Action4Canada - June 22, 2026


Pastors Webinar Bill C-9 and Coronation Oath

Topics
coronation oath letters common law supremacy constitution supremacy God coronation oath
Hosted by
Tanya Gaw
Guests
Action
Mentioned
David Lindsay Queen Elizabeth Bill C-63 Louise Arbour King Charles Mark Simone O'Donoghue Bill C9 Majesty Pierre Trudeau Juanita Nathan Brian Peckford Pastor Trewella Dominion Day Charles III Magna Carta King James George III Pastor Dan John Doe and 9 more
Chiefs Wanted Schools No Empower Hour Next Week Enjoy Dominion Day

Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 5 minutes

Words per minute

166.39

Word count

10,937

Sentence count

441

Harmful content

Misogyny

3

sentences flagged

Toxicity

8

sentences flagged

Hate speech

27

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In light of Bill C-9 being passed in Canada, Pastor Tanya Goff encourages us to be strong and courageous in the face of persecution. She reminds us that the Lord has promised never to leave us, nor forsake us.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00 all right welcome everyone to this very important pastors webinar with action for canada today is
00:00:12 thursday june the 18th and uh we are very privileged to have with us today tanya goff
00:00:18 founder of action for canada and um we have a very special guest that i'll let tanya introduce
00:00:24 here in just a little bit but uh we are hosting this in light of the fact that bill c9 has just
00:00:29 passed in canada and as action for canada's national pastor and church coordinator i just
00:00:36 want to start uh with a very um with a message to really encourage you across canada if you're in
00:00:42 the pastoral ministry in any way shape or form i want to encourage you that these days are not
00:00:49 necessarily dark days but these are days that other pastors and ministers have faced throughout
00:00:53 history and so i just want to read you a couple of scriptures that came to my heart when i
00:00:59 heard that Bill C9 has passed. Well, over the last few months, Bill C9 has been kind of in the house
00:01:04 in that. When we've come to a crossroads, Joshua, when he faced taking the nation of Israel into 0.59
00:01:13 the promised land, his counterpart Moses that he had spent over 40 years with had passed on,
00:01:20 and now it was his daunting task to bring this vast group of perhaps up to a couple of million
00:01:26 people into the promised land and so god repeatedly a number of times in joshua chapter one
00:01:31 and i want to read just one verse but god repeated a number of times this the same message and so in
00:01:37 joshua chapter one verse nine the lord says this is my command be strong and courageous do not be
00:01:45 afraid or discouraged for the lord your god is with you wherever you go and we're reminded of
00:01:51 that again over and over and over again today the lord has promised never to leave us nor forsake us
00:01:58 and i want to read to you another verse in scripture that's not often taught on or or even
00:02:04 touched upon and it's at the very end in the book of revelation in revelation chapter 21
00:02:09 it gives us a list of people that will not make it into glory and um it's a stern warning but in
00:02:17 In Revelation 21, beginning at verse 8, it says,
00:02:20 But cowards, or cowardly, the cowardly, unbelievers, the corrupt, murderers, the immoral, 0.98
00:02:27 those who practice witchcraft, auto-worshippers, and all liars, 1.00
00:02:30 their fate is in the fiery lake of burning sulfur. 0.99
00:02:33 This is a second death. 0.93
00:02:34 It always amazes me that it doesn't put people like the Hitlers of the day,
00:02:39 or the murderers first, but it puts the cowardly.
00:02:43 So this is a time where we will not be cowards.
00:02:47 We will be strong and courageous and we will not fear.
00:02:51 And so these are exciting days to be alive.
00:02:54 And I'm always reminded of the persecuted church around the world, how it's growing and how it is strong.
00:03:03 And when people are faced with persecution, and this may be very well be the beginning of persecution for the Christian church in Canada.
00:03:11 but this is the time where God will sift the church perhaps and this is a time where you that
00:03:17 are in pastoral ministry maybe you're a lay person and involved in ministry in your church
00:03:23 but this is a time for you to stand firm and strong in the word of God and when the church
00:03:28 was first established about 2,000 years ago when those in power said to those that were
00:03:36 new in their faith in the lord jesus christ don't preach in that name again they said um you know
00:03:43 we've thought this through and we're going to obey god before we obey you so i want to welcome
00:03:49 you all to this webinar and a couple things i want to mention first of all is we are not here
00:03:54 today to provide to you any kind of legal advice we're going to give you great advice but it's not
00:03:59 legal advice okay and the second thing that i want to share with you is um a lot of what we have been
00:04:05 doing and sharing, particularly in the pastoral department here with Action for Canada, is based
00:04:12 on our thoughts and our beliefs and our biblical convictions on the doctrines of the lesser
00:04:18 magistrates. We've had Pastor Matthew Torella on as a guest a couple of times, and we've had him
00:04:25 on the Empower Hour. We've also had him on one of our webinars dealing with homeschooling.
00:04:32 And so we're perhaps going to look to see if we can get him on on another pastor's webinar here in the next little while to explain really what authorities our authorities really have.
00:04:43 And that's what our guest is going to explain to us today.
00:04:47 What authorities do the elected or sort of elected authorities have over us versus what authority God has over us in the Bible?
00:04:59 and we've got a choice who we're going to listen to because ultimately we all stand before God
00:05:06 and stand in judgment of him so again I want to welcome you to our empower not empower hour but
00:05:12 our pastor's webinar today I'm so used to saying empower hour but at this time I would like to
00:05:18 introduce Tanya Gah the founder of Action for Canada who so courageously almost 12 years ago
00:05:23 responded to the call of God when God called her to into this ministry. And so Tanya, welcome and
00:05:30 thank you for joining us with us today. Yeah, thank you so much, Dan. It is just such an honor
00:05:35 to be here and speaking with all the pastors and church leaders who have taken the time out today
00:05:40 to join us. As Dan said, we're not offering legal advice, but what we are going to do is provide you
00:05:45 resources and educational material that will help embolden you. As we say, you know what, we need
00:05:52 courage in this day. We say knowledge is power. The Bible says for a lack of knowledge, people
00:05:57 perish. And so the fact that Canada is a Christian nation, we are not secular, we are not multicultural,
00:06:04 and we are certainly not a state, a post-national state with no core identity. These lies have been 0.92
00:06:10 repeated often enough, so the next generation will embrace them. And that's what they're doing
00:06:15 through our education system as well, is that they are trying to erase our history. And so
00:06:20 So David Lindsay is our guest today from CLEAR Common Law Education and Rights,
00:06:25 and he is going to go over some material as well that informs us of our history.
00:06:32 I will start out by sharing my screen,
00:06:36 and I am going to provide you some of the resources that Action for Canada has as well
00:06:41 that will facilitate you.
00:06:45 And like I say, I want to see that there's going to be a fire in your belly moving forward
00:06:50 where you can stand boldly in the position that, yes, this is a Christian nation. They cannot 1.00
00:06:55 criminalize scripture. They're going to try. During COVID, they tried to shut the pastors down and
00:07:01 stop us from preaching the gospel and gathering. And it was the churches that stayed open. Yes,
00:07:06 they may have got some fines, and those fines pretty much disappeared once they were challenged
00:07:10 because they knew it was illegal and it couldn't have passed through the Supreme Courts. And so
00:07:15 we're we're being tested again and this is another season where they're trying to come through they
00:07:21 are in violation of the constitution of the charter rights and everything that god has blessed
00:07:27 us with that the fathers of confederation gifted us with and and so we're going to go over those
00:07:33 materials yes bill c9 has passed um because of the foundation because we feel so confident that
00:07:41 we have the freedom of religion, even though they've removed the good faith religious expression
00:07:46 defense, should not stop us from quoting scripture and reading the Bible. And I'm even going to
00:07:52 provide a response that one of the MPs did in one of Action for Canada's multiple Coliseum action
00:07:59 that we had against Bill C-9. And so we started in December, but we took a different angle. And
00:08:07 we were approaching this not from our members. We've got 100,000 members across the country
00:08:13 saying that, you know, we disagree with this, don't remove the good faith clause. We went by it. I was
00:08:19 like, okay, what you're doing is actually in violation of the coronation oath. And so we
00:08:25 challenged the members of parliament. We challenged the then Governor General Mary Simon, who is now
00:08:31 Louise Arbour. We challenged the senators. And we believe that we have made progress. We're bringing
00:08:37 awareness to something, the coronation oath that I call a buried treasure that needs to be
00:08:41 resurrected. And once you hear David's presentation, you're going to say, wow, okay, I've got that fire
00:08:46 in my belly, I'm going to stand firm, I'm going to preach the gospel on Sunday, and I'm not going
00:08:51 to hold back. So I'll share my screen right now. And I'm going to, like I say, go through a couple
00:08:56 of resources to help you. This is a look at Action for Canada nationwide, just in case you're
00:09:03 unfamiliar with it, and I will move in here. So as I mentioned, Bill C-9, we've been going many,
00:09:11 many months at fighting this. We had a last-ditch effort this week of all of our members sending
00:09:16 the Coronation Oath letters advising MPs and the Governor-General of what their duties and
00:09:24 limitations are. The Bill C-9 correspondence with the MP I just mentioned was Juanita Nathan.
00:09:32 She is a liberal. And literally, she has stated freedom of religion and expression is a fundamental guarantee under Section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Nothing in Bill C-9 changes that. And this is one of the really important reasons it is to converse with elected officials during such times as this because you want this on public record.
00:09:55 And this is the section I was mentioning. She goes, to make this evidently clearer, we have also added four greater certainty clauses that explicitly protect sermons, religious teachings, and good faith discussions of scripture.
00:10:10 And most importantly, every individual's freedom of religion, this is what it says, remains fully and unambiguously protected under the charter.
00:10:18 for reference the amendment reads as follows and this is 11.11 I'll just read this one I won't read
00:10:26 the whole letter for greater certainty nothing in subsection 319.2 or 2.2 of the criminal code
00:10:32 shall be construed as prohibiting a person from communicating a statement on a matter of public
00:10:36 interest including an educational religious political or scientific statement made in the
00:10:42 course of a discussion publication or debate if they do not willfully this is the clause right
00:10:47 this is the section, if they do not willfully promote hatred against the unidentifiable group
00:10:52 by communicating the statement. And that's where they're going to want to get the pastors, people
00:10:57 like myself, I'm proclaiming the Word of God every single week on the Empower Hour. And I'm not going
00:11:03 to stop doing that, especially because there are what is an identifiable group? Is it going to be
00:11:09 the LGBTQ? Is it going to be the Muslims? You know, the sensitivities of people have increased 0.99
00:11:15 because they are using these hate speech laws as a lawfare, as a weapon of warfare.
00:11:22 And so if we are going to end up in court over this,
00:11:26 we have the Word of God and the materials we're going to share with you today on our side.
00:11:31 So stand firm.
00:11:33 Now, this is the page of the Coronation Oath.
00:11:36 It is on Action for Canada's website.
00:11:39 In the menu, it says Current Issues.
00:11:41 If you scroll down three tabs, it'll say the Coronation Oath.
00:11:45 The materials that David is going to cover today, previous, we've had David on so many times, as you can see, we created a page.
00:11:53 And we talk about property rights and all of the rights, the God-given unalienable rights that God has given us according to the coronation oath, which is a binding document.
00:12:06 And this is why I say you'll learn why I say it's a buried treasure they don't want us to know about, and they're certainly not teaching it to our children in school.
00:12:14 So here are the letters that went to the governor generals, a member of parliament, senators, etc.
00:12:19 I'm going to talk about Canada as a Christian nation.
00:12:22 This is one page we can find the resources on.
00:12:24 And then we also have a church resource page.
00:12:28 Now, the coronation oath, as I said, you know, they want to say, oh, no, no, it's just ceremonial.
00:12:33 It's not binding, but it is binding.
00:12:36 And as evidence of that, there was an open letter to His Majesty, the King Charles III, by a bishop.
00:12:43 in Europe, Bishop Dewar. And he came out with an incredible letter. Oh, this man is just
00:12:51 amazing. And then he actually has a recorded version of this as well, which we have on our
00:12:55 webpage. And you can even just Google his name, look him up, and you'll be able to watch the video
00:13:00 or read this letter. And he really clearly said that the king is in violation of what? The
00:13:05 coronation oath. This is one of the letters that David had crafted. This is the one to
00:13:13 Right Honorable Louise Arbour, the new Governor General, who is a full-on United Nations globalist.
00:13:19 So we believe that our action that we put forward, advising Mary Simon that she has a limit. She
00:13:27 cannot give royal assent to legislation that is in violation of the King's oath. She does not have
00:13:33 more power than the king. And by passing legislation that purportedly criminalizes
00:13:39 scripture, she would be in violation of her oath to the king. David will explain more about that,
00:13:45 but I would encourage you to go onto this page, read the letter so that you are well-versed and
00:13:50 well-educated on it, and even start talking about it in church. Maybe have a service. This should be
00:13:55 something exciting. We as Christians have guaranteed rights in this country. Bring this up at church on
00:14:02 Sunday morning. Canada is a Christian nation. This will be on the pastor resource page and what this
00:14:08 is, it's just this PDF that we've created with a lot of our history easily accessible. So the
00:14:15 Constitution Act, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, of course, opens up with the preamble
00:14:20 whereas Canada is founded upon the principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law
00:14:25 colon. And as we go into explain the opening words to the charter are the framework principles
00:14:31 Christian biblical principles based on God the creator through which the charter is to be
00:14:36 interpreted and supersedes any other sections items listed under general that suggest otherwise
00:14:43 so that colon is extremely powerful that means when the section on multiculturalism section 27
00:14:51 that means yes we may have many people from different cultures living in Canada but they
00:14:57 must all embrace our values, our Christian values in this country and abide by our rule of law,
00:15:04 the Magna Carta, all which focuses on and was built from biblical principles. So this is a good,
00:15:10 this is really good news. And that's why I say knowledge is power. So dig into this page. There's
00:15:15 Supreme Court rulings that we've included. And down at the very bottom, we had made this resource
00:15:21 available during COVID, so-called COVID-19 pandemic, and because we wanted pastors who
00:15:27 were being threatened by arrest to know that section 176.1 of the Canadian Criminal Code,
00:15:34 which was first passed in 1892, which protects Christian clergymen and ministers, okay,
00:15:41 it doesn't protect imams, there were no Muslim, Sikhs, Hindus that were here during the foundation
00:15:49 of this nation, and this is evidence of our history. So back to 1892, clergymen and ministers
00:15:56 were provided a protection that nobody could abstract or violence or arrest officiating
00:16:03 clergymen, and that must stand today. So it's a great resource. Here it is again. I just wanted
00:16:09 to highlight the Where is Canada is founded on the principles that recognize the supremacy of God
00:16:14 in the rule of law, there's that beautiful colon. So get to know how powerful that little
00:16:18 symbol is. Another resource we've made available is the history of the Dominion Day of Canada
00:16:25 and the change to Canada Day on July 1st. We call it, we're celebrating Dominion Day. We're never
00:16:32 going to celebrate Canada Day again. And you'll learn how they have chipped away at undermining
00:16:38 Christianity in this nation for several decades. And so, of course, the Dominion of Canada was
00:16:47 formed from Psalm 72.8, he shall have dominion also from sea to sea and from the river unto the
00:16:54 ends of the earth. And so you can imagine why a Liberal MP put legislation forward for the name
00:17:02 change in 1982 and changing it to Canada Day. So we're going to just rebuke that. We're going to
00:17:09 continue to call it Dominion Day celebration. We never want to use their language now that we're
00:17:14 getting keen to how many things that they've changed. And finally, I have created just recently,
00:17:20 I've launched a research paper challenging the expansive interpretation of religion under
00:17:25 Section 2A of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Think about that, the expansive
00:17:30 interpretation of religion. What does it include? It now includes other systems of belief that in
00:17:38 biblical times, in historical times, it was known as false gods. So we have been duped into giving
00:17:45 false gods protection under the freedom of religion. And Brian Peckford, the last living
00:17:53 signatory of the Charter of Rights, clearly said, and I had him on the show to get it under recording,
00:17:59 is that when they included freedom of religion in the Charter,
00:18:03 it was to give protection to the church,
00:18:05 to keep the government out of the business of the church.
00:18:08 Because, of course, Pierre Elliott Trudeau was Prime Minister back then,
00:18:12 and if he had it his way,
00:18:13 and he tried really hard to get God even removed from the Charter of Rights,
00:18:17 but he did not succeed.
00:18:18 We've got to praise the Lord for that.
00:18:20 So I would encourage you to review this document.
00:18:25 It is extremely powerful.
00:18:26 I've created a U.S. version as well
00:18:28 and my contacts in the U.S.
00:18:30 have committed to take it to the White House
00:18:32 and the Texas legislature
00:18:33 because there is power in this
00:18:35 we will not call other false gods a religion
00:18:40 that phrase was coined during the 16th to 19th century
00:18:45 so again it's a powerful document
00:18:47 God put it on my heart
00:18:48 and he doesn't give us a mission to fail
00:18:50 so we are praying that this is going to have an impact in Canada
00:18:53 and in other Commonwealth countries around the world.
00:18:57 And so finally, under resources in our menu,
00:19:01 you scroll down to church resources
00:19:03 and you can see our doctrinal statement.
00:19:06 Again, Canada is a Christian nation.
00:19:08 Here is our historical resources that I was referring to
00:19:11 and that one click away from the Coronation Oath page.
00:19:15 We do a prayer walk for revival
00:19:16 seven weeks from Passover to Pentecost.
00:19:19 Every year, we just finished our fourth annual one
00:19:22 And God has answered just absolutely miraculous prayers.
00:19:27 One of those was in Alberta, where Action for Canada's teams had been lobbying the provincial government
00:19:34 and on behalf of our children to remove SOGI 123, the sexual pornographic books.
00:19:40 And we've had a great win.
00:19:42 They passed Bill 25.
00:19:43 And as of this January, all political and ideological agendas will be removed from the education system in Alberta.
00:19:51 And so can we hear a praise alleluia to that? And so the work that we're doing is absolutely amazing. We are uncompromising to the Word of God. If it doesn't align with the Word of God, then we will not be involved in that.
00:20:04 We will not use the language of the liberals who are definitely trying to undermine our Christianity.
00:20:13 And finally, on the false gods as well, my heart says that as an example of us not being uncompromising to the word of God,
00:20:21 the top two commandments say you shall have no other gods before me or make for yourselves idols,
00:20:26 and that he will visit the third and fourth generations with the harm that would come to those that open that door.
00:20:34 and that God is a jealous God. And so I look at that and I think, oh my goodness,
00:20:39 God is absolutely serious on a great reset in Canada. It's not Klaus Schwab's Great Reset.
00:20:46 This is a spiritual reset where God wants us to clean up Canada. The Bible says, 0.65
00:20:53 when you go into a nation, do not sign treaties with them. I believe all of what is going on with 0.69
00:20:59 the Indian Act, land grabs, I believe God is bringing this attention and awareness 0.53
00:21:03 so that God is going to remove those treaties. 0.82
00:21:06 We believe that the false gods in this nation,
00:21:10 to be obedient to God because he is a jealous God and takes this serious,
00:21:14 that we need to move towards shutting these false gods down
00:21:17 and that we definitely need to protect the over 100,000 babies
00:21:22 that are being murdered every year in Canada
00:21:26 in what's supposed to be a developed civil Western nation.
00:21:30 And so we got some work to do.
00:21:32 God's very serious about this, and he's calling on us to be uncompromising and to be courageous.
00:21:37 And so with that, thank you for your time.
00:21:40 I hope you go in and dig in and research this material.
00:21:43 And now, David, Lindsay, my friend, over to you.
00:21:46 We look forward to your presentation.
00:21:49 Thank you.
00:21:50 Can you hear me okay?
00:21:52 We can.
00:21:53 All right.
00:21:53 Cool.
00:21:54 Well, thanks, everyone, for showing up.
00:21:56 I'm David Lindsay, and I'm with Clear Common Law Education and Rights.
00:21:59 and we formed originally about 25 years ago here in British Columbia
00:22:03 specifically on the goal of eliminating usury or money
00:22:07 or interest I should say in the money system of Canada
00:22:10 which as many of you know are prohibited in the Bible
00:22:13 and we should not be having that in our money system
00:22:16 so we formed on that basis
00:22:19 and then we branched out into a number of other areas
00:22:22 including this specific area on the coronation oath
00:22:25 and people have been trying to rule the world since the beginning of time
00:22:30 and I keep telling people that why would you think it's any different today
00:22:34 if they try and call you a conspiracy theorist for example
00:22:37 I refer to myself as a conspiracy factualist
00:22:40 because the facts are there, the evidence is there
00:22:43 and we need to simply let people know what is going on
00:22:45 and it's interesting that many people claim that we are a secular country
00:22:52 including a recent MP that me and Tanya went and talked to
00:22:55 in Ottawa. And my first question to him was, if we're a secular country, where do you get that
00:23:01 knowledge and information from? What law was passed to create us as a secular country? And I
00:23:07 never, ever get an answer. And I certainly did not get one from this MP. Christianity cannot be
00:23:14 separated from our government. That is a myth. And they promote that myth, of course, to eliminate 0.99
00:23:21 Christianity eventually from our law. Many people will be 0.99
00:23:25 surprised to know, and I'll show you today, how and why
00:23:29 the Coronation Oath of the King overrides even the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in
00:23:33 Canada. So let's move on here. This opening letter
00:23:37 is something that you're more than welcome to copy,
00:23:41 and you can send this to every MP and MLA in Canada
00:23:45 that you think needs to be educated on this issue.
00:23:49 Even many of the Christian MPs and MLAs are simply not aware of their oath of allegiance and what it means.
00:23:57 And this is important to tell them, this package that I'm about to show you can be sent to them as well.
00:24:04 So this is our index of what we're going to go through today.
00:24:07 Basically, we're talking on the supremacy of God in our law,
00:24:11 and that the Charter is not the only document in our Constitution,
00:24:14 why we have royal assent, and the nature of royal assent, and what the powers of the legislatures
00:24:20 and the kings will be. So let's dive right in here right now. The first thing we're going to
00:24:25 talk about is that our Constitution recognizes the supremacy of God in our law. And this is
00:24:31 critical because the most important aspect of everything is the beginning. Governments like
00:24:36 to talk in generalities. They like to talk in the present tense without telling you history,
00:24:42 because he who does not know his history, of course, is doomed to repeat it.
00:24:46 So they want you to know nothing about history.
00:24:49 And I'm here to tell you a little bit about it.
00:24:51 This is a sample of the information that we have available.
00:24:55 And some of this comes from case law, some of it from judges themselves
00:24:58 and articles that have been written.
00:25:00 And the first thing is the Streeter's case in 1653 in England
00:25:04 where God made man and the laws of God, or I should say the laws of England,
00:25:08 are grounded on the laws of God.
00:25:10 This is one of the first cases to show that English law, which we have in Canada, was all based on the Bible.
00:25:19 And here's a number of other ones.
00:25:21 And again, these are samples.
00:25:23 This was originally the letter I referred to, that you can read here,
00:25:29 and definitely send it to all MPs along with this package, which can be printed off as well.
00:25:35 And they need to be made aware of everything that's in here.
00:25:38 and this is basically what I first talked about
00:25:41 is the Streeter's case that the laws of England
00:25:44 are grounded in the laws of God
00:25:46 there's a number of case law that have upheld
00:25:48 Christianity as being part of our law in Canada
00:25:50 here's some more of them including this Byrd case
00:25:53 right at the beginning
00:25:54 and there's no act which Christianity forbids 0.67
00:25:58 the law will not reach
00:25:59 if it were otherwise Christianity would not be
00:26:02 as it has always been held to be part of the law of England
00:26:04 this has been the law of England since at least
00:26:07 At least 900 AD, Christianity has formed part of our law of England.
00:26:12 It's been upheld by every major judge throughout history, and law professor, and so on.
00:26:19 It's also involved in our law, and I should say in our courts, because the proceeding
00:26:25 in our courts are founded upon the law of England, which is founded on the law of God.
00:26:29 And this is one of the reasons that England had a problem separating from, or joining
00:26:34 the European Union, because it would have allowed the European Union to come in and
00:26:39 take over.
00:26:40 And as I'll show you a little bit later, our law does not recognize other forms of law
00:26:44 other than Christianity.
00:26:46 It's part of the law of the land, as you see in William's case, and the law of the
00:26:53 land has always been common law, which is the foundation of our law.
00:26:57 so many other authors have written about
00:27:01 basically the supremacy of God in our law
00:27:05 and how our law has been based on Christianity
00:27:07 and the one thing I do want to show you
00:27:09 is the Munster versus Lamb case at the bottom
00:27:12 liberals I guess and the judges
00:27:15 most of whom are appointed by liberals today
00:27:17 want you to believe that the common law is judgment law
00:27:21 it is not and never was
00:27:23 common law is a set of principles that originated in the Bible
00:27:26 and it were passed on from generation to generation.
00:27:30 And these principles are what formed the common law.
00:27:35 And the judges got lazy.
00:27:37 And instead of researching the principles
00:27:38 and applying them to the facts of the case,
00:27:41 they would just quote another judge
00:27:43 and say, well, look what Judge John Doe has gone and done.
00:27:46 I think he's right.
00:27:47 So they got lazy and didn't do any work.
00:27:50 And that was the whole purpose for precedent
00:27:52 and following judges.
00:27:54 But it is not our common law.
00:27:56 here are the fundamental principles
00:27:59 there is really no system of law in the world
00:28:02 freer in principle than our common law
00:28:05 and when people say to me
00:28:06 we need to change the system
00:28:08 and I go why
00:28:09 what are you going to replace it with that's better
00:28:10 there is nothing
00:28:12 it's not the law that's the problem
00:28:14 it's the people in power
00:28:16 that we have allowed to get into power
00:28:18 that are evil
00:28:19 that we need to remove
00:28:20 the system of law is the best
00:28:22 you can do everything you want
00:28:23 as long as it is not expressly prohibited.
00:28:27 And there are limitations on what the king can prohibit.
00:28:31 The foundation of our law is freedom.
00:28:33 And you have that in no other law in the world.
00:28:36 And it's based primarily on the Bible.
00:28:39 Do unto others as you would have done unto you,
00:28:41 and do not do unto others as you would not have done unto you.
00:28:45 Keep your contracts and don't infringe on the rights, freedom,
00:28:48 of property of the other.
00:28:49 And as I said earlier, the law of England does not recognize any other form of law.
00:28:54 Christianity, our common law, does not recognize socialism or communism,
00:28:59 which are primarily atheistic by design.
00:29:02 We don't recognize that, period.
00:29:06 If there's a conflict, God's laws are to be followed.
00:29:11 Not man's laws. Not statute law.
00:29:13 And if any statutes violate God's laws, as Broome pointed out here in the middle of the page on the left, they are no force in effect.
00:29:23 You can't serve two masters.
00:29:25 You can't serve statutes in man that violate the Bible and claim to be Christian.
00:29:30 It's important that people realize we need to follow God's laws in the Bible.
00:29:37 We do not need to follow man's laws unless they don't violate God's laws.
00:29:43 For example, passing a law that says you can drive on the right-hand side of the road.
00:29:47 There's nothing wrong with that.
00:29:49 Therefore, it would be binding upon us.
00:29:52 But once that line is crossed, where statutes and policies override God's laws,
00:29:58 that is where the dividing line in the sand has to be.
00:30:02 And this common law followed England.
00:30:04 It followed the flag all the way to Canada.
00:30:06 So we've got it in our Constitution.
00:30:09 And our Constitution is pretty simple.
00:30:11 it outlines all the relationships between men and people throughout the country,
00:30:16 men in the government, I should say, and the king.
00:30:19 Both are applicable here because we have a king, in fact, not just parliament.
00:30:24 We have the king and right of Canada.
00:30:26 We have the king and right of the provinces.
00:30:29 Constitution just defines the relationship between who's in charge and the people below it,
00:30:33 keeping in mind the people in charge get their power from the people below it, right?
00:30:38 and importantly most people are not aware of these constitutional principles that i'm about
00:30:44 to tell you the constitution is neither one document or two it is a series of documents
00:30:51 if it affects the nature of the relationship between the monarch and the people it is part
00:30:56 of our constitution and the first one that did that was magna carta and insofar as they have
00:31:02 not been repealed and the people have allowed it to be repealed they are for still a force in effect
00:31:07 So a lot of provisions in Magna Carta are still part of our Constitution.
00:31:12 The Constitution, of course, is not exhaustive.
00:31:16 There's a lot of documents that are not in this Constitution Act
00:31:21 that are not in there that are still part of our Constitution
00:31:26 and a number of unwritten principles as well.
00:31:29 If you look on the right, these are just a sample of some of our constitutional documents.
00:31:34 The BNA Act of 1867, the Constitution Act 82, the Statute of Westminster 1931, if you read Section 7, it expressly states it does not affect the BNA Act at all, the Charter, and 5, 6, and 7 here on the right-hand side would show that it is an act for establishing the Coronation Act, or the Coronation Oath, I should say, the English Bill of Rights, and the Act of Settlement, which are all part of what's known as the Rules of Succession of the King.
