Action4Canada - June 24, 2023


Trudeau is Fully Aware of Foreign Interference and the Threat to Canada Losing its Sovereignty


Episode Stats

Length

15 minutes

Words per Minute

130.83656

Word Count

1,968

Sentence Count

1


Summary

In this episode of the 2019 Annual Report, we discuss the threat facing Canada from foreign interference and the government's response to that threat. We also discuss the role of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) and the need for greater interdepartmental cooperation on foreign interference.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 and i'm aware that you obviously can't get into details can you give any kind of ballpark about
00:00:27.620 how many other countries we're talking about here is that a lot of other countries
00:00:31.100 that engage in foreign no no we're not allowed i i'm sorry i can't uh can't get into that thank
00:00:37.640 you thank you for trying let me now turn to the second review in the 2019 annual report
00:00:49.160 the government response to foreign interference this review examined the threat facing canada
00:00:55.900 from foreign interference and the government's response to that threat on both fronts the
00:01:02.980 committee heard testimony from dozens of officials from the canadian security and intelligence
00:01:08.200 community reviewed thousands of pages of documentation both classified and open source and i mean
00:01:15.640 thousands of pages and deliberated at great length first the threat our democratic institutions
00:01:23.580 on independent media civil society academia and our electoral system and process support
00:01:29.900 effective accountable and transparent government however the review demonstrates that those same
00:01:35.920 institutions are also vulnerable to foreign actors seeking to covertly and inappropriately
00:01:41.920 interfere or exert influence in canada
00:01:47.460 to repeat the committee sought to present a clear description of the magnitude and nature of the
00:01:53.540 challenge of foreign interference in canada the committee's assessment of the threat is best
00:01:58.820 described at paragraph 189 on page 77 and i quote the committee believes there is ample evidence that canada
00:02:07.700 canada is the target of significant and sustained foreign interference activities the prc the russian federation other states
00:02:23.380 the committee believes that these states target canada for a variety of reasons
00:02:27.060 but all seek to exploit the openness of our society and penetrate our fundamental institutions
00:02:33.380 to meet their objectives they target ethno-cultural communities
00:02:38.100 seek to corrupt the political process
00:02:43.060 manipulate the media
00:02:47.300 and attempt to curate debate on post-secondary campuses
00:02:59.940 each of these activities pose a significant risk to the rights and freedoms of canadians and to the
00:03:05.940 country's sovereignty they are a clear threat to the security of canada the committee conducted a
00:03:12.740 thorough examination of the primary security and intelligence organizations
00:03:17.140 responsible for investigating and countering the threat of foreign interference
00:03:21.220 cesis global affairs canada the privy council office public safety canada and the rcmp
00:03:28.980 we undertook a deep dive into the extent and sufficiency of interdepartmental coordination
00:03:35.380 we examined a series of case studies of canadian responses to instances of foreign interference in canada
00:03:41.620 we examined the extent to which the government of canada engaged with other orders of government
00:03:47.060 and the canadian public and finally we examined international collaboration and coordination
00:03:53.780 the review found that the interdepartmental coordination and collaboration on foreign interference
00:03:59.460 was done on a case by case even on an ad hoc basis it found also that there are differences
00:04:06.820 in how individual organizations interpret the gravity and prevalence of the threat
00:04:11.300 and it found the federal government's engagement with provincial and municipal governments
00:04:19.220 and the canadian public on the threat from foreign interference has been limited
00:04:23.860 most afternoon thanks for taking our questions um in terms of uh foreign interference and
00:04:33.220 recommendations you talk about a whole of government approach but obviously espionage
00:04:37.860 is about as old as statecraft itself so what what's missing what are the gaps right now that need to be addressed
00:04:46.100 in the government's response to this sustained effort by numerous countries including china and russia to
00:04:54.100 spy on canadians the report goes to uh considerable length
00:05:01.940 foreign interference foreign interference under two key rubrics one is a clear description of the threat
00:05:08.660 and the other is perhaps most importantly the government's response to that threat but let's be clear
00:05:14.420 on this there is ample evidence the committee believes that canada is the target of significant
00:05:19.860 and sustained foreign interference activities the committee also believes that these activities pose a
00:05:26.900 significant risk to the rights and the freedoms of canadians and to our sovereignty they are a clear threat
00:05:31.940 threat to the security of canada
00:05:36.900 one of the things we do point to in the report is the example from australia
00:05:52.820 just recently australia launched its new counter interference strategy
00:05:59.780 it also then created the post of the national counter foreign interference coordinator
00:06:04.820 and then as recently as december 2019 backstopped it with a recently created task force
00:06:12.260 to deal specifically with foreign interference in australia and funded it to the level to the tune of
00:06:16.980 of ninety million dollars for a single task force um but specifically within the framework here i mean
00:06:25.700 is there a lack of communication between it seems that that csis takes the lead on most of these files
00:06:32.340 is there a lack of communication when it comes to the rcmp and it seems that the cbsa i know that
00:06:38.420 they're covered in a different part section of this report but it does seem like there's a need for
00:06:41.940 there's a need for the cbsa to also have uh be more in the loop when it comes to the potential of foreign
00:06:49.780 interference and uh within canada's uh governance structures and institutions you're right in pointing
00:07:01.220 out that there needs there there needs to be enhanced uh cooperation interdepartmental cooperation integration
00:07:07.140 uh sharing of information uh clarity when it comes to defining what foreign interference is or is not
00:07:14.500 um better efforts at reaching out and engaging civil society actors academic institutions the canadian
00:07:22.660 public all of these things are laid out in considerable detail in the review itself which is why we're saying
00:07:30.180 it's time it's time it's time uh for canada to move forward and improve uh its cooperation in at the
00:07:38.660 at the governmental level given what we've seen south of the border in the 2016 election i don't think
00:07:43.700 many canadians would necessarily be surprised by the fact that there are foreign actors russia and china as
00:07:50.580 an example that would be trying to interfere with our democracy so is it fair to say that with this report today
00:07:59.460 you're sending a message to the government that they've not been taking this seriously enough
00:08:08.340 i think what we're saying to the government is that um it's a reminder from the committee that canada
00:08:15.540 is the target of significant and sustained foreign interference activities we're saying that uh there have
00:08:23.860 been efforts made uh at the governmental level different institutions departments agencies to respond
00:08:30.500 to it but that that response that can be vastly improved we're saying that there there's no evidence
00:08:38.980 that that foreign interferences is going to cease and desist uh we're saying that appears to be continuous
00:08:46.420 it appears to be in different settings it appears to be uh we've listed a number of examples that in
00:08:52.660 university contexts we've talked about this at length when it comes to media and free media foreign
00:08:59.380 language media we've talked about the effects of foreign interference on ethnocultural communities and
00:09:04.660 the pressure some of those communities may feel so we've pointed this out we've broken it down into as i said
00:09:10.980 earlier uh the threat of foreign interference and the government's response to it and we're really
00:09:16.580 focusing on saying to the sending the message to the government that things can be improved
00:09:22.420 good efforts have been have been made but it's time to up our game
00:09:26.340 um so my second question there are two countries that are named here i understand that there are
00:09:34.740 also other countries that remain unnamed so what are those other countries and why do you not name them
00:09:43.780 could you answer uh rather repeat the question yes so you name two specific countries in your report
00:09:50.180 that are involved in foreign interference but you say that there are other countries involved as well but
00:09:54.580 you don't say which countries they are so which countries are we talking about first and second
00:10:04.420 how would you describe the nature of the threat that they pose
00:10:13.460 but when it comes to actually naming the other countries i i can't answer that question directly
00:10:18.260 uh mr mcginti you mentioned in the report that you had issues with some departments and agencies in
00:10:22.420 terms of the information that they were handing over whether it was a full report or actual documents
00:10:26.740 and you've raised this with the prime minister can you name the departments or agencies that you face
00:10:31.540 this resistance from sure um i'm going to ask uh our executive director to speak to that directly
00:10:37.220 because this is very much a question of of um officials to officials uh negotiation discussion
00:10:45.220 and of course sourcing the information perhaps rainy mark who can answer that directly for you
00:10:49.220 thank you um so i'll just go back and quote uh our right of access in our legislation because that's
00:10:55.620 very important so our act says that the committee is entitled to have access to any information that
00:11:01.700 is under the control of a department and that's related to the fulfillment of the committee's mandate
00:11:07.380 very broad access
00:11:08.580 so in the cancer it would be the department of national defense and uh also in the same national
00:11:19.780 defense from in our diversity and inclusion study and then maybe more generic generally from the privy
00:11:26.980 council office itself so uh and in follow-up can i just add to that sure um i've raised these uh issues
00:11:34.340 this issue directly with the prime minister right uh and i'm now we're now following up with the
00:11:39.940 prime minister's national security and intelligence advisor uh to um to make sure that we come to
00:11:46.740 ground on a much um clearer understanding between the committee and the government of what the
00:11:52.740 committee has access to or does not have access to based on the enabling legislation so we're following
00:11:58.100 up on this quite quite directly you you mentioned single out two countries china and russia in terms
00:12:03.940 of foreign interference uh why were you able to name those but not the others that you mention are are
00:12:10.100 present as well uh china and russia have been named publicly in the media in reports by think tanks in
00:12:19.060 academic studies by other foreign actors partners as states that engage in foreign interference
00:12:26.020 uh the committee also named china and russia in the opening chapter of its 2018 annual report
00:12:34.980 the question of identifying or speaking about any other country is a question of redaction
00:12:40.740 and i explained the redaction process at the beginning of my comments so we're really in no position to
00:12:44.900 speak further about uh any other uh country in any detail other than china and russia given the details
00:12:52.740 around how state actors are using their ethno-cultural communities what do you want canadians to take
00:12:58.420 away from that given their obviously sensitivities and some of those communities already face a lot of
00:13:02.740 stigma i would say one of the most important messages the committee wants to impart about ethno-cultural
00:13:10.020 communities is that they are targets they are targets and that's what concerns the committee
00:13:16.900 uh their rights as canadian citizens are are targeted their freedoms are targeted um and we've laid out
00:13:26.340 the kinds of activities that take place from different sources um so we are um we're concerned
00:13:35.220 we're concerned about our fellow canadians um given the tone in the annual report and in your tone now
00:13:41.620 should we take away from that that china and russia have been successful in their objectives but
00:13:47.220 these aren't just attempts not in a position to answer that um we focused very much on what the threat
00:13:58.100 looks like as fulsomely as possible and we focused even more on the government's ability to respond
00:14:05.780 respond to the threat how well it was responding and where it could improve
00:14:35.780 a larger community so we want to extend of the foundation and then we will try to compare the