Action4Canada - Our Christian Heritage Hangs by an Oath with David Lindsay

00:00:00.000 We'll be right back.

00:00:30.000 Thank you.

00:01:00.000 Thank you.

00:01:30.000 Thank you.

00:02:00.720 Well, welcome everyone to tonight's Empower Hour.

00:02:04.520 I'm really looking forward to this.

00:02:05.860 We have David Lindsay on with us tonight.

00:02:08.560 And as you can see, going across Canada right now, we have, and in the last 11 years, a lot of legislation that has been passed that's running roughshod over our Charter Rights and Freedoms and the Constitution and the rule of law.

00:02:22.080 And we're all kind of dismayed looking back and saying, how do we stop this?

00:02:25.860 And David Lindsay and myself have been on the front line of elevating the conversation regarding the coronation oath.

00:02:32.740 This is a living, breathing, binding document that all other founding documents come after, and that they must first, let me try that again, and that all documents that have come after the oath, such as the Constitution, the B&A Act, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, must comply with the oath.

00:02:57.540 And the oath says that Canada must be governed by Judeo-Christian biblical principles.

00:03:04.060 And we need to move this forward in order to save Canada.

00:03:07.840 And that's what we're going to be talking about tonight.

00:03:10.000 And when I say that we need this conversation to be front and centre, we need it to be front and centre in the legislature.

00:03:16.300 We need it to be front and centre in the House of Commons.

00:03:19.520 And we need to revoke legislation in the last 11 years that is in violation of it.

00:03:25.020 But in order to do that, we need to be educated. And Action for Canada, along with David Lindsay, is working to lobby government, MPs, MLAs, MPPs, and bring awareness to this incredibly important agreement.

00:03:42.580 And so with that, before, actually, you know what, I'm going to bring David on right now. David is the founder and president of CLEAR Common Law Education and Rights. And so, David, you know, we've had you on the show multiple times on this issue.

00:04:00.840 During the COVID era is when I met you on July 1st of 2020, and I was speaking at the BC legislature, and I had proclaimed Canada as a Christian nation, and you and I became fast friends after that.

00:04:16.180 because you have been working for over 30 years

00:04:19.420 on researching, understanding our common law.

00:04:24.500 And the Coronation Oath is,

00:04:27.060 I think you're the only one that I know

00:04:28.500 that is an actual expert on the oath

00:04:31.080 and why we've brought you on the show so many times

00:04:34.520 in order to bring this forward and help educate citizens.

00:04:38.320 And now we are really working on this campaign

00:04:41.900 to lobby government

00:04:42.860 because I've always said knowledge is power.

00:04:46.180 And we're finding that this oath, most of the sitting MPs and MLAs, nobody knows about it.

00:04:57.000 They don't understand that the oath is binding and how powerful it is to taking back Canada.

00:05:02.940 So first of all, I welcome you on the show.

00:05:05.140 And then let's just have a bit of conversation for a moment.

00:05:07.960 And then we're going to play a clip that I think is very relevant on who Carney has just appointed or selected or inserted as the next governor general.

00:05:23.700 David, are you able?

00:05:24.760 No, yeah. Yeah, I'm here. You were going to play a clip.

00:05:27.460 Oh, yeah. OK, so. All right. Terenzi, we're going to need to do a little edit here.

00:05:32.880 I was having a little bit of trouble explaining this as well.

00:05:37.080 All right. So, David, thanks for being on the show. Before we begin, we're just going to play a clip and it will highlight who the new governor general is that's been inserted by Mark Carney and an upcoming campaign where I think it's very important to appeal to Mark Carney to reassess her suitability as governor general. And so we'll discuss that after the clip. So, Terenzio, if you would go ahead, that'd be great. Thanks.

00:06:04.820 So, last week, we all saw King Charles in Washington trying to save the post-war order.

00:06:10.840 This week, Mark Carney was in Armenia, admitting that the original version of that order is

00:06:16.200 ruptured and needs to be retooled.

00:06:18.880 Charles brought the pageantry.

00:06:20.960 Carney is building the successor system.

00:06:23.280 Now, look at the countries that Carney identified who are supposed to comprise that successor

00:06:28.060 system.

00:06:29.240 Canada, the European Union, the United Kingdom, Australia. 0.95

00:06:33.540 That's the Anglosphere plus the European imperial remnant.

00:06:37.560 That is not a coalition of democracies. 0.53

00:06:40.220 That's the British imperial system's remaining structure, consolidating against the American

00:06:46.360 system of Donald Trump and what he's trying to revive.

00:06:49.580 And the rest of the cast of characters in Armenia included the usual has-beens, Keir

00:06:55.560 Starmer, Emmanuel Macron, Ursula von der Leyen.

00:06:59.300 You get the picture.

00:07:00.000 But when Carney returned from Armenia to Canada, he made an announcement in Ottawa.

00:07:07.060 He appointed a new governor general of Canada.

00:07:10.000 Now, the media covers it as a routine administrative appointment.

00:07:14.000 That's not what it was.

00:07:15.800 Carney didn't just name the name of the new governor general.

00:07:19.660 He described the office itself.

00:07:21.900 The crown is a continuous thread through our constitutional life.

00:07:25.740 It is, as His Majesty himself said, a symbol of Canada in all her richness and dynamism.

00:07:34.660 And the Governor-General is the Crown's representative in Canada,

00:07:39.800 Commander-in-Chief of the Canadian Armed Forces, steward of our traditions.

00:07:45.280 Now pay close attention to what Carney said.

00:07:48.940 The Crown is not a symbol.

00:07:50.600 It permeates Canada's constitutional life.

00:07:55.740 power. Most people, including many Canadians, probably assume it's the prime minister who

00:08:01.420 commands the military. He doesn't. The crown's representative does. Remember that. Then he added

00:08:08.740 this. The governor general is the guardian of our constitutional order. The most demanding part of

00:08:15.840 that role is rarely seen. It's the duty to ensure the government in Canada is form sustained and,

00:08:24.020 when the time comes dismissed in accordance with law and convention. Dismissed. The governor

00:08:31.440 general can dismiss the government. That's how he chose to describe the ultimate power

00:08:36.640 of the office he was about to fill. Because the people of Canada are not sovereign. The king is

00:08:42.500 the sovereign. And I want you to remember that when you look at how Carney has been given the

00:08:47.680 public portfolio to try and reshape the empire's rules-based order. Now, if you're beginning to

00:08:55.040 get the idea of how the imperial system continues to operate, that it's really the real name for

00:09:01.820 what a lot of you call globalization, then you need to subscribe to Promethean Action's free

00:09:06.940 newsletter. We're going to show you how President Trump is taking on that imperial system and just

00:09:12.820 how much of a threat he is to its controllers. The link is in the description. Because you're

00:09:18.380 going to get a bigger picture of what this fight looks like when I tell you just who it was that

00:09:24.620 Mark Carney appointed as governor general. Her name is Louise Arbor, and her appointment tells

00:09:30.740 you everything about what rebuilding the rules-based order actually means in practice.

00:09:37.100 Arbor built her career as chief prosecutor of the United Nations International Criminal

00:09:42.660 tribunals for both Yugoslavia and Rwanda. These were the first such tribunals since Nuremberg.

00:09:49.800 And from that platform, she became one of the most prominent advocates for creating a permanent

00:09:55.760 international criminal court. She delivered the opening statement at the launch of the NGO

00:10:02.780 coalition for the ICC's global ratification, and she pushed governments to sign the statute.

00:10:10.480 She described the ICC as the necessary evolution from the tribunal she ran, turning them into a permanent standing institution.

00:10:19.580 So while she didn't work for the ICC, she built the political and legal movement that brought it into existence.

00:10:24.940 She did it from the inside, inside the same apparatus that George Soros was funding from the outside.

00:10:32.240 Here's what Soros' Open Society said in a document they published on March 19, 2018, about their relationship to the ICC.

00:10:42.100 The Justice Initiative works closely with the International Criminal Court, helping it function as efficiently and effectively as possible, assisting local human rights advocates in gathering and presenting information of use to the ICC, pursuing advocacy and public education with governments to secure support for the ICC, and contributing to building the capacity of the ICC staff.

00:11:10.160 So Arbor's career, the very same Arbor who's now the governor general of Canada, helped build the legitimacy for the court that George Soros funded.

00:11:21.020 And that apparatus then produced Jack Smith.

00:11:26.020 Before he was appointed special counsel to prosecute Donald Trump, Jack Smith spent two years inside the ICC's Office of the Prosecutor in The Hague, the institution that Arbor championed and Soros funded.

00:11:40.020 He then went to the Kosovo Specialist Chambers, and that was the direct successor to Arbor's

00:11:45.640 Yugoslavia Tribunal.

00:11:47.340 This is the same legal framework and the same mandate.

00:11:50.560 Then Jack Smith brought it home, and he was handed a domestic target, Donald Trump.

00:11:56.060 So Carney just made the architect of that entire project Canada's governor general,

00:12:04.340 the officer with the power to dismiss a government and command its military.

00:12:08.380 This is not a coincidence. That's not a personnel decision. That is a signal delivered just as Carney is trying to rally what is left of the empire against Donald Trump's world of sovereign nations.

00:12:21.500 all right so i think that uh that clip was a really good way to um open uh towards your

00:12:31.420 presentation david because we're going to be talking uh you're going to be going deep into

00:12:36.180 the coronation oath and how can it is so incremental that people under so so important

00:12:43.260 that people understand the role and who louise arbor is and when it's interesting that when mark

00:12:51.000 Carney was describing her and the Crown that he neglected to talk about the coronation oath.

00:12:57.800 And I think that was very intentional. Now, in this clip, they mentioned that Louise Arbour would be

00:13:07.360 the commander of our military. One of the statements that she made, which has been reported

00:13:14.820 on by Epoch Times is, listen, this is a direct quote. If you just recruit white boys who look, 0.64

00:13:22.640 who like guns, but don't like women or anybody who doesn't look like them, you'll perpetuate 0.72

00:13:29.660 that culture. And if we're going to look back at this and say, this is the individual that is going

00:13:37.240 to be inserted as the governor general, who has a duty by her sworn oath to uphold the king's

00:13:44.360 sworn oath, to govern Canada based on Christian principles. Another comment that she makes is that

00:13:51.400 once she is fully behind the mass migration, and she believes that any fears of foreigners coming

00:13:59.580 in and changing the social fabric of Canada, she dismisses that idea, and that Canada should

00:14:06.240 embrace a future in which our children, think about this, in which our children will develop

00:14:11.380 their own culture fully open to that of others. So again, I want to ask, how can Louise Arbour

00:14:19.560 possibly uphold her role as the Governor General? And so we're going to be commencing a campaign 0.95

00:14:29.880 targeting Mark Carney and requesting that he reassess Louise Arbour's position, her suitability

00:14:39.020 to be the governor general and as David digs into the coronation oath and helps to educate us you

00:14:46.740 will understand why and this should have all of us very concerned because the global agenda

00:14:53.060 is targeting Canada very specifically and they mean to wipe out our freedoms our democracy

00:15:01.280 and everything that our founding fathers had created and gifted us with we are in a war and

00:15:07.680 we are in a fight for our lives in canada so david please um let's comment on that and then

00:15:14.600 i look forward to your presentation hi good evening um thank you i think that um the president

00:15:22.400 or the video by um i forget her name by the woman in the states is absolutely correct and accurate

00:15:30.300 to a T. Louise Arbour is a staunch globalist, and everything she talks about is globalism,

00:15:38.540 everything she promotes is globalism. She's with a major global law firm based out of Montreal,

00:15:44.300 Quebec, and everything that she is promoting involves the destruction of our nation and our

00:15:53.320 culture and promoting internationalism globalism however you want to refer to it and 0.66

00:15:59.660 you you know as i point out i i will point out certainly you can't serve two masters

00:16:06.220 you cannot serve god and serve our country and at the same time serve international issues it's it's

00:16:13.320 not going to work so um it's something that i think her appointment is contradictory to the

00:16:22.680 office itself and it's like pointing an atheist to a position where you have to to support and

00:16:30.160 promote god how are you going to do it and you can't so i'm not sure how she's going to respond

00:16:36.220 but i did send a letter to her today and i specifically requested a meeting for us to

00:16:43.900 meet with her to discuss hopefully prior to her appointment to discuss um the duties

00:16:51.680 of her office. And so that hopefully we can make her aware that in the capacity of a governor

00:16:57.880 general, you cannot give royal assent to legislation that violates God's laws in the Bible, period.

00:17:04.720 And that went off to her this afternoon. And I hope we hear back within the next day or two on that.

00:17:11.900 Right. And thank you for that, David. And she has said very clearly, again, publicly, that she is

00:17:18.600 open to meeting with people with a different opinion than herself. And that's one of the

00:17:25.580 reasons why we are sending, why you've already sent it today, but that's one of the reasons why

00:17:30.660 we're pursuing this meeting with Louise Arbor, who will be sworn in on June 8th. And so Mary

00:17:38.800 Simons remains in this position. But this is also very important to address this issue in the light

00:17:45.960 that Bill C-9 right now is before the Senate. And it is, right now they're listening to witnesses.

00:17:55.060 I've had information from senators' offices who have sent the list to the Senate of all of the

00:18:02.640 people that they would like to be heard, and they're only accepting about a third of them.

00:18:07.540 And there's many, many Canadians and Christians who, and non-Christians who are concerned about

00:18:13.840 the step to criminalize scripture and have pastors who will be self-censoring, maybe out of fear

00:18:22.740 or being apprehensive about quoting scripture. And again, this is in violation of the coronation

00:18:29.360 oath. Susan Kokinda is the one from Promethean Action. I should have mentioned that earlier 0.96

00:18:35.360 when we played that clip. And I would really encourage people to follow her.

00:18:40.980 She and a team do some of the best investigative reporting on issues.

00:18:46.040 And she's in America, but they do a lot of reporting on Canada because it is very relevant to them what Carney is doing, his alignments with China and the EU, how that is affecting Canadian sovereignty and, of course, posing a greater and greater threat to the United States.

00:19:05.280 So all in all, they have reasons to be concerned.

00:19:08.540 We're very concerned about what's happening in Canada.

00:19:12.000 The Coronation Oath also addresses the mass migration, people integrating and assimilating into our culture and embracing our belief systems.

00:19:21.660 And that is fair not only to expect it, but to demand it.

00:19:26.140 And so, David, with that, I'd like to hand the floor over to you, and I look forward to your presentation.

00:19:32.440 Thank you.

00:19:34.180 We've talked about this on a few occasions in the past,

00:19:37.640 and without doubt, the oath is the most important document

00:19:41.560 and the longest-standing document in our Constitution,

00:19:44.680 and it's there for a reason.

00:19:46.920 And, you know, if you look back historically,

00:19:49.280 every culture and society that has turned its back on God

00:19:52.380 has suffered the consequences.

00:19:54.140 And when people first wanted a king,

00:19:58.560 they specifically were asking why they wanted a king,

00:20:04.060 because they were free already.

00:20:05.620 And as a result, they were given a king,

00:20:09.460 and they were told, as long as your king follows God's laws,

00:20:12.420 you will prosper, and if you don't, you will suffer.

00:20:15.080 Consequently, they, for the most part, have not followed God's laws.

00:20:21.620 A few have, and they prospered under those circumstances. 0.98

00:20:24.800 So I think it's important that people realize that we need to get our culture back from the immigration problem that we're having and the attempt to secularize Canada.

00:20:40.280 And in that context, Tanya, both of us have been the first that I'm aware of to actually demand that our elected officials and the governor general uphold the coronation oath in the capacities and in their duties.

00:20:53.960 nobody else has done this before and essentially a couple people have been aware of it but it's

00:21:01.180 something that nobody has ever actually focused on and tried to say listen we're going to uphold

00:21:06.500 you to these promises you made under oath and we've been doing that since December and we've

00:21:11.660 had a lot of notices sent in and this is the first time that this has actually happened

00:21:16.860 and I'm hoping that we're going to get results in the near future but it's important to remember

00:21:22.680 this is the first time that this has happened and we're going to have to educate a lot of people

00:21:27.600 who are not aware of what we are talking about so having said that um let's uh yeah get right

00:21:33.820 into the presentation it turns you if i can share my screen sure thing david okay and let's do uh

00:21:41.960 which one am I on here I believe it is that one okay so this is what I would do if I was talking

00:21:57.560 to my government officials my elected officials my MPs and so on this is essentially what I would

00:22:02.980 be starting to talk to them about and first thing I want to establish with them is that God's laws

00:22:09.760 are supreme in our law. And that's the first thing. Most of them are not aware of it. They're

00:22:15.780 raised under the charter and they believe in multiculturalism and they're not aware that God's

00:22:19.940 law is supreme to Christian God. And that's the first thing I want to establish. Then I want to

00:22:24.400 talk about their duties as kings and queens, the oath, and then their duties as elected officials

00:22:29.680 and what they're obligated to do. So let's talk about the first thing with God being supreme.

00:22:36.540 If you're going to talk to your elected officials, you need to convince them that God is supreme.

00:22:42.260 And once you've done that, because the next question is, you swore an oath of allegiance to the king.

00:22:47.460 How can you serve two masters if you don't know what they mean?

00:22:52.380 The most important part of everything is the beginning.

00:22:55.060 And this is why I want so much to focus on the supremacy of God and our law, because that is the beginning and has been there for 1,100 years.

00:23:03.700 And then, essentially, all our provinces adopted that from England into our law as well.

00:23:11.360 And this is why it's so important for them to understand that God is supreme in our law.

00:23:17.540 So the law of England, whether it's statutory or customary,

00:23:20.740 people think if it's a statute, it can override God's laws, and it cannot.

00:23:26.940 And what I'm showing you today, believe me, is just a sample, a very small sample,

00:23:32.120 of our documents that we have in our presentation

00:23:36.540 that me and Terenzio and Heather did a few years ago.

00:23:39.840 And it's just critical to understand

00:23:42.940 that all our laws have to conform with the laws of God.

00:23:47.840 And Broom said, quoting Blackstone,

00:23:50.740 that it's superior to whether others

00:23:52.740 and no human laws are of any effect or of any force

00:23:56.020 if are contrary to God's laws.

00:23:57.860 so and essentially that applies not only politically but in our courts as well

00:24:03.720 and lord denning pointed out years ago one of the best things that the english had was that

00:24:08.720 christians were appointed to judges today that's not the case and when you got somebody who believes

00:24:14.640 in islam or swearing in the quran they're not going to establish and and uphold god's laws 0.63

00:24:19.700 in the courtroom and they should not be sitting there and and that's a real problem because um 0.99

00:24:25.800 You sworn an oath to the king to uphold God's laws, and you cannot do that if you don't believe in God.

00:24:33.100 But it is a principle of our law that all proceedings in our courts are founded on the laws of God as well.

00:24:40.620 And that's all based on our common law.

00:24:43.820 And the reason I want to emphasize the common law is because it has been with us from the beginning.

00:24:49.220 It got passed down from generation to generation back before printing existed based on principles that existed in the Bible.

00:24:59.040 And those principles basically, what happened here?

00:25:04.680 Let me get rid of that.

00:25:05.480 Sorry.

00:25:06.240 Those principles all were biblically based.

00:25:10.860 And as a result, they were passed on from generation because people couldn't read.

00:25:15.940 And when the printing press came and the Bible came out, then they got passed down that way as well.

00:25:20.560 But by then, they were already part of our common law.

00:25:26.600 And the fundamental principle of our common law is that everything is permitted that is not forbidden by law.

00:25:33.920 So whereas European and every other form of law in the world says you can do what the government tells you to do,

00:25:40.200 I want our MPs to know that in Canada and our MLAs that it's the exact opposite.

00:25:45.940 we're entitled to do whatever is not expressly prohibited

00:25:49.820 and that does not mean that people in power can prohibit and do whatever

00:25:53.860 they want in the exercise of their powers I want our elected

00:25:57.840 officials to know that our freedom is

00:26:01.780 unbounded that is the starting point

00:26:04.100 and these principles again came from the

00:26:09.960 Bible do unto others as you would have done unto you and do not do unto others

00:26:13.760 and they're pretty straightforward and civil law is pretty simple keep all your contracts that

00:26:19.340 you're making and don't infringe on the rights and freedoms of others you will not find a better

00:26:24.240 system of law anywhere in the world so when people in alberta want to separate i ask them and i've

00:26:29.580 yet to get an answer what law are you going to replace it with that's better than our common

00:26:33.400 law that you have right now and i have never got an answer from anybody at all yet

00:26:39.020 one of the best things about common law is it doesn't recognize any other form of law so it

00:26:45.700 doesn't recognize what's happening in our country it doesn't recognize recognize secularism

00:26:51.100 communism socialism or any other form of law it's the common law is there and it is our law

00:26:58.400 and that's why i call it a republican monarchy because the law cannot be changed

00:27:03.800 if it is attempted to be changed

00:27:06.500 it's being done illegally

00:27:07.900 and unconstitutionally

00:27:09.700 by somebody with a lot of power

00:27:11.620 and if there's a conflict

00:27:15.760 the thing about the common law is very clear

00:27:18.560 if there's a conflict between statutes

00:27:20.660 and God's laws

00:27:21.780 God's laws prevail

00:27:23.160 I want our MPs to know

00:27:25.080 that when they swear an oath to uphold the king

00:27:27.820 they have a duty

00:27:29.480 when they vote

00:27:31.780 to vote against bills

00:27:33.440 that are contrary to the Bible.

00:27:35.800 And folks, this is the starting point for your power

00:27:39.040 of peaceful civil disobedience in Canada

00:27:42.000 to any legislation that does not comply

00:27:44.740 with God's laws in the Bible.

00:27:47.160 You can absolutely sit back and say,

00:27:49.800 I'm not complying with it.

00:27:52.540 Because it should never have been given royal assent

00:27:54.780 and it violates the Bible.

00:27:56.740 This is constitutionally permissible in Canada. 0.75

00:28:01.360 And again, as I pointed out earlier,

00:28:03.240 you can't serve two masters. So if you're going to serve in your capacity as an MP, an MLA,

00:28:08.700 or Governor General, and if you're going to serve us and serve God, you cannot serve anybody else.

00:28:16.600 And that means that you are required in the exercise of your duties to uphold God's laws

00:28:26.280 at all times. That common law followed the flag here in Canada, and we got it here now.

00:28:34.000 And that came also in the BNA Act, where it says right in the opening preamble that we will have a constitution similar in principle to that of England and the United Kingdom.

00:28:44.180 And as a result, all the great common law principles and everything we have in our common law got brought here and was incorporated in the BNA Act as well.

00:28:53.120 It's now called the Constitution Act of 1867.

00:28:56.120 and simply i think everybody knows what a constitution is but generally speaking defined

00:29:03.680 it outlines the relationships between whoever is in charge in the state and the individuals who

00:29:09.320 comprise the state and it sets out limitations to the powers of those people who are in charge

00:29:15.040 in the state in in the english law it also sets out who is going to be successors to the throne

00:29:22.140 who is going to establish their sovereign territory what it's going to be where the

00:29:26.920 flag is going to be planted and the law that's going to be applied which is our common law of 0.57

00:29:31.100 course i want these mps to know this most of these don't and mlas they don't know anything about this

00:29:38.880 anything if you ask them to define a constitution all they would tell you is the charter for

00:29:45.300 example. And our charter, our constitution, is more than that. It's significantly more. It's a

00:29:52.840 series of documents that go back basically to Magna Carta. So these MPs and MLAs need to know

00:30:01.760 that this isn't me just saying that. This is the Supreme Court of Canada saying that. It's a series

00:30:07.260 of documents. So they need to know it's much more than the charter. I want them to know that.

00:30:12.780 And I want them to know that it's not exhaustive. The Supreme Court of Canada also pointed out, and it says right in the Constitution Act of 82, Section 52, sub 2b, I think it is, that it uses the word includes. The Constitution of Canada includes, which means it's significantly broader than what is stated in the Constitution Act.

00:30:36.620 So I'm going to tell these MPs, and I've talked to them, some of them already, that the Constitution is much more exhaustive than that.

00:30:44.660 And we need, every time you talk to an MP, they need to know it's much more than the Charter.

00:30:50.160 And the Supreme Court of Canada has recognized that as well.

00:30:55.020 Here are some of the documents.

00:30:57.320 The B&A Act, Constitution Act of 1867, 82, the Statue of Westminster, and the Charter, of course.

00:31:03.680 and then we have all these documents the bible which was the beginning you have magna carta

00:31:10.340 and keep in mind some judges who are on power trips try to say magna carta is not part of our

00:31:17.140 constitution and however i want to point out the king signed it in 1215 1225 and 1297 and various

00:31:25.400 amendments it has the force of law insofar as it has not been repealed and many sections have not

00:31:31.860 For example, you cannot sell justice. That is an unwritten principle of our constitution,

00:31:37.440 and it goes back to Magna Carta as well. The ones here you see in yellow are what are known as the

00:31:43.540 rules of succession of the monarch. They set out how the monarch is getting appointed, who takes

00:31:49.360 their place when they die, and what their powers and duties are to us. And they're extremely,

00:31:55.040 extremely important. And here at the bottom, Pursuit of Happiness, for example, those are part

00:32:01.120 of our unwritten constitution and that's where the americans got it from was the english law

00:32:05.880 they didn't just sit around a boardroom table and decide they were going to put it in there

00:32:09.220 they took the best out of the english law so our constitution is the supreme law which includes

00:32:16.020 the coronation oath so if the oath isn't supreme law mr mp you need to know that you cannot vote

00:32:25.080 for anything that violates that constitution and that oath and you cannot have it both ways

00:32:30.280 if it violates the oath you cannot vote for it pure and simple every constitutional document

00:32:37.600 in our history recognizes the supremacy of god so you do not have the power to vote for anything

00:32:46.180 that violates that at any time any bill that comes before you you don't have that legal power

00:32:52.780 even if your your liberal mp or whip is telling you to do it you've got two choices you either

00:32:59.780 violate your oath, or you vote for it, or I should say, or you don't vote for it, and violate what

00:33:06.740 the Liberal Party is telling you. Which is more important? And I tell you it's the oath, because

00:33:11.840 all power flows from that oath. You wouldn't be sitting there, Mr. MP or MLA, if you didn't take

00:33:16.680 that oath. And one of the things I like the best is that the charter cannot be applied to derogate

00:33:23.400 or take away from any other constitutional provisions. So you cannot use the charter to say

00:33:29.060 it overrides, for example, the BNA Act or the Coronation Oath. This is phenomenal. You can't

00:33:38.020 come in and use the Notwithstanding Clause or anything, the Section 1 loophole, you can't use

00:33:43.420 that to come in and say that we are going to have statutes take force and effect over the Coronation

00:33:50.500 Oath. That cannot be done. And that's the benefit of the oath. There are no loopholes. And I love

00:33:57.920 that i just love it and i want to talk about the property and an obligation because the king swore

00:34:05.640 these oaths to us and he has to uphold them and it goes back to the principle that the king is not

00:34:11.160 supreme and there's the maxim and this goes back 1100 years even though it's been violated

00:34:17.000 for centuries millennia the law is still there that the king is not supreme

00:34:22.560 and the crown cannot disregard the law so in other words the king cannot come in

00:34:30.440 and say i'm going to pass a law that allows me to do something i can't do anyway and because i

00:34:35.740 passed it it's now law you cannot do that you cannot pass a law allowing you to break the law

00:34:43.120 very very simple and again this is from a superior court out of the province of quebec

00:34:49.840 but the principle is well known throughout our entire court system and this includes contracts

00:34:57.080 if the king enters a contract he has to comply with it and he has to obey it

00:35:04.160 and he's not allowed to break it the coronation oath is a contract

00:35:09.040 and they're not allowed to break it and most of the MPs and MLAs and government officials

00:35:17.880 fail to understand the protection versus subjection principle, that if you want to be subject to the

00:35:24.540 king and have the protection of the king, then you obey his laws, limited by the fact that the

00:35:30.500 king cannot just pass any law he wants, it's limited by your rights and freedoms that the

00:35:35.020 king has sworn to protect as well. So it's a contract, absolutely. And what they do if the

00:35:42.360 king does break it is they try to say that the king cannot do any wrong and as a result they try

00:35:48.260 and blame it on all the councillors ministers and mps and mlas and this is what i tell the mps and

00:35:53.620 mlas if you're going to be eating and advising the king or through the governor general in canada

00:36:00.480 to break their oath you are responsible you're the one that takes the legal and constitutional blame

00:36:07.640 and should be voted out of office for doing that.

00:36:10.720 Either you took an oath not knowing what it means,

00:36:14.100 or you took an oath knowing what it means,

00:36:15.940 and you're absolutely decided willingly to break that oath to the king

00:36:20.920 and to the people, of course.

00:36:22.840 But keep in mind, the oath of allegiance is to the king

00:36:25.880 and to uphold God's laws.

00:36:28.080 It's not a democratic principle.

00:36:30.620 And you do not want democracy in any event.

00:36:33.760 In a democracy, 50 plus 1% of the people

00:36:36.640 can make the most horrific of acts lawful simply because the majority of people voted on it right

00:36:43.500 but this is what they they try to do to get away from the king being wrong is they try to blame it

00:36:49.200 on the councillors and ministers meaning your mps and mlas and the privy council and if they're

00:36:54.680 breaking the law they should be removed from office and i want the whole the members of

00:37:02.320 parliament and the legislatures to know why royal assent is even necessary in the first place

00:37:08.420 from the king and it's to protect the people from abuses from parliament and as much as the king

00:37:16.120 was breaking the law for decades and centuries and they had the the thing that the king could

00:37:21.460 do no wrong and he would just go out and do whatever he wanted to this is to protect parliament

00:37:26.720 from doing the same thing that the coronation oath act and coronation oath was there to protect in

00:37:32.100 the first place, from kings and queens breaking the law and doing whatever they wanted. Now the

00:37:38.260 king is there to make sure parliament doesn't do what it wants and just breaks the law and takes

00:37:42.660 away our rights and freedoms as well. And that's the main purpose of royal assent, is to make sure

00:37:48.960 that parliamentary bills, legislative bills, comply with the coronation oath of the king,

00:37:55.080 and to a lesser degree the Charger as well.

