Action4Canada - Pastors Webinar Bill C-9 and Coronation Oath

00:00:00.000 all right welcome everyone to this very important pastors webinar with action for canada today is

00:00:12.400 thursday june the 18th and uh we are very privileged to have with us today tanya goff

00:00:18.460 founder of action for canada and um we have a very special guest that i'll let tanya introduce

00:00:24.480 here in just a little bit but uh we are hosting this in light of the fact that bill c9 has just

00:00:29.780 passed in canada and as action for canada's national pastor and church coordinator i just

00:00:36.020 want to start uh with a very um with a message to really encourage you across canada if you're in

00:00:42.700 the pastoral ministry in any way shape or form i want to encourage you that these days are not

00:00:49.260 necessarily dark days but these are days that other pastors and ministers have faced throughout

00:00:53.980 history and so i just want to read you a couple of scriptures that came to my heart when i

00:00:59.680 heard that Bill C9 has passed. Well, over the last few months, Bill C9 has been kind of in the house

00:01:04.280 in that. When we've come to a crossroads, Joshua, when he faced taking the nation of Israel into 0.59

00:01:13.780 the promised land, his counterpart Moses that he had spent over 40 years with had passed on,

00:01:20.200 and now it was his daunting task to bring this vast group of perhaps up to a couple of million

00:01:26.040 people into the promised land and so god repeatedly a number of times in joshua chapter one

00:01:31.760 and i want to read just one verse but god repeated a number of times this the same message and so in

00:01:37.700 joshua chapter one verse nine the lord says this is my command be strong and courageous do not be

00:01:45.580 afraid or discouraged for the lord your god is with you wherever you go and we're reminded of

00:01:51.760 that again over and over and over again today the lord has promised never to leave us nor forsake us

00:01:58.040 and i want to read to you another verse in scripture that's not often taught on or or even

00:02:04.340 touched upon and it's at the very end in the book of revelation in revelation chapter 21

00:02:09.040 it gives us a list of people that will not make it into glory and um it's a stern warning but in

00:02:17.320 In Revelation 21, beginning at verse 8, it says,

00:02:20.180 But cowards, or cowardly, the cowardly, unbelievers, the corrupt, murderers, the immoral, 0.98

00:02:27.300 those who practice witchcraft, auto-worshippers, and all liars, 1.00

00:02:30.820 their fate is in the fiery lake of burning sulfur. 0.99

00:02:33.400 This is a second death. 0.93

00:02:34.900 It always amazes me that it doesn't put people like the Hitlers of the day,

00:02:39.020 or the murderers first, but it puts the cowardly.

00:02:43.500 So this is a time where we will not be cowards.

00:02:47.840 We will be strong and courageous and we will not fear.

00:02:51.640 And so these are exciting days to be alive.

00:02:54.300 And I'm always reminded of the persecuted church around the world, how it's growing and how it is strong.

00:03:03.280 And when people are faced with persecution, and this may be very well be the beginning of persecution for the Christian church in Canada.

00:03:11.320 but this is the time where God will sift the church perhaps and this is a time where you that

00:03:17.440 are in pastoral ministry maybe you're a lay person and involved in ministry in your church

00:03:23.340 but this is a time for you to stand firm and strong in the word of God and when the church

00:03:28.700 was first established about 2,000 years ago when those in power said to those that were

00:03:36.560 new in their faith in the lord jesus christ don't preach in that name again they said um you know

00:03:43.760 we've thought this through and we're going to obey god before we obey you so i want to welcome

00:03:49.780 you all to this webinar and a couple things i want to mention first of all is we are not here

00:03:54.460 today to provide to you any kind of legal advice we're going to give you great advice but it's not

00:03:59.060 legal advice okay and the second thing that i want to share with you is um a lot of what we have been

00:04:05.740 doing and sharing, particularly in the pastoral department here with Action for Canada, is based

00:04:12.460 on our thoughts and our beliefs and our biblical convictions on the doctrines of the lesser

00:04:18.520 magistrates. We've had Pastor Matthew Torella on as a guest a couple of times, and we've had him

00:04:25.600 on the Empower Hour. We've also had him on one of our webinars dealing with homeschooling.

00:04:32.940 And so we're perhaps going to look to see if we can get him on on another pastor's webinar here in the next little while to explain really what authorities our authorities really have.

00:04:43.880 And that's what our guest is going to explain to us today.

00:04:47.540 What authorities do the elected or sort of elected authorities have over us versus what authority God has over us in the Bible?

00:04:59.760 and we've got a choice who we're going to listen to because ultimately we all stand before God

00:05:06.240 and stand in judgment of him so again I want to welcome you to our empower not empower hour but

00:05:12.980 our pastor's webinar today I'm so used to saying empower hour but at this time I would like to

00:05:18.280 introduce Tanya Gah the founder of Action for Canada who so courageously almost 12 years ago

00:05:23.880 responded to the call of God when God called her to into this ministry. And so Tanya, welcome and

00:05:30.580 thank you for joining us with us today. Yeah, thank you so much, Dan. It is just such an honor

00:05:35.500 to be here and speaking with all the pastors and church leaders who have taken the time out today

00:05:40.500 to join us. As Dan said, we're not offering legal advice, but what we are going to do is provide you

00:05:45.980 resources and educational material that will help embolden you. As we say, you know what, we need

00:05:52.640 courage in this day. We say knowledge is power. The Bible says for a lack of knowledge, people

00:05:57.620 perish. And so the fact that Canada is a Christian nation, we are not secular, we are not multicultural,

00:06:04.700 and we are certainly not a state, a post-national state with no core identity. These lies have been 0.92

00:06:10.080 repeated often enough, so the next generation will embrace them. And that's what they're doing

00:06:15.260 through our education system as well, is that they are trying to erase our history. And so

00:06:20.600 So David Lindsay is our guest today from CLEAR Common Law Education and Rights,

00:06:25.840 and he is going to go over some material as well that informs us of our history.

00:06:32.660 I will start out by sharing my screen,

00:06:36.400 and I am going to provide you some of the resources that Action for Canada has as well

00:06:41.000 that will facilitate you.

00:06:45.020 And like I say, I want to see that there's going to be a fire in your belly moving forward

00:06:50.200 where you can stand boldly in the position that, yes, this is a Christian nation. They cannot 1.00

00:06:55.400 criminalize scripture. They're going to try. During COVID, they tried to shut the pastors down and

00:07:01.420 stop us from preaching the gospel and gathering. And it was the churches that stayed open. Yes,

00:07:06.620 they may have got some fines, and those fines pretty much disappeared once they were challenged

00:07:10.600 because they knew it was illegal and it couldn't have passed through the Supreme Courts. And so

00:07:15.380 we're we're being tested again and this is another season where they're trying to come through they

00:07:21.340 are in violation of the constitution of the charter rights and everything that god has blessed

00:07:27.100 us with that the fathers of confederation gifted us with and and so we're going to go over those

00:07:33.840 materials yes bill c9 has passed um because of the foundation because we feel so confident that

00:07:41.700 we have the freedom of religion, even though they've removed the good faith religious expression

00:07:46.580 defense, should not stop us from quoting scripture and reading the Bible. And I'm even going to

00:07:52.860 provide a response that one of the MPs did in one of Action for Canada's multiple Coliseum action

00:07:59.240 that we had against Bill C-9. And so we started in December, but we took a different angle. And

00:08:07.480 we were approaching this not from our members. We've got 100,000 members across the country

00:08:13.800 saying that, you know, we disagree with this, don't remove the good faith clause. We went by it. I was

00:08:19.980 like, okay, what you're doing is actually in violation of the coronation oath. And so we

00:08:25.800 challenged the members of parliament. We challenged the then Governor General Mary Simon, who is now

00:08:31.000 Louise Arbour. We challenged the senators. And we believe that we have made progress. We're bringing

00:08:37.260 awareness to something, the coronation oath that I call a buried treasure that needs to be

00:08:41.360 resurrected. And once you hear David's presentation, you're going to say, wow, okay, I've got that fire

00:08:46.840 in my belly, I'm going to stand firm, I'm going to preach the gospel on Sunday, and I'm not going

00:08:51.220 to hold back. So I'll share my screen right now. And I'm going to, like I say, go through a couple

00:08:56.280 of resources to help you. This is a look at Action for Canada nationwide, just in case you're

00:09:03.440 unfamiliar with it, and I will move in here. So as I mentioned, Bill C-9, we've been going many,

00:09:11.120 many months at fighting this. We had a last-ditch effort this week of all of our members sending

00:09:16.860 the Coronation Oath letters advising MPs and the Governor-General of what their duties and

00:09:24.180 limitations are. The Bill C-9 correspondence with the MP I just mentioned was Juanita Nathan.

00:09:32.120 She is a liberal. And literally, she has stated freedom of religion and expression is a fundamental guarantee under Section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Nothing in Bill C-9 changes that. And this is one of the really important reasons it is to converse with elected officials during such times as this because you want this on public record.

00:09:55.280 And this is the section I was mentioning. She goes, to make this evidently clearer, we have also added four greater certainty clauses that explicitly protect sermons, religious teachings, and good faith discussions of scripture.

00:10:10.880 And most importantly, every individual's freedom of religion, this is what it says, remains fully and unambiguously protected under the charter.

00:10:18.440 for reference the amendment reads as follows and this is 11.11 I'll just read this one I won't read

00:10:26.280 the whole letter for greater certainty nothing in subsection 319.2 or 2.2 of the criminal code

00:10:32.320 shall be construed as prohibiting a person from communicating a statement on a matter of public

00:10:36.740 interest including an educational religious political or scientific statement made in the

00:10:42.100 course of a discussion publication or debate if they do not willfully this is the clause right

00:10:47.940 this is the section, if they do not willfully promote hatred against the unidentifiable group

00:10:52.800 by communicating the statement. And that's where they're going to want to get the pastors, people

00:10:57.560 like myself, I'm proclaiming the Word of God every single week on the Empower Hour. And I'm not going

00:11:03.580 to stop doing that, especially because there are what is an identifiable group? Is it going to be

00:11:09.340 the LGBTQ? Is it going to be the Muslims? You know, the sensitivities of people have increased 0.99

00:11:15.020 because they are using these hate speech laws as a lawfare, as a weapon of warfare.

00:11:22.760 And so if we are going to end up in court over this,

00:11:26.280 we have the Word of God and the materials we're going to share with you today on our side.

00:11:31.840 So stand firm.

00:11:33.460 Now, this is the page of the Coronation Oath.

00:11:36.440 It is on Action for Canada's website.

00:11:39.100 In the menu, it says Current Issues.

00:11:41.240 If you scroll down three tabs, it'll say the Coronation Oath.

00:11:45.020 The materials that David is going to cover today, previous, we've had David on so many times, as you can see, we created a page.

00:11:53.880 And we talk about property rights and all of the rights, the God-given unalienable rights that God has given us according to the coronation oath, which is a binding document.

00:12:06.800 And this is why I say you'll learn why I say it's a buried treasure they don't want us to know about, and they're certainly not teaching it to our children in school.

00:12:14.060 So here are the letters that went to the governor generals, a member of parliament, senators, etc.

00:12:19.640 I'm going to talk about Canada as a Christian nation.

00:12:22.140 This is one page we can find the resources on.

00:12:24.720 And then we also have a church resource page.

00:12:28.160 Now, the coronation oath, as I said, you know, they want to say, oh, no, no, it's just ceremonial.

00:12:33.600 It's not binding, but it is binding.

00:12:36.160 And as evidence of that, there was an open letter to His Majesty, the King Charles III, by a bishop.

00:12:43.520 in Europe, Bishop Dewar. And he came out with an incredible letter. Oh, this man is just

00:12:51.180 amazing. And then he actually has a recorded version of this as well, which we have on our

00:12:55.260 webpage. And you can even just Google his name, look him up, and you'll be able to watch the video

00:13:00.860 or read this letter. And he really clearly said that the king is in violation of what? The

00:13:05.700 coronation oath. This is one of the letters that David had crafted. This is the one to

00:13:13.560 Right Honorable Louise Arbour, the new Governor General, who is a full-on United Nations globalist.

00:13:19.800 So we believe that our action that we put forward, advising Mary Simon that she has a limit. She

00:13:27.840 cannot give royal assent to legislation that is in violation of the King's oath. She does not have

00:13:33.820 more power than the king. And by passing legislation that purportedly criminalizes

00:13:39.420 scripture, she would be in violation of her oath to the king. David will explain more about that,

00:13:45.120 but I would encourage you to go onto this page, read the letter so that you are well-versed and

00:13:50.680 well-educated on it, and even start talking about it in church. Maybe have a service. This should be

00:13:55.360 something exciting. We as Christians have guaranteed rights in this country. Bring this up at church on

00:14:02.300 Sunday morning. Canada is a Christian nation. This will be on the pastor resource page and what this

00:14:08.060 is, it's just this PDF that we've created with a lot of our history easily accessible. So the

00:14:15.260 Constitution Act, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, of course, opens up with the preamble

00:14:20.460 whereas Canada is founded upon the principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law

00:14:25.680 colon. And as we go into explain the opening words to the charter are the framework principles

00:14:31.800 Christian biblical principles based on God the creator through which the charter is to be

00:14:36.880 interpreted and supersedes any other sections items listed under general that suggest otherwise

00:14:43.380 so that colon is extremely powerful that means when the section on multiculturalism section 27

00:14:51.440 that means yes we may have many people from different cultures living in Canada but they

00:14:57.140 must all embrace our values, our Christian values in this country and abide by our rule of law,

00:15:04.620 the Magna Carta, all which focuses on and was built from biblical principles. So this is a good,

00:15:10.240 this is really good news. And that's why I say knowledge is power. So dig into this page. There's

00:15:15.280 Supreme Court rulings that we've included. And down at the very bottom, we had made this resource

00:15:21.520 available during COVID, so-called COVID-19 pandemic, and because we wanted pastors who

00:15:27.680 were being threatened by arrest to know that section 176.1 of the Canadian Criminal Code,

00:15:34.940 which was first passed in 1892, which protects Christian clergymen and ministers, okay,

00:15:41.180 it doesn't protect imams, there were no Muslim, Sikhs, Hindus that were here during the foundation

00:15:49.260 of this nation, and this is evidence of our history. So back to 1892, clergymen and ministers

00:15:56.880 were provided a protection that nobody could abstract or violence or arrest officiating

00:16:03.640 clergymen, and that must stand today. So it's a great resource. Here it is again. I just wanted

00:16:09.280 to highlight the Where is Canada is founded on the principles that recognize the supremacy of God

00:16:14.180 in the rule of law, there's that beautiful colon. So get to know how powerful that little

00:16:18.760 symbol is. Another resource we've made available is the history of the Dominion Day of Canada

00:16:25.140 and the change to Canada Day on July 1st. We call it, we're celebrating Dominion Day. We're never

00:16:32.440 going to celebrate Canada Day again. And you'll learn how they have chipped away at undermining

00:16:38.580 Christianity in this nation for several decades. And so, of course, the Dominion of Canada was

00:16:47.200 formed from Psalm 72.8, he shall have dominion also from sea to sea and from the river unto the

00:16:54.460 ends of the earth. And so you can imagine why a Liberal MP put legislation forward for the name

00:17:02.240 change in 1982 and changing it to Canada Day. So we're going to just rebuke that. We're going to

00:17:09.160 continue to call it Dominion Day celebration. We never want to use their language now that we're

00:17:14.540 getting keen to how many things that they've changed. And finally, I have created just recently,

00:17:20.280 I've launched a research paper challenging the expansive interpretation of religion under

00:17:25.360 Section 2A of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Think about that, the expansive

00:17:30.460 interpretation of religion. What does it include? It now includes other systems of belief that in

00:17:38.540 biblical times, in historical times, it was known as false gods. So we have been duped into giving

00:17:45.880 false gods protection under the freedom of religion. And Brian Peckford, the last living

00:17:53.620 signatory of the Charter of Rights, clearly said, and I had him on the show to get it under recording,

00:17:59.240 is that when they included freedom of religion in the Charter,

00:18:03.160 it was to give protection to the church,

00:18:05.160 to keep the government out of the business of the church.

00:18:08.420 Because, of course, Pierre Elliott Trudeau was Prime Minister back then,

00:18:12.340 and if he had it his way,

00:18:13.820 and he tried really hard to get God even removed from the Charter of Rights,

00:18:17.160 but he did not succeed.

00:18:18.880 We've got to praise the Lord for that.

00:18:20.780 So I would encourage you to review this document.

00:18:25.180 It is extremely powerful.

00:18:26.600 I've created a U.S. version as well

00:18:28.960 and my contacts in the U.S.

00:18:30.340 have committed to take it to the White House

00:18:32.020 and the Texas legislature

00:18:33.740 because there is power in this

00:18:35.640 we will not call other false gods a religion

00:18:40.200 that phrase was coined during the 16th to 19th century

00:18:45.200 so again it's a powerful document

00:18:47.160 God put it on my heart

00:18:48.600 and he doesn't give us a mission to fail

00:18:50.300 so we are praying that this is going to have an impact in Canada

00:18:53.940 and in other Commonwealth countries around the world.

00:18:57.920 And so finally, under resources in our menu,

00:19:01.740 you scroll down to church resources

00:19:03.400 and you can see our doctrinal statement.

00:19:06.240 Again, Canada is a Christian nation.

00:19:08.380 Here is our historical resources that I was referring to

00:19:11.720 and that one click away from the Coronation Oath page.

00:19:15.060 We do a prayer walk for revival

00:19:16.980 seven weeks from Passover to Pentecost.

00:19:19.640 Every year, we just finished our fourth annual one

00:19:22.340 And God has answered just absolutely miraculous prayers.

00:19:27.300 One of those was in Alberta, where Action for Canada's teams had been lobbying the provincial government

00:19:34.320 and on behalf of our children to remove SOGI 123, the sexual pornographic books.

00:19:40.440 And we've had a great win.

00:19:42.120 They passed Bill 25.

00:19:43.860 And as of this January, all political and ideological agendas will be removed from the education system in Alberta.

00:19:51.160 And so can we hear a praise alleluia to that? And so the work that we're doing is absolutely amazing. We are uncompromising to the Word of God. If it doesn't align with the Word of God, then we will not be involved in that.

00:20:04.260 We will not use the language of the liberals who are definitely trying to undermine our Christianity.

00:20:13.260 And finally, on the false gods as well, my heart says that as an example of us not being uncompromising to the word of God,

00:20:21.880 the top two commandments say you shall have no other gods before me or make for yourselves idols,

00:20:26.980 and that he will visit the third and fourth generations with the harm that would come to those that open that door.

00:20:34.260 and that God is a jealous God. And so I look at that and I think, oh my goodness,

00:20:39.220 God is absolutely serious on a great reset in Canada. It's not Klaus Schwab's Great Reset.

00:20:46.380 This is a spiritual reset where God wants us to clean up Canada. The Bible says, 0.65

00:20:53.380 when you go into a nation, do not sign treaties with them. I believe all of what is going on with 0.69

00:20:59.020 the Indian Act, land grabs, I believe God is bringing this attention and awareness 0.53

00:21:03.140 so that God is going to remove those treaties. 0.82

00:21:06.540 We believe that the false gods in this nation,

00:21:10.320 to be obedient to God because he is a jealous God and takes this serious,

00:21:14.360 that we need to move towards shutting these false gods down

00:21:17.560 and that we definitely need to protect the over 100,000 babies

00:21:22.660 that are being murdered every year in Canada

00:21:26.760 in what's supposed to be a developed civil Western nation.

00:21:30.880 And so we got some work to do.

00:21:32.080 God's very serious about this, and he's calling on us to be uncompromising and to be courageous.

00:21:37.920 And so with that, thank you for your time.

00:21:40.540 I hope you go in and dig in and research this material.

00:21:43.740 And now, David, Lindsay, my friend, over to you.

00:21:46.540 We look forward to your presentation.

00:21:49.240 Thank you.

00:21:50.420 Can you hear me okay?

00:21:52.020 We can.

00:21:53.060 All right.

00:21:53.460 Cool.

00:21:54.040 Well, thanks, everyone, for showing up.

00:21:56.180 I'm David Lindsay, and I'm with Clear Common Law Education and Rights.

00:21:59.480 and we formed originally about 25 years ago here in British Columbia

00:22:03.980 specifically on the goal of eliminating usury or money

00:22:07.760 or interest I should say in the money system of Canada

00:22:10.420 which as many of you know are prohibited in the Bible

00:22:13.880 and we should not be having that in our money system

00:22:16.360 so we formed on that basis

00:22:19.580 and then we branched out into a number of other areas

00:22:22.360 including this specific area on the coronation oath

00:22:25.540 and people have been trying to rule the world since the beginning of time

00:22:30.860 and I keep telling people that why would you think it's any different today

00:22:34.700 if they try and call you a conspiracy theorist for example

00:22:37.560 I refer to myself as a conspiracy factualist

00:22:40.360 because the facts are there, the evidence is there

00:22:43.060 and we need to simply let people know what is going on

00:22:45.920 and it's interesting that many people claim that we are a secular country

00:22:52.800 including a recent MP that me and Tanya went and talked to

00:22:55.300 in Ottawa. And my first question to him was, if we're a secular country, where do you get that

00:23:01.660 knowledge and information from? What law was passed to create us as a secular country? And I

00:23:07.740 never, ever get an answer. And I certainly did not get one from this MP. Christianity cannot be

00:23:14.680 separated from our government. That is a myth. And they promote that myth, of course, to eliminate 0.99

00:23:21.760 Christianity eventually from our law. Many people will be 0.99

00:23:25.740 surprised to know, and I'll show you today, how and why

00:23:29.580 the Coronation Oath of the King overrides even the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in

00:23:33.760 Canada. So let's move on here. This opening letter

00:23:37.120 is something that you're more than welcome to copy,

00:23:41.740 and you can send this to every MP and MLA in Canada

00:23:45.780 that you think needs to be educated on this issue.

00:23:49.700 Even many of the Christian MPs and MLAs are simply not aware of their oath of allegiance and what it means.

00:23:57.380 And this is important to tell them, this package that I'm about to show you can be sent to them as well.

00:24:04.260 So this is our index of what we're going to go through today.

00:24:07.920 Basically, we're talking on the supremacy of God in our law,

00:24:11.160 and that the Charter is not the only document in our Constitution,

00:24:14.920 why we have royal assent, and the nature of royal assent, and what the powers of the legislatures

00:24:20.920 and the kings will be. So let's dive right in here right now. The first thing we're going to

00:24:25.440 talk about is that our Constitution recognizes the supremacy of God in our law. And this is

00:24:31.660 critical because the most important aspect of everything is the beginning. Governments like

00:24:36.720 to talk in generalities. They like to talk in the present tense without telling you history,

00:24:42.320 because he who does not know his history, of course, is doomed to repeat it.

00:24:46.640 So they want you to know nothing about history.

00:24:49.660 And I'm here to tell you a little bit about it.

00:24:51.680 This is a sample of the information that we have available.

00:24:55.340 And some of this comes from case law, some of it from judges themselves

00:24:58.820 and articles that have been written.

00:25:00.560 And the first thing is the Streeter's case in 1653 in England

00:25:04.340 where God made man and the laws of God, or I should say the laws of England,

00:25:08.820 are grounded on the laws of God.

00:25:10.480 This is one of the first cases to show that English law, which we have in Canada, was all based on the Bible.

00:25:19.760 And here's a number of other ones.

00:25:21.240 And again, these are samples.

00:25:23.100 This was originally the letter I referred to, that you can read here,

00:25:29.240 and definitely send it to all MPs along with this package, which can be printed off as well.

00:25:35.340 And they need to be made aware of everything that's in here.

00:25:38.480 and this is basically what I first talked about

00:25:41.980 is the Streeter's case that the laws of England

00:25:44.120 are grounded in the laws of God

00:25:46.060 there's a number of case law that have upheld

00:25:48.660 Christianity as being part of our law in Canada

00:25:50.960 here's some more of them including this Byrd case

00:25:53.900 right at the beginning

00:25:54.660 and there's no act which Christianity forbids 0.67

00:25:58.440 the law will not reach

00:25:59.620 if it were otherwise Christianity would not be

00:26:02.260 as it has always been held to be part of the law of England

00:26:04.780 this has been the law of England since at least

00:26:07.540 At least 900 AD, Christianity has formed part of our law of England.

00:26:12.520 It's been upheld by every major judge throughout history, and law professor, and so on.

00:26:19.320 It's also involved in our law, and I should say in our courts, because the proceeding

00:26:25.240 in our courts are founded upon the law of England, which is founded on the law of God.

00:26:29.620 And this is one of the reasons that England had a problem separating from, or joining

00:26:34.660 the European Union, because it would have allowed the European Union to come in and

00:26:39.460 take over.

00:26:40.480 And as I'll show you a little bit later, our law does not recognize other forms of law

00:26:44.380 other than Christianity.

00:26:46.260 It's part of the law of the land, as you see in William's case, and the law of the

00:26:53.960 land has always been common law, which is the foundation of our law.

00:26:57.420 so many other authors have written about

00:27:01.780 basically the supremacy of God in our law

00:27:05.140 and how our law has been based on Christianity

00:27:07.140 and the one thing I do want to show you

00:27:09.980 is the Munster versus Lamb case at the bottom

00:27:12.140 liberals I guess and the judges

00:27:15.860 most of whom are appointed by liberals today

00:27:17.820 want you to believe that the common law is judgment law

00:27:21.320 it is not and never was

00:27:23.180 common law is a set of principles that originated in the Bible

00:27:26.620 and it were passed on from generation to generation.

00:27:30.480 And these principles are what formed the common law.

00:27:35.240 And the judges got lazy.

00:27:37.260 And instead of researching the principles

00:27:38.820 and applying them to the facts of the case,

00:27:41.680 they would just quote another judge

00:27:43.040 and say, well, look what Judge John Doe has gone and done.

00:27:46.700 I think he's right.

00:27:47.520 So they got lazy and didn't do any work.

00:27:50.480 And that was the whole purpose for precedent

00:27:52.920 and following judges.

00:27:54.840 But it is not our common law.

00:27:56.620 here are the fundamental principles

00:27:59.460 there is really no system of law in the world

00:28:02.640 freer in principle than our common law

00:28:05.100 and when people say to me

00:28:06.960 we need to change the system

00:28:08.480 and I go why

00:28:09.140 what are you going to replace it with that's better

00:28:10.940 there is nothing

00:28:12.220 it's not the law that's the problem

00:28:14.800 it's the people in power

00:28:16.420 that we have allowed to get into power

00:28:18.460 that are evil

00:28:19.020 that we need to remove

00:28:20.380 the system of law is the best

00:28:22.180 you can do everything you want

00:28:23.720 as long as it is not expressly prohibited.

00:28:27.120 And there are limitations on what the king can prohibit.

00:28:31.080 The foundation of our law is freedom.

00:28:33.860 And you have that in no other law in the world.

00:28:36.720 And it's based primarily on the Bible.

00:28:39.360 Do unto others as you would have done unto you,

00:28:41.580 and do not do unto others as you would not have done unto you.

00:28:45.180 Keep your contracts and don't infringe on the rights, freedom,

00:28:48.120 of property of the other.

00:28:49.900 And as I said earlier, the law of England does not recognize any other form of law.

00:28:54.820 Christianity, our common law, does not recognize socialism or communism,

00:28:59.060 which are primarily atheistic by design.

00:29:02.480 We don't recognize that, period.

00:29:06.140 If there's a conflict, God's laws are to be followed.

00:29:11.100 Not man's laws. Not statute law.

00:29:13.940 And if any statutes violate God's laws, as Broome pointed out here in the middle of the page on the left, they are no force in effect.

00:29:23.540 You can't serve two masters.

00:29:25.600 You can't serve statutes in man that violate the Bible and claim to be Christian.

00:29:30.720 It's important that people realize we need to follow God's laws in the Bible.

00:29:37.180 We do not need to follow man's laws unless they don't violate God's laws.

00:29:43.940 For example, passing a law that says you can drive on the right-hand side of the road.

00:29:47.920 There's nothing wrong with that.

00:29:49.740 Therefore, it would be binding upon us.

00:29:52.480 But once that line is crossed, where statutes and policies override God's laws,

00:29:58.420 that is where the dividing line in the sand has to be.

00:30:02.320 And this common law followed England.

00:30:04.180 It followed the flag all the way to Canada.

00:30:06.920 So we've got it in our Constitution.

00:30:09.880 And our Constitution is pretty simple.

00:30:11.540 it outlines all the relationships between men and people throughout the country,

00:30:16.020 men in the government, I should say, and the king.

00:30:19.520 Both are applicable here because we have a king, in fact, not just parliament.

00:30:24.240 We have the king and right of Canada.

00:30:26.040 We have the king and right of the provinces.

00:30:29.000 Constitution just defines the relationship between who's in charge and the people below it,

00:30:33.900 keeping in mind the people in charge get their power from the people below it, right?

00:30:38.480 and importantly most people are not aware of these constitutional principles that i'm about

00:30:44.700 to tell you the constitution is neither one document or two it is a series of documents

00:30:51.260 if it affects the nature of the relationship between the monarch and the people it is part

00:30:56.920 of our constitution and the first one that did that was magna carta and insofar as they have

00:31:02.380 not been repealed and the people have allowed it to be repealed they are for still a force in effect

00:31:07.420 So a lot of provisions in Magna Carta are still part of our Constitution.

00:31:12.700 The Constitution, of course, is not exhaustive.

00:31:16.480 There's a lot of documents that are not in this Constitution Act

00:31:21.180 that are not in there that are still part of our Constitution

00:31:26.740 and a number of unwritten principles as well.

00:31:29.880 If you look on the right, these are just a sample of some of our constitutional documents.

00:31:34.380 The BNA Act of 1867, the Constitution Act 82, the Statute of Westminster 1931, if you read Section 7, it expressly states it does not affect the BNA Act at all, the Charter, and 5, 6, and 7 here on the right-hand side would show that it is an act for establishing the Coronation Act, or the Coronation Oath, I should say, the English Bill of Rights, and the Act of Settlement, which are all part of what's known as the Rules of Succession of the King.

00:32:04.380 And they apply here in Canada.

00:32:06.920 Every document in our Constitution, every one of them,

00:32:11.080 recognizes somewhere in those documents the supremacy of God.

00:32:14.920 Going back to Magna Carta, that alone tells you it is ingrained in our law,

00:32:20.200 independent of the king and independent of government.

00:32:22.760 The people said from the beginning, God's laws will prevail.

00:32:27.000 And we got that in the BNA Act, with a Constitution similar in principle to the United Kingdom,

00:32:32.080 which included a number of unwritten constitutional principles as well.

00:32:39.900 Consequently, if the Constitution is the supreme law

00:32:42.840 and founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God,

00:32:48.640 then clearly any law that violates the Constitution,

00:32:52.360 including the coronation oath, is of no force and effect.

00:32:55.540 And as Tanya has pointed out, that colon that you can see

00:32:58.840 on the right-hand side of the page

00:33:00.540 means that under the Canadian

00:33:02.640 Styles Manual, that everything that

00:33:04.740 follows after it is subsumed

00:33:06.680 within the overriding parameters

00:33:08.680 of the supremacy of God and the

00:33:10.700 rule of law. Those are the railings

00:33:12.480 that all

00:33:14.380 law, all statutes and orders

00:33:16.560 and regulations and so on have to comply

00:33:18.640 with.

00:33:21.900 This on

00:33:22.700 the left-hand side from reference

00:33:24.760 Rebuild 30 in Ontario

00:33:26.800 went to the Supreme Court of Canada

00:33:28.840 One constitutional provision cannot override another.

00:33:32.300 So the Charter cannot be used to override the Coronation Oath of the King.

00:33:38.680 It cannot be used to override the Constitution or BNA Act of 1867. 0.91

00:33:44.420 And they came first. 0.92

00:33:46.100 And when Queen Elizabeth signed the Charter, where did she get her power?

00:33:49.440 She got it from the Coronation Oath, which we'll talk about in a few minutes. 0.98

00:33:53.700 And that oath requires her to preserve principles of Christianity.

00:33:58.140 and the supremacy of God.

00:33:59.580 So she could not sign the Canada Act

00:34:02.180 to give supremacy to any other God 0.72

00:34:06.200 other than the Christian God. 0.89

00:34:08.000 She did not have the power to do that. 0.67

00:34:10.540 In the O'Donoghue case in Ontario,

00:34:13.400 it went to the Court of Appeal,

00:34:15.580 and O'Donoghue wanted to get Catholicism

00:34:19.280 recognized in our Constitution

00:34:20.700 so that Catholics could hold the position of the monarch.

00:34:24.400 And the court stated,

00:34:25.840 Her Majesty is now Queen of Canada

00:34:28.460 but she is Queen of Canada

00:34:29.780 because she's Queen of the United Kingdom

00:34:31.580 it is not a separate office

00:34:33.960 it is the sovereign who is recognized

00:34:36.240 as the sovereign of the United Kingdom

00:34:38.040 who is our sovereign

00:34:39.000 these rules of succession

00:34:41.060 and the requirement may be the same

00:34:43.100 as those in Great Britain

00:34:44.240 are necessary to the proper functioning

00:34:46.500 of our constitutional monarchy

00:34:48.180 and therefore rules are not

00:34:50.200 the rules, the rules of succession

00:34:52.060 are not subject to the Charter

00:34:54.140 these rules of succession

00:34:56.380 which set out the coronation oath

00:34:58.320 are not subject to the charter

00:35:00.260 period

00:35:01.380 so think about that in relation to equality

00:35:04.680 immigration

00:35:05.800 multiculturalism 1.00

00:35:07.260 those cannot be used to override

00:35:10.440 the coronation oath of the king

00:35:11.920 and because the king is head of state

00:35:18.160 he has to give royal assent to all legislation

00:35:20.480 excuse me, federal and provincial

00:35:22.360 and part of that reason is for the monarch to have checks and balances over parliament

00:35:27.440 and parliament is there to make sure they have checks and balances over the king

00:35:31.300 so that the king does not become a despot as has happened in the past

00:35:35.320 both are there to be a check and balance on each other

00:35:39.360 and the ultimate source of power is the king and his oath to uphold god's laws

00:35:44.640 in canada the king is represented as shown at the bottom on the page 19 here

00:35:51.200 by the Governor-General of Canada.

00:35:54.000 All executive government rests in the King,

00:35:56.960 and then that's carried on by the Governor-General

00:36:00.220 in the name of the King.

00:36:07.380 Section 55 is important because it points out

00:36:10.440 of the Constitution Act of 1867

00:36:13.240 that the Governor-General has a discretion

00:36:18.000 whether to give royal assent to bills passed by Parliament.

00:36:21.200 It's not mandatory.

00:36:23.680 They tried to tell you that it's convention,

00:36:26.360 that they have to do it by convention.

00:36:28.740 However, the Supreme Court of Canada has already ruled

00:36:31.960 that conventions are not part of our Constitution.

00:36:35.100 What it is, effectively, is the government is saying,

00:36:37.880 look, we've done this for so long,

00:36:40.720 they should just give royal assent to it automatically.

00:36:44.900 That is a violation of the oath,

00:36:46.700 of their oath of allegiance and oath of office to the king, period.

00:36:51.700 So they can't do that.

00:36:53.400 And there's been a number of times when royal assent has been refused.

00:36:57.360 And it can be done again.

00:36:58.700 And in fact, it needs to be done.

00:37:01.460 Every time that parliament or the legislatures recommend to the king to break the law by giving them a bill that does so.

00:37:11.920 Here are some examples or instances where royal assent has been void.

00:37:15.800 if the king is deceived

00:37:17.420 by false suggestions 0.77

00:37:19.080 if he's been ignorant or misinformed

00:37:21.480 if the language is so vague 0.76

00:37:23.920 in general you can't understand it

00:37:26.100 and

00:37:27.300 if it's uncertain or if it would

00:37:29.900 work an injustice or a wrong or something

00:37:31.960 contrary to law

00:37:33.100 if they're getting a bill that says

00:37:35.500 we want you to do something that violates

00:37:37.840 the Bible, Christian principles 1.00

00:37:39.880 it's void 0.99

00:37:41.280 royal assent cannot, the king doesn't have

00:37:43.780 the power to do it

00:37:45.800 and that's critical.

00:37:47.860 He doesn't even have the power to give royal assent.

00:37:50.440 So they may be doing it,

00:37:51.680 but he does not have the lawful power at law to do it,

00:37:55.280 to give royal assent to it.

00:37:57.960 When and if situations like this arise,

00:38:00.900 where the monarch is bound to advise the government to cease,

00:38:04.900 I should say, where Parliament is advising the king

00:38:08.720 to give royal assent,

00:38:10.680 the bills that violate God's laws,

00:38:12.800 the monarch is bound

00:38:14.640 to tell the parliament of Canada

00:38:17.640 cease and desist

00:38:18.820 and if they don't

00:38:19.940 then the governor general

00:38:21.660 on behalf of the king

00:38:22.660 is required to dissolve parliament

00:38:24.260 tell the prime minister

00:38:26.360 to call an election

00:38:27.320 if they keep giving bills

00:38:29.040 that violate God's laws

00:38:30.260 call an election 0.56

00:38:31.780 get rid of these people 0.94

00:38:33.120 okay 0.96

00:38:34.320 if parliament refuses

00:38:36.380 the monarch can call in

00:38:37.560 the armed forces for protection

00:38:38.940 because they are sworn

00:38:40.540 in allegiance to the king

00:38:42.000 not the government

00:38:43.240 people have lost focus

00:38:45.340 that all oaths are to the king

00:38:47.580 and eventually to God

00:38:48.980 they are not to the government

00:38:50.520 so the king can call in the armed forces

00:38:53.400 and get rid of parliament

00:38:54.640 and call in an election

00:38:55.860 they have the right to use force

00:38:59.920 if necessary

00:39:00.680 I'm certainly not advocating that

00:39:02.520 force is always a last resort

00:39:04.880 if everything else fails

00:39:05.940 but the point being is

00:39:07.800 if you're breaking your oath

00:39:09.040 it's a criminal offense

00:39:10.360 our first oath

00:39:14.140 just to go back

00:39:14.920 the constitutional nature of the coronation oath

00:39:17.340 it goes back to 973 AD

00:39:19.960 and that's the first one

00:39:22.360 and you can see it here

00:39:23.360 it basically says almost the same as what's being said today

00:39:26.580 and the main one is to preserve Christianity

00:39:29.680 in the O'Donoghue case

00:39:32.420 the court recognized that the act of settlement

00:39:35.220 along with the Bill of Rights and the Coronation Oath Act

00:39:37.980 these are part of the rules of succession

00:39:40.240 and form part of our constitution this has already been decided these are part of our constitution

00:39:46.060 and cannot be removed we are a constitutional monarchy i call it a republican monarchy because

00:39:52.420 this law cannot be changed it is there and it starts with the present day with the coronation

00:39:58.600 of act of 1688 and it says whereas by law and ancient usage of the realm the kings and queens

00:40:05.360 have taken a solemn oath upon the evangelists at their respective coronations to maintain the

00:40:10.940 statutes, laws, and customs, i.e. our common law, of the realm, and all the people and inhabitants

00:40:17.440 thereof in their spiritual and civil rights and properties. Folks, this is where your property

00:40:22.100 rights come from, not the charter. Saskatchewan did us a great favor by opposing property rights

00:40:27.620 in the charter, because otherwise they would have used section one loopholes so frequently and so

00:40:32.620 often, you wouldn't have any property rights lifting. It would have been looking like Swiss 0.94

00:40:36.160 cheese by the time where it had dealt with this. But because it's in the Coronation Oath Act of

00:40:42.280 1688, and as part of our laws and customs, going back to biblical times when God said,

00:40:49.720 thou shall not steal in the Ten Commandments, which presupposes that you own property,

00:40:55.000 this is where your property rights come from. This is the ultimate source of property rights

00:40:59.620 that the king is there to protect in order to get your allegiance.

00:41:03.500 And if he doesn't protect you and your property rights,

00:41:05.780 then you shouldn't be allegiant to him.

00:41:09.200 Now, the specific wording in Section 1,

00:41:14.200 according to the Coronation Old Act,

00:41:16.680 is that, will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the people

00:41:19.860 of the Kingdom of England and the Dominions,

00:41:22.520 thereto belonging, according to statutes in Parliament agreed on

00:41:25.800 and the laws and customs?

00:41:27.260 There's your common law, your supremacy of God.

00:41:30.540 And number three, will ye to the utmost of your power,

00:41:34.560 maintain the laws of God, the true profession of the gospel,

00:41:37.880 and Protestant reformed religion.

00:41:42.060 And you'll notice it says established by law.

00:41:44.740 It means the people have already decided the supremacy of God is in our law.

00:41:50.380 It's there.

00:41:51.820 And that's what the king is swearing in order to have power.

00:41:56.860 to pass laws that are binding he has to swear to protect us and number one is where your property

00:42:03.800 rights are number two is simply to protect you so you don't get some despot who puts you in jail

00:42:09.300 for 20 years for a parking ticket right pretty simple so the coronation oath cannot be eliminated

00:42:16.380 in the coronation oath act of 1688 it specifically says in the last paragraph and in the presence of

00:42:24.420 all persons that shall be attending, assisting, or otherwise present at their respective

00:42:28.400 coronations, any law, statute, or usage to the contrary notwithstanding. The king or queen must

00:42:35.340 take this oath. Even if a statute prohibits it, they have to take it, and the wording cannot be

00:42:43.560 changed. This is why when King Charles tried to change it for his oath, the archbishop in England

00:42:50.180 had to say, sorry, I cannot change the oath. That's not to say it hasn't been changed

00:42:55.200 illegally, as I'll show you in a few minutes. It has. But fortunately, the supremacy of

00:43:00.020 God is still there, and the illegalities make it non-binding.

00:43:05.860 So, Halsbraith was very clear. The coronation is a recognition by the nation that the king

00:43:11.980 is supreme, and by the king of the fundamental rights of the people. It's called protection

00:43:17.380 versus subjection.

00:43:20.920 And the whole ceremony is Christian-based,

00:43:23.480 and you can find parts of it, if not all of it, online.

00:43:26.520 But the entire, and that's for Queen Elizabeth in 1953,

00:43:30.680 the whole coronation oath ceremony is specifically Christian. 0.61

00:43:35.800 The orb set under the cross to remember the whole world

00:43:39.340 is subject to Christ. 0.80

00:43:41.080 Receive the ring of kingly dignity,

00:43:43.300 So you may continue steadfastly as defender in Christ's religion.

00:43:48.580 The sword was given for protection of the defenseless and the poor,

00:43:52.940 which means as well there is a duty for the Queen to look after the poor.

00:43:58.040 And as was mentioned in the video documentary that was taken live from the entire 1953 ceremony,

00:44:08.580 where it was stated the Queen now compacts with her people.

00:44:12.880 In other words, by swearing on the Bible, it's a contract.

00:44:17.140 And some of the kings have broke that contract.

00:44:19.100 They kicked King James out, and they threw him out of the country for breaking the contract.

00:44:25.260 And King Charles, Queen Elizabeth, should be held accountable for breaking that contract.

00:44:30.440 And make no mistake, they should be criminally charged for breaking their contract with us.

00:44:37.220 Absolutely.

00:44:38.000 Or forced to leave the country and go live somewhere else.

00:44:41.200 It's a contract.

00:44:42.500 They have broken it.

00:44:45.740 And Halsbury's Laws of England also points out that it's a contract.

00:44:49.920 Every major prominent judge in English history,

00:44:54.400 from Coke to Blackstone to Broome, Halsbury, Denning,

00:44:58.300 everyone has all recognized the coronation oath is a contract.

00:45:02.620 That is the starting point in our law for somebody in power to tell you what to do.

00:45:08.280 And remember, there's only two ways for somebody to tell you what to do.

00:45:12.180 One is force, which is unlawful, and the other is with your agreement.

00:45:16.580 And nobody's going to tell somebody else and give them the power to do anything they want to do to you,

00:45:22.220 because you would be a slave.

00:45:23.820 So there's limitations to what others can do in your best interest and all of our best interests.

00:45:29.520 And that limitation, those limitations are in the coronation oath of the king

00:45:34.120 in order for him to get in the position of power to tell you what to do.

00:45:38.860 King George III admitted that when he was asked about breaking his oath,

00:45:43.880 he said, no, I can't do it.

00:45:45.360 I would rather go from house to house in England begging for bread

00:45:48.360 than break my oath.

00:45:49.900 And he said, if I violate that oath,

00:45:52.200 I am not the sovereign, no longer legal sovereign in this country.

00:45:56.860 And apply that today to King Charles and Queen Elizabeth

00:45:59.440 who have broken their oath repeatedly by giving royal assent.

00:46:04.120 The legislation that violates God's laws in the Bible, that makes them no longer legal sovereign in the country.

00:46:12.260 Keep in mind, if you went up to somebody who is taking an oath to be a witness in a court case,

00:46:18.660 and during the break you come up to him and tell that person and advise him to break that oath,

00:46:24.140 you would be committing a criminal offense.

00:46:26.540 And if the person broke his oath, he would be committing a criminal offense.

00:46:30.140 think about that in the context of the coronation oath of the king and parliament parliament is

00:46:37.380 aiding and advising the king including bill c9 and a number of others to break his oath

00:46:42.400 they are in a similar position of telling a witness on the witness stand to break their oath

00:46:48.180 during the break come back and break the law lie under oath and by lying under oath the king has

00:46:55.880 broken the law as well and this leads me right into the legislatures and parliament it's called

00:47:02.060 his majesty the king and right of parliament that's the full correct name on it and they are

00:47:06.980 not supreme parliament is not contrary to what even in england they say parliament is not supreme

00:47:13.540 there when they say supremacy of parliament it means in respect of other agencies below it it's

00:47:20.580 relative, not absolute. So it's also relative to the fact that God is the eventual supreme law

00:47:28.080 in our law. God is supreme, not parliament. And even Dicey, who is one of the most often

00:47:37.820 quoted constitutional judges in Canada, pointed out, if the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty

00:47:46.020 involves the attribution of unrestricted power to parliament, the dogma is no better than a legal

00:47:51.900 fiction and not worth the stress laid upon it. He was very clear. Parliamentary sovereignty is a

00:47:58.600 myth. Do not accept that. They are not. And section 91 tells you of the Constitution Act or B&A Act,

00:48:07.040 tells you what their powers are. Right in section 91, it said, it'll be lawful for the queen,

00:48:12.180 which means

00:48:14.100 the queen cannot give royal assent

00:48:16.780 without the conditions that follow

00:48:18.700 it wouldn't be lawful

00:48:20.300 those conditions are

00:48:22.920 to get the advice and consent

00:48:24.700 of the senate and house of commons

00:48:26.280 that's their only power 0.96

00:48:29.000 folks is to give

00:48:30.400 aid and advise the king

00:48:31.980 on what bills he should give royal assent to

00:48:34.420 and they cannot

00:48:36.900 aid and advise to break the law

00:48:38.580 period

00:48:39.160 and it's the same with the Privy Council

00:48:43.560 they also have to take an oath

00:48:45.140 and their oath recognizes that they're servants of the Queen

00:48:49.400 in this case the King

00:48:51.200 all police officers, military, government officials, MPs

00:48:56.480 everybody has to take that oath

00:48:59.000 and swear that oath to the King

00:49:01.540 and the King in turn swears the oath before God

00:49:05.140 and that oath is an oath of fidelity

00:49:08.680 loyalty or faithfulness

00:49:10.800 interestingly Lord Mackey

00:49:13.180 who was Lord Advocate and Lord Chancellor

00:49:15.120 was recently asked

00:49:17.160 in light of the Church of England's

00:49:19.460 opposition on

00:49:21.240 abortion

00:49:21.680 and whether signing the bill might put

00:49:25.060 the Queen in breach of her coronation

00:49:27.120 oath and he opposed the same

00:49:29.040 sex marriage and other similar things

00:49:31.220 and he pointed out

00:49:33.060 the Queen under our 0.97

00:49:34.860 constitutional arrangements is

00:49:36.800 expected to act in accordance with her ministers the advice of her ministers i should say given

00:49:42.600 ultimately through the prime minister the idea of the coronation oath was that it would never

00:49:47.460 be in conflict with that advice and therefore it's the responsibility of the ministers of the crown

00:49:53.600 to see whatever advice they give is consistent with the proper construction of the oath how do

00:49:59.180 you do that if you're an mp and you don't even know what the coronation oath is if you've never

00:50:03.780 heard of it we need to bring this to our to their attention and the duty is on our ministers to make

00:50:10.500 sure they do not break their oath in doing so their only duty is to aid and advise the king

00:50:16.200 that's it and those oaths of allegiance that are required by mps are set out in section 127 i think

00:50:25.920 it's 127 it might be 128 of the constitution act of 1867 it's part of our constitution that they

00:50:34.120 have to take their oath of allegiance and oath of office to the king period they don't have a choice

00:50:39.100 and it's the same for the legislatures as well all of them have to take these oaths of office

00:50:45.660 and oath of allegiance to the king and they're not meaningless it you don't put ceremonial stuff

00:50:53.940 in a constitution. It's there because it has legal constitutional ramifications and meaning

00:50:59.880 ascribed to it. And all of the people, all of them, are required to enforce the law. They have

00:51:08.160 to obey the law themselves. What governments want you to do is they want you to think statute law

00:51:13.140 is above God's law, and it is not. God is supreme, then you have the rule of law, and then you have

00:51:20.500 are constitutional law, and then you have statutes way underneath that.

00:51:24.860 But governments are lying to you and telling you that they are supreme and they are not.

00:51:29.880 And the king is not supreme either. And the principles and maxims of our law are clear.

00:51:35.440 The law may not be violated by the monarch. Period. And not only can the law not be violated,

00:51:42.980 the king cannot sign any statute that allows him to break the law. So he cannot sign a bill that

00:51:49.460 allows him to break his coronation oath. He doesn't have that power. There are limits. This

00:51:55.520 is why it's called a limited monarchy, and there's a reason for that. There are limits to their powers

00:52:00.380 that are in the oath. And the coronation oath, in my respectful opinion, is the most important

00:52:07.320 document in our Constitution, especially from a Christian perspective. So the king cannot sanction 0.98

00:52:16.200 any act forbidden by law he's bound by contracts including the coronation oath he cannot break it

00:52:22.840 lawfully speaking that's not to say they don't do it criminals always have the upper hand because

00:52:28.700 they know what they're going to do in advance right however that doesn't make it lawful

00:52:33.580 and it's not our law that's defective it is the people and the criminals in power that are doing

00:52:39.640 it um i got about seven or eight more slides and i'll be done and the kings and queens have done

00:52:47.960 wrong okay it's important to realize that intentionally or unintentionally they have

00:52:53.320 done wrong they have changed illegally the wording of the coronation oath and

00:53:00.280 interesting unak gay who's parliamentary council very high up in england 0.52

00:53:05.160 She wrote, it's worth noting, the coronation oath has been modified without statutory authority. 0.94

00:53:11.760 The Queen swore a slightly different version of the oath, although it still included a promise to maintain the established Protestant religion.

00:53:21.200 In 1937, they started to change the oath a little bit, but they didn't do it properly.

00:53:27.900 and in 1937 the wording of the coronation oath was changed illegally according to scales in his

00:53:35.500 pamphlet of crowning mercy they also said the same thing in the london times so even in their paper

00:53:42.000 they recognized that here's the archbishop swearing the queen and the king in 1937 to

00:53:48.760 uphold the law and they're breaking the law at the same time they're swearing the king in that

00:53:52.920 he's got to comply with the law so clearly there's a problem that they broke the law

00:53:59.820 by changing those words here are the original words on top and right below it are the words

00:54:06.960 they added they added underlined united kingdom of great britain your and they added um i should

00:54:14.460 underline it as well northern ireland canada and so on your possessions and to rule according to

00:54:20.200 their respective laws and customs the king you cannot divide the king and you cannot divide his

00:54:26.540 oath oaths are not divisible if he takes an oath it's for everybody within the realm you cannot

00:54:32.940 take an oath and break it for some countries and not for others and consequently the oath that he

00:54:39.860 took was for all dominions and not according to our laws because the king cannot give think of it

00:54:47.380 as a circular argument. The king cannot give royal assent

00:54:50.820 to a law or a bill passed in Canada that

00:54:55.400 violates his oath, because he would still be breaking his oath as Canada

00:54:59.300 is a dominion still of the United Kingdom. So it doesn't

00:55:03.360 matter to a large degree if it says to their respective laws

00:55:07.280 and customs, because they're the same as England's.

00:55:10.540 Right? So the

00:55:14.560 original words are always maintaining the laws of God, and those are still here in the words today

00:55:21.140 that they swore. Even though they added some words to it, it doesn't take away from the

00:55:26.120 supremacy of God in our law that they swore to uphold. In O'Donohue, the Court of Appeal upheld

00:55:36.000 that the rules of succession for the monarchy must be shared and be in symmetry with those

00:55:40.780 of the United Kingdom. One cannot accept the monarchy, but reject the legitimacy or legality

00:55:46.020 of the rules by which the monarch is selected, or the limitations on their power. If you accept

00:55:52.300 the king, you accept the king in all his capacities, all his powers, and all his duties,

00:55:57.580 period. And if you subvert that, if you tell the king to break the law, it's called committing

00:56:02.820 treason. All MPs who are made aware of the coronation oath and decide to vote according

00:56:08.740 to their party leader, are breaking the law. Period. And if we have duties to God, then

00:56:18.940 we have rights against the state. And this is where your power of peaceful civil disobedience

00:56:23.860 comes in, in our constitution. As Christians, we need to know, we have the power, contractually,

00:56:32.240 constitutionally, to say

00:56:34.300 to the king, sorry, your

00:56:36.140 law violates God's

00:56:38.340 laws in the Bible. I am refusing to

00:56:40.220 comply with it.

00:56:43.300 And our

00:56:43.700 cartoons on the side, basically

00:56:48.140 here show, originally with Mary Simon,

00:56:50.600 it's been horrible timing

00:56:51.860 getting the change of guard

00:56:53.760 right at this point.

00:56:56.000 Horrible timing. And now

00:56:57.880 Louise Arbour. And essentially what this

00:57:00.120 shows is

00:57:01.000 Carney trying to get people to vote for his bill

00:57:05.180 No matter where you are in the party

00:57:08.360 To vote for them

00:57:09.720 And finally one MP says no sir

00:57:12.120 He's crossing the floor

00:57:13.240 But he's not crossing the floor to the other parties

00:57:15.560 He's crossing the floor to the king

00:57:17.500 And saying sir

00:57:18.560 I have to obey my oath to the king

00:57:20.840 That's what these Liberal Party members need to be doing

00:57:23.660 And the Conservatives

00:57:24.480 And the NDP

00:57:25.380 All of them

00:57:25.980 Their leader does not override their oath to the king

00:57:30.100 and finally I just want to point out the king the official title was changed in Canada by

00:57:37.140 Trudeau Justin Trudeau and he took out the word defender of the faith but nothing changes on that

00:57:44.360 constitutionally simply by taking that word out the constitutional oath in its entirety is still

00:57:50.920 sworn in by the king it's still required to be sworn in and they cannot change that

00:57:55.760 so hopefully folks this gives you an idea

00:57:59.720 of the supremacy of God in our law

00:58:02.020 where it comes from and the duty and obligation for all of us

00:58:06.080 to uphold God's laws

00:58:08.880 and recognize

00:58:11.620 that there will be coming a time

00:58:14.840 when we have to answer to our conscience

00:58:16.580 when you look at a statute and you go

00:58:19.600 I'm sorry this violates God's laws

00:58:22.440 that you promised me you would protect

00:58:24.500 and that I cannot violate my beliefs to God

00:58:29.940 in order to comply with your legislation.

00:58:33.000 And as Tanya mentioned earlier,

00:58:34.660 and I have talked about it at many of our protests and events

00:58:39.040 or protests and rallies we've had out here,

00:58:43.940 courage is the foundational aspect of what we believe.

00:58:48.820 And there's been a dearth, a real lack of courage

00:58:52.500 by a lot of us in society we need to get that courage back again and tell the government sorry

00:58:58.420 i'm not going to comply and remember all change takes place by saying no it does not take place

00:59:06.440 by complaining about what the government is doing and telling them they're wrong and then going and

00:59:10.420 doing it anyway that's not how change takes place so hopefully we'll get change back we need to get

00:59:16.940 the Lord's Prayer back in schools, and the provinces need to be doing that, because it

00:59:22.240 says to the utmost of their ability, they will uphold God's laws. We need it in all aspects of

00:59:27.080 our society, the courts, politicians, and the schools, again, before that change is going to

00:59:31.800 happen. I hope this was educational, and if there's any questions, you can definitely get

00:59:37.580 back to us as well, and let us know with any questions you might have. Thanks, Tanya.

00:59:41.760 Okay, well, wonderful. Thank you so much, David. That was very informative.

00:59:45.800 if you can just stop sharing screen and so to the pastors and church leaders who have joined us

00:59:52.880 today thank you so much for taking this time we are going to make this video available we know

00:59:58.120 some pastors could not make it today and so for everyone who has registered we will be sending an

01:00:04.920 email out and getting this into your hands we ask that you share it with other pastors this is just

01:00:10.140 step one. And we are committed to having more meetings with you. The next one will be a regular

01:00:17.300 Zoom so that we can have an open Q&A. As Pastor Dan had said, we're going to be asking Pastor

01:00:23.640 Truella to come on and give his testimony. I think you will feel encouraged and inspired by it.

01:00:29.600 And so there is no simple answer to the passing of Bill C-9 other than being courageous and

01:00:36.020 refusing to comply, because we know that this is a man-made law, and it goes against God's

01:00:42.300 law and the Word of God. And so we will continue to encourage you. If you do have any questions,

01:00:48.100 you can reach Pastor Dan at pastors at actionforcanada.ca, and that's with the number

01:00:53.760 four, pastors at actionforcanada.ca, and we will notify you as soon as we have another meeting set

01:01:03.580 up. We were going to do a month, but I'm thinking two weeks may be a better idea as everybody

01:01:08.800 rallies together right now and tries to decide how they're going to approach this. Some have

01:01:14.980 even talked about the possibility of having a day of declaration, I guess, where we all speak

01:01:23.780 out at the same time on the Word of God and all stand united together. And if COVID taught us

01:01:29.560 anything. It's that, you know, the pastors should learn from this. Romans 13 does not work in this

01:01:36.000 situation. We are not to obey government over God, and it's quite the opposite. So we'll continue to

01:01:42.020 support you in that and encourage you. So Pastor Dan, would you please close us in prayer, or if

01:01:47.840 you have any closing words on that as well? Yeah, thanks, Tanya, and thank you, David, for all that

01:01:52.780 valuable information. Let me just remind you all that all throughout the Old Testament, you know,

01:01:58.300 we are reminded that the day of judgment is coming where every unjust judge king uh anyone

01:02:05.400 who is in a position of rulership they will all have their day before god and god hates injustice

01:02:12.060 and uh even though you know it may feel a little bit oppressive right now it's a time to shine

01:02:17.400 and it's a time that we can just really be courageous and um you know you may be wondering

01:02:25.120 so what is where does that leave me you know what does that mean for me in the pulpit going forward

01:02:30.140 do i change my style of preaching do i change what i preach on absolutely not if it's in god's word

01:02:36.360 it's your calling to preach god's word from genesis to revelation and the government may

01:02:44.780 threaten you and uh you know you got to look at what happened with uh uh god's servants throughout

01:02:51.100 history you know persecution is nothing new and certainly nobody wants to go through persecution

01:02:55.820 nobody wants to suffer for the sake of the gospel but we are told that we may have to

01:03:00.280 and uh god forbid that you know some would be martyred but there's a special a special reward 1.00

01:03:07.360 for the martyrs too and you know thank the lord that we don't live in places like nigeria right

01:03:12.120 now or or uh other places where you know it's it's a heavy price to play to pay if you are a

01:03:19.100 believer. Those things may be coming to Canada, but for now, let's take the freedoms and the

01:03:24.080 liberties that we have. Let's be courageous. And this is a time where Canadians are looking for

01:03:29.180 hope. They're looking for answers, and they're looking for the truth. And they're not going to

01:03:33.440 get it from Walmart or Superstore. They're going to get it from church. And so let your church shine

01:03:39.480 with the truth of the gospel. So thank you for joining with us. Heavenly Father, bless this time

01:03:45.560 that we've had together.

01:03:47.340 Bless the words that came forth.

01:03:49.040 Lord, we have such a rich history in Canada.

01:03:53.300 You spoke to the hearts and minds of men

01:03:55.800 who put together our constitution, our charter,

01:03:59.320 and we don't know where all of them stood

01:04:01.820 in a relationship with you.

01:04:03.900 But Lord, we believe that you took the time

01:04:06.220 to put these men together and to use their words

01:04:10.060 and to formulate them into sort of like a stone fortress in the protection of Canada.

01:04:18.400 And even for those that have visited our parliament buildings in Ottawa,

01:04:24.020 we see etched in stone and in glass scriptures that point to who you are

01:04:30.060 and what you have done in history and in God's word.

01:04:37.340 And so, Lord, we will stand firm upon that.

01:04:39.720 Your word tells us, Lord, that your word will stand firm and strong to the end.

01:04:46.540 And when the enemy tries to, you know, come against the church, come against God's people, come against whatever it is that you're doing, it always backfires.

01:04:59.420 And so, Lord, find us to be men and women of courage during this time and to be obedient to the calling you've placed upon us.

01:05:05.740 So I pray your blessing upon David and his ministry.

01:05:08.700 I pray your blessing upon Tanya and the work of action for Canada and all of these pastors that

01:05:15.320 we're on today, Lord, and those that be watching this video, even after the fact, Lord, we just

01:05:21.220 pray your blessing upon the ministry and help them to be people of courage, Lord, by your Holy Spirit

01:05:27.160 and to finish the task well, because we all want to hear those words. Well done. Well done,

01:05:32.940 good and faithful servant we ask this now in jesus name amen amen amen thank you thank you

01:05:40.980 david thank you pastor dan thank you pastors for joining us

Action4Canada - June 22, 2026

Pastors Webinar Bill C-9 and Coronation Oath

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript