Action4Canada - November 12, 2021


EMPOWER HOUR with Tanya Gaw and Vincent Gircys. Nov 10 2021


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 18 minutes

Words per Minute

170.4201

Word Count

13,326

Sentence Count

692

Misogynist Sentences

4

Hate Speech Sentences

2


Summary

Action for Canada is a grassroots movement reaching out to millions of Canadians and uniting our voices in opposition to the destructive policies tearing at the fabric of our nation. Through call-to-action campaigns, we equip citizens to take action. We are committed to protecting faith, family, and freedom.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 To those of you who have just joined us, welcome. It is Wednesday, November 10th, 2021. My name
00:00:08.360 is Heather Fournier, and on behalf of everyone at Action for Canada, I'd like to welcome
00:00:13.340 you to the Empower Hour. Once again, I'd like to remind everyone to be supportive and respectful
00:00:18.680 of other people's opinions in the chat. Action for Canada is a grassroots movement
00:00:26.020 reaching out to millions of Canadians and uniting our voices in opposition to the destructive
00:00:30.780 policies tearing at the fabric of our nation. Through call-to-action campaigns, we equip
00:00:36.860 citizens to take action. We are committed to protecting faith, family, and freedom.
00:00:43.300 The information presented at this meeting is for general information purposes only. While we
00:00:49.340 endeavor to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we make no representations or
00:00:54.420 warranties of any kind express or implied about the completeness, accuracy, reliability,
00:01:01.540 suitability, or availability of the information we provide. Any reliance you place on such
00:01:07.780 information is therefore strictly at your own risk. The information we provide should not
00:01:13.020 be used as a substitute for advice from a qualified legal professional, health practitioner, or
00:01:18.460 appropriate licensed professional. It is not intended to provide legal and or medical advice,
00:01:24.220 as we are not lawyers and or medical professionals. For those of you who are new tonight
00:01:31.340 to the Empower Hour, it's my very great pleasure to introduce to you to Tanya Gah, the founder
00:01:38.640 of Action for Canada. Tanya has a great love for Canada and for all the people who live across
00:01:44.700 the face of this nation. For many years now, she has worked to bring awareness to the destructive
00:01:50.560 policies that are undermining our nation. And one of her passions is to empower each and every one of
00:01:56.480 you to stand up for your rights and freedoms. When you go to the Action for Canada website,
00:02:01.840 you will discover for yourself the abundance of information and the many documents Tanya and her
00:02:07.520 associates have made available for you to use. Tanya is a woman of courage, strength, and faith,
00:02:13.760 an amazing freedom fighter, and an inspiration to us all. Hello, Tanya.
00:02:18.080 Good. Here we go. First of all, I've just heard as well, you guys know that we've been doing this
00:02:22.880 amazing campaign in BC, because the Minister of Education is, she is listed as a defendant
00:02:30.560 in Action for Canada's claim, and she decided not to mandate vaccines for the teachers. And she did that,
00:02:38.560 I believe, because she's getting a good sense of where she's going to be liable in the future.
00:02:44.400 And so we, she had ended up putting it on the school board trustees to vote whether teachers
00:02:49.680 should get vaccinated. Like, that's their job, right? And so they're quite offended by that,
00:02:54.320 and they don't want to be put in a position of liability. So we have been serving them notices of
00:03:00.160 liability throughout BC, and we already have eight school districts who have voted no. And I think that's
00:03:06.960 eight out of eight so far who have had a vote on that. So we're very pleased, and it's very effective,
00:03:13.280 and you can do these campaigns in every single province. And that's why we've got the chapters
00:03:17.920 available, because we want parents who are passionate about protecting their kids. We want business owners
00:03:23.760 who are passionate about protecting their businesses. We've got unionized workers meetings going on,
00:03:28.400 it's all great. And we want you to feel supported within your community. And I believe the best way to do
00:03:33.920 that is to become part of an Action for Canada chapter. And we are also going to be very focused
00:03:40.640 on making sure that we replace all these bad players in all levels of government, school trustees who
00:03:46.480 don't really give a hoot about our kids. And of course, we got mayors and city councilors who love
00:03:52.400 the globalists and love the UN and really don't care about you. And then, of course, we've got a lot of
00:03:57.680 people who are MLAs or MPPs, and those who are MPs. And so we're going to be working really hard.
00:04:03.360 But we need to build up these communities across Canada. We have over 100 chapters. And so that's
00:04:09.920 like in 10 weeks. So we're doing really good. Okay, I need a little update, Terenzio, if we want to
00:04:15.680 bring on the medical directive. I just wanted to let you know we were promoting these cards that we've
00:04:21.200 created. A lot of people are concerned about being rushed to emergency and then getting the jab or
00:04:27.120 being put on remdemsevir or a ventilator. And so we've created this card that allows you if you
00:04:34.000 choose to sign it and let the emergency personnel know what your wishes are when you go there.
00:04:40.080 This math plus is the protocol from the doctors down in the United States.
00:04:45.360 And it is about using antivirals and vitamin C and D and three and ivermectin, etc. So we have added
00:04:51.920 right here the word COVID. We had advanced medical directive, and that we do not consent to any COVID-19
00:04:59.360 vaccination, but it didn't include COVID testing code, whatever, right? So we just want to make sure
00:05:05.280 it's super duper clear. We've added COVID events medical directive. This is what this card specifically
00:05:11.760 is in regards to. Okay, so we'll go on to I've launched two new letters. And if you could just
00:05:19.920 scroll down. Okay, so these two additional VAX mandate letter of response. And the second one is
00:05:26.880 for employees down at the just below it. What this letter does, I call it the drop the mic letter.
00:05:33.520 All right, every point in there verifies that you have the constitutional right. And according to the
00:05:39.680 law, and the Charter, 100% right to refuse this jab, and that it cannot affect your ability to work
00:05:47.840 or get an education, or use essential or non essential services. All right, so let me just see,
00:05:55.600 can we just click on the first one, the additional VAX mandate letter. So what I just want to cover,
00:06:00.640 we'll just scroll through, it talks about section 52 one of the Constitution Act, that anything that
00:06:06.560 is in violation of it is of no force or effect. It verifies the Public Health Agency of Canada has
00:06:13.600 said vaccines are not mandatory, and they're not mandatory, they can't be made mandatory,
00:06:17.920 because we're protected under the Constitution. A lot of times I've talked to you about the Federal
00:06:22.480 Emergency Act, that had it been implemented, which it hasn't, that it says that your fundamental rights
00:06:28.720 are not to be limited or abridged, even in a national emergency. And then if you want to just
00:06:34.320 scroll down a little bit more. And so section seven, it works for, in the other one, I used it as
00:06:40.000 core, of course, as far as employment, you are guaranteed the right to life, liberty and security
00:06:44.880 of the person security means that you get to work and provide for your family, you don't have to shut
00:06:49.440 your business down, they can't do that to you. And you have the right to life, liberty and security of the
00:06:54.080 person, and not to be deprived thereof to get an education, and to not be discriminated against.
00:07:00.480 The consent to medical treatment and testing, there's a couple of Supreme Court rulings in
00:07:05.280 there that the Supreme Court of Canada has already ruled, you know, that you need informed consent,
00:07:11.520 and that you can't be deprived, or if you can refuse such treatment, and it can't interfere with your
00:07:16.800 life. Genetic Non-Discrimination Act, Bill S201, this is illegal. It's an indictable offense up to
00:07:23.840 a million dollars or imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years. Some people have said, well,
00:07:29.040 you know, they're not storing my DNA or RNA. They are testing your genetic material. Any testing,
00:07:35.920 any force testing, anything is absolutely against the law. And I finish off by saying extortion,
00:07:41.520 committing tort, privacy violations, willful misconduct, assault and battery, and acting
00:07:46.480 in bad faith are serious, indictable criminal code offenses. Interfering with someone's right in
00:07:52.000 this one, it says work in the other one. Sorry, got a tickle in my throat. Someone's right to an
00:07:58.800 education, extracurricular activities, or essential or non-essential services is a further violation of
00:08:04.880 the Constitution and Charter of Rights and Freedoms. I am writing to advise you, and this is whoever you're
00:08:10.320 directing it at, and I'm just going to remind you again, we are not going after anybody in their
00:08:16.160 capacity as the executive for a union or the president of a company, etc. We're going after
00:08:23.360 them as a fellow citizen who are breaking the law. If they were going in and robbing a bank,
00:08:28.480 and that's an indictable offense, well then they'd have to be charged for that. But by them using
00:08:33.280 extortion, that's a criminal offense, all right? Interfering with your privacy, that's an offense.
00:08:39.840 So it's saying, I'm writing to advise you that if you persist in interfering with my guaranteed rights
00:08:45.200 by supporting or enforcing the injection or any other medical treatment, testing and masking,
00:08:52.580 all right? They can't do this. Under threat of losing my right to education, extracurricular
00:08:58.200 activities, or essential or non-essential services, that I will hold you personally liable for any loss
00:09:04.160 of income, damages, and or injury I suffer as a result of your actions. You are personally not
00:09:10.560 protected under any act, order, or statute that is in violation of the Canadian rule of law,
00:09:16.320 constitution, and charter rights and freedoms. You have been duly warned, all right? And when you're
00:09:21.360 getting an education and they're holding you back from getting that education, you could become an
00:09:26.240 accountant, a doctor, they're interfering with your future income by prohibiting you from going to
00:09:32.320 college or university. So make sure you calculate that into the cost when you go and take legal
00:09:37.280 action. All right, and if we can just go to the next, the call to action. Nope, that's okay. We've
00:09:42.880 covered that. That's very similar letter, just differently worded for employees. All right,
00:09:47.760 I'm asking the big question this week, and this is why I'm excited to get Vincent on as well.
00:09:52.480 Is Canadian law enforcement facilitating fascism? And I would say yes, they are, because the government
00:09:59.440 is tyrannical at this point, they're bringing communism into this nation, and they're using
00:10:05.280 the police to hold us back, because they're not upholding our rights as guaranteed under the
00:10:11.920 constitution charter. All right, if you could just scroll down a little bit. If you haven't,
00:10:18.240 didn't receive that this week, please make sure you join Action for Canada. This was an example here of
00:10:24.160 myself going to recently to a city council meeting. I've never spoken at one before, and was very,
00:10:31.520 very polite to the RCMP, and the mayor had shut the meeting down, and we waited 45 minutes for the
00:10:38.160 RCMP to show up. I was sitting against this wall totally away from anybody else. I am not wearing a
00:10:44.640 mask as I am permitted to do, and they didn't like the idea that. So instead of just having me up speak
00:10:50.720 three minutes and showing me the door, we waited 45 minutes being in the room with all of these people,
00:10:56.320 and up at city council, they were sitting there, not social distance, without masks on having
00:11:01.600 conversations. And so the RCMP came in, tried to educate them a little bit that I had the right to
00:11:07.920 be there, and they read the municipal act, the mayor did, but the municipal act does not apply if it is in
00:11:14.320 violation of the constitution and the charter, and it most certainly was, because I wasn't doing anything
00:11:19.520 wrong. I was even abiding by the orders, which meant that if I have an exemption, which you don't even
00:11:24.640 have to prove or show that they need to respect that. So we won't watch that video. We'll just scoot
00:11:29.120 down a little bit more, and then what I would like you to look at, and we'll just keep going down a
00:11:36.000 little bit. I have written this report to let you know that I have been working and communicating
00:11:44.160 with the RCMP since July of 2020. The top cops, Assistant Commissioner McDonald, who is now the
00:11:50.800 Deputy Commissioner for all of BC, top cop in BC, and I have informed him consistently and provided him
00:11:59.760 evidence and information, and then throughout several different meetings throughout the whole
00:12:05.040 year as well. And August 17th, we filed the 391-page statement of claim. They've got a copy of that.
00:12:12.960 August 30th, I had written a 25-page affidavit calling for an investigation and wanting a case number
00:12:19.520 against the Bonnie Henry, our health officer, and our premier, etc. And they said that there is such a high
00:12:28.080 threshold in BC for commencing an investigation and getting approved before the Crown. And I think
00:12:34.800 it's a pile of nonsense, and I think they need to be exposed, because I think that they're a huge part
00:12:39.840 of the problem right now. And I'm hoping that by making this public, it'll apply pressure, because
00:12:45.120 100%, you know, people are being harmed by the decisions that are being made by this government and
00:12:51.440 our health officers in every single province. And this was just an extra effort on Action for Canada's
00:12:58.320 part to commence an investigation and get things moving. So I decided to make that public. You can
00:13:04.320 go and read that. Let me just see. If you go up to the top, please, Terenzio. I just want to let people
00:13:11.840 know where they can see that. If you hover on Legal Action. Yep. And then go down. Sorry, sorry. Call to
00:13:19.280 Action. Call to Action. Yep. And go down to Recent Actions. Click on that. And second one down is
00:13:29.120 Canadian Law Enforcement Facilitating Fascism. You will find that report right there. And then you can
00:13:34.640 read some of that information and become familiar. And as well, feel free. Use the information within
00:13:40.480 that affidavit and file against your own health officers, because they're all lockstep, you know,
00:13:47.600 in the decisions that they're making. Okay, so I'm that was my rapid, rapid talk. I do want to
00:13:53.760 very much as well say thank you to everybody who is donating. Thank you to so many people who have
00:13:59.280 become monthly donors that makes it really much easier for me to budget and to be able to support
00:14:05.760 all of you. We've got the chapters going across the nation and we've got a lot of resources that we're
00:14:13.200 providing to them. And all of this costs money to make sure that what we're doing here and what I'm
00:14:17.920 talking to you about tonight is actually within your own communities. So again, thank you so much
00:14:23.440 for your support and your continued support. Okay, Heather, back to you. Let's bring on our special guest.
00:14:30.080 Thank you so much, Tanya, for all that information. We are so pleased to once again
00:14:34.640 have Vincent Gurses as our special guest speaker on this week's Empower Hour. Vincent is a retired 32-year
00:14:41.440 veteran of the Ontario Provincial Police. He has a wealth of experience in criminal investigations
00:14:48.640 and as an expert witness in forensic reconstruction. I remember that he was one of the very first people
00:14:55.360 to stand up for the rights and freedoms of all Canadians. And early on, he was encouraging every
00:15:00.640 law enforcement officer, whether active or retired, to stand by their oath as they serve the Canadian
00:15:07.040 public during these tyrannical times. Vincent is a national representative of Police for Freedom,
00:15:14.160 an international movement committed to improving societal well-being for all people, including
00:15:19.680 members of the police, firefighters, security personnel, and the military. He is also a representative
00:15:26.400 of the World Council for Health. Welcome, Vincent, to Empower Hour.
00:15:33.600 It's good to be here.
00:15:36.640 Good. You are my friend. And we're looking very much forward to what you have to say. Give us those
00:15:42.560 updates, whatever. The floor is yours.
00:15:46.560 Great. Well, a lot has happened since the last time I've been here with Action for Canada. And I've
00:15:51.680 been proud to work with Action for Canada for, I'd say, the last 10 or 11 months now. It's been
00:15:57.280 quite a while. Much has happened here in the last month in Ontario. I can say there's been a tremendous
00:16:03.840 amount of pushback in the policing community. I know people are concerned about how much support we're
00:16:08.240 getting from the police on these issues. And I've made it very clear this last weekend. In Toronto,
00:16:14.640 we just had the first ever police-organized demonstration initiative in Toronto, which had
00:16:23.280 garnished about 5,000 people to show up at Nathan Phillips Square. And we had a number of great speakers.
00:16:28.960 And the event was put on by the police community for the public. And we are completely on board and on
00:16:36.720 side. And that isn't to say all police officers are on board and on side, but a growing number, a very
00:16:43.040 substantial number is on board. And much of that had to do with the mandates coming forward towards
00:16:49.520 those individuals. When a lot of people make comments about, you know, why are you coming
00:16:54.160 forward now? Why haven't you come forward and assisted the public over the last 18 months?
00:17:01.840 I can tell you they've always been on board. They've always been there. They've been working in
00:17:06.000 the background. You just don't see it. But they have been very supportive. And it's very easy to see
00:17:12.720 and complain about those officers that have been quite aggressive with these mandates and
00:17:18.400 enforcing these issues. But you don't talk about the good guys. You don't talk about the men and
00:17:24.080 women in law enforcement that are standing up for you. And they have to do it silently in the background,
00:17:30.320 whatever you're going through with your family members in terms of an apartheid state or a difference
00:17:37.200 of opinion where you're seeing fracturing within your family, within your friendships, within your
00:17:42.000 neighbors. They are experiencing this as well within the police services. It's happening within the fire
00:17:48.960 services, within the paramedic services, all emergency services. It's affecting everybody equally. So there are
00:17:56.560 a lot of police officers that are on board and some that are still needing to be won over.
00:18:03.200 I think by now most people are aware of the group called Mounties for Freedom and that now gives us
00:18:08.880 the third law enforcement group in the country. So we have police on guard. We have the Mounties for
00:18:18.880 Freedom and we now have Police for Freedom. So that's really three different distinct police agencies.
00:18:28.800 I was very lucky to have actually met with and liaised with Corporal Daniel Bulford of the RCMP,
00:18:35.440 who is now heading up Police for Freedom. I should say Mounties for Freedom. And we had a very interesting
00:18:42.800 conversation and I can tell you he is very legitimate. He's very sincere and very, very concerned about the
00:18:48.560 future of where we are going and the pushback. I also have a very good working relationship with Rocco
00:18:55.760 Gulati, our best constitutional lawyer that we have in this country. And I think one of the
00:19:02.400 reasons behind that great working relationship was a conversation that we had by chance when I was in BC
00:19:09.280 last month speaking to some freedom people down there. We happened to have a phone call
00:19:15.680 and came to the realization that we were actually in school together in elementary school. We were in the
00:19:21.920 same class in the same school. So that really strengthened our relationship to realize we have
00:19:27.520 some history. And I've spent quite a bit of time with Rocco Gulati over the last couple of weeks.
00:19:33.280 There are a few different days that we spent the entire day together having quite a bit of
00:19:38.160 conversation and going over what's going on in this country. And I can tell you he is very, very
00:19:43.280 optimistic about the processes that we have in place.
00:19:46.400 One of the groups that I'm with in the Ontario area is Take Action Canada. Take Action Canada was
00:19:54.400 fully supportive in Ontario of all the emergency services providers across Ontario that were pushing
00:20:01.840 back against these mandates. And we were able to get Rocco Gulati to come on board and represent
00:20:08.080 all of the emergency service providers in Ontario for pushing back. And that includes all the
00:20:14.320 all the government workers in Ontario across the spectrum and law enforcement and fire services
00:20:23.200 and in the emergency medical services system. He's also representing the nurses as well. While this
00:20:30.480 was taking place, we had people reach out from Calgary and indicate that they wanted to come on board with
00:20:37.040 this civil process with Rocco as well. And we were able to negotiate something that is currently in
00:20:45.360 process with all of Alberta as well for 9-11 service providers. And it looks like there are 9-11 service
00:20:53.280 providers in British Columbia that are wanting to do the same thing. So it's representative of quite a
00:21:00.480 substantial percentage of the population. And in doing so, what's really important here is we're
00:21:06.640 trying to get our house cleaned up. And once this issue is cleaned up, we want to really jump on board
00:21:12.000 and get everybody else's house cleaned up as well. The amount of police officers coming forward and that
00:21:17.360 are on board is incredible. We have people across all ranks and all different divisions and departments
00:21:23.840 of different police services that are on board. And it's very, very encouraging. So I see much to be
00:21:31.760 encouraged about. I see a substantial push also on the side of people wishing to lay criminal charges
00:21:39.920 back against this coercion leading to extortion and or assault. So depending on where you work, I know
00:21:46.800 in Ontario, many, many different groups are looking to push back by laying criminal charges by visiting
00:21:52.720 their local police station, division or service, depending on where you are. And they're making
00:22:00.640 complaints and filing complaints with the police services for extortion or assault. Not all of these
00:22:07.360 complaints are being received well, but more and more of them are. And it's encouraging to see from
00:22:14.960 different police departments across the country, similar things are happening. Even within the police
00:22:20.480 services, officers are making complaints against their chiefs for mandating this, using the term coercion
00:22:28.800 and going and pushing back for extortion and assault against the officers for doing so. And this is
00:22:36.240 happening in other provinces as well, not just Ontario. So we're making good inroads. We're making a
00:22:41.680 lot of connections. More and more people are coming forward. The grassroots movements, both in the
00:22:48.880 government, from government employees, from government agencies, and from the private sector, they continue
00:22:54.320 to grow. And of course, Action for Canada was one of the first groups that really stepped up to the
00:23:00.480 plate. And I can tell you that we reference Action for Canada quite a bit across Canada. And Tange is doing
00:23:07.440 a great job. And certainly your legal team at Action for Canada is doing phenomenal work. They really are
00:23:14.160 one of the best, I think, in the country, for sure. Beyond that, some of the information I'd like to
00:23:24.240 pass on, really, I find there are so many different groups pushing back on so many different directions,
00:23:30.720 all simultaneously. And that's actually a very good strategy. So a multi-pronged approach pushing back
00:23:37.040 from different people from different ideas in different directions is good. Unfortunately,
00:23:43.120 not everybody understands that not everybody's on board with everybody else's initiative or project.
00:23:50.800 I have my own number of initiatives. I probably have eight or 10 that I'm working on simultaneously.
00:23:56.800 And sometimes you'll be approached by somebody who wants you to come on board with their initiative or
00:24:02.640 work on or with their initiative. And the best way I can describe it is all initiatives that people
00:24:10.240 are working on are good. You know, it's the same battle that we're all pushing back on and fighting
00:24:14.400 on. But think of it as being in a canoe with somebody else who has a different initiative that
00:24:20.880 you may not agree with or think that that's not really the direction that you think you should be going.
00:24:26.560 Then either you need to get out of that canoe and get into a different one, or they need to get out
00:24:31.440 of your canoe and they need to go into a different canoe with like-minded people. Because we all need
00:24:37.600 to be paddling in the same direction, but not necessarily working on the same initiatives. So if
00:24:43.680 somebody else is working on an initiative that you don't really agree with, then they really need to
00:24:49.520 come together with other like-minded people on those initiatives.
00:24:52.960 Again, not everybody thinks that every initiative is the direction they want to go. So we need to be
00:24:59.760 respectful of that and not be dismissive and just encourage people to work the best they can on the
00:25:07.600 initiatives that they're working on, but don't put them down for the work they're trying to do. And just
00:25:13.920 proceed in the direction that you think is the best direction to go. Generally, we find medical people
00:25:19.120 stick together and law enforcement people tend to stick together, but it's also good to have a mix.
00:25:25.840 I've had a number of doctors from across the country reach out looking for
00:25:32.480 direction. You know, giving legal advice is not something that we do, but we can certainly help
00:25:38.240 facilitate the best course of action strategy and direction to take on any given initiative and be
00:25:45.200 very helpful with that. And certainly I like to offer assistance and direction when people are
00:25:52.000 looking to attend the police stations and make complaints to discover what issues or ideas work
00:25:58.320 best for those strategies. And lastly, I'd probably like to say that one excellent strategy for you to
00:26:06.720 utilize across the country in trying to get people's attention and bring attention to these issues
00:26:14.160 is by planting seeds. Planting seeds is a really, really good way to do it. I mean, that's how farmers
00:26:19.200 grow crops and that's how everything seems to grow agriculturally and in the ideological world as well.
00:26:25.600 Planting seeds really grows and it really flourishes. So instead of trying to convince
00:26:31.920 somebody what's going on with reams and reams of data, some of the doctors that I've spoken to
00:26:37.760 agree that discussing reams and reams of actual scientific data just doesn't seem to be getting
00:26:44.160 through to people. So you can do that very well and effectively in planting your seeds by just asking
00:26:52.480 one or two very basic questions. So try to come up with a list of a few very, very basic questions
00:27:00.560 that you know people aren't going to be able to answer that are very logical, simple questions
00:27:06.240 that just don't seem to make any sense in our current system with the current narrative.
00:27:10.880 And it could be a question based on the efficacy of the vaccine or transmissibility of the virus or
00:27:19.360 something to do with the apartheid system that we're having to go through.
00:27:23.600 There are just so many questions that you can throw out there as a very simple question
00:27:28.480 that people would ponder, they would really think about. And it's that ponderance of the question
00:27:34.880 that makes them want to dig a little deeper to answer that question. And before you know it,
00:27:40.080 they've fallen into the rabbit hole and they're starting to ask a lot of questions and do some
00:27:45.360 research on information they're finding. The door needs to open from within, not from the outside,
00:27:51.040 but from the inside. So planting seeds is a great way to go. And that's kind of my update. And I think
00:27:59.280 it's a good time to do a Q&A. If anybody has some questions, I can certainly feel those answers as best I can.
00:28:07.520 Okay, that's awesome. I've just had a few questions here. I want to make sure they're specific. If you
00:28:15.280 ask some questions right now, everyone, please make sure they're specific to
00:28:19.840 Vincent. It says, doesn't Section 1 of the Constitution say they can change the terms of the
00:28:26.080 Act, which then makes all the sections we are relying on become mute? Quick answer.
00:28:31.280 Absolutely not. No, it doesn't work like that. You know, there is a withstanding clause within
00:28:39.200 the charter that says the government can limit your rights and freedoms. The government can
00:28:44.960 limit your rights and freedoms where they are demonstrably demonstrated. The necessity is
00:28:51.280 demonstrably demonstrated. So number one, the government has never said that it's invoking
00:28:56.560 the notwithstanding clause. And number two, after numerous, numerous requests, the government has
00:29:04.160 never provided any data, anything other than claiming what they're claiming, which is the same
00:29:11.440 narrative we're hearing all the time. The government has not been able to support its claim whatsoever.
00:29:17.520 And that's not only my opinion, that's the opinion of our top constitutional lawyer as well.
00:29:22.560 There's no supporting evidence to justify anything the government is doing on this narrative at all.
00:29:30.160 Right. Yeah. Thank you, Vincent. And, you know, we've repeatedly said it that in order to
00:29:35.280 use that section, you need the government needs to demonstrably prove like that's beyond a reason of
00:29:40.480 reason of a doubt that there is a pandemic and then it needs to go before the legislature and have public
00:29:46.000 input and debate. And they, Trudeau, the federal government has never even enacted the Federal
00:29:52.800 Emergency Act. So how big and serious can this so-called pandemic be if, you know, they haven't
00:29:59.120 even implemented it. And so it was about control and Justin Trudeau would have lost control of this
00:30:05.680 agenda. And so I believe very strongly that, shall I say, allegedly he's making backroom deals with the
00:30:11.440 premiers to have them do their dirty work and they're doing the same thing. And they're bypassing
00:30:17.040 the legislatures, no public input, no debate, and they as well have not demonstrably proved anything.
00:30:24.400 And so that I'm thinking, okay, so then it goes, what steps can we take to prompt local police to
00:30:31.680 investigate the criminality of the VAX program?
00:30:34.400 I'm sorry, repeat that part? What is it going to take?
00:30:39.120 Yeah, what steps can people take to prompt the police to take legal action against the
00:30:46.400 VAX passes? Because they're illegal, they're unlawful.
00:30:51.920 Yeah, I'm sorry, your audio cut out a bit. I got the gist of that question. What position or steps
00:31:00.400 can people take to get their criminal charges into court or at least get the process going with some
00:31:08.960 criminal charges? Well, one of the best directions to do is, you know, if you can imagine your
00:31:15.120 profession and I don't care what it is you're doing, whether you're a doctor or a dentist or
00:31:20.080 have some other profession, when somebody walks into your office and tells you how to do your job,
00:31:24.640 it doesn't usually go over very well. So one of the things you want to do is instead of telling
00:31:29.840 the police that a crime has occurred, you know, it goes off a lot better when you present to the
00:31:36.720 police the situation you're dealing with specifically. So a lot of people like to throw
00:31:42.080 around the word murder and say murder is being committed. Well, in fact, you know, there's
00:31:47.200 that word takes on very, very specific meaning and it requires intent. So a lot of times I say to
00:31:54.800 people, look, when you can't prove intent, don't use a certain term. If you can't prove all the facts
00:31:59.520 and issues of a particular charge, don't utilize that charge. But what you can do when you walk
00:32:04.480 into a police station is you can say, here's what happened here. Here are the details of what happened
00:32:10.320 in this particular case. Now, you know, I want to, I want a investigation initiated into this. If this
00:32:17.920 apparently turns out to be a crime that's been committed, I wish to lay a formal complaint on this
00:32:24.880 issue. So if you have evidence of what you suspect to be a crime, you can, first of all, look it up,
00:32:31.680 look up the criminal code and see if that offense applies. And if you feel that it does, then, you know,
00:32:37.360 walk into a station, ask to speak to an officer and provide them with all the information that you have.
00:32:43.840 You're not really in a position to demand that they lay a charge. It's up to the officer to determine,
00:32:49.040 first of all, whether the offense was actually committed, who committed it, and that there would
00:32:54.560 be a high probability of a conviction in court. So if the officer is in doubt and the evidence is
00:33:01.120 there, the officer would need to liaise with the Crown prosecutor and get the opinion of the
00:33:07.280 prosecutor as to whether or not they should proceed if there's any doubt. So, but for an officer to brush
00:33:13.280 you off and say, no, I'm not even going to take down this information, I don't want to, I don't
00:33:17.280 want to proceed, when in fact you do have evidence that a criminal offense has occurred, that's a
00:33:23.120 violation of the Police Services Act. So they really can't do that. They need to take down your information,
00:33:28.320 look into it, and launch an investigation into the matter. It's, you know, under the
00:33:37.520 the coercive measures that we're seeing across the country, as a matter of fact, across the world,
00:33:42.560 we're seeing this coercion being rolled out. Coercion is actually a weapon under the criminal code,
00:33:49.680 and it can be weaponized. And the use of coercion can translate to extortion, and it can translate
00:33:57.280 to an assault among other charges as well. So you'll have to look up that section of the criminal code,
00:34:03.520 and depending on who wrote what documents and how they were worded, you'll have to form the opinion if
00:34:09.840 you feel that that was coercive, and then you'll need to bring it to the attention of the police,
00:34:13.920 and hope that they find it coercive as well. One strategy I like to utilize is, you know,
00:34:20.960 if you wrap that in a package of a sexual content and said, you know, if I was told by my employer that I
00:34:27.440 had to do this, or I was going to be terminated, you know, I have to provide this sexual favor, or I'm going to be terminated.
00:34:35.360 Is that coercion? You know, and I can't think of anyone who would say no, and then say, well,
00:34:41.520 it wasn't actually that. It was, I'm supposed to jab my, you know, get a jab of this gene therapy into
00:34:49.040 my system that has dangerous side effects and has no long-term safety data. And I don't want to do that,
00:34:56.960 but they're telling me they're going to terminate me for that. How is that different? You know,
00:35:01.040 so once you plant that seed in their mind that it really isn't different, you tend to get a better response
00:35:07.520 and a more favorable outcome.
00:35:11.360 Perfect. That was a great answer, Vincent. It says one person was concerned that if they show up to work,
00:35:18.360 some people are saying that if you've been put on unpaid leave, that it's a good idea to just show up to work,
00:35:25.620 that you're not in agreement with their unlawful decision, and can they call the police and have you removed?
00:35:34.660 Yeah, I would definitely show up for work. They put me on leave, unpaid leave and said don't come to work,
00:35:40.580 I would definitely show up. You're indicating that I am going to continue doing what I'm doing until you
00:35:46.200 physically have me removed from here because I'm not going to be responsible for not showing up to work.
00:35:52.060 That, that would definitely be your fault and your responsibility. I'm prepared to work and I'm coming to work. Yeah.
00:35:58.620 Okay. Yeah. Awesome. Awesome. I agree. Somebody has said my volume isn't quite right. So anyways,
00:36:05.420 I'll try to speak up a little louder. That's, that's what we're, you know, recommending that people do as well.
00:36:11.180 And please make sure that you're recording the event when you go to work so that you have evidence that you've made
00:36:16.540 every effort to go to work and comply, you know, with your position and your job that you are entitled
00:36:23.040 to. And along with serving a notice of liability, this will just be further evidence, you know, to support
00:36:29.260 your position and that what they're doing is unlawful. Okay. It says, this is a big one. What would it take
00:36:35.360 to arrest people like Bonnie Henry, Teresa Tam, or Justin Trudeau? Okay. Yeah, that's, that's a great
00:36:42.700 question. That's one I ask myself every morning when I wake up. Um, and, uh, you know, that, that
00:36:48.580 actually takes us to a slightly different topic. And that is, uh, one of my, my main beefs is the lack
00:36:55.500 of accountability in government at the highest levels. We have a tremendous lack of accountability
00:37:00.480 now where, where we, we shouldn't be surprised that we are in the situation that we're in. If you go
00:37:06.700 back to 2019, when we were dealing with, um, the SNC Lavalin scandal and Jody Wilson-Raybould and what
00:37:16.020 happened there, you know, um, throughout the history of Canada, members of parliament
00:37:21.300 understand fully not to ever, ever mess with the judicial system, because the minute you go poking
00:37:29.100 around in the judicial system and asking for favor or trying to, uh, work something out, you're asking
00:37:35.020 for a lot of trouble because that is really obstruction of justice and nobody ever wants to
00:37:40.260 go there. It's the live rail. You don't want to touch that wire. It's just completely wrong on so
00:37:45.360 many levels. And we clearly understand that in the policing community, it's, it's like conspiring to
00:37:50.700 alter evidence or something. You just don't do it. So, um, when that happened and our prime minister
00:37:57.240 pulled the attorney general out of that position, that was the clearest, most obvious indication of an
00:38:03.860 obstruction of justice. And so what happened? Nothing, nothing happened. And that opened the door
00:38:11.240 for a tremendous amount of abuse, because just as a, um, an abusive relationship in a marital
00:38:18.800 situation or a family situation is going to increase and escalate anybody who is, who has gone that far
00:38:26.180 to abuse the justice system and get away with it is going to progress worse down the road later. So I,
00:38:34.600 I foresaw this coming that if you allow our prime minister and, uh, anybody at a higher level of
00:38:40.680 government to get away with something like that, um, it, it becomes unstoppable, you know? So now we
00:38:47.060 have a situation where not only was there back in 2019 and abuse of the process pulling the attorney
00:38:53.180 general changing that position, but we now have a government that just does what it wants. There's
00:38:58.280 no authority whatsoever for them to do what they are doing, but they're not held to any account.
00:39:05.000 There is no transparency and there is no accountability. And, uh, we're going to need to
00:39:10.340 change things. We definitely need a complete change within our system, our government of governance and
00:39:15.740 accountability on the federal level, on the provincial level. Um, there has to be accountability. Now,
00:39:21.880 as far as the health doctors go, um, and the, the health systems within our province that seem to be,
00:39:28.900 um, really pushing, pushing this, um, the decisions relative to the lockdowns and the mandates and so
00:39:38.620 on and so forth. I know that here in Ontario, and I've only looked at Ontario, there is a correlation
00:39:43.480 between our provincial agencies. And in Ontario, we have three, we have the Ontario Ministry of Health,
00:39:50.840 we have the Public Health Ontario, and we have the CPSO, which is the College of Physicians and
00:39:56.260 Surgeons. And when it comes to, let's use, for example, the issue of, um, a, uh, exemption certificate
00:40:04.840 for, for vaccines, uh, they openly acknowledge there on the provincial level that they're, they get
00:40:12.200 their directive from a group called the, uh, Brighton Collaboration. And the Brighton Collaboration
00:40:19.980 is an international network and it's, it's founder interests are based on economic algorithms. It's
00:40:29.020 about money and it's an international organization. It's not, it's not a Canadian organization and it's
00:40:35.160 not a provincial organization. And the Ontario government defers to the Brighton Collaboration
00:40:41.240 for defined terms within what we're dealing with. And the Brighton Collaboration has now morphed into
00:40:50.120 what is called the Task Force for Global Health. So you've got the Brighton Collaboration Task Force
00:40:56.600 for Global Health. Well, who, who are the members of that? Do you want to know? We're talking about the
00:41:02.920 WHO, UNICEF, uh, NGOs, the Rockefeller Foundation, the World Bank, and the UN Development Program.
00:41:09.800 And then they're funded by Big Pharma and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the CDC.
00:41:18.200 It's, it's incredible. And so they, there's a hierarchy there. They actually get, uh, take
00:41:25.240 direction from a group above them called the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness known as CEPI,
00:41:33.240 CEPI, which was founded in 2017. It was founded in Davos. So if you wonder what goes on in Davos,
00:41:41.800 what goes on with the Bilderberg groups, what goes on through the Trilateral Commission and so on and so
00:41:46.440 forth, you know, they create these organizations and who is CEPI? CEPI is the Bill and Melinda Gates
00:41:53.000 Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, the World Economic Forum, and all the pharmaceutical companies.
00:41:58.200 Now, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, J&J, Sanofi and Pfizer, among others. So when you, when you think
00:42:06.840 this is playing out like a bad movie with all kinds of collusion and conspiracy, uh, this is not
00:42:14.120 conspiracy theory. This is conspiritual, uh, forensic conspiritual, conspiritual examination of how these
00:42:22.440 bodies interconnect and how they operate and how they, um, how they are controlled. And this has been
00:42:29.400 a game that's been, uh, being staged for a few years now based on the criteria of the dates of
00:42:35.480 when these agencies were set up, but they all work together. They're, they're working harmoniously.
00:42:41.560 And this is, this entire system is not organic. This is, uh, this is, this is contrived through these groups.
00:42:49.000 Yeah. Thank you, Vincent. I know you and I were chatting about the other, that the other day,
00:42:54.440 and it can all seem so big and so frightening, but I really, you know, I look back in history and
00:43:00.040 there has always been a time where evil has prevailed, but the beauty of it is, is that, uh,
00:43:05.320 righteousness and goodness always overcome it. And it is really a matter of the people becoming
00:43:12.360 extremely active right now. And I believe it's strategically chipping away at what they have
00:43:18.440 spent 40 years getting into place. And I mean that by the fact that they were very strategic
00:43:24.040 into getting these, these individuals into positions of the school trustees, the mayors and
00:43:29.800 city councils, the MPPs, you know, and a lot of these are, uh, people that weren't actually
00:43:35.480 strategically placed in these positions, but they're so spineless that, you know, they, they just
00:43:40.760 wanted a cushy job of being an elected official. And, and so therefore when this came, they weren't
00:43:46.360 willing to be the, the odd duck out nor the black sheep and, and to be bold and speak up.
00:43:51.400 And, and so that's a lot of the work that, you know, that I know that action for Canada has been
00:43:56.040 doing is trying to equip and empower the individual, let them know what their guaranteed rights are so
00:44:01.720 that they will take that stand. And I think it would be 3% of the population maximum of 10%, but 3%
00:44:08.680 can turn this around and already elected officials in positions like school trustees are already
00:44:15.560 stepping down because they can't handle the heat and they don't want to take the risk that they
00:44:20.680 could be held liable. And so this is one of the reasons again, that you and I have been encouraging
00:44:26.120 people to say no, to get involved. And it's not only a matter of becoming a, you know, a member with a
00:44:33.000 chapter. If we're going to actually get these elected, get into these positions of elected
00:44:38.520 officials, we have to be supporting people within our community to do that. You may be the person
00:44:44.120 that needs to say, I'm going to run as a school board trustee and, and then make sure that you're,
00:44:48.680 you know, that you have a community of people that are raising the money and getting the information
00:44:52.600 together for you to be successful in that. And we're just going to keep going up the chain
00:44:56.680 thing because these people are really cowards and, and they're only good in a mob, but when you
00:45:02.680 single them out and you start shining a light on them and holding them accountable, they don't like
00:45:07.280 the feeling of that. You know, it's like that bully. I love a commercial. I used to be on TV and
00:45:12.680 it was zoomed in, you know, that kid with the crew cut and everything he's standing, you see a chain link
00:45:18.000 fence and he's talking all tough. But as the camera went back, you see that this bully is standing all alone
00:45:24.580 and that alone, he doesn't have the support and, and all of his bullying isn't worth anything in the
00:45:30.660 world. And, and that's really, you know, part of what it is we're facing. I do believe in the court
00:45:36.840 system. I believe that there are good judges still in Canada, but we're going to have to push and our
00:45:43.200 cases are going to have to be very, very tight. And I, like you believe that Rocco a hundred percent, uh, we
00:45:52.060 don't care about the criticisms and the armchair quarterbacks right now are saying, oh, it's taking
00:45:56.160 too long. It's taking this and that we're going up a monster up against a monstrous corrupt government.
00:46:01.960 And we need to go into court with the expert witnesses and a case that is solid. And that's
00:46:08.020 what we're building. And that was one of the questions is that somebody was asking, what is
00:46:12.740 your opinion on, on moving towards the courts and seeking justice?
00:46:17.560 Well, based on what you had, uh, had already said, uh, I don't disagree with anything you said.
00:46:24.040 And quite clearly, let's not forget, everybody wants to be a hero until it, until it comes time
00:46:30.860 to do something heroic. And everybody wants to be a patriot until it's time to do something patriotic.
00:46:37.800 So we all have to do our part. You know, we all individually need to step up to the plate,
00:46:42.980 but as far as the issue of the courts go, yeah, I see tremendous, uh, I put tremendous faith into
00:46:49.140 the court system. Um, there are, there are problems with the court system. There is corruption within
00:46:55.340 the court system. There is corruption within the policing system. Um, but, uh, essentially,
00:47:01.420 you know, the methodology of winning is there are a lot of roadblocks that happen initially in the
00:47:07.280 early stages of a court process. So, um, who gets to choose who the judge is going to be on the case?
00:47:13.720 Um, there's a lot of dynamics happening on the first round and you got to remember that, uh, these,
00:47:19.940 these really big issues, these battles, it's not going to be a one round issue. It's going to be a
00:47:25.760 one round issue followed by an appeal and then followed by a process moving to the Supreme court.
00:47:30.840 It has to work that way. And I have, I have tremendous respect of our courts at the highest
00:47:36.380 levels. Um, I don't have a lot of faith at the courts at the lower levels. I've seen, um, I've seen
00:47:44.180 there are a lot of good judges and there are, there are, I would say there are probably more good judges
00:47:49.100 than there are bad judges, but, um, there are methods that can be put in place to sort of, uh, tilt
00:47:55.940 the scales of justice to really push against what we're trying to achieve. But again, it's a
00:48:02.640 multi-layered approach. And when you finally start to get to the higher levels and the higher
00:48:06.560 layers within the system, um, it's not subject to a subjective opinion by, by a judge in an appellate
00:48:16.200 court. It's, you know, the balance of the evidence presented in all of the evidence that's going to be
00:48:21.820 presented is going to be on our side. There is no evidence to present on the government side. And
00:48:27.080 I've already seen that in cases that have, we've dealt with in the last few months. Um, even on a
00:48:33.320 provincial level, the, uh, provincial judges and the provincial courts have no evidence to offer.
00:48:39.700 And, uh, there's overwhelming evidence on the other side. So we've got the evidence on our side.
00:48:45.400 There is no question about it. Um, what they've got on their side is, um, legacy media and television
00:48:52.280 and, um, and the, the parodying of their narrative. That's all they've got. But when it comes down to,
00:48:59.280 you know, put the cards down, let's see what you got. They don't have anything.
00:49:02.700 No, I love it. You know, we have the constitution and, and the, uh, rule of law on our side.
00:49:08.600 And I just want to remind people, you know, that action for Canada filed August 17th,
00:49:13.680 and we're already having great success and we haven't stepped a foot into the courts.
00:49:18.820 And that comes along as a reminder, the BC minister of education, uh, you know, not mandating,
00:49:24.400 uh, vaccination for teachers that would have, she would have been right out the door,
00:49:28.540 um, in out the gates, uh, promoting that. I believe had we not had her filed as a defendant in this claim.
00:49:35.760 And then recently somebody has asked about, uh, their child, uh, or anybody actually flying
00:49:43.000 or taking the train right now. And are you aware that the minister or sorry, the attorney general,
00:49:49.640 sorry, the minister of transportation, Omar Al-Ghabar has put a pause on the VAX passes for
00:49:55.520 flying and for trains. And, um, you know, this is a really big deal that people, you know,
00:50:01.200 aren't aware of. If you go to our legal action page, the article is down the right side,
00:50:06.140 unless you're on the phone, then it'll be down at the bottom from the Toronto sun.
00:50:09.400 And they also, in that same article quoted the attorney general as a warning, Justin Trudeau,
00:50:16.640 that the VAX passes mandating them was unconstitutional. They're all listed as
00:50:22.180 defendants in our claim, as well as BC ferries who has turned around and said that they are exempt
00:50:27.400 from the VAX passes and asking passengers for their status because they're also listed as a
00:50:34.500 defendant and we're going to go after him. Now, BC ferries is just trying to mandate, uh,
00:50:39.120 VAX passes for their employees. And I can tell you, they're receiving a lot of backlash and I'm,
00:50:44.680 I'm letting these people know they're actually, you know, in one of the biggest cases in Canada
00:50:48.960 right now, listed as a defendant. And this has got to give power to these cases. And as Vincent has
00:50:54.580 said, when you get up to the Supreme court, the constitution and the rule of law are on our side.
00:51:00.380 We've got the evidence. And, um, even with the fight to find, uh, people that have come from
00:51:06.640 outside of Canada and got a quarantine fine, $3,500, they're being dismissed because they're
00:51:12.180 unconstitutional. We have the right to the freedom of movement. Okay. Um, another question, Heather,
00:51:17.860 be prepared. I'm going to ask you to come on and ask a couple of questions too. It says, um, ask
00:51:23.000 Vincent about pre-charge regarding constables having to consult with the crown before they
00:51:29.000 lay a charge. And, uh, Vincent, you and I have had several conversations about BC and, uh, New
00:51:35.800 Brunswick, apparently having a higher threshold for, uh, permitting a, an investigation or charges
00:51:42.640 to go through without consulting the crown. Can you, um, speak on that into that a little bit?
00:51:47.000 Yeah, that wasn't something that was around, uh, when I was still active, actively policing,
00:51:53.640 but certainly, uh, from province to province, depending on the judicial, uh, jurisdiction,
00:51:59.500 usually on a provincial level, uh, the, uh, prosecutors, the provincial prosecutors
00:52:04.340 probably can come up with a system like that. It wasn't around again when I was working, but, uh,
00:52:10.580 generally the rule of thumb with consultation with a crown was when an officer wasn't
00:52:16.980 sure they had enough evidence to proceed on a conviction, uh, or it was just looking
00:52:21.380 for clarification. The crown's office is always open to police officers. It's like your, uh,
00:52:27.080 your private attorneys that you can speak with to go in there and say, look, this is what
00:52:30.500 I've got. I'm not sure if we can get a conviction based on this. What do you think? And so officers
00:52:36.580 really are not familiar at all with case law because, you know, our job is to be out on the
00:52:42.040 road creating cases, not, uh, being really familiar with the extent of cases all across
00:52:49.020 the country, but the crowns are. So when you bring a case to a crown, uh, they'll say, well,
00:52:54.260 based on case law, based on other cases, yeah, I think we will have no problem getting a conviction
00:52:58.740 on this or no, it doesn't look like this would apply. So there is sometimes an onus to consult
00:53:04.460 with the crown on that, but that doesn't mean that a charge won't be laid. It just means the
00:53:08.740 officer says, I'm not really sure what to do with this. Uh, let me take it to the crown and see how
00:53:13.800 the prosecutor wants to deal with it. And, um, I know, I know as a result of backdoor deals that
00:53:20.000 have been taking place with the, uh, with the crowns, um, in consultation, uh, with amongst
00:53:26.780 themselves, there's been a lot of discussion about, um, things needing to be thrown out from
00:53:32.740 those, uh, in Ontario anyways, the reopening act charges and such, but, uh, there's nothing wrong
00:53:39.300 with an officer going to see the crown. It just means the officer's not familiar with this type
00:53:44.020 of situation. It's kind of a new thing and they want some guidance on it. But if the, um, information
00:53:49.840 that you're providing is relevant to a charge, then the crown should be saying, yeah, actually this is
00:53:55.440 going to apply and let's go ahead and run the charge. Okay. And I love what you had said to me
00:54:01.080 the other day when we were having conversation and it may seem like a bit of a, it's, you know,
00:54:06.100 a difficult subject, but here I filed this 25 page affidavit with a ton of really good information
00:54:12.500 and compelling information in it. I also provided them with seven death certificates that I was
00:54:17.780 provided from a whistleblower nurse, uh, death certificate, for instance, that said 87 year old,
00:54:23.820 uh, male had passed away. He had comorbidities, actually stage four cancer. He died.
00:54:31.080 And they did a COVID test on him apparently and marked it as a COVID death, you know, so there's
00:54:36.460 a lot of good information. I opened up to them that I had an undertaker, doctors, nurses, who were
00:54:40.680 all wanting to give testimony. And they're still saying, Oh no, it's just not enough. Tanya,
00:54:44.800 you got to come to us with more. And, you know, in consulting with you, I said, how does this work?
00:54:50.380 And you said, well, if somebody comes into the police station, a woman comes in and said,
00:54:54.520 I've been raped. And, you know, the investigator wouldn't go straight to the crown to press charges.
00:54:59.760 They would get the information, investigate, see if they could find enough
00:55:03.360 information to, uh, lay charges against the individual who was allegedly, you know, responsible
00:55:09.520 for the rape. And then they would go to the crown to press charges. And, and that's what
00:55:14.540 we're asking for, right? We've got all of this compelling information. We have others that want
00:55:18.540 to come, you know, and speak with you. Uh, they have the power and ability to do far more than I could.
00:55:23.540 And I think I've done a pretty good job presenting what I have. And they're still saying, you need
00:55:28.220 more. I mean, the country is being raped, so to speak, and, uh, you know, in the most vile of ways
00:55:33.860 and they're saying, yeah, you know, it's just, there's not enough information there. It's really
00:55:38.580 quite disgusting what's going on. Yeah. I mean, um, it's not, it's not a lot different than if you had
00:55:45.160 a commercial outlet selling a product and you have one person working at the store at a time and,
00:55:51.140 you know, the odd customer comes in every five minutes or 10 minutes and you that's, that's your
00:55:55.960 flow. Uh, but all of a sudden, you know, with resources being kind of tight, um, somebody comes
00:56:01.960 in with something that becomes a fairly big deal. You know, it's not a small investigation. It's an
00:56:06.940 investigation. It's not just a, it's not like writing a ticket. You're actually going to have
00:56:10.960 to do a fair bit of work to process this. And that's going to translate to boy, if I say yes to you,
00:56:17.720 this could, this could mean tens of thousands of people in this province are going to start coming
00:56:22.800 up to this desk and it's going to create a massive workload for us. Well, too bad. I mean,
00:56:28.620 look who created the problem and there's nothing anywhere in the police services act that says
00:56:32.580 if you have a, an inordinate amount of, um, uh, complainants coming in with, uh, you know,
00:56:39.900 criminal accusations, then you don't have to take it because, uh, you know, you should only have to do
00:56:45.140 one or two a day. It doesn't work like that. Um, the government created this problem. The
00:56:50.100 government's going to have to fix it. And, uh, there is absolutely no, uh, I would never accept
00:56:55.740 the response that, well, you know, this is going to be too many cases for us to deal with, or we
00:57:01.100 really don't want to get into this. Cause can you imagine the workload? That's your problem. You
00:57:06.200 know, that that's their problem. That's not your problem. They're going to have to deal with it
00:57:09.900 because if it sticks, if it really applies and it needs to be investigated, then they cannot brush
00:57:17.280 you off and say, no, we're not going to do it. And keep in mind that, you know, every person coming
00:57:22.740 in with this type of complaint, uh, really requires a individual investigation because, uh, if you're
00:57:30.480 coming from as a student from one university or as an employer from a different company, the, um,
00:57:37.020 the wording of the documents or the information that you were given by an email or however,
00:57:42.720 the information was given to you relative to something that's coercive is going to be different
00:57:47.800 case by case. So if they say no to, you know, if a woman came in and said she was raped and they said,
00:57:53.380 no, actually it wasn't a rape based on, you know, we've looked at all the information. It wasn't.
00:57:57.800 And then, you know, five hours later, three other women come in saying they were raped. You can't
00:58:03.160 be dismissive and push them away and say, no, you know, that the woman that was already here,
00:58:08.080 we found her case was not valid. So your case is not valid too. No, your case is a completely
00:58:12.920 separate situation and needs to be investigated independently of that.
00:58:19.120 Be interesting to make the affidavit available to people so that they can, uh, if they, you know,
00:58:25.720 agree with the information in there, go and get it notarized and bring it in and file a complaint
00:58:29.520 themselves, like, you know, the pressure has to increase. And, you know, if these are good cops
00:58:35.260 at the top, I've said to them, that is, this is a top down problem. And because of it, you know,
00:58:40.060 they're putting the boots on the ground at risk and there's a high rate of depression and anxiety
00:58:46.400 with the police. But, you know, this was happening before 20 months ago. And I think we really need to
00:58:51.460 address that as well as a lot of people don't understand that since Trudeau took office, they were
00:58:56.600 passing legislation because they could, they had a majority government and then they, we worked real
00:59:01.120 hard to get them down to minority government. Um, but the police with the, uh, passing bill C-16 about
00:59:07.540 the trans and LGBTQ agenda. And again, that's not about the LGBTQ community. So, you know, nobody get
00:59:13.560 the wrong idea there. It was a matter of forcing people, uh, to be in compliance or agreement with a
00:59:20.380 vocabulary that they wanted used. So that was interfering with your freedom of speech, your freedom of
00:59:25.860 belief and thought. And so tyranny was already coming in massively the, before COVID-19 and they
00:59:32.280 were breaking society down in order to get them to function, but it was forcing police to already go
00:59:38.880 into positions where they were already violating a person's right because of a complaint that would
00:59:44.300 come in. And because the government had say passed this, this bill, even though it's in violation of the
00:59:49.960 constitution and charter, there was no measure. And so I've heard for quite some time that the police,
00:59:55.260 you know, have been wanting to quit and the suicide rate has increased and it's incredibly sad to see.
01:00:01.820 And so I'm really grateful that someone like you is on the front line here, leading, uh, these
01:00:06.600 individuals and giving them a means to step up and, uh, have a voice. I think it's really important
01:00:12.600 and vital right now. Yeah. So just remember that if you want to consider yourself, um, a civilian or a,
01:00:21.360 um, a person, uh, a citizen of a democratic country, then you're going to need to have a say.
01:00:27.940 If, if we don't allow people to have a say within our society, then we are no longer a democratic country.
01:00:34.600 And, um, that's the component that I'm talking about when it comes relative to, um, accountability
01:00:41.180 and transparency within government. And as things progress further down the path of tyranny,
01:00:48.980 where our governments are not only violating your rights, they're just ignoring the laws,
01:00:55.300 you know, we'll, we can become a completely lawless society. And that's when revolutions happen and take
01:01:00.520 place when people want to push back. And we're very fortunate that we haven't had any violence yet.
01:01:05.880 And I hope that we don't, but if you continue down this path, it is a path to tyranny. So right now I
01:01:13.060 see it having, my personal opinion is I think it's stabilized and I think there's a lot of pushback
01:01:19.000 causing it to shift direction and start to move backwards a bit. But, um, every week, every,
01:01:25.620 every week, every month is a different guess. You know, we don't know, is it going to shift back?
01:01:31.180 Is it going to get harder in some provinces? There are more substantial lockdowns coming
01:01:35.320 in Ontario. We haven't seen that yet. So we don't really know what's coming yet in our new
01:01:40.980 flu season. Um, but time will tell, but we, you know, I know we as Canadians aren't going to be
01:01:47.940 tolerating this much longer and we are patient and we're going to allow this to work out within the
01:01:53.760 courts. But unfortunately this, this mandate issue has gone too far. And with the termination of,
01:02:01.020 um, not only nine 11 service providers, but everybody across the spectrum, everybody seems
01:02:06.760 to be following suit. And what they don't realize is the repercussions of their actions. They'll have
01:02:12.320 to pay for the repercussions of those actions. But those words don't really mean much to people who
01:02:18.140 are going to be put out of work very soon or who are already put out of work. It's, it's extremely
01:02:24.200 traumatic to them and their families. And, um, we need to push hard to get that reversed.
01:02:30.780 And I think one of the methods is to, you know, this laying of criminal charges is letting our
01:02:36.840 governments know that we are not going to tolerate being treated, uh, as criminals and allow you to
01:02:43.960 harass us. I'm sorry, to, to treat us as you are criminals. You're, you're exercising criminal
01:02:50.320 behavior against your, your civilians. And it's not going to be tolerated and we'll push back.
01:02:55.980 It's not acceptable. We do not at all accept that. Don't treat us like that. It's not going to happen.
01:03:01.820 Yeah. It's been very inhumane what we've seen going on, uh, within humanity and to our fellow
01:03:06.640 Canadians. And I just want to let people know that have been on tonight and have had questions about
01:03:10.780 the notices of liability or this or that. Please make sure you go to the October 13th and October 27th
01:03:16.320 and power hour, because we talk in depth about how to manage that. And, uh, we had David Lindsay on
01:03:24.160 one of our business owners who are using them very effectively. And then as well, moving towards,
01:03:30.400 uh, filing personal criminal charges against another citizen, again, not in their capacity
01:03:36.800 as an employer or the head of a union, but as a citizen who's breaking the law. And, uh, you know,
01:03:42.360 Vincent is, um, very much in his words here as well, supporting that, that if, uh, the government
01:03:48.180 is interfering at this level and we can't count on the police because it's so subjective right now
01:03:53.820 in their minds, then we got to take these matters into our own hands. And, um, okay, Heather, would
01:03:59.340 you come on and just ask a couple more questions and then we'll wrap this evening up?
01:04:03.660 Well, there have been a few people that have been asking this, Vincent, you as a retired police
01:04:11.180 officer, but also for so many people that you have talked about other officers right now,
01:04:18.060 this is a really tough time for them too. And people on the call want to know how we can support
01:04:26.000 those officers who are, are true to their job, true to their oath. They want to know how we can,
01:04:32.480 as citizens support them. Um, well, let them know that you support them. I I've been saying
01:04:39.760 this right from the beginning of this entire process. I say that, um, you know, we used to
01:04:44.720 have a term used called back the blue. And I say, I don't think that's an accurate term. I said,
01:04:50.140 you want to support those men and women in law enforcement that uphold the charter rights and
01:04:56.260 freedoms. Uh, if they do, you know, you fully, you fully support them, but you don't
01:05:01.320 just blanket support all law enforcement officers. When we have this polarized situation,
01:05:06.740 it doesn't matter your choice of whether you're vaccinated or not vaccinated is not the issue.
01:05:12.600 The issue is our, our officers treating people fairly, are they treating them fair and square?
01:05:18.380 And are they making decisions that are non-political? Um, I think there's a tremendous
01:05:23.540 amount of bias out there. Uh, and, uh, you know, a good example would have been, uh, at the beginning
01:05:29.120 when this all started and we would see a number of arrests of people who were trying to walk into
01:05:33.960 a Costco or a location, not wearing a mask. I mean, there should have been charges laid there
01:05:39.860 on the other side. It's, it's the, uh, people who, who don't respect the fact that you have an
01:05:45.320 exemption, which is perfectly legal and you're, you're perfectly within your rights. So we're seeing,
01:05:50.440 um, some, some, some mandate coming from probably within the organization that's saying this is the
01:05:58.440 way we'd like to see things go. And in fact, I can tell you, there's a number of officers that spoke
01:06:03.380 out at our protest this weekend from police on guard, uh, very clearly outlining the fact that
01:06:09.120 under no circumstances with this officer ever charge anybody with anything that violates your
01:06:14.340 charter rights. So those are the officers you want to support. And you want to let the other
01:06:18.560 officers know that you are not supporting them if they are going to, uh, trample on your charter
01:06:24.000 rights. It's as simple as that. And it's a no brainer. It's a very interesting, it's a very
01:06:29.740 simple decision to make, you know, regardless of your, um, your laws that are created within your
01:06:36.260 province and the, the decisions made by your own management, take a look at your oath, take a look at
01:06:42.580 your police services act, take a look at your constitution, take a look at the bill of rights,
01:06:47.340 take a look at the international declaration of human rights. These are all things that you've
01:06:51.760 been protecting your entire career. Don't stop protecting them now because somebody came up with
01:06:57.060 some totally stupid decision that makes no sense whatsoever. And even if you think it makes sense,
01:07:03.420 if it violates the charter rights, do not enforce it.
01:07:06.660 Yeah, I love it. You know, um, I've had a lot of, uh, interaction with the police, uh, rallying on the
01:07:13.320 overpasses, you know, for two years practically, and somebody make a call and the RCMP would come up
01:07:18.620 and they say, Hey, you know, make sure all our signage was good. There was no threat to anybody.
01:07:23.280 And then I'd let them know, Hey, you know, I'm actually for Canada. I'm actually being a voice for
01:07:27.260 the RCMP and law enforcement. And many of them shook my hand and said, thank you. And I said, I understand
01:07:33.460 this is a top-down problem and this is causing you a lot of, you know, uh, stress. And, and they were
01:07:38.720 so happy to hear about, you know, the compassion and the understanding because they felt alone and
01:07:43.740 lost in it. And I think it's really important. You know, you feel a, uh, an officer out when you're
01:07:48.500 having a conversation, there are those that are, well, this is just, you know, the way it is.
01:07:52.260 I wanted to note in the video where it was six RCMP officer that showed up. And when we had moved
01:07:59.320 outside, the actual Sergeant spent 30 minutes in a conversation with me. And she said, thank you so
01:08:06.760 much because as a citizen, you can do more than I can right now. And she took my card and she says,
01:08:11.680 on my days off, I'm going to be going thoroughly through your, your website. She felt encouraged.
01:08:16.060 We're giving them hope. And so I want to encourage everyone else, you know, feel them out, try it out,
01:08:21.440 do this, understand that, uh, you know, in my sending out that, uh, letter the other day,
01:08:26.080 it's to hold them to account. I'm talking about those at the top because the union for the RCMP
01:08:31.060 had come out originally and said that they would be supporting the Mounties in me and in whether or
01:08:36.840 not they should get this injection. And, uh, I said to the context that I was dealing with now,
01:08:42.080 this is sends Canadians a good message to give them confidence in the RCMP. And they were like,
01:08:47.240 yeah, yeah, you know, this is good. Well, a week later they retracted, the union retracted,
01:08:52.440 the pressure was on. And I would imagine that came from commissioner lucky's office who I say
01:08:57.820 must be bought out because she has compromised. She should have been the one putting the rest
01:09:02.000 forward for Trudeau and the rest of it. It's very obvious that she is the problem because she
01:09:07.160 as the top of the, uh, as commissioner of the RCMP is where politic politics stays out of the
01:09:13.320 department. That's her role is to make sure no social agendas, nothing comes in political into the
01:09:19.280 RCMP that they can 100% do their job and uphold the rule of law and the constitution. And so that's
01:09:25.500 why I keep saying this is a top-down problem. And yes, there are those officers on the ground that
01:09:30.400 are part of the problem because they're complying, but there's a lot of them for many years who have
01:09:34.880 felt the pressure. Oh, okay. Um, Heather, another question.
01:09:39.220 Well, I'll just answer to what you said, Tanya. Um, I've been saying this for a long time now that
01:09:45.640 it's never ever too late to do the right thing. It's never too late to do the right thing. And I
01:09:51.920 strongly, strongly encourage all the chiefs of police and the commissioners that we have within
01:09:57.260 this country to do the right thing. And I think that we would be in a much better place if the
01:10:03.540 simple directive given to all their members was simply to ensure that you uphold the charter of
01:10:10.460 rights of all the people of this country. Do not violate their charter of rights. Whatever you
01:10:15.380 see coming down the pipe from the government, it is what it is, but we're just not going to
01:10:21.460 violate people's charter rights. And that's all we're asking is, uh, you just don't, you just
01:10:25.940 don't do that. And that's, that's a common understanding. So if that, that information
01:10:30.260 and that directive would have been issued clearly from the chiefs and the commissioners to the working
01:10:35.120 field operatives, then, um, we wouldn't have this problem today. And, uh, it's a lack of
01:10:41.380 sound leadership really is what it is. It super is. And I know that I've been saying for years that,
01:10:47.880 uh, the countries that didn't fall into tyranny are where the military and the police stood on the
01:10:52.020 side of the people. How are you finding the military? Are you, are you getting a good response
01:10:56.120 from, from, uh, those individuals in support? Well, again, the military are no different than the
01:11:03.260 police that are no different from the butchers and the bakers and the candlestick makers. You know,
01:11:07.740 there are those that believe this narrative because of the, the, uh, you know, you are what
01:11:14.040 you eat when it comes to food and you are what you think when it comes to media. So depending if
01:11:18.740 you're watching CNN all day or cable pulse 24 or something like that, um, you're, you're going to
01:11:24.340 be brainwashed. So it, it's different right across the spectrum. So there you go, Heather, another
01:11:30.960 question, and then maybe two more questions and then we'll wrap it up. Actually, Tanya, the, the,
01:11:36.360 the last question I had was the one that you just asked was about the military. Okay. So, but I do,
01:11:41.920 I actually have another one. Um, this is just, uh, uh, maybe you can, it says when the RCMP
01:11:47.060 arrested Max, Maxine Bernier in Manitoba several months ago, how did that work? Did an officer just
01:11:52.900 decide to arrest him or did it come from an order from above and who can give such orders?
01:11:58.820 Well, I'm not really sure where those orders came from, but a freedom of information, a request on
01:12:03.580 that information can be submitted to find out, uh, who was involved in who's making, uh, what types
01:12:09.380 of orders. But there are exemptions within the police agencies to the release of freedom of
01:12:14.280 information documents, um, saying that, uh, it could be classified information for reasons that, uh,
01:12:22.080 can be, uh, either valid or contrived. You know, it, it, it's really hard to squeeze lemon out of
01:12:28.940 something. This is just not going to give you any juice at some point. So I love your sayings.
01:12:34.900 You got them all. Well, Vincent, it's been an absolute pleasure having you on again tonight,
01:12:40.480 everyone. I hope that this was an informative evening for you and encouraging to know that we
01:12:45.700 do have a force behind us that is on our side. Vincent, give us some closing words,
01:12:51.160 any advice or comments that you'd like to make. I'm just letting people know that based on what I'm
01:12:56.740 hearing and seeing with boots on the ground here, I'm, I'm quite encouraged. I'm feeling positive
01:13:02.640 maybe a month from now. I won't, but right now I am good. We're going to all keep working hard and
01:13:08.780 together. And, uh, I think I honestly feel like we are moving this mountain and we're shifting. I know
01:13:15.580 that with the notices of liability, we've got the literally the government, the media, and the unions
01:13:21.240 all trying to get ahead of it, uh, because it's effective. But what, what makes it even more
01:13:26.640 effective is if everybody just rips that mask off, do your shopping, do everything you can
01:13:32.420 to be mask free. This is absolutely a barometer for the government to know who's complying and
01:13:38.940 it's keeping us in this situation. It's prolonging our agony. So take the mask off for starters,
01:13:44.720 be bold, make sure you're a strong advocate for your children. This is abuse what's happening to
01:13:50.160 our kids. And they're relying on us for futures to come to be the best advocates. We'd never let
01:13:56.160 anyone hold a gun to their head. So why are we allowing them to think to get this jab? All right.
01:14:01.620 We love you guys become part of a chapter, make sure you've joined action for Canada,
01:14:05.800 support the police, encourage them, support Vincent, and we hope we'll see you again next
01:14:10.840 week. Thank you so much. Thank you, Vincent. Thank you. Thank you, Heather.
01:14:15.500 I'm going to thank God and God alone for the ground that I'm standing on.
01:14:38.140 I'm going to thank our founding fathers for giving their lives and sacrificing so much for
01:14:49.760 our freedom. And I'm calling on you today. Don't put them to shame. Don't waste what they
01:15:00.400 did. We have guaranteed rights in this country.
01:15:11.520 We are putting chapters across the nation. We are going to be in every town and every city.
01:15:18.980 And we are going to build communities within these communities of like-minded people who are
01:15:24.220 actually going to care for one another again and love on each other and give each other the
01:15:28.900 help when they're down. We are going to use the teams and the people that build within chapters
01:15:35.600 to support our businesses. The government's actions are completely, 100% unlawful.
01:15:44.980 Judgment will again be found on justice and those with virtuous hearts will pursue it.
01:15:52.280 You have a virtuous heart if you are here today pursuing freedom and righteousness.
01:16:00.460 And then verse 23 comes along with a promise. God says he will turn the sins of evil people back on
01:16:10.100 them. He will destroy them for their sins. I take great comfort in that because I serve a mighty
01:16:21.240 living God who has allowed us to go through this season of discomfort because we as a nation
01:16:29.620 have turned our backs on him and we need to get right. So I am just going to thank you so much.
01:16:38.260 I'm going to say God bless you and God bless Canada.
01:17:08.260 God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and all and for security.
01:17:10.260 Let's pray.
01:17:11.720 We'll be right back.
01:17:41.720 We'll be right back.