more

00:49:10.100 duties to a

00:49:10.700 higher power.

00:49:12.920 And the

00:49:13.480 principle is

00:49:13.980 recognized in

00:49:14.660 our common

00:49:15.080 law.

00:49:15.960 You have to

00:49:16.840 at some point

00:49:17.340 answer to your

00:49:17.980 conscience.

00:49:19.420 You have to.

00:49:19.980 answer to your

00:49:22.240 leader when

00:49:22.840 you're given

00:49:23.280 unlawful orders

00:49:24.840 means you're

00:49:26.440 breaking your

00:49:26.940 oath, which

00:49:27.760 means you

00:49:28.400 have sworn a

00:49:29.380 false oath.

00:49:30.640 And you did it

00:49:31.460 either knowing you

00:49:32.180 were going to do

00:49:32.660 that in the

00:49:33.040 future, which

00:49:33.580 would be perjury,

00:49:34.320 or you broke

00:49:35.460 the oath, which

00:49:37.560 could be a

00:49:37.920 variety of

00:49:38.320 other fences.

00:49:39.360 Fraud, fabricating

00:49:40.540 evidence possibly.

00:49:42.980 Okay.

00:49:44.900 Etiangelo

00:49:45.460 Bwede pointed

00:49:46.180 out in 1548,

00:49:47.820 phenomenal book.

00:49:48.980 If you can get

00:49:49.640 it, it was

00:49:50.140 called The

00:49:50.960 Politics of

00:49:51.700 Obedience.

00:49:53.220 It's a

00:49:53.560 phenomenal book.

00:49:54.060 It's not very

00:49:54.580 long, 70

00:49:56.820 pages maybe, but

00:49:58.200 it's an

00:49:58.460 incredible read.

00:49:59.920 And he points

00:50:00.600 out from all

00:50:01.200 these indignities,

00:50:02.360 such that the

00:50:02.900 very beasts of

00:50:03.600 the field would

00:50:04.180 not endure.

00:50:05.260 You can deliver

00:50:05.980 yourself if you

00:50:06.840 try, not by

00:50:08.120 taking action, not

00:50:09.140 by doing violence,

00:50:10.680 but you simply

00:50:11.260 don't comply with

00:50:12.060 these tyrants.

00:50:13.880 And sure, there's

00:50:14.580 risks.

00:50:17.540 You may lose

00:50:18.440 your home.

00:50:18.900 I lost mine in

00:50:19.740 the process years

00:50:20.520 ago, decades

00:50:21.740 ago.

00:50:22.720 But ultimately,

00:50:25.100 there's risks in

00:50:25.920 everything.

00:50:26.980 And if you

00:50:29.160 reserve to

00:50:29.900 serve them,

00:50:31.940 then the only

00:50:32.600 thing you will

00:50:33.180 have is what

00:50:34.440 they allow you

00:50:34.980 to have.

00:50:36.820 The objective

00:50:37.680 is to say no

00:50:38.540 to them any

00:50:39.300 time their

00:50:40.300 laws break

00:50:40.960 God's laws.

00:50:42.900 And he goes

00:50:43.600 on to say

00:50:44.140 that I don't

00:50:44.700 ask you to

00:50:45.140 place your

00:50:45.500 hands on the

00:50:46.100 tyrant to

00:50:47.260 topple him

00:50:47.840 over, but

00:50:48.720 merely that you

00:50:49.420 support him no

00:50:50.220 longer, and

00:50:51.080 then you'll see

00:50:51.520 him fall over

00:50:52.160 like a great

00:50:52.760 pedestal that's

00:50:53.920 been taken

00:50:54.300 away, and

00:50:54.760 he'll follow

00:50:55.120 his own

00:50:55.500 way.

00:50:56.340 If nobody

00:50:57.000 supports the

00:50:57.720 guy, and

00:50:59.300 he's sitting

00:50:59.720 with 20

00:51:00.180 people, and

00:51:00.700 he says to

00:51:01.220 his inner

00:51:01.540 circle, go

00:51:02.320 and do

00:51:02.540 that, and

00:51:03.140 they just

00:51:03.460 stand there.

00:51:05.800 He's lost.

00:51:06.520 He's got no

00:51:06.960 power.

00:51:07.300 He's lost

00:51:07.780 it all.

00:51:10.060 And at

00:51:11.400 that point,

00:51:12.580 as Caesar

00:51:13.040 said,

00:51:13.440 once he

00:51:16.880 found out

00:51:17.340 Brute was

00:51:17.820 against him,

00:51:18.500 he just

00:51:18.840 died, and

00:51:19.640 that was

00:51:19.960 it.

00:51:21.860 That's what

00:51:22.500 people need

00:51:23.600 to realize

00:51:24.280 here.

00:51:24.640 Nobody's

00:51:24.940 asking you

00:51:25.320 to kill 1.00

00:51:25.660 anybody, or 0.68

00:51:26.520 even recommending

00:51:27.220 it, but

00:51:27.800 just say no,

00:51:28.600 you will not

00:51:29.200 comply with

00:51:29.840 these people's

00:51:30.480 orders.

00:51:32.780 And finally, I

00:51:33.700 point out

00:51:34.160 Oscar Wilde's

00:51:35.380 point that it's

00:51:36.180 our original

00:51:36.860 virtue of

00:51:37.500 saying no.

00:51:38.120 How do you

00:51:38.620 expect change

00:51:39.480 to happen if

00:51:41.080 you're telling

00:51:41.580 people, I

00:51:43.520 agree with

00:51:44.000 the oath, it's

00:51:45.100 part of our

00:51:45.580 constitution, but

00:51:46.640 I'm going to

00:51:46.940 let you break

00:51:47.500 it.

00:51:49.440 Allowing 0.98

00:51:49.880 somebody to

00:51:50.460 break the

00:51:50.840 constitution and

00:51:52.200 complaining about

00:51:53.000 it while you

00:51:53.520 comply with it

00:51:54.400 is not an

00:51:55.380 answer.

00:51:56.320 It's part of

00:51:57.120 the problem.

00:51:58.740 And

00:51:58.920 consequently, you

00:52:00.800 need to be

00:52:01.340 able to tell

00:52:02.600 anybody in

00:52:03.360 our constitution

00:52:04.220 who's breaking

00:52:04.880 the law, you

00:52:06.440 will not

00:52:06.840 comply, no

00:52:08.140 matter what

00:52:08.680 level you

00:52:09.220 are at, period.

00:52:11.040 You simply

00:52:11.560 need to tell

00:52:12.480 them no.

00:52:13.060 It takes

00:52:13.660 somebody who

00:52:16.680 can get rid

00:52:17.200 of the fear

00:52:17.800 element.

00:52:20.980 And

00:52:21.420 hopefully,

00:52:22.780 you've got a

00:52:23.920 family that

00:52:24.420 will be

00:52:24.760 supportive.

00:52:25.280 a friend

00:52:26.740 of mine

00:52:26.960 told me

00:52:27.440 30 some

00:52:28.680 odd years

00:52:29.060 ago, he

00:52:29.420 said one

00:52:29.860 of the

00:52:30.060 problems

00:52:30.500 with freedom

00:52:31.660 is that in

00:52:32.900 a family, one

00:52:33.640 spouse is in

00:52:34.280 and one

00:52:34.580 isn't.

00:52:36.040 And that

00:52:36.380 can be still

00:52:37.020 a problem

00:52:37.480 today.

00:52:39.340 But

00:52:39.800 ultimately,

00:52:41.160 somebody's got

00:52:43.000 to make

00:52:43.280 decisions not

00:52:44.420 to comply with

00:52:45.140 these government

00:52:45.640 officials who

00:52:46.260 are breaking

00:52:46.680 the law.

00:52:48.240 And this

00:52:48.840 goes to all

00:52:49.700 your justices of

00:52:50.560 the peace,

00:52:51.240 all your

00:52:51.920 bureaucrats and

00:52:52.900 officials that

00:52:53.740 are getting

00:52:54.040 orders to

00:52:55.340 break the

00:52:55.720 law, all

00:52:56.640 the way up

00:52:57.000 the chain

00:52:57.340 of command

00:52:57.840 to your

00:52:58.420 politicians and

00:53:00.360 to your

00:53:00.660 governor general

00:53:01.320 and lieutenant

00:53:02.620 governor.

00:53:04.420 That's what we

00:53:05.140 need to hold

00:53:05.660 them accountable

00:53:06.260 with.

00:53:07.540 As I said,

00:53:08.420 I go through

00:53:08.900 a much, much

00:53:09.760 more extensive

00:53:10.320 analysis on

00:53:11.180 this.

00:53:11.700 And as you

00:53:12.540 can see on

00:53:13.000 most of my

00:53:13.480 slides here,

00:53:14.140 everything is

00:53:14.800 where I get

00:53:15.920 it from,

00:53:16.260 is quoted

00:53:16.620 from, so

00:53:17.060 people can

00:53:17.580 verify it.

00:53:21.140 But look

00:53:21.840 back at what

00:53:22.440 I've mentioned

00:53:23.700 to you tonight

00:53:24.420 in our

00:53:24.780 law.

00:53:26.500 You know,

00:53:26.920 having 350

00:53:28.320 MPs, where

00:53:30.580 an MPCA has

00:53:31.480 100,000

00:53:32.180 constituents, but

00:53:33.860 he's beholden

00:53:34.560 to the party.

00:53:35.360 So the

00:53:36.100 constituents tell

00:53:37.040 him not to do

00:53:37.760 anything, and

00:53:39.060 he votes

00:53:39.540 according to

00:53:40.100 the leader of

00:53:40.620 the party.

00:53:42.220 Your only

00:53:42.940 power right

00:53:43.900 now is to

00:53:44.440 vote him

00:53:44.840 out, but

00:53:45.380 that could 0.68

00:53:45.600 be four

00:53:45.920 years later.

00:53:47.960 And he

00:53:48.540 does whatever

00:53:49.040 he wants

00:53:49.520 during those

00:53:49.980 four years.

00:53:51.400 We need to

00:53:52.580 know that we

00:53:53.260 will not

00:53:53.700 support them

00:53:54.420 at all in

00:53:55.680 anything that

00:53:56.300 they do, if

00:53:57.760 that's the

00:53:58.120 case.

00:53:58.480 And we need

00:53:59.000 to get rid

00:53:59.380 of political

00:53:59.800 parties, because

00:54:00.700 for the most

00:54:01.160 part, political

00:54:01.760 parties are run

00:54:02.540 by tyrants who

00:54:03.660 do not believe

00:54:04.280 in God and

00:54:05.420 are telling

00:54:05.820 their people

00:54:06.400 not to do

00:54:07.500 it.

00:54:08.020 What does

00:54:08.460 that say

00:54:08.860 about MPs

00:54:09.780 who profess

00:54:10.420 to be

00:54:10.740 Christian and

00:54:11.400 go and do

00:54:11.840 what their

00:54:12.140 leaders tell

00:54:12.720 them to do,

00:54:13.400 over and

00:54:13.860 above what

00:54:14.240 their constituents

00:54:14.900 are telling

00:54:15.480 them to do?

00:54:17.040 There's a

00:54:17.700 serious, serious

00:54:18.900 defect that's

00:54:20.080 happening there

00:54:20.700 in our

00:54:22.180 political system

00:54:23.020 as well.

00:54:23.500 That needs

00:54:23.940 to be remedied.

00:54:24.800 And I'm

00:54:25.360 grateful for

00:54:25.980 Tanya and

00:54:26.460 all her work

00:54:26.960 to get people

00:54:27.580 into the

00:54:28.000 school boards

00:54:28.580 and into

00:54:29.380 various levels

00:54:30.180 of municipal

00:54:31.820 law.

00:54:32.900 And we

00:54:33.340 did try

00:54:33.840 here in

00:54:34.420 Kelowna to

00:54:35.040 get some

00:54:35.340 people in

00:54:35.760 as well.

00:54:36.720 And we

00:54:37.680 came pretty

00:54:38.040 close for

00:54:38.860 first time

00:54:39.440 around.

00:54:40.420 We came

00:54:41.080 pretty close.

00:54:41.960 I suspect

00:54:42.400 the next

00:54:42.880 municipal

00:54:43.340 election we

00:54:44.120 will get

00:54:44.600 some people

00:54:45.080 into power

00:54:45.580 because it's

00:54:46.080 going to be

00:54:46.320 a lot more

00:54:46.700 people resigning

00:54:47.460 in that.

00:54:48.060 And that's

00:54:48.560 when we

00:54:48.820 can start

00:54:49.180 upholding

00:54:49.600 God's

00:54:49.920 laws in

00:54:50.440 our political

00:54:50.940 establishment

00:54:51.520 as well.

00:54:52.920 In conclusion,

00:54:53.980 I simply

00:54:54.420 want to

00:54:54.860 mention that

00:54:55.840 in Canada

00:54:56.540 you have a

00:54:57.320 constitutional

00:54:58.100 basis for

00:54:59.480 the doctrine

00:54:59.940 of the

00:55:00.260 lesser

00:55:00.460 magistrate

00:55:01.180 that Matthew

00:55:03.000 Truwella

00:55:03.660 pointed out

00:55:04.500 so very,

00:55:05.520 very good

00:55:05.920 in his own

00:55:06.720 book and

00:55:07.520 on his show

00:55:08.020 a couple

00:55:08.340 weeks ago.

00:55:09.580 And I

00:55:10.440 wanted to

00:55:10.920 instill in

00:55:11.520 you the

00:55:12.020 belief of

00:55:13.280 where that

00:55:13.860 comes from

00:55:14.380 in our

00:55:14.680 law.

00:55:15.440 It's not

00:55:16.000 just morally

00:55:16.560 and ethically,

00:55:17.140 but it's

00:55:17.780 religiously,

00:55:18.560 which is

00:55:18.960 protected

00:55:19.400 constitutionally,

00:55:21.460 not to

00:55:21.940 comply with

00:55:22.580 them.

00:55:23.940 And on

00:55:24.880 that basis,

00:55:25.580 Tanya,

00:55:25.840 thank you for

00:55:26.380 having me on

00:55:26.980 here tonight.

00:55:27.500 I hope I

00:55:28.060 was able to

00:55:28.860 answer a

00:55:29.180 bunch of

00:55:29.400 questions.

00:55:47.140 yeah.

00:55:58.020 Yeah.

00:56:10.620 Yeah.

00:56:11.460 Yeah.

00:56:11.840 absolutely.

00:56:36.660 it remains

00:56:37.560 the foundational

00:56:38.440 document.

00:56:39.080 And although

00:56:40.860 changes were

00:56:41.600 made,

00:56:42.180 they were

00:56:42.460 made illegally.

00:56:43.760 And that's

00:56:44.600 just not my

00:56:45.040 opinion.

00:56:45.400 That's opinion

00:56:45.860 of many,

00:56:46.420 many other

00:56:46.780 people as

00:56:47.380 well.

00:56:47.660 And we've

00:56:48.240 got statute

00:56:48.820 to back

00:56:49.300 it up.

00:56:50.480 Consequently,

00:56:50.920 it's something

00:56:51.620 that I hope

00:56:52.520 to work with

00:56:53.040 you on in

00:56:53.480 the coming

00:56:54.540 little while

00:56:55.200 about getting

00:56:55.940 something in

00:56:56.500 the court

00:56:56.920 that recognizes

00:56:58.140 that that

00:56:58.860 oath was

00:56:59.260 illegal and

00:57:00.300 has been

00:57:00.660 since 37.

00:57:01.420 and still

00:57:02.800 at least

00:57:03.980 the part of

00:57:04.400 the Protestant

00:57:04.800 religion is 0.76

00:57:05.440 still in

00:57:05.820 there,

00:57:06.200 virtually unchanged.

00:57:07.420 So that

00:57:08.260 part can be

00:57:08.880 enforced with

00:57:09.600 respect to

00:57:10.220 anything that

00:57:11.060 the government

00:57:11.520 is doing.

00:57:12.800 All the

00:57:13.520 drag queens,

00:57:14.420 all the 1.00

00:57:14.760 homosexual 0.93

00:57:15.100 activity,

00:57:16.120 all of that

00:57:16.720 can be

00:57:17.480 challenged

00:57:18.540 simply on

00:57:19.500 that basis

00:57:20.040 as well.

00:57:21.080 And the

00:57:21.420 Ontario

00:57:21.780 Court of

00:57:22.240 Appeal has

00:57:22.760 already

00:57:23.040 recognized

00:57:23.620 that the

00:57:24.000 coronation

00:57:24.440 oath is

00:57:25.140 the

00:57:25.580 fundamental

00:57:25.920 part of

00:57:26.400 our

00:57:26.540 constitution

00:57:27.100 and the

00:57:27.860 courts

00:57:28.080 cannot

00:57:28.380 change it.

00:57:29.860 Period.

00:57:30.160 Period.

00:58:00.160 Period.

00:58:01.160 Period.

00:58:30.160 Period.

00:58:40.820 Period.

00:58:48.040 Period.

00:58:48.640 Period.

00:58:49.080 Period.

00:58:49.580 Period.

00:58:51.700 Period.

00:58:52.080 Period.

00:58:52.760 Period.

00:58:54.220 Period.

00:58:54.940 Period.

00:58:55.040 Period.

00:58:55.160 Period.

00:58:56.400 Period.

00:58:56.680 Period.

00:58:57.200 Period.

00:58:58.980 Period.

00:58:59.620 Period.

00:59:00.020 Great.

00:59:00.160 Right.

00:59:30.160 Thank you.

01:00:00.160 Thank you.

01:00:30.160 Thank you. 0.64

01:00:32.680 Somebody's going to steal a bicycle out of your yard that doesn't give you the right to go and chop his head off, for example.

01:00:37.920 So it's always been a test of reasonableness under common law, which means there has to be an underlying purpose and it has to be proportionate.

01:00:46.340 But for what these people in power are doing, I don't know if I have an answer to that.

01:00:56.580 On one hand...

01:00:58.580 Yeah.

01:01:03.160 Yeah.

01:01:03.260 Yeah.

01:01:07.280 Mm-hmm.

01:01:26.580 Yeah.

01:01:46.520 Yeah.

01:01:46.580 Mm-hmm.

01:01:58.580 Mm-hmm.

01:02:07.580 Mm-hmm.

01:02:08.960 Yeah.

01:02:09.080 Mm-hmm.

01:02:09.360 Mm-hmm.

01:02:09.920 Yeah.

01:02:10.160 Mm-hmm.

01:02:10.240 Thank you.

01:02:40.240 Thank you.

01:03:10.240 Thank you.

01:03:40.220 Thank you.

01:04:10.220 Thank you.

01:04:40.220 Thank you.

01:04:42.220 Thank you.

01:04:44.220 Thank you.

01:04:46.220 Thank you.

01:05:16.220 Thank you.

01:05:18.220 Thank you.

01:05:20.220 Thank you.

01:05:22.220 Thank you.

01:05:24.220 Thank you.

01:05:26.220 And we've got some work to do, and I think we're going to come up in a force, as we are,

01:05:37.220 and because we're getting the support of the people, we can tear this down.

01:05:41.220 So, I just want people to have hope and take heart, but we need you involved. We need you actively involved.

01:05:47.220 Okay. Our friend Dan Vashon has asked a question. It's that people keep saying the government works for us. Is that in fact true?

01:05:54.800 I think in order to answer that, you need to look at their oath. Who is their oath to? Their oath is to the monarch. So, although you vote the men, you're voting the men for them to make your concerns known to the monarch. And that's constitutionally how it's working. And they are there to serve your interest to the monarch. And they have forgotten that. They don't do that.

01:06:24.800 They don't say, hey, I've got 100,000 people. 99,000 are saying no. Therefore, I'm not voting for this. I'm recommending to the monarch not to put this statute into power and give it royal assent, and I'm voting against it. They don't do that. You could have 99,000 telling you to vote against it, and they will vote with their party, who happens to go along with it. That is a serious concern.

01:06:50.300 So, to answer your question, look at the nature of the parliamentarians, the MPs and MLAs. They're there to aid and advise Her Majesty, and now His Majesty the King. And they're there to aid and advise the monarch with what your views are and the views of all their constituents, not what the party leader is telling them to do.

01:07:12.920 Right. And it all, bottom line is, it comes down to the fact that they need to be upholding biblical principles.

01:07:22.200 And so, you can pretty much bet that since Justin Trudeau came into office, what was one of the first things he did, my friends, is that he thought it was important to lower the age of anal sex from 18 to 16. 0.95

01:07:33.220 Well, you know what? That's against biblical principles. So, that could be struck. And it's just a matter that we've got to get people into office. 0.97

01:07:42.500 Bill C-16, allowing biological men into women and children's spaces. You know, that can be struck. 0.94

01:07:48.740 Bill C-75, and lessening the crimes against sexual offenders. All of this needs to be overturned, according to the fact that Canada is 100% supposed to be governed by biblical principles.

01:08:00.280 And that's why all those people that have beaten me up for years, we're a secular nation, Tanya, and we're a multicultural nation. It's like, you know what? You need to reconsider your position on that.

01:08:10.560 Where have you known that, you know, a homosexual is safer in one of the 56 Islamic-majority countries? 1.00

01:08:18.260 Take a look what's going on over there to Christians, non-Islamists, and to homosexuals. 1.00

01:08:23.500 Take a look at how, you know, what their rights are in many countries around the world.

01:08:29.000 And, you know, even atheists aren't safe in Islamic-majority countries. 0.83

01:08:34.160 And so, people, I've been appealing to them. I'm hoping they're beginning to get it.

01:08:38.420 That I'm not calling as much as I'd love for everybody to come to know the Lord and have, you know, eternity with Him.

01:08:44.120 You know, if you're an atheist, you have free will and you're making that decision.

01:08:48.280 But I'm just saying that by embracing the fact that we have godly principles, that gives you a much safer environment and much more peaceful environment that you would have an opportunity to live in than anywhere in the world.

01:09:01.140 Okay, so, do we really need a monarchy at all?

01:09:06.980 The Bible seems to warn against asking for a king, you had just mentioned that verse, and instead exhorts us to simply follow God's commands.

01:09:16.020 I agree. But God did give them a king.

01:09:19.740 And, ironically, even Christ is referred to from the lineage of the House of David, King David, all the way through to the New Testament as well, right?

01:09:29.760 So, I think there's still a recognition by God.

01:09:33.500 People wanted a king, and God kept His word and said, you'll have one.

01:09:37.020 And He said, if your king violates our laws, you will suffer.

01:09:42.040 And if you don't, you will prosper.

01:09:44.740 So, I think it's also, it should be fundamentally easier to hold one man accountable than trying to hold 330 people in Parliament accountable to do what you want to vote.

01:09:56.780 Because everybody's interest in the country are going to be different.

01:10:00.260 So, if you have one leader who has limited powers, it, in law, should be easier to hold that person accountable than a whole government who says to you,

01:10:13.220 we're going to give you your rights and freedoms, and we'll tell you what they are, and we'll decide in the future what they are.

01:10:19.020 So, one person is easier to hold accountable than hundreds, and I believe it's much, much better.

01:10:25.520 It's what's called a Republican monarchy, because the principles of God and so forth in that oath form part of the law that cannot be changed.

01:10:36.520 And that's essentially what a republic like in the States is.

01:10:39.120 They have laws that the government cannot change, period.

01:10:42.400 They're there, and you cannot change them.

01:10:44.340 And that's the same in our monarchy.

01:10:46.180 It's a Republican form of monarchy, because being limited, the monarch does not have the power to remove God from the equation without breaking the law in the process of doing it as well.

01:10:57.060 Okay, so there's a couple of similar questions coming in right now as well.

01:11:02.160 One was, how can this oath be used legally by the average person, and then sort of into the next one?

01:11:09.220 How can the coronation oath be enforced in our nation?

01:11:12.380 Should the king be petitioned to bring justice to the ungodly laws and policies they keep passing that violate our principles?

01:11:19.460 I was just going to talk about the governor general, but it says, does the governor general have to hear the plea of the people about this?

01:11:26.760 I know that we've been talking about this for quite a number of years, right?

01:11:30.260 And the governor general was always, you know, that block that's in the way of appealing to the monarch. 0.75

01:11:37.860 Yeah, well, the governor general is put in place as the representative for the monarch here in Canada under the V&A Act, now the Constitution Act of 1867.

01:11:51.180 And the powers of the governor general are limited by the powers, of course, of the monarch.

01:11:58.100 You can't delegate to somebody more powers than you have.

01:12:01.940 You don't have that ability to do it.

01:12:03.680 As a result, the governor general can only be accountable, or needs to be accountable as well to the people for when they're going to be giving that royal assent to legislation, sorry.

01:12:18.160 So, with the monarch in place, I think I forgot part of that question.

01:12:23.720 Can you repeat that?

01:12:25.460 Sorry.

01:12:26.540 Yeah, no, no, that's okay.

01:12:28.120 Are you good?

01:12:29.500 Yeah.

01:12:29.700 Okay, it says, how can the coronation oath be enforced on our nation?

01:12:33.180 Should the king be petitioned to bring justice?

01:12:35.660 And then does the governor general have to hear the plea?

01:12:38.680 Part of the problem with that, and how to holding them accountable, in my opinion, it's twofold.

01:12:45.980 Number one, you need to live it in your own life.

01:12:49.360 And by that, I mean, say no to every single example where the government is breaking God's laws in the Bible.

01:12:55.540 Don't comply with it and complain about it later.

01:12:59.200 That's not the solution.

01:13:00.840 That's the first aspect.

01:13:02.740 If every Christian in Canada did that, we wouldn't be here where we are today. 1.00

01:13:06.980 If 10% of every Christian did that, we wouldn't be where we are today. 0.99

01:13:10.520 Because they've been brainwashed to think that it's the law, you have to obey it, and fight it out later.

01:13:16.140 And that's simply not the case.

01:13:18.600 The other aspect of that is, and it's difficult for a majority of people, A, financially, and B, through knowledge.

01:13:31.320 A lot of people have gone into court, and they don't know anything about court procedures.

01:13:38.720 And they don't know anything about the nature of courts.

01:13:41.460 For example, if you're charged with a provincial criminal code of defense or a provincial offense, and you go to court, and you want to say, hey, that statute's unconstitutional.

01:13:52.440 It violates freedom of expression or whatever.

01:13:57.340 The provincial court judge does not have the power to strike the legislation.

01:14:03.100 They don't have that power.

01:14:04.680 Only a superior court judge has.

01:14:06.640 Consequently, all you can do is make the challenge and tell the judge, because it's unconstitutional, you can't enforce it.

01:14:17.380 And most people don't know that.

01:14:19.200 And they get into court, and they're trying to get the judge to rule it unconstitutional, but the judge doesn't have the power to do it.

01:14:25.480 And it's important to know how to present your case to the court on the oath, and how you're going to put your evidence and arguments to the court.

01:14:36.680 It's something that's not for the faint of heart, because it is time-consuming, and it's something that you need somebody with legal experience to do it.

01:14:46.320 You know, I called the Ontario Christian Lawyers Association a couple years back, and I said to them, I want to come out there, I want to meet with some of your board, and I want to show you where the supremacy of God really is in our Constitution, and see who I can talk to that will help take this to court if you want.

01:15:09.940 And I said, I have the ability to do it, but I said, I personally don't have anything in the court at that time to go after.

01:15:18.360 And they called me back a few days later, and they said, none of the lawyers want to have anything to do with it.

01:15:24.860 And I said, what? They're Christians. Why would they not want to see the supremacy of God, where Section 1 of the Charter doesn't apply?

01:15:32.700 They hung up on me.

01:15:34.760 Wow.

01:15:35.700 And I was so, so disappointed.

01:15:38.660 I thought, this is a bunch of Christian lawyers who have sold themselves out, fear, whatever, or given in to something. 0.98

01:15:48.600 But it's really, I mean, the law is there, and as long as you have that belief and knowledge, as you said earlier, knowledge is power, Tanya, and you have that knowledge, that will empower you to stand up against these people.

01:16:02.120 And share that information with others, because going to court is not an option for most people.

01:16:08.840 They don't know the procedures.

01:16:10.180 They don't know the powers.

01:16:11.280 They don't know the jurisdiction of the court, what they can and cannot do.

01:16:14.340 They don't know how to draft documents.

01:16:15.920 They don't know the difference between evidence and argument, and on it goes.

01:16:19.220 It's going to be very, very difficult.

01:16:23.580 And the other thing is, we need to find a case that they cannot get out of, where there's no discretion.

01:16:30.980 So something, for example, or God has completely banned homosexuality.

01:16:35.880 Then you need to find a statute that authorizes it.

01:16:40.620 That would be something to challenge really, really strong.

01:16:43.860 You've got to cut and dry case.

01:16:45.920 There's no ambiguities.

01:16:47.220 There's nothing.

01:16:48.240 And you would win, in my opinion, if it was done correctly.

01:16:52.000 But going to court on ambiguous cases, where it's kind of in, kind of out a little bit, or it doesn't totally apply, or there's other issues,

01:17:01.380 we want to pick the strongest case possible, because if it's the strongest case, that will involve the least amount of evidence to prove it.

01:17:11.320 And then you get in, and the law is already there to back us up, and I've got all the law on it.

01:17:15.340 So then you would get in on that basis.

01:17:18.800 Well, I think that moving forward, because I know we were going to, you know, apply some of this reasoning to the courts,

01:17:26.460 but with King Charles coming in, we weren't sure if he was going to sign the oath, or what kind of changes he was going to make.

01:17:33.380 But I think this is something that we're going to start to need to assert in the courts.

01:17:37.860 And again, you know, we need to demand this justice, and to present it properly.

01:17:45.180 It's just so unbelievable, the kind of things that are going on right now.

01:17:48.400 And there's a law firm in British Columbia called Harrison Company, and they've become, you know, this pitbull law firm,

01:17:58.320 this bullying law firm for the school districts.

01:18:02.240 And so I'm just hearing about, I knew about this several months ago, but a gal had served a notice of liability, 0.98

01:18:09.840 a SOGI notice of liability to the board in Vernon, British Columbia.

01:18:13.280 And she was issued a no-trespass order.

01:18:16.560 And this is not against the law to issue a notice of liability.

01:18:20.920 It's just a document to say, to give somebody notice, to inform them that what they're doing is causing either harm or is illegal.

01:18:28.700 And in most of the situations regarding the jab and what's going on with SOGI, it's both.

01:18:33.980 It's harmful and it's illegal.

01:18:36.120 And so I found out today that there's these, you know, court actions, and Harrison Company is involved.

01:18:41.980 Harrison Company, they should be so ashamed of themselves.

01:18:45.440 Like when all of this becomes public, these letters, I haven't made them public yet.

01:18:50.240 I'm going to determine what I'm going to do with this.

01:18:52.220 But they're using taxpayers' money to try to cause people fear and bully them into silence and into submission

01:19:00.080 and not to provide them, you know, their guaranteed right to come to a school board meeting

01:19:06.220 and express their concerns and advocate for the children.

01:19:10.200 And I know the school board superintendent in the area, she used to be in the Kootenays,

01:19:14.160 and she's the one two years ago that was on video on her social media promoting kids to come and get the jab. 0.81

01:19:22.120 You don't need your parents' permission.

01:19:24.020 Just gather your friends, get your friends together like it's a jab party, and gather your friends. 0.95

01:19:29.600 Anyway, she got so much backlash, she had to take it down.

01:19:32.260 And I understand she's now the superintendent in Vernon, and her name is in some of the court documents along with the board.

01:19:41.000 And there just needs to come to a point where we're going to be able to have the ability to turn this around.

01:19:48.080 And it is going to need to be done at the civic level, the voting level.

01:19:52.380 We need to really raise up large numbers of people within the community to vote in the next elections.

01:20:00.780 But how would you—somebody asked a question here.

01:20:03.660 This will maybe one or two more questions, then we'll bring this to a close.

01:20:07.320 But can the people ask for an elected official to be fired,

01:20:11.400 or can a citizen have someone arrested for violating God's law and violating our oath?

01:20:16.380 Well, I wouldn't be asking anything.

01:20:20.580 Asking—by asking, you're seeking permission.

01:20:23.680 You're seeking their fiat benevolence.

01:20:26.480 Please do this.

01:20:27.940 I would be demanding, number one.

01:20:30.740 You demand, in a legal sense, means you have a right to something,

01:20:33.720 and you're exercising that right, or a claim to something.

01:20:37.080 And I would be demanding that right off the bat.

01:20:40.060 I would not be—no pleasantries involved, right?

01:20:42.920 And if the MP—like, I'm thinking, could you get a writ of prohibition

01:20:52.080 prohibiting your member of parliament from voting on a bill

01:20:57.220 that violates God's laws as said out in the Bible?

01:21:03.020 So say, for example, parliament wants to pass a law—

01:21:07.060 because right now there isn't—my understanding is there's no law on abortion in Canada.

01:21:10.260 But say parliament wanted to pass a law mandating that abortion is legal in Canada.

01:21:20.560 And that bill was going through parliament.

01:21:24.220 And you contact your MP, and your MP says, no, I'm going to vote for that.

01:21:30.980 Could you get a writ of prohibition on the basis that abortion violates the biblical principles that he swore to?

01:21:37.040 In my opinion, I think you could.

01:21:39.540 But you would—it's something that you would need your legal argument done and ready to go first,

01:21:45.380 because bills will be passed in a month to six weeks.

01:21:48.080 You don't have a lot of time to start drafting arguments on that basis.

01:21:52.940 And consequently, if you can get your arguments done in advance and then have the evidence ready,

01:22:01.560 here's your correspondent, the correspondents that said they're going to do this in any event,

01:22:06.060 and they've done it in the past, so you've got them voting on bills in the past that break God's laws.

01:22:12.200 I think you stand a good chance of going in and getting rid of prohibition on them.

01:22:16.380 I think what they would do is they would come up and try and get it adjourned or put off until the issue is decided.

01:22:25.380 But ultimately, I think that's one way, legally speaking, you could possibly get them to stop doing what they say they're going to do

01:22:34.880 to violate God's laws, because you cannot swear an oath to uphold God's laws in their oath of allegiance and oath of office,

01:22:41.700 and they have no more powers than the monarch has, and then openly and brazenly come up and say,

01:22:46.360 you're going to violate it and expect that no legal action is going to happen as a result.

01:22:52.160 And it would be no different if they said that they were going to go out and actively say that I'm going to go rob a store.

01:22:57.160 However, putting aside the fact that it's a criminal code of defense, it violates God's laws that they swore to uphold as well.

01:23:03.520 So that's something to consider is getting some sort of injunctive relief, prohibiting them from doing that.

01:23:11.020 That's an option.

01:23:11.520 Right. You know, I would imagine that what's going through my head is going through the viewers' heads as well,

01:23:17.240 is that if we can't get Justin Trudeau removed with all the ethics violations and, you know, the criminality of his actions,

01:23:25.680 how could we expect, you know, to get somebody removed at the civic level?

01:23:32.380 And I think that's where it comes back to if it's a force of people that are coming together.

01:23:39.000 Because as you know, I hope everybody's heard that there was, oh, just that horrible, was her name Ashby,

01:23:46.080 or the school trustee in the Catholic School Board in Ontario who had made all those racist comments

01:23:53.080 and derogatory comments about white people.

01:23:56.380 And there was so much backlash that she resigned the other day.

01:24:01.100 And that, to me, is as effective of trying to charge somebody.

01:24:05.900 And, you know, we need to rightfully oppose these individuals because they are using their position to assert authority they don't have.

01:24:15.260 And unless we bring them in to check with the backlash, they didn't sign up to become a school board trustee or councillor, you know, for all of this opposition.

01:24:25.760 They want their cushy job and to get their paycheck and obviously to assert their agenda.

01:24:32.740 And we do have the power to, you know, disrupt that.

01:24:36.300 And I see that it's happening.

01:24:37.600 And I know just in closing, because I think we need to close, this has been a long session,

01:24:42.560 is that people have asked about the laying of private information, which we were going so hard on starting a year and a half ago all the way into last year.

01:24:52.260 And we're still pursuing that, but we're not promoting it as actively because the courts, the judges, I'm sorry to say this out loud,

01:25:01.200 I'm going to say it, are spineless and we have solid cases in showing that an employer has committed extortion and intimidation and they're adjourning the cases.

01:25:11.560 They're not proceeding with them.

01:25:13.740 And so rather than take on any more cases right now, I won't publicly say, you know, what the strategy is,

01:25:20.700 but just know that we are taking further steps and that as soon as there is breakthrough, people are going to hear about it.

01:25:29.620 So just make sure that, you know, you're ready to go.

01:25:32.580 This is all new to us.

01:25:34.060 We're trying desperately to save jobs and lives.

01:25:37.120 And sometimes, you know what, maybe one out of eight things of our efforts is going to work.

01:25:43.740 But we've got a very good track record in the notices of liability working.

01:25:49.540 And these private informations, these criminal charges have applied a lot of pressure.

01:25:54.400 And the government is hearing from Canadians and stating, we're on to you.

01:25:59.960 We know what you're doing is criminal.

01:26:01.980 And as soon as a judge, we're asking judges, we're calling on you to be brave and to set the pace,

01:26:07.640 probably for so many other judges that want to do the same, but they're just too afraid to be the first.

01:26:12.880 And so we'll keep you posted on that.

01:26:15.240 Terenzio, could you bring up David's?

01:26:16.880 Oh, yeah, sure.

01:26:18.180 Sorry, I just wanted to clarify something.

01:26:19.680 It's not so much the judges, it's the Crown.

01:26:23.780 The Crown has what's called the two-step charge approval process.

01:26:28.660 All charges that get approved by the Crown have to comply with one of these two steps.

01:26:34.000 The first is whether there's a likelihood of success at trial.

01:26:37.300 And the second is whether it's in the public interest.

01:26:40.080 The Crown is coming up on all our charges right now and staying them.

01:26:44.580 And they're not only staying them.

01:26:46.000 Let me back up.

01:26:47.760 They're staying them before you get to your process hearing, your screening hearing that has to take place.

01:26:52.840 So they don't even have the evidence to be able to determine if the charges meet their two-step approval process.

01:27:00.300 They don't even have the evidence because they're coming in and staying it before the evidence gets on the record.

01:27:05.260 And they never used to be able to do that until amendments were made a few years ago in the criminal code to allow them.

01:27:10.900 That's the problem, is the Crown right now.

01:27:13.240 They are covering up for all these criminals who have committed criminal offenses.

01:27:18.180 And I hope to get that back before the court.

01:27:21.120 One of the things we're looking at is with one of the government officials that we're looking at charging in the next little while.

01:27:28.280 I don't want to get too much out right now.

01:27:30.220 But I can tell you, it is not something we've given up on.

01:27:33.460 You have a right to lay the charge.

01:27:34.880 And if the Crown is going to stay it, they should have a basis of law or fact for doing that.

01:27:41.420 And they're not doing it.

01:27:43.020 And they're not even giving reasons.

01:27:44.820 And that's one of the things that I want to bring before the court at some time, sometime when I, as soon as I can get away from all the other legal stuff that they've swamped me with, is to get an order from the court that if the Crown is going to stay charges, they need to give legal detailed reasons, number one.

01:27:59.060 And number two, they should not be able to stay charges before you get the evidence on the record.

01:28:06.000 And we need to look at that.

01:28:07.720 And we're still looking at laying more criminal charges later this year.

01:28:11.220 I'm working with somebody on the island on that.

01:28:13.960 But, yeah, it's something that I, fortunately, I can't have the time to be just doing everything right now, of course.

01:28:22.120 I'm just swamped already with this petition to try and get our rallies banned.

01:28:25.640 But it's something that I want to emphasize has the criminal charging procedure has a lot of merit.

01:28:31.980 We've just come up against the really serious criminal Crown Prosecution Service who are corrupt.

01:28:37.700 And they're the ones that are trying to make sure it doesn't get on the record.

01:28:40.660 And we need to get around them.

01:28:42.460 And we will eventually.

01:28:43.560 But you know what?

01:28:44.220 You're in a war.

01:28:45.120 As you said, it's a psychological war.

01:28:46.760 It's a different type of war.

01:28:48.120 And we need to, you know, get them.

01:28:51.460 And it's just going to take some time.

01:28:53.240 But it will happen.

01:28:54.040 And they can't be covering it all.

01:28:56.900 Go ahead.

01:28:57.280 I'm sorry.

01:28:58.400 Yeah, no, I was going to say thank you for clarifying that regarding the judges and the Crown and where the obstacle is there.

01:29:04.420 And, David, can I encourage people who still want to lay criminal charges against their employer to hold off,

01:29:10.540 make sure that you have all your information together,

01:29:12.740 and that there is no limitation because these are criminal offenses.

01:29:16.780 These are indictable offenses.

01:29:18.820 So you know how some people, if they're going to lay a complaint or do something, they have a year time frame to do that within.

01:29:26.740 If it's a summary conviction offense, yes.

01:29:28.580 If it's indictable or hybrid, they have unlimited time.

01:29:31.440 But if it's a strictly summary conviction, they have 12 months.

01:29:34.840 Okay.

01:29:35.440 And extortion and intimidation are indictable offenses, correct?

01:29:40.340 They're what's called hybrid.

01:29:42.520 They can go by indictment or summary.

01:29:45.160 So if it's over 12 months, you can proceed by filing an information on them,

01:29:49.300 and it'll just proceed by as an indictable offense.

01:29:51.580 Okay, excellent.

01:29:53.700 Because I know some people are panicking, thinking, oh, my time is running out.

01:29:57.560 I'm actually going to read Les Prez had put in the question,

01:30:01.700 Have you ever thought or done this?

01:30:03.400 When in court, invoke the Bible as the law of the court and give God supremacy and jurisdiction. 0.97

01:30:08.560 I have written to the courts stating this, and they refuse to communicate or give me a court date.

01:30:15.200 Every courtroom has a Bible.

01:30:17.540 The Bible is our sword. 0.99

01:30:18.780 We are David, showing up to battle against Goliath.

01:30:22.160 David used the sword provided to him, just like the Bible, just a sword sitting there waiting to be used.

01:30:28.580 And for those people who are not Christians, the Word of God is, like it talks about putting on the armor of God,

01:30:37.780 and the Bible is the sword, or no, sorry, it's the sword of the Spirit, actually, that I'm thinking of.

01:30:44.200 And then there is the Word of God.

01:30:45.520 Okay, so what do you have to say about that?

01:30:48.780 It all comes down to the procedure, because if you just walk in claiming supremacy of God,

01:30:55.320 the judge is simply going to believe that you have a faith in God that's protected under the charter,

01:31:00.320 but that doesn't give you the right, for example, to murder somebody based on your religious beliefs.

01:31:05.320 They're not going to the coronation oath, because most judges don't even know about it.

01:31:09.180 And it all comes back to what I said earlier about how you raise it with the court, and on what basis you're going to raise it.

01:31:17.180 You can walk in, and you can say, you know, I'm here in God's name, and I'm here on the basis of the supremacy of God in our law.

01:31:23.700 But if you've been charged, for example, with murder, it may or may not have any relevance to the charge.

01:31:32.460 On the other hand, if you've been charged with something that violates God's laws,

01:31:36.640 and they don't have the power to make that law in the first place, then it would be relevant.

01:31:40.560 And you need to be able to plead the coronation oath to do that.

01:31:43.320 I got the message.

01:31:47.500 Did you hear that?

01:31:48.440 All right.

01:31:48.940 Yeah, yeah, yeah.

01:31:50.140 The lights are going out, David.

01:31:52.360 All right.

01:31:53.140 Okay, thank you, David.

01:31:54.480 And I was just going to ask Terenzio, could you please bring up David's website?

01:32:00.780 And this is David's book that we're talking about, The Annotated Criminal Charging Procedure in Canada.

01:32:06.880 David has written one of the only books in Canada on how to lay criminal charges against another individual without going through the police, straight to the Crown.

01:32:17.620 And it's brilliant.

01:32:19.460 We've had webinars with David.

01:32:22.140 You can go to David's website.

01:32:24.320 Is there something going on with the music there?

01:32:27.340 Sorry about that.

01:32:27.360 David, you must have a video that pre-plays here.

01:32:30.160 That's what it is.

01:32:30.840 Sorry about that.

01:32:31.680 That's what it is.

01:32:32.460 Down at the bottom, I've had that happen before.

01:32:35.400 Got to be a good video.

01:32:36.880 And that's David's website.

01:32:38.520 I would encourage everybody as well to support David.

01:32:42.860 And I'm going to ask you to support David financially as well.

01:32:46.400 David is fighting a huge agenda against him with the city of Kelowna as well.

01:32:54.420 There's a hotspot, I'm telling you, in Kelowna, many places across Canada.

01:32:57.580 But David has been committed to rallying, which is our constitutionally protected right.

01:33:03.640 And they've got a petition to end the rallies.

01:33:07.400 And David is representing himself.

01:33:09.920 And he has been going hours and hours and hours, day after day, preparing for this.

01:33:14.620 But this is on behalf of all Canadians.

01:33:16.760 And most people do not know the extent to the work that David has done on behalf of all of us.

01:33:23.820 So, again, thank you for that, Terenzio, for bringing the screen up.

01:33:28.400 And so, again, Sheila, we will make sure that the donation button for David will be in the description of this video.

01:33:35.960 And as well, we can pop it into, I think Sheila's already done it on the chat.

01:33:41.860 Okay, my friend, thank you.

01:33:44.840 Like I said, that was a huge topic tonight to take care of.

01:33:48.840 And I hope that people feel very well informed.

01:33:52.740 I'm actually looking forward to some of the legal arguments moving forward using the coronation oath.

01:33:57.940 I think that there's a lot of power in that.

01:34:00.880 So, time will tell.

01:34:02.560 All right.

01:34:02.960 Thank you.

01:34:03.360 It's the foundation of our law.

01:34:04.540 Closing?

01:34:05.460 Yep.

01:34:05.780 It's the foundation of our law.

01:34:08.240 That's it.

01:34:08.640 I'm just grateful for all that.

01:34:10.020 And the only thing I want to let people know, if the government wins on what they're trying to do to shut down rallies,

01:34:16.260 every municipality in B.C. is going to shut down political protests on the streets and in the parks.

01:34:22.100 They will use bylaws to shut it down.

01:34:23.960 And that's what they're trying to do.

01:34:25.480 So, there's a lot at risk, not just for us, but for every single person who has been at protests or rallies or street marches anywhere in B.C.

01:34:32.800 And once it's here, they will start moving into other provinces.

01:34:36.100 So, it will eventually affect everyone in Canada.

01:34:38.420 And once they've taken away the ability to protest on the street, and as one media guy here told me,

01:34:44.800 they were called by the B.C. government and said that nobody against COVID could get a platform in their media.

01:34:50.140 So, they've taken away our ability to talk in the media.

01:34:53.140 Then they're going to try and take away to talk on the streets. 0.86

01:34:55.720 And then when they start taking rights and freedoms away, there'll be nobody to protest because they won't allow you on the streets to do it and get public visibility.

01:35:02.660 So, this is going to be a critical, critical case that's going to affect everyone in B.C. and eventually probably everyone in Canada.

01:35:11.040 Yeah, yeah.

01:35:12.060 So, I want to reiterate, David is using all of his time, day and night, to take care of these matters, plus help so many people.

01:35:23.220 It's not, we don't refer to it as protesting, but the peaceful gatherings of going out and people coming together.

01:35:29.640 And there being speeches and talks and hugs and booths and just, you know, just a wonderful time.

01:35:39.520 I'm still going out.

01:35:40.560 I didn't know if David was trapping me.

01:35:42.160 I went there a week ago and spoke and I'm, you know, I know that all of this is going on.

01:35:45.740 I'm like, is this a trap?

01:35:47.580 Tanya Gaw was at that gathering with David Lindsay.

01:35:50.820 But yeah, no, I'll gladly go out and do this, even if they pass this kind of bylaws, because it's in violation of our rights.

01:36:00.920 And so, we're just going to keep fighting the good fight.

01:36:03.120 I'm so glad to be in this with you, David.

01:36:05.060 And again, thank you for coming and sharing this evening with us.

01:36:07.940 All right.

01:36:08.300 Thank you very much, Sue.

01:36:09.220 I appreciate it.

01:36:10.740 All right.

01:36:11.040 Well, next week, as I mentioned, Dr. Anne Gillies will be joining us again, and she is going to be talking about the dangers of affirming gender dysphoria in children. 0.99

01:36:21.520 We already have a good idea of that, but Anne has also a new book coming out.

01:36:25.880 We're going to look forward to that.

01:36:27.260 And in the weekly action I'm preparing, we are going to be finally providing the video about what took place in Mission in January.

01:36:37.000 And in February, the Mission School Board decided to ban Action for Canada.

01:36:41.260 It was unjust.

01:36:42.520 It's unlawful.

01:36:43.600 We're going to be exposing this, and we're going to really, is it a school board, or is this a fascist dictatorship going on in our school boards right now?

01:36:52.940 And I think we need to take this kind of business seriously.

01:36:55.420 So be sure to join us next week.

01:36:57.880 And then, again, if you just want to bring up the Bible verses, I'm not going to go deep into this.

01:37:03.840 I'm going to encourage you each to go and read this section of Scripture, and it talks about the Ten Commandments.

01:37:14.160 Google the Ten Commandments and read them.

01:37:16.060 And as I encouraged in the weekly update, I'm going to reiterate here, God's laws, those Ten Commandments, those principles from what we are to live by, are good, honest, upright, moral principles and values.

01:37:31.060 And when communities and countries are living by godly principles, they prosper.

01:37:37.880 When families know that a marriage is forever and children and neighborhoods prosper, it's advantageous.

01:37:45.900 All right?

01:37:46.240 It's good principles under the Bible of not stealing and not lying and not cheating and not murdering.

01:37:52.520 I could live by that.

01:37:53.500 All right, and the second one, Trenzio, again, I'm going to just mention again in Deuteronomy 28.15 that it's in Deuteronomy, oh, what was the last one?

01:38:07.080 Was it 17.5?

01:38:09.140 Somebody remind me of the one that I just read.

01:38:12.500 Okay, Deuteronomy 5.1-22.

01:38:14.960 Sorry about that.

01:38:15.640 And so now we're in Deuteronomy 28.15 and 16, and it just really talks about that, you know, when we don't honor God's laws, He loves us so much.

01:38:25.800 But just so you love your children, just compare that.

01:38:29.640 Make that comparison for those of you who have raised children.

01:38:33.300 You love them, so you discipline them.

01:38:35.640 You teach them right from wrong.

01:38:37.820 And eventually they move out and they have free will.

01:38:40.720 And the Bible says, teach them in the way they should go so that when they get old, they won't depart from it.

01:38:46.280 Some of them, you know, they go through that season of rebellion.

01:38:50.260 And that's for many just a normal way of, you know, becoming their own person.

01:38:56.080 But if they were to continue that and completely in their free will remove themselves from God, then God sits back and He waits.

01:39:02.640 He loves them, but He allows them their free will to make their decisions as He does with each one of us.

01:39:07.520 But He loves us so much, He wants us to abide by His rules.

01:39:12.300 And as you, as a good parent, would have consequences for your kids stepping out, because you want them to be good human beings and not end up in jail, God has consequences for us too.

01:39:22.220 And Deuteronomy says that these decrees I am giving you today, you know, that all these curses will come upon you and overtake you if we don't listen to what God has to say.

01:39:31.280 And we are suffering those consequences in this nation.

01:39:34.660 So we need to get on our knees and we need to pray and we need to do our part to bring justice, righteousness, and godliness back into Canada.

01:39:41.860 All right. Thank you. I'm going to look forward to seeing you all next week.

01:39:45.840 God bless you and God bless Canada.

01:39:47.680 I'm going to thank God and God alone for the ground that I'm standing on.

01:40:10.400 I'm going to thank God and God alone for the greatest of the beast out here.

01:40:17.900 As it turns out, it was a rainy day they called it.

01:40:21.360 So they're basically indoctrinating the kids.

01:40:24.660 There was no drag.

01:40:25.920 And I'm calling on you today.

01:40:28.380 Don't put them to shame.

01:40:31.380 Don't raise what they did.

01:40:33.640 We have guaranteed rights in this country.

01:40:36.980 We are putting chapters across the nation.

01:40:47.280 We are going to be in every town and every city.

01:40:51.040 And we are going to build communities within these communities of like-minded people

01:40:55.840 who are actually going to care for one another again and love on each other

01:40:59.700 and give each other the help when they're down.

01:41:02.080 We are going to use the teams and the people that build within chapters to support our businesses.

01:41:10.160 The government's actions are completely, 100% unlawful.

01:41:17.020 Judgment will again be found on justice and those with virtuous hearts will pursue it.

01:41:24.560 You have a virtuous heart if you are here today pursuing freedom and righteousness.

01:41:32.760 And then verse 23 comes along with a promise.

01:41:37.680 God says he will turn the sins of evil people back on them.

01:41:43.220 He will destroy them for their sins.

01:41:47.200 I take great comfort in that because I serve a mighty living God who has allowed us to go through this season of discomfort

01:42:00.180 because we as a nation have turned our backs on him and we need to get right.

01:42:07.200 So I am just going to thank you so much.

01:42:11.100 I'm going to say God bless you and God bless Canada.

01:42:14.860 I'm going to say God bless Canada.

01:42:44.860 I'm going to say God bless Canada.

01:42:46.900 Bye,神 campus.

01:42:48.500 Bye.

01:42:48.540 Bye.

01:42:48.920 Bye.

01:42:49.800 Bye.

01:42:54.480 Bye.

01:42:56.140 Bye.

01:43:12.900 Bye.

01:43:13.700 Bye.

01:43:13.960 Bye.

01:43:14.180 Thank you.

01:43:44.180 Thank you.

Action4Canada - May 18, 2023

Defying Tyrants - A Canadian Perspective With David Lindsay & Legal Case Update

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript