Action4Canada - Updates And Government Inquiry with Rocco Galati

00:00:00.000 Can I ask you, I know a lot of people are very concerned about Federal Bill C-11 at the federal level and the Provincial Bill here in BC-36.

00:00:10.300 Could you comment on both of those?

00:00:12.320 I stick with the Section 52-1 of the Constitution, but love to hear where you are at it.

00:00:18.320 That's being challenged. We're challenging that as part of our amendment to our claim.

00:00:22.240 We are so honoured that Rocco Galati is joining us once again on the Empower Hour.

00:00:31.080 Rocco is a prominent Canadian constitutional lawyer who is committed to challenging unconstitutional actions and omissions of the state.

00:00:39.720 He has had a very successful career spanning over three decades and has twice been named as one of Canada's top 25 influential lawyers by Canadian Lawyer magazine.

00:00:52.240 Rocco believes it is his duty, not just as a lawyer, but as a Canadian citizen, to speak up and take action.

00:00:59.600 And we are so grateful for his impressive knowledge, expertise and integrity.

00:01:05.000 Will you all please help me welcome Rocco Galati.

00:01:08.680 Rocco, welcome to the Empower Hour.

00:01:11.440 Thanks for having me again.

00:01:14.480 Terrific. Thank you, Heather.

00:01:15.860 Well, Rocco, I've been so excited about having you on the show tonight.

00:01:19.520 I look at you and you're looking amazing.

00:01:24.500 And the recovery that you've had, I think there's been a lot of prayer for you.

00:01:27.800 I know there has been.

00:01:29.320 And so I'd like to start off the show by giving you the opportunity to talk a little bit about your journey,

00:01:36.160 about how you became sick in December of 2021.

00:01:39.360 And maybe you want to discuss a little bit about what went on in the hospital

00:01:43.840 and then this remarkable recovery that you've had.

00:01:46.560 We're just so grateful.

00:01:47.440 Well, you know, as my father used to say, you know, I'm a sick man and my health ain't too good either.

00:01:54.120 But I'll give you broad strokes of what happened.

00:01:58.420 Essentially, just before Christmas of 2021, I fell very ill.

00:02:04.320 And just to dispel all the nonsense that was on the Internet,

00:02:07.760 including the six obituaries about me that are still online that they refused to take down.

00:02:13.560 My illness is not COVID-related whatsoever.

00:02:20.560 I was hospitalized and then intubated into a coma against my written instructions.

00:02:28.360 And so I was in a coma for about 12 days.

00:02:32.300 I had myself released two days after I came out of the coma.

00:02:37.380 And I had myself released to a private medical facility and where I was basically paralyzed for the first several weeks.

00:02:47.100 And then I began my slow rehabilitation.

00:02:50.560 I was on four liters of oxygen a minute with 24-7 ICU nursing care that I had to pay for

00:02:59.400 because I didn't trust the hospital to do anything but kill me.

00:03:03.080 And then so I took myself out of the hospital.

00:03:06.480 And then basically it wasn't until March that I was walking without oxygen, without the oxygen tank.

00:03:17.120 And then it took me a while to recuperate.

00:03:19.320 I'm still recuperating, you know.

00:03:20.940 I'm still, I'm back at work.

00:03:23.320 I'm back to my duties as a lawyer.

00:03:26.320 But it was quite a check, it was quite a slam to the boards that I took in terms of health.

00:03:34.980 Everybody thought it was a miracle that I even survived.

00:03:38.720 I reminded the hospital staff and others that we have a saying where I come from in Calabria in southern Italy,

00:03:45.460 that nasty brown grass does not die, it returns in the spring.

00:03:49.540 And I was lucky enough with the grace of God and all the prayers I received and just the tenacity to get better.

00:03:56.320 That I did recuperate.

00:03:57.600 I'm not 100%, but as I said to you before, Tanya, I think that doesn't bother me

00:04:01.940 because ever since I've been six years old, everyone I've known has always leaned over and said to me,

00:04:06.760 Rocco, you're not 100%.

00:04:08.820 And so I'm used to that.

00:04:11.140 But I'm basically 90%, 92%, which is fine with me.

00:04:15.560 I can more than function well at 92%.

00:04:18.260 And so it was a very, very difficult six months to literally get back on my feet.

00:04:23.840 I couldn't move anything but my head or hands, my fingers when I first came to the private care facility that I had set up for myself.

00:04:33.120 And so, you know, I recuperated.

00:04:35.800 The hospital said they could have me walking with difficulty by June, which was five months.

00:04:42.460 I said, no, thank you.

00:04:44.340 And, you know, I made a recovery that was a lot quicker than that because I was in control of my own program.

00:04:51.260 And so that was about it.

00:04:53.500 I got a lot of funny emails while I was still in hospital and just shortly after when I was released to the effect of,

00:05:04.340 oh, we know you were in a coma, but, you know, you must be better by now.

00:05:07.600 So here, can you look at all these 27 electronic files, read them and give me your advice on this?

00:05:13.560 And, of course, I deleted all that stuff.

00:05:16.240 I had a lot of nasty emails saying that I was faking my illness, you know.

00:05:21.500 So this is human nature.

00:05:23.720 But at any rate, that's, unless you have any pointed question, that is basically a recap on my health.

00:05:30.160 So to repeat, from December of 2021 to about May, I was basically incapacitated.

00:05:38.880 I was not 100.

00:05:39.780 I couldn't, you know, I was at 20, 30% in terms of taking care of the store.

00:05:45.040 And then through the summer, I got back into it in 22.

00:05:49.520 Okay.

00:05:50.120 So, and as you recall, we had a discussion.

00:05:53.080 I was really not 100% when I argued the motion for action for Canada, but I felt that I needed to argue that.

00:05:59.840 So it wasn't delayed any further.

00:06:01.620 That was May, I believe, if I recall.

00:06:04.060 Yes.

00:06:04.420 Of last year.

00:06:06.020 Yeah.

00:06:06.600 And then from there, I moved to schedule the federal workers motion to strike very quickly.

00:06:12.560 And we argued that January 19th of this year, the court is still on reserve on that while waiting for a decision.

00:06:19.640 And we've been pursuing all the doctor's cases.

00:06:22.380 Where they're trying to de-license doctors for their free speech and criticism of COVID measures.

00:06:29.720 So my firm has been, you know, keeping on top of the cases and we're moving.

00:06:34.280 Of course, it's not never fast enough for anyone because they basically don't understand the court process.

00:06:39.920 And most people don't understand that I have different clients who have different instructions for me.

00:06:46.140 Not every client has the same objectives they're trying to achieve.

00:06:49.240 And I answer only to God and my clients.

00:06:52.740 I don't answer to anybody else.

00:06:54.420 I don't even answer to my wife.

00:06:57.780 Well, let me see.

00:06:59.640 All right.

00:07:00.100 Yeah.

00:07:00.360 So, yeah, Rocco, thanks for sharing that, you know, regarding your health and your recovery.

00:07:04.980 I know that a lot of people, the majority of Canadians care very deeply for you.

00:07:10.200 And, you know, it's a tough place to be in as well when so many people feel, you know, you feel the weight of people relying on you in a capacity such as this.

00:07:19.680 And so what would you rate your quality of care in the hospital?

00:07:23.660 Oh, dismal, negligent, criminal. 0.95

00:07:27.080 Yeah. 0.97

00:07:28.200 Criminal.

00:07:28.720 I won't get into it now.

00:07:30.400 You may read about it in a statement claim later or in a podcast with the international podcast.

00:07:35.000 But it's just I just don't want to even waste the viewers' time on that.

00:07:39.500 It was just criminal.

00:07:40.820 Just to clarify, I mean, for instance, you hear my voice is different.

00:07:44.080 This is permanent damage from the permanent damage they did to me through the intubation, which I did not want.

00:07:50.360 And specifically, in writing before I was hospitalized, indicated under no circumstance, intubate me.

00:07:56.900 Because, you know, 90% of people who are intubated die.

00:07:59.880 Right.

00:08:00.480 Yeah, well, we were all very, yeah, we were all very concerned about that, that and remdesivir, right?

00:08:05.880 So there was much concern as you were recovering.

00:08:09.280 And as well as, you know, being a client and have multiple plaintiffs, there was a lot of pressure put on action for Canada and others,

00:08:17.220 Vaccine Choice Canada and Ted Kuhns, because people were demanding answers.

00:08:21.380 And as you said, there were these horrible obituaries saying six of them saying that you died.

00:08:27.620 There was a lot of information going around that only further impacted it in order to agitate, you know, the crowds and bring people to, yeah, to lead them, you know, to doubt what was going on.

00:08:40.880 And, you know, it's really good to have this conversation today and let people know that, you know, we were all doing our absolute best.

00:08:48.240 And it was so exciting that day that you were in court, even at, you know, the level that you could, you know, be present.

00:08:55.500 You were magnificent.

00:08:56.840 You were absolutely magnificent.

00:08:58.140 And you put all of the lawyers for the defendants to shame that day.

00:09:02.680 And, you know, our case continues to go.

00:09:04.840 So where would you like to go from here?

00:09:06.780 Would you like to talk about some of those cases?

00:09:08.500 Oh, sure.

00:09:09.900 Well, in your case, as you know, we've appealed the order because good parts of it were wrong.

00:09:14.940 But I have been diligently doing an amended claim, which should be issued and filed very imminently in the next couple of weeks, two or three weeks.

00:09:25.720 And we're going to proceed.

00:09:27.260 The federal case, we'll see what the judge decides, but it'll proceed one way or the other.

00:09:33.020 And the cases are proceeding.

00:09:34.320 We have a motion scheduled this year for the vaccine choice for Canada instructed me to get the government defendants either to poo or get off the pot.

00:09:47.420 And they have.

00:09:48.040 So we got a motion scheduled on that case later in the year.

00:09:51.380 And so they're progressing in accordance with the instructions of my different clients along the way.

00:09:58.060 And I'm not going to reveal those instructions.

00:10:00.640 But along the way, not all my clients gave me the same instructions for different reasons.

00:10:06.380 And clients have a right to pursue their interest in the way that they want, not in the way that the peanut gallery at large, who's interested in just subverting those clients wants.

00:10:16.240 It's not their case.

00:10:17.560 We're keeping our legal action page updated.

00:10:20.160 There's some things that we haven't put on there yet because we'll be posting at the time that we file.

00:10:24.340 But as Rocco had mentioned, we are doing an appeal.

00:10:31.340 And I want to encourage people to continue to donate to Action for Canada, continue to donate to the Constitutional Rights Centre,

00:10:39.460 because we need to ensure that it takes extra funds to appeal.

00:10:45.140 This isn't part of the constitutional challenge.

00:10:47.100 There's a lot of cases that Rocco's turning out and, you know, that he needs assistance with as far as financially.

00:10:54.160 So, Sheila, can you make sure you put the Constitutional Rights Centre in the chat for where people can donate and to Action for Canada?

00:11:01.560 Now, Rocco, you and I both know that, you know, we've undergone a lot of criticism in our cases because of timing.

00:11:08.780 So, I would like to bring it to the attention, you know, of our viewers that there's different kinds of cases and different ways to go about it.

00:11:16.860 We're very specific in this strategy, as Rocco has said, and we're not going to always make that public.

00:11:22.620 And it may not go to the pace that you feel it should go.

00:11:26.280 But when you reflect on other cases, there's one in BC that was launched in January 2021, and it's now 2023 and it's gone nowhere.

00:11:35.940 And they've also, they've raised hundreds of thousands of dollars, made all kinds of grand promises.

00:11:40.000 So, we're asking you to weigh, you know, where it is before you go to make a criticism.

00:11:47.760 Understand that we are working at our fullest and best capacity for every single Canadian.

00:11:55.340 And we are personally invested in this.

00:11:58.020 And so, anyways, Rocco, let's talk about that federal case.

00:12:01.600 When you filed.

00:12:03.240 I'm sorry, I'd like to mention, I'm sure they won't mind mentioning.

00:12:06.820 You know, we've got a huge case going on with the Ontario health workers with hundreds of plaintiffs.

00:12:12.720 And I often get emails every week.

00:12:15.640 Can you give us another update?

00:12:16.980 And I often respond with, you know, a court case is not a medical patient in the hospital.

00:12:23.540 You don't go in for daily updates.

00:12:25.840 You know, a court case doesn't move as a hospital patient moves through a hospital, through a healing process.

00:12:33.140 Right.

00:12:33.600 There are points.

00:12:34.440 There's a process there.

00:12:35.960 And, you know, the process and there's junctures where you get an update because it's time for the next step to happen in accordance with the instructions of the client.

00:12:44.380 And so, I don't, when I look at other people's cases, I don't pass any judgment on how fast or slow they're going, on whether they win or lose.

00:12:55.500 It disheartens me when they lose, especially if the, you know, the judgment says you got no evidence to support your case, which tells me something's gone wrong in terms of amassing the evidence.

00:13:06.520 But what's been really disheartening about this whole challenge to the COVID measures, and I'm not going to, I don't point my finger at anybody, is how different groups are simply sniping at others and they have no connection to them.

00:13:26.320 People are free to bring whatever the cases they want, to take whatever action on the ground they want.

00:13:31.740 I don't tell anybody else how to conduct their protest or business, right?

00:13:37.080 And it's disheartening to see this backstabbing sniping, which is really petty and counterproductive for those of us who claim to want to resist these measures in order for us and other Canadians to enjoy their constitutional rights.

00:13:54.780 What I see is a phenomenon of what I call the runway peacock of different groups who say, nobody else, I want the glory of challenging this.

00:14:06.560 Well, there's no glory in this.

00:14:07.940 It's just a lot of hard work.

00:14:09.760 And the sad reality is that a lot of the courts are frightened and they're bent towards the government policies.

00:14:17.380 And so it's hard enough to deal with the other side, the crown and the courts, that you need people.

00:14:22.600 So you have to contend with people who claim to be on your side, who are doing nothing constructive except bad-mouthing you without any knowledge or experience or no way.

00:14:35.240 Yeah, I as well have made a firm decision that I don't name any of the individuals that blog about me on a Friday night or go out there and do this because it's counterproductive and a distraction.

00:14:48.200 I feel like, you know, we're not in high school.

00:14:50.980 This is, we're up against murderers and criminals and we need to take this very seriously.

00:14:56.880 So my commitment is like, you know, the little horse blinders, I'm moving forward and I just put that to the side.

00:15:03.280 And I'm trying tonight to ask others to do that because Rocco doesn't need the criticism.

00:15:08.680 I don't.

00:15:09.180 We need the support.

00:15:10.000 We're in a battle.

00:15:11.120 And I know Heather had that picture of that ferocious lion. 0.75

00:15:14.200 That's what I look like every morning when I wake up, right?

00:15:16.500 And when we're addressing, when we're addressing this matter, like I'm, I'm staying focused on who the real criminals are.

00:15:23.200 So yeah, Rocco in that, I'm very, very grateful for you.

00:15:26.480 And I just wanted to give you that encouragement.

00:15:29.260 Okay.

00:15:29.700 So I want to let people know as well, if I'm not mistaken, when you launched on behalf of the 600 workers, the federal workers at the end of May of last year, within two weeks, isn't it something that Trudeau overturned the travel mandates?

00:15:46.220 Well, within two weeks of issuing the statement of claim in which we challenged the constitutionality of his travel mandates, he suspended them all.

00:15:54.020 Mm-hmm.

00:15:55.260 And then again, October 1st, what happened October 1st, right after you'd had a discussion, you had a trial date, I think, set up for the third or an appearance in the court.

00:16:05.380 Well, they tried to delay it to no end to hear other cases being argued.

00:16:09.660 And I said, nothing doing.

00:16:11.080 I want mine heard now.

00:16:12.420 That was my instructions from my client.

00:16:14.000 I want it heard now.

00:16:15.180 And so we picked, we picked January 19th within three months for a full day of argument in the federal court.

00:16:21.800 And we argued it January 19th, the motion.

00:16:24.020 Right.

00:16:24.460 So we're just waiting on the court.

00:16:26.300 Right.

00:16:26.860 And backing up to September, I remember you stating that you were away at that time and you were looking for an appearance in the court and you wanted it within a week of coming back.

00:16:37.740 And it was October 3rd.

00:16:39.180 And all of a sudden, I think within 24 hours was a Globe and Mail had put out a report that Trudeau was overturning the Arrive Can app as of October 1st.

00:16:50.020 Right, right, right.

00:16:50.800 That's right.

00:16:51.320 Yeah, that's right.

00:16:51.900 So these are huge wins.

00:16:53.700 I don't have a clear map.

00:16:54.820 Yeah, that's right.

00:16:55.440 That happened.

00:16:56.000 I don't remember as vividly because I was in the Mediterranean for medical treatment and convalescing on the beach.

00:17:03.100 So I didn't think of anything else but vitamin D and sunscreen.

00:17:06.880 I was on the first holiday I've had in decades.

00:17:09.620 So that's right.

00:17:10.860 I came back September 22nd from overseas.

00:17:13.900 That's right.

00:17:15.260 And so, yeah.

00:17:17.160 So these cases do have an impact, even though people don't see it.

00:17:21.140 The thing I try to explain to people is that we live in a cafe culture on social media, and people don't understand that doing a case is not a Twitter post.

00:17:32.680 It's not a Facebook post.

00:17:34.460 It's a mountain, an avalanche of documentary and evidence. 0.95

00:17:38.800 And, you know, the idea that if something has not been finally determined in court, nothing has happened, is asinine below high school. 0.61

00:17:53.780 It's elementary school.

00:17:54.760 The way I explain it is this, Tanya.

00:17:58.100 You imagine that somebody is holding a knife or something, and the police are called.

00:18:04.120 The police arrives on the scene, draws their gun, and they say to the guy, drop your knife and get on the ground and put your hands behind your back.

00:18:12.840 And he does it.

00:18:14.140 And they handcuff him. 0.81

00:18:16.140 And the response that's akin to the responses we're getting is, why didn't you shoot him?

00:18:21.620 Well, I didn't have to.

00:18:22.460 You know, we got a lot of what we wanted by him surrendering.

00:18:26.980 Oh, yeah, but you didn't do anything because you didn't shoot him.

00:18:30.360 Right? 0.60

00:18:30.900 As if shooting them is the only possible win in that scenario. 0.99

00:18:36.140 And that's what they're doing. 0.86

00:18:37.400 It's like with all the other places.

00:18:40.200 We've had wins that are not visible because the media doesn't report them.

00:18:45.780 So that was an example, perfect example, in the federal case.

00:18:49.060 We got a lot of concessions out of Trudeau just by filing.

00:18:51.780 And him knowing this is serious.

00:18:53.760 This is going to go.

00:18:54.620 It's hundreds of million dollars in damages that are at stake.

00:18:58.440 Right?

00:18:58.960 Because we have 600 employees.

00:19:00.780 We've sued for damages.

00:19:02.540 Yeah.

00:19:03.080 You know, so in addition to the Constitution, in addition to the constitutional relief.

00:19:07.880 So we did get immediate response to our lawsuit.

00:19:10.540 I don't take that as a coincidence that within two weeks of this, that happened.

00:19:14.620 And within one week of that, that happened.

00:19:17.140 That's not a coincidence.

00:19:18.020 Well, when you filed for Vaccine Choice Canada as well in Ontario, that brought about some

00:19:24.740 immediate changes a few years ago as well because there was the mask mandates.

00:19:29.760 But the problem was, it's like it says in the Bible, right?

00:19:32.820 For lack of knowledge, people perish.

00:19:34.760 And even though they had these mandates in place, they were mandates.

00:19:39.900 You can't legislate against breathing freely.

00:19:42.800 You can't have a law to wear a mask.

00:19:45.500 You have the freedom not to.

00:19:47.080 And it was mainly fear and compliance that, you know, right.

00:19:52.520 Right.

00:19:52.660 And when we announced an impending injunction against the masking, well, they promulgated

00:19:57.720 regulations and said you can declare your own exemption without having to provide proof.

00:20:02.860 And so people saying, where's your injunction?

00:20:04.360 We don't need it.

00:20:05.420 You have the right to just declare an exemption and enforce your own right.

00:20:08.800 Now, the fact that some people were not respecting that has got nothing to do with me.

00:20:13.300 If we had gone to court, the court would say, well, what do you need an injunction for?

00:20:17.100 You're not obligated to mask if you declare an exemption.

00:20:20.700 The court would have just turfed the injunction as saying, well, you have that right.

00:20:25.080 Just the people, one, either didn't know or even if they knew, they had to push a bit as you had your experience, you know, with these masking mandates when you were out in Ontario.

00:20:37.220 You know, so that's the other thing I like to tell people, that there is a lot of cases are not won in the court.

00:20:45.140 And in fact, if you rush in where angels fear to tread, you may trip yourself and lose prematurely, you know.

00:20:53.200 No, I think the science is out.

00:20:55.200 The landscape has changed dramatically, you know.

00:20:59.480 Even judges know what's, you know, they read and they listen.

00:21:05.680 I mean, it's not 18 months ago where anybody who criticized the mandates was a crackpot.

00:21:12.260 Yeah, you make a very good point.

00:21:14.980 And when we consider the judges as well, there's a lot of movement and press back against judges with the Canadian Judicial Council as well, bringing into question a breach of oath of the bench.

00:21:28.220 And, you know, I think judges are starting to have to even consider treading a little more carefully about how far they're going to be taking this in complying with whatever the government is requesting they're doing.

00:21:40.960 Because I don't think they're doing this of their own free will.

00:21:43.440 I think there's been pressure there on the judges.

00:21:45.780 Some obviously, willingly.

00:21:47.600 Yeah, it's the culture, too.

00:21:50.480 Look, Canadian society has always been more authority, respecting, and compliant in American society.

00:21:59.720 For instance, the case law coming out of the states, they are smacking the COVID measures left, right, and center.

00:22:06.000 The courts are.

00:22:07.260 But the Canadian courts are not so far.

00:22:09.880 It's a tougher slog.

00:22:11.600 We, by definition, you know, as I said to a federal court judge once, you know, where I alleged that a border officer had abused his authority and had exercised a depraved abusive process.

00:22:28.620 And we bantered back and forth with the judge on the issue.

00:22:32.100 And then finally I said, oh, my lord, I understand the problem that we're having in communicating.

00:22:37.920 He said, what?

00:22:38.900 It's an ethno-cultural one.

00:22:41.140 I said, you're of Anglo-Saxon extraction.

00:22:44.580 I'm of Southern Italian extraction.

00:22:46.520 When I see a man or woman in a uniform, I see a man or woman in a uniform.

00:22:50.960 They either honor that uniform or they disgrace it.

00:22:54.140 And he says, what do I see?

00:22:55.880 I said, you see a uniform.

00:22:57.380 Then you hear the brass bands, the bee feeders, and all the royal parade.

00:23:03.960 I don't see any of that.

00:23:05.000 And so you're more likely from an ethno-cultural point of view to just bow to authority and uniforms.

00:23:16.660 I'm not.

00:23:18.060 I won the case.

00:23:19.580 But he was taken aback by that.

00:23:21.100 But that's what's happening.

00:23:22.660 We have a culture that simply salutes authority at first instance without question.

00:23:28.820 The Americans overthrew their government, overthrew the king.

00:23:33.300 They take a different approach.

00:23:35.240 You have to justify your exercise of power down there.

00:23:38.720 I'm not saying they're perfect.

00:23:40.200 But that explains right now there's a lot of cases that are going against the government in the states on the COVID measures.

00:23:48.740 A slew of them.

00:23:49.500 Right.

00:23:50.360 And I believe the civil disobedience is key.

00:23:53.640 And that's what Action for Canada has been trying to do in creating these chapters across the nation in order to tell people what their guaranteed 100% rights are.

00:24:04.080 And as well equipping them.

00:24:05.400 We've had a lot of criticism over the notices of liability.

00:24:08.940 A notice of liability is just meant to inform somebody that what they're doing is causing harm or it's illegal.

00:24:14.640 In most instances regarding COVID and regarding the SOGI 123, it's both.

00:24:19.560 It's causing harm and illegal.

00:24:21.500 And what we found is that the people that are being served, they're getting lawyers involved.

00:24:26.620 Whether it's the unions, the government, they're all talking about our notices of liability.

00:24:30.820 So they are having a very legitimate impact.

00:24:33.580 And it is changing the direction of what's going on along with the legal action that we're doing with you.

00:24:40.060 Right.

00:24:40.620 That's right.

00:24:41.140 And, well, look at when Trudeau broke wind and said the following.

00:24:46.240 We live in a vibrant democratic country.

00:24:48.940 Democracy is very healthy in Canada.

00:24:51.480 But protesting, protesting outside against government policy is not allowed.

00:24:59.260 Well, when do you protest if you're not protesting against government policy?

00:25:03.700 You're protesting what?

00:25:05.060 You don't have enough rides at the Canadian National Exhibition?

00:25:08.020 I mean, you think of that statement.

00:25:10.280 He's the king of double speak. 0.99

00:25:12.260 Yeah, it's so asinine. 0.99

00:25:13.840 Everything he does. 0.93

00:25:15.680 I've actually got a book that I was going.

00:25:17.900 A couple of weeks ago, I recommended a book called The Doctrine of the Lesser Magistrates.

00:25:22.780 It's a must read.

00:25:23.520 It's awesome.

00:25:24.540 And this week I was going to recommend one.

00:25:26.540 It's called Why Trudeau is a Great Leader and Deserves Respect.

00:25:30.980 And it's Henry Maple, Ph.D., that wrote it.

00:25:34.080 And I highly recommend it.

00:25:35.580 I love my son.

00:25:36.700 He gave it to me for Christmas.

00:25:39.040 Oh, it's blank.

00:25:41.480 And it's empty, right?

00:25:43.800 You know, we have a saying in my language in Calabria about people like Justin Trudeau.

00:25:49.480 We say that boy is very lucky that he was born after his father.

00:25:55.920 Otherwise, he'd be nowhere.

00:25:58.020 Right.

00:25:58.740 Really, nowhere.

00:25:59.600 That's all he's got going for him.

00:26:02.160 No, there just wouldn't be.

00:26:04.220 Okay.

00:26:04.660 There wouldn't be anything.

00:26:05.500 Can I ask you?

00:26:07.620 I know a lot of people are very concerned about Federal Bill C-11 at the federal level and the

00:26:14.040 provincial bill here in B-C-36.

00:26:16.620 Could you comment on both of those?

00:26:18.980 I stick with the Section 52-1 of the Constitution, but love to hear where you are at it.

00:26:24.920 Well, with Bill C-36, I don't know if you want me to reveal.

00:26:28.720 I can.

00:26:28.980 Again, that's being challenged.

00:26:30.240 We're challenging that as part of our amendment to our claim.

00:26:34.000 That's the new draconian mandatory vaccination on health workers, if I'm correct. 0.99

00:26:40.620 That's the bill you're referring to and the idiotic penalty. 0.98

00:26:44.880 Now, I don't read the section that people are worried about the same way everybody else does. 0.98

00:26:49.520 There's a section that says if you utter false information with respect to health care and you're not a health care professional, that's simply a provision that is trying to prevent people who are not qualified from practicing medicine.

00:27:14.280 And that's I have no objection to that.

00:27:17.600 So if you're purporting to be a doctor and you're not a doctor, then you could be heavily fine.

00:27:22.380 And that's fine.

00:27:22.980 But the other one about mandatory vaccines for health care professionals is insane.

00:27:27.020 C-11, you're referring to the control of Internet content in that?

00:27:33.160 Is that what it is?

00:27:34.240 I haven't had time really to take a fine-tooth comb to that legislation.

00:27:39.780 And one of the reasons I've been slow to look at it is I don't think that that kind of draconian legislation against free speech is ever going to survive the Charter or the Constitution.

00:27:55.900 Right.

00:27:56.400 And that's where I would take it as well.

00:27:59.000 And so many people are concerned because even, you know, organizations like myself, if they don't like what we're saying, you know, then they can come and shut us down.

00:28:08.600 It's basically, you know, China 101 all over again in the censorship and what the government is telling you.

00:28:16.000 Just like what you said, you know, Trudeau is always like, you know, we're in a free and democratic society as long as you do what I say.

00:28:22.420 Yeah, that's right.

00:28:22.900 Right?

00:28:23.500 And it's funny you mentioned China.

00:28:25.000 You know, I'm just glancing quickly.

00:28:27.380 Boy, this chat really goes beyond the speed limit.

00:28:33.840 So what people are mentioning is 15-minute city.

00:28:36.560 You know, I lived in a 15-minute city off and on for five years when I was living in China with my first wife.

00:28:43.940 This is a Chinese concept.

00:28:46.720 Back then, they didn't have this massive transportation, so they were just starting off on their free market and capitalist system.

00:28:53.740 You had to live within two miles of where you worked.

00:28:57.100 That was the law in China.

00:28:59.340 Unless you lived in an industrial complex outside, in which case they housed you and fed you, you went there for your shifts and then you went back home.

00:29:07.580 So this is a Chinese concept.

00:29:09.520 It's a communist draconian concept.

00:29:12.400 Right.

00:29:12.660 You know, and here we are.

00:29:14.480 And I don't, and I want to pause before we talk about what you were slated to talk about in public inquiries and that.

00:29:22.080 I want to talk about the fact, and I mentioned this in the VCC statement of claim in 2020.

00:29:28.160 The juncture we're at now, Tanya, is, of course, we still have to fight these vaccines and masks because it's part of the psych war. 0.53

00:29:37.400 They keep coming back.

00:29:38.840 But they've done their damage.

00:29:40.840 All the misguided people who want the vaccines have already taken their second and third doses.

00:29:49.760 They're, you know, they've done the damage to those.

00:29:52.900 People who did not and will not ever vaccinate are never going to vaccinate.

00:29:57.020 So now with the public inquiry about the truckers and all of that and all the lawsuits that are coming down and all the analysis on the damage that the vaccines have done, that's where they're going to distract us for the next two or three years while they fully implement digital ID, digital currency, get rid of cash, 15 minute cities where the real fascist control is going to be implemented.

00:30:26.060 So people right now have to start fighting against that.

00:30:31.020 The vaccine damage will be dealt with in the lawsuits and all that.

00:30:35.980 But if people fixate on ruminating on the past, what's going on on the globalist agenda is going to be entrenched before people realize and then they'll wake up in two or three years to that nightmare.

00:30:49.960 And I want to share the following stats.

00:30:52.220 Yesterday, I went and because because I pled in the statement of claim three years ago that they're looking what the documents from the WEF and all of that were looking.

00:31:03.520 They they they said, ideally, the world's population by 2050 should should come down by five billion.

00:31:12.380 So when they put out that statement back 2017, I think it was before covid.

00:31:20.240 By 28, by the end of 2019, the start of covid in 2020, the all cause mortality around the world at the beginning of 2020 was 60 million for 2019.

00:31:32.320 Even with the brief introduction of the vaccines in late 2020, the the all cause mortality and because of the measures of the pandemic,

00:31:45.440 the all cause mortality for 2020 had gone from from 58 million in 2019 to 64 million for 2020.

00:31:58.080 It jumped to 68 or 69 million for 2021.

00:32:02.380 And last year, it jumped to 72 million.

00:32:04.840 And their magic number, their magic number, their magic number for 30 year period to get rid of five, four and a half, five billion people with the sterilization effect of the vaccines is 150 million all cause mortality in a year.

00:32:21.380 So they are slowly and quickly inching to that.

00:32:25.060 Once they get to that 20 years later, we have four and a half billion people less on the planet.

00:32:31.040 Right.

00:32:31.520 OK, and so as part of that agenda, yeah, as part of that agenda.

00:32:36.900 Now, of course, they're attributing the increase in deaths to covid rather than the vaccine, even though it defies the publication of how many people they say died of covid.

00:32:48.300 It's nowhere near.

00:32:49.100 So from from 19 from 2019 to 2022, that was a 22 percent increase, 22 percent in all cause mortality.

00:32:58.500 And only one thing explains the difference.

00:33:01.120 Mass vaccinations.

00:33:03.040 So so now they're moving on and people have to be mindful of, you know, elimination of cash and the digital the digital currency agenda and digital I.

00:33:13.560 That's what's going to really clinch us into into prison.

00:33:18.040 Right.

00:33:18.220 Right. And and servitude and slavery, really.

00:33:24.220 Right. And Rocco, and this is where I'm going to do another plug again for Action for Canada in our chapters is we are mobilizing.

00:33:31.200 I mean, look up the French resistance, my friends.

00:33:33.340 Take a look at what it took to overturn the government government's devious plans.

00:33:38.960 And it was that when you mobilize citizens.

00:33:42.340 Yeah. You know what?

00:33:43.220 You don't want to go out and stand on a side of a road and have a rally.

00:33:45.800 It is a physical presence.

00:33:47.720 But you're drawing people in.

00:33:49.420 We have our Action for Canada signs.

00:33:51.080 But then within the meetings, we are strategically fighting on behalf of our kids.

00:33:55.560 You know, the reason the fight on the front line for our kids, as well as going up against the the cities and and attending the city council meetings and attending the school trustee meetings is because those are the two locations that the government is using to control the future.

00:34:13.420 One is our kids in controlling their minds and marching out little fascists and little Marxists out of the school system and sterilizing them.

00:34:20.800 So that's a number one battle for us.

00:34:23.120 And we're having an incredible success rate.

00:34:25.340 If you don't know what we're what we're doing, Sheila, we'll put some links in the chat, get involved.

00:34:29.800 And the other side is we need you to go to every single school board meeting and press in against this, press in against all of this indigenous land rights and all of that crap, because it's all part of UNDRIP. 0.98

00:34:39.940 It has nothing to do with the rights of indigenous people and stop complying, stop even coming into agreement with all the seated territories. 0.91

00:34:48.120 When I start a rally or I go to a board meeting, I am saying I thank God and God alone for the ground that I'm standing on.

00:34:55.800 And you know what?

00:34:56.700 You have to find ways to fight this.

00:34:59.920 Go ahead.

00:35:00.260 Sorry.

00:35:00.500 And it's fought on the streets.

00:35:02.820 It's fought on the streets.

00:35:04.960 Court cases primarily draw attention and consciences to it.

00:35:08.460 But just on the point of a 15-minute city, you know, Oxford, England, well on the way to one of the first prototypes.

00:35:18.160 People have to know that it's being run right now, as we speak, as a pilot project in Edmonton.

00:35:23.480 And Toronto, for those who are familiar with Toronto, they've approved the 500-acre landmass that today comprises Downsview Airport to build a 15-minute city prototype within that land.

00:35:39.660 They're going to build an entire encircled community, you know?

00:35:45.300 Well...

00:35:45.820 Well, you can't go anywhere outside unless you walk.

00:35:49.640 Right.

00:35:51.040 You know, the power is in the people.

00:35:52.800 And I'll give you, you know, an idea, my friends, as to how it works.

00:35:55.880 Is they were going to do a smart city.

00:35:57.320 I want to say it was in Ontario.

00:35:58.720 It was pre-COVID.

00:35:59.920 And they had all the plans.

00:36:01.340 They had signed up.

00:36:02.180 They'd received their millions of dollars for a smart city where they'd have automatic robots picking up garbage and all the rest of it.

00:36:09.020 And because of the amount of public backlash, it got nixed.

00:36:13.060 All right?

00:36:13.500 And I saw a video.

00:36:15.160 I think it might have been.

00:36:16.260 It was in the UK where they were doing a smart city.

00:36:18.360 And they had dug a hole in the ground where they'd put the pole.

00:36:21.860 There was barriers.

00:36:22.860 And then they could remove this pole and let people, you know, pass if for whatever, you know, they received a permission from the city to travel outside of the 15 minutes.

00:36:32.100 People came out and filled it with concrete.

00:36:34.800 Right?

00:36:35.320 I mean, civil disobedience.

00:36:37.320 Get involved.

00:36:38.640 We've got to take down these 5G towers.

00:36:40.800 And, of course, apart from China where they had the system, they didn't have to enforce that people complied.

00:36:48.260 Where did we see smart cities before?

00:36:51.380 Apartheid South African. 0.93

00:36:53.520 With the passes, you need permission to go from one part of the town to another if you were black. 0.94

00:36:58.140 But now it's going to be everybody, you know?

00:37:00.620 Right.

00:37:01.740 And, you know, we had tremendous success in the summer.

00:37:05.420 People were like, oh, I can't, you know, get into or get back home from the United States.

00:37:09.320 And so we started a notice of liability.

00:37:11.540 And it was based on the Constitution, the criminal code, and the charter rights.

00:37:15.040 Well, wouldn't you know, people who were brave enough were approaching the border guards and saying, I don't comply, and I have a right, and here's my passport, I'm a free citizen.

00:37:25.220 And I'm not talking about freaky common law.

00:37:28.320 I'm saying that I have the freedom, according to the charter, to move freely.

00:37:32.620 And I have the freedom to enter Canada.

00:37:35.240 And wouldn't you know we're winning?

00:37:36.820 And people are winning in the courts right now with their tickets.

00:37:39.460 It all comes down to they can wave their little magic wand and tell people, you know, what their rules are.

00:37:47.100 But if it's not in line with the Constitution and the Charter of Rights, those are 100% guaranteed rights for you.

00:37:52.880 And one of the reasons that they're flooding us with immigrants from China and nations where they are used to living under tyranny is because they're true afraid to stand up. 1.00

00:38:02.740 So my Chinese friends, my friends, you stand up.

00:38:06.960 You're in a free country.

00:38:07.800 And, you know, you are free when you withdraw your consent to be governed by the state and be governed by the Constitution.

00:38:19.220 That's it.

00:38:20.200 Just on a chat note here, Tanya, I see quite a few people asking, is Rocco going to be able to answer questions?

00:38:28.060 And the answer is yes.

00:38:29.700 I'll take questions, but I don't guarantee I'll answer all of them, meaning some questions I refuse to answer.

00:38:35.900 But go ahead.

00:38:36.460 OK. And so what I'm going to do is I've got my team sending me emails, sorry, messages with questions that we that are coming out of the Q&A.

00:38:45.920 So we're going to try and hit as many as possible.

00:38:48.000 When we go live, we're having a lot of people having trouble with putting their Zoom mic on.

00:38:52.460 So let me see what I can get through here first.

00:38:54.280 And then if we get to time to do lives, we'll do that.

00:38:56.600 Don't we want to talk about inquiries before we do that?

00:38:59.580 Yes, we do want to talk about inquiries as well.

00:39:03.080 So about the government inquiries and the truckers' convoy, I know a lot of people have put a lot of weight on those.

00:39:10.380 But how do you feel about a government inquiry?

00:39:12.580 Well, you know, if you let me if you let me five minutes to explain so I can give the sort of the lay of land of what inquiries are and what they're not.

00:39:23.800 So there are different there are different types of inquiries in our in our political and legal system.

00:39:32.220 The first one is legislative inquiries where the legislative body itself conducts the inquiry.

00:39:40.340 So we've seen those like parliamentary committee inquiries.

00:39:43.840 And in the states, congressional or senatorial inquiries.

00:39:47.160 Those those inquiries, the rules are set by the legislative house, not by the executive, not by the president, not by the prime minister.

00:39:57.000 They're bipartisan.

00:39:58.780 Different parties have a right to participate in those inquiries.

00:40:02.980 Then you have two other types of inquiries, which are inquiries under the various inquiries act where a commission of inquiry is is is is is chosen.

00:40:14.040 And you have royal commission inquiries, commission commissions.

00:40:18.960 They're very similar.

00:40:20.880 And the the the important thing about those as opposed to legislative inquiries is they're struck by the executive.

00:40:28.900 Not only are they is the commissioner or the commission members chosen by the executive, the government.

00:40:36.640 But the terms of the inquiry are not free ranging.

00:40:41.080 They are set by the government and they cannot exceed the terms of those that the inquiry.

00:40:47.880 So it's the government that don't not only sets the terms of the the inquiry, but also chooses the person who's going to conduct the inquiry.

00:40:57.920 They're not they're not as democratic as a legislative inquiry.

00:41:02.340 So, for instance, right now in the States, Japan, I think, and a few other Western countries, they've struck legislative inquiries on the harm that the vaccines have caused.

00:41:14.840 OK, so the third the third type of inquiry that that exists is a good old fashioned police investigation.

00:41:23.400 And that that that is more impartial than any of the other two, because the other three, rather, are political in nature.

00:41:32.120 OK, so here's the problem.

00:41:34.600 Now, dealing with executive struck public inquiries, it's been my view, my strong view as a constitutional lawyer, as an observer of inquiries over the 34 years I've been practicing law, that most government, virtually most government inquiries serve two purposes.

00:41:59.040 One is to whitewash the wrongdoing of government officials and to ignore actually dealing with the problem of the wrongdoing of the officials.

00:42:10.800 And two, more sinister is that by issuing subpoenas to these government wrongdoers, they're immunized from criminal prosecution from any of the evidence they give or any of the derivative evidence coming from what the evidence they they gave.

00:42:30.580 So if you're a smart witness who's done something wrong, you admit to it at the inquiry because they can't prosecute it for you.

00:42:36.740 They can't prosecute you for. And the reason for that is Section 13 of the Charter.

00:42:42.560 And I'll read it to you then. Section 13 of the Charter says, and it's it's a subentitled self-incrimination.

00:42:49.700 A witness who testifies in any proceeding has the right not to have any incriminating evidence so given used to incriminate that witness in any other proceeding except in a prosecution for perjury.

00:43:06.900 So that means if somebody goes up there and says, yeah, yeah, I broke the criminal code, I committed criminal offenses in a public inquiry and the subpoena, they can never be charged for that offense.

00:43:18.800 You got it?

00:43:19.560 So that's why we have these public inquiries and moreover, the really cynical idea of striking a public inquiry as a smoke and mirror to give the misimpression that you're actually doing something about the problem.

00:43:38.300 How many missing indigenous women inquiries have we had? We've had three and then we had a fourth aborted one.

00:43:46.100 What have they done with the problem of missing indigenous women, including not charging all the police officers who just shrugged it off and refused to investigate?

00:43:56.880 They've done nothing.

00:43:57.740 The problem is not going away.

00:44:01.040 Three and a half inquiries and nothing has happened.

00:44:04.280 But people get the impression, oh, yeah, they're dealing with it.

00:44:06.980 What else do these missing murdered women want and their families? 1.00

00:44:11.180 So that's the problem with public inquiries.

00:44:13.660 I have no time or need for it.

00:44:16.580 You know, they don't do anything.

00:44:17.860 Now, I think a lot of people now are talking about citizens' inquiry and inquiries, and you asked me if I can comment about them.

00:44:29.940 Again, a citizen's inquiry, while it sounds great, also has pitfalls to it because a citizen's inquiry is no more than a podcast.

00:44:45.300 Okay?

00:44:45.820 It's got no legal effect.

00:44:47.720 It binds no one.

00:44:49.320 But when you structure it to make it look like an actual inquiry, there's a lot of people out there who think it's for real.

00:44:57.360 So the perfect example I have, and I've seen it no less than seven times on this chat, Nuremberg 2.0, right?

00:45:08.520 What is that?

00:45:09.100 It came out of Reiner out in Germany, and I used to get hate mail when he did his citizens.

00:45:16.300 He didn't call it a citizens' inquiry.

00:45:18.000 When he struck his inquiry, I used to get hate mail saying, why aren't you doing something like Reiner over in Germany and conducting prosecutions for crimes against humanity?

00:45:31.300 And I said, show me where he's doing that.

00:45:34.240 All he's got is a masqueraded citizens' inquiry.

00:45:39.440 Right.

00:45:40.280 Right?

00:45:40.860 I don't know if you remember all the stuff on Internet.

00:45:44.660 They were thinking he was actually doing prosecutions.

00:45:47.680 He's there with his team of commissioners, interviewing people, giving testimony.

00:45:53.980 Well, he was not conducting anything official.

00:45:58.180 Okay.

00:45:59.000 Am I saying that there's no value in that?

00:46:01.660 No.

00:46:02.720 It could educate people.

00:46:04.160 It could draw attention to the problem.

00:46:06.160 But you've got to be very careful how you put it over, because people are actually thinking you're doing something,

00:46:12.040 and they sit at home waiting for you to solve the problem, instead of taking their own action in their own backyard.

00:46:18.380 So I've never had any time whatsoever for a citizen's inquiry, because the very title is misleading.

00:46:28.180 It gives it an air of officiality that it doesn't have, and it gives it an air that somebody's doing something with the problem.

00:46:36.040 So, and past the point of providing useful information, it's not an inquiry.

00:46:43.080 Okay?

00:46:44.240 Right.

00:46:44.680 They have no subpoena power.

00:46:46.600 Yeah.

00:46:46.840 Huh?

00:46:47.220 I appreciate you clarifying this, Rocco, because there's a lot of pressure for myself to support.

00:46:54.100 There's a citizen inquiry going on in Canada, and I haven't had a lot of time to look into it.

00:46:58.860 But, you know, we're very busy with our action and other things that we're doing, so I always wish others all the best.

00:47:04.880 But I understand, you know, that they want to raise a million dollars for it, and Brian Peckford has been quite vocal lately,

00:47:12.760 because he was a director and he's pulled out, because Preston Manning is in a position where he's taken $250,000 from the Alberta government on an inquiry.

00:47:24.780 And so I know there's some controversy there, and I just feel bad for people that, you know, they're desperate,

00:47:29.920 and they're trusting people when they're donating their funds.

00:47:32.160 And, you know, it's just really important to sometimes have these conversations, just to clarify it for people,

00:47:38.440 so then they can make a decision.

00:47:39.920 If people want to support this, absolutely support it.

00:47:43.060 But make sure that you're going in being informed on what it is that, you know, you're partaking in, participating in.

00:47:51.120 Everybody needs hope right now.

00:47:52.600 And I know that we know that we wear that ourselves at Action for Canada in this case, too, with our case.

00:47:59.480 And don't get me wrong, and I don't want your listeners to misunderstand.

00:48:04.020 I'm not saying don't participate or don't watch Citizens Inquiry.

00:48:07.880 But I'm saying understand what they are in essence, okay?

00:48:15.420 They're not what they're put out to be.

00:48:17.980 And I know that from the misapprehension of all those people who sent me hate mail that I wasn't prosecuting like Reiner.

00:48:28.680 And I said, Reiner's not prosecuting anything.

00:48:33.480 He's got some colleagues and friends who are bringing forward information, but he structured it as if it were a court proceeding.

00:48:40.000 And it's not.

00:48:41.460 Right.

00:48:41.920 And I know that you had a lot of...

00:48:43.420 You know, for a lawyer, that shouldn't be happening.

00:48:47.780 You should be more transparent and clear about what you're actually doing.

00:48:51.960 I think he cleaned up his act in part because people are saying, listen, you're giving people the wrong impression here.

00:48:57.660 People think, you know, and I had a call to him, and I said, you're giving people the wrong impression.

00:49:03.560 I'm getting hate mail.

00:49:04.920 They think you're running an actual prosecution.

00:49:07.240 I say, where the hell do they get that idea?

00:49:09.680 Well, I said, look at your videos.

00:49:11.620 That's where, right?

00:49:13.780 He was astounded that people thought that.

00:49:16.300 Yet he's not aware of what he's putting across.

00:49:18.940 And of course everybody thought that.

00:49:21.480 You know?

00:49:22.080 Well, again, it's a matter of wanting hope in something, right?

00:49:24.880 And why is Reiner Fulmich going full bore, Rocco?

00:49:27.700 And you're still sitting on some fence having, you know, a nice drink or eating bonbons and...

00:49:36.140 Okay.

00:49:36.740 Listen, don't get me wrong.

00:49:37.580 I like Reiner.

00:49:39.520 I respect what he does.

00:49:41.020 Okay?

00:49:41.520 For what it is.

00:49:43.280 Okay?

00:49:43.860 But you shouldn't even innocently lead people up a hope-filled garden path is what I'm saying.

00:49:52.260 Okay?

00:49:53.300 So that's all I got to say about inquiries, unless you have any questions.

00:49:58.500 Nope.

00:49:58.900 That's good.

00:49:59.680 Let's fire off and get into the questions.

00:50:02.000 I see there's like 60 there.

00:50:03.480 I don't know how we'll get through them all.

00:50:04.780 But thanks.

00:50:05.340 You've already said you're going to be generous with your time.

00:50:08.900 Yeah.

00:50:09.120 It's a longer evening for you than me.

00:50:10.980 So don't feel guilty.

00:50:12.360 Go ahead.

00:50:13.420 All right.

00:50:14.400 All right.

00:50:14.920 I haven't really read these in advance.

00:50:16.900 So I'll read the question.

00:50:18.100 And if you decide to answer, say pass next one.

00:50:20.260 Two caveats.

00:50:20.600 I will not answer any fact-specific questions that go to some person's personal.

00:50:27.540 I can't do that.

00:50:29.240 Do you understand?

00:50:30.660 Yeah.

00:50:30.900 Perfect.

00:50:31.380 So if somebody has a question, I did this and this happened to me, what should I do?

00:50:35.400 I will not answer that.

00:50:37.300 It's improper for me as a lawyer over the screen to do that.

00:50:41.000 Okay?

00:50:41.280 And I will not answer anything that will divulge solicitor-client litigation strategy.

00:50:48.220 Okay.

00:50:48.520 With that caveat, go ahead.

00:50:50.320 So no legal advice being given tonight.

00:50:52.500 Okay.

00:50:53.160 No.

00:50:53.460 All right.

00:50:53.820 Will Canadian citizens have to submit to digital IDs, as the PM has discussed with all premiers

00:51:01.000 recently, in order to access health services and to travel in Canada or abroad?

00:51:06.320 If yes, what is each citizen's recourse to fight this?

00:51:10.680 I think we've kind of answered that already.

00:51:12.840 Well, you refuse at every turn.

00:51:15.500 You protest.

00:51:16.980 And obviously, I anticipate we'll be taking legal challenge to that.

00:51:21.960 Okay.

00:51:22.560 But resistance on the ground is more effective.

00:51:27.060 And the earlier the resistance, the better.

00:51:31.240 Okay.

00:51:33.280 This one was regarding the NOLs, but you can answer that.

00:51:36.740 I've heard the NOLs don't have actual legal authority.

00:51:39.960 Are they actually a legal weapon we can use?

00:51:43.660 Okay.

00:51:44.060 The term NOL is confusing because in certain Western provinces like BC and Alberta, a notice

00:51:56.200 of liability is an actual legal document that you file in court.

00:52:01.200 It is the equivalent of a statement of claim in Ontario or Quebec.

00:52:06.160 If you're not filing it in the court, no, it doesn't trigger a legal proceeding, but it puts

00:52:12.320 the other side on notice that you may be legally liable up the road, and we may.

00:52:17.200 So as a tool of communicating an objection and making a stand and telling people, hey,

00:52:24.280 in my view, this is what you're doing.

00:52:26.060 That's against the law.

00:52:27.220 Of course, it's a valid notice.

00:52:29.260 Yeah.

00:52:29.660 But it doesn't have any legal effect in the sense that until you file the actual notice

00:52:34.320 of liability in court, the people you're handing it to don't have to directly answer.

00:52:39.260 But as you said, they're reacting.

00:52:41.960 They're calling their lawyers because it's affecting them.

00:52:45.200 It's disturbing their sleep, which is good.

00:52:48.900 Which is good.

00:52:49.460 It's a good thing.

00:52:51.200 Right.

00:52:51.920 And the key is it can be used if you do decide to go and take legal action.

00:52:57.400 You can have evidence that you fully inform them that what they were doing was either

00:53:01.380 causing harm or illegal.

00:53:03.160 They can't pretend.

00:53:04.160 I had never heard of this complaint before.

00:53:06.020 That's the point.

00:53:06.760 Yeah.

00:53:07.300 Right.

00:53:07.660 That's the other effect of use.

00:53:09.800 All right.

00:53:10.120 And I want to apologize.

00:53:11.160 Somebody said, Tanya, quit interrupting Rocco when you were speaking earlier.

00:53:14.460 But sometimes there's a pause and I think you've stopped talking.

00:53:18.200 So I go to speak.

00:53:19.880 So my apologies if that's coming across as me interrupting Rocco.

00:53:24.260 Well, you have a hard time winning and interrupting with a Southern Italian. 1.00

00:53:28.580 Let me tell you.

00:53:29.280 They don't understand.

00:53:30.980 I need to interrupt to get a word in.

00:53:32.920 Come on.

00:53:33.480 That's true.

00:53:35.780 Okay.

00:53:38.020 You're fun.

00:53:38.900 I love you.

00:53:39.680 Okay.

00:53:40.120 Do you trust the judicial system?

00:53:42.440 I fear many judges have been compromised and corrupted with payoffs or threats.

00:53:47.680 I don't think they've been at all corrupted with payoffs or threats.

00:53:53.020 First of all, they're handsomely paid.

00:53:55.540 Okay.

00:53:55.860 Second of all, I think they've been corrupted by their own cultural bent and fear.

00:54:04.840 But it's not intentional.

00:54:06.700 It's not because the government has told them decide this way or the other way.

00:54:10.720 It's because they're overly conservative.

00:54:13.260 I've said it.

00:54:14.060 I filed a factum in the divisional court that says, and we're getting heard on March 30th,

00:54:20.880 that said that the divisional court is exuding a palatable and visible bias towards the CPSO,

00:54:29.480 the regulator, against doctors on all COVID-19 related litigation.

00:54:34.140 And I've said that what the divisional court has decided and how it's decided drags the administration of justice into disrepute.

00:54:40.800 I don't think they've been bribed or threatened into that.

00:54:46.480 It's just that they're acting like a lot of the population out of fear.

00:54:50.960 Okay.

00:54:52.200 So I will not say that they've been paid off because I don't think that they have.

00:54:57.300 I will not say that they got threatened because some judges have ruled in favor.

00:55:01.300 They've been overturned, but they've ruled in favor of a rational analysis of what's going on.

00:55:06.660 But I think they're just afraid and they say, we don't want to decide public health.

00:55:10.820 Let the public health people decide, which is very dangerous.

00:55:13.560 In doing so, they're ignoring binding jurisprudence from the Supreme Court of Canada and pretending it doesn't exist.

00:55:19.680 That's corruption in the sense of they're breaching their oath as judges.

00:55:26.140 But it's not an intentional corruption as we know it.

00:55:29.660 Okay.

00:55:30.200 They're just being, and this is not new, when they don't like where the law takes them, some of them, you know, the courts simply are dishonest with the law.

00:55:44.800 Right.

00:55:45.240 You know, and, you know, and people say, oh, you can't say that you get in trouble with the law society.

00:55:49.940 Well, I can say that because the Judicial Council guidelines say that bias and breach of their oath to act impartially is grounds for removal as a judge.

00:56:02.340 So we know it happens if it's grounds for removal.

00:56:05.320 Otherwise, they wouldn't have that in the Judicial Council's code of conduct for judges.

00:56:10.140 The CJC just recommended on December 22nd that a judge be removed.

00:56:18.180 So it does happen.

00:56:19.980 This would be a good time to ask, then, the question, talking about this, because it says, just for the public, so they know, what does it mean when the court takes judicial notice?

00:56:29.740 And can you give some examples in the context?

00:56:33.840 Okay.

00:56:35.880 Judicial notice is taken in very rare circumstances.

00:56:40.140 Normally, pre-COVID, everything changes with COVID.

00:56:44.800 Judicial notice is something that a court can accept it as evidence on matters of notorious facts that are known and non-disputed.

00:56:57.540 So, for instance, the courts have taken judicial notice of the fact that the Holocaust happened in World War II.

00:57:04.640 You no longer have to prove judicial notice of the fact that the Holocaust happened. 0.67

00:57:11.020 If you were counting how many people perished in the Holocaust, if that was an issue for whatever bizarre reason, then you'd have to prove that.

00:57:18.680 Okay?

00:57:19.280 I can't see that ever being an issue.

00:57:21.180 So, the courts are now bypassing the rules and requirement of evidence.

00:57:28.180 The leading case on judicial notice is Regina versus Find, F-I-N-D, where Chief Justice McLaughlin said, you can take judicial notice of notorious events.

00:57:41.900 So, for instance, you can take judicial notice, and they have, that the WHO declared a global pandemic for COVID-19,

00:57:50.280 and that the governments, federal and provincial, declared a COVID-19 pandemic.

00:57:56.200 What Regina versus Find said very clearly is you cannot take judicial notice of a scientific fact.

00:58:05.620 And so now, with the COVID, these courts are getting lazy, and they're outrageously taking, some of them, judicial notice, that the vaccine is effective and safe.

00:58:16.700 That's a scientific fact, which is belied by the fact that if you can take judicial notice of that, that they're effective and safe,

00:58:26.580 you can take judicial notice that they're not for a good number of people because they've implemented a COVID-19 vaccine compensation fund.

00:58:37.180 So, the government of Canada has conceded that these vaccines in some people will cause injury or death.

00:58:43.600 So, this is where the courts are going.

00:58:47.160 So, for instance, you cannot take judicial notice of any scientific fact, only events.

00:58:55.880 You can take judicial notice that the government has approved the temporary inoculation as being effective and safe.

00:59:02.960 That doesn't make it so.

00:59:05.440 That has to be, if you're contesting that statement by the government, you're entitled to call evidence and say, no, this is not true.

00:59:12.040 So, another famous case that was dealt with judicial notice was a refugee case in which the Federal Court of Appeal, with respect to a Ghanaian claimant,

00:59:25.220 he testified at the hearing that they surreptitiously, slowly, over months and months, created a hole in their cell,

00:59:34.920 which was located on the exterior wall of the prison.

00:59:39.600 And they escaped at night through that hole one night, four of them.

00:59:44.320 And the panel asked them, how big was the hole?

00:59:48.380 And the guy raised the sand and said, what about the size of a soccer ball?

00:59:52.300 And the decision came down and said, we find a complete lie.

00:59:55.520 It's completely incompatible.

00:59:57.140 We take judicial notice of the fact that no human being can fit through a hole the size of a soccer ball.

01:00:07.140 And the Federal Court of Appeal said, you can't take judicial notice of that.

01:00:11.720 What size soccer ball did the guy envisage when he said a soccer ball?

01:00:16.620 They didn't ask for the dimensions of the soccer ball.

01:00:19.060 How big was this guy?

01:00:20.640 Was he thin vat?

01:00:22.340 Was he able to contort his body in a way to fit through that hole?

01:00:25.380 So without all these surrounding facts, you can't just blanket say, nobody can fit through a hole the size of a soccer ball.

01:00:35.080 Now, that's how rare judicial notice is.

01:00:38.100 Okay?

01:00:38.500 You can't take notice of physical facts like that, scientific facts.

01:00:43.340 But the courts in COVID, mostly in family cases, are taking judicial notice.

01:00:48.320 But the irony is that in family cases, they all make it clear that we're not deciding whether the children should be vaccinated or not.

01:00:57.620 We're deciding which parent gets to decide, which is really a fig leaf, right?

01:01:04.260 Which is a fig leaf.

01:01:05.440 So judicial notice, in the COVID context, has the potential to throw the entire system of law and rule of law out the window.

01:01:22.100 Yeah, it's a concern.

01:01:22.980 I take judicial notice that if X percentage of people in prison are this race, then I take judicial notice that you're likely guilty. 1.00

01:01:34.340 Right? 1.00

01:01:35.920 That kind of shit, right? 1.00

01:01:37.520 Yeah. 1.00

01:01:37.940 So somebody clearly understands this act of the judicial notice.

01:01:42.820 It's when something is so obvious that the court won't debate on it.

01:01:46.160 Example, the sky is blue.

01:01:48.080 The sky is blue.

01:01:49.020 We're not going to have another conversation about this.

01:01:50.900 So they're taking that, and in these cases, they're saying the COVID vaccine is safe.

01:01:57.300 The sky is blue.

01:01:58.340 The COVID vaccine is safe.

01:02:00.460 So, you know, this is not up for debate in the court.

01:02:03.420 And is this, I mean, there must be a way, the only way, I'm thinking, is to bring in expert witnesses to counter this in the court systems.

01:02:13.320 And I don't think individuals, such as a single mother, has the opportunity, you know, to get a woman out expert witnesses. 1.00

01:02:21.320 Especially when they're self-represented.

01:02:23.840 Right.

01:02:24.060 Okay?

01:02:24.520 So that's a good example you raised, because you know the sky is not blue.

01:02:28.960 Okay.

01:02:30.180 There we go.

01:02:31.500 The sky, as a result of the sun piercing through it and through the atmosphere, gives the impression that the sky is blue.

01:02:39.440 There's no color to the sky.

01:02:40.560 As the water is not blue, because it's reflecting the light from the sky.

01:02:44.320 Look, the sky.

01:02:44.920 So, too, the sky is not blue.

01:02:47.100 Okay.

01:02:47.580 I'll tell you another example.

01:02:50.420 Okay.

01:02:50.780 So I'll tell you another example, a real example of a case I argued in federal court on judicial notice.

01:02:57.140 And I was saying, you know, the panel couldn't take judicial notice of this.

01:03:01.900 And I was giving the trial judge the example of the soccer ball from the federal court of appeal.

01:03:07.260 And he was bound by federal court of appeal.

01:03:09.760 And I, like this judge, we used to get into these arguments.

01:03:12.440 He was, like me, he was, you know, visceral, hot, you know, hot-tempered.

01:03:16.140 And so he says, well, yeah, you know, I said, judicial notice is extremely rare.

01:03:21.960 And I read him the law.

01:03:22.860 He says, oh, yeah, but, like, you can check.

01:03:25.540 There's a lot of things you can take judicial notice, such as the day and time on the calendar.

01:03:34.800 I said, well, in most cases you can.

01:03:36.980 He says, what do you mean?

01:03:38.000 Well, if the issue is when is the contract signed remotely between Tokyo and Toronto,

01:03:44.820 you're dealing with two different calendar dates because of the time zone differences, right?

01:03:51.080 Okay?

01:03:51.660 So if it has to be signed by a certain date and the contract is governed by Ontario law,

01:03:57.960 you may be out of time unless it's governed by Japanese law, right?

01:04:02.100 He said, okay, okay, well, you know, the directions of the earth, north, south, east, west,

01:04:06.700 I said, mostly you can take judicial notice of that.

01:04:09.680 He says, when can I not take judicial notice of north, south, east, west?

01:04:14.300 I said, if you're standing in the Arctic Circle, there is no east-west.

01:04:18.160 Every direction is south.

01:04:19.620 And if you're standing on the Antarctic Circle, there is no east-west either.

01:04:23.400 Everything is north, right?

01:04:25.240 And so he starts getting exasperated, right?

01:04:29.060 And then he says to me, okay, you know, both, you know, you say there's two sides of every coin.

01:04:37.380 You're the kind of guy, he says to me, if I point one to one side of the coin, you point to the second side.

01:04:44.520 So luckily I had a loony in my pocket.

01:04:46.920 And I said, well, on that point, my lord, I held up the rim.

01:04:50.200 I said, a coin has three sides.

01:04:53.140 The third side prevents the two other sides from looking at each other.

01:04:57.560 And he lost it and he recessed for a coffee and he came back and he turned to the crown attorney and said, yeah, what about this judicial notice?

01:05:07.660 They couldn't do this, right?

01:05:09.760 So, I mean, there's simple examples, right?

01:05:12.720 There's simple examples.

01:05:14.020 But pre-COVID, that's how rare judicial notice is, okay?

01:05:21.240 You cannot take anything that's physical or scientific as a fact without evidence.

01:05:29.080 Right.

01:05:29.260 How can you determine that a vaccine in your body is safe on judicial notice just on the statement that the government says it's safe?

01:05:40.340 I remember when the government for three years, despite cries to the contrary, saying, philinomide is safe.

01:05:48.780 Right.

01:05:49.300 Do you remember that?

01:05:50.360 How many children were born with no limbs?

01:05:53.200 Mm-hmm.

01:05:54.140 Because the government said it's safe?

01:05:56.240 Was it so?

01:05:57.340 No.

01:05:58.500 No.

01:05:59.200 So.

01:05:59.440 This is brilliant, Rocco.

01:06:01.240 And this is why I call you the top constitutional lawyer and go on and on about you and to all the naysayers.

01:06:06.360 I mean, they've just got to watch this show because you are brilliant and you bring that to the courts.

01:06:12.620 And this is, you know, why I truly believe that we're going to have success.

01:06:16.720 We have those expert witnesses to come in and challenge the courts on this.

01:06:21.480 And you're just going to blow them away.

01:06:23.040 Okay.

01:06:23.220 Let me see if I can get through some of these more questions, some more of them.

01:06:26.680 Okay.

01:06:26.860 Is it, no, somebody's asking if there's someone they can speak to in your office, if they have questions, phone number and contact name.

01:06:37.240 Shall we make that available right now?

01:06:39.560 I'm in the book.

01:06:40.540 They can look me up and call.

01:06:41.860 There you go.

01:06:43.040 Okay.

01:06:43.860 Okay.

01:06:44.360 So something just happened.

01:06:45.500 Is there, okay.

01:06:46.420 Is it consequential that the provincial representatives in Quebec no longer need to pledge allegiance to the monarch before taking office?

01:06:55.360 Should we worry about the swift manner in which the change was adopted?

01:07:00.340 And why does Quebec seem to have powers other provinces do not enjoy?

01:07:06.160 Well, it's not true that they have other provinces they do not enjoy.

01:07:10.300 Anyway, I actually salute Premier Daniel Smith in Alberta.

01:07:19.860 That's Alberta, though. 0.58

01:07:20.860 We're talking about Quebec here.

01:07:22.440 No, I don't.

01:07:23.140 No, I point this out because she enacted the Sovereignty Act, which I've read.

01:07:29.180 And contrary to all the Federalist monkeys and parrots, I think it's totally constitution.

01:07:35.040 We have in Canada a system of division of power, right?

01:07:39.160 And so certain offices require allegiance to Her Majesty to take your office, but that's completely legislative.

01:07:49.660 The government of the province or the federal government could remove that requirement.

01:07:54.100 It's not a constitutional requirement to take an allegiance to Her Majesty or His Majesty and right of the Queen either.

01:08:03.760 Okay.

01:08:04.280 It's not a constitutional requirement.

01:08:07.140 It's imposed by legislation.

01:08:10.140 So, for instance, I'll tell you, I was involved in the movement to remove the requirement of lawyers to have to take an allegiance to Her Majesty to be lawyers.

01:08:22.240 Because I felt if we had to have an allegiance, it should be the Constitution.

01:08:25.680 Because the Constitution applies.

01:08:26.920 That's against Her Majesty.

01:08:27.640 So, why am I taking allegiance to Her Majesty when I often fight Her Majesty?

01:08:32.860 So, we failed in our bid in court.

01:08:40.460 But in my call at the bar, before my call, they used to, every individual lawyer has to take a quick oath.

01:08:47.780 And since they did a joint oath with all 600 students getting called to the bar, and my graduating class at the bar was the first and last to swear allegiance to Freddie Mercury and Queen.

01:09:07.560 We didn't say Her Majesty the Queen.

01:09:09.420 We swore allegiance to the Queen.

01:09:12.100 Okay.

01:09:12.680 They later removed that requirement that the Law Society, because they realized it was problematic.

01:09:18.380 How can you swear allegiance to the monarch and be expected to fight the monarch in that particular context of being a lawyer?

01:09:27.020 So, people do not anymore have to swear allegiance to the Queen to be called to the bar.

01:09:32.720 Okay.

01:09:33.060 So, it's not a constitutional requirement.

01:09:35.340 So, Quebec has the right to do that.

01:09:37.600 Now, Daniel Smith, they're saying she can't order her provincial officials to ignore federal law.

01:09:43.820 I say that's not true if the feds are encroaching on exclusive provincial jurisdiction.

01:09:48.800 She has a right to stay off the status quo until they go to court and get a declaration on a reference whether she's – her provincial officials are bound by this federal law, which the province says, hey, you're entrenching on our jurisdiction under Section 92.

01:10:03.700 Because we don't have a unitary state in Canada.

01:10:07.020 We have a state of sovereign provinces with exclusive jurisdiction in their own spheres to the feds and vice versa.

01:10:16.140 It's a federation.

01:10:17.000 It's not a unitary country.

01:10:20.240 So, we have his majesty and right of Canada, but then we have his majesty and right of the provinces.

01:10:25.200 Each province has a different fictional majesty in accordance with their heads of power under the Constitution.

01:10:32.380 So, I think it's nothing more than a political statement.

01:10:36.420 I don't think it changes anything.

01:10:38.000 Quebec is still bound by the charter.

01:10:40.020 The courts have ruled that time and again.

01:10:42.540 So, it doesn't really change much.

01:10:45.280 Right?

01:10:45.720 And they have the right to do that.

01:10:47.820 Provincially, they can say these offices don't require allegiance to the Queen anymore.

01:10:52.480 Right.

01:10:53.000 Okay.

01:10:53.340 And if you think about it, not to – I don't want to be American, but I think after the Constitution came in where it says in the Constitution,

01:11:00.400 this Constitution binds Her Majesty the Queen, then everybody who's the highest power in Canada, not the Queen anymore, it's the Constitution.

01:11:10.820 So, we should all be swearing public office in allegiance with the Constitution.

01:11:16.180 Because if you're a public office holder, you don't follow Her Majesty's lead.

01:11:21.560 You have to be directed by constitutional requirements, even a police officer.

01:11:27.980 So, you don't swear allegiance to Her Majesty because she's putting in the laws that are unconstitutional that you're helping her breach against private citizens.

01:11:36.080 So, I think the oath of office should be switched to allegiance to the Constitution.

01:11:41.400 The police officer's oath now says that they're going to uphold the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

01:11:49.260 They swear to that, which is right.

01:11:51.720 So, I know all you loyalists out there, you know, are saddened by the idea that Her Majesty is gone and His Majesty is not going to have the power he did,

01:12:03.080 but it's just the evolving nature of our society.

01:12:05.820 It changed in 1982 when we patriated our Constitution.

01:12:09.920 Well, that's correct as well.

01:12:12.060 And is this where I was talking about this book about the doctrine of the lesser magistrates?

01:12:16.380 Because it clearly says that someone like Daniel Smith, that people have a duty, officers have a duty, elected officials have a duty,

01:12:24.660 that when the federal government or anybody is asking to do something that is illegal or in violation of our Charter and Constitution,

01:12:31.160 they have a duty to not be complicit with it.

01:12:34.600 Right.

01:12:35.220 And so, somebody had said in the chat that Quebec...

01:12:38.060 But it's even more pronounced, Daniel.

01:12:39.940 I'm sorry.

01:12:40.200 But it's even more pronounced when it deals with laws that entrench on exclusive provincial jurisdiction.

01:12:46.160 And they expect the provincial officers to enforce that illegal federal law.

01:12:52.100 That's not for them to enact.

01:12:53.420 It's for the province.

01:12:54.260 And until the courts clear it up, why should they have injustice?

01:12:58.180 Danielle Smith is saying, no, we're not going to apply it until you go to court and get the permission of the Supreme Court to enforce it.

01:13:04.800 Why should they enforce an illegal law that's going to take five, six years for Alberta to fix?

01:13:11.080 They should maintain the status quo.

01:13:12.380 Well, the tables have turned here, right?

01:13:14.980 Because they are passing these bills, like Bill C-19, whatever, the emergency bills provincially.

01:13:20.900 And they're saying, oh, if you don't like it, you have to do a constitutional challenge and fight in the courts.

01:13:25.280 So, what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

01:13:27.400 So, how do you feel about the RCMP coming to me, as I've had meetings with them, and, you know, based on the lesser magistrate and their duty to uphold the Constitution and the Charter of Rights,

01:13:39.680 and they're saying, well, no, Bill C-19 is legislated, so you have to do a constitutional challenge.

01:13:47.300 And it's the courts that have to tell us, you know, instruct us to investigate or not comply with it.

01:13:54.080 How do you feel about that scenario?

01:13:59.500 I'm sorry, I missed that, because I was looking at a chat post that said, on what we were talking about,

01:14:04.580 sorry, according to the Canadian People's Union, the Canadian Constitution still lies in the UK.

01:14:11.840 I'm sorry, you're wrong, for two reasons.

01:14:15.060 The Canada Act 1982 in England from the Imperial Parliament at Westminster sent the Constitution here.

01:14:24.420 When the Constitution was passed, the Canadian Indigenous groups went to the House of Lords in England and said,

01:14:33.100 we got a short end of the stick.

01:14:35.720 We want you to change the terms of the Constitution in Canada.

01:14:39.740 And the House of Lords said, I, you don't understand.

01:14:45.220 Her Majesty the Queen has nothing to do with Canada anymore in terms of the structure.

01:14:50.600 Go home.

01:14:51.880 So this gentleman, or Pascal Blisson, is wrong.

01:14:56.540 It does not reside, according to their top court, and the terms of the Canada Act 1982 in Britain, in England.

01:15:05.120 It's here.

01:15:06.200 There's a lot of problems that are posed.

01:15:07.800 Like, we still have the outstanding, in my view, for instance, the head of state, it's the governor general now.

01:15:13.360 Not the monarch in England, because the governor general, in theory, represents the monarch.

01:15:19.120 But the monarch is not the monarch unless he or she is physically in Canada.

01:15:23.440 But when they're not here, it's the governor general who's the head of state.

01:15:27.880 Anyway, that's an issue that will be resolved eventually.

01:15:29.820 I'm just going to back up, too, because somebody said Quebec did not sign the charter.

01:15:35.380 It doesn't matter.

01:15:36.180 The courts, the courts, I agree.

01:15:39.140 And if I were Quebecer at the time, I wouldn't sign, I would not have signed it either.

01:15:42.640 There was dirty back dealing.

01:15:45.460 But the amendment formula that was set out by the Imperial Parliament was complied with.

01:15:50.840 And both the Quebec courts and the Supreme Court of Canada said they didn't sign, but they're still bound by it.

01:15:56.600 Okay, thanks for clarifying that.

01:15:58.080 Okay, I just want to get back to the RCMP for a moment.

01:16:01.060 That's all right.

01:16:01.360 Repeat your question.

01:16:02.140 I'm sorry.

01:16:03.280 Yeah.

01:16:03.600 So their position is that we feel that they're duty-bound to the Constitution Charter of Rights, and they've been violating that.

01:16:10.840 They have not been going in and arresting the criminals, whether they're in office or not, who are violating citizens' rights outright.

01:16:21.680 And the top RCMP in B.C. have said to me that until our legal action goes before the courts, it has to be a constitutional challenge.

01:16:32.400 It's by another number and name in each province, but in B.C., it's Bill 19 is the Emergency Measures Act in B.C.

01:16:40.300 And they're saying that that is legislation.

01:16:44.380 And that so therefore the RCMP have to comply with it, even though it's in conflict with the Charter and the Constitution.

01:16:51.760 How does that work?

01:16:54.120 Well, you want the short answer or long answer?

01:16:57.360 Oh, well, Rocco, let's give me your whatever you like.

01:16:59.920 What's on your heart? 1.00

01:17:01.760 Short answer is full of shit. 1.00

01:17:03.980 Longer answer, he does not know what he's talking about. 1.00

01:17:06.840 Right.

01:17:07.460 And the last short answer is he's wrong.

01:17:10.900 Right.

01:17:11.540 A police officer can decline to enforce the law if it's unconstitutional.

01:17:15.800 Right. 1.00

01:17:16.360 He's trying to tell me if there's a law that says if you're out after curfew and you're black, shoot, shoot to kill. 1.00

01:17:21.940 It's OK. 1.00

01:17:22.380 He's going to shoot to kill. 0.99

01:17:24.020 I mean, haven't we seen this before through history? 0.99

01:17:26.820 Right.

01:17:27.660 You know, didn't Hitler have laws to kill Jews that were democratically passed, by the way? 0.51

01:17:32.740 They were passed in the kind of in the rights tag.

01:17:37.520 All everything Hitler did was democratically passed to their democratic process. 0.61

01:17:42.340 What did that make it legal?

01:17:44.940 No.

01:17:46.140 No.

01:17:46.720 No.

01:17:47.460 Come on.

01:17:47.900 So there you have it, folks.

01:17:49.260 This is this is I'm just glad to have this conversation, you know, because going into headquarters and having these conversations and also official and telling me that I have to get to the court.

01:18:00.060 We have to have affidavits.

01:18:01.840 We've provided them affidavits.

01:18:03.240 I've provided them and everything you could possibly imagine.

01:18:06.620 And to me, I'm calling out to all the RCMP and police officials.

01:18:10.260 You have a duty to oppose what you're being asked to do and be men.

01:18:15.140 Stand up.

01:18:15.780 Be men.

01:18:16.360 Be women.

01:18:17.440 Stand up and support your fellow Canadians.

01:18:20.440 All right.

01:18:21.020 Rocco, how much time more time do you have?

01:18:23.780 Yeah, you can go on.

01:18:24.780 I'm fine.

01:18:25.660 Go on.

01:18:26.100 OK.

01:18:26.320 I'm I'm you know, sometimes these conversations, you know, the answer is a bit lengthy and I hope people are respecting this and enjoying it.

01:18:33.720 So can a person sue where an exemption was not respected?

01:18:40.220 A what?

01:18:41.500 Can can somebody can a person sue probably their employer, maybe where an exemption was not respected?

01:18:50.180 Yeah, that's a nuanced question.

01:18:52.400 Certainly in Ontario, for instance, where you can exempt yourself from masking.

01:18:58.460 Yeah, you can sue if they don't if they don't respect your exemption, if they don't accept your exemption to the vaccine because it's a constitutional right to refuse any medical treatment.

01:19:08.500 Yes, you can.

01:19:10.880 OK, and I know that you and I.

01:19:12.840 That's happening now in the labor context.

01:19:14.560 Yeah.

01:19:14.700 Yeah, that's perfect.

01:19:16.580 And for most of the country, though, people, you know, had to go for religious exemptions.

01:19:22.200 And we decided never to support having exemptions because we felt very strongly that there's nothing to be exempt from.

01:19:29.320 And instead, we took the NOL position of it, saying these are are 100 percent rights.

01:19:35.700 At the Constitutional Rights Center, we were asked hundreds of times to assist with exemptions.

01:19:43.520 And our policy is absolute.

01:19:46.580 We will not assist with requesting or facilitating any exemption because the request.

01:19:55.640 To facilitate an exemption implies that you are OK with the law and we take the position that to force somebody to vaccinate is unconstitutional and you have a right to exempt yourself under the Constitution. 0.98

01:20:11.920 So why would you seek an exemption from an idiot employer? 0.99

01:20:16.620 Right. 1.00

01:20:17.280 To respect your constitutional rights, which has already been recognized by the Supreme Court of Canada.

01:20:22.300 So that's our view on that.

01:20:23.680 Yeah, and that's been ours.

01:20:25.700 And get yourself in a position.

01:20:26.980 Use our notices of liability.

01:20:29.020 Even if it's a business, I went into a medical facility for an emergency eye appointment with my mom a couple of weeks ago.

01:20:34.820 I tell you, my mom's 82 and she just refused to wear that mask. 0.94

01:20:38.860 I served them.

01:20:40.140 They were just shaken and they were very, very concerned.

01:20:43.020 But if there comes a time when legal actions are going to be unfolding here, I can revisit that potentially and be a greater advocate for my mom.

01:20:50.860 And there will be justice from these from these fascist dictators in the doctor's offices.

01:20:56.340 OK, did Ontario.

01:20:58.160 This is this was something dear to my heart as well about what's happened in the nursing homes.

01:21:02.840 They never had a right to do anything they did to any of our elderly people or withhold loved ones from going in and seeing them.

01:21:10.720 So did Ontario nursing homes ever have the legal authority given to them by the province to refuse indoor access to residents from visitors who were not vaccinated?

01:21:20.140 Indirectly, they did, because they allowed these private, which I say is a constitutional violation.

01:21:26.820 They allowed private entities to make their own rules.

01:21:30.520 And what if their government, because I know somebody here in B.C., they have their elderly.

01:21:36.160 Yeah, if their government, if their government, no, they can't.

01:21:39.660 It's a constitutional violation.

01:21:41.140 Again, you know, it's 86 percent of all those who died from COVID, according to the government, were in long term care facilities.

01:21:54.520 Average age of every person who died in the long term facilities was 83.4 years of age average.

01:22:04.180 The life expectancy in Canada is 81.2 or something like that.

01:22:11.140 So there you have COVID, a non-pandemic.

01:22:15.800 Right.

01:22:16.760 Yeah.

01:22:17.140 And then you go in and you calculate those that were forced to take the jab and how their life was shortened or even just purely dying from loneliness.

01:22:26.360 I had so many calls and I shed some tears myself over this matter.

01:22:32.220 So the English did a study of Alzheimer's patients in 2020.

01:22:38.120 They compared two months, one in 2019.

01:22:43.480 I'm sorry, one April of 2020, just after the pandemic was declared in April of 2021.

01:22:51.180 And they found that on the average, 10,000 more Alzheimer's patients died a month.

01:23:04.680 A month?

01:23:05.680 A month than pre-COVID, yes.

01:23:09.100 Yes.

01:23:09.880 Yeah.

01:23:10.120 And that was from the complications of Alzheimer's and being isolated with no contact.

01:23:14.280 Well, I take a look at, you know, people with Alzheimer's and, you know, testimonies from family members where there is an essence of knowing who that person is at some degree or level.

01:23:25.580 And then you take that away from them and they have no understanding of it as well, right?

01:23:30.020 So psychologically, that would play a major role in their lives.

01:23:34.120 So thank you for that, Rocco.

01:23:35.820 I thought the law was above all.

01:23:38.720 So who has the last word, the law or the government?

01:23:43.380 Well, the courts and the law have the last word.

01:23:45.960 The courts have the last word.

01:23:48.000 Mm-hmm.

01:23:48.860 Right.

01:23:49.060 And this is why we need to also be applying pressure to the judiciary.

01:23:54.020 And because if you feel that you have to come with evidence, you can't just make a complaint just because you don't like a ruling of a judge.

01:24:00.640 If you feel that a judge has breached his oath of office, you can file complaints.

01:24:05.580 There's something that you can do about that.

01:24:07.320 But you need to provide the evidence.

01:24:09.680 And but it takes it takes your time.

01:24:12.040 It takes your energy and your effort.

01:24:13.460 We've got to hit this at all levels, just like what they're doing to us.

01:24:17.700 All right.

01:24:17.960 Question.

01:24:19.040 I recently heard the charter was wasn't properly ratified or signed off on.

01:24:24.120 And so technically is not enforceable.

01:24:26.660 Is there any truth to that?

01:24:28.620 No.

01:24:31.160 OK.

01:24:31.960 Next question.

01:24:32.460 Since Trudeau lied under oath at the commission, can he be found in contempt or charged with perjury?

01:24:39.240 He can.

01:24:40.060 But you've got to get somebody to charge the prime minister with perjury.

01:24:43.800 And to charge a cabinet minister or prime minister, you need the personal consent.

01:24:48.420 Of the attorney general.

01:24:50.720 Which is not going to happen.

01:24:52.120 And even if you get him charged by justice of the peace, the crown can step in any time and will take over the prosecution and withdraw the charges.

01:25:00.820 So with the governor general being in cahoots with the prime minister and as you said, we can't go to his majesty, the king and ask for him to be removed.

01:25:14.580 Not that he would if he even had the power.

01:25:17.100 What are we looking at here, Rocco, potentially with Trudeau? 1.00

01:25:21.140 You're looking at a dumbass Canadian population who keeps voting this asshole into office. 1.00

01:25:26.380 That's what you're looking at. 1.00

01:25:27.580 And what about those who say the elections were rigged?

01:25:32.600 I think that's partially true in the States.

01:25:36.000 There's a lot of evidence of Trump being deprived of his election.

01:25:40.540 And with the Dominion voting machines now, you can't verify any voting fraud.

01:25:46.140 With the electronic vote counting, it's non-verifiable.

01:25:52.700 You know, for 300 years, this continent had no problem counting physical ballots and having a result within two to three days.

01:26:01.600 And why did that have to change but for an open door to fraud?

01:26:05.980 Right. And people, you know how you change this is you start getting involved in the system.

01:26:14.100 You start being the one that – sorry, go ahead.

01:26:18.800 Governor DeSantis in Florida banned electronic voting.

01:26:23.380 It's all hard copy voting.

01:26:26.120 You know, for those of you who are too young to remember, in the old days, when the ballot boxes were open,

01:26:31.860 you had a member of it, a scrutineer from every different party, the major parties,

01:26:37.100 looking over the same ballot and saying, yeah, NDP, over there.

01:26:41.060 Liberal, over there.

01:26:41.980 I don't think it's clear.

01:26:43.480 Over there, and we'll dispute it later.

01:26:46.100 That's how it worked.

01:26:47.860 Now you get 400,000 votes in a riding in a county in the United States in the federal election that went all for Joe Biden.

01:26:56.540 Is that conceivably possible, that there wasn't a single Republican vote in that batch of 400,000 electronic votes in that same county?

01:27:05.860 Are you kidding me?

01:27:07.400 Yeah.

01:27:08.800 That's why this has to be challenged, my friends.

01:27:11.100 We had Dominion voting machines here in Surrey and in Chilliwack in this last election throughout British Columbia.

01:27:18.740 And you need to get in.

01:27:20.100 You need to take over the municipalities.

01:27:21.780 Sorry, Rocco.

01:27:22.300 Yeah.

01:27:22.400 There's a man in Naples, computer genius, who pled guilty to eight years in prison for, you know, remotely manipulating the votes in the Trump-Biden election.

01:27:38.740 He says at the request of Barack Obama, because Barack Obama was a good friend of the Italian president who's ancient.

01:27:45.100 He's close to 90.

01:27:46.880 And he pled eight years to prison for that.

01:27:49.060 And people say he's a conspiracy theorist.

01:27:51.020 Really?

01:27:51.320 He was looking at 16 or 18 years.

01:27:54.380 But really, somebody would plead guilty to 12 years of prison just to be a conspiracy theorist?

01:27:58.800 Really?

01:27:59.240 You believe that, correct?

01:28:00.620 And he admitted, yeah, he was manipulating votes for Biden remotely from Naples in favor of Biden to defeat Trump.

01:28:10.560 And here's the thing.

01:28:12.840 The courts, this is where the courts fail, because they're not equipped to do that. 0.50

01:28:17.960 There are thousands of elections at different levels every year in the United States.

01:28:23.340 The courts do not want to invigilate elections.

01:28:27.020 This is why vote challenges are rarely successful in the States.

01:28:30.720 They don't want to open that door that every time there's a challenge, they have to go in and invigilate.

01:28:36.140 They say, we don't care.

01:28:38.120 Right.

01:28:38.880 Basically.

01:28:39.440 So they won't review that.

01:28:42.000 It's not that they think it's not happening, but they'll figure, well, you're in politics.

01:28:46.500 If you think that these electronic votes are being manipulated, ban them.

01:28:52.860 Yeah.

01:28:53.140 Get the political will, like the scientists did, to ban them.

01:28:56.760 Yeah.

01:28:57.180 And I'll tell you, you know, people can think that there's a small thread.

01:29:01.800 I call it the small remnant is Action for Canada.

01:29:04.100 We got a lot of people on our email list.

01:29:06.020 But when I look at our chapter leaders and our actual active members and how we are turning the direction of things in Canada, especially regarding the SOGI books and the SOGI resources and all the rest of it.

01:29:19.000 I mean, it's not by mistake that the media and the governments and the Canadian Library Federation are all talking about, you know, the work that we're doing.

01:29:27.780 Think about that small remnant.

01:29:29.200 Now, think about if everybody would get involved and there'd be millions of Canadians because we are the majority.

01:29:35.340 Too silent, but we are the majority.

01:29:37.320 Now, you start showing up at school board meetings like I did last night, taking on a Dominion voted election that had taken place with several very questionable individuals who won their seats and running these school board trustee meetings like a dictatorship in violation of the Roberts Rules of Order, everything.

01:29:59.240 And so there were a lot of people that showed up and only 15 people could could end up in the room.

01:30:04.920 So we've said this is a public meeting.

01:30:07.580 You need to look at the future and you need to start thinking about recorded meetings in a bigger public space because Canadians are starting to show up.

01:30:15.840 My friends, you need to fill up City Hall.

01:30:18.740 You need to fill up the school board meetings and you need to get your voice known.

01:30:22.480 And that's where the pressure is because these guys want to get voted again.

01:30:26.220 And we have a small window to begin to ensure that our votes matter and our votes count and our actions matter and count.

01:30:33.760 So you really need to get involved.

01:30:35.780 This is why Trudeau as well is pushing so hard with the gun ban.

01:30:38.840 And he pulled back on two assault rifles.

01:30:41.980 So there's some wins there.

01:30:43.440 There's going to be civil unrest in the streets if they continue.

01:30:48.320 And this is not a question.

01:30:50.440 We've got men ready to stand up across the nation.

01:30:53.600 This is why they try to emasculate men. 1.00

01:30:55.540 And it's time to do what we can civilly now.

01:30:59.180 But we need you to get off your duffs on a Saturday and get involved.

01:31:03.480 Get out there during the week to a school board meeting.

01:31:05.940 Get involved.

01:31:07.260 Okay, Rocco, I'm going to ask you a couple more questions.

01:31:10.620 And then we're going to wrap this up for the night.

01:31:14.140 As I would say to Ted, comes when?

01:31:18.620 Okay.

01:31:19.320 Oh, that's a challenge.

01:31:20.880 I think Ted may be on here, actually.

01:31:22.640 I saw Sheila had posted it earlier.

01:31:28.140 Okay, if I'm not mistaken, there is still a travel mandate to enter the U.S.

01:31:32.360 Is this correct?

01:31:33.540 How do we work around this?

01:31:35.700 I don't keep up with the U.S.

01:31:37.660 I haven't traveled to the U.S. since the year 2000.

01:31:41.320 So I'm afraid I'm not interested in what it takes to travel to the U.S.

01:31:45.780 I gave up on that society before coming to almost giving up on Canadian society,

01:31:51.400 except I live here, my family's here, my children are born here.

01:31:54.520 I don't care about the States.

01:31:56.840 I'll be frank with you.

01:31:57.680 I don't know what their laws are down there.

01:31:59.460 I don't care.

01:32:00.200 Yeah.

01:32:00.900 And my answer is...

01:32:01.120 I know that might sound arrogant.

01:32:03.420 I don't know what they are.

01:32:04.480 I don't keep up with their laws because I will never travel to the States, ever.

01:32:08.420 So, I'm sorry, wrong lawyer for that question.

01:32:13.840 I don't want to make it up, you know.

01:32:15.140 I don't know what their rules are.

01:32:16.960 It doesn't interest me.

01:32:18.360 Although I have my daughter who lives there who's a citizen.

01:32:22.180 I can't travel there.

01:32:23.660 I'm there on their blacklist for all the anti-terrorism work I did and the anti-COVID work I'm doing.

01:32:29.340 I can't travel to the States.

01:32:31.340 Oh, I see.

01:32:32.880 Okay.

01:32:33.260 Okay, you dark horse.

01:32:34.120 You dark horse.

01:32:35.200 Okay.

01:32:39.400 Okay.

01:32:40.160 Well, you know what?

01:32:40.960 I'll give some people a bit of a tidbit then.

01:32:43.660 Sure.

01:32:44.080 Okay, you can advise them.

01:32:45.960 I will advise them.

01:32:47.280 Okay, good.

01:32:47.640 Because of the excellent work of Rocco Galati filing on behalf of the federal workers

01:32:52.240 and challenging this case before the courts and the overturn of Arrive Can,

01:32:56.800 and because of the excellent work of action for Canada with our notices of liability,

01:33:01.720 allowing people, because we had free reign, people had free reign to go down to the United States.

01:33:06.160 They just were having trouble getting back into Canada.

01:33:08.400 Well, because of all that great work through the summer and into the fall,

01:33:12.440 I guess Trudeau probably had a little bit of a panic call with Biden

01:33:16.040 and saying this Rocco Galati and Tanya Gar are a real pain in my side and other places,

01:33:21.580 and I need your help.

01:33:22.800 So, Mr. Biden then stepped up to the plate and mandated that Canadians coming into the U.S.

01:33:30.180 needed to provide vaccine status, and that's what's taking place.

01:33:34.780 So, Rocco has just said to myself, we don't have the red phone to Mr. Biden.

01:33:39.200 We can't make calls to him, and so there's nothing we can do to help you out there.

01:33:43.300 Okay.

01:33:44.040 All right.

01:33:44.820 Rocco, I haven't heard.

01:33:46.160 Listen, he wouldn't know where the red phone is anyway.

01:33:50.260 Right.

01:33:50.700 Okay, somebody pick it up for him.

01:33:53.620 I keep thinking there must be an El Chapo tunnel between Canada and the U.S. anyways.

01:33:57.760 Go find that, and you have access to the U.S.

01:34:01.700 Okay.

01:34:02.300 If I'm not, Rocco, have you heard that the meeting with the premiers has conditions attached to the extra funding

01:34:08.540 for the health care the feds are giving? 0.59

01:34:11.860 They want access to our health record in order for the provinces to get the extra funds.

01:34:17.340 Yeah, that's all illegal and unconstitutional.

01:34:22.240 Yeah.

01:34:22.540 You see, these all ministers' meetings are required by section, I think it's 36 of the Constitution Act,

01:34:29.420 to ensure that enough money flows from the feds to the provinces so that every Canadian is receiving comparable services

01:34:41.120 and health and education and everything else, it doesn't have to be exact to the penny,

01:34:46.120 but it has to be comparable because the feds possess the constitutional spending power.

01:34:53.100 So they can try to impose conditions, but not where it goes to the heart of the exclusive jurisdiction of the province.

01:35:04.420 So, for instance, they can say, we're sending you this money for welfare in the province

01:35:11.000 because the unemployment rate is really high, but you can't use it for anything else.

01:35:15.800 They can do that.

01:35:17.460 Or they say, we're sending this, you know, you say you need more hospitals.

01:35:21.480 We'll send this money to build the hospitals, but you can't use it for anything else.

01:35:25.600 What they cannot do is say, yeah, we'll give you more money if you forfeit,

01:35:33.180 if you do something that we can't do, like give us the patient records,

01:35:39.400 because that's not for the feds.

01:35:41.080 They have no jurisdiction over patient records.

01:35:42.980 Okay, well, that is illegal and unconstitutional.

01:35:47.900 Well, they're constantly trying to find back doors, right, to receive our information.

01:35:54.160 And a lot of people, because they don't understand their rights or they just don't know what's going on,

01:35:58.880 you know, are capitulating or somehow providing information that they should not be providing.

01:36:04.040 And I know it's going on at the school level right now.

01:36:06.800 Somebody had sent me a message recently,

01:36:09.560 and they're asking kids themselves to provide medical information.

01:36:15.040 And, you know, parents, you really need to be hypervigilant in telling your kids,

01:36:20.600 do not sign anything, don't answer any surveys, don't do any questions,

01:36:23.980 don't do anything that the school is asking without your permission and involvement.

01:36:29.000 And better than that, pull your kids out.

01:36:30.900 We want to just absolutely destroy the public and private school systems.

01:36:36.820 And the only way to do that is by numbers.

01:36:38.780 Pull your kids out and, you know, just get them at home for a while.

01:36:42.440 It will do them good.

01:36:43.760 And, you know, you have a chance at saving your kids' life.

01:36:47.620 The reports and complaints I'm getting from the school systems in Ontario are horrifying.

01:36:53.200 Teachers asking questions and telling the kids,

01:36:56.120 don't tell your parents we asked you this.

01:36:57.740 Well, of course, kids are going to tell their parents, right?

01:37:01.060 I don't know where they get off to act like criminals like that, you know?

01:37:05.560 No, it's amazing.

01:37:07.140 I was at a school board meeting last night,

01:37:09.280 and this Willow Reichardt is the one that's the chair.

01:37:13.340 And this other woman, Karen Bonder,

01:37:15.540 who have both gone after Barry Neufeld with everything that they've got.

01:37:19.080 They're very much in support of all of the LGBTQ propaganda. 1.00

01:37:22.600 And we were trying to address the fact that these books are pornographic.

01:37:28.080 And I was trying to warn them about their liability under several sections of the criminal code

01:37:33.820 of making this available to children, but also the Provincial School Act,

01:37:38.100 which says that because the associations are trying to say they're indemnified,

01:37:42.240 they don't have to worry about anything.

01:37:43.740 They're indemnified from any liability.

01:37:45.440 But when you dig into the school acts under further sections,

01:37:48.820 it shows where they are liable for vicarious liability, tort, willful misconduct, etc.

01:37:55.800 So be warned.

01:37:57.800 I'm glad that Rocco brought that up.

01:37:59.380 This is a huge thing that Action for Canada is taking on,

01:38:02.180 is that it's going to come down to liability of the trustees personally.

01:38:06.740 But they have to understand that what they're doing is a criminal offense,

01:38:10.040 even if they're denying it.

01:38:11.640 And they're running these boards like dictators.

01:38:13.840 There are ways around that you just need to keep pressing in.

01:38:17.800 In one of the boards in Ontario, the report I got was they're routinely asking children,

01:38:24.480 like grades four to eight, or in that range, every morning,

01:38:29.980 do you feel like a boy or a girl today?

01:38:32.720 And don't tell your parents we asked you.

01:38:35.500 I don't even know why that question is even being asked.

01:38:40.860 No, they're doing a gender spectrum chart where the activist ones will put a chart at the end, 1.00

01:38:48.120 princesses on the left, a princess on the right,

01:38:50.420 and asking children in grade one, two, three to go up and say,

01:38:54.520 to point where they feel most like.

01:38:57.140 So if they're three quarters towards a boy,

01:38:59.440 a kid like me that liked to climb trees, I rode horses and all the rest of it,

01:39:02.920 and then that activist teacher is going to begin to groom that child and focuses on them.

01:39:07.420 And those are the ones part of the social contagion, right?

01:39:10.740 But maybe I missed basic biology, but these kids aren't even near puberty.

01:39:16.700 How would they even begin to answer that question?

01:39:19.820 That's because this is a pedophilic grooming network that has infiltrated our schools across

01:39:24.820 Canada with this agenda.

01:39:26.260 And we're calling them out for what it is.

01:39:28.300 We're disrupting what they're doing, and we're going to overturn it.

01:39:30.920 And that's the campaign I was talking about earlier.

01:39:35.900 So, yeah, there's nothing good or right or normal or thought-provoking on a reasonable level about this.

01:39:41.340 Well, on a personal note, Tanya, I don't know what people...

01:39:45.140 I pulled my kids out of the public school system. 1.00

01:39:48.860 In grade eight, I was clinically assessed as a mental retard, idiot, 1.00

01:39:53.280 an imbecile using the terms of the Immigration Act. 1.00

01:39:56.100 And I just did not want my children taught by teachers who had the IQ of a fence post. 1.00

01:40:05.940 Yeah.

01:40:06.980 The system is broken.

01:40:08.400 They don't teach them anything.

01:40:10.180 The only thing they can do is harm them.

01:40:11.580 They don't teach them anything.

01:40:13.680 You know, and you're right.

01:40:14.460 They've got a political agenda.

01:40:15.340 Years ago, in Alberta, they had vouchers, educational vouchers.

01:40:18.900 I think they should be brought back.

01:40:21.060 You get a voucher from the province, and you put your kid in whatever school you want.

01:40:24.880 Right.

01:40:25.280 Public, private, you know.

01:40:29.500 I agree, Rocco.

01:40:30.980 And right now, though, it's also infiltrating the private schools.

01:40:34.400 So we're advising people, and we need all the homeschoolers on board.

01:40:37.920 If you think, oh, I've pulled my kid out, I don't have to worry.

01:40:39.960 They're coming for you next.

01:40:41.400 They're in the private schools.

01:40:42.640 They're in the public schools.

01:40:43.580 They're coming for you next.

01:40:44.900 We have a fantastic parent leader, Doris, who is head of our homeschooling division.

01:40:50.500 We have vetted homeschooling groups across Canada.

01:40:54.640 So no matter what province you're in, you get in touch with us.

01:40:58.020 You pull your kids out, and we're going to try to help you, you know, get in touch with

01:41:02.460 people that can surround you with the information you need.

01:41:05.340 And we're also reaching out to pastors and church leaders across Canada saying, open your

01:41:09.620 doors during the week so we can get kids and teachers into actual safe spaces where in

01:41:14.960 two hours they can learn more than they can in seven hours, and they'll be healthy kids

01:41:20.980 that understand their God-given biological sex is good.

01:41:24.800 That's it.

01:41:25.880 All right.

01:41:27.340 Okay, so here we go.

01:41:29.340 What challenges can be actively done to eliminate Bill C-21, the handgun freeze, and is there anything

01:41:36.160 that can legitimately be done and the reversal of, oh, and now somebody said Bill C-71.

01:41:42.780 I'm not quite sure what that is, but what do you have to do with all, what do you have

01:41:47.000 to say about all these gun bans?

01:41:50.560 Oh, that's a very, that.

01:41:53.340 That a loaded question?

01:41:55.360 That's a topic for a whole show.

01:41:58.920 Okay.

01:41:59.380 We get into the really, we get into the really complicated issue of the right to bear arms

01:42:06.980 that comes out of the Catholic right in the English Bill of Rights of 1688, which was,

01:42:13.400 which is still recognized as part of our constitutional law through the preamble of the 19, is 1867

01:42:22.740 Constitution Act or the old British North America Act.

01:42:27.300 And both the Magna Carta and the English Bill of Rights recognize the right to bear arms.

01:42:33.120 That's where the American Constitution gets its right.

01:42:36.140 And while people says, oh, we don't have that right, I disagree.

01:42:39.000 And one of these days I will take this to court.

01:42:41.260 I think under the Magna Carta and the English Bill of Rights, we have the right to bear arms

01:42:45.520 as a pre-1982 constitutional right.

01:42:50.400 It's not clear to me why Trudeau, well, I have my suspicions and my educated guess as

01:42:59.180 to why he wants to disarm everybody, but it's not clear to me why these laws are coming in.

01:43:05.740 From Troy, from Troy to Rome, to every dictatorship in the history of the world, to Nazi Germany, 0.76

01:43:15.320 the first thing Hitler did was go door-to-door and ask for people's weapons on the pretext 0.73

01:43:20.400 of protecting the fatherland because they weren't armed.

01:43:24.740 Every dictator takes the first step of disarming its population to prevent civil unrest

01:43:32.220 when they really come down hard with their draconian laws.

01:43:35.740 It's not going to work either in the States or Canada.

01:43:39.160 People are not going to declare their guns.

01:43:42.300 They can ban all the guns they want.

01:43:45.140 People are already armed, so it's a discussion that really is worth the whole show.

01:43:51.060 But it's my view as a constitutional lawyer, and it's never been raised or litigated.

01:43:57.420 It's my view, and I may, you know, some gun owners want to go to court,

01:44:02.100 and I would be happy to take on the challenge.

01:44:04.980 I take the position that we have a constitutional right, just like the Americans, to bear arms.

01:44:10.480 I love that, Rocco.

01:44:12.900 That brings me such comfort to hear you clarify that, and it really does warm my heart,

01:44:18.800 and I hope that that is very clear to everybody else.

01:44:22.460 I mean, the government is being so transparent.

01:44:25.160 If only people are looking, right, as to the reasons, you know,

01:44:29.480 and the steps of what they're doing to overcome citizens.

01:44:33.480 And Canadians are heavily armed, and so I agree with you.

01:44:39.660 I can share with you, you know, you remember the gun registry that was attempted

01:44:46.740 at $2 billion of wasted public funds by Harper?

01:44:50.160 Yes.

01:44:50.460 On the pretext that murders in big urban centers were on the rise.

01:44:58.340 First of all, they weren't on the rise.

01:45:00.640 They were on the decline.

01:45:02.520 Second of all, nobody commits murder in the cities with long rifles.

01:45:06.640 Their preference is handguns.

01:45:07.840 I know.

01:45:08.400 Okay?

01:45:09.080 So what was behind this whole gun registry was to disarm the indigenous population

01:45:17.700 that was getting very close to insurrection after Gufferson Lake, Oka,

01:45:23.380 Burnt Church, Caledonia, and all of that stuff, right?

01:45:27.900 It didn't work.

01:45:30.220 I had some involvement and colleagues who filed legal briefs on the gun reference,

01:45:36.380 and the indigenous bands were clear.

01:45:40.280 We have a constitutional right to our hunting rifles.

01:45:43.260 You're not getting them.

01:45:44.420 If you want them, pull out your rifles.

01:45:46.160 And if you try to get our rifles, we'll use our rifles to defend ourselves.

01:45:51.480 They were aiming that law at the indigenous communities.

01:45:56.320 When they put in the law, the five provinces with the highest indigenous populations,

01:46:02.860 their attorney general refused to prosecute the law

01:46:06.060 because they didn't want indigenous insurrections in their problem.

01:46:11.360 Right.

01:46:11.500 So where's the gun registry today?

01:46:13.140 The long armor?

01:46:14.200 Dead.

01:46:14.540 Dead.

01:46:16.160 And how did it die?

01:46:17.520 Because the people who was directed at said, F-U.

01:46:21.440 Right.

01:46:22.840 Okay.

01:46:23.200 And this is, you know, I appreciate your colorful language without saying it

01:46:28.020 because it's exactly where it is, Rocco.

01:46:30.880 No, no, no.

01:46:32.000 People just need to say no.

01:46:33.640 No, no.

01:46:34.500 No, no.

01:46:34.620 You misunderstand.

01:46:36.660 F-U is my personal pronoun.

01:46:39.180 It stands for F, F, F, U, bracket, forever undetermined.

01:46:45.500 There you go.

01:46:47.020 There you go.

01:46:47.540 Okay.

01:46:47.700 Okay.

01:46:47.880 Thanks for, again, clarifying for me.

01:46:50.460 All right.

01:46:50.800 Well, yeah, like I say, somebody has already said a couple of times,

01:46:55.720 you've got to bring Rocco back on and then I need to get in touch with the CFR.

01:46:59.400 I have somebody very dear to me, very close to me,

01:47:02.300 who is fighting very hard against the ridiculous gun legislation that Trudeau

01:47:08.100 and the liberal governments are trying to put in place.

01:47:10.300 So I'll be on, I'll be connecting with them after this call.

01:47:13.960 I do think that it's in a very, it would be a very critical and important lawsuit

01:47:19.440 just to tap the toes of Trudeau trying to come over this, this line.

01:47:24.700 That's all he needs, I think, on this issue, because it's going to be a no-brainer.

01:47:29.420 Canadians are not going to give up their guns.

01:47:32.080 I'm really glad.

01:47:33.340 Yeah.

01:47:33.620 I'm really glad that this came up.

01:47:35.160 So, you know, I went to an all boys industrial school and we, it was a tough, 1.00

01:47:39.440 rough school in downtown Toronto.

01:47:41.240 And we used to joke that we don't need guns. 0.99

01:47:43.820 If we want to shoot you, we'll insert the bullet manually. 0.99

01:47:49.520 Those are true rebels. 0.99

01:47:52.220 You know, and, and, you know, my question too is, are they,

01:47:54.520 are they going to ban butter knives next?

01:47:57.620 Because my understanding is that there's many more murders related to stabbings

01:48:02.680 than there are to any shootings in Canada.

01:48:05.240 Okay.

01:48:05.620 So, so, all right.

01:48:07.720 You know, we have all sorts of myths in our mind as Canadians.

01:48:11.860 One, we're not armed.

01:48:12.980 We are a lot of, when I say we, I don't necessarily mean me.

01:48:16.540 Canadians are armed.

01:48:17.860 Okay.

01:48:18.260 The other myth we have seemed to be under delusion of is that we have less

01:48:23.720 murders in Canada.

01:48:25.160 Now that's true.

01:48:26.100 And it's not true.

01:48:27.500 A good friend of mine had it from the senior homicide detective in Toronto that

01:48:33.660 the reason we have less murders in the States, in the big cities, primarily Toronto and

01:48:42.000 Montreal and Vancouver and Montreal as well.

01:48:46.080 Our paramedics in those three cities have the fastest response time in the world.

01:48:53.660 Usually under three minutes.

01:48:58.040 Okay.

01:48:58.920 From the report of a stabbing or a shooting.

01:49:01.420 And whereas in the States, they're not that fast for a lot of different reasons.

01:49:07.600 Funding, traffic, caring, not caring.

01:49:11.520 And this, this, this homicide detective conveyed the fact that if we had the same reaction time

01:49:17.420 as the American paramedics, we'd have close to about the same murders.

01:49:22.320 Yeah.

01:49:22.980 Right.

01:49:23.520 Okay.

01:49:24.200 The paramedics save our murder victims.

01:49:26.560 Okay.

01:49:28.240 Yeah.

01:49:28.460 I hadn't thought, I hadn't even considered it before.

01:49:31.260 Huh?

01:49:32.360 I hadn't even considered it from that angle before.

01:49:35.420 Yeah.

01:49:35.680 So as many people get stabbed and shot, but they survive because the paramedics are right

01:49:40.520 there.

01:49:41.500 Not always, but you know, they save a lot of people, you know, so.

01:49:46.700 Excellent.

01:49:47.140 I've got about two questions left and then that's the end at my, my team.

01:49:51.840 Thank you to Sheila and Heather for sending me all these good questions.

01:49:54.880 All right.

01:49:55.300 This is a good one.

01:49:56.500 And, and I have meant to do an action about this, but I just, just not enough time in the

01:50:00.280 day.

01:50:00.660 It says there, you know, what's happened with pastor Archer Poloski and going through the

01:50:06.540 courts and getting arrested.

01:50:08.040 And, you know, he's been very, very fortunate because he's had so much love and support.

01:50:13.120 Arrested and tortured.

01:50:14.260 Absolutely.

01:50:15.000 In Canada.

01:50:15.580 But he's had so much support, you know, from the media and from people rising to his defense.

01:50:21.280 But there are four individuals that were arrested.

01:50:25.460 I believe it's four or five because of coots and they still remain in jail. 1.00

01:50:31.000 The one gentleman, his dad died at Christmas and his brother recently died, I believe, of

01:50:37.940 a drug overdose.

01:50:39.400 And of course he's, he's just sitting there in jail.

01:50:41.600 He's had no opportunity.

01:50:42.620 And people have appealed to Daniel Smith who made some promises.

01:50:48.000 And so it's, it's sort of been that Daniel Smith is, is she on the right side of this?

01:50:53.140 Is she stepping in to give a soft exit to Premier Kenny, Premier Kenny?

01:50:59.580 And why isn't she assisting, you know, these, these individuals who wrongfully accused and

01:51:06.820 arrested in jail based on these COVID measures?

01:51:09.360 Do you have any comment about these individuals or who can help them?

01:51:14.260 What can be done?

01:51:14.760 I don't know the facts.

01:51:16.820 The primary help they should be getting is from their lawyers bringing a habeas corpus application

01:51:21.240 and taking that through the courts up to the court of appeal if they have to.

01:51:24.800 She's the Premier.

01:51:26.880 It's a complicated issue because the public prosecution section, she can't direct the public 1.00

01:51:33.500 prosecution system on how to proceed with the prosecution.

01:51:37.900 Neither is she the Attorney General.

01:51:39.900 And even the Attorney General could not interfere with the prosecution.

01:51:44.640 We split our prosecutorial system into a public prosecution.

01:51:50.120 And they're independent.

01:51:53.340 Yeah, I started my career in the Department of Justice and the federally it's the same thing.

01:51:57.980 This is what, this is what, the federal minister, Attorney General partly got into hot water with, with Trudeau over.

01:52:13.560 She has no right to say, hey, you got to drop these charges. 1.00

01:52:16.700 You can't.

01:52:17.940 So it's public prosecution.

01:52:19.040 My question is, how long has it been there and why is it, has anybody brought a habeas corpus application?

01:52:25.020 It's been, I think, nearly, was it Coots?

01:52:27.080 I believe that was, it's been a year.

01:52:29.560 That's obscene.

01:52:30.940 That's obscene.

01:52:32.400 His lawyer should have brought a, by now he could have been through the court of appeal on a, on a habeas corpus application.

01:52:38.680 I don't know if he brought one or not.

01:52:39.940 Maybe he did or she, I don't know.

01:52:41.880 I haven't followed the case.

01:52:43.040 I haven't, no, and I, I don't even know if these guys are having public support.

01:52:47.660 So if anybody knows, I know Kim is our national chapter leader coordinator and she's in Calgary and she says over a year with no bail.

01:52:54.360 And, you know, for the fact that they were at the Coots border crossing, it's, it's, it's very, very criminal what's going on.

01:53:01.320 I mean, it's obscene because they wouldn't get a year.

01:53:02.740 The sanction is not a year.

01:53:04.120 I mean, it's obscene.

01:53:05.620 It's just obscene.

01:53:06.800 I don't know what to say.

01:53:07.820 Do you know who their lawyer is?

01:53:08.760 I don't even know if they, they have one, but I'm going to try to get some more information.

01:53:14.000 It's just like I said, Rocco, not enough time in the day to take all of this on.

01:53:18.440 And, um, okay.

01:53:20.640 Uh, yeah, so that, that definitely is a situation.

01:53:24.160 And then terminate for refusing to get jab.

01:53:27.900 Do they have a case?

01:53:29.660 Okay.

01:53:30.440 Somebody has asked, comment on federal unionized workers that were terminated for refusing to get jab.

01:53:35.880 Do they have a case at all?

01:53:37.180 Because it seems the employers have some assurance from the government that they would be immune from litigation.

01:53:43.060 Well, we just argued that in federal court, we sued.

01:53:45.820 They're saying, they're saying that it should be dealt with in the labor relations context.

01:53:51.300 I disagreed.

01:53:52.920 Supreme Court of Canada, you know, we're not suing for them being fired.

01:53:57.900 We're suing for tort of misfeasance of public office and abuse of authority.

01:54:02.360 So, yeah, they could sue.

01:54:03.780 We have sued.

01:54:04.400 That was the lawsuit we filed in May of last year.

01:54:08.300 Right.

01:54:08.860 You're in that process, right?

01:54:10.320 Yeah.

01:54:10.820 Yeah.

01:54:11.140 Okay.

01:54:11.540 And, and then I'm just going to close because, um, I know you've received some information about Dr. Hoff here in British Columbia with the BC, um, college of physicians and the pressure that they're putting on him.

01:54:26.260 There was a real misinformation letter that was going around.

01:54:29.700 No.

01:54:29.980 Okay.

01:54:30.340 All right.

01:54:30.720 I have not received any information.

01:54:33.380 I have seen statements floating around on social media.

01:54:38.140 Yeah, that's what I meant.

01:54:38.420 Just to be clear.

01:54:40.480 That's what I meant.

01:54:41.300 Yeah.

01:54:41.540 Just some information on his predicament right now.

01:54:43.740 But I think there's going to be a lot of relief for people to know now that you've, um, stated it publicly that we will be challenging Bill 36.

01:54:51.620 There's been so much unrest amongst healthcare workers in here in BC.

01:54:55.580 And we just want to know you to know that, uh, you know, we, we, there's things that, uh, we haven't, uh, provided in advance for strategic reasons, but we want you to know we're coming for them.

01:55:06.040 Uh, you know, we're going to be taking this on, uh, Dr. Hoff has a lawyer who ended up in, uh, the hospital as well.

01:55:13.660 Uh, we're not sure of the medical reasons, uh, why that happened.

01:55:17.220 And, uh, but I just want you to know that main letter going around and asking you to write the College of Physicians was false information and that his lawyer, Michael, sorry, what was, um, Dr. Hoff's lawyers?

01:55:28.980 He's the one from.

01:55:29.720 I think, I think it's, uh, Michael, uh, Alexander's is the lawyer.

01:55:33.120 Yes.

01:55:33.480 Thank you.

01:55:34.160 He, he has put out a letter.

01:55:36.040 Do you know what happened to the hearing today on the adjournment request?

01:55:39.080 No, I haven't heard.

01:55:40.600 Okay.

01:55:41.220 Right.

01:55:42.080 Yeah.

01:55:42.400 Uh, yeah, I'm waiting to hear to, to see whether or not they, they permitted that.

01:55:47.220 Um, but anyways, okay.

01:55:48.500 So, uh, that again was, uh, I see that Sandy Sable has put on the chat that she knows what happened today.

01:55:55.460 Can you type in Sandy what happened today at the hearing?

01:56:04.180 Too long to type.

01:56:05.920 Oh, too long to type.

01:56:07.200 All right.

01:56:07.880 I'll call you after this podcast, Sandy.

01:56:10.500 Well, what we could do as well as, um, Terenzio, can you find Sandy and just bring her on for a moment?

01:56:17.080 It would just need to be brief though, please, Sandy.

01:56:19.820 Oh, there you go.

01:56:20.680 Okay.

01:56:21.080 Fair enough.

01:56:21.800 All right, Sandy.

01:56:22.540 Thank you.

01:56:24.320 Okay.

01:56:25.140 Good stuff.

01:56:26.080 Well, Rocco, I am again, just so grateful for your time.

01:56:30.940 I've had good fun with you.

01:56:32.400 And, uh, you know, I would say, I hope all of our viewers and those who will be listening to this video presentation in the future, um, you know, have learned a lot tonight.

01:56:41.420 It has been good fun.

01:56:43.340 I feel educated and always so well-informed when, uh, Rocco has been on the show.

01:56:47.520 In closing, Rocco, what would you, what would you like to say?

01:56:50.880 Well, as Laurel always used to say to Hardy, this is just another fine mess you got me into.

01:56:57.580 I have nothing to say.

01:56:58.720 Thank you.

01:56:59.480 And I wish everybody out there well and keep living your life as a free person.

01:57:05.420 First, assert and exercise your constitutional, God-given rights.

01:57:11.860 And that's what, that's all I have to say.

01:57:14.220 All right.

01:57:15.000 Thank you so much, uh, Rocco, for being on the show.

01:57:18.060 Uh, Terenzio, again, I want to just encourage everybody, please continue to give to the Constitutional Rights Center.

01:57:24.760 Rocco is working very hard on your behalf.

01:57:27.480 He has staff and an office to run.

01:57:29.680 And so we want to just make sure that he continues to have, uh, you know, we, what do they call that?

01:57:34.940 A little war chest, not a little one, but a big one.

01:57:37.620 Um, Action for Canada as well.

01:57:39.460 We, uh, had been very wise with our funds.

01:57:42.160 And so when we had to, uh, appeal some of the decisions that Judge Ross had made, uh, we were able to, uh, pay Rocco those funds.

01:57:50.400 But we need to as well, uh, work and have some extra funds in our war chest to, to keep everything going.

01:57:56.720 Because we don't know where the future is going, but we want those, uh, the government oligarchs to know that we are well-funded and ready to go for whatever they bring our way.

01:58:05.800 And it is definitely going to be the power of the people getting behind us.

01:58:09.800 And, uh, we need you to be ever so present.

01:58:12.540 So, all right.

01:58:13.620 Um, our guests next week, it's going to be awesome.

01:58:16.620 Christine Douglas Williams.

01:58:18.720 Christine, you, you may have heard about the new appointee to the Canadian, uh, racial committee.

01:58:24.920 And, uh, this, uh, this lady has made some very damaging statements in the past about, uh, Canada and about this being a Christian nation. 0.80

01:58:34.960 And Christine Douglas Williams used to be on the Canadian race committee.

01:58:39.780 And one of the first things Trudeau, uh, did when he came into office was make it a top priority to remove her because she's too Canadian. 0.99

01:58:47.760 She's too sovereign.

01:58:49.620 She believes in the, um, fact that Canada is founded on Judeo-Christian principles and was questioning all the, uh, rhetoric regarding the, uh, Islamization of this nation through the passing of motion.

01:59:04.280 And one Oh three, the Islam, uh, Islamophobia motion, Christine didn't support that.

01:59:09.620 So we're going to be talking about her story, how she was removed from office and why the work that she's been doing since the statements that were made, uh, by the newly appointed individual.

01:59:21.660 What does it really mean about, um, immigration, uh, how the government is trying to pit and divide the, uh, citizens of Canada into partitioning by, uh, creating nations within our nations.

01:59:35.240 Uh, we've got the Muslims in one section, the Pakistanis in another, the Canadian in another, the Chinese. 1.00

01:59:41.740 Isn't that why we, why are we doing this right?

01:59:44.680 We are all Canadians under one rule of law, under one constitution, under one charter of rights and freedoms.

01:59:50.620 And we need to embrace that.

01:59:52.500 And we're going to talk about how reasonable it is that when people immigrate to Canada, they are expected to assimilate and integrate.

02:00:01.320 And that is not a racist comment to make.

02:00:05.660 It is a reasonable comment to make if we want to exist as a country that was founded on, on the values and principles that gave us that foundation for the very democracy that we're living in.

02:00:18.940 And, uh, you have heard me often say before, if you question this, if you think that we are a multicultural nation, if you believe that we're a secular nation,

02:00:28.860 then you're moving towards the fact of what was it Trudeau said?

02:00:32.300 We're a post-national state with no core identity.

02:00:35.040 So if we don't stand up for the core of what action, what, what Canada is founded on, Christian principles, we are going to be where Trudeau's dream of.

02:00:46.500 And that's a communist, fascist, uh, diabolical state, call it what you will.

02:00:52.840 All right. 0.96

02:00:53.200 So Christine's going to come on.

02:00:54.460 We're going to have some honest conversation, uh, you know, uh, and, and I'll just leave it at that.

02:00:58.860 And I always like to close off with a verse, uh, Trensio, would you please bring that up?

02:01:04.480 I'm sorry, Tanya, before you finish off, I'm sorry.

02:01:07.620 Can I join that session next week?

02:01:11.160 I would love it if you would join us for that session.

02:01:14.660 I have very strong views on this and I have written about it.

02:01:17.400 I am fluent in seven languages, have litigated in both official languages.

02:01:21.500 And the section 27 of the charter, in my view, the multiculturalism section was meant to divide and not build.

02:01:30.320 Yes.

02:01:30.500 And I have no problem integrating with this country and nobody's taken away my native tongue.

02:01:35.460 And I think this whole nonsense of parading every different culture in a two way, in a two way conversation and tunnels with the main groups is wrong.

02:01:45.900 And it's, and I totally agree with your statement, but I have some legal views on this.

02:01:49.960 I think it's, I think it's going to be a great show.

02:01:53.200 I'm hoping to pipe in.

02:01:56.240 Oh, Rocco, absolutely.

02:01:57.840 And, you know, this has been pre-COVID.

02:01:59.720 This was one of the many issues that I was addressing.

02:02:02.380 I think it was one of the most critical, honestly, pre-COVID.

02:02:04.840 And, you know, people say, if we're going to, we're going to focus on Motion 103, but it's going to be about immigration as a whole, et cetera, and about us being a sovereign nation built on biblical principles.

02:02:15.340 And I always challenge people, if you are challenged with me saying that, I would say go to one of the 57, 56 Islamic majority countries, Pakistan, China, North Korea, and, and think about the basis of which their country, the belief system, which forms their political system.

02:02:33.600 And these wonderful people living in those nations are living under tyranny, oppression.

02:02:40.520 They don't have the rights and freedoms that we enjoy in the Western world.

02:02:43.660 And that's why we're being hit so hard with this multiculturalism. 1.00

02:02:48.120 We didn't vote on that.

02:02:49.620 Pierre Elliott Trudeau cursed us with it.

02:02:52.300 And we've always been very.

02:02:54.460 They consciously confuse religion with politics.

02:02:59.040 Fascists always do that. 0.95

02:03:01.320 They confuse religion with politics.

02:03:02.940 That's why we have the mess here.

02:03:05.200 Right?

02:03:05.600 Because truly religious people of any stripe, all they want is to be left alone in peace, to raise their family, and be treated equally.

02:03:13.340 They don't want to be put into boxes on the shelf.

02:03:16.600 Right.

02:03:17.400 And the thing is, as well, Rocco, is I was talking to Brian Peckford recently, who is the last surviving, you know, individual of the signage of the charter.

02:03:27.420 And when we were talking about this section on freedom of religion, he said, Tanya, when that was signed, that was to keep the government out of the churches.

02:03:35.800 And it was based on Christianity.

02:03:37.720 It was based on the God of the Bible, not all these multiple religions that are trying to infiltrate and force their failed foreign policies and religious belief systems in Canada.

02:03:49.840 And so it's really, you know, and then, of course, like they've done with COVID, they've really upped the mind manipulation that, how do we say that, psychological warfare,

02:04:03.320 that if you take a stand on this issue and object to it, then you are that racist, you're Islamophobic. 0.67

02:04:11.580 They've got all of the word attacks to shut people down from opposing something that we have a right and a duty to protect.

02:04:24.220 And I'm really, really, really adamant to protect our Christian roots, because that's the basis of all.

02:04:30.420 That's what gives people to be atheists and live freely in Canada as an atheist. 0.94

02:04:35.900 You know, try living as a homosexual in Islam. 1.00

02:04:40.540 Yeah, in most countries. 0.99

02:04:42.080 But, you know, this is why part of this COVID agenda is to be rid of all religions. 0.99

02:04:47.580 And the best way to do it is to adapt the majority religion historically in Canada, which is the Christian religion.

02:04:54.220 Like, I don't see any more churches.

02:04:56.380 They're all being turned into condos, for God's sake.

02:04:59.160 Yeah.

02:04:59.580 You come to Toronto, all the churches are being turned on for condos or refurbished as condos.

02:05:05.940 Yeah.

02:05:06.180 You see the COVID agenda wants to eliminate people's faith in God, you know, and you see it clearly.

02:05:16.440 Yeah.

02:05:18.000 Yeah, yeah, because, yeah, because they want to be God.

02:05:21.960 And we've seen Klaus Schwab's little puppet, you know, who's gone around and spoken about that God is dead and that they're going to take over our brains and minds. 0.94

02:05:35.420 So there's crazy people running the nuthouse, or what is it, the lunatics are running the nuthouse, and we've got to take back control. 0.97

02:05:42.920 So, okay, Rocco, great. 0.96

02:05:44.520 We're going to look forward to next week's show.

02:05:47.060 So thank you so much.

02:05:48.100 Thank you.

02:05:48.740 See you then.

02:05:49.220 It's been a fun evening away from the family.

02:05:52.400 Yeah, I've loved it.

02:05:53.520 I loved it.

02:05:55.060 Okay, Trendsia, let's bring up that verse. 0.99

02:05:57.820 And we're going to leave everybody on a high note tonight.

02:06:00.540 Okay, Psalm 37, 8 to 15.

02:06:03.460 This is how God feels about the wicked.

02:06:06.080 Refrain from anger and turn from wrath.

02:06:08.580 Do not fret.

02:06:09.420 It leads only to evil. 0.69

02:06:11.560 For those who are evil will be destroyed. 0.93

02:06:13.900 Yay! 0.99

02:06:14.220 But those who hope in the Lord will inherit the land.

02:06:17.640 A little while, and the wicked will be no more.

02:06:20.740 Though you look for them, they will not be found.

02:06:23.560 But the meek will inherit the land and enjoy peace and prosperity. 1.00

02:06:27.900 The wicked fought against the righteous and gnashed their teeth at them.

02:06:32.020 But the Lord laughs at the wicked, for he knows their day is coming.

02:06:36.920 The wicked draw the sword and bend the bow, to bring down the poor and needy, to slay those

02:06:42.580 whose ways are upright.

02:06:44.260 But their swords will pierce their own hearts, and their bows will be broken.

02:06:50.220 All right, as always, I take great hope in these scriptures that God has spoken to us long ago.

02:06:58.560 And that, as I've been saying, if you have hope in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior of

02:07:03.320 your life, you have hope in eternity.

02:07:05.900 And if you're sitting on the fence because you're filled with fear right now, and everything

02:07:09.740 regarding COVID, regarding these injections, regarding division in your family has really

02:07:14.560 broken you down, I just want to encourage you, contact Action for Canada.

02:07:18.700 We have a prayer chain, we'd like to offer you support.

02:07:21.320 Get involved with the chapters in your community, because there's an incredible support team

02:07:26.160 there just waiting to meet you.

02:07:27.920 And you have gifts and talents that you can offer, whether you greet at the door, whether

02:07:32.140 you go out and talk to parents about what's happening in the schools, whatever it is, we

02:07:36.900 need your help.

02:07:37.760 We love you.

02:07:38.780 So, and you're not alone.

02:07:40.500 All right, God bless you, and God bless Canada.

02:07:43.280 Thank you.

02:07:48.700 I'm going to thank God and God alone for the ground that I'm standing on.

02:08:05.080 I'm going to thank our founding fathers for giving their lives and sacrificing so much

02:08:16.480 for our freedom.

02:08:20.540 And I'm calling on you today, don't put them to shame, don't waste what they did.

02:08:27.880 And we have guaranteed rights in this country.

02:08:38.500 We are putting chapters across the nation.

02:08:42.140 We are going to be in every town and every city.

02:08:46.060 And we are going to build communities within these communities of like-minded people who are

02:08:51.220 actually going to care for one another again and love on each other and give each other

02:08:55.700 the help when they're down.

02:08:57.980 We are going to use the teams and the people that build within chapters to support our businesses.

02:09:05.460 The government's actions are completely 100% unlawful.

02:09:12.100 Judgment will again be found on justice and those with virtuous hearts will pursue it.

02:09:19.260 You have a virtuous heart if you are here today pursuing freedom and righteousness.

02:09:27.580 And then verse 23 comes along with a promise.

02:09:32.400 God says he will turn the sins of evil people back on them.

02:09:37.960 He will destroy them for their sins.

02:09:41.920 I take great comfort in that because I serve a mighty living God who has allowed us to go

02:09:52.780 through this season of discomfort because we as a nation have turned our backs on him.

02:09:59.420 And we need to get right.

02:10:01.860 So I am just going to thank you so much.

02:10:05.740 I'm going to say God bless you and God bless Canada.

02:10:09.600 God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you again.

02:10:18.340 Thank you so much for His Son and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you and God bless you.

02:10:39.600 so

02:11:09.600 Thank you.

02:11:39.600 Thank you.

Action4Canada - February 12, 2023

Updates And Government Inquiry with Rocco Galati

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript