Pathologist Spills the Beans on Falsified Pfizer COVID Jab Study Data
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
168.31543
Summary
In this episode, Dr. Clare Craig, a diagnostic pathologist and co-chair of the Heart Group, takes you through the evidence presented by Pfizer to the FDA on the COVID trial, and explains why this trial should be deemed null and void.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
I'm Dr. Clare Craig. I'm a diagnostic pathologist and I am co-chair of the Heart Group and I want
00:00:07.700
to take you through the evidence that Pfizer just presented to the FDA on the six-month to
00:00:14.060
four-year-old children. There's an awful lot about this trial that has shocked me and I think will
00:00:19.820
shock you too. The trial recruited 4,526 children aged from six months to four years old. 3,000 of
00:00:28.800
these children did not make it to the end of the trial. That is a huge number, two-thirds of them.
00:00:35.600
Why was there this drop-off? That needs to be answered and without an answer to that, on that
00:00:40.600
basis alone, this trial should be deemed null and void. So what did the trial show? Well, they defined
00:00:47.080
severe COVID as children who had a slightly raised heart rate or a few more breaths per minute. There
00:00:53.400
were six children aged two to four who had severe COVID in the vaccine group, but only one in the
00:01:00.780
placebo group. So on that basis, the likelihood that this vaccine is actually causing severe COVID
00:01:07.360
is higher than the likelihood that it is. There was actually one child who was hospitalized in this
00:01:12.900
trial. They had a fever and a seizure. They had been vaccinated. So now let's turn to what they
00:01:19.680
are defined as any COVID. And what they did was to utterly twist the data. They vaccinated the
00:01:27.040
children and they waited three weeks after the first dose before the second dose. In that three-week
00:01:32.980
period, 34 of the vaccinated children got COVID and only 13 in the placebo group, which worked out as
00:01:41.020
a 30% increased chance of catching COVID in that three-week period if you were vaccinated. So they ignored
00:01:48.060
that data. And then there was an eight-week gap between the second dose and the third dose, where
00:01:53.220
again, children were getting plenty of COVID in the vaccine arms. They ignored that data. There was then
00:01:59.140
seven weeks after the third dose, which they also ignored, which meant that in the end, they had ignored
00:02:04.560
97% of the COVID that occurred during the trial. And they just looked at tiny numbers, so tiny. In the end,
00:02:12.400
they were comparing three children in the vaccine arm who had COVID with seven in the placebo arm.
00:02:18.740
And they said that this showed the vaccine was effective.