Action for Canada's Tanya gawd and her team are fighting for the freedom of speech and freedom of the press. They are fighting back against a defamation suit filed by a former Action for Canada employee who accused them of making false and misleading claims about him.
00:00:00.000So there's only three options. Alberta keeps the monarch and the supremacy of the Christian god, and you will likely have civil war on your hands, with all these other people complaining about it.
00:00:12.340Or you allow Islam or some other god to take its place, and I don't have to go into detail what's going to happen with that.
00:00:20.580Or suddenly Alberta is like Quebec, and it becomes a secular state, and you lose the supremacy of God out of your constitution.
00:00:28.080And then the last two, you're in worse shape than you are in now.
00:00:34.060But these people are going to want seats at the table, not the bargaining table.
00:00:39.960And when you say we the people, we the people in Alberta no longer means exclusively European Christian people anymore, as it did 100, 120 years ago.
00:00:53.760It doesn't mean that anymore, because of the immigration problem.
00:00:57.580And all these people are going to vie for a seat at the table to get rid of God out of the equation, the Christian god.
00:01:03.460If you're joining us for the first time, it's my pleasure to introduce you to Tanya Gaw, the founder and leader of Action for Canada.
00:01:16.340Tanya has a powerful focus on faith, family, and freedom, and she and her team are always hard at work, bringing awareness to the many critical issues facing our nation.
00:01:27.440Tanya has a few words she wants to share with us before we bring on tonight's guest.
00:01:32.660So will you all please help me welcome the lovely Tanya Gaw.
00:01:46.180Before we bring my good friend on and a regular guest of ours, David Lindsay, I would like to provide a little update.
00:01:54.060It happened last Thursday after the Empower Hour, and it's a good news report.
00:01:59.200So we're just going to get right into that.
00:02:01.540As many of you know, we've been in, well, since December, there was word that drag queen Frida Wells, a.k.a. Tyson Cook, or is it Tyson Cook, a.k.a. Frida Wells, drag queen Frida Wells,
00:02:15.140decided to file a defamation case against Action for Canada for posting information on our website that happens to be factually true.
00:02:25.320All of the information came off of his, came from his own social media, his YouTube.
00:02:30.820And, you know, in and of itself, if a drag queen is wanting to perform for children, we usually do a little bit of a deep dive to find out who this person is.
00:02:41.380And that's how we became aware of the information.
00:02:44.700And for those of you who are new to this story, he happened to make videos that he posted on YouTube that was open to the public,
00:02:52.960where he was chloroforming a woman in an alley, murdering people in his basement, chopping a person up and eating them.
00:07:09.660And we have a reason as individuals and a responsibility to be educated on what's happening.
00:07:16.260I know with everything going on in the country and all of the attacks coming at us from all different directions, it can be really hard to keep up.
00:07:25.360So, David is on tonight that he's going to provide us a presentation to help educate you in the best way possible.
00:07:33.820Part of that conversation is going to include, talk again about the Coronation Oath.
00:07:40.420We refer to this as a buried treasure that needs to be resurrected.
00:07:44.700Queen Elizabeth on the page that we provided.
00:07:47.680And again, they want to erase our history.
00:07:50.900So, this is a time to jump right in and learn as much as you can about it.
00:07:57.020It's really important because it has a huge impact on pressing back against the tyranny and the, well, the tyrants sitting in government right now.
00:08:40.380And in the one and only true God and His Son, Jesus Christ.
00:08:43.760And so, then, as well, a little history, recent history, as well, regarding King Charles also taking that oath and why it applies currently today.
00:09:00.720Our guest tonight is someone who is very dear to us, and it's always such a pleasure to have him join us.
00:09:07.500David Lindsay is the author of several books, including The Annotated Criminal Charging Procedure in Canada.
00:09:15.020And he's the co-founder of Common Law Education and Rights, or CLEAR for short.
00:09:21.020As many of you know, David is a passionate freedom fighter who is on the front lines of standing up for our fundamental rights and freedoms.
00:09:28.960Tonight, we are so pleased that he's joining us to tackle some of the pressing questions regarding Canadian sovereignty, Alberta's autonomy, and constitutional authority.
00:09:41.260Will you all please help me welcome David Lindsay.
00:10:03.120And I got to tell our viewers, I mean, David is amazing.
00:10:07.240He is sacrificially giving all of his time to multiple legal actions, many of which have, well, all of which that he has been forced to spend his time on.
00:10:20.620But these are important cases to all Canadians for freedom of speech, the right to be out at rallies and expressing our views.
00:10:31.140And so, David, first, I want to just thank you so much for the time that you spend.
00:10:38.460And you're in the court transcribing documents and writing briefs and doing everything you can.
00:10:44.520But the other thing you do is that whenever I need a hand and a little bit of legal information or advice, you are always so ready to help me out.
00:10:53.160And I just want to extend my gratitude to you in a public forum right now because Canadians really need to know.
00:10:59.740So I think they need to understand more clearly the amount of work that you are consistently doing in the background.
00:11:10.240And I never would have thought 35 years ago when I got involved that I would be where I am today doing legal work.
00:11:18.640And it's come in handy in the sense that for the most part, I don't have to hire lawyers.
00:11:24.940And when they come after me and attack me, I can generally – you can defend yourself on law, but it's difficult to defend yourself when you've got prosecutors who are not morally and ethically correct.
00:11:45.300And that's not to say every judge is like that.
00:11:47.720There's a lot of really, really good judges out there.
00:11:49.860But it's difficult when you get politically charged cases that come before the courts because there's a lot of pressure on judges and a lot of – which I don't agree with.
00:12:03.780Most people don't even – are not aware of it.
00:12:06.080There's a lot of teaching, if I can use that word, by the executive, by the government, that they're teaching judges what to consider and what not to consider in their decisions with respect to, say, SOGI or a variety of other issues.
00:12:19.980And how are you going to have a fair and impartial judge when they're getting taught by the government and then they come into court and try and tell you that you're getting a fair and impartial hearing at the same time and that's simply not possible.
00:12:31.480But I'm grateful and I'm glad I can still be there to help you at all times because you're on the front lines as much as I am and as much as a lot of other people are.
00:12:42.660And when you're in the court system, you're on the front lines and everybody needs to support those people because not everybody can be on the front lines.
00:12:51.900And, you know, there's a real lack of lawyers as well who are willing to stand up or who are knowledgeable enough, who embrace our constitution, our charter, the rule of law with some sort of ferociousness.
00:13:03.460And I've said about the LGBTQ agenda and this amendment to the Human Rights Code, it's like it's a one-way street for them.
00:13:10.100And they're the only one with any kind of human rights.
00:13:13.480Never mind the ones that all preceded them that, you know, take precedence over them.
00:13:19.260So it comes down to they'll say, oh, you know, lawyers will say, oh, well, the human rights says this.
00:13:26.140It's not to supersede the constitution.
00:13:31.160Section 52.1 says any legislation that's in violation of it is of no force or effect.
00:13:36.540Well, finding lawyers to actually know that phrase.
00:13:39.580And so you're up against the Kelowna City who are trying to shut you down and the amazing rallies that you had with thousands of people through the so-called COVID pandemic.
00:13:54.220And as you say, there's problems within the courts being captured.
00:13:57.960Then we've got the other case that's against the individual when you went into interior health and you were obstructed.
00:14:08.660So, you know, those cases are going on and you continue to fight them.
00:14:12.860So now this is actually going to segue nice into what we're going to be talking about tonight, because we see a province that is sick of the tyranny.
00:14:22.580They're sick of the judges and the courts and the senators and everybody else involved who seems to have thrown our constitution, ripped it up or throw it in the garbage or burned it.
00:14:33.580And I don't know what they've done, but there's certainly the country is not being governed by what our fathers of confederation gifted us with.
00:14:42.560And so I can understand there were so many levels of why Alberta, you know, is talking about separating.
00:14:49.220And then as well, the other issue you're going to be talking about again tonight, and we're going to repeat this, is because the left has repeated lies often enough that it became our future generation's truth.
00:15:02.560And that we're a post-national state, for instance, with no core identity, or we're a secular nation or multicultural nation, when in fact we are a nation founded on Christian biblical principles.
00:15:14.120And there comes in the coronation oath, which sets the pace.
00:15:17.700And I meet with lawyers and, you know, bringing up this conversation, they go, I never once learned about the coronation oath in law school.
00:15:27.780And so it's a matter that we got to repeat the truth and historical facts often enough that Canadians embrace them again and let's win this country back.
00:15:37.820So on that, I want to hand the floor over to you and you can comment on what I've said or just go straight into your presentation if you like.
00:15:49.160You know, it's interesting, the coronation oath remains the longest standing document in our Constitution.
00:15:55.560And Christianity was adopted in England circa 600 AD.
00:16:00.440And the coronation oath, the first recorded one, was around 973 AD.
00:16:05.680And it's interesting your point that lawyers are not even taught that in law school.
00:16:10.820And yet the rules of succession, which include the oath, are the fundamental document that sets out the powers of what they can do and what they can't do.
00:16:45.220And England really was not predisposed into granting Canada sovereignty for a variety of reasons we don't need to get into.
00:16:52.540But they brought them to England and subsequently in December of 1866 and into the spring of 1867, they started the negotiations all over again at what was known as the London Conference.
00:17:08.660And, ironically, the minutes of that conference have never been made public.
00:17:13.920So I suspect there's something in there that the governments don't want us to see about what was talked about there.
00:17:20.120And that document subsequently became the British North America Act of 1867.
00:17:38.040It set out the powers of the Governor General.
00:17:40.800And it set out basically the entire situation of how the government was supposed to run in Canada.
00:17:48.420And they did not get a separate country.
00:17:53.100Canada at that time was still a colony of England.
00:17:58.440And they were to be that way for a while.
00:18:01.600And subsequently, in 18—I'm sorry, in 1931, they passed the Statute of Westminster.
00:18:06.980And I think there's a lot, in my opinion, a lot of misinformation about that out there, where people are saying that after 1931, the provinces were sovereign, if I can use that term, and they could have formed their own country.
00:18:23.860However, Section 7 of the Statute of Westminster was very clear.
00:18:29.860And that was primarily because the provinces could not get together and get over their differences and come up to an agreement on what type of country they were going to have.
00:18:38.860So England just said, fine, we'll leave the BNA Act in there.
00:18:41.980And although our statutes don't apply to you and you can pass your own statutes and they don't apply, they will still be considered lawful, even if they're repugnant to English statutes, that the BNA Act itself would still be in force and effect.
00:19:00.360Everything in the BNA Act remained in place.
00:19:02.840And then came the Charter issue in 1982, and some people were saying, well, Quebec didn't sign it, and therefore it's of no force and effect.
00:19:21.360However, the fact that Quebec didn't sign it did not prevent the Constitution Act from being given royal assent by Queen Elizabeth at that time, with the exception of Section 23.
00:19:32.840Which Quebec had objections over on the minority language rights issue.
00:19:39.740Consequently, the Charter was passed, the Constitution Act was passed, and because the British North America Act was and still remains a statute of the English Parliament, and it's still in the English Parliamentary Archives right now,
00:19:55.220Canada simply adopted or incorporated it into our Constitution, because again, even in 1982, there was so much wrangling and arguing on what was to be in there, and every province wanted their own separate ideas and so on.
00:20:12.100But they just brought in the same wording, the BNA Act, and incorporated it into the Constitution Act that Queen Elizabeth Gabriel sent to in 1982.
00:20:25.300And that document is still in force and effect today.
00:20:32.020Interestingly enough, it says right in the document, we are still a dominion of the United Kingdom, and we are still a possession, even under the Interpretation Act of England.
00:20:42.640We remain a possession of the United Kingdom, and interestingly enough, for those who think the provinces were separate, well, King Chucky is coming here next week to open Parliament and do the throne speech.
00:20:58.020And it's not a time or issue to go through an entire presentation that I have on the matter, but Canada remained a country, well, it was originally a union, and then it remained a dominion of the United Kingdom.
00:21:18.380And if they call it the Constitution Act now of 1980, 1867, and it still says we are a dominion under the United Kingdom, which is why the monarch and King Charles are leaders, I guess, if you can put it that way, and they constitute the crown.
00:21:39.340And as a result, the provinces are not separate, which means they don't have the ability to simply call themselves sovereign and set up their own country.
00:21:55.460And in the North America Act, now known as the Constitution Act of 1867, there was no amending formula, and there was no provision made for provinces to leave or to remain in Canada.
00:22:12.540They were there, and they didn't have an option, because it was a Statute of England.
00:22:16.660And when Canada incorporated it into our own constitutional law in 1982, those provisions remained.
00:22:26.440There is still no provision in the Constitution Act of 1867 for Alberta or Quebec or any other province to secede or leave from Canada.
00:22:41.920And Quebec is the first one that raised the issue when they went to the Supreme Court of Canada.
00:22:51.980And they started in Quebec courts all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada on the matter.
00:23:00.240And that was called the Quebec Secession Reference Case.
00:23:05.540And I believe that was in circa 1998 in that area.
00:23:09.980And the Supreme Court of Canada had to deal with questions that were put to the court at that time.
00:24:57.080And it's designed, at least by the Supreme Court of Canada, in a matter that it wasn't supposed to be easy.
00:25:03.680Because it's not just a question of, OK, we want to leave, we're leaving.
00:25:08.820Anyway, any province that leaves Canada is going to have a direct major effect on every other province in the country, economically and constitutionally.
00:26:24.700But even if they get that amount of signatures, that doesn't mean that Alberta is suddenly leaving the country.
00:26:34.600All that does is set in place the motion for Alberta to be able to negotiate with Canada at the bargaining table.
00:26:43.940That doesn't mean there's eventually going to be a succession with Alberta leaving.
00:26:51.020And they have to be very, very clear on that, that when they go and do that, the referendum is not binding.
00:26:58.840Because it affects everyone else in Canada.
00:27:00.920All it shows is that the majority, and there has to be a clear majority, of people in Alberta have decided that they want to leave Canada.
00:27:10.380That doesn't mean constitutionally, federally, that they have the power to leave Canada.
00:27:17.200What it means is they have the power to enter into negotiations with Canada in order to be able to do that.
00:27:24.620So, essentially, the Supreme Court was ruling that, maybe I'll paste this definition of what they decided succession would mean into the chat box.
00:27:42.100Succession is an effort of a group of sections of a state to withdraw itself from the political and constitutional authority of that state with a view to achieving statehood for a new territorial unit on the international plane.
00:28:00.680In other words, if Alberta was to leave, it also has to be recognized internationally as part of its obligations.
00:28:08.260Furthermore, it talks about a territorial unit.
00:28:14.000Under the British North America Act, Section 3 is what created Canada.
00:28:19.240But Canada didn't have a geographical definition.
00:28:24.680It was a constitutional or a, it's called a juridical or a body corporate that was created.
00:28:49.320Because the Supreme Court of Canada also ruled, after you have a successful referendum,
00:28:55.820that all parties have to negotiate in good faith, including minorities, natives, and a variety of other affected parties that will have to be at the table.
00:29:09.080This is not simply saying, we want to leave, we're going to vote to leave, and we're leaving.
00:29:15.420Constitutionally, the Supreme Court of Canada was very clear, you cannot do that, because your actions will affect millions and millions of other people.
00:29:25.580So, they have to enter into negotiations with the other provinces and with the federal government as well.
00:29:38.840And the Supreme Court recognizes that that may not result in a consensus as to how they're going to leave.
00:29:45.900They recognize there's a variety of issues that need to be determined.
00:31:42.300You have a federal government and you've got provinces.
00:31:44.680And they all have to be involved in the issue.
00:31:49.040They're all parties and they're all going to be directly affected.
00:31:55.160So the Supreme Court of Canada talked at length on constitutionalism and the history of Canada, how it came about, and the fact that there is no amending formula.
00:32:04.500I would think that if the provinces had originally been sovereign and were to get together to federate into their own country called Canada, there would have been an amending formula.
00:32:16.100And it's certainly a procedure to allow the provinces to leave or stay in at whatever they want.
00:32:25.320And, of course, there is nothing in there because it was and remains an act of the British Parliament.
00:32:30.620And they didn't anticipate anybody was going to just unilaterally walk out and leave.
00:32:36.200In times of financial uncertainty, securing your wealth is more important than ever.
00:32:41.620With inflation, market instability, and economic challenges, many Canadians are turning to one timeless strategy – precious metals.
00:32:51.980Gold and silver have historically retained their value, offering a hedge against economic turmoil and a safeguard for your assets.
00:33:01.540If you're looking to invest, there's good news for members of Action for Canada.
00:33:06.120We're proud to announce our partnership with Steve Merrill of Sun City Silver.
00:33:11.620Steve is not only a friend of the freedom movement, but he's also offering Action for Canada members exclusive access to some of the best pricing in Canada.
00:33:21.480Thanks to his extensive client base and affiliation with Silver Gold Bull, you can now secure your precious metals at incredible rates.
00:33:31.380Silver Gold Bull is a trusted Canadian leader with live pricing available 24-7 and nearly 400,000 five-star reviews on Trustpilot.
00:33:42.740When you purchase through Steve, you're not only investing in your future, you're also supporting the freedom movement as a percentage of each sale helps support Action for Canada.
00:35:43.340We're not told how they're strategizing, how their military people are organizing, how their political governments are negotiating and talking.
00:35:51.080When Trump came up with the 50-first state idea, was it – why did he do that?
00:35:59.360I'm still at a loss because he was saying that he was a supporter of Carney.
00:36:03.740Carney is a staunch Democrat from their point of view and socialist.
00:36:10.120Keeping in mind, Trump used to also be a Democrat, a state.
00:42:14.880And although the case went to the Supreme Court of Canada, I think it was a Boise Newt case where that guy went nuts in Quebec shooting people,
00:42:23.580they didn't really address that issue.
00:49:09.560So as you can see in this graph I did or chart, you can have no government on my left, it might be on your right, which is anarchy, which it would violate the rule of law to have that.
00:49:21.300And the Supreme Court of Canada has already made that determination in the BCGEU case.
00:49:28.980So you're going to have some sort of a government.
00:52:47.200He threw it back at me and said, I'm not talking to you.
00:52:50.460But I'm telling you, these lawyers are on the take if they're hired by the government.
00:52:57.000And you will not get a better Alberta using the lawyers than what we have today.
00:53:01.540So I urge you, let's keep Alberta in Canada, solve our problems that we have to do, because having the provinces separate will allow other entities, the U.S., other countries, other bankers to come in and take it over.
00:53:43.580And because one of the things I've been saying is, you know, we've been inundated for decades over a multicultural nation, which is a lie right from the pit of hell, because we're a nation with many different cultures.
00:53:58.360And because of that, people haven't been expected to integrate and assimilate and speak the language.
00:54:04.820And so when we've been coming boldly out speaking against different cultures who are trying to transplant here their failed systems of governance that they left,
00:54:16.040which is just so confusing to me for the average person fleeing those countries.
00:54:22.080But of course, it's the ones with an objective to get a hold of Western nations and convert them, such as to Islam or the Kalistani Sikhs wanting to come in and take over.
00:55:01.620And if we expect to defend it, then we need to speak these truths very loudly, very boldly, very courageously.
00:55:10.040And then we need to challenge people's thinking.
00:55:12.320So, OK, if you think that we should be silent over these people invading our nation, then turn it around and tell me one other nation where these people come from, their cultures.
00:55:24.880We'll say the 56 Islamic majority countries are always my example, plus Pakistan, North Korea, China, India.
00:55:33.200And tell me how their systems of governance based on different belief systems are functioning.
00:55:58.040It's horrific what's going on in all of the countries that I spoke about.
00:56:01.800And so we're supposed to shut up because decades ago, Pierre Elliott Trudeau decided to say and the other prime ministers that came after him were a multicultural nation, which was in violation of our constitution and the coronation oath.
00:56:17.020And as we've repeatedly said, and I'm going to keep just kneeling this home so that our viewers will understand it.
00:56:24.080And David, I'm so grateful for you to teaching and educating us on this is and Brian Peckford, when I had him on in December, specifically to get this statement down in history, noted that he said,
00:56:38.500when we drafted and created the chart of rights and freedoms, that colon, the supremacy of God and the rule of law, the colon, everything that comes after that must align with the supremacy of the God of the Bible and the rule of law.
00:56:54.540And I need Canadians, we need Canadians to assert this right, to speak it boldly and stand on this.
00:57:19.160Okay, yeah, I was interested in that because I've got a new resource that I've been building and creating, giving all of the evidence that this is a Christian nation and make that available to everybody.
00:57:30.220I want them to send it to every single elected official at all levels of government, get these land acknowledgements out of the mayor and council meetings, our school board meetings, get them out of our schools.
00:57:42.720Now they have our kids telling them it's just going to keep progressing until we smack their toe and get it back across the line.
00:57:57.420Supremacy of God and the rule of law principles identified in the preamble of the charter upon which Canada is founded, including supremacy of God, should also be allowed to define and interpret the rights set out in the charter.
00:59:05.000And I don't want to hear people saying, yeah, but we don't go by the yeah, but we go by the fact that God is a mighty God and he gifted us with this nation.
00:59:14.940And if we believe and we pray and we put this before him and we get our hearts right and we overturn all of the tyrannical and godless legislation that's unlawfully been passed in this nation, like same sex marriage.
00:59:48.740And Canadians have failed to care about who they've elected into office.
00:59:53.180They've failed to be part of the election process for far too long.
00:59:59.260So and that's one of the reasons as well, while why they're successfully being able to fraudulently take elections as well.
01:00:08.520We need millions of Canadians in order to stand like they did in the United States because they were in the same position as like they did in Venezuela and other countries.
01:00:18.460And just in closing, before it goes back to you, David, is I just want people to understand how strategic that this plan is, is that I mentioned before that Ken Hardy was the liberal MP in my writing.
01:00:33.160When I first got started in this 10 years ago, I didn't even I'd never sat with him, met with him.
01:02:11.480But ultimately, it was an interesting comment that although she is going to allow a referendum and make it easier to happen, her personal preference is to stay in Canada as well.
01:02:23.760And it was an interesting, it's only about 45 second video, if you want to show that right now.
01:02:27.940We've got 30 to 40 percent of Albertans polled saying that they are dissatisfied with the country to the point where they would consider it.
01:02:40.300And my job is to try to bring those numbers down.
01:03:57.360And especially when they're a socialist party.
01:03:59.320I disagree with her on that, but I just found it interesting that her she said her job is to make sure that Alberta doesn't separate effectively.
01:04:11.360I was listening to Dr. Michael Wagner today and man, does he ever really well versed on the history of Alberta and he referred to her as a federalist.
01:04:23.320And I got to be honest, I had to look it up because I was like, what's a federalist?
01:04:26.540And it says supports a form of government government government divided between a central authority and a smaller political units like provinces, which is exactly, of course, like federal government federalist.
01:04:36.780What we've got set up just in case our viewers were unaware as well.
01:04:40.640But the thing is, is that we've said that she doesn't have to, Alberta doesn't have to separate to put Ottawa in their place because she has a great bargaining chip and she has the power on her side right now with the oil resource.
01:04:55.140And my hat's off to her in the way that she's been asserting that authority for her province and it's long overdue.
01:05:02.720But I still am on the fence about Danielle Smith.
01:05:06.300And as you had mentioned during your presentation, what's going on in the background?
01:05:10.660What conversations are these tag teams, good cop, bad cop?
01:05:15.960There's some very, very good, some reliable people that are part of this process that's going on in Alberta right now.
01:05:24.360And so I think that we really need to pray for a right and good outcome, no matter what the decision ends up being, because a lot is on the line for Canadians.
01:05:38.100And like the Supreme Court of Canada said, it doesn't just affect Alberta if they separate.
01:05:43.700It will affect every province, every person in every province, territory, and it will affect people in the U.S. economically and in other contexts as well.
01:05:52.020So it's something that needs to be looked at from that perspective.
01:05:57.520And I know they had a big sovereignty's meeting in Calgary, I think it was, in Alberta last Monday, a week ago or so.
01:06:07.200But these are questions they need answers to.
01:06:11.700And I can guarantee you, if you separate and you eventually negotiate your way out of Canada and you have a banking system that has usury in that banking system, you will be just going from the frying pan into a fire.
01:06:26.840And other people with the money will be controlling your purse strings, will be controlling your government, will be controlling everything in the province.
01:06:40.640She's in Calgary and she says there was a thousand plus people that showed up at that meeting.
01:06:44.580And, you know, David, just as well, because I was looking into this as well, because, you know, I didn't realize how far the history goes back of wanting separation and why.
01:06:55.940But it was Pierre Elliott Trudeau back in 1973.
01:06:59.840There was a war in the Middle East and a barrel of oil was $3.
01:07:05.040Because of the war, it went up to $11 a barrel.
01:07:08.100And he ended up putting an export tax on Alberta oil.
01:07:12.100And then the federal government was coming in and taking a large portion of that, which they weren't entitled to.
01:07:19.220So back then as well, we've always said forever that, you know, they've abused the West.
01:07:24.960Ottawa has abused the West for far too long.
01:07:27.940And we haven't had the attention that we deserve.
01:07:34.940There's other provinces in the West that are very upset about this.
01:07:38.200We don't have proportional representation, really.
01:07:41.320They do it by population as far as the House is concerned, but that the Senate is more properly proportioned.
01:07:49.560But we don't have the Senate was the other thing that came up is that our Senate isn't elected.
01:07:55.520And so as I was going through this process today and thinking about how far it goes back, and then Trudeau had lost, Pierre Elliott Trudeau had lost office for a while and came back in 1980.
01:08:06.700And then he put the National Energy Program in place.
01:08:11.440And that was an attack to take control of Alberta's oil.
01:08:14.440And it really destroyed people's livelihoods.
01:08:17.040So his son said that he was going to come back and finish what he started, and he definitely did a lot of harm to Alberta.
01:08:24.600A lot of people were working three jobs.
01:08:28.300And it's really been a horrible thing to witness.
01:08:31.540And so I fully understand why Alberta has finally said enough is enough and why they feel separation is necessary.
01:08:40.480And then we look at the populist movement as well around the world, where countries about the size of Alberta, who are living under tyrannical governments, ended up electing in.
01:08:51.680And guess who they elected in, Christian populist, if you want to call that, leaders.
01:08:56.400But they're bringing God back into the Constitution, into the conversation, and they're overturning all of the socialist agenda, the tyrannical trends, LGBTQ agendas that's attacking the very heart of our children and societal norms, and the mass immigration that's meant to destabilize us.
01:09:16.840I mean, these governments are coming in and doing business.
01:09:19.880If I heard more of Premier Smith talking about those issues as well, I'd have more confidence in what she's doing.
01:09:31.340And then one final closing thought for myself is when people were talking about the 51st state, and people want to jump on that bandwagon.
01:09:38.360Oh, yeah, we want to be the 51st state.
01:09:40.120But would you have wanted it a year ago under Biden?
01:09:42.960It's like, what's around the corner for the United States as well?
01:09:46.240Well, so it has to happen, change has to happen at the community level.
01:09:51.260We need hundreds of people should be showing up to Action for Canada's chapter meetings every week, saying, what can we do?
01:09:57.720We'll go to the school board meetings and make sure that we have people to run in the next election.
01:10:14.100Just go to our urgent action page to see all of the delegations that we're doing at the city level, finding out, you know what, maybe 10 people on our side came to these meetings.
01:10:37.460Every generation has to fight for it, and we got a big fight on our hands for our kids and our grandkids and the future generations.
01:10:44.840So I'm trying to light a fire under people's butts tonight, David.
01:10:49.340I'm glad because they do, and hopefully more people can come on.
01:10:53.840There was a comment in the chat box that my understanding, Canada, that the Constitution was never ratified.
01:10:59.420But, first of all, ironically, in Halisbury's Laws of England, it's quite clear.
01:11:05.880Constitution simply sets out what all the parameters, limitations of your government, executive, and all those things are, and what your rights and freedoms are going to be.