00:01:01.000Our featured story is about Brian Sicknick, and this almost isn't really even news because we covered this months ago.
00:01:11.000And this is what we all speculated, and I think we all knew this to be true at the time, but finally they came out and admitted it.
00:01:19.000A medical examiner has found that the Capitol police officer Brian Sicknick, who the media claimed was killed by protesters during the January 6th Capitol riot, was not in fact killed by protesters, not killed by Trump supporters.
00:01:37.000He died of natural causes the day after the Capitol riot.
00:01:42.000And the reason why I say that that's not really news is because Revolver reported months ago, months ago, that this was the case.
00:01:52.000And they reported that because the timeline was completely inconsistent.
00:01:56.000Initially, they told us that he was rushed to the hospital after getting hit in the head with the fire extinguisher and died at the hospital later that night.
00:02:07.000Then they told us that he actually went back to the police station, made a phone call, said he was doing great.
00:03:27.000They are serious about D.C. statehood.
00:03:29.000They are serious about Puerto Rican statehood.
00:03:32.000And this bill, too, comes a week after a bill which was introduced last week, which would add three Supreme Court justices to the Supreme Court.
00:03:43.000All this is to say we can see what's going on here.0.67
00:03:47.000They're trying to create a one party state through immigration, through.
00:03:52.000A lack of voter ID, right, through an expansion of suffrage, voting equity, Supreme Court expansion, and expansion of statehood.
00:04:02.000They are trying to rig the entire political system so that we can never win again.
00:04:05.000We know that, but this is just another tactic here.
00:04:10.000So we'll talk about all of that tonight.
00:04:44.000Number one, I think Derek Chauvin is innocent.
00:04:46.000And I saw the closing statement from the defense today.
00:04:49.000It was very thorough, it was very long and a little bit repetitive and monotonous.
00:04:55.000And you know what I mean if you saw it.
00:04:57.000But it proved beyond a reasonable doubt that, or rather, it proved that there is a reasonable doubt as to the fact that Derek Chauvin is guilty.
00:05:18.000I could really care whether or not, I don't know that I could care less whether or not Derek Chauvin gets off for his sake because he's a cop.
00:05:29.000And, you know, we've gone over last week what the cops think of us, the American people, last week.
00:05:36.000So it's really not even so much about him or this individual case.
00:05:39.000I just, Happen to think that he's innocent, but man, I want to see what happens if they find him innocent.
00:05:46.000I want to see what happens in Minneapolis.
00:05:48.000And more than that, I want to see what happens to the country in response to what happens in response to the trial.
00:05:58.000If we did it all over again, if we had the summer of BLM riots, summer of George Floyd, all over again times 10, now that I want to see.0.77
00:06:08.000Anyway, but we'll probably have a lot of time to talk about that the rest of the week, so I'll save it for then.
00:06:14.000Before we get into the show tonight, before we get into the news, I want to remind you to follow me on Telegram.
00:06:20.000Go to t.meslash nickjfuentes to follow me there.
00:06:23.000We had a really good episode of Good Morning Groyper on Friday with Baked Alaska.
00:06:28.000One of our highest viewed episodes of Good Morning Groyper yet, and everybody loved it.
00:07:25.000So, for about three months, we have only had Litecoin as a payment option to buy a monthly subscription to watch the replays of the shows and access the archive of all my content and also to buy merch.
00:07:40.000Now we have eCheck processing for both.
00:07:42.000So, if you want to subscribe for $5, I think it's actually $6.
00:07:47.000I don't know what the price is at, but whatever it is.
00:07:51.000If you want to pay a monthly fee and be a subscriber on NicholasJFuentes.com.
00:07:57.000Access all 1,500 plus hours of America First content, including every single episode of this show ever, as well as gaming streams, commentary streams, interviews, debates, all of that.
00:09:02.000That's at merch.nicholasjfuentes.com, and the replays you can access at nicholasjfuentes.com.
00:09:09.000Anyway, so kind of a big announcement.
00:09:12.000I know that makes it a lot easier for people because honestly, if I had to pay for something using Litecoin, I would probably be like, oh, this is too complicated.
00:09:21.000And I know I shouldn't say that because that's how we were asking people to buy my products for the past three months.
00:10:41.000And I don't know if you've ever done this, but this happens to me regularly.
00:10:47.000My sleep schedule gets totally inverted, and I'll be awake all throughout the night and asleep all throughout the day.
00:10:55.000And it's so difficult to change that, it's so difficult to flip it back because it means you either have to sleep all day and then all night to wake up during the day.
00:11:09.000Or you have to stay awake all night and all day to sleep during the night.
00:11:14.000Those are the only two ways you could do it.
00:11:16.000You either have to sleep for like a really long time and stay asleep, or you have to be awake for like 24, 30 hours, and there's no fun or easy way to do it.
00:11:31.000And then once you flip the sleep schedule, your body doesn't adjust quite yet.
00:11:39.000If you, uh, You know, if you stay up all day, or rather all night and all day, and then go to sleep at night, you may wake up the next morning, but you get tired at the same time.
00:11:49.000You get tired in the afternoon, and you gotta fight through it.
00:11:52.000And then you try to go to bed at night and wake up the next morning, and then it's the same thing.
00:14:10.000It says Democrats are poised to move one of their biggest priorities this week, D.C. statehood.
00:14:16.000The House, which is set to leave town at the end of the week until early May, will vote on legislation this week to make Washington, D.C., the country's 51st state after pledging to prioritize it during President Biden's first 100 days in office.
00:14:35.000House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer tweeted late last week I expect to bring H.R. 51 to the House floor for a vote on Thursday, April 22nd, to grant hashtag DC statehood to the more than 700,000 residents of the District of Columbia.
00:14:51.000The voice of every American citizen deserves to be heard.
00:14:54.000It's past time that we make statehood a reality for DC.
00:14:58.000The House previously passed the bill last year, but it went nowhere in the GOP controlled Senate, even with Democrats now in control of both chambers.
00:15:06.000DC statehood faces an uphill, unlikely climb to actually pass Congress.
00:15:12.000Democrats would need the support of at least 10 GOP senators in order to advance a DC statehood bill without getting rid of the 60 vote filibuster.
00:15:21.000Even if Democrats change the rules, something they don't currently have the support to do, DC statehood doesn't even have the 50 votes needed to pass.
00:15:30.000So to break a filibuster, you need 60.
00:15:34.000And even if they changed the rules so that they didn't have to break the filibuster, they would only need 50 votes because.0.77
00:15:40.000They have Kamala Harris as a tiebreaker because, as vice president, she acts as president of the Senate, and then in the case of ties, she can vote.
00:15:49.000But they don't even have a 50 vote majority.
00:15:54.000It says, Senator Tom Carper announced last week that his bill now had the support of just 44 Democratic senators, in addition to himself, after Senators John Tester, John Ossoff, and John Hickenlooper signed on as co sponsors.
00:16:10.000Carper said in a statement, quote, D.C. statehood is a matter of basic fairness, not politics.
00:16:28.000He added, These are Americans who, just like in any other state, pay federal taxes and proudly serve in our nation's armed forces and yet do not have a voice or vote in Congress.
00:16:39.000But that still leaves the bill five votes short of the number needed if Democrats got rid of the filibuster to let Vice President Harris break a tie.
00:16:56.000Like every other proposal, and it's obvious what they're doing.
00:17:00.000They could say it's not about politics.
00:17:02.000Everybody knows you don't need to know anything about politics to understand what they're doing here.
00:17:08.000DC in the last election voted something like 95% for Joe Biden.
00:17:15.000And you've heard about certain demographic groups voting numbers like that for Democrats, like blacks, for instance, in 2008 voted 97% for Barack Obama.
00:17:27.000But there is no other entity, no other state or territory in the United States which is more extreme than D.C. 95% for Democrats.
00:17:38.000And that's because D.C. is all politicians, government workers.
00:17:42.000The people that are not involved in government are college students.
00:17:46.000The people that are not college students or politicians or bureaucrats or lobbyists.0.97
00:17:51.000And the people that are not any of those things are like black homeless people.0.97
00:17:55.000So it's all Democrats in Washington, D.C. What D.C. statehood would guarantee.0.91
00:18:01.000Is two more Democratic senators in the Senate.
00:18:04.000You would then have 102 senators, and two more reliable Democratic seats would come from Washington, D.C.
00:18:13.000And you would get at least three electoral college votes in a presidential election, in addition to representatives in the House as well, although that'd be, I think, the least meaningful.
00:19:03.000If this bill passed, it would mean that Joe Biden and Chuck Schumer get three additional Supreme Court justices, flipping the balance of power in the court to a 6 6 split court.
00:19:19.000And then, of course, it goes even to things like voting rights, where they're trying to make it so that you can vote without an ID, trying to make it so that every single person can vote, people can vote twice, people can camp out in line, they could vote five weeks before the election, they could vote five weeks after the election.
00:19:36.000And in addition to that, they're making it so that 30 million illegal immigrants get citizenship and then they could vote too.
00:19:45.000Long story short, it's obvious what's going on.0.76
00:19:48.000They're just rigging the entire system.
00:19:50.000They are rigging the entire government.
00:21:10.000When we have control over a state legislature, we don't change the voting rules to make it so that voter ID is mandatory and get rid of absentee voting and get rid of ballot dumps and all those things.
00:21:23.000When we get in control of the government, we don't expand the number of Supreme Court seats.
00:21:28.000Create new states like in Northern California or other places which have been suggested.
00:21:54.000Donald Trump was in office for four years, he presided over Republican Senate for four years, he presided over Republican House for two years.
00:22:02.000Presided over a Republican or conservative Supreme Court for roughly four years, right?
00:22:36.000If we did it first, we wouldn't have to worry about them doing it next because we wouldn't have to worry about it, right?
00:22:45.000If we made the first move and enhanced our ability to attain and maintain power, who's to say there could be a democratic unified government, House, Senate, White House, and Supreme Court, that could overturn all that or to do the same thing to us?
00:23:03.000I don't know that it goes without saying that there would be.
00:23:08.000We make an aggressive move like that, or we don't, they will do it anyway.
00:23:13.000Whether we do it first, or we are the good guys and take the high road and restrain ourselves, they do it anyway.
00:23:21.000Because we didn't break the filibuster, we didn't do any of this kind of stuff, and they come in, and within three months, within three months of a unified Democratic government, they're saying expand the Supreme Court for the first time since the Civil War, give voting rights to 30 million people who will be Democrat, 90% Democrat.
00:24:35.000Do they ever preside over unified government like they do now and say, well, let's not go too far because we have to ensure that the other side can still win?
00:25:23.000They're trying to make it so that we cannot wield power, and therefore they can dominate all of our lives until we die.
00:25:32.000And that's in everything that they do.
00:25:35.000And even in response to this kind of legislation, Republicans will point to the Constitution.
00:25:41.000That's the most amazing part we see that it's a naked political play, and instead of people saying, This is about politics, and we should oppose this because this hurts us politically.
00:25:52.000You know, I see a bill like this and I say, obviously, I'm against D.C. statehood because D.C. statehood would give our enemies more political power, so I oppose it.
00:26:08.000That should be the obvious disposition of anybody in politics.
00:26:13.000It will help our enemies get more political power, so it's bad, so we should not support it.
00:26:20.000But instead, Republicans appeal to the Constitution and they say, well, Actually, DC statehood is bad because, you know, the founding fathers wrote about this.
00:26:29.000And you know what this letter said 300 years ago?
00:26:32.000You know, this guy who signed the declaration wrote in a letter in the 18th century that actually the capital as a federal property or a federal territory should not have.
00:26:47.000Why does it matter what somebody wrote 300 years ago?
00:26:51.000If somebody 300 years ago wrote that DC should eventually become a state, Would we have to resign ourselves and reluctantly say, oh, well, you know, Ben Franklin wrote in 1765 that the capital should probably be, or, you know, whatever, the 17, I guess it would be the 1790s or 1780s.
00:27:15.000But you know what I'm saying, whatever the decade is, if Ben Franklin or John Hancock or John Adams or whoever 300 years ago wrote, you know, D.C. must become a state, would we have to throw our hands up impotently and say, Well, the founding fathers have spoken, and now we have to get two senators from D.C.
00:27:37.000And they'll probably both be transsexual, neither of them will be white, and both of them will vote for the dispossession of white people in America.0.77
00:27:46.000It's what the founding fathers wanted.
00:27:48.000Republicans have to stop thinking this way.
00:27:51.000We have to remember the nature of the conflict that we're in, which is if these people remain in power, they will take measures to make it so that they will never have to give up that power.
00:28:03.000And what are they going to do with it?
00:28:08.000It's not like they're going to use their power to give themselves more Jolly Ranchers than us, right?
00:28:15.000It's not like they're going to use their power so that, uh oh, they get 10 more minutes of recess.
00:28:22.000And, you know, our best players in the penalty box, what they're going to use that power to do is to take your money, take your land, arrest you, take away your rights, take away your guns, take away your ability to say what you think, think what you want, to teach your children evil things, to put evil things in front of your children on television and social media, take your kids out of your home.
00:28:51.000And ultimately, destroy your way of life and your bloodline.
00:28:55.000That's what they're going to do with that power.
00:28:57.000And we take a look at this situation without realizing gravity and say, well, we would never prevent Democrats from maintaining power.
00:29:36.000This is where we're at 30 million people getting amnesty, which is what they're proposing.
00:29:41.000Three Supreme Court justices, statehood for two territories, which would be Democrat, as well as they want to prevent voter ID, they want to prevent any form of voter security or anything like that.
00:31:01.000We have to look at the influence of universal suffrage and, you know, no voter ID, anyone can vote anytime, anywhere.
00:31:09.000We should look at big tech and the media's influence on elections.
00:31:14.000And we have to curtail these things that are on a systemic level, making it difficult for us to compete on the national political stage.
00:31:23.000That has to be addressed immediately and without restraint, without regard for what the Democrats might do in retaliation, not with regard to what the founding fathers might have said.
00:31:34.000Because at this point, it is just a race to see which part of the country is going to dominate the other for the rest of the century.
00:33:39.000And honestly, it doesn't need to because those 30 million illegals are all having three babies at least.0.93
00:33:47.000And those three babies are going to turn 18.0.90
00:33:50.000And they're all going to vote Democrat.1.00
00:33:54.000Every day, those illegal immigrants are having kids.0.97
00:33:57.000And every year, those children of illegal immigrants are turning 18 and they're voting in Nevada, Arizona, and Texas, and all throughout the country.0.68
00:34:08.000And so Democrats are like, well, you know, we could pass all this now and Republicans could never win again, or we could wait seven years and Republicans will never win ever again without lifting a finger.
00:34:20.000Republicans could control all federal government for the next seven years.
00:34:59.000I mean, it's going to be slim pickings.
00:35:01.000It's going to be like less than 25 states that will be able to elect a single Republican senator.
00:35:07.000Less than 25 states where we'll be able to win electoral college votes, where we'll be able to control a delegation of the House of Representatives.
00:35:15.000If we go on in this way, the message is dire.
00:36:11.000And our politicians, they get out on the balcony from the ivory tower and they condescend to us and they say, now, now, tsk, tsk, tsk, ah, ah, ah, the Constitution says.
00:36:34.000And an illegal immigrant stole my car.
00:36:37.000And the police killed my grandpa because he's not wearing a mask.
00:36:43.000And you've got these people from the Federalist Society and Heritage Foundation and AEI and the politicians and the Fox News pundits, and they come out and they come out on the balcony and they say, Oh, we cannot give in to our impulses.
00:37:08.000I mean, the base, if the base became the politicians, you see what that would look like.
00:37:13.000I mean, these people would get in Congress and they'd be throwing spears at Democrats.
00:37:18.000If you put like any generic Republican voter from the heartland of the country into Congress, they would go in there and they would just start beating people up because they get it.
00:38:11.000What did Thomas Jefferson say about Facebook, artificial intelligence, Google, double the money supply in two years, and the Federal Reserve?
00:38:20.000You know, I don't think he wrote anything about that.
00:38:23.000So, We're going to have to make it up as we go along, actually.
00:38:48.000So, all these people calling themselves national conservatives, these people from National Conservatism Institute, which is Yoram Hazoni's rag, and.
00:38:57.000American Moment, which is Saurabh Shwarma's organization, they're pushing this thing called common good originalism.
00:39:07.000And what they're saying is well, traditional conservatism, which is based on free markets and libertarianism and whatever, that's no good.
00:39:18.000They say, well, and we have the antidote for that because in the Constitution, in the preamble, it says, you know, for the common good, like the purpose of the Constitution is to protect the common good or whatever, the general welfare.
00:39:32.000So, common good from the preamble of the Constitution means like, you know, it says public welfare in the preamble.
00:39:40.000So, the public welfare, a synonym for that is common good.
00:39:43.000So, we've got that from the Constitution.
00:39:46.000And as originalists, meaning they interpret the original intent of the Constitution to mean that we have the legal authority through the preamble of the Constitution to pursue the common good, which means that we don't have to let private companies do whatever they want.
00:40:29.000The enemies of America are inside the gates.
00:40:33.000And we've got to do something to defeat these people.
00:40:36.000And everybody said, That's good enough.
00:40:38.000We have to win and they have to lose, and that's good enough.0.70
00:40:41.000And then you have these people from Washington, D.C., from the think tanks, these intellectuals, these metro type people that come in and they totally gayify it.
00:40:53.000They totally gay it up with, like I said, this intellectual think tank kind of stuff, and they call it common good originalism.
00:41:02.000In other words, they have to appeal to the Constitution to do what we all know is right.
00:41:08.000They have to take what we all know to be true, which is that our enemies are going to kill us and therefore we've got to win.
00:41:14.000And they say, well, let's find a pretext for that in the Constitution.
00:41:22.000Well, I've poured over the Constitution, I poured over all the documents, and I think we could technically save our country from extinction based on this verse, based on this sentence.
00:41:35.000Because, see here in the Constitution, it says public welfare.
00:41:59.000We don't need a constitutional pretext to stop our nation from killing itself.
00:42:04.000We do not need a constitutional pretext.
00:42:07.000We don't need an originalist interpretation of the preamble.
00:42:10.000To say that we don't want our way of life and our people to go extinct at the hands of globalist, internationalist interlopers that have taken over the government.
00:42:31.000The survival of our country is a good enough reason.
00:42:34.000We do not need to appeal to some dated legal standard in our founding document from 300 years ago to say that these people cannot destroy our country.
00:42:44.000But These think tank people don't know how to think like that.
00:42:49.000Well, actually, I think I'm working on this thing called common good originalism.
00:42:54.000And, you know, it's very interesting because what the founder said is actually very precise and very interesting.
00:47:27.000It was different in 2016, and it's been different for the past four years.
00:47:33.000And now that Trump is out of office, a lot of people are getting wrapped back up into politics.
00:47:39.000A lot of people took their Donald Trump profile picture and they've changed it to a Josh Hawley profile picture, or a Ron DeSantis, or a Brian Kemp.
00:47:50.000I've seen one person, Brian Kemp, or Tucker Carlson, or JD Vance.
00:47:56.000And if you're one of those people, I mean, you really don't get it.
00:48:02.000Because all those politicians are not like Donald Trump.
00:48:08.000Now that the Trump phenomenon is winding down, maybe it'll be revived in 2020, or rather in 2024, maybe not.
00:48:16.000Whether it finishes now or it gets brought back later, I don't know.
00:48:22.000But I'm not about to just go and say, okay, well, who's next?
00:51:04.000And just because Donald Trump ran as a Republican and just because he got support from some of these people and some of these people are saying good things doesn't mean I'm going to get memed into being a Republican.
00:51:56.000So, I've been trying to find a way to articulate it on Twitter, but I feel like I have to say it on my show because it's kind of a difficult thing to articulate.
00:52:05.000But a lot of people are getting memed into just getting wrapped up in the usual politics, the usual cyclical kind of thing.
00:52:19.000And now that he's out of office, I'm not going to get tricked into just getting wrapped back up into the same partisan nonsense, which is what a lot of people are doing.
00:52:29.000People were totally checked out of politics.
00:52:32.000Trump came along and they said, Oh, Trump, you know, we love Trump, make America great again, whatever.
00:52:36.000And now that he's out of office, they're getting these donor emails and these GOP, you know, these RNC fundraising emails, and they go, Oh, the next best thing.
00:54:04.000It says Capitol police officer Brian D. Sickneck suffered two strokes.
00:54:11.000And he died of natural causes a day after he confronted rioters at the January 6th insurrection, according to the district's chief medical examiner.
00:54:20.000The ruling released on Monday likely will make it difficult for prosecutors to pursue homicide charges in the officer's death.
00:54:29.000It tends to be difficult to pursue homicide charges when the guy died of natural causes, actually.
00:54:36.000The strokes killed him, not anybody that was inside the Capitol.
00:54:41.000Two men are accused of assaulting Sicknick.
00:54:43.000By spraying a powerful chemical irritant at him during the siege, which to my knowledge doesn't cause strokes.
00:54:50.000In an interview by the Washington Post, Francisco J. Diaz, the medical examiner, said the autopsy found no evidence that the 42 year old officer suffered an allergic reaction to chemical irritants, which Diaz said would have caused sickness throat to quickly cease.
00:55:06.000Diaz also said there was no evidence of internal or external injuries.
00:55:57.000Sicknick collapsed after returning to his office during the riot and died about eight hours later on January 7th.
00:56:03.000Diaz said Sicknick suffered two strokes at the base of the brainstem caused by a clot in an artery that supplies blood to that area of the body.
00:56:12.000Diaz said he could not comment on whether Sicknick had a pre existing medical condition, citing privacy laws.
00:56:19.000Sicknick was among hundreds of officers who confronted the violent mob that took over the Capitol, seeking to overturn the election that Donald Trump had lost, which He won, which he won.
00:56:42.000We have known this from the beginning.
00:56:44.000And Revolver did some groundbreaking reporting on this, I think, as early as February, maybe even January.
00:56:50.000They said that there's a lot of inconsistencies with this story because initially the New York Times reported.
00:56:58.000That Brian Sicknick got hit in the head with a fire extinguisher, was rushed to the hospital from the Capitol, and died.
00:57:04.000That was what the New York Times said.
00:57:07.000And House Democrats cited that report from the New York Times in their articles of impeachment filed against the president.
00:57:16.000They impeached Trump, I think, on January 6th, later that day, or it might have been the following day, the 7th.
00:57:23.000But the Democrats impeached him after the Capitol riot, and they cited that New York Times article.
00:57:29.000And the articles of impeachment, you know, which is an indictment, saying that he incited violence, which led to the death of a police officer.
00:57:36.000Their only evidence was a New York Times report, which told this tall tale about a fire extinguisher, got hit in the head, rushed to the hospital, and died.
00:57:45.000Well, then it turned out that Brian Sicknick went back to the police station by himself.
00:57:53.000So he was at the Capitol, didn't get rushed to the hospital.
00:57:56.000He went by himself to the police station and called his dad and said, Hey, I'm doing great, I feel fine.
00:58:04.000It wasn't until much later that night he went to the hospital, and then the media said, He died.
00:58:10.000And his family saw it on the news, and they called and they said, What's going on?
00:58:14.000And they said, Actually, he's not dead.
00:58:59.000Three months later, they finally come out and say it.
00:59:01.000And, you know, I'm sure they knew this from the beginning.
00:59:04.000But three months later, they tell us after the impeachment, after the inauguration, after he lied and stayed, after the narrative was cemented, now they could come out and say, oh, actually, it was a whole lie.
00:59:17.000And this is how it goes with everything.
00:59:26.000Charlottesville was a lie, and this was a lie, too.
00:59:29.000This is like everything that happens now.
00:59:33.000Every major event that you see, which they push to advance their narrative, it's all built somewhere along the way on a foundational lie, something like this, where there's a critical part of the narrative, it's disputed, and then it turns out months later, after the narrative is cemented, that it was a lie.
00:59:51.000Like Charlottesville, like Heather Heyer, who died of a heart attack.
00:59:56.000Like the BLM riots, George Floyd, who died of a drug overdose.
01:00:01.000Like the Capitol riot, where the police officer, the only person to die of a homicide other than Ashley Babbitt, died of two strokes.
01:00:10.000Not because he was hit with a fire extinguisher by violent protesters.
01:00:15.000The whole thing was a big tall tale, which kind of changes everything about the Capitol.
01:00:21.000You had 100,000, 200,000 people surrounding the building, thousands of people breaking in.
01:00:58.000But it doesn't matter because the narrative has already been solved.
01:01:01.000It doesn't matter that months after the fact, after they've tracked every single person down and it turns out that the only thing they could charge these people with is trespassing, it doesn't matter that the only homicide was Ashley Babbitt.
01:02:23.000The New York Times and then the Democrats cited that in impeachment, and then all the media ran with it, and that's why you believe that it was this murderous insurrection.
01:03:04.000In the same press conference that they said, Russia hacked our election.0.99
01:03:09.000And a lot of libtards go, oh, okay, well, you know, you lied about Russia putting bounties on American soldiers, but your claims about election meddling, beyond reproach, yeah, beyond question, must be true.0.93
01:03:26.000And certainly the national news media has no reason to lie, right?1.00
01:03:31.000I mean, what would be the incentive to lie about his historical events?
01:03:35.000What would be the incentive to collude to lie about the biggest political happenings in the country?
01:03:40.000I can't think of any reason why they would do that.
01:07:51.000And if one company was lying, well, maybe another company wouldn't lie.
01:07:57.000If someone was lying, somebody would figure it out and cover it.
01:08:02.000Where's the evidence that that happens?
01:08:04.000Show me the evidence that that happens.
01:08:06.000Because what we see is that with these lies, like Brian Sicknick, like George Floyd, like Heather Heyer, like everything, like with the masks and the lockdowns and all of it, is that rarely, if ever, does any single media entity cover the truth.
01:08:24.000They're all in on it television, