Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. is an American civil rights activist, historian, and political commentator. He was a founding member of the civil rights movement and served as the first black president of the United States from 1968-1968. He is also the author of The New York Times bestselling book, The Civil Rights Movement, and has been a regular contributor on CNN and other media outlets. He is a frequent guest host on conservative talk show Rush Limbaugh's radio show, and is one of the most well-known white supremacists in the country. He has been in prison for decades for his anti-white views, but is now free and living a life of freedom and dignity. He has served as a consultant to the Obama administration, the Department of Justice, the Justice Department, the FBI, the CIA, the Homeland Security Department, Homeland Security, and other agencies. His work has been featured on CNN, CBS, NPR, and NPR, among other outlets, and he is a regular guest on conservative media outlets such as Fox News and NPR. You can reach him at: or and . His work can be found on all social medias, if you search for him, and listen to his music on Soundcloud. If you like what you find interesting, please leave a review on Apple Podcasts, and tell a friend about him! if you like his music, I'll be sure to check out his music! Thank you so much for all the support he's support and support, and I'll consider giving him a shout out in the future episodes of his music review on the next week, too. Thank you very much thank you for all of the support you've been kind enough to give him a review, he's a review and a shoutout in the comments section below. I'm looking forward to hearing his music is very much appreciated, thank you. - The Best Fiends - Thank you, Cheers. Cheers! Cheers Cheers Cheers, Jon Sorrentino Jonestown Thank You, Jonest and Cheers Jonest Tom Bell John Rocha by: John Raldsoe . Jon Sargent Thanks Jonest is a fellow Christian is a good friend of mine, Jon Sellett , Jon Sells a good man, and Jon's music is
Transcript
Transcripts from "America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. You can also explore and interact with the transcripts here.
00:03:51.000They prescribed poison to us from the pharmaceutical companies.
00:03:56.000They're poisoning us with the seed oils that we're eating, the high fructose corn syrup.
00:04:02.000They're poisoning the water with heavy metals, which is in the tap water.
00:04:07.000They're poisoning us with what's on television and out of Hollywood and pornography.
00:04:13.000They're poisoning us in every way that you can imagine, but we're supposed to believe now, suddenly, they care so much about our public health.
00:04:45.000We are faced with the question about whether or not we will get the vaccine and surrender and capitulate to the system, a devil-worshipping system that hates us and hate our country.
00:09:36.000This little boy, Cash Gernon, was murdered, dragged out of his bed in the middle of the night in his home and murdered outside his house in the street by a black man because he was white.
00:09:50.000That black guy killed a white boy because he was white.
00:09:54.000And this black guy hated white people.
00:11:15.000They perpetrated the Holocaust against Jews.
00:11:18.000And that was, by far and away, the most obscene, worst genocide ever in the history of the world.
00:11:23.000And then, when all was said and done, white people were racist to the Muslims that blew up the World Trade Center.
00:11:29.000White people are racist to black criminals and the police.
00:11:34.000Basically, people are bred from cradle until grave thinking that white people are uniquely evil people.
00:11:41.000White people bear a special guilt for all the problems of this country, all the problems of every other group, and really, like, all the problems of humanity.
00:11:51.000And that's a guilt that is ancestral, it's not individual, everyone has it, and you can never overcome it.
00:11:59.000There's no clear way, discernibly, that you can ever overcome it and ever achieve equality with these non-white people.
00:12:09.000And it's as a consequence of this that these things are becoming more and more common.
00:12:17.000And when white people are dehumanized, black people are going to start killing white people because they see them as less than human.
00:12:26.000And other people are going to start killing white people because they see them as less than human.
00:12:30.000How much do you want to bet that this, uh, whatever his name is, Darren Brown, whatever, was radicalized by the media into thinking that white people are racist and responsible for his suffering, not just as a black man, but as a gay man too.
00:12:46.000And that he committed this crime in retaliation for that perceived prejudice, perceived hatred against him.
00:12:54.000That's the consequence of all this anti-white hatred and dehumanization in the media, education system, and it's even enshrined in the law systematically through the government.
00:13:04.000And what do you think affirmative action is?
00:13:07.000And a lot of white people don't want to talk about it now.
00:13:11.000They want to pretend that that's not the case because
00:13:15.000Honestly, I think a lot of white people think that it's beneath them.
00:13:18.000I think that white people think that it's our job to be better, to strive towards a post-racial society, that we ought not to notice race, and we should try not to notice race, that it's a good thing to aspire to, to not notice race.
00:13:33.000I think that white people are under the impression that to be cognizant of race, and to mention it and act like it matters, is beneath us.
00:13:47.000And a big part of that, too, is because white people have, I think, internalized a lot of what the media says about us, which is that, well, we're on top of the world, so what do we really have to complain about?
00:14:11.000And in a lot of ways, it already isn't a white country anymore.
00:14:15.000And as the percentage and proportion of white people diminishes in America relative to non-white people, it's going to become more and more of a problem for white people that non-white people don't like us.
00:14:52.000People are very comfortable talking about racism against blacks or other non-whites, but nobody talks about the distrust, nobody talks about the resentment that non-white people have for white people in the country.
00:15:04.000And it's not everybody, but it is a lot of people, and everyone knows that.
00:15:09.000As the population becomes less and less white, and as the people in charge of the country, and the people enforcing the laws of the people of the country, in charge of the country, become less and less white, that's going to matter a lot more.
00:19:44.000I'd like to propose a toast to our people.
00:19:49.000I'd like to propose a toast to the Voipers, to White Boy Summer, White Boy Century, to the reaction and the reclamation of the United States.
00:20:48.000I don't care if I have to drive there.
00:20:52.000I don't care if I have to get in Lake Michigan and go all the way around the Panama Canal.
00:21:00.000Nothing is going to stop White Boy Summer.
00:22:02.000I think our ancestors smile on us right now, what we're doing.
00:22:21.000The mayor also just announced the city will start requiring proof of COVID vaccination for a range of indoor activities, including going to a restaurant or to the gym.
00:23:18.000I'm not going to Walgreens to get an mRNA, non-FDA approved, and even if it was, experimental vaccine that goes inside your cells and manipulates your DNA to start producing spike proteins which are killing babies and giving people heart attacks.
00:23:42.000Because I'm afraid of the flu, which kills like .00013%.
00:24:21.000People get a small taste of what they used to have, the hard lockdown comes back, and then people are more desperate to do what they're told in order to get full normalcy.
00:24:34.000And they're already talking about that in Iceland.
00:24:36.000They say in Iceland it's a 15-year lockdown plan.
00:24:42.000And they're talking about that with the vaccines.
00:24:44.000Regular, every six months, booster shots.
00:24:48.000Booster shots, vaccinations for COVID.
00:24:53.000So you're gonna get your two shots, and then get sick, and then you gotta get a third shot, and then, you know, you just get a shot every six months or something.
00:25:04.000And that's with the 15-year lockdown plan, and that's with the masks, and the plexiglass, and the lockdown, and the vaccine passport.
00:25:12.000I think the endgame is the vaccine passport.
00:25:14.000When all of this is said and done, there will be no independent businesses left.
00:25:19.000There will be no public institution, public or private institution that is open to the public that will not be controlled by the state, that will not be controlled by bureaucrats.
00:25:30.000There's not going to be one place that you could go to outside where other people gather that will not be restricted based on vaccination status or some other arbitrary thing.
00:25:43.000And if they announced it tomorrow that that's what they were doing, people would resist it.
00:25:48.000And the only way to stop this, by the way, is to stop it where it is.
00:26:55.000There's a chance we could have earned that outcome.
00:26:57.000We are continuing to wage our war against the mask mandate.
00:27:02.000I'm a big believer in just making everybody's life harder.
00:27:05.000You don't have to get fired over this stuff, but just make everybody's life difficult.
00:27:09.000Don't let the CDC guidelines be an imposition on you.
00:27:14.000Let it be an imposition on the people that have to enforce it.
00:27:18.000You know, let the people that work at these places of business remind you five times when you're in a store or wherever to put your mask back on and put it on over your nose and do this and that, right?
00:27:33.000Go into one of these stores when they reimpose the mask mandate and get in a confrontation with a worker and get in a shouting match and get kicked out.
00:28:18.000Make them go to their therapist, and get on antidepressants, and cry.
00:28:23.000Because you walked into Target and ruined their whole day.
00:28:26.000Because gas is $4, and they don't know how they're going to pay their rent, and their relationship with their parents is bad, and they're getting used, and Tinder hookups, and then they gotta go to Target, and they gotta deal with some smug right-wing asshole not wearing their mask.
00:28:41.000And let those people go off the rails, and let the whole fucking system go off the rails.
00:37:10.000The mayor also just announced the city will start requiring proof of COVID vaccination for a range of indoor activities, including going to a restaurant or to the gym.
00:38:07.000I'm not going to Walgreens to get an mRNA, non-FDA approved, and even if it was, experimental vaccine that goes inside your cells and manipulates your DNA to start producing spiked proteins which are killing babies and giving people heart attacks.
00:38:31.000Because I'm afraid of the flu, which kills like .00013%.
00:39:11.000People get a small taste of what they used to have, the hard lockdown comes back, and then people are more desperate to do what they're told in order to get full normalcy.
00:39:23.000And they're already talking about that in Iceland.
00:39:25.000They say in Iceland it's a 15-year, 15-year lockdown plan.
00:39:31.000And they're talking about that with the vaccines.
00:39:33.000Regular, every six months, booster shots.
00:39:38.000Booster shots, vaccinations for COVID.
00:39:42.000So you're gonna get your two shots, and then get sick, and then you gotta get a third shot, and then you know you just get a shot every six months or something.
00:39:53.000And that's with the 15-year lockdown plan, and that's with the masks, and the plexiglass, and the lockdown, and the vaccine passport.
00:40:01.000I think the endgame is the vaccine passport.
00:40:04.000When all of this is said and done, there will be no independent businesses left.
00:40:08.000There will be no public institution, public or private institution that is open to the public that will not be controlled by the state, that will not be controlled by bureaucrats.
00:40:19.000There's not going to be one place that you could go to outside
00:40:24.000Where other people gather that will not be restricted based on vaccination status or some other arbitrary thing.
00:40:32.000And if they announced it tomorrow that that's what they were doing, people would resist it.
00:40:37.000And the only way to stop this, by the way, is to stop it where it is.
00:41:44.000There's a chance we could have heard that outcome.
00:41:46.000We are continuing to wage our war against the mask mandate.
00:41:51.000I'm a big believer in just making everybody's life harder.
00:41:54.000You don't have to get fired over this stuff, but just make everybody's life difficult.
00:41:58.000Don't let the CDC guidelines be an imposition on you.
00:42:03.000Let it be an imposition on the people that have to enforce it.
00:42:08.000You know, let the people that work at these places of business remind you five times when you're in a store or wherever to put your mask back on and put it on over your nose and do this and that, right?
00:42:22.000Go into one of these stores when they reimpose the mask mandate and get in a confrontation with a worker and get in a shouting match and get kicked out.
00:43:08.000Make them go to their therapist and get on antidepressants and cry because you walked into Target and ruined their whole day because gas is $4 and they don't know how they're going to pay their rent and their relationship with their parents is bad and they're getting used and Tinder hookups and then they got to go to Target and they got to deal with some smug right-wing asshole not wearing their mask.
00:43:31.000And let those people go off the rails.
00:43:32.000And let the whole fucking system go off the rails.
00:50:55.000We had 20,000 live viewers across all platforms on Friday.
00:51:01.000Which makes it, I think, one of the biggest streaming events we've ever done on Cozy.
00:51:06.000We had I believe 10,000 watching on Cozy between my channel and Ethan Ralph's channel.
00:51:14.000I think there was about 8,000 watching on Destiny's YouTube channel and then 1,500 to 2,000 on the Ethan Ralph Odyssey channel.
00:51:23.000So between everything about 20,000 live viewers at its peak.
00:51:28.000I think now hundreds of thousands of people have watched it with all the replays that have been posted on my channel, Ethan's channel, and Destiny's channel.
00:51:37.000So, huge viewership and I think a decisive victory for the Russians.
00:51:59.000And right now all eyes are on, and I don't know if I'm pronouncing this right, it's Mariople.
00:52:05.000Again, I don't know if I'm pronouncing that right, but it's uh...
00:52:08.000Coastal city on the coast of the Sea of Azov and so everybody's paying attention to this siege Which is going on on that city.
00:52:19.000The Russians are trying to take it over and connect their forces Which originated in Crimea and its forces from Donbass after which they'll move north Towards the capital or west towards Odessa, which is the other major city on the Black Sea coast
00:52:37.000Specifically, we'll be talking tonight about the negotiations.
00:52:41.000The Russians and the Ukrainians have relaunched negotiations.
00:53:21.000We'll also talk about what Zelensky is saying.
00:53:24.000Zelensky says that he is not going to capitulate to any of those demands.
00:53:28.000And Zelensky says that if Russia does not surrender, there will be a third world war, there will be a no-fly zone, and he still says that he wants to join NATO.
00:53:57.000It was like 60s yesterday, 70s today, and I've just been driving around just enjoying the weather, doing some work, but doing some work on the road.
00:54:07.000But I just can't stop thinking about it.
00:54:09.000Everywhere I look, I just see the blue and gold for Ukraine and it's just infuriating.
00:54:16.000And I just wish there was some way I could show support.
00:54:19.000I just wish there was something I could do.
00:54:21.000I'm driving around, I'm looking for stores that sell Russian flags, Russians.
00:54:54.000I was driving around my town, and I saw in the street corner, there's this house and it's all decorated, and they've got these little signs in their lawn and it says,
00:55:15.000I want to put a big Russian flag on my car, but I don't want my car to get vandalized, you know?
00:55:20.000I would put, like, a Russian bumper sticker on my car or something, but I don't want someone to vandalize my car.
00:55:26.000You know, I'd put... I would tie, like, a white, blue, and red ribbon around my tree outside my house, but I don't want my... I don't want my house to get vandalized either.
00:56:57.000And I saw over the weekend they used a hypersonic missile to take out an arms depot, which is awesome.
00:57:05.000And there's something about that because, you know, there's a sense of powerlessness that the opponents of the American regime have had to endure for decades, you know, almost a century.
00:57:20.000And you're beginning to see a real global resistance.
00:57:26.000You know, it's the same feeling when I saw UX going on Twitch and raiding those livestreams and they couldn't do anything about it.
00:57:33.000And they're like, there's this off-platform activity.
00:57:38.000Protect yourselves from the UX love raids!
00:57:41.000And it's the same feeling I got watching Trump win all the primaries and then win the general.
00:57:47.000And it's the same feeling I get watching Putin reach out and take Ukraine and bombing buildings and hypersonic missiles and just absolutely crushing the opposition and there's nothing anyone can do.
00:58:01.000You know, Nancy Pelosi, she introduces Zelensky and Zelensky's talking before Congress and they're all applauding, you know, but you can do nothing.
00:58:58.000And it's just been a real pleasure, been a real joy to watch the ongoing conflict and to hear the increasingly degraded Ukrainian forces.
00:59:09.000I especially like these videos of the Foreign Legion because you have these American volunteers, all these...
00:59:16.000You know, all these liberal Americans.
00:59:18.000They're volunteering to go fight in Ukraine and you read their posts on Reddit, they're posting videos on Twitter, and they're saying, We're running out of supplies!
00:59:39.000They told us they'd shoot us in the back if we don't go to the front lines, but we're just getting cut down on the front lines!
00:59:45.000And the Russians say, you know, it doesn't matter where you're from, we'll kill you.
00:59:51.000So the conflict has been a real, you know, it's been a real joy, you know, because these myths about the Ukrainian resistance just getting dashed, you know, on the rocks of reality.
01:00:02.000They're saying, oh, you know, the ghost of Kiev and all this.
01:00:07.000And then they come back from Ukraine and they say, it's over.
01:00:28.000And it'll be a real... And Darren Beattie writes a lot about this.
01:00:33.000And I don't know what the...you know, the coverage of this on Revolver has been a little confusing, but Darren Beatty wrote about this, he's been writing about this for years, talking about the psychological impact.
01:00:46.000There's going to be a real psychological impact on the world when Putin dictates the terms of surrender, and Ukraine accepts them, and he just wins the war.
01:00:54.000It's not ambiguous, it's not murky, it's not a great area, he just wins.
01:01:13.000Putin goes in there and he does what he wants and he just wins.
01:01:17.000And there was nothing we could do about it.
01:01:19.000All the hashtags, all the posts, all the bullshit.
01:02:58.000Click the follow button and you'll get a push notification whenever I go live.
01:03:03.000Whenever my show begins, you'll get a push notification on Telegram if you follow me here on Cozy.
01:03:08.000So make a Telegram, follow me on Cozy, and you'll get notified when the show begins.
01:03:17.000It's been a tough deal trying to adjust to this new time zone deal.
01:03:22.000You know, I've been struggling with that, but I think the show's gonna sort of regulate.
01:03:26.000I think we're gonna... the show start time will begin to stabilize very soon.
01:03:32.000It's just that ever since the Senate abolished time as we know it it's it's been a little tricky getting used to all of that but you know we're finding other ways you know we're finding a rhythm here so anyway I don't think there's any other announcements
01:04:42.000I mean, this platform is just growing every day.
01:04:45.000I don't know if you noticed, but it's like every week we're adding new streamers.
01:04:49.000It's unbelievable, the rate at which this thing is growing, and it's just awesome to see.
01:04:55.000It's awesome to see, particularly, because I watch Cozy every day, and I'll be watching Cozy at like 3 a.m., and we'll have a thousand people across the site watching streams any time of the day.
01:06:07.000We're between 5 and 6 million page views over the past 30 days, which is incredible because I think America First.Live was getting like 4 million per month.
01:06:17.000And we went from zero on CozyTV in October to we're approaching six million, which is just unbelievable.
01:06:26.000Which is, like I said, that's 50% more than what I had on AmericaFirst.live at its peak.
01:06:32.000So, this thing is just exploding in the best way.
01:07:49.000And I said last week, you know, I remember when I was in high school when the crisis began.
01:07:55.000You know, I was on Speech Team, I was on Model UN, I was a sophomore in high school when this whole crisis started in 2014 when the Maidan Revolution happened and Russia annexed Crimea and started backing the separatists in Donbass.
01:08:13.000So I've been following this for fully 8 years, you know, and I've been following it ever since.
01:09:11.000Iran invading its neighbors at the same time that China is invading Taiwan at the same time that Russia invades Ukraine from Belarus and from Crimea.
01:09:23.000And I remember reading that and thinking, oh my gosh, we need American leadership in the world.
01:09:28.000And I watched or listened to the Max Boot podcast.
01:09:31.000Max Boot, he's another Jewish Zionist neocon.
01:09:35.000I remember I read Garry Kasparov's book.
01:09:37.000Garry Kasparov was a chess grandmaster from Russia.
01:09:41.000And now he's a polemicist and he's a political pundit and he writes books.
01:09:46.000And he wrote a book eight years ago called Winter is Coming.
01:09:50.000And it was about how Putin's a dictator and he's gonna turn Russia into this totalitarian state.
01:09:57.000And I actually saw him speak live at the Chicago Council on Foreign Relations.
01:10:12.000But on the other side, I was on the neocon side.
01:10:16.000And I will go to Speech Team, and I will go to Model UN, and I would make the case.
01:10:21.000Everything that Destiny said, I would make those arguments.
01:10:24.000And I would say, you know, Obama needs to do more to support Ukraine.
01:10:29.000He's sending them non-lethal aid, hamburgers and blankets.
01:10:32.000They need guns, they need fighter jets, you know, they need all this.
01:10:37.000And I said, you know, we need to create a tripwire in Ukraine because if Putin invades, that's gonna signal to the rest of the world and the rogue states that, you know, America doesn't defend democracy and all this crap.
01:11:37.000Like, he doesn't know the Cuban Missile Crisis, okay?
01:11:40.000He doesn't know the Monroe Doctrine, he doesn't know... he just doesn't know.
01:11:43.000And you don't know what you don't know.
01:11:46.000So we do the debate on Friday, and it went exactly as I expected.
01:11:51.000It's funny, he does his opening statement, and he doesn't even really make an argument.
01:11:57.000And if you go back and watch the debate he does this and you know I may at some point I think I may actually tomorrow or at some point this week I may go back and watch a debate and do a commentary stream on the debate itself and go over everything because I really
01:12:12.000I want to go over it precisely and in a very surgical way.
01:12:15.000Because when you're in a debate you kind of miss certain things and you have to be strategic and stuff.
01:12:21.000But he does this opening statement and he really doesn't even put forward an argument.
01:12:26.000The topic is, it's about Russia's incursion into Ukraine.
01:12:38.000In his opening statement, he doesn't even really make a positive claim.
01:12:42.000He doesn't even make a positive proposition.
01:12:45.000He just says, you know, Nick might tell you this, he might say this, and he he almost he tries to preempt a lot of the pro-Russian arguments like that Russia is trying to denazify Ukraine or
01:13:18.000And it was funny because I'm listening to the opening statement and I'm thinking, like, that's not covering anything that I prepared.
01:13:25.000I mean, nothing in his opening statement even addresses my core argument, which is about NATO enlargement, about theater support missiles, about all this kind of stuff.
01:13:36.000And so he does this whole opening statement, and then at the very end he says, you know, the issue is that Russia has invaded Ukraine and violated their sovereignty,
01:13:48.000And, you know, Ukraine wants to join NATO.
01:13:52.000So, you know, 95% of his opening statement is trying to preempt arguments that I wasn't even going to make.
01:13:59.000And then the final 5 or 10%, the core of his argument, there's two parts to it, it's something like this.
01:14:09.000Russia violated Ukraine's sovereignty and nothing can justify that.
01:14:15.000That's one part of it, and then the other part is, if you're going to argue that NATO expansion is a threat to Russia, well, the reason that that's not the case is because Ukraine chose NATO expansion, and if Ukraine was in Russia's sphere of influence, well, that's not consensual.
01:14:39.000So, to put those two together, it would be something like this.
01:14:42.000It would be like, well, you know, you have to consider the plight of the Ukrainians.
01:14:47.000They want NATO membership, and you can't put Russia's security interest ahead of Ukraine's security interest, and Ukraine's security interest is they want NATO membership.
01:14:56.000So I guess it's actually a three-parter.
01:14:58.000And then it says on top of that, you know, therefore nothing justifies the Russian invasion.
01:15:03.000So there's kind of like three... I guess there's really three pieces.
01:15:45.000You know, and this is sort of the background of that three-part argument is, well, Russia's not really concerned about security.
01:15:52.000The things that Russia says it's concerned about are not its real concerns.
01:15:56.000What's really going on here is that Putin is a dictator, and he is power-hungry, and he's hungry for territory, and he's trying to rebuild a dead empire.
01:16:05.000So that's sort of the... that's really the background of the whole argument.
01:16:35.000You know, we can argue about what ought to be, or what should be, or what is right and what is wrong, but what is real is that people are dying, and buildings are being destroyed, and there's war going on, and we are on the brink of a great power nuclear conflict, which has never happened before.
01:16:52.000We've been on the brink before, but it's never actually happened, but it seems like we're closer now maybe than ever.
01:17:03.000What is the responsibility of the United States?
01:17:06.000And I make the case that there is a pattern of behavior over 30 years, since the end of the Cold War, where the United States has expanded its power and expanded its dominion at the expense of the security interests of other nations, in particular Russia.
01:17:22.000That the United States is not a benign hegemon.
01:17:26.000It is a global hegemon with lots of power, more power than any other country in the world by far, and maybe more power than every country in the world put together.
01:17:37.000And if we want to have a stable world order, we have to have balance.
01:17:41.000And in order to have balance, we have to allow other great powers and other countries to exert a reasonable sphere of influence and pursue a reasonable security policy.
01:17:53.000I said, and part of that would be, we have to stop expanding NATO.
01:18:02.000We didn't, now there's a crisis, but there's still time to neutralize the situation.
01:18:07.000And that was really my counter-argument, which I supported, I think, at length with historical examples and numbers and, you know, it's funny, I go into the Destiny community, I go onto their subreddit, I go onto Destiny's upload on YouTube, and everybody in the comments section is saying, you know, oh, Nick was looping, Nick was saying the same things over and over.
01:18:39.000This isn't a technical debate where everybody hears every argument and everybody is doing a technical analysis of every argument and every warrant and every claim.
01:18:50.000I kept repeating, look, NATO spends $1.2 trillion, Russia spends $65 billion.
01:18:57.000Now the Destiny sub-community, they kept hitting me for this.
01:19:00.000They're saying, oh he kept looping that.
01:19:03.000He kept saying, you know, NATO spends all this and Russia only spends this.
01:19:07.000He kept saying that NATO is a counter-Russian alliance.
01:19:11.000And I wanted to impress those two points because
01:19:14.000When you consider those two facts in particular, it really changes your whole understanding of the conflict.
01:19:21.000Because how could you contend that Russia is this aggressive empire, you know, they're the belligerent, they're the problem, when they are so small and so powerless compared to the entire NATO alliance?
01:19:37.000I mean, how could any serious person portray Russia as this?
01:19:44.000To your average simpleton, your average normie who knows nothing, they think this is the new Soviet Union.
01:19:51.000They think that Putin is Joseph Stalin.
01:19:53.000They think that he's the arch-villain, he's the big bad guy, he's the big evil supervillain that's invading its neighbors and trying to end the world because they're greedy and so on.
01:20:04.000And impressing those two facts destroys that narrative.
01:20:08.000The big bad guy, you know, the big evil warlord, yeah, his military is a fraction of a fraction of the size of the NATO alliances.
01:20:43.000Anyway, so I impressed those two facts in particular, but I also talked a lot about missiles.
01:20:50.000And this is something that I hadn't really talked about on the show last week, but this is another important thing.
01:20:56.000Missile systems are a huge part, you know, maybe the central part of military doctrine in the nuclear age.
01:21:05.000Specifically in the ICBM age, because it's really, I guess you could separate it, you have the introduction of the A-bomb in World War II, and then you have the H-bomb in the 1950s, and then you have the development of intercontinental ballistic missiles, which means you've got these missiles that are extremely long-range,
01:21:25.000With a miniaturized warhead, and they could be launched from the sea, the air, or from land, and they could hit a country on another continent and inflict devastating damage.
01:21:36.000So now the military doctrine and the balance of power is not so much about tanks, obviously, and guns and planes and bullets and conventional means.
01:21:48.000And the point that I made, and this is really crucial to understanding how America is provoking Russia, how they're undermining Russia's security, look at the big picture.
01:21:58.000Look at the pattern of behavior over 20 years.
01:22:04.000In 2001, the United States pulls out of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty.
01:22:09.000So in 1973, I believe, Richard Nixon and Leonid Brezhnev, they formed the ABM Treaty and they put a moratorium on the development of anti-ballistic missile systems.
01:22:24.000What is an anti-ballistic missile system?
01:22:27.000The United States and the Soviet Union at the time, you know, they had amassed these giant stockpiles of nuclear warheads and ICBMs and they were engaged in an arms race.
01:22:38.000And people, you know, there's really, there's actually a lot to unpack here.
01:22:41.000It's a really complicated subject and I actually regret this a little bit.
01:22:45.000I maybe should have laid this out more in the debate or maybe before the debate.
01:22:51.000It was almost tough to have a real conversation because you could tell that the audience and Destiny don't actually understand the theory behind nuclear doctrine and balance of power in the nuclear age.
01:23:06.000Because there's a lot to it that isn't very intuitive and maybe isn't obvious at first glance.
01:23:13.000You know, because people would say something like, well why would the United States have a thousand nuclear warheads?
01:23:20.000That's more than enough to destroy the entire world.
01:23:23.000So why would you need like three or four times as many missiles as would be required to end the world?
01:23:29.000And that's because, you know, the missiles aren't always accurate, and maybe some of them fail, and of course, you know, the idea is that if the Soviet Union triggered a first strike against the United States, where would the Soviet Union launch their missiles at?
01:23:46.000Well, the Soviet Union would launch their missiles at our missiles, so that we couldn't use our missiles to retaliate.
01:23:53.000So, the United States, in order to hedge, you know, and this is a concept in international relations that is sort of central, it's called the security dilemma, insofar as the Soviet Union has nuclear weapons, they have the capability to strike America first.
01:24:11.000They have the capability to hit America with nuclear bombs.
01:24:24.000Well, the United States has to develop enough nuclear missiles that if the Soviet Union hits our nuclear missiles, we'll have enough that we can hit them back and retaliate.
01:24:34.000And so, nuclear retaliation is kind of at the heart of defending against nuclear weapons.
01:24:41.000Insofar as two countries have nuclear weapons, each country knows that the other can launch nuclear weapons at the other.
01:24:50.000You know, if the Soviet Union has nuclear weapons, they can drop nuclear bombs on our population and destroy our country.
01:24:57.000That's an unacceptable security posture, so we have to have nukes.
01:25:02.000Well, if we both have nukes, then we both know that we can hit each other with nukes.
01:25:07.000And if we both have nukes, where would we drop those nukes?
01:25:09.000We drop them on the other country's nukes, so that they couldn't hit us.
01:25:15.000So both countries are developing lots of nukes so that if the other side hits the other, well then they'll always have more.
01:25:22.000Then you get the nuclear triad where they have various means of launching them.
01:25:26.000They've got nuclear submarines, nuclear warheads that could be dropped from planes, nuclear-tipped missiles.
01:25:33.000So that in the event that, let's say, the Soviet Union destroys all our airfields and all our missile silos, we can still launch them from our submarines, which are always moving and the locations are unknowable, right?
01:25:46.000So that's a very important concept in understanding how do you have a stable world order?
01:25:52.000How do you have peace in the nuclear age?
01:25:55.000How is it that many countries can have large nuclear arsenals without war breaking out?
01:26:00.000Because understand, the very existence of nuclear weapons creates instability.
01:26:07.000That any country has a nuclear bomb, that any country has a nuclear capability, threatens all the other countries.
01:26:16.000And creates an unacceptable security risk.
01:26:19.000So, it's actually a very tenuous and a very delicate thing that we even have peace, that we even have confidence between the nuclear powers.
01:26:29.000And that confidence and that peace, it's built on this understanding, it's built on this psychological concept, this theory,
01:26:41.000And Mutually Assured Destruction, what that means is that every nuclear power has to be confident that the world would end if nuclear weapons are used.
01:26:51.000That if we launch them against another nuclear power, they would retaliate and it would be a losing prospect for any country to initiate the use of nuclear weapons.
01:27:04.000Because otherwise, countries could not accept.
01:27:06.000And that's another thing in international relations, is the idea, you know, Destiny kept repeating, he kept saying, well, NATO's a defensive alliance, they've never invaded Russia, and they never probably will.
01:27:20.000You know, you may believe that NATO, it is unlikely that they will invade Russia, but that's all that you could really say.
01:27:28.000And that's kind of another concept is that, you know, and I said this on the show today and I said this on Friday, the existence of an offensive capability in itself presents a theoretical threat.
01:27:42.000That the United States possesses the nuclear weapons, that NATO possesses a $1.3 trillion per year military, the capability that they have, that kind of firepower, presents a threat.
01:27:58.000Because all it would take is a discretionary choice by the leadership in DC for them to win a war against Russia.
01:28:08.000And so understand, if you're Russia, if you're any country for that matter, the existence of an offensive capability in another country without an equal or, you know, without defensive parity, that presents a risk to the security of your country.
01:28:27.000The only thing that's stopping NATO from invading Russia, if we say that NATO will probably not invade them, is this very sort of flimsy, like,
01:28:37.000You know, this very flimsy assumption.
01:28:41.000And I said this in the debate, it's not sufficient.
01:28:44.000It's not adequate to say NATO probably won't invade Russia today.
01:28:49.000Because, of course, NATO could invade Russia tomorrow, or the next day, or ten years from now.
01:28:55.000And that's the thing, is they always can.
01:28:57.000It's the capability to do that that creates a security risk.
01:29:02.000So, what countries have to do is create a balance.
01:29:06.000So if NATO has certain offensive capability, Russia needs some way to match that.
01:29:19.000If we're talking about conventional capabilities, non-nuclear capabilities, countries can develop cheaper defensive capabilities that can match the more expensive offensive capabilities of the other country.
01:29:33.000And this is where we get into missiles.
01:29:36.000So, as an example, in 1973, and we'll get into the ABM thing, and I guess we'll sort of circle back to this concept.
01:29:43.000So in 1973, back to the ABM thing, Richard Nixon and Leonid Brezhnev, the General Secretary of the Soviet Union, they signed a treaty on anti-ballistic missile systems.
01:29:54.000And what's happening in the 60s and 70s is that the Soviet Union and America are building up their stockpiles of warheads and of missiles,
01:30:02.000In an arms race, and that's why I explained the concept of mutually assured destruction and the sort of nuclear thinking, there's an arms race.
01:30:12.000They're building up because both sides are distrustful of one another and they need to know, again, that they can retaliate.
01:30:20.000Well, in the 60s and 70s, both countries start to look into anti-ballistic missiles, which are missiles that shoot down missiles.
01:30:28.000And they're looking into the capability to create basically an umbrella
01:30:35.000Where, you know, hypothetically the Soviet Union launches an ICBM at the United States, and then an anti-ballistic missile system will shoot down those ballistic missiles.
01:30:45.000And then the United States can launch missiles at the Soviet Union and retaliate.
01:30:51.000Or, theoretically, you know, if the United States builds an ABM shield around itself, it can launch strikes at Russia without Russia being able to retaliate.
01:31:01.000And understand, the ABM shield, it's counterintuitive.
01:31:04.000Most people would think, oh, you know, there's technology where we could shoot nuclear missiles out of the sky.
01:31:09.000Wouldn't we want to pursue something like that?
01:31:12.000Wouldn't we want to protect ourselves from nuclear weapons?
01:31:15.000The answer, counterintuitively, is no.
01:31:18.000We do not want to protect ourselves from nuclear weapons.
01:31:21.000And that has a lot to do with the balance and the concept of mutually assured destruction.
01:31:28.000Because if the United States is protected from ICBMs, if it's protected from a first strike or a retaliatory strike, then there is no deterrent from the United States initiating the use of nuclear weapons.
01:31:43.000It actually makes the world less safe.
01:31:45.000Because if the United States develops an ABM shield, and if the Soviet Union develops an ABM shield, and if China develops an ABM shield, well then there's really, you know, now nuclear weapons are sort of back on the table.
01:31:59.000Because then if we say hypothetically, hmm, you know, let's say in a theoretical scenario, the United States says, you know, well, hostilities between us and the Soviet Union have reached a boiling point, we think that we could destroy their ABM shield, we could destroy their anti-ballistic missile system, and then the Soviet Union will be vulnerable to a nuclear attack.
01:32:25.000We can nuke the Soviet Union, we can nuke their ABM sites, we can nuke their nuclear weapons, we can nuke their population centers and their industry, and even if they have nuclear submarines that could launch nukes at us, our ABM shield will knock all of that out of the sky.
01:32:41.000Now nuclear weapons are back on the table as
01:32:46.000As a sort of, you know, functional tool of war.
01:32:50.000It's not something any longer that we could say confidently would result in our own destruction, like we could if we didn't have an ABM shield.
01:32:59.000So, the military doctrine of the United States ever since that treaty passed was not to protect ourselves.
01:33:06.000Was to say we will not develop a capability to shoot down nuclear weapons.
01:33:42.000It is because of mutually assured destruction.
01:33:45.000It is built on the 1973 ABM Treaty that says countries will not develop an anti-ballistic missile system.
01:33:54.000So, in 1991, the Soviet Union dissolves, and it is weakened dramatically.
01:33:59.000Its conventional military capability is destroyed, its economy is destroyed, the territory shrinks, the population shrinks, it's a disaster.
01:34:08.000In 2001, Russia is still a very weak country, and all the Soviet satellites are amputated from Russia.
01:34:16.000In 2001, the United States pulls out of the ABM Treaty and the United States begins to research and develop an anti-ballistic missile system.
01:34:28.000And I said this is part of a pattern of behavior here.
01:34:31.000This is a very provocative thing to do.
01:34:33.000This is an incredibly destabilizing thing to do.
01:34:40.000And Destiny countered and he said, well, you know, the United States pulled out of that treaty because China was not a signatory on the treaty, and China is developing an ABM, and China's nuclear power.
01:34:54.000He said also North Korea has a nuclear arsenal, and Iran is developing a nuclear arsenal, and at the time we thought Iraq was developing a nuclear arsenal.
01:35:03.000So the argument goes from the foreign policy establishment in Washington that, you know, Russia shouldn't be too concerned about this because, well, we're only building an ABM system to counter Iranian missiles.
01:35:16.000And we're only pulling out of the treaty because it's insufficient, because China hasn't signed on to it, so therefore China could develop an ABM shield.
01:35:25.000So, we're investing into an ABM shield to counter Iran and maybe China.
01:35:31.000The problem with that logic though, and this is what I said in the debate, is that the ABM system that's being deployed to Europe does not discriminate against Iranian or Russian missiles.
01:36:45.000The ABM Treaty peace and the confidence that other nuclear powers have that other nuclear powers will not initiate a first strike.
01:36:54.000I mean that's really the foundations of the thinking on nuclear strategy is the ability to initiate a first strike and survive.
01:37:04.000Theoretically, if the United States is successful and develops an ABM shield, and they deploy it around Russia, they could say it's for Iran, they would have the capability to strike Russia, and Russia would not be able to retaliate, theoretically.
01:37:59.000That America won't strike Russia because America will then be destroyed.
01:38:03.000If, after the ABM Treaty is toast, America would not be destroyed if they initiated a first strike, there's no longer that assurance, there's no longer confidence, and now Russia is thinking about, we're going to be destroyed.
01:38:22.000This destabilizes and upsets the entire nuclear order.
01:38:27.000And so the next day, Putin goes out and says, we will be forced to develop hypersonic capabilities.
01:38:34.000So Russia then begins to develop a hypersonic missile system.
01:38:38.000What's the significance of hypersonic?
01:38:40.000You know, maybe you've read about this or heard about this.
01:38:42.000The idea behind a hypersonic missile, hypersonic meaning faster than the speed of sound, is that these missiles are unstoppable.
01:38:51.000So if America's going to develop a system that shoots down missiles, Russia says, okay, we'll develop a missile that is so fast, you can't stop it.
01:39:03.000And what has been initiated, thus, is an arms race.
01:39:07.000Now America is racing to develop an ABM shield, and now Russia is racing to develop these offensive capabilities that can pierce the ABM shield.
01:39:18.000So now Russia is investing in hypersonic missiles, hypersonic gliders, and these other more sophisticated kinds of missiles, and I'll add, that are far cheaper.
01:39:30.000It just so happens that the ABM shield doesn't work.
01:39:34.000There is no anti-ballistic missile system that works in any reliable way.
01:39:40.000These ABM shields, they shoot down about half of the missiles that are launched.
01:39:46.000And when they conduct tests on the systems, and when they conduct the tests, the ABM system knows where the missiles are going to be, when they're fired, where they're fired from, the missiles are launched in the daytime, so they can see them, and even then they only shoot down half of them.
01:40:06.000There was only one test conducted at night and the ABM didn't shoot down any of the missiles.
01:40:12.000So the ABM shield is extremely expensive and it doesn't work.
01:40:15.000Nevertheless, that we're even investing into it, Russia doesn't know what our capability is, that we're investing into it is enough to destabilize the current order.
01:40:26.000On the other hand, the hypersonic missiles are very cheap and they work.
01:40:36.000And Russia and China are further along on those technologies than even the United States is.
01:40:42.000And so this is just an example of, you know, trying to understand the things that the United States is doing that are provoking Russia.
01:40:50.000And again, and this gets to the heart of the conversation, you know, throughout the debate I'm saying, look, the United States is doing these things which are very provocative.
01:40:59.000To pull out of the ABM Treaty is extremely provocative, it's destabilizing, it upsets the order, it disrupts Russia's security,
01:41:07.000It is causing them to invest in more sophisticated missiles, it's causing an arms race, and this is just sort of hand-waved away.
01:41:15.000And, you know, the NATO side and the pro-America side and the neocons, they sort of hand-wave that away and they say, well, the ABM doesn't work.
01:42:40.000If you're a Russian citizen, and you look up at the sky, and you know that an American nuclear missile can fall out of the sky and land on you and kill everybody in a 10-mile radius, is it good enough for you to just say, like, well, you know, that probably won't happen?
01:42:55.000Well, they said that they, you know, wouldn't shoot down our missiles.
01:43:03.000When we're talking about a country of 150 million people, when we're talking about a country with a $3 trillion GDP, we're talking about a great power, and we're talking about a state apparatus.
01:43:46.000If you're the Russian President, and your job is to keep your people safe, would you prefer to say, well, the United States' ABM shield doesn't work, and they probably won't strike us, and it's for Iranian missiles anyway, or would you prefer to say, it doesn't matter if the Americans have an ABM shield, we have a missile that will pierce anything, we have an unstoppable missile, and no matter what happens, if the US initiates a first strike, they will be destroyed.
01:44:19.000One of those, the latter, is an obligation.
01:44:23.000You, if you're the President of Russia, you have an obligation to do the second thing.
01:44:28.000That's the only, frankly, that's the only responsible thing to do.
01:44:32.000That's the only responsible security policy.
01:44:36.000If you're not doing anything and everything to ensure that you have parity, defensive parity, or offensive parity with the other side's capabilities, if you're not doing that, you're not doing your job as President.
01:46:35.000And that gives you an idea of the mentality.
01:46:36.000But the other thing is to demonstrate this pattern of behavior that America does these kinds of things where, is it better for us to build an ABM shield?
01:46:45.000In a selfish way and in a short-sighted way, you know, yes, potentially.
01:46:49.000In the long term, it's going to backfire.
01:46:51.000But yeah, we're building this ABM shield, but we're doing it without regard to anybody else's interest.
01:47:22.000Over the past 20 years, NATO has expanded into 13 different countries since the enlargement process was initiated in 1997.
01:47:29.000There were three major waves of NATO expansion in 1999, 2004, and 2009.
01:47:38.000And with the NATO expansion into all these Eastern European countries, they're expanding into formerly neutral countries, into formerly Warsaw Pact countries, into countries that are formerly part of Russia.
01:47:51.000And since 2008, Russia has said it's a red line for Ukraine and Georgia to be made members of NATO.
01:47:57.000Nevertheless, NATO keeps pushing for them to be a part of NATO.
01:48:01.000And in 2014, there's a coup in Ukraine.
01:48:07.000It's backed by the West, and people can dispute that, but there's evidence that suggests that the Western intelligence agencies were involved.
01:48:15.000And the Ukrainian government is overthrown and a new government is installed that wants Ukraine to join NATO.
01:48:22.000So Russia moves in and they invade Crimea to secure their naval base on the Black Sea and they back the separatists in Donbass because it's a stipulation that in order to join NATO you can't have any kind of civil disorder.
01:48:35.000So by fueling the civil war in Donbass this is preventing Ukraine from advancing towards NATO membership.
01:48:42.000And in a sense, in 2014, NATO pushes across the red line.
01:48:48.000You know, Putin lays down the red line in 2008 and says Ukraine is not joining NATO.
01:48:53.000And in 2014, that red line is crossed.
01:48:58.000We're going to overthrow the government and put Ukraine and NATO anyway.
01:49:01.000And Putin pushes them right back and says, no you're not because I'm going to invade Crimea and I'm going to fuel a civil war and that will preclude Ukraine from joining NATO.
01:49:10.000You thought you were going to get away with this?
01:49:12.000You thought you were going to push past my red line and make Ukraine part of NATO?
01:50:26.000It is of vital strategic importance to Russia.
01:50:29.000So they cross this red line and this is something that really is not even important to the NATO security posture or, you know, that's not even to say the American security posture, but it is for Russia.
01:50:42.000So they cross this red line in a way that is so belligerent and in a way that is so offensive and really for no good reason.
01:50:51.000It's not like they invaded Ukraine because this mattered so much.
01:50:56.000They pushed into Ukraine just because they thought they could do anything.
01:51:02.000We saw that Putin drew a red line and we said, you know what, we don't care.
01:52:10.000And Russia's not moving out of Crimea anytime soon, and Russia's not going to stop the civil war anytime soon because Russia drew a red line.
01:52:50.000And so they start giving money now to the Poroshenko government.
01:52:53.000You know, they install the Western-backed leader, Poroshenko, and they bring in these Galician neo-Nazis who now head up the security forces, the military, and they occupy important positions in the government.
01:53:36.000So Russia is, they're not as powerful as NATO, but they're vastly more powerful than Ukraine.
01:53:42.000But Ukraine thinks that the West will do anything to defend them.
01:53:46.000So now Ukraine says, you know what, I'm not scared of you, Russia.
01:53:51.000I'll use drones against Donbass, and I'll talk about, and this is the precipitating factor,
01:53:58.000Zelensky, who was recently elected in Ukraine, another Western-backed leader, he signs an agreement with the United States bolstering their diplomatic relationship.
01:54:09.000Zelensky threatens to rearm Ukraine with nuclear weapons.
01:54:15.000The United States and the British are sailing destroyers and flying planes right up against the disputed territory in Crimea and Donbass.
01:54:23.000So, you know, Russia intervenes and says, you know, not so fast, you're not crossing my red line, and the United States and NATO walk right up to the red line and say, oh yeah?
01:54:32.000Well, we'll see who can draw red lines in the world.
01:55:54.000And understand that with the NATO membership comes a lot of consequences.
01:56:00.000If Ukraine joins NATO, you know, why is this a red line for Putin?
01:56:04.000Why is this a legitimate security problem for Putin?
01:56:08.000If Ukraine joins NATO, NATO puts a military base in the Black Sea, a naval base.
01:56:14.000If Ukraine joins NATO, NATO can deploy an ABM shield in Ukraine.
01:56:19.000If Ukraine joins NATO, NATO can deploy short-range and intermediate-range nuclear missiles in Ukraine.
01:56:27.000They can deploy hypersonic missiles in Ukraine that can reach Moscow in five minutes that are unstoppable.
01:56:33.000So in short, you know, once again going back to this idea of balance and security, if Ukraine joins NATO, NATO has a dagger at the throat of Moscow with ABM, with short-range missiles, theater support missiles, and with the naval base in Sevastopol.
01:56:56.000This puts Russia in a completely indefensible situation because if you look at a map of Eastern Europe, the Baltic states are a part of NATO.
01:57:16.000And you've got the Kaliningrad Expost.
01:57:22.000In a hypothetical war, you would, and also then you have Turkey in the south as well, in a hypothetical war, you have got an indefensible border from St.
01:57:31.000Petersburg in the north all the way down through to the Caucasus for Russia.
01:57:37.000You've got a NATO attack, which, I mean, they would quickly take over Belarus, and so you've got the entire northern European plain.
01:58:06.000I mean, it's over before it even begins.
01:58:09.000And so Russia's put in a completely indefensible posture in both conventional and nuclear means, if all of this is completed.
01:58:17.000With Ukraine under the control of NATO, they could not win a conventional war, they could not win a nuclear war.
01:58:23.000They put up an ABM shield to shoot down the nuclear missiles, and they can launch missiles just as easily, and a full-on naval assault, and a land assault, and an aerial assault, and it's over.
01:58:37.000And the only argument that comes from the other side is like, oh well, but NATO wouldn't do that.
01:58:48.000And the reason that people compare it to Mexico, like what if Russia had an alliance with Mexico, is because the thought of Mexico having Russian nuclear missiles, and having a Russian naval base in the Gulf of Mexico, and having the entire southern border have to be defended against a potential peer competitor, it would just be unthinkable.
01:59:11.000And then imagine if Russia was 13 times more powerful than the United States.
01:59:16.000Right, or 20 times more powerful than the United States.
01:59:21.000What if Russia were 20 times more powerful, and Mexico was in a defensive alliance with Russia, and Russia had their ICBMs, or I should say short and intermediate range missiles, and an anti-ballistic missile shield, and they had a naval base in Mexico.
01:59:57.000Because between what the United States has done with the missile treaties, this new arms race, what we've done in the Middle East, the expansion of NATO,
02:00:09.000We are putting Russia in a position where it cannot defend itself, and we have demonstrated no good faith, we have demonstrated no restraint either.
02:00:17.000You know, when we didn't like Gaddafi, we just took him out.
02:00:20.000When we didn't like Assad, we just tried to take him out.
02:00:23.000And it didn't matter who we had to back.
02:00:27.000We didn't like Saddam Hussein, we took him out.
02:00:33.000So, you've got this pattern of behavior where we don't care about other countries' security, we do whatever we want, we don't follow international law, we depose countries we don't like, we contain countries that we don't like but we can't do anything about yet, and then we're putting Russia in a position where if we wanted to take them out they couldn't stop us.
02:02:14.000That's why they had to oust the president.
02:02:17.000That's why they had to overthrow the government and install a new one.
02:02:20.000And then anyway, that fails in the latter argument because the final argument is no country's security can be enhanced at the expense of another's.
02:02:28.000Well, we can surely demonstrate that Ukraine joining NATO, while it may enhance Ukraine's security, clearly comes at a detriment to Russia's security, so it actually doesn't matter what Ukraine wants.
02:02:39.000It cannot enhance its own security at the expense of Russia, which is what joining NATO does.
02:02:48.000And it also fails on the front of if you're going to defend NATO and the United States.
02:02:52.000Well, NATO and the United States have done things that are far less defensible than what Russia is doing in Ukraine now.
02:02:58.000And we could get into a lot of counterexamples.
02:03:00.000We could get into the Saudis' war in Yemen.
02:03:02.000We could get into Israel's war in Palestine and Syria.
02:03:06.000We could get into the Monroe Doctrine and everything that that has entailed for 200 years.
02:03:12.000You know, I mean, there are so many counterexamples with how the United States and NATO has acted in recent years that there just wasn't time to cover that in the debate.
02:03:22.000You know, like, for example, the situation in Yemen.
02:05:22.000You know, in 1967 there's this Arab-Israeli war.
02:05:27.000And the Israelis not only beat back the Arabs, but they then occupy a greater extent of Palestinian lands than ever before, and they move into the Sinai Peninsula, and they move into the Golan Heights in Syria.
02:05:39.000They eventually relinquish Sinai, but they keep the Golan Heights to this day, and they retain control over those areas in Palestine, and they say, well, we have to control Palestine because if we don't, Palestine will be used to attack Israel.
02:05:56.000And the United States unconditionally supports this since 1967.
02:06:15.000And it's not to pass judgment on Israel.
02:06:17.000I'm not trying to, you know, that's not, I'm not making a value statement about Israel's occupation of those territories.
02:06:25.000But it is to say, you know, if in principle you're opposed to these kinds of military operations, well then where's the outrage over Israel?
02:06:33.000Where's the outrage over Saudi Arabia?
02:08:30.000And now they're conducting a brutal war that they can't even win!
02:08:34.000And so it's a stalemate because the Saudi military is completely ineffective, and we're fueling this never-ending conflict, and that one's got nothing to do with democracy or, you know, self-determination or anything like that.
02:08:50.000What's the Saudi basis for violating the sovereignty of Yemen?
02:09:15.000They're seriously going to say, well, I'm really mad about Russia invading Ukraine because they violated the sovereignty of Ukraine and Ukraine has a right to determine if it wants to join NATO.
02:10:02.000Okay, so if sovereignty is inviolable, and if self-determination is sacrosanct, then where's the outrage over the Saudi war in Yemen that the United States is funding and providing material support for?
02:10:18.000Except there is no pretense about... I mean there's no... Nobody is arguing that Yemen hasn't involved... No one's even talking about it.
02:10:27.000And no one's talking about the war in Yemen because the Council on Foreign Relations supports that war.
02:10:33.000The State Department supports that war.
02:10:35.000The CIA and the Pentagon support that war.
02:10:38.000And you will not see it on CNN because CNN obeys those institutions.
02:10:44.000And you won't see it on social media because big tech obeys those institutions.
02:10:49.000And as a consequence, nobody's talking about it.
02:10:52.000And nobody's talking about it because they weren't fucking told to talk about it because people are ignorant and stupid and they will just go with whatever is on TV.
02:11:00.000But, you know, like, Destiny is making this case of like, oh, you know, people are, you know, people are just mad.
02:11:09.000You know, the reason that everybody is upset with Russia, like, Visa and McDonald's left Russia because of popular outrage.
02:11:17.000You know, the people spontaneously noticed what was happening in Ukraine and it was such an outrage, they demanded something be done about it, they held McDonald's accountable, and McDonald's answered to the people.
02:11:38.000The institutions do not respond to what the people want.
02:11:41.000The people want what the institutions tell them to want.
02:11:46.000The institutions set the agenda, and the media launders the agenda through public opinion, and public opinion feeds it back to the institutions.
02:11:55.000And that is why people cry bloody murder over Russia's invasion in Ukraine, but the American government funds a Saudi's war in Yemen.
02:12:03.000And it's got nothing to do with democracy, it's got nothing to do with self-determination, or the fucking UN, or the UN's laws on war, or any of that.
02:12:27.000You know, and fundamentally that's the conceit of the other side, is they really believe that, you know, some fucking tranny in a ballerina skirt who's drinking soy and playing Valorant, they think that person is making decisions for McDonald's boycotting Russia.
02:12:48.000I mean, that's literally what they think.
02:12:50.000They think that the Pentagon and the State Department and all of that is at the beck and call of some fucking guy with boobs, with pink hair, who is balding, who is complaining about war crimes on Twitter because he saw it on Reddit.
02:13:08.000And like, I can assure you, that is not the direction of how these things are decided.
02:14:29.000I mean they're creating the picture of the world and of the policy.
02:14:33.000So it's the interest groups which are representing all the richest.
02:14:37.000It's the think tanks which are all the elite academics, Jews, legacy people.
02:14:42.000Legacy people meaning like other people that went to Harvard and Yale.
02:14:45.000So that's like the current elite just reproducing itself.
02:14:48.000And then you've got the bureaucracies.
02:14:50.000Then you've got the agencies and the departments and the executive branch, the bureaucrats that have been there forever, the proper deep state, the Pentagon, officer corps, intelligence agencies.
02:15:03.000So you get this conglomeration of like, you know, the Atlantic Council, and the Brookings Institute, and like the Council on Foreign Relations, in concert with Raytheon, and Lockheed Martin, and the Pentagon, and the IC, and the State Department, and they are setting a policy about Ukraine.
02:15:23.000And the policy that they set is, well, Ukraine should be a part of NATO.
02:15:27.000And that is good for a number of reasons.
02:15:38.000The Pentagon wants it because they want to put their missiles there.
02:15:41.000The State Department wants it because they want their embassy there.
02:15:46.000It's democracy, liberal democracy to flourish there.
02:15:49.000And, you know, maybe investors want it because if Ukraine is a part of NATO and there's a thriving liberal democracy, then that means that, you know, Western energy companies can invest in all the shale oil in Ukraine and all the natural gas deposits in the Black Sea and profit from it.
02:16:05.000And they don't have to ship expensive liquefied natural gas to Western Europe to stave them off of Russian natural gas, which is cheaper and comes from a pipeline through Ukraine.
02:16:15.000So they three, this Iron Triangle, comes up with the policy, and then they send over the CIA to kill the people in Maidan, and they send over billions to back the opposition, and they control, they have a monopoly on media, they control the media, they overthrow the government, and then Putin pushes their shit in and says, not so fast, we just invaded Crimea, fuck you.
02:16:39.000And they go, oh, you want to say F you?
02:16:42.000Well, you know, we got an answer for you.
02:17:02.000You know, the foreign policy experts, they get interviewed on the shows, they write the policy papers, and the experts and the journalists pick it up in the Times and in the Washington Post, and then that is fed into the lowest common denominator sources like BuzzFeed and Vox and all the others, and then this is what people are guzzling 24-7 because there is no other media.
02:17:31.000So, you know, where are people getting their news about the world?
02:17:34.000CNN and NBC, they're watching the shows, and the shows go to the experts, and the experts all came from Harvard, and so on.
02:18:07.000And then they're tweeting about it and they're regurgitating it back to the establishment and there's this illusion that it initiated with them.
02:18:14.000Like, well people saw what was happening on TV and they got so mad about it they demanded that action be taken and then the government responded.
02:18:22.000And this is how the Iron Triangle launders its agenda through public opinion.
02:20:45.000It's got nothing to do with democracy and if People were spontaneously being aware about these things.
02:20:53.000Hey, they would have stopped the Yemen thing nine years ago, you know, so It's just ridiculous and this you know these this iron triangle is literally gonna get us all killed because
02:21:12.000They have unlimited resources and You know, these are the sociopaths.
02:21:17.000These are the murderers that are going to get all of us killed ultimately so
02:21:23.000And you know that's why the Harvey Weinstein and the Jeffrey Epstein thing were so important because Jeffrey Epstein was your bridge between Hollywood and the intelligence agencies.
02:21:35.000Jeffrey Epstein was a Mossad agent and he had dealings with Hollywood celebrities and financiers and the British government and other world governments.
02:21:46.000Harvey Weinstein was protected by an outfit which was all former Mossad agents.
02:22:22.000No, they're all, I mean, these are all mechanisms of control of about a thousand people, you know, one to three thousand people in the world that are making all the decisions.
02:22:32.000And they're enforcing their decisions with blackmail, extortion, you know, and other, you know, kinds of punitive things.
02:22:45.000But anyway, so that's... now I'm just totally off track.
02:22:48.000But that was a debate and like I said, I thought it went very well because, I mean, at a certain point he just... in order to justify his position, he was just making these crazy claims like he was saying
02:23:01.000Yeah, NATO determines when sovereignty can be violated.
02:23:06.000Like, if you say that, you lose the debate.
02:23:10.000If you start out by saying, you know, under no circumstances can Russia violate Ukraine's sovereignty, and then later on you say, oh, well, NATO invaded Libya, that was okay because sovereignty is actually conditional.
02:23:21.000Who determines when it can be violated?
02:24:22.000You know, that would be like if I put a loaded gun in your mouth and I said, hey, listen, I mean, if I shoot you, I mean, I will go to jail.
02:25:19.000I know that's a sort of oversimplification, but, like, the point stands.
02:25:24.000If somebody has the capability to utterly destroy you, it really honestly doesn't matter what their intentions are, what they say they're gonna do, it's unacceptable.
02:26:33.000We'll pick this up where I left off tomorrow, because tonight's show I was going to get into Putin's demands, which are extremely reasonable.
02:26:41.000Well, we just don't have time to do that tonight.
02:26:45.000So, I'll have to change the title here.
02:26:51.000And we'll just cover what I was going to cover tonight, tomorrow.
02:29:21.000You know, I just, I get into this, you know, I'm losing my voice, you know, because I'm talking so much.
02:29:29.000I get into this foreign policy stuff, man.
02:29:31.000I just, I just get really worked up about it, okay?
02:29:33.000I just get really... Because this, I'm getting pissed off, like I'm saying, and I'm getting, I'm getting into it, and I'm like gesticulating, and I'm getting angry, I'm like raising my voice.
02:29:54.000So let me just calm down and then we'll get into the super chats.
02:32:34.000You know, it's like a big crowd of people just going blah blah blah blah like that's my live chat every other live chat There's like some semblance of like a conversation and my live chat people are just like blah blah blah blah blah Everybody's just saying just car like just complete crap and just garbage Nick twerk, please see like why I mean why even say that?
02:34:16.000What are you, simping over her or something?
02:34:17.000I mean, I think she's older than me, so... Does no one find it suspicious that that sexy girl that I'm... Why even throw her a bone like that?
02:34:31.000You know, you people just can't help yourselves.
02:34:33.000You just can't help yourselves, can you?
02:35:06.000I'll just say he's always on that show.
02:35:08.000I don't know what to tell you, but some of these people, they're always on this girl's show.
02:35:12.000You know, I dropped in there, I dropped in there the other night because Destiny was on there, I dropped in there because there was a debate, but I'm never, I'm never like, hey Britney, can I come on Politically Provoked?
02:35:25.000You know, but these guys always are on there.
02:36:22.000You know my entire life my entire life.
02:36:25.000I sort of looked at You know sort of like Friendship and groups, and I was always sort of socially on the outside looking in you know I've always had friends.
02:36:36.000I've always had groups of friends, but I I've always been an alien.
02:37:52.000I'm going to take all of that and just channel it into my work.
02:37:56.000I'll take all of my, you know, whatever is not happening socially, I'm just going to take all of it and redirect it into my sort of eccentric passions and my projects.
02:38:10.000And all of that, because that's really all that I'm deriving any kind of satisfaction and fulfillment from.
02:38:18.000The rest is just frustrating, to be quite honest.
02:39:13.000He goes dutifully every night, he goes in, and I like the guy, he's a nice guy, but he dutifully goes in there every night to be like, hi Brittany, I'm here, I'm here, I'm back, hi Brittany, you're so cool.
02:39:30.000And be her little like minion and like Nobody sees anything wrong with this like but this is and to a lesser extent This is like what every guy does now, and I'm like It's like is there something wrong with me am I the weird one apparently apparently yes So I'm I am just I'm out.
02:40:29.000I'll hire like one person to be my ambassador to the world and that's gonna be... I think I've decided that's my new direction in my life because
02:40:40.000It's the rest of it is just too it's almost just too infuriating to bear sometimes This little nigga he goes on this show.
02:40:49.000He jumps on these zoom calls and goes hi Brittany And she goes hi Mio.
02:41:34.000That's really and that's the worst part.
02:41:36.000I was just on the Dalton stream and Dalton was like you know yeah I'm like the man of the house and yeah I agree with you Nick and and it's like you know full well you know full well he's you know he says that and he gets back with his wife and it's like you know honey I'm home you know
02:44:23.000That's, you know, when I say I'm like, you know, when I say I'm like taxi driver and American psycho and joker, you know, it's really, it's all real.
02:44:35.000I and I'm we're really relating and we're relating okay we're finding we're finding commonality in the in these archetypes okay modern American archetypes because I wanted to fit in you know that's so me it's so me
02:44:56.000You know, and I'll try to fit in and all that, but I think, I think I've realized, you know, I'm, in a society, I'm the Joker, right?
02:45:04.000In a world of Bruce Wayans, I'm a Joker, okay?
02:45:08.000In a world of Batmans and Bruce Wayans and, uh, and Black Catwoman, I'm a Riddler, I'm a Joker, okay?
02:47:32.000He doesn't talk about it and You know, he got outed by Gawker years ago I'm not good.
02:47:39.000I would never be like, oh, you know what like fuck him or whatever I'm not just saying that cuz he's rich either.
02:47:45.000I'm not just saying that because he's rich.
02:47:47.000He doesn't give me money I you know, but hey, we would always welcome.
02:47:51.000We're always welcome as long as no strings attached but um
02:47:57.000What's really, what's really bothersome are just, like, these people that are, like, freaks.
02:48:02.000Like, when I see Scott Presler, and he's in these ridiculous cowboy boots, and he's got the long girl hair, and he's, like, you know, and he's, like, sassy, you know, it's like, get that, just get that away from me.
02:48:32.000So I would, I would really say it's something more like, I would not say decent, I would say benign.
02:48:37.000Now, if you're sort of like benign, I really, I don't care.
02:48:41.000You know, is it, it's still wrong, is wrong, but from like a social, political point of view, it is benign in a sense.
02:48:51.000But yeah, we all know we're talking about like these faggots like that's just so you know It's just awful and I don't you know, it's a bane on society.
02:49:03.000I don't know why I mean it is all together But that stuff in particular is like I'm just wondering who is seeing that and being like yeah like more of that please fill up my cup with more of that like
02:50:49.000So, but Scott Presler's flamboyant, and he's probably like one of these more, you know, one of the... It would be a big problem if you were against the gay agenda for him, so.
02:51:07.000And I was trying to be... You know, I'm just a friendly guy to everybody, but he was a total jagoff, so it's like, whatever.
02:51:14.000But, um... Yeah, so Scott Presler, he's, you know... And do they all have to be, like... Why does it have to be a literal, like, Rob Smith, Scott Presler leading the charge?
02:51:30.000But anyway, King Fatass says, I don't know if Patrick Hawley is based or cringe, he's on the verge of becoming a wig gnat or just overdosed on red pills.
02:51:40.000But what I do know is that this movement needs a Zoomer leader and he's a millennial.
02:51:46.000Well... Yeah, see, I really like Patrick Hawley.
02:52:48.000It's like, listen, if you don't get it, you just don't get it, okay?
02:52:51.000If you don't understand, if you don't grasp that intuitively, you just don't have the sense.
02:52:59.000And I'm not saying that about Hawley because I like him a lot.
02:53:04.000He's a great guy and he's totally right on the money.
02:53:06.000He's courageous and he's a great writer and he's my friend.
02:53:12.000I saw that article and I'm just like, come on, man, like, what are we doing here?
02:53:16.000Because, you know, these groups, there's this, and let's just say it outright, there's this active effort on the part of the alt-right to reconstitute itself, and you see all these new groups popping up, like Patriot Front is one of them, and there's a few notable others.
02:53:33.000And it's all these former alt-right groups sort of re-reforming into these new... It's the same shit though.
02:56:15.000You know, I just don't want to be seen as, you know, people on their side are always talking about, you know, when is Nick going to join up with Mike Enoch?
03:00:20.000You know, it's good to see the other people, but it's also really good to see the chads, because it's like, you know what, if there's buy-in from the chads, you know, we're in good shape.
03:00:32.000Great to hang out at the Meme Mansion, and glad you had a good time at AFPAC, your first IRL event.
03:00:38.000Just, you know, the TikTok content just has to improve a little bit.
03:00:43.000The Batman meme, that was a good start.
03:00:48.000but you know we just we want to get some better tik-tok content you know I'm I'm following you so I see what's up but yeah I believe in you I think there's some good stuff the Batman thing you sent me that was cack that was good stuff but thanks a lot man I appreciate it good to hear from you sorry I attacked you earlier but you know just wasn't on purpose burgish says hey hey
03:01:16.000Donald Trump says had a meeting to get an internet provider for my boss and this representative with Cogent Communications bragged to me about how they cut off internet to their clients in Russia.
03:02:09.000You know, hey, the proverbial, you know, I'm gonna be being attacked by, I said this before, Vosh will be about to finish me off in a duel.
03:06:15.000I guess it all ends with me sort of creating a destructive final order and like knocking all the gala...
03:07:09.000Okay, this cord keeps coming unplugged whenever I hit my desk it knocks that cord out All right So anyway, so as I was saying So I was saying, you know where this is going is I'm gonna be on Exegol and I am going to blast the entire galaxy fleet out of the sky with force lightning and
03:07:36.000Knock some girl into a cavern with the force push That was awesome.
03:07:41.000It's Star Wars 9 when He was like and this will be the last of this.
03:07:46.000What is the I don't even I've seen that movie like one time But he was like this will be the last word in the Skywalker Bloodline or whatever any fucking force pushes both of them into a cave or does he knock out Ben Solo knocks him into the cave and
03:08:05.000Yeah, and then she's just laying down bloody and bashed and he's just nuking the whole galaxy fleet.
03:08:48.000Kyle says, mutually assured destruction probably applies in the cybersecurity realm as well.
03:08:55.000We'll shut down your energy networks if you shut down ours, maybe to a lesser extent because it's harder to showcase or flex those types of capabilities.
03:09:09.000get out of get out of town man oh my do you know what there's so much wrong with this super chat no no there is nothing comparable with cybersecurity that's just not even close and
03:11:03.000Like there's this me that you think of in your head and you think like I'm gonna wear a fucking cowboy hat.
03:11:09.000Or, you think I'm gonna go to the Alamo, or you think I'm gonna move to Louisiana for the girls or something, and then there's like, you know, then there's Nick Fuentes, the eccentric genius, misunderstood, you know, screaming into the void every night.
03:11:27.000Sort of what sucks about being famous, you know, struggle for your own identity, for me, you know, who I am.
03:12:34.000But I appreciate your consideration Michael says thank you Nick for delivering logic and knowledge every nightly program America versus the future What is your take on the deviant left begging for money to place?
03:17:59.000I had, I had pizza for breakfast, I watched the Putin interviews, I did some work, and then I fell asleep at like, I don't know, maybe, you know, nine, nine or ten.
03:18:14.000Then I wake up at noon, you know, and I'm just like so tired, and then I, you know, I force myself to get out of bed, I shower, I drive around, and I do stuff all day.