00:00:04.720He had his notes there and he started reading them.
00:00:07.180And there was vitriol and there was definitely discrimination in those words.
00:00:12.480And so I'm going to just go straight to those.
00:00:14.600And so in his reasons, Justice Witherhill described the amended claim as a hodgepodge of verbosity
00:00:20.400and said that inflammatory and conspiratorial language had been removed from an earlier version.
00:00:25.680He went on to describe the pleading as an incoherent, unintelligent diatribe.
00:00:32.440Then he went on, and I found this most troubling, was when he stated that the claim sought to take the court into conspiratorial and demon-haunted shadow of Christian nationalism's opposition to and defiance of the COVID-19 measures introduced by the federal and B.C. government in 2020.
00:00:50.080Let that sink in. I'm going to repeat it. Conspiratorial and demon-haunted shadow of
00:00:55.140Christian nationalism. Now, Canadian Anti-Hate Network has done smear campaigns on Action for
00:01:00.540Canada calling us Christian nationalists because society, as they are trying to destroy us and
00:01:05.840bring communism in or whatever, Christian nationalism in order to destroy our Christian0.95
00:01:09.800foundation is the direction they're going. And so if the judge had knowledge of Action for Canada0.91
00:01:17.520of being called Christian nationalists, but he doesn't have knowledge of what's going on with
00:01:21.900Fauci down in the United States and the trials or the Allison inquiry recently where people are
00:01:30.140giving their firsthand testimony. And so these individuals between the lawyers and the judge
00:01:36.080are making a mockery of the court as far as I'm concerned. He referred to the decision in which
00:01:42.520a claim was described as grandstanding political advocacy and that he said the sentiment applied
00:01:47.440with equal force in this case, and then went on to say that he had no hesitation in accepting the
00:01:53.120defendant's submissions in their entirety. He characterized Mr. Gladi's submissions for the
00:01:57.920plaintiffs as general, vague, and superficial protests. Now, if you were there, once we get
00:02:03.720the transcripts and makes those public, and this judge refused to provide us an online link so that
00:02:09.800the public could participate and listen in on this case, and I'm wondering if it's because of this
00:02:15.580diatribe that he had prepared. The judge summarized the amended pleadings as well as our
00:02:20.580counsel's submissions as trying to put lipstick on a pig. So there is no doubt in my mind that
00:02:29.960the judge's decision was predetermined.