Ali Dawah - August 13, 2021


MUSLIM BURNING FLAG ESCALATES TO DEBATE ON FREEDOM OF SPEECH


Episode Stats

Length

18 minutes

Words per Minute

224.90814

Word Count

4,162

Sentence Count

210

Misogynist Sentences

1

Hate Speech Sentences

12


Summary

In this episode of the Salaam Talk podcast, we talk about freedom of speech and what it really means to be free of speech in the modern world. We also discuss the issue of who is to blame and who is not to blame for the current state of affairs in our community.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 i'm gonna go to the town center and i'm gonna get a british flag i'm gonna put petrol over it
00:00:04.440 and i'm gonna install the flag and i'm gonna insult churchill
00:00:07.460 check out our sponsors nature's blends they specialize in premium ethiopian black seed
00:00:15.080 products the website is in the description link below you can also use the discount code
00:00:19.160 salaam10 for 10% of their products okay guys so basically what's your name kev kev came here
00:00:27.000 and he said ali wave the british flag now i said why do you need me to wave the british flag what's
00:00:33.460 the reason but i wanted to make a point he allowed me to use the flag with consent yeah okay i want to
00:00:38.180 ask you a question yeah i i used to live in a town called grimsby has everyone heard of grimsby
00:00:43.820 okay i used to live there i used to get into trouble in london before i came to islam i used to be involved
00:00:48.460 in gangs and stuff like that yeah i think you need to pay me royalties for this please sir yeah thank
00:00:52.600 you uh anyways so i used to live there for about five six years i used to get into a lot of fights
00:00:57.840 i used to be called p-a-k-i all day every day even though i'm kurdish yeah and so it's a very racist
00:01:03.780 town i used to get into fights day in day out if i go to grimsby and they are quite i would say
00:01:10.820 british nationalists you know they're proud if i have this flag and i set it on fire i set it on fire
00:01:17.980 i put petrol over it i set it on fire and i say i hate britain what would happen to me
00:01:24.200 angry what else what else do you think would happen to me i'll be attacked in what way like slapped
00:01:32.560 punched stabbed potentially potentially yeah yeah are they to blame or am i to blame
00:01:39.500 if that happened so if i went out my way okay okay so basically okay i i leave my i leave london i
00:01:51.560 travel all the way to north i'm like where is the most national british nationalist grimsby i'm gonna go
00:01:56.060 all the way to grimsby i'm gonna go to the town center and i'm gonna get a british flag i'm gonna put
00:02:00.820 petrol over it and i'm gonna insult the flag and i'm gonna insult churchill and i'm gonna say
00:02:05.700 i might who's to blame at this instance and i'm getting attacked imagine somebody comes to me
00:02:09.660 with a baseball bat yeah and they're attacking me are they to blame or am i to blame
00:02:13.740 technically so they are to blame technically but then my view would be why are you so stupid enough
00:02:25.960 to be sat there yes with a union jack and provoke people provoking people by burning why would you
00:02:31.760 do that that's a good question so the reason why i'm doing this question what's your name sir
00:02:35.620 tom tom how you doing tom you all right all right yes i like the swagger by the way yes i'm working
00:02:40.380 on mine but it's still in the process yes so now the question is the following freedom of speech does it
00:02:46.600 really exist does the formula when we apply it really work it doesn't and what happened is that
00:02:52.460 for example we have people who come and insult islam they insult the quran they insult the prophet
00:02:57.820 muhammad and people make it seem and by the way jack i'm sorry jack kev kev sorry kev yeah so the thing
00:03:03.900 is here people make it seem like it's exclusive to islam it's only the muslims that can't deal with
00:03:08.340 freedom of speech and we're like hold on a second if i went to peckham who's from peckham no i know you're
00:03:13.620 from peckham cameraman relax yourself dig up the ends if i you're from peckham yeah if i went to
00:03:18.120 peckham a black community and i had and i said i hate n-i-g-g-e-r-s do you think the people in
00:03:24.720 peckham will be like look mate you know you have a right to freedom of speech and we're gonna what
00:03:29.120 would happen to me i think there might be a drive-by i think there might be a little drive-by
00:03:33.680 let's be real here yeah the point is the following every community has individuals who might say look
00:03:40.080 like for example we have people come in and insult the prophet i ignore them i've got
00:03:43.420 that's hate i don't i don't want anything to do with that i do my thing but there are also people
00:03:47.660 in our community as muslims who would go and do something crazy that happened two weeks ago
00:03:52.000 right the question is this is it exclusive to islam no it's not because if i was to go to grimsby
00:03:58.540 a brit and and there was i don't know white mates to this day i have white mates yeah if i went to
00:04:03.180 them and i said i hate churchill church and i burnt the flag i'm not going to expect them to say
00:04:08.120 well ali you know we defend your freedom of speech of course you're not and we know what happened
00:04:11.740 at tommy robinson's march when me and mohammed hijab we nearly got killed yeah and we went and
00:04:15.860 okay okay all right let's i got punched we got punched let's say yeah let's say we got punched
00:04:20.760 yeah but if they had the means i think they wouldn't let us live the point is this and i was invited to
00:04:24.560 to tommy robinson's event it wasn't that i went there i didn't turn up like without being invited i
00:04:29.080 was invited to give it's a freedom of speech event but i was stopped because i'm a muslim the point
00:04:34.400 here is and the reason why i was stopped is because the fla the football lads alliance said to tommy
00:04:39.200 robinson if he goes up there he's not coming down yeah so the point here is the following that if
00:04:45.160 people are provoked there's you're an idiot i'll be an idiot to go to grimsby hold that flag and burn
00:04:50.060 it and i will be to blame and you said absolutely and i admire your honesty and this is what we need
00:04:55.280 to talk about here because people make it seem like it's only the muslims that get upset no we're not the
00:04:59.940 only people that get upset anyone would if this was a well it's not christian country anymore in that
00:05:04.780 in that sense there is a lot of atheism atheism if i went to russia they're quite christian orthodox
00:05:10.740 and i went and insulted the church i'm gonna get kicked in the face the point i'm trying to make
00:05:17.460 here is freedom of speech is a dream and in real life it doesn't exist would you agree
00:05:23.480 can you come here please sorry i've set the point yeah that if if you were to go to grimsby yeah and
00:05:38.500 burn a british flag yeah i need to get beaten up the people who are beating you up for doing a
00:05:42.320 morally legal however you want to conceptualize it yeah doing are doing a wrong action oh oh can
00:05:47.220 you can you move outside sorry sir come come here what an honor why is it honor am i the king
00:05:54.040 i'm a nobody yeah so why so why is it the case yeah that if someone else commits a wrong act yes that
00:06:00.520 justifies you doing the wrong like one one right no no it doesn't but that's my point what i'm saying
00:06:05.180 is i'm not saying just because someone else does i'm gonna do it i'm making a point here i would never
00:06:08.800 do that good good i would i would never do that no it's okay i can i would never do that my point
00:06:15.260 is the following way from i'm from edward edward your background you're british complicated you want
00:06:20.520 britain to be about british i'm not sure i'm not sure what that means okay neither do i i heard it
00:06:25.960 somewhere so the point is this year is if someone provokes a group of individuals yeah do we agree
00:06:33.140 that there'll be people who might come wait but we can we can separate between the kind of the fact
00:06:38.360 that there will be consequences we can separate from that where there should or shouldn't be
00:06:41.800 consequences no no no no the fact doesn't imply their fact doesn't imply a moral judgment no no
00:06:45.820 no but and then you're deriving moral judgment no no would there be an action to the to that
00:06:50.420 there would but that doesn't imply anything about what what that you have the right to do or not
00:06:53.900 no no i'm not saying i've never said they do i want to do it i'm not so so you're inferring
00:06:58.020 from you're inferring from kind of facts about how people behave in immoral ways facts about what
00:07:03.300 should and shouldn't happen well so you're so you're inferring from the actions of immoral people
00:07:07.720 what actions are moral or not and i take objection no no no what i'm saying is the following if a group
00:07:12.620 an individual here provokes a certain group of people and that person is attacked yes they have
00:07:20.500 provoked and they play a part in that because they've provoked it and that is nice the point is
00:07:26.180 the point is within some reasonable boundary exactly what that is we can have another people who carry the
00:07:31.900 attack don't follow the reasonable boundaries no no no right right but you're but what you're doing
00:07:34.740 further on in your arguments let me make sure i've understood your argument correctly so your
00:07:38.480 argument is is you you you you are certain and i and i think you're probably broadly on the money
00:07:43.920 here that if you were to go to x place and do y action which was in your legal moral rights legal
00:07:50.880 kind of ignore any distinction between legality morality for the purpose of this argument because
00:07:55.420 that's the same one you can do with another you're saying if we were to go to that situation and then
00:07:59.140 you were to get attacked you know so you're you're deriving from that that freedom of speech
00:08:03.960 shouldn't exist it doesn't it doesn't exist well no so but that that's not quite what freedom of
00:08:09.840 speech means what does it what does so so so what you're doing is you're you're deriving you're
00:08:14.540 deriving a fact from how immoral people behave in a way which we agree is wrong yes as in we
00:08:18.820 we all agree i think everybody would agree here however much we could have an argument about your
00:08:22.940 right to burn the flag or not we would agree that anyone who beat you up yeah on in virtue of that
00:08:27.700 has committed immorally it's a legal crime well so are we are we well it's a legal crime but
00:08:34.320 the application of freedom of speech do we see the effects of it working or not working you're
00:08:38.260 you're you're you're deriving moral facts from immoral people you're you're deriving facts about
00:08:42.220 the way the world should be from the way the world is but but not even from the way we have to we
00:08:47.120 have no but but you're not dealing you're not you're saying you're not deriving it from a fact
00:08:50.820 based upon how you think the world should morally be it is a fact you're deriving no you're you're
00:08:54.880 freedom of speech is a dream base not just a fact you're so you're so you're deriving what
00:08:59.980 you're doing is you're saying there are people who behave in ways we disagree with yes okay and
00:09:04.960 you're deriving from a fact about that the way you think the world should be and i don't see why
00:09:09.960 yeah yeah i don't see why you should i don't see why you should determine how you think the world
00:09:13.980 should be yeah based on people who you vehement no no no no we have to no surely the onus is on those
00:09:18.440 people to you should be your onus should be to make those people behave no no no so surely what you
00:09:23.620 should be looking that's dreaming surely what you should be looking towards is a world in which
00:09:27.960 people accept enough extent of freedom of speech to the extent that if they see you burning a
00:09:32.000 british flag their response is not and and freedom of speech does not mean the response
00:09:36.040 does not mean you you kind of have the right to then does not mean you have the right to not
00:09:40.320 have the consequence in terms of that someone can't have an argument with you about that
00:09:43.380 all we're saying all we're asking all you want is you you want you want the right to be able to
00:09:49.640 burn a flag or do some other provocative act and you just want to be not attacked i don't think
00:09:53.880 that's a dream i think the right that you can go into a product and then not be beaten up i think
00:09:57.520 it's that that is an absolute dream let me tell you something because hey how you doing okay
00:10:02.300 yeah good
00:10:03.600 i i think i think freedom of speech i think it's i think you have to unpick what you mean by that
00:10:11.400 no no no but in the first can i can i know because no one thinks sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir sir you
00:10:16.620 ask me a question let's not go somewhere let's not go somewhere give me one second
00:10:19.860 the point here is this look i would love a world where we hold hands like hippies run around
00:10:27.460 yeah i don't know go for a jog or whatever bruv that's a dream world and it's not that's not the
00:10:33.720 that's not the world you're looking at no no sir sir what's your name what's your name adam listen to me
00:10:36.860 please. I have to listen to you.
00:10:38.740 No, no, no. I have understood
00:10:40.740 you. But I don't know if you've understood
00:10:42.900 me. Because the thing is the following.
00:10:45.340 Freedom of speech is a
00:10:46.880 dream. The reason why it's a dream
00:10:49.060 is because we can see the consequences.
00:10:50.860 For example, Charlie Hebdo
00:10:52.660 drew the characters, character
00:10:54.820 shows of the prophet, right? Yes.
00:10:56.820 The whole world went on a mad one.
00:10:58.840 Like in the context where, that's their
00:11:00.820 freedom of speech.
00:11:02.620 Well, last week, somebody
00:11:04.940 drew Macron as
00:11:06.840 Hitler. And Hitler and
00:11:08.780 Macron is suing them.
00:11:10.960 Macron, the guy who's freedom of speech
00:11:12.980 advocate, is now suing
00:11:14.820 freedom of speech.
00:11:16.760 Freedom of speech doesn't mean the right to say
00:11:18.960 whatever you want in any context.
00:11:20.580 One second. Say that again.
00:11:23.000 No one's claiming that that's what freedom of speech is.
00:11:25.040 No one's claiming that freedom of speech
00:11:26.880 is the right to say whatever you want in any context.
00:11:28.460 If you can't say whatever you want, how is freedom of speech?
00:11:31.120 Well, we clearly agree.
00:11:32.500 In terms and conditions? There's limits. It's a freedom of speech.
00:11:35.080 Everything has limits. Okay, good. Now we're talking.
00:11:37.760 So we agree
00:11:39.380 that an incitement to violence
00:11:41.180 so there's lots of different ways
00:11:43.100 you can kind of do this.
00:11:45.040 The most obvious one is an incitement
00:11:47.260 to violence. So that is, if someone
00:11:49.220 stands up in Speaker's Corner and
00:11:51.140 says, not violence
00:11:53.200 incitement to violence.
00:11:54.500 Yeah, incitement to violence.
00:11:55.260 Yeah, so we agree that's wrong.
00:11:56.220 There's also
00:11:56.620 actions which kind of limit the...
00:11:59.040 So it depends exactly...
00:12:00.340 You can take a complicated view on exactly
00:12:02.060 why you think you want free speech
00:12:03.500 to be valuable.
00:12:04.300 Yeah.
00:12:04.560 So I would
00:12:05.320 typically take the view
00:12:07.580 that it's a necessary condition
00:12:09.260 for a functioning democracy.
00:12:10.920 And so that
00:12:11.300 kind of gives you some limits.
00:12:13.060 And so we can agree
00:12:13.940 that if you speak
00:12:15.520 in such a way
00:12:16.280 that it limits the ability
00:12:17.500 of others to speak freely
00:12:18.720 in the sense that you degrade
00:12:20.100 another population
00:12:20.920 or degrade another group.
00:12:22.300 So the most classic example
00:12:23.200 of this is racist behaviour.
00:12:25.200 So if you speak in a racist way
00:12:26.600 that's problematic
00:12:27.380 obviously because it's offensive.
00:12:28.500 Why is it problematic?
00:12:29.560 Well it's problematic
00:12:30.200 in a few different ways.
00:12:30.760 It's not inciting hatred.
00:12:31.800 Well no, so it's problematic.
00:12:32.960 So if you...
00:12:34.120 It's about to get horrible.
00:12:35.140 I might run.
00:12:36.260 So if it's problematic
00:12:37.520 so even if it's not
00:12:39.440 incitement to violence
00:12:40.280 so the reason why we want
00:12:41.540 free speech in the first place
00:12:42.540 is to have a functioning democracy.
00:12:44.200 And as part of that...
00:12:44.300 Free speech is used to
00:12:45.140 question the government.
00:12:46.340 Right, right, exactly.
00:12:47.080 And that's part of...
00:12:47.600 Right, right, right.
00:12:48.540 So let me explain.
00:12:49.320 So what's part of that
00:12:50.460 is you need
00:12:51.200 all the different groups
00:12:52.140 in society
00:12:52.820 to be able to have
00:12:53.600 an input into
00:12:54.180 the democratic process.
00:12:55.740 Okay, and so the problem is
00:12:56.920 if I say something racist
00:12:58.300 which then degrades
00:13:00.040 the ability of another group
00:13:01.320 in society
00:13:02.060 to say what they...
00:13:03.420 to express their opinion.
00:13:04.840 So if I was to say
00:13:05.980 all people of X group
00:13:07.460 are stupid
00:13:08.040 and I'm in a position
00:13:09.260 of such authority
00:13:10.220 I'm clearly not.
00:13:11.520 But if I was in such
00:13:12.600 a position of authorities
00:13:13.780 that all people
00:13:14.360 in group X
00:13:15.240 are stupid enough
00:13:16.300 such that their opinions
00:13:16.960 shouldn't be valued
00:13:17.800 in that...
00:13:18.920 So then if I can do that
00:13:20.420 enough times
00:13:20.960 and have enough impact
00:13:21.760 on enough people
00:13:22.320 then what I can do
00:13:23.160 is I can diminish
00:13:23.860 from the functioning
00:13:24.440 of democracy
00:13:25.060 because I can stop
00:13:26.220 that group from participating.
00:13:28.000 Okay, but in reality...
00:13:30.400 You get what I mean?
00:13:30.940 In practice...
00:13:31.540 You get what I mean?
00:13:32.240 But in practice...
00:13:34.240 Why do you disagree?
00:13:35.920 The point I'm making...
00:13:37.700 In practice
00:13:38.380 when you apply...
00:13:39.500 When you apply it
00:13:40.580 it doesn't work.
00:13:42.260 It does work.
00:13:42.640 Sir, I'm asking
00:13:43.240 a simple question.
00:13:43.980 Yeah.
00:13:45.000 You go to a...
00:13:46.420 Go to a black...
00:13:48.080 Predominantly black area.
00:13:49.580 I think you haven't
00:13:50.160 understood what I've said.
00:13:50.700 No, no, no.
00:13:51.180 I have but I think
00:13:52.240 we're talking about
00:13:52.660 a bit two separate things here.
00:13:53.920 You ask me why
00:13:54.640 these speeches were awful
00:13:55.840 I'd like to explain.
00:13:56.340 No, no, no.
00:13:56.980 That's fine.
00:13:57.440 Do you reject the explanation?
00:13:58.540 Okay, no, no, no.
00:14:00.020 No, no, no.
00:14:00.760 On the explanation
00:14:01.360 I'm just giving you
00:14:01.900 which bit you disagree with.
00:14:02.600 No, no, no.
00:14:03.120 You said, for example,
00:14:03.940 a person of a stature
00:14:05.860 makes a comment
00:14:06.880 about a group of people
00:14:07.880 to a certain extent
00:14:09.420 that they are disregarded.
00:14:10.500 That undermines democracy.
00:14:11.460 That undermines them, yes.
00:14:12.500 Okay.
00:14:12.900 That means that...
00:14:13.480 Can I ask you
00:14:13.860 do you believe in democracy?
00:14:15.020 No, I don't believe in democracy.
00:14:15.780 Why don't you believe in democracy?
00:14:16.280 I believe in Islamic law.
00:14:18.080 Why?
00:14:18.600 So...
00:14:19.320 Because what God's saying
00:14:19.980 I believe that's the best
00:14:20.620 for humankind.
00:14:21.560 What if you're wrong?
00:14:22.180 I believe that for myself.
00:14:23.460 No, if I'm...
00:14:23.960 You're wrong.
00:14:24.520 I have to be proven wrong.
00:14:25.640 I have to be proven wrong.
00:14:26.480 That's the good thing
00:14:27.020 about democracy.
00:14:27.540 I have to be proven wrong.
00:14:28.260 No, no, we can discuss it.
00:14:28.800 If I'm wrong,
00:14:29.200 there's the collection wrong.
00:14:29.940 No, no, we can prove it wrong.
00:14:30.800 But the point is this year,
00:14:31.580 we're talking about...
00:14:32.900 I'm a bit worried
00:14:33.600 about having a discussion
00:14:34.340 with someone
00:14:34.620 who doesn't believe in democracy.
00:14:35.380 No, no, no.
00:14:36.000 No, no, why not?
00:14:36.860 Why not?
00:14:37.280 It's my freedom of speech.
00:14:38.420 Well, of course it's your freedom of speech.
00:14:39.480 But you don't think
00:14:40.020 I just have the freedom of speech
00:14:41.040 to like democracy.
00:14:42.100 Well, as a Democrat,
00:14:43.000 I have to give you
00:14:43.580 the freedom of speech.
00:14:43.600 I never said you don't.
00:14:44.660 So I'm...
00:14:45.140 As a person that advocates democracy,
00:14:47.000 you're saying...
00:14:47.520 I'm very happy for you
00:14:48.460 to express whatever...
00:14:49.060 Well, I'm trying to express it.
00:14:50.040 Within the bounds of just...
00:14:51.300 Well, you're not allowing me.
00:14:52.920 I never hit me out, yeah?
00:14:54.260 I'm saying in practice,
00:14:55.480 if you go to a predominantly
00:14:57.460 black area community
00:14:58.560 and you use the N-word,
00:15:00.320 what will happen to you?
00:15:01.840 Well, not a very nice thing.
00:15:03.340 No, no, but why not?
00:15:04.660 What happened to freedom of speech?
00:15:06.520 Well, but...
00:15:06.860 No, but that's a very different question.
00:15:09.940 Why?
00:15:10.520 That's my question being from the start.
00:15:11.860 There's two different questions.
00:15:12.340 Well, you haven't...
00:15:12.940 So you just asked me why...
00:15:14.180 I did.
00:15:14.460 You came into the conversation
00:15:15.240 without listening then.
00:15:15.920 That's not my fault.
00:15:16.460 So the point is,
00:15:17.840 is there's a difference
00:15:18.520 between the practice
00:15:19.360 of the way different people
00:15:20.400 interpret freedom of speech.
00:15:21.700 So if there are some people
00:15:23.160 out there who don't respect...
00:15:24.140 Well, so it depends
00:15:24.960 in the context
00:15:25.480 in which you're using it.
00:15:26.780 And it's almost certainly
00:15:28.300 an unacceptable thing to say,
00:15:29.300 and I would agree
00:15:29.740 anyone who says it is...
00:15:30.700 But isn't the black community
00:15:32.900 then limiting my freedom of speech?
00:15:34.980 Well, yes they are,
00:15:36.600 but it's justified
00:15:37.860 for the reason I've just explained.
00:15:39.100 Okay, so okay, one second.
00:15:39.880 Which is...
00:15:40.320 So if somebody...
00:15:41.160 I'm not justifying to assault them.
00:15:42.500 No, I'm not justifying...
00:15:43.460 I'm not justifying to assault.
00:15:44.400 I'm not justifying to...
00:15:45.400 I'm justifying there should be some...
00:15:46.520 No, no, no, one second.
00:15:47.500 Who is at fault?
00:15:48.260 We asked the people here.
00:15:48.960 They said, you mean...
00:15:49.580 Because you're provoking them.
00:15:51.380 No, no, no.
00:15:51.620 You're at fault.
00:15:52.100 You're an idiot.
00:15:52.740 You're provoking them.
00:15:53.780 That's not...
00:15:54.580 Acting out violently.
00:15:55.680 No, no, no, no.
00:15:56.600 One second.
00:15:57.240 One second.
00:15:57.660 You legally shouldn't be allowed to say that.
00:15:58.500 No, no, no.
00:15:58.840 One second.
00:15:59.240 Legally...
00:15:59.420 And why should you not be allowed to say that?
00:16:00.620 Because if you say that word,
00:16:01.740 you diminish from that...
00:16:03.340 It's vagal.
00:16:03.920 Thank you.
00:16:04.700 So, so, in reality...
00:16:06.340 Yes, you do.
00:16:06.800 If you don't exaggerate all the laws that are saying we apply for them,
00:16:09.240 then how would it...
00:16:09.960 No, because you're going against human psychology.
00:16:12.300 What you're saying is, guys,
00:16:13.600 I'm going to insult you and call you the N-word.
00:16:15.720 You can't do nothing about it.
00:16:16.900 No, no, no.
00:16:17.260 They can insult me back all they want.
00:16:19.340 No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
00:16:20.680 But there are people who are not going to insult,
00:16:22.320 but want to get violent.
00:16:23.180 Yeah, sure.
00:16:23.580 And then they'll go to jail for it.
00:16:24.340 No problem.
00:16:24.920 They can go to jail.
00:16:25.520 But does that exist within our community?
00:16:27.200 Yes.
00:16:27.580 If that exists within our community,
00:16:29.200 then does the application of freedom of speech work
00:16:31.860 or doesn't work?
00:16:33.340 Wait, wait.
00:16:34.100 Wait, say that again.
00:16:34.900 Okay, if you're going to have in any group,
00:16:37.920 Muslim, Christian, Jewish, black,
00:16:40.560 white, green, blue, aliens, yeah?
00:16:43.180 Yeah.
00:16:44.180 If we go and insult them and provoke them and they...
00:16:48.840 Provoke is different to insult.
00:16:49.560 No, no, insult and provoke.
00:16:50.760 When you're insulting, you're provoking.
00:16:52.260 No, but they're not the same.
00:16:53.800 Well, they might not be the same,
00:16:54.860 but one leads to another.
00:16:55.720 If you're insulting and it provokes them.
00:16:57.200 So the point is the following,
00:16:58.780 that if an individual does that continuously
00:17:01.560 and there are a group of people in that community
00:17:03.820 who say ignore.
00:17:04.680 No, but...
00:17:05.040 There are a group of people in the midst of the...
00:17:06.440 What I'm saying is the right to do that
00:17:09.560 is not a right under freedom of speech.
00:17:10.840 Adam, let me finish.
00:17:11.520 Because you're diminishing...
00:17:12.380 No, it's not because it is.
00:17:12.720 Can I make my point?
00:17:13.480 One second.
00:17:14.460 I'm disagreeing with both.
00:17:15.220 Let me finish.
00:17:16.400 If a group of people say
00:17:18.260 we will ignore that person who spits hate,
00:17:20.300 another person says we'll swear back,
00:17:21.960 and another group of people say
00:17:23.020 we will try to punch them physically.
00:17:24.860 Okay.
00:17:25.080 The point here is the following.
00:17:26.720 The application of freedom of speech
00:17:28.500 doesn't apply and work in the real world.
00:17:31.420 Am I right or wrong?
00:17:33.180 Okay.
00:17:33.660 Okay.
00:17:33.880 That's more interesting, actually.
00:17:35.800 I don't think it's consistently applied,
00:17:37.720 but could it be consistently applied?
00:17:39.340 I think so.
00:17:39.840 Yeah.
00:17:40.340 What do you mean by that?
00:17:41.020 As in, so for example,
00:17:41.900 I don't think we actually adhere
00:17:42.980 to proper freedom of speech,
00:17:44.680 which would be to say
00:17:45.400 you can basically say anything
00:17:47.180 irrespective of how insulting it is
00:17:48.640 as long as it's not an incitement to violence.
00:17:50.260 Okay.
00:17:50.500 So if someone is not inciting to violence,
00:17:52.720 but they go out and do this
00:17:54.180 and a group of...
00:17:55.680 or an individual,
00:17:56.860 yeah,
00:17:57.380 an individual
00:17:57.980 decides to take action physically,
00:18:00.280 who is to blame?
00:18:02.340 What do you think?
00:18:05.700 What do you think?
00:18:07.500 What do you think?
00:18:08.880 What do you think is human
00:18:09.500 who is saying?
00:18:10.220 I don't think this is crazy.
00:18:12.200 You think it can be true.
00:18:12.900 I'm good.
00:18:13.620 You think it's true.
00:18:14.240 Why?
00:18:15.340 How do we think is this?
00:18:16.020 How do we think?
00:18:16.680 What do we think is this is
00:18:17.280 what this is versus
00:18:17.400 is this person
00:18:20.560 If you think it's behind thatô
00:18:21.880 now?
00:18:22.600 You think it's blazing
00:18:22.920 Bye.
00:18:24.300 You think so.
00:18:28.860 Who is?