Action4Canada - Property Rights, Canadian Judges, Personal Rights, Your Constitutional Power & Live Q&A

00:00:00.000 Welcome everyone to the Empower Hour. Thank you for being here. We're so glad you can join us.

00:00:12.260 Action for Canada's founder, Tanya Gaw, will be coming on in just a moment to share updates

00:00:16.940 and information with us. She'll be joined by Quest Fewitt, a university student who will

00:00:22.840 give us an update on how the lockdowns and unlawful mandates of the past two years have

00:00:28.140 affected him and his peers. Our special guest speaker tonight is David Lindsay, and he'll be

00:00:34.280 speaking about the importance of the Coronation Oath and what it means to Canadians. We'll be

00:00:40.320 having a Q&A following his presentation. I have to tell you that one of the highlights of my week is

00:00:46.060 choosing a Bible verse to share with you with the hope that you'll be encouraged. From 2 Corinthians

00:00:51.860 4, 18, we don't look at the troubles we can see now. Rather, we fix our gaze on things that cannot

00:00:59.080 be seen. For the things we see now will soon be gone, but the things we cannot see will last forever.

00:01:07.080 Action for Canada is a grassroots movement reaching out to millions of Canadians and uniting our voices

00:01:12.480 in opposition to the destructive policies tearing at the fabric of our nation. Through call to action

00:01:18.620 campaigns, we equip citizens to take action. We are committed to protecting faith, family, and freedom.

00:01:27.420 For some of you here tonight, it's your very first time attending the Empower Hour, and it's always my

00:01:33.500 pleasure to introduce you to Tanya Gaw, the founder of Action for Canada. For the past several years,

00:01:40.520 Tanya has been working to bring awareness to government policies that are damaging our beloved country.

00:01:45.960 And with Action for Canada, she has created an amazing campaign to bring truth to our nation.

00:01:53.220 Because of Tanya's great love for our country, she's always willing to share information regarding

00:01:58.540 our rights and freedoms, and her goal is to teach and empower each and every one of us to learn how

00:02:04.540 to stand up for those rights. Tanya's faith in God gives her the courage and strength to take a stand

00:02:11.020 as she helps and inspires hurting people all across this nation. Tanya, over to you.

00:02:19.200 Thank you, Heather.

00:02:21.480 There's that little music in there. Thanks, Joran Dio, for that.

00:02:25.500 Anyways, welcome, everyone. Thank you, Heather, so much for the orientation and introduction and doing

00:02:30.820 all the updates, especially for those people who are new. Welcome. We hope that you enjoy Heather's

00:02:36.360 presentation so that you get a little bit of an idea of what it is that Action for Canada is up to

00:02:41.580 and the resources that we are providing. And so on that, what I'm going to do is I'm just going to get

00:02:47.780 straight to my update so that we can bring Quest on and hear from him. As we've been saying for

00:02:53.620 some time, we believe that, of course, the future has a huge dependency on our youth.

00:02:59.980 And so we are committed to give the youth and the young people and the young adults

00:03:05.480 a platform so that they can have a voice and let you know how the last two years have been

00:03:10.220 affecting them. And our hope is that they will be able to affect other youth who are going through

00:03:17.880 this and young people who feel like maybe they're alone and that there's not others that would be

00:03:23.040 in agreement or feel the same way they do. All right. So, Terenzio, I'm just going to share my screen.

00:03:27.880 We'll get right to the Action this week. And then again, I can't wait to have David Lindsay on this

00:03:32.760 week because I'm really looking forward to him educating us further. So we all thought that he

00:03:38.620 only talked about the rule of law. And this man has studied the history and the coronation oath,

00:03:46.700 which I'm excited to get to. And speaking of that, I'm just going to go straight in. For those of you

00:03:52.780 who are new, if you go to Call to Action under weekly emails, that's where you'll find what we

00:03:57.920 post every week. I'd encourage you even to go back and see the series that I'm working on right now.

00:04:04.140 It's what is the value of a country like Canada being founded on Christian biblical principles?

00:04:11.180 And it is actually the core to our freedoms and democracy. And so with that, we're exposing some

00:04:18.920 counterfeits and some frauds and some things that the World Economic Forum and the globalists are

00:04:24.320 doing to break down Christianity in Canada so that they can gain more control. And the reason is if

00:04:30.740 they destroy Christianity in Canada, they destroy our rule of law because our rule of law is based on

00:04:36.560 the biblical principles that our founding fathers had created. And so then we know they're working

00:04:42.720 towards a one world government, a new world order, and a one world religion. And so I have been saying

00:04:50.240 in the last couple of weeks that it's just not Christianity that they want to destroy. It's all

00:04:55.820 religions. And a friend of mine who's on our team had sent this to me just in case I know my screen

00:05:01.800 wasn't working last time. And so this is a community type center down in Vancouver. And their sign on the

00:05:09.680 street says spiritual but not religious. And you can see up here all of the symbols for all the different

00:05:17.300 religions. And so this was posted on their building. And I don't know if you recognize this symbol, but

00:05:23.780 this is the UN symbol for a one world religion. So they're taking all the different religions. And

00:05:30.500 basically, they're saying we all serve the same God, just many paths. And they're going to eventually

00:05:37.360 just destroy all religions, whether you're a Sikh, whether you're a Muslim, whether you're a Buddhist,

00:05:43.360 because they have an idea what they feel on their philosophies, their sick, bent philosophies,

00:05:50.640 what kind of demonic religion they would like to see happen. And the reason I call it demonic

00:05:57.040 is because we can see here that, okay, so David Spangler, he is really deeply into the United Nations,

00:06:05.600 New World Order, etc. And this is his quote, no one will enter the New World Order unless he or she

00:06:12.800 will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian

00:06:19.120 initiation. And so we got to take this pretty serious when we see these kind of symbols popping

00:06:25.200 up now in our town, and say, okay, this isn't conspiracy theory. And maybe what Tanya and Action for

00:06:31.200 Canada, the message we're trying to get out has some substance to it. And so I have said,

00:06:38.160 it is up to the Islamists to fight for Islam and the Quran in their countries. It is up to the Sikhs

00:06:44.480 to fight for Sikhism in their countries, Buddhists, etc. But in Canada, because our democracy is based on

00:06:52.080 Christianity, we all need together to come together and fight for Christianity in Canada. Whether you're

00:06:58.240 a Christian or not, that's what this country is founded on. And that's what our security of a

00:07:04.160 nation and the freedoms that we enjoy have been built on. Unlike the other nations I named who

00:07:09.520 are living under oppression, and people would love to be living in freedom there. But their system of

00:07:15.760 belief, their governance based on those systems do not operate like Western nations built on Christian

00:07:22.080 principles. And so David, when I met him nearly two years ago in July, he was the first one that

00:07:28.080 brought the Coronation Oath to my awareness. And I won't go into all of it, he will read the report,

00:07:34.400 the Coronation Oath secures Canada as a Christian nation being governed in that manner. And that's

00:07:40.880 why I say your property rights, everything are protected under this, we just got to take authority

00:07:45.600 over this against the government. So of course, every week, I always say who the guest is for the Empower Hour.

00:07:51.440 And then I'm just going to quickly cover so excited, we have new resources that many of you have been

00:07:58.160 waiting for. We have a mask notice of liability that David had crafted, it's now on the website on the

00:08:06.160 notice of liability page, I'll just show you where you can find it here under call to action notices of

00:08:11.520 liability. So if you go to the web page, click there, you will see it at the top, it says new in red,

00:08:16.800 and you can find this document. So we are asking people to use it on mass, because absolutely crazy,

00:08:23.840 they're still expecting people to wear masks, even though they listed lifted the restrictions.

00:08:28.400 And as I've been saying consistently, they cannot that they can mandate mass all they like, but you

00:08:34.400 don't have to follow along with it, because it's not law in Canada. And the reason it's not law because

00:08:39.920 you cannot interfere with an individual's right to breathe freely. So there is no legislation in Canada

00:08:46.000 saying you got to wear a mask, there's just bullies making you think you do. And they're

00:08:50.240 having the authority to intimidate you and extort you into wearing them. Otherwise, you don't get a

00:08:55.840 service, or maybe your job. Alright, so this was a great video that a new fellow that's on our team

00:09:03.040 had created regarding kids, I'd highly recommend that you watch that. And then I'm going down the other

00:09:10.320 one we needed. Boy, oh boy, oh boy, this is important. This is the notice of liability against rapid

00:09:15.280 antigen testing. As we've known, it is in violation. It's a criminal offense under the

00:09:21.360 Genetic Non-Discrimination Act, three to five years in jail, million dollar fine, nobody's taken it too

00:09:26.800 seriously. So we're working towards laying private information and criminal charges against certain

00:09:31.760 individuals to make sure that hopefully we can set a precedent and get this working on behalf of

00:09:37.440 people. It's also in violation of the criminal code to use extortion or intimidation to get people to

00:09:44.160 subject themselves to this or any medical treatment. I have had success using the information in the

00:09:51.600 new notice of liability. The city, I won't mention what city it was, a city staff member had been on

00:09:58.400 sick leave while they brought in mandating rapid testing. They had to come back, not sick leave,

00:10:03.760 sorry, they had an injury. They come back to, they're going to come back to work the night before they say,

00:10:08.560 oh, don't forget, give us your VAX status or give us your rapid antigen results. And so this template

00:10:17.280 letter I had created. And so I would highly recommend that if you're in the position where they're forcing

00:10:24.160 you to take the rapid antigen testing, that you kind of follow along. So this was the city manager,

00:10:31.040 not the city manager, the employee's manager saying, hey, you know, you gotta, he's just doing his job.

00:10:36.560 He just thinks he's a good guy doing his job saying, hey, don't forget, you know, gotta do the rapid

00:10:40.320 testing. And so then comes the letter to the supervisor. And I had laid this out. And so the

00:10:47.440 employee was very courageous and ended up sending it to them saying, it's not only unlawful, but you're

00:10:52.320 causing harm through the sodium azide and the chemicals that are in here. And it's also causing harm to the

00:10:58.320 environment. And it's again, a criminal offense. Anyways, please read this. It has a huge environmental

00:11:04.880 impact with all this rapid testing because it contains sodium azide. Everybody's pouring this

00:11:09.840 down their drains. Don't tell me Trudeau or any of them care about our environment. This is a highly

00:11:15.920 toxic chemical that's going into our system on mass. And so the manager comes back and says, oh,

00:11:23.440 you know, it's just, it's policy. You got to do it. And these comes back saying other employees may not

00:11:28.240 know their rights and the rule of law, but I do. And I will not subject myself to being physically

00:11:32.560 assaulted or forced to take a medical procedure at threat of not being permitted to work. So I'm

00:11:37.840 going to stop talking about all this now. And, but I just want to show you where the templates are.

00:11:43.680 I'll go into the notice of liability page. We reviewed all of this yesterday at Tuesday's meeting. I'd

00:11:49.600 invite you or encourage you to come to the Tuesday calls because we try to have Q and A and go over this

00:11:55.120 material. This video I did yesterday will be on the workers unite page. And so if you go right here,

00:12:02.560 further response template letters pops down the page. Thank you, Jenny, for that. She set this

00:12:07.840 page up so wonderfully, so user friendly. And then if you go down right here to public body

00:12:14.960 letter templates, it's right here. Okay. So letter to city, it's sort of a whole line. I got vaccination

00:12:21.600 mandated stopped in the city, as well as people be putting people on unpaid leave. It's been awesome.

00:12:28.960 It's been effective, but they still wanted to do the rapid antigen testing. The end of this story is,

00:12:34.800 is that the employee refused to take it, said, you better talk to your legal team because this is

00:12:40.560 unlawful. We gave a good letter there and he has been working ever since without taking one test.

00:12:48.000 And so you just got to know the law. You got to know how to work it. You got to have the authority

00:12:53.520 and you just have to keep pressing in my friends. And we're trying to give you all the resources

00:12:58.880 possible in order to do that. You're not all going to be successful because it depends, of course,

00:13:04.080 on the individual, but at least you're setting yourself up when this starts to unravel and it will

00:13:09.760 unravel. You're going to be in the best position if you took action because you have proof and evidence

00:13:15.040 to support yourself. And as you may have heard in Richmond, the unions were working on behalf of

00:13:20.400 individuals. I'm just going to put stop share now. The unions were working on behalf of the city

00:13:27.200 workers in Richmond, and it ends up that they were not only provided back pay for being put illegally

00:13:33.200 on unpaid leave. They were also given all of their vacation payback, right? This is good. We just

00:13:38.880 got to keep pressing in. So have courage. Yeah. Woo. So take courage, take heart. I know some of you

00:13:46.960 are on unpaid leave. It's so diabolical. It's so criminal. My heart goes out to you and that's

00:13:51.680 why Action for Canada and our team across Canada are working so hard. And on that as well, I want

00:13:56.960 to encourage you to get involved in the chapters. We got up to 150 chapters. We've had a little bit

00:14:02.640 of a delay in expanding that. We had some glitches because we're growing so fast. Some people weren't

00:14:08.480 having emails returned. And so we've been putting kind of a pause on it till we could catch up and kind of

00:14:13.520 get the infrastructure built. And we feel that we're getting closer to being at a point where we're

00:14:21.120 vetting again and we're going to be growing up those numbers. We're committed to 300 and being at

00:14:27.120 least 338 chapters across Canada. Okay. So Heather, would you come on please? And let's bring on our

00:14:33.680 first guest quest. And thank you once again, Tanya, for all your excellent updates. They're so important

00:14:41.360 for everyone to be hearing. I am so thrilled to be able to introduce our next guest, Quest Fewitt.

00:14:48.000 Quest is 20 years old and a university student. He's very concerned about the direction Canada is going

00:14:55.200 and is also troubled by the indoctrination in the educational system. We're so thankful that he is

00:15:01.360 willing to speak up about how the unlawful mandates and loss of freedoms have affected him and his peers.

00:15:08.720 Please help me welcome for the very first time ever to the Empower Hour, Quest Fewitt. Welcome, Quest.

00:15:17.200 Hi, thanks for having me on.

00:15:19.920 Good to have you here, Quest. We want to just give you the floor right now

00:15:23.520 and share with us what it's been like in the last two years for you.

00:15:26.880 Okay, well, when COVID, well, COVID as in the lockdowns first hit, I was in my second semester of

00:15:35.600 high school. So I originally just thought my graduation was going to get crushed,

00:15:41.600 that COVID would last for like about four months. And then turns out it lasted, you know,

00:15:47.360 till now. So that's two years. Specifically, how it affected me and my peers specifically is,

00:15:56.400 so my generation, I'm sure old people love complaining about the younger generations.

00:16:00.880 But seriously, my generation, the social statistics of my generation is not very good.

00:16:06.320 We're one of the most mentally ill generations, if not the most mentally ill generation.

00:16:10.000 We have very high rates of substance abuse, we're very depressed, and we're very lonely.

00:16:14.800 And this is before the pandemic happened. So during the pandemic, I've only seen more social

00:16:21.440 isolation, social decay. And really, a lot of people my age are now being put on

00:16:29.440 depressed, depressive medication, they're getting put on antidepressants, they're getting put on

00:16:33.920 on codeine, or just a whole slew of drugs by doctors. And I've just seen my generation is now

00:16:41.360 so unfriendly, because they really buy into this COVID stuff, they mask very frequently.

00:16:48.640 And it's just so depressing, because the reason that this is all happening is it has been 20, 30,

00:16:56.240 40 years in the making. As Action for Canada is very happy to share with everyone,

00:17:03.200 our education system is very, very deeply broken, because it's an inherently liberal,

00:17:08.560 or I guess woke is a better term organization. I remember when I was even in elementary,

00:17:14.080 I was being taught about LGTBQ stuff. This is from, you know, kindergarten to grade 12.

00:17:19.920 I was being taught about, you know, opening our borders, how socialism is, you know, really

00:17:25.200 helpful and beneficial to us. So, as you know, to all the parents out there,

00:17:31.440 like, I'm very lucky that I, you know, that I kept my head on straight, I suppose.

00:17:37.840 But it's just very sad, because I know, I'm sure a lot of people in this audience, too,

00:17:41.280 has found this where even their own kids are, you know, incredibly woke, or turning against what

00:17:46.480 their parents want. Or, because my own, you know, my own brother is also incredibly woke,

00:17:51.680 and he's from my family with me in it. And another very depressing thing about the COVID-19 situation

00:17:59.440 is when I was a kid, I trusted doctors, I trusted scientists, and I trusted the government.

00:18:04.240 And all three of these areas have failed me, and led to the situation where we're at now.

00:18:09.360 So it's, it's just very depressing seeing all of the institutions that you used to trust,

00:18:13.520 and used to think, you know, were fact-based and logical, or just political, just political actors.

00:18:24.400 Wow, okay, Quest, like, thank you. I mean, can you imagine, you are, honestly, you're going to be a

00:18:29.600 leader of the future. We're so proud of you. When I hear you speak with such wisdom, understanding,

00:18:34.960 and knowledge, I just commend you. And I'm encouraged to hear it at the same time. I've called the

00:18:41.520 public school systems, even private school systems, basically petri dishes of indoctrination.

00:18:47.600 And, you know, I've been fighting for nearly seven years now, the sexual orientation, gender identity,

00:18:53.840 all of what you're talking about, of this trans LGBTQ agenda, this should not be part of the school

00:18:58.720 system. And I've been saying for many years that we're the adults, we need to be stepping in and

00:19:03.760 protecting our youth from this attack, because it is affecting their mind, it's affecting the way they

00:19:10.080 think the climate change propaganda, instilling fear, resentment towards, you know, the parents,

00:19:16.720 so you know, as if we polluted all of the world and done these horrible things. And none of the

00:19:21.600 statistics as well are accurate there. It's because of all these multi trillion or billionaires wanting

00:19:27.200 to make money. And that's what's at the root and our kids have had to pay the brunt of this. And so

00:19:34.160 Quest, I guarantee you, we at Action for Canada, are bringing awareness, we're going to continue to

00:19:40.320 do this. And we're fighting really hard on behalf of you and your future. And we are wanting to give

00:19:45.840 you a voice because we need our youth fighting with us. And we need to figure out a way, I'm always

00:19:50.800 saying to tap into the rebellion, the natural rebellion, the rebellion of our youth, and do something

00:19:56.000 positive and good with it. And so I'd love it if you'd be part of our team and help us to figure out how to

00:20:00.800 do that. Yeah, I'm happy to help in any way possible. Yeah. So Heather, do you want to come

00:20:07.360 on with us as well? Is there anything else that you would like to add a quest or to just if you were

00:20:16.560 to give a word to youth, whether in high school still, or just the beginning years of university,

00:20:22.400 what would you have to say to them? Well, unfortunately, by the time most people reach

00:20:27.360 university, they're pretty very well, you know, indoctrinated already. But I encourage people

00:20:33.920 to like sincerely, I know this is going to sound cliche that everyone says it, but I sincerely

00:20:39.760 ask of people my age, especially just straight up to listen to the other side. I'm not sure if you

00:20:45.680 guys are keeping up social statistics of people my age, but we're incredibly, we're incredibly

00:20:52.480 close minded. Most of my studies come from the United States, but I can extrapolate them due to

00:20:57.680 my own experience and due to my knowledge generally of what the youth culture is like. We're very

00:21:02.720 close minded, lots of liberals or woke people, I should say, in America are just willing to cut off

00:21:08.560 the other side or any people that dissent from their views, they're just wanting to cut off and not

00:21:12.720 interact with. So I know a lot of people like, in my opinion, of a long held belief that I've had for

00:21:19.120 my entire life is, you know, organic food is a scam. And GMOs are 100% good, no matter what,

00:21:25.680 because that was what I was told my entire life. And I never listened to people who told me to eat

00:21:29.520 organic, or never listened to people who had concerns about these things. And then now I'm,

00:21:33.200 you know, I'm starting to think like, there's truth in this, like, we are eating terribly.

00:21:37.680 And part of that is a food process. So I really encourage people to listen to the other side,

00:21:41.920 as cliche as that is, because you learn a lot. And I feel like the biggest problem with my generate,

00:21:48.000 well, not the biggest, but one of the bigger problems is we just completely tune out anything

00:21:51.600 we don't like. And we only listen to views that reinforce our own. And I think that leads to

00:21:58.000 incredible polarization and just hate towards people who think differently than you.

00:22:02.720 I would agree. And you know, you made the comment of, you know, they don't agree with people who

00:22:06.640 don't think like they do. Think like they do. That's even an oxymoron or think like they do.

00:22:12.720 They've been indoctrinated in how to think they've been conditioned how to think they've not been

00:22:17.520 taught how to think critically or to question. And if they did question, there was, you know,

00:22:22.160 a subtle kind of reprimand for it, a conditioning and embarrassment in the classroom, something,

00:22:27.760 having kids stand up in classrooms, you know, the vaccinated on this side, the unvaccinated over

00:22:32.160 there, you know, they have that herd mentality. And they're counting on that with kids because we,

00:22:38.800 as parents, we're bringing our kids up as well to respect the adults, the authorities in their lives.

00:22:44.400 So it's very clever what they've done. I believe we can undo this. We need a movement in order to

00:22:48.880 undo it. And I believe that if the youth understand that the government is using them as pawns, if we

00:22:55.520 can get that message because they think they're gullible, and they're stupid, and they don't know how

00:23:00.080 to think on their own, and that they'll just follow anything, you know, that they're presenting to

00:23:05.040 them. I think we may have a chance of undoing this something has to click for them. Somebody has

00:23:10.080 asked, like, how was how has how had you made out in university?

00:23:16.800 I didn't address that. I actually haven't been on university campus yet, because up until

00:23:21.760 I think it's February, basically, schools mostly done for me, I wasn't allowed on campus because I

00:23:27.760 chose not to vaccinate myself. And I wasn't allowed on campus because of that. So I've really only been

00:23:33.360 attending zoom calls and on said zoom calls, not all of them, but in a lot of them, you know,

00:23:38.640 like the unvaccinated, there were, you know, derogatory comments towards the unvaccinated during

00:23:42.560 them, or like, oh, this is all the unvaccinated people's fault. University is just as bad,

00:23:49.200 if not worse than, you know, than all of high school and elementary. We're constantly bombarded with,

00:23:56.640 you know, LGTB, um, you know, propaganda and celebrations and panels. And, you know,

00:24:08.160 all of the woke propaganda were just absolutely bombarded with the university as well. It never

00:24:12.160 stops. Yeah. Um, yeah, basically, a lot is on the kids too, because the kids have their own volition,

00:24:19.120 and they have the right to, they have the right to choose their own paths. And if they go on the wrong

00:24:22.880 path, then that's their decision. But I definitely think parents really need to watch out for what

00:24:28.000 they're teaching, because my mom didn't know what they were teaching me when I was in elementary or

00:24:32.320 high school. And I didn't know what they were teaching me was wrong. So I had no reason to tell

00:24:36.800 her. So I like really parents need to be very involved in what, you know, information their kids

00:24:42.080 are absorbing. And social media is also really terrible. Right? Yeah, that's having a huge effect,

00:24:49.520 isn't it? So you know what we're going to need to do? I'm realizing because we need to get to David,

00:24:53.760 but I think in the next few weeks, we're going to have another youth evening. And I'm going to want

00:24:59.600 you to come back on Quest. We're going to have more interaction and conversation. I believe that

00:25:05.680 there's questions from our audience that they would like to ask you as well. We want to know how,

00:25:12.480 how we can help in talking to the next generation, how we can we do this in a way to reach out to them.

00:25:18.960 And so I think that that is definitely something that we are going to coordinate and arrange. And so

00:25:25.440 Heather, was there anything else you want to add before we bring David on?

00:25:29.120 Yeah, I just wanted to say, Quest, thank you so much for coming on and for standing strong too,

00:25:33.120 and for being an example for all the other people in your age group. Thank you.

00:25:38.880 Yeah, it's amazing. Yeah, we're going to have you back on Quest. We really want to figure out how to

00:25:44.000 reach our youth. And I think the best way to do that is to tap into the minds of those that

00:25:49.360 are closest. I'm a few years away from my teenage years, so I need a little help.

00:25:54.720 All right. Awesome. Thank you, Quest. Heather, would you please introduce our special next guest?

00:26:00.560 Yes, it is my privilege to introduce David Lindsay this evening. And I have to say that as soon as Tanya

00:26:07.200 announced on last week's webinar that David was going to be our guest tonight, the chat just exploded.

00:26:12.800 Everyone is always so happy when he comes on to the show. David is the co-founder of CLEAR,

00:26:18.640 the Common Law Education and Rights Initiative. He's the author of the Annotated Criminal Charging

00:26:24.960 Procedure in Canada and has been teaching many of you how to lay criminal charges without needing to

00:26:30.800 hire a lawyer. David is a man of integrity and he has a vast knowledge of law. Tonight, he's going to

00:26:37.920 be speaking about property rights, personal rights, Canadian judges, and the coronation oath. David,

00:26:44.320 you are back by popular demand. And on behalf of everyone here, I want to give you a great big

00:26:49.680 welcome to tonight's Empower Hour. Welcome. Thank you. Great to hear there was a lot of support out

00:27:00.240 there. Thank you. Thank you very much. That's amazing. Well, we're so happy. Thank you, Heather,

00:27:04.800 for the wonderful intro. You have a gift for blessing people when they come on the show. I love it. And so,

00:27:10.720 David, so good to have you on. We're going to be talking about a little something different tonight

00:27:14.960 than the norm. And I'm excited about this. Maybe you'll even have something to help parents regarding

00:27:20.160 their children and getting this system, this education system, turned around a little bit. So,

00:27:27.040 I am going to just stop. We're going to just get right into it. I'm handing the floor over to you.

00:27:31.760 You've got a presentation that'll be somewhere between 30 and 45 minutes. So, we're going to go a

00:27:36.240 little later tonight, my friends. I hope that's okay. I just thought it was so important to bring

00:27:40.880 Quest on and to start to give youth, give them a place in our show on a weekly basis. Hopefully,

00:27:46.880 that's our plan. All right, David, the floor is all yours. Good evening. It was wonderful to hear

00:27:54.160 Quest speaking and it brought back memories, you know, his comments of last year, we did a rally in

00:27:59.680 front of the school here, Rutland School in Kelowna. And our whole purpose was to get people coming out of

00:28:06.720 school, kids, children, youth, and just to hand out flyers that we had, brochures we had on why masks

00:28:12.000 don't work and they shouldn't be wearing them and so on. And we just got attacked. Kids took our signs,

00:28:18.160 some of them cost like 80, 90 bucks. They took our signs, they were breaking them, smashing them,

00:28:23.360 and a couple of kids walked off and stole them. And it was really a nightmare. Several of the girls

00:28:30.400 that were in our group just left in tears. And subsequently, we've got a police investigation

00:28:37.360 going. Our goal is simply to get an apology from the two main youths that instigated it. But I see

00:28:43.520 his point when he says the youth today are basically lost. And I witnessed that firsthand at the rally we

00:28:51.040 had. So hopefully that can be changed, took to get to this part anyway. But yeah, so in any event,

00:29:01.840 on the issues that that we're here for tonight. Yeah, Tanya, we had met two years ago almost in

00:29:07.120 Victoria, and Tanya was up speaking. And it was wonderful to hear finally somebody talking about

00:29:14.160 the necessity and the desire of complying with God's laws. And it immediately struck a chord.

00:29:20.960 And I brought up the issue of the coronation oath. And it basically was the foundation for us

00:29:27.120 getting together in the future, which was just awesome. And so we definitely met on that particular

00:29:35.760 issue. And a lot of people are now aware of it that weren't before. I wasn't aware of it until probably

00:29:43.440 15 years ago. No, it was longer than that, 18, 19 years ago, when it was brought to my attention. And then

00:29:50.240 there was no information out there on it. So I did my own research from Osgoode Hall, University of

00:29:56.160 Ottawa, everywhere out west here, to see what I could find on it. And it was an incredible learning

00:30:04.320 experience, because so far, everybody, myself included, had been arguing various rights and

00:30:10.320 freedoms issues in relation to primarily the Charter or the British North America Act of 1867.

00:30:17.040 And this put a brand new landscape on what we were going to be arguing and talking about in the

00:30:22.880 future as freedoms. There's a maxim in Latin, I can't pronounce the Latin, but basically, it says,

00:30:31.680 the most important part of everything is the beginning. People talk about COVID today, for

00:30:36.800 example, and I tell them, at least in British Columbia, go back to the original orders of Bonnie

00:30:41.040 Henry, and find out how she lied on those orders, as did Mike Farnworth, the safety minister here,

00:30:48.160 and find out how they lied, because everything is based on those original lies. And when we talk about

00:30:54.160 the supremacy of God, that is the most important part in our law, and that is the beginning.

00:30:59.840 All societies that are out there, every one of them, is going to have a choice. You're either

00:31:04.800 going to be ruled by statutes or laws that are made by men, or you're going to be basically ruled

00:31:11.120 by God, one or the other. And you've got basically two options. If you're on an island, you can do

00:31:18.160 whatever you want, of course. If you're out in the woods, you can do whatever you want. But when you

00:31:21.600 start living with people, you've got an option. If somebody's going to tell you what to do,

00:31:27.520 then either you agree to it, or somebody's going to do it by force. Force, of course, is unlawful,

00:31:35.040 completely unlawful. So when we look at it from a perspective of somebody's going to mention that

00:31:42.400 they're going to tell you what to do, the first thing you're going to want to do is what's in it

00:31:45.360 for me, what benefits am I going to get? And then the second thing is that you're going to want to put

00:31:50.960 limitations on that power. Anybody who's going to tell you what to do in all aspects of your life

00:31:57.520 is simply a dictator and a tyrant. You might as well be a slave at that point. And that's clearly

00:32:02.080 not an option either. So you want to have the benefits of somebody being a leader and in charge,

00:32:09.120 and at the same time, minimizing the power that that person has to maximize your freedom. And it's

00:32:14.160 kind of a correlative that the more rights and freedoms you have, the less government you have.

00:32:20.320 And the more government you have, the less rights and freedoms that you're going to have.

00:32:26.000 And nobody, of course, that's of the same mind, is going to let basically somebody else tell them

00:32:31.920 all aspects of their lives and what they can do. And we're certainly getting that worked in a way today.

00:32:36.800 And the constitution that we have developed came about very, very early on. It's going back to at

00:32:46.320 least the 900s in AD in England. And that's when the first recorded coronation oath basically began.

00:32:56.000 And it goes to the basic principle of protection versus subjection. It's a law of nature. You know,

00:33:03.360 if cubs want protection from the mother bear, they do what they're told, or they're not going

00:33:08.320 to get protected. If they stray off somewhere, well, they're open to being attacked, of course.

00:33:13.200 And same with people in society. If they want protection from a leader,

00:33:18.160 then they have a responsibility to do what the leader says. Limited, of course, by the powers that

00:33:24.160 that leader has, because nobody's going to willingly give this leader, whoever it may be, all the powers

00:33:29.120 they want to have over you. And our constitution is both written and unwritten. Some of it is written.

00:33:36.160 A lot of common law principles are not written anywhere. They were passed down generation to

00:33:40.160 generation, originating in the Bible, of course, and going back historically thousands of years.

00:33:46.320 And these rules in our constitution set out the nature of the government you're going to have,

00:33:52.000 the nature of, in this particular case, that we have a monarchy that we're going to have,

00:33:56.960 and the limitations to those powers. Every monarch that has been in existence throughout our English

00:34:03.680 history and now into Canada has had limitations to those powers. Definitely some have abused it.

00:34:08.880 Absolutely. And the whole thing has resulted in a basic revolution. And I go back to what Einstein

00:34:16.320 said. When people take no interest in politics, and they take no interest in their rights and

00:34:22.400 freedoms and freedoms and just let evil people rule over them, then they will. And then eventually

00:34:27.120 the whole cycle will start all over again, if you don't maintain your rights and freedoms and stand

00:34:32.080 up for them. Which again, leads back to leads back to the principle that the price of freedom is eternal

00:34:37.840 vigilance. And that's one of the reasons where even if masks have been removed, and various other

00:34:44.960 aspects have been removed, this is not the time to be giving up. Because they've already admitted,

00:34:50.560 they're going to try and bring them back in the fall maybe. And they still have the federal mandates.

00:34:55.520 Many of us, thousands, if not millions of us still can't fly because we won't get vaxxed. So there's

00:35:00.400 still a lot more to go in a long way that we have to go. And in Canada, there's a principle that

00:35:07.680 law follows the flag. So when England came here, all our rich English constitutional law and history

00:35:14.800 came with the flag that came to Canada. And that includes the coronation oath of the monarch.

00:35:22.080 And all the limitations were set out in her in her oath that she has to take and every monarch has to

00:35:28.320 take when they're when the first monarch dies. And then the next one comes in immediately right

00:35:33.120 afterwards. And in our particular case, Queen Elizabeth was appointed in 1953. I shouldn't

00:35:40.160 say appointed. She assumed office in 1952 and took her oath in 1953. And it was the first recorded

00:35:47.520 oath video recorded oath in history. It had never been recorded before. If you weren't lucky enough to

00:35:52.640 attend the ceremony, you heard it from word of mouth. And that was about it. So in order for the monarch

00:36:01.280 to be able to give royal assent to legislation, then that legislation has to comply with her oath.

00:36:11.440 If she tries to give legislation that violates her oath and she is committing basically treason and

00:36:16.880 she's breaking the law that she swore to uphold because the contract makes the law. And that ironically

00:36:25.600 includes the charter of rights and freedoms. When Her Majesty signed it on Parliament Hill,

00:36:31.280 in 1982, she could not sign that charter if the charter is interpreted in a manner that violates

00:36:39.840 her coronation oath because the oath is where she gets the power to sign the charter. And ironically,

00:36:46.080 the charter is the first document in our history where the monarch has said, these are going to be

00:36:50.160 your rights and freedoms. Every other constitutional document simply recognized that we already had

00:36:56.880 rights and freedoms. The monarchs were breaking them and we were demanding them back. So it's a very

00:37:02.080 different type of document. And its interpretation must be done in accordance with the coronation oath

00:37:08.240 of the monarch. And there's three parts that every monarch has had to take since 973 AD. They've been kind of

00:37:15.920 worded differently over the years. And the wording was basically made certain starting in 1688 with the

00:37:22.240 Coronation Oath Act. And essentially, the monarch, in this case, Queen Elizabeth, she has to promise,

00:37:28.800 and I'll just read you the first part, will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the people of

00:37:34.320 this Kingdom of England and the dominions thereto belonging according to the statutes and parliament

00:37:39.200 agreed on and the laws and customs of the same. My first thought reading that is when the monarch is

00:37:46.560 swearing this in, she's swearing to govern according to laws of parliament agreed on and our laws and

00:37:54.000 customs. So that means those have to, our laws and customs already had to exist before the monarch even

00:38:00.080 got into power. Otherwise, she would have nothing to swear to hold our laws and customs if they don't

00:38:07.760 already exist. That means for the monarch to get into power, she is already agreeing that our common,

00:38:14.480 fundamental common law rights and freedoms and biblical are there. And as part of her duty,

00:38:20.400 she's going to protect them. And she's swearing an oath to do that. Second, she says, will you,

00:38:26.320 in your power, cause law and justice and mercy to be executed in all your judgments? And this is

00:38:31.760 because the courts, of course, are the King's courts. And nobody wants to get a parking ticket,

00:38:36.640 to use a modern analogy, and spend 20 years in jail. I think you can look to the US as a good example of

00:38:42.800 countries that jail so many people for minor offenses. It's really sad when you see what

00:38:48.560 happens down there. On the other hand, a lot of people complain in Canada, well, all these really

00:38:54.000 serious crimes, people get away with murder up in Canada. And there's some degree of legitimacy to

00:39:00.080 that. But the reason that happens in Canada is because Her Majesty, through her judges, has sworn to

00:39:06.560 give judgment and mercy. And that's exactly why you see some lenient sentences throughout the court system.

00:39:15.280 And the third one, which I think is probably the most powerful, Her Majesty has sworn that,

00:39:21.280 will you, to the utmost of your power, maintain the laws of God, the true profession of the gospel,

00:39:28.960 and the Protestant reformed religion established by law? And will you preserve unto the bishops,

00:39:33.840 clergy of the realm, and to the churches, committed to their charge all such rights and privileges,

00:39:39.840 as by law, do or shall appertain unto any of them? And pursuant to this section,

00:39:47.760 Her Majesty is swearing to uphold, to the utmost of her ability, the principles of Protestant Christian

00:39:54.400 religion established by law, which means that was already the law going back even prior to 1688.

00:40:02.480 That was part of our law already. And she takes this oath. And at the same time she is taking it,

00:40:11.360 this whole ceremony is Christian religious based. Every aspect of it, from the swords that are used,

00:40:18.720 to the essential oils that are used, to the procedures that are used, every aspect of it is based on

00:40:26.640 Christian history and Christian principles. The swords, for example, are listed in where they come

00:40:30.880 from. Defense of the just, defense of the defenseless, I guess, is a good way to put it.

00:40:38.320 People that can't defend themselves. And that goes back to her promises that if people are going to be

00:40:44.480 subject to her laws, she has a duty to protect them. And that's the nature of projection versus

00:40:52.720 subjection. And if she wants our loyalty, if she wants our allegiance, then she has to comply with

00:41:00.000 that oath. And she has to uphold Christian principles. And going back to in the Bible,

00:41:09.520 the first king was in Samuel. And God was basically saying, why do you want a king?

00:41:14.800 You are free already. And the people said, no, we want a king. And we want to be able to look like

00:41:21.840 everybody else. Because everybody else had a king. And finally, God said, okay, here is the king you

00:41:28.240 have chosen, to quote from Samuel. The one you asked for. See, the Lord has set a king over you.

00:41:34.080 If you fear the Lord and serve and obey him, and do not rebel against his commands. And if both of you,

00:41:41.040 you and the king, who reigns over you, follow the Lord your God, good. But if you do not obey the

00:41:47.440 Lord, and you rebel against his commands, his hand will be against you as it was against your

00:41:51.360 ancestors. So essentially, what God has said, and this is where our biblical history goes right back to,

00:41:58.480 is that if you want a king, fine, I'll give you a king. And if your king obeys my laws, you will

00:42:03.120 prosper. If he doesn't, or if you don't obey my laws, then you will suffer. And all you need to

00:42:10.000 do is look at our Canadian society today and go, wow, we are suffering because Canada has

00:42:14.960 strayed so far from our biblical law, so far from God's laws that we have strayed, that the wrath of

00:42:22.880 God is certainly seeming to come upon people right now. But our history, our biblical history goes all

00:42:29.200 the way back to Samuel. And Saul, of course, was the was the first king that was appointed, I believe.

00:42:34.480 And if, and there has been a lot of kings who've been good. There's been a lot of kings who've been

00:42:41.680 bad. And it's kind of an ebb and tide because those bad kings, we've really, really suffered

00:42:47.280 unto them. And interestingly, when the her majesty is sworn in, that picture is a picture of her majesty

00:42:55.920 kissing the Bible at her coronal ceremony in England in 1953. The archbishop presents the

00:43:03.200 Bible as the royal law to her. And as a pivot for a second, people rise when judges come into court,

00:43:11.920 not because the judge is coming in or of any reverence for the judge, they rise because historically,

00:43:16.480 the judge walked into court holding the Bible, and people rose in respect of the Bible. They didn't

00:43:21.840 rise in respect of the judge. And the judges no longer bring the Bible into court anymore.

00:43:30.720 So my position is, why should I rise for them? So what I do is I just wait outside the court door

00:43:35.440 until the judge, if I have to be in court for any reason. And then once the judge sits down,

00:43:39.360 then I'll come in. But I don't like the idea of standing for them anymore.

00:43:42.960 So her majesty kisses the Bible, and all power that she has, everything flows from that oath.

00:43:53.040 And that's the maxim of law. If she doesn't take that oath, she has no power. She cannot give any

00:43:58.720 laws that tell you what to do, period. So the oath preserves our common law that she swore to protect,

00:44:06.320 which is also based on the supremacy of the individual, not the collective.

00:44:10.000 Every constitutional document we have, every one of them, recognizes the supremacy of God,

00:44:17.040 that her majesty swears, and is by... And these oaths, same as when you go to court,

00:44:24.400 if you have to swear an oath to give evidence, they're not meaningless. These are critical.

00:44:28.880 Everything she does is based on this oath. And if she violates that oath, she has no power.

00:44:34.720 And all our laws come from the Bible. So even if you're not religious, if you're an atheist or a

00:44:40.560 secular or whatever, you get the benefits. Murder didn't come about because it was the best law to

00:44:45.120 have to preserve life. It came about because God told people, don't do it. And that's where our law

00:44:50.800 came from. And that's all our law can be traced back directly to God's laws in the Bible.

00:44:55.440 And the other aspect is that everybody who works in the government for the monarch also has to swear

00:45:06.000 an oath of allegiance and an oath of office. And there's only two options. When they swear that oath,

00:45:13.600 they either know what they're swearing or they don't. If they don't know what they're swearing

00:45:19.040 to the monarch, then they're swearing out a false oath, which essentially is probably perjury.

00:45:24.720 And they should be charged accordingly. It's not a trivial manner. And if they do swear the oath,

00:45:31.680 and they go and break it later, then they've been breaking their oath as well. And possibly they

00:45:37.040 could get charged with fraud or a number of other offenses for breaking their oath.

00:45:41.440 These oaths form the basis of all power and somebody telling you in a limited manner what you can do and

00:45:52.000 what you cannot do. And as long as the statutes that Her Majesty gives royal assent to, as long as

00:45:59.520 they don't violate God's law, then they're binding. That's the nature of our government. If they do violate

00:46:05.840 God's law, then you have the power to refuse to comply. And that is where your power of lawful,

00:46:12.800 peaceful, civil disobedience comes from at law. Anything that Her Majesty passes through parliament

00:46:21.360 or the ledge that you can show violates her laws, you do not have to comply with. So getting back on

00:46:27.680 the issue with schools, they took the Lord's Prayer out of school and God saved the queen at the end of the

00:46:33.200 day. And all that the schools are teaching right now about the benefits of the LGBTQ community and how

00:46:43.520 you can be gay, you can be queer, you can get trannies and all the sexual orientation stuff that

00:46:49.200 they are teaching at schools violates, completely violates God's laws. And any statute in the province

00:46:56.720 that authorizes those teachings, any order that authorizes those teachings, can be confidently

00:47:03.760 challenged on the basis that they violate God's laws in the Bible, that Her Majesty swore to uphold,

00:47:09.600 and the MLAs that they swore to uphold as well. Usury is another example. Usury or interest is

00:47:16.640 prohibited in the Bible. We've had interest for 300 years because the bankers got into the monarch.

00:47:22.080 Almost 80% of all your national debt is based of interest in taxes. The majority, of course,

00:47:28.960 is interest. Only $40 billion of an $800 billion debt before COVID was principal. The rest was all

00:47:36.560 compound interest. We're not supposed to have usury in our money system. And yet, the monarch is

00:47:42.080 allowing it. The entire bank act can be struck as being unconstitutional on that basis alone.

00:47:48.240 So, MLAs and MPs, they take an oath of office and an oath of allegiance before they get into power.

00:47:56.240 You can't sit as an MP or an MLA unless you take an oath of office and an allegiance to Her Majesty

00:48:02.240 because you are her agent. And your only job as an MLA or an MP is to aid and advise the monarch.

00:48:09.120 And you cannot aid and advise the monarch for her to give royal assent and break her oath to do that.

00:48:17.520 And that's been well-documented over centuries. And if Parliament or the legislature

00:48:24.880 makes a statute, the Governor General or Lieutenant Governor, as the case may be, if it violates God's law,

00:48:31.360 they have the power and the duty to refuse to sign it. They are breaking the law by allowing this legislation

00:48:39.200 that violates Her Majesty's oath to go through and sign it. They are breaking the law and they are breaking

00:48:44.720 their oath as well by signing it into power. So, the MPs and the MLAs, notwithstanding party allegiance,

00:48:51.440 they are breaking the law because their oath to Her Majesty overrides their party allegiance,

00:48:58.080 not the other way around. And they should not be swearing an oath to do something and then going

00:49:03.920 ahead and breaking it because they don't want to get kicked out of the party. As for judges, Lord Denning,

00:49:10.000 many years ago in England, one of the greatest modern judges of all time, he specifically said,

00:49:16.240 there has to be a science of law, not a lawless science. And without getting into all the details,

00:49:22.880 the science of law means there's an agreement, a contract, and the oath, the coronation oath,

00:49:30.560 as Blackstone said, is a contract. Her Majesty takes it, swears it in, and has duties that flow from it.

00:49:36.720 And the judges are agents of Her Majesty who, they swear an oath of allegiance and an oath of office.

00:49:42.720 And it's interesting that if you go to his oath today, it simply says, I will bear true allegiance to Her Majesty.

00:49:50.800 And that's about it, which is a really shortened version of what it used to be.

00:49:56.000 Today's oath, you look at it, it really doesn't have any meaning. The underlying meaning is still there,

00:50:01.920 pursuant to the oath, but the words, it's too general and vague to understand it. But they are agents of Her Majesty,

00:50:08.320 and they are required, when they're sitting as judges, if a statute comes before them that violates

00:50:15.600 the coronation oath of Her Majesty, they cannot enforce it. They cannot allow it to come before

00:50:22.320 the court in any way, period. And when you look at the coat of arms, underneath the coat of arms in

00:50:30.320 the courtrooms, it says, God and my law. And those coat of arms show that they represent the monarch.

00:50:36.560 And it was said, and I forgot, I didn't mark the judge down, but it was once said that in all these

00:50:43.440 courts, the sovereign is supposed in contemplation of law to be always present. But as in fact that's

00:50:50.720 impossible, he is there represented by his judges, whose power is only an emanation of the royal

00:50:56.320 prerogative. The judge's power is only an emanation of the oath of the monarch that they have,

00:51:03.120 and the judge cannot violate it. And the lawyers, they take an oath of office and oath of allegiance

00:51:10.720 as well, as do all government officials. And that oath of office and oath of allegiance is there to

00:51:17.520 preserve the Christian religion. But at some point, starting 50 years ago, roughly, people started to

00:51:23.040 forget it. And they started to think it didn't mean anything. And look at the results that we've

00:51:27.600 happened in less than 40, 50 years. Look what has happened. Because people have believed that the

00:51:34.320 oath doesn't mean anything. It's just a formality. And it is not. It is the very foundation of all

00:51:39.760 power. And if it doesn't mean anything, why do you have to swear when you go to court and you want to

00:51:44.080 give evidence? I'll quote you from King George III. He said, Where is the power on earth to absolve me

00:51:51.760 from the observance of every sentence of that oath, particularly the one requiring me to maintain

00:51:58.400 the Protestant reform religion? Was not my family seated on the throne for that express purpose?

00:52:04.560 And shall I be the first to suffer it to be undermined, perhaps overturned? No, I had rather

00:52:10.480 beg my bread from door to door throughout Europe than consent to any such measure. I can give up my

00:52:15.680 crown and retire from power. I can quit my palace and live in a cottage. I can lay my head on a block

00:52:21.600 and lose my life. But I cannot break my oath. If I violate that oath, I am no longer legal sovereign

00:52:27.280 in this country. And that was from King George III. And you can't really say it any better than that.

00:52:34.800 You look at all the statutes that Her Majesty has violated since 1953, and she shouldn't be in power

00:52:44.080 because she has broken her oath to us. And we have that power to say, sorry, I'm not going to comply

00:52:49.440 with any statute that violates your oath. The actual title of the monarch is, in this case, Queen Elizabeth

00:52:56.800 II, by the grace of God of the United Kingdom, Canada, and her other realms and territories,

00:53:02.560 Queen, head of the Commonwealth, defender of the faith. Remember those words, defender of the faith.

00:53:08.800 That comes directly from her oath. And it's not every faith. She's not defender of any other faith

00:53:15.520 or religion other than the Protestant Christian religion. That's it. And if she not only does,

00:53:23.360 not only allow statutes to be passed that violate biblical law, but if she promotes any other religion,

00:53:32.560 directly or indirectly, by simply allowing people that have other religions to come into the country.

00:53:38.080 It's a contentious issue, but it's a fact and it's a law. She's breaking her oath when she goes and does

00:53:44.800 that. In the Coronation Oath Act, which was established in 1688, it was simply done to make certainty to the

00:53:54.080 terms of the oath. The essential words were the same since 973 AD, but there had been some uncertainties

00:54:01.360 that had cropped up here and there. So they wanted to make it certain. And the one thing in that oath,

00:54:08.480 in that act, I should say, that is very clear is that she swears to protect you and your property rights.

00:54:15.840 That's part of her oath.

00:54:16.880 So thing that ever happened was that property was not included in the charter because then it would

00:54:27.120 have been subject to section one. I dare say that section one of the charter is a violation of Her

00:54:31.760 Majesty's oath anyway. And a really good, competent lawyer would have no problem arguing that in court,

00:54:38.080 successfully arguing that in court, I might add. No problem whatsoever.

00:54:41.440 But property is in our constitution. It's part of our laws and customs that existed before the

00:54:47.280 monarchy took her oath. Even before that, it was part of our laws and customs. And it goes back to

00:54:53.520 biblical times. You want to trace the law of property, it goes back to the law of Moses,

00:54:58.640 law of God that Moses gave. What did he say? Thou shall not steal. You can't steal unless it presupposes

00:55:05.920 somebody else has property. That's where the origination of property in our law comes from,

00:55:11.840 that the monarch swore and promised to uphold in the first place. And all the law that takes away

00:55:18.080 your property, process of law, or on a presumption that you have to prove otherwise, tax law, for example,

00:55:27.360 all of that is a fundamental breach of her oath, a breach of God's laws, and a breach of trust

00:55:34.560 by Her Majesty, by all the monarchs that have done that. So in conclusion, what I want to point out

00:55:43.440 today, I am going to be doing a much more comprehensive seminar on this. I'm still working

00:55:47.520 on some of the slides on them right now, but I'm going to be doing one shortly. And

00:55:54.000 that coronation oath that the monarch took, especially for people who are Christians,

00:55:58.640 is the fundamental source of power. That's where the power comes from for somebody to say to you,

00:56:05.280 you're going to do something. And that's why it's called the limited monarch. For that very,

00:56:11.920 very reason that it's not an absolute monarch. And there's serious limitations to what the monarch can

00:56:18.000 say, what she can do, and what laws she can pass, what orders she can give. And all Trudeau,

00:56:27.040 the communists, all members of the legislature, members of parliament, the only power that these

00:56:33.520 people have is to aid and advise Her Majesty. That's it. They don't have the power to pass law.

00:56:41.440 All they have is the power to tell Her Majesty, we're aiding, excuse me, we're advising her. This

00:56:46.720 would be a good law to pass. And then the monarch is required to review it, make sure it complies with

00:56:53.040 her coronation oath. And if it does, then she can do the governor general or lieutenant governor.

00:57:00.720 And if they're violating it, then I go back to what a gentleman said years ago. If parliament or the

00:57:10.160 legislature is violating their oath of office and oath of allegiance to Her Majesty, and they're aiding

00:57:17.680 and advising Her Majesty to do something she cannot lawfully do because of her oath, that Her Majesty is

00:57:23.760 required to tell them to cease and desist. If they do not, then Her Majesty is required to dissolve

00:57:30.640 parliament or the legislature and bring in a new one, call new elections and have that done. And if the

00:57:39.520 government still doesn't comply, then the monarch is required to bring in the armed forces and kick them

00:57:45.600 out, if not try them and put them in jail. Because the oath of office and oath of allegiance by the

00:57:51.440 armed forces is to Her Majesty. They're not taken to the prime minister or the premier of the province.

00:58:01.120 I told that on the front lines to a number of police officers that were there face to face,

00:58:07.200 and I explained that to them, that their oath was not to Trudeau or the Emergencies Act or orders

00:58:15.840 that he had passed. It was to Her Majesty and they were breaching their oath. One person kind of nodded

00:58:20.400 I was really surprised. One person nodded, but still stood there. So the armed forces can then

00:58:28.320 come in and get rid of Trudeau. And that might be one option we should be looking at is reminding

00:58:33.840 the armed forces. The problem with that is the armed forces have been correct right at the top,

00:58:38.240 of course, too. So they might even come back and say, yeah, well, we're not going to do it. We agree,

00:58:43.440 but we're not going to do it. Or some excuse that they might come up with. But the law is there.

00:58:48.320 And if the governor general told the general in command of the armed forces, you go in and get

00:58:52.480 Trudeau out of there, they would have to comply by law to do that. So I urge you to think about

00:58:58.880 that from a new perspective. Now, when we look at laws, a how they're passed and the limitations of

00:59:04.720 what the monarch can do to give royal assent to that legislation. And there are serious, serious

00:59:08.960 limitations to what she can do. And I hope that provides a little basis for what we're going to

00:59:15.200 talk about in the next four to six weeks when the presentation I'm done is going to be done.

00:59:22.640 I'm going to get into a lot more than just the oath. I'll be talking about personhood.

00:59:27.280 I did a phenomenal amount of research on what personhood is in Canada, which ironically was

00:59:32.000 started because a woman just was running out of the library at UBC and banged into me and her papers

00:59:37.280 went flying. And she's apologizing profusely. And I just said, what's the rush?

00:59:42.160 And she says, I've got a thesis I have to write on what a person is in law. And I got to get this

00:59:48.000 done right away. And I went, well, that's interesting. So then I started doing my own

00:59:52.080 research. So I phenomenal what I found out about personhood and law. And keep in mind what God said

00:59:57.680 in the Bible, he is no respecter of persons either. So I'll be talking that I'll be talking

01:00:02.720 about property rights and a lot of other really, really important stuff. Everything that I tell you,

01:00:07.360 everything I will show you on PowerPoint, and I will tell you where I got it from.

01:00:11.920 And it's backed up. So you'll be able to verify it as well. Thanks, Tanya.

01:00:16.560 That's awesome, David. This is just a taste of what David has to come. And so David, when do you

01:00:22.560 think that this program will be ready? I understand it's going to be about an eight or nine week course.

01:00:28.080 Is that correct?

01:00:28.800 Yeah, yeah, we got about 1100 PowerPoint slides. And I've still got about another 100,

01:00:34.880 150 that I'm formatting right now. So I'm going to say roughly about six weeks.

01:00:38.640 Okay, about six weeks.

01:00:39.920 I was hoping to get it done by now. But there's been a lot of legal,

01:00:44.240 a lot of legal work to keep going.

01:00:45.920 On the side that we're doing.

01:00:47.200 Yeah, yeah, but it's coming along nicely. And when it's done, I guarantee you, nobody will be

01:00:54.240 disappointed. Right? Okay, well, I'm going to be making sure that on the Empower Hour,

01:01:00.000 when it's ready to go, that we'll be promoting that course. And I think this is I'm always saying

01:01:04.880 knowledge is power, right? And when we've got this kind of information, we need to dig deep into it.

01:01:09.840 And we need to take that authority back and make it work for us. So I think if you're ready, we're

01:01:15.760 going to get into some q&a. And I have a lineup of questions that I thought there's about six here that

01:01:21.600 I thought I would throw your way first. And then Terenzi, maybe once I get through these few

01:01:26.800 questions, we could ask people to raise their hands. And then they could ask David a question

01:01:32.640 directly. Copy that.

01:01:34.240 All right. Okay, so David, first question. This is from Suzanne. She says, thank you so much.

01:01:40.960 And so what will happen when the Queen passes on her royal duties, whether through retirement or death?

01:01:47.920 There's a principle that it's called there's no interregium, which means the minute

01:01:55.600 Lizzie the lizard dies, as we affectionately call her, the next person who's in line automatically

01:02:01.920 becomes king or queen. I think it's Prince Charles right now. I stand corrected, but they will

01:02:06.560 automatically become king or queen afterwards. If it's Prince Charles, he'll be king. And then within

01:02:11.520 a certain period of time after that, they have to take their oath of allegiance and oath of office as well.

01:02:16.160 Right. And do they have an option then not to take that particular oath? What if they say,

01:02:21.920 I'm not taking this oath? We know, well, we've heard some rumors about where royalties stand on the

01:02:28.960 global scale. So what if he comes in to be king and decides not to? Can he do that? Or that's just part of

01:02:36.960 taking their oath and getting into that position? It's a condition of power and they cannot refuse to

01:02:45.760 take it. The oath itself, in order to be changed, has to go through, has to be agreed upon by all

01:02:55.600 premiers in Canada, the federal government in Canada, all heads of state or from all other commonwealth

01:03:02.240 countries, parliament in England, and the monarch itself. Everybody has to agree in order to change

01:03:09.600 it because they're all part of it. And unless that happens, then no person coming in will have to

01:03:16.000 swear the oath as per the Coronation Oath of 1688. And that's the other thing. Parliament will have to

01:03:20.880 change that act itself in order to make the changes too. Right. And there's a huge process that would be

01:03:26.080 involved in that. So, so, so far, we're feeling pretty secure then, that these are our rights,

01:03:31.680 it will be maintained. And I should point out, sorry to interrupt, I should point out that somebody

01:03:36.960 mentioned something in England a while back about the king coming in and removing God. And there was a

01:03:43.440 big, massive outcry of opposition. And the public got really, really angry about that. So I think if they

01:03:50.160 try to remove God, or they're, they're going to face such a backlash, it'll really surprise them,

01:03:54.960 and they're not going to like it. No. And I think that with the growing

01:03:58.800 tyranny has come a rise in awareness of Christianity and the stand in the world of how that affects

01:04:06.800 people's individual lives. And so I think if it were to happen now as well, there would be a huge

01:04:12.320 uprising. I believe that. I will pray for it. Okay. Ross has asked the question, would you address the

01:04:18.320 issues where the courts in Canada have held that the Coronation Oath is of no legal force or effect?

01:04:24.800 And then he had in brackets, there are at least 10 to 12 in the 21st century.

01:04:31.200 First of all, I raised the issue back in 05 roughly in court. And my problem is I didn't put it to the

01:04:37.200 court properly. So it wasn't really considered all that much. That was my problem. I know now much

01:04:43.360 better how to put it to the court after being in court so much over the last 15 to 18 years.

01:04:48.400 There's not a lot of decisions out there on it. What I will tell you is that the decisions that are

01:04:55.920 out there were primarily, if not exclusively, put by by unrepresented people, people who didn't know

01:05:03.200 how to frame the challenge or whatever it was they were putting to the court. They didn't know how to

01:05:07.920 frame it properly. They didn't get evidence on the record. There was a lot of defects in what they were

01:05:13.040 doing in order to put it before the court correctly. My problem is my affidavits that I was using in

01:05:18.800 support of it, I filed them in the court registry. And nobody told me that in order to get into

01:05:25.040 evidence, I actually had to take the witness stand and submit them into evidence. The judge legally was

01:05:31.440 required to tell me that. He never did. So my evidence never got on the record. I learned that about

01:05:37.760 a year or two later, I learned that the hard way I might add. But that's why one of the reasons that

01:05:43.920 my case failed is the evidence never got on the record and it wasn't put pursuant to a court,

01:05:48.160 a constitutional challenge at the time. And the other thing I want to mention is there was a case,

01:05:53.120 and I'm going to talk about it in our presentation, where somebody did try to go to court and change

01:05:59.120 the oath. And the judge specifically said, I can't change it. I don't have the power to change it.

01:06:04.960 Your case is going to fail. And it is failing. And it went up to the court of appeal. And they said

01:06:10.400 the same thing, that you cannot change the oath, even if it violates the charter. They said, we cannot

01:06:19.040 change the oath of Her Majesty, meaning the oath is supreme to the charter, period. And you could go in

01:06:28.640 and you can make a constitutional challenge that Section 1 of the charter violates Her Majesty's

01:06:34.320 Coronation. That can be done. Absolutely. That's why everybody has lost so far. It just hasn't been

01:06:41.600 put to the court properly. And the lawyers, they're not going to do it. I phoned the Ontario

01:06:46.320 Lawyers, the Ontario Christian Lawyers Association many, many years ago. And I said, here it is. I've

01:06:51.760 got it all. I've got all this research. I'll share it to you. No problem. Let's get it. Not one lawyer would

01:06:57.440 take it. Not one. And I said, you guys are Christians. Why would you not go for this and

01:07:03.280 show the supremacy of God in our law and everything that comes with it? We don't want to talk to you.

01:07:08.480 And the girl on the phone hung up on me. Is that right? Well, that's frightening. And maybe this is

01:07:13.200 going to be a time, the time is coming, where there's going to be lawyers who are willing to

01:07:18.160 stand up. I was listening to James Kitchen the other day. He used to be with the JCCF. He's left.

01:07:23.440 And I believe he's working with Liberty Coalition. And there he was. He was clearly stating he was

01:07:29.920 working on behalf of a pastor who had been imprisoned, another one in Alberta, one of many

01:07:35.120 under Jason Kenney's tyranny. And he had again said, just like I've been saying that this is a

01:07:41.280 Christian nation and that our principles are based on Christian principles. And this is not something

01:07:47.040 that you get in other nations. He named Iran. He named several other countries that you do not have

01:07:52.960 the privilege to live in the freedoms we do outside of having and being governed by biblical principles.

01:07:59.120 So that's why I keep saying this is something we really need to fight for. All right. So thank

01:08:02.960 you for answering that question. Next one. What does it mean when our prime minister swears

01:08:08.560 allegiance to the queen when being sworn in? Is he swearing to the coronation oath?

01:08:13.440 Well, he is swearing allegiance to the monarch and he cannot aid and advise her to do anything she can't do.

01:08:23.440 And if she if he tries to get the monarch to do something that she has sworn an oath not to do,

01:08:28.960 he should be charged with treason. Right. And so as he's breaking his oath.

01:08:33.600 OK, so as an example, we he's passed so many different laws since he came into office nearly

01:08:40.080 seven or a half, six and a half, whatever years ago. One of them would be something like Bill C-16,

01:08:45.920 which allows biological men into women's private spaces. And it has been sort of a catalyst to,

01:08:53.360 well, the provinces had already passed and and created the amendment to the human rights codes.

01:08:59.600 And then the federal government did it. I believe all of these bills that are outside of and in

01:09:05.680 violation of the coronation oath need to be rescinded. They need to be overturned.

01:09:10.080 Absolutely. What I would do is I would pick the strongest ones and use those and then work your

01:09:16.080 way down. You don't want to pick something that, you know, some minor little statute or whatever that

01:09:22.400 says you shouldn't drive on this side of the road or something stupid like that. You want to pick

01:09:26.080 something that has significant repercussions and meaning to it and and use that and go after it.

01:09:32.000 Absolutely. But these cases, you know, it's

01:09:39.600 in law, in constitution, it's simple. The obstacles are incredible. The judges are politically appointed,

01:09:47.120 non-elected and not accountable to anybody. And they cover up a lot of their corruption. That's one

01:09:52.480 of the reasons, getting back to the last question, why a lot of people haven't won,

01:09:56.080 is because the judges are just corrupt. All of them. And they're bought and paid for. You know,

01:10:01.040 I was helping a friend in court and I found out a year and a half later, the judge was fully on my

01:10:05.920 side. And I think, why did we lose? And I find out we got contacted by a member of the government,

01:10:13.040 inside the government, who knew and was part of the case. And they said,

01:10:17.760 CRA threatened the judge to be audited if they ruled in our favour.

01:10:23.120 Every judge is compromised. Everyone is compromised, or they would not be sitting there.

01:10:28.160 Right. So it's going to be difficult. You've got to get them in a corner they can't get out of.

01:10:32.160 Right. We've had a couple make some positive decisions like the judge in Ontario on behalf of

01:10:37.280 that mother. But it is far and few between. All right, let's get through one more and then we're

01:10:42.000 going to bring a few people on to ask you personally a question. What effect or influence,

01:10:48.000 if any, did the Constitutional Act of 1982 have in today's constitution since then?

01:10:59.440 Well, it has had some benefits. For example, in disclosure law, people used to get a package,

01:11:05.200 a small package of information if you were charged with an offence, but the Crown determined what you

01:11:09.680 were going to get and half the time you didn't get hardly anything. After 1982, in the Stinchcomb case,

01:11:16.960 the Supreme Court of Canada made it very clear, you're entitled to everything that's relevant,

01:11:20.960 whether it's good or bad, whether the Crown wants to use it or not. And it applies to, you know,

01:11:26.000 almost all offences. And it's been very powerful in that regard for disclosure. It's had a very good

01:11:35.360 effect on disclosure law. On the other hand, there's been where they've used number one,

01:11:40.480 as you're aware, to override a lot of decisions that the government had no power to make in the

01:11:45.440 first place. It would be time consuming to start going through all of them. But has it had its

01:11:51.200 benefits? Yeah, it's had some benefits. But that's the way law is supposed to be. Law is supposed to

01:11:57.120 go up. It's not supposed to go down. And when you start talking about communism, socialism, the

01:12:03.680 supremacy of the collective, and trying to use our law to that effect, then you're going down and we're

01:12:08.400 losing everything. Yes, intentionally, like this is this is a planned attack, just to override and

01:12:15.120 trample all over our constitution and the coronation oath, etc. Okay, Terenzio, do we have somebody ready

01:12:21.360 with their hand raised? Yes, we have a few questions. For those who would like to ask questions, please go

01:12:25.760 down to the bottom right corner and click raise hand and we'll try to get you in. First one we have is

01:12:32.000 Roxy. Okay, I guess one of them is like, I know the queen has to do what she's for to do,

01:12:40.480 but I feel she's corrupt too. So I don't think that's going to work. And

01:12:47.600 I don't know. By the time we get to the court, it's going to be too late. They're going to have

01:12:52.720 everything done that they wanted to do to control us and take our freedom away. That's how I feel.

01:12:58.720 They keep breaking laws, yet we have to wait. That's where our power of peaceful civil disobedience

01:13:04.400 comes in. We should not be complying with any of these statutes. If you're a parent, you should not

01:13:09.680 be putting your kids in school to be taught the garbage that they're putting in there that violate

01:13:13.520 God's laws. Pure and simple, you have a duty as a parent not to do that. And you have the power to do

01:13:18.800 that. And that's just one example. Some people have said, for example, well, we need to change the

01:13:23.360 system. And my first question is, what are you going to change it to? Some people have said,

01:13:27.680 well, we need a republic like the US. And I've said, look how corrupt it is down there.

01:13:31.760 It is so bad. And they do not have the supremacy of God directly in their constitution like we do.

01:13:39.600 We're the only, the Commonwealth is the only place in the world. You have the supremacy of

01:13:43.600 God directly in the constitution as the source of law that's required to be complied with.

01:13:49.520 What are you going to do to get better than that? It's not the system per se. Granted,

01:13:53.920 it needs tweaking. I mean, you got to get rid of political parties and a few other things. But

01:13:58.000 the problem is the corrupt people that we've put into power and we do nothing about it.

01:14:08.880 That's the problem. Get them out of power. And as Tanya's talked about, and I've talked about,

01:14:12.640 and others have talked about, we need to get people in power that cannot be bought or sold.

01:14:17.760 And then you will start seeing change, even at a local level, you'll start seeing change made.

01:14:22.640 Yeah. Yeah. I agree with you so much, David. And that's why we've been pushing so hard,

01:14:26.640 join a chapter, you know, get, we're going to recruit people to run for offices, school board

01:14:31.280 trustees, us kind of people, you know, the good hearted grassroots people who understand,

01:14:35.840 who are going to go in there and actually represent our kids as trustees and represent

01:14:40.800 the community in municipalities, et cetera. And I believe that if we get our numbers up within

01:14:46.720 the chapters that we can take over elections, we can push the needle in favor of ourselves and get

01:14:52.160 good people into office. And I think they're actually becoming a little bit afraid of us because

01:14:56.640 I think we're growing faster and better than what they'd anticipated. So please help us out on that.

01:15:02.080 All right. Next question. Hi, Jess. Are you there? Hello. What's your question?

01:15:05.760 Just a question there. I'm wondering, David, if you're familiar with the concepts that Cal

01:15:10.800 Washington talks about in terms of jurisdictions from down in the, the common law and law mercantoria

01:15:18.960 and how that relates to work. And then what he sort of states is that we don't have any ratified

01:15:23.680 charter in Canada because Queen Victoria unenacted the BNA act when she died. She, she put a clause in

01:15:31.360 there essentially that it can't be unenacted. So then it kind of like his, his sort of theory is

01:15:36.480 that we're operating under the Hudson Bay charter, which maybe connects to what you're saying. So

01:15:40.720 and in the Hudson Bay charter, it says they can't create any law that is repugnant to the common law.

01:15:47.120 So with the, the, the law of like the Protestant church be the common law. Is that what we're talking

01:15:52.640 about here or does that my, does my question make sense? Well, that the Protestant religion has

01:15:58.240 generally been our law and, um, and the monarch has, has sworn an oath to uphold that. I disagree

01:16:04.320 that Queen Vic, um, has repealed the BNA act. The BNA act, if you look, has never been repealed.

01:16:10.480 And in order to be repealed, it would have to go through parliament and repealing the entire act.

01:16:14.720 I know some sections have been repealed, um, but they have, some of them are redundant with other sections.

01:16:20.240 And that's one of the reasons they have statute law revision acts where they go back in the,

01:16:24.320 um, and they were, and they go back and they repeal some of them. So the BNA act still is in force and

01:16:29.600 effect. Um, it was in force and effect in 1931 when the statute of Westminster was passed

01:16:34.960 and recognized under section seven of the statute that the BNA act was, uh, was still in force and

01:16:39.920 effect. And yeah, our common law is still there. Absolutely. And, um, the monarch is still there to,

01:16:45.600 uh, to, uh, to protect that. And, um, I'm not sure where else you'd want me to go. It's more of a,

01:16:52.480 probably a private lengthy discussion than could be getting into, gotten into right here. Suffice to

01:16:57.600 say that, um, the BNA act still is in force and effect in my opinion, and the monarch is definitely

01:17:03.200 bound to it. And, uh, to argue otherwise, um, again, what are you going to replace it with anyway?

01:17:09.360 You're not going to get anything better in, in law. I'm talking in law. In fact, of course,

01:17:13.680 I mean, she's not been a very good queen with all the law she's given the given royal assent to

01:17:18.240 through her, um, governor general and so on, but that's a different issue, of course.

01:17:22.960 Right. Okay. Thank you, David. Um, so while, uh, Trent, you have set somebody else up here.

01:17:27.920 So when he talks, when you talk about property, does that include my money in the bank

01:17:32.800 and my financial holdings? What about freezing assets?

01:17:36.160 Absolutely. It does. And, uh, FinTrack, in my opinion, is completely unconstitutional and unlawful.

01:17:43.360 Everything they're doing, everything they're doing to take the, the freezing of, um,

01:17:47.280 the money from the truckers in their convoy is completely unconstitutional.

01:17:51.600 And the problem is none of these lawyers are, are putting it to the court properly.

01:17:56.240 Many of them don't even know it exists. And, uh, and, and that's the, uh, the problem,

01:18:01.280 but to answer your question succinctly, the answer is yes, absolutely.

01:18:05.200 Okay. Super. All right. Terenzio, do you have somebody else lined up?

01:18:07.920 Yeah. Let's try Irene again.

01:18:09.200 Hello. I've served my employer, uh, notice of liability last March 21.

01:18:15.280 And then I follow up with another letter, April 4. Um, I haven't ordered the book yet

01:18:22.400 from David Lindsay, and I'm not sure, um, what is my next step?

01:18:27.840 You served your employer notice of liability?

01:18:33.760 Yes. March 21. And I did another follow up April 4. So I, I sent it through registered mail,

01:18:41.840 uh, with my autograph and, uh, talk mark.

01:18:47.360 Are you still working there?

01:18:48.400 No.

01:18:51.440 I was, couldn't leave. And then later on, I was, uh, they sent me a letter, like, uh,

01:18:57.280 terminate termination letter.

01:19:00.080 Right. I think that your question is something that is going to require a private conversation.

01:19:06.160 It's just simply, they're going to, there's too many questions that I have in response that

01:19:10.160 we wouldn't be able to get into right now. So, um, if we can put my email there, if somebody,

01:19:15.680 if you wanted to send me an email or something, I could, uh, I could definitely talk to you privately

01:19:19.440 about it for sure.

01:19:20.960 Okay. Super. And we'd also recommend that you go to our past and power hours back in the fall

01:19:26.560 of 2021, where David came on as special guest and we answered oodles of questions just like this.

01:19:32.480 And we were preparing people to, uh, lay private information as well.

01:19:37.280 So I would recommend that. Okay. Uh, Trenzio, next person, please.

01:19:41.520 Next question is from Vlad.

01:19:44.480 Hello, if you can hear me.

01:19:46.480 Yes, we can hear you.

01:19:47.600 Excellent. Uh, I have a proposal for David.

01:19:51.040 We're talking, we have a lot of trouble with our mask mandates and other mandates and lawyers

01:19:57.040 trying to talk a lot, but no help.

01:19:59.040 Maybe somebody from Lawrence can create some kind of special case that shows this experience for

01:20:06.080 other people. For example, you could, uh, decrease prices for your teaching for 20 or 10 bucks and

01:20:13.360 find several thousand clients and say, and get more money if you decrease your price.

01:20:19.280 And for example, I know people who create, uh, criminal and, uh, cases for mask mandates and so on.

01:20:28.400 And it will be minimum, at least one win somewhere, at least some experience for other people.

01:20:33.600 Thank you for your help.

01:20:36.960 I, um, I think in order to get something before the court, it's either going to require, um,

01:20:42.880 myself doing it or some lawyer who is a committed Christian that's willing to do it and willing to

01:20:49.920 work with me because I have a lot of information and a lot of knowledge that I could share with the,

01:20:55.520 the lawyer, if they would be willing to work on it. Um, the question is trying to find somebody right

01:21:00.320 now. Um, I think finding a lawyer who's not Christian, you won't get the same commitment

01:21:07.840 to, to putting this forward. Um, especially because most of the lawyers have been compromised

01:21:13.200 as well and they get threatened from the law society. So it definitely needs to be a committed

01:21:17.360 Christian lawyer to, to do that. And, um, if we can find one, I'd be more than happy to work with

01:21:22.880 them and to get the, the appropriate test case filed with the court where we would be guaranteed

01:21:28.000 to win on it. Yeah, absolutely.

01:21:30.320 Okay. Thank you, David. I'll just ask a question and thank you, Vlad. And, um, as Terenzi,

01:21:36.320 you'll get somebody else lined up. If the coronation oath is being openly violated by our leading

01:21:41.600 politicians and officials, example, the law does not apply to them, then how can we hope

01:21:46.640 to challenge them on the basis of the coronation oath? Well, the oath is the supreme law and if

01:21:53.360 they're violating it, it's simply a question of what are you going to do about it? And the options

01:21:59.280 are peaceful civil disobedience and refusing to comply. That, that needs to be done no matter what.

01:22:05.200 And the second one is, um, is taking the monarch to court. Historically, you, you, the, uh, historically,

01:22:11.760 her majesty or the monarch could not be pleaded in her own courts and pleaded in her own courts.

01:22:16.400 And it was really difficult to get justice that way. That's changed. And you now can take the

01:22:20.720 monarch to court, even their own courts. And notwithstanding the judge's oath of office

01:22:25.600 and allegiance to the monarch, they also have an oath to be impartial in, in the execution of those

01:22:30.720 duties. That's part of their oath of office is to be impartial when they're giving judgment.

01:22:35.360 So you want to be able to, as I've said, um, the term I use is to pigeonhole them in a corner

01:22:39.600 they can't get out of. And I've done that myself in the past on a couple of occasions and, and been

01:22:44.240 successful. But ultimately those are the two primary weapons that we have of, of getting justice and

01:22:52.720 getting it into the court requires time, preparation, study, getting your case planned out before you

01:22:58.640 even file it with the court and so on. It's, uh, it's a lot of effort as Tanya found out to, to get it.

01:23:03.680 And even with a lawyer, it takes a lot of time to make sure you get it done correctly. So the first thing

01:23:07.840 is we need a committed Christian lawyer and I'm hopefully we're going to have some of them on our

01:23:12.720 presentation in, in, in roughly six weeks when we, when we start to do that because, um, they're,

01:23:17.680 they will learn a lot as well. Right. Exactly. Thank you so much, David.

01:23:22.000 Good. Um, okay. Terenzio, did you have, let's have two more people have questions. It's, uh,

01:23:27.360 six 30 already. Time goes by quickly. And, uh, do you have somebody lined up there?

01:23:32.960 Yes. Uh, Robert.

01:23:33.920 I have a question just in regards to the technology of Judge David hyphen Wayne Miller. Um,

01:23:41.680 he uses the parse syntax grammar, uh, to, I guess, debunk the words in contracts. And my question is with

01:23:50.960 her majesty when she's speaking in some of her oaths, there's, uh, words that have, uh, I guess,

01:23:56.720 double meaning double talk. And some of those words are very negative. Um, so how does that affect

01:24:03.360 us if we want to use the coronation oath, uh, to get back to work to my Canada post employee,

01:24:08.080 um, and they've, uh, basically denied any, uh, they forced the masks, forced the vaccine. Um,

01:24:16.000 and they're not recognizing anything from me as an employee there. So I just to sum up on that

01:24:21.600 technology. Um, I just wanted to, if I'll answer your question at one point, there's not been any

01:24:29.760 English writing that I've ever seen in any English literature that mirrors what David

01:24:34.480 Wynn Miller was teaching. Um, he was in the States. He's now deceased, I believe. Yeah.

01:24:39.040 And I'm, I've talked to a lot of people over the years. Um, I'm not a supporter of, of what he

01:24:46.160 teaches with respect to the English language and, um, to, to go and try and plead that you're going to

01:24:52.800 have to start pleading that that law should be accepted in the first place, which means you would

01:24:57.920 need some sort of challenge just to get that, that accepted and the courts recognizing it.

01:25:02.480 And there's no legal historical or other, uh, information to back it up in Canadian law

01:25:07.840 that is going to back that. Um, keep in mind, he's an American and a lot of the American stuff

01:25:12.640 doesn't apply up in Canada anyway, especially with the court system, which has gone on divergent paths

01:25:18.080 from, from where we've gone on. Um, so I, I, I'll just leave it at that, that in my opinion,

01:25:23.920 what Miller is teaching, uh, if somebody was to go and use it, you're, um, you're lining yourself

01:25:29.280 up for a possible psych assessment in the courtroom. Uh, if you don't know what you're talking about,

01:25:33.520 it can be very dangerous. Okay. So I, I'm going to have two, but I'll ask this one, uh, from Nathan,

01:25:39.840 the lawyers also take a vow oath to the bar, which has precedence in Canada or like, which one has

01:25:47.760 precedence in Canada, the oath to the coronation or to the bar? The oath to the monarch has, has, um,

01:25:54.320 um, priority over everything. The, um, lawyers are officers of the court, which is a duty to her

01:26:00.400 majesty. And if they start pleading something in court, similar to what MPs do, um, that violates

01:26:07.120 her majesty's oath, the judges can't give, uh, cannot recognize it in court. So if they start

01:26:13.840 trying to get the judge to do something that her majesty can't do as well in court, they too can

01:26:18.640 can find themselves in hot water. So everything starts at the top. And that top is that coronation

01:26:24.880 oath. It binds the monarch and it binds everybody who is allegiant to her, uh, or an oath of office

01:26:31.040 to her as well. The membership in that to the bar that comes next. Okay. And so what would you say?

01:26:40.240 I know it's awfully hard to remove a judge. Have you ever seen it happen? Has it ever happened in

01:26:44.960 Canada? And is there any steps that we could be taking because they are in definite breach of

01:26:51.200 their oath to uphold the criminal cop, um, the criminal code and the constitution charter rights

01:26:58.320 in Canada? Yeah, there was a judge in Kamloops. Uh, I was before him once and I found him just to be a

01:27:04.400 real rude, arrogant judge, but he got removed because he, I mean, he was swearing in court and causing all

01:27:09.440 kinds of problems for people. And, um, so yeah, he, um, complaint got made to the law society. Uh,

01:27:15.200 no, not law society. It was to the judicial council, I believe. And, um, and he was removed. Absolutely.

01:27:20.880 And, uh, he's not the only one that it's had happened to. It has been done for sure. So, um,

01:27:26.000 judges can be removed. Absolutely. And the judicial councils, um, kind of like the, um,

01:27:35.280 how do I put it? It's kind of like, um, they're, they're corrupt because they're going to be

01:27:42.800 protecting their own as well for the most part. Right. So to get judges removed is very, very

01:27:48.480 difficult. Um, you need some, some good evidence to, to do that. And saying that they didn't uphold

01:27:55.880 their oath. In many cases, they'll say, well, I made an error. Well, yeah, you made an error. You made

01:28:01.160 an error. How do you get somebody removed for making an error unless it's repetitive, of course,

01:28:05.720 and then you complete negligence on, on the judge. He simply doesn't know what he's doing.

01:28:09.800 So, yeah, it's just very, very difficult to, to get a judge removed. Um, but it can be done.

01:28:15.960 It can be done. Absolutely. It has been done. Yeah. I was just seeing Kat had, uh, posted here some

01:28:22.000 years ago, we raised enough of a fuss and had a judge from Northern BC removed from the bench.

01:28:27.040 Good to you. And this just may be the direction we need to go. I know for the judges in Alberta who

01:28:32.640 have been, uh, closely tied in trying to take down pastors, especially Pastor Artur, uh, oh boy,

01:28:39.600 what they have done has just been so criminal. And so we want to, we want to maybe provide some

01:28:45.280 posters. Uh, we think people should know who these judges are and, uh, bring some attention to them

01:28:51.360 because they have made decisions in the court that have severely, uh, uh, affected innocent

01:28:57.760 people's lives like Pastor Artur who has to go out in public and face the criticism. Um, shouldn't

01:29:03.760 they have to go out in public and face the criticism for what they've done as well? I don't think that

01:29:07.600 they should be protected from this. I'm not calling for violence. Of course, I'm just calling for

01:29:11.920 accountability. What a friend of mine did years ago in Alberta, uh, he got screwed by a JP in court.

01:29:19.840 So he did up flyers listing what this JP had done and they delivered it all around Southern Alberta,

01:29:26.000 including where the JP lived, but they did not go on his property. They left his house out.

01:29:31.760 So he didn't have no idea until his neighbors and everybody started phoning them. And, and,

01:29:36.160 and they were going, what the heck are you doing? And he's going, what? And, um, the only qualification

01:29:42.720 I would add is that the flyers were well researched and well backed up. The last thing you want to,

01:29:47.280 you want to do is put something out about anybody, let alone a judge where you're not able to back up

01:29:52.320 what you're putting in the, uh, in the fire. Cause you could not only get in trouble yourself,

01:29:56.320 it can make, make everybody look bad. Right. But I just wanted to point out that it was done.

01:30:00.480 Yeah, no, we would just tell the truth about decisions that they've made and let people make,

01:30:05.200 uh, you know, come to their own conclusions as to whether or not that was good. So I think that's pretty

01:30:11.280 simple and harmless. And all right, let's go to our last question. Terenzio.

01:30:16.240 All right. Last question is from Carla. There you go.

01:30:19.840 Hi. Hello. Hi, Carla. Hi, how are you?

01:30:25.280 Hope all is well. Good, thank you.

01:30:28.480 I was just inquiring about the, um, the, the vaccine passport for traveling and the mandates not being

01:30:38.320 lifted. I know someone, uh, queried it earlier about eight, 10 or so, but I'm,

01:30:44.080 I might've not been on the zoom. So I didn't hear the answer.

01:30:51.920 What's your question?

01:30:54.880 Uh, um, as anyone, uh, the question was, has anyone challenged the airlines, uh, to board and fly

01:31:01.840 on a commercial airline as of late that has not been vaxxed, but I, I wasn't on the call at the

01:31:10.560 time. So I, I, I don't know if that was answered.

01:31:14.240 I don't think it was asked.

01:31:15.440 Okay. No, I don't think that question has been asked yet. I, we know that Brian Peckford,

01:31:20.480 Sheila has already posted it in the chat, is taking legal action, uh, about what's going on as far as

01:31:26.880 travel is concerned.

01:31:28.000 Okay. Yes. I've, I've been watching what he's been doing too, as well, but I

01:31:33.840 just thought maybe there was something, uh, um, action for Canada was doing as well.

01:31:40.480 So I thought that's what the question was.

01:31:42.960 Okay. So no, because Mr. Peckford has taken this on, uh, we don't want to recreate the wheel,

01:31:48.560 right? We've got all of us only have so many resources to be responsible with. So I figure

01:31:53.440 that case is in very good hands. And, uh, so we'll just hope and pray for a great outcome for them.

01:31:59.440 Okay. Thank you. Thank you. You know what, Trendio, maybe let's make that one more question directed

01:32:06.160 to us specifically at David. Okay. And then we'll wrap this evening up. Next question is from, uh, Richard.

01:32:16.640 Richard, if you can please unmute yourself. Hi, can you hear me? Yes.

01:32:19.920 Yes. Yeah. David. Greetings. Very good. Um, I just wanted to quickly ask you, the UK has an unwritten

01:32:30.160 constitution where the queen is just a symbolic figure. So she has no power. And if she did try to

01:32:38.160 get involved in, uh, laws or politics, uh, things would get very unpredictable. Does that affect your

01:32:46.160 argument? So that position is, uh, what's the word I'm looking for? Um,

01:32:55.600 convention, um, that her majesty will, um, sign laws by parliament and that parliament is supreme.

01:33:03.840 If parliament is supreme, you wouldn't need royal assent by the crown, by the monarch in the first

01:33:07.840 place. They would just go and do whatever they want. They need royal assent by the ledger by the

01:33:13.040 monarch in order for legislation to be valid in England, as well as here. And the information,

01:33:18.800 a lot of what I'm talking about comes directly from England and they cannot recommend to her

01:33:25.440 majesty to give royal assent there to legislation that violates her oath as well. It is not a symbolic

01:33:31.040 position. People who are claiming it's symbolic are people who are there breaking the law and trying

01:33:36.080 to maximize power and control to do whatever they want, pure and simple. And they're trying to get

01:33:41.680 Christianity out of our law because that that's the whole purpose for doing that is so that they're

01:33:47.280 not responsible to uphold Christian principles throughout parliament. So I disagree. Um, in

01:33:54.960 Canada, they've tried to argue that by convention, the, uh, governor general just rubber stamps everything

01:34:00.080 by parliament. That may be, uh, that may be what they're doing, but it's not lawful for him to do that.

01:34:06.320 And if he simply says, well, uh, I'm doing it because the last guy did it and the last guy did

01:34:11.040 it, uh, rubber stamped everything by parliament and I'm going to do it, even though it violates her

01:34:16.000 majesty's laws that I'm representing, then they're breaking the law as well. And I go back to what I

01:34:21.520 said earlier, all power flows from the oath. They are not trivial. They're not meaningless and they're not,

01:34:26.800 uh, symbolic. They have a lot of constitutional meaning and it's the very beginning of all power from the

01:34:33.280 monarch. So, um, I hope that answers your question in any event.

01:34:39.040 Yeah. Thank you, David. I've been calling the coronation oath a buried treasure, but a living

01:34:43.600 document, if that could make sense, because it truly is. Um, and you know, I know there's some people

01:34:50.000 that have been sort of on this tyrant to say, uh, you know, saying that charter of rights is no good.

01:34:56.000 And, you know, it's causing all cases to fail. You got to go with the bill of rights, the bill of rights.

01:35:00.240 And, and I think that's bringing people down rabbit holes. We've got to understand, uh, you know,

01:35:04.720 there's some people that do a common law referring to not the common law that you, uh, support, but the

01:35:11.600 other kind saying, we don't have a constitution and all of these, if anything is bringing people

01:35:15.920 down rabbit holes right now, we, we really need to make a decision. We've got to support what we have.

01:35:21.040 We've got to fight for what we have and what we know it's hard enough to get Canadians to admit

01:35:26.400 they have rights that they didn't have to go into lockdown, that they don't have to wear masks.

01:35:31.200 So let's try to keep it as on focus as possible. And then I'm just delighted to bring new information

01:35:37.600 to the table that, so people can get educated on, for instance, this coronation oath that really drives

01:35:43.680 it home that you thought the constitution was good and the charter of rights and the criminal code

01:35:48.720 supports you. Well, take a look at the coronation oath. And, and that just, uh, to me,

01:35:54.480 I think it simplifies things and the direction, and it really digs my heels in to what the fight is

01:36:00.720 all about in this nation. Definitely for our Christian heritage and root. It is absolutely

01:36:07.040 central to our freedoms. Could you, uh, let's wrap this up and I want to give you a moment to

01:36:12.560 address everybody. Do you have any final thoughts, um, when maybe you're going to have this course

01:36:17.520 available and, uh, we're looking forward to it. Yeah, thanks. Um, I'm hoping in about six weeks,

01:36:24.000 roughly to have it done. I had hoped to have it done, um, earlier in late March or April, but,

01:36:29.360 uh, as usual, a lot of legal stuff has put it back a bit, but some work that's getting done every day

01:36:34.080 on it. And like I said, there's about 1100 PowerPoint slides. So it's going to be over

01:36:38.000 about seven or eight, maybe even nine presentations, um, that's going to happen. So there's a lot of

01:36:44.000 information to be shared and a lot of, um, sources that I'm going to reference for everybody to back

01:36:49.280 it up and they'll be able to, um, email me and, um, and get questions asked and so on afterwards

01:36:55.120 as well. Every, every, um, seminar that I do, we'll have a Q and a at the end as well. It's, um, I'm,

01:37:00.880 I'm grateful that the amount of interest has finally peaked that people are going and asking questions now

01:37:06.720 about where laws come from, who is in charge, who's making them the limitations of their power

01:37:11.760 and so on and are expanding their thoughts beyond not just the bill of rights and the charter,

01:37:17.520 but beyond all of that too, what powers your members of parliament have and what they can do

01:37:23.760 and what they can't do. And, um, I I'm grateful, you know, a lot of our rallies, we just get massive

01:37:30.320 ovation ovations when people say our prayer and our rallies now all the time too. There's a lot of

01:37:35.280 Christians out there, a lot who are really supportive of, um, of what's about to hopefully happen over

01:37:41.280 the next couple of years to bring back Christianity back into the forefront of our law again. So I'm

01:37:46.560 excited. Um, I'm really excited. This is, uh, it's going to make a big difference in our law.

01:37:51.840 And, um, certainly the criminals and government are going to come out of the woodwork to stop it.

01:37:55.680 That's to be expected. But as you said, Tanya, let's stand on the truth and stand on our law and not

01:38:00.640 let it go. Um, right. Yeah. And those, and those criminals are already coming out of the woodwork.

01:38:06.320 Yeah. They're there. And, uh, you know, it's just, it's interesting to see because, uh, I know you

01:38:13.520 refer to how many Christians are beginning to stand up in Canada, but a lot of non-Christians are

01:38:18.640 supporting the basis of what we're founded on as well. So together we are going to make a difference.

01:38:22.640 We're going to continue to fight this fight. We're in it to win it, David. And, uh, you know,

01:38:27.680 not enough people know about you in Canada and how much work that you have been doing in the background,

01:38:32.880 as far as helping to lay the private information, the book that you wrote, the webinars, the time

01:38:37.760 that you have been sacrificial in giving people, um, as they email you and you answer questions

01:38:44.240 just from the bottom of your heart, you are doing this for Canadians. You're not charging them. And

01:38:49.200 you have just been so generous with your time, the course you're going to have a fee on the course,

01:38:53.920 which I think is absolutely fair. And so we'll look forward to all of the information and, uh,

01:38:59.120 supporting that and helping people to become, um, familiar with it and to be able to promote as

01:39:04.320 many people as possible to sign up. And I think that one day when this is all over your face needs

01:39:09.840 to be on a stamp, because, because, because of the difference you've helped make in Canada.

01:39:16.080 And so I just really appreciate you and I'll be voting on that stamp when, when the time comes.

01:39:21.440 You'll have to have one too. There'll be several people out there.

01:39:24.160 All right. Maybe even a coin, right? So awesome. Well, thank you, my friend. Thank you so much for

01:39:30.720 being on here tonight. We look forward to having you on again. Well, everyone, again, thank you,

01:39:36.720 David. So this is the end of another Empower Hour where we hope that you're feeling empowered and

01:39:42.800 educated. Remember that we want to be able to equip you and educate you so that you can get out there

01:39:48.160 and take action. And we encourage you to do that. Next week, we're having Pastor Archer

01:39:52.560 Palowski on the show. We're very privileged and pleased to have him on. I've spoken with Pastor

01:39:57.920 Archer in private. We've talked about his journey in prison and there truly is persecution of

01:40:04.400 Christians going on in Canada. And we need to address this. As you know, last week we had

01:40:09.520 Reverend Majed on. We will be working with him for Canadians against the persecution of Christians.

01:40:15.680 And so we're excited about the direction that this is all going and in working to overturn this.

01:40:22.480 So I just want to, again, close off by saying how much we love you and appreciate you. Please tell

01:40:28.320 others about Action for Canada. Help us on the mission to grow our chapters up and be part of that.

01:40:33.920 If you're somebody that is feeling prompted to run for office, we are creating a database. It's going to

01:40:40.080 take a little time. We may not have everything done by the upcoming elections. Municipally, they're

01:40:45.360 happening in Ontario, Manitoba, I believe, BC and Nova Scotia coming this fall. So trustees,

01:40:53.360 city councillors, mayors will be replaced come this fall. The good ones we want to keep. And so if you

01:40:59.200 have a desire to run for office and a niggling, please get in touch with one of our Action for Canada

01:41:05.120 chapters. And we want to help you win that seat. So again, thank you. God bless you. And God bless Canada.

01:41:25.440 I'm going to thank God and God alone for the ground that I'm standing on.

01:41:36.000 I'm going to thank our founding fathers for giving their lives and sacrificing so much for our freedom.

01:41:47.200 And I'm calling on you today. Don't put them to shame. Don't waste what they did. We have guaranteed

01:41:56.080 rights in this country. We're putting chapters across the nation. We are going to be in every town and

01:42:09.840 every city. And we are going to build communities within these communities of like-minded people

01:42:15.840 who are actually going to care for one another again and love on each other and give each other

01:42:20.560 the help when they're down. We are going to use the teams and the people that build within chapters

01:42:27.520 to support our businesses. The government's actions are completely 100% unlawful. Judgment

01:42:37.440 will again be found on justice and those with virtuous hearts will pursue it. You have a virtuous heart if you

01:42:46.320 are here today pursuing freedom and righteousness. And then verse 23 comes along with a promise.

01:42:55.760 God says he will turn the sins of evil people back on them. He will destroy them for their sins.

01:43:04.880 I take great comfort in that because I serve a mighty living God who has allowed us to go through this

01:43:16.000 season of discomfort because we as a nation had turned our backs on him and we need to get right.

01:43:23.440 So I am just going to thank you so much. I'm going to say God bless you and God bless Canada.

01:43:53.440 God bless you.

01:44:16.220 Thank you.

01:44:46.220 Thank you.

01:45:16.220 Thank you.

Action4Canada - April 21, 2022

Property Rights, Canadian Judges, Personal Rights, Your Constitutional Power & Live Q&A

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript