00:24:19.000We do have some fuel in the tank here to get us through.
00:24:22.000But forgive me if I'm a little bit tired and mentally fatigued because it's been a lot of streaming in the past few days.
00:24:29.000Really been putting the foot on the gas, so to speak, putting our foot on the gas pedal.
00:24:35.000Not in any other way with the content because who knows how much longer we have with the YouTube channel.
00:24:41.000We still are under the gun in the aftermath of controversy and events in the world.
00:24:47.000But in any case, we're going to dive into the news here.
00:24:50.000I don't really have any fun anecdotes or anything to tell you.
00:24:53.000I guess one thing that I sort of debated whether or not I would talk about this on the show, because I hate when people do this.
00:25:02.000If you come up to me in a day to day conversation, you do this to me, I will be annoyed.
00:25:07.000I will be very impatient and uninterested.
00:25:10.000I hate when people talk about dreams that they have while they're sleeping.
00:25:13.000Not like they're life goals or pipe dreams, but people tell me, oh, I had the craziest dream last night.
00:25:20.000It's like, unless I'm in it, I don't care.
00:25:22.000I don't care about what happens to you in your waking life, let alone in the dream world.
00:25:29.000But it's relevant to the show because it was so realistic to me.
00:25:34.000I said in my Telegram chat, I talked about this, that it could perhaps be a premonition because of the realism.
00:25:41.000I dreamt last night that I was at a Turning Point USA conference and there was some kind of presentation happening, and a fellow knicker went up to ask a question and he started to deride the panel about how they were all a bunch of boomers.
00:25:56.000And right away, the Turning Point host swooped in and grabbed the mic and said, We're not going to use language like boomer because that's not inclusive.
00:26:04.000And me from the back of the audience, I yelled out, Fag at the guy who said I'm not supposed to say boomer.
00:26:12.000And right away, some security guy rushes in.
00:27:53.000This curriculum law in Illinois, which touched on this very briefly yesterday in the super chats, somebody asked me about it, but I hadn't really looked into it very closely.
00:28:04.000I had just seen it on Twitter, but it's actually a lot worse than I thought it was.
00:28:08.000You know, for people that are not in the know about this, Illinois just passed a law which says that it's mandatory to teach gay history in public schools.
00:28:17.000And I saw that, and I assumed like high school or maybe even like public universities.
00:28:24.000It turns out it's much worse than that.
00:28:28.000It says, quote, Illinois public schools will be required to teach about the contributions of LGBTQ people across the state and the country under a new law approved by Governor J.B. Pritzker.
00:28:44.000Not that that has any relevance to this subject at all.
00:28:48.000But J.B. Pritzker is a Jewish billionaire.
00:28:51.000And he spent $130 million to get himself elected.
00:28:54.000The law signed by Pritzker last week mandates that the history curriculum in schools across the state.
00:29:00.000Include lessons spotlighting noteworthy lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Americans, according to the Chicago Tribune.
00:29:08.000As part of the new curriculum set to launch in 2020, the LGBTQ focused lessons must be taught before the students reach the eighth grade, according to the report.
00:29:20.000All textbooks must include the roles and contributions of all people protected under the Illinois Human Rights Act and must be non discriminatory as to any of the characteristics under the act.
00:29:34.000The curriculum will include topics ranging from the country's first gay rights organization, the Society for Human Rights, launched in Chicago in 1924.
00:29:55.000And again, it serves as another reminder.
00:29:57.000Before I really dive into what's going on here, it serves as yet another reminder for any of our libertarian friends, any of our turning point friends.
00:30:06.000Any people who might describe themselves loosely as fiscally conservative, socially liberal, that the slippery slope is very real.
00:30:15.000You know, this is something we talk about a lot on this show.
00:30:18.000And what does the slippery slope mean?
00:30:20.000Well, 10 or 11 years ago, when all this gay stuff started to kick up, and really just in general, a lot of social liberal type politics started to surface on the Democrat side, there were a lot of arguments from religious people, from right wing people, real social conservatives that.
00:30:38.000Well, once you go down this path of social libertinism or liberalism, once you start with gay marriage, it doesn't end there.
00:30:46.000Of course, it starts with these things and it only goes further and further towards more depraved, deviant, and degenerate things until you get a society that is completely immoral and completely unrecognizable.
00:30:58.000You know, people said, well, it starts with gay marriage and then you get, you know, marriage with animals or you get polyamory or you get your polygamy rather in the case of marriage or you get incest relationships, right?
00:31:12.000Marriage is now no longer about procreation and the complementary union between man and woman, but is now just a reflecting of passion or a tax contract or something like that.
00:31:23.000Well, where does it really end once you change this definition?
00:31:33.000What does two people getting married have to do with you?
00:31:36.000This is the most common argument I used to hear from peers or other people on the left during this time in the media.
00:31:42.000Was, oh, you know, people are going to get married basically over there, and how does that affect you over here?
00:31:48.000You know, if Adam and Steve want to go and do what they want in their bedroom and, you know, they want to get married, well, how does that affect you if you want to do your own thing and get married to get into a heterosexual union?
00:32:01.000Well, we see 10 years later, obviously, how that affects everybody.
00:32:06.000Now, they say that they're teaching LGBTQ curriculum to people before the eighth grade.
00:32:13.000Do you know how old kids are in eighth grade?
00:32:16.000Kids are 13 years old in eighth grade.
00:32:18.000So they're saying that they have to be taught before they turn 13 years old about the contributions of homosexuals, lesbians, and transsexuals in their history classes.
00:32:48.000You know, people were brought up and raised in a Christian household or something, and they say to themselves, well, you know, in their 13 year old brains, well, I don't know about all this.
00:33:36.000Or, I guess, relatively extreme compared to what's going on now.
00:33:39.000You know, a lot of people look at what's going on.
00:33:42.000For example, you look at our alt light friends or conservatives or turning point USA people who say, well, you know, third wave feminism is bad, right?
00:33:52.000I mean, things have gotten out of control now.
00:33:55.000Jordan Peterson will say, well, if the law compels me to use transsexual pronouns, We can all agree that that's too far.
00:34:03.000You know, that the left has gone too far.
00:34:06.000But they'll always say egalitarianism is totally fine, right?
00:34:11.000And transsexuals, as they are, are totally fine.
00:34:14.000You know, they're totally accepting of somebody like Blair White.
00:34:17.000Hunter Avalon will tell you that defending transsexuality and homosexuality is totally conservative because it's individualistic, it's equal, it's about individual liberty, the liberty of every individual to do whatever they want with their own lives.
00:34:44.000In other words, you don't have the ability to say, well, in 2019, I don't really like it, but we just need to go back to where we were in 2008 and press pause and keep it that way.
00:35:16.000Of course, if we went back to 2009 or 2008 or 2010 when these things were perhaps more tolerable to most people, why do people believe that it would stay that way?
00:35:27.000Of course, once these things are implanted in the society and entrenched in the society and going on this trajectory, it has a momentum that cannot be stopped, it has an inertia that cannot be stopped.
00:35:38.000And so you could reset the clock to 2010.
00:35:40.000You could reset the clock back to 1995, frankly, before most of this stuff started to gain public acceptance, before it was even popular.
00:35:50.000But it would still inevitably follow the same track because the underlying principles are the same.
00:35:55.000And those principles and the entrenched interests promoting them follow themselves through to their logical conclusion, which is if you believe in total individualism, if you believe in total amorality, right?
00:36:07.000If you believe in total equality and all this stuff about human rights.
00:36:11.000Then inevitably, you're going to get to the point where people say that your sexual perversions and deviancy constitutes a protected class.
00:36:19.000And therefore, if it's a protected class, then it deserves anti discrimination.
00:36:23.000And if it deserves anti discrimination, then that means that they should be taught about in the history class.
00:36:28.000And if they should be taught about in the history class, then anybody who opposes this should be put in jail because they're discriminating, they're going against human rights, whatever it is, the founding fathers, you know, this perversion of the founding fathers, and that's where we're headed.
00:36:43.000So, you know, you see how far this has come.
00:36:45.000Full circle in 10 or 20 years, how we started so small and went so big, so crazy in such a short amount of time.
00:36:52.000And you got to wonder what does the next five years hold?
00:37:36.000So, you know, one of the biggest complaints I get on this show is from younger people, or one of the bigger complaints from the younger people, is that Generation Z is largely a libertarian sort of demographic.
00:37:48.000You know, I would say that there's a good percentage of Generation Z which are reactionary, but I would say that generally the zeitgeist of Generation Z in the political realm, if you know about 4chan or the internet or gamer culture, is basically libertarian.
00:38:03.000I would say the ethos of Generation Z is probably more manifested in things like Gamergate and this libertarian moment that happened in 2015, more so than a lot of the right wing identitarian stuff, if I'm being totally honest.
00:38:18.000The impulse for Generation Z is a lot less uniting as the white man and authoritarianism and religiosity, and it's more so a reaction against oppressive social justice type propaganda and things like this.
00:38:32.000The problem with most Generation Z who see Politics and say, well, the social stuff doesn't really matter, or you know, this social liberal agenda, maybe we can tolerate that, or maybe it's not even important.
00:38:44.000Is of course, this is where it leads to inevitably, where you get young kids, six, seven, eight years old, being taught that, you know, people that are sexual degenerates are supposed to be lauded as heroes, and the real people that founded the country are villains.
00:38:56.000You know, that's obviously the contrast.
00:38:59.000Is it maybe it would be one thing if they were up against all the other heroes?
00:39:03.000I would still think that would be a bad thing, but it's George Washington is evil.
00:39:09.000And, you know, all these war heroes in World War II and everybody else was a bad person.
00:39:14.000All the white men were bad, but the people that are good are all the black civil rights icons, the Hispanic union leaders, and it's the homosexual advocacy groups and everybody else.
00:39:23.000And that's how you get a totally different country, totally, totally distinct and different from what it was 10 or 15 years ago, from the one that I grew up in.
00:39:36.000You know, it's a lot of people just like J.B. Pritzker that are behind things like this, you know.
00:39:41.000On the slightly offensive interview, we talked about feminism in the second episode, which was coming out on Friday on his channel.
00:39:49.000And, you know, he said something to the effect that, well, who's really to blame for women's rights and women's suffrage and all this is men, because, you know, men are the ones who gave them the right to vote, because we held all the cards in the 1920s.
00:40:03.000And I said, well, you know, you would be surprised if you take a look at who's buying women's suffrage.
00:40:08.000And, you know, it's a bit from that old Sam Hyde comedy routine, I think, in Williamsburg, New York.
00:40:14.000Where he says, if you look behind all these different movements, women's suffrage, gay rights, civil rights, the NAACP, you look behind these different organizations and you don't find female suffragettes and, you know, these real black thought leaders or anything like that.
00:40:30.000You find a whole lot of people like J.B. Pritzker pushing this stuff on the country.
00:40:34.000And it really makes you think what's going on there, why that is, right?
00:40:39.000So I would say I see something like this, and this is probably going to be, you know, part of the last straw where I say, probably going to have to homeschool the kids.
00:40:48.000You know, it's totally mutually exclusive with a proper religious upbringing or even a proper, I don't know, just generally American upbringing that this is now the new narrative.
00:40:58.000You know, I had somebody replying to me on Twitter where I tweeted about this and I said, you know, 10 years ago they asked us how gay marriage would affect us and here we are.
00:41:05.000And somebody's like, oh yeah, kids being taught about Harvey Milk is going to ruin the country.
00:41:22.000It undermines all the legitimacy, all the morality that the country is founded upon, and gets people into this mind of thinking that basically everything is okay.
00:41:33.000Because understand why the homosexual thing is really not an end totally in itself.
00:41:39.000What this is meant to do is to undermine traditional relationships.
00:41:50.000Just another flavor, just another preference that people can engage in.
00:41:54.000It's the same, but just a little bit different than having a marriage with a wife and having kids and everything.
00:42:02.000Well, the natural conclusion is relationships and living out your life isn't really about participating in the stream of life or the cycle of life.
00:42:11.000It's more about doing this thing that makes you happy.
00:42:14.000In other words, life is not this idea of women growing up and becoming mothers and men growing up and becoming fathers and having children and perpetuating and A life affirming cycle that we're reproducing the civilization and rearing children and, you know, being good and moral and natural and all these things.
00:42:32.000But instead, it's just about what do you feel like doing?
00:42:35.000What's going to make you feel the best?
00:42:41.000Once you start to say that a homosexual union or that kind of thing is heroic or on the same level as heterosexuals, you'll say, well, you know, these people obviously can't create children or even families.
00:42:51.000And most of the time, they don't even maintain stable unions.
00:43:12.000A man can sleep around with as many women as he wants and not settle down, not have a family, and he could just be some sort of atomic individual.
00:43:20.000But again, it's all about undermining that traditional conception of the family, of the union, that core.
00:43:27.000Unit of the civilization, which is mother, father, and child.
00:43:58.000On a different note, on a very white pilling note, A good law was just passed, or a good rule was just rolled out the other day pertaining to immigrant welfare.
00:44:11.000It says, quote, Yesterday the Trump administration rolled out its latest immigration policy, a new rule that would restrict the public benefits available to green card holders and legal residents.
00:44:21.000Current immigration law bars entry for people likely to, quote, become a public charge, although that term is not well defined.
00:44:29.000The new rule specifies public charge as any immigrant who is personally enriched.
00:44:34.000By a public benefit over the course of 12 months as part of a 36 month period.
00:44:40.000Receiving two public benefits over the course of a month will be equaled with two months.
00:44:44.000Examples of benefits include food stamps and subsidized housing.
00:44:48.000The public charge rule, as it is being referred to, would require foreigners applying for permanent residency to prove that they are unlikely to ever require public assistance.
00:44:57.000According to NBC News, this move is likely to save the federal and state governments nearly $2.5 billion annually.
00:45:19.000Obviously, this makes sense, you know, and I see all kinds of people, conservatives and liberals out there protesting this and saying, for whatever reason, I don't know why anybody should be protesting people coming here and getting welfare.
00:45:36.000Saves us money, and also it discourages poor people from coming to the country.
00:45:40.000You know, if somebody has to apply for permanent residency, and in order to do that, prove that they'll never ever need food stamps.
00:45:49.000Subsidized housing, anything like that, you're probably going to cut out a lot of people out of the pool who are applying to become permanent residents.
00:45:56.000You know, poor people, unskilled people, people that we don't need in the country.
00:46:00.000And I know that might sound a certain way.
00:46:02.000You know, everybody always harkens back to the Jewish poem on the Statue of Liberty that talks about, you know, bring us your tired, your huddled masses, your pathetic losers.
00:46:11.000You know, just crawl across the border and, you know, put up shop in the middle of the country and be ugly and stupid.
00:47:05.000We're cutting out a lot of the bad people that are coming here.
00:47:08.000And also, in light of the economic situation that we were talking about a couple of days ago, it makes a lot of sense.
00:47:13.000You know, one of the arguments from the left is well, this is going to put an undue burden on immigrants who are working class or something.
00:47:21.000We don't really need a lot of working class immigrants, right?
00:47:24.000If you want wages to rise for low skilled workers, which is the problem we've been having, stagnant wages for the middle class, the opposite of what we want to do is bring in more people and flood the labor market with people that don't have skills and keep wages down, right?
00:47:39.000So it makes total sense from a cultural point of view, from an economic point of view, generally from a holistic point of view.
00:47:45.000And thank Donald Trump for finally doing something like this about immigration.
00:47:49.000Here's part of the black pill about this rule.
00:47:52.000You know, I've seen a lot of people celebrating this.
00:47:54.000A friend of the show, Ryan Gerdusky, Was writing about this.
00:47:58.000I think this was in, I forget what publication this was, but he was speaking very positively about it.
00:48:04.000Everybody loves this and it makes sense.
00:48:06.000The black pill is that this has been in the pipeline for three years.
00:48:48.000The black pill is that this has been in the pipeline for three years.
00:48:52.000This is something that was put together.
00:48:54.000This was a policy that has been in the administration for a long, long time, and it has only been approved and greenlit and rolled out now.
00:49:02.000And so you just think about all the immigrants that have applied and attained legal residency or gotten their green cards in that time period because this administration has just been so slow to the draw to highlight or green light things like this.
00:49:15.000You know, and this is the biggest problem with the administration.
00:49:19.000You know, whenever we see this administration do something good, you know, whether it's the ICE detentions or the ICE arrests, rather, or they're rolling out a rule like this or there's an executive order, it's like that's great.
00:49:31.000You know, of course we want to see progress, we want to see good rules.
00:49:43.000The problem is, the people in the administration oppose things like this.
00:49:47.000The people that work in the Department of Homeland Security or in the Treasury or, you know, whatever, take your pick at whatever federal agency or department, they are ideologically and principally opposed to rules and laws like this.
00:49:59.000So they actively work to thwart them, they actively work to stall and delay things like this getting all the way up or getting through and taking into effect.
00:50:29.000Get people that want to see these things passed and they can fill up the White House, fire the bad people, hire the right people, and get things like this going every day.
00:50:38.000But so I see this law and I say, you know, again, we all agree with it, but.
00:50:42.000How can we really say it's a huge victory when it took three long years for something so simple and obvious and uncontroversial and within the president's jurisdiction to get passed, right?
00:50:52.000I mean, if he's been in office since January 20th and it took us two and a half years to get it through, and that's something that's easy, it's like, how are we ever going to build a wall?
00:51:01.000How are we ever going to do anything we're actually serious about if this guy's in office for another term, right?
00:51:06.000Going to be in office for another year and a half.
00:51:08.000What does the next six years look like if he's in there through to 2024?
00:51:16.000But it's like, again, if it's something that is this simple and this uncontroversial, and by the way, it's something that doesn't require a big legal fight or anything, it's not even something that's difficult and therefore isn't even going to make a huge impact.
00:51:30.000I mean, it'll do a little bit, but this is not like a game changer.
00:53:08.000One of these FBI agents investigating this, named Chris Combs, said, I don't think there's a question that they knew which floors the ICE officers were.
00:53:17.000The building shot at has multiple tenants, and the ICE facility was located on the upper floors, and those were targeted.
00:53:24.000So I see this story, and this is getting like no coverage, by the way.
00:53:27.000This is getting no national coverage, no coverage of any kind, but you've got to recognize they're shooting at a building, yes, right?
00:53:33.000I mean, they shot windows out, nobody was killed.
00:54:14.000When they're shooting at your office, what is the message other than to say, we're going to harm you, we're going to kill you, what you're doing is wrong, and we're going to hurt you in some capacity, right?
00:54:27.000And you know, you would think with all this talk about white nationalist terrorism, white supremacist terrorism, that this would be a bigger story, that this is obviously political terrorism.
00:54:36.000And I know that nobody died in this episode, but it's still exactly the definition of political terrorism.
00:54:43.000Many such cases like this in the past couple of years.
00:54:46.000We know that in July in Tacoma, Washington, an Antifa member was shot and killed firebombing an ICE facility, throwing Molotov cocktails at cars, at a building where there were people inside.
00:54:58.000You know, he brought a firearm with him with the intention, presumably, to kill people.
00:55:16.000This is a form of terrorism against ICE agents.
00:55:19.000They're shooting the buildings in New Mexico, firebombing facilities in Washington.
00:55:23.000They're doxing ICE agents, presumably with the intention of getting them fired from their jobs or targeted for violence at their homes or their families targeted or something like that.
00:55:32.000And that's, again, the definition of terrorism the use of violence or intimidation tactics towards political ends.
00:55:41.000You know, if you have a problem with that, there's also a lot of left wing violence that has been going on.
00:55:45.000You know, I continue to think about the shooting in Dayton, Ohio.
00:55:49.000We've been hearing for two weeks about the shooting in El Paso and Charlottesville.
00:55:53.000Still, two years later, we heard a lot about this from the media and certain public figures about how Heather Heyer was killed and, you know, one of the first incidents of modern white supremacist or white nationalist terrorism.
00:56:05.000They ignore that literally a day after the El Paso killing, there was a mass shooting by an Antifa member in Dayton.
00:56:15.000In June, we remember this story a transgender student named Alec McKinney.
00:56:20.000Shot up a school in Colorado, killed one person, injured eight others.
00:56:23.000In November 2017, Devin Kelly shot up a Baptist church in Sutherland Springs, Texas, killed 27 people, and injured 20.
00:56:33.000They didn't ascertain a motive, but he shot up a church.
00:56:35.000And before shooting up the church, he was posting on Facebook about how stupid Christians were and how the Bible wasn't true and all this kind of stuff.
00:56:45.000And then, of course, famously in June 2017, you had the congressional baseball shooting when James Hodgkinson injured six people, most famously Steve Scalise.
00:56:54.000And this was Congress people, this is politicians.
00:56:57.000So, you know, I see all this kind of stuff about white nationalist terrorism, white supremacist terrorism, and I notice that not only is it not the media that's not covering the other side, whether it's ICE terrorism or just plain Antifa terrorism or left wing terrorism or atheist terrorism, but it's even our own guys don't even talk about it, or our own guys.
00:57:16.000It's even people in the conservative media, Fox News, Ben Shapiro, don't even talk about things like this.
00:57:22.000And then you realize again what the agenda is here about that kind of stuff.
00:57:28.000Just another one today of a facility being shot.
00:57:31.000And often the argument I hear from the left, you know, I bring these examples up on Twitter or on the show, and I hear from people that, well, shooting a building is different than killing 20 people.
00:57:42.000It's obviously true that if somebody's firebombing an ice facility or shooting at windows, consequentially, the consequence is different than a mass shooting or a bombing where dozens and dozens of people are killed.
00:57:55.000You can argue that the intention is basically the same.
00:57:57.000You can argue that, uh, You know, somebody like this person who firebombed the Seattle or rather the Tacoma, Washington ICE facility could have had his intention was to kill ICE people or could have killed people because he's, you know, brought a gun and was firebombing cars and buildings or something like that.
00:58:15.000But fundamentally, the intent is the same.
00:58:17.000The intent is to use violence, the intent is to intimidate people for political reasons.
00:58:22.000I think both are effectively the same.
00:58:24.000Moreover, people use the argument that, well, even if there are ICE terrorists or anti ICE terrorists, even if there is left wing terrorism or Antifa terrorism, Or atheist terrorism, it's not happening as much as right wing terrorism.
00:58:40.000It's also true that there is probably, if you added up all the numbers, probably more casualties and more attacks from a so called right wing or a white nationalist ideology than there is for left wing people.
00:58:52.000I think they're both infrequent, but I would say that probably right wing has a handful more than left wing terrorism.
00:58:58.000But that brings up a very important point.
00:59:01.000You know, I remember on my debate on Trainwrecks TV with. Hassan Piker and Destiny, they said, well, sure, you can point to like a dozen examples of left wing terrorists, but there's like 13 examples of white nationalist terrorists.
00:59:15.000Well, there's a good reason why white nationalists or so called right wing people, there might be a greater frequency of terrorism.
00:59:23.000And that's because we look at terrorism as a tactic or a strategy, and naturally, terrorism is an asymmetrical tactic.
00:59:30.000It's used in asymmetrical warfare when it's a weaker opponent against a much stronger adversary.
00:59:36.000You know, I'll use Israel as a perfect example.
00:59:38.000You know, the Zionists in the 1940s invented terrorism.
00:59:43.000I don't know if this is popular knowledge on this show or not.
00:59:45.000Maybe some people watching this show know what I'm talking about, some people do not.
00:59:49.000But there's, for example, a very famous Zionist militia called Ergun, which was literally famous in the 1930s and 40s for innovating modern terrorist techniques.
01:00:00.000They say that Zionist militias invented the bus bombing, they invented modern suicide bombings, and they were responsible for all kinds of mass killings of Palestinians, and they were proud of it.
01:00:12.000You know, if you read in the diaries of some of the early prime ministers, if you look at the head of the Ergun militia, Manicham Begin, he talked about how he was bragging about being the inventor of modern terrorism in the whole world, you know, and things like this.
01:00:25.000They used that tactic when they were much weaker, going up against Great Britain in many cases, or going up against the majority of the population in Palestine, which was Arabs and Muslims, right?
01:00:39.000So when the Zionists were a smaller force and they were much weaker, They use terrorism as a tactic to gain power, right, or to affect change.
01:00:47.000Now that they've become institutionalized and they're the state of Israel, and they're now one of the strongest militaries in the world, objectively speaking, one of the most advanced and sophisticated militaries in the world, now they don't use terrorism.
01:01:00.000Now the Palestinians use suicide bombings and knife attacks and shootings because they're a much, much weaker force compared to the Israelis.
01:01:08.000And that's how you have to consider these things.
01:01:10.000Similarly, people say, well, why is it that we see so many high profile Well, a handful, I should say.
01:01:18.000High profile shootings by people with a right wing manifesto or something like this.
01:01:22.000It's very simple because the left wing violence and the left wing terrorism is conducted by the state, of course.
01:01:30.000That's the very simple and obvious answer, which I haven't seen anybody talk about this just yet.
01:01:34.000The reason why some crazy people are driven to these kinds of acts of desperation, and I don't say that in any other way, I mean, these are bad, heinous, evil acts by crazy people, but the reason that those kinds of people are the ones who do these violent acts.
01:01:48.000Are because they are on the fringe, they are on the outside.
01:01:51.000There is no institutional right wing power in the whole country.
01:02:19.000As a tactic, it would make no sense for a radical leftist to do terrorism because they could just sit and wait.
01:02:24.000The government will do it for them, right?
01:02:26.000Somebody who's an avowed communist, an avowed socialist, somebody like that.
01:02:30.000All they have to do is wait 10 or 15 years, and one of their radicals will get elected in Congress, or one of their radicals will be appointed the head of the FBI or the head of the CIA, and they'll be conducting their terrorism using the state apparatus.
01:02:43.000And so I hear all this talk about, you know, violence and political violence and all this kind of stuff.
01:02:50.000And to me, the most obvious explanation for it all is that.
01:02:53.000Right wing, you know, whenever that does happen, it's driven out of desperation.
01:03:08.000We find that thinking disturbing and wrong and troubling, obviously.
01:03:12.000From a purely political lens, it does more harm than good.
01:03:15.000From a moral lens, you're going to hell if you do things like that, right?
01:03:18.000But left wing radicals don't think in these terms because they can join the DSA.
01:03:23.000And the DSA isn't subject to FBI raids, and they're not banned from Facebook, they're not banned from Twitter, right?
01:03:28.000You can join Antifa, which is radical left wing terrorists, literally.
01:03:33.000You know, I just read off some examples here.
01:03:35.000Antifa was responsible for the mass shooting in Dayton.
01:03:38.000Antifa was responsible for that Tacoma firebombing, and they lauded him as a hero and a martyr, and they encouraged more people to take action like him.
01:03:46.000They can talk like that on Facebook and not get banned.
01:03:50.000They can talk about killing public right wing figures, and Facebook changes the rules to say that's fine because those right wing people are acceptable targets.
01:03:59.000So, what is it other than state authorized political violence, right?
01:04:03.000If that's the kind of thing that's going on.
01:04:05.000So, a left wing person can join the DSA, they can join Antifa, they can join the AOC campaign, they could be a professor in a university, they could be a staff member for a congressional person, they could work in the White House.
01:04:16.000You look at some of these people in the Obama White House, and it's no wonder why you don't see many radicals popping off from the left wing side.
01:04:23.000When they want to commit violence, when they want to make a difference, they sign up for whatever local institution fits their aptitude and temperament.
01:04:31.000So, I've been hearing all this stuff about the violence, and I haven't heard anybody make that claim.
01:04:35.000And it should, I think it should make.
01:04:37.000Maybe more moderate people realize that this is why it's critical to involve everybody in the conversation.
01:04:44.000You know, for example, when I was on that train wrecks TV debate, it was a great dialectic.
01:04:48.000That was the last time I sat down with a real, like, left wing opponent.
01:04:59.000You know, crazy people that do violence should not be incorporated into the system.
01:05:03.000However, right wing people, even right wing people that you find extreme or fascist or something like that, Should be incorporated into the system.
01:05:12.000People that have illiberal worldviews, people that have traditionalist worldviews, people that have identitarian worldviews should be brought into the fold because ultimately what stops political violence is enfranchisement.
01:05:25.000If there are opportunities for young people to get involved and see a future for whatever their chosen political ideology is, if they could go in and make a difference and affect change within the system, then probably you're not going to get a lot of conflict.
01:05:38.000Probably a lot of people are going to make the logical calculation.
01:05:41.000If I see a problem, well, I know that, you know, even though we're not going to win 100% of the time, we could get in the government and fight the good fight.
01:05:49.000You know, we could get into the system and we could fight the good fight.
01:05:54.000We could wage a war of laws or something like that and not in the streets.
01:05:58.000You know, not be preparing for some kind of cataclysmic thing.
01:06:00.000But that's ultimately the problem with this kind of one party globalist thinking, which is you disenfranchise 60 million people and then they get surprised when you get these kinds of destabilizing things.
01:06:12.000Volatile actions or rhetoric or things like this.
01:06:15.000That's what the country is being driven to because, you know, probably a good 25 to 50% of the population feels that they're being completely dominated or conquered by the other side.
01:06:26.000And, you know, it's an asymmetrical battle, right?
01:06:28.000The violence that is being perpetrated by the other side is being done so under the aegis of the legitimacy of the state, of the market, of tech, right?
01:06:43.000So, You know, I see this conversation evolving about political violence, and that is seldom mentioned why you see maybe perhaps slightly more of this than you do of left wing terrorism.
01:06:54.000You know, you want to see left wing terrorism?
01:06:56.000Go look at what's happening in the European Union.
01:07:03.000Look at what the government is doing, or social media companies, all these different institutions that run interference for Antifa, you know, and what they're doing, for example, in Portland, Oregon, or what they did in Tacoma, Washington, or what they did in Dayton, Ohio.
01:07:16.000Or what they did in Charlottesville, Virginia two years ago.
01:07:33.000We have to have a national conversation about radicalization online.
01:07:36.000But when 2,000 Antifa members descend on Charlottesville with lead pipes, baseball bats, flamethrowers, jars of piss, feces, chemical weapons, mace, things like that, To injure and maim people, and they get the government helping them and then the media running interference for them, that's not terrorism, that's human rights activism.
01:07:56.000I think that tells you everything you need to know about political violence in America in 2019.
01:08:08.000We're going to take a look at our super chats.
01:08:09.000We'll see what you guys are saying about all this stuff.
01:08:15.000I know we've been talking a lot about the El Paso thing and political violence in general, but that's the one thing that I haven't heard from anybody, which is to say it's totally asymmetrical.
01:08:25.000And that's why terrorism as a tactic is always used by the weak, the powerless, the disenfranchised.
01:08:35.000I'm just giving it a very sober and clinical analysis and diagnosis.
01:08:39.000If you want to see it stop, well, there's a very easy solution.
01:08:42.000But I think the Democrats ultimately and left wing people ultimately like to see it because they can use that to further their grip on the country.
01:09:40.000It'd be one thing if the guy came up to him and it was like tough.
01:09:43.000And he was giving it back to him, but Cuomo was like, you know, he was really busting this guy's balls, and he's like, no, no, I'm sorry, I don't want any trouble, I don't mean to start anything, you know?
01:09:53.000So the guy that called him a name, you know, he wrote a check with his mouth that he could not cash, right?
01:10:21.000Came off as pretty tough, I guess, you know, because that guy was calling him Fredo and then he was like, oh, no, no, don't hit me, don't hit me.
01:10:27.000So I thought I have to defend my guy Cuomo.
01:10:30.000Hirachi says, Are you done with that soup?
01:10:50.000Dad says, Nick, one of our iFunny Zoomers were wrongfully arrested on the grounds of a red flag law in a state that does not have such laws.
01:12:05.000It's matters of life and death, quite literally, eternal life and death and salvation.
01:12:09.000But there doesn't need to be an authority to interpret it and tell me what it means.
01:12:13.000Yeah, maybe if I get struck by lightning or somebody punches me really hard in the head, you know, I take up boxing finally and I get like 50 IQ points knocked out of me, I'll be like, all of a sudden, I think, you know, we don't need any unity.
01:12:26.000And my Protestant tradition is the one that's got it correct, and the 1,000 others are all wrong.
01:12:33.000Just busting your chops a little bit, but yeah, no, I don't think that's going to happen anytime soon.
01:12:37.000Maybe one day I'll just get tired of justifying myself and say, you know what?
01:13:18.000And he didn't respond, so I'll have to check it out.
01:13:21.000Mark Allen says If a man knows no Latin, he belongs to the vulgar, even though he'd be a great virtuoso on the electrical machine and have the base of hydrofluoric acid in his crucible, says Arthur Schopenhauer.
01:13:47.000And it's sort of ironic in the sense that Latin was the language of the Romans, and the Romans were notoriously anti intellectual and against the Greek philosophers.
01:13:56.000So take that Greek shit somewhere else, all right?
01:16:41.000I don't want to make any stupid and cringe, unfunny designs that would make people think that any of those things would be attributable to me.
01:18:42.000Gays for Nick group as if they all got in a very tiny concentrated area, maybe off the grid, maybe sort of away from a lot of traffic, and then I don't know, you know.
01:18:53.000And then I don't know, they'd all get together in one place, right?
01:19:43.000You know, it's not surprising at this point, but You get to see things like this where it's just so transparent and obvious what's going on.
01:21:38.000The previous day, all I ate the whole day was a cheeseburger, fries, and a brownie, like Blizzard, a brownie concrete mixer is what they call it.
01:21:48.000Okay, so that was all I ate the whole day.
01:21:50.000One meal, it was a cheeseburger, fries, and a little bit of ice cream.
01:21:54.000So in the past, like four to eight hours, I ate two whole meals.
01:21:58.000I think the day before, I didn't eat anything in the whole 24 hour period.
01:22:27.000And it's not a response to that, but it's just like I just, you know, I sort of eat when it's convenient for me.
01:22:32.000That's why I can have such a bad diet because it's like, Sure, you might eat like a lot of shitty food, but if it's only a thousand calories of shitty food, you're probably good, you know?
01:24:22.000He's got a turtle emoji, which I guess when he says he's going movie, movie, he's describing that the turtle is moving, the turtle emoji moving across the page.
01:24:32.000Jay Stewart says, use this to upgrade that V6 Mustang to a hardtop GT.
01:24:36.000I'm not doing any upgrades anytime soon.
01:24:40.000Evan Wood says, I notice you tend to say things like this instead of things like that when referring to previous examples.
01:27:19.000I'm down here sometimes, and normally it's really cool, but I have my space heater on sometimes, and it gets a little bit too warm, and I have to turn it off and get a glass of water while I'm playing Guitar Hero.
01:27:30.000And I've got to tell you, I can relate because my fingers hurt a little bit sometimes when I'm playing Guitar Hero, and it's a little bit too warm.
01:27:37.000So I can kind of understand where you're coming from.
01:27:47.000Jason Jones says, I am the original person who started using boomer as a pejorative way back in 2012 before I heard anyone else on the internet use it in that way.
01:29:49.000Zirconium says Dremp several knickers and I fought over my laptop to cancel our cringe chats because you were upset and going to end it unless we could make you laugh.
01:31:08.000Antolan says Cuomo is really out of touch if he thinks this society will grant a white man the same entitlement to outrage for being called the name as a colored person.
01:31:18.000Almost surprised his fellow journalists didn't call him fragile.
01:31:22.000I don't know if that was a really well thought out thing.
01:31:24.000I think he was just probably in a heated moment there.
01:31:29.000Skits says you're just falling into your public character with that dream.
01:31:33.000Just a developed mind entity that is sort of like a suit of clothes that you are slipping into.
01:32:05.000Supreme Intention Cruise says, Whites are like air travel, safest form when compared to others, but sensationalized in the media when tragedy strikes.
01:32:39.000Against Degeneracy says, I understand the utility of people questioning Epstein's suicide, but does it really have to be under such a cringy and boomer hashtag?
01:33:23.000You know, here we have a totally based. World event, world historical moment where Jeffrey Epstein suicides, the whole thing is revealed, and people are like, duh, Clinton kill list, Clinton kill count.
01:34:44.000I'm so poisoned by the internet stuff.
01:34:46.000I can't really tell what to make of that one.
01:34:49.000Dumbass says New York's finest literally dabbing on open borders rabbis as they cuff them and load them onto a bus headed straight to jail.
01:38:02.000I guess I would say just, you know, enjoy your youth.
01:38:05.000You want to make your years productive, but you also want to be enjoying them.
01:38:08.000It's sort of, I don't know, a dual mentality there because on the one hand, you want to have this mentality of, well, you're only young once and this time is fleeting and you should enjoy it, but at the same time, you want it to be productive.
01:38:20.000So I would say try and temper those two things.
01:40:17.000Thanks for the big super chat, but no, you'll just have to wait for Sunday just like everybody else.
01:40:22.000Levi says, hey, Nick, have you gone to the library recently?
01:40:25.000I've heard they have a lot of great books you can check out.
01:40:27.000Yeah, no, I haven't been to the library recently.
01:40:30.000This guy says, so sick of the brainlets who quote that kid's poem from five generations ago as if it's supposed to hold our entire immigration policy hostage.
01:40:47.000Prince of Conquest says, Statue of Liberty was built by the French, not even originally meant for the U.S. Put in Globo Homo NYC with a poem written by a Russian immigrant named Lazarus.
01:42:36.000Ethan Patrick says, have you thought about doing dedicated segments on the show, like stories, MSM selectively buried, rather than freeform like you do it now?
01:48:46.000Yolt says, Nick, my wife is complaining that you don't care about super chats enough, so could you reply to mine with, Okay, by the way, got the mug.
01:48:53.000Hey, well, thanks for getting the mug.
01:48:55.000Dennis Prager says, A lady at work asked me to sign up as a gay ally.