AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IS OVER: Supreme Court Votes 6-3 To END Harvard Admissions Policy | America First Ep. 1184AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IS OVER: Supreme Court Votes 6-3 To END Harvard Admissions Policy | America First Ep. 1184
In this episode, we discuss the ruling from the Supreme Court regarding race and affirmative action in the case of a case against Harvard University. We also talk about the riots in France and the reaction of the National Guard in response to them. And we finish up the episode with our featured story of the day. America First! is a show about Americanism, not globalism, and putting the American people first. Produced and Edited by Nicholas J. Fuentes and Betsy DeKorte. Our theme song is Come Alone by Suneaters, courtesy of Lotuspool Records. Music by PSOVOD and tyops. Words and Music by Zapsplat and our main amigo, Evan Handyside. All rights reserved. Used by permission. We do not own the rights to any music used in this episode. This episode was produced, produced, and edited by our patrons. The opinions expressed are our own and do not necessarily those of our record labels, unless otherwise stated. If you have any thoughts or opinions regarding any of the music featured in the show, please reach out to us directly or indirectly through our social media platforms. We are not responsible for the production or any other third parties. Thank you for any amount you pay for this product or service you receive from this podcast. Please do not hesitate to reach out directly to us. . We are a proud member of the media and thank you for your support and support our efforts. in any way you can be a supporter of the show. Thank you! and we appreciate the support. and all the support we get back from our listeners. , we appreciate it. It means the support you show, it helps us out there is much more than we can truly appreciate the love and support we receive. we are truly appreciate it, and we are grateful and appreciate the respect and appreciation. - Thank you. -- Thank you, we appreciate all of the love, support, appreciation, and appreciation, we really do appreciate it -- it really means it, truly means the respect, it really does mean it, it's a lot. that we can do that. it really helps us, it truly means it. -- it means the world, too much, it s all of it, really means that it's not just a little bit more than that, it means it can help us, really matters.
Transcript
Transcripts from "America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. You can also explore and interact with the transcripts here.
00:05:13.000Court decision came down this afternoon.
00:05:16.000And then Harvard, which is one of the institutions that's actually involved in the case, puts out a statement in response
00:05:26.000Effectively saying, we'll obey the court, but we'll do everything possible to circumvent it.
00:05:33.000And so, for example, they say that they're not going to take race into account, but if an applicant talks about race-based trauma in their essay, well, they will consider that.
00:05:46.000So they're not going to let me in because I'm Mexican, but if I write in my essay about how I was called a spick in high school or something, oh then they'll let me in.
00:06:02.000So we'll read the decision, we'll read through what the majority opinion was, and we'll read through the very strong dissent from the liberal judges, and we'll talk about this.
00:06:15.000For a long time I didn't really understand how important it was because I feel like a lot of people, and I'm not going to get into it right away, okay, because sometimes I have a habit of just racing into it.
00:06:29.000But for a long time, I never really understood how important education was.
00:06:33.000I think a lot of people view these political issues as segregated or segmented, compartmentalized.
00:06:41.000They see it as guns, immigration, education, economy, foreign policy.
00:06:50.000And they're all important in their own unique way.
00:06:53.000And the reason why this is so important, specifically with Harvard being involved, is because
00:07:00.000The elite universities are where the elite companies pull all of their job applicants.
00:07:08.000The people that go to Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Columbia, and the other Ivy Leagues, these are the people that will go on to be the Supreme Court Justices.
00:08:29.000We'll also be talking tonight about the riots in France over there.
00:08:32.000George Floyd, an Algerian Moroccan 17 year old who has a lot of problems with law enforcement was shot and killed at a traffic stop a few days ago.
00:08:43.000And his immigrant parents have called for revenge.
00:08:47.000So now all the blacks and browns are burning France, burning Paris to the ground over this kid.
00:08:56.000And the National Guard is out there, and the police are out there, and it's absolute mayhem.
00:09:00.000They've arrested, I don't know if it's 400 or 700, but they're arresting hundreds of people.
00:09:07.000And these are the worst riots in France in 18 years.
00:09:12.000So we'll talk about that too, just more of the same.
00:09:44.000As you know, we sold out of our tickets for our upcoming event, Fuentes Rally 2, on July 16th, but we still have slots available for the VIP-sponsored dinner.
00:09:55.000It's a thousand bucks, RSVP, you get dinner with me and a ticket to the event.
00:10:01.000Dinner with me before the event, we get to talk, hang out, picture, autograph, ask me anything.
00:11:24.000I'm like becoming everybody that was older than me when I was a teenager.
00:11:30.000And I don't want to get into specific conversations, but just lately I talked to some of these younger guys who are getting involved in politics and some of them that are saying some of the controversial things that I say.
00:12:24.000Don't post about that Israel stuff, it'll only get you in trouble.
00:12:27.000I've literally had that conversation with like 10 people this year.
00:12:33.000And not for any reason other than I'm like, play it cool, come on, be cool, you know, let's... let's be... let's work on our approach, you know, but...
00:14:32.000The other thing I wanted to get into before we do the news is finally we got the apology from Pedro Gonzalez.
00:14:40.000And if you missed the show a couple days ago, the big story from Tuesday is that the prominent Ron DeSantis supporter and writer at Chronicles Magazine, an American conservative, his name is Pedro Gonzalez, maybe you've heard of him,
00:14:57.000He got totally exposed by Breitbart News for so-called anti-Semitic texts that he sent in 2019.
00:15:15.000Breitbart published all these texts from some group chat from the Gruyper War where Pedro is attacking blacks and Jews and calling for an uprising and saying that I'm the future and I'm actually so intelligent he agrees with everything I say.
00:15:31.000So he got put on blast and he said that this was Trump supporters, that Trump supporters who hate him for turning on Trump and now supporting DeSantis
00:15:44.000Pedro blames them for a political hit job.
00:15:51.000And I said a couple days ago, because some people told me, they said, well, he's getting cancelled for supporting you, or having supported you in the past.
00:16:45.000And at some point over the last few years, he decided that he was going to betray all of those views that he held and shill for Ron DeSantis, who is like a hardcore, as you know, Israel shill.
00:16:58.000Ron DeSantis goes to Israel and has dinner with Miriam Adelson and gets her blessing on behalf of her dead husband to run for president for the Zionist lobby.
00:17:10.000So Pedro was aware and knew about the extent of Jewish power and Israeli espionage and the corruption that goes on, and for whatever reason decided to betray all of that to join up with this Peter Thiel national conservatism movement with Tucker Carlson, with that crowd.
00:17:33.000He decided to become one of these post-liberal types, Red-Brown Alliance, like Glenn Greenwald and others.
00:17:46.000And so I said on Tuesday, we have to attack him.
00:17:49.000We have to hold him to his own standard.
00:17:52.000If he wants to work for the number one Zog shill, if he wants to work for the number one Israel shill, well, yeah, we're going to create a problem for you that you were once a so-called anti-Semite.
00:19:00.000I do not know what exactly triggered the dissent that happened next.
00:19:05.000Part of it, I think, stems from a desire to transgress the boundaries of politically acceptable discourse.
00:19:12.000He's talking about how he came to be a Groyper, how he came to be an anti-Semite.
00:19:19.000I don't know how exactly I descended into these views.
00:19:25.000I think it stemmed from a desire to transgress.
00:19:29.000There is a human impulse to stalk and break taboos, and anger with the status quo leads some of us to seek answers outside the mainstream at a time when trust in traditional sources of information has collapsed.
00:19:44.000That which is declared off-limits, which cannot be said, does not disappear from the discourse.
00:19:49.000It is merely driven underground, where it roils and burns.
00:19:53.000Joking about taboos becomes a signifier
00:19:57.000of membership in a secret club while demonstrating supposedly esoteric knowledge indicates that one has ascended from the cave of normie conservatism.
00:20:15.000He says, but the truth is that all this is just different parts of the same cave.
00:20:20.000Subterranean chambers that merely feel like freedom from constraints when they are in fact limiting and self-destructive, monomaniacal malding over Jews or any group.
00:20:34.000Although it's not just any group, because you, as we all know, can mauld about China, Chi-Coms, Communists, Marxists, Post-Modernists, the woke, the left, the Democrats, the liberals, the Muslims.
00:20:48.000So it's not... So don't say maulding over Jews or any group, because we all know that
00:20:57.000Any other group, that's just politics.
00:21:30.000You can make a small or a large fortune attacking the right group and having a monomaniacal obsession with the right group.
00:21:39.000It's just the one wrong group that is self-destructive, and that happens to be the one he named, happens to be the one that he's apologizing for criticizing, which is the Jews.
00:21:52.000He goes on, he says, the monomaniacal malding over Jews or any group as the collective source of your frustration is a trap and an acidic mind virus.
00:22:04.000It is a mind virus, like the 1619 Project is a mind virus.
00:22:09.000And like any disease, it will envelop your mind in midnight and consume your life and destroy your relationships if you let it.
00:22:19.000There is no need to conduct substantive analysis or engage in anything constructive if your enemies are everywhere and nowhere.
00:22:27.000You do not have to think about things seriously when you can just engage in performative bigotry at collectives.
00:22:34.000Vulgarity becomes a substitute for actual thinking.
00:22:38.000You either see that and grow up and move on, or stay tilting at a different set of shadows, losing your mind in the seething darkness.
00:24:07.000The moment that you attack the people that are paying for the system to be corrupt, the people paying for the system to be corrupt pull your paycheck.
00:24:17.000If you're a political mercenary, and you attack the political system, the political system says, you can no longer work here.
00:24:26.000And that's not something a lot of people can recover from.
00:24:32.000And so then what they'll do, and you've seen this many times in the last 10 years with all these so-called former white supremacists, former neo-Nazis, former rehabilitated and so on extremists.
00:24:47.000They'll go out and they'll do a mea culpa, they do an apology, I no longer hold these views.
00:24:53.000But what's amazing, they all have the same thing in common.
00:24:56.000Whenever they describe how they came to believe those views, they always say, they always talk about it with this kind of language.
00:27:53.000Although sometimes I'm vulgar, but that's not, I don't think that characterizes the position, which is simply that there is a ethnic interest group which controls this country.
00:28:04.000You know, that's not a vulgar, there's nothing vulgar about that.
00:28:11.000And so being somebody that holds these views, if this is a real, if this is real, I'd love to hear the argument.
00:29:48.000The nature of these apologies is that they imply, and they almost prove, exactly what the apology is supposed to be about.
00:29:58.000Which is, if Jews weren't running everything, and if this wasn't a bad thing, if this wasn't something that is malignant, then why would you need to apologize like the Soviet Union for talking about it?
00:30:16.000They bring somebody in to get a confession out of them because they run everything and they're brutal.
00:30:24.000And so you'll have some Chinese dissident be brought in and they'll say, no, no, I don't criticize, the Chinese government isn't brutal and it's not a dictatorship.
00:30:32.000And you know the same thing with the Soviet Union and the same thing with Saddam Hussein and the rest of it.
00:32:24.000I grew up in a very normal home, very normal upbringing.
00:32:27.000How do you think some ethnic kid from the suburbs of Chicago, whose parents didn't even go to college, who goes to Boston University to study IR, starts saying the stuff that I say because I have these deep-seated frustrations?
00:34:32.000It depends on what you're trying to achieve.
00:34:34.000And so I don't, I don't say that if you're not out there talking about this in the most extreme terms, in mixed company, every day, and so on, and bring on all the consequences, then you're a liar.
00:35:01.000It was more profitable to not be a part of it.
00:35:07.000And I think this is really problematic that we're raising up a class of political pundits that even if they covertly hold the right views, it's in their moral character that they will literally say and do anything.
00:35:34.000I don't think that's... I don't think that's noble character.
00:35:38.000There is something in the European character.
00:35:40.000There is something in the Christian character about honor and about valor.
00:35:44.000And there's something sacred about not allowing yourself to be perverted in that way.
00:35:50.000And so I feel like the honorable thing to do in a situation like this is if you get caught, now maybe you put something out there to keep your job.
00:35:59.000You know, I don't know what your menu of options is in that situation.
00:36:04.000People can imagine a few different scenarios.
00:36:06.000Maybe you say you own it in its entirety.
00:36:18.000There's a lot of things you could say, but I think it's totally inappropriate and wrong ever to apologize when you have nothing to apologize for if it concerns something that is very important.
00:36:28.000If you want to apologize, you know, pardon me.
00:37:47.000The people attacking you for your principles did that.
00:37:50.000And you said to yourself, how crazy am I that I would lose something for adhering to my principles, for my principles, my real views to be exposed?
00:38:13.000So I know some time ago somebody asked me in the Super Chats, they said, when did you decide and what made you decide not to back down, to tell the truth?
00:40:27.000You shouldn't be in a political position then.
00:40:29.000The privilege of politics, which is power, comes with the responsibility of very high moral character and the very high risks that come with that.
00:41:16.000You know, they say the right things, they're nerds, they write about a lot of the right stuff, but when push comes to shove, they're not there.
00:42:08.000If I'm putting myself out there and I have a guy like Ryan Gerduski and Dave Reboy going on the timeline and gloating about my imminent apology and I
00:44:57.000And yet one of them's the president of the NYYRC, and one of them's running the DeSantis Comms thing, and I'm out here in the fucking cold and freezing rain.
00:45:06.000I can't get in anywhere for having the same views that they both have, and they both know that both of them have those views.
00:45:15.000But they have both convinced themselves, and they tell everybody else, you know, we can't say those things because of our position.
00:45:23.000But I've always believed there's something really hokey about this, because what happens when you get exposed for your real views?
00:45:29.000Because then you just look like a liar!
00:45:31.000Then people are gonna go out and say, wait a second, so you believed those things all along?
00:45:53.000I don't hate to see it, and I like Gavin.
00:45:55.000I don't want Gavin to be fired, but I have to say, and I talked about it then, you know, I get treated a certain way by that crowd, and it doesn't feel so good.
00:46:05.000I understand why it happens, but it doesn't feel great.
00:46:09.000And to see that happen, it gives everyone else a little glimpse
00:46:17.000Because I'm over here taking all the bullets, I get called every name, and I'm like the sacrificial lamb.
00:46:21.000Everyone can hate me, it's super convenient.
00:46:24.000They hold the same views, they're sympathetic, but they get to go on their public YouTube and say, you know, this Nick Fuentes guy, we're not associated, he's terrible.
00:46:32.000And I'll just be the sacrifice for the views that we all actually have.
00:46:38.000And nobody really even... Nobody's really doing a whole lot to help me from that area, you know?
00:46:43.000I mean, I don't want to name any names, but there's a lot of people that love... I'm like the Sneaky Link.
00:46:48.000I'm like the Dirty Slut Sneaky Link where they're texting me at night on the encrypted apps and what... I'm not naming any names.
00:46:54.000I'm not talking about anybody specific.
00:48:04.000Because I just went on an hour-long tangent.
00:48:09.000But I want to get into this affirmative action
00:48:12.000So as many of you know the Supreme Court ruled on this widely anticipated or highly anticipated case with Harvard and with a University of North Carolina.
00:48:27.000And the Supreme Court ruled 6-3, conservative judges, that affirmative action is now illegal for college admissions in the United States.
00:48:35.000They cannot take race into account in admissions.
00:48:40.000And this has been a big problem for a long time.
00:48:59.000That's actually how it originated about a hundred years ago.
00:49:02.000And it's gone back and forth many times over the years and now it's affecting different groups, but it's a big problem that we have these racial quotas.
00:49:11.000And here's the thing about affirmative action.
00:49:13.000So-called affirmative action will give weight to the so-called underprivileged groups.
00:49:20.000A black applicant can underperform tremendously compared to a Hispanic, white, Asian, or Jewish applicant, but be admitted because they've got quotas.
00:49:30.000They want to put in so many black students, so they're not going to take the best students, they're going to take a certain number of the best black students, who may not even approach the other students.
00:49:54.000Because some people think that naturally that's what it would be.
00:49:57.000It's not even proportionate to the composition of the American nation.
00:50:01.000In other words, you might think, well, if it's not strictly meritocratic, in other words, they're not just going to let in the top 1,000 applicants, well, maybe they'll let in
00:50:13.000The top applicants of whites so that it's 63% of the student body.
00:50:19.000Because whites are 63% of the country.
00:50:21.000And they'll permit the top black students and fill up 13% of their slots with blacks because blacks are 13% of the population.
00:50:38.000It's from Oon's Review, a really fine article I encourage everybody to read.
00:50:42.000It's called The Myth of American Meritocracy.
00:50:45.000And here's a section which I highlighted.
00:50:47.000It says, quote, Between 1990 and 2011, the official figures indicate that non-Jewish white enrollment dropped by 63% at Yale, 44% at Princeton, 52% at Dartmouth, 69% at Columbia, 62% at Cornell, 66% at Penn, and 64% at Brown.
00:51:13.000If we can find our attention to the last decade or so, the relative proportion of college-age, non-Jewish whites enrolled at Yale has dropped 23% since 2000, with drops of 28% at Princeton, 18% at Dartmouth, 19% at Columbia and Penn, 24% at Cornell, 23% at Brown.
00:51:32.000So the percentage of non-Jewish white applicants has been dropping precipitously over the last 30 years, the last 20 years, the last 10 years.
00:51:45.000The implementation of these race-based affirmative action quotas or policies for admissions has had one major impact, which is to diminish the number of non-Jewish white students in every Ivy League university.
00:52:01.000They have elevated every other group, and every other group is in fact over-represented now, to the detriment of whites.
00:52:11.000It goes on, it says, for most of these universities, non-white groups have followed a mixed pattern, mostly increasing, but with some substantial drops.
00:52:19.000I have only located yearly Jewish enrollment percentage going back to 2006, but during the six years since then, there is a uniform pattern of substantial rises.
00:52:29.000Increases of roughly 25% at Yale, 45% at Columbia, 10% at Cornell, 15% at Brown, and no decline anywhere.
00:52:38.000So the number of white students is going down on average of 50% or 60% over a 20-year period from 1991 to 2011.
00:52:47.000On average, across every Ivy League, it's gone down significantly by an average of 50% or 60% for non-Jewish whites.
00:52:55.000But for Jews, in the years 2006 to 2012, there was not a decline in the percentage of Jews and Ivy Leagues in any school.
00:53:04.000And in a number of them, there was actually a significant increase, as high as 45% in the case of Columbia.
00:53:12.000That's your affirmative action, by the way.
00:53:30.000But these relative ratios differ by perhaps 1,000% from the enrollments we find at Harvard and other institutions which select America's future elites.
00:53:40.000Meanwhile, an ethnic distribution much closer to this apparent ability ratio is found at California Tech, whose admissions are purely meritocratic, unlike the opaque, subjective, and discretionary Ivy League system.
00:53:53.000He writes, each year the Ivy League colleges enroll almost 10,000 American whites and Asians, of whom 3,000 are Jewish.
00:54:01.000Meanwhile, each year the NMS Corporation selects and names America's highest ability 16,000 graduating college seniors.
00:54:10.000Of these, fewer than 1,000 are Jewish, while almost 15,000 are non-Jewish whites and Asians.
00:54:22.000So out of the top 16,000 graduates in the country, only 1,000 are Jewish.
00:54:29.000These are the top academic performers.
00:54:33.000Yet at the same time, the Ivy League enrolled 3,000 Jews.
00:54:38.000Meanwhile, 15,000 out of the top 16,000 graduates were white or Asian.
00:54:48.000But the Ivy League University only permitted 7,000.
00:54:53.000So you've got this extraordinary problem where whites are completely underrepresented in the elite universities according to population size.
00:55:01.000They're also underrepresented according to performance.
00:55:05.000Whereas every other group is overrepresented when compared with the size of the population and overrepresented compared to performance.
00:55:12.000So there's only one group getting screwed here.
00:56:09.000Almost all the existing senators, congressmen, presidents, judges are from Ivy League universities.
00:56:15.000Almost all of the major heads of companies or the vice presidents or CEOs that run them or the lawyers that represent them come from these institutions.
00:56:25.000And that's where these institutions recruit.
00:57:36.000And so these are the people that are permitted through the gate to make the decisions for our country.
00:57:42.000So really you can see undergraduate admissions at Harvard is actually undergraduate admissions for Supreme Court justice eligibility.
00:57:50.000It's undergraduate admission for joining the legal profession at an extremely high level or being a diplomat at the United Nations or State Department or so on and so on and so forth.
00:58:00.000And it's not just the Ivy Leagues, it's others, but
00:58:04.000It's to demonstrate the principle that it is so much more than just education.
00:58:08.000And so, therefore, we're really talking about, when we talk about admissions to these universities, what are we going to set as the qualifications for who's going to be put on track to rule?
00:58:20.000And then what are they going to talk about at the universities?
00:58:23.000That's why college is such a critical issue.
00:58:27.000Because this guy that gets admitted to Harvard is then going to get to Harvard Law School, and then from Harvard Law School is then going to become a clerk at the Supreme Court, or they're going to be a lawyer for Monsanto, or they're going to be a senator, you know, or whatever.
00:58:43.000And you could talk about any other trajectory, it's the same story.
00:59:08.000In the future, it will be mostly non-white.
00:59:11.000And some say, well, how does that affect me?
00:59:14.000But you see that concurrently, at the same time that the general population is changing, the elite composition is changing as well, but it's not happening organically.
00:59:25.000Because of course, if the elite was chosen on a meritocratic basis, it would probably be insulated from most of the migration, with the exception of Asians.
00:59:35.000There's going to be a lot more Indian and Chinese elite.
00:59:38.000But these Hispanics that are coming over, they're not going to crop up in the elite if you have a strictly meritocratic admissions at Harvard or wherever.
00:59:47.000But that's the whole point of Affirmative Action.
00:59:50.000It is not just to destroy the white population in America, but it's to decapitate the white leadership of America's elite.
00:59:57.000That's what Affirmative Action is about.
01:00:01.000Because these people come here and they take English as a second language.
01:00:05.000And so you would actually have an appropriate balance of power, which is that people that are just pouring across the border first-second generation basis are not going to be telling the people that have been here since Plymouth Rock what to do.
01:00:19.000And yet, because of affirmative action, that is the case.
01:00:22.000And this is the system that is churning out these La Raza lawyers.
01:00:27.000This is the institution that's churning out the affirmative action hires, churning out these unexceptional elites that hate whites.
01:00:36.000Because you've got these policies that by changing the composition of Harvard and Dartmouth and Yale and Cornell and Columbia, is changing the composition of the law schools, and changing the composition of the think tanks in the boardrooms, and all the positions that matter.
01:00:52.000And they're filling them up with people that are not even good at what they do, and they're not even that smart, and they're probably not even good people.
01:00:58.000But they're filling them up with people that are radical,
01:01:07.000Because those are the people being permitted.
01:01:09.000Can you imagine the profile of a high-achieving non-white that gets permitted through the admissions office of a left-wing institution like Harvard?
01:01:19.000Do you think that an Hispanic is getting into Harvard because they talk about
01:01:22.000Oh, me father has a small business and he makes a lot of money?
01:01:27.000Or do you think it's going to be some Hispanic that comes in, some Latinx woman who comes in writing about oppression and about the Mexican-American War, etc.
01:01:38.000This is where AOC, and AOC went to Boston University, but it's the same thing.
01:01:42.000This is where the AOCs and the Ilhan Omars and the others are coming from.
01:01:47.000They're going into Harvard, and this is why it matters that they're being indoctrinated with an anti-white bias.
01:01:53.000Not just a left-wing bias, but an anti-white bias.
01:01:59.000If the universities were merely leftist, and these affirmative action policies were merely anti-Asian, or just anti-equality of opportunity, or something like that, then it wouldn't be that much of a problem.
01:02:13.000Because if the universities were churning out Marxists that were just straight Marxists, maybe they would come out and have sympathy for the poor rural whites, or the poor whites from these industrial towns that were destroyed, and they would sound a little bit more like Andrew Yang than they sound like AOC.
01:02:31.000Do you understand what I'm saying here?
01:02:33.000If the university had a strictly ideological bias,
01:02:37.000Whatever color, maybe they'd be churning out people that had a little sympathy for the plight of poor white people, or unions led by whites, or something like this.
01:02:48.000They're selecting militant first and second generation non-whites, and they're indoctrinating them with a particularly virulent anti-white strain of leftism.
01:02:58.000And so what they're creating is something very specific.
01:03:01.000It's not just communists and socialists, it's communists and socialists
01:03:06.000Non-white POC women that fucking hate white people.
01:03:23.000Because when you question where these policies come from, where do they write the bill that says that the COVID relief is prioritized for the so-called underprivileged?
01:04:09.000We're basically coordinating a fifth column to come in.
01:04:13.000They are creating an anti-white, non-white elite.
01:04:17.000They're decapitating the white leadership, they are dispossessing whites of political power, and they're giving it to militant anti- and non-white people.
01:04:29.000Because, and this is creating this catastrophic situation because in the future, without an educated elite with political clout, whites as a group are going to be very vulnerable.
01:04:43.000If whites aren't going to Ivy League schools, if whites aren't going to elite universities, then they're not going to become lawyers or doctors.
01:04:51.000They're not going to be running companies or banks or be in government.
01:04:55.000And if they're not doing those things, then they're not going to have political power.
01:04:58.000And if they have no political power, they have no means to protect their rights.
01:05:04.000They have no means to look out for their collective safety and interest.
01:05:08.000And that's exactly it seems the position that they want to put us in to prevent another Holocaust to prevent another Holocaust is if you
01:05:18.000If you decapitate whites and bury their country in the third world, then whites could never raise up another Hitler, whites could never raise up another fascist state that would ever pose a threat to the Jews.
01:05:29.000And I think that's all by design, but that's sort of another tale.
01:05:31.000Maybe you're not sold on that aspect of it yet.
01:05:40.000Let's focus on affirmative action for now, but quite honestly, I mean, that is a big part of why that's happening.
01:05:46.000And all you have to do is listen to them.
01:05:48.000Listen to their prophet, Karl Popper, who talks about never again, never again, we can never have a Holocaust happen, and how do we disable the means for something like that?
01:05:59.000You gotta start with the fathers, the families, the religions, the race, the nation.
01:06:03.000It's a basis of George Soros Open Society.
01:06:14.000Jewish Zionist columnist in New York Times who said that Trump is hostile to the liberal international principles that have been so good to us as Jews.
01:06:22.000Jews don't do good in populist nativist dictatorships.
01:06:26.000Jews thrive in a liberal individualist climate.
01:06:45.000It's about grooming the next class of Stacey Abrams and Lori Lightfoots and Barack Obamas and Kamala Harrises to tell white people what to do and take their stuff and throw open the borders and open up the prisons and let the criminals out.
01:08:06.000The Supreme Court says colleges and universities can no longer take race into consideration as a specific basis for granting admission.
01:08:16.000A landmark decision overturning long-standing precedent that has benefited Black and Latino students in higher education.
01:08:24.000Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the opinion for the conservative majority, saying the Harvard and University of North Carolina admissions programs violated the Equal Protection Clause because they failed to offer measurable objectives to justify the use of race.
01:08:39.000He said the programs involved racial stereotyping and had no specific endpoint.
01:08:46.000The decision reads, quote, the Harvard and UNC admissions programs cannot be reconciled with the guarantees of the Equal Protection Objectives, or I'm sorry, the Equal Protection Clause.
01:08:56.000Both programs lack sufficiently focused and measurable objectives warranting the use of race, unavoidably employ race in a negative manner, involve racial stereotyping, and lack meaningful endpoints.
01:09:08.000We have never permitted admissions programs to work in this way, and we will not do so today.
01:09:14.000The majority opinion claims that the court was not expressly overturning prior cases authorizing race-based affirmative action and suggested that how race is affected in applicants' life can still be part of their application.
01:09:27.000But even if the court did not formally end race-based affirmative action in higher education, its analysis will make it practically impossible for colleges and universities to take race into account, as the three Democratic appointees stressed in their dissents.
01:09:45.000In a lengthy concurrence, Justice Clarence Thomas, the second black person to join the Supreme Court, spoke in unusually personal terms as he criticized the use of affirmative action policies by colleges and universities, which he described as rudderless, race-based preferences designed to ensure a particular racial mix in their entering classes.
01:10:07.000Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown-Jackson, issued a fiery dissent, saying the opinion rolls back decades of precedent and momentous progress.
01:10:21.000Their decision says, quote, The result of today's decision is that a person's skin color may play a role in assessing individualized suspicion, but it cannot play a role in assessing that person's individualized contributions to a diverse learning environment.
01:10:36.000That indefensible reading of the Constitution is not grounded in law and subverts the 14th Amendment's guarantee of equal protection.
01:10:43.000In a demonstration of the controversial nature of the case, justices read their dissent from the bench for the first time since 2019.
01:10:50.000The devastating impact of this decision cannot be overstated, said Sotomayor.
01:10:56.000In ending her dissent, she quoted Martin Luther King Jr., of course, attempting to end the opinion on an optimistic note.
01:11:03.000She says, Sotomayor pointedly did not use the customary language, I respectfully dissent.
01:11:20.000And her own dissent, Jackson, the only black woman on the bench, accused the majority of having a let-them-eat-cake obliviousness, and how the ruling announced colorblindness for all by legal fiat.
01:11:50.000I love how black people always say you're ignorant even though more often than not you know way more than they do.
01:11:57.000Like if you go to your average black person who says, and them banks and them, they won't even let us get no loans and anything.
01:12:05.000And you, you know, you give them whatever the correction is and then they say, nah, nah, nah, that's ignorant, nah, nah, you need to get educated, that's ignorant.
01:12:33.000Dan G. Brown Jackson says, you're ignorant of racism.
01:12:36.000I don't think anybody's not aware of the screeching about racism.
01:12:41.000And so in any case, that's a decision.
01:12:44.000It is aimed at affirmative action in the country, which is a great thing.
01:12:48.000Although, I don't know how transformative this is going to be, because like the decision says, and as Harvard said in their reply to the decision, race can indirectly be taken into consideration.
01:13:02.000So they're not going to take it into account that you check black, white, Asian, Latino.
01:13:07.000But they will take it into account if you write in your essay, boo-hoo, boo-hoo, someone call me the n-word.
01:13:13.000Boo-hoo, boo-hoo, someone did Asianize in me.
01:13:18.000I worked at my father's Chinese restaurant and someone came in and says, can I have an egg roll?
01:14:11.000But I imagine it will have some effect, and maybe the white applications will pick up.
01:14:18.000The fact of the matter is, though, we do not have enough admissions that is just based on raw talent.
01:14:24.000The point of the universities is to churn out very elite people.
01:14:29.000So the university should be finding the best musicians, the best artists, the best athletes, the best scientists, literary, legal minds, you know, whatever.
01:14:42.000And they should be scouting them, and they should be giving them a world-class education, and then they should be putting them in positions of power.
01:14:53.000And to the extent that there should be any qualification, it should be based on character, it should be based on if they're Christian, it should be based on if they're a patriot.
01:15:01.000Like, if you were to design an educational system, that would be the framework.
01:15:07.000It would be based largely on merit, and then to the extent that there would be something subjective, it would be based on patriotism, leadership, Christian virtues.
01:15:20.000But instead, we have this admissions policy that is based on how liberal and oppressed you are as a black person, how much you hate the white man.
01:15:28.000And as such, that's going to be the character and the composition of the elite.
01:15:33.000So, that's the story on affirmative action.
01:15:36.000We're running out of time here, so we're going to get into the Super Chats, but that's that.
01:15:40.000It is a step in the right direction, but let this be a lesson to everybody.
01:17:05.000All you have to do is go on Amazon and look for a book about race, and you'll find a number of them.
01:17:09.000Harvard-educated, sociology major, writing another book about, you know, Don't Touch My Hair, a story about America, you know, don't, do not touch my hair, bitch!
01:17:45.000All you have to do is go on Amazon or turn on MSNBC during some racial controversy and you'll see some frizzy haired woman with funky glasses talking about, you know, well in my book I went to Harvard.
01:24:29.0004chan underscore grow I percent three dollars Nick you woe are like Arthur Morgan cool and based and you or enemy Marjorie faggot green is like Micah Bell a fucking rat 4chan underscore grow I percent three dollars you woe are like Arthur Morgan cool and based and you or mortal enemy Marjorie faggot green Thank you, I appreciate it
01:27:16.000If you told John Doyle or Pedro Gonzalez to infiltrate the FBI, they would make a 30-year career out of throwing J6 patriots in prison with nothing to show for it.
01:27:25.000I think most guys have no business trying to infiltrate anything.
01:27:28.000They're not infiltrating, they're just submitting.
01:27:30.000Like, they're just joining the enemy team.
01:28:59.000Well, and you know it's so funny because it's been my experience my entire career where people go and tell me, oh, you gotta talk to so-and-so, you gotta talk to this one, you gotta, you never heard of this person, you gotta talk to them.
01:29:08.000They're hardcore, they know what's going on.
01:29:09.000And then I talk to them and they're a total pussy, you know?
01:29:31.000And so last week, I had never heard of this loser before.
01:29:51.000But I said, okay, maybe I'll talk to him.
01:29:53.000So I put it out on Telegram, and the guy comes back and says, Well, I refuse to associate with Nick Fuentes because I don't need that kind of heat!
01:31:14.000Number four, this very obnoxious, in your face, Michael Rapoport, Dave Portnoy style, prototypical New York ordeal of civility, ghetto Jew trait.
01:31:38.000Because he's got every one of the options, and everybody's telling me, oh he's so good, oh he's the best!
01:31:46.000Until he got super duper triggered by Ye.
01:31:50.000Now he'll talk to people that hate God, he'll talk to people that don't believe in God, but somebody who believes in God and criticizes Jews?
01:32:19.000That's why Italians are the real closest ally, because Italians are every bit as confrontational and aggressive and loud and high verbal IQ, but just without being compromised in that way.
01:45:37.000Anyway, it's pay-to-win trash anyway who even cares about that stupid game We have to watch advertisements every day to get premium so that we could queue So that we could queue things for our factories to build ridiculous game ridiculous pay-to-win trash Whatever I don't even care anymore
01:46:31.000It does hurt Asians with affirmative action and I think that part of it is they really do believe in this equality narrative and So when you look at when you look at race, it's bifurcated between really whites and Asians and then blacks and Hispanics according to achievement so I think that they see Asians like whites as probably too excellent and
01:47:22.000It's a frustrating situation, but we're um, you know, finally we're resolving some of our credit card problems So we should have a system hopefully online this year at some point because I know this Payment solution isn't the best but you know, what can you do when you're banned from everything?