00:00:20.000We will be getting into everything that that entails, all the provisions in this bill, Stephen Miller's role in this bill, Donald Trump's comments at his press conference today.
00:02:10.000With that necessary intro out of the way, with that necessary housekeeping work out of the way, we have to get into the DACA bill, which was proposed today in the House of Representatives by the chair of the House Judiciary Committee, Goodlot.
00:02:30.000I believe it's Goodlot from North Carolina.
00:02:33.000And he proposed the DACA fix that everybody was so worried about.
00:02:36.000And if you remember yesterday and today, all over Twitter, All over Breitbart, Ann Coulter, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin.
00:02:44.000Everybody's up in arms about the DACA fix, and rightly so.
00:02:48.000You listen to Donald Trump's comments from the bipartisan meeting yesterday, the negotiations over DACA, border security, the diversity visa lottery system, and chain migration, and a lot of the comments sounded a little bit discouraging.
00:03:03.000He said things like, I'll sign whatever Congress puts in front of me.
00:03:56.000But during the bipartisan meeting yesterday, they focused it down on the four issues, which were, of course, DACA, border security, chain migration, diversity visa lottery system.
00:04:06.000And so we got a bill in front of us today, and we got to see what was in it.
00:04:10.000And, folks, I have to say, it is a very good bill.
00:04:13.000I have to say, just on the merits of what is in the bill alone, this is a good deal.
00:04:19.000If this were the final offer, I would take it.
00:04:21.000I think anybody who's sane on this issue, who's practical on this issue, would take it.
00:04:49.000People think that's like trying to get away with cucking on immigration, but I mean, you have rivers, you have mountains, you have unpassable terrain where to build a wall there would just not be economical.
00:05:01.000It wouldn't really make much sense when you consider the depth and the speed and the width of the river, when you consider the mountains.
00:05:10.000So the White House proposal on Friday was a little bit under 1,000 miles of continuous wall, and they've already constructed samples, I believe, in Arizona or maybe it's California.
00:05:22.000Somewhere in the Southwest, they've constructed.
00:05:24.000I think six samples they had contractors build, and Donald Trump will be visiting those sometime this month to test them out and to judge and pick a design.
00:05:34.000And so, first in the bill would be $18 billion for that wall, and then an additional $12 billion for more border security, which would mean more enforcement.
00:05:45.000It would mean more drones, surveillance.
00:05:47.000They want to have aviation surveillance over it, they want to have maintenance for the wall.
00:05:51.000So, the additional $12 billion will go towards other forms of protection for the border in addition to the $18 billion.
00:06:00.000In addition to that, they want 10,000 more border agents.
00:06:05.000So they have 5,000 border patrol agents and 5,000 immigration and customs protection agents.
00:06:11.000So that'll help speed up deportations.
00:06:13.000That's a doubling of the size of our border patrol, which would be very good.
00:06:18.000You imagine these numbers like 5,000 customs and border, 5,000 border patrol, and that sounds kind of abstract.
00:06:26.000I don't think we really think in terms of manpower.
00:06:29.000You know, when we think about the police or border patrol, I don't think people really factor this in that doubling the size of the border patrol would not only deter more illegals from coming here, turn around more illegals from coming here, but the additional 5,000 immigration and borders protection will also help speed up deportations, I believe.
00:06:48.000And that will be a very good thing as well to target the 40 million.
00:07:17.000This was not in the four things that they said they would focus on yesterday.
00:07:21.000Remember, yesterday they said it was only going to be DACA, border security, diversity visa lottery, and chain migration.
00:07:29.000In this bill proposed by Goodlot, they're also including mandatory e verify, which is a huge white pill.
00:07:35.000I don't know why many people don't talk about this.
00:07:38.000Maybe they don't really understand what it is, but e verify would be a massive step forward in forcing illegals to self deport.
00:07:46.000Once you start to understand what the average life looks like for an illegal alien in this country, or even for a poor legal immigrant in this country, you start to realize that the most effective way to get these people out is not necessarily to go in with a van and cause all kinds of commotion and handcuff them, throw them in the truck, and ship them over the border.
00:08:08.000Of course, we'd love to see a lot of that too.
00:08:10.000But if you're talking about removing mass amounts of people, if we're talking about millions of people, one of the most effective ways you can do this, in addition to obviously hiring more immigration and customs agents or ICE agents or whatever to go in and take them out, is to disincentivize people from coming here and disincentivize people from staying here.
00:08:32.000So, for example, you imagine that it's far more costly to have Border Patrol agents go and hunt down, or ICE agents rather, go and hunt down.
00:08:42.000All 40 million illegal immigrants in the country.
00:08:45.000Far easier to say those 40 million immigrants will have a very, very tough time getting a job.
00:08:52.000Those 40 million illegal immigrants will have a very, very tough time getting welfare.
00:08:58.000They'll have a very hard time finding their way in this country.
00:09:01.000Such a hard time that it'll be much easier for them to go back to Mexico and live there.
00:09:06.000Conditions will be better in Mexico and therefore the flow will reverse.
00:09:11.000So the e verify is actually a very positive step in the right direction.
00:09:15.000People don't talk about this very much.
00:09:17.000But that's a very good thing for self deportation.
00:09:20.000People made fun of Mitt Romney a lot for that.
00:09:35.000They want to not get shot in the head by drug cartels.
00:09:38.000And ironically, they bring that with them.
00:09:41.000But if we make it so that they can't get free stuff, if we make it so that even if they want to work, they couldn't get a job, they will leave by themselves.
00:10:23.000So, if you understand that there are 800,000 DACA recipients, and even let's be generous, there's 1.2 million illegal immigrants that are, what do you call it?
00:11:01.000So every year, after we end chain migration, every year we are cutting immigration by 700,000 if we end chain migration.
00:11:10.000So you have 800,000 DACA recipients in the country.
00:11:14.000End chain migration, you have 700,000 less people coming in every year.
00:11:18.000So in 10 years, you're down 7 million immigrants that come here.
00:11:23.000So, you know, and already I'm trying to draw a contrast here.
00:11:26.000If you're thinking that DACA is the end of the world, if you're thinking that 1.2 million eligible and 800,000 recipients is the end of the world.
00:11:34.000Consider that in 10 years, we will not have 7 million immigrants that we would otherwise have if we did not remove chain migration.
00:12:02.000You're ending the diversity visa lottery system.
00:12:04.000And in return for all of that, in return for $30 billion, $18 for the wall, $15 for other forms of enforcement, 10,000 new border patrol agents, 5,000 border patrol, 5,000 immigration and customs protection, mandatory e verify, ending chain migration, ending the diversity visa lottery system.
00:12:25.000And in exchange, what this bill proposes is a three year residency renewable indefinitely for DACA recipients with no pathway to citizenship.
00:12:36.000So, whereas previously under DACA, it was two year residency that was renewable.
00:12:42.000Now it's three years renewable and no pathway to citizenship.
00:12:46.000And I think the citizenship is really the crucial part there.
00:12:49.000Because if you consider that we're ending chain migration and there's no pathway to citizenship, what we're talking about with the 800,000 DACA is 800,000 DACA.
00:13:00.000So the biggest concern with DACA was number one, that if you legalize them, they will vote.
00:14:01.000Without chain migration, you're going to have an additional 7 million immigrants in the next 10 years and they'll all have children.
00:14:07.000Without the 5,000 border patrol, the 5,000 immigration and customs, you're going to have more illegals in here having more kids.
00:14:15.000And so you look at this deal, and if it was just this deal on its own, on net, if you're looking at math, if you're looking at the Qualitative and quantitative comparison between current immigration policy and what immigration policy would be after the DACA deal, it's hard to argue that this would be a bad thing.
00:14:34.000I mean, this deal as it stands won't happen.
00:14:37.000And the reason is this the Democratic leadership has said they will not entertain a DACA fix if it has a wall.
00:14:44.000During a press conference today, Donald Trump said, I will not sign anything that doesn't have a wall.
00:14:49.000And of course, this only confirmed what we knew yesterday.
00:14:52.000Everybody didn't know this yesterday, even though it was right there in front of everybody.
00:14:56.000But yesterday, we said on the show that Donald Trump said during the negotiations yesterday, a clean bill has to have DACA and also security.
00:15:06.000And he said that a clean bill has DACA and security.
00:15:09.000I'll sign anything that has DACA and security.
00:15:11.000And I said yesterday, this is a very telling nuance, where when the government shuts down on January 19th, because the government will run out of money, and Democrats and Republicans are trying to fix DACA with a spending bill to reopen the government, when we get along to January 19th, no deal is made.
00:15:29.000Negotiations break down because one side wants a wall, one side doesn't.
00:15:33.000People say, Well, what's a clean bill?
00:15:34.000We go back to Donald Trump, a clean bill is security and DACA.
00:15:38.000We go back to the comments yesterday where he said he'll sign anything.
00:15:42.000And I said he won't have anything to sign because Chuck Schumer said it can't have a wall.
00:15:47.000And Donald Trump's side said it must have a wall.
00:15:49.000And he laid out what the wall looks like on Friday.
00:15:51.000He might have paid lip service yesterday at the meeting when all the reporters were there.
00:15:56.000And in the words of Senator Cornyn, Said they stayed and stayed and stayed, and they heard everything.
00:16:36.000I believe that the most likely outcome, I believe that the theory that conforms with everything that we've seen so far, all of the facts, is the idea that Trump is using the DACA kids, or excuse me, the DACA illegals.
00:16:48.000People get on my case for calling them kids when, in fact, the majority of them are over the age of 24, I believe.
00:16:55.000The DACA illegals as a bargaining chip.
00:16:58.000He's using them as a bargaining chip to get the wall.
00:17:01.000To get an end to chain migration, to get an end to the diversity visa lottery system, and ultimately to put the onus of a government shutdown on the Democrats.
00:17:09.000Ultimately, if no deal is made, to put the onus on the expiration of DACA on the Democrats.
00:17:14.000And that's a very solid thing to do in the context of the 2018 midterms.
00:17:19.000When you look at Chuck Schumer and his relationship with the Hispanic House caucus, it's not going to go very well for him.
00:17:25.000Chuck Schumer and the Democrats and their relationship with Hispanics, if they couldn't protect the DACA recipients, if they couldn't protect the illegals like they said they could, Not going to go very well for them in the midterms.
00:17:36.000So, again, what we have seen today has vindicated the idea.
00:17:40.000These facts have given more credence to the theory that this is what's going on.
00:17:45.000And I can understand why people are freaking out.
00:17:47.000I can understand why people are concerned or doubtful.
00:17:50.000But again, you just have to look no further than every other time that this has happened, every other time that Trump has seemed to go against a campaign promise.
00:18:25.000Some people believe, as they believe that Donald Trump was going to war in Syria with 100,000 ground troops, as they believe that Donald Trump made a deal with Chuck Schumer to.
00:18:35.000Protect the DACA recipients without a wall back in September, as they said he was going to war in Iran just as recently as one week ago.
00:18:42.000They say now that Donald Trump has decided that he's going to protect the DACA recipients and win their votes.
00:18:50.000Well, okay, but then he said in 2013 that the Republicans shouldn't give amnesty to the DACA recipients or to illegals because they wouldn't vote Republican.
00:20:01.000Now, knowing Donald Trump, has Donald Trump really been keen about short term political victories?
00:20:07.000Think about the Paris Climate Accords, for example.
00:20:10.000That was a massive victory, if you're talking about a political victory in the context of what DACA would constitute, the mainstream media giving you a pat on the back, Democrats and moderates maybe saying you're okay.
00:20:21.000Think about everything he's done this year.
00:20:23.000For example, the Paris Climate Accords, where he pulled out and unilaterally, universally condemned.
00:20:29.000By the mainstream media, the moderates, the Democrats, everybody that the Black Pillars say he's trying to impress with DACA.
00:20:35.000Well, why would he do the Paris Climate Accords?
00:20:37.000That really wasn't affecting the U.S., it wasn't legally binding.
00:20:40.000Why would he do that if he wanted a short term political victory?
00:20:44.000You have to look at anything else he's done over the course of the summer, over the course of the fall.
00:20:49.000I mean, take, for example, what happened with the tax cut.
00:20:52.000I mean, that, in the words of a lot of Democrats, moderates, and other people, was going to be for the rich.
00:21:01.000The same people that would be Approving of him that would deliver him this short term political victory if he appeased on DACA would have been really upset with the tax cut, right?
00:21:11.000But, you know, he went ahead with that one anyway.
00:21:14.000And so you just have to look at everything he's done this year.
00:21:35.000Why did Donald Trump rescind DACA at all?
00:21:38.000If he was after short term political victories, if people were whispering in his ear that that would be a politically savvy move, why did he, number one, rescind DACA?
00:21:47.000And then, number two, why did he not protect the DACA recipients in September when he met with Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi and they said they'd reached an agreement?
00:21:55.000Why didn't that happen in September when everybody said it was?
00:21:58.000Why didn't he come back out firing harder than ever that he was going to have a wall and he had a list of 70 demands?
00:22:04.000So then the question becomes what changed between September and September?
00:22:09.000If he's cucking, if he's turning around, well, he has a motive, he has an intent.
00:22:14.000Maybe it's political cycles, but what changed between now and September?
00:22:19.000Because obviously, if he rescinded it in August, if he didn't make the deal in September, then if he's really cucking, then something specific must have changed between September and January.
00:22:31.000Well, I can't really think of anything.
00:22:33.000I don't believe Michael Kelly came in in that time.
00:22:36.000There were no major shakeups in the cabinet.
00:22:38.000So I'm just left scratching my head and wondering.
00:22:43.000You have one theory that Trump is cucking, and the idea is that between September and January, Trump made a complete 180 degree turn on things he's been saying for 40 years.
00:22:56.000On things he campaigned on, things that he built his presidency on, things that he will be remembered as.
00:23:01.000He is going to be, he wants to go down and be hated by Democrats and Republicans for being a fascist in the words of Democrats and cucking on immigration in the future words of Republicans.
00:23:13.000Something that happened between September and January, which the Black Pillars say was some shadowy Rasputin like advisor whispered in his ear and said, Go against all your better judgment.
00:23:49.000But rather, Trump is using a negotiating tactic.
00:23:53.000Trump is using a negotiating tactic outlined in his book, The Art of the Deal.
00:23:58.000Trump is using a negotiating tactic that he used no less than three obvious times in the last year.
00:24:04.000And so you have to ask yourself if you're skeptical, if you don't believe me, if you think I'm making things up, if you think I have a blind faith in the president, I have a blind, irrational, unreasonable faith in the president, look at the two theories.
00:24:17.000And tell me which one has more evidence.
00:24:19.000Tell me which one has more qualitative and quantitative evidence to support it.
00:24:34.000The only thing that I could imagine, like we talked about yesterday, is that they have his family, is that they have his family or they have something compromising on him.
00:24:44.000If that were the case, and I talked about that yesterday, it would be dubious that they would let him have.
00:24:49.000Twitter and social media and tweet the things that he does and have the autonomy that he does with the press and with social media and with the people, you know, even hosting rallies.
00:25:57.000It's reported from 14 unnamed sources in Congress and many GOP congressmen that the one who was obstructing the negotiation process on DACA is Stephen Miller.
00:26:09.000All kinds of Republican congressmen are telling Newsweek and these other outlets that Stephen Miller keeps going in and making all these unreasonable demands.
00:26:17.000Every time they try to make progress, Stephen Miller comes in and says, No, we have to go a little bit further.
00:26:26.000They said that he's deliberately putting in place provisions in the House bill that he knows won't make it through the Senate bill, where the Republicans only have a 51 vote majority.
00:26:35.000And this is play by play exactly what happened in September.
00:26:45.000If you recall, September 12th or 13th, a note came out of Chuck Schumer's office that said that Donald Trump had reached an agreement with Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi.
00:26:55.000To protect the DACA recipients without a border wall, which was huge.
00:27:02.000The only way we would, the only way that we could ever contemplate giving the DACA recipients protection is if we got a wall at the bare minimum, at the bare minimum.
00:27:13.000You would have to have a lot more than that.
00:27:16.000And then one day later, Trump said, no, actually, we need the wall.
00:27:19.000And then a day later, it came out that Stephen Miller was scuttling all the negotiations.
00:28:17.000And every time I staked my credibility and every time I came out right.
00:28:21.000And it is really curious to me that everybody who is wrong about these issues, everybody who takes the most pessimistic look, everybody who takes this worldview that Trump is against us and Trump isn't working with us, that we have no faith in electoral politics, they're always wrong, and yet they're always the most credible every time.
00:28:41.000Every time this happens again, everybody always looks to the black pillars and says, well, that's probably true.
00:29:59.000Bilateral negotiations for the first time in a long time between South Korea and North Korea, prompted by Donald Trump because of his pressure on Iran.
00:30:34.000And you will see that every time it rolls around, I have no credibility for some reason on this issue, even though I was right the previous four times.
00:31:04.000NBC tweeted this video that was really hitting hard against birthright citizenship, but not in the way you think.
00:31:12.000NBC puts out a video today about Russian birth tourism, which birth tourism is when, of course, expectant mothers come from places like China, places from Russia, and other countries like that, and they fly all the way out here when they're pregnant.
00:31:29.000To have their kids in America because, of course, when they have their kids on the land, the kids become naturalized citizens.
00:31:36.000They can get dual citizenship with their other country, and then they can help people from their country come into the United States and get all kinds of benefits.
00:31:43.000And they themselves are entitled to public school and all kinds of money and everything else.
00:31:49.000And so it's just really funny because NBC puts out this video and they say, look at Russian birth tourism.
00:31:54.000Russian birth tourism, where Russians come over here and these kids get to grow up and take welfare and go to our schools and all this.
00:32:02.000And you have to love the hypocrisy of it.
00:32:04.000You have to just love the naked and stark hypocrisy of the media.
00:32:09.000That Donald Trump is saying, we can't have this with Mexicans because the vast majority of people that benefit from birthright citizenship are Mexicans.
00:33:18.000But when it's whites, when it's white people, when it's white Christians from Russia, no less, then suddenly they've got a problem.
00:33:28.000Then suddenly they're talking about welfare and schools and voting and all the rest, because, of course, you know, the Russians are infiltrating Russian foreign influence.
00:35:11.000We saw this with the Netflix advertisement last week, and the Netflix advertisement was a perfect example of this.
00:35:17.000The argument often goes when you see advertisements where there's race mixing, you see advertisements where there's homosexuality.
00:35:25.000You see advertisements where there's all kinds of hedonism and degeneracy and materialism, and it's often passed off as, well, this is coincidental.
00:35:33.000Look at the people that are making the advertisements.
00:35:47.000The argument goes when you look at types of advertisements, like the Netflix advertisement, which depicted a white guy getting cucked by a black guy in metaphor.
00:36:02.000But then you look on YouTube at the Netflix commercial 1,000 likes to 12,000 dislikes, universally panned by liberals, moderates, I mean, whatever the political label, if that's even relevant, people are against it.
00:36:19.000And that just goes to show that when NBC puts this stuff out, when Netflix puts this stuff out, when the media puts this stuff out, this is not reflective.
00:37:23.000Only if you come at it with the understanding that liberals care about the principle, liberals care about the law, liberals care about the sanctity of law and birthright citizenship in and of itself, when in fact, that's not what they care about.
00:37:36.000They don't like birthright citizenship because they like what it represents and for a democracy and anyone can come here and they can participate.
00:37:43.000They lie and say that's why they like it.
00:37:46.000They like it because it displaces white people.
00:37:49.000They like it because birthright citizenship is a way for Mexicans to come here and outvote white people.
00:37:55.000It's a way for Mexicans, Asians, Africans, and you name it, to come over here and they're just as American as anyone else.
00:38:01.000And the American identity is degraded, the white identity is destroyed, and that's why they're for it.
00:38:07.000It's not inconsistent at all when you look at it from that metric, because sure, when birthright citizenship benefits white people, it's bad.
00:38:15.000But when it benefits Mexicans, it's good.
00:38:17.000And so if you look at it from that angle, if you look at it from their values, then there's no inconsistency at all.
00:38:23.000Then suddenly it makes a lot of sense.
00:38:25.000If you're talking to a liberal, like a neighbor, somebody you know, you might be able to point this out to them, and they will concede and they will say, gee, I never thought about it that way.
00:39:22.000And a lot of people had a problem wrapping their heads around this because they subconsciously, because of what they consume from the media, are against white people.
00:39:30.000They've been, and I'm talking about the masses now.
00:39:34.000But if you're talking about the masses, they're not illogical people.
00:39:38.000When they become aware of these inconsistencies, it creates cognitive dissonance only because they're only subconsciously aware that they believe what they believe.
00:39:48.000Subconsciously, they know that colonialism, Western civilization, and all the rest is code for white.
00:39:56.000And that's why they're against it subconsciously.
00:39:59.000Then they just have to figure it out consciously.
00:40:00.000And that's kind of the race against time right now.
00:41:11.000And you know, it's funny because David Irving, for people that don't know, is a revisionist about the Holocaust, which is terrible, which is condemnable.
00:41:21.000He has a different view of something that happened a long time ago.
00:41:26.000Lock him up, lock him up, throw him in jail.
00:41:28.000And actually, it's illegal in many countries in Europe.
00:41:32.000You know, on what planet, on what other issue is this standard applied?
00:41:36.000Could you imagine, like, take for example, Take, for example, the USS Liberty, where Israel destroyed a US intelligence ship and killed American sailors.
00:41:45.000If you think that Israel didn't do that deliberately, is that a crime?
00:42:27.000Well, David Irving, he's a revisionist, and he happens to be the most educated person on the subject in the world.
00:42:36.000I mean, real World War II historians concede that David Irving knows more languages, has studied more primary sources, and Has looked into this in more detail than anybody else alive in the world.
00:42:50.000Like, he is a preeminent World War II historian.
00:42:58.000I wonder why that's still not okay to talk about.
00:43:02.000I would imagine that if an expert, if the smartest guy in the world on a topic is not heard about, imagine if, like, Stephen Hawking, you've never heard of him.
00:43:12.000You're an astrophysicist guy, but you've never heard of Stephen Hawking.
00:43:15.000You've never heard what he had to say.
00:43:28.000Simon Skola says Have you noticed how Ben Shapiro hates single payer health care yet never brings up how Israel has single payer health care?
00:43:54.000And we have to be careful about that because.
00:43:56.000If they can delegitimize some of your arguments, they can throw out the whole thing.
00:43:59.000So, for example, like with Ben Shapiro, if you start saying, well, Ben Shapiro, all of his views are constructed on the basis of some double, you know, he's a double, what do they call that?
00:44:16.000I mean, if you start saying stuff like that, then all the allegations that he has a prejudice in favor of his country and his people, it becomes completely not credible if you start going with the more extreme stuff.
00:44:29.000So that's why I tend to avoid those kinds of things.
00:44:31.000Only because single payer, there's a pretty solid economic case against it.
00:44:35.000There's a pretty solid economic school of thought and political theory against it, where there's not really a lot of evidence to suggest that the only reason Ben Shapiro doesn't oppose single payer health care in Israel and he supports it in America is because he has like a secret agenda.
00:44:50.000I mean, a really good place to focus on would be why does he not speak out against Israeli ethno nationalism, but he finds the alt right so repugnant?
00:44:58.000I mean, that's the only thing you really need to ask.
00:45:52.000He'll have to admit either, number one, Jewish people are better, which is, I believe, unironically what he believes, Jewish supremacist who believes that he is entitled and we are not because they are chosen or whatever, or he's going to bring up the Holocaust, in which case.
00:46:06.000In 20 countries, it's illegal to have that debate.
00:46:08.000And you have to ask yourself why that is.
00:46:19.000DACA is a good trading token as it doesn't even matter while birthright citizenship still exists and we don't have mass deportation squads.
00:46:33.000But, you know, again, the people that are saying that the DACA deal is not good enough are comparing the real to the ideal.
00:46:41.000They're saying because ending chain migration is reversible, we shouldn't try it.
00:46:46.000Because DACA recipients could receive legalization in the future or pathway to citizenship in the future, we shouldn't use them as a bargaining chip to get a wall and so on and so forth.
00:46:58.000And it's to say, well, what is the alternative?
00:47:00.000Show me the alternative, and I will gladly oppose this.
00:47:04.000You know, I had some guy in my Discord saying, Nick has no idea what is possible.
00:47:21.000If somebody could show me a way that Republicans could get everything that we want a wall, ending chain migration, ending diversity visa, implementing eVerify, getting more border agents, defunding sanctuary cities, ending birthright citizenship, implementing the RAISE Act, ending all immigration, and so on and so on and so on, and it's not reversible by a future Congress, not reversible by a future president, we don't have to give up anything for it.
00:48:08.000So, how are you going to get all of this passed?
00:48:11.000And let's forget about irreversibility and future administrations and other things.
00:48:15.000How are you going to get a bill that has everything hardline Republicans want if you don't even have a majority in the Senate or the House?
00:48:22.000If you start looking at how these people vote and what these People's particular ideologies are.
00:48:49.000Yeah, well, they could increase it later on.
00:48:51.000Okay, so your problem is that bills are reversible.
00:48:54.000Your problem is that a future administration could.
00:48:57.000Change your bill, then you're just going to have to implement a dictatorship.
00:49:01.000And if that's the case, I would refer you, I don't know where I would refer you, but probably to a place called Not Serious in a Political Movement.
00:49:10.000So, and that's not, that is meant to be, that is meant to be honest in the sense that we all want the same thing.
00:49:33.000They said, no, no, we could have Nazi flags and no podiums and fat people and ugly people and trad thoughts and everything else.
00:49:40.000Don't make perfect the enemy of the good here, Nick.
00:49:42.000You want a movement with no Nazis in it, Nick?
00:49:44.000You want a movement with no swastikas prominent throughout the movement?
00:49:49.000Don't make perfect the enemy of the good.
00:49:50.000You expect that people are paying $10,000 for a venue, book the right venue, the right size, bring a podium, look professional, have optics that appeals to people?
00:50:02.000Don't make perfect the enemy of the good.
00:50:04.000And now people are saying that because the deal is Don't completely unilaterally rewrite the immigration system according to the Daily Stormer or according to Bright, I mean, even Breitbart, far right ideology.
00:50:41.000It's like if you're touching it in too many places, it starts, it's like R2D2 when he spazzes out in Star Wars 3 when he confronts the super battle droids.
00:50:51.000Marissa Blythe says he verifies improves employment outcomes for, quote, legal immigrants on temporary work visas, but not for white Americans.
00:53:07.000And so, enough of this infighting that we see going on, and I know people are going to say, Nick is saying enough of that infighting, different.
00:53:13.000I'm saying among the groups, you know, it's very different to say, you know, we should advocate for this and not advocate for that than saying we have to disavow total groups of people.
00:53:24.000So, You know, we're all kind of in the same boat where some people have been disillusioned and disenfranchised by the economy, some by the dating market, some people in terms of politics.
00:53:34.000I mean, there are all kinds of things in education and academia all over the place.
00:53:38.000And so we have to understand where they're coming from.
00:53:43.000You look at the divorce laws in this country, you look at marriages in this country, how insolvent they are, and how heavily women are incentivized to divorce.
00:53:51.000If they don't like their husband, they can leave.
00:53:53.000If they find someone better, they can leave.
00:53:55.000If they decide they're tired of it, they can leave.
00:53:58.000Not only is it if they're bored, they can leave, or not only is it if things aren't going really well, they can leave, but also if they leave, they get to take half the money, and they get to take the kids, and they get to ruin your life.
00:54:10.000And so understand where they're coming from.
00:54:11.000And look at even the dating market these days.
00:54:15.000Not only for a lot of people are you in jeopardy, serious jeopardy sometimes, if you even have sex with a woman, because they could accuse you of raping them, and your life is over.
00:54:26.000The courts are against you, the system is against you, and forget about it.
00:54:30.000But then on top of that, you have these loose and promiscuous women where they're out there, and I think it's like 20% of them have more than 10 partners before they get married.
00:54:59.000Between birth control, between liberalism, social liberalism, I guess, taking over the downfall of traditionalism, to a certain extent, industrial society, you're not really going to get back to a total traditionalist order.
00:55:12.000Unfortunately, I guess that's not practical right now.
00:55:14.000But he said what the chief concern should be now is preserving the project of love and the project of raising children.
00:55:24.000If we can maintain and we can restore, actually, the rearing of children and intimate love, and we're not talking about this lust, this degenerate, hedonistic sex that we're talking about, but an earnest and really a Western attraction between the two sexes, we're in a good place.
00:55:41.000And that's how we have to come at it with the MGTOW.
00:55:42.000And women are going to have to meet us halfway.
00:56:31.000Maybe it's because women have been browbeating men since the time they were born, whether it's helicopter moms or female elementary school teachers or the media.
00:56:39.000I mean, could you blame them with the feminizing culture, the estrogen and the birth control and the water and the food, the xenoestrogens?
00:57:12.000We'll go back to being men if you meet us halfway and you go back to being women, which means no working, unless, of course, you know, unless you're like below the poverty line and you need two incomes, in which case, you know, we make those exemptions.
00:57:29.000But we're talking, generally speaking, the expectation is that you are monogamous, you're exclusive.
00:57:35.000There is some aspect of modesty, sexual modesty.
00:57:39.000There's not this hookup culture among the women that they want to adopt the male sexual mindset and that they will be home rearing the children.
00:57:48.000If you meet us halfway on that regard, I am certain men will meet them there.
00:58:16.000Nick, Nazbol people are ruining the movement.
00:58:18.000You know, countless people, friends of mine, told me I was siding with a toxic element on the right called the Nazbols, National Bolsheviks.
00:59:44.000You know, people can be Duganists, but you can't go around saying that Nick is a bad guy for allegedly associating with these people and you love a guy that is actually, you know, the founder of the ideology.
00:59:59.000But don't want to go back and re litigate that.
01:00:01.000But that's going to do it for us tonight.
01:00:03.000Looks like those are all of our super chats.
01:00:06.000So that is going to do it for us tonight on another hard hitting episode of America First.
01:01:00.000Hopefully, we'll figure out the technology in time for that.
01:01:03.000I know we're having a little bit of trouble in the company making it happen, but we will see to it that we have the technology over there for the big debate.
01:01:14.000Please subscribe, comment, like the video, click the notification icon if you like what you see.
01:01:19.000If you like the content, if you want to see more of it, the way to do it is to subscribe to the channel, click the notification, like it up, leave a comment.
01:01:27.000It does help us when you click the buttons.