In this episode of Conspiracy Theories, Alex Jones talks about DNA testing in public schools and the government wanting to collect DNA samples from elementary and secondary school children. DNA testing has been around for a long time, but did you know that schools and public schools have been collecting DNA samples?
00:00:12.000He's Alex Jones on the GCN Radio Network.
00:00:17.000And now, live from Austin, Texas, Alex Jones.
00:00:22.000Blasting out on the AM and FM dial, from Oregon to Colorado, to Florida to New York, I'm Alex Jones.
00:00:31.000Your host, Simulcasting at InfoWars.com, InfoWars.net, PresentPlanet.com, as well as Global Shortwave 12.172 and 93.20 during the day and back from 9 to midnight at 5.085 and 68.90.
00:00:49.000Yesterday I read a New Jersey Herald article, DNA legacy still water first in the country to identify pupils through genetic fingerprinting.
00:00:59.000And the article goes on to say, peoples were brought into the school cafeteria one class at a time, had their DNA collected by a patrolman, Tom Cicetti, who took two swabs of each people's mouth.
00:01:09.000There were a few complaints from the peoples who seemed eager for their turn to be swabbed.
00:01:17.000A police officer said, it tickles so a lot of kids start laughing.
00:01:22.000Now they started drug testing about 10 years ago in more conservative areas of the country where people were foolishly brought into it just for football players or if you wanted to park in the parking lot or a privilege or being banned.
00:01:34.000Now it's universal they're going to test for nicotine.
00:01:36.000That's the problem with this and we've got the...
00:01:43.000dna-fingerprint.com hyperlink on the main guest section of infowars.com and he now joins me here on
00:02:25.000But, you know, there's a problem with just, like, a parent taking, like, a lock of hair from their child, because there's two things that affect DNA negatively.
00:02:36.000And one is bacteria, and the other is the sunlight.
00:02:40.000So, by just taking a locker here, over a period of time, you're not going to be able to extract the DNA.
00:02:46.000Instead, you take the soft, tender mucous membrane tissue out of the side of the cheek.
00:02:53.000Right, by rubbing it for like five seconds, it absorbs the buccal cells, and then you place that in the tube, and there's a fixative agent that preserves the DNA.
00:03:03.000Antibacterial fixative agent that preserves the DNA, and then you place that tube That's vapor-proof in a red envelope that filters off the ultraviolet light and it literally preserves the DNA for an indefinite period of time, forever.
00:03:18.000Again, we're talking to the president and founder of DNA LifePrint.
00:03:33.000Now, this always starts where it's just the parents having it, but why it says two swabs, then it says, oh, one of the kids goes home with the parents.
00:03:45.000The reason why we have two swabs instead of one is the amount of DNA that's absorbed on each swab is an enormous amount.
00:03:55.000It's going to be a minimum of 1,000 to 7,800 nanograms of DNA.
00:04:01.000Uh, to do an analysis you need three quarters of one percent of the one thousand.
00:04:06.000But, you know, instead of having one, I decided let's put two in there, so in case the parent needed the sample and used one of the swabs, God forbid the child was lost, and then years later they needed it for medical reasons, you had two samples.
00:04:22.000Those cotton swabs are in the tube together, and they stay with the family.
00:04:26.000There's no big brother involved, no repository.
00:04:29.000It goes home and stays in the privacy of the family at room temperature.
00:04:33.000Joe, you certainly heard about the big scandals in North Carolina, Virginia, Texas, where they have been caught taking the heel blood sample, but taking an extra ampule and putting it in a federal database.
00:05:03.000Certainly you know the government starts something out as voluntary, and then it becomes mandatory.
00:05:09.000You haven't heard about the government discussing mandatory DNA samples from everybody?
00:05:14.000Now, let me tell you, there's been rumors about everything about maintaining DNA samples, but everything that I've heard, it's being maintained in the privacy of your own home.
00:05:24.000And whether the family keeps it or, God forbid, you need it for other reasons, you're going to be able to still obtain it.
00:05:30.000But, just like at the World Trade Center, when they wanted the families to bring in the toothbrushes, You know, the majority of that, they weren't able to extract the DNA.
00:05:39.000I mean, you're talking about a plastic toothbrush that, uh, who knows who used it last or whatever, uh, depending on the toothpaste, whether or not they were able to extract it and it wasn't successful.
00:05:48.000Well, here's another... If I'm maintaining the sample of the DNA, it's kept in a privacy-run home, and only, God forbid, if you need it, then you turn it over to the authorities or to the medical... Well, why are they... Well, here's an important question.
00:06:14.000They're told, stand here, you go to the bathroom, you sit there, you do that.
00:06:19.000And it says, oh, all the children loved it.
00:06:22.000Look, who set this up is what I'm asking.
00:06:24.000What you have is, we distribute DNA kits all over the country through police departments, non-profit organizations, and especially corporate sponsorships.
00:07:39.000Who in this New Jersey township, because you're the president of the company and you get a lot of attention on this, I'm sure you know how this was set up.
00:07:50.000Were parents consulted or did they just march the kids in to have their DNA taken?
00:07:56.000What they do is anytime there's an event, whether it's the police department or a corporate sponsor, they do a public service announcement, they bring home notices from the schools, and they offer it to the parents free of charge if they decide to have it.
00:08:12.000If the parent wants it, they'll bring the child in, And they'll take the DNA sample, whether it's for the child or whether it's for an Alzheimer's patient or a family.
00:08:20.000Wait a minute, they marched in whole classes, the whole school, and took their DNA.
00:08:26.000Yeah, and everything is with parents' permission.
00:08:28.000If the parents did not want their child's DNA, But you have to remember, the sample goes home with the parent.
00:09:18.000I don't want any relationship with the school.
00:09:21.000Kids lined up in masks because of the crimes this government's committed with eugenics and bioethics and the things they've done and they've already been caught.
00:09:30.000See, I read the news wires three hours a day.
00:09:34.000And I see articles every two weeks about them grabbing DNA illegally.
00:09:39.000The scams they're running, what they're doing.
00:09:41.000I don't want government, school districts, involved in this.
00:09:44.000If parents want to do it, they should do it.
00:09:46.000This hurting people, you know, in a cattle car fashion, I think is wrong.
00:09:51.000Well, I'm telling you, that's the interpretation that maybe the reporter had and the way he described it.
00:09:55.000But what is taking place is they're offering it to the parents free of charge if they want it, and if they do want it, The only record of that goes home with the family.
00:10:06.000What if the Colorado State Police say that they want 10,000 kits from you because they're going to set up checkpoints and make people take these?
00:10:22.000But if you, the president of the company, if the state police said, we're going to use these at checkpoints, give it to us, would you do it?
00:11:01.000I know, in the past... Okay, so I'm sure, I'm sure, I am sure that no one is going to volunteer and give their DNA for a data bank, for whatever company it is, or for whatever organization, unless there was a demand, a legal demand, through a search warrant, that they were able to obtain it through the court.
00:11:21.000But maybe you heard about the Total Information Awareness Network Homeland Security.
00:11:24.000They're saying under this wartime they don't need that anymore.
00:11:29.000And that's a total violation of our rights.
00:11:31.000Well, no, that's not exactly the interruption.
00:11:33.000I think you're looking at it... I'm not any more familiar with it than the general public when I'm watching on TV.
00:12:30.000That's why you've heard about it, because somebody saw it on the news or read an article and they told somebody, they told somebody that I guess it was a rumor for you.
00:12:37.000They are keeping illegal DNA databases.
00:13:10.000I was in charge of homicide for Miami Beach Police, and I worked there for 29 years.
00:13:15.000And I worked over 2,000 death investigations during my career.
00:13:20.000On November 2nd, 1990, a baby was found dead in the bushes that we weren't able to identify.
00:13:25.000It was the worst case of abuse, neglect, and torture in the history of Dade County.
00:13:31.000And I said to the media that very first day, because I knew this child who was three years old, and he only weighed 18 pounds, and he had his pampers taped to his body, and the pampers had been on for over a month.
00:13:43.000I said, with today's technology, we're able to obtain an entire history of a motor vehicle within seconds, yet we're unable to identify a missing or abandoned child.
00:13:52.000I didn't realize how profound my words were, and then I testified before Senate subcommittees after I solved the case and the murders on death row, and then I went to Washington and I did research and I tried to pass a bill that would mandate social services to take a DNA sample of at-risk children.
00:14:24.000I received over 100 footprints taken at birth of newborn babies.
00:14:31.000These are the families that were hoping that this was their child.
00:14:34.000One of the footprints was, in fact, baby lollipops.
00:14:38.000We had the baby in one hand and we had 100 footprints in the other,
00:14:42.000and not one single print was legible for identification purposes.
00:14:47.000So it was of no value whatsoever, yet we have laws under books in certain states that say a child has to be footprinted for identification purposes.
00:14:56.000Number one, now I'm beginning to get really concerned about what you're saying here, Joe, because let me tell you something right now.
00:15:03.000I'll tell you about the Associated Press.
00:15:04.000They've taken 46,000 children by CPS for at-risk parents with diabetes, people that are sick, no records, attacking homeschoolers' families.
00:15:14.0003,500 of those children that CPS took are now gone.
00:15:17.000No record of where CPS put them, where they are.
00:15:20.000These stories are popping up nationwide.
00:15:22.000CPS has got a federal mandate to break up the family, and you just said it.
00:15:27.000Mandated that at risk, you haven't committed a crime but oh you're poor, head start program, they send CPS out to the house, take DNA databanks, you just said it, government databanks!
00:15:38.000You can talk about dead kids all day long, this government has been involved in more of this than you can imagine.
00:15:44.000Have you heard about the 3,500 missing kids in Florida?
00:15:47.000I think your focus is so negative and not positive.
00:15:52.000The positive thing is that if you take a DNA sample of your child, of your own child, and God forbid that baby is missing, and you have no resources to find your own child, what would you do?
00:16:03.000The first thing you do besides presenting a picture and fingerprints...
00:17:57.000Public officials have warned that the breadbasket of America... About a year ago, they said one little two-and-a-half-year-old black girl that CBS had taken a year before was gone.
00:19:09.000What I'm saying is my original goal in this whole thing as a police officer was to encourage or pass the law, which I wasn't successful obviously, in having Um, social services, when they take a child into custody to take a DNA sample and maintain it, you know what I mean?
00:19:41.000We're getting in a lot of trouble, by the way.
00:19:42.000You think, let me ask you this, Alex, do you think Is anything wrong with a family taking their child's DNA and keeping it in the privacy of their own home?
00:19:52.000Is there anything wrong with that at all?
00:20:16.000You tried to pass legislation mandating it!
00:20:18.000Ten years ago I tried to and I wasn't successful because I was the investigator that found a dead baby that I couldn't identify and has been in social services custody.
00:20:28.000I'm an investigator and I know what Skull and Bones and others are doing to children.
00:20:32.000I read the reports on the BBC where the UN kidnaps millions of children and women a year and they're the ones trying to pass this type of legislation.
00:20:58.000We maintain the sample of the families maintain the sample of their own child.
00:21:03.000My point is, this government's criminal and I don't want the government involved anywhere and you said ten years ago you tried to pass legislation when I said, what about checkpoints taking our hair?
00:22:10.000But it doesn't involve the DNA life-bring kit.
00:22:14.000The DNA life-bring kit is made for the family.
00:22:17.000The DNA life-bring kit was made for the family to keep in the privacy of your own home, at room temperature, and God forbid, God forbid, whether it's an Alzheimer's patient or a child that's missing, or, on the other hand, for medical reasons.
00:22:36.000Then I would suggest you take a DNA sample of your parents and that DNA sample 20 years from now may be of great value medically for your children or their children.
00:22:59.000We have a government that has done every wicked thing I could imagine and it's full of cops like you who aren't evil, but trust the government.
00:23:07.000And think that give up liberty for security.
00:23:10.000It doesn't work that way and you already said because of your outrage of the dead lollipop baby that you wanted to force people to do this and now you're just trying to get people to do it.
00:23:30.000You know when I was invited to come on the show and they You know, I didn't know it was, and I'm happy to be on, and I'll talk as long as you want.
00:23:39.000I didn't know it was a controversial show.
00:23:40.000The impression she got is they just wanted to make people aware that the product was available and how to use it and everything else.
00:23:47.000I wasn't prepared to discuss laws, I wasn't prepared to discuss conspiracies, the government
00:25:37.000The CPS I have been in hospitals where a mother who was on food stamps has done nothing wrong.
00:25:42.000They come in without a judge's order, sign an emergency order, grab the child because they got a racket going, and then we get a copy of the report, the removal report, and it says we have reports they abused this baby, Jocelyn Houser, one year ago.
00:25:59.000Understand, they are criminals, and just because you're not a criminal and can't get your head around it, and you think government's good, I can send you 50 articles a day on this.
00:26:08.000If a guy who works for the post office goes in and shoots everybody, are you going to say that all postmen... No, it's government policy!
00:28:20.000He says here, Behold, we are servants and stay for the land that you gave to our fathers, to eat the fruit thereof and to eat the good thereof.
00:28:24.000we are servants to the land that you gave to our fathers to eat the fruit thereof and to eat the good thereof.
00:28:30.000Because we have so much land and we have so much increase to the kings...
00:28:35.000Have time to read the King James, you know, the whole Bible.
00:28:39.000Well, no, I just want to read this one last verse, Alex, because it's a king here.
00:28:43.000And it yields much increase to the kings who you have set over us because of our sins.
00:28:48.000Also, they have dominion over our bodies and over our cattle at their pleasure, and we are in great distress.
00:28:55.000And that is the underlying piece of why what's happening is happening, Alex.
00:28:59.000Yeah, and this guy, because he thinks it's all good, he admits 10 years ago he had to force DNA databases with CPS, but uses that risk with no charges, no nothing, to take people's children!
00:30:23.000Well, you know, I didn't intend to get in this conversation, but since I'm on, I'm wondering, Joe, if you had had the DNA of that baby, would that have allowed you to know, or if the parents that had the DNA on that baby, do you think they would have given it to you?
00:32:35.000The child had been taken away from the mother on several occasions.
00:32:40.000One time it was in the custody of social services for a four month period.
00:32:45.000Then they returned it to her and they told her that she had to comply with their guidelines of going for counseling and going for drug testing.
00:34:15.000We've got the civil rights people at the state going after it, and there's one guy in there that's doing something.
00:34:21.000You know, I don't see no difference between you and making money selling this kind of technology to these freaks than George Bush is selling nuclear reactors in Korea!
00:34:34.000You need to get your head out of your chest rather than just talking on the phone all day!
00:34:40.000Well, I think the reason he's angry is because of the BBC article about 7,200 police and CBS workers and a giant pedophile ring from London, England to Fort Worth, Texas.
00:35:17.000You know, if parents want to get the DNA database thing and put it in their refrigerator or in the closet, I think that's fine.
00:35:23.000But I don't want to have the government involved.
00:35:25.000Joe, any closing words here on the air?
00:35:27.000No, I just really enjoy talking to you.
00:35:28.000And I just want to say that there's no big brother involved.
00:35:31.000If they want to maintain the sample of their baby for medical reasons or for identification, God forbid they're missing, that they keep it in the privacy of their own home and that's how simple it is.
00:35:41.000But you're mainly involved with big corporations and sponsorships and police and schools.
00:35:45.000We have police departments that get the corporation to do a co-sponsorship.