00:37:59.720 Now the Governor General is empowered under Section 55

00:38:03.620 to withhold royal assent if it violates God's laws

00:38:09.080 and the wording is very clear in Section 55 of the former BNA Act,

00:38:14.420 now Constitution Act,

00:38:16.020 that he shall declare according to his discretion

00:38:18.800 but subject to the provisions of the Act and Her Majesty's instructions

00:38:22.780 that he assents thereto or he withholds it or he reserves the bill for signification of the

00:38:28.700 queen's pleasure there is nothing in here in the constitution that expressly states that a governor

00:38:35.280 general is required by law to give royal assent to every bill passed by parliament nothing it's

00:38:43.720 according to his discretion and that means if the governor general has a discretion he has to use

00:38:51.940 that discretion in accordance with the terms of his oath of allegiance to the king, and in turn,

00:38:58.140 the king's coronational promises to us. And here are instances, for example, where

00:39:06.840 a royal assent has been refused in Canada, and a lot of provincial lieutenant governors who also

00:39:14.120 submit their bills to the governor general for royal assent have been turned down over the years.

00:39:20.340 So it has happened on a regular basis

00:39:23.620 Throughout our history

00:39:25.280 That governors general have refused to give royal assent

00:39:28.620 As have lieutenant governors

00:39:30.080 Here are general instances where it's been turned down

00:39:34.740 For example, if the king has been deceived

00:39:37.200 If he's been misled by MPs and MLAs or the Privy Council

00:39:40.900 Then the royal assent is void from the beginning

00:39:43.860 If he's misinformed

00:39:46.060 If the language is so general that you cannot apply it

00:39:50.200 if it's couched in uncertain terms

00:39:54.560 so you cannot tell how to apply it with precision

00:39:57.080 and most importantly

00:39:58.720 if it would work a wrong or an injury or something contrary to law

00:40:02.920 if royal assent is given

00:40:05.500 to any bill in parliament or the legislature

00:40:10.380 that works a wrong or an injury or is contrary to law

00:40:14.200 the law is set out in the oath

00:40:16.320 the contract makes the law

00:40:17.920 And if they give royal assent, it's completely unconstitutional, and it's void from the beginning. This goes back to what I said earlier, peaceful civil disobedience. It's void from the beginning, you can refuse to comply with it at that time.

00:40:33.780 and

00:40:38.100 this is something that

00:40:41.180 our friend mentioned in the video a few minutes

00:40:43.720 ago on the governor general being

00:40:45.700 head of the military in

00:40:47.760 Canada the king is actually

00:40:49.100 if parliament tries to pass

00:40:51.780 laws that violate the oath

00:40:53.580 the monarch the king is required to advise

00:40:55.900 government to stop doing it

00:40:57.460 if the government refuses

00:40:59.240 then the king through the governor general

00:41:01.880 is required to dissolve parliament

00:41:03.680 So when Carney spoke earlier about the power of the king to dissolve parliament, this is one of the duties he has under these circumstances, if parliament is breaking their oaths.

00:41:15.240 And if the parliament or the MP or PM refuses, the monarch can call in the armed forces because they are sworn in allegiance to the king.

00:41:24.560 They are not sworn to parliament or the governor general or the minister of health or the attorney general or anybody else.

00:41:31.280 they are sworn to the king and if necessary the king can bring in the armed forces

00:41:38.320 to get to eliminate parliament if they're if they've gone rancid and gone rogue and they

00:41:44.940 can bring in the armed forces everything is a pyramid that focuses with god on top

00:41:50.020 and the king underneath and the house of commons and everybody else below it

00:41:53.720 so let's just talk a few minutes on the oath that i would tell these mps and mlas about

00:42:00.380 the first thing I want them to know is how far back

00:42:02.640 it goes. 973 AD is

00:42:04.560 the first recorded one, all 0.64

00:42:06.440 referencing, again, the supremacy

00:42:08.460 of God right from the very

00:42:10.400 beginning for almost 1,100

00:42:12.360 years now. So I'm going to bring

00:42:14.440 that to their attention.

00:42:17.120 They need to know this is

00:42:18.480 not something that just came about in the Middle

00:42:20.400 Ages. This has always been the 0.84

00:42:22.380 case.

00:42:25.080 Now in the O'Donohue

00:42:26.400 case in 2003,

00:42:28.260 the Supreme or the Court of Appeal upheld the Supreme Court of Ontario's case and they pointed

00:42:35.600 out that the Act of Settlement and the impugned portions of it are part of the rules of succession

00:42:41.100 governing succession to the crown. They confirmed that only the Protestant heirs

00:42:46.200 can hold the crown from that point forward and these documents the Act of Settlement the Bill

00:42:52.500 of Rights Coronation Oath were all recognized as part of our constitution by the Ontario Court of

00:42:57.520 appeal. Canada was established, spelling error here, but as a constitutional monarchy. And this

00:43:06.100 aspect is recognized and maintained in the Constitution Act. And Carney was correct. We are

00:43:11.220 a constitutional monarchy with the king at the top, and it permeates our entire constitutional,

00:43:18.320 legal lawful structure in Canada and the original oath from 1688 is clear that whereas by the law

00:43:28.720 and ancient usage of the realm this was already the case and this act is just recognizing that

00:43:33.520 which already has been the case for decades and centuries that they had to take an oath

00:43:39.140 at their coronations and to protect people in their spiritual and civil rights and properties

00:43:46.740 folks this is where your property rights are recognized they don't come from the constitution

00:43:52.260 property rights came from god in the ten commandments when god said thou shall not steal

00:43:57.100 that's where it was first recognized that god said you have property rights all this does

00:44:02.840 is recognize that you have those property rights and the best thing that ever happened is that

00:44:08.040 they were never ever put into the charter ever that was the best thing that ever happened

00:44:13.240 so they have to protect us in our property rights and that's part of what it says here

00:44:19.180 according to the statutes in parliament agreed and the laws and customs of same what are our

00:44:23.420 laws and customs it's a common law goes back to the bible and the protection of property and the

00:44:30.040 whole purpose as frederick bastius said in the book the law which i urge everybody to get a copy

00:44:35.040 of it's free online it was very clear the whole purpose of people coming into society was to

00:44:40.460 protect us in our property rights because it's easier to protect with a group of people to

00:44:46.160 protect your property than just one individual right will you cause in your power cause law

00:44:53.040 and justice and mercy to be executed so you don't go to jail for 20 years on a parking ticket and

00:44:58.560 so kings and parliament do not abuse their powers and basically jail people for nothing

00:45:03.760 and of course the most important part will you to the utmost of your power maintain the laws of

00:45:10.040 god the true profession of the gospel and the protestant reform religion established by law

00:45:14.620 again established by law it already exists and all this act and and the wording of it here

00:45:22.600 is to solidify in a statute that which already exists and the king had to give royal assent to

00:45:29.020 this as well every king and queen has had to take it queen elizabeth took it in 53 and king chucky

00:45:35.340 He took it three years ago.

00:45:38.040 He took it as well.

00:45:39.600 And the thing about King Charles is he tried to get it changed,

00:45:43.440 and he couldn't do it.

00:45:44.220 The archbishop said, no, we cannot do it.

00:45:46.340 And I'll come back to something like that in a minute.

00:45:48.820 But this is part of our Constitution.

00:45:50.360 It is the limitation of all powers.

00:45:52.580 And when Queen Elizabeth signed the charter, she did it because her power came from the coronation oath.

00:46:06.100 That's where she got the power from.

00:46:08.680 She was the one that signed it, but it didn't just come out of nowhere.

00:46:12.360 And there were limitations.

00:46:13.320 So in the coronation oath to uphold the Protestant Christian religion, she could not sign the Canada Act in 82 and the Charter if it recognized any other god other than the Christian god.

00:46:24.840 She didn't have that power to do that.

00:46:28.680 now the oath is administered to all kings and queens who shall succeed in that power and in

00:46:38.220 the presence of all persons that shall be attending assisting or otherwise present at

00:46:42.360 their coronations any law statute or usage notwithstanding in other words this law cannot

00:46:49.160 be changed you cannot pass a statute to change it it's there you have to take it it's the law

00:46:55.700 and if you don't want to take it

00:46:57.640 then you decline to be king or queen

00:47:00.020 but this is what O'Donohue

00:47:01.840 the Ontario Court of Appeal recognized

00:47:04.020 in the Coronation Oath Act

00:47:05.900 that you cannot

00:47:08.040 pass a statute to take away

00:47:10.120 the king's obligation

00:47:11.820 to protect Christianity 1.00

00:47:13.520 and our law, you cannot do it 1.00

00:47:16.100 it's there

00:47:17.700 it's our law

00:47:18.600 I think

00:47:23.940 this is pretty straightforward

00:47:25.000 It's just a recognition that the king recognizes our rights, and he's not going to go in and basically take them away.

00:47:35.000 And the whole ceremony, every part of it is religious-based, Christian-based, whether it's the orb, in this case, the king, the ring, the sword that's given to protect the defenseless.

00:47:52.180 every part of it including the anointing with the oils that goes back to king solomon that's where

00:47:59.240 the history comes from from anointing the king and that goes back to king solomon folks all of

00:48:05.960 this whole ceremony is christian based and as i pointed out earlier in halsbury's laws of england

00:48:11.740 confirms it is a contract if they break the contract you can refuse to comply with those

00:48:17.960 terms that the king has broken peacefully of course and simply refuse to comply that's the

00:48:25.460 benefit of having a contract and finally i just want to tell all our members of parliament and

00:48:34.180 deal with their powers and what they have to do and the first thing they need to know of course

00:48:39.180 is that um parliament it's actually called her you know in this case my my slides were back when

00:48:46.240 queen elizabeth was here but it's now his majesty the king and right at parliament

00:48:50.340 and it's a body politic with the like like similar to a corporation you have the king

00:48:55.440 and his head and peers and commons as members call them directors somebody's going to be the

00:49:01.500 president and that's the king and that's the way it's looked at right now with respect to parliament

00:49:06.740 it is not supreme and supreme when they talk about parliamentary supremacy supremacy is relevant

00:49:15.360 is relative they're not owners they don't own everything we do the people do and when we talk

00:49:26.580 about the parliament being supreme as they do in england for example it just means it's supreme

00:49:31.320 to all the lower powers underneath it that's all it does not mean the king is supreme in the sense

00:49:37.900 of being absolute he is not if the king was absolute there would be no need for a constitution

00:49:43.960 or a coronation oath in the first place.

00:49:46.180 You would have an absolute monarchy

00:49:47.540 who could do whatever they wanted.

00:49:49.840 The fact that there is a constitution

00:49:51.880 means that the king is limited to what he can do.

00:49:58.240 Now, Dicey pointed out the same thing.

00:50:01.260 A former law professor and judge out of England,

00:50:05.300 I believe, if I remember correctly,

00:50:07.020 that basically he points out that everybody knows

00:50:10.160 parliament is not supreme.

00:50:11.980 So as a member of parliament

00:50:13.300 and a member of the legislature in Canada, you are not supreme. Let's establish that.

00:50:17.860 We know God is supreme in our law. The coronation oath is there protecting God.

00:50:23.140 And as a member of parliament, you are not supreme and you cannot vote for bills that

00:50:27.720 violate our fundamental law because you don't have the power. Parliament is not supreme.

00:50:33.300 The members of parliament are not supreme.

00:50:35.180 and the powers as an mp specifically come from section 91 of the bna act it's there for you to

00:50:45.800 advise the queen or in this case the king and that's it and that includes senators all your

00:50:53.280 power is there to aid and advise to recommend bills to be passed your power is not absolute

00:51:00.760 And if there's conflict between aiding and advising the king and breaking the Liberal Party whip or prime minister, at some point your conscience will have to govern.

00:51:17.000 Who do you comply with?

00:51:19.180 Ernie or your oath to the king?

00:51:25.740 Even the Privy Council.

00:51:28.500 They're the same.

00:51:30.760 their dare is to aid and advise the government of Canada

00:51:35.240 and they are recognized in their oath

00:51:39.320 as a servant and they're a servant of the king

00:51:43.080 not parliament

00:51:44.020 that word servant and you'll notice it does not say

00:51:51.100 a servant of people it says a servant of in this case the queen

00:51:54.840 or king charles today

00:51:57.000 and he will do as faithful and true servant ought to do if you were an employee are you

00:52:05.440 going to tell your boss to do something that's illegal i don't think so you won't be working

00:52:10.760 there very long all of these civil servants ministers cabinet ministers mps they cannot

00:52:17.880 advise the king to break his oath and that was exactly what was asked to lord mackey

00:52:24.640 years ago and he responded and he said the idea of the coronation oath was that it would never

00:52:31.440 be in conflict with the advice and therefore it is the responsibility of ministers of the crown

00:52:36.680 to see that whatever advice they give is consistent with the proper construction of 1.00

00:52:42.340 the coronation oath when i'm talking to a member of parliament an mla who has the power 0.88

00:52:48.280 to give royal assent or i'm sorry to vote for bills they need to know the duty lies on them

00:52:55.880 not to advise the king to break their oath that's their duty and that duty overrides party politics

00:53:04.280 or any partisan influences that they may get or have and i i really want to emphasize this

00:53:11.480 If you're talking to MPs, MLAs, government officials, everything is secondary.

00:53:19.240 Everything is secondary to their oath of office and oath of allegiance, especially the oath of allegiance to the king.

00:53:26.560 And they cannot advise the king to break the oath any more than they can tell the king to break the charter, for example.

00:53:34.520 And that oath is required by our Constitution in Section 127 of then the BNA Act.

00:53:41.480 and it says every member of the Senate and House of Commons has to take the oath set out in the

00:53:47.260 schedule of the Constitution of the B&A Act at that time. They have to take it. It's part of

00:53:53.200 the Constitution, and you cannot constitutionally sit unless you take this oath. I want all MPs to

00:53:59.200 know, do you know what this oath means when you take it? Tell me. I'm talking to you as my MP.

00:54:04.980 You tell me what that oath means that you took and what duties it imparts upon you. I want you

00:54:10.140 to tell me and if you can't then you swore out a false oath and you shouldn't be sitting

00:54:14.780 and that's where the oath is it's a lot shorter than what it used to be back in the 30s

00:54:22.460 but the emphasis is the same fidelity loyalty to the king to expose treasonous traitors

00:54:31.020 corruptions to the king so he's aware of them i submit to you all the immigrants coming into

00:54:37.760 canada right now who do not believe in god from third world countries that are being allowed in 1.00

00:54:42.920 our country somebody somebody in government has an oath and a duty to tell the king what you're

00:54:49.480 doing is wrong and nobody's doing that right now and again um former premier mike harris

00:54:57.980 pointed out that the oath to the queen is fundamental and again it's the king today

00:55:04.060 to the administration of law in this country in Canada justice is done in the name of the king

00:55:11.640 it's not done in the name of parliament or the senate or the prime minister we need to have

00:55:19.640 all our MPs and MLAs recognize your orders do not come from the prime minister or the leader

00:55:25.000 of the party they come from your oath and your oath to the king and that requires basically an

00:55:33.220 oath of fidelity to the king and that oath overrides your signature to the conservative

00:55:39.680 or the liberals or the NDP or any other political party even as an independent

00:55:44.700 your oath governs I want all government officials MPs MLAs to know nothing is basically superior

00:55:54.140 to your oath to the king that is what governs and of course those whose function is to enforce

00:56:01.300 law have to observe the law themselves so all the members of the executive all of you and all the

00:56:08.680 cabinet ministers are required to make sure you do not tell the king to break the law

00:56:14.760 right now this is our hierarchy god's laws are supreme you have the rule of law which governs

00:56:22.960 all officials and says that you cannot break the law which is god's law then you have our

00:56:27.560 constitutional law which protects all this and then you have statute law at the bottom

00:56:31.120 what governments are trying to tell you is that statute law overrides God's laws

00:56:35.480 and I tell you it does not they're lying

00:56:38.160 they're lying to us and I've got about

00:56:42.960 10 more slides and I'll be done King George

00:56:47.140 the third was asked and commented about this

00:56:51.540 and somebody who wanted him to break his oath and he said very clearly

00:56:55.420 Where is the power on earth to absolve me from the observance of every sentence of that oath, particularly the one requiring me to maintain the Protestant Reformed religion?

00:57:08.560 Emphasis on the word particularly there. He's emphasizing that is the most important.

00:57:14.200 Was not my family seated on the throne for that express purpose, and shall I be the first to suffer it to be undermined, perhaps overturned?

00:57:21.960 No, I had rather beg my bread from door to door throughout Europe than consent to any such measure.

00:57:27.280 I can give up my crown and retire from power.

00:57:30.360 I can quit my palace and live in a cottage.

00:57:32.880 I can lay my head on a block and lose my life, but I cannot break my oath.

00:57:36.700 If I violate that oath, I'm no longer legal sovereign in this country, and that applies to every king and queen today, including King Charles.

00:57:44.100 If he breaks his oath, if the governor general breaks their oath, they are not legal sovereign in this country, Canada.

00:57:49.960 if they pass laws that violate the laws of God

00:57:54.840 they are not the legal sovereign

00:57:56.400 and you have every power and law

00:58:00.640 to refuse to comply with them

00:58:03.740 I like this quote

00:58:06.200 it's a really stark admission from a king

00:58:09.120 from a former king

00:58:10.020 that the oath is binding and he cannot break it

00:58:13.600 and in 1953

00:58:16.420 I just want to point out that

00:58:18.840 um they changed the oath they tried to change it illegally and it was very interesting um because

00:58:27.620 the coronation oath can only be changed from all with consent of all provinces

00:58:32.060 all commonwealth countries the parliament of england and the king everyone has to agree

00:58:39.000 if changes are going to be made that never happened so unangay who is parliamentary

00:58:45.260 Council in England, very high up, pointed out that the coronation oath was modified without

00:58:50.760 statutory authority. The present Queen swore a slightly different version, although it still

00:58:56.500 included a promise to maintain the Protestant religion. So that part is there, and they have

00:59:01.900 not got out of it. And in 1937, a whole bunch of people recognized that the changing was done

00:59:10.320 illegally in the this was the first one after the statute of westminster they changed the oath

00:59:16.640 illegally and i say that because i stand by the original oath in the coronation oath act

00:59:21.980 not by the one that was passed illegally and even in the london times they pointed out it was

00:59:28.700 illegal and the archbishop um well we'll get that second but they um they assume they had the right

00:59:35.640 to break the law and the whole purpose of the oath is to restrain royal prerogative and of course

00:59:41.320 what parliament is doing. So by altering the oath they were claiming by their own motion

00:59:47.200 to vary the terms on which parliament permitted them to hold office. The result in 1937 was that

00:59:54.240 Archbishop Lange at the coronation had to depart from the law at the very moment he's most solemnly

01:00:00.460 of jurying the king to obey it, for only parliament can give lawful authority to a new oath.

01:00:06.300 And yet, by giving authority to a new oath with parliament, it can only be done if the king signs

01:00:11.560 off on it as well. All of them have to be involved. And that did not happen in 1937. It was rushed

01:00:20.220 through by cabinet only. These were the original words on top, and these are the words on the

01:00:27.120 bottom and they added Canada Australia New Zealand they added these countries and said

01:00:32.280 according to their laws and customs but as king the king can still not give royal assent in Canada

01:00:39.600 to any law that violates his oath which is the supremacy of God so that still applies in Canada

01:00:46.060 in any event as it does with all the other countries and I point this out that you cannot

01:00:51.680 cross your fingers when you're taking the oath you cannot cross it and say I'm taking the oath

01:00:56.540 and then tomorrow go and break it

01:00:58.100 it applies in its entirety

01:01:00.940 as the former king said

01:01:02.620 just a few seconds ago

01:01:03.940 this is the

01:01:06.780 original wording as I pointed out earlier

01:01:08.940 to maintain the laws of God

01:01:10.720 this is what they implied

01:01:12.320 in 1937

01:01:14.960 and they just added

01:01:16.740 about maintain

01:01:18.900 the laws of God and they 0.66

01:01:20.760 changed it to United Kingdom

01:01:21.940 and the process of reform

01:01:24.780 religion is still there

01:01:25.780 and to maintain the church.

01:01:29.420 This was not altered in any way, in any meaning

01:01:32.160 in any way. The laws of God were still there

01:01:35.300 to be preserved by the king. So I'm grateful

01:01:37.960 that they didn't try to get that through.

01:01:42.120 And as stated

01:01:44.400 by Prime Minister Saint Laurent to the House

01:01:47.040 during debate on the bill, Her Majesty is now

01:01:50.260 Queen of Canada, but she is Queen because she is Queen of the United

01:01:53.260 Kingdom. It is not a separate office. It is the sovereign who is recognized as sovereign of the

01:01:59.280 United Kingdom who is our sovereign. And this is, by the way, upheld by the Court of Appeal in the

01:02:05.220 O'Donoghue case. And the rules of succession and the requirement that they be the same as Great

01:02:11.440 Britain are necessary to the proper functioning of our constitutional monarchy, and therefore the

01:02:17.160 rules are not subject to charter scrutiny. The charter does not apply to the coronation of

01:02:21.900 the Ontario Court of Appeal already just recognized that. And as former Prime Minister admitted

01:02:27.980 that there is only one king, and that's a king for the entire Commonwealth.

01:02:34.460 And finally, I just point out that one cannot accept the monarch, but reject the legitimacy

01:02:39.780 or legality by which the monarch is selected. We in Canada have accepted the king, you accept it

01:02:45.860 in its entirety, and that's the preservation of the supremacy of God in our law. So in conclusion,

01:02:51.900 That's what I'm going to tell MPs and MLAs, and I urge you to do that as well.

01:02:56.920 Establish, number one, the supremacy of God in our law, so they know where you're coming from,

01:03:01.820 and don't just say, well, that's not true, Canada passed the Charter, and so on.

01:03:07.600 Then you rebut that by pointing out the oath, how the oath works, and how the Charter cannot override the oath,

01:03:14.480 and that's upheld by the Supreme Court of Canada, that the Charter is not over and above the law.

01:03:20.520 So when it says religion in the charter, that is underneath the supremacy of God in our law.

01:03:28.520 And then finally, as a member of parliament or an MLA, these are your duties pursuant to the oath

01:03:34.520 that you took in order to hold that office. Without taking that oath, you could not hold

01:03:39.600 that office. And I'm holding you to those duties right now. When bills come up, you better not vote

01:03:46.780 on them if they violate God's laws or we will do everything in our power to get you removed from

01:03:52.760 office any way we can including the next election and I mean legally of course so maybe there might

01:03:59.540 be an injunction or court action to get against them I'm not sure yet but ultimately we will try

01:04:05.420 everything in our power to make sure that you don't vote on these bills again that's what I

01:04:09.800 want to get across to all the MPs and MLAs and candidates to what their duties are where they

01:04:13.920 come from and it's critical that they know that you know and that you're upholding your rights

01:04:20.420 because your rights come from the oath and come from that contract to the king your rights do not

01:04:27.720 come from parliament and you're upholding them i'm grateful uh as tanya mentioned earlier that

01:04:34.100 yeah we met in uh 2020 on um on the legislative grounds and when i first asked her asked her if

01:04:41.240 She was aware of the oath she didn't know.

01:04:43.200 And I'm just so grateful she had an open mind to say, yes, David, let's get together and meet.

01:04:48.420 That agreement, that willingness to meet has allowed us to come this far and be able to get this information out to so many people who are not aware of it in Canada.

01:04:58.580 And it's going to get better and better as more and more people become aware of it.

01:05:02.540 And as more MPs and MLAs realize this is the only basis that you hold power and sit in that office are these oaths.

01:05:12.040 Other than that, I guess, Tanya, if there's any questions or if anything else, anything you wanted to say, I'm grateful for just allowing me on the show again to speak because we need to get it out there that this overrides the Charter and overrides all other laws in Canada.

01:05:31.180 Absolutely, David.

01:05:32.140 That was such an informative and educational presentation.

01:05:35.600 And we thank you for that.

01:05:36.520 It was very simple, straightforward, factual, to the point.

01:05:39.760 and we are going to be asking everyone possible like not just the viewers we're asking you to

01:05:46.700 share this video with friends family co-workers get a team together join action for canada start

01:05:53.980 a chapter in your community because we're expecting that you're going to take this

01:05:58.020 information and start lobbying your local government it is critical as i say knowledge

01:06:04.480 is power. When you have it, you've got to share it. You've got a responsibility. I don't want to

01:06:10.040 hear anybody complaining about the direction that Canada is going if you are not willing to do your

01:06:15.820 part. It can't just be David and I that are front lining this campaign in Canada for the past six

01:06:23.300 years. David is right. As soon as he told me about this, I was like, David, tell me more. And he has

01:06:29.200 all of the knowledge and 30 years experience in educating himself on all of these and investigating

01:06:35.940 these facts and truths of our binding documents that establish this nation. And the Lord has

01:06:42.220 blessed me with a national organization to then take that information and spread it Canada-wide.

01:06:49.020 And as all of you know, I can repeat it time and time again, that there are some communities where

01:06:55.820 our chapter leaders maybe only have two or three people that are active, but we're having great

01:07:00.760 wins. So, if you consider the state that Canada is in, if you consider who it is that Carney has

01:07:10.340 handpicked to be the next Governor-General after hearing David's presentation and now understanding

01:07:19.080 what a threat that Louise Arbour poses to Canada and to our future. 0.52

01:07:26.240 And that she is definitely, she needs to be reassessed 1.00

01:07:29.900 for her suitability to be the governor general 0.52

01:07:32.760 based on her history, her career, her ties to the United Nations.

01:07:39.560 And, you know, David, I think I'll just take just a short opportunity

01:07:44.080 to remind people again as to who she is and what she's been involved in.

01:07:49.080 So she is a former Supreme Court of Canada justice, Ontario Court of Appeal judge, and UN High Commissioner for Human Rights.

01:07:56.960 She was the UN Chief Prosecutor for the International Criminal Tribunals, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, UN Special Representative for International Migration,

01:08:08.060 deeply embedded in UN global governments, supported Suave vs. Canada, granted voting rights to federal prisoners,

01:08:15.020 blocked a BC school from removing books featuring same-sex parented families on religious grounds.

01:08:21.440 In 2022, Arbour attacked the Canadian Armed Forces, toxic culture of misogyny and glorification of masculinity. 1.00

01:08:30.640 This is the woman that's going to oversee our military, and that when our Parliament is in violation of their oath of office, 0.87

01:08:40.580 do we really believe or expect that Louise Arbour will do her job based on the oath that she sworn 0.75

01:08:47.560 to uphold it and shut down that parliament? Would she bring in the military that she is

01:08:54.640 criticizing? When we hear her anti-white male military comments, I'm going to quote it again,

01:09:01.780 if you just recruit white boys who like guns but don't like women or anybody else who doesn't look 0.52

01:09:07.000 like them, you'll perpetuate that culture. And then finally, I am going to read once again 0.77

01:09:12.840 her comments about and dismissing the concerns, the reasonable concerns that we have over 1.00

01:09:21.080 foreigners coming into Canada that will never and have no desire to align with our culture 1.00

01:09:27.660 and our way of life, but are transplanting their failed foreign systems of governance from their 1.00

01:09:33.120 third world countries into Canada and it's dragging us down and she's telling us that won't

01:09:38.580 change the social fabric and then she wants us to embrace a future in which our children will 0.98

01:09:44.280 develop their own culture fully open to that of others rather than stagnate in isolation

01:09:50.380 this is not a person who can take this sacred place as governor general

01:09:59.860 And David, I do have a question for you. When I take a look at this, there was that bishop,

01:10:08.020 and Bishop Dewar, he was a high-ranking bishop in England, and he did a video that went viral

01:10:17.460 because he read a letter that he had written to King Charles for being in violation of the oath.

01:10:23.140 So, for those officials in Canada that say the oath is merely ceremonial, here you have a bishop in the UK who is calling out the king for being in violation of the coronation oath, which means to me that is further to support what we're saying, that this is a living, breathing, binding document.

01:10:43.380 so how do we get rid of king charles i'd like to get in touch with that bishop actually and say

01:10:49.560 let's work together in this and and overturn uh this treason uh you know that's happening right

01:10:55.820 now yeah i agree and somebody had a question about um in the chat about a living tree doctor

01:11:02.700 doctrine as well and that all that issue is under the the the laws of god so if something happens

01:11:10.700 today that is a new issue that didn't exist it gets pigeonholed into the laws of god

01:11:15.580 and if it doesn't and the laws of god prohibit it then it's not to be done pure and simple

01:11:20.280 and that um that quote that you that you just commented about from

01:11:27.920 priest i can't remember i always get them mixed up he um he was very correct and i wish more of

01:11:35.960 them would contact our governments and the attorney governor general and put that same

01:11:41.860 comment to them that we are holding you to these oaths and you have a duty to uphold god's laws and

01:11:48.300 we want you to know that we know about it and we're holding you to it because that is so correct

01:11:54.640 about what he was saying to them how do you get rid of the governor general um you know what i

01:12:01.760 don't have an answer for that at the present other than holding them accountable and refusing

01:12:05.660 to comply with um any legislation that is given royal assent that violates god's laws um

01:12:13.040 you know it uh it takes courage absolutely but if they have broken the law our you know all change

01:12:21.280 takes place by somebody saying no i'm not going to comply it doesn't take place by somebody saying

01:12:26.800 what you did was wrong but i'm going to do it any i'm going to comply with in any way

01:12:32.080 So we need to know that, and Louise Arbour needs to know,

01:12:35.240 if she's going to give royal assent to bills that eventually become law

01:12:39.800 and violate God's laws, that people, lots of them, will not comply with it.

01:12:45.840 Well, and David, yeah, you've answered that question in a roundabout way,

01:12:49.180 which was peaceful civil disobedience.

01:12:51.520 We saw that last Saturday with Tommy Robinson's huge, massive rally in the United States.

01:12:56.640 People came out peacefully in civil disobedience against Darmer

01:13:00.800 in the government. And that is paying off. And they just had a massive win in the UK where they

01:13:07.340 had a local election and they had 1,400 seats that they took back as far as councillors are concerned.

01:13:15.340 And that is destroying the Starmer cabal in the UK. It's taking them right down. And so we can see

01:13:25.220 that he's on his last legs, although he doesn't want to admit it. He looks quite foolish as he 0.99

01:13:30.180 stands up there and thinks that he can still turn this around. So civil disobedience is very, 0.99

01:13:34.660 very important. What Action for Canada is doing along with you in the letter writing campaigns

01:13:40.340 that we commenced in December against Bill C-9, because it is so vitally important to what we're

01:13:48.020 talking about here, because Bill C-9, I think, is one of the worst of the worst bills that they've

01:13:53.160 passed in the last 11 years to criminalize scripture. This is an attack against Christianity.

01:14:00.760 These are very evil, anti-God people that are behind this. And I even believe, you and I were 0.91

01:14:07.120 discussing this, that this change of governor, they said, well, you know, she kind of has a

01:14:11.980 five-year term, Mary Simon, and her five-year term was coming up. Although I don't know that

01:14:17.880 it actually specifies clearly that it's only five term. I believe a governor general, if the

01:14:22.820 government decides can even be in that position longer. But isn't it interesting that we've been

01:14:28.980 lobbying government for the last five months, specifically on the coronation oath and their

01:14:34.920 duties and their limitations of power and directing it at Mary Simons, that she cannot

01:14:41.140 give Bill C-9 royal assent because it's in direct violation of biblical principles and the Bible

01:14:48.420 itself. So we encourage people to come on to Action for Canada's website, even reading the

01:14:55.820 letter that David wrote to the Governor General. He then wrote one to the MPs and then one directed

01:15:02.080 at the Senators to explain to them all of their limitations in powers and their duties. And so I

01:15:09.580 encourage you that you go to Action for Canada's webpage. You can look up the Bill C-9. You'll see

01:15:16.940 those actions. I just want to see, I just want to bring up the Coronation Oath page that we've

01:15:22.860 created. If you go to our menu, go under Current Issues. This is if you want to learn more about

01:15:28.000 this and get a crash course. We've got great information there because David, as I said,

01:15:32.240 has been coming on for years. You can see third down, it says Coronation Oath. Super easy for you

01:15:37.920 to access. And then if you just scroll down the page, there's a few videos talking about property

01:15:46.380 rights at the top and the coronation oath in the constitution we've provided the resources the

01:15:52.340 letters i was talking about to the governor general and the member of parliament and senators you can

01:15:57.520 see all of those at the top of the page for easy access and then down at the bottom are further

01:16:04.500 empower hours that we've had with david talking about all of these important issues we would

01:16:11.980 encouraged you to watch one at a time, watch one a week, and get educated so that when you go in

01:16:19.000 and you sit down and talk to your MLA, MPP, Member of Parliament, you know, maybe it's your mayor.

01:16:25.760 Who knows who it is you're going to have a conversation with, but if you can just continue

01:16:29.720 to put this information in, what goes in is what comes out. And you need to be convincing,

01:16:35.060 which means you need to be educated. And so, as David also said at the beginning of his

01:16:41.100 presentation, that nobody has ever addressed the Governor-General in passing and giving royal

01:16:50.360 assent to bills that were in violation of the oath and bringing awareness to the coronation oath.

01:16:57.500 And we believe, because we've been at this six years, we can see that momentum is building.

01:17:03.900 David and I have been speaking at events. I mentioned it in front of 700 people

01:17:09.840 at the event in Red Deer the other day, and I said, hey, you know, are you aware that this is

01:17:15.240 the coronation oath, and that this is key to our freedoms and having victory in this country?

01:17:20.780 And you could almost hear a gasp from 700 people to hear the coronation oath. I've never heard

01:17:26.300 about that, because they're not talking about it ever in social studies or teaching our kids about

01:17:32.640 this in school, because they're threatened about it. And then finally, I believe that goes back to

01:17:38.260 why Carney has handpicked Louise Arbour. Because we believe that in the five months of educating

01:17:46.860 and lambasting Mary Simon's office and Carney with the letters telling them about the coronation

01:17:54.220 oath, we believe this is the threat. We believe that this is legitimate to turning this around.

01:18:00.720 But we need all hands on deck. Join Action for Canada. Sign up with David Lindsay to get his

01:18:06.520 letters but david and i as we've worked together the majority of the actions are all on action for

01:18:12.500 canada's page so we always have a balance in sharing the responsibility here as david and i

01:18:19.220 have partnered up with many years to bring awareness to this critical critically important

01:18:25.320 document so david is there any thing that you would have uh to say in closing regarding this

01:18:32.160 um the only thing i just want to mention is that one thing i've talked about in the past

01:18:37.760 is that um there's only four ways to get justice you have war you have civil disobedience you've

01:18:43.580 got justice the legal system and you have political right now we're focused on the

01:18:48.020 political system and the legal system is coming up when some of these bills get passed

01:18:51.880 and peaceful civil disobedience is always there to simply say no we're not going to comply

01:18:58.000 war is not an option

01:18:59.580 they got the guns and then invariably

01:19:02.040 the people who are running the war

01:19:04.400 they get into power and they get corrupted

01:19:06.120 and the whole cycle starts over again

01:19:08.260 so

01:19:09.180 we need to focus on all three at once

01:19:12.380 if we're going to get success

01:19:13.760 and make sure they know that we're not going to comply

01:19:16.380 if they break the law

01:19:17.700 and we will use every political legal method

01:19:20.280 possible to do that

01:19:22.780 and I think your point is correct

01:19:24.680 it's interesting that suddenly

01:19:26.300 before these bills are going to get royal assent they're bringing in a globalist

01:19:31.960 and who knows maybe mary simon got this information and said whoa i can't do this

01:19:36.960 and they decided to get rid of her pretty quick um in politics nothing happens by chance right

01:19:44.000 well i i believe that's true uh because if the anybody can push anything we know that the

01:19:49.960 Liberals are going to do that and overstep. You know, I really wanted to wrap the show up within

01:19:56.900 an hour. We can edit it down a bit because I want people to be able to share this video. We may make

01:20:04.220 it just totally separate on your presentation, David, in order to make this a working resource

01:20:10.460 for people. But some people have asked a question and I don't want to end the show before maybe we've

01:20:16.120 covered some of those. I know that Liz, you've put out there about, okay, so we go, we lobby

01:20:20.940 government, and there's going to be elected officials that are going to dismiss it and laugh

01:20:25.280 at it. But you know what, that's part and parcel. And that's where continuing to lobby the government

01:20:30.480 being the squeaky wheel, helping to hold them to account, possibly, you know, court actions will be

01:20:37.860 coming on this, you can see it's kind of undeniable that we'll have to move forward with legal actions

01:20:43.280 because we can't continue to have them just dismissing this.

01:20:47.020 It's binding.

01:20:47.820 And if we don't have a fire in our belly about this

01:20:51.040 and the fact that it's true and binding,

01:20:52.880 then why would we expect anybody else?

01:20:55.040 Why are we accepting the lies of the liberals

01:20:58.020 and feeling victimized by it

01:21:01.040 rather than proclaiming the truth,

01:21:04.100 standing firm and hard on it and moving forward with it?

01:21:07.220 And that's what Action for Canada has been doing

01:21:09.980 when we've been lobbying government over the SOGI issue in Saskatchewan and making sure it got

01:21:16.440 removed. You see the books coming down in Alberta, and you see the next step is removing SOGI. They're

01:21:22.680 committed to doing that. SOGI, CRT, DEI, and land acknowledgements that comes from being the squeaky

01:21:28.920 wheel. So don't go, oh, you know what, they're not going to believe us. Look at all the foreigners

01:21:32.760 sitting in office right now. Why would these Hindus and Sikhs and Muslims that are pushing 1.00

01:21:36.960 their agenda, listen to what we have to say. So we have to hold them to the oath, and we're going 1.00

01:21:43.760 to need to continue to press in on this. And these people need to be removed from office. Yes, David.

01:21:48.780 Sorry to interrupt. I just wanted to make one further comment. If you remember on the slide

01:21:52.740 I showed you about the Coronation Oath Act, the king has a constitutional duty to protect us and

01:21:58.540 our property rights not to protect any foreigners or indians or anybody else the oath is to us his

01:22:07.420 subjects to protect us in our property rights so when we look at what's happening on on indian land

01:22:13.580 and some of these court cases that have come up the judges who are sworn in a both of allegiance

01:22:19.160 to the king they are bound by that as well to protect us and the fee simple that we have is

01:22:26.020 with the king so the king in my opinion has a constitutional duty to protect everybody all

01:22:31.780 those landowners under the torrent system to protect them in their property rights as well

01:22:36.920 even in fee simple and i think that is something that that eventually lawyers are going to need to

01:22:42.180 look at but as you know with the lawyer we talked to last year she came up and said david and she

01:22:46.940 said to you dan we never got taught any of this in law school we need to get that information out

01:22:53.120 to them because that is where the protection of property and those landowners are going to come

01:22:57.480 from right and if anybody viewing this knows a lawyer we're praying we've been praying for

01:23:02.500 years to find a lawyer with a fire in their belly that has a clear deep understanding of the

01:23:08.440 coronation oath and is willing to learn so that we can put forth uh cases it's going to be critical

01:23:13.560 it's coming uh they can't just sidestep this and we can't permit them to do that henry has asked

01:23:19.160 What do you say to people who claim that we do not have a constitution because it was never ratified by the unanimous consent of the provinces?

01:23:29.140 I did an email on that.

01:23:31.640 I think they're referring to the section in the Constitution Act of 82 where Quebec had to come on board.

01:23:36.940 That was given by Declaration and Proclamation by the Queen, I forget, the year 85, 84, somewhere in the 80s.

01:23:45.400 and they weren't necessary well Quebec wasn't necessary to sign that people have interpreted

01:23:52.300 that section incorrectly and maybe at some point with our email going out in the next week or two

01:23:58.340 I'll address that by resending that that email because I went into it in length into the legal

01:24:03.920 aspects of that but Quebec wasn't really required to sign that so I'll send that in an email but

01:24:09.500 as as for the fact that the provinces have not all signed on the only one that hasn't signed

01:24:14.300 on is Quebec so I'll address that in an email and I'll put that out in our newsletter next week

01:24:19.660 okay and so how can people sign up to your newsletter um they can just email us at clear bc

01:24:27.060 oh no clear 2012 clear 2012 that's our website clear 2012 at pm.me good great and that's just

01:24:38.180 below david's name as well um under his image and so david i again i just want to thank you so much

01:24:45.160 for the time that you take to put the presentations together your clarity in presenting and for helping

01:24:52.920 to be on the front line of educating this nation so that we can together save canada and and thanks

01:25:00.760 in all of this thank you yeah in all of this we need to pray we need to submit ourselves to god

01:25:07.000 and pray for miracles.

01:25:08.760 All right, do you have any closing words

01:25:10.020 for our audience?

01:25:12.020 I'm just grateful for their support.

01:25:13.760 Hopefully they will do something

01:25:15.660 and approach their MLAs and MPs.

01:25:18.220 Keep on them right through to the next election.

01:25:21.480 Keep on them, all of them,

01:25:23.080 wherever your provincial elections are going to be.

01:25:25.400 And otherwise, I just look forward

01:25:27.040 to hearing your in prayer.

01:25:29.040 Okay, thank you, David.

01:25:31.700 Okay, so I just want to remind everybody,

01:25:33.680 if you haven't signed up with Action for Canada,

01:25:35.880 please do so go on to our website action with the number four you can see it all over the page there

01:25:41.300 right here action for canada.com we're going to be doing a very important cult action i hope to

01:25:48.300 get it out tomorrow night so it's in your inbox on friday morning and it is going to be directed

01:25:53.480 at carney as i mentioned several times through this presentation to reassess the suitability

01:25:59.420 for Louise Arbour to actually be sworn in officially on June 8th to take on the role 0.99

01:26:07.460 as our new Governor General. I think we can do much, much better than this.

01:26:12.880 All right, so next week, our guest is going to be Ashley Vance. I was speaking at an amazing event

01:26:20.960 on Saturday about the subject of conception, about a baby's right in the womb, and we don't

01:26:28.160 mean that in the United Nations way or the way they want to take control of our children,

01:26:32.760 but that the right of a child to have a mother and father, for instance, and to be able to

01:26:40.720 succeed and thrive. And so that was one of the speakers. Another one was about IVF. And then

01:26:47.580 Ashley had come on and she was telling us about the abortion pill reversal. Are you aware that

01:26:53.860 such a pill even exists. And so far, over 8,000 babies have been saved. And I think the abortion

01:27:01.200 issue is, it just, it is long overdue that this has to become front and center of our conversations

01:27:08.540 and upcoming elections. I keep saying we need to start raising up incredible, great, principled,

01:27:14.740 godly leaders right now. We need the public and communities to already start getting to know them

01:27:20.500 so that when they walk up and vote on election day,

01:27:23.920 you know, they're just not spinning the wheel

01:27:25.680 and saying, yeah, maybe I'll go with that one.

01:27:27.700 All right, we need to know who we're voting for

01:27:29.820 and where they stand on these critically important issues.

01:27:33.560 And so that will be on the page that I've prepared today

01:27:36.480 that will be going out on Sunday night.

01:27:38.360 We always send out the weekly email Sunday nights

01:27:41.740 into your inbox Monday, talking about the next guest

01:27:44.920 and then providing solutions within that email.

01:27:48.020 So what can you do?

01:27:49.160 So I've created a great message today. I'm excited to get it out to you. I'm excited to have you hear the presentation that Ashley has in bringing awareness to the abortion pill reversal.

01:28:03.520 They're being terribly censored, of course, because the abortion industry doesn't want you knowing about this.

01:28:10.620 And it is a natural treatment within a short period of time of after taking that first abortion pill that you can have success by taking the abortion pill reversal, which is progesterone, to turn that around and save the baby.

01:28:28.240 And it's absolutely amazing.

01:28:30.000 I'm so excited about it.

01:28:31.040 So make sure you join us next week.

01:28:32.860 The verse for today is from Jeremiah 22, 3 to 5.

01:28:37.800 Thus saith the Lord,

01:28:39.980 Execute ye judgment and righteousness,

01:28:42.600 and deliver the spoiled out of the hand of the oppressor,

01:28:45.620 and do no wrong, do no violence to the stranger,

01:28:49.220 the fatherless nor the widow,

01:28:51.620 neither shed innocent blood in this place.

01:28:54.820 For if you do this thing indeed,

01:28:58.160 then shall there enter in by the gates of this house

01:29:01.760 kings sitting upon the throne of David, riding in chariots and on horses, he and his servants

01:29:09.160 and his people. In other words, you will be blessed, you know, if you treat people right,

01:29:13.980 if you help those who are in need, but it's got a great warning. But if you will not hear these

01:29:20.140 words, I swear by myself, saith the Lord, that this house shall become a desolation. And that's

01:29:28.680 what I see over all of these leaders like Starmer and Macron and Justin Trudeau and Mark Carney. It

01:29:36.080 is not going to go well for them. And the Word of God continually, repeatedly says this. Now,

01:29:43.300 God does allow really crummy leaders to rise up for a period of time when people have turned on

01:29:49.940 God and the Word of God. And that's where we're at in Canada. So, it is long overdue for us to

01:29:56.540 get right with God, to repent about allowing all of these false gods to set themselves up in Canada. 1.00

01:30:04.480 We've got to shut down all the mosques and temples. Those are idols and worships and false 1.00

01:30:09.180 gods. These are not other religions. There is no such thing as the word religion to address false 0.90

01:30:16.340 gods in the Bible. They're actually called false gods. The freedom of religion that's in our

01:30:22.760 charter, and this is straight from Brian Peckford, the last living signatory of the

01:30:27.320 charter, said the freedom of religion was included to keep the government out of the

01:30:32.740 business of the church. And so, these are the truths that we are trying to repeat and

01:30:38.800 repeat to bring to the front lines until they're once again the truth again and being embraced

01:30:44.280 because they are essential to us maintaining Canada as a Christian nation, which as David

01:30:51.580 had said in the presentation is literally the best form of government based on Christian principles

01:30:58.240 that you could possibly have in the whole world. And so on that, I look forward to seeing you next

01:31:02.940 week. God bless you, and God bless Canada. In times of financial uncertainty, safeguarding

01:31:11.620 your assets is increasingly important. In response to ongoing inflation, economic challenges,

01:31:18.280 and market instability, many Canadians are adopting the timeless strategy of investing

01:31:24.580 in precious metals. Historically, gold and silver have held their value, safeguarding your assets

01:31:31.420 against economic turmoil. Action for Canada is pleased to announce our partnership with Steve

01:31:37.840 of Sun City Silver, providing valued members of A4C with expanded investment opportunities

01:31:44.600 designed to help you achieve your financial goals.

01:31:48.440 Steve is an ally of the Freedom Movement and he's offering members of Action for Canada

01:31:54.360 exclusive access to some of Canada's premier prices.

01:31:58.120 By leveraging his connections with Silver Gold Bull,

01:32:01.560 you can access competitive rates for securing your precious metals.

01:32:06.200 Silver Gold Bull is a trusted Canadian leader,

01:32:09.480 offering live pricing 24-7 and boasting nearly 400,000 five-star reviews on Trustpilot.

01:32:17.400 For an order of $5,000, be sure to indicate you're an Action for Canada member

01:32:23.320 and receive a complimentary 1967 silver dollar, courtesy of Sun City Silver.

01:32:30.440 Expand your collection further by referring a new customer who places a similar order,

01:32:35.880 and Steve will reward you with a special bonus thank you gift.

01:32:40.600 Your purchase with Steve is a dual investment. You invest in your future while simultaneously

01:32:46.600 supporting the freedom movement with a percentage of each sale benefiting Action for Canada.

01:32:52.760 For more information, be sure to visit actionforcanada.com

01:32:57.320 slash purchasing dash precious dash metals slash. Secure your assets. Protect your future.

01:33:05.160 Support Action for Canada and the Freedom Movement.

01:33:08.520 The information presented is for educational and informational purposes only

01:33:13.480 and is not intended to provide financial, legal, or tax advice as we are not licensed financial

01:33:19.880 advisors, accountants, or attorneys and cannot provide professional counsel.

01:33:25.560 Be advised that the content and information provided does not create a client relationship.

01:33:31.800 We recommend you consult with a qualified professional advisor before making any financial,

01:33:37.800 legal, or tax decisions. Please note that Action for Canada is not responsible for

01:33:43.880 an individual's financial outcome. Remember, your decisions are your own,

01:33:49.560 and we recommend doing your own research before making any investment.

01:34:01.800 That's what I've got to say. Look at this crowd.

01:34:08.800 I'm going to thank God and God alone for the ground that I'm standing on.

01:34:19.800 I'm going to thank our founding fathers for giving their lives

01:34:24.800 and sacrificing so much for our freedom.

01:34:30.800 And I'm calling on you today. Don't put them to shame. Don't waste what they did. We have guaranteed rights in this country.

01:34:42.380 We are putting chapters across the nation.

01:34:52.380 We are going to be in every town and every city.

01:34:56.380 And we are going to build communities within these communities of like-minded people

01:35:01.380 who are actually going to care for one another again and love on each other

01:35:05.380 and give each other the help when they're down.

01:35:08.380 We are going to use the teams and the people that build within chapters to support our businesses.

01:35:15.380 The government's actions are completely 100% unlawful.

01:35:22.380 Judgment will again be found on justice and those with virtuous hearts will pursue it.

01:35:30.380 You have a virtuous heart if you are here today pursuing freedom and righteousness.

01:35:38.380 And then verse 23 comes along with a promise.

01:35:42.900 God says he will turn the sins of evil people back on them.

01:35:48.420 He will destroy them for their sins.

01:35:53.660 I take great comfort in that.

01:35:56.100 Because I serve a mighty living God who has allowed us to go through this season of discomfort.

01:36:05.420 because we as a nation have turned our backs on him

01:36:09.420 and we need to get right.

01:36:12.420 So I am just going to thank you so much.

01:36:16.280 I'm going to say God bless you and God bless Canada.

01:36:35.420 Thank you.

01:37:05.420 Thank you.

01:37:35.420 Thank you.

Action4Canada - May 22, 2026

Our Christian Heritage Hangs by an Oath with David Lindsay

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript