America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - Analyzing Trump's UN Rhetoric | America First Ep. 13

00:00:00.000 America first.

00:00:00.000 My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes, and we've got a great show for you tonight.

00:00:05.000 As promised on Twitter, we're going to be slapping the hell out of Clown World.

00:00:09.000 We're going to be on Thought Patrol.

00:00:11.000 So much to talk about.

00:00:12.000 I'm ready for a high energy show tonight.

00:00:15.000 As you can see, I got a haircut in preparation.

00:00:18.000 Wasn't thrilled.

00:00:19.000 Wasn't really thrilled with it.

00:00:20.000 I'm going to be really honest.

00:00:22.000 You know, for $31, outrageous these days.

00:00:25.000 If you want to get your haircut at a barbershop, $25, $30.

00:00:29.000 For $30, I'm not thrilled with it.

00:00:31.000 But, you know, let me know what you think.

00:00:33.000 I think it's okay.

00:00:34.000 I think it's okay.

00:00:35.000 We could do better.

00:00:36.000 But I didn't get to go to the barber I wanted to.

00:00:38.000 But beyond that, other things that are going on.

00:00:40.000 I saw my dear friend, the highly respected, highly esteemed Cassie Dillon.

00:00:46.000 She had her first speech, if you could call it that, her first event at Westminster College.

00:00:54.000 And I watched a little bit of it.

00:00:56.000 I watched a little bit of it while I was brushing my teeth this morning, I think, or this afternoon, really.

00:01:03.000 And I was watching it on Periscope.

00:01:06.000 And it was just the most boring speech I've ever seen in my entire life.

00:01:09.000 She was talking about what was she talking about?

00:01:12.000 Campus conservatism and like the conversation on college campuses, which is so overdone, which is so trite at this point.

00:01:21.000 Aren't we all tired of hearing about safe space culture on college campuses?

00:01:26.000 It's just the most redundant nonsense at this point.

00:01:29.000 Barack Obama's complained about it, Joe Biden's complained about it.

00:01:33.000 They complain about it on the late night shows.

00:01:35.000 They talk about it.

00:01:37.000 Everybody talks about it.

00:01:38.000 It's done.

00:01:39.000 It's not cool.

00:01:40.000 It's not edgy.

00:01:41.000 It's not interesting anymore.

00:01:42.000 It's not even mildly interesting anymore.

00:01:44.000 So she's up there.

00:01:45.000 She gives her talk on campus conservatism and safe space culture.

00:01:50.000 Give me a break.

00:01:51.000 I mean, like, my dad and his friends at work talk about this, okay?

00:01:55.000 If you want to get into how out of touch you are, if you're talking about that, no offense, dad.

00:02:00.000 But, I mean, if the above 60, above 50 crowd is talking about that at the water cooler at work, I don't know.

00:02:09.000 Maybe it might be time to find something a little bit more interesting.

00:02:12.000 Timely, a little bit more youthful.

00:02:14.000 But so, yeah, that was what the speech was about.

00:02:17.000 And I heard someone tweeted this.

00:02:19.000 Someone tweeted that she said during the speech that the alt right doesn't have a moral compass.

00:02:25.000 And I saw this and I tweeted about it because, of course, I take a little bit of offense to this.

00:02:30.000 I find it a little bit hypocritical when somebody who finds a video of me, which was taken in private, a video that was taken covertly of me saying controversial things out of context, Acquires it, sends it to an alleged pedophile to be released to ruin my career.

00:02:48.000 She's going to go up and lecture the alt right about morality, right?

00:02:52.000 About having a moral compass.

00:02:54.000 And, you know, beyond that entirely, look at what conservatives, look at what the careerist conservatives are promoting.

00:03:00.000 And you tell me what's moral.

00:03:03.000 What the alt right or paleocons or the fringe right, the dissident right, whatever you want to call it, people that are outside of the beltway, outside of the Koch brothers circle, outside of that network of Mercer family money, What we believe in is our families.

00:03:19.000 What we believe in is our children, our people, our race, our heritage, our history.

00:03:25.000 Fighting for that, defending that at any cost, there's nothing more moral than that, I would argue.

00:03:31.000 There's nothing any higher, any higher pursuit that someone could aspire to other than fighting for your God, your family, posterity.

00:03:40.000 I mean, these are the highest virtues that a man can hold.

00:03:43.000 These are the highest values someone can strive to defend.

00:03:47.000 And what are the careerist values?

00:03:48.000 Conservatives defending?

00:03:50.000 What is Cassie Dillon defending?

00:03:52.000 Her job at campus reform, her job as the state chair at Young Americans for Liberty, her little five minute spots on Fox and Friends in the morning, just trying so hard for that internship.

00:04:04.000 You tell me what's moral, right?

00:04:07.000 But I saw that and I was just so hurt deeply by this because, you know, I'm a content creator.

00:04:12.000 I say that semi ironically, but I do create a lot of content, right?

00:04:16.000 I create a lot of audio, video content.

00:04:19.000 We do this show for an hour every day, then we do Nationalist Review on Saturday, me and James.

00:04:24.000 And we're going to be producing a lot more content very soon.

00:04:27.000 Things are in the works.

00:04:28.000 But as a content creator on the right wing, I look at a market that is completely oversaturated with people who just don't know what they're doing.

00:04:37.000 I look at the Cassie Dillons.

00:04:39.000 I look at the Will Nardis, the Ali Stuckis.

00:04:41.000 I look at all these people.

00:04:43.000 Every young person with an opinion on politics now has a vlog, or they have a blog, or they write, or they start their own website.

00:04:52.000 How many college conservative websites are there?

00:04:55.000 I mean, the proliferation of.

00:04:58.000 Conservative amateur vlogging is obscene and offensive to a person like me because for the vast majority of these people, you just need to get a job.

00:05:07.000 You just need to go to school, get a job.

00:05:09.000 You could go to technical school, you could become a plumber or an electrician.

00:05:13.000 That's good work, it's good money, it's respectable.

00:05:16.000 You could go and become a professional, you could go and become a doctor or a lawyer or an engineer.

00:05:22.000 But for everybody and their brother, because they're 18 and they watch a little bit of Ben Shapiro, to sit down and they buy a little mic and a microphone and they think they're going to be the next.

00:05:32.000 Big thing, not going to happen.

00:05:34.000 It's kind of insulting because I see like Will Nardi.

00:05:37.000 He has a guy on The Rouser.

00:05:39.000 And don't ask me how I know about this, but there's a show on The Rouser that gets like 50 views if they're lucky.

00:05:46.000 I think the inaugural show got 50 views. 0.93

00:05:49.000 And again, I don't say this to insult, but I say this I think the reality is kind of ridiculous, kind of ludicrous. 0.96

00:05:56.000 But it's this older guy. 0.99

00:05:57.000 He's bald.

00:05:58.000 He does this little podcast for Will Nardi's website, The Rouser.

00:06:01.000 It gets like no views, no traction, no impressions.

00:06:04.000 And if you watch it, it's just boring.

00:06:06.000 It's not interesting.

00:06:08.000 The commentary isn't insightful.

00:06:10.000 The knowledge he's presenting isn't unique or specialized.

00:06:14.000 And you think there are people like me who know what we're talking about, who can present well, who can present in an articulate, eloquent fashion information that most people don't know.

00:06:25.000 And we take on this burden because most people aren't reading books.

00:06:29.000 Most people have jobs, as they are supposed to do to provide for a family.

00:06:33.000 But you see all these amateurs, all these people who.

00:06:36.000 They think they put up a microphone and a camera and they can regurgitate their basic Fox News talking points.

00:06:43.000 It really, to me, I'm very troubled by this because, you know, I watch my show and I think my show is good because I can watch my show.

00:06:51.000 I watch my show every night.

00:06:53.000 I laugh at my show.

00:06:54.000 I find what I say insightful.

00:06:56.000 People are going to say, you know, Nick, you're so conceited.

00:06:58.000 Nick, you're so self absorbed.

00:07:00.000 But I watch my show because I want to make a show that I would want to watch, that I would want to watch and find funny and invest time in it.

00:07:07.000 These people don't watch their shows.

00:07:09.000 These people don't read.

00:07:10.000 Anyway, enough about that.

00:07:11.000 That's a little self indulgent, but I just, I was watching it.

00:07:15.000 The show's called The Bald Eagle.

00:07:16.000 And look it up.

00:07:17.000 Go on Rouser News on YouTube and watch The Bald Eagle.

00:07:20.000 And, you know, try and stick it out for more than 30 seconds.

00:07:23.000 It's brutal, brutal, so boring. 0.71

00:07:26.000 And then I watched Cassie Dillon's speech.

00:07:28.000 Audio's terrible. 0.99

00:07:29.000 The content is garbage. 0.93

00:07:31.000 The presentation is amateur at best. 0.98

00:07:34.000 And I think, you know, when conservative pundits are sending their people, they're not sending their best.

00:07:40.000 Right?

00:07:41.000 Because the people that actually care, they kind of go outside the lines.

00:07:44.000 But anyway, enough about that.

00:07:46.000 What else do we want to talk about?

00:07:48.000 The other thing I want to talk about that's not necessarily news, we're going to get to the General Assembly speech in a moment.

00:07:55.000 I know everybody was asking my hot take on President Trump's first address to the General Assembly and what he had to say, whether it was good, whether it was bad, whether it was nationalist, whether it was globalist, axis of evil currents there.

00:08:09.000 We'll get to that.

00:08:10.000 But first, I was thinking about this earlier today about the immigration issue.

00:08:14.000 I was watching my show last night, and I was thinking about immigration.

00:08:18.000 And I think it's so problematic the way that we view immigration.

00:08:22.000 I don't like the word problematic.

00:08:23.000 It's kind of a liberal Prague thing to say.

00:08:27.000 But really, when we think of immigration, I think we tend to think of it as it's a given, you know, that we have people from all over the world coming here.

00:08:35.000 And if you accept anything less than complete and total integration and acceptance of becoming a minority in your own country, you're a bigot.

00:08:44.000 Like, example, I was watching a speech by Oswald Mosley.

00:08:48.000 And of course, I was watching it.

00:08:50.000 Just to get mad. 0.97

00:08:51.000 I was watching it because it was just dripping with bigotry and fascist hate.

00:08:56.000 So I was watching it purely just to get an insight into the evil alt right and what they believe.

00:09:02.000 So I'm watching one of these inspirational videos with Oswald Mosley from the UK, and he was talking about segregation.

00:09:09.000 He was talking about how you love your race like you love your family.

00:09:14.000 And just because you love your race doesn't mean you hate any other races.

00:09:18.000 And we can all live in peace and harmony if we live.

00:09:21.000 Separately, if we can respect each other in our own nations.

00:09:25.000 And I thought that's not an unreasonable proposal.

00:09:28.000 If we're talking about what's happening to our countries in the West, if we're talking about what's happening in America or in Europe, and you see this policy, which is a stated and active policy to change the demographics of these countries, to bring in millions of people from the third world that don't speak the language, that don't practice our religion, that are not ethnically the same, that do not have the same historical legacy or tradition or shared history.

00:09:55.000 And it's worthy, if you're going to debate the merits of this proposal, to bring up that side of it, which is segregation, which I think is a, you know, maybe people don't totally agree with that.

00:10:05.000 Maybe that has some poor connotations.

00:10:08.000 But think of it.

00:10:09.000 If we're in this post-Cold War era where we have all the different civilizations and nations and empires clashing with each other for the first time in human history, by the way, this is really something that we haven't seen ever in thousands of years that you have.

00:10:24.000 Separate and distinct civilizations of the Latin American people, of the Europeans, of the Chinese, the Sino people, the Japanese, the Indus Valley civilization, India, the Arabs in the Middle East, Sub Saharan Africa, all these different civilizations for the first time in human history are now smashing against each other in truly a globalist fashion where they're coming to different countries, where they're communicating, they're doing trade.

00:10:53.000 And so as we move through this very crucial time in human history, this very transformative time in human history, And we have this discussion about what our policy will be moving forward as a boat in the storm, figuring out how we're going to navigate this transitional period. 0.88

00:11:10.000 It's worth considering do we want to have all these millions of people in our borders and just integrate right away and mix them up, multiracial, multireligious, multiethnic?

00:11:22.000 I think if you're going to have that sort of a policy, you need to have the debate. 0.95

00:11:25.000 And the alternative to the debate is segregation.

00:11:28.000 And I don't think anybody should be afraid of talking about it.

00:11:31.000 That.

00:11:32.000 Certainly, again, you have those negative connotations, but it says a lot about the immigration debate that you cannot propose a totally reasonable thing, which is that in the 20th and 21st century, it would be better for all involved, it would be better for all civilizations to remain separate in their own countries, for every people, ethnic or religious or racial, to have their own government, to have their own geographic borders, to determine their own affairs and their own fate.

00:12:00.000 That is a reasonable proposition in response to.

00:12:03.000 To this time.

00:12:04.000 And that you're not able to say it, that you're not able to express this even in an academic or scholastic setting, even to say, well, here is the alternative to the debate, you'd still get called a bigot.

00:12:17.000 Nonetheless, if you were even to advocate for such a thing.

00:12:20.000 I mean, that's what's really troubling is that it is really only acceptable, it's only permissible, it's only allowed, not in a de jure sense, but in a de facto sense, to believe that in this transformative period in the history of the world, We've never seen these forces.

00:12:36.000 We've never seen this kind of mixing of different cultures and religions and groups and tribes that you can only have one position on that, or else you get fired from your job.

00:12:47.000 You get suspended on Twitter.

00:12:49.000 People dox your address and your phone number and your identity, and they come after you in many cases.

00:12:56.000 That's really, I think, a sign of the dysfunction, not only in our country, but with the discussion that's to be had.

00:13:02.000 And we talk all day long about free speech, free discussion, and we know.

00:13:06.000 You know, people make a lot of money off of that.

00:13:08.000 People make a lot of money off of free discussion, free discourse.

00:13:12.000 Dave Rubin comes to mind.

00:13:13.000 Ben Shapiro comes to mind.

00:13:15.000 They talk about how they just want to talk.

00:13:17.000 They just want a free marketplace of ideas.

00:13:20.000 I have heard nobody, I have heard nobody in the mainstream who has presented anything that is truly, in principle, opposite to this multiracial, multiethnic, multicultural policy that has been pursued for 30 or 40 or 50 years.

00:13:37.000 Since 1965.

00:13:39.000 And you look at the history of the country and you look at conservatives.

00:13:42.000 Conservatives, the conservative wing, the conservative party, the conservative movement in the country purports to want to conserve things.

00:13:51.000 They want to conserve traditions, cultures, rituals, etc.

00:13:56.000 And we have an entire wing in our country, the right wing, the conservative faction, whatever you want to call it, that is supposed to conserve, that is obligated to preserve these institutions.

00:14:08.000 And that entire organism is.

00:14:11.000 Whether it's that financial network or the political network, doesn't want to conserve anything at all.

00:14:15.000 Because the country from 1776 to 1965 was an ethnostate, essentially. 0.78

00:14:23.000 You had 20% non whites in 1790, the first time they took the census. 0.86

00:14:28.000 In 1960, that's five years before the Hart Seller Act, it was 90% white.

00:14:33.000 So you're fluctuating between 80% to 90% white for the vast majority of the country's history, from George Washington.

00:14:41.000 Through to Abraham Lincoln, through to Teddy and Franklin Roosevelt, through to Jack Kennedy. 0.82

00:14:45.000 So that's about as American as it gets, folks.

00:14:48.000 And we're talking about what the founders would have intended, what the historical Americans would have intended for the country.

00:14:55.000 And so then for conservatives to say that to hold these opinions that for the majority of the country's history were not only permissible, not only acceptable, but the mainstream stated policy of every president, it says a lot.

00:15:08.000 It says a lot about who's controlling the discourse.

00:15:10.000 It says a lot about who's controlling these.

00:15:14.000 These nodes of discussion and communication. 0.81

00:15:19.000 It's worth pointing out that even from 1776 to 1860, the 20% that were non white were not even considered citizens. 0.83

00:15:29.000 They were considered property. 0.86

00:15:30.000 And that's not to say that we should, you know, Reagan Battalion is going to clip that and say, Nick Swanson thinks that non whites should return to property status. 0.66

00:15:38.000 But it is to say that people bring up the fact that, oh, well, black people, non whites, have been here since the country's founding. 0.61

00:15:45.000 Non whites have been here and been a significant part of the population since the country's founding. 0.52

00:15:49.000 Well, from 1776 to 1860, the 20% that were non white, that were non European, were considered property.

00:15:57.000 So I don't think that's really a fair assessment to say that, well, they've been here as long as we have. 0.84

00:16:02.000 Well, yes, but in a totally different capacity.

00:16:04.000 Because if you read the Federalist Papers, I think it was the first or the second one written by John Jay, where he says specifically that this nation was set out and laid out for the blood, the lineage of the founders, for people that speak English, for people that practice Christianity, for people descended from the people that established this colony or the 13 colonies.

00:16:25.000 And then you have in the period from 1860 to 1900, it remained 20% non white.

00:16:31.000 But from 1900 to 1960, you move steadily.

00:16:34.000 That trend moved in the opposite direction. 0.92

00:16:37.000 We had 20% non white from 1860 to 1900.

00:16:42.000 Instead of that going in the opposite direction, where it was increasing to 30 or 40 or whatever, after they became citizens, after they became emancipated, actually the demographics moved in the other direction and it became increasingly white for 60 years in modern history since the dawn of the 20th century.

00:17:03.000 So these are just some considerations about the immigration question.

00:17:06.000 That I think a lot of people leave out, that I think a lot of people forget when they concede from the starting point that America is a nation of immigrants or that historically this was not a white country or a European country, which it was, and so on.

00:17:24.000 Immigration is supposed to benefit the people in the country.

00:17:26.000 But enough about that. 0.97

00:17:27.000 We talked about that on the last show.

00:17:28.000 Just some other thoughts, just some other things about the discussion in general, which I think a lot of people need to revisit when they get into these talks because so many people concede from the outset so many false.

00:17:40.000 Historically illiterate premises that aren't true in principle or in fact.

00:17:47.000 You know, we're in this weird period now where people are moving all over the place and they call it immigration.

00:17:52.000 But really, it's not immigration.

00:17:56.000 It's sort of like if you live in a cul de sac and you have like 10 houses and they say, well, anybody can come into any house that they want.

00:18:03.000 You know, we're all pretty good friends.

00:18:04.000 We're all equal.

00:18:06.000 We're all the same intelligence.

00:18:07.000 We all have the same equally good cultures.

00:18:10.000 Basically, we can come and go into each other's houses as we please.

00:18:13.000 Now, You could call that immigration if people were going into Steve's house one day and Fred's house another day and Jimmy's house the next day.

00:18:22.000 But what would happen if, in that cul de sac, the only direction that the sharing of the households went was into one house?

00:18:29.000 What if you had the 10 households and everybody was just pouring into one guy's house and they were eating all his food and they were sleeping on his couch and they were abusing his children sexually and nobody went into any of the other houses because all the other houses are.

00:18:45.000 Dirty and smelly and not good, and there's violence in them.

00:18:49.000 But the one house, it's beautiful.

00:18:51.000 They give people food.

00:18:52.000 There's hors d'oeuvres on the kitchen table.

00:18:54.000 You can come and eat as you please.

00:18:56.000 I mean, that's the situation. 0.93

00:18:57.000 People have it in the former category where you have immigration. 0.83

00:19:01.000 People are moving all over the place.

00:19:03.000 We want freedom of movement, freedom of goods, and everything else.

00:19:06.000 But that's really not at all what it looks like.

00:19:08.000 Immigration would have it that there's some equity.

00:19:11.000 Immigration would have it that there's some equilibrium, that there's some reciprocity.

00:19:16.000 That you'd have Mexicans moving into America, but you'd also have Americans moving to China or to Nigeria or to Iran.

00:19:24.000 But you don't see that.

00:19:25.000 The immigration moves in one direction from the third world into Western countries.

00:19:30.000 And you don't think that's because they want to pursue the American dream. 0.99

00:19:36.000 They want to become hamburger eaten, hot dog eaten, Chuck Berry listening Americans, Jimmy number one Americans.

00:19:46.000 I don't think so.

00:19:47.000 It's because they want the free stuff.

00:19:48.000 It's because they want a safe place where you don't get killed and you get free stuff and there's wealth and prosperity.

00:19:55.000 And don't think that. 0.99

00:19:57.000 Like having a job in this country is any different than welfare for a third worlder. 1.00

00:20:01.000 You know, who do you think pays your salary when you have a job? 1.00

00:20:06.000 I mean, when people come here, when immigrants come here and they say, oh, well, they're working, they want to get jobs. 1.00

00:20:11.000 They want to get jobs and earn money. 1.00

00:20:13.000 Okay, well, they're still taking that money from Americans. 1.00

00:20:17.000 If you have all these migrants coming here, maybe they don't go on welfare. 0.99

00:20:20.000 Maybe they don't just want to take money for nothing. 0.98

00:20:23.000 But if they want to work, well, you're still taking advantage of the capital that Americans have built up to have such a huge labor force.

00:20:30.000 You're taking advantage of Of the jobs that people might have, of the labor potential. 0.58

00:20:35.000 I mean, there are so many things in terms of what they're taking from the economy that isn't just the giddies, that isn't just the welfare, the unemployment, the Social Security, et cetera, but it's also the capital of the country, the material and human capital of the country, social capital as well, that they are consuming and, in many cases, degrading.

00:20:54.000 But anyway, just a couple of thoughts on immigration. 0.69

00:20:57.000 I know everybody's eager, they're chomping at the bit to hear about Rocket Man and the GA speech, but.

00:21:03.000 These are just some things I never hear about.

00:21:05.000 I never hear about these things.

00:21:07.000 We all hear about the nation of immigrants.

00:21:09.000 We all hear about, you know, poor Jim Crow and everything else.

00:21:12.000 But there are these other considerations.

00:21:14.000 Anyway, President Trump today, this morning, he made his first address before the United Nations General Assembly in New York City.

00:21:24.000 And it was pretty polarizing, I think, on the right wing.

00:21:27.000 About half of the right wing said it was nationalist.

00:21:30.000 They said that his speech was one that broke away from many of the past presidents by promoting national sovereignty.

00:21:37.000 As a chief organizing principle for the world, as opposed to this Wilsonian democratizing idealism.

00:21:44.000 And then the other half of the right said this was an axis of evil.

00:21:47.000 This was a speech that Bush would give.

00:21:49.000 This is a speech that Romney or McCain would give.

00:21:52.000 Just a little bit softer rhetoric.

00:21:54.000 Because, of course, he still did call out North Korea, Venezuela, Cuba, Syria, and Iran.

00:22:00.000 And, you know, I tend to take a little bit from both sides.

00:22:03.000 That tends to be my analysis that at once he started out with these very nationalist overtones that we've never really heard.

00:22:10.000 From an American president in the modern period or the postmodern period, where he talked about how nations have a right, a God given right, to determine the affairs of their own country, to determine the fate of their own people.

00:22:24.000 And so the first 20 minutes of the speech was dedicated to this, which was to say, we are not going to impose our principles, we're not going to impose our values, everyone can do their own thing.

00:22:35.000 We just asked for mutual respect.

00:22:37.000 And I was on board with this.

00:22:39.000 I was saying, this is really a break from the past 20 years.

00:22:43.000 And then he got into the axis of evil.

00:22:46.000 Then he started talking about North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, and Syria.

00:22:51.000 And you heard in the same speech at once we don't want to impose our values, we don't want to impose our morals.

00:22:58.000 And then immediately after, immediately within five minutes, talking about and lecturing how North Korea starves its people and Iran is an authoritarian country masquerading as a democracy.

00:23:10.000 And if Venezuela doesn't get democratic, we're going to go in there and we're going to bust things open.

00:23:16.000 And that's where it fell apart for me. 0.82

00:23:18.000 That's where I started to side a little bit with the Black Pillars, with this H.R. McMaster fear mongering crowd, which is to say that I imagine that Steve Miller drafted this speech and then H.R. McMaster or General Kelly got their hands on it and inserted all this neocon BS, all this neocon saber rattling, which was just totally unnecessary.

00:23:40.000 This was an opportunity for President Trump to pitch his worldview, to pitch this new paradigm and really send us into a new era.

00:23:48.000 Of American power in the world.

00:23:50.000 Whereas for the past 70 years, really, I mean, since the creation of the United Nations, you've had this American monolithic, unipolar, hegemonic power that sought to create all the institutions and dominate them and advance liberalism and democracy and capitalism at any cost with military bases in every country and ambassadorships in every country and our mittens and everything.

00:24:16.000 And this was an opportunity for President Trump to say, that's over.

00:24:20.000 American empire is over.

00:24:21.000 America first. 0.99

00:24:22.000 He did say America first.

00:24:24.000 He got a huge standing ovation because he said, time to put America first, and every other country has the right to do the same.

00:24:31.000 And he got a standing ovation.

00:24:33.000 And then he launched into the Bush era, the Bush League condemnation and lecture at all the foreign countries.

00:24:40.000 And, you know, I'll read you an excerpt.

00:24:42.000 This is why I'm so opposed to this, okay? 0.96

00:24:44.000 It's this blatant and naked hypocrisy.

00:24:47.000 I'll read to you an excerpt from the U.N. speech of President Trump addressing the Iran situation, the Iran deal, their nuclear program in particular.

00:24:56.000 Here's what he had to say about Iran. 0.58

00:24:58.000 He said, The Iranian government masks a corrupt dictatorship behind the false guise of a democracy. 0.66

00:25:05.000 It has turned a wealthy country with a rich history and culture into an economically depleted rogue state whose chief exports are violence, bloodshed, and chaos. 0.87

00:25:15.000 The longest suffering victims of Iran's leaders are, in fact, its own people. 0.94

00:25:20.000 Rather than use its resources to improve Iranian lives, its oil profits go to fund Hezbollah and other terrorists that kill innocent Muslims. 0.56

00:25:28.000 And attack their peaceful Arab and Israeli neighbors. 0.61

00:25:31.000 Now, you read an excerpt like that, and this reasoning, this description guess what? 0.87

00:25:37.000 You can apply that to Saudi Arabia.

00:25:39.000 You can apply that to Saudi Arabia.

00:25:41.000 You can apply that to Qatar.

00:25:43.000 You can apply that to the United Arab Emirates.

00:25:46.000 You can apply that to Israel in certain ways as well.

00:25:51.000 You can apply that to Egypt.

00:25:52.000 You can apply that to many, many, many regimes that receive billions of dollars in American aid, in American defense contracts.

00:26:01.000 Major allies of the United States. 0.75

00:26:03.000 Why is there no condemnation of the corrupt dictatorship masquerading with a false guise of democracy with Saudi Arabia?

00:26:12.000 Why is there no condemnation of that with some of our other allies in the Middle East, the Emirates, Qatar, etc.?

00:26:19.000 You don't hear that because it's really not about democracy.

00:26:22.000 It's really not about liberalism.

00:26:24.000 It's not about any of that.

00:26:26.000 You think the Pentagon, you think the National Security Council really cares if the ballot box is legitimate in the deserts of Arabia?

00:26:34.000 Or the Middle East?

00:26:35.000 I don't think so.

00:26:37.000 Liberalism generally means that the United States can interfere.

00:26:40.000 Liberalism generally means that if you have a weak, fledgling democracy with not a lot of resources in a place like Afghanistan or throughout the Cold War in Latin America or Africa, it means that the CIA can stuff the ballots and steal elections and bring other countries into our sphere of influence.

00:26:58.000 But that's not in America's interest anymore.

00:27:00.000 What's in America's interest right now is not the democratizing, is not the liberalizing, is not the lecturing about the The grandiosity of our liberal system.

00:27:11.000 I thought, you know, President Trump established in the beginning of the speech that that was over.

00:27:15.000 Time to put our countries first with different systems.

00:27:18.000 He said that.

00:27:19.000 And, you know, look, Iran is a theocratic country.

00:27:23.000 Do we know of any, hmm, let's activate our almonds for a moment.

00:27:28.000 Do we know of any other theocratic countries in the Middle East?

00:27:32.000 Gee, I mean, if we could take a pretty, if we could take sort of a pretty superficial look at the Middle East, let's just take a short glance at some of these countries here and let's look at the systems.

00:27:43.000 Iraq, not a theocracy.

00:27:45.000 Syria, not a theocracy.

00:27:47.000 Actually, it's a strong secular government that protects Christians. 0.98

00:27:50.000 Somehow we're condemning them and sponsoring proxies against that government, but, you know, we'll keep going. 0.89

00:27:56.000 Jordan's a monarchy.

00:27:57.000 Don't think it's totally theocratic.

00:27:59.000 They protect Christians as well.

00:28:01.000 Saudi Arabia. 0.98

00:28:02.000 Oh, you know, that one's a theocracy. 0.94

00:28:05.000 That one is a brutal authoritarian theocracy that doesn't let women drive, that is going to execute somebody for doing the dab, for dancing.

00:28:13.000 So, you know, where's the condemnation of that?

00:28:16.000 Let's keep going.

00:28:16.000 Let's take another quick look.

00:28:19.000 Oh, how about.

00:28:20.000 How about the Jewish state?

00:28:20.000 Israel.

00:28:22.000 How about the country that was founded in 1948 as the Jewish state, that in their constitution establishes their government as a Jewish state? 0.90

00:28:33.000 So, authoritarian, theocratic countries, bad for Shia Iran, but it's okay for Wahhabist Saudi Arabia and Zionist Israel. 0.94

00:28:44.000 Those are totally fine. 0.58

00:28:45.000 In fact, President Trump is meeting with Netanyahu.

00:28:47.000 They're shaking hands.

00:28:48.000 What a great relationship.

00:28:50.000 We love each other.

00:28:51.000 Oh, it's so great.

00:28:52.000 Closest ally, everything like that.

00:28:55.000 And it's just that glaring hypocrisy of globalism, globalism, of neoconservatism that we are going to risk American lives, American treasure, American political capital overseas and around the world by lecturing these countries, by invading these countries, interfering with these countries' affairs at our expense.

00:29:17.000 And all the other countries that are doing the same, but they keep the oil money flowing, they keep certain other things flowing, like AIPAC.

00:29:25.000 Suddenly, that's not really a problem.

00:29:28.000 That's the issue there.

00:29:29.000 I mean, are we going to have an administration ever for the people, for this country, or are we always going to be led by a global empire?

00:29:38.000 I mean, that's what it comes down to empire versus nation state.

00:29:43.000 The problem with the current situation in the United States is in Washington, D.C., you have an occupied government, a government that is occupied by forces who want to see America controlling far more than just the affairs on our own borders.

00:29:57.000 You have an expansionist, hegemonic government.

00:30:01.000 In Washington, D.C., that wants to see America dominate the entire Western Hemisphere, wants us to dominate the Middle East and Northern Africa, wants us to dominate the Pacific, wants us to dominate Europe and East Europe, wants us to dominate Sub Saharan Africa.

00:30:16.000 And they want to do this not for the American people, but because, number one, it brings money, it brings power, it brings influence, and so on.

00:30:24.000 And they do all of these activities of trying to dominate the world at the expense of the people living within our actual borders.

00:30:31.000 Not the de facto borders, the de jure borders.

00:30:34.000 Not the de facto 51st state that contributes nothing but gets everything, but the actual 50 states admitted via a constitutional process.

00:30:42.000 And you see this in every empire throughout history, whether it's the Soviet Union.

00:30:47.000 Look at how much Russia suffered as a result of the Bolshevik regime, the globalist Bolshevik regime in Moscow that tried to project Russian power far beyond its borders, far beyond its industrial capacity.

00:31:03.000 You saw them building tanks and missiles and troops and armies and everything else at the expense of the well being of Russia's people.

00:31:11.000 We forget that sometimes.

00:31:13.000 That at the expense of the Russian people, the Moscow government sought to dominate Estonia and the Baltic states and the Balkan states and Sub Saharan Africa and all other countries in the world. 0.57

00:31:26.000 The same was true of the British Empire to an extent.

00:31:28.000 Jacob Viner from the University of Chicago did a study on this.

00:31:32.000 This is quoted by Milton Friedman.

00:31:33.000 But Jacob Viner did a study on this that said that actually.

00:31:37.000 Britain's colonial holdings in countries like India, for example, were a net drain on Britain's economy.

00:31:43.000 So you see that hostile, foreign, alien, rootless, cosmopolitan, internationalist, globalist governments in the capitals of strong, powerful nations sacrifice the citizens, the subjects within their own borders in pursuit of these hegemonic empire ambitions.

00:32:02.000 And it's really a travesty, I think, that President Trump is falling victim to that corrupting influence, falling victim to that corrupting establishment.

00:32:11.000 I don't know what we're doing.

00:32:12.000 You know, what are we doing?

00:32:13.000 What do we care?

00:32:14.000 What do we care if there's a ballot box in Iran so long as they're not actively hurting our interests at home?

00:32:19.000 Who cares?

00:32:21.000 You know, does anybody wake up on their way to work?

00:32:24.000 You know, they get in their car for their morning commute and everything's more expensive.

00:32:28.000 Gas is more expensive.

00:32:30.000 Coffee's more expensive.

00:32:31.000 Soda pops more expensive.

00:32:35.000 Car insurance is more expensive.

00:32:36.000 Bills are more expensive.

00:32:38.000 They drive to work. 0.99

00:32:39.000 Work sucks. 0.99

00:32:40.000 It's horrible. 1.00

00:32:41.000 Not fulfilling.

00:32:42.000 Not meaningful.

00:32:43.000 They go home. 0.99

00:32:44.000 Their kids are being taught by the television and the public school system, which is indoctrinating them to be promiscuous, degenerate, hedonistic, sexual animals. 0.92

00:32:53.000 Their wives resent them and they're looking for divorce because, of course, it's about the pleasure principle and not about sacrifice or nation. 0.94

00:33:00.000 You think these people really give a damn what kind of political system goes on in Persia, in the Gulf of Persia?

00:33:11.000 I don't think so.

00:33:12.000 I don't think so. 0.99

00:33:15.000 And what a foolish axiom to govern by. 0.64

00:33:19.000 That instead of abiding by the concerns and spending our resources to fix the concerns of the voters, you'd think that would be the incentive.

00:33:28.000 How about we improve the lives of the voters?

00:33:31.000 But we've been taught, we have basically been brainwashed.

00:33:34.000 It's sort of like Stockholm Syndrome, where we love our captors and we've been conditioned to believe that this is as good as it's going to get.

00:33:42.000 We have to lower our expectations.

00:33:44.000 Folks, you know, to expect that our government would serve us and not kill our children and not steal and pillage our resources to invade other countries at the behest of certain other countries, that's expecting too much.

00:33:56.000 It'll never happen.

00:33:58.000 Politics, same as usual, lesser of two evils.

00:34:00.000 We're just supposed to lower our expectations.

00:34:03.000 Instead of politicians rising to the occasion and representing the people that vote for them and fund their luxurious lifestyles, it's us who have to suffer and say, Mr. President, can we please have an economy that works?

00:34:18.000 Can we please have meaningful work?

00:34:20.000 Can we not have a media that promotes sexual degeneracy to our children?

00:34:24.000 And the president says, No, no, you can't.

00:34:28.000 And we go, Sorry for asking.

00:34:30.000 I hope the wall comes up soon.

00:34:32.000 Hope the wall comes up soon.

00:34:34.000 Hope the wall comes up soon, sir.

00:34:36.000 We have it all reversed.

00:34:39.000 And this country was established.

00:34:41.000 I used to do this talking point all day long when I was a basic conservative.

00:34:46.000 Well, there's all the difference in the world between a democracy and a republic.

00:34:50.000 And the reason we have democratic systems is because we've accepted that we're a liberal republic.

00:34:56.000 And in a republic, essentially the difference is that the people are sovereign.

00:35:01.000 In a monarchy, in an aristocracy, in a theocracy, sovereignty, that is the right to govern with authority within a geographic region, is given to the monarch or to the aristocrats or to God, if you're talking about the divine mandate of kings.

00:35:19.000 In a republic, the sovereignty of the nation is vested in its people.

00:35:23.000 And that's why we have enshrined in our history, I don't know if it's constitutional, but we have a right to overthrow the government.

00:35:30.000 Because the government is not sovereign.

00:35:32.000 The people are sovereign.

00:35:33.000 And we delegate rights and responsibilities to the government to operate within our borders, to do things collectively that we individually cannot.

00:35:41.000 And that's why in a liberal republic, we have a democracy to execute the will of the sovereign people in a way that is efficient, in a way that is pragmatic, and makes sense.

00:35:51.000 Well, you know, what difference would it make if we were under a monarchy?

00:35:55.000 At least in a monarchy, the difference is that though sovereignty is vested in a monarch, the monarch.

00:36:03.000 Has the responsibility to look after his subjects.

00:36:06.000 He'd almost prefer to live there because in this republic, when people basically concede their sovereignty to an autocratic, technocratic, occupied government, these are the three important qualifying factors, it negates the responsibility of that government to its people and it concedes the sovereign power that we have. 0.55

00:36:25.000 So it's almost preferable in many ways to live in Russia. 0.55

00:36:28.000 That's why all these people who criticize Vladimir Putin, you know, at least Putin executes the will of the people.

00:36:35.000 Putin is not beholden to oligarchs.

00:36:38.000 Putin is not beholden to aristocrats.

00:36:41.000 He's not beholden to a certain small elite.

00:36:44.000 He's not beholden to anybody except for himself.

00:36:48.000 And what that allows him to do is bring glory to his people and bring victories for his people.

00:36:55.000 So when he's paving the way for a pro Russian Ukraine, when he's paving the way for a pro Russian Belarus or Estonia or Crimea or everything else, he is protecting.

00:37:07.000 The interests of ethnic Russians in these countries and in his own borders. 0.80

00:37:11.000 That's almost preferable. 1.00

00:37:13.000 Maybe you have less freedom of the press, but do we have freedom of the press here, folks?

00:37:18.000 You tell me, you write up a little article criticizing Israel.

00:37:22.000 You write up a little bit of an article criticizing, I don't know, certain historical revisionism.

00:37:27.000 Is that going to get published?

00:37:28.000 Is that going to get you anywhere?

00:37:29.000 Are you going to get on Fox News talking about what we were talking about earlier that segregation of the nations might be a proposal worth looking at in the 21st century and the advent of the clash of civilizations?

00:37:41.000 Not going to get you very far.

00:37:42.000 That's not really a freedom of the press.

00:37:45.000 So you'd almost prefer that in Russia, you'd almost prefer the system they have in Russia or Iran or other countries where, and I'm not talking about the Soviet Union.

00:37:54.000 I said the Soviet Union was different.

00:37:56.000 That's because the Soviet Union was an empire.

00:37:58.000 Russia is a nation state.

00:37:59.000 So it's almost preferable to live in a, what appears to be in all superficial ways, a less democratic country, but a much more representative country, a much more, I don't know, nationalist country that looks after its own people. 0.65

00:38:13.000 I think that's almost preferable in certain circumstances.

00:38:16.000 And it really gets to the heart of the matter that a speech like this really, really lets you know the what for, really lets you know who's in charge over there.

00:38:25.000 And you see some of these other excerpts.

00:38:27.000 There were some other good moments from the speech.

00:38:29.000 Generally, I think it wasn't his best.

00:38:32.000 He was out of his element.

00:38:33.000 You know that President Trump is, when he does his best, when he's at his most Trump, when he's at his most controversial and his most high energy, it's when he's giving a speech for the people, which are his people.

00:38:46.000 And he said in interviews before, That he gets along better with the taxi drivers and the workers better than he does with the other rich people.

00:38:52.000 That's when he's his fullest.

00:38:54.000 That's when he's at the top of his game, is when he's at the rallies and he can do the theatrics and be funny and make jokes and be loose and candid and people love him and he loves them.

00:39:04.000 And so that he was.

00:39:06.000 And additionally, he was in the United Nations.

00:39:08.000 When you give a speech before the United Nations, there is a lot of protocol, there's a lot of procedure, there's decorum to abide by.

00:39:16.000 There are many other complicating factors where you have to read the script and you can't call out individual delegates in the General Assembly and so on and so on.

00:39:26.000 He was really out of his element.

00:39:27.000 So I think that contributed.

00:39:29.000 To it as well.

00:39:30.000 Because you saw even in Poland, he was better off because he was giving a speech for the Polish people.

00:39:35.000 You tend to see that when he gives speeches before the heads of states, before politicians and globalists and internationalists, like he did in Saudi Arabia when he went on his first foreign trip, or when he went to Italy to talk before the European Union or NATO, I think, and finally in the General Assembly, where he's out of his element, the delivery is not great, the speech is not great, and kind of a disappointment.

00:40:01.000 And beyond even the Iran stuff, he threatened Venezuela.

00:40:04.000 He threatened, like, we're going to invade Venezuela.

00:40:06.000 Why?

00:40:07.000 Who cares?

00:40:08.000 Who cares? 0.99

00:40:09.000 It's Venezuela.

00:40:10.000 Humanitarian concerns?

00:40:12.000 Sorry, but be a missionary. 1.00

00:40:15.000 You know, for all these Will Nardis out there, and I use him so often because I think he's symptomatic of a lot of fallacious reasoning on the right and on the left and in the center as well. 0.67

00:40:25.000 Will Nardi told me that we have to be Christian. 0.97

00:40:29.000 It is our Christian, charitable obligation to help illegal immigrants.

00:40:33.000 Okay. 0.84

00:40:34.000 People have Christian charitable obligations.

00:40:37.000 You and I do.

00:40:38.000 So if you feel bad for illegal immigrants, go to Mexico and be a missionary.

00:40:43.000 Go to Mexico and open up a church where you can funnel contributions to local poor communities.

00:40:49.000 Go to Mexico and become a magnate and make Mexico rich.

00:40:52.000 That's how you charitably help these people.

00:40:54.000 That's how you be a Christian. 0.61

00:40:55.000 You're not a Christian by advocating for the government and other people in your country to shoulder the burden of a humanitarian crisis. 0.58

00:41:03.000 There's nothing Christian about that. 0.87

00:41:06.000 You know, it's like if you're in your house, right? 0.94

00:41:10.000 Or no, it's like if you are, I see, I come up with these analogies on the fly.

00:41:15.000 Sometimes they're not always so quick.

00:41:16.000 It's like if you're walking down the street and you see a cat in a tree, and instead of helping it, you go home and you call the fire department and get someone to get the cat out of the tree.

00:41:25.000 Well, you know, that's really not a moral or a charitable thing to do.

00:41:28.000 You know, you're really not.

00:41:29.000 Did you really help that cat or did you alert someone who had helped the cat?

00:41:33.000 I mean, that's not.

00:41:34.000 You didn't do that.

00:41:35.000 That is not.

00:41:36.000 That is not fulfilling your obligation by voting for the government to import people or spend lives and money to help other people.

00:41:44.000 You know, if Will Nardi or these conservatives or these career conservatives, if they feel so bad about the refugee situation that will result from the collapse of the Venezuelan government, go to Venezuela.

00:41:55.000 I got a tip for you. 0.99

00:41:57.000 Pack a backpack, pack granola bars, pack a sleeping bag, pack one of those stupid backpack water bottles, and fly to Venezuela. 1.00

00:42:07.000 Bring a little care package. 1.00

00:42:08.000 Bring, I don't know, your dog.

00:42:10.000 Bring 500.

00:42:12.000 I don't know what the currency is there.

00:42:14.000 I think it's like Bolivarians or something.

00:42:16.000 I don't know, named after the revolution.

00:42:18.000 But go down there and you help those people.

00:42:20.000 You go down there, you treat these people for their wounds, and you set them up with homes and whatever.

00:42:27.000 But don't expect me, because you voted, that now I have to contribute a percentage of my income to help people I never met who don't know me, and on and on.

00:42:37.000 I mean, that's the corruption, I think, of these sorts of schemes. 0.94

00:42:41.000 Beyond Venezuela, beyond Iran, he did say some good things about refugees and migration.

00:42:47.000 This was pretty groundbreaking.

00:42:49.000 He said, We have learned that over the long term, uncontrolled migration is deeply unfair to both the sending and the receiving countries.

00:42:57.000 For the sending countries, it reduces domestic pressure to pursue needed political and economic reform and drains them of the necessary human capital to motivate and implement those reforms.

00:43:07.000 And for the receiving countries, the substantial costs of uncontrolled migration are borne overwhelmingly by low income citizens whose concerns are often ignored by both media and government.

00:43:17.000 That's pretty groundbreaking stuff because for so long, On the world stage, at least from Barack Obama, Justin Trudeau, Merkel, Cameron, and who was the French president, Holland?

00:43:29.000 You heard that migration is a positive good.

00:43:32.000 Not only is it a moral good, not only is it an economic good, it's a positive good in all aspects.

00:43:37.000 We need more migrants, we need more immigrants, we need to be more welcoming of them and everything else.

00:43:44.000 So far as I can recall, President Trump is the first world leader, at least in the West, Western Europe and America, Canada and Australia, to say that immigration is not good.

00:43:55.000 Uncontrolled migration harms everybody involved, not just us, not just the people that have to pay for these people, but the countries that these people are fleeing. 0.99

00:44:03.000 And it's true. 0.99

00:44:04.000 And we talk about this a lot on the show that if you care about immigrants, if you care about people in foreign countries, what good are you doing foreign people that are suffering by slicing out the top three or 1% of their country every year in migration? 1.00

00:44:20.000 Because that's the people that are coming to the United States. 1.00

00:44:23.000 The most ambitious.

00:44:24.000 The smartest, the most pragmatic people with enough resources to do something.

00:44:30.000 Those are the people that are deciding to come to America so that they could be entrepreneurs or maybe they could just go on the dull or whatever. 0.59

00:44:37.000 But you're slicing that top 1% right out of the country, and as such, there's no progress in these countries.

00:44:43.000 You know, maybe if in Cuba all the freedom loving people stayed in Cuba to fight for the future of Cuba, you'd have a democratic government there.

00:44:51.000 But instead, all the ambitious people, all the people that want reform, all the people that want change, all the people that hate the system, They got on a boat and they came here.

00:45:01.000 So that's number one.

00:45:02.000 You have the brain drain.

00:45:03.000 And that's huge. 0.91

00:45:06.000 What do you think India stands to gain by sending their smartest, most educated people to come do work that anybody in America could do in Silicon Valley?

00:45:14.000 They should be in India.

00:45:16.000 They should be in India figuring out how they could get their country to work. 0.65

00:45:20.000 Same is true all over the world. 0.69

00:45:21.000 China understands this, by the way. 0.99

00:45:23.000 China, they have a program right now where they bring in Africans.

00:45:27.000 They bring in Africans from West and East and South Africa.

00:45:32.000 And they bring South Africa, the region, South and Central Africa, and they bring them into China.

00:45:37.000 They educate them.

00:45:38.000 They give them training for advanced machinery. 1.00

00:45:42.000 They give them training in their colleges that they don't have in Africa. 1.00

00:45:46.000 And then they send them back. 1.00

00:45:48.000 And guess what?

00:45:49.000 Everybody's better off as a result.

00:45:51.000 I mean, that is a policy that we can replicate in America.

00:45:55.000 Nobody's saying that no foreigners can come here. 0.99

00:45:58.000 We're saying people can't pick up all their crap. 1.00

00:46:02.000 From their country and drop it over here. 1.00

00:46:04.000 If Africans want to come here and go to school and contribute to the economy and everything else while they're here and then go back and rebuild their country, that's fine. 1.00

00:46:13.000 As long as they don't vote, as long as they don't have 10 kids, as long as they don't go on the dole and start absorbing resources that they didn't contribute into. 0.56

00:46:21.000 I mean, that's something that we can replicate here. 0.74

00:46:24.000 But I think the China example is really one that we should look at more often, where we have this idea that anybody who comes here has to become Johnny America. 0.91

00:46:36.000 And move into a suburb and all that.

00:46:38.000 China, what they do is they have Chinese people go to Africa, and the Chinese people that go there help them build up their businesses, help them build up their infrastructure, contribute to their economy. 0.54

00:46:49.000 And by the way, the Chinese people there are very frustrated because they go there and they say, You've squandered everything that Europe gave you.

00:46:57.000 Europe gave you railroads, they gave you electricity, they gave you power lines, and you basically just destroyed it and you didn't learn from it. 0.98

00:47:05.000 But that's the program that they have where the Chinese go to Africa. 0.99

00:47:05.000 Activates the almonds. 0.99

00:47:10.000 And they build up their stuff. 0.88

00:47:11.000 And as a result, these African countries drift closer to China in terms of influence. 0.81

00:47:16.000 Africans go to China, they get their education, their technical training, and then they go back to Africa. 0.97

00:47:23.000 And this is what commerce is supposed to look like. 0.98

00:47:26.000 This is what real trade, what real multiculturalism should look like this sharing, where you have separate countries, separate peoples, and they can go and help each other out, but then they go home.

00:47:40.000 And so that President Trump brought attention, I think, to that very important argument that what you're doing by taking in people is number one, you're harming us, which we all, I think, are pretty familiar with.

00:47:50.000 But number two, you're harming these countries where you take the best and brightest, you bring them here, you assimilate them here, and then everyone else is left in squalor.

00:47:59.000 So that's a big part of it.

00:48:00.000 And so that was definitely, I think, a strong point of the speech.

00:48:04.000 Beyond that, it was again, it was the neocon stuff. 0.98

00:48:07.000 Went after Iran in a totally hypocritical way, went after Syria in just kind of a foolish way. 0.88

00:48:13.000 The North Korea stuff, I think, is justified. 0.97

00:48:15.000 A lot of people on the alt right are upset about the North Korea. 0.96

00:48:19.000 North Korea presents a legitimate threat, I think, to the United States. 0.96

00:48:22.000 And again, people on the alt right that don't understand international relations, and I don't say that like you're an idiot, but you don't understand international relations if you believe that a hostile regime to the United States can be allowed to have a nuclear arsenal or a nuclear triad, especially when that regime is so unstable. 0.96

00:48:43.000 I mean, that's just something that is unacceptable. 0.98

00:48:46.000 Maybe you don't think they'll nuke us.

00:48:48.000 Maybe you think that the Kim regime is self preservationist and it's not in their interest to nuke anybody and they're rational actors. 0.52

00:48:57.000 Okay, I think that's a fair argument to make. 0.89

00:48:59.000 I would actually tend to agree with that.

00:49:01.000 I think the alarmist rhetoric about North Korea, but Iran more particularly, is just based on a misunderstanding of decision making in government, which is to say that Iran and North Korea may have bombastic rhetoric, but at the end of the day, the actors in government are rational and they want to live and they want their countries to do well.

00:49:21.000 But if you're looking at it again from an international relations perspective, it is just an unacceptable contingency that North Korea could strike the United States.

00:49:32.000 Never mind if it is your best bet and you're 99% sure that they wouldn't. 0.69

00:49:37.000 North Korea is a country that if oil didn't get in there for three months, the government would collapse.

00:49:41.000 They don't have oil reserves.

00:49:43.000 They don't have resources.

00:49:44.000 They don't have enough food.

00:49:45.000 I mean, this is a country that is probably the most fragile, for all the rhetoric, is probably the most fragile country.

00:49:53.000 And unstable countries in the world, and people are okay with giving them intercontinental ballistic missiles that can strike Chicago and New York and DC and LA and nuclear weapons, H bombs, A bombs, and I think they tested MIRVs the other week, which are far more devastating.

00:50:13.000 That was their test over Japan.

00:50:14.000 It was speculated they tested MIRVs, which is a missile that goes up and then separate projectiles drop and can bomb multiple cities with one missile. 0.67

00:50:23.000 So, maybe you don't think that's the end result, but we cannot allow that as a possibility that the Kim regime will last forever in all its stability as it exists right now.

00:50:34.000 And beyond the stability factor, beyond the contingency factor, you have the factor that the Kim regime is a known collaborator with Iran and Pakistan and other countries as well. 0.55

00:50:48.000 There's this network between North Korea, Pakistan, Iran, Libya, and some other rogue regimes.

00:50:55.000 Where they share nuclear technology, they share blueprints for nuclear infrastructure, missile technology, and so on.

00:51:01.000 I mean, this is proven. 0.95

00:51:02.000 If you can trace back where North Korea got these schematics for their nuclear centrifuges, it was AQ Khan of Pakistan.

00:51:10.000 So, this is not a neocon fantasy. 0.51

00:51:13.000 This is not a neocon phantom.

00:51:15.000 This is real.

00:51:16.000 I mean, this is a real thing that's happening. 0.92

00:51:18.000 And to pretend like we can have nuclear proliferation in the most unstable countries in the world and that's not going to affect us, it's very silly. 0.89

00:51:27.000 It's a very silly thing to say.

00:51:29.000 And, you know, look, Maybe we can negotiate a settlement where North Korea denuclearizes and we bring home our troops from the demilitarized zone on the Korean Peninsula.

00:51:39.000 Maybe we could work something out.

00:51:41.000 But that is something that is not in the cards right now.

00:51:44.000 That is not something that either of the regimes are talking about, that nobody believes could work or would be a potentiality in the near future.

00:51:52.000 So we have to get a little bit realistic about that one.

00:51:55.000 So the positives were the rhetoric about nationalism and sovereignty, the rhetoric about immigration.

00:52:02.000 The rhetoric about North Korea, which I think was fair, and I think a lot of people misread this situation, misread the gravity of the situation.

00:52:10.000 The alt right has this cartoonish mindset of international relations where it's like, we'll just get the troops out of the Korean Peninsula and then they won't bother us.

00:52:20.000 What do you think is going to happen?

00:52:22.000 We get our troops out, we get our missiles out, we get our navy out of there, and North Korea rolls over South Korea.

00:52:28.000 You want to know why?

00:52:29.000 Because South Korea and North Korea are still at war, and either one. Could destroy the other with the first strike.

00:52:37.000 So that's what happens.

00:52:38.000 And people, oh, well, who cares?

00:52:39.000 Well, number one, you have tremendous loss of life.

00:52:41.000 Number two, all of America's allies then begin to freelance. 0.52

00:52:45.000 If they say that America's backing out on its allies and countries are being invaded, Japan gets a nuclear arsenal.

00:52:52.000 Saudi Arabia develops a nuclear arsenal.

00:52:54.000 Turkey develops a nuclear arsenal.

00:52:57.000 That's not where we want to head. 0.68

00:52:59.000 That is not a direction we want to go in.

00:53:01.000 Because the more mutually assured destruction, Situations that you have, the higher the probability that one of them will fail.

00:53:10.000 You know, right now we have the West and the East, which is America, France, and the United Kingdom versus Russia and China. 0.74

00:53:18.000 And these are offsetting each other. 0.98

00:53:19.000 You have India and Pakistan.

00:53:21.000 You have Israel and the threat of an Iranian nuclear program.

00:53:25.000 Do we want a North and South Korea or a China and Japan in addition to a Ukraine and Russia, in addition to a Saudi Arabia and Israel and Iran and Turkey and Egypt and everything else?

00:53:37.000 Not a good idea.

00:53:38.000 Not a good idea.

00:53:40.000 So there's a lot more gravity to that situation that people let on.

00:53:44.000 Those are the positives. 0.58

00:53:46.000 The negatives, of course, are the Iran stuff, the Syria stuff, and just generally the whole tone of it, which I think reeked of a double standard of hypocrisy, of sort of this smashing together of a Stephen Miller ideology and a General Kelly ideology.

00:54:03.000 And he alluded to this a little bit, I think, a few months ago when he said he was a nationalist and a globalist.

00:54:09.000 Sort of this.

00:54:11.000 And this is a quote from.

00:54:13.000 The Fountainhead, where they're talking about architecture.

00:54:17.000 The great architect, I forget his name, but he's Ayn Rand's like number one guy.

00:54:22.000 He's not a real person.

00:54:24.000 What's his name?

00:54:25.000 It's Howard something, maybe?

00:54:27.000 I forget.

00:54:28.000 But he says, you know, I'm going to do it my way.

00:54:29.000 I'm going to build buildings my way and nothing else to it.

00:54:32.000 And so he does work for this company, and they say, well, we're changing your design a little bit.

00:54:38.000 It's a little bit of the old, a little bit of the new.

00:54:41.000 Nobody's upset.

00:54:42.000 Everybody's happy.

00:54:43.000 And that's essentially what we have going on here with the Trump administration, where it's we could be nationalist and globalist.

00:54:49.000 We could.

00:54:49.000 Feel sorry for DACA, and we can think uncontrolled migration is horrible.

00:54:53.000 You have to pick something.

00:54:54.000 You have to stand for something.

00:54:56.000 And it's a real issue that we have to be embarrassed like this in front of the General Assembly.

00:55:02.000 And you guys know me.

00:55:03.000 You guys know me on my show. 0.91

00:55:06.000 It's useless to do this because I explain myself every time, and you have the same autistic MAGA pedes who are like, You just hate our president. 0.97

00:55:14.000 You don't want our president to succeed. 0.94

00:55:16.000 You're a Debbie Downer like the progressive left. 0.99

00:55:19.000 So even when I explain myself and say I support the president, even when people don't, You still get that dumb nonsense. 0.98

00:55:27.000 But I will say that for a long time, I've been more white pilled than anybody about this administration. 0.85

00:55:32.000 But increasingly, as we move away from the inauguration, as we move into closing in on about a year of this administration in the next three or four months, we're not seeing a lot of results.

00:55:44.000 And I'm praying, I'm praying, and I have faith that there's a strategy here.

00:55:49.000 I have faith that there's a direction here.

00:55:52.000 It's looking like that's dubious right now.

00:55:55.000 And I think that's where faith comes in, where you say, We trusted this guy.

00:55:59.000 We saw this guy for two years.

00:56:01.000 We will give him a chance, as he does have four years to ask for our votes again.

00:56:05.000 So it's really not fair to make a judgment until the four years are up.

00:56:08.000 But as we're in progress, I have to say, I'm not really happy with what's going on.

00:56:14.000 Border stoppage is good, but the deportations are unimpressive.

00:56:17.000 The DACA stuff is unimpressive.

00:56:19.000 We couldn't stop Obamacare. 0.89

00:56:21.000 We couldn't get tax reform passed.

00:56:23.000 There's no funding for the wall.

00:56:25.000 We saw a strike in Syria, which, although it might have been to serve a North Korean thing, We still have this rhetoric with Iran and Venezuela, which is neocon and problematic.

00:56:35.000 So we're still rooting for him, but these things are unacceptable and they have to change.

00:56:41.000 And I have faith they will change in the next three years as we delve into this presidency, but I have to be honest about it.

00:56:47.000 I'm not thrilled.

00:56:49.000 So that's the GA speech.

00:56:51.000 Wow, we're already at an hour.

00:56:52.000 Holy smokes.

00:56:54.000 But there is a lot to cover.

00:56:55.000 So we'll start taking your questions.

00:56:57.000 Remember, you can send those in, post those on Twitter using the hashtag AmericaFQ.

00:57:03.000 I'm pulling them up right now, so we'll get to your questions.

00:57:07.000 And I'm going to take a little bit of water because my throat's getting all dry.

00:57:14.000 Okay.

00:57:16.000 So here we are, hashtag AmericaFQ on the questions.

00:57:23.000 And we have, let's see, Gerald J. How many kids do you plan on having, and how many do you recommend white parents have?

00:57:33.000 Well, I'm going to have as many as I can. 0.91

00:57:34.000 I mean, that's.

00:57:35.000 The answer.

00:57:35.000 I'm not looking at any set number.

00:57:37.000 I'm going to have as many as is fiscally possible to have children because we want big families.

00:57:43.000 I don't think there's any shortage of children.

00:57:46.000 I think another limiting factor will be how much I can be or my wife can be involved in raising the kids because if there's not the time, you're not doing anybody any favors by raising bad kids that are going to be in daycare all the time.

00:58:02.000 So I guess however many is possible is my answer. 0.92

00:58:05.000 And the same is true for white parents. 0.97

00:58:07.000 However many you can handle. 1.00

00:58:08.000 Fiscally and otherwise, that's how many you should have.

00:58:11.000 If that means one parent stays home and that parent is the mom, obviously, not the dad, then so be it.

00:58:17.000 If you can do that, if you can swing that financially, you know, it's got to happen.

00:58:22.000 Sean Hoy, Nick, the Nardi Nation is going all out against the Dylan division.

00:58:27.000 Is he our guy now? 1.00

00:58:28.000 No, his little banter with Cassie Dylan was so cringe and so like faggy. 1.00

00:58:34.000 He's like, I'm usually the one who white knights for you. 1.00

00:58:38.000 I mean, he literally said that to some guy.

00:58:42.000 And it's just embarrassing at this point, the kind of stuff he says to her and just this whole style.

00:58:47.000 Like, I've always prided myself, well, I don't know if I've prided myself on this, but it's always been axiomatic to me that you have self respect, that you have balls, that you have guts, that you're like, you're outrageous and you say what's on your mind and you're bombastic.

00:59:04.000 I mean, that's always been, I've always believed in that as a principle itself.

00:59:08.000 People ask me all the time, like, why are you like this?

00:59:11.000 Why are you not mellow?

00:59:12.000 I think it's kind of a sin to be a mellow, boring person.

00:59:16.000 A vanilla person.

00:59:19.000 So I don't understand why Will Nardi acts cocked all the time and he doesn't see anything wrong with that. 0.99

00:59:26.000 He's like, I'm just a cock. 0.99

00:59:27.000 I'm just a silly, sorry little guy and I'm humble and that's okay. 1.00

00:59:33.000 You're just a fool. 1.00

00:59:35.000 You're a fool. 1.00

00:59:36.000 And I say that because I like Will and it would be great if Will would become our guy. 1.00

00:59:40.000 But sheesh, cringe stuff.

00:59:44.000 Break asks, what do you think of the eugenics via gene editing and embryo selection that is projected to be?

00:59:51.000 Coming in the next 20 years or so, I think it's wrong. 0.88

00:59:55.000 I think it's an insult to God in many ways.

00:59:59.000 I don't like it.

01:00:00.000 I don't like it right off the bat.

01:00:01.000 The gene editing, the embryo stuff, tough to say.

01:00:05.000 I think there's a line.

01:00:06.000 I think there's a fine line between medical advances and we don't want people to have diseases and all of that to all this other crazy, wacky Icarus stuff.

01:00:18.000 It's no good.

01:00:20.000 Otto Vaughn.

01:00:21.000 The future is ethnic solidarity inside multiracial societies, a transcendent ethnostate, if you will.

01:00:28.000 Segregation equals discredited.

01:00:31.000 Again, I'm talking about a segregation of nations, not segregation within nations.

01:00:36.000 That's the difference.

01:00:37.000 Segregation between nations, meaning you don't have this spilling out of Mexico into America.

01:00:42.000 You don't have this spilling out of these Arab countries into Europe.

01:00:46.000 That's what I mean by that.

01:00:47.000 Not segregation with.

01:00:48.000 I think if it's preferable, you shouldn't need segregation in countries.

01:00:52.000 I think English.

01:00:53.000 England should be for the English and France for the French and so on.

01:00:57.000 So segregation between the nations, not within them.

01:01:01.000 The Forgotten Man.

01:01:03.000 Hey, Nick, do you think the endless wars will end under Trump or is war with Iran around the corner?

01:01:09.000 God, I hope not.

01:01:10.000 But, you know, it's not looking great.

01:01:12.000 I don't think there'd be a war with Iran under this administration.

01:01:15.000 I don't think there would be.

01:01:17.000 But certainly we can never take our foot off the gas with telling him not to because if that happened, I mean, it's the end.

01:01:25.000 I mean, You've fulfilled the entire Yunnan plan, which was established in the 1980s.

01:01:31.000 And you can look at interviews before where generals, people in government, have said that this was the plan from day one, where we go into the Middle East and we just knock out all these governments.

01:01:40.000 And for whom, really? 0.58

01:01:42.000 I mean, who stands to gain from the fact that after we won the Cold War and we had nothing to do, we decided one very special day to go in and just start smashing countries in the Middle East that we had nothing to do with. 0.79

01:01:57.000 That we never really had anything to do with. 0.57

01:01:59.000 I mean, we did during the Cold War, but not in an in depth way.

01:02:04.000 I mean, who stands to gain from that?

01:02:06.000 Definitely not us.

01:02:08.000 So I hope it doesn't happen.

01:02:09.000 I don't think it'll happen, but we can never get complacent about that because that paves the way for a pretty great project. 0.87

01:02:18.000 If we destroy Iraq, Syria, Iran, Libya, Egypt, Yemen, Lebanon, and Palestine ultimately, it's going to pave the way for a pretty great plan, like a plan that's greater than the one going on, a greater agenda in the Middle East. 0.57

01:02:36.000 And things are happening there.

01:02:40.000 Catholic nationalist, what is your ideal form of government?

01:02:43.000 That's number one.

01:02:45.000 Two, I hate to blackpill, but what are we supposed to do once Texas goes blue in 2024, 2028?

01:02:50.000 Well, to answer question number one, ideal form of government varies from country to country, of course.

01:02:57.000 I think the idea that every country necessarily needs to be democratic or liberal or anything like that is absurd.

01:03:06.000 And even liberals understood this.

01:03:08.000 Jean Jacques Rousseau.

01:03:10.000 One of the most liberal philosophers that came out of the French Revolution, even he said that not all countries are necessarily supposed to be democracies.

01:03:20.000 Some will have to be monarchies or aristocracies.

01:03:23.000 It varies based on size, it varies based on culture, it varies based on people.

01:03:27.000 So I would say that it's not a one size fits all.

01:03:30.000 My ideal form of government for this country is the one that was established in 1788 with the passage of the Constitution or the ratification of the Constitution, which is a federal system.

01:03:42.000 Which has separation of powers.

01:03:44.000 We don't have that anymore.

01:03:46.000 The great compromise which established our bicameral Congress was that you would have one chamber for the people, the House of Representatives, directly elected, and one chamber for the states, which was two representatives for every state determined by state legislatures.

01:04:01.000 That's how this government was supposed to function.

01:04:03.000 And the Supreme Court, I think, things have gone off the rail there, and the same is true with the executive.

01:04:09.000 So if we got back to what was intended by the Constitution, I think we'd be okay. 0.61

01:04:13.000 And people are going to call me like a constitution fag or whatever, but I think that that's the ideal form of government for America.

01:04:20.000 And once you get an independent intelligentsia, an independent media, and we know what that means liberation from the globalists in those sectors, I think it could work.

01:04:31.000 I think it can work.

01:04:32.000 But we have to get the Federal Reserve out.

01:04:35.000 We have to get these federal departments out.

01:04:37.000 We have to get states, the 17th Amendment out.

01:04:40.000 We have to get the 16th Amendment out.

01:04:42.000 We have to get, oh, I don't know, another amendment out.

01:04:44.000 That has people voting based on emotions and not based on facts.

01:04:48.000 And some other things need to be taken care of.

01:04:50.000 Birthright citizenship needs to go.

01:04:52.000 And certain 14th Amendment things need to be revised.

01:04:56.000 But yeah, if we could get all that done, if we could revert, if I had my ideal government, it'd be 1788.

01:05:02.000 It'd be what the founders intended.

01:05:04.000 Because I think it was to an extent monarchical.

01:05:07.000 It was to an extent monarchical.

01:05:09.000 It was to an extent aristocratic.

01:05:11.000 It was also to an extent democratic.

01:05:13.000 I think you had the best of all worlds there for a liberal free government.

01:05:17.000 Educated, intelligent people.

01:05:19.000 And if we get back to all those things, it could work.

01:05:22.000 Two, I hate the black pill, but what are we supposed to do once Texas goes blue in 2024? 0.94

01:05:27.000 Well, nothing is written.

01:05:29.000 Texas hasn't gone blue yet.

01:05:30.000 That's still preventable.

01:05:32.000 It's going to require mass deportations. 0.98

01:05:34.000 It's going to require a change in the birth rate.

01:05:37.000 It's going to require a lot of changes.

01:05:38.000 So I would say that nothing is written there.

01:05:41.000 But once that happens, I mean, it's going to be very difficult.

01:05:46.000 It's going to be very, very difficult.

01:05:49.000 And, you know, I believe, correct me if I'm wrong, but, uh, How many electoral votes does Texas have?

01:05:54.000 I'm going to look it up.

01:05:54.000 Because Trump won by a margin of 36.

01:05:57.000 So let's see.

01:06:00.000 Because if we were to have an electoral shift after this, let's see.

01:06:07.000 Okay, yeah, so it's 36.

01:06:09.000 Okay, so it's exactly 36.

01:06:12.000 Or no, that's electors for the primary.

01:06:16.000 Oh, no, okay, yeah, they have 36.

01:06:19.000 So, yeah, it's exactly 36.

01:06:22.000 So it would be tenable, I think.

01:06:25.000 This would be like a really last-ditch strategy, but Texas, it wouldn't be the end of the world if Texas lost, if and only if we could consolidate control of Iowa.

01:06:38.000 North Carolina, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, and Virginia.

01:06:43.000 And we are on track to do that, I think.

01:06:45.000 And that's a lot of states.

01:06:47.000 I'm not sneezing at this.

01:06:48.000 I'm not saying, well, if we could just capture eight states forever.

01:06:52.000 But if we can secure and institutionalize this electoral shift where you have the Midwest, the Rust Belt, parts of the Northeast, parts of the Mid Atlantic that go red consistently and reliably, we could lose the Southwest.

01:07:06.000 And I'm not saying we want to lose that.

01:07:08.000 I'm not saying that's a good thing.

01:07:10.000 Like, obviously, If that happens, it will be very impossible almost for us electorally.

01:07:17.000 But that is a way for us to buy time while we change the social currents. 0.95

01:07:21.000 Because what's needed to change the country is for the native population to have more kids and the foreign born population to decrease, either through less immigration, deportations, or having less children. 0.96

01:07:34.000 So until we can change the incentive structure to have these social things change, which is we can have maternity leave, paid maternity leave for. 0.96

01:07:43.000 We can have tax reform that incentivizes home ownership and everything else. 1.00

01:07:43.000 The middle class. 1.00

01:07:47.000 We could have a plan. 0.98

01:07:48.000 We could even have some kind of a social program where either it's a tax credit or it's something where our young people can get an education, get a house, start a family, and we can discourage foreign born population growth by cutting immigration, deporting, and getting rid of welfare and other things like that, cutting off the path to citizenship. 0.97

01:08:09.000 While we fix that in the meantime, while we work towards that, a way to avert total catastrophe would be. 0.89

01:08:15.000 That electoral shift, which is changing from the southeast and, or the southwest rather, and I foresee Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, Nevada, Colorado, possibly Florida and Georgia going blue forever, and then Texas, of course.

01:08:32.000 So, in order to offset that, we would need maybe Washington, New Hampshire, Maine, or at least their one electoral vote, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Iowa, North Carolina, Virginia, Minnesota.

01:08:43.000 I mean, that's what it would take.

01:08:45.000 So, that's my answer.

01:08:46.000 It's going to be hell.

01:08:46.000 It's got to be.

01:08:47.000 It's going to be really tough.

01:08:48.000 Or Oregon as well.

01:08:49.000 Good work. 0.85

01:08:50.000 Because west or east, rather, of Seattle and Portland, I mean, these are like western United States countries that are reliably, solidly red. 0.75

01:08:59.000 So if we could up those birth rates, up the turnout in those states, we could be okay.

01:09:06.000 What else?

01:09:06.000 Looking like 14 questions.

01:09:10.000 We're going to have to cut it off short today, folks.

01:09:12.000 We're already at 810.

01:09:14.000 What more can you expect from a man? 0.98

01:09:19.000 We have Huang Zhen N who asks If he filled out the paperwork, he'd be an American. 0.93

01:09:26.000 He could be an Italian or a French, right?

01:09:28.000 Huang Zhen N asks Hey, Nick Fuentes, love the show.

01:09:31.000 Do you have any opinionslash analysis of neo reactionaries and their ideas?

01:09:35.000 I actually have read a lot of the neo reactionaries.

01:09:39.000 What's the guy's name?

01:09:40.000 It's like Moldbug or something.

01:09:42.000 I think the LARPing is a little bit silly, but I think it tends to make a lot of sense to me.

01:09:48.000 I think a lot of that makes a lot of sense.

01:09:50.000 Their talk of the Cathedral and all of that, and a cynicism and skepticism of rationality, of the Enlightenment, of liberalism.

01:10:00.000 They call it the Dark Enlightenment.

01:10:01.000 I think there's a lot to that.

01:10:03.000 And so I am, I think in many ways I would describe myself as a neo reactionary.

01:10:09.000 Otto von, amazing how the government can extract hundreds of billions of taxpayer cash for wars instead of enhancing our country.

01:10:16.000 Yeah, isn't that something?

01:10:17.000 And nobody cares, right? 0.87

01:10:19.000 The conservative Inc. people say, universal health care, you don't have a right to my money. 0.97

01:10:24.000 Pay for your health care with your own money.

01:10:26.000 But, you know, we're paying for neocon wars with our money, right?

01:10:30.000 We're paying for Israel's wars with our money.

01:10:34.000 We got to pay for your wars. 0.81

01:10:35.000 We got to pay for wars in Iran and wars in Iraq and wars in Afghanistan and wars in every other country.

01:10:41.000 And that's fine.

01:10:42.000 We can spend trillions on those wars.

01:10:44.000 But God forbid we were to have a social safety net that made sense.

01:10:48.000 Yeah.

01:10:50.000 If you're opposed to deficit spending, you're opposed to deficit spending.

01:10:53.000 It doesn't matter what it's for.

01:10:56.000 Maverick, saw that you were contacting UW students.

01:10:59.000 I could set you up with some college Republicans and offer a place to stay in Madison.

01:11:03.000 Yeah, about that.

01:11:04.000 I.

01:11:05.000 I have no intention to go to UW Madison, but when I was at Leadership Institute, these Jags, when I was at Leadership Institute, right before, it was like they had this week long training for a job to be a field representative, and they announced who got the job on Friday.

01:11:25.000 On Thursday night, they had everybody message 20 random people on Facebook saying, Hey, do you want to start up an organization on a college campus?

01:11:36.000 And, uh, And so I texted the people in there because I was like, you know, realistically, am I going to get the job?

01:11:41.000 Because if I'm not going to get the job, don't make me contact 20 people.

01:11:46.000 Like, I am going places.

01:11:49.000 I have a show.

01:11:50.000 Like, I have a little bit of notoriety. 0.95

01:11:52.000 It would be very humiliating and embarrassing for me to reach out to 20 people with some ridiculous offer.

01:11:59.000 If I'm not going to be a representative, if I'm not going to be in the state, I will have to say, sorry, I don't know what to tell you.

01:12:05.000 And they all told me, No, you should do it.

01:12:08.000 You should do it.

01:12:09.000 You should definitely do it.

01:12:10.000 They wouldn't tell me if I got the job or not, but they said you should definitely reach out to these people anyway, you know, because it's good practice.

01:12:17.000 So at like 2 a.m., I'm sending random messages to random people about starting conservative organizations.

01:12:24.000 And then the next day they bring me in and they say, we don't think you're field rep material, so you don't get the job. 0.98

01:12:29.000 So I'm like, okay, really jerk? 1.00

01:12:31.000 You know, really scumbag? 1.00

01:12:33.000 These people are scum. 1.00

01:12:35.000 These people are the worst scum. 1.00

01:12:37.000 In the country right now, because they are hypocrites, they are liars, they're disingenuous, and maybe it sounds like I am a bitter rejected applicant, but I mean, think of it that you have an institution, an organization which is supposed to promote conservatism, which is supposed to promote conserving traditional values, and they talk about being a meritocracy, they talk about freedom of speech, they talk about being a Big Ten organization, they talk about ethics, 1.00

01:13:06.000 they talk about Christianity and being moral, and then they Use and abuse applicants before they're discarded. 0.98

01:13:15.000 That's not very moral. 0.79

01:13:16.000 That's not very Christian in pursuit of what? 0.99

01:13:18.000 The destruction of our culture and our people. 0.99

01:13:20.000 And if you advocate for that, you're not allowed in their organization.

01:13:22.000 It's rife with nepotism.

01:13:25.000 We know Cabot Phillips, who's the head of Campus Reform.

01:13:28.000 Campus Reform is a subsidiary of Leadership Institute.

01:13:31.000 Cabot Phillips' father, Tim Phillips, who's the head of Americans for Prosperity, a literal shill organization for the Koch brothers.

01:13:40.000 He went to the Leadership Institute as a child and met his wife there under Morton Blackwell, the founder of that organization.

01:13:46.000 So you have the guy that's running their biggest media enterprise, Cabot Phillips.

01:13:53.000 His dad knew the founder intimately like 30 years ago.

01:13:56.000 I mean, that tells you everything you need to know.

01:13:59.000 It is an exclusive Beltway club.

01:13:59.000 It's a club.

01:14:01.000 And if you're not in it, you're not in it.

01:14:03.000 And that's not how it's supposed to go, folks.

01:14:06.000 That's not traditional.

01:14:07.000 That's not hierarchical.

01:14:08.000 That's bad stuff.

01:14:10.000 So, no interest in UW Madison.

01:14:13.000 If there are 15 lucky people left who have not opened their messages for me asking if they like to organize for conservative principals on campus, if you see that, I'm going to delete the message and ignore you.

01:14:25.000 But yeah, pretty rotten stuff. 0.54

01:14:27.000 Pretty rotten people.

01:14:28.000 And you know what? 0.93

01:14:29.000 Fine.

01:14:30.000 They have a lot of winners in Leadership Institute.

01:14:32.000 Let's put it that way. 0.77

01:14:33.000 They have Emily Faulkner, butt tattoo extraordinaire. 0.89

01:14:36.000 They got some other, they have all kinds of degenerates and hedonists and people that get drunk and people that get high and people that are for hedonism and sexual degeneracy and everything else.

01:14:48.000 So, you know, you can keep them.

01:14:50.000 All right.

01:14:50.000 You can keep the field rep job.

01:14:53.000 Maverick.

01:14:54.000 And he's telling me more about UW Madison.

01:14:57.000 Not interested.

01:14:58.000 Sorry.

01:14:58.000 Sorry, my friend.

01:15:00.000 Theo.

01:15:01.000 How long until Stephen Miller gets the axe?

01:15:04.000 I don't think it'll happen, to be honest.

01:15:06.000 I think he's, and if it did happen, I don't think it would be for a while.

01:15:11.000 I think Trump understands that if he cuts Stephen Miller, he would lose his base.

01:15:16.000 Rob, Nick, who is the best and worst president in your opinion?

01:15:20.000 Hmm, best and worst.

01:15:22.000 Hmm.

01:15:24.000 I would have to say the best would be Andrew Jackson.

01:15:29.000 Best would be Andrew Jackson because, you know, obviously he gave us the West, he gave us manifest destiny. 0.97

01:15:36.000 Defeated the Native Americans brilliantly, stopped the National Bank.

01:15:39.000 So I think Jefferson, did I say Jefferson? 0.86

01:15:42.000 Jackson.

01:15:43.000 Jackson's definitely up there.

01:15:45.000 And then the worst, I would say, would be Wilson, because he had the income tax, he had World War I, which was done in exchange for the Balfour Declaration and the Federal Reserve.

01:15:54.000 And the 17th Amendment, I believe, was also under Wilson.

01:15:57.000 So all bad, nefarious stuff.

01:16:00.000 So I'd say number one Jackson, last is Wilson.

01:16:03.000 And Wilson was one of these intellectuals.

01:16:05.000 He was.

01:16:06.000 He was one of these college professors.

01:16:08.000 That's when you saw the advent.

01:16:09.000 You want to talk dark enlightenment, neo reactionary?

01:16:12.000 Wilson was straight out of the cathedral.

01:16:13.000 I mean, that was the concerns of the neo reactionaries personified. 1.00

01:16:19.000 So those are the best and worst. 0.99

01:16:22.000 Trad Americana discussed the Vox lawsuit toward Gab.

01:16:26.000 No.

01:16:27.000 No, I'm not.

01:16:28.000 Don't order me around to discuss this, discuss that.

01:16:32.000 And you told me, like, and this guy, you DM me.

01:16:36.000 I think Vox needs a little pushback.

01:16:38.000 Are you requesting that I push back?

01:16:40.000 I mean, come on.

01:16:41.000 I really resent when people DM me and they order me around like retweet this, push this, promote this.

01:16:46.000 I really, you know, the odds of me retweeting something go down by 150% if you DM me and ask me to do it.

01:16:53.000 It's one thing if you ask me like humbly, another thing if you're like, hey, retweet this.

01:16:57.000 You know, I'm not a dog.

01:16:59.000 But if we're going to talk about the Vox Day thing, I would say it's a mistake.

01:17:04.000 I mean, we want people to get involved with the alt cyber, we want people to get involved with the alt tech movement.

01:17:11.000 And The minute that anybody is not ideologically pure enough or they're not doing it exactly like a bunch of anonymous users on Twitter who contribute nothing, then they're out.

01:17:22.000 I think that's a big mistake.

01:17:24.000 Because, you know, people who, if we're going to have a movement, we need people who do this full time.

01:17:29.000 If we're going to have any pragmatic results from this movement, we need people that are doing this and they're doing tech full time or they're doing commentary full time or they're doing something full time.

01:17:42.000 A full time job to this sort of thing, or the time of a full time job to this sort of a thing.

01:17:46.000 And anytime, and we have to make a living off of this, by the way.

01:17:49.000 If we're going to fight for this revolution and everything, we need to make a living.

01:17:53.000 So it doesn't help when every time we need to disassociate ourselves from the most extreme elements or we need to make a little bit of money to support ourselves or our lives and we get called out as shills or like our allegiances are in question or we're in it for shekels.

01:18:11.000 I mean, it's really insulting.

01:18:14.000 And that's how you get a movement going nowhere.

01:18:16.000 I mean, I saw someone who responded to me the other day where I tweeted out that the Georgia tech riots.

01:18:24.000 And the Black Lives Matter riots that have been going on for four consecutive nights now were far worse than Charlottesville, and the president has said nothing.

01:18:33.000 He condemned white nationalists and the alt right and the fringe right.

01:18:37.000 For Charlottesville, he doesn't condemn Black Lives Matter for St. Louis.

01:18:41.000 And somebody responds to me, Nick, this is a terrible take.

01:18:44.000 Has someone hacked your account?

01:18:46.000 And I said, around here, we let the likes do the talking.

01:18:48.000 So it was like 450 likes, which was a lighthearted way of saying, obviously, it wasn't a bad take.

01:18:54.000 A lot of people liked it.

01:18:55.000 And he responded, Oh, don't let me get in the way of your E fame.

01:18:59.000 Don't let me get in the way of your E celebrity and follows and clicks.

01:19:02.000 Immediately blocked.

01:19:04.000 Immediately blocked.

01:19:05.000 I have no patience for that.

01:19:06.000 I have no time for that.

01:19:07.000 I don't deserve that.

01:19:09.000 I have given up a lot.

01:19:10.000 I have sacrificed a lot to be in this movement, to say these things.

01:19:15.000 And ultimately, I'll end up sacrificing my life for this movement.

01:19:18.000 I'm a smart guy.

01:19:19.000 I'm a smart guy.

01:19:20.000 I'm a talented guy.

01:19:21.000 I could be right now having a very normal college experience, having a fun time.

01:19:26.000 I could be having the time of my life.

01:19:29.000 And then I could graduate from college and I could make a ton of money.

01:19:32.000 If I were to cuck and actually shill for the people that you think or people accuse me of doing so, I could be with the Milo Yiannopoulos thing.

01:19:42.000 I could be at Milo's Free Speech Week like Ariana Collins making money and getting all kinds of shekels from major donors and having a lot of influence and having a lot more fame.

01:19:52.000 Or I could just be a regular person and make money in finance as people do, as smart people do.

01:19:57.000 But I'm not doing that.

01:19:58.000 I'm here doing this show.

01:20:00.000 So, when people question my allegiance or question my motivations, and when people do that to people like Torba, who set up Gab, I think it's really insulting and it makes me angry.

01:20:11.000 Those are one of the few things that really rile me up and offend me to a personal level are when anonymous people with no Twitter profile picture, without their real name, without any skin in the game, without any stake in the game, are going to come after us and criticize us for trying to monetize us to make a living or trying to save our institution, our organization, or our livelihood.

01:20:35.000 Because it's like, you know, people ask me all the time, why don't you talk about certain questions?

01:20:39.000 Why don't you talk about certain things?

01:20:41.000 And, you know, nine times out of 10, actually, 10 times out of 10, this is a person who has no clout, who does not have their name online, who does not have their picture online.

01:20:50.000 And you ask them, well, why don't you do that?

01:20:51.000 Why don't you do that with your real name?

01:20:53.000 Well, I'd lose my job.

01:20:54.000 So there it is, right?

01:20:54.000 Okay.

01:20:56.000 But anywho, that's my thought on Vox Day I think Vox Day suing Gab, I think it's the wrong move.

01:21:03.000 And it also doesn't make any sense because. 0.63

01:21:06.000 Vox went after Andrew Anglin for trying to destroy the Gab platform because he said Gab was never a place for free speech and free speech is ridiculous.

01:21:15.000 And now he's suing Gab.

01:21:17.000 I don't understand what's going on.

01:21:18.000 And, you know, Vox is smart on a lot of things, but, I mean, kind of weird on this thing, kind of a weird thing going on where he was one way last week, he's one way this week.

01:21:29.000 And by the way, it does nothing for us.

01:21:31.000 You know, Vox is going to sue Gab.

01:21:33.000 Meanwhile, he's doing his Dark University, which is, again, a for profit thing for himself.

01:21:40.000 And, you know, that's fine.

01:21:41.000 Again, you want to make money to do education, but do your thing and do it over there.

01:21:46.000 Don't try and destroy Gab.

01:21:48.000 You know, if it's really so bad, if it's really against all the principles, people won't use it, you know.

01:21:53.000 But you're not creating the right incentives when every time anybody steps up and does something and they might have to conform a little bit to the system we're living in, they get torn down and called a shill and they get derided on 4chan and whatever.

01:22:07.000 Like I saw during the content Emmys, how critical people were of TV Ameriqua and people in the Discord.

01:22:14.000 I will tell you, people in Discord were getting legitimately angry at the people that were watching, myself included, because a lot of people that were watching.

01:22:22.000 That we're watching Ameriqua put on this show that he put together, that he put invested all kinds of time, all kinds of resources into making funny clips, really good content, putting this whole thing together, promoting it, making all the pictures, making videos, cutting interviews, doing editing, making music, putting this group together, the Discord, the whole presentation.

01:22:44.000 And you have people that show up who contribute nothing and they sit there with their arms folded and say, that's not good enough.

01:22:49.000 And I really just resent that about the country today that you have so many critics.

01:22:54.000 It's sort of like a culture of critique.

01:22:56.000 In the country where you have all these critics and nobody's doing anything.

01:23:01.000 So that's my take on Vox.

01:23:09.000 And what do we have next?

01:23:10.000 Lynch.

01:23:12.000 Lynch from Twitter here.

01:23:12.000 Hey, Nick.

01:23:14.000 Did you address the idea I put in your DMs?

01:23:16.000 If not, voice it now, brother.

01:23:18.000 Okay, again, with this kind of like, I don't like the.

01:23:23.000 Talk about the thing we talked about.

01:23:24.000 You know, ask a question or post in the live chat or post a link I can share.

01:23:31.000 I really, I really, that stuff grinds my gears.

01:23:34.000 I don't know why, but it's like, you know, I built this platform so I could say my views, and then people are like, can I just sort of like hijack your platform and say what I think?

01:23:43.000 And you could be a mouthpiece for what I think?

01:23:45.000 Like Lynch, you know, I agree with what she said, but, you know, write it up so I can retweet it.

01:23:50.000 Mr. White, bottom line is the Trump MAGA presidency over?

01:23:54.000 No, and I don't think anyone has the right to make that judgment yet.

01:23:57.000 It's premature, it's immature, and it's wrong.

01:24:01.000 You know, that we're going, it's been, how long has it been, folks?

01:24:04.000 It's been eight months.

01:24:05.000 We've been at this presidency for eight months.

01:24:09.000 He's in the office for 48 months.

01:24:11.000 So we're not even one sixth of the way there yet.

01:24:15.000 And people are already saying, it's done.

01:24:17.000 Nothing good can come of it.

01:24:18.000 It's over.

01:24:19.000 You know, so no, I will say that the MAGA presidency is not over yet.

01:24:24.000 You know, I'm not saying don't pressure the president.

01:24:27.000 I'm not saying don't put pressure on him.

01:24:29.000 Don't voice your concerns.

01:24:31.000 Don't say if you think we're going in the wrong trajectory.

01:24:34.000 However, You cannot make a definitive judgment until it's the end.

01:24:40.000 Manlet Supreme, how do you reconcile nationalism and tradition when nationalism and self determination didn't exist before the Enlightenment?

01:24:50.000 That's a good question, but you have tribes before the Enlightenment.

01:24:54.000 The nation state might be a modern conception, and certainly the nation state was born out of the Peace of Westphalia in the early 17th century.

01:25:03.000 So you didn't have full on Enlightenment just yet.

01:25:05.000 And additionally, I would say that.

01:25:08.000 The worst elements of the Enlightenment didn't even come around until after the French Revolution.

01:25:13.000 I mean, if you're talking about Kant, if you're talking about German idealism, if you're talking about even Jung, if you're talking about things like this, I don't even think those are necessarily harmful.

01:25:24.000 And those existed after or during the Enlightenment as well.

01:25:31.000 And so, again, I wouldn't say that I am totally dark Enlightenment.

01:25:37.000 I agree with some of the premises there.

01:25:39.000 But tradition also means hierarchy.

01:25:41.000 Tradition means lineage.

01:25:42.000 Tradition means blood and family and all of that.

01:25:45.000 So, I don't think you necessarily need to say that, throw out the baby with the bathwater and say that everything after the Enlightenment is evil.

01:25:53.000 The nation state is just a system.

01:25:55.000 The nation state is just our international system presently.

01:25:58.000 Maybe it's insufficient in the modern world, or in the post Cold War era.

01:26:05.000 Maybe we need something different.

01:26:07.000 But I would say that the nation state isn't necessarily infected by the Enlightenment.

01:26:13.000 And certainly, self determination is something that I think is.

01:26:18.000 The will to power, right?

01:26:20.000 I mean, people are going to determine what happens in their own borders.

01:26:23.000 The conception that we would respect that, I think, is enlightenment, but I think it's also, I think peace is more beneficial than war for everybody.

01:26:29.000 So, again, you know, you can throw these together and say, oh, well, nation state actually happened during the enlightenment or during the early enlightenment.

01:26:37.000 I don't think that's necessarily contradictory.

01:26:40.000 Anti gamer ruin.

01:26:42.000 Would Trump be better off exercising executive power more, perhaps treating the wall as a military matter?

01:26:48.000 Tough to say, and I think he would if he could, but I'm sure there are some restrictions.

01:26:52.000 Like, I'm sure.

01:26:54.000 There's only so much he could do before there would be articles of impeachment or there would be some kind of a court stopping him or something.

01:27:02.000 I mean, he would really create a constitutional crisis if he did some of these things.

01:27:06.000 Maybe people say that's necessary.

01:27:08.000 Maybe people say that that needs to happen.

01:27:11.000 But to a certain extent, I don't think you can say, like, at the same time, the Constitution is broken and people don't abide by it.

01:27:18.000 And at the same time, President Trump isn't using his constitutional powers.

01:27:23.000 If he used his constitutional powers on immigration or on the border, You would have articles of impeachment drafted, and it would win only because it would win the war of legitimacy.

01:27:33.000 In other words, people see the Congress as more legitimate than the president in terms of if they drafted articles of impeachment, half the country would say that, probably a little bit more than half would say that that's legitimate than the president.

01:27:47.000 So we're in this weird space right now where there's no laws, there's no constitution.

01:27:50.000 It's basically a public relations battle.

01:27:53.000 And so that's why I would say there probably hasn't been revolutionary executive action, though I wish there were.

01:27:59.000 Catholic nationalists, thoughts on the race and IQ debate?

01:28:03.000 Can't talk about that explicitly, and I think everybody knows that.

01:28:07.000 Admiral Fancy Pants, any nationalistslash pro white orgs worth joining? 0.93

01:28:12.000 Are they all autistic LARPers? 0.92

01:28:15.000 Most of it is LARPy, but some of them are worth joining just because, like, if you're not publicly a part of them, if you're not, you know, getting harmed by it, I would say it might be fun just as a fraternal sort of a thing, just to. 0.97

01:28:30.000 Just sort of live in a not clown world every now and again and talk to people that aren't clowns.

01:28:35.000 So I suppose.

01:28:37.000 But a lot of them, I think, do a little bit more harm than good, or some of them do.

01:28:41.000 So I would say play it by ear, you know, use judgment.

01:28:45.000 Prisoner's Dilemma. 0.64

01:28:47.000 Nick, what are your thoughts on Savitri Devi and esoteric Hitlerism?

01:28:52.000 Okay, you know, people always ask me this stuff.

01:28:55.000 I have this tug of war where some people are like, you need to go full Faulkner, you need to go full 1488. 0.65

01:29:03.000 Unironic exterminationist, full unironic support of Hitler.

01:29:07.000 And then the other side is saying, no, no, you need to be normie presenting.

01:29:10.000 And, you know, look, we're trying to straddle the line between talking about things that people don't talk about because there's a virtue in that and also being viable.

01:29:21.000 And I don't think it makes any sense that we're going to take all of our politically viable people and ask them questions about esoteric Hitlerism and everything else.

01:29:30.000 I question the motivation, I question the intention there.

01:29:33.000 Where people are trying to drag you into a space where you can't be taken seriously, where you can't be taken as a legitimate political actor or legitimate media actor.

01:29:44.000 I mean, what Generation Z has going for it is it hasn't been spoiled yet.

01:29:48.000 It hasn't been spoiled by LARPy, extreme, offensive stuff. 0.62

01:29:52.000 And, you know, look, I have no problem on a personal level with LARPy, extreme stuff.

01:29:57.000 But if we're going, again, if we're going to have pragmatic results and we have to convince people to do what we want them to do, that's politics. 0.97

01:30:06.000 You cannot go around as truthful, as objectively correct you think esoteric Hitlerism is. 0.66

01:30:15.000 You can't go around talking about that stuff. 0.70

01:30:17.000 So.

01:30:19.000 I would say that it's interesting.

01:30:20.000 I'll say it's interesting.

01:30:20.000 I'll say that much.

01:30:22.000 You can look into it for scholastic purposes.

01:30:26.000 But when people ask me that stuff, I can't help but get a little frustrated when I'm, you know, people understand and I think people see what I'm trying to do.

01:30:35.000 People understand where I'm trying to take this movement.

01:30:38.000 And I'm not trying to co opt the leadership of it or seize power, but I'm trying to push the boundaries in this direction.

01:30:46.000 And there are all sorts of people who want to drag me in.

01:30:50.000 Want me to be Richard Spencer.

01:30:51.000 I'm not Richard Spencer. 0.89

01:30:52.000 You know, you want to hear about esoteric Hitlerism, go on a podcast on the right stuff.

01:30:56.000 Go and hear what the Southern white nationalists want to say about that.

01:31:01.000 But that's not this show, okay?

01:31:04.000 Lynch.

01:31:06.000 Okay, again, we're posting DMs.

01:31:09.000 Wandy, underestimating the deep state.

01:31:11.000 Remember Kennedy?

01:31:12.000 Course of action for the alt right if deep state assimilates Donald Trump.

01:31:17.000 You know, I think Donald Trump was the beginning, definitely not the middle or even close to the ending.

01:31:21.000 Donald Trump was the beginning.

01:31:23.000 And I said from the start that if he did nothing more than defeat Hillary Clinton, that would be enough.

01:31:30.000 Because not only does he defeat Hillary Clinton, not only does he suspend the imminent demise of the country, but he has proven that we can all make it.

01:31:37.000 If Donald Trump can say that John McCain wasn't a war hero because he was captured, if he can make fun of veterans, he can attack a Muslim Gold Star family, he can.

01:31:50.000 What else did he say? 0.88

01:31:51.000 He can say Mexico sends drugs and crime and rapists and say that George W. Bush. Didn't keep us safe because of 9 11.

01:32:01.000 If he could say all that and get elected president, he's demonstrated that it's possible and everyone and the emperor isn't wearing any clothes, essentially, that we can do it if we just never back down.

01:32:11.000 So I think that Donald Trump, in a lot of ways, has already accomplished some of his most important legacy.

01:32:16.000 The wall needs to happen, the deportations need to happen, but I would be satisfied, I think, with a lot of what he's done already.

01:32:23.000 We can do better.

01:32:24.000 He can do better.

01:32:25.000 We can do more, but I think people underestimate or they understate what a huge victory that was in itself.

01:32:31.000 So if Donald Trump is assimilated, That would be a major, major blow to our movement, but I don't think it'd be the end of the world.

01:32:40.000 I think we're the future anyway.

01:32:43.000 DM me, Rare Loomers.

01:32:45.000 How many one foot, eight inch Will the Thinkers do you think you and real James Alsop could take before being overwhelmed in a death match?

01:32:54.000 I don't know.

01:32:56.000 It would depend.

01:32:56.000 I don't know.

01:32:57.000 Maybe like 30, maybe like 35.

01:33:00.000 It's tough to say.

01:33:00.000 It's tough.

01:33:01.000 I think the biggest issue that he would have going for him, the one foot, eight inch Will the Thinkers, is that.

01:33:06.000 I don't think they'd have it in them to kill.

01:33:08.000 I don't think they'd have it in them.

01:33:11.000 The master morality to exert their existence. 1.00

01:33:14.000 I mean, they'd be bound to sklavin morale, so would they even fight at all? 0.97

01:33:18.000 I think is the question. 0.99

01:33:20.000 How many could me and James execute while the rest watched before any of them took action?

01:33:26.000 I think that's the real question.

01:33:27.000 Because I think he'd probably be able to kill like 10 or 15 before the rest even had a problem with it.

01:33:33.000 And then, even then, they have a problem with it.

01:33:35.000 How many would fight back?

01:33:37.000 How many would fight to the death?

01:33:38.000 We're getting into the hundreds or thousands. 1.00

01:33:40.000 I mean, Will Nardi sees his own people, his own American brothers and sisters killed and gunned down by illegal immigrants, and he still wants more of them. 1.00

01:33:47.000 So, you know, it could be millions that me and James could take us, 6'8, 250 IQ people. 1.00

01:33:58.000 Lynch just found Emily Faulkner's Facebook profile.

01:33:58.000 And here we go.

01:34:01.000 Thanks for the laugh, Nick.

01:34:02.000 Yeah, look that up, right?

01:34:04.000 Check that out.

01:34:05.000 That is your conservative ink, Emily Faulkner.

01:34:08.000 On her profile picture on Twitter, she's doing this face like.

01:34:12.000 Like, oh my God.

01:34:15.000 Are these the people that are supposed to be leading the movement? 1.00

01:34:18.000 Number two, like these ridiculous, silly, dumb women. 1.00

01:34:18.000 Number one, women. 1.00

01:34:23.000 I mean, come on, give me a break. 1.00

01:34:25.000 People are going to say, Nick says all women are dumb and silly. 1.00

01:34:27.000 No, I said she's a dumb, silly woman. 1.00

01:34:31.000 Lynch, Nick, don't be a dummy. 1.00

01:34:32.000 You actually told me to bring it up on the stream this time.

01:34:35.000 Yeah, and I alluded to it, all right.

01:34:36.000 I alluded to it pretty vaguely.

01:34:38.000 I said a social form of capitalism.

01:34:40.000 But, you know, again, you want to talk about this idea.

01:34:44.000 In the way that you want to talk about, do your show.

01:34:47.000 Do a tweet.

01:34:48.000 Do something that I can retweet.

01:34:50.000 But don't expect me to do your opinion justice.

01:34:54.000 I talked about that already.

01:34:55.000 I talked about maybe we can get the government to fund houses and whatever.

01:35:00.000 People are so demanding.

01:35:02.000 Jesus.

01:35:03.000 Jesus, for a free show, people are so demanding.

01:35:07.000 Gosh, golly.

01:35:09.000 You know, you get this content for free, and people are demanding.

01:35:13.000 Admiral Fancy Pants, what do you think is the best method for red pilling far leftists?

01:35:18.000 It's tough. 0.99

01:35:19.000 Okay, this dog, this damn dog, he's up there playing with the toy. 1.00

01:35:28.000 God, I told them how many times did I say before my parents got the dog? 0.99

01:35:33.000 I don't know if you could hear that, but he's up there making all kinds of noise.

01:35:37.000 My parents, when they got the dog, I said, you know what?

01:35:40.000 You bring a dog into the house, everybody has to live like a dog.

01:35:43.000 People come over, it smells like dog.

01:35:46.000 The dog barks and yells, and it's unpleasant, it's obnoxious.

01:35:49.000 You walk in the door and the dog is all over. 0.97

01:35:52.000 It's jumping, it's slobbering, and you, like a plebeian, have to be like, oh no, oh get off. 0.99

01:35:57.000 Oh, he's so funny. 1.00

01:35:58.000 Oh, stop, you're being so bad.

01:36:00.000 And I just hate that.

01:36:01.000 It's so plebeian. 1.00

01:36:04.000 I said, all of this and more will be the result. 0.99

01:36:04.000 And I said that. 0.99

01:36:07.000 You think it's going to be all fine and well?

01:36:09.000 Well, guess what it's going to be?

01:36:10.000 Pooping and peeing in the house. 1.00

01:36:12.000 It's going to be having spilled water and dog food everywhere.

01:36:15.000 It's going to be having dog toys strewn everywhere.

01:36:19.000 It's going to be another obligation, like a baby.

01:36:22.000 That is alive for years.

01:36:25.000 And there's going to have to be gates in the house and fences around the house.

01:36:29.000 And you're going to have the smell and the hair and the yelling and all that.

01:36:33.000 And they said, No, no, we'll just train him.

01:36:35.000 They said, No, Nicholas, we'll just train him and he'll be fine.

01:36:39.000 Well, they're not training him.

01:36:40.000 You didn't train him right.

01:36:42.000 Because he barks and he jumps and all the rest.

01:36:46.000 And I'm the only one that yells at him, by the way. 0.91

01:36:48.000 I understand using the gorilla mindset. 0.96

01:36:51.000 I understand that he's a dog and he respects yelling and strength.

01:36:56.000 And so, me, like, the dog knows.

01:36:58.000 The dog knows that, like, I understand his game.

01:37:01.000 I understand that we are both animals.

01:37:03.000 I understand that it's a game of domination.

01:37:07.000 And my parents are like, oh, like, he's a stuffed animal.

01:37:09.000 No, he's an animal.

01:37:11.000 And he will run the house if you let him, if you don't show him who's the boss.

01:37:14.000 I'm not saying you, like, beat the hell out of him.

01:37:16.000 I'm saying you say bad dog when he barks, or you punish him, you put him in the cage.

01:37:22.000 God, that's what's going on over here. 0.99

01:37:24.000 It's clown town over here. 0.99

01:37:27.000 Lynch, Nick, don't be a dummy. 0.96

01:37:29.000 You told me you'd bring it up on the stream this time.

01:37:32.000 I told you I brought it up.

01:37:34.000 Sheesh, I'm already beholden to Twitter interests.

01:37:41.000 Epsilon A, are you going to turn your Twitter feed into a dog picture show like some others, like KD?

01:37:46.000 No.

01:37:47.000 I do that on my Snapchat.

01:37:48.000 I post pictures of my dog all the time because he's just funny.

01:37:51.000 He's funny.

01:37:52.000 I will say he's funny, he's adorable, but you know what?

01:37:55.000 I like dogs.

01:37:55.000 I like them somewhere else.

01:37:57.000 It's one thing to like, you know, dogs are great for 20 minutes, and then it's obnoxious, it's too much.

01:38:03.000 So he is cute.

01:38:04.000 I do post pictures of him on my Snapchat all the time.

01:38:07.000 But Twitter is for galaxy brain content.

01:38:10.000 And Cassie Dillon, here's the best thing. 0.78

01:38:13.000 When me and Cassie Dillon broke officially, there was one night where she was like, I'm done with you.

01:38:17.000 I can't. 0.52

01:38:17.000 You're too much. 0.52

01:38:19.000 She told me that the reason she had a problem with me was because my activism wasn't up to her standards. 1.00

01:38:27.000 And I think your Twitter is absolute garbage. 1.00

01:38:31.000 It is like excrement. 1.00

01:38:32.000 It is worse than human excrement. 1.00

01:38:34.000 You post. 1.00

01:38:36.000 You post pictures of your dog. 0.98

01:38:38.000 You post like silly, stale jokes about pop culture. 0.80

01:38:43.000 You started a whole Twitter account to talk all ditzy and cutesy about Game of Thrones. 0.99

01:38:48.000 Oh my God, people are dying. 0.99

01:38:50.000 Oh my God, I'm just a silly, ditzy little girl. 0.99

01:38:54.000 And I'm seeing violent things on TV. 0.99

01:38:56.000 That's your activism.

01:38:58.000 You know what my activism is?

01:38:59.000 Patrolling thoughts tirelessly without thanks, without, well, with the content, Emmy, but without thanks, without a salary.

01:39:08.000 For beat patrollers like me who are out there ensuring that women, that these thoughts are under control, we don't get any thanks.

01:39:17.000 We don't get invited places.

01:39:19.000 We don't get shekels to go to Israel or to fly all over the country and everything else like she does.

01:39:24.000 That's real activism. 1.00

01:39:27.000 Just another nobody.

01:39:28.000 Okay, we got it.

01:39:29.000 We're an hour and 40 minutes, but we'll take these last two.

01:39:32.000 We'll take these last two and then it's over.

01:39:34.000 Just another nobody.

01:39:35.000 Nick, would you say that what needs to be done is to redefine what it means to be an American?

01:39:40.000 It feels like it's become just a location.

01:39:42.000 Yeah, that's a big part of it.

01:39:43.000 And we've sort of conceded the initiative of America as this proposition nation. 0.67

01:39:50.000 We need to take back what being an American means, which means being a Christian, being a European. 0.89

01:39:55.000 I mean, the only people that are really Americans, I think, Christians, Europeans, and the descendants of slaves. 0.51

01:40:02.000 These are Americans.

01:40:04.000 Because these are the people that were here when the country was founded.

01:40:08.000 And you have European immigrants as well.

01:40:10.000 But to say that, like, you come here and you fill out the paperwork and you're suddenly an American.

01:40:15.000 Nobody wants to say that you're not an American because then people say, I am from Pakistan.

01:40:23.000 I am just as American as you, Nicholas.

01:40:26.000 I am just as American.

01:40:27.000 Like, no, you're not.

01:40:29.000 No, you're not. 1.00

01:40:30.000 You practice Islam. 1.00

01:40:32.000 You don't respect our laws, certain ones. 1.00

01:40:36.000 And you don't speak the language and everything else. 0.96

01:40:41.000 So, no.

01:40:43.000 But nobody wants to say that because then people get all up in arms and they get offended.

01:40:48.000 Henceforth, we can grandfather everyone in.

01:40:51.000 We can grandfather everyone in who came here before the redefinition.

01:40:55.000 But from henceforth, I'm making a declaration. 0.99

01:40:58.000 Henceforth, you're either European, you're an African American. 0.98

01:41:03.000 I don't say that like a PC thing. 1.00

01:41:04.000 I mean, you've been here for a while because of circumstances beyond your control.

01:41:09.000 You're a Christian.

01:41:10.000 You speak English.

01:41:11.000 You respect the Constitution.

01:41:12.000 You're a conservative.

01:41:13.000 You're an American.

01:41:15.000 We can grandfather everyone else in. 0.96

01:41:17.000 But after that point, I don't care.

01:41:19.000 You're not.

01:41:20.000 You're just not.

01:41:22.000 And we have to define what it means and what it doesn't mean. 0.89

01:41:25.000 We know what a Chinese person looks like. 0.98

01:41:28.000 We know what they sound like.

01:41:29.000 We know their language.

01:41:30.000 We know their culture.

01:41:31.000 We know their customs.

01:41:33.000 That is defined.

01:41:34.000 We know the same about Arabs.

01:41:36.000 We know the same about Iranians, the same about Russians, the same about countless other peoples around the world, but words, it doesn't matter.

01:41:43.000 We don't have an identity.

01:41:45.000 It is necessarily exclusionary to define who we are, and we can't be afraid to do it.

01:41:52.000 Yeah, all these people. 1.00

01:41:53.000 You know, I had some Mexican get up in my face in Washington, D.C. That's another thing. 1.00

01:41:58.000 I'm in Chinatown at Leadership Institute. 1.00

01:42:00.000 During the training, what they had you do.

01:42:02.000 This is my last story.

01:42:04.000 During Leadership Institute, what they had you do was to go out and practice like canvassing for a political campaign or for a college organization.

01:42:13.000 They had you go out into a really liberal part of D.C. and advocate and try and collect signatures for a petition on a really conservative issue.

01:42:23.000 So I'm in the middle of Chinatown and Washington, D.C.

01:42:26.000 I mean, think of what that looks like, folks.

01:42:28.000 Think of who's walking around Chinatown and Washington, D.C.

01:42:32.000 It's not hillbillies, it's not conservatives, it's not people that listen to country music.

01:42:36.000 And I'm out there. 0.93

01:42:37.000 Collecting signatures for a petition on building a wall, building a friggin' wall on the southern border.

01:42:44.000 So I'm there, and I'm collecting signatures, and I asked this one guy, well, you know, hey, I'm collecting signatures for wall funding, for a bill that would fund the wall, and it was like a fictitious petition.

01:42:57.000 And I'm arguing with this guy.

01:43:00.000 You're not supposed to argue with him, but I'm like entertaining it for a moment, because, you know, why not?

01:43:04.000 And he comes like this close to just punching me in the face, because I start out basically saying, like, Because I don't want to get killed.

01:43:11.000 But I started out like, you know, look, economics, yada, yada, jobs, this and that.

01:43:15.000 And I said, you know, look, here's why. 0.64

01:43:17.000 Because we don't want to speak Spanish here.

01:43:19.000 This is a country you speak English.

01:43:21.000 This is a country where, you know, tacos are not a part of it, okay?

01:43:25.000 We don't want the sombrero thing.

01:43:27.000 I don't want to drive 15 minutes east into Pilsen and feel like I'm in Mexico City. 1.00

01:43:32.000 That's why they can't come here. 0.57

01:43:34.000 And he got right up in my face and he's like, it's bigots like you that are ruining the country.

01:43:38.000 I'm just as American as you. 1.00

01:43:39.000 And this big, fat, disgusting animal. 0.99

01:43:42.000 And I want, you know, At that point, I'm like self preservation. 1.00

01:43:45.000 Like, this is not the hill to die on, is insulting this belligerent, obese Mexican. 1.00

01:43:51.000 But he gets all up in my face. 1.00

01:43:52.000 He was this close to striking me.

01:43:55.000 And where was I going with that?

01:43:57.000 But anyway, he was like, I'm just as American as you.

01:43:59.000 And I'm thinking, no, you're not.

01:44:02.000 Americans don't get up in people's face and threaten to beat the hell out of them because they oppose immigration.

01:44:07.000 Nothing American about it.

01:44:09.000 Sean Hoy, and this is our last question for the evening.

01:44:12.000 Sean Hoy, but Nick, you can now be an official member of the Dog Right.

01:44:16.000 Yeah, I'll post pictures every now and again.

01:44:18.000 I understand the propaganda value of the dog, of the humble dog.

01:44:24.000 I generally don't care for them, but I'll bring Al, that's the dog, on the periscope once in a while.

01:44:30.000 I'll bring him on for some content, but he's very difficult, so be warned about that.

01:44:35.000 You know, it's just, it's so.

01:44:41.000 What's the word for it?

01:44:42.000 It's so.

01:44:43.000 I don't know.

01:44:44.000 Like, it's look at me, look at me.

01:44:46.000 I mean, that's what it is.

01:44:47.000 It's so obnoxious and sensational to bring the dog into the mix, you know.

01:44:52.000 Cassie Dillon, if you have good political commentary, tweet your political commentary.

01:44:56.000 Don't tweet pictures of Tucker.

01:44:58.000 Look, it's me and Tucker. 1.00

01:44:59.000 You're an idiot. 1.00

01:45:01.000 Sorry. 1.00

01:45:02.000 Anywho, that's the show.

01:45:04.000 That's the show.

01:45:04.000 Any more questions?

01:45:05.000 My throat's getting all dry.

01:45:06.000 We've been here for 45 minutes longer than the show, taking your questions.

01:45:11.000 Only because I have so much energy, so much fire in the belly tonight.

01:45:16.000 But those are all the questions.

01:45:17.000 Remember, you can ask any questions you might have using the hashtag AmericaFQ, hashtag AmericaFQ for any and all questions.

01:45:25.000 Questions, comments, concerns, anything like that.

01:45:28.000 Remember to follow me on Twitter at Nick J. Fuentes.

01:45:31.000 Follow me on Periscope at Nick J. Fuentes.

01:45:34.000 Facebook.com slash Nick J. Fuentes.

01:45:36.000 You can find all my content at Nicholas J. Fuentes.com.

01:45:40.000 Please subscribe to the channel.

01:45:42.000 Click the bell for notifications.

01:45:45.000 Really, really helps us out.

01:45:47.000 Smash the subscribe button, bro.

01:45:48.000 Like, comment, subscribe.

01:45:51.000 But really, it does help.

01:45:52.000 It helps the channel and our analytics and monetization and things like that.

01:45:57.000 So do subscribe.

01:45:58.000 We like when people subscribe.

01:46:00.000 But that's the show.

01:46:01.000 We're on the air Monday through Friday, 8 p.m. Eastern Time, 7 p.m. Central Time.

01:46:06.000 I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.

01:46:08.000 This was America First.

01:46:09.000 Thank you guys, as always, for watching.

01:46:11.000 It's a blast to have you.

01:46:12.000 Thanks for all the questions tonight.

01:46:14.000 A little bit overload, but I appreciate more than less.

01:46:17.000 But that's the show.

01:46:18.000 We'll see you tomorrow.

01:46:19.000 Have a great rest of your evening.

01:46:20.000 And as always, thanks for watching.

01:46:26.000 Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.

01:46:32.000 It's going to be only America first.

01:46:35.000 America first. 0.99

01:46:37.000 The American people will come first once again. 0.95

01:46:43.000 With respect to respect that we Or it's going to be only America first. 0.82

01:47:09.000 America first. 0.88

America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - September 19, 2017

Analyzing Trump's UN Rhetoric | America First Ep. 13

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript