America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - December 05, 2017


An Inquiry into Trad Thots | America First Ep. 64


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour

Words per minute

186.93195

Word count

11,353

Sentence count

856


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Transcript

Transcripts from "America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. Explore them interactively here.
00:00:04.000 Good evening, everybody.
00:00:05.000 You are watching America First.
00:00:06.000 My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
00:00:08.000 We have a great show for you tonight.
00:00:10.000 As you can see, new decorations.
00:00:13.000 I don't know how well that shows up.
00:00:15.000 I think it shows up pretty well.
00:00:17.000 But we have our nativity scene, we have the reason for the season.
00:00:22.000 I was a little uncomfortable and I was doing the decorations because we got the lights, we got the wreath right there.
00:00:31.000 We have the Christmas colors, the snow, but we didn't have anything that said, we didn't have anything that screamed.
00:00:39.000 This is about the birth of our blessed Lord Jesus Christ.
00:00:42.000 But we have that now.
00:00:44.000 It's all right here.
00:00:45.000 Very nice.
00:00:46.000 You know, my mom, bless her heart.
00:00:48.000 Last night, I don't sleep, or yesterday, I hadn't slept in 24 hours.
00:00:53.000 I do my show.
00:00:55.000 I go on the Discord for our patrons only stream for three hours.
00:01:00.000 And then finally, I'm ready to retire to bed.
00:01:02.000 Okay, I've had my snack.
00:01:04.000 I have my bowl of chili.
00:01:05.000 I'm ready to go to bed.
00:01:06.000 I'm all in bed, just taking care of a little bit of Twitter.
00:01:09.000 I'm thinking up.
00:01:10.000 Some very great thoughts, some great content, and she bursts into my room because I tell her earlier I was looking for a nativity scene.
00:01:17.000 She bursts into my room with this box and she starts whipping all this stuff out, unwrapping things.
00:01:22.000 So I thought, I'm like, Mom, can I just go to bed, please?
00:01:29.000 But she did provide me with the nativity scene.
00:01:32.000 I'm noticing now that if I hit the table, it's going to shake a little bit.
00:01:38.000 I hope nothing falls over.
00:01:39.000 But anyway, enough of these are minor details, of course.
00:01:42.000 But there it is.
00:01:43.000 There it is for our man, our main man.
00:01:46.000 He's present now for his birthday, for the big birthday party coming up.
00:01:49.000 But we have much to talk about many hot topics, many exciting takes, exciting things to get to on the show, which we might have partially covered yesterday, but we're going to talk about them again today.
00:02:03.000 I didn't want to take a side.
00:02:05.000 I didn't want to take a side in the civil war between the women haters and the women lovers, the white knights versus the rest of them.
00:02:17.000 But I was forced, I was forced to take a position this morning.
00:02:22.000 I didn't want to do it.
00:02:24.000 I tried my best.
00:02:25.000 You saw last night how much equivocating, how much, what was the word destiny used?
00:02:31.000 How much gish galloping there was yesterday, trying desperately to appease both sides, trying desperately, as our great president does, to get along with everybody.
00:02:41.000 But I couldn't do it.
00:02:43.000 They forced my hand.
00:02:44.000 They really did.
00:02:46.000 This morning, and now I love this person, but an unnamed person.
00:02:50.000 In the alt right, who's been very upset about the women controversy.
00:02:54.000 Someone in particular, I don't think I'm going to name names, but somebody who's been very upset about all the women hating in the alt right, they DM me this morning.
00:03:04.000 Now, this is a person who I like.
00:03:05.000 This is a person who I follow.
00:03:07.000 I like their content.
00:03:08.000 I'm a big fan.
00:03:10.000 But this person messages me this morning and basically gives me an ultimatum.
00:03:14.000 They say, look, I need to know you're either with the women haters or you're against them.
00:03:20.000 She said, I can't endorse anybody who believes in the Thought Patrol.
00:03:24.000 She said, basically, are you with me or are you against me?
00:03:27.000 And, you know, I was this close to responding.
00:03:30.000 Only a Sith deals in absolutes.
00:03:32.000 The infamous Obi Wan Kenobi quote, of course, from The Revenge of the Sith.
00:03:36.000 I don't think that would have quite fit.
00:03:38.000 I don't think that would have helped my case there.
00:03:41.000 But I said very simply, I said, you know, look, I like you.
00:03:44.000 You're a good person.
00:03:45.000 I'm a big fan.
00:03:46.000 I like your content.
00:03:48.000 But I can't give up the Thought Patrol.
00:03:51.000 I can't do it.
00:03:53.000 What kind of a thought patroller would I be?
00:03:56.000 Famous, famous words.
00:03:58.000 You may know them.
00:03:59.000 When shit hits the fan, is you still a fan?
00:04:02.000 Immortal words.
00:04:04.000 And what kind of a fan, what kind of a participant, an advocate of the thought patrol would I be if, when presented?
00:04:12.000 I mean, I thought patrol all day long.
00:04:14.000 I did it last night.
00:04:15.000 I did it this morning.
00:04:16.000 Maybe that's why I was given the ultimatum.
00:04:19.000 What kind of a person would I be if a woman gets in my face, if she gets all right up in my face and says, you know, listen, you pig, you either give up the thought patrolling or you're going to be, I'm going to be your mommy.
00:04:32.000 And that's.
00:04:33.000 What kind of a person would I be if I said, okay, mommy, I'm sorry for the thought patrol?
00:04:38.000 So I had to tell her, I said, look, I like you, but not giving up the thought patrol.
00:04:42.000 And she said, okay, well, I'm unfollowing for now.
00:04:45.000 And I don't know.
00:04:47.000 I said, do what you got to do.
00:04:48.000 Do what you got to do.
00:04:50.000 I told her before she said that, I said, you should think this through.
00:04:53.000 You should give it a week to breathe a little bit.
00:04:55.000 I know it might seem like the sky is falling, but before you make any rash decisions, you ought to take a breather for a week, which I think is fair.
00:05:06.000 And especially with our female companions who we love, we love women, we cherish women.
00:05:11.000 I mean, do we love women or what, folks?
00:05:13.000 We really do.
00:05:14.000 But we know from time to time, but we all know from time to time they can be a little bit emotional, they can be a little bit rash.
00:05:22.000 And for that, we give them the benefit of the doubt.
00:05:25.000 For that, we give them a week to take a breather, and I'll still give her a week.
00:05:30.000 If next week or sometime this week she reconsiders, I will say, no harm, no foul.
00:05:34.000 I understand.
00:05:35.000 We are all in some capacity limited by our biology.
00:05:39.000 And, you know, perhaps we make.
00:05:40.000 Mistakes because of our biology.
00:05:42.000 And so I say, fair enough.
00:05:46.000 But if there's no reconciliation, I'll have to say, bye, bye, bye.
00:05:53.000 You know, so I'll have to say, be gone, thought.
00:05:55.000 I mean, look, look, to be serious for a moment, this movement is not an identitarian movement, not on this show.
00:06:03.000 I believe in America first.
00:06:05.000 I believe in traditionalism.
00:06:06.000 I believe in nationalism.
00:06:08.000 I believe the world is supposed to work in a very particular way.
00:06:12.000 I believe it was.
00:06:12.000 Designed.
00:06:13.000 I mean, that's why I'm a Christian.
00:06:14.000 I believe it was designed.
00:06:16.000 And we have to use the instruction manual.
00:06:18.000 We have to use the owner's manual.
00:06:20.000 The world was designed to work a specific way, and for it to be functional, for it to be just, it must work according to this plan.
00:06:29.000 It must work according to these rules that were laid down.
00:06:33.000 And these rules are the rules set forth by our ancestors, set forth by our pastors and the clergy and everything else.
00:06:41.000 It's in tradition.
00:06:42.000 The wisdom is in the tradition.
00:06:44.000 And if you believe in like some of the stuff, But you don't believe in the tradition, I'm sorry, that's really just not useful.
00:06:52.000 And part of that tradition is that women are supposed to be good mothers.
00:06:56.000 Now, there's an argument to be made that women can't be mothers in this economy.
00:07:02.000 They can't be stay at home mothers because, you know, the economy is bad and people need an extra income.
00:07:07.000 You know, if women need a part time job, if you need two income earners in your house, that's understandable.
00:07:13.000 That's understandable.
00:07:15.000 If all other options are exhausted, some people will have to downsize, some people will have to move, some people.
00:07:21.000 Should, in my opinion, make accommodations because their children should be the priority.
00:07:25.000 That's what my parents did.
00:07:26.000 My mom gave up her great salary.
00:07:28.000 She gave up her great job.
00:07:29.000 We gave up a big house to downsize so she could raise two kids and raise them the way they were supposed to be raised.
00:07:36.000 I'm a big believer in that.
00:07:37.000 And I'm a believer in that not because it's fashionable, not because it's a meme, but because that is the only healthy way to raise a child.
00:07:46.000 And when you bring life into this world, when you bring children into this world, you have to do right by them, you have to do what's best for them.
00:07:53.000 It's out of your hands at that point.
00:07:55.000 You don't believe that.
00:07:56.000 If you want to put yourself first, don't have kids.
00:08:00.000 So, when people have kids, they should be putting them first.
00:08:03.000 It's the only moral, just way to do it.
00:08:06.000 If economically you would be starving if there weren't two income earners, and often when a household takes on an extra income earner, they also take on extra expenses and it ceases to be profitable or at least less marginally profitable.
00:08:19.000 You know, you think if you have two income earners, you're going to need a second car maybe, you're going to need different insurance, you're going to have to pay for daycare, you're going to have to pay for other things.
00:08:28.000 So, for some women, you know, if you're a widow, for example, Makes perfect sense.
00:08:32.000 Of course, you're going to have to work.
00:08:34.000 If you're in dire straits, if the husband's unemployed briefly, or if the husband doesn't bring in enough money, if these things are just not an option, you know, of course, economically, you have to put food on the table.
00:08:46.000 But we have to get back to having the mother, having this family unit as the aspirational feature of society.
00:08:56.000 You know, and people say, well, Nick, that's too absolutist.
00:09:00.000 Nick, that's too extreme.
00:09:01.000 Nick, what about these exceptions?
00:09:02.000 But they're exceptions.
00:09:04.000 When so much in the society is pointing in one direction, we have to be pointing very strongly in the opposite direction.
00:09:11.000 You know, you want to believe in like this milquetoast liberal feminist ideology where it's like we have low taxes, but also women are inferior men, basically?
00:09:21.000 There's Ben Shapiro, there's Steven Crowder, there's Dave Rubin.
00:09:24.000 I mean, there's so much out there for you.
00:09:27.000 Is there one person in all of media, in all of conservative media, who is preaching this message?
00:09:35.000 No, they're not there.
00:09:37.000 We have to be there.
00:09:39.000 So there it is.
00:09:41.000 There it is.
00:09:42.000 And, you know, that's not to say people like the person that messaged me and the people that I work with in this particular industry are like bad people or anything, or I condemn them or I want to talk to them.
00:09:55.000 You know, people make it very black and white, but it's not so black and white.
00:09:58.000 In principle, it's black and white.
00:10:00.000 In practice, there are different complications to it.
00:10:07.000 And I would say that the main problem people have is the hypocrisy.
00:10:11.000 I think that's the Problem that people have.
00:10:13.000 That's all.
00:10:13.000 You know, when some people say you should live a certain way and then they don't live that way themselves, and there's a way to do that.
00:10:19.000 There's a way to do that.
00:10:20.000 You say, you know what?
00:10:21.000 Yeah, we're all hypocritical.
00:10:22.000 I mean, there's a hypocrisy there.
00:10:25.000 I admit it, or this didn't align with my values, or I understand that, but I'm doing it for a pragmatic reason.
00:10:32.000 But people then turn and they justify and they rationalize it.
00:10:35.000 And that's, I think, what people have a problem with it, which is like, well, for everyone else, it's this way.
00:10:39.000 But for me, it's actually not wrong that I'm doing it.
00:10:42.000 It's okay that I'm doing that.
00:10:44.000 I think that's where people.
00:10:46.000 Say there's an issue there.
00:10:47.000 I don't know.
00:10:47.000 I can't speak for everybody.
00:10:49.000 I can only speak for myself.
00:10:50.000 And I say, this is not, it's not misogynist.
00:10:53.000 It's not woman hating.
00:10:55.000 It's not even hating on any particular personality or person or anybody I've talked to.
00:10:59.000 But it is just to say, this is how it's supposed to be.
00:11:02.000 And we have to say that pretty unequivocally.
00:11:05.000 People are tired.
00:11:07.000 People are tired of the watering down, the dilution of this message because it is so important.
00:11:15.000 And ultimately, it's what we want.
00:11:17.000 It's what we want for women that is different.
00:11:19.000 We want the best for women.
00:11:20.000 We want them to be happy.
00:11:21.000 We want them to produce another generation that's happy and good and contributes to society.
00:11:27.000 And there it is.
00:11:28.000 So that's the women thing.
00:11:29.000 I know I addressed it a little bit last night, but it seems like it's getting kind of out of hand online.
00:11:34.000 People force me to take a position.
00:11:36.000 There's my position.
00:11:37.000 We can have women that are.
00:11:39.000 And another thing, people talk about the movement.
00:11:41.000 Like, I didn't sign up for the movement, I don't get paid by the movement.
00:11:46.000 You know, people are saying.
00:11:48.000 People are saying, like Lauren Southern shouldn't be in the movement.
00:11:52.000 Well, you know, I don't really care so much about what other personalities do or do not do.
00:11:58.000 You know, Lauren Southern and I, we did not sign up for like, we're in the camp, you know, we're on the same corporation or whatever.
00:12:06.000 Lauren Southern, she makes great content.
00:12:08.000 She's a smart person and she'll do what she's going to do.
00:12:14.000 But people are asking to devour like certain personalities.
00:12:17.000 Like those personalities exist outside of me.
00:12:20.000 You know, I do my show.
00:12:21.000 I say what I say.
00:12:23.000 They do their show.
00:12:23.000 They say what they say.
00:12:25.000 And that's fine.
00:12:26.000 You know, my movement is traditionalism.
00:12:28.000 I understand Lauren Southern's is different.
00:12:30.000 I don't know what exactly she identifies as, but, you know, that's her thing.
00:12:35.000 You know, people saying you got to disavow, you got to disassociate, or whatever.
00:12:38.000 I wouldn't go that far.
00:12:39.000 I would say these are my principles.
00:12:41.000 I mean, it's no different than when Democrats say, okay, well, you know, Donald Trump says this, and what do you say about this particular person?
00:12:48.000 Or in the topic we're going to get to later today about the Supreme Court case for the Colorado baker who denied the homosexual wedding cake.
00:12:57.000 People say, oh, well, what about if your cousin was gay?
00:12:59.000 Would you go to their wedding?
00:13:00.000 It's like, that's really not the point, you know?
00:13:04.000 It's really not, it's not about the cousin.
00:13:05.000 It's about forms, it's about principles.
00:13:08.000 So, anyway, enough about that.
00:13:10.000 Very divisive.
00:13:11.000 We're going to get over into the topic of the day.
00:13:16.000 But before we do that, the mugs, my friends, the mugs, they're selling out.
00:13:21.000 We have five left in stock, I believe.
00:13:25.000 So, if you are interested in buying a mug, if you want to be a number one America First patron, an America First fan, You got to get them while they're hot.
00:13:33.000 There's only five left.
00:13:35.000 And remember, these are great gifts for the nationalist in your life, for the patroller in your life.
00:13:41.000 And they're only 10 bucks and they're selling out.
00:13:41.000 You got to get them.
00:13:44.000 Five left.
00:13:45.000 We're going to get them, I believe, on the 8th.
00:13:48.000 FedEx is telling us they will arrive on the 8th.
00:13:50.000 So they'll start shipping out shortly after that.
00:13:53.000 And I believe you'll get them in time for Christmas.
00:13:54.000 So order them up.
00:13:56.000 Remember, it's the 16 ounce.
00:13:58.000 We're not babying around, okay?
00:14:00.000 These are not mugs for little men.
00:14:03.000 Who don't consume content.
00:14:05.000 This is not for little brainlets who their brains are so small.
00:14:08.000 It's like peanuts because they don't have a 300 or 250 IQ.
00:14:14.000 The mug that we're selling is 16 ounces of fluid because, and it's not that way.
00:14:19.000 We didn't order that for any other reason than we, me and James, need 16 ounces of fluid per fill up.
00:14:25.000 Anything else is not sufficient.
00:14:27.000 You know, whether we're filling that up with supplements, whether we're filling that up with water, whether we're filling that up with like brain fuel.
00:14:35.000 You know, whatever it is, we need 16 ounces of it for it to be worth it.
00:14:39.000 12 ounces is a sip for us, okay?
00:14:42.000 Gone.
00:14:43.000 It's a sip.
00:14:44.000 That's why we need the tall boy.
00:14:45.000 And I would say, don't order it if you're not a big fella.
00:14:48.000 You won't be able to lift it off your desk, it won't be practical.
00:14:52.000 So get them.
00:14:54.000 It's for kings only.
00:14:56.000 But that's the mug.
00:14:58.000 And what is the other thing we've been talking about lately on the show?
00:15:01.000 I forget.
00:15:02.000 There's another thing.
00:15:03.000 Oh, yeah.
00:15:04.000 The other thing.
00:15:04.000 The other new thing.
00:15:06.000 All the super chats, remember, all the super chats in the month of December go to the Christian Appalachian Project.
00:15:11.000 So please donate using the super chat, and that money at the end of the month, all of it will go to good people of eastern Kentucky, good impoverished people who have been killed by bad trade deals, by thoughts, by all kinds of things.
00:15:25.000 And we've got to help them out, folks.
00:15:27.000 Nobody else is going to do it.
00:15:28.000 So there it is.
00:15:30.000 That's the month of December.
00:15:31.000 Now that that is through, we have to get into Jerusalem again.
00:15:35.000 We glossed over it a little bit talking about Jared Kushner last night.
00:15:40.000 But it's in the news again today.
00:15:42.000 It is official now.
00:15:44.000 It is official, not the date that it will be announced, but it is official that it is happening.
00:15:49.000 It came out today that President Trump made a little phone call to the Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas and to Jordanian King Abdullah and told them essentially that the United States is moving their embassy in Tel Aviv in Israel to Jerusalem in Israel.
00:16:06.000 And in doing so, they will recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
00:16:11.000 Now, a little bit of background for those people that are confused.
00:16:15.000 I know we mentioned it in passing on Friday and Monday, but if we're going to do a little deep dive into the history of it.
00:16:21.000 So now, Jerusalem is the capital of Israel in terms of their government operates out of Jerusalem.
00:16:28.000 I mean, that is the functional, if you think of capitals in terms of what they provide for a country in the functional sense, that is Israel's capital.
00:16:35.000 That's where their legislature is housed, that's where the Supreme Court is, that's where the magistrate resides.
00:16:40.000 I mean, that is where their capital is.
00:16:43.000 However, in 1967, during the Arab Israeli War, East Jerusalem, which was formerly under the jurisdiction of the Palestinians, Was seized by Israel.
00:16:55.000 And now they are illegally expanding civilian settlements.
00:16:58.000 They are illegally annexing formerly Palestinian neighborhoods into Jerusalem, the capital of Israel.
00:17:05.000 So formerly you had West Jerusalem was Israel, East Jerusalem was Palestine.
00:17:10.000 In 67, Israel said, No, it's all mine.
00:17:13.000 It's all mine now.
00:17:14.000 And they took over East Jerusalem.
00:17:16.000 And since then, they've been gradually saying more and more of it is under our jurisdiction.
00:17:20.000 It's not just a military occupation.
00:17:23.000 And so the most nations in the world, I believe it's All nations in the world, if they have an embassy in Israel, they have their embassy in Tel Aviv, which is, I believe, the biggest city, instead of the capital.
00:17:35.000 Normally, the embassy is in the capital.
00:17:36.000 With the case of Israel, because every country in the world recognizes Tel Aviv as the capital and Jerusalem as not completely sovereign, the way the Israelis define it, they have their embassies in Tel Aviv.
00:17:50.000 In 1995, Bill Clinton, as part of negotiations between the Palestinians and the Israelis, They signed a statute.
00:17:58.000 Bill Clinton signed a statute that said that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel.
00:18:02.000 The United States recognizes Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
00:18:07.000 And the 1995 Jerusalem Embassy Act, which was passed, said that the United States must move the embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.
00:18:16.000 However, every president since that year has been signing a six month waiver, allowing the State Department to keep the embassy in Tel Aviv.
00:18:25.000 Because if they moved it in actuality instead of just in law, It would cause all kinds of uprest and civil disorder in the Arab world.
00:18:35.000 So we've been delaying that for a long time.
00:18:37.000 Well, now President Trump is saying this week, and he called those two heads of states, he called the head of Palestine and he called the head of Jordan to tell them that he will be recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and, in effect, acknowledging Israel's illegal annexation of East Jerusalem as legitimate, which is a big deal.
00:18:56.000 And that goes against about 50 years of American precedent.
00:18:59.000 That's a big deal.
00:19:02.000 So, now some of the responses to this have not been great.
00:19:05.000 And I want you to think while I'm reading through the responses, how the world is reacting to this, I want you to think we give $3.8 billion a year to Israel every year.
00:19:17.000 Unequivocal diplomatic support, political support.
00:19:20.000 I mean, we go over this all the time on the show.
00:19:22.000 But in spite of everything that they do, we give them everything in terms of money, military, diplomacy, everything.
00:19:30.000 Ask yourself while I'm reading the reactions how the world is reacting to this decision.
00:19:35.000 Which Israel wants really badly, that we move our embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.
00:19:39.000 Ask yourself is this a good thing for the United States?
00:19:42.000 Is this putting America first to cause all of this?
00:19:46.000 So, King Salman of Saudi Arabia warned that this would constitute a flagrant provocation of Muslims around the world and cautioned Donald Trump not to do it.
00:19:56.000 King Abdullah of Jordan said this would undermine efforts to resume the peace process and said that this would cause the same thing widespread unrest in the Arab world.
00:20:05.000 President al Sisi of Egypt said this would complicate the situation in the region and urge the president not to do it.
00:20:12.000 President Erdogan of Turkey, and Turkey is a NATO ally, warned that this would.
00:20:18.000 That this would be a bad idea, and also warned that his country, Turkey, would sever ties with Israel if it goes through this week.
00:20:25.000 Palestinian President Abbas warned that this would push the region into instability and destroy the peace process between Israel and Palestine, and he announced three days of rage beginning on Wednesday.
00:20:36.000 The Palestinian Islamist group Hamas has threatened a second intifada if Trump moves the embassy to Jerusalem, and Germany's foreign minister, the European Union foreign minister, and the French foreign minister all criticized the move as counterproductive.
00:20:49.000 So, I don't know.
00:20:52.000 Is that a good thing?
00:20:54.000 Is that a winning move for the president, for the United States?
00:20:58.000 Is that going to be a good thing that we move our embassy to Jerusalem?
00:21:02.000 That we take a pretty benign, symbolic, diplomatic gesture and move our embassy from one city to another?
00:21:10.000 Is that going to be good for us?
00:21:12.000 That we alienate Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, Palestine, Turkey, France, Germany, the European Union?
00:21:19.000 Is that.
00:21:21.000 Is that putting America first?
00:21:23.000 I don't know.
00:21:23.000 I think it's a tough sell.
00:21:24.000 I think it is a tough sell if you're trying to make that case.
00:21:28.000 And we see this continually with the state of Israel that we do things that benefit this country, exclusively benefit this country, and we pay a cost everywhere else, either in the form of our European allies, who are much harder on Israel than we are, or our Arab allies, or Arab partners, or just plain Arab countries that will impose a penalty on us for it.
00:21:52.000 You know, you think of Egypt, for example, who is cautioning against this.
00:21:55.000 Egypt is a good ally.
00:21:57.000 Egypt is a good ally.
00:21:58.000 I don't want to see us giving foreign aid to them.
00:21:59.000 We give something like $800 billion a year in foreign aid to Egypt, which is no good.
00:22:04.000 But Egypt allows us to work with them militarily.
00:22:07.000 I mean, there are many things that Egypt does for us in terms of stabilizing the region.
00:22:11.000 We can count on them in military coalitions.
00:22:13.000 They're a good ally.
00:22:14.000 I mean, there are many things with Egypt.
00:22:15.000 With Saudi Arabia, it's the same thing.
00:22:17.000 I mean, they sell oil to us, they help keep regional stability.
00:22:20.000 I mean, they sponsor.
00:22:22.000 You know, there are some rogue elements in the Saudi royal family that have sponsored terrorists in the past, but the Trump administration is presently working with good elements in the Saudi government, if there is such a thing, to push the country in a more moderate direction, to crack down on terrorism.
00:22:38.000 And certainly that's happened.
00:22:39.000 Look no further than the situation in Iraq and Syria, where ISIS has all but been defeated.
00:22:44.000 And you think that had nothing to do with Saudi Arabia, you think that had nothing to do with President Trump.
00:22:49.000 And you look at Jordan's cooperation with us, you look at Turkey's cooperation with us.
00:22:54.000 And is it worth jeopardizing our diplomatic role in the world and in that region in particular to make a symbolic gesture for Israel?
00:23:03.000 Is that putting America first?
00:23:03.000 I don't know.
00:23:08.000 Don't think so.
00:23:09.000 But I started to think maybe the reason for it, while I was reading the reactions to this, I started to think the reason for changing the Capitol is maybe for the actual effect.
00:23:09.000 Not quite.
00:23:21.000 Maybe it's intended to cause outrage.
00:23:24.000 Because you think that if President Trump is thinking about moving the embassy, and there's really no pressure for him to do it outside of maybe AIPAC in the 2018 elections, maybe there is pressure.
00:23:34.000 But if you put that on hold for a second, which is just general Israeli influence over our government, and say, why would Trump do this?
00:23:41.000 Why would he do it now?
00:23:43.000 You know, you would think that this would cause a lot of outrage.
00:23:45.000 This would cause a second intifada.
00:23:48.000 This would cause days of rage from the Palestinians.
00:23:51.000 This would cause everything that's happening.
00:23:53.000 You could have easily forecasted this horrible reaction by the Arab world.
00:23:57.000 Could it be that they want that to happen?
00:23:59.000 Could it be that President Trump doesn't believe in a two state solution?
00:24:03.000 I'm hard pressed to believe that if he's giving legitimacy to Israel's claims of East Jerusalem, which is like a major sticking point in the negotiations between Palestine and Israel, that maybe he's just not serious about it.
00:24:16.000 Giving the Palestinians a state of their own.
00:24:18.000 Maybe he wants Israel to have dominion over the entire country.
00:24:22.000 And it was reported earlier this week, at the same time, basically, that the proposal put forth by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Jared Kushner is one that the Palestinians would reject outright.
00:24:35.000 It's a horrible proposal.
00:24:37.000 President Trump, who wants to make the ultimate deal, he's putting forth to the Palestinians a deal where basically they get no state of their own, they get no sovereignty, they get non contiguous portions of the West Bank.
00:24:49.000 I'm hard pressed to believe that this administration is serious about reaching peace.
00:24:52.000 Maybe they just want a one state solution.
00:24:54.000 So, I don't know.
00:24:56.000 Something to watch.
00:24:57.000 It's not good either way.
00:24:58.000 I'm not thrilled about it.
00:25:00.000 It could just be general pressure from the Israel lobby.
00:25:03.000 You know, we know that Steve Bannon gave a speech basically to Zog the other week, and me and Jane thought about that a little bit.
00:25:10.000 But maybe that has something to do with people are looking for money for the 2018 midterms as we come up on an election cycle.
00:25:17.000 You might see why we would be doing things.
00:25:20.000 Favorable to Israel, maybe in exchange for other things.
00:25:22.000 I don't know, but we'll see what happens.
00:25:26.000 That's Jerusalem.
00:25:27.000 It'll develop.
00:25:27.000 We'll probably be talking about it again tonight if the announcement happens, and we'll see if he's recognizing the annexation of East Jerusalem, if he's recognizing the military occupation of East Jerusalem, if he's even going to move the embassy.
00:25:41.000 Apparently, it came out of the White House that they'll actually delay that by six months so they can prepare for it logistically.
00:25:46.000 So, you know, I don't know.
00:25:47.000 I mean, we'll know the details tomorrow, but.
00:25:50.000 That's Jerusalem.
00:25:51.000 The other major thing we got to talk about is the gay cakes, my friends.
00:25:54.000 The gay cakes.
00:25:56.000 We're always talking about the homosexuals and their weddings and their cakes and everything.
00:26:00.000 In my opinion, it's really a non issue.
00:26:03.000 Not like it's not important, but comparatively speaking, I mean, these are not the hills to die on.
00:26:08.000 But of course, it is about morality, so I guess it is important.
00:26:13.000 But the Supreme Court appears to be split this week over the gay wedding cake case.
00:26:19.000 This is still going on, apparently, from 2012.
00:26:22.000 When a Christian baker from Colorado refused to make a custom wedding cake for a gay couple, and in response, the state of Colorado ordered remedial training for his workers.
00:26:33.000 Pretty Orwellian, right?
00:26:35.000 And so it's looking like Kennedy will be the deciding vote in the Supreme Court to decide whether the Colorado baker was in the right to refuse service to the gay couple, if it was in his freedom of association and freedom of speech rights to deny service, or if it was violating the 14th Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause.
00:26:54.000 Although there are some dubious things about the 14th Amendment, you know, given that it wasn't ratified by two thirds of the states.
00:27:00.000 So I don't know, kind of a tough sell for me on that one.
00:27:03.000 But here's another great thing about this.
00:27:06.000 Whenever conservatives talk about the gay wedding cake case, you have to really bust their balls about it because the deciding vote in this one will be Anthony Kennedy.
00:27:15.000 And who is Anthony Kennedy appointed by?
00:27:17.000 You know, if you could take a guess, what conservative icon, you know, that everybody holds up, they have posters in their college Republican dormitory, it's Ronald Reagan.
00:27:27.000 Ronald Reagan.
00:27:28.000 So, real winner, this Ronald Reagan guy.
00:27:30.000 Yeah, I mean, sure, the economy grew really, you know, a lot in the 1980s, but was it worth California going blue forever?
00:27:38.000 Was it worth America being invaded from the southern border, 3 million given amnesty?
00:27:43.000 Was it worth Supreme Court justices that are not conservative at all?
00:27:47.000 Was it worth the military empire, the Bush family, free trade?
00:27:51.000 I don't know.
00:27:54.000 I think I would trade away.
00:27:55.000 I think I would live in a smaller house if it meant that people like Kate Stinley weren't being gunned down in the streets.
00:28:00.000 I think I'd trade a smaller television for no amnesty, for blue collar jobs.
00:28:08.000 You know, I think we would all make that trade.
00:28:10.000 But.
00:28:11.000 On this, I mean, it's a pretty basic bitch conservative talking point, pretty regular normie conservative type issue here.
00:28:18.000 But if we go back to the regular talking points, if we go back to the Barry Goldwater talking points for a moment on discrimination, there's nothing unconstitutional about discrimination by the private sector.
00:28:30.000 I mean, this is just, I don't know why it's even argued anymore today.
00:28:35.000 It just is not.
00:28:36.000 I mean, the 14th Amendment gives people equal protection under the law for the law, for the government, for the public sector.
00:28:44.000 There's no 14th Amendment protection for people like myself or James Alsop who are discriminated against by Twitter.
00:28:51.000 There's no 14th Amendment protection for people who want to go into McDonald's and not wear a shirt.
00:28:57.000 There's no 14th Amendment protection for James Alsop and Richard Spencer who get banned from Uber or get banned from Airbnb.
00:29:03.000 It doesn't exist.
00:29:05.000 And they impose that double standard because they know that it's not about the Constitution.
00:29:09.000 It's about what's fashionable, it's about the fact that you can't discriminate against people living alternative, degenerate lifestyles.
00:29:17.000 That's not okay.
00:29:18.000 Or incompetent people, or people that might be predisposed to incompetence, but you can discriminate against the Nazis.
00:29:25.000 So it's got nothing to do with the Constitution.
00:29:28.000 The Constitution is perfectly upheld with Twitter and in all these other cases.
00:29:32.000 The First Amendment says you have freedom of association.
00:29:35.000 So if I want to deny service to you, the government is not in their legal right to.
00:29:40.000 So I guess it's these living Constitution type people that say, like, oh, we disagree with that, so it shouldn't be enforced.
00:29:48.000 But now you're starting to see, I think you're starting to see the payback for that.
00:29:52.000 And this will actually be a good thing because I think if it goes not our way and Anthony Kennedy says Colorado is within their rights to punish the baker, then we could make a case for nationalizing Twitter or we could make a case for an anti discrimination suit against Twitter or, you know, that could be done in the future sometime for white people or for right wing people.
00:30:12.000 You know, that would certainly help bolster our argument that there's a double standard.
00:30:17.000 If it goes our way, though, I think that'll be a major win for.
00:30:20.000 Religious people for Christians because, you know, it just isn't fair.
00:30:24.000 Nobody would say that a Jewish baker should have to make a cake with a swastika on it or even a cross in some cases, right?
00:30:31.000 Nobody would force a Jewish baker to make a cake with a cross or a Nazi slogan or anything like that because Nazis are not fashionable, but homosexuality is.
00:30:41.000 So, really, it's more about a cultural thing.
00:30:45.000 And I think that gives credence to the idea that we are fighting a cultural war.
00:30:50.000 Because if we had won the cultural war, if we had won the cultural conversation on homosexuality, I don't think gay marriage would be legal.
00:30:59.000 I think the reason it became legal is because people on the Supreme Court wanted to be cool.
00:31:05.000 They didn't want to be good constitutional scholars, because if they did, they would find there's nothing in the Constitution about marriage.
00:31:12.000 And they invented a right to marriage out of thin air based on the 14th Amendment, which Anthony Scalia pointed out.
00:31:19.000 They wanted to be fashionable.
00:31:20.000 And so if we had won the cultural conversation, it wouldn't have happened.
00:31:25.000 And you look at a lot of these laws that are being passed, which are not good.
00:31:28.000 You look at a lot of these Supreme Court cases that are being lost, which are not good.
00:31:32.000 Marijuana, for example, it doesn't really matter if marijuana gets legalized or if it doesn't.
00:31:37.000 It's already widely used because we lost the conversation culturally.
00:31:40.000 And now it's cool and it's acceptable.
00:31:43.000 And actually, you're expanding your mind when you use it.
00:31:46.000 So we have to focus back on the conversation.
00:31:49.000 We have to come up with better arguments.
00:31:51.000 And that doesn't necessarily mean arguments based on logos.
00:31:54.000 That doesn't necessarily mean look at the facts, look at the studies.
00:31:58.000 It just means we have to come up with ways to convince people that this stuff is the wrong direction.
00:32:02.000 And then the laws will follow from there.
00:32:06.000 So that's the Supreme Court.
00:32:07.000 The other thing about this, which I think is so funny, is that homosexuals do not want wedding cakes because they don't want weddings, because they don't want to be married, because they don't like monogamy.
00:32:17.000 I mean, that was the biggest myth, I think, that allowed it's like the Trojan horse of degeneracy, where homosexuals came forth and they said, We just want to get married like you guys.
00:32:27.000 We just want to put, you know, we want to join in an eternal union of souls just like you, even though not really possible.
00:32:35.000 But that if anybody knows homosexuals, if anybody knows.
00:32:38.000 Gay culture, if you could even call it that, for a moment, you know that this is not what they want.
00:32:46.000 It is not like a simple thing where it's like you have heterosexuals and then you have homosexuals.
00:32:51.000 Pick one.
00:32:51.000 Do you want a gay couple or a straight couple?
00:32:53.000 It's just not like that.
00:32:55.000 Homosexuals, if you look at their patterns in terms of sexual behavior, relationship behavior, they don't themselves want that.
00:33:04.000 That was a way of normalizing degenerate behavior to say that they wanted marriage, to say, look, we're just like you.
00:33:11.000 Look, we want the same things that you do, but they don't want the same things we do.
00:33:15.000 If you don't believe me, there was a study that was done, and this is from the Daily Beast, so a pretty liberal paper.
00:33:21.000 There was a study done in 2013 that says 50% of gay marriages are not strictly monogamous, and they estimate that that number could actually be as high as 75%.
00:33:32.000 Now, you understand that the purpose of a marriage is to be monogamous.
00:33:36.000 The reason that you enter into a financial, a civil, a moral contract with another person is to say, I want to spend the rest of my life with you.
00:33:45.000 And only you for the purpose of procreation and for the purpose of we can take care of each other.
00:33:51.000 And when you look and you find that the gay married people, 75% of them don't follow the prerequisite for what it means to be married, you understand that the whole thing was a lie.
00:34:03.000 The whole thing was a farce.
00:34:04.000 The whole thing was a fraud.
00:34:05.000 They didn't want that.
00:34:07.000 They tricked you.
00:34:07.000 They made that up.
00:34:11.000 So I know that.
00:34:13.000 I don't know if many conservatives make that case.
00:34:15.000 Conservatives make the case now because they're all libertarians.
00:34:18.000 They're all like, Cato Institute libertarians, they say, you know, what does Austin Peterson say?
00:34:23.000 I want to get gay married at my marijuana factory and defend it with an AR 15.
00:34:28.000 You know, that's the talking point now from the libertarian infiltrated Republicans.
00:34:33.000 But the argument should be that this is not equal.
00:34:37.000 This is not the same.
00:34:39.000 They don't want the same thing.
00:34:40.000 It is a different behavior, it is a different thing altogether.
00:34:45.000 I mean, it's almost comparable.
00:34:47.000 I don't know if I go as far to say it's a mental illness.
00:34:51.000 But it is a deviant pattern of behavior and not in any way, shape, or form equivalent to the holy sacrament of marriage.
00:35:00.000 And to try and conflate those, and even when you have it in the Supreme Court and people talk about it like, oh, you know, there's some equal protection that they're entitled to or anything like that.
00:35:08.000 I mean, just look at what we're doing.
00:35:11.000 Does anybody stop and say, look at the folly of this?
00:35:13.000 We're arguing about if a baker has to make a wedding cake for homosexuals when they don't want to get married and they don't want to have this union.
00:35:22.000 I mean, we made that up, we projected that onto them.
00:35:25.000 Or certain people in the media, certain elements in the media projected that onto them for the sake of subverting traditional values and the traditional institutions.
00:35:35.000 So that's my take on that.
00:35:37.000 You won't hear that on Crowder.
00:35:38.000 You won't hear that on Ben Shapiro, I don't think.
00:35:41.000 You'll hear, those are my values, but I don't want to impose them on anyone else.
00:35:44.000 You know, God forbid.
00:35:46.000 God forbid you didn't want them parading degeneracy down the streets and on television.
00:35:50.000 That would violate the non aggression principle, right?
00:35:53.000 So that's the gay wedding cakes.
00:35:55.000 Hopefully, I mean, we'll see what happens.
00:35:57.000 I don't know.
00:35:58.000 It sucks that Christians are just bullied now.
00:36:01.000 I mean, Christians, it's like they just have no legal rights anymore.
00:36:06.000 They get genocided in the Middle East and nobody talks about it.
00:36:09.000 They get genocided and nobody cares about it.
00:36:11.000 There's no money for it.
00:36:12.000 We don't care about their refugees, right?
00:36:14.000 We don't talk about the fact that the Christian population in the past 25 years has shrunken exponentially thanks to mass murder.
00:36:23.000 And Christians, if they want to uphold their values or their virtues, they're laughed at, you know, their rubes, their songs, their movies, and everything, although it is cheesy.
00:36:32.000 Mocked endlessly, and that's okay, right?
00:36:35.000 You can't make fun of anybody else.
00:36:37.000 You can't make fun of a certain group of people.
00:36:39.000 But Christians, all day long, we have the target on our back, and it's a shame.
00:36:44.000 It's a shame if we lose, and it'll be a real shame that Anthony Kennedy did it, you know, and Ronald Reagan appointed him.
00:36:50.000 What a loss.
00:36:51.000 What a fraud he was, too, right?
00:36:53.000 But anyway, that's the gay cakes.
00:36:56.000 Our last topic here before we get into your super chat here is the Mueller probe, which we're finding out every day is just completely illegitimate.
00:37:04.000 We're finding out every day.
00:37:05.000 That this grand crusade, Robert Mueller, who's doing God's work, he's rooting out corruption in the government.
00:37:12.000 He's draining the real swamp, as the blue boomers say.
00:37:15.000 I mean, this guy's no better than anybody else.
00:37:18.000 We're finding out that this investigation needs an investigation.
00:37:22.000 We found out earlier this week that one of the top investigators, FBI official Peter Sturzok, I think it's some Eastern European consonant name, he was fired after sending anti Trump texts.
00:37:36.000 And that happened to be the same guy who softened James Comey's language on Hillary Clinton's email.
00:37:41.000 He changed it from grossly negligent to extremely careless.
00:37:44.000 So, this is a guy who was biased against Trump from the get go.
00:37:47.000 I mean, he was soft on Hillary Clinton, and then he's texting these terrible things about Donald Trump, and he was investigating Donald Trump.
00:37:54.000 And now we find out today that a top prosecutor, who is now a deputy for special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia probe, praised former Attorney General Sally Yates for refusing to defend Trump's travel ban in an email after she was fired.
00:38:10.000 So, I mean, yeah, it's no secret.
00:38:13.000 I mean, we all knew this from the beginning, what a joke this was.
00:38:16.000 We're 18 months in, and the only thing that we found out, the only corruption that we found, is Israel influence, Israel corrupting our government, and Democrats being corrupt in investigating the corruption.
00:38:29.000 18 months.
00:38:30.000 They've been at it for a year and a half.
00:38:32.000 Media's been on it for a year and a half.
00:38:34.000 Democrats have been on it for a year and a half.
00:38:36.000 George Soros has been on it for a year and a half.
00:38:39.000 They've subpoenaed everybody, they've unturned every rock.
00:38:42.000 They've illegally looked at phone calls.
00:38:44.000 They had the NSA at their disposal.
00:38:45.000 They unmasked it to the media.
00:38:48.000 All the money that they could need for this investigation.
00:38:53.000 And here we are in December of 2017.
00:38:55.000 And the only corruption they found was Israel interfering in our government, influencing our government through Jared Kushner, and the Democrats infiltrating this investigation, using it for political purposes.
00:39:08.000 So, needless to say, we are doing very well.
00:39:13.000 Drumpf is not going anywhere.
00:39:15.000 He's going to serve out the remainder of his term.
00:39:17.000 I would say, for anybody who wants to make a little bit of money off of this, if you know, predict it.
00:39:21.000 And before I give my advice, I have to disclose I'm not a financial advisor, so you can't sue me if it doesn't work out.
00:39:27.000 But there's all kinds of markets right now, unpredicted, in case Trump gets impeached or something.
00:39:34.000 The market will be like, what are the odds that Trump is still in office in 2018 or by January 1st, 2018 or by January 1st, 2019?
00:39:43.000 And I think you can make a little bit of money off of that because you have a lot of these dummy Democrats who don't read the actual information.
00:39:51.000 Charges against Manafort and Rick Gates, and they think he's on his way out.
00:39:55.000 You could probably make a little bit of money off of that.
00:39:57.000 I haven't looked at those markets lately, but just a little tip there because it's just clear that it's not going anywhere and they're wasting time, they're wasting money.
00:40:06.000 I don't know what's going to come of this.
00:40:07.000 I don't know what the purpose is that it's still going on when it's clear that it's a farce.
00:40:11.000 Why has President Trump not dismissed Robert Mueller?
00:40:14.000 Why has he not fired Robert Mueller?
00:40:16.000 Why has he not pardoned all these people that are being charged for these silly crimes from like decades ago?
00:40:24.000 I don't know why he's not doing that.
00:40:24.000 I don't know.
00:40:25.000 Is it because he doesn't want to look corrupt?
00:40:28.000 Is it because he doesn't want to, I think, give it away in the sense that this committee, this council, is already on its way to proving they have nothing?
00:40:38.000 And if he dismissed them and he pardoned people, he wouldn't allow them to come to that conclusion on their own?
00:40:44.000 You know, because if he dismissed it before they had to eventually say, we found nothing, well, then people would say, they didn't have nothing.
00:40:52.000 Obviously, they had something.
00:40:53.000 That's why he fired them and they would have found something.
00:40:55.000 You know, so is that why?
00:40:56.000 Or is it because.
00:40:58.000 Mueller's eventually going to find stuff on Clinton and the Podestas, or I don't know what's going on, but I think it continually is a positive because it is proving that they have nothing.
00:41:09.000 I mean, you look at even some mainstream sources saying it's time to throw them the towel, and it's turning into a joke in the mainstream, not in the media, not in the cultural class, in the John Oliver Saturday Night Live class, but I think the vast majority of people heading into the midterms, heading into the 2020 election, this is turning into a huge joke.
00:41:32.000 Sinking point for the Democrats.
00:41:34.000 I think it's really killing them with the electorate.
00:41:36.000 So we'll see.
00:41:38.000 We'll see what happens with that later on, and we'll move into your live chat.
00:41:42.000 We'll see what the people are saying.
00:41:44.000 For those people that are wondering, today I'm drinking, usually I drink the water, but today I'm drinking a little vitamin C supplement in the water.
00:41:52.000 I know it looks yellow.
00:41:53.000 Whoops.
00:41:54.000 Ah, shit.
00:41:55.000 Spilled it on the desk.
00:41:58.000 I hate when I spill, because this is not even, this was supposed to be like a green screen, and I just threw it over the desk.
00:42:05.000 As a makeshift tablecloth, because I didn't have one when I started this.
00:42:09.000 So I don't know if that's going to come out.
00:42:11.000 But I put in a vitamin C supplement here.
00:42:13.000 It's called Emergency.
00:42:15.000 My mom's getting sick.
00:42:17.000 Everybody's getting sick.
00:42:18.000 So I got to beef up the immune system with a little vitamin C supplement.
00:42:27.000 Very tasty.
00:42:27.000 And you got to have the supplements.
00:42:30.000 I suppose we're shills now for the big supplement because you got to have it.
00:42:35.000 You think about vitamins and minerals.
00:42:37.000 And you're just not getting it from the stuff that you eat every day if you're not cognizant of this.
00:42:42.000 The fact that, and I was reading about this the other day, because our soil has been overused in terms of when our farmers go out and they farm fruits and vegetables and even the cows when they eat, I don't know, whatever they eat.
00:42:56.000 I'm not a farmer.
00:42:58.000 But basically, the meat and the vegetables and the produce that we consume, because the soil has been overworked, there's no minerals in it.
00:43:07.000 When you use and abuse the soil as much as we have, You lose all the good stuff in there.
00:43:11.000 It's already been used up.
00:43:13.000 And so, when you just eat your veggies regularly, whereas in the 1940s you ate your spinach, you ate your broccoli and all that, you'd be getting your zinc, you'd be getting your potassium, you'd be getting your iron.
00:43:24.000 These days you don't get it.
00:43:25.000 So, you got to go forth with the supplements.
00:43:28.000 I take the multivitamin, I take the vitamin C.
00:43:31.000 I got to get into the other stuff, the fish oil and all that.
00:43:34.000 Party Goy, my buddy was telling me that there's one theory that the reason that human beings developed the brains that we did is because we ate fish and we ate fish oil, and fish oil is good.
00:43:45.000 For the brain, good for the mental clarity, the cognition, as they call it, as the kids are calling it these days.
00:43:52.000 So, you got to hit those supplements.
00:43:55.000 These people are not putting good stuff in your food.
00:43:58.000 Actually, they're taking out all the good stuff and they're putting in bad stuff.
00:44:00.000 You know, they took out the potassium, they took out the zinc, they took out the iron, the vitamin B12, the fish oil, the omega 3s, and they put in xenoestrogens and endocrine disruptors and soy and just stuff that makes you gay and a woman.
00:44:16.000 And we can't have it anymore, folks.
00:44:18.000 We can't have it.
00:44:19.000 We have to get back to nutrition right, okay?
00:44:24.000 Have to have the minerals.
00:44:26.000 Have to have the nutrients.
00:44:28.000 You are what you eat.
00:44:30.000 So, enough shilling, though, for big supplement and big water.
00:44:34.000 We got to get into the super chats, our generous super chatters.
00:44:40.000 Let's see.
00:44:41.000 Apple Butt says a few shekels for not cucking to rustled and irrational thoughts.
00:44:47.000 I don't cuck.
00:44:48.000 You know, that's the thing.
00:44:50.000 You have to be genuine about these things, and you can't.
00:44:54.000 You can't really beat around the bush on the women question.
00:44:57.000 I know, you know, my mom tells me all the time, Nick, it's off putting.
00:45:00.000 Nick, well, she calls me Nicholas.
00:45:01.000 I get very mad when she calls me Nick.
00:45:03.000 She goes, Nicholas, it's very off putting the way you talk about women sometimes.
00:45:07.000 And I said, you know, mom, a lot of it's joking, of course, and you just don't get it because it's a generational thing.
00:45:12.000 I showed her a Sam Hyde video the other day, and she's like, I just don't get why you think he's funny.
00:45:16.000 And I'm like, that's because you watch Seinfeld, okay?
00:45:19.000 That's because you watch sitcoms, and that's your sense of humor.
00:45:23.000 We grew up hating everything and transcending all.
00:45:27.000 Conventional forms of media, and that's why he's funny.
00:45:30.000 But anyway, she says, You know, Nicholas, you gotta, you can't be so anti woman.
00:45:34.000 You can't be this way.
00:45:35.000 I'm not anti woman.
00:45:36.000 I love women.
00:45:36.000 That's why I push this.
00:45:38.000 You know, people say, Nicholas, you say, you know, you hate women so much you're sexist.
00:45:42.000 Wrong.
00:45:44.000 We love women more than anybody.
00:45:45.000 That's why we want to see them healthy and happy, even when they themselves don't know what's good for them sometimes.
00:45:51.000 So, like I said, it's aspirational.
00:45:55.000 We want to get to a point where women are raising the kids and they're having.
00:46:00.000 Excuse me, they're having lots of them.
00:46:02.000 And, you know, they can have their hobbies.
00:46:04.000 I'm not advocating for Sharia law.
00:46:06.000 I'm not saying they can't leave the house.
00:46:07.000 I'm not saying they can't drive.
00:46:09.000 I'm not calling for arranged marriages.
00:46:12.000 I'm saying, look, women are better off.
00:46:15.000 They should be venerated.
00:46:16.000 They should aim for being good mothers.
00:46:19.000 And, you know, I don't know.
00:46:21.000 Can they get educated?
00:46:22.000 Sure.
00:46:23.000 Can they work part time?
00:46:25.000 Can they work after their kids are grown?
00:46:27.000 Absolutely.
00:46:28.000 But when you have kids, you should be there for them in some capacity.
00:46:32.000 It's just, it's really.
00:46:34.000 We're losing our way where I'm arguing we should value women staying at home, and they're saying no, we shouldn't.
00:46:39.000 That's the argument.
00:46:40.000 The argument is not if you're a single mom, should you be able to work?
00:46:43.000 That's not the argument.
00:46:45.000 The argument is people are saying that all women should be out of the home and at work, and it's not cool to be a mom, and it's not cool to stay at home, it's not cool to be a woman and be a feminine woman.
00:46:57.000 And we have to forcefully assert the opposite.
00:46:59.000 So that's why it may come across as extreme.
00:47:02.000 Simon Skola, the alt right.
00:47:05.000 Shits on Irish and Italians all the time, and I'm both.
00:47:08.000 Me too.
00:47:09.000 You never hear me or other people threatening to leave the movement.
00:47:12.000 Stupid thought.
00:47:13.000 Well, I mean, that's a big part of it too, is the sensitivity that you see with these people.
00:47:17.000 I take a lot of heat from a lot of people all day long.
00:47:20.000 People calling me Jewish, people calling me a shill.
00:47:23.000 Like, people say I'm the FBI.
00:47:26.000 I wish I was the FBI.
00:47:27.000 I wish I was making FBI money.
00:47:30.000 And they don't even make that much money, by the way, but it's more than I make, you know?
00:47:34.000 I wish I was like a 30 year old with a wife and kids and a steady income, but I worked for the FBI.
00:47:40.000 Believe me, you know, 19 year old who does a show in his basement.
00:47:46.000 And wants to see the movement go forward as an FBI shield or he's Jewish.
00:47:49.000 Yeah, okay.
00:47:50.000 But you know, when that happens to me, if it's excessive, I block.
00:47:53.000 You know, if people are piling on, for example, I started to block because I said, you know what, a lot of this is in bad faith and I don't want this right now.
00:48:03.000 But generally speaking, when people come at me with this stuff or soft criticism, I say, like, whatever.
00:48:08.000 And even if I do block, I don't throw like a fit about it.
00:48:12.000 I don't lock my account and start like going on all these weird rants and whatever.
00:48:20.000 So, you can't throw a tantrum.
00:48:22.000 You've got to keep it cool, calm, collected.
00:48:25.000 You've got to stay above it all.
00:48:27.000 Carl Ritzenthaler says Can the alt-right draw any wisdom from the teachings of Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen?
00:48:33.000 Also, do you think he will be canonized soon?
00:48:35.000 Love the show.
00:48:36.000 Well, thank you.
00:48:37.000 Glad you enjoy the show.
00:48:39.000 I think he will be canonized.
00:48:40.000 I mean, the guy was a saint.
00:48:42.000 The guy was a brilliant.
00:48:44.000 I mean, the guy was a genius in terms of philosophy and theology.
00:48:48.000 Studied it in school for years, and it shows.
00:48:51.000 And on top of that, not only was he a genius, but he was never.
00:48:55.000 Like an intellectual elitist.
00:48:57.000 He was never bookish about it in a way that was unnecessary.
00:49:02.000 When he pitched his ideas, he didn't do it in a needlessly inaccessible, French philosopher type way.
00:49:09.000 He did it in a way that the ordinary man could explain.
00:49:11.000 He was an evangelist, in a sense.
00:49:15.000 And so, for that, I think he should be canonized.
00:49:18.000 Not only that, but he lived like a saint.
00:49:19.000 I mean, the guy was a monk, basically.
00:49:22.000 So, yeah, and there is a lot that the alt right can learn from them.
00:49:24.000 They all should go and watch.
00:49:26.000 His videos.
00:49:27.000 They're all on YouTube for free.
00:49:28.000 He does these 23, 28 minute lectures about the faith and about other topics.
00:49:34.000 And I encourage everybody to check him out and read some of his works.
00:49:37.000 I mean, he's a great writer as well.
00:49:38.000 So, Fulton Sheen, he's a winner.
00:49:41.000 He's the icon we should be looking to.
00:49:44.000 Jeff Sheldon, this movement will be strong if it is led by strong men who will guide their followers correctly.
00:49:51.000 Being led by women will create weak men and a weak movement.
00:49:56.000 I generally believe that women should not leave political movements.
00:49:58.000 That's true.
00:50:00.000 You do need men, unfortunately.
00:50:02.000 Or not fortunate, unfortunately.
00:50:03.000 I don't think it goes either way.
00:50:05.000 I think that's just the natural order.
00:50:07.000 It's not unfortunate or fortunate.
00:50:08.000 It just is.
00:50:09.000 It's not good or bad or offensive or inoffensive.
00:50:12.000 It just is what it is.
00:50:14.000 Men are the leaders, and women generally are not.
00:50:18.000 There are exceptions, few exceptions throughout history.
00:50:21.000 There are exceptions, but it is the exception.
00:50:24.000 And you need men to forcefully advocate for these things and to be there to be strong.
00:50:27.000 I mean, what it comes down to in a movement, what it comes down to in leadership is a certain element of.
00:50:35.000 I mean, you think of like what a king represented.
00:50:35.000 Of protection.
00:50:38.000 When we think of a leader of a movement or a leader politically, the archetype is a king.
00:50:43.000 And why was there a king?
00:50:45.000 Why did feudal countries have kings?
00:50:47.000 Well, when you had manorial lords, when you had a feudal system, you had different manors and different settlements there where they would protect their serfs, they would give them land, they would give them their capital.
00:51:01.000 And in exchange for that, the serfs would work for the lords or the peasants would work for the lords.
00:51:07.000 And then the lords would give their allegiance to the king.
00:51:09.000 They would recognize the king as legitimate in exchange for protection from the king.
00:51:13.000 And you'd have governorships and other things as well, depending on the country.
00:51:17.000 But that's what a leader is a protector.
00:51:20.000 And if push comes to shove, they should be a warrior.
00:51:22.000 They should be able to lead people into battle, either morally or in terms of physically taking over, in terms of physically going after people.
00:51:31.000 And so you just don't have that.
00:51:33.000 That's just not what women were designed for.
00:51:37.000 And that's just how it is.
00:51:38.000 I mean, you don't have to like it, you don't have to like it, you don't have to agree with it.
00:51:42.000 The person that made everything in the world isn't going to sit there and argue with you.
00:51:46.000 But actually, I mean, you're just wrong.
00:51:48.000 I mean, that's just, you can agree with it or not, but you will be wrong regardless.
00:51:53.000 So I agree.
00:51:55.000 Got to have men leading it.
00:51:56.000 You can have women in it, but you can't have them leading it.
00:51:59.000 Charles Heiston says The alt right needs women.
00:52:03.000 We can't disavow them, they're essential for the movement to grow.
00:52:06.000 We can't condone past actions of Lauren, but we need her.
00:52:09.000 I agree, we need women in the movement as an asset.
00:52:12.000 We need women in the movement so that they can attract men.
00:52:15.000 I don't think they attract women.
00:52:16.000 I think they attract men and they can be a role model for women.
00:52:19.000 But it's a fundamentally different proposition.
00:52:21.000 We're not saying no women in the movement.
00:52:23.000 I don't think anybody's saying that.
00:52:24.000 I just think women in the movement need to be acting according to their virtues.
00:52:29.000 Or, you know, if they have different virtues, then they're not considered in the movement, right?
00:52:34.000 So I think that's the problem.
00:52:36.000 I'm not against women in the movement.
00:52:37.000 I'm not against women being advocates for this stuff.
00:52:41.000 You know, Faith Goldie, for example, she's engaged.
00:52:44.000 She's going to get married.
00:52:44.000 She's going to have kids.
00:52:46.000 And she said she will take a more part time role once she has kids.
00:52:50.000 And I think that's fine.
00:52:52.000 You know, if she's at home and she has kids and she's raising her kids and she takes an hour every week or however frequently to do a little podcasting in a spare room, I don't think there's any harm in that.
00:53:04.000 You know, women can be in the movement.
00:53:06.000 She'd be a great role model.
00:53:06.000 And you know what?
00:53:08.000 She would be living exactly what we advocate for women.
00:53:10.000 And that's fine.
00:53:12.000 And Lauren Southern says she's going to get married.
00:53:13.000 She's young.
00:53:14.000 She's 22, I believe, right?
00:53:16.000 Or 23.
00:53:16.000 So.
00:53:17.000 She's got time.
00:53:17.000 She's young.
00:53:18.000 And I think once she gets married and she has kids, it'll put a lot of pressure off of her.
00:53:22.000 But I think that's what we're more looking at it's not so much we don't want women in the movement.
00:53:26.000 It's just more like it's hard to have leaders in the movement that are not living up to their stated values.
00:53:33.000 And I don't know.
00:53:33.000 I don't think Lauren is as hard of a traditionalist, so I don't even think it's that hypocritical.
00:53:37.000 I just think maybe people had unrealistic expectations of what she was saying.
00:53:42.000 You know, like with Steve Bannon, when Steve Bannon disavowed the alt right, I don't think Steve Bannon was alt right.
00:53:48.000 And so when he disavowed it, I think people had these unreasonable expectations shattered where they thought he was one way, and actually, you know, he just wasn't.
00:53:56.000 And I think Lauren Southern is not that much of a traditionalist.
00:53:59.000 I don't think she's that ideologically conservative, right?
00:54:02.000 And I think that's why maybe she's not necessarily that hypocritical on it.
00:54:07.000 But I don't know.
00:54:07.000 I don't consume a lot of her content, so I don't know.
00:54:10.000 A lot of it's speculation.
00:54:11.000 Gary Oak with the single shekel.
00:54:13.000 Thank you.
00:54:15.000 Dominic Liberator Ben Gurion believed the land was rightfully won in a just preemptive war.
00:54:20.000 Where do we draw the line?
00:54:22.000 When describing annexed or conquered land.
00:54:25.000 Well, I mean, Ben Gurion, who believed the land was conquered, I mean, he believed that the land was justifiably conquered in 1948, but then in 1967, there was more conquered land.
00:54:37.000 And I don't know.
00:54:40.000 My position is no different than the President of the United States.
00:54:42.000 I don't really have an issue so much if Israel were to conquer Palestine.
00:54:48.000 I have a problem with the fact that America says that these lands are conquered and that these settlements are illegitimate and should be stopped.
00:54:56.000 Because America's interest is to work with the Arab world.
00:55:00.000 And if you had a one state solution, if you annex these territories and there is no reconciliation, the Arab world hates us and that hurts our interests.
00:55:07.000 And so I don't really take a stake.
00:55:09.000 I don't know.
00:55:10.000 I think there's a case to be made for both sides.
00:55:12.000 I think it's more might makes right kind of an argument in the sense that they conquered it in a preemptive war, maybe, to defend themselves.
00:55:21.000 And that's really a question for the Israelis to answer if that's sovereign.
00:55:24.000 And that's something for the Palestinians to wonder if it was their actions that led to that.
00:55:30.000 But if you're an American, the question is what hurts or helps our interests?
00:55:34.000 If we're paying this country and they're giving us the finger, essentially, if we're making concessions to a country because of lobbyists in our country and it hurts our interests, That's not good.
00:55:44.000 So, I'm not really interested so much in the moral question of whether or not it's illegitimate or if it's okay because it's conquered or what the justification is on a moral level.
00:55:54.000 I'm more interested in is this going to help or hurt our immediate interests in the region?
00:55:59.000 You know, again, the moral question is for the moralists to decide, the scholars to decide, and whether that's a just thing that's on the conscience of the Israeli people.
00:56:12.000 But for an American, it is is this going to be a good tactical move for our country?
00:56:16.000 And I don't know.
00:56:17.000 It's tough.
00:56:17.000 It's a tough sell that it is.
00:56:20.000 The right leaf, which version of the Bible do you prefer and why?
00:56:23.000 Well, we all know.
00:56:24.000 We all know that the King James Version of the Bible is the correct version.
00:56:28.000 However, the New Living Version or the New Living Translation, I believe, is the easiest to read.
00:56:35.000 So you do have, there are discrepancies in the two.
00:56:38.000 And technically, the King James Version, the syntax and how it is written, I think is the most pure form of the Bible that you can read in English.
00:56:48.000 But it is a difficult read.
00:56:50.000 It's a long read and a difficult read.
00:56:52.000 And to be reading it in old English, you know, or not quite old English, but older English is a task.
00:56:59.000 So I endorse the King James Version, but the New Living is understandable.
00:57:05.000 The New International is Marxist, and all the other ones are Marxist, in my opinion.
00:57:10.000 Gary Baker, why do you have two Bitcoin wallets?
00:57:12.000 I do not have two Bitcoin wallets.
00:57:14.000 I have a Bitcoin wallet, and the company has a Bitcoin wallet, but I do not have two.
00:57:19.000 I have one.
00:57:20.000 Mac Alpha says, How do you feel about Scientology?
00:57:25.000 They have bought up a lot of property in Hollywood and are a nepotistic cult of Christ deniers who have celebrities.
00:57:31.000 Yeah, I agree with that.
00:57:32.000 It's not the true religion, and therefore it is wrong, and it's evil.
00:57:36.000 I think it's one of these satanic, like Masonic religions used to control people.
00:57:40.000 Probably CIA or other types of people that are involved with that.
00:57:44.000 And we've got to fly through these because we're at 8 o'clock here.
00:57:47.000 Governor Wallace says, Segregation is good optics.
00:57:50.000 That's a good LARP, but I disagree.
00:57:53.000 Music Man, who is your favorite European painter?
00:57:55.000 Rembrandt, probably.
00:57:58.000 That's his name, right?
00:57:59.000 I'm never a big art guy, so if I'm butchering the name, yuck it up, art people, but he's probably my favorite.
00:58:06.000 Gary Baker, some people think Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies are going to destroy the nation state because government cannot shut it down and cannot control it.
00:58:14.000 How can we protect white people without government?
00:58:17.000 Bitcoin won't destroy the nation.
00:58:18.000 Bitcoin will destroy the Federal Reserve.
00:58:23.000 Kind of the opposite, kind of the antithesis of the nation.
00:58:26.000 Central banking, fractional reserve banking, big finance.
00:58:30.000 I mean, these things are the enemy of the nation state.
00:58:32.000 Bitcoin is choking that monopoly that is held by a very particular group of interest controlling the bank.
00:58:38.000 So, Bitcoin, I think, could actually bring the nation together in the sense that it operates outside of elements hostile to our government.
00:58:46.000 If we had a responsible Caesar in government, a responsible Caesar that redid banking in our country, you wouldn't need cryptocurrency.
00:58:53.000 But you need cryptocurrency because you have irresponsible, Hostile international actors in control of the money supply.
00:59:00.000 But that's going to do it.
00:59:02.000 We're past our time.
00:59:03.000 Overdrive is supposed to start.
00:59:05.000 So thank you, everybody, for watching.
00:59:06.000 Thanks for donating.
00:59:07.000 That's going to do it for us tonight.
00:59:09.000 Remember to buy your mugs.
00:59:11.000 They may already be sold out.
00:59:12.000 I don't know.
00:59:13.000 Before the show, there were five left, so you can buy those on ampfirstmedia.com.
00:59:17.000 Remember to donate to our Super Chat.
00:59:18.000 All the money goes to charity, Christian Appalachian Project, this month.
00:59:23.000 Please follow me down below Twitter, Facebook, Periscope, all the rest for more good content.
00:59:28.000 Donate if you want.
00:59:29.000 The information is there.
00:59:31.000 And please like, subscribe, and click the notification bell on the video.
00:59:35.000 It helps us tremendously.
00:59:36.000 You've got to smash the subscribe button, it helps us out.
00:59:40.000 We're on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m. Central, 8 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.
00:59:44.000 I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes, and this was America First.
00:59:48.000 We will see you tomorrow.
00:59:49.000 Have a great rest of your evening and enjoy America First Overdrive with James Alsop.
00:59:54.000 We'll see you tomorrow, folks.
00:59:58.000 Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
01:00:04.000 It's going to be only America First.
01:00:09.000 America First.
01:00:13.000 The American people will come first once again.
01:00:18.000 With respect to respect.
01:00:37.000 From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.
01:00:43.000 America first.