00:02:19.000Someone tweeted that she said during the speech that the alt right doesn't have a moral compass.
00:02:25.000And I saw this and I tweeted about it because, of course, I take a little bit of offense to this.
00:02:30.000I find it a little bit hypocritical when somebody who finds a video of me, which was taken in private, a video that was taken covertly of me saying controversial things out of context, Acquires it, sends it to an alleged pedophile to be released to ruin my career.
00:02:48.000She's going to go up and lecture the alt right about morality, right?
00:03:03.000What the alt right or paleocons or the fringe right, the dissident right, whatever you want to call it, people that are outside of the beltway, outside of the Koch brothers circle, outside of that network of Mercer family money, What we believe in is our families.
00:03:19.000What we believe in is our children, our people, our race, our heritage, our history.
00:03:25.000Fighting for that, defending that at any cost, there's nothing more moral than that, I would argue.
00:03:31.000There's nothing any higher, any higher pursuit that someone could aspire to other than fighting for your God, your family, posterity.
00:03:40.000I mean, these are the highest virtues that a man can hold.
00:03:43.000These are the highest values someone can strive to defend.
00:03:52.000Her job at campus reform, her job as the state chair at Young Americans for Liberty, her little five minute spots on Fox and Friends in the morning, just trying so hard for that internship.
00:04:28.000But as a content creator on the right wing, I look at a market that is completely oversaturated with people who just don't know what they're doing.
00:04:58.000Conservative amateur vlogging is obscene and offensive to a person like me because for the vast majority of these people, you just need to get a job.
00:05:07.000You just need to go to school, get a job.
00:05:09.000You could go to technical school, you could become a plumber or an electrician.
00:05:13.000That's good work, it's good money, it's respectable.
00:05:16.000You could go and become a professional, you could go and become a doctor or a lawyer or an engineer.
00:05:22.000But for everybody and their brother, because they're 18 and they watch a little bit of Ben Shapiro, to sit down and they buy a little mic and a microphone and they think they're going to be the next.
00:06:10.000The knowledge he's presenting isn't unique or specialized.
00:06:14.000And you think there are people like me who know what we're talking about, who can present well, who can present in an articulate, eloquent fashion information that most people don't know.
00:06:25.000And we take on this burden because most people aren't reading books.
00:06:29.000Most people have jobs, as they are supposed to do to provide for a family.
00:06:33.000But you see all these amateurs, all these people who.
00:06:36.000They think they put up a microphone and a camera and they can regurgitate their basic Fox News talking points.
00:06:43.000It really, to me, I'm very troubled by this because, you know, I watch my show and I think my show is good because I can watch my show.
00:07:00.000But I watch my show because I want to make a show that I would want to watch, that I would want to watch and find funny and invest time in it.
00:07:48.000The other thing I want to talk about that's not necessarily news, we're going to get to the General Assembly speech in a moment.
00:07:55.000I know everybody was asking my hot take on President Trump's first address to the General Assembly and what he had to say, whether it was good, whether it was bad, whether it was nationalist, whether it was globalist, axis of evil currents there.
00:08:23.000It's kind of a liberal Prague thing to say.
00:08:27.000But really, when we think of immigration, I think we tend to think of it as it's a given, you know, that we have people from all over the world coming here.
00:08:35.000And if you accept anything less than complete and total integration and acceptance of becoming a minority in your own country, you're a bigot.
00:08:44.000Like, example, I was watching a speech by Oswald Mosley.
00:08:51.000I was watching it because it was just dripping with bigotry and fascist hate.
00:08:56.000So I was watching it purely just to get an insight into the evil alt right and what they believe.
00:09:02.000So I'm watching one of these inspirational videos with Oswald Mosley from the UK, and he was talking about segregation.
00:09:09.000He was talking about how you love your race like you love your family.
00:09:14.000And just because you love your race doesn't mean you hate any other races.
00:09:18.000And we can all live in peace and harmony if we live.
00:09:21.000Separately, if we can respect each other in our own nations.
00:09:25.000And I thought that's not an unreasonable proposal.
00:09:28.000If we're talking about what's happening to our countries in the West, if we're talking about what's happening in America or in Europe, and you see this policy, which is a stated and active policy to change the demographics of these countries, to bring in millions of people from the third world that don't speak the language, that don't practice our religion, that are not ethnically the same, that do not have the same historical legacy or tradition or shared history.
00:09:55.000And it's worthy, if you're going to debate the merits of this proposal, to bring up that side of it, which is segregation, which I think is a, you know, maybe people don't totally agree with that.
00:10:05.000Maybe that has some poor connotations.
00:10:09.000If we're in this post-Cold War era where we have all the different civilizations and nations and empires clashing with each other for the first time in human history, by the way, this is really something that we haven't seen ever in thousands of years that you have.
00:10:24.000Separate and distinct civilizations of the Latin American people, of the Europeans, of the Chinese, the Sino people, the Japanese, the Indus Valley civilization, India, the Arabs in the Middle East, Sub Saharan Africa, all these different civilizations for the first time in human history are now smashing against each other in truly a globalist fashion where they're coming to different countries, where they're communicating, they're doing trade.
00:10:53.000And so as we move through this very crucial time in human history, this very transformative time in human history, And we have this discussion about what our policy will be moving forward as a boat in the storm, figuring out how we're going to navigate this transitional period.
00:11:10.000It's worth considering do we want to have all these millions of people in our borders and just integrate right away and mix them up, multiracial, multireligious, multiethnic?
00:11:22.000I think if you're going to have that sort of a policy, you need to have the debate.
00:11:25.000And the alternative to the debate is segregation.
00:11:28.000And I don't think anybody should be afraid of talking about it.
00:11:32.000Certainly, again, you have those negative connotations, but it says a lot about the immigration debate that you cannot propose a totally reasonable thing, which is that in the 20th and 21st century, it would be better for all involved, it would be better for all civilizations to remain separate in their own countries, for every people, ethnic or religious or racial, to have their own government, to have their own geographic borders, to determine their own affairs and their own fate.
00:12:00.000That is a reasonable proposition in response to.
00:12:04.000And that you're not able to say it, that you're not able to express this even in an academic or scholastic setting, even to say, well, here is the alternative to the debate, you'd still get called a bigot.
00:12:17.000Nonetheless, if you were even to advocate for such a thing.
00:12:20.000I mean, that's what's really troubling is that it is really only acceptable, it's only permissible, it's only allowed, not in a de jure sense, but in a de facto sense, to believe that in this transformative period in the history of the world, We've never seen these forces.
00:12:36.000We've never seen this kind of mixing of different cultures and religions and groups and tribes that you can only have one position on that, or else you get fired from your job.
00:13:15.000They talk about how they just want to talk.
00:13:17.000They just want a free marketplace of ideas.
00:13:20.000I have heard nobody, I have heard nobody in the mainstream who has presented anything that is truly, in principle, opposite to this multiracial, multiethnic, multicultural policy that has been pursued for 30 or 40 or 50 years.
00:13:39.000And you look at the history of the country and you look at conservatives.
00:13:42.000Conservatives, the conservative wing, the conservative party, the conservative movement in the country purports to want to conserve things.
00:13:51.000They want to conserve traditions, cultures, rituals, etc.
00:13:56.000And we have an entire wing in our country, the right wing, the conservative faction, whatever you want to call it, that is supposed to conserve, that is obligated to preserve these institutions.
00:14:11.000Whether it's that financial network or the political network, doesn't want to conserve anything at all.
00:14:15.000Because the country from 1776 to 1965 was an ethnostate, essentially.
00:14:23.000You had 20% non whites in 1790, the first time they took the census.
00:14:28.000In 1960, that's five years before the Hart Seller Act, it was 90% white.
00:14:33.000So you're fluctuating between 80% to 90% white for the vast majority of the country's history, from George Washington.
00:14:41.000Through to Abraham Lincoln, through to Teddy and Franklin Roosevelt, through to Jack Kennedy.
00:14:45.000So that's about as American as it gets, folks.
00:14:48.000And we're talking about what the founders would have intended, what the historical Americans would have intended for the country.
00:14:55.000And so then for conservatives to say that to hold these opinions that for the majority of the country's history were not only permissible, not only acceptable, but the mainstream stated policy of every president, it says a lot.
00:15:08.000It says a lot about who's controlling the discourse.
00:15:10.000It says a lot about who's controlling these.
00:15:14.000These nodes of discussion and communication.
00:15:19.000It's worth pointing out that even from 1776 to 1860, the 20% that were non white were not even considered citizens.
00:15:30.000And that's not to say that we should, you know, Reagan Battalion is going to clip that and say, Nick Swanson thinks that non whites should return to property status.
00:15:38.000But it is to say that people bring up the fact that, oh, well, black people, non whites, have been here since the country's founding.
00:15:45.000Non whites have been here and been a significant part of the population since the country's founding.
00:15:49.000Well, from 1776 to 1860, the 20% that were non white, that were non European, were considered property.
00:15:57.000So I don't think that's really a fair assessment to say that, well, they've been here as long as we have.
00:16:02.000Well, yes, but in a totally different capacity.
00:16:04.000Because if you read the Federalist Papers, I think it was the first or the second one written by John Jay, where he says specifically that this nation was set out and laid out for the blood, the lineage of the founders, for people that speak English, for people that practice Christianity, for people descended from the people that established this colony or the 13 colonies.
00:16:25.000And then you have in the period from 1860 to 1900, it remained 20% non white.
00:16:31.000But from 1900 to 1960, you move steadily.
00:16:34.000That trend moved in the opposite direction.
00:16:37.000We had 20% non white from 1860 to 1900.
00:16:42.000Instead of that going in the opposite direction, where it was increasing to 30 or 40 or whatever, after they became citizens, after they became emancipated, actually the demographics moved in the other direction and it became increasingly white for 60 years in modern history since the dawn of the 20th century.
00:17:03.000So these are just some considerations about the immigration question.
00:17:06.000That I think a lot of people leave out, that I think a lot of people forget when they concede from the starting point that America is a nation of immigrants or that historically this was not a white country or a European country, which it was, and so on.
00:17:24.000Immigration is supposed to benefit the people in the country.
00:17:27.000We talked about that on the last show.
00:17:28.000Just some other thoughts, just some other things about the discussion in general, which I think a lot of people need to revisit when they get into these talks because so many people concede from the outset so many false.
00:17:40.000Historically illiterate premises that aren't true in principle or in fact.
00:17:47.000You know, we're in this weird period now where people are moving all over the place and they call it immigration.
00:17:56.000It's sort of like if you live in a cul de sac and you have like 10 houses and they say, well, anybody can come into any house that they want.
00:18:03.000You know, we're all pretty good friends.
00:18:07.000We all have the same equally good cultures.
00:18:10.000Basically, we can come and go into each other's houses as we please.
00:18:13.000Now, You could call that immigration if people were going into Steve's house one day and Fred's house another day and Jimmy's house the next day.
00:18:22.000But what would happen if, in that cul de sac, the only direction that the sharing of the households went was into one house?
00:18:29.000What if you had the 10 households and everybody was just pouring into one guy's house and they were eating all his food and they were sleeping on his couch and they were abusing his children sexually and nobody went into any of the other houses because all the other houses are.
00:18:45.000Dirty and smelly and not good, and there's violence in them.
00:20:13.000Okay, well, they're still taking that money from Americans.
00:20:17.000If you have all these migrants coming here, maybe they don't go on welfare.
00:20:20.000Maybe they don't just want to take money for nothing.
00:20:23.000But if they want to work, well, you're still taking advantage of the capital that Americans have built up to have such a huge labor force.
00:20:30.000You're taking advantage of Of the jobs that people might have, of the labor potential.
00:20:35.000I mean, there are so many things in terms of what they're taking from the economy that isn't just the giddies, that isn't just the welfare, the unemployment, the Social Security, et cetera, but it's also the capital of the country, the material and human capital of the country, social capital as well, that they are consuming and, in many cases, degrading.
00:20:54.000But anyway, just a couple of thoughts on immigration.
00:20:57.000I know everybody's eager, they're chomping at the bit to hear about Rocket Man and the GA speech, but.
00:21:03.000These are just some things I never hear about.
00:21:54.000Because, of course, he still did call out North Korea, Venezuela, Cuba, Syria, and Iran.
00:22:00.000And, you know, I tend to take a little bit from both sides.
00:22:03.000That tends to be my analysis that at once he started out with these very nationalist overtones that we've never really heard.
00:22:10.000From an American president in the modern period or the postmodern period, where he talked about how nations have a right, a God given right, to determine the affairs of their own country, to determine the fate of their own people.
00:22:24.000And so the first 20 minutes of the speech was dedicated to this, which was to say, we are not going to impose our principles, we're not going to impose our values, everyone can do their own thing.
00:22:39.000I was saying, this is really a break from the past 20 years.
00:22:43.000And then he got into the axis of evil.
00:22:46.000Then he started talking about North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, and Syria.
00:22:51.000And you heard in the same speech at once we don't want to impose our values, we don't want to impose our morals.
00:22:58.000And then immediately after, immediately within five minutes, talking about and lecturing how North Korea starves its people and Iran is an authoritarian country masquerading as a democracy.
00:23:10.000And if Venezuela doesn't get democratic, we're going to go in there and we're going to bust things open.
00:23:16.000And that's where it fell apart for me.
00:23:18.000That's where I started to side a little bit with the Black Pillars, with this H.R. McMaster fear mongering crowd, which is to say that I imagine that Steve Miller drafted this speech and then H.R. McMaster or General Kelly got their hands on it and inserted all this neocon BS, all this neocon saber rattling, which was just totally unnecessary.
00:23:40.000This was an opportunity for President Trump to pitch his worldview, to pitch this new paradigm and really send us into a new era.
00:23:50.000Whereas for the past 70 years, really, I mean, since the creation of the United Nations, you've had this American monolithic, unipolar, hegemonic power that sought to create all the institutions and dominate them and advance liberalism and democracy and capitalism at any cost with military bases in every country and ambassadorships in every country and our mittens and everything.
00:24:16.000And this was an opportunity for President Trump to say, that's over.
00:24:33.000And then he launched into the Bush era, the Bush League condemnation and lecture at all the foreign countries.
00:24:40.000And, you know, I'll read you an excerpt.
00:24:42.000This is why I'm so opposed to this, okay?
00:24:44.000It's this blatant and naked hypocrisy.
00:24:47.000I'll read to you an excerpt from the U.N. speech of President Trump addressing the Iran situation, the Iran deal, their nuclear program in particular.
00:24:58.000He said, The Iranian government masks a corrupt dictatorship behind the false guise of a democracy.
00:25:05.000It has turned a wealthy country with a rich history and culture into an economically depleted rogue state whose chief exports are violence, bloodshed, and chaos.
00:25:15.000The longest suffering victims of Iran's leaders are, in fact, its own people.
00:25:20.000Rather than use its resources to improve Iranian lives, its oil profits go to fund Hezbollah and other terrorists that kill innocent Muslims.
00:25:28.000And attack their peaceful Arab and Israeli neighbors.
00:25:31.000Now, you read an excerpt like that, and this reasoning, this description guess what?
00:26:37.000Liberalism generally means that the United States can interfere.
00:26:40.000Liberalism generally means that if you have a weak, fledgling democracy with not a lot of resources in a place like Afghanistan or throughout the Cold War in Latin America or Africa, it means that the CIA can stuff the ballots and steal elections and bring other countries into our sphere of influence.
00:26:58.000But that's not in America's interest anymore.
00:27:00.000What's in America's interest right now is not the democratizing, is not the liberalizing, is not the lecturing about the The grandiosity of our liberal system.
00:27:11.000I thought, you know, President Trump established in the beginning of the speech that that was over.
00:27:15.000Time to put our countries first with different systems.
00:27:19.000And, you know, look, Iran is a theocratic country.
00:27:23.000Do we know of any, hmm, let's activate our almonds for a moment.
00:27:28.000Do we know of any other theocratic countries in the Middle East?
00:27:32.000Gee, I mean, if we could take a pretty, if we could take sort of a pretty superficial look at the Middle East, let's just take a short glance at some of these countries here and let's look at the systems.
00:28:05.000That one is a brutal authoritarian theocracy that doesn't let women drive, that is going to execute somebody for doing the dab, for dancing.
00:28:13.000So, you know, where's the condemnation of that?
00:28:22.000How about the country that was founded in 1948 as the Jewish state, that in their constitution establishes their government as a Jewish state?
00:28:33.000So, authoritarian, theocratic countries, bad for Shia Iran, but it's okay for Wahhabist Saudi Arabia and Zionist Israel.
00:28:55.000And it's just that glaring hypocrisy of globalism, globalism, of neoconservatism that we are going to risk American lives, American treasure, American political capital overseas and around the world by lecturing these countries, by invading these countries, interfering with these countries' affairs at our expense.
00:29:17.000And all the other countries that are doing the same, but they keep the oil money flowing, they keep certain other things flowing, like AIPAC.
00:29:25.000Suddenly, that's not really a problem.
00:29:29.000I mean, are we going to have an administration ever for the people, for this country, or are we always going to be led by a global empire?
00:29:38.000I mean, that's what it comes down to empire versus nation state.
00:29:43.000The problem with the current situation in the United States is in Washington, D.C., you have an occupied government, a government that is occupied by forces who want to see America controlling far more than just the affairs on our own borders.
00:29:57.000You have an expansionist, hegemonic government.
00:30:01.000In Washington, D.C., that wants to see America dominate the entire Western Hemisphere, wants us to dominate the Middle East and Northern Africa, wants us to dominate the Pacific, wants us to dominate Europe and East Europe, wants us to dominate Sub Saharan Africa.
00:30:16.000And they want to do this not for the American people, but because, number one, it brings money, it brings power, it brings influence, and so on.
00:30:24.000And they do all of these activities of trying to dominate the world at the expense of the people living within our actual borders.
00:30:31.000Not the de facto borders, the de jure borders.
00:30:34.000Not the de facto 51st state that contributes nothing but gets everything, but the actual 50 states admitted via a constitutional process.
00:30:42.000And you see this in every empire throughout history, whether it's the Soviet Union.
00:30:47.000Look at how much Russia suffered as a result of the Bolshevik regime, the globalist Bolshevik regime in Moscow that tried to project Russian power far beyond its borders, far beyond its industrial capacity.
00:31:03.000You saw them building tanks and missiles and troops and armies and everything else at the expense of the well being of Russia's people.
00:31:13.000That at the expense of the Russian people, the Moscow government sought to dominate Estonia and the Baltic states and the Balkan states and Sub Saharan Africa and all other countries in the world.
00:31:26.000The same was true of the British Empire to an extent.
00:31:28.000Jacob Viner from the University of Chicago did a study on this.
00:31:33.000But Jacob Viner did a study on this that said that actually.
00:31:37.000Britain's colonial holdings in countries like India, for example, were a net drain on Britain's economy.
00:31:43.000So you see that hostile, foreign, alien, rootless, cosmopolitan, internationalist, globalist governments in the capitals of strong, powerful nations sacrifice the citizens, the subjects within their own borders in pursuit of these hegemonic empire ambitions.
00:32:02.000And it's really a travesty, I think, that President Trump is falling victim to that corrupting influence, falling victim to that corrupting establishment.
00:32:44.000Their kids are being taught by the television and the public school system, which is indoctrinating them to be promiscuous, degenerate, hedonistic, sexual animals.
00:32:53.000Their wives resent them and they're looking for divorce because, of course, it's about the pleasure principle and not about sacrifice or nation.
00:33:00.000You think these people really give a damn what kind of political system goes on in Persia, in the Gulf of Persia?
00:33:15.000And what a foolish axiom to govern by.
00:33:19.000That instead of abiding by the concerns and spending our resources to fix the concerns of the voters, you'd think that would be the incentive.
00:33:28.000How about we improve the lives of the voters?
00:33:31.000But we've been taught, we have basically been brainwashed.
00:33:34.000It's sort of like Stockholm Syndrome, where we love our captors and we've been conditioned to believe that this is as good as it's going to get.
00:33:44.000Folks, you know, to expect that our government would serve us and not kill our children and not steal and pillage our resources to invade other countries at the behest of certain other countries, that's expecting too much.
00:33:58.000Politics, same as usual, lesser of two evils.
00:34:00.000We're just supposed to lower our expectations.
00:34:03.000Instead of politicians rising to the occasion and representing the people that vote for them and fund their luxurious lifestyles, it's us who have to suffer and say, Mr. President, can we please have an economy that works?
00:34:41.000I used to do this talking point all day long when I was a basic conservative.
00:34:46.000Well, there's all the difference in the world between a democracy and a republic.
00:34:50.000And the reason we have democratic systems is because we've accepted that we're a liberal republic.
00:34:56.000And in a republic, essentially the difference is that the people are sovereign.
00:35:01.000In a monarchy, in an aristocracy, in a theocracy, sovereignty, that is the right to govern with authority within a geographic region, is given to the monarch or to the aristocrats or to God, if you're talking about the divine mandate of kings.
00:35:19.000In a republic, the sovereignty of the nation is vested in its people.
00:35:23.000And that's why we have enshrined in our history, I don't know if it's constitutional, but we have a right to overthrow the government.
00:35:30.000Because the government is not sovereign.
00:35:33.000And we delegate rights and responsibilities to the government to operate within our borders, to do things collectively that we individually cannot.
00:35:41.000And that's why in a liberal republic, we have a democracy to execute the will of the sovereign people in a way that is efficient, in a way that is pragmatic, and makes sense.
00:35:51.000Well, you know, what difference would it make if we were under a monarchy?
00:35:55.000At least in a monarchy, the difference is that though sovereignty is vested in a monarch, the monarch.
00:36:03.000Has the responsibility to look after his subjects.
00:36:06.000He'd almost prefer to live there because in this republic, when people basically concede their sovereignty to an autocratic, technocratic, occupied government, these are the three important qualifying factors, it negates the responsibility of that government to its people and it concedes the sovereign power that we have.
00:36:25.000So it's almost preferable in many ways to live in Russia.
00:36:28.000That's why all these people who criticize Vladimir Putin, you know, at least Putin executes the will of the people.
00:36:41.000He's not beholden to a certain small elite.
00:36:44.000He's not beholden to anybody except for himself.
00:36:48.000And what that allows him to do is bring glory to his people and bring victories for his people.
00:36:55.000So when he's paving the way for a pro Russian Ukraine, when he's paving the way for a pro Russian Belarus or Estonia or Crimea or everything else, he is protecting.
00:37:07.000The interests of ethnic Russians in these countries and in his own borders.
00:37:29.000Are you going to get on Fox News talking about what we were talking about earlier that segregation of the nations might be a proposal worth looking at in the 21st century and the advent of the clash of civilizations?
00:37:42.000That's not really a freedom of the press.
00:37:45.000So you'd almost prefer that in Russia, you'd almost prefer the system they have in Russia or Iran or other countries where, and I'm not talking about the Soviet Union.
00:37:54.000I said the Soviet Union was different.
00:37:56.000That's because the Soviet Union was an empire.
00:37:59.000So it's almost preferable to live in a, what appears to be in all superficial ways, a less democratic country, but a much more representative country, a much more, I don't know, nationalist country that looks after its own people.
00:38:13.000I think that's almost preferable in certain circumstances.
00:38:16.000And it really gets to the heart of the matter that a speech like this really, really lets you know the what for, really lets you know who's in charge over there.
00:38:25.000And you see some of these other excerpts.
00:38:27.000There were some other good moments from the speech.
00:38:29.000Generally, I think it wasn't his best.
00:38:33.000You know that President Trump is, when he does his best, when he's at his most Trump, when he's at his most controversial and his most high energy, it's when he's giving a speech for the people, which are his people.
00:38:46.000And he said in interviews before, That he gets along better with the taxi drivers and the workers better than he does with the other rich people.
00:38:54.000That's when he's at the top of his game, is when he's at the rallies and he can do the theatrics and be funny and make jokes and be loose and candid and people love him and he loves them.
00:39:06.000And additionally, he was in the United Nations.
00:39:08.000When you give a speech before the United Nations, there is a lot of protocol, there's a lot of procedure, there's decorum to abide by.
00:39:16.000There are many other complicating factors where you have to read the script and you can't call out individual delegates in the General Assembly and so on and so on.
00:39:30.000Because you saw even in Poland, he was better off because he was giving a speech for the Polish people.
00:39:35.000You tend to see that when he gives speeches before the heads of states, before politicians and globalists and internationalists, like he did in Saudi Arabia when he went on his first foreign trip, or when he went to Italy to talk before the European Union or NATO, I think, and finally in the General Assembly, where he's out of his element, the delivery is not great, the speech is not great, and kind of a disappointment.
00:40:01.000And beyond even the Iran stuff, he threatened Venezuela.
00:40:04.000He threatened, like, we're going to invade Venezuela.
00:40:15.000You know, for all these Will Nardis out there, and I use him so often because I think he's symptomatic of a lot of fallacious reasoning on the right and on the left and in the center as well.
00:40:25.000Will Nardi told me that we have to be Christian.
00:40:29.000It is our Christian, charitable obligation to help illegal immigrants.
00:41:06.000You know, it's like if you're in your house, right?
00:41:10.000Or no, it's like if you are, I see, I come up with these analogies on the fly.
00:41:15.000Sometimes they're not always so quick.
00:41:16.000It's like if you're walking down the street and you see a cat in a tree, and instead of helping it, you go home and you call the fire department and get someone to get the cat out of the tree.
00:41:25.000Well, you know, that's really not a moral or a charitable thing to do.
00:41:36.000That is not fulfilling your obligation by voting for the government to import people or spend lives and money to help other people.
00:41:44.000You know, if Will Nardi or these conservatives or these career conservatives, if they feel so bad about the refugee situation that will result from the collapse of the Venezuelan government, go to Venezuela.
00:42:12.000I don't know what the currency is there.
00:42:14.000I think it's like Bolivarians or something.
00:42:16.000I don't know, named after the revolution.
00:42:18.000But go down there and you help those people.
00:42:20.000You go down there, you treat these people for their wounds, and you set them up with homes and whatever.
00:42:27.000But don't expect me, because you voted, that now I have to contribute a percentage of my income to help people I never met who don't know me, and on and on.
00:42:37.000I mean, that's the corruption, I think, of these sorts of schemes.
00:42:41.000Beyond Venezuela, beyond Iran, he did say some good things about refugees and migration.
00:42:49.000He said, We have learned that over the long term, uncontrolled migration is deeply unfair to both the sending and the receiving countries.
00:42:57.000For the sending countries, it reduces domestic pressure to pursue needed political and economic reform and drains them of the necessary human capital to motivate and implement those reforms.
00:43:07.000And for the receiving countries, the substantial costs of uncontrolled migration are borne overwhelmingly by low income citizens whose concerns are often ignored by both media and government.
00:43:17.000That's pretty groundbreaking stuff because for so long, On the world stage, at least from Barack Obama, Justin Trudeau, Merkel, Cameron, and who was the French president, Holland?
00:43:29.000You heard that migration is a positive good.
00:43:32.000Not only is it a moral good, not only is it an economic good, it's a positive good in all aspects.
00:43:37.000We need more migrants, we need more immigrants, we need to be more welcoming of them and everything else.
00:43:44.000So far as I can recall, President Trump is the first world leader, at least in the West, Western Europe and America, Canada and Australia, to say that immigration is not good.
00:43:55.000Uncontrolled migration harms everybody involved, not just us, not just the people that have to pay for these people, but the countries that these people are fleeing.
00:44:04.000And we talk about this a lot on the show that if you care about immigrants, if you care about people in foreign countries, what good are you doing foreign people that are suffering by slicing out the top three or 1% of their country every year in migration?
00:44:20.000Because that's the people that are coming to the United States.
00:44:24.000The smartest, the most pragmatic people with enough resources to do something.
00:44:30.000Those are the people that are deciding to come to America so that they could be entrepreneurs or maybe they could just go on the dull or whatever.
00:44:37.000But you're slicing that top 1% right out of the country, and as such, there's no progress in these countries.
00:44:43.000You know, maybe if in Cuba all the freedom loving people stayed in Cuba to fight for the future of Cuba, you'd have a democratic government there.
00:44:51.000But instead, all the ambitious people, all the people that want reform, all the people that want change, all the people that hate the system, They got on a boat and they came here.
00:45:06.000What do you think India stands to gain by sending their smartest, most educated people to come do work that anybody in America could do in Silicon Valley?
00:45:51.000I mean, that is a policy that we can replicate in America.
00:45:55.000Nobody's saying that no foreigners can come here.
00:45:58.000We're saying people can't pick up all their crap.
00:46:02.000From their country and drop it over here.
00:46:04.000If Africans want to come here and go to school and contribute to the economy and everything else while they're here and then go back and rebuild their country, that's fine.
00:46:13.000As long as they don't vote, as long as they don't have 10 kids, as long as they don't go on the dole and start absorbing resources that they didn't contribute into.
00:46:21.000I mean, that's something that we can replicate here.
00:46:24.000But I think the China example is really one that we should look at more often, where we have this idea that anybody who comes here has to become Johnny America.
00:46:38.000China, what they do is they have Chinese people go to Africa, and the Chinese people that go there help them build up their businesses, help them build up their infrastructure, contribute to their economy.
00:46:49.000And by the way, the Chinese people there are very frustrated because they go there and they say, You've squandered everything that Europe gave you.
00:46:57.000Europe gave you railroads, they gave you electricity, they gave you power lines, and you basically just destroyed it and you didn't learn from it.
00:47:05.000But that's the program that they have where the Chinese go to Africa.
00:47:11.000And as a result, these African countries drift closer to China in terms of influence.
00:47:16.000Africans go to China, they get their education, their technical training, and then they go back to Africa.
00:47:23.000And this is what commerce is supposed to look like.
00:47:26.000This is what real trade, what real multiculturalism should look like this sharing, where you have separate countries, separate peoples, and they can go and help each other out, but then they go home.
00:47:40.000And so that President Trump brought attention, I think, to that very important argument that what you're doing by taking in people is number one, you're harming us, which we all, I think, are pretty familiar with.
00:47:50.000But number two, you're harming these countries where you take the best and brightest, you bring them here, you assimilate them here, and then everyone else is left in squalor.
00:48:00.000And so that was definitely, I think, a strong point of the speech.
00:48:04.000Beyond that, it was again, it was the neocon stuff.
00:48:07.000Went after Iran in a totally hypocritical way, went after Syria in just kind of a foolish way.
00:48:13.000The North Korea stuff, I think, is justified.
00:48:15.000A lot of people on the alt right are upset about the North Korea.
00:48:19.000North Korea presents a legitimate threat, I think, to the United States.
00:48:22.000And again, people on the alt right that don't understand international relations, and I don't say that like you're an idiot, but you don't understand international relations if you believe that a hostile regime to the United States can be allowed to have a nuclear arsenal or a nuclear triad, especially when that regime is so unstable.
00:48:43.000I mean, that's just something that is unacceptable.
00:48:46.000Maybe you don't think they'll nuke us.
00:48:48.000Maybe you think that the Kim regime is self preservationist and it's not in their interest to nuke anybody and they're rational actors.
00:48:57.000Okay, I think that's a fair argument to make.
00:48:59.000I would actually tend to agree with that.
00:49:01.000I think the alarmist rhetoric about North Korea, but Iran more particularly, is just based on a misunderstanding of decision making in government, which is to say that Iran and North Korea may have bombastic rhetoric, but at the end of the day, the actors in government are rational and they want to live and they want their countries to do well.
00:49:21.000But if you're looking at it again from an international relations perspective, it is just an unacceptable contingency that North Korea could strike the United States.
00:49:32.000Never mind if it is your best bet and you're 99% sure that they wouldn't.
00:49:37.000North Korea is a country that if oil didn't get in there for three months, the government would collapse.
00:49:45.000I mean, this is a country that is probably the most fragile, for all the rhetoric, is probably the most fragile country.
00:49:53.000And unstable countries in the world, and people are okay with giving them intercontinental ballistic missiles that can strike Chicago and New York and DC and LA and nuclear weapons, H bombs, A bombs, and I think they tested MIRVs the other week, which are far more devastating.
00:50:14.000It was speculated they tested MIRVs, which is a missile that goes up and then separate projectiles drop and can bomb multiple cities with one missile.
00:50:23.000So, maybe you don't think that's the end result, but we cannot allow that as a possibility that the Kim regime will last forever in all its stability as it exists right now.
00:50:34.000And beyond the stability factor, beyond the contingency factor, you have the factor that the Kim regime is a known collaborator with Iran and Pakistan and other countries as well.
00:50:48.000There's this network between North Korea, Pakistan, Iran, Libya, and some other rogue regimes.
00:50:55.000Where they share nuclear technology, they share blueprints for nuclear infrastructure, missile technology, and so on.
00:51:16.000I mean, this is a real thing that's happening.
00:51:18.000And to pretend like we can have nuclear proliferation in the most unstable countries in the world and that's not going to affect us, it's very silly.
00:51:29.000And, you know, look, Maybe we can negotiate a settlement where North Korea denuclearizes and we bring home our troops from the demilitarized zone on the Korean Peninsula.
00:51:41.000But that is something that is not in the cards right now.
00:51:44.000That is not something that either of the regimes are talking about, that nobody believes could work or would be a potentiality in the near future.
00:51:52.000So we have to get a little bit realistic about that one.
00:51:55.000So the positives were the rhetoric about nationalism and sovereignty, the rhetoric about immigration.
00:52:02.000The rhetoric about North Korea, which I think was fair, and I think a lot of people misread this situation, misread the gravity of the situation.
00:52:10.000The alt right has this cartoonish mindset of international relations where it's like, we'll just get the troops out of the Korean Peninsula and then they won't bother us.
00:53:21.000You have Israel and the threat of an Iranian nuclear program.
00:53:25.000Do we want a North and South Korea or a China and Japan in addition to a Ukraine and Russia, in addition to a Saudi Arabia and Israel and Iran and Turkey and Egypt and everything else?
00:53:46.000The negatives, of course, are the Iran stuff, the Syria stuff, and just generally the whole tone of it, which I think reeked of a double standard of hypocrisy, of sort of this smashing together of a Stephen Miller ideology and a General Kelly ideology.
00:54:03.000And he alluded to this a little bit, I think, a few months ago when he said he was a nationalist and a globalist.
00:55:06.000It's useless to do this because I explain myself every time, and you have the same autistic MAGA pedes who are like, You just hate our president.
00:55:14.000You don't want our president to succeed.
00:55:16.000You're a Debbie Downer like the progressive left.
00:55:19.000So even when I explain myself and say I support the president, even when people don't, You still get that dumb nonsense.
00:55:27.000But I will say that for a long time, I've been more white pilled than anybody about this administration.
00:55:32.000But increasingly, as we move away from the inauguration, as we move into closing in on about a year of this administration in the next three or four months, we're not seeing a lot of results.
00:55:44.000And I'm praying, I'm praying, and I have faith that there's a strategy here.
00:55:49.000I have faith that there's a direction here.
00:55:52.000It's looking like that's dubious right now.
00:55:55.000And I think that's where faith comes in, where you say, We trusted this guy.
00:56:25.000We saw a strike in Syria, which, although it might have been to serve a North Korean thing, We still have this rhetoric with Iran and Venezuela, which is neocon and problematic.
00:56:35.000So we're still rooting for him, but these things are unacceptable and they have to change.
00:56:41.000And I have faith they will change in the next three years as we delve into this presidency, but I have to be honest about it.
00:57:37.000I'm going to have as many as is fiscally possible to have children because we want big families.
00:57:43.000I don't think there's any shortage of children.
00:57:46.000I think another limiting factor will be how much I can be or my wife can be involved in raising the kids because if there's not the time, you're not doing anybody any favors by raising bad kids that are going to be in daycare all the time.
00:58:02.000So I guess however many is possible is my answer.
00:58:05.000And the same is true for white parents.
00:58:28.000No, his little banter with Cassie Dylan was so cringe and so like faggy.
00:58:34.000He's like, I'm usually the one who white knights for you.
00:58:38.000I mean, he literally said that to some guy.
00:58:42.000And it's just embarrassing at this point, the kind of stuff he says to her and just this whole style.
00:58:47.000Like, I've always prided myself, well, I don't know if I've prided myself on this, but it's always been axiomatic to me that you have self respect, that you have balls, that you have guts, that you're like, you're outrageous and you say what's on your mind and you're bombastic.
00:59:04.000I mean, that's always been, I've always believed in that as a principle itself.
00:59:08.000People ask me all the time, like, why are you like this?
01:00:06.000I think there's a fine line between medical advances and we don't want people to have diseases and all of that to all this other crazy, wacky Icarus stuff.
01:01:17.000But certainly we can never take our foot off the gas with telling him not to because if that happened, I mean, it's the end.
01:01:25.000I mean, You've fulfilled the entire Yunnan plan, which was established in the 1980s.
01:01:31.000And you can look at interviews before where generals, people in government, have said that this was the plan from day one, where we go into the Middle East and we just knock out all these governments.
01:01:42.000I mean, who stands to gain from the fact that after we won the Cold War and we had nothing to do, we decided one very special day to go in and just start smashing countries in the Middle East that we had nothing to do with.
01:01:57.000That we never really had anything to do with.
01:01:59.000I mean, we did during the Cold War, but not in an in depth way.
01:02:09.000I don't think it'll happen, but we can never get complacent about that because that paves the way for a pretty great project.
01:02:18.000If we destroy Iraq, Syria, Iran, Libya, Egypt, Yemen, Lebanon, and Palestine ultimately, it's going to pave the way for a pretty great plan, like a plan that's greater than the one going on, a greater agenda in the Middle East.
01:03:10.000One of the most liberal philosophers that came out of the French Revolution, even he said that not all countries are necessarily supposed to be democracies.
01:03:20.000Some will have to be monarchies or aristocracies.
01:03:23.000It varies based on size, it varies based on culture, it varies based on people.
01:03:27.000So I would say that it's not a one size fits all.
01:03:30.000My ideal form of government for this country is the one that was established in 1788 with the passage of the Constitution or the ratification of the Constitution, which is a federal system.
01:03:46.000The great compromise which established our bicameral Congress was that you would have one chamber for the people, the House of Representatives, directly elected, and one chamber for the states, which was two representatives for every state determined by state legislatures.
01:04:01.000That's how this government was supposed to function.
01:04:03.000And the Supreme Court, I think, things have gone off the rail there, and the same is true with the executive.
01:04:09.000So if we got back to what was intended by the Constitution, I think we'd be okay.
01:04:13.000And people are going to call me like a constitution fag or whatever, but I think that that's the ideal form of government for America.
01:04:20.000And once you get an independent intelligentsia, an independent media, and we know what that means liberation from the globalists in those sectors, I think it could work.
01:06:25.000This would be like a really last-ditch strategy, but Texas, it wouldn't be the end of the world if Texas lost, if and only if we could consolidate control of Iowa.
01:06:38.000North Carolina, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, and Virginia.
01:06:43.000And we are on track to do that, I think.
01:06:48.000I'm not saying, well, if we could just capture eight states forever.
01:06:52.000But if we can secure and institutionalize this electoral shift where you have the Midwest, the Rust Belt, parts of the Northeast, parts of the Mid Atlantic that go red consistently and reliably, we could lose the Southwest.
01:07:06.000And I'm not saying we want to lose that.
01:07:10.000Like, obviously, If that happens, it will be very impossible almost for us electorally.
01:07:17.000But that is a way for us to buy time while we change the social currents.
01:07:21.000Because what's needed to change the country is for the native population to have more kids and the foreign born population to decrease, either through less immigration, deportations, or having less children.
01:07:34.000So until we can change the incentive structure to have these social things change, which is we can have maternity leave, paid maternity leave for.
01:07:43.000We can have tax reform that incentivizes home ownership and everything else.
01:07:48.000We could even have some kind of a social program where either it's a tax credit or it's something where our young people can get an education, get a house, start a family, and we can discourage foreign born population growth by cutting immigration, deporting, and getting rid of welfare and other things like that, cutting off the path to citizenship.
01:08:09.000While we fix that in the meantime, while we work towards that, a way to avert total catastrophe would be.
01:08:15.000That electoral shift, which is changing from the southeast and, or the southwest rather, and I foresee Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, Nevada, Colorado, possibly Florida and Georgia going blue forever, and then Texas, of course.
01:08:32.000So, in order to offset that, we would need maybe Washington, New Hampshire, Maine, or at least their one electoral vote, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Iowa, North Carolina, Virginia, Minnesota.
01:08:50.000Because west or east, rather, of Seattle and Portland, I mean, these are like western United States countries that are reliably, solidly red.
01:08:59.000So if we could up those birth rates, up the turnout in those states, we could be okay.
01:11:05.000I have no intention to go to UW Madison, but when I was at Leadership Institute, these Jags, when I was at Leadership Institute, right before, it was like they had this week long training for a job to be a field representative, and they announced who got the job on Friday.
01:11:25.000On Thursday night, they had everybody message 20 random people on Facebook saying, Hey, do you want to start up an organization on a college campus?
01:11:36.000And, uh, And so I texted the people in there because I was like, you know, realistically, am I going to get the job?
01:11:41.000Because if I'm not going to get the job, don't make me contact 20 people.
01:12:10.000They wouldn't tell me if I got the job or not, but they said you should definitely reach out to these people anyway, you know, because it's good practice.
01:12:17.000So at like 2 a.m., I'm sending random messages to random people about starting conservative organizations.
01:12:24.000And then the next day they bring me in and they say, we don't think you're field rep material, so you don't get the job.
01:12:37.000In the country right now, because they are hypocrites, they are liars, they're disingenuous, and maybe it sounds like I am a bitter rejected applicant, but I mean, think of it that you have an institution, an organization which is supposed to promote conservatism, which is supposed to promote conserving traditional values, and they talk about being a meritocracy, they talk about freedom of speech, they talk about being a Big Ten organization, they talk about ethics,
01:13:06.000they talk about Christianity and being moral, and then they Use and abuse applicants before they're discarded.
01:14:13.000If there are 15 lucky people left who have not opened their messages for me asking if they like to organize for conservative principals on campus, if you see that, I'm going to delete the message and ignore you.
01:14:33.000They have Emily Faulkner, butt tattoo extraordinaire.
01:14:36.000They got some other, they have all kinds of degenerates and hedonists and people that get drunk and people that get high and people that are for hedonism and sexual degeneracy and everything else.
01:15:45.000And then the worst, I would say, would be Wilson, because he had the income tax, he had World War I, which was done in exchange for the Balfour Declaration and the Federal Reserve.
01:15:54.000And the 17th Amendment, I believe, was also under Wilson.
01:16:59.000But if we're going to talk about the Vox Day thing, I would say it's a mistake.
01:17:04.000I mean, we want people to get involved with the alt cyber, we want people to get involved with the alt tech movement.
01:17:11.000And The minute that anybody is not ideologically pure enough or they're not doing it exactly like a bunch of anonymous users on Twitter who contribute nothing, then they're out.
01:17:24.000Because, you know, people who, if we're going to have a movement, we need people who do this full time.
01:17:29.000If we're going to have any pragmatic results from this movement, we need people that are doing this and they're doing tech full time or they're doing commentary full time or they're doing something full time.
01:17:42.000A full time job to this sort of thing, or the time of a full time job to this sort of a thing.
01:17:46.000And anytime, and we have to make a living off of this, by the way.
01:17:49.000If we're going to fight for this revolution and everything, we need to make a living.
01:17:53.000So it doesn't help when every time we need to disassociate ourselves from the most extreme elements or we need to make a little bit of money to support ourselves or our lives and we get called out as shills or like our allegiances are in question or we're in it for shekels.
01:18:14.000And that's how you get a movement going nowhere.
01:18:16.000I mean, I saw someone who responded to me the other day where I tweeted out that the Georgia tech riots.
01:18:24.000And the Black Lives Matter riots that have been going on for four consecutive nights now were far worse than Charlottesville, and the president has said nothing.
01:18:33.000He condemned white nationalists and the alt right and the fringe right.
01:18:37.000For Charlottesville, he doesn't condemn Black Lives Matter for St. Louis.
01:18:41.000And somebody responds to me, Nick, this is a terrible take.
01:19:21.000I could be right now having a very normal college experience, having a fun time.
01:19:26.000I could be having the time of my life.
01:19:29.000And then I could graduate from college and I could make a ton of money.
01:19:32.000If I were to cuck and actually shill for the people that you think or people accuse me of doing so, I could be with the Milo Yiannopoulos thing.
01:19:42.000I could be at Milo's Free Speech Week like Ariana Collins making money and getting all kinds of shekels from major donors and having a lot of influence and having a lot more fame.
01:19:52.000Or I could just be a regular person and make money in finance as people do, as smart people do.
01:20:00.000So, when people question my allegiance or question my motivations, and when people do that to people like Torba, who set up Gab, I think it's really insulting and it makes me angry.
01:20:11.000Those are one of the few things that really rile me up and offend me to a personal level are when anonymous people with no Twitter profile picture, without their real name, without any skin in the game, without any stake in the game, are going to come after us and criticize us for trying to monetize us to make a living or trying to save our institution, our organization, or our livelihood.
01:20:35.000Because it's like, you know, people ask me all the time, why don't you talk about certain questions?
01:20:39.000Why don't you talk about certain things?
01:20:41.000And, you know, nine times out of 10, actually, 10 times out of 10, this is a person who has no clout, who does not have their name online, who does not have their picture online.
01:20:50.000And you ask them, well, why don't you do that?
01:20:51.000Why don't you do that with your real name?
01:20:56.000But anywho, that's my thought on Vox Day I think Vox Day suing Gab, I think it's the wrong move.
01:21:03.000And it also doesn't make any sense because.
01:21:06.000Vox went after Andrew Anglin for trying to destroy the Gab platform because he said Gab was never a place for free speech and free speech is ridiculous.
01:21:18.000And, you know, Vox is smart on a lot of things, but, I mean, kind of weird on this thing, kind of a weird thing going on where he was one way last week, he's one way this week.
01:21:29.000And by the way, it does nothing for us.
01:21:48.000You know, if it's really so bad, if it's really against all the principles, people won't use it, you know.
01:21:53.000But you're not creating the right incentives when every time anybody steps up and does something and they might have to conform a little bit to the system we're living in, they get torn down and called a shill and they get derided on 4chan and whatever.
01:22:07.000Like I saw during the content Emmys, how critical people were of TV Ameriqua and people in the Discord.
01:22:14.000I will tell you, people in Discord were getting legitimately angry at the people that were watching, myself included, because a lot of people that were watching.
01:22:22.000That we're watching Ameriqua put on this show that he put together, that he put invested all kinds of time, all kinds of resources into making funny clips, really good content, putting this whole thing together, promoting it, making all the pictures, making videos, cutting interviews, doing editing, making music, putting this group together, the Discord, the whole presentation.
01:22:44.000And you have people that show up who contribute nothing and they sit there with their arms folded and say, that's not good enough.
01:22:49.000And I really just resent that about the country today that you have so many critics.
01:22:54.000It's sort of like a culture of critique.
01:22:56.000In the country where you have all these critics and nobody's doing anything.
01:23:24.000You know, ask a question or post in the live chat or post a link I can share.
01:23:31.000I really, I really, that stuff grinds my gears.
01:23:34.000I don't know why, but it's like, you know, I built this platform so I could say my views, and then people are like, can I just sort of like hijack your platform and say what I think?
01:23:43.000And you could be a mouthpiece for what I think?
01:23:45.000Like Lynch, you know, I agree with what she said, but, you know, write it up so I can retweet it.
01:23:50.000Mr. White, bottom line is the Trump MAGA presidency over?
01:23:54.000No, and I don't think anyone has the right to make that judgment yet.
01:23:57.000It's premature, it's immature, and it's wrong.
01:24:01.000You know, that we're going, it's been, how long has it been, folks?
01:24:31.000Don't say if you think we're going in the wrong trajectory.
01:24:34.000However, You cannot make a definitive judgment until it's the end.
01:24:40.000Manlet Supreme, how do you reconcile nationalism and tradition when nationalism and self determination didn't exist before the Enlightenment?
01:24:50.000That's a good question, but you have tribes before the Enlightenment.
01:24:54.000The nation state might be a modern conception, and certainly the nation state was born out of the Peace of Westphalia in the early 17th century.
01:25:03.000So you didn't have full on Enlightenment just yet.
01:25:08.000The worst elements of the Enlightenment didn't even come around until after the French Revolution.
01:25:13.000I mean, if you're talking about Kant, if you're talking about German idealism, if you're talking about even Jung, if you're talking about things like this, I don't even think those are necessarily harmful.
01:25:24.000And those existed after or during the Enlightenment as well.
01:25:31.000And so, again, I wouldn't say that I am totally dark Enlightenment.
01:25:37.000I agree with some of the premises there.
01:25:42.000Tradition means blood and family and all of that.
01:25:45.000So, I don't think you necessarily need to say that, throw out the baby with the bathwater and say that everything after the Enlightenment is evil.
01:26:20.000I mean, people are going to determine what happens in their own borders.
01:26:23.000The conception that we would respect that, I think, is enlightenment, but I think it's also, I think peace is more beneficial than war for everybody.
01:26:29.000So, again, you know, you can throw these together and say, oh, well, nation state actually happened during the enlightenment or during the early enlightenment.
01:26:54.000There's only so much he could do before there would be articles of impeachment or there would be some kind of a court stopping him or something.
01:27:02.000I mean, he would really create a constitutional crisis if he did some of these things.
01:27:08.000Maybe people say that that needs to happen.
01:27:11.000But to a certain extent, I don't think you can say, like, at the same time, the Constitution is broken and people don't abide by it.
01:27:18.000And at the same time, President Trump isn't using his constitutional powers.
01:27:23.000If he used his constitutional powers on immigration or on the border, You would have articles of impeachment drafted, and it would win only because it would win the war of legitimacy.
01:27:33.000In other words, people see the Congress as more legitimate than the president in terms of if they drafted articles of impeachment, half the country would say that, probably a little bit more than half would say that that's legitimate than the president.
01:27:47.000So we're in this weird space right now where there's no laws, there's no constitution.
01:27:50.000It's basically a public relations battle.
01:27:53.000And so that's why I would say there probably hasn't been revolutionary executive action, though I wish there were.
01:27:59.000Catholic nationalists, thoughts on the race and IQ debate?
01:28:03.000Can't talk about that explicitly, and I think everybody knows that.
01:28:07.000Admiral Fancy Pants, any nationalistslash pro white orgs worth joining?
01:28:15.000Most of it is LARPy, but some of them are worth joining just because, like, if you're not publicly a part of them, if you're not, you know, getting harmed by it, I would say it might be fun just as a fraternal sort of a thing, just to.
01:28:30.000Just sort of live in a not clown world every now and again and talk to people that aren't clowns.
01:28:47.000Nick, what are your thoughts on Savitri Devi and esoteric Hitlerism?
01:28:52.000Okay, you know, people always ask me this stuff.
01:28:55.000I have this tug of war where some people are like, you need to go full Faulkner, you need to go full 1488.
01:29:03.000Unironic exterminationist, full unironic support of Hitler.
01:29:07.000And then the other side is saying, no, no, you need to be normie presenting.
01:29:10.000And, you know, look, we're trying to straddle the line between talking about things that people don't talk about because there's a virtue in that and also being viable.
01:29:21.000And I don't think it makes any sense that we're going to take all of our politically viable people and ask them questions about esoteric Hitlerism and everything else.
01:29:30.000I question the motivation, I question the intention there.
01:29:33.000Where people are trying to drag you into a space where you can't be taken seriously, where you can't be taken as a legitimate political actor or legitimate media actor.
01:29:44.000I mean, what Generation Z has going for it is it hasn't been spoiled yet.
01:29:48.000It hasn't been spoiled by LARPy, extreme, offensive stuff.
01:29:52.000And, you know, look, I have no problem on a personal level with LARPy, extreme stuff.
01:29:57.000But if we're going, again, if we're going to have pragmatic results and we have to convince people to do what we want them to do, that's politics.
01:30:06.000You cannot go around as truthful, as objectively correct you think esoteric Hitlerism is.
01:30:15.000You can't go around talking about that stuff.
01:30:22.000You can look into it for scholastic purposes.
01:30:26.000But when people ask me that stuff, I can't help but get a little frustrated when I'm, you know, people understand and I think people see what I'm trying to do.
01:30:35.000People understand where I'm trying to take this movement.
01:30:38.000And I'm not trying to co opt the leadership of it or seize power, but I'm trying to push the boundaries in this direction.
01:30:46.000And there are all sorts of people who want to drag me in.
01:31:23.000And I said from the start that if he did nothing more than defeat Hillary Clinton, that would be enough.
01:31:30.000Because not only does he defeat Hillary Clinton, not only does he suspend the imminent demise of the country, but he has proven that we can all make it.
01:31:37.000If Donald Trump can say that John McCain wasn't a war hero because he was captured, if he can make fun of veterans, he can attack a Muslim Gold Star family, he can.
01:31:51.000He can say Mexico sends drugs and crime and rapists and say that George W. Bush. Didn't keep us safe because of 9 11.
01:32:01.000If he could say all that and get elected president, he's demonstrated that it's possible and everyone and the emperor isn't wearing any clothes, essentially, that we can do it if we just never back down.
01:32:11.000So I think that Donald Trump, in a lot of ways, has already accomplished some of his most important legacy.
01:32:16.000The wall needs to happen, the deportations need to happen, but I would be satisfied, I think, with a lot of what he's done already.
01:32:45.000How many one foot, eight inch Will the Thinkers do you think you and real James Alsop could take before being overwhelmed in a death match?
01:33:38.000We're getting into the hundreds or thousands.
01:33:40.000I mean, Will Nardi sees his own people, his own American brothers and sisters killed and gunned down by illegal immigrants, and he still wants more of them.
01:33:47.000So, you know, it could be millions that me and James could take us, 6'8, 250 IQ people.
01:33:58.000Lynch just found Emily Faulkner's Facebook profile.
01:41:36.000We know the same about Iranians, the same about Russians, the same about countless other peoples around the world, but words, it doesn't matter.
01:42:04.000During Leadership Institute, what they had you do was to go out and practice like canvassing for a political campaign or for a college organization.
01:42:13.000They had you go out into a really liberal part of D.C. and advocate and try and collect signatures for a petition on a really conservative issue.
01:42:23.000So I'm in the middle of Chinatown and Washington, D.C.
01:42:26.000I mean, think of what that looks like, folks.
01:42:28.000Think of who's walking around Chinatown and Washington, D.C.
01:42:32.000It's not hillbillies, it's not conservatives, it's not people that listen to country music.
01:42:37.000Collecting signatures for a petition on building a wall, building a friggin' wall on the southern border.
01:42:44.000So I'm there, and I'm collecting signatures, and I asked this one guy, well, you know, hey, I'm collecting signatures for wall funding, for a bill that would fund the wall, and it was like a fictitious petition.
01:43:00.000You're not supposed to argue with him, but I'm like entertaining it for a moment, because, you know, why not?
01:43:04.000And he comes like this close to just punching me in the face, because I start out basically saying, like, Because I don't want to get killed.
01:43:11.000But I started out like, you know, look, economics, yada, yada, jobs, this and that.
01:43:15.000And I said, you know, look, here's why.
01:43:17.000Because we don't want to speak Spanish here.