In this episode, Heather and Heather discuss the devastating fires that have ravaged the western United States since mid-August. They discuss the possible link between climate change and the use of geoengineering to manipulate our weather patterns. Mike Beckwith, a chemical engineer and environmentalist, joins them to discuss the impact of climate change on our environment and our health and safety.
00:00:00.000Do you feel what is being injected into the skies can be causing issues like burning eyes, persistent coughing, rather than the fires, the smoke from the fires causing it?
00:00:10.680Like, what are the chemicals that they're using?
00:00:14.020And I know that there's some had said there's mercury and different things, but how is that affecting people medically?
00:00:21.600I haven't really delved into that too much, but I know that there's a lot of aluminum, barium, sulfur-related compounds that are being emitted.
00:00:33.180And yes, could they be affecting eyes and throat irritation?
00:00:39.040There's reports actually coming out that it is causing, it's affecting and causing dementia and neurological, yeah, neurological problems.
00:00:48.800So, I believe, you know, that it's a chemical that's being dropped upon the earth.
00:00:54.320And the other part of that would be then, do you think that this chemical residue that is ending up on the earth's surface and on our plants is helping to ignite the fires?
00:01:29.720So, directed energy weapons can deny entrance to an area or prevent enemy forces or assets from functioning within an area.
00:01:36.940Directed energy weapons used for denial do not cause long-term damage to targets, and when enemy forces or assets leave the area, they typically regain function or the effect is mitigated.
00:01:49.940That's basically the deny here, which can be used on humans as well.
00:01:55.220For example, the Department of Defense's active denial system uses millimeter waves that interact with the water and fat molecules in a person's skin to create a heating sensation.
00:02:08.140During testing, the discomfort persuaded individuals to move away from the area.
00:02:13.860First, I'd like to introduce our special guest speaker.
00:02:21.000We are so pleased that Mike Beckwith is joining us on the Empower Hour this evening.
00:02:27.740Mike comes from a technical and business background.
00:02:31.560He has a chemical engineering technology diploma, a bachelor's degree in chemical engineering, and a master's degree in business administration.
00:02:41.280While in tech school, he took a number of environmental courses on air, water, and soil, and over the last several years, he studied current and historic details about climate change.
00:02:53.940By accessing government documents, military, and UN papers, Mike has researched the historical progression of geoengineering, which is the unprecedented large-scale manipulation of our weather.
00:03:07.840He continues to bring awareness to citizens and politicians regarding climate change alarmism and how it's affecting our economy, our freedoms, and our health and welfare.
00:03:20.180Will you all please help me welcome Mike Beckwith.
00:03:34.060We're really looking forward to your presentation tonight and having this conversation.
00:03:39.060Previously, we've had Jeff Snycer on and, you know, talking about what's going on policy-wise regarding the 15-minute cities.
00:03:47.280We've had Robert on regarding the fires and just bringing this whole picture together as how the government and the globalist elites are working to strategically put a scenario in place
00:04:01.060to, you know, to give the masses the idea that climate change is real and the only way and the solutions are to get us into 15-minute cities.
00:04:10.760And geoengineering, weather modification, plays a big role in that.
00:04:15.400And so I think this is going to be a really important piece to the puzzle.
00:04:19.020And anyways, I'm just going to hand the floor over to you and look forward to your presentation.
00:04:23.920So further to that comment, what I would actually like to even ask people is, what is the Earth's climate, naturally?
00:04:33.280From the research I've done, I don't think anybody that's on the Earth right now, well, maybe some of the elders,
00:04:40.380but most people on the Earth now actually don't truly understand what the true climate is.
00:04:46.260I think it's been manipulated for such a long time that we've lost touch with what it is naturally.
00:04:53.640So if you go back to the 70s, there was all talk about global cooling, that we were going to go into another ice age.
00:05:02.700And then there was talk about the ozone layer depletion.
00:05:05.760And then we moved into global warming.
00:05:08.260But the global warming part didn't work, so they had to redub it to global climate change.
00:05:12.880So this has been used as a backstop for a lot of politicians and people of influence to try to manipulate what we do, our everyday lives.
00:05:25.440So we've been subjected to a big push on electrification, and especially here in Canada, the carbon tax.
00:05:36.920But something that isn't talked about when we're looking at this is geoengineering.
00:05:42.880As was previously stated, geoengineering is a large-scale manipulation of a specific process central to controlling Earth's climate for the purpose of obtaining a specific benefit.
00:05:56.940And who's deciding whether those benefits are good or not good?
00:06:00.180Well, there's evidence that geoengineering has been going on since the late 1800s, and it started with some fairly crude, like, weather balloon-related experiments that were done in the, like, I think, 1870s, 1880s is when it started.
00:06:23.160And if you go back to the time of the Vietnam War, there was a lot of talk and a lot of controversy after that, that the U.S. government was using weather manipulation as acts of war.
00:06:37.040And there was a lot of denial from government officials on that.
00:06:39.980But then eventually, information did start coming out.
00:06:46.420And I'm just going to share my screen here and show some documents.
00:06:51.340So this is an article that was put up, and it was originally from the early 70s.
00:07:07.180And this was talking about rainmaking used as a weapon by the U.S. during the Vietnam War.
00:07:12.460So this is a scan of the document, but here it's been rewritten.
00:07:19.300So here it says the United States has been secretly seeding clouds over North Vietnam, Laos, and South Vietnam to increase and control the rainfall for military purposes.
00:07:29.700Government sources, both civilian and military, said during an extensive series of interviews that the Air Force cloud seeding program has been aimed most recently at hindering movement of North Vietnamese troops and equipment and suppressing enemy and aircraft missile fire.
00:07:46.160The disclosure confirmed a growing speculation in congressional and scientific circles about the use of weather modification in Southeast Asia.
00:07:52.980Despite years of experience, so here they're even saying years of experience prior to the war, with rainmaking in the United States and elsewhere, scientists are not sure they understand its long-term effect by the ecology of the region or even the Earth.
00:08:09.700So there was some opposition against that.
00:08:13.120There was people asking some questions.
00:08:14.760But the intent was to basically drench the enemy so that they can't move, so it would impair the logistics, it would impair the morale of the troops that were on the ground.
00:08:30.880So here it says, talks about muddying roads and flooding lines of communication.
00:08:35.720But there were also many military and government officials who expressed doubt that the project had caused any dramatic results.
00:08:41.340But I think that history has shown that there was.
00:08:49.460So they used a method for developing or for treating clouds with a chemical that eventually produced an acidic rainfall capable of fouling the operation of North Vietnamese radar equipment used for directing surface-to-air missiles.
00:09:02.380So what that did is the acidity then affected equipment on the ground because of acid rain.
00:09:09.040And it was promoting, you know, decay of the equipment, rust, et cetera, and stuff wouldn't work.
00:09:16.920So a few other things here that they were targeting was providing rain and cloud cover for infiltration of South Vietnamese commando and intelligence teams into North Vietnam.
00:09:29.280As I mentioned, it served as a spoiler for North Vietnamese attacks and raids on South Vietnam, altering or tailoring the rain patterns over North Vietnam and Laos to aid the United States bombing missions and diverting North Vietnamese men and material from military operations to keep muddied roads and lines of communication and operation.
00:09:53.240So this goes into a lot more detail on that.
00:09:58.800And I encourage people to read these documents as well for yourselves.
00:10:05.760Now, on the flip side to that, I recently came across this document.
00:10:12.300And this document is talking about using forest fires as a military weapon.
00:10:17.760So it's basically the flip side of what the first one was.
00:10:20.660And this was done by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
00:10:24.900And they initiated a study on how that they could use wildfires, again, basically for the same purpose as the rain, as a military weapon.
00:10:34.720So they went through a whole bunch of testing and study.
00:10:37.440And they figured out that if they pre-plan it, they can artificially dry out a certain area using certain chemicals.
00:10:45.280And then they can initiate small, little localized fires that will eventually grow and actually grow into each other to turn into a massive fire.
00:10:58.360They found that just setting one big fire wasn't as effective as setting a bunch of small fires that would then grow into one massive one.
00:11:09.200So I'm just going to show you the top here of this document so everybody can see where it's coming from.
00:11:51.080So if anybody is on Twitter or X now, look up that profile, and you'll probably find even more information than what I'm going to show you here.
00:12:02.120So just some of the information that was talked about there.
00:12:19.940As part of going back to the military using rainfall, they actually came out and said, or they was dubbed to Operation Popeye,
00:12:29.040which actually Ripley's has actually admitted that it was there.
00:12:32.120For some websites for people to look at, here's one.
00:12:37.280It's called Weather Modification Association.
00:12:41.040So the history of this, the Weather Modification Association was organized in 1950
00:12:46.100to cultivate a better understanding of weather modification techniques, impacts, and expectations among program sponsors, program operators,
00:12:55.420and the scientific community, and the scientific community, and to promote ethical, professional conduct, and a free exchange of information.
00:14:51.300But the NMOD convention is specifically intended to prevent use of the environment as a means of warfare
00:14:57.760by prohibiting the deliberate manipulation of natural processes that could produce phenomena,
00:15:04.600such as hurricanes, tidal waves, or changes in climate.
00:15:09.240So a non-exhaustive list of phenomena that could result from the use of environmental modification techniques
00:15:16.080are earthquakes and tsunamis, an upset in the ecological balance of our region,
00:15:22.540changes in weather patterns, clouds, precipitation, cyclones, and tornadic storms,
00:15:27.820changes in climate patterns, changes in ocean currents,
00:15:31.720changes in the state of the ozone layer, and changes in the state of the atmosphere.
00:15:35.740So just imagine what technology has developed since then.
00:15:54.560Here is the UN document from back in the 70s,
00:16:01.860where they came to an agreement, and this is in multiple languages.
00:16:08.720But here's their definitions, and they're basically stating here,
00:16:12.820it's a legal document basically stating that they're not going to use these weather modification techniques
00:16:18.500on the state parties or the state, the countries that are part of the UN.
00:16:26.320Another document from recent Congress, this is from the 107th Congress, H.R. 2977,
00:16:42.280and this bill was dubbed to be the Space Preservation Act of 2001.
00:16:47.820So it talks about certain weapons, etc.
00:16:55.360So here are the terms weapon and weapon systems mean a device capable of any of the following.
00:17:02.340So there's a few other things, but I just want to focus on a few.
00:17:06.100And one of them here is directing a source of energy, including molecular or atomic energy,
00:17:11.080subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low-frequency or ultra-low-frequency energy radiation against an object.
00:17:22.480We'll see a little bit more about that a little later on as well.
00:17:27.920Further in here, it talks about such terms as what they say are exotic weapon systems.
00:24:28.100And one time I just, I had enough of being ignored.
00:24:30.760And I asked them, I said, well, you don't seem to be giving me answers to these questions.
00:24:36.420I asked them if they needed help with the answers.
00:24:39.280And that actually did finally promote a response.
00:24:43.220But unfortunately, that response was just a regurgitation of all of the climate-related initiatives that were ongoing and being pushed by the Alberta government.
00:25:15.800The only difference was I got a list of stuff that the federal government was pushing for initiatives relative to climate change.
00:25:26.080So again, I basically gave him the same reply that, you know, you guys, you're not getting the point here.
00:25:33.660So I would encourage, and the questions can be put on the Action for Canada, if Tanya wants to, to give to other people.
00:25:47.980If you guys want to use my questions to push your local representatives, please do so.
00:25:53.960So I encourage everybody that wants to do it to push government officials, because if more of us do it, we'll actually have a better chance of actually getting something changed.
00:26:06.880So with those questions, I'm just going to go over, I'm not going to go over all the questions, but I'm just going to give you my feedback or my thoughts on those questions.
00:26:15.980So the first one I want to talk about is, is the science settled, or is the other opinion being suppressed?
00:26:26.920My opinion, based on what I've seen and all the research I've done, it is 100% being suppressed.
00:26:32.720There is so much information out there now.
00:26:35.800All you need to do is just do a little bit of a search.
00:26:38.800Don't use Google, but if you do a little bit of a search, look on Twitter accounts, look on Telegram accounts.
00:26:44.940There is a lot of information out there.
00:26:50.060Another important one I want to talk about is,
00:26:56.820why are select data ranges used to predict future impacts?
00:27:02.140Now this is an article that I saw some time ago, put out by the Weather Network, where they talk about new climate report,
00:27:09.020paints a harsh picture of the future of Canada's coastlines.
00:27:11.660And it's talking about the impacts of CO2 on, on the oceans.
00:27:18.340I just want to focus here on just this graph.
00:27:22.440And some people have heard of, but maybe some of your viewers haven't, but there's something that's called a hockey stick effect.
00:27:33.180And what it is, is you take past data, and you somehow manipulate it to seem like things are going up at a rapid rate,
00:27:42.140which is kind of represented here by this graph.
00:27:45.120So, if you look here, past this point, is more of a projection.
00:27:53.500And that's based on some modeling of past data.
00:28:00.340But if you look at it, the data that was used was from about 1985 to about 2005.
00:28:08.360And in that period, there was actually some warming of the Earth.
00:28:15.980And they used that select data range to use what's called the mathematical regression analysis.
00:28:24.740And that's just a fancy way of saying you're using data to predict the future.
00:28:27.900But using just that little period of time influences that regressional analysis, which creates this rapid rise.
00:28:38.820But if you were to take back to 1950 and use all of that data for your mathematical analysis,
00:28:47.240this curve would be down here with a little bit of bumps up and down.
00:30:01.440They're not going to put their money out there if they think that it's going to be a loss.
00:30:05.140The 400 jets going over to COP27, what I want to talk about or just show on there is some more hypocrisy.
00:30:21.480So our governor general flies around talking about climate change initiatives.
00:30:29.260So recently, she went to Finland to talk about climate change.
00:30:38.620So here is the latest almost $40,000 bill for 25,000 liters of jet fuel to fly the governor general to a climate conference in Finland in February
00:30:51.200so she could deliver a speech on the dangers of climate emissions.
00:30:54.760If you put that into perspective, that amount of fuel and carbon, they say here,
00:31:08.780so according to online news source Blacker Blocks Reporter,
00:31:13.820for a four-day trip, a 15-person junket produced an estimated 77 tons of carbon dioxide.
00:31:19.840So according to Transport Canada, driving the average family van for a whole year only produces 3.5 tons.
00:31:28.460So here they're beating on us as citizens to reduce the carbon footprint, but they're going ahead and doing this.
00:31:36.000The other one is, why was the Earth's climate?