Action for Canada is a grassroots movement reaching out to millions of Canadians and uniting their voices in opposition to the destructive policies tearing at the fabric of our nation. Through call-to-action campaigns, we equip citizens with the skills and knowledge to take action in defence of faith, family, and freedom. Every week, Tanya Gaw, the founder of Action for Canada, shares her weekly updates with us and is joined by our special guest speaker, David Lindsay.
00:00:00.960Welcome back, everyone. For those of you who are new to the show, we play the orientation every week in order to showcase many of the resources available on the Action for Canada website.
00:00:11.640We try to highlight the key points and resources, but our website offers so much more information than we can put on into the orientation, so be sure to check out the website as often as you can.
00:00:23.100One of our goals is to enable you to be completely knowledgeable and confident as you stand up for your rights and freedoms.
00:00:31.780The orientation, as well as recordings of each week's Empower Hour, are available on our website for you to re-watch or to share with others.
00:00:40.080At the top of the hour, Tanya Gaw, the founder of Action for Canada, will be coming on to share her weekly updates with us, and then she'll be joined by our special guest speaker, David Lindsay.
00:00:50.360We have lots of opportunities for you to meet other like-minded people on our website.
00:00:56.340For example, every Tuesday, you can join Tanya for Taboo Talks, where she is not afraid to tackle all those tricky topics that others are unwilling to talk about.
00:01:07.820This meeting happens every Tuesday at 4.30 p.m. Pacific Time on Zoom, and everyone is welcome, so be sure to register for that.
00:01:16.620As well, we're always promoting the A4C chapter, so if you haven't already done so, go to the website and join a chapter near you.
00:01:25.500We want you to be able to connect with other like-minded people who will support you as you stand up for your rights and freedoms.
00:01:32.980Have you had a chance to check out the Youth Freedom Movement on our website yet?
00:01:37.360Action for Canada is committed to providing a platform so the youth in our country can voice their concerns and opinions.
00:01:44.240Several of the young people who attended the recent Youth Leadership and Speaker Program taped their speeches, and you can watch their presentation on our website.
00:01:54.380We'll also be highlighting one of the speeches every week, so be prepared to be challenged and impressed by the courage of our young people as they speak out.
00:02:04.120We also have a place for you to reach out with any specific prayer requests you might have.
00:02:10.760The information you give us will be kept in strict confidence.
00:02:14.280Please be sure to use this valuable resource.
00:02:17.820It's been over a month since Action for Canada committed to one week of fasting and prayer,
00:02:23.180and that initial one-week period has been extended to June 4th.
00:02:26.940You still have a few days left to join us on the Zoom call each morning at 7 a.m. Pacific time as we meet together in worship, praise, intercession, and petition.
00:02:37.980As many of you know, Action for Canada is volunteer-run and is 100% supported by donations.
00:02:45.220Any amount helps, and I want to mention that we also have a monthly donor plan available if you'd like to bless us with a regular donation.
00:02:53.600We are so grateful that you've chosen to partner with us and contribute to Action for Canada.
00:02:59.760With your donations, we will continue to provide hope, solutions, and free resources to Canadians from shore to shore.
00:03:07.780Now, before we head into the Empower Hour, I want to extend a heartfelt thank you to everyone who is faithfully praying for Action for Canada.
00:03:16.440Your love and your prayers mean so much to us, and we are very grateful for your commitment.
00:03:22.420I also want to honor all the incredible people I have the pleasure of working with, the Empower Hour crew, the core team, all the volunteers and behind-the-scenes people, and, of course, Tanya Gaw.
00:03:34.720And now, fellow Freedom Fighters, it is time for the Empower Hour.
00:03:39.480Hello, hello, and welcome to the June 1st, 2022 Empower Hour.
00:03:56.420In just a few moments, Action for Canada's founder, Tanya Gaw, will be joining us with her weekly updates.
00:04:02.280And our special guest speaker tonight is David Lindsay, so be sure to stay tuned for that.
00:04:09.840Action for Canada is a grassroots movement reaching out to millions of Canadians and uniting our voices in opposition to the destructive policies tearing at the fabric of our nation.
00:04:19.700Through call-to-action campaigns, we equip citizens to take action.
00:04:23.780We are committed to protecting faith, family, and freedom.
00:04:29.220Every week, I have the pleasure of introducing Tanya Gaw, the founder of Action for Canada, and I always wonder, where do I start?
00:04:41.720She's not afraid to speak out against government corruption and tyranny.
00:04:45.220She teaches and empowers us to stand out for our rights and freedoms, and she encourages us to stand strong in truth.
00:04:52.920Tanya, I know I speak for everyone on this call when I say we're so grateful for your leadership and for your knowledge as you inspire us to stand on guard for Canada, for truth, and for righteousness.
00:05:04.540Welcome, and thank you for all you do.
00:05:10.000Thank you, Heather, and welcome, everyone.
00:05:12.280I was loving the little picture of the ant.
00:05:14.980They can carry so much more time to their weight, but I want you to know they're part of a colony, and they all work together.
00:05:21.100And so Action for Canada is nothing with just Tanya on her own.
00:05:24.360We need all of you, and we need so many more people like Heather and the team that we have here, you know, making this production available.
00:05:34.120As always, I always love welcoming you all.
00:05:37.640I love it that you're committed to come and join us on Wednesday night.
00:05:41.960Denny Rancourt was supposed to join us tonight, but he got called away to a court proceeding.
00:05:47.480And so David and I happened to be talking the same day, and I said, you know, David, I think it's very timely that you come on tonight.
00:05:52.860It's been a while since we've had an update regarding the filing of private informations and a little bit more about how we're doing there.
00:05:59.360And then David and I, again, timely, because David was in town and joined me at the courts yesterday to listen to Rocco in action.
00:06:09.640And I tell you, it was just spectacular.
00:06:11.440You know, for all of those who, the little mob that had been criticizing and negative towards Rocco, he put them all to shame, showed why I call him the top constitutional lawyer in Canada.
00:06:25.420He was skilled, the talent there, he was well-prepared, and he just laid everything out.
00:06:32.360I was very proud of him, very proud that he's representing Action for Canada and representing all of you.
00:06:37.660And to many of you, to all of those who have donated and supported, again, you know, give yourself a huge pat on the back right now because we couldn't have made this happen without the amount of financial support we had across Canada to make sure that we covered the costs of this action.
00:06:59.980And we're going into court completely paid and up to date and ready for this.
00:07:05.700All right, Terenzio, I'm just going to share my screen.
00:07:14.800Isn't that a beautiful thing, everyone?
00:07:17.460That's a map of Canada and all those little beautiful maple leaves.
00:07:22.080Those are chapters, 159 chapters nationwide.
00:07:25.900I went and spoke at a conference this weekend in Victoria, had several opportunities to speak.
00:07:31.840And, unfortunately, I was a speaker that had a little less time than others.
00:07:37.700It was supposed to be a conference for individuals to come and help so that we could show and present solutions to the problems that we're in.
00:07:48.260And I got to tell you, I think Action for Canada is one of the number one.
00:07:54.540But as far as strategy and plans and activism and resources and, you know, and as far as really gaining the power throughout Canada, Action for Canada is doing an amazing job.
00:08:05.620And, again, that's very much due to our members, to our team at Action for Canada, working very hard to provide the real good resources.
00:08:14.680All of our chapter leaders, you know, if you know any of them, if you want to go down the list and say thank you for what you're doing, send them an email.
00:08:20.720Because it takes a lot to step up into one of those positions.
00:08:24.380And they need your support and your time and your skills.
00:08:28.180So make sure that you join an Action for Canada chapter.
00:08:32.000We had a bit of a pause on chapters because we had to catch up with the growth.
00:09:38.700So today, we are doing the review this week was legal action and, of course, wanting to discuss a bit of laying private information, bringing awareness of the court date yesterday.
00:09:49.740Every week, I am going to highlight one of the youth who have provided their video.
00:10:24.920Again, that was part of it, is that you would contact elected officials and senators.
00:10:29.660If you just click there, we've got all of their emails very easy available to you and share the youth videos.
00:10:36.100They need to know what they're doing to our kids.
00:10:38.380This is cruel and unusual punishment and abuse to our kids.
00:10:43.140When I was in the court yesterday, I had come out briefly, and as I was entering back in, there was a lady sitting on the concrete ledge shouting into the doors, into the courtroom, you know, wanting justice.
00:10:56.700She goes, every morning, I have to wake up and make sure my two teenage daughters are alive.
00:11:02.640You need to pay for what you're doing to them.
00:11:27.040For years prior to COVID, getting ready, you know, for this tyranny, Trudeau has been trying to take away guns from Canadians by putting in more and more restrictions.
00:11:37.880Canadian gun owners, legal gun owners, have the hardest restrictions from, I think, anywhere in the world.
00:11:45.560And in order to create a socialist government, you need to disarm the people.
00:11:50.800And so my advice to everybody is do not give up your guns.
00:12:00.560I know that we're in a season of civil disobedience, which is a time-honored tradition.
00:12:05.800And if it's going to move this way, the only way they will succeed is if they take away our weapons, and they can't be allowed to do that.
00:12:13.620So they will rely on mass shootings like what took place in Texas.
00:12:21.160So Trudeau and his friends there are already using the Texas strategy as an excuse to take guns away from responsible gun owners in Canada.
00:12:30.900The Nova Scotia shooting in Canada several years ago, just in case you're not aware of what the government does, they had tabled, sorry, something just flashed up there.
00:12:43.300They had tabled a bill regarding gun restrictions.
00:12:47.320And every time, nearly every time, they're going to table a bill that they want to push through.
00:12:52.420I don't believe it's by coincidence that some sort of tragedy takes place that's relevant.
00:12:57.040And so it's very well thought that the shooting was something that was constructed in order to assist that Canadians would say, we need to take away our guns.
00:13:09.420Everybody needs to be, you know, without gun ownership.
00:13:13.060And of course, we know that in tyrannical countries, that doesn't change anything.
00:13:16.680It just gives the government the power.
00:13:18.140And then you want to see problems with guns, you hand them over to a government's army and a government-led police force, all right?
00:13:29.240And the greatest problem we're having with guns is, at this point, is with criminals and the illegal guns coming across the border, all right?
00:13:38.560Let your MPs, everybody know, sign the petition.
00:13:41.880I don't normally, you know, do a whole lot of, hey, sign these petitions, but this is an e-petition, which means that your signatures actually count.
00:13:50.020The person that put it forward, it will actually be presented to the legislature.
00:13:55.000So please go into this action and make sure that you sign that and continue just to learn more.
00:14:00.100This week, I didn't realize as I was doing this, it was silly of me.
00:14:03.820We were going to talk more about the rapid antigen testing on the Taboo Talks with Tanya on Tuesdays.
00:14:09.160But, of course, I was in court yesterday and I didn't think I would make it back, so we canceled that.
00:14:31.000But also, I have provided the link, if you go to legal action, details and updates, we try to keep you posted and up to date here, okay?
00:14:40.880So the other day I had posted, I had a little more here, but I deleted it because it was irrelevant at this point, but that we went to court on May 31st.
00:14:48.340And then here is the information that the defendants, as far as the legal documents that they had to file.
00:14:56.820And Rocco's application, his response was on Tab 9.
00:15:01.340If you go in there and then you scroll down, you'll see why Rocco felt that the motion to strike was ludicrous.
00:15:07.800I can say in his own words, ludicrous.
00:15:09.820Let me see if I underline that, right?
00:15:35.940So as I said earlier, we've had, you know, some criticisms about Rocco Galati and the length of the case.
00:15:41.200There were things that I can't necessarily tell you all about as they're transpiring.
00:15:46.200Like the fact that when you file a statement of claim, it is then up to the defendants to file a statement of defense or, you know, have some sort of reply.
00:15:57.520But you also have to deliver to them the statement of claim.
00:16:00.940And then they have a certain amount of time they need to reply to you.
00:16:03.320And the statement of claim on behalf of Bonnie Henry and Horgan, et cetera, could be delivered to the AG's office, David Eby.
00:16:11.740But when we went to do that, they didn't accept them.
00:16:14.540They only accepted David Eby's and they're, oh, we're so confused, you know.
00:16:17.880So for two and a half months, they were dragging their heels on accepting the statement of claim.
00:16:25.980And I was taking it in the chin from people who were criticizing what's taking so long.
00:16:30.560So I'm going to ask all of you to make sure that if you see anybody who is, you know, being negative towards Action for Canada or rude on social media or something like that, stand up for us.
00:16:42.860Stand up for us and just know that we're fighting hard here.
00:16:45.540But it's not always do we have the liberties to explain what is going on.
00:16:49.520And so after all of that time, they finally decide to reply.
00:16:54.560And they replied by filing a motion to strike.
00:17:07.760And, you know, we're going to go back to life as it should be.
00:17:10.400So they put through what could be considered a very shameful reply, motion to strike.
00:17:19.780And when the defendants' attorneys came up to speak, especially Mr. Whitten, who was the lead counsel for, as it says there, Justin Trudeau, John Horgan, Bonnie Henry, and the other provincial crown defendants, it was the weakest.
00:17:35.180And what they've done, and now I'm just going to go back a bit because I love it if you guys will take the time to review some of this material because I think it's interesting.
00:18:15.580Maybe they'll understand how tyrannical it is and, you know, how they're violating the constitutional rights and creating and committing egregious crimes against Canadians.
00:18:25.280So the reason they had posted this is that they were opposing the fact that, you know, filing a legal claim and then posting about it, talking about it, showing that we're creating and that we had raised money for it was bad for and that we shouldn't be doing that.
00:18:44.600And so Rocco's rebuttal to that was he named five or six different cases of well-known activists who were, you know, whatever their cause was they were fighting for and they were posting about it.
00:18:58.540It's like, what are we supposed to do?
00:19:00.540You know, just become victims and slaves and not have a voice, not let Canadians know what it is the government is doing.
00:19:10.620And then you're going to all love this.
00:19:12.160This is much kudos to all of you who have served a notice of liability.
00:19:16.360In B.C., many, he tried to say, the council tried to say that there was 80 or so notices of liability that had been sent to, you can see at the top there, John Horrigan, who's the premier.
00:19:29.260And then if we go down, there was Adrian Dix and others, I could just keep scrolling down.
00:19:37.180And so their angle on this was that the notices of liability were intimidating to the health officials that were receiving them.
00:19:45.060How intimidating, it was really upsetting to them and that this was a form of harassment.
00:19:49.400And, you know, no thought for what it is that they're doing to Canadians who are losing their jobs and their homes, whose loved ones are committing suicide and kids who are struggling with depression.
00:20:03.680But these poor victims in the government offices who are receiving a notice of liability and that, you know, that this was a problem in their mind.
00:20:12.700So, again, that was the second affidavit.
00:20:16.460And so that's just a little bit about what will transpire.
00:20:19.440But, again, I would encourage you, David, I'm going to bring David on now for a little bit.
00:20:24.560He and I are going to talk about the claim or the court proceedings.
00:20:27.620And then David is going to present somewhat on the criminal charges, et cetera.
00:20:32.060And just so you know as well, I've asked Rocco to come on the Empower Hour.
00:20:36.460So, you know, keep checking in with us.
00:20:38.960Make sure you're joined with us to receive our weekly emails.
00:20:42.460And we'll give you a good heads up on when that's going to happen.
00:20:44.880And thank you, Tanya, once again for the update.
00:25:38.260Yeah, there were 78 seats that were completely packed with 50 to 70 people having to stand outside.
00:25:45.000And so a lot of people didn't get to hear.
00:25:47.020And, of course, they didn't make it open to the public.
00:25:50.480Only Rocco could attend via Zoom or whatever format they choose.
00:25:55.800And one of his opening statements that I loved, he says, this case, and talking about the merits of the case and why it shouldn't be struck,
00:26:02.340he says, we're not talking about a truck that hit a bicycle, right?
00:26:05.360Like, this is so far greater than all of that.
00:26:10.820And, you know, just the way that he had presented everything, it was so well formatted, his argument.
00:26:17.940And as part of his written argument, which I was saying was in tab nine, the government, the attorney, he had turned around at one point.
00:26:27.860And he said that it was costly and it wasn't worth the time.
00:26:33.260You know, it was going to take a lot of time to go through something like this.
00:26:42.320I think it was the way this council was presenting.
00:26:45.860Anyways, they wanted to say it was too expensive, complex, and prolex.
00:26:50.420And Rocco's, of course, response to that was the extent and complexity of the claim is appropriately proportionate to the extent and complexity of the issues at hand.
00:27:01.000The purported global pandemic, the scientific medical basis or non-basis of the measures, its history, and the constitutional violations imposed in Canada and abroad.
00:27:12.600And then within the courts, this was in what he had filed, is that he talked about the fact that Justin Trudeau has spent $1.2 trillion on COVID measures.
00:27:23.940And that, by comparison, the cost of this case would be inconsequential.
00:27:30.420You know, so these were important details for Rocco to discuss.
00:27:35.040I mean, talk about absurd and ludicrous not to proceed with a case based on cost, you know, when we're talking about the kind of violations that are taking place.
00:27:46.080So anyways, any other high, anything else that sort of stood out, David?
00:27:51.700Yeah, they, especially Witten, really tried to harp on this conspiracy theory.
00:27:59.140And Rocco pointed out, and he said, that's their term of labeling.
00:28:04.180And, you know, I was in court within about a year ago, and I got really, really angry at a judge.
00:28:11.340Not directly to the judge himself, but to the Crown.
00:28:14.460And I'm getting really, really frustrated with Crown prosecutors, and sometimes even private lawyers, who are coming up with no evidence.
00:29:01.500So I'm looking in the future of trying to get an order that the Crown cannot make those allegations in court without either an application cited by evidence and defining what those terms mean in the first place.
00:29:14.780Does it mean that somebody who says for religious grounds, I personally am not going to get it, suddenly they oppose everybody, and you're an anti-vaxxer, or anti-tax protester, or whatever terms they want to throw at you?
00:29:26.960I want to get, and I'm looking at trying to do that.
00:29:31.260But I want to get an order that they should not be able to throw these labels at you without, A, being proven, and, B, you given the opportunity to fully respond to them and know what their other position is going to be.
00:29:42.800Because they've won cases simply on putting that label out in court before, within the first five minutes of the case starting at court.
00:29:50.680And then the judge just thinks, well, you're one of those people.
00:29:54.140So Rocco, for example, he addressed that.
00:29:57.100And he came up and he said about him calling them conspiracy theorists.
00:30:02.160And he said, you know what, conspiracies, and this was an awesome analogy, it really was.
00:30:08.160And he said, conspiracy theories, theories, or conspiracies, he said, have been around since the time of Julius Caesar.
00:30:14.000And how much more correct can you get when all of his people got together, et tu bouteille, and they conspired to murder Julius Caesar.
00:30:25.200So conspiracies have been around, they exist.
00:30:28.220And the label that they attach is not conspiracy, but they had to wear theory or theorist on the end of it to qualify it and say that anybody who opposes the government, it's just a theory.
00:30:40.000The government's wrong, they're all looking out for your best interest.
00:30:43.060And really, those people should be charged with fraud, because they know better, and it's a complete lie.
00:30:48.280So Rocco's answer was just incredibly, the analogy he gave was directly to the point on that, and very well done.
00:30:57.940And, you know, it's very sad, but I'm having to deal with many people trying to contact me, single parents whose ex wants to get their minor child given this injection.
00:31:09.380And I see that the abuse of human rights and discrimination within the courts, and it's so disgusting, and it's heart-wrenching, you know, to hear about.
00:31:17.820So I've got one father, his child is six years old, and in March, the court made a decision because he was an anti-vaxxer.
00:31:24.820But the six-year-old had said, I do not want to take this shot.
00:31:31.000She got medical authority over the child and then injected the child, I think, within a day or two.
00:31:36.420And the father was prohibited for three months from seeing his child.
00:31:40.300And in speaking to him, like I say, it's so moving that he said, you know, I don't know how to respond when he's going to be able to see him very shortly.
00:31:51.160He said, I don't know how to respond to him.
00:31:52.820You know, my child, I know, depending on the shot that he was given is not the same, and then said how he'd found one of his teeth, you know, saved one of his teeth, and that had his true DNA in it.
00:32:04.480This is the level of despair that some parents are feeling.
00:32:11.220When I was sitting in court, actually, yesterday, when Rocco went to address the plaintiffs and the compensation for them financially that was written because they were trying to say, you know, that this is, you know, absurd as well.
00:32:26.160And Rocco went to plead the position of that, and I actually teared up with emotion because of how carefully I went through every story with every single plaintiff that we have.
00:32:38.720But, you know, since then, I'm hearing from one testimony after another of people who are suffering unbelievable loss.
00:32:45.680You know, this week, a loved one who had committed suicide who couldn't cope, another mother who had just served an affidavit from her ex wanting to vaccinate their four-year-old.
00:32:55.440I mean, we are in battle, we're in war, and we've got to be as tenacious moving forward with this.
00:33:03.580Rocco moved through the whole process of his argument, and I thought he's an expert.
00:33:08.600He is absolutely a top constitutional lawyer of Canada, and I was impressed and very proud to see him in action.
00:33:14.900All right, so, David, let's go over to you now.
00:33:18.700You know, we had put forth the notices of liability, and, you know, I just got to point this out for a minute.
00:33:23.780There was a gal by the name of Susan Coles who has tried to undermine the notices of liability.
00:33:29.420I think Rebel News had her on, and I was a bit surprised that Rebel News did that.
00:33:33.300And other organizations, I don't know who the angry Albertan is, but he's obviously angry.
00:33:38.560He's been, apparently, I don't go on social media, and he's handing me over some real sort of hate postings, and somebody brought it to my attention.
00:33:47.440I've never talked to the man, again, you know, regarding the case.
00:33:53.180I don't think they're coming to the Empower Hours.
00:33:55.320I don't think these individuals look on our legal action page to see what it is we're doing, and seeing that we're fighting a war in Canada, and we are laying it all out there and doing our best, and we are up against great corruption.
00:34:05.840And we don't have control of that corruption, but we are trying to do our best to bring them to task.
00:34:12.340And so, for these haters out there, I got to tell you, if you're truly on our side, start sending us some love.
00:34:18.600Start posting about the notices of liability and the fact that they're saving lives and saving jobs.
00:34:23.940Do you think that the government would be paying notice to the notices of liability if they were really that ineffective, and just some sort of, what do they call that, pseudo-legal document?
00:34:37.820Do you think that, you know, premiers would be talking about it in the legislature, and newspaper citizen, Ottawa citizen, just wrote an article as well about us the other day, because our chapter leaders had done this.
00:34:51.100They wanted to give the elected officials, the provincial, sorry, candidates, an opportunity to have a debate.
00:34:58.720And three of them actually showed up, but four of them did not.
00:35:02.700The NDP, I believe it was the NDP who said he was afraid for his life.
00:35:07.460He was afraid for his life to come to this event.
00:35:10.000Action for Canada has never been violent.
00:35:15.040You know, so, Ottawa citizen, if you see comments like this, counter the comments.
00:35:20.220This is what our team, Team Action for Canada and Team Freedom in Canada needs to do.
00:35:26.180We need to hold the Ottawa citizen to account and anybody else that's attacking us, because we're friends of yours.
00:35:32.260We're friends of Canadians, and we are truly one of the only organizations that, to the depths of us, are true patriots.
00:35:40.060And thank you, Terenzio, for bringing that map up and the power that we have.
00:35:43.940So, the reason I went on this little tangent about the notices of liability is, you know, we had many, many thousands and thousands of Canadians have served the notice of liability.
00:35:54.940And then the next part is if the principal of a school, a teacher, an employer didn't reply positively, then the next step was to make sure that you have, are accumulating the evidence.
00:36:07.820And you have up to a year to file a charge.
00:36:11.300So, if you were let go six months ago or on unpaid leave, file the notice of liability, file the warning letters, get yourself set up.
00:36:18.220Make sure you've engaged your employer or whomever it is you're dealing with, and put that information in a file.
00:36:23.460And then you put your notice of liability in there, because if they haven't ceased and desist, and they're still causing your harm, once this dam breaks, and once we get additional actions in the court, and they start progressing, this is going to be your time.
00:36:37.580It's going to be your time to shine, and we're going to be walking you through how to do that.
00:36:41.720And so, David, we are incredibly grateful, because you have written, I'm going to go down here again, we can bring it up on the website, and we'll do that as well.
00:36:49.980But I happen to have a copy here, a hard copy.
00:36:53.160You have written one of the only books in Canada on how to lay private information, criminal charges.
00:36:59.980So, you don't go through the police, you file.
00:37:12.700So, this has just been a magnificent journey with you.
00:37:16.120We've held workshops, and you have been so generous.
00:37:20.100We have provided every single one of our chapter leaders one of these books, and to make sure that anybody who's a member can sit down with our chapter leaders and go over this.
00:37:29.680We've provided workshops that David and Action for Canada members have been involved in.
00:37:35.020And now, since then, as well, we've had private meetings with David where, you know, for those members who have just been through horrific times, who have decided, I want to take this a step further.
00:37:54.180Before you go, I just wanted to mention, too, that if you were not having any measure of success, you would not be attacked publicly, either Ottawa Citizen or anything else.
00:38:05.280And that I can tell you from experience, as I've told a lot of people at our rallies.
00:38:10.460They attacked us right from the beginning in the media, and they attacked me personally with a lot of falsehoods.
00:38:16.140They attacked other people with falsehoods.
00:38:18.080And then they started coming up, laying bylaw tickets every week to try and get us to stop using the park that we're at, and that hasn't worked.
00:38:26.340And they're doing the same thing to me and you, and they're doing it to others.
00:38:31.860As I told people at our rallies, if we were not having an effect, similar to the business down the street, you never hear about them.
00:38:39.600They never hear about the banks down the street or any of the restaurants.
00:38:42.560You never hear about them in the media.
00:39:03.100Yeah, the organizations that are doing a good job.
00:39:05.700And visit our partner page on Action for Canada.
00:39:09.360Because those who have been not critical, those who are serious about the business of whatever their organization is focused on, we support them.
00:39:20.100So if you ever want to know who we support, it's not limited to that.
00:39:22.840We may not have heard about another organization, but if they're not on there and they're a larger organization, there would probably be a good reason for that.
00:39:29.740We don't spend time criticizing anybody else, and we expect the same courtesy.
00:39:35.900One little thing, you showed up just, you were at the rally on Saturday as well, and Action for Canada had their tent set up with all the notice of liability and resources.
00:39:46.080And I didn't know that there was a small group way down on the sidewalk of about 8 to 10 LGBTQ, I want to call them activists, but they were young people that have just come out of the public school system that's indoctrinating them.
00:40:02.600And these are hurting individuals that are a bit confused about the matters.
00:40:06.620And so one of them came and dumped a huge bucket of water all over our resources and got a couple of our gals soaked.
00:40:14.600And my response right away is I just said, Action for Canada is number one, you know, just to, and the crowd cheered and we made light of it because these sad individuals don't really understand.
00:40:25.320And don't be shy about the tough topics that we talk about, you know, as far as immigration and radical Islam and the trans LGBTQ agenda.
00:40:35.500Again, it's not about moderate Muslims, it's not about the gay and lesbian community, their platforms are being taken over for a more sinister reason.
00:40:43.520And these are the reasons your freedom of speech were limited prior to all of this COVID garbage.
00:40:49.660This COVID is just a small symptom of what we were fighting beforehand.
00:40:55.860Don't be embarrassed that Action for Canada talks about these issues, because these are things we need to know and we need to help our kids.
00:41:01.740If we can't talk about them, the school is, and we're in big trouble if we don't give them a counter the information and give them the truth.
00:41:08.780All right. So, all right, David, over to you.
00:41:11.360Thanks. And fortunately, the person got charged to the police went and charged them.
00:41:14.840They picked him up just down the sidewalk and I saw him being put in handcuffs and they took him away.
00:41:20.280So, he was charged and my only hope is he's over 18, so that the consequences will be a little more severe and send a little more message to people who are doing that.
00:41:30.020You know, with respect to the criminal charging procedure, I'm really hopeful that charges are going to get through.
00:41:40.840A lot of them are in the process right now and a lot of it have been adjourned.
00:41:47.160And the Crown is using various tactics to prevent these from coming and the evidence before coming before the court.
00:41:54.380There's many in Ontario and in Manitoba and other provinces that have also been adjourned.
00:42:00.280And the fact that they have been adjourned, so many of them, is indicative to me that the Crown is working in unison throughout the country, the provincial Crowns, to delay these as long as possible.
00:42:15.240Fortunately, on Monday, the prosecutor, although it was adjourned, she did comment that it was under investigation and they were looking at doing further investigation on the charges that we've laid against an employer.
00:42:29.540So, the Crown is not hinting they're going to stay it.
00:42:31.900They're looking at saying we want to see what other information is out there and we're going to hopefully work with them over the next few weeks on that to get some information directly to them.
00:42:40.460But, again, if this procedure had no merit, if it really had no merit at all, you wouldn't see any charges getting through.
00:42:52.060The fact that the Crown has got such an attempt to try and stay a lot of them tells me that we're on to something that they don't really, other than a stay, they've got no power to control.
00:43:03.780And we're looking in the near future of possibly doing a judicial review on a Crown that has stayed the charges as well.
00:43:25.720And because these hearings are in camera, I'm not really at liberty to give details about it yet.
00:43:31.160But I'm optimistic that we're going to get charges laid.
00:43:36.720And I've done further research on over the last three or four months on extortion and intimidation, the two main charges we're laying.
00:43:44.460And I have found some just incredibly supportive authorities on it.
00:43:48.120And unfortunately, judges don't like non-lawyers.
00:43:52.300And it's difficult for somebody who's not a lawyer to get into court.
00:43:58.440And it's difficult for an agent to get into court.
00:44:01.480But I'm working on trying to get in on somebody's case right now to come in as an agent to help them because they, my experience of knowledge, they won't get around me in the process hearing.
00:44:10.660For example, in New Westminster, about four months ago, a judge ruled this was an employment issue and did not issue a summons on that regard.
00:44:20.940And the fact remains that if it is an employment issue, you cannot use that as a basis to not issue a summons, for example.
00:44:29.880I found case law and authorities that have come up and said, you cannot stay or refuse to issue a summons on that basis.
00:44:38.520So I'm really looking forward to showing up in court with somebody in the near future to be able to present a lot of convincing case law that will stymie them from trying to make sure these cases are never heard.
00:44:51.640There's a lot that are going on right now.
00:45:36.860So they'll go and try and put them all in.
00:45:38.760So I have some concerns in that area about flying.
00:45:43.020But it's difficult to get to a lot of places to help people.
00:45:46.380And I'm going to still work on that over the next little while.
00:45:48.980Hopefully we can we can work on getting me into court as an agent.
00:45:53.000And I'm optimistic that once the evidence is on the record and with the case law that I have to back it up on all avenues of it.
00:46:01.800It's not a question of if it's just a question of when that these employers and then government officials eventually will get charged.
00:46:08.340I've mentioned to anybody who's got evidence, solid evidence that I can that would be accepted by a court that if you've got it on Bonnie Henry or any of our government officials, then and somebody with the capability wants to lay the charge, I'll definitely help them and get them through the process.
00:46:29.740But I think it's important to note, and this is one comment I really wanted to talk about for a few minutes, is the issue of evidence and what a lay person would consider evidence and what the courts and the legal or lawful system would consider evidence are two entirely different things.
00:46:46.300What we would consider evidence, what we would consider evidence, the courts may look and go, we can't accept it.
00:47:40.780But you cannot just go and tender them.
00:47:43.960And what you would have to do is either subpoena the person who wrote it.
00:47:49.680Or, more importantly, if the person wrote it and said, a new study or report has come out from the government saying blah, blah, blah.
00:47:59.300Then you would need to get a copy of that study and report and actually tender that report yourself as evidence and point out whatever sections you're referencing.
00:48:08.180And any document you want to bring into court is a principle that documents don't just walk into court.
00:48:17.120Somebody has to tender it as an exhibit under oath for that document to be accepted as evidence.
00:48:23.200So, if you're going to go into court, whether it's on a process hearing or any other matter, somebody's going to need to take a witness stand and say, here are the documents.
00:48:35.100And here's where I got it from so that it can be accepted.
00:48:40.260Some of them can be accepted on what's called judicial notice.
00:48:42.980For example, if you have a copy of a regulation, you don't need to have a government official come in and say, yeah, the government of Canada passed this regulation.
00:48:52.740If the regulation is there, it stipulates where it came from, the citation and everything, the court will give judicial notice of it.
00:49:00.180But for the most part, you need to be able to make sure that you tell the court where your evidence came from.
00:49:06.980So, if you're laying a private prosecution on an employer, for example, and I cannot stress enough how critical all evidence is.
00:49:17.820If you think there's a problem, you should be tape recording every single conversation or, more importantly, telling your employer or whoever it is you're dealing with, put it in writing so that you will have everything documented on whatever you want to tender.
00:49:33.160For example, if your employer specifically says, I'm going to fire you if you don't get vaxxed, and you've got no proof of it, and then suddenly you're terminated without cause, you may have civil redress.
00:49:49.340But it'd be very difficult to make any criminal prosecution available simply because you've got nothing to back it up.
00:49:55.020You could take the witness stand, and you could say, yeah, this is what they said, but it's your word against theirs.
00:50:03.300To give you an example, a friend of mine later charged in Okanagan years ago.
00:50:07.300I mentioned this on one of our first shows, and I'll repeat it because it's important with respect to evidence.
00:50:12.780And he had two witnesses, and they never showed up.
00:50:16.880So, the judge said, I'll give you an adjournment.
00:50:18.420And my friend, contrary to my instructions, went and said, no, I just want to get it over with.
00:50:25.000So, the judge came back in with the judgment in the afternoon.
00:50:27.160He said, you know what, it's your word against the cops.
00:50:29.460So, I have to give the cop the benefit of the doubt.
00:50:32.320So, the police officer was found not guilty.
00:50:34.920But the judge said to him, if your witnesses had showed up and supported what you said, he said, you would have won.
00:50:40.640So, it's absolutely important to have as much evidence as possible, as well as the quality of the evidence.
00:50:50.580You don't want documents that are blotted out in places or, you know, they're difficult to read and so on, right?
00:50:57.920You want to be able to get the best evidence possible before the court.
00:51:02.960And you don't want to get into a situation where it's your word versus their word.
00:51:17.640If you've got several witnesses, anything that you can get to support it and the person that did it.
00:51:25.380For example, if you have a co-worker and a co-worker is given an email from your boss and your boss, the boss says to the co-worker, I'm firing Jane Doe because she's not getting back.
00:51:38.660It would be much more effective to put your co-worker on the witness stand and say, yes, this is the email that was directly given to me personally.
00:51:47.980Then for her to give you the email and then you take the stand and say, yeah, my co-worker gave it to me.
00:51:53.120Because it's an email and the email addresses are there, they may accept on a low, at a process hearing, it probably would get accepted, but it may not at trial.
00:52:05.340The witness would probably, your co-worker would have to take the stand at trial, but it would probably be accepted at a process hearing because you can have hearsay at that level.
00:52:23.660You don't want the Crown saying, I'm going to stay a charge because you've got no evidence or all your evidence, I can't use it.
00:52:30.140You want to make sure you've got documents to back it up, witnesses to back it up, and everything that you can have is supported as much as possible.
00:52:40.320Then you're going to stand a really good chance of getting somewhere.
00:52:43.580And I want to emphasize this test at a process hearing is really low.
00:52:46.480And the fact that the Crown has stayed some of these charges already and have adjourned others to try and delay it.
00:52:55.060They know it's a low test and they're worried about getting this evidence on the record because it's not very high to meet on extortion and intimidation.
00:53:02.820And usually, if you can prove, have some evidence on the offense of extortion, usually intimidation will follow as well.
00:53:13.880And they know the repercussions of what's going to happen once the floodgates open and the doors open and charges are laid and a summons is issued.
00:54:09.160I don't think we'll get a warrant unless you can prove that the person is still doing.
00:54:14.120Like, for example, if you walked in and said, here's my co-employee right now.
00:54:19.240And that employee takes a stand and says, yeah, Jane Doe is still telling everybody, if you're not vaxxed within a month, you're going to be fired.
00:54:29.740Because they're still breaking the law, you may get a warrant.
00:54:35.400But in most cases, you're going to get a summons.
00:54:37.860And a lot of employers won't allow people to work if you're facing criminal charges because of something that happened in the workforce, in the workplace, in your capacity of what you were doing as an employee or manager, for example.
00:54:54.720Many companies will say, look, minimally, you're going to be suspended, which would be awesome.
00:55:02.000But to get to that stage, we're going to need the evidence.
00:55:05.240And I've mentioned it before, and I'm going to mention it again.
00:55:22.120And I'm optimistic for what's going to happen tomorrow because the person laying the charge tomorrow has experience in this area.
00:55:28.480He called me up last week, and ironically, he said, Dave, I have experience doing this in another capacity, but I don't have experience in a private individual capacity.
00:55:40.500So he wanted me to help him go through it.
00:55:43.540And I'm just really, really optimistic that we're going to be successful at some point in the near future.
00:55:49.540So the case that we worked on on Monday, it's been adjourned for a month.
00:55:55.560We'll be talking to the Crown and get some information out to them.
00:55:59.440I've been talking to people in other provinces, and I'm really optimistic of getting somewhere to help somebody and be in court to get through evidence.
00:56:07.660The stronger the evidence, the easier my job will be to get it through the courts.
00:56:12.100And it certainly will not be a problem with the case law that I have.
00:56:17.020So, yeah, I guess if there's one thing I can stress, please, if you're in a position or somebody you know is in a position of having been terminated or having faced repercussions because they won't get vaccinated, stress the importance of keeping evidence as much as possible in the best format as possible.
00:56:37.840And not just being vaxxed, but think about it, as I've said before, fundamentally.
00:56:43.520Forcing you to get vaccinated against your free will is a criminal assault.
00:56:49.820And I have found case law, for example, that says you cannot force somebody to be sexually assaulted in order to work.
00:57:51.840But if you go up and you threaten to beat them, that's against the law.
00:57:58.220If you threaten them and say, look, you either do that or I'm going to make sure you suffer for it, that's probably against the law as well.
00:58:05.080And it's just absolutely going to be important to know where that dividing line, because some threats you can make, some you cannot.
00:58:11.420And forcing you to be vaccinated or assaulted in order to work is a threat of unlawful activity that no court will uphold.
00:58:22.060You cannot threaten a criminal offense against somebody, even if you have a right.
00:58:27.800So even if the employer has a right to hire or fire you, they cannot force a criminal offense on you in order to work.
00:59:19.140We've got some guns on our side, like laying criminal charges, and we're going to use them.
00:59:23.000And it's just a question of realizing that they are the enemy.
00:59:26.520We're in a war, and they're going to try and delay it to make sure that they don't lose on that aspect of the war, and we don't get a victory on it.
01:00:01.200And like David said, we know that you have a year in order to file and take action.
01:00:05.820But even if you file and you lose and you appeal, there's options.
01:00:09.120We just want to make sure you're in the best possible position.
01:00:11.920Somebody had just mentioned here in the chat that her son, their son, had ended up going to the courthouse in Guelph, Ontario, filing.
01:00:22.860They'd gone before the JP, but they were filing based on assault.
01:00:27.960And the JP had brought them in right away but had asked if the employer or whomever had physically assaulted them, and they had said no.
01:00:36.780So basically they told their son that he had no case and was dismissed.
01:00:42.360But, David, we're taking those things into consideration, right?
01:00:46.260So if you have been somebody who was duped into taking this experimental injection, and really whether you did or didn't even have a reaction, you were still assaulted.
01:00:57.340You know, it was something that you were duped into taking.
01:00:59.480But this is more about extortion and intimidation if an employer is trying to force you to take this injection and you've decided to, that you couldn't do that.
01:01:09.280And so you were forced into either unpaid leave or being terminated.
01:01:12.640Well, yeah, extortion itself is a – the basis of extortion is that it interferes with freedom of choice.
01:01:22.440There's some good case law that trace it right back to blackmail in England, which is really good.
01:01:27.840And as a side note, a humorous side note, if anybody wants, there's a good little skit on Monty Python called blackmail.
01:01:33.860If anybody ever wants to check that, it's good.
01:01:37.000In any event, the history of extortion, yeah, definitely goes back to taking away freedom of choice.
01:01:44.000And that's something that underlines the whole thing.
01:01:47.500If you can't choose whether or not to get vaccinated and somebody's threatening you as a result, an offense has been committed.
01:01:55.300And with assault, I think 265-1B, if a person threatens you with assault and you believe he can do it, it would still constitute an offense under that section as well, even if you were not physically assaulted at that time.
01:02:07.720Okay, that's interesting because they put criminal code 266, which would have been after the fact.
01:02:12.700That would have been directed at an actual assault.
01:02:15.060So 265-1 was the threat to assault, and that's an extremely good point.
01:02:20.740I just want to let people know, if you have a question for David, please raise your hand, and we're going to actually move into those.
01:02:25.660I don't want to take up this time, David, for people to ask you direct questions.
01:02:29.260Terenzio, do we have somebody available?
01:02:31.320Yeah, we have – first person we have is Wayne.
01:39:53.860Try and get the best evidence you can from them.
01:39:56.080And you can do a privacy request on the RCMP to get all their documents they have on you as well, including correspondence, emails, attachments, policies on vaccination, anything that might be able to be used as well.
01:40:07.880That's where I would go first, is to get that information and then think about laying criminal charges for sure.
01:40:13.980Yeah, and I'm going to just add to that.
01:40:16.100The gal that I was talking about earlier, actually, she not only worked for the city, but she was also working for the RCMP in that office and had been with them for years.
01:40:26.240And, you know, like I said, she was reinstated based on the information that we had filed the notices of liability along with the letters that I had written that were on the template page.
01:40:36.060And so, if people have these kind of questions, maybe what we should do at an upcoming Tuesdays talk with myself, I could do a review of this.
01:40:43.820In the meantime, go to our Workers Unite page because we walk you step-by-step through the documents you need.
01:41:06.060For those that raised their hands, just a further reminder, when you do raise your hands, you should see a message pop up on your screen to unmute.
01:41:34.440I have a bunch of questions, but I guess I'll just ask one or two.
01:41:38.640Do I need to do a freedom of information request for the meetings that my union was having with my employer?
01:41:47.800And I was offered severance, but in the severance package, there was a line stating that I could take no legal action, so I did not accept the severance.
01:42:19.780If it's a school, you can do an access request and privacy to get all their documents, all their emails, correspondence.
01:42:26.960You need to name the person you want it from and the time element, the temporal component you want in there from what day to what day as well.
01:43:34.300David, you just mentioned earlier in the conversation it might make your case a little bit more difficult,
01:43:38.240so I hope I didn't screw myself there.
01:43:41.400Also, now that I've done the NOLs, I've also done a FOIP request.
01:43:44.220I'm not really sure what to do after that because someone filled out my declaration I did not declare,
01:43:49.480and I'm looking at a fraud charge if I can prove that.
01:43:53.600I don't know what you mean by somebody filled out a declaration.
01:43:57.900If you did a FOIP request, I don't know if you've got it or what's in there.
01:44:02.620Sort of that effect, it's difficult to say anything on the substance of it or content because I simply don't know what's in there.
01:44:08.720But, yeah, being with the government, if they've broken their contract, I assume you have a union as well.
01:44:16.960The union will look after the civil aspect of it, which you have to then go through the courts and whatever procedures are in that contract.
01:44:25.020But if you've got the individuals in the company or government that have threatened you and in doing that have broken the law,
01:44:33.340then, yeah, you can definitely still lay criminal charges on them.
01:44:36.700And if you need the information, then you may want to do another FOIP.
01:44:42.020If what you've got isn't in there, you can do another FOIP and reword your application to get more specific stuff.
01:44:48.440Sometimes you get an answer and you go, oh, I didn't know this letter was there.
01:44:51.620Then you can go make another request to get that.
01:44:53.660So you should look over whatever you've got because there may be more information you can get as well.
01:44:59.040And once you've got sufficient evidence to lay the charges and you need to look at each specific section,
01:45:06.980346 and 423 are the two main ones in the criminal code or the Genetic Non-Discrimination Act,