00:01:00.000If you want to get your mug, mine just came in the other day along with five broken ones, and we're not going to get into that.
00:01:08.000But If you want to get your very own America First Media Mug, 16 ounces, 16 powerful ounces of liquid, fluid, you could probably put solids in here, I imagine.
00:01:23.000Remember, you can get that at amfirstmedia.com.
00:01:26.000We're getting in a new shipment of those, and those will ship out after Christmas, unfortunately.
00:01:31.000We're all sold out after less than two weeks of the first run, but we're getting a second run in there, and we are looking into other merch.
00:01:38.000So if you want to check that out on amfirstmedia.com, we'll have more merch coming.
00:03:17.000I'm talking about two things in particular.
00:03:20.000The first thing I want to talk about is net neutrality.
00:03:24.000Didn't get to talk about it last night because I wasn't here.
00:03:27.000But net neutrality was repealed by the FCC yesterday afternoon after a bomb threat was called in basically to delay the vote.
00:03:37.000But the FCC did repeal the Obama era net neutrality rules.
00:03:41.000Now, on this show, I've been pretty honest about it that I don't know what the hell net neutrality is.
00:03:46.000I didn't know anything about it before yesterday.
00:03:50.000Had to read up on it a little bit today.
00:03:53.000And I didn't really have an opinion on it before, but now I am staunchly against it.
00:03:57.000And at first, I started out just being against net neutrality because Redditors loved net neutrality.
00:04:04.000The kind of people that liked net neutrality are the worst, lowest, scum sucking, like Reddit porn users on the planet.
00:04:15.000And so I saw who was going out there for net neutrality, who was calling their congressman, you know, how earnest, and posting about this, even among my peers.
00:04:25.000And I said to myself, boy, I do not want to be associated with that.
00:05:05.000Fairness or market competition or anything like that.
00:05:09.000What I think, well, it is a little bit about market competition, but what I have been hearing about net neutrality is more than anything, it's about bandwidth.
00:05:17.000More than anything, it's about companies like Facebook and Google and YouTube not wanting to pay for all of the 4K and other video streaming that they do in contrast with other websites.
00:05:30.000At least that's what we've said, and we've is the computer expert.
00:05:34.000But from what I understand, net neutrality says that when your ISP Your internet service provider provides your internet to you under net neutrality rules, government FCC imposed net neutrality rules.
00:05:47.000They have to give everybody, I think, an equal internet speed or something.
00:05:52.000They can't penalize websites based on their traffic.
00:05:56.000They have to give everybody the same kind of internet speed.
00:05:59.000Without net neutrality, I guess ISPs would be able to offer you premium and you could pay a premium, pay additional money for your internet service.
00:06:10.000To get higher speed for the websites you want, I guess.
00:06:29.000I'm giving people the Reader's Digest.
00:06:31.000And net neutrality, which was repealed yesterday in terms of the rules, it turns out to me it's not so much about the censorship.
00:06:40.000The free and open internet, like they call it, it's more about bandwidth.
00:06:43.000It's that YouTube, Google, Facebook, they want to get away with having this high volume of video streaming and putting, or rather, pushing the cost of that streaming, of that bandwidth, onto the internet service provider in the sense that Comcast would have to build up their internet capacity to accommodate these companies.
00:07:06.000And, you know, those costs are passed on to the companies as opposed to.
00:07:11.000The internet, the ISPs, as opposed to the Facebook or the Google or whoever.
00:07:19.000But more broadly, I think what's offensive about net neutrality is just the lies about it, just the out and out propaganda about it.
00:07:28.000I'm listening to a video about it today because I'm doing my very thorough research about the cyber, as I must do.
00:07:35.000And I'm on this one website, and you have this Yahoo.
00:07:38.000You have this complete bozo who goes on and he says, Net neutrality is basically you want to get the content you want to get without interference, right?
00:07:48.000And if you want to protect net neutrality, you want to protect that.
00:07:51.000And I'm thinking, hey, guy, I don't think anybody would be opposed to you getting what you want on the internet with no interference, right?
00:08:59.000What I think is significant is that Facebook, Google, Reddit, all these other companies have undertaken this concerted misinformation campaign and that it's worked, that it's been so helpful.
00:09:11.000Rather, not helpful, but that it's been so effective.
00:09:36.000The polling actually shows that it's not a left and right issue, you know, because, you know, then we're supposed to say, oh, well, I can get up if it's not ideological, if it went under Obama, but it's not actually a left wing position.
00:09:55.000I just think it's goofy the way it was pushed, the way, you know, the people that were supporting it, these are not the kind of people we want to support.
00:10:36.000Pay a Chinese kid to figure out the rest, but that's net neutrality.
00:10:41.000All the porn users, all the Rick and Morty watchers, all the Redditors seem to be very up in arms about it.
00:10:47.000Mark Zuckerberg was up in arms about it, and therefore I am for the repeal of it.
00:10:52.000Another thing about it is they make it out like it was about censorship.
00:10:57.000They make it out like net neutrality was about maintaining the integrity of political discourse on the internet, the free and open internet.
00:11:05.000You heard that a lot with net neutrality.
00:11:07.000And you think these people don't give a damn about any of that.
00:11:10.000The companies pushing it, the people pushing it.
00:11:14.000If they cared about the free and open Internet, they wouldn't want the Daily Stormer to have their domain name seized, have it be censored in all kinds of countries across the world.
00:11:25.000They wouldn't want people like James Alsop, my business partner, being kicked off of Uber, being kicked off of Airbnb, being kicked off of all kinds of websites, losing his check mark on Twitter.
00:11:55.000So, even if it did compromise that, I would say I don't care.
00:11:59.000Because if more people get censored, in terms of I'm talking about normal political people, not like this very specific right wing fringe, racialist right wing fringe, that is me and James and others, if more normal type people start getting censored, like Palestinians, liberals, DSA people, maybe then there will be some kind of action.
00:12:22.000Maybe there will be some kind of mass movement for de censorship of the internet.
00:12:51.000I just have a problem with the narratives of it.
00:12:53.000It just lays plain all the hypocrisies and a lot of the gluttony of what's going on.
00:12:57.000You know, it's people, and here's the other thing.
00:13:00.000They're talking about call your congressman.
00:13:02.000Here's a list of all the congressmen and your local congressman and their number, and call them and say this.
00:13:08.000And I tweeted about this, and many people said this was classist or this was my hate for the poor.
00:13:13.000But you notice that there's this very particular strain of activism among the left, but moreover in the middle, the centrist type people, where Like, they can't watch their Netflix.
00:13:27.000They can't watch their Rick and Morty.
00:13:53.000Do you think any one of these so called activists.
00:13:56.000Do you think any one of these Redditors who's up in arms about net neutrality, they're fighting tirelessly the political battle against censorship?
00:14:06.000Do you think any one of these people could explain to you what a trade deficit is?
00:14:11.000Do you think any one of these people could tell you like more than three or four or five amendments to the Constitution?
00:15:50.000But with this debate in particular, just so much misinformation and so much hypocrisy and just absurd the way people think.
00:15:59.000It just goes to show you that the vast majority of the population, when you see an argument like this online and people are talking about you're going to have to pay $7 a month for YouTube and Facebook and whatever, the vast majority of people, you know, because the average IQ is 100, Most people are going to be like a YouTube commenter.
00:16:20.000Most, and not to neg our YouTube commenters, but most people in the world are going to be the kind of people that laugh out loud at commercials.
00:16:28.000Most of these people are going to be the people who wear, you know, keens at Disney World or go to Disney World, you know.
00:17:20.000And so it's looking like the tax reform, which would lower the corporate tax rate from 35 to 21%, the top marginal income tax rate from 39.6 to 37%.
00:17:32.000It'll make the tax system more of an international tax system, more like the rest of the world.
00:17:37.000They'll add non child dependence on a tax credit for that, raising the standard deduction.
00:17:43.000There'll also be a repeal of the individual mandate in there.
00:17:46.000It's looking like all of that is going to pass through the House and the Senate.
00:17:49.000And of course, that would be a very big win.
00:17:52.000A very big win for the president politically and also for the economy, which would lead to political ends as well.
00:18:00.000You know, we talked on Wednesday a lot about Roy Moore's defeat and how that's going to be a lot of trouble for Donald Trump and Steve Bannon and the insurgent America First type people.
00:18:10.000And you have to imagine that a policy like this, like this tax reform bill, and some of these things, which I think we see ramping up, we heard that President Trump will address chain migration and his State of the Union.
00:18:23.000The White House will put more pressure on the Congress and on public opinion on the subject of immigration.
00:18:29.000President Trump is talking about cutting regulations to lower than the 1960 levels today.
00:18:35.000Some of this stuff that's ramping up and the economic reform in particular will bode very well for him in the 2018 midterms.
00:18:44.000I think it's all heavily reliant on the outcome of that election because you understand that the elements that are controlling the party right now are not just.
00:18:55.000They're not just like Republican in name only.
00:18:58.000They're not just not ideological with Trump.
00:19:01.000They are actively impeding the president's agenda.
00:19:05.000And so many people have taken this line since the inauguration that if President Trump isn't laying down the rebar on the southern border since day one, he's a shill and he's a bad guy.
00:19:16.000And if he's not moving towards immigration reform immediately after his latest attempt at Obamacare or tax or whatever, then he's a shill and a deceiver.
00:19:27.000But you have to understand the institutional elements at work here that President Trump is the president.
00:19:33.000He is the chief of the executive branch.
00:19:35.000And if you're familiar with the Constitution, if you're familiar with our tripartite system of government of checks and balances, the president has very, very, very little autonomous or unilateral authority.
00:19:50.000And that's why you're not seeing the kind of action we'd like to see.
00:19:53.000Unfortunately, there does have to be cooperation with the congressional and the judicial branch.
00:19:59.000And I think that as we see these two years unfold, we're really working towards, or the president has been working towards, Shoring up and consolidating influence in those other two branches so there can be a lasting foundational reform that will surpass his presidency.
00:20:17.000You didn't see that with Barack Obama.
00:20:19.000Barack Obama didn't work with the judiciary, didn't work with the Congress, and as a result, his legacy has been abrogated in a matter of 10 months.
00:20:28.000But with this president, what you're seeing is reforms and a strategy that undertakes to completely revise what it means to be a Republican, completely change what it means.
00:20:39.000To hold power in the legislature, and hopefully that'll bear fruit.
00:20:43.000I have faith that it will, and I think it will.
00:20:46.000Because you understand that if he would spend all of his capital on immigration reform this month, or the last month, or the next month, you would get a pretty watered down, pretty milquetoast immigration bill.
00:20:58.000There would probably have to be a lot of compromises to allow it to pass in the first place.
00:21:03.000And as a result, because he wasn't strong on that, nothing would change in the midterms.
00:21:08.000He would spend all his political capital.
00:21:11.000Appear to his base as a sellout and a shill.
00:21:14.000He would not win in the midterms, or if we retained our majority through the midterms, it wouldn't be people that would be any more friendly to his agenda, and that would be the end of it.
00:22:09.000Very few people that you can have defecting.
00:22:12.000And you have much more organization in the House than you do the Senate.
00:22:15.000You have the Freedom Caucus, you have many caucuses.
00:22:18.000That could turn and run with their collection of votes.
00:22:21.000And so to try and get a wall through, to try and smash something through, to try and brute force something through, it would end up a Pyrrhic victory, much more harm than good in the long term.
00:22:33.000And I understand many people don't have the vision for it, but for the high IQ people that want the real analysis, we got to have the vision for it.
00:23:26.000Now, to introduce it a little bit, I took the 23andMe, a very kind donor, a very kind America First donor who's been with us for a long time and has been very gracious and very benevolent with us.
00:23:40.000Don't want to dox him unless, you know, he's out there and, you know, he doesn't want to get fired or whatever.
00:23:46.000But somebody put up the money for me to go on 23andMe.
00:23:49.000I said I wasn't going to pay for it because I wasn't, you know, too interested in it.
00:23:52.000But somebody put up the money and we did it.
00:23:55.000People since have told me things about 23andMe which have made me skeptical about the veracity of the results and a bit regretful about my decision.
00:24:06.000You know, maybe we should have done ancestry.com or something else because I've learned that 23andMe is run by some, let's just say, fellow white people who might have a dubious interest, an ulterior motive in collecting genetic material.
00:24:23.000And also they tamper with the results.
00:26:05.000I'm not familiar with any Balkan ancestors that I had.
00:26:08.000I guess that's in the mix somewhere there.
00:26:10.000Iberian, that's the Castizo probably, 6% there.
00:26:15.000Sardinian, very, very tiny percentage there.
00:26:18.000And then the broadly Southern European, the med slash WAP genetics going on over there.
00:26:27.000And that's the majority of it, 63% Southern European.
00:26:31.000But then we also have, and this is the redeeming factor here for our Anglo friends 13.2% Northwestern European, 9.8% British and Irish, and 3.4%.
00:26:43.000Broadly Northwestern European, and then 2.3% broadly European.
00:26:48.000Now, on the people might have been confused about the East Asian stuff because I'm not Asian.
00:26:53.000I think it's 13.7% Native American, and then there's this residual Southeast and East Asian stuff.
00:27:02.000I have to imagine that is just like also Native American.
00:27:06.000You know, if you agree with the hypothesis that Native Americans came from the land bridge from Alaska, of course, and they actually came from Asia because.
00:27:16.000I don't have any Asian ancestors, I don't believe.
00:27:57.000It's not 100% Bavarian phenotype, but hey, at least we know, at least we know I am a goy.
00:28:03.000Many people accused me pretty ardently of having Jewish blood, and I took offense to that more from a religious context, you know, because I like Jesus Christ and I don't want the curse.
00:28:18.000I don't want the blood of his hands on me.
00:29:18.000I don't know if you take it to heart too much because, you know, the 23andMe, I've heard reports that people have sent in the results or they've sent in the genetic samples of triplets or twins, and the results they get back are all different.
00:29:30.000So I don't know if it's entirely accurate, but it's a fun thing.
00:31:22.000You know, the boomers, the boomers are an unfortunate people, the largest generation, and arguably the one that ruined Western civilization.
00:32:45.000And, you know, look, history tends to be deterministic in the sense that very few times in history can an individual, Or a group of individuals changed the course.
00:32:57.000You know, many times there is this feeling of inevitability about history, and I tend to believe that.
00:33:04.000But like it or not, the boomers were not torchbearers.
00:33:08.000The boomers were not good vanguards of the civilization they were handed.
00:33:12.000They were handed a great, prosperous empire, a great, and prosperous, and successful, and wealthy civilization, and they handed it to the next generations in worse condition.
00:33:27.000And you can point fingers and you can say, oh, it was this group of people, oh, it was this interest, it was this 2%, it was this, it was that.
00:33:36.000And unfortunately, now, if that wasn't bad enough, it's not bad enough that they made the women into feminists who bear no children, they made the economy produce no fruits, they made the country an empire that couldn't sustain itself.
00:33:51.000If that wasn't enough, now they're annoying online.
00:33:55.000Now they're annoying and they won't shut the hell up on Twitter and Facebook and they don't know how to use it.
00:34:01.000You know, that's the final, that's like the latent revenge.
00:34:04.000And then the final revenge will be that when they all die out, we will be in a minority.
00:34:10.000The boomer, not good enough that they ripped it all to pieces, but then they got to go online and rub your face in it and gloat about it and say, you're a Gen Z basement dweller and, you know, get out of your mom's basement.
00:34:24.000And then after they do that, then they get to die peacefully with Social Security that's still viable, that's still solvent and comfortable.
00:34:33.000And they're rich and they have all the wealth and they have all the money, and then they get to die.
00:34:38.000And then, after that, because they shift all the demographics away from a certain group of people, then they force us into an age of majority, minority America where we have no voting power, where we have no social or cultural capital.
00:35:25.000The prototypes are being tested as we speak, tested for if you can scale the wall, if you can drill through the wall, if you can dig under the wall.
00:35:33.000And people are like, where's the wall?
00:35:36.000Well, if you have to build prototypes before you build a wall, you have to be a little bit patient, right?
00:36:02.000I think he's timed to just write that that'll go through probably at the start of the midterms, you know, March to August time period, late spring, early summer.
00:36:11.000I think that's when money will be won for it.
00:36:15.000But that's not like a hard prediction.
00:36:17.000I just would guess that that's probably when he would have the most leverage over this majority in Congress.
00:37:02.000And unlike other people, I don't have the luxury of deleting all my content and quitting the movement and demanding people defend me and White Knight for me.
00:37:11.000So, you know, sometimes I just have to take a chill pill if I'm feeling under the weather or whatever.
00:38:21.000Even though it's race mixing propaganda, even though it's feminist propaganda, even though, you know, questionable who was involved in making it and whatever.
00:42:03.000And now that we both have some more time on our hands, or he does, and I'm a neat, I always have time on my hands, but now that we can cooperate a little bit, we're going to start laying the groundwork potentially for an America First campus organization for fall of next year.
00:42:38.000I mean, that's the best thing you can do on a college campus is to start the infrastructure, start the institution, the long march through the institutions.
00:42:47.000The problem is, we conservatives on the right wing in America have a lot of infrastructure in terms of you have Young Americans Foundation, Young Americans for Liberty, College Republicans, Turning Point USA, you have the whole litany of conservatives.
00:45:19.000Every time I mail anything, and that has happened like twice or three times in my life, I have to go on WikiHow and like, Which one do you put the return address on?
00:45:29.000What do you put the sender's address on?
00:47:18.000People have to understand that the whole movement was born out of shitposting.
00:47:23.000The whole movement was born out of trolling.
00:47:26.000And moreover, out of rigorous intellectual discourse.
00:47:30.000And we've come to an impasse in the movement where these two things are under fire where you can't make fun of certain people, you can't make certain jokes, you can't be too edgy with some people, and you can't disagree with certain people.
00:47:46.000And, you know, God forbid you voice those disagreements publicly.
00:47:49.000And I'm not going to play by that rule.
00:47:52.000I'm not going to play by those rules because that's BS, frankly.
00:47:56.000And the movement, you know, whatever you want to call it, didn't get this far by being this way, by being so insular and fragile and sensitive to criticism.
00:48:10.000So at the end of the day, I don't have allegiances to people, or, you know, I have allegiances to my people.
00:48:18.000More broadly, but I'm talking about individual personalities.
00:48:36.000But I mean, that's the one thing I cannot compromise on because people, lately, people have been trying to tell me that, Nick, you can't say this, you can't say that, you can't say this because do you know who that is?
00:50:31.000Did you see how the Daily Stormer endorsed Fuentesm today?
00:50:34.000I did see that, and I'm very appreciative of Andrew Anglin.
00:50:39.000I know he's doing something different than me with the Daily Stormer and optically different, but he's been very supportive of me, and I appreciate that immensely because a lot of people in this movement I'm a young guy, I'm a newcomer.
00:50:53.000A lot of people in this movement have been pretty cold towards me in the sense that if they see me making a mistake in their eyes or I'm saying something they disagree with, some people have been cool about it.
00:51:05.000But many people have been quick to burn me or to try and embarrass me or humiliate me or they go after me.
00:51:17.000And I don't say that like from a personal level, but just if you have young talent, if you have young people that are ambitious and they want to do good things and they're.
00:51:26.000You know, they have energy and there's potential.
00:51:30.000It's just not good policy to try and turn those people away if they don't kiss the ring and bend the knee and all the rest.
00:51:36.000And so, what I will say about Anglin and Weave and some of the others, even Eli Mosley, is that they've been incredibly supportive and they've been out there and saying Weave and Anglin more publicly and endorsing what I'm doing and trying to get people to understand it if I feel to communicate things about it.
00:51:54.000And I really do appreciate that because, you know, you need to have that.
00:51:58.000And every other political movement, you have that kind of.
00:52:02.000That, I don't know, passing of the torch where the older generation is favorable and allows the younger generation to come into it.
00:52:10.000And I haven't felt that way so much with certain elements, but other elements have been pretty friendly.
00:52:15.000So I have been appreciative of that and I do notice it.
00:54:38.000The Thought Wars is to bully, slash, force the culture to change.
00:54:43.000So that women return to being feminine, which is important, and return to their traditional roles.
00:54:49.000And if that happens, you will have stronger relationships between men and women in dating, in marriage, in having and raising children and continuity, longevity in raising children.
00:55:24.000You understand that for us to fix our problems, we have to have a higher birth rate.
00:55:28.000For us to have a higher birth rate, we have to be having more children.
00:55:31.000For us to be having more children, we have to have healthy people.
00:55:34.000For us to have healthy people, we have to have parents that stay together.
00:55:39.000For us to have parents that stay together, we have to have healthy marriages, healthy dating slash courtship relationships, healthy men and women who are women.
00:55:48.000That is how you derive from saving our people, saving our race, saving our country, to why Thought Patrol is a necessity.
00:56:42.000If we co opted almost 80% of Bernie Sanders' platform, we could probably win Minnesota, New Hampshire, Maine could be in play, Washington could be in play, Oregon could be in play if we co opted that labor part of the platform.
00:57:00.000You have to understand the electoral politics of it that we're dealing with in the next 10 to 20 years, the loss of 38 electoral votes.
00:57:29.000But if it comes to that, the contingency is that if we have Washington, Oregon, Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin, Michigan, Indiana, Ohio, Virginia, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Vermont, Pennsylvania, possibly Maryland, possibly Maine, Delaware.
00:57:47.000You know, we could weather it for some time, enough time that we could reverse the trends.
00:58:55.000I'm not wild about it, but that's how you could co opt the white vote.
00:59:00.000These are small concessions that you would make for the overall victory.
00:59:06.000You know, if you're like a constitutionalist and you can't bear to see like left wing type things in your platform, think of it this way if we don't win a higher percentage of the white vote, the country becomes majority minority and therefore democratic.
00:59:19.000And then You know, it will never happen that you'll have constitutionalism.
00:59:24.000It will never happen that you'll have conservatism ever again in this country.
00:59:28.000If you co opt part of the left wing platform, you turn the tide on demographics, and we remain an American country in character, well, then you can still have a conservative party.
01:00:03.000The problem with purity spiraling is not the purity aspect of it, it's the urgency of it, or rather, the urgency at the expense of strategy, right?
01:00:14.000Nobody has a problem with purity, but the problem is that when people try and make the ideal, the ideal situation that could prevail in an ideal order, The immediate necessity, and that is problematic.
01:00:27.000Ideally, we would like to have women at home raising the kids, and they wouldn't have to have the burden of working or the burden of making war or the burden of legislating.
01:00:48.000I'm not wild about Hayek, but Hayek did write a pretty good series called Rules.
01:00:54.000Legislation and Liberty, I believe, or Law, Legislation, and Liberty.
01:00:58.000And the first volume is called Rules and Order.
01:01:01.000And in that book, Hayek talks about this much later, I believe, in his life.
01:01:06.000He talked about how political reform, and this is Burkeian also, but political reform isn't designed as people commonly imagine it, like Plato did or like others did, where you have one guy sitting atop and says, We'll do this and we'll do that, and this is how the government will work, and this is how the demographics will work, and this is where we'll put our cities.
01:01:28.000Few times in history are we afforded that luxury, if ever.
01:01:31.000More often than not, reform comes from an evolution and what is accepted by power structures and people and other things.
01:01:39.000But he explains it in much more depth in that book.
01:01:42.000A curious thing about that book, too, Hayek said, and I've been skeptical of Hayek, but Hayek, when he was preaching his individualist philosophy in that book, he said, presuming that all races are equal, presuming that egalitarianism holds true, and it is, you know, individualism.
01:02:05.000But I think that's a very interesting admission that few individualists are willing to admit that if we are able to distinguish between groups of people, that it's not one race to human race, individuals interchangeable from one another, from continent to continent, gender to gender, race from race, their entire worldview collapses.
01:04:07.000Some conservative commentators in the West argue that political correctness and multiculturalism are part of a conspiracy with the ultimate goal of undermining Judeo Christian values.
01:04:35.000I don't believe the Talmud is compatible with anything Jesus Christ said.
01:04:39.000And if people disagree with that, I'd be interested in hearing how you can reconcile the differences between the text that says that Jesus Christ was the son of an adulterer and that Jesus Christ was an adulterer and that he would be burning in hell.
01:04:55.000And the book that said that Jesus Christ was the Son of God.
01:04:58.000I don't know how you reconcile the two into Judeo Christian.
01:05:01.000However, multiculturalism and political correctness aren't a conspiracy to undermine not only Christianity, but white people.
01:05:10.000And the purpose of that is to create a slave class, a disassociated, dispassionate slave class that pays taxes, goes to work, and would have no chance at achieving power or challenging the status quo.
01:06:50.000Nick, will Texas go blue for sure in the near future?
01:06:53.000Well, as Lawrence of Arabia said, as T.E. Lawrence said, nothing is written, but it's certainly looking like that will be the case if things don't change.
01:07:43.000I legitimately think he's been detained by the world government or whatever, because you notice he went on that rant.
01:07:51.000About the entertainment industry at his Life of Pablo tour last year, last November.
01:07:57.000Then he visited Donald Trump and then he dropped off the face of the earth, completely went off the grid.
01:08:01.000No, he had a mental breakdown, got forcibly brought to a psychiatrist or a psychologist or whatever, and then we never heard from him again.
01:08:31.000You can't prove God exists, not from a rationalist perspective, but that's because the spiritual, the divine, does not conform to the rationalist perspective, the secularist perspective.
01:09:32.000And even with the evolutionists, the other week when I was talking about evolution, everyone's like, Nick, you got to believe in evolution.
01:09:39.000All the people telling me that I should believe in evolution have not read The Origin of Species by Charles Darwin.
01:09:47.000So it's like, I don't even have a problem with evolution so much as I have a problem with people who think they know things and they don't know things.
01:09:56.000They hear things and they hear things that other people say and they say, I know that now.
01:10:33.000If you're a deist, I don't believe you believe in Jesus Christ, right?
01:10:37.000I mean, the deist perspective is that God is the clockmaker, right?
01:10:40.000He builds the clock and then it runs according to his plan.
01:10:43.000Well, I believe that he interceded 2,000 years ago to save our souls, to save mankind.
01:10:52.000And, you know, look, it was predicted that Jesus Christ would come in the Old Testament.
01:10:56.000I don't know why that's, you know, people say there's no proof that God exists or Jesus was real.
01:11:02.000If you look at all the prophecies in the Old Testament, About the coming of Jesus Christ.
01:11:09.000One fellow who actually did the math on this, and he took just, I think it was 13 of the many, many, many prophecies in the Old Testament about the coming of the Son of God, and he did the math on what probability it would be that all those prophecies could just coincidentally have come true in the character of Jesus, and it was a number so astronomical it'd be impossible, and that was a handful of the prophecies.
01:11:35.000I mean, they said things in the Old Testament about Jesus Christ.
01:11:40.000That they had no way, incapable of knowing at the time.
01:11:45.000You know, the nature of him, where he would be born, how he would die, what his message would be, what he would say.
01:11:51.000I mean, so don't come to me with this atheist stuff if you haven't read the books.
01:11:58.000Do the research, do the research, and then get back to me.
01:12:03.000I was a deist, agnostic kind of a guy for a long time, and then I read the books.
01:13:16.000I would question the intent of anybody who wants to put purity, who wants to put public self professed purity before journalists and the internet before achieving our goals.
01:13:44.000I mean, the Catholics and the Catholic Church preserved for a long time.
01:13:49.000All kinds of learning and discoveries and literature, and a great deal of scholarship survived and thrived during the Dark Ages because of the church, because of monks and ascetics and monasteries and everything else.
01:14:07.000I don't get where that comes from, where people think Christianity was somehow backwards or whatever, because it's just incorrect.
01:14:14.000Some of the greatest philosophers of all time were Christians, the preservationists were Christians.
01:14:28.000Nick, how do you explain the overwhelming similarities between the Enuma Elish and the book of Genesis, which was authored after the former?
01:14:35.000I don't know anything about the Enuma Elish.
01:15:40.000Certainly, you have people in the church who have become celibate so that they could fulfill their holy orders, which is a sacrament, which is a calling for many people.
01:15:51.000But by the same token, Christianity is a pro life, pro marriage, pro child, pro family institution, tradition.
01:16:01.000And so, I don't understand how anybody could say that that would be dysgenic.
01:16:04.000The problem, you know, people are saying it's dysgenic or whatever, but like it or not, secular humanism is not producing any kids, let alone smart kids.
01:20:10.000Remember, all the super chats, all of your super chats that I read off in the month of December are going to the Christian Appalachian Project.
01:20:19.000So if you're feeling charitable, be sure to give, give, give.
01:20:22.000We want to have a big fat check for that charity, for the Christian Appalachian Project, once we collect all the donations at the end of the month.
01:20:31.000We want to give them as much money as possible so they could contribute to schools and families and job training and health and all those great things for the people that are.
01:20:41.000That have been left behind, that have been not doing so hot.