00:32:04 And they apply here in Canada.
00:32:06 Every document in our Constitution, every one of them,
00:32:11 recognizes somewhere in those documents the supremacy of God.
00:32:14 Going back to Magna Carta, that alone tells you it is ingrained in our law,
00:32:20 independent of the king and independent of government.
00:32:22 The people said from the beginning, God's laws will prevail.
00:32:27 And we got that in the BNA Act, with a Constitution similar in principle to the United Kingdom,
00:32:32 which included a number of unwritten constitutional principles as well.
00:32:39 Consequently, if the Constitution is the supreme law
00:32:42 and founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God,
00:32:48 then clearly any law that violates the Constitution,
00:32:52 including the coronation oath, is of no force and effect.
00:32:55 And as Tanya has pointed out, that colon that you can see
00:32:58 on the right-hand side of the page
00:33:00 means that under the Canadian
00:33:02 Styles Manual, that everything that
00:33:04 follows after it is subsumed
00:33:06 within the overriding parameters
00:33:08 of the supremacy of God and the
00:33:10 rule of law. Those are the railings
00:33:12 that all
00:33:14 law, all statutes and orders
00:33:16 and regulations and so on have to comply
00:33:18 with.
00:33:21 This on
00:33:22 the left-hand side from reference
00:33:24 Rebuild 30 in Ontario
00:33:26 went to the Supreme Court of Canada
00:33:28 One constitutional provision cannot override another.
00:33:32 So the Charter cannot be used to override the Coronation Oath of the King.
00:33:38 It cannot be used to override the Constitution or BNA Act of 1867. 0.91
00:33:44 And they came first. 0.92
00:33:46 And when Queen Elizabeth signed the Charter, where did she get her power?
00:33:49 She got it from the Coronation Oath, which we'll talk about in a few minutes. 0.98
00:33:53 And that oath requires her to preserve principles of Christianity.
00:33:58 and the supremacy of God.
00:33:59 So she could not sign the Canada Act
00:34:02 to give supremacy to any other God 0.72
00:34:06 other than the Christian God. 0.89
00:34:08 She did not have the power to do that. 0.67
00:34:10 In the O'Donoghue case in Ontario,
00:34:13 it went to the Court of Appeal,
00:34:15 and O'Donoghue wanted to get Catholicism
00:34:19 recognized in our Constitution
00:34:20 so that Catholics could hold the position of the monarch.
00:34:24 And the court stated,
00:34:25 Her Majesty is now Queen of Canada
00:34:28 but she is Queen of Canada
00:34:29 because she's Queen of the United Kingdom
00:34:31 it is not a separate office
00:34:33 it is the sovereign who is recognized
00:34:36 as the sovereign of the United Kingdom
00:34:38 who is our sovereign
00:34:39 these rules of succession
00:34:41 and the requirement may be the same
00:34:43 as those in Great Britain
00:34:44 are necessary to the proper functioning
00:34:46 of our constitutional monarchy
00:34:48 and therefore rules are not
00:34:50 the rules, the rules of succession
00:34:52 are not subject to the Charter
00:34:54 these rules of succession
00:34:56 which set out the coronation oath
00:34:58 are not subject to the charter
00:35:00 period
00:35:01 so think about that in relation to equality
00:35:04 immigration
00:35:05 multiculturalism 1.00
00:35:07 those cannot be used to override
00:35:10 the coronation oath of the king
00:35:11 and because the king is head of state
00:35:18 he has to give royal assent to all legislation
00:35:20 excuse me, federal and provincial
00:35:22 and part of that reason is for the monarch to have checks and balances over parliament
00:35:27 and parliament is there to make sure they have checks and balances over the king
00:35:31 so that the king does not become a despot as has happened in the past
00:35:35 both are there to be a check and balance on each other
00:35:39 and the ultimate source of power is the king and his oath to uphold god's laws
00:35:44 in canada the king is represented as shown at the bottom on the page 19 here
00:35:51 by the Governor-General of Canada.
00:35:54 All executive government rests in the King,
00:35:56 and then that's carried on by the Governor-General
00:36:00 in the name of the King.
00:36:07 Section 55 is important because it points out
00:36:10 of the Constitution Act of 1867
00:36:13 that the Governor-General has a discretion
00:36:18 whether to give royal assent to bills passed by Parliament.
00:36:21 It's not mandatory.
00:36:23 They tried to tell you that it's convention,
00:36:26 that they have to do it by convention.
00:36:28 However, the Supreme Court of Canada has already ruled
00:36:31 that conventions are not part of our Constitution.
00:36:35 What it is, effectively, is the government is saying,
00:36:37 look, we've done this for so long,
00:36:40 they should just give royal assent to it automatically.
00:36:44 That is a violation of the oath,
00:36:46 of their oath of allegiance and oath of office to the king, period.
00:36:51 So they can't do that.
00:36:53 And there's been a number of times when royal assent has been refused.
00:36:57 And it can be done again.
00:36:58 And in fact, it needs to be done.
00:37:01 Every time that parliament or the legislatures recommend to the king to break the law by giving them a bill that does so.
00:37:11 Here are some examples or instances where royal assent has been void.
00:37:15 if the king is deceived
00:37:17 by false suggestions 0.77
00:37:19 if he's been ignorant or misinformed
00:37:21 if the language is so vague 0.76
00:37:23 in general you can't understand it
00:37:26 and
00:37:27 if it's uncertain or if it would
00:37:29 work an injustice or a wrong or something
00:37:31 contrary to law
00:37:33 if they're getting a bill that says
00:37:35 we want you to do something that violates
00:37:37 the Bible, Christian principles 1.00
00:37:39 it's void 0.99
00:37:41 royal assent cannot, the king doesn't have
00:37:43 the power to do it
00:37:45 and that's critical.
00:37:47 He doesn't even have the power to give royal assent.
00:37:50 So they may be doing it,
00:37:51 but he does not have the lawful power at law to do it,
00:37:55 to give royal assent to it.
00:37:57 When and if situations like this arise,
00:38:00 where the monarch is bound to advise the government to cease,
00:38:04 I should say, where Parliament is advising the king
00:38:08 to give royal assent,
00:38:10 the bills that violate God's laws,
00:38:12 the monarch is bound
00:38:14 to tell the parliament of Canada
00:38:17 cease and desist
00:38:18 and if they don't
00:38:19 then the governor general
00:38:21 on behalf of the king
00:38:22 is required to dissolve parliament
00:38:24 tell the prime minister
00:38:26 to call an election
00:38:27 if they keep giving bills
00:38:29 that violate God's laws
00:38:30 call an election 0.56
00:38:31 get rid of these people 0.94
00:38:33 okay 0.96
00:38:34 if parliament refuses
00:38:36 the monarch can call in
00:38:37 the armed forces for protection
00:38:38 because they are sworn
00:38:40 in allegiance to the king
00:38:42 not the government
00:38:43 people have lost focus
00:38:45 that all oaths are to the king
00:38:47 and eventually to God
00:38:48 they are not to the government
00:38:50 so the king can call in the armed forces
00:38:53 and get rid of parliament
00:38:54 and call in an election
00:38:55 they have the right to use force
00:38:59 if necessary
00:39:00 I'm certainly not advocating that
00:39:02 force is always a last resort
00:39:04 if everything else fails
00:39:05 but the point being is
00:39:07 if you're breaking your oath
00:39:09 it's a criminal offense
00:39:10 our first oath
00:39:14 just to go back
00:39:14 the constitutional nature of the coronation oath
00:39:17 it goes back to 973 AD
00:39:19 and that's the first one
00:39:22 and you can see it here
00:39:23 it basically says almost the same as what's being said today
00:39:26 and the main one is to preserve Christianity
00:39:29 in the O'Donoghue case
00:39:32 the court recognized that the act of settlement
00:39:35 along with the Bill of Rights and the Coronation Oath Act
00:39:37 these are part of the rules of succession
00:39:40 and form part of our constitution this has already been decided these are part of our constitution
00:39:46 and cannot be removed we are a constitutional monarchy i call it a republican monarchy because
00:39:52 this law cannot be changed it is there and it starts with the present day with the coronation
00:39:58 of act of 1688 and it says whereas by law and ancient usage of the realm the kings and queens
00:40:05 have taken a solemn oath upon the evangelists at their respective coronations to maintain the
00:40:10 statutes, laws, and customs, i.e. our common law, of the realm, and all the people and inhabitants
00:40:17 thereof in their spiritual and civil rights and properties. Folks, this is where your property
00:40:22 rights come from, not the charter. Saskatchewan did us a great favor by opposing property rights
00:40:27 in the charter, because otherwise they would have used section one loopholes so frequently and so
00:40:32 often, you wouldn't have any property rights lifting. It would have been looking like Swiss 0.94
00:40:36 cheese by the time where it had dealt with this. But because it's in the Coronation Oath Act of
00:40:42 1688, and as part of our laws and customs, going back to biblical times when God said,
00:40:49 thou shall not steal in the Ten Commandments, which presupposes that you own property,
00:40:55 this is where your property rights come from. This is the ultimate source of property rights
00:40:59 that the king is there to protect in order to get your allegiance.
00:41:03 And if he doesn't protect you and your property rights,
00:41:05 then you shouldn't be allegiant to him.
00:41:09 Now, the specific wording in Section 1,
00:41:14 according to the Coronation Old Act,
00:41:16 is that, will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the people
00:41:19 of the Kingdom of England and the Dominions,
00:41:22 thereto belonging, according to statutes in Parliament agreed on
00:41:25 and the laws and customs?
00:41:27 There's your common law, your supremacy of God.
00:41:30 And number three, will ye to the utmost of your power,
00:41:34 maintain the laws of God, the true profession of the gospel,
00:41:37 and Protestant reformed religion.
00:41:42 And you'll notice it says established by law.
00:41:44 It means the people have already decided the supremacy of God is in our law.
00:41:50 It's there.
00:41:51 And that's what the king is swearing in order to have power.
00:41:56 to pass laws that are binding he has to swear to protect us and number one is where your property
00:42:03 rights are number two is simply to protect you so you don't get some despot who puts you in jail
00:42:09 for 20 years for a parking ticket right pretty simple so the coronation oath cannot be eliminated
00:42:16 in the coronation oath act of 1688 it specifically says in the last paragraph and in the presence of
00:42:24 all persons that shall be attending, assisting, or otherwise present at their respective
00:42:28 coronations, any law, statute, or usage to the contrary notwithstanding. The king or queen must
00:42:35 take this oath. Even if a statute prohibits it, they have to take it, and the wording cannot be
00:42:43 changed. This is why when King Charles tried to change it for his oath, the archbishop in England
00:42:50 had to say, sorry, I cannot change the oath. That's not to say it hasn't been changed
00:42:55 illegally, as I'll show you in a few minutes. It has. But fortunately, the supremacy of
00:43:00 God is still there, and the illegalities make it non-binding.
00:43:05 So, Halsbraith was very clear. The coronation is a recognition by the nation that the king
00:43:11 is supreme, and by the king of the fundamental rights of the people. It's called protection
00:43:17 versus subjection.
00:43:20 And the whole ceremony is Christian-based,
00:43:23 and you can find parts of it, if not all of it, online.
00:43:26 But the entire, and that's for Queen Elizabeth in 1953,
00:43:30 the whole coronation oath ceremony is specifically Christian. 0.61
00:43:35 The orb set under the cross to remember the whole world
00:43:39 is subject to Christ. 0.80
00:43:41 Receive the ring of kingly dignity,
00:43:43 So you may continue steadfastly as defender in Christ's religion.
00:43:48 The sword was given for protection of the defenseless and the poor,
00:43:52 which means as well there is a duty for the Queen to look after the poor.
00:43:58 And as was mentioned in the video documentary that was taken live from the entire 1953 ceremony,
00:44:08 where it was stated the Queen now compacts with her people.
00:44:12 In other words, by swearing on the Bible, it's a contract.
00:44:17 And some of the kings have broke that contract.
00:44:19 They kicked King James out, and they threw him out of the country for breaking the contract.
00:44:25 And King Charles, Queen Elizabeth, should be held accountable for breaking that contract.
00:44:30 And make no mistake, they should be criminally charged for breaking their contract with us.
00:44:37 Absolutely.
00:44:38 Or forced to leave the country and go live somewhere else.
00:44:41 It's a contract.
00:44:42 They have broken it.
00:44:45 And Halsbury's Laws of England also points out that it's a contract.
00:44:49 Every major prominent judge in English history,
00:44:54 from Coke to Blackstone to Broome, Halsbury, Denning,
00:44:58 everyone has all recognized the coronation oath is a contract.
00:45:02 That is the starting point in our law for somebody in power to tell you what to do.
00:45:08 And remember, there's only two ways for somebody to tell you what to do.
00:45:12 One is force, which is unlawful, and the other is with your agreement.
00:45:16 And nobody's going to tell somebody else and give them the power to do anything they want to do to you,
00:45:22 because you would be a slave.
00:45:23 So there's limitations to what others can do in your best interest and all of our best interests.
00:45:29 And that limitation, those limitations are in the coronation oath of the king
00:45:34 in order for him to get in the position of power to tell you what to do.
00:45:38 King George III admitted that when he was asked about breaking his oath,
00:45:43 he said, no, I can't do it.
00:45:45 I would rather go from house to house in England begging for bread
00:45:48 than break my oath.
00:45:49 And he said, if I violate that oath,
00:45:52 I am not the sovereign, no longer legal sovereign in this country.
00:45:56 And apply that today to King Charles and Queen Elizabeth
00:45:59 who have broken their oath repeatedly by giving royal assent.
00:46:04 The legislation that violates God's laws in the Bible, that makes them no longer legal sovereign in the country.
00:46:12 Keep in mind, if you went up to somebody who is taking an oath to be a witness in a court case,
00:46:18 and during the break you come up to him and tell that person and advise him to break that oath,
00:46:24 you would be committing a criminal offense.
00:46:26 And if the person broke his oath, he would be committing a criminal offense.
00:46:30 think about that in the context of the coronation oath of the king and parliament parliament is
00:46:37 aiding and advising the king including bill c9 and a number of others to break his oath
00:46:42 they are in a similar position of telling a witness on the witness stand to break their oath
00:46:48 during the break come back and break the law lie under oath and by lying under oath the king has
00:46:55 broken the law as well and this leads me right into the legislatures and parliament it's called
00:47:02 his majesty the king and right of parliament that's the full correct name on it and they are
00:47:06 not supreme parliament is not contrary to what even in england they say parliament is not supreme
00:47:13 there when they say supremacy of parliament it means in respect of other agencies below it it's
00:47:20 relative, not absolute. So it's also relative to the fact that God is the eventual supreme law
00:47:28 in our law. God is supreme, not parliament. And even Dicey, who is one of the most often
00:47:37 quoted constitutional judges in Canada, pointed out, if the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty
00:47:46 involves the attribution of unrestricted power to parliament, the dogma is no better than a legal
00:47:51 fiction and not worth the stress laid upon it. He was very clear. Parliamentary sovereignty is a
00:47:58 myth. Do not accept that. They are not. And section 91 tells you of the Constitution Act or B&A Act,
00:48:07 tells you what their powers are. Right in section 91, it said, it'll be lawful for the queen,
00:48:12 which means
00:48:14 the queen cannot give royal assent
00:48:16 without the conditions that follow
00:48:18 it wouldn't be lawful
00:48:20 those conditions are
00:48:22 to get the advice and consent
00:48:24 of the senate and house of commons
00:48:26 that's their only power 0.96
00:48:29 folks is to give
00:48:30 aid and advise the king
00:48:31 on what bills he should give royal assent to
00:48:34 and they cannot
00:48:36 aid and advise to break the law
00:48:38 period
00:48:39 and it's the same with the Privy Council
00:48:43 they also have to take an oath
00:48:45 and their oath recognizes that they're servants of the Queen
00:48:49 in this case the King
00:48:51 all police officers, military, government officials, MPs
00:48:56 everybody has to take that oath
00:48:59 and swear that oath to the King
00:49:01 and the King in turn swears the oath before God
00:49:05 and that oath is an oath of fidelity
00:49:08 loyalty or faithfulness
00:49:10 interestingly Lord Mackey
00:49:13 who was Lord Advocate and Lord Chancellor
00:49:15 was recently asked
00:49:17 in light of the Church of England's
00:49:19 opposition on
00:49:21 abortion
00:49:21 and whether signing the bill might put
00:49:25 the Queen in breach of her coronation
00:49:27 oath and he opposed the same
00:49:29 sex marriage and other similar things
00:49:31 and he pointed out
00:49:33 the Queen under our 0.97
00:49:34 constitutional arrangements is
00:49:36 expected to act in accordance with her ministers the advice of her ministers i should say given
00:49:42 ultimately through the prime minister the idea of the coronation oath was that it would never
00:49:47 be in conflict with that advice and therefore it's the responsibility of the ministers of the crown
00:49:53 to see whatever advice they give is consistent with the proper construction of the oath how do
00:49:59 you do that if you're an mp and you don't even know what the coronation oath is if you've never
00:50:03 heard of it we need to bring this to our to their attention and the duty is on our ministers to make
00:50:10 sure they do not break their oath in doing so their only duty is to aid and advise the king
00:50:16 that's it and those oaths of allegiance that are required by mps are set out in section 127 i think
00:50:25 it's 127 it might be 128 of the constitution act of 1867 it's part of our constitution that they
00:50:34 have to take their oath of allegiance and oath of office to the king period they don't have a choice
00:50:39 and it's the same for the legislatures as well all of them have to take these oaths of office
00:50:45 and oath of allegiance to the king and they're not meaningless it you don't put ceremonial stuff
00:50:53 in a constitution. It's there because it has legal constitutional ramifications and meaning
00:50:59 ascribed to it. And all of the people, all of them, are required to enforce the law. They have
00:51:08 to obey the law themselves. What governments want you to do is they want you to think statute law
00:51:13 is above God's law, and it is not. God is supreme, then you have the rule of law, and then you have
00:51:20 are constitutional law, and then you have statutes way underneath that.
00:51:24 But governments are lying to you and telling you that they are supreme and they are not.
00:51:29 And the king is not supreme either. And the principles and maxims of our law are clear.
00:51:35 The law may not be violated by the monarch. Period. And not only can the law not be violated,
00:51:42 the king cannot sign any statute that allows him to break the law. So he cannot sign a bill that
00:51:49 allows him to break his coronation oath. He doesn't have that power. There are limits. This
00:51:55 is why it's called a limited monarchy, and there's a reason for that. There are limits to their powers
00:52:00 that are in the oath. And the coronation oath, in my respectful opinion, is the most important
00:52:07 document in our Constitution, especially from a Christian perspective. So the king cannot sanction 0.98
00:52:16 any act forbidden by law he's bound by contracts including the coronation oath he cannot break it
00:52:22 lawfully speaking that's not to say they don't do it criminals always have the upper hand because
00:52:28 they know what they're going to do in advance right however that doesn't make it lawful
00:52:33 and it's not our law that's defective it is the people and the criminals in power that are doing
00:52:39 it um i got about seven or eight more slides and i'll be done and the kings and queens have done
00:52:47 wrong okay it's important to realize that intentionally or unintentionally they have
00:52:53 done wrong they have changed illegally the wording of the coronation oath and
00:53:00 interesting unak gay who's parliamentary council very high up in england 0.52
00:53:05 She wrote, it's worth noting, the coronation oath has been modified without statutory authority. 0.94
00:53:11 The Queen swore a slightly different version of the oath, although it still included a promise to maintain the established Protestant religion.
00:53:21 In 1937, they started to change the oath a little bit, but they didn't do it properly.
00:53:27 and in 1937 the wording of the coronation oath was changed illegally according to scales in his
00:53:35 pamphlet of crowning mercy they also said the same thing in the london times so even in their paper
00:53:42 they recognized that here's the archbishop swearing the queen and the king in 1937 to
00:53:48 uphold the law and they're breaking the law at the same time they're swearing the king in that
00:53:52 he's got to comply with the law so clearly there's a problem that they broke the law
00:53:59 by changing those words here are the original words on top and right below it are the words
00:54:06 they added they added underlined united kingdom of great britain your and they added um i should
00:54:14 underline it as well northern ireland canada and so on your possessions and to rule according to
00:54:20 their respective laws and customs the king you cannot divide the king and you cannot divide his
00:54:26 oath oaths are not divisible if he takes an oath it's for everybody within the realm you cannot
00:54:32 take an oath and break it for some countries and not for others and consequently the oath that he
00:54:39 took was for all dominions and not according to our laws because the king cannot give think of it
00:54:47 as a circular argument. The king cannot give royal assent
00:54:50 to a law or a bill passed in Canada that
00:54:55 violates his oath, because he would still be breaking his oath as Canada
00:54:59 is a dominion still of the United Kingdom. So it doesn't
00:55:03 matter to a large degree if it says to their respective laws
00:55:07 and customs, because they're the same as England's.
00:55:10 Right? So the
00:55:14 original words are always maintaining the laws of God, and those are still here in the words today
00:55:21 that they swore. Even though they added some words to it, it doesn't take away from the
00:55:26 supremacy of God in our law that they swore to uphold. In O'Donohue, the Court of Appeal upheld
00:55:36 that the rules of succession for the monarchy must be shared and be in symmetry with those
00:55:40 of the United Kingdom. One cannot accept the monarchy, but reject the legitimacy or legality
00:55:46 of the rules by which the monarch is selected, or the limitations on their power. If you accept
00:55:52 the king, you accept the king in all his capacities, all his powers, and all his duties,
00:55:57 period. And if you subvert that, if you tell the king to break the law, it's called committing
00:56:02 treason. All MPs who are made aware of the coronation oath and decide to vote according
00:56:08 to their party leader, are breaking the law. Period. And if we have duties to God, then
00:56:18 we have rights against the state. And this is where your power of peaceful civil disobedience
00:56:23 comes in, in our constitution. As Christians, we need to know, we have the power, contractually,
00:56:32 constitutionally, to say
00:56:34 to the king, sorry, your
00:56:36 law violates God's
00:56:38 laws in the Bible. I am refusing to
00:56:40 comply with it.
00:56:43 And our
00:56:43 cartoons on the side, basically
00:56:48 here show, originally with Mary Simon,
00:56:50 it's been horrible timing
00:56:51 getting the change of guard
00:56:53 right at this point.
00:56:56 Horrible timing. And now
00:56:57 Louise Arbour. And essentially what this
00:57:00 shows is
00:57:01 Carney trying to get people to vote for his bill
00:57:05 No matter where you are in the party
00:57:08 To vote for them
00:57:09 And finally one MP says no sir
00:57:12 He's crossing the floor
00:57:13 But he's not crossing the floor to the other parties
00:57:15 He's crossing the floor to the king
00:57:17 And saying sir
00:57:18 I have to obey my oath to the king
00:57:20 That's what these Liberal Party members need to be doing
00:57:23 And the Conservatives
00:57:24 And the NDP
00:57:25 All of them
00:57:25 Their leader does not override their oath to the king
00:57:30 and finally I just want to point out the king the official title was changed in Canada by
00:57:37 Trudeau Justin Trudeau and he took out the word defender of the faith but nothing changes on that
00:57:44 constitutionally simply by taking that word out the constitutional oath in its entirety is still
00:57:50 sworn in by the king it's still required to be sworn in and they cannot change that
00:57:55 so hopefully folks this gives you an idea
00:57:59 of the supremacy of God in our law
00:58:02 where it comes from and the duty and obligation for all of us
00:58:06 to uphold God's laws
00:58:08 and recognize
00:58:11 that there will be coming a time
00:58:14 when we have to answer to our conscience
00:58:16 when you look at a statute and you go
00:58:19 I'm sorry this violates God's laws
00:58:22 that you promised me you would protect
00:58:24 and that I cannot violate my beliefs to God
00:58:29 in order to comply with your legislation.
00:58:33 And as Tanya mentioned earlier,
00:58:34 and I have talked about it at many of our protests and events
00:58:39 or protests and rallies we've had out here,
00:58:43 courage is the foundational aspect of what we believe.
00:58:48 And there's been a dearth, a real lack of courage
00:58:52 by a lot of us in society we need to get that courage back again and tell the government sorry
00:58:58 i'm not going to comply and remember all change takes place by saying no it does not take place
00:59:06 by complaining about what the government is doing and telling them they're wrong and then going and
00:59:10 doing it anyway that's not how change takes place so hopefully we'll get change back we need to get
00:59:16 the Lord's Prayer back in schools, and the provinces need to be doing that, because it
00:59:22 says to the utmost of their ability, they will uphold God's laws. We need it in all aspects of
00:59:27 our society, the courts, politicians, and the schools, again, before that change is going to
00:59:31 happen. I hope this was educational, and if there's any questions, you can definitely get
00:59:37 back to us as well, and let us know with any questions you might have. Thanks, Tanya.
00:59:41 Okay, well, wonderful. Thank you so much, David. That was very informative.
00:59:45 if you can just stop sharing screen and so to the pastors and church leaders who have joined us
00:59:52 today thank you so much for taking this time we are going to make this video available we know
00:59:58 some pastors could not make it today and so for everyone who has registered we will be sending an
01:00:04 email out and getting this into your hands we ask that you share it with other pastors this is just
01:00:10 step one. And we are committed to having more meetings with you. The next one will be a regular
01:00:17 Zoom so that we can have an open Q&A. As Pastor Dan had said, we're going to be asking Pastor
01:00:23 Truella to come on and give his testimony. I think you will feel encouraged and inspired by it.
01:00:29 And so there is no simple answer to the passing of Bill C-9 other than being courageous and
01:00:36 refusing to comply, because we know that this is a man-made law, and it goes against God's
01:00:42 law and the Word of God. And so we will continue to encourage you. If you do have any questions,
01:00:48 you can reach Pastor Dan at pastors at actionforcanada.ca, and that's with the number
01:00:53 four, pastors at actionforcanada.ca, and we will notify you as soon as we have another meeting set
01:01:03 up. We were going to do a month, but I'm thinking two weeks may be a better idea as everybody
01:01:08 rallies together right now and tries to decide how they're going to approach this. Some have
01:01:14 even talked about the possibility of having a day of declaration, I guess, where we all speak
01:01:23 out at the same time on the Word of God and all stand united together. And if COVID taught us
01:01:29 anything. It's that, you know, the pastors should learn from this. Romans 13 does not work in this
01:01:36 situation. We are not to obey government over God, and it's quite the opposite. So we'll continue to
01:01:42 support you in that and encourage you. So Pastor Dan, would you please close us in prayer, or if
01:01:47 you have any closing words on that as well? Yeah, thanks, Tanya, and thank you, David, for all that
01:01:52 valuable information. Let me just remind you all that all throughout the Old Testament, you know,
01:01:58 we are reminded that the day of judgment is coming where every unjust judge king uh anyone
01:02:05 who is in a position of rulership they will all have their day before god and god hates injustice
01:02:12 and uh even though you know it may feel a little bit oppressive right now it's a time to shine
01:02:17 and it's a time that we can just really be courageous and um you know you may be wondering
01:02:25 so what is where does that leave me you know what does that mean for me in the pulpit going forward
01:02:30 do i change my style of preaching do i change what i preach on absolutely not if it's in god's word
01:02:36 it's your calling to preach god's word from genesis to revelation and the government may
01:02:44 threaten you and uh you know you got to look at what happened with uh uh god's servants throughout
01:02:51 history you know persecution is nothing new and certainly nobody wants to go through persecution
01:02:55 nobody wants to suffer for the sake of the gospel but we are told that we may have to
01:03:00 and uh god forbid that you know some would be martyred but there's a special a special reward 1.00
01:03:07 for the martyrs too and you know thank the lord that we don't live in places like nigeria right
01:03:12 now or or uh other places where you know it's it's a heavy price to play to pay if you are a
01:03:19 believer. Those things may be coming to Canada, but for now, let's take the freedoms and the
01:03:24 liberties that we have. Let's be courageous. And this is a time where Canadians are looking for
01:03:29 hope. They're looking for answers, and they're looking for the truth. And they're not going to
01:03:33 get it from Walmart or Superstore. They're going to get it from church. And so let your church shine
01:03:39 with the truth of the gospel. So thank you for joining with us. Heavenly Father, bless this time
01:03:45 that we've had together.
01:03:47 Bless the words that came forth.
01:03:49 Lord, we have such a rich history in Canada.
01:03:53 You spoke to the hearts and minds of men
01:03:55 who put together our constitution, our charter,
01:03:59 and we don't know where all of them stood
01:04:01 in a relationship with you.
01:04:03 But Lord, we believe that you took the time
01:04:06 to put these men together and to use their words
01:04:10 and to formulate them into sort of like a stone fortress in the protection of Canada.
01:04:18 And even for those that have visited our parliament buildings in Ottawa,
01:04:24 we see etched in stone and in glass scriptures that point to who you are
01:04:30 and what you have done in history and in God's word.
01:04:37 And so, Lord, we will stand firm upon that.
01:04:39 Your word tells us, Lord, that your word will stand firm and strong to the end.
01:04:46 And when the enemy tries to, you know, come against the church, come against God's people, come against whatever it is that you're doing, it always backfires.
01:04:59 And so, Lord, find us to be men and women of courage during this time and to be obedient to the calling you've placed upon us.
01:05:05 So I pray your blessing upon David and his ministry.
01:05:08 I pray your blessing upon Tanya and the work of action for Canada and all of these pastors that
01:05:15 we're on today, Lord, and those that be watching this video, even after the fact, Lord, we just
01:05:21 pray your blessing upon the ministry and help them to be people of courage, Lord, by your Holy Spirit
01:05:27 and to finish the task well, because we all want to hear those words. Well done. Well done,
01:05:32 good and faithful servant we ask this now in jesus name amen amen amen thank you thank you
01:05:40 david thank you pastor dan thank you pastors for joining us