Rocco Galati is a prominent Canadian constitutional lawyer who is committed to challenging unconstitutional actions and omissions of the state. He has had a very successful career spanning over three decades and has twice been named as one of Canada s Top 25 Influential Lawyers by Canadian Lawyer Magazine. Rocco believes it is his duty, not just as a lawyer, but as a Canadian citizen, to speak up and take action. We are so honoured that Rocco is joining us once again on The Empower Hour.
00:00:00.000Can I ask you, I know a lot of people are very concerned about Federal Bill C-11 at the federal level and the Provincial Bill here in BC-36.
00:00:12.320I stick with the Section 52-1 of the Constitution, but love to hear where you are at it.
00:00:18.320That's being challenged. We're challenging that as part of our amendment to our claim.
00:00:22.240We are so honoured that Rocco Galati is joining us once again on the Empower Hour.
00:00:31.080Rocco is a prominent Canadian constitutional lawyer who is committed to challenging unconstitutional actions and omissions of the state.
00:00:39.720He has had a very successful career spanning over three decades and has twice been named as one of Canada's top 25 influential lawyers by Canadian Lawyer magazine.
00:00:52.240Rocco believes it is his duty, not just as a lawyer, but as a Canadian citizen, to speak up and take action.
00:00:59.600And we are so grateful for his impressive knowledge, expertise and integrity.
00:01:05.000Will you all please help me welcome Rocco Galati.
00:07:00.360So, yeah, Rocco, thanks for sharing that, you know, regarding your health and your recovery.
00:07:04.980I know that a lot of people, the majority of Canadians care very deeply for you.
00:07:10.200And, you know, it's a tough place to be in as well when so many people feel, you know, you feel the weight of people relying on you in a capacity such as this.
00:07:19.680And so what would you rate your quality of care in the hospital?
00:08:00.480Yeah, well, we were all very, yeah, we were all very concerned about that, that and remdesivir, right?
00:08:05.880So there was much concern as you were recovering.
00:08:09.280And as well as, you know, being a client and have multiple plaintiffs, there was a lot of pressure put on action for Canada and others,
00:08:17.220Vaccine Choice Canada and Ted Kuhns, because people were demanding answers.
00:08:21.380And as you said, there were these horrible obituaries saying six of them saying that you died.
00:08:27.620There was a lot of information going around that only further impacted it in order to agitate, you know, the crowds and bring people to, yeah, to lead them, you know, to doubt what was going on.
00:08:40.880And, you know, it's really good to have this conversation today and let people know that, you know, we were all doing our absolute best.
00:08:48.240And it was so exciting that day that you were in court, even at, you know, the level that you could, you know, be present.
00:09:09.900Well, in your case, as you know, we've appealed the order because good parts of it were wrong.
00:09:14.940But I have been diligently doing an amended claim, which should be issued and filed very imminently in the next couple of weeks, two or three weeks.
00:09:34.320We have a motion scheduled this year for the vaccine choice for Canada instructed me to get the government defendants either to poo or get off the pot.
00:09:48.040So we got a motion scheduled on that case later in the year.
00:09:51.380And so they're progressing in accordance with the instructions of my different clients along the way.
00:09:58.060And I'm not going to reveal those instructions.
00:10:00.640But along the way, not all my clients gave me the same instructions for different reasons.
00:10:06.380And clients have a right to pursue their interest in the way that they want, not in the way that the peanut gallery at large, who's interested in just subverting those clients wants.
00:10:20.160There's some things that we haven't put on there yet because we'll be posting at the time that we file.
00:10:24.340But as Rocco had mentioned, we are doing an appeal.
00:10:31.340And I want to encourage people to continue to donate to Action for Canada, continue to donate to the Constitutional Rights Centre,
00:10:39.460because we need to ensure that it takes extra funds to appeal.
00:10:45.140This isn't part of the constitutional challenge.
00:10:47.100There's a lot of cases that Rocco's turning out and, you know, that he needs assistance with as far as financially.
00:10:54.160So, Sheila, can you make sure you put the Constitutional Rights Centre in the chat for where people can donate and to Action for Canada?
00:11:01.560Now, Rocco, you and I both know that, you know, we've undergone a lot of criticism in our cases because of timing.
00:11:08.780So, I would like to bring it to the attention, you know, of our viewers that there's different kinds of cases and different ways to go about it.
00:11:16.860We're very specific in this strategy, as Rocco has said, and we're not going to always make that public.
00:11:22.620And it may not go to the pace that you feel it should go.
00:11:26.280But when you reflect on other cases, there's one in BC that was launched in January 2021, and it's now 2023 and it's gone nowhere.
00:11:35.940And they've also, they've raised hundreds of thousands of dollars, made all kinds of grand promises.
00:11:40.000So, we're asking you to weigh, you know, where it is before you go to make a criticism.
00:11:47.760Understand that we are working at our fullest and best capacity for every single Canadian.
00:11:55.340And we are personally invested in this.
00:11:58.020And so, anyways, Rocco, let's talk about that federal case.
00:12:35.960And, you know, the process and there's junctures where you get an update because it's time for the next step to happen in accordance with the instructions of the client.
00:12:44.380And so, I don't, when I look at other people's cases, I don't pass any judgment on how fast or slow they're going, on whether they win or lose.
00:12:55.500It disheartens me when they lose, especially if the, you know, the judgment says you got no evidence to support your case, which tells me something's gone wrong in terms of amassing the evidence.
00:13:06.520But what's been really disheartening about this whole challenge to the COVID measures, and I'm not going to, I don't point my finger at anybody, is how different groups are simply sniping at others and they have no connection to them.
00:13:26.320People are free to bring whatever the cases they want, to take whatever action on the ground they want.
00:13:31.740I don't tell anybody else how to conduct their protest or business, right?
00:13:37.080And it's disheartening to see this backstabbing sniping, which is really petty and counterproductive for those of us who claim to want to resist these measures in order for us and other Canadians to enjoy their constitutional rights.
00:13:54.780What I see is a phenomenon of what I call the runway peacock of different groups who say, nobody else, I want the glory of challenging this.
00:14:09.760And the sad reality is that a lot of the courts are frightened and they're bent towards the government policies.
00:14:17.380And so it's hard enough to deal with the other side, the crown and the courts, that you need people.
00:14:22.600So you have to contend with people who claim to be on your side, who are doing nothing constructive except bad-mouthing you without any knowledge or experience or no way.
00:14:35.240Yeah, I as well have made a firm decision that I don't name any of the individuals that blog about me on a Friday night or go out there and do this because it's counterproductive and a distraction.
00:14:48.200I feel like, you know, we're not in high school.
00:14:50.980This is, we're up against murderers and criminals and we need to take this very seriously.
00:14:56.880So my commitment is like, you know, the little horse blinders, I'm moving forward and I just put that to the side.
00:15:03.280And I'm trying tonight to ask others to do that because Rocco doesn't need the criticism.
00:15:29.700So I want to let people know as well, if I'm not mistaken, when you launched on behalf of the 600 workers, the federal workers at the end of May of last year, within two weeks, isn't it something that Trudeau overturned the travel mandates?
00:15:46.220Well, within two weeks of issuing the statement of claim in which we challenged the constitutionality of his travel mandates, he suspended them all.
00:15:55.260And then again, October 1st, what happened October 1st, right after you'd had a discussion, you had a trial date, I think, set up for the third or an appearance in the court.
00:16:05.380Well, they tried to delay it to no end to hear other cases being argued.
00:16:26.860And backing up to September, I remember you stating that you were away at that time and you were looking for an appearance in the court and you wanted it within a week of coming back.
00:16:39.180And all of a sudden, I think within 24 hours was a Globe and Mail had put out a report that Trudeau was overturning the Arrive Can app as of October 1st.
00:17:17.160So these cases do have an impact, even though people don't see it.
00:17:21.140The thing I try to explain to people is that we live in a cafe culture on social media, and people don't understand that doing a case is not a Twitter post.
00:17:58.100You imagine that somebody is holding a knife or something, and the police are called.
00:18:04.120The police arrives on the scene, draws their gun, and they say to the guy, drop your knife and get on the ground and put your hands behind your back.
00:20:05.420You have the right to just declare an exemption and enforce your own right.
00:20:08.800Now, the fact that some people were not respecting that has got nothing to do with me.
00:20:13.300If we had gone to court, the court would say, well, what do you need an injunction for?
00:20:17.100You're not obligated to mask if you declare an exemption.
00:20:20.700The court would have just turfed the injunction as saying, well, you have that right.
00:20:25.080Just the people, one, either didn't know or even if they knew, they had to push a bit as you had your experience, you know, with these masking mandates when you were out in Ontario.
00:20:37.220You know, so that's the other thing I like to tell people, that there is a lot of cases are not won in the court.
00:20:45.140And in fact, if you rush in where angels fear to tread, you may trip yourself and lose prematurely, you know.
00:21:14.980And when we consider the judges as well, there's a lot of movement and press back against judges with the Canadian Judicial Council as well, bringing into question a breach of oath of the bench.
00:21:28.220And, you know, I think judges are starting to have to even consider treading a little more carefully about how far they're going to be taking this in complying with whatever the government is requesting they're doing.
00:21:40.960Because I don't think they're doing this of their own free will.
00:21:43.440I think there's been pressure there on the judges.
00:22:11.600We, by definition, you know, as I said to a federal court judge once, you know, where I alleged that a border officer had abused his authority and had exercised a depraved abusive process.
00:22:28.620And we bantered back and forth with the judge on the issue.
00:22:32.100And then finally I said, oh, my lord, I understand the problem that we're having in communicating.
00:23:50.360And I believe the civil disobedience is key.
00:23:53.640And that's what Action for Canada has been trying to do in creating these chapters across the nation in order to tell people what their guaranteed 100% rights are.
00:26:30.240We're challenging that as part of our amendment to our claim.
00:26:34.000That's the new draconian mandatory vaccination on health workers, if I'm correct.
00:26:40.620That's the bill you're referring to and the idiotic penalty.
00:26:44.880Now, I don't read the section that people are worried about the same way everybody else does.
00:26:49.520There's a section that says if you utter false information with respect to health care and you're not a health care professional, that's simply a provision that is trying to prevent people who are not qualified from practicing medicine.
00:27:14.280And that's I have no objection to that.
00:27:17.600So if you're purporting to be a doctor and you're not a doctor, then you could be heavily fine.
00:27:34.240I haven't had time really to take a fine-tooth comb to that legislation.
00:27:39.780And one of the reasons I've been slow to look at it is I don't think that that kind of draconian legislation against free speech is ever going to survive the Charter or the Constitution.
00:27:56.400And that's where I would take it as well.
00:27:59.000And so many people are concerned because even, you know, organizations like myself, if they don't like what we're saying, you know, then they can come and shut us down.
00:28:08.600It's basically, you know, China 101 all over again in the censorship and what the government is telling you.
00:28:16.000Just like what you said, you know, Trudeau is always like, you know, we're in a free and democratic society as long as you do what I say.
00:28:59.340Unless you lived in an industrial complex outside, in which case they housed you and fed you, you went there for your shifts and then you went back home.
00:29:40.840All the misguided people who want the vaccines have already taken their second and third doses.
00:29:49.760They're, you know, they've done the damage to those.
00:29:52.900People who did not and will not ever vaccinate are never going to vaccinate.
00:29:57.020So now with the public inquiry about the truckers and all of that and all the lawsuits that are coming down and all the analysis on the damage that the vaccines have done, that's where they're going to distract us for the next two or three years while they fully implement digital ID, digital currency, get rid of cash, 15 minute cities where the real fascist control is going to be implemented.
00:30:26.060So people right now have to start fighting against that.
00:30:31.020The vaccine damage will be dealt with in the lawsuits and all that.
00:30:35.980But if people fixate on ruminating on the past, what's going on on the globalist agenda is going to be entrenched before people realize and then they'll wake up in two or three years to that nightmare.
00:30:49.960And I want to share the following stats.
00:30:52.220Yesterday, I went and because because I pled in the statement of claim three years ago that they're looking what the documents from the WEF and all of that were looking.
00:31:03.520They they they said, ideally, the world's population by 2050 should should come down by five billion.
00:31:12.380So when they put out that statement back 2017, I think it was before covid.
00:31:20.240By 28, by the end of 2019, the start of covid in 2020, the all cause mortality around the world at the beginning of 2020 was 60 million for 2019.
00:31:32.320Even with the brief introduction of the vaccines in late 2020, the the all cause mortality and because of the measures of the pandemic,
00:31:45.440the all cause mortality for 2020 had gone from from 58 million in 2019 to 64 million for 2020.
00:31:58.080It jumped to 68 or 69 million for 2021.
00:32:02.380And last year, it jumped to 72 million.
00:32:04.840And their magic number, their magic number, their magic number for 30 year period to get rid of five, four and a half, five billion people with the sterilization effect of the vaccines is 150 million all cause mortality in a year.
00:32:21.380So they are slowly and quickly inching to that.
00:32:25.060Once they get to that 20 years later, we have four and a half billion people less on the planet.
00:32:31.520OK, and so as part of that agenda, yeah, as part of that agenda.
00:32:36.900Now, of course, they're attributing the increase in deaths to covid rather than the vaccine, even though it defies the publication of how many people they say died of covid.
00:33:03.040So so now they're moving on and people have to be mindful of, you know, elimination of cash and the digital the digital currency agenda and digital I.
00:33:13.560That's what's going to really clinch us into into prison.
00:33:51.080But then within the meetings, we are strategically fighting on behalf of our kids.
00:33:55.560You know, the reason the fight on the front line for our kids, as well as going up against the the cities and and attending the city council meetings and attending the school trustee meetings is because those are the two locations that the government is using to control the future.
00:34:13.420One is our kids in controlling their minds and marching out little fascists and little Marxists out of the school system and sterilizing them.
00:34:23.120And we're having an incredible success rate.
00:34:25.340If you don't know what we're what we're doing, Sheila, we'll put some links in the chat, get involved.
00:34:29.800And the other side is we need you to go to every single school board meeting and press in against this, press in against all of this indigenous land rights and all of that crap, because it's all part of UNDRIP.
00:34:39.940It has nothing to do with the rights of indigenous people and stop complying, stop even coming into agreement with all the seated territories.
00:34:48.120When I start a rally or I go to a board meeting, I am saying I thank God and God alone for the ground that I'm standing on.
00:35:04.960Court cases primarily draw attention and consciences to it.
00:35:08.460But just on the point of a 15-minute city, you know, Oxford, England, well on the way to one of the first prototypes.
00:35:18.160People have to know that it's being run right now, as we speak, as a pilot project in Edmonton.
00:35:23.480And Toronto, for those who are familiar with Toronto, they've approved the 500-acre landmass that today comprises Downsview Airport to build a 15-minute city prototype within that land.
00:35:39.660They're going to build an entire encircled community, you know?
00:36:22.860And then they could remove this pole and let people, you know, pass if for whatever, you know, they received a permission from the city to travel outside of the 15 minutes.
00:36:32.100People came out and filled it with concrete.
00:37:01.740And, you know, we had tremendous success in the summer.
00:37:05.420People were like, oh, I can't, you know, get into or get back home from the United States.
00:37:09.320And so we started a notice of liability.
00:37:11.540And it was based on the Constitution, the criminal code, and the charter rights.
00:37:15.040Well, wouldn't you know, people who were brave enough were approaching the border guards and saying, I don't comply, and I have a right, and here's my passport, I'm a free citizen.
00:37:25.220And I'm not talking about freaky common law.
00:37:28.320I'm saying that I have the freedom, according to the charter, to move freely.
00:37:32.620And I have the freedom to enter Canada.
00:37:36.820And people are winning in the courts right now with their tickets.
00:37:39.460It all comes down to they can wave their little magic wand and tell people, you know, what their rules are.
00:37:47.100But if it's not in line with the Constitution and the Charter of Rights, those are 100% guaranteed rights for you.
00:37:52.880And one of the reasons that they're flooding us with immigrants from China and nations where they are used to living under tyranny is because they're true afraid to stand up.
00:38:02.740So my Chinese friends, my friends, you stand up.
00:38:36.460OK. And so what I'm going to do is I've got my team sending me emails, sorry, messages with questions that we that are coming out of the Q&A.
00:38:45.920So we're going to try and hit as many as possible.
00:38:48.000When we go live, we're having a lot of people having trouble with putting their Zoom mic on.
00:38:52.460So let me see what I can get through here first.
00:38:54.280And then if we get to time to do lives, we'll do that.
00:38:56.600Don't we want to talk about inquiries before we do that?
00:38:59.580Yes, we do want to talk about inquiries as well.
00:39:03.080So about the government inquiries and the truckers' convoy, I know a lot of people have put a lot of weight on those.
00:39:10.380But how do you feel about a government inquiry?
00:39:12.580Well, you know, if you let me if you let me five minutes to explain so I can give the sort of the lay of land of what inquiries are and what they're not.
00:39:23.800So there are different there are different types of inquiries in our in our political and legal system.
00:39:32.220The first one is legislative inquiries where the legislative body itself conducts the inquiry.
00:39:40.340So we've seen those like parliamentary committee inquiries.
00:39:43.840And in the states, congressional or senatorial inquiries.
00:39:47.160Those those inquiries, the rules are set by the legislative house, not by the executive, not by the president, not by the prime minister.
00:39:58.780Different parties have a right to participate in those inquiries.
00:40:02.980Then you have two other types of inquiries, which are inquiries under the various inquiries act where a commission of inquiry is is is is is chosen.
00:40:14.040And you have royal commission inquiries, commission commissions.
00:40:20.880And the the the important thing about those as opposed to legislative inquiries is they're struck by the executive.
00:40:28.900Not only are they is the commissioner or the commission members chosen by the executive, the government.
00:40:36.640But the terms of the inquiry are not free ranging.
00:40:41.080They are set by the government and they cannot exceed the terms of those that the inquiry.
00:40:47.880So it's the government that don't not only sets the terms of the the inquiry, but also chooses the person who's going to conduct the inquiry.
00:40:57.920They're not they're not as democratic as a legislative inquiry.
00:41:02.340So, for instance, right now in the States, Japan, I think, and a few other Western countries, they've struck legislative inquiries on the harm that the vaccines have caused.
00:41:14.840OK, so the third the third type of inquiry that that exists is a good old fashioned police investigation.
00:41:23.400And that that that is more impartial than any of the other two, because the other three, rather, are political in nature.
00:41:34.600Now, dealing with executive struck public inquiries, it's been my view, my strong view as a constitutional lawyer, as an observer of inquiries over the 34 years I've been practicing law, that most government, virtually most government inquiries serve two purposes.
00:41:59.040One is to whitewash the wrongdoing of government officials and to ignore actually dealing with the problem of the wrongdoing of the officials.
00:42:10.800And two, more sinister is that by issuing subpoenas to these government wrongdoers, they're immunized from criminal prosecution from any of the evidence they give or any of the derivative evidence coming from what the evidence they they gave.
00:42:30.580So if you're a smart witness who's done something wrong, you admit to it at the inquiry because they can't prosecute it for you.
00:42:36.740They can't prosecute you for. And the reason for that is Section 13 of the Charter.
00:42:42.560And I'll read it to you then. Section 13 of the Charter says, and it's it's a subentitled self-incrimination.
00:42:49.700A witness who testifies in any proceeding has the right not to have any incriminating evidence so given used to incriminate that witness in any other proceeding except in a prosecution for perjury.
00:43:06.900So that means if somebody goes up there and says, yeah, yeah, I broke the criminal code, I committed criminal offenses in a public inquiry and the subpoena, they can never be charged for that offense.
00:43:19.560So that's why we have these public inquiries and moreover, the really cynical idea of striking a public inquiry as a smoke and mirror to give the misimpression that you're actually doing something about the problem.
00:43:38.300How many missing indigenous women inquiries have we had? We've had three and then we had a fourth aborted one.
00:43:46.100What have they done with the problem of missing indigenous women, including not charging all the police officers who just shrugged it off and refused to investigate?
00:45:09.100It came out of Reiner out in Germany, and I used to get hate mail when he did his citizens.
00:45:16.300He didn't call it a citizens' inquiry.
00:45:18.000When he struck his inquiry, I used to get hate mail saying, why aren't you doing something like Reiner over in Germany and conducting prosecutions for crimes against humanity?
00:45:31.300And I said, show me where he's doing that.
00:45:34.240All he's got is a masqueraded citizens' inquiry.
00:46:47.220I appreciate you clarifying this, Rocco, because there's a lot of pressure for myself to support.
00:46:54.100There's a citizen inquiry going on in Canada, and I haven't had a lot of time to look into it.
00:46:58.860But, you know, we're very busy with our action and other things that we're doing, so I always wish others all the best.
00:47:04.880But I understand, you know, that they want to raise a million dollars for it, and Brian Peckford has been quite vocal lately,
00:47:12.760because he was a director and he's pulled out, because Preston Manning is in a position where he's taken $250,000 from the Alberta government on an inquiry.
00:47:24.780And so I know there's some controversy there, and I just feel bad for people that, you know, they're desperate,
00:47:29.920and they're trusting people when they're donating their funds.
00:47:32.160And, you know, it's just really important to sometimes have these conversations, just to clarify it for people,
00:55:30.200They're just being, and this is not new, when they don't like where the law takes them, some of them, you know, the courts simply are dishonest with the law.
00:55:45.240You know, and, you know, and people say, oh, you can't say that you get in trouble with the law society.
00:55:49.940Well, I can say that because the Judicial Council guidelines say that bias and breach of their oath to act impartially is grounds for removal as a judge.
00:56:02.340So we know it happens if it's grounds for removal.
00:56:05.320Otherwise, they wouldn't have that in the Judicial Council's code of conduct for judges.
00:56:10.140The CJC just recommended on December 22nd that a judge be removed.
00:56:19.980This would be a good time to ask, then, the question, talking about this, because it says, just for the public, so they know, what does it mean when the court takes judicial notice?
00:56:29.740And can you give some examples in the context?
00:56:35.880Judicial notice is taken in very rare circumstances.
00:56:40.140Normally, pre-COVID, everything changes with COVID.
00:56:44.800Judicial notice is something that a court can accept it as evidence on matters of notorious facts that are known and non-disputed.
00:56:57.540So, for instance, the courts have taken judicial notice of the fact that the Holocaust happened in World War II.
00:57:04.640You no longer have to prove judicial notice of the fact that the Holocaust happened.
00:57:11.020If you were counting how many people perished in the Holocaust, if that was an issue for whatever bizarre reason, then you'd have to prove that.
00:57:21.180So, the courts are now bypassing the rules and requirement of evidence.
00:57:28.180The leading case on judicial notice is Regina versus Find, F-I-N-D, where Chief Justice McLaughlin said, you can take judicial notice of notorious events.
00:57:41.900So, for instance, you can take judicial notice, and they have, that the WHO declared a global pandemic for COVID-19,
00:57:50.280and that the governments, federal and provincial, declared a COVID-19 pandemic.
00:57:56.200What Regina versus Find said very clearly is you cannot take judicial notice of a scientific fact.
00:58:05.620And so now, with the COVID, these courts are getting lazy, and they're outrageously taking, some of them, judicial notice, that the vaccine is effective and safe.
00:58:16.700That's a scientific fact, which is belied by the fact that if you can take judicial notice of that, that they're effective and safe,
00:58:26.580you can take judicial notice that they're not for a good number of people because they've implemented a COVID-19 vaccine compensation fund.
00:58:37.180So, the government of Canada has conceded that these vaccines in some people will cause injury or death.
00:58:43.600So, this is where the courts are going.
00:58:47.160So, for instance, you cannot take judicial notice of any scientific fact, only events.
00:58:55.880You can take judicial notice that the government has approved the temporary inoculation as being effective and safe.
00:59:05.440That has to be, if you're contesting that statement by the government, you're entitled to call evidence and say, no, this is not true.
00:59:12.040So, another famous case that was dealt with judicial notice was a refugee case in which the Federal Court of Appeal, with respect to a Ghanaian claimant,
00:59:25.220he testified at the hearing that they surreptitiously, slowly, over months and months, created a hole in their cell,
00:59:34.920which was located on the exterior wall of the prison.
00:59:39.600And they escaped at night through that hole one night, four of them.
00:59:44.320And the panel asked them, how big was the hole?
00:59:48.380And the guy raised the sand and said, what about the size of a soccer ball?
00:59:52.300And the decision came down and said, we find a complete lie.
01:02:00.460So, you know, this is not up for debate in the court.
01:02:03.420And is this, I mean, there must be a way, the only way, I'm thinking, is to bring in expert witnesses to counter this in the court systems.
01:02:13.320And I don't think individuals, such as a single mother, has the opportunity, you know, to get a woman out expert witnesses.
01:02:21.320Especially when they're self-represented.
01:04:53.140The third side prevents the two other sides from looking at each other.
01:04:57.560And he lost it and he recessed for a coffee and he came back and he turned to the crown attorney and said, yeah, what about this judicial notice?
01:08:10.140So, for instance, I'll tell you, I was involved in the movement to remove the requirement of lawyers to have to take an allegiance to Her Majesty to be lawyers.
01:08:22.240Because I felt if we had to have an allegiance, it should be the Constitution.
01:08:40.460But in my call at the bar, before my call, they used to, every individual lawyer has to take a quick oath.
01:08:47.780And since they did a joint oath with all 600 students getting called to the bar, and my graduating class at the bar was the first and last to swear allegiance to Freddie Mercury and Queen.
01:09:37.600Now, Daniel Smith, they're saying she can't order her provincial officials to ignore federal law.
01:09:43.820I say that's not true if the feds are encroaching on exclusive provincial jurisdiction.
01:09:48.800She has a right to stay off the status quo until they go to court and get a declaration on a reference whether she's – her provincial officials are bound by this federal law, which the province says, hey, you're entrenching on our jurisdiction under Section 92.
01:10:03.700Because we don't have a unitary state in Canada.
01:10:07.020We have a state of sovereign provinces with exclusive jurisdiction in their own spheres to the feds and vice versa.
01:10:53.340And if you think about it, not to – I don't want to be American, but I think after the Constitution came in where it says in the Constitution,
01:11:00.400this Constitution binds Her Majesty the Queen, then everybody who's the highest power in Canada, not the Queen anymore, it's the Constitution.
01:11:10.820So, we should all be swearing public office in allegiance with the Constitution.
01:11:16.180Because if you're a public office holder, you don't follow Her Majesty's lead.
01:11:21.560You have to be directed by constitutional requirements, even a police officer.
01:11:27.980So, you don't swear allegiance to Her Majesty because she's putting in the laws that are unconstitutional that you're helping her breach against private citizens.
01:11:36.080So, I think the oath of office should be switched to allegiance to the Constitution.
01:11:41.400The police officer's oath now says that they're going to uphold the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
01:11:51.720So, I know all you loyalists out there, you know, are saddened by the idea that Her Majesty is gone and His Majesty is not going to have the power he did,
01:12:03.080but it's just the evolving nature of our society.
01:12:05.820It changed in 1982 when we patriated our Constitution.
01:13:12.380Well, the tables have turned here, right?
01:13:14.980Because they are passing these bills, like Bill C-19, whatever, the emergency bills provincially.
01:13:20.900And they're saying, oh, if you don't like it, you have to do a constitutional challenge and fight in the courts.
01:13:25.280So, what's good for the goose is good for the gander.
01:13:27.400So, how do you feel about the RCMP coming to me, as I've had meetings with them, and, you know, based on the lesser magistrate and their duty to uphold the Constitution and the Charter of Rights,
01:13:39.680and they're saying, well, no, Bill C-19 is legislated, so you have to do a constitutional challenge.
01:13:47.300And it's the courts that have to tell us, you know, instruct us to investigate or not comply with it.
01:17:49.260This is this is I'm just glad to have this conversation, you know, because going into headquarters and having these conversations and also official and telling me that I have to get to the court.
01:18:26.320I'm I'm you know, sometimes these conversations, you know, the answer is a bit lengthy and I hope people are respecting this and enjoying it.
01:18:33.720So can a person sue where an exemption was not respected?
01:18:52.400Certainly in Ontario, for instance, where you can exempt yourself from masking.
01:18:58.460Yeah, you can sue if they don't if they don't respect your exemption, if they don't accept your exemption to the vaccine because it's a constitutional right to refuse any medical treatment.
01:19:46.580We will not assist with requesting or facilitating any exemption because the request.
01:19:55.640To facilitate an exemption implies that you are OK with the law and we take the position that to force somebody to vaccinate is unconstitutional and you have a right to exempt yourself under the Constitution.
01:20:11.920So why would you seek an exemption from an idiot employer?
01:20:40.140They were just shaken and they were very, very concerned.
01:20:43.020But if there comes a time when legal actions are going to be unfolding here, I can revisit that potentially and be a greater advocate for my mom.
01:20:50.860And there will be justice from these from these fascist dictators in the doctor's offices.
01:20:58.160This is this was something dear to my heart as well about what's happened in the nursing homes.
01:21:02.840They never had a right to do anything they did to any of our elderly people or withhold loved ones from going in and seeing them.
01:21:10.720So did Ontario nursing homes ever have the legal authority given to them by the province to refuse indoor access to residents from visitors who were not vaccinated?
01:21:20.140Indirectly, they did, because they allowed these private, which I say is a constitutional violation.
01:21:26.820They allowed private entities to make their own rules.
01:21:30.520And what if their government, because I know somebody here in B.C., they have their elderly.
01:21:36.160Yeah, if their government, if their government, no, they can't.
01:22:17.140And then you go in and you calculate those that were forced to take the jab and how their life was shortened or even just purely dying from loneliness.
01:22:26.360I had so many calls and I shed some tears myself over this matter.
01:22:32.220So the English did a study of Alzheimer's patients in 2020.
01:22:38.120They compared two months, one in 2019.
01:22:43.480I'm sorry, one April of 2020, just after the pandemic was declared in April of 2021.
01:22:51.180And they found that on the average, 10,000 more Alzheimer's patients died a month.
01:23:10.120And that was from the complications of Alzheimer's and being isolated with no contact.
01:23:14.280Well, I take a look at, you know, people with Alzheimer's and, you know, testimonies from family members where there is an essence of knowing who that person is at some degree or level.
01:23:25.580And then you take that away from them and they have no understanding of it as well, right?
01:23:30.020So psychologically, that would play a major role in their lives.
01:23:49.060And this is why we need to also be applying pressure to the judiciary.
01:23:54.020And because if you feel that you have to come with evidence, you can't just make a complaint just because you don't like a ruling of a judge.
01:24:00.640If you feel that a judge has breached his oath of office, you can file complaints.
01:24:05.580There's something that you can do about that.
01:24:52.120And even if you get him charged by justice of the peace, the crown can step in any time and will take over the prosecution and withdraw the charges.
01:25:00.820So with the governor general being in cahoots with the prime minister and as you said, we can't go to his majesty, the king and ask for him to be removed.
01:25:14.580Not that he would if he even had the power.
01:25:17.100What are we looking at here, Rocco, potentially with Trudeau?
01:25:21.140You're looking at a dumbass Canadian population who keeps voting this asshole into office.
01:27:22.400There's a man in Naples, computer genius, who pled guilty to eight years in prison for, you know, remotely manipulating the votes in the Trump-Biden election.
01:27:38.740He says at the request of Barack Obama, because Barack Obama was a good friend of the Italian president who's ancient.
01:28:57.180And I'll tell you, you know, people can think that there's a small thread.
01:29:01.800I call it the small remnant is Action for Canada.
01:29:04.100We got a lot of people on our email list.
01:29:06.020But when I look at our chapter leaders and our actual active members and how we are turning the direction of things in Canada, especially regarding the SOGI books and the SOGI resources and all the rest of it.
01:29:19.000I mean, it's not by mistake that the media and the governments and the Canadian Library Federation are all talking about, you know, the work that we're doing.
01:29:37.320Now, you start showing up at school board meetings like I did last night, taking on a Dominion voted election that had taken place with several very questionable individuals who won their seats and running these school board trustee meetings like a dictatorship in violation of the Roberts Rules of Order, everything.
01:29:59.240And so there were a lot of people that showed up and only 15 people could could end up in the room.
01:30:04.920So we've said this is a public meeting.
01:30:07.580You need to look at the future and you need to start thinking about recorded meetings in a bigger public space because Canadians are starting to show up.
01:30:15.840My friends, you need to fill up City Hall.
01:30:18.740You need to fill up the school board meetings and you need to get your voice known.
01:30:22.480And that's where the pressure is because these guys want to get voted again.
01:30:26.220And we have a small window to begin to ensure that our votes matter and our votes count and our actions matter and count.
01:54:11.540And, and then I'm just going to close because, um, I know you've received some information about Dr. Hoff here in British Columbia with the BC, um, college of physicians and the pressure that they're putting on him.
01:54:26.260There was a real misinformation letter that was going around.
01:54:41.540Just some information on his predicament right now.
01:54:43.740But I think there's going to be a lot of relief for people to know now that you've, um, stated it publicly that we will be challenging Bill 36.
01:54:51.620There's been so much unrest amongst healthcare workers in here in BC.
01:54:55.580And we just want to know you to know that, uh, you know, we, we, there's things that, uh, we haven't, uh, provided in advance for strategic reasons, but we want you to know we're coming for them.
01:55:06.040Uh, you know, we're going to be taking this on, uh, Dr. Hoff has a lawyer who ended up in, uh, the hospital as well.
01:55:13.660Uh, we're not sure of the medical reasons, uh, why that happened.
01:55:17.220And, uh, but I just want you to know that main letter going around and asking you to write the College of Physicians was false information and that his lawyer, Michael, sorry, what was, um, Dr. Hoff's lawyers?
01:56:32.400And, uh, you know, I would say, I hope all of our viewers and those who will be listening to this video presentation in the future, um, you know, have learned a lot tonight.
01:57:39.460We, uh, had been very wise with our funds.
01:57:42.160And so when we had to, uh, appeal some of the decisions that Judge Ross had made, uh, we were able to, uh, pay Rocco those funds.
01:57:50.400But we need to as well, uh, work and have some extra funds in our war chest to, to keep everything going.
01:57:56.720Because we don't know where the future is going, but we want those, uh, the government oligarchs to know that we are well-funded and ready to go for whatever they bring our way.
01:58:05.800And it is definitely going to be the power of the people getting behind us.
01:58:09.800And, uh, we need you to be ever so present.
01:58:49.620She believes in the, um, fact that Canada is founded on Judeo-Christian principles and was questioning all the, uh, rhetoric regarding the, uh, Islamization of this nation through the passing of motion.
01:59:04.280And one Oh three, the Islam, uh, Islamophobia motion, Christine didn't support that.
01:59:09.620So we're going to be talking about her story, how she was removed from office and why the work that she's been doing since the statements that were made, uh, by the newly appointed individual.
01:59:21.660What does it really mean about, um, immigration, uh, how the government is trying to pit and divide the, uh, citizens of Canada into partitioning by, uh, creating nations within our nations.
01:59:35.240Uh, we've got the Muslims in one section, the Pakistanis in another, the Canadian in another, the Chinese.
01:59:41.740Isn't that why we, why are we doing this right?
01:59:44.680We are all Canadians under one rule of law, under one constitution, under one charter of rights and freedoms.
01:59:52.500And we're going to talk about how reasonable it is that when people immigrate to Canada, they are expected to assimilate and integrate.
02:00:01.320And that is not a racist comment to make.
02:00:05.660It is a reasonable comment to make if we want to exist as a country that was founded on, on the values and principles that gave us that foundation for the very democracy that we're living in.
02:00:18.940And, uh, you have heard me often say before, if you question this, if you think that we are a multicultural nation, if you believe that we're a secular nation,
02:00:28.860then you're moving towards the fact of what was it Trudeau said?
02:00:32.300We're a post-national state with no core identity.
02:00:35.040So if we don't stand up for the core of what action, what, what Canada is founded on, Christian principles, we are going to be where Trudeau's dream of.
02:00:46.500And that's a communist, fascist, uh, diabolical state, call it what you will.
02:01:30.500And I have no problem integrating with this country and nobody's taken away my native tongue.
02:01:35.460And I think this whole nonsense of parading every different culture in a two way, in a two way conversation and tunnels with the main groups is wrong.
02:01:45.900And it's, and I totally agree with your statement, but I have some legal views on this.
02:01:49.960I think it's, I think it's going to be a great show.
02:01:57.840And, you know, this has been pre-COVID.
02:01:59.720This was one of the many issues that I was addressing.
02:02:02.380I think it was one of the most critical, honestly, pre-COVID.
02:02:04.840And, you know, people say, if we're going to, we're going to focus on Motion 103, but it's going to be about immigration as a whole, et cetera, and about us being a sovereign nation built on biblical principles.
02:02:15.340And I always challenge people, if you are challenged with me saying that, I would say go to one of the 57, 56 Islamic majority countries, Pakistan, China, North Korea, and, and think about the basis of which their country, the belief system, which forms their political system.
02:02:33.600And these wonderful people living in those nations are living under tyranny, oppression.
02:02:40.520They don't have the rights and freedoms that we enjoy in the Western world.
02:02:43.660And that's why we're being hit so hard with this multiculturalism.
02:03:17.400And the thing is, as well, Rocco, is I was talking to Brian Peckford recently, who is the last surviving, you know, individual of the signage of the charter.
02:03:27.420And when we were talking about this section on freedom of religion, he said, Tanya, when that was signed, that was to keep the government out of the churches.
02:03:37.720It was based on the God of the Bible, not all these multiple religions that are trying to infiltrate and force their failed foreign policies and religious belief systems in Canada.
02:03:49.840And so it's really, you know, and then, of course, like they've done with COVID, they've really upped the mind manipulation that, how do we say that, psychological warfare,
02:04:03.320that if you take a stand on this issue and object to it, then you are that racist, you're Islamophobic.
02:04:11.580They've got all of the word attacks to shut people down from opposing something that we have a right and a duty to protect.
02:04:24.220And I'm really, really, really adamant to protect our Christian roots, because that's the basis of all.
02:04:30.420That's what gives people to be atheists and live freely in Canada as an atheist.
02:04:35.900You know, try living as a homosexual in Islam.
02:05:18.000Yeah, yeah, because, yeah, because they want to be God.
02:05:21.960And we've seen Klaus Schwab's little puppet, you know, who's gone around and spoken about that God is dead and that they're going to take over our brains and minds.
02:05:35.420So there's crazy people running the nuthouse, or what is it, the lunatics are running the nuthouse, and we've got to take back control.
02:10:01.860So I am just going to thank you so much.
02:10:05.740I'm going to say God bless you and God bless Canada.
02:10:09.600God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you again.
02:10:18.340Thank you so much for His Son and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you.