America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - Bannon vs Trump | America First Ep. 78

00:00:00.000 Good evening, everybody.

00:00:01.000 You are watching America First.

00:00:03.000 My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes, and we have a great show for you tonight.

00:00:08.000 Lots to get into, lots to talk about.

00:00:10.000 Of course, 2018 is very exciting already.

00:00:14.000 So much going on, so many major things.

00:00:17.000 I'm not even sure if everybody knows everything that's going on because so much has gone on today.

00:00:23.000 And you have to wonder is it all a coincidence that it's all happening today?

00:00:27.000 Of course, we have civil war between former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon and President Donald Trump, which erupted today in the wake of some excerpts revealed from Michael Wolf's upcoming book, Fire and Fury.

00:00:42.000 We saw the investigation into the Russia probe heat up.

00:00:45.000 The investigation into the Russia probe.

00:00:48.000 The Russia probe, of course, is investigating possible collusion in the 2016 election.

00:00:53.000 It looks like now the people investigating that might come under fire themselves from the House Intelligence Committee.

00:01:00.000 Of course, Paul Manafort is now counter suing.

00:01:04.000 The special counsel for looking into his possible financial crimes in Ukraine back in 2012.

00:01:10.000 We have information with regards to Hillary Clinton and the FBI investigation of her a year ago.

00:01:16.000 And so, investigations on top of investigations, all kinds of things going on.

00:01:23.000 And like I said, you got to wonder is it all related?

00:01:25.000 Is it all connected?

00:01:26.000 Is it all a coincidence?

00:01:28.000 That will be a theme possibly this week, possibly this month, certainly tonight, because there is a lot going on.

00:01:35.000 And so, we'll start with.

00:01:37.000 The Civil War between Steve Bannon and Donald Trump.

00:01:41.000 And I'll pull up my notes, actually.

00:01:42.000 I know it's funny, you know, like the past two episodes have been so information heavy, and I didn't even use notes for the past two because I've been following it so closely.

00:01:51.000 But this one, there's just a lot.

00:01:54.000 So it started out, of course, today between the White House chief strategist Steve Bannon and the president, Donald Trump.

00:01:59.000 It started out with an excerpt that was acquired by The Guardian from the book Fire and Fury by Michael Wolf.

00:02:07.000 And the excerpt from the book was a quote from Steve Bannon.

00:02:11.000 And he essentially gave a lot of credence to the special counsel and to the Russia accusers against Donald Trump that what was done in the early transition, the transition period between Barack Obama and Donald Trump, between the election in November of 2016 and the inauguration in January of 2017, he said that the contact between Michael Flynn and Russia was unpatriotic and treasonous.

00:02:34.000 At least that's what he was quoted as saying, according to this excerpt from this.

00:02:39.000 Upcoming book.

00:02:40.000 In response, President Trump issued a scathing statement, which we don't know if he said it.

00:02:46.000 He didn't, of course, come out and say it publicly.

00:02:48.000 It was a written statement.

00:02:49.000 So, again, that throws some doubt into the equation.

00:02:52.000 But a scathing statement nonetheless, disassociating the president and the White House from Steve Bannon, disassociating the presidency, the win in the 2016 election from Steve Bannon, and ultimately saying that he has lost his mind.

00:03:06.000 And now Donald Trump Jr. is going on the offensive.

00:03:10.000 Basically, everybody in the Republican establishment is going on the offensive in Steve Bannon.

00:03:14.000 And what is remarkably interesting about all of this so far is that we've heard statements from the White House.

00:03:22.000 We've heard from Sarah Huckabee Sanders.

00:03:24.000 We saw the written statement, which they say is from Donald Trump.

00:03:28.000 We've heard the media's reaction.

00:03:30.000 Everybody's had their reaction about it.

00:03:32.000 We haven't heard from Steve Bannon yet.

00:03:36.000 In Breitbart, they published the Guardian article without editing it.

00:03:40.000 Without Steve Bannon denying that he said what he said in the book or he's quoted as saying in the book, they quoted it word for word.

00:03:47.000 There was no excerpt saying this is fake news, no excerpt saying this didn't happen.

00:03:50.000 Steve Bannon didn't deny it.

00:03:52.000 No comment by Steve Bannon since this came out.

00:03:56.000 And Steve Bannon is effectively done.

00:03:57.000 Now that the president is against him, the president has actively humiliated him in front of the country.

00:04:03.000 Steve Bannon is left essentially with no allies.

00:04:06.000 He's alienated the media, the establishment, the GOP, and now the White House.

00:04:10.000 And so Steve Bannon is dead in the water as of this statement from the president, as of what has come out of the White House.

00:04:17.000 And yet there's nothing, no word from Steve Bannon.

00:04:20.000 And if you go on Breitbart, even more peculiar is every story on Breitbart, the featured story and all the other side features, they're all about.

00:04:30.000 What happened this morning?

00:04:31.000 And you just have to wonder.

00:04:33.000 This came out of nowhere.

00:04:35.000 It came out of nowhere, and the excerpt came from The Guardian.

00:04:39.000 It came from Michael Wolf, who's a reporter for, I think, The Hollywood Inquirer, The Hollywood Reporter.

00:04:45.000 I mean, this is like fake news central, this guy, CNN guy.

00:04:49.000 He appears on CNN.

00:04:51.000 So this guy comes out this morning with this excerpt from his book.

00:04:54.000 It comes out in The Guardian, which is, of course, a centrist or left leaning paper.

00:05:00.000 And this all of a sudden has caused a complete and total rift between the president and Steve Bannon.

00:05:06.000 And moreover, if you look at what was said, what Steve Bannon was quoted as saying in the book, Steve Bannon is quoted as saying that the contact between the Trump transition team and Russia is treasonous and unpatriotic.

00:05:20.000 When he's gone on television before and said that the Russia story was fake news and a witch hunt, President Trump comes forth and says that Steve Bannon had nothing to do with his win in 2016.

00:05:32.000 Steve Bannon had very little contact with the president, no influence in the West Wing, and yet he's gone on and said glowing things about Steve Bannon in the past.

00:05:41.000 So everything is very, very fishy about this.

00:05:44.000 I said this on Nationalist Review this morning on the podcast.

00:05:48.000 When it just came out, I mean, this was still developing while James and I were producing the podcast.

00:05:54.000 I said, Something's not right here.

00:05:55.000 Something is off here.

00:05:57.000 This does not pass the smell test.

00:05:59.000 I'm still convinced of that.

00:06:00.000 We've been seeing a lot of other developments going on on the side.

00:06:04.000 At the same time.

00:06:05.000 And it really makes me wonder is this a smokescreen?

00:06:08.000 Is this a part of a broader play?

00:06:10.000 Is this to delegitimize the media?

00:06:13.000 I'm not sure what's at play here.

00:06:15.000 And this is going to sound like Nick the Conspiracy Theorist again.

00:06:18.000 I didn't believe what was going on in Iran.

00:06:20.000 I don't exactly believe what's going on here between Trump and Steve Bannon.

00:06:23.000 But you got to wonder how this one excerpt from this CNN reporter, this CNN contributor, who is in every book that he's produced and almost every piece he's produced, he gets criticized for exactly what I'm accusing him of doing.

00:06:38.000 Which is either inventing a quote or taking liberties with it, how that would inspire the Trump administration to completely disown Steve Bannon.

00:06:45.000 And that Steve Bannon has yet to say anything, that speaks volumes in and of itself.

00:06:51.000 And let's look at Michael Wolf.

00:06:53.000 This is the guy who wrote the book that has caused all this controversy.

00:06:59.000 Now, he also wrote an excerpt in his book about Thomas Barack Jr., who was a billionaire and a confidant of the president.

00:07:08.000 Quoted by The Guardian, that was taken by The Guardian. 1.00

00:07:11.000 There was also an excerpt about Thomas Brock Jr., who this book, Michael Wolf, quotes Thomas Brock Jr. in this book as saying that the president is not only crazy, but he's also stupid. 0.92

00:07:22.000 Now, Thomas Brock Jr. went on Twitter today and said that he only talked to the author of this book one time, and he didn't say the quote that was attributed to him. 0.93

00:07:30.000 That anybody who knows him would know that that's inconsistent with who he is, what he believes about the president, his values, everything.

00:07:38.000 Now, we saw a statement from Katie Turr today, which is Very interesting, and I'll pull this up.

00:07:44.000 Now, Katie Turr, she's NBC.

00:07:46.000 So, you know, you might think that if people are denying the veracity of these quotes, people might think, oh, well, of course the MAGApedes, of course the Donald Trump supporters, are going to try and discredit the quote.

00:08:00.000 Of course the MAGApedes are going to ignore the quote because it doesn't really fit the narrative.

00:08:05.000 The narrative since Steve Bannon has been released from the White House has been that Steve Bannon wasn't really fired, it wasn't really bad blood.

00:08:13.000 It was more of like Steve Bannon was going out into the world to continue to fight for the America First MAGA agenda.

00:08:20.000 But not having the same constraints that he would be under in his official capacity in the White House.

00:08:26.000 And so we can understand why right wing people would say that this story doesn't smell right, why it might be wishful thinking that people on the right might say that.

00:08:34.000 But Katie Turr from NBC, this is what she said about it today.

00:08:37.000 This is a quote from her, from her Twitter.

00:08:40.000 She writes Wolf, Michael Wolf, who wrote the book, is likely to face some serious questions and criticism regarding his use of quotes.

00:08:49.000 It does appear from the reading that he is in the room.

00:08:52.000 for many of the conversations he ends up quoting in the book, but from the author's note it sounds like they are re-creations.

00:08:58.000 How can he be sure the characters said what they said?

00:09:01.000 Were the conversations recorded and played back to him?

00:09:04.000 Did he cross-confirm quotes with both parties or with others in the room?

00:09:08.000 It is not clear from this author's note.

00:09:10.000 He also notes that the stories he has told often compete or conflict with one another.

00:09:15.000 Despite that, Wolfe says in some cases he's let the sources tell his or her version.

00:09:20.000 The reader can decide if it's true or false.

00:09:23.000 The reader can decide if it's true or false, really?

00:09:26.000 This is going to split the country in two.

00:09:28.000 This is going to split the White House in two.

00:09:30.000 The reader can decide if it's true or not.

00:09:34.000 Wolf says, in some cases, or no, I'm sorry, I read that part already.

00:09:37.000 That is concerning unless he makes clear which stories are conflicting or are stories he can't confirm.

00:09:44.000 I'm not sure that he does.

00:09:45.000 I haven't gotten far enough in to tell.

00:09:47.000 It is also unclear from the author, note, how many times he sat down with Trump himself.

00:09:52.000 As he notes below, his access pretty much ended when Kelly came in and Bannon was kicked out.

00:09:58.000 His access to the White House ended when Kelly came in and Bannon was kicked out.

00:10:03.000 Now, if you recall the timeline here, when Bannon was working in the White House, this is when he was going on television defending the president, going on television saying that the Russia scandal was a witch hunt, that it was made up, it was fake news.

00:10:17.000 And after he got fired, that's when these quotes started to come around.

00:10:20.000 Yet Michael Wolf, who wrote this book, who's quoting Steve Bannon as saying all this suddenly inconsistent, out of character things about the Russia investigation, He's saying that he got those quotes even though he wasn't in the White House when those quotes would have been made.

00:10:35.000 So we look at this is Katie Turr from NBC who is casting serious doubt on the legitimacy, on the credibility of this book, of this quote.

00:10:43.000 Steve Bannon has not made a comment.

00:10:45.000 It's been a remarkably aggressive play from the White House.

00:10:49.000 You just have to wonder what the play is here.

00:10:51.000 I don't think it is what everybody says it is.

00:10:54.000 I don't think it's that simple.

00:10:55.000 How could it be that simple that the president had this scathing statement locked and loaded?

00:11:00.000 No statement from the president, verbally at least.

00:11:03.000 No statement at all from Steve Bannon.

00:11:05.000 You have this guy who's causing the fracture, and the guy's a CNN contributor.

00:11:11.000 Doesn't make any sense.

00:11:12.000 Whenever we hear something like this from CNN, it's dismissed as fake news by the president.

00:11:18.000 Whenever we hear something like this from the New York Times, from MSNBC, from any of the other mainstream media outlets about the West Wing, about allies in their quotes, people with single or no sources, the president says it was fake news.

00:11:30.000 Remember a couple of months ago with Rex Tillerson. 0.99

00:11:34.000 It came out in the mainstream media that Rex Tillerson had called Donald Trump an idiot. 0.99

00:11:39.000 Rex Tillerson later came on and said, Of course, that wasn't true. 1.00

00:11:42.000 President Trump said, Of course, that wasn't true.

00:11:44.000 That was a made up story.

00:11:46.000 Well, now a CNN contributor came out, and it's dubious if he ever heard a conversation between Steve Bannon and the president or anything that President Trump ever said.

00:11:56.000 That maybe all the quotes in this book are made up, and that's going to tear him in half.

00:12:00.000 I don't buy it.

00:12:01.000 And the silence is deafening from Steve Bannon.

00:12:04.000 So that's that.

00:12:06.000 This, again, it looks kind of like a smokestream.

00:12:10.000 It looks like they're trying to take our eye off of something.

00:12:12.000 President Trump has been doing a tweet storm last night and the night before, tweeting all kinds of outlandish things, really.

00:12:19.000 Attention grabbing things.

00:12:20.000 Now we hear this this afternoon.

00:12:22.000 It seems like there's some kind of a play in the works here.

00:12:25.000 I know we've been saying that a lot lately, but it really seems like something is up.

00:12:29.000 Something is not right.

00:12:31.000 For the past three months, you've been seeing a lot of coincidences, a lot of unexplainable things going on domestically, internationally.

00:12:39.000 I'm not buying any of it.

00:12:40.000 Nobody should be buying any of it.

00:12:42.000 Since Vegas, nothing has been right.

00:12:45.000 Since Vegas, nothing has made any sense.

00:12:48.000 We still haven't gotten an explanation about that.

00:12:51.000 You've had power outages at airports.

00:12:53.000 And that may not sound like a big thing, but I mean, think of it.

00:12:56.000 You had a total blackout at the Atlanta Hartford Airport, the biggest airport in the world.

00:13:02.000 Really?

00:13:02.000 Their power goes out, their backup generators go out, and then not only does that happen, but then a month later, the same thing happens at the New Orleans Airport, and on the same day, customs computers across the country go down.

00:13:15.000 That happens in the span of one month?

00:13:15.000 Really?

00:13:18.000 You have the social media blackout the same weekend as the Saudi purge.

00:13:22.000 You have planes coming into the Atlanta Hartford Airport.

00:13:24.000 While the blackout is happening, and customs agents don't board these planes, they go in and out while all other planes are grounded.

00:13:31.000 You have the Vegas shooting unexplained, you have Iranian protests out of nowhere, which appear to be astroturfed, and now you have this going on with all these investigations coming to a brim.

00:13:42.000 What's going on, folks?

00:13:44.000 What's going on?

00:13:45.000 Everybody's reacting to it, everybody's got their opinion about it, everybody's so quick to weigh in and say, Are you Team Bannon?

00:13:52.000 Are you Team Trump?

00:13:53.000 But something is not right.

00:13:55.000 Something has not been right for a long time.

00:13:57.000 I'm not crazy for saying that.

00:13:59.000 Just look at the evidence.

00:14:00.000 It doesn't add up.

00:14:01.000 So that's Steve Bannon.

00:14:02.000 That's Donald Trump.

00:14:04.000 And that's only, that was the least crazy thing that happened today.

00:14:07.000 That is the least, ironically, the least consequential thing to happen today.

00:14:12.000 The thing that everybody was talking about, the most people were talking about, but the least consequential.

00:14:18.000 The more consequential thing was that just shortly after we heard the president disown Steve Bannon, essentially, and end Steve Bannon's political career.

00:14:27.000 We heard that Paul Manafort, if you recall, who was charged a couple of months ago on 12 counts, which included money laundering and actually conspiracy against the United States.

00:14:36.000 Paul Manafort, former campaign chairman for Donald Trump, is now countersuing.

00:14:40.000 He's now suing special counsel Robert Mueller and deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein, alleging that the Russia probe has gone beyond the scope of the special counsel regulations.

00:14:53.000 And this is a part of the complaint that his legal team put together.

00:14:57.000 Quote, the investigation of Mr. Manafort is completely unmoored from the special counsel's original jurisdiction to investigate any links andor coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump.

00:15:11.000 So, like you recall, in October, Manafort and his partner Rick Gates, his business partner Rick Gates, pled not guilty to 12 criminal charges, and that was pertaining to his ties in Ukraine.

00:15:23.000 If you recall, Paul Manafort and Rick Gates were brought in on charges pertaining to financial dealings that happened in 2012.

00:15:31.000 That happened in 2012 and in Ukraine.

00:15:34.000 The special counsel was appointed by the FBI, by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosentine, to investigate Russian collusion in the 2016 election.

00:15:45.000 And they brought charges against Manafort and Rick Gates for financial crimes, perhaps, in 2012 with regards to Ukraine.

00:15:55.000 So, of course, it's outside the scope of the original jurisdiction of the special counsel.

00:15:59.000 So, Paul Manafort is suing now.

00:16:01.000 He's suing Robert Mueller and Rod Rosenstein.

00:16:05.000 And not only did they say that it went outside the scope of the regulations for that investigation, but that for the deputy attorney general to even appoint special counsel Bob Mueller was outside of his jurisdiction as deputy attorney general.

00:16:18.000 So that's happening.

00:16:20.000 And at the same time that that happened, shortly after Paul Manafort announced that he was suing, you had a meeting take place between Rod Rosenstein, FBI Director Chris Wray, and Speaker of the House Paul Ryan.

00:16:33.000 This is a lot of information, but we'll summarize, we'll do a little analysis.

00:16:37.000 At the same time that you have this Bannon and Trump civil war, you have Paul Manafort, which is suing special counsel Robert Mueller, who a couple of months ago brought Paul Manafort in on charges totally not in relation to the Russia collusion with 2016 narrative.

00:16:55.000 Shortly after that, you have the same person who's being sued, Rod Rosenstein, Deputy Attorney General, and FBI Director Chris Wray, meeting with the Speaker of the House, Paul Ryan.

00:17:06.000 Why are they on Capitol Hill meeting with the Speaker of the House?

00:17:10.000 Allegedly, Rod Rosenstein called the meeting.

00:17:12.000 Many people speculate that this is in response to something going on in the House Intelligence Committee.

00:17:18.000 This was not in the news in the past couple of days.

00:17:21.000 I wonder why nobody was talking about this.

00:17:25.000 But Devin Nunes, who is the chairman of the House Special Intelligence Committee, he set a deadline and said that if the Robert Mueller special counsel does not reveal key witnesses and key documents pertaining to his Russia probe, then there will be action by the House Intelligence Committee.

00:17:43.000 They are weighing.

00:17:44.000 Possibly bringing charges against Mueller and against Rosenstein for contempt against the Congress.

00:17:52.000 And the reason for this, of course, all goes back to the Trump dossier.

00:17:55.000 The reason that we even have this Russia probe by Robert Mueller is because of the 35 page Trump Russia dossier from, I think it was January or February.

00:18:06.000 It was the BuzzFeed article that was put out that said that Trump went to Moscow and he went to the Ritz Carlton in Moscow and he peed on Barack Obama's bed or he had prostitutes do that.

00:18:17.000 And that Putin was filming that and he was using that to blackmail the administration.

00:18:21.000 It turned out to be a total hoax, turned out to be totally made up.

00:18:26.000 But it turned out that that dossier, that report, which turned out to be complete fiction, that was put together by a man named Christopher Steele.

00:18:34.000 Christopher Steele was a former spy for Great Britain during the Cold War.

00:18:39.000 He went on, obviously, to do security contracting work or intelligence work.

00:18:44.000 And he put together that dossier using his ties in the Kremlin.

00:18:47.000 He was contracted by a company named Fusion GPS.

00:18:50.000 Fusion GPS is directly connected to the Hillary Clinton campaign and the DNC and many elements in the Republican establishment.

00:18:58.000 So you have this money trail from the DNC, the Clinton campaign, and even elements in the Republican Party, which put together this extremely, extremely wrong and inflammatory dossier on the president.

00:19:11.000 This dossier has served as the basis for the Russia investigation.

00:19:16.000 The reason that Bob Mueller was able to put together the special counsel, the reason That Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein was able to appoint Bob Mueller to lead this investigation was because of the dossier.

00:19:28.000 The dossier was not true.

00:19:29.000 The dossier was put together by Clinton, the DNC, and the Republican establishment.

00:19:35.000 And so now it's been coming out that basically they're all in cahoots.

00:19:39.000 They're all in cahoots, the people investigating the dossier, the people that put together the dossier.

00:19:44.000 And so it came out, I don't know if you recall, before the break, we talked about all of the people that were being taken off of Bob Mueller's team because they were found to have tweeted anti Trump things or texted anti Trump things, sent anti Trump emails, people that gave money to Barack Obama, people that gave money to Hillary Clinton.

00:20:01.000 People that were involved in the FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton, which let her off the hook.

00:20:06.000 And so now Devin Nunes of the House Intelligence Committee is saying look, if you're going to base your Russia probe off of the Trump Russia dossier, which is total BS, you're going to have to put together witnesses.

00:20:17.000 You're going to have to put together interviews with Peter Sturzok, for example, who was the one who was caught sending an anti Trump email, who was on the Bob Mueller probe.

00:20:27.000 You're going to have to put together documents for why you are basing your investigation off of this, even though it was widely discredited.

00:20:34.000 And they didn't meet the deadline.

00:20:35.000 That deadline was set for today that Devin Nunes demanded those witnesses and those documents to justify the investigation to continue to go forward.

00:20:45.000 And now the House Intelligence Committee is weighing, bringing charges against Rod Rosenstein and Bob Mueller for obstructing the Congress in their oversight process and their oversight authority.

00:20:56.000 So you're looking at all of this combined.

00:20:59.000 You're looking at this smoke screen.

00:21:00.000 You're looking at a lot of these irregularities.

00:21:02.000 And it's looking like what's going on behind the scenes is that there is an investigation of Clinton.

00:21:08.000 Of the Republican establishment, of John McCain.

00:21:11.000 I know it sounds far fetched maybe right now, but mark my words, in a couple of months, I don't know what the timeline will be here, but it looks like some serious actors are becoming compromised behind the scenes.

00:21:24.000 Because why else would you have all this movement?

00:21:26.000 Why else would you have all this frantic and panicking movement by politicians and other people when you have all these things coming out from the sex abuse cover up in Congress to these things now coming out with the House intelligence investigation or the special counsel investigation, rather?

00:21:43.000 So, you have that.

00:21:45.000 And then, if you're not convinced, so all of this happens the same day that you have the Steve Bannon Donald Trump thing.

00:21:50.000 If you're not convinced yet, yesterday was reported by The Hill that Republican investigators have secured written proof that the FBI knew, the FBI knew that Hillary Clinton broke the law and they exonerated her anyway.

00:22:04.000 Republican investigators secured written proof that this happened.

00:22:08.000 And so, this was in The Hill.

00:22:10.000 This was according to a report by The Hill that the FBI was aware that given the sheer volume of classified information that was transferred using Hillary Clinton's Unsecured private email server, and given other irregularities, inconsistencies in witness testimony, that Hillary Clinton had broken the law.

00:22:27.000 So the FBI knew that she broke the law.

00:22:30.000 And despite that, despite that, despite a dozen outstanding witnesses that they had not interviewed, despite a dozen outstanding subpoenas that they had yet to acquire, they began to draft a statement exonerating her of all wrongdoing.

00:22:43.000 That was just discovered today.

00:22:44.000 They got written proof that that happened.

00:22:47.000 This is the same time that the special counsel.

00:22:49.000 Got the bank records that the DNC was collaborating with GPS Fusion, which got the dossier.

00:22:56.000 Now you have written proof that Hillary Clinton broke the law and that the FBI was covering it up.

00:23:00.000 The cake was already baked.

00:23:02.000 They were going to exonerate her before they even saw all the evidence, before they got their subpoenas back, before they interviewed all the witnesses.

00:23:11.000 And then, if that wasn't good enough, if that was not good enough that they found all this information and nobody's reporting on it, then today, conveniently, one day after Republican investigators find the written proof that there was wrongdoing, that the FBI exonerated her without having all the information, there was a fire at Hillary Clinton's house.

00:23:34.000 In her bedroom, the second floor of her house, which she's lived in since 2001, which her and her husband have lived in since 2001, there's a fire on the second floor of her house.

00:23:44.000 And there's ambulances and fire trucks and police that have to go and put it out.

00:23:48.000 Isn't that really perfect timing?

00:23:51.000 Isn't that convenient timing?

00:23:53.000 You just got to wonder what the hell is going on, folks.

00:23:56.000 We don't have all the information, of course.

00:23:58.000 I mean, it'll come out slowly.

00:24:00.000 We'll see what's being done behind the scenes.

00:24:02.000 And somebody was telling me, like, I was really, oh, you're really sophisticated for saying there's something going on behind the scenes.

00:24:08.000 But when I say there's something going on behind the scenes, I mean there is massive movement taking place.

00:24:14.000 There is serious movement.

00:24:16.000 I'm not sure what nature it is.

00:24:18.000 I'm not sure who's involved.

00:24:20.000 I'm not sure what it involves, but something's going on.

00:24:25.000 This kind of stuff doesn't just happen.

00:24:28.000 I don't believe all these excuses that the mainstream media puts up.

00:24:31.000 They say, oh, well, the meeting between Paul Ryan and Rosenstein and Chris Wray was actually about considering impeachment charges against the president, which maybe.

00:24:41.000 Maybe it has something to do with Paul Manafort.

00:24:44.000 So take all that for what you will.

00:24:46.000 I can't really put all these pieces together because there's just not enough information which ties it all up.

00:24:50.000 But it looks like the Trump administration, whether it's the Justice Department or the Attorney General or maybe elements in the Intelligence Committee, it looks like they're closing in on the Clintons.

00:25:02.000 It looks like they're closing in on the swamp, on whatever this international criminal syndicate is in Saudi Arabia, in Pakistan, in.

00:25:11.000 These other countries in the United States.

00:25:13.000 It looks like the noose is tightening around these people and they're getting desperate.

00:25:18.000 And so there it is.

00:25:20.000 That's everything that's happened today with regards to that domestic situation with these investigations and the legislature and all of that.

00:25:29.000 I don't buy that the Steve Bannon and the Donald Trump thing is just a matter of that.

00:25:32.000 I think it has a lot more to do with the investigations happening.

00:25:36.000 And I think it's all connected.

00:25:37.000 The Paul Manafort, Hillary Clinton discoveries, the meeting between Paul Ryan, Chris Ray, and Rod Rosenstein, it's all connected.

00:25:45.000 And something is going on there.

00:25:47.000 Something is not right.

00:25:48.000 Something is very rotten here.

00:25:49.000 And that's all I can offer today, unfortunately.

00:25:52.000 Fortunately, it's a week, it's a nightly show, rather, every day of the week.

00:25:57.000 So we'll have more updates on that tomorrow as we watch the situation develop.

00:26:01.000 But we're off to a very exciting start here in 2018.

00:26:04.000 It looks like these people are finally going to bay.

00:26:07.000 It looks like they're worried.

00:26:09.000 Rod Rosenstein called that meeting because he was worried, because he's worried about Devin Nunes, he's worried about Paul Manafort, he's worried about Donald Trump.

00:26:18.000 So that's that.

00:26:19.000 The other major story we saw today, this wasn't really a major story, but this also happened, which was Keith Ellison.

00:26:25.000 This is so rich.

00:26:27.000 Keith Ellison today tweets out a picture of himself holding the Antifa handbook.

00:26:33.000 He says, This is going to strike fear into the heart of Donald Trump.

00:26:37.000 You've got to imagine what is getting into people these days.

00:26:40.000 I just don't know what it is.

00:26:41.000 Why is everybody acting out?

00:26:43.000 2018, we're three days in, and you've got a revolution in Iran.

00:26:48.000 The Russia probe is crumbling down.

00:26:50.000 Hillary Clinton's starting fires in her house.

00:26:52.000 Donald Trump is at war with Steve Bannon.

00:26:54.000 Keith Ellison is supporting domestic terrorists.

00:26:57.000 What is getting into everybody this year already?

00:27:00.000 But Keith Ellison did tweet that, and I don't know if that's connected.

00:27:04.000 Probably not, but I think it tells you something about the Democratic Party here.

00:27:08.000 I think it tells you, you know, if we take this and we take everything else that's going on and some of the things that have been said by Elizabeth Warren and other top level Democrats in recent weeks, we are shaping up for a real paradigm shift in my vision in 2018.

00:27:24.000 I don't know what shape that will take.

00:27:26.000 I don't know who's going to win here, but something is obviously up.

00:27:29.000 And with the Democratic Party, these people are.

00:27:31.000 Falling apart.

00:27:32.000 These people are collapsing at the seams here.

00:27:35.000 This Keith Ellison tweet, he goes from saying that 9 11 was, what did he say?

00:27:41.000 He said that 9 11 was for Israel what the Reichstag fire was for Hitler, which was, you know, crazy.

00:27:48.000 Then he runs for the DNC.

00:27:49.000 He doesn't win there.

00:27:50.000 And now he's tweeting out this about Antifa.

00:27:54.000 And this party, the Democratic Party, is absolutely in shambles.

00:27:57.000 And the Republican Party, too.

00:27:59.000 I don't know what's going on here, but I think this is another one of these flares that just goes to show that they're.

00:28:05.000 There is something here.

00:28:06.000 There is something going on, and we're not totally sure about it.

00:28:09.000 It looks like a lot of smoke screens.

00:28:11.000 And I just don't understand why he would do that.

00:28:16.000 Antifa is a domestic terrorist organization.

00:28:18.000 He's going to go out there.

00:28:19.000 And, you know, I'm hesitant to sound the outrage machine about that.

00:28:23.000 It is a tweet, it is a picture, and he is a far left kind of a guy.

00:28:26.000 But at what point are we in the country where Antifa at the Deplorable, and we're not wild about the Deplorable people, but there was an active terrorist threat at the Deplorable by Antifa.

00:28:38.000 Like they got arrested by the FBI because they were going to go in there and do smoke bombs.

00:28:42.000 I mean, these people at the inauguration were doing vandalism.

00:28:45.000 There was, you know, all kinds of attempts, all kinds of terrorist activity from them.

00:28:49.000 They're planning political violence in the streets.

00:28:52.000 You know, Lord knows what happened at Charlottesville with all those people.

00:28:55.000 And you got Keith Ellison supporting it.

00:28:58.000 I wonder.

00:28:59.000 I wonder if that's part of a bigger play.

00:29:01.000 Probably not.

00:29:01.000 But anyway, I just had to say that.

00:29:04.000 I think we're going to move over into our super chats and see what the masses are saying about all this.

00:29:09.000 Am I going crazy?

00:29:10.000 Am I. Am I losing it here?

00:29:13.000 Is it all a conspiracy? 0.84

00:29:14.000 Because I see what's going on from Vegas to Atlanta to Iran to all these places. 0.79

00:29:14.000 Is it not? 0.79

00:29:23.000 And I'm not saying it's all connected.

00:29:24.000 I'm not saying it's all a conspiracy, like the Illuminati is behind it or something.

00:29:31.000 But it just looks like there's too much movement on the surface level.

00:29:34.000 And it looks like it's coming from a higher place.

00:29:36.000 It looks like it's coming from behind the highest corridors of power here.

00:29:42.000 What do people have to say about all this?

00:29:42.000 But let's see.

00:29:46.000 The Daily Oven says, I'm loving the new intro music.

00:29:49.000 You like jazz?

00:29:50.000 Yeah, isn't that nice for a change?

00:29:53.000 I know people weren't so wild about the hip hop music.

00:29:57.000 Not really hip hop, it was more like a soul intro that got a little functified.

00:30:01.000 But that's actually my old intro music from back in February of 2017.

00:30:06.000 We had to stop using it because we had to pay for it.

00:30:09.000 Back when I worked for RSBN, we had to pay for it every time we used it.

00:30:12.000 But on this show, we don't monetize the show.

00:30:14.000 So fortunately, we can use that now.

00:30:18.000 Eli Jarnigan says, Nick, if you were God Emperor of America, how would you cure the country of degeneracy and bring it out of its state of cuckoldry in terms of policy?

00:30:30.000 Well, you know, I've gone over my policy proposal in depth on the show before in terms of what we can do economically and what we could do culturally.

00:30:39.000 Unfortunately, I don't think if you're looking at purely government solutions to degeneracy, you won't find very many good tools to use in the sense that.

00:30:50.000 How much can the government, in terms of legislation, enforce what people are going to choose to do on a day to day basis?

00:30:56.000 You know, you look at the American founders, and the reason why we were able to have such a virtuous society is not because of the laws that were in place. 0.65

00:31:03.000 Certainly, you had some more Christian laws on the books.

00:31:06.000 You had some more laws pertaining to social affairs than you do now.

00:31:11.000 But you didn't exactly need them.

00:31:13.000 The laws were downstream from what the behavior already was in the country.

00:31:16.000 You know, you had laws against miscegenation, for example, in the wake of the Civil War.

00:31:20.000 Well, you didn't really need those laws because it wasn't happening, because people knew that was wrong.

00:31:26.000 And so that's why I don't see laws as the be all end all.

00:31:29.000 Of course, the state can direct the society, but in a far more indirect way.

00:31:33.000 I don't think rounding people up in mass and doing all these other things, I don't think that really changes fundamentally the behavior.

00:31:41.000 So I don't know if there are many policies you could do, but I would bring back the church.

00:31:45.000 I guess if you could affect some policies, that's kind of a cop out, so I'll give you a real answer.

00:31:49.000 It's education.

00:31:50.000 That's how you got to do it.

00:31:52.000 You have to reform the education system.

00:31:54.000 If you make education local again, that would solve so many of the problems that you see.

00:31:59.000 If you broke up the media, Monopolies that you see.

00:32:02.000 You have six companies that control 95% of the media.

00:32:06.000 Break up those companies and force the antitrust laws on that, enforce the antitrust laws on social media, or force them to nationalize to some degree to implement anti censorship laws.

00:32:18.000 If you make it essentially so that the education system is local and kids are not being taught things that were cooked up in the Department of Education, which of course falls under the sway of Zionist and Saudi and other kinds of money, and you also Unleash the media, unleash social media, and make it so that information can find its way to people, that would be the best way.

00:32:39.000 I think, you know, a society needs to correct itself, and that's where we're at right now.

00:32:44.000 And it's not allowed to do so because the means of communication are either tightly controlled in the hands of the press and television and, you know, the major communications companies, or in the case of social media, the people that are trying to get out there and broadcast their message are being shut down and censored.

00:33:00.000 So I think you release those two things.

00:33:02.000 You have the education.

00:33:04.000 The indoctrination machine shut down.

00:33:06.000 Maybe you do some economic reform so that academia is less relevant, and then I think organically this will come back.

00:33:13.000 And you've seen that happen.

00:33:14.000 In Russia, after the Soviet Union fell, you saw the rise of the church.

00:33:19.000 In Poland, when the Soviet backed communist government there fell, you saw the church come back.

00:33:25.000 In many of these East Asian countries, you're seeing the rise of the Christian church and some more responsible behavior.

00:33:31.000 So I think that's the way you got to do it. 0.96

00:33:34.000 But, you know, people like Tara McCarthy the other day, I'm going to go after her.

00:33:38.000 Tara McCarthy proposed on Twitter the other day that the solution to, like, divorce law complications was to just make, what was it? 1.00

00:33:48.000 It was to make premarital sex illegal, it was to make adultery illegal. 1.00

00:33:52.000 Now, those kinds of fixes, they don't work.

00:33:55.000 You know, that's, you either undermine credibility for the law by not enforcing it, or you enforce it and you undermine credibility for the law.

00:34:03.000 Because if you think of, you know, take that as a good example.

00:34:06.000 A lot of people in this movement think, That theocracy, that state action is the way to go.

00:34:10.000 A lot of people, they go from libertarian to like, they discard it for this meme tier statist ideology where, well, we want these goals and we need to pass these laws to achieve them.

00:34:22.000 And let's take anti adultery as an example.

00:34:25.000 We don't want adultery in our country.

00:34:27.000 Adultery is very harmful, lots of negative effects.

00:34:29.000 You can't even measure how harmful that is on the country.

00:34:33.000 The solution proposed is that we make it illegal.

00:34:36.000 Well, let's see.

00:34:36.000 You can do that one of two ways.

00:34:38.000 Either it's made illegal tomorrow and the government begins to enforce it and faithfully execute that law.

00:34:44.000 And how do they do that?

00:34:45.000 They have to implement mass surveillance. 0.77

00:34:48.000 They have to have informants stacked in every tier of society.

00:34:52.000 They have to have infiltration across the country.

00:34:54.000 They have to be spying on you with your television and your phone, and they have to really start flexing their NSA muscle.

00:35:01.000 And there's going to have to be mass arrests of adulterers.

00:35:04.000 Either they enforce the law faithfully, and that is the result.

00:35:07.000 And what happens?

00:35:08.000 You completely destroy liberty.

00:35:10.000 The state takes control.

00:35:11.000 We are now serfs of the state.

00:35:13.000 They control social activity.

00:35:15.000 The precedent that is set will change the way the government operates in the country forever.

00:35:20.000 And people are going to look at that and say, I don't want to live in a country where this is the case.

00:35:24.000 I don't want to.

00:35:25.000 I don't want to live where the government can spy on me and it undermines credibility for the law.

00:35:29.000 And then, you know, that inspires a lot of instability.

00:35:32.000 On the flip side, you can not enforce a law like that.

00:35:35.000 It can be on the books and it can be like marijuana, for example, where it's kind of enforced, but it's kind of not in the sense that states have legalized it and the federal government hasn't done anything about it.

00:35:45.000 And it's pretty much widely available in the country today.

00:35:49.000 And unless you're like caught with it outside and using it obnoxiously, for the most part, adults that are using it get away with it pretty easily.

00:35:57.000 You undermine credibility for the law, and then no laws are respected.

00:36:01.000 If people understand that, well, the laws aren't really for everybody, this law is kind of discretionary, and the law just becomes a discretionary tool of law enforcement or kind of a guideline, well, then the law doesn't matter, and then the state doesn't matter.

00:36:13.000 So that's why I don't, and that's kind of a wonky, silly example.

00:36:17.000 It's obviously a very extreme and hyperbolic example, which people would say is ridiculous, but it demonstrates the principle, which is that laws in and of themselves are not sufficient to change the behavior of individuals in the country.

00:36:30.000 Has to be more organic, has to be cultural.

00:36:33.000 And people might say that's like libertarian stuff.

00:36:35.000 People might say I'm not NRX for that.

00:36:37.000 But I mean, that's just true.

00:36:39.000 I think that's what history bears out.

00:36:42.000 Eli Jarnigan says, Nick, 14 words off the top of your head.

00:36:47.000 Of course I know them, but I don't want to create that soundbite. 1.00

00:36:50.000 I've said them before, which is we must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children. 0.78

00:36:55.000 Well, you know, I don't know why that's so controversial.

00:36:58.000 It's so controversial to say that in the mainstream press.

00:37:01.000 You can't say the 14 words.

00:37:03.000 You can't, you know, God forbid you do 1488 or anything like that. 1.00

00:37:07.000 But with the 14 words in particular, if a black person said that, it would be the most uncontroversial thing in the world. 0.81

00:37:13.000 Is that not what Black Lives Matter means in fewer words or more words, rather? 0.75

00:37:18.000 Is that not what La Rasa hopes to achieve or the NAACP or what's the Muslim organization? 0.96

00:37:27.000 It's been so long since I've been on the basic bitch anti Muslim stuff, so I forget. 0.90

00:37:32.000 Care, the Council on American Islamic Relations, that's what it is. 0.97

00:37:36.000 I don't think if you replaced white children and our people with Islamic people and Islamic children or black children or Asian children or Hispanic children, would that be controversial? 0.68

00:37:48.000 If a black man stood up, he got up on top of a police car in the middle of a massive protest because some thug was committing a crime and he got killed.

00:37:57.000 If a black person got up on a cop car and said, We must secure the existence of black people and a future for black children, would CNN. 0.99

00:38:05.000 Take that and say, look at this black supremacist, look at this black Nazi. 1.00

00:38:10.000 It wouldn't happen. 1.00

00:38:12.000 That would blow up on social media.

00:38:14.000 He would be the hero of the century. 0.72

00:38:15.000 It would be like, that would be the new Black Lives Matter, right?

00:38:20.000 But when white people say it, and that kind of belies what the agenda is, if you understand what you can't say, look very carefully at what you're not allowed to say, and that will tell you why political correctness exists.

00:38:32.000 There are very peculiar, or rather, very particular things you're not allowed to say.

00:38:37.000 Look at what those things are.

00:38:39.000 Look at what things you're not allowed to research, opinions you're not allowed to have, revisionist views you're not allowed to have.

00:38:45.000 Look at what that was all about, why that might not be a good idea to have that out today.

00:38:51.000 For example, Oswald Mosley, and this is getting a little bit out there, but Oswald Mosley, you'll find very few of his speeches available on YouTube.

00:39:00.000 Very few of his speeches.

00:39:01.000 Whereas all kinds of other dictators and other leaders, you've heard about them.

00:39:07.000 Stalin, everybody learns about Stalin.

00:39:09.000 Everybody learns about Hitler.

00:39:10.000 Everybody, even some of them, learn about the leader in Yugoslavia, the communist leader there.

00:39:15.000 People learn about all kinds of people Mao Zedong and everybody else.

00:39:20.000 Nobody learns about Oswald Mosley in school.

00:39:22.000 You can't find a lot of his speeches online, not full speeches.

00:39:26.000 And you got to wonder why that is.

00:39:27.000 Maybe if people heard about who that is, maybe if people heard those speeches, maybe if they got a taste of that in their head.

00:39:34.000 The narrative that certain ideologies and certain movements are about hate and they were totally irrational and they were totally evil and vindictive, maybe that would start to thaw a little bit.

00:39:44.000 And, you know, the 14 words kind of plays into that in the sense that it's completely uncontroversial.

00:39:49.000 Why would we not want to secure a future for our children?

00:39:52.000 You know, if you went up to somebody on the street and said, Hello, sir, would you like to secure an existence for your children?

00:39:58.000 They would say, Yeah, I would like to.

00:39:59.000 I want my children to be secured in their existence.

00:40:02.000 Okay.

00:40:03.000 Would you like to have a future for your children?

00:40:05.000 They'd say, Yeah, I want a future for my children.

00:40:07.000 I want a good future for my children. 0.92

00:40:09.000 But when you put that all together and you say, We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children, suddenly you are blacklisted. 0.99

00:40:18.000 You cannot get a job. 1.00

00:40:19.000 You can't own a small business.

00:40:21.000 You can't have a PayPal.

00:40:22.000 You can't have a Twitter.

00:40:23.000 You can't have a Facebook.

00:40:25.000 You can't post anything online.

00:40:27.000 You're put on a government watch list.

00:40:29.000 You're put on the no fly list.

00:40:31.000 Why?

00:40:32.000 Anybody else could say that.

00:40:33.000 So. 0.95

00:40:34.000 Pretty goofy.

00:40:35.000 Rick M says, Should the federal government have more control over voter ID laws in presidential elections?

00:40:42.000 The laws by the states seem to be a joke.

00:40:46.000 Yeah, well, I mean, I think the president is in a unique position right now to overhaul that system.

00:40:52.000 And it's funny you mention that because just today the president passed an executive order decommissioning, or rather, disassembling his commission on voter fraud, which he established immediately after his inauguration in January to look into possible voter fraud.

00:41:07.000 In the 2016 election.

00:41:09.000 Well, he disbanded his commission to investigate that just today because states weren't cooperating.

00:41:13.000 And, you know, you got to wonder why states weren't cooperating, even though the commission found substantial evidence already.

00:41:20.000 And so the president is in a very unique position to come down hard on voter fraud because it's rife.

00:41:25.000 There's evidence everywhere.

00:41:27.000 And if he had, you know, a real FBI that was committed to serving the country and it wasn't full of deep state shills and everything, he could probably go after that.

00:41:37.000 He could probably shore that up.

00:41:40.000 That's one of the bigger things that costs us state and even national elections.

00:41:43.000 There's a great anecdote that Pat Buchanan tells about Ronald Reagan, where after the 1984 election, Pat Buchanan was an advisor of President Reagan.

00:41:53.000 He comes running into the president's office, and I forget why, I vaguely remember it, but essentially he said, Good job, President Reagan.

00:42:02.000 You got almost all of them.

00:42:03.000 It was one of the biggest landslides in history.

00:42:05.000 He goes, But you didn't get Minnesota, whatever.

00:42:08.000 And Reagan goes, We won Minnesota.

00:42:10.000 But, I mean, that's how it's just everywhere.

00:42:12.000 It's in every state all the time.

00:42:14.000 It was in Alabama.

00:42:15.000 I'm sure it was in Pennsylvania.

00:42:16.000 I'm sure it was in Chicago and everywhere else.

00:42:20.000 And he's in a position to do that.

00:42:21.000 They should do that because, like you said, you look at some of these states across the country where the laws are so lax, where anybody can vote and they can vote twice.

00:42:30.000 In Alabama, you had people on camera after the election saying they came in from out of state to vote.

00:42:36.000 Really?

00:42:37.000 And especially in the cities.

00:42:38.000 So I agree.

00:42:40.000 They absolutely must overhaul the voter ID laws.

00:42:44.000 And get rid of electronic voting, by the way.

00:42:46.000 You've got to put in place some kind of system because I do not trust electronic voting.

00:42:51.000 How could anybody trust electronic voting?

00:42:53.000 You know, it's, it's, it comes down to who controls the voting machines?

00:42:57.000 Who builds the voting machines?

00:42:59.000 You don't think that's relevant?

00:43:00.000 The voting machines are out there counting all the votes.

00:43:03.000 They're counting 60 million votes. 1.00

00:43:05.000 You don't think it matters who built the damn machines? 1.00

00:43:07.000 We don't know how they run. 0.99

00:43:09.000 I've never seen anybody take one apart.

00:43:11.000 You don't think that's a relevant or a transparent piece of information that we should have?

00:43:16.000 Who built the machines to count the votes?

00:43:18.000 That's what Stalin said.

00:43:19.000 It's not the voters that decide the election.

00:43:20.000 It's people that count the votes.

00:43:22.000 Well, the voting machines count them.

00:43:24.000 And after the Alabama election, their Supreme Court in Alabama ruled that they're not going to preserve the electronic voting records.

00:43:30.000 You got to wonder why that is, right?

00:43:33.000 So, blockchain might be a solution to that.

00:43:36.000 For people that know how blockchain operates, that might be a solution to that.

00:43:42.000 I heard that suggested in some lecture about it from 2013.

00:43:45.000 I don't know how practical that would be, but certainly, blockchain, if you're familiar with Bitcoin, it solves the problem of double spending, where you can't spend.

00:43:54.000 Money, digital currency, more than one time, I'm sure it could be applied to voting.

00:43:59.000 You can't vote more than once if you had a ledger where everyone is allocated a vote.

00:44:03.000 I don't know how that would work, but potential solution there.

00:44:08.000 Simon Skola says the Enoch and Tree of Logic debate is hilarious. 1.00

00:44:11.000 I don't want to be a jerk, but she is such a retard. 1.00

00:44:15.000 Talk about low IQ. 1.00

00:44:16.000 She's not based at all. 0.87

00:44:18.000 I don't know Tree of Logic.

00:44:19.000 I didn't watch the debate.

00:44:20.000 I'll have to check that out, but that's the first I'm hearing of it.

00:44:27.000 John Shepard Smith, possibly another piece of the puzzle.

00:44:30.000 Both George and Alex Soros haven't tweeted since November.

00:44:33.000 Uncharacteristically quiet, yes.

00:44:36.000 Well, let's present it all, okay?

00:44:38.000 Because I alluded to it initially, and I'm always hesitant to throw it all out there because every time I suggest that something's going on, I get people that say, Nick, you're damaging your credibility.

00:44:50.000 When you say that there are inconsistencies in what's being reported, you're damaging your credibility somehow.

00:44:54.000 If you're suggesting that we don't know everything, the government's Doing, you know, somehow that's hurting your credibility.

00:45:02.000 Well, look, we have the Las Vegas shooting.

00:45:05.000 This is the first moment where the alarm bells start going off, where we see Stephen Paddock, he kills all these people.

00:45:13.000 There's no official reason why.

00:45:15.000 People can speculate all they want.

00:45:16.000 And people always tell me when I ask questions about this, they say he was shooting into a country music festival.

00:45:22.000 We already know what it was about.

00:45:24.000 Crazy things happen all the time. 0.96

00:45:24.000 He was crazy. 0.96

00:45:26.000 Okay. 0.99

00:45:27.000 But in every case where a crazy person goes and shoots a place up, whether it's Aurora with James Holmes, You saw the guy was clearly nuts.

00:45:35.000 He showed up in Joker makeup from the dark night.

00:45:38.000 The guy had his apartment rigged with explosives and guns.

00:45:42.000 There was a clear pattern of behavior.

00:45:44.000 There was witness testimony.

00:45:46.000 You could see the degeneration of this man into madness.

00:45:49.000 The Virginia Tech shooter, he had all kinds of testimony, the problems this guy had.

00:45:54.000 The Supreme Gentleman, Elliot Roger, that's his name in California, who went on that shooting spree.

00:46:03.000 The manifesto, you could clearly see it.

00:46:06.000 The guy in Sandy Hook, where, you know, if you believe what happened in Sandy Hook, this guy was autistic or whatever.

00:46:12.000 He had that condition where if you touched him, it hurt him.

00:46:15.000 And this guy, Stephen Paddock, was a Fed.

00:46:18.000 The guy carried mail.

00:46:19.000 The guy was an auditor for the Defense Department.

00:46:21.000 The guy worked another government job.

00:46:24.000 Father was a bank robber.

00:46:25.000 Then, after he's done with all this federal work, he gets into real estate investment, sells a company for so much money that he isn't able to not work a day in his life.

00:46:35.000 Pursue a career of amateur high stakes gambling, go on all these trips, throw money around for 30 years, and then one day, with no prior criminal history or psychological history, goes off and kills 56 people.

00:46:48.000 Worst mass shooting in history.

00:46:50.000 Not only that, but he shows up with 26 guns.

00:46:53.000 He shows up to the hotel room with 26 guns, no surveillance footage, hard drive missing from his computer, set up cameras to monitor inside and outside the hotel room, but they weren't running at the time of the shooting.

00:47:06.000 He fired, I think, for 10 minutes, and yet he hit 500 people, which is that's a difficult thing to do from the distance he was doing it from.

00:47:14.000 You had the security guard who showed up to stop him, and he fled to Mexico immediately after.

00:47:19.000 How was he allowed to do that?

00:47:21.000 The guy wired 100 grand to his girlfriend in the Philippines the week before.

00:47:25.000 The interview with his brother, if you saw that guy.

00:47:27.000 The other brother got arrested a month later for child pornography.

00:47:32.000 No surveillance footage.

00:47:33.000 We didn't see the note he left behind.

00:47:34.000 And so that was the first time where I said, something's up.

00:47:37.000 And then you saw what happened in Saudi Arabia, where you had the massive purge, where you had Crown Prince Al Walid arrested.

00:47:44.000 And that's a big deal.

00:47:46.000 That was a big guy.

00:47:47.000 And the same weekend that that happened, you had blackouts on Instagram, Facebook, Twitter.

00:47:51.000 Comcast had outages all over the country, all in the same weekend, while this purge was happening. 0.86

00:47:56.000 Wild things were happening in Lebanon.

00:47:59.000 Then, over the course of the past two months, you had the power outage at the Atlanta Hartford Airport.

00:48:05.000 You had the outage at the New Orleans Airport.

00:48:08.000 And then you had the customs computers going down across the country.

00:48:12.000 Then you have these things going on with these investigations a house fire at Hillary Clinton's house in New York.

00:48:18.000 You have Paul Manafort suing.

00:48:19.000 You have charges being brought against these people.

00:48:21.000 You have 2,000 sealed indictments in Virginia and Maryland.

00:48:24.000 Something is going on here, and it's difficult to put all the pieces together because, of course, it's going on behind the scenes.

00:48:31.000 But there are too many irregularities.

00:48:34.000 There are too many unexplained things happening that are being swept under the rug, and nobody can make anything out of them.

00:48:40.000 And I think it's all there.

00:48:44.000 So, yeah, that's another piece of the puzzle people being quiet.

00:48:47.000 John McCain, who he has a boot on his foot because he would break his toe or something, or no, that was Hillary Clinton. 0.97

00:48:54.000 Hillary Clinton had a boot on her leg.

00:48:56.000 Because she stubbed her toe in the UK. 0.99

00:48:58.000 Had to cancel her book tour in the UK because she stubbed her toe. 0.73

00:49:02.000 Had to come back to the United States.

00:49:04.000 John McCain, boot on the foot because complications with my brain cancer.

00:49:10.000 Funny thing is, though, one day the boot's on one foot, two weeks later it's on the other foot.

00:49:15.000 What's going on there?

00:49:16.000 So, just so much is going on where you gotta wonder Q Anon, was he right?

00:49:22.000 Was it a LARP?

00:49:23.000 It turns out that the Intel story on Paul wasn't a LARP.

00:49:27.000 I don't know, maybe the Q wasn't either.

00:49:30.000 I know we're getting into conspiracy talk, but really, folks, it's how do you explain all this stuff?

00:49:35.000 I'd like for somebody who's telling me that's conspiracy talk to come and show me how we still haven't seen any surveillance footage from Las Vegas, why the social media blackout happened, why the airport blackouts are happening, why this purge is.

00:49:49.000 I mean, explain all of this to me.

00:49:51.000 Explain this curious timing, and then maybe I'll stop talking about it.

00:49:57.000 Julius Caesar says, What do you think this will mean for Bannon back?

00:50:01.000 Candidates in the 2018 primaries.

00:50:04.000 Well, I mean, it's still early to tell, obviously.

00:50:07.000 If it goes forward like this, Steve Bannon and Donald Trump not having a relationship, Steve Bannon cut off from the White House, they will fare very poorly, of course, I think, because the people's loyalty is to Donald Trump.

00:50:21.000 I don't think it's so much to Steve Bannon.

00:50:22.000 Even if you go on Breitbart, for example, if you go on Breitbart today and you read any of the articles that are on Breitbart about what's going on between Bannon and Trump, all the comments are against Bannon.

00:50:33.000 And so, if Breitbart's audience isn't in support of Bannon, you know, where's Steve Bannon's base?

00:50:38.000 That's not Donald Trump's base.

00:50:39.000 So, I think they will fare very poorly if this relationship doesn't improve, if there's something else that's, if there's not something else going on here.

00:50:48.000 But it's premature, of course, to start talking about that because, you know, primaries are coming up in months.

00:50:54.000 And this just happened this morning, and I don't totally buy it.

00:50:56.000 So we'll see what happens.

00:50:59.000 Marcus Warner says Did you see Molyneux's sobbing plea for Iran?

00:51:03.000 And it was a very sorry sight.

00:51:03.000 I did.

00:51:06.000 I like Stefan Molyneux.

00:51:07.000 I respect Stefan Molyneux.

00:51:09.000 He had me on his show.

00:51:11.000 And in a lot of ways, that's what helped me get my start.

00:51:14.000 And I'm very grateful for that.

00:51:16.000 And I've defended him before.

00:51:17.000 But I don't know what's going on with him with this Iran thing.

00:51:20.000 I mean, this is such a smart guy.

00:51:22.000 And, And he's so wrong about this.

00:51:24.000 I don't know what it is.

00:51:25.000 Maybe it's.

00:51:27.000 I can't tell you what it is.

00:51:29.000 It just doesn't add up because this is somebody who's usually so sharp about Middle Eastern intervention in particular.

00:51:35.000 He has been very anti war for many years.

00:51:37.000 He turned me on to that because for a long time I was a neocon, like in middle school and high school, and I didn't know better.

00:51:43.000 I was a neocon.

00:51:44.000 And I'd watch his videos, I'd listen to his podcasts, and I would say, This guy's one of these hippie free love guys.

00:51:51.000 I would say, You know, I like him on the economic stuff, I like him on the free market stuff, but.

00:51:55.000 The anti war stuff is where he loses me.

00:51:58.000 Well, as I got older and I saw what was really going on there with Israel, and there were war crimes being committed, and the weapons of mass destruction, and all these things going on there, I said, oh, okay, well, actually, he's pretty sharp.

00:52:10.000 He was pretty prescient about this stuff. 0.60

00:52:12.000 He was riding that way for a long time. 0.75

00:52:15.000 And now he seems to be shilling for some kind of infiltration of Iran.

00:52:20.000 And what's the reason?

00:52:21.000 Because the mainstream media is not covering it?

00:52:24.000 What does he think is going to happen?

00:52:26.000 I mean, just show me one regime change in the Middle East that has worked in the past 30 years, that has been better than its predecessor.

00:52:34.000 In Afghanistan in 2001, we went in there and it's still no better. 0.73

00:52:38.000 We have still not won the war in Afghanistan.

00:52:40.000 It is still far from being won.

00:52:42.000 It's actually going to get worse this year, it's predicted.

00:52:45.000 So, Afghanistan, since 2001, has not gotten better.

00:52:50.000 Iraq, 2003, we deposed Saddam Hussein and we got horrible terrorist attacks, a terrible insurgency, and then we got ISIS.

00:52:59.000 And we're still not out of there.

00:53:01.000 In Libya, in 2011, we deposed Muammar Gaddafi, and there's still no government there.

00:53:06.000 It's a failed state.

00:53:08.000 There are three provisional governments, all warring for control of the country.

00:53:12.000 ISIS has gained a foothold there, so not better there.

00:53:15.000 In Egypt, we deposed Hosni Mubarak, or we stood by and watched while the Egyptian protesters deposed Hosni Mubarak. 0.88

00:53:21.000 And in his place, we got the Muslim Brotherhood, who was more despotic, more Islamist, than wasn't an ally of the United States. 0.84

00:53:27.000 And then after him, we got Al Sisi. 0.79

00:53:30.000 Who is a worse dictator than Mubarak and less friendly to the United States?

00:53:36.000 In Yemen, a massive civil war, one of the worst humanitarian disasters in 20 years.

00:53:41.000 Syria, we tried to depose Bashar al Assad, didn't work, just ended up being another terrible humanitarian crisis, another ugly civil war. 0.56

00:53:50.000 But in Iran, it'll be different, right?

00:53:53.000 In Iran, it'll be different this time.

00:53:54.000 Lebanese civil war in 2006 still isn't resolved completely.

00:53:58.000 You know, literally every country, maybe barring Jordan, Is worse off after attempted regime change.

00:54:05.000 Maybe Jordan, Oman, the Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, and Kuwait.

00:54:10.000 These are the exceptions.

00:54:11.000 Every other country that has been touched by regime change, oh, and Tunisia. 0.97

00:54:14.000 Tunisia was the one good one, has been worse than the last. 0.60

00:54:18.000 How will it come out any better in Iran? 0.99

00:54:20.000 How will it come out any better in Iran? 0.99

00:54:23.000 How can you be guaranteed that this regime will come out any better? 0.99

00:54:29.000 So it's just.

00:54:31.000 What are people thinking?

00:54:32.000 I don't know.

00:54:33.000 I don't know why they think it'll be better.

00:54:34.000 Why do they think.

00:54:36.000 It'll change even slightly.

00:54:38.000 A bad order is better than no order.

00:54:41.000 Every time.

00:54:42.000 You had Gaddafi, for example, ruling Libya, a terrible dictator.

00:54:47.000 He supported terrorists for a long time.

00:54:49.000 He tried to get a nuclear arsenal.

00:54:51.000 Towards the end, he was much more cooperative with the United States.

00:54:53.000 But for a long time, he was a brutal socialist dictator.

00:54:57.000 Well, you know what?

00:54:58.000 When Muammar Gaddafi was in charge in Libya, you could still go to school and not get shot on your way there.

00:55:03.000 You could still go to work and make a living.

00:55:05.000 You go on vacation there.

00:55:07.000 It was still a functional country.

00:55:11.000 It wasn't a war of all against all.

00:55:13.000 And that is the Hobbesian ethic of nation states that everybody must accept.

00:55:18.000 A bad order is better than disorder. 0.99

00:55:21.000 It is better to have a Muammar Gaddafi. 0.79

00:55:23.000 It is better to have a Saddam Hussein than it is to have a civil war, than it is to have ISIS, than it is to have what's going on in these countries. 0.99

00:55:30.000 And how many times, how many people have to die before we see that that's the case? 0.61

00:55:36.000 Eric Wright, joke, 1488. 0.56

00:55:39.000 Woke, we must secure the existence of immigration and a future for other people's children. 1.00

00:55:43.000 Yeah, right? 1.00

00:55:45.000 That's basically the mantra.

00:55:47.000 Eli Jarnigan, any questions for a former Mormon?

00:55:50.000 Not really.

00:55:52.000 You know, I've looked into the LDS.

00:55:56.000 Bible, the Book of Mormon, or whatever that's all about.

00:55:59.000 Somebody was like, You should really read the Book of Mormon, and I'm reading about it.

00:56:02.000 I'm like, No, this is just heresy.

00:56:06.000 I'm a strong Catholic.

00:56:08.000 Look, I understand there are other faiths out there.

00:56:11.000 I understand we're all Christians, but look, the Catholic Church is the church. 0.95

00:56:16.000 Sorry, that's how it is.

00:56:18.000 Protestants, Mormons, Baptists, Pentecostals, I mean, you name it, I don't care who it is.

00:56:24.000 The Catholic Church is the church.

00:56:27.000 And Mormons, you know, we're not going to come after you.

00:56:31.000 There's not going to be an inquisition against you, but you've got to go to the church eventually.

00:56:36.000 And people ask me all the time, like, Nick, what's wrong with being Protestant? 0.93

00:56:39.000 Nick, the Catholic Church is cucked. 0.98

00:56:41.000 The Pope is cucked. 1.00

00:56:42.000 The Pope kisses the feet of African migrants. 0.99

00:56:45.000 Okay, okay, but here's the difference we have a bad Pope right now. 0.93

00:56:50.000 Human institutions degenerate over time.

00:56:52.000 We know this.

00:56:53.000 The Catholic Church has degenerated, as all human institutions do.

00:56:57.000 But there is nothing flawed in the philosophy of the Catholic Church.

00:57:00.000 When you look at Wrongdoing on the part of priests or bishops or cardinals, they are in the wrong.

00:57:06.000 And they're in the wrong because the Catholic Church has an authority on what is right.

00:57:10.000 It says this is right and this is wrong. 0.99

00:57:12.000 This is Christian and this is not. 0.99

00:57:13.000 And so when you have these priests and these cardinals or whoever that were implicated in the sex scandal earlier in the century, that was wrong.

00:57:23.000 That was wrong according to the doctrine.

00:57:24.000 And everybody could say it's wrong in the Catholic Church because here's the authority saying it is and done.

00:57:30.000 Well, in the Protestant religion, My interpretation of the Bible is no better than anybody else's. 0.64

00:57:36.000 If you're like some Hispanic pagan cultist in Central America and you believe the Bible commands you to kill your gang rivals, if you're some African tribesman who believes that the Bible tells you about voodoo black magic, my interpretation is no better than his. 0.74

00:57:53.000 My interpretation is no better than the Central American, according to sola scriptura, according to Protestant principle. 0.91

00:58:01.000 You can't have that.

00:58:02.000 The Catholic Church is superior because it has authority, because it has hierarchy, and so. 1.00

00:58:07.000 Mormons, not interested. 1.00

00:58:08.000 Sorry. 1.00

00:58:09.000 You know, somebody's like, you know, you've really got to check it out.

00:58:11.000 You really got to get hooked on the Book of Mormon.

00:58:13.000 I'm like, yeah, no, I don't think so.

00:58:15.000 I don't think so.

00:58:16.000 You need the church.

00:58:17.000 You need to have the church that was established by Christ and St. Peter.

00:58:21.000 But there it is.

00:58:22.000 People have a really hard time with that.

00:58:24.000 Like, because incidentally, the Catholic Church is flawed, that is somehow comparable to a systemically flawed Protestant philosophy, which is Sola Scriptura.

00:58:35.000 Can't have it. 0.68

00:58:36.000 Can't have it. 0.65

00:58:36.000 Everybody in the Protestant religion must accept that they're all, to an extent, a little bit wrong. 0.65

00:58:40.000 You can't have that with the Word of God. 0.77

00:58:43.000 That was such a tangent.

00:58:44.000 That was so self indulgent.

00:58:46.000 Simon Skola, thoughts on Kilroy?

00:58:48.000 It looks completely dead now.

00:58:49.000 I believe it is completely dead now.

00:58:51.000 I believe they paid Christine de Hoff Summers $20,000 to come and speak there, to come and rescue it.

00:58:58.000 What a joke that turned out to be. 1.00

00:59:00.000 The lady that runs it is a nut. 1.00

00:59:03.000 The lady that runs it is a loon. 1.00

00:59:06.000 She is a crazy nut. 1.00

00:59:08.000 She is a peanut. 1.00

00:59:10.000 She is an almond. 0.99

00:59:12.000 She is out of her head. 1.00

00:59:13.000 You've got to see, she calls herself Based Mama. 0.99

00:59:16.000 She's a. 0.97

00:59:17.000 What is she?

00:59:17.000 She's a former Muslim.

00:59:19.000 She says she used to support terrorism. 0.88

00:59:22.000 This is what she says. 0.99

00:59:23.000 Based mama, who runs the Kilroy event, former Muslim. 0.98

00:59:27.000 I'm like, oh, okay. 0.96

00:59:29.000 Former terrorist supporter.

00:59:30.000 I'm like, whoa, whoa.

00:59:32.000 Pump the brakes, lady.

00:59:33.000 Former terrorist supporter.

00:59:35.000 Who are we dealing with here?

00:59:36.000 I thought this was a skeptic conference.

00:59:38.000 I thought this was a free speech conference organized by somebody who wanted to blow.

00:59:43.000 You know what?

00:59:44.000 And the reason she said that she's giving all the speakers, she gave all the speakers, um, She gave all the speakers a non disclosure agreement, which was so arduous and non compete for three years in the city of Phoenix. 0.92

00:59:57.000 And she said the reason for that is because there's going to be a lot of Muslims at this event, going to be a lot of ex Muslims she wants to protect. 0.52

01:00:04.000 And I'm thinking, you build it as a free speech event, and now you're telling us it's like an ex terrorist convention.

01:00:10.000 Yeah, I don't know about that. 0.90

01:00:11.000 So very goofy, very goofy. 1.00

01:00:13.000 These are retarded people. 1.00

01:00:15.000 I'm just going to come right on and say it. 1.00

01:00:17.000 There are retarded people today who think that you can go on the internet and you can just do whatever you want. 1.00

01:00:23.000 This has happened. 1.00

01:00:24.000 I've noticed this in the past couple of years, particularly in politics, where Jack Posobiak and Milo and Mike Cernovich, they're all opportunists who they saw a little bit of movement on this.

01:00:35.000 They saw something they kind of had a little bit of conviction about.

01:00:38.000 And Milo, who was a tech journalist, and Posobiak, who was a literal fed, Mike Cernovich, who was in the manosphere, he was a pickup artist, they all had kind of these intersecting convictions.

01:00:52.000 And they said, Yeah, what the hell?

01:00:53.000 I'll be a political pundit.

01:00:54.000 Well, it's not that simple.

01:00:56.000 It's not that simple.

01:00:57.000 And Based Mama thought, I could do a free speech conference.

01:01:01.000 Yeah, I'll just get the money and I'll just do it online.

01:01:04.000 I'll start a Twitter account and I'll just do it.

01:01:06.000 We've really gotten to this point in this country where just experience has no, and maybe that comes across as a little hypocritical, but experience just has no respect that it deserves.

01:01:16.000 People think that you don't have to have experience in doing anything at all, or you don't have to bring anybody on who has experience in anything.

01:01:23.000 Based Mama, she can just create this conference.

01:01:26.000 She doesn't have to have run anything before. 1.00

01:01:28.000 You know, she couldn't plan a birthday party. 0.94

01:01:30.000 She thinks she can plan a $100,000 free speech summit in Phoenix, Arizona.

01:01:36.000 Are you kidding me?

01:01:37.000 You can't.

01:01:38.000 You can't.

01:01:38.000 There are things that you just have to know having done things prior to do that.

01:01:43.000 You have to know, you have to like figure out security.

01:01:46.000 You have to figure out tables.

01:01:48.000 You have to figure out chairs.

01:01:49.000 You have to figure out all kinds of things.

01:01:50.000 This is what I hit Spencer and them for in their Florida rally.

01:01:54.000 Get a podium, book a smaller space.

01:01:58.000 If you're going to have not a lot of people in a big space, Have them spread out in the seating so it looks like there's more people.

01:02:03.000 Dress up the stage or have a smaller stage.

01:02:06.000 Don't have people standing in the background with their hands in their pockets.

01:02:09.000 These are little things in presentation and event planning that you have to have experience in, or you need to have somebody to come on for event planning.

01:02:16.000 I see this so much, and it just makes me furious.

01:02:18.000 People who try and go out and bless their hearts that they have this entrepreneurial spirit and everything, but it's not that simple.

01:02:27.000 People just don't even think of these things.

01:02:30.000 You've got to think detailed, you have to think of the details.

01:02:33.000 I'm going to start a big skeptic conference.

01:02:35.000 Where are the people going to sit?

01:02:36.000 Where are the people going to speak?

01:02:38.000 Are there going to be refreshments?

01:02:39.000 Are there going to be plates?

01:02:40.000 Are there going to be napkins, cups?

01:02:42.000 Where are the people going to be lodged at?

01:02:43.000 How's the transportation going to work?

01:02:45.000 And on and on and on.

01:02:46.000 Have to figure these things out. 1.00

01:02:48.000 And she can't plan her way out of a paper bag, this lady. 0.86

01:02:52.000 But yeah, it looks like it's dead.

01:02:54.000 Simon Skola, thoughts on us sending weapons to Ukraine?

01:02:59.000 I don't know.

01:03:00.000 I mean, I guess it's kind of a matching, I guess, Vladimir Putin's involvement in the region.

01:03:08.000 Because you imagine for people that are saying, we should just be friends with Putin.

01:03:12.000 Donald Trump is not delivering the friendship with Putin that he promised.

01:03:15.000 Well, if you consider that Putin.

01:03:18.000 Has been actively aiding and abetting the revolutionaries in Luhansk and Donetsk, and they took over Crimea.

01:03:26.000 Well, it would be only fair to counter that.

01:03:28.000 I mean, if Trump declared war on Russia, if Trump brought Ukraine into NATO, I would say that's too aggressive.

01:03:34.000 But I see that as just matching Vladimir Putin's aggression.

01:03:38.000 So it's not ideal, obviously, but that's how you gain the respect of Vladimir Putin.

01:03:44.000 And when you gain respect, that's when you gain an alliance.

01:03:46.000 You don't gain an alliance by giving Putin everything.

01:03:49.000 That he wants and not matching him where he's being aggressive.

01:03:53.000 So I actually endorse that.

01:03:55.000 I don't endorse that from a neocon perspective in justifying how far NATO has expanded and how expansionist the European Union has been and all of that, and in justifying antagonizing Vladimir Putin and Russia as we have for the past 20 years, but simply the action of, for example, what he's been doing in Syria with the missile strike and the advisors that are there and some of the more aggressive things he's done, buzzing their planes in response to.

01:04:21.000 Putin sending his planes by Alaska and all that.

01:04:24.000 I mean, that's just par for the course with diplomacy.

01:04:28.000 The Daily Oven says, and this will be the last one, and then we'll call it a night.

01:04:32.000 A lot of questions tonight.

01:04:34.000 The Daily Oven says, you need to read the book America in Crimson Red.

01:04:37.000 I'll check it out.

01:04:38.000 I'll check it out.

01:04:39.000 I got a lot of book money for Christmas, so I've been looking to drop the dough on the books.

01:04:45.000 But, you know, the problem is all the books that I want to get, they don't have on Amazon or Barnes and Noble.

01:04:51.000 All the books that I want to get, And it sucks too because the really esoteric ones, they either don't exist or it's like a really shitty version of it.

01:04:59.000 You know, the cover is not good.

01:05:01.000 The binding isn't good.

01:05:02.000 Just the quality is no good.

01:05:03.000 But I'll check it out.

01:05:05.000 I'll check it out.

01:05:06.000 But that's going to do it for us tonight.

01:05:07.000 Lots going on.

01:05:08.000 Not a lot of conclusions.

01:05:10.000 It's not a conclusive episode because it was just a bomb that went off today.

01:05:13.000 A lot of things going on today.

01:05:15.000 A flurry, a chaos, a cloud of things going on.

01:05:19.000 And maybe that's by design.

01:05:20.000 Maybe that's by design.

01:05:21.000 So not a lot of conclusions.

01:05:23.000 More information will become available, and we'll have some conclusions later in the week.

01:05:27.000 But I'm not going to make a call.

01:05:28.000 You know, people are so quick to jump out there and say, this is going to happen.

01:05:32.000 I'm on this team.

01:05:33.000 You got to look at it, the whole thing.

01:05:35.000 You have to have the context.

01:05:36.000 But that's going to do it for us tonight.

01:05:38.000 Remember, tomorrow is our big episode face to face with Laura Loomer, face to face with Laura Loomer and her tire to talk about who owns the media and the banks.

01:05:48.000 That'll be a good one.

01:05:49.000 That'll be one to watch.

01:05:50.000 Set your DVRs, folks.

01:05:53.000 It'll be a big one.

01:05:54.000 But that's our show for tonight.

01:05:55.000 Remember, you can get your mugs at amfirstmedia.com.

01:05:59.000 Amfirstmedia.com.

01:06:01.000 Your Chad Tall Boy, your 16 ounce Big Boy here, your big fat sip right here.

01:06:07.000 And they were supposed to come in today.

01:06:09.000 I think they're coming in later in the week.

01:06:11.000 James is handling that.

01:06:13.000 But if you order those, we're going to get those shipped out to you as soon as possible.

01:06:17.000 Remember to like, subscribe, comment on the video.

01:06:21.000 If you like it, click the notification bell so you get the notification when we go live.

01:06:25.000 Subscribe, it does help us.

01:06:27.000 And I said actually the other day, That you were going to check out James' show last night.

01:06:32.000 He is actually transferring next week to an early show.

01:06:36.000 He's transferring to doing Overdrive, and he hasn't come up with a new name for it.

01:06:40.000 It's going to be called something else.

01:06:41.000 But he'll be transitioning to a four day a week show in the morning or afternoon on Spreaker.

01:06:48.000 So he'll be doing that.

01:06:49.000 I misspoke yesterday when I said that.

01:06:51.000 Forgot about the new changes.

01:06:52.000 But that's what's going on with James.

01:06:53.000 That's what's going on with me.

01:06:55.000 Check out all my information down below.

01:06:57.000 Follow me on Twitter, Facebook, Gab, everything else.

01:07:00.000 The donation info is down below if you're feeling cool, if you want to help me break away from the establishment.

01:07:05.000 But that's the show for tonight.

01:07:07.000 We're on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m. Central, 8 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.

01:07:11.000 I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.

01:07:12.000 This was America First.

01:07:14.000 Thank you as always.

01:07:15.000 For watching, thank you for donating for the questions, for the super chats, for participating.

01:07:21.000 And we will see you tomorrow for the big loomer episode.

01:07:24.000 Have a great rest of your evening.

01:07:30.000 Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.

01:07:37.000 It's going to be only America first.

01:07:42.000 America first. 0.99

01:07:46.000 The American people will come first once again. 0.67

01:07:58.000 With respect to respect From this day on, it's going to be only America first.

01:08:13.000 America first.

America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - January 03, 2018

Bannon vs Trump | America First Ep. 78

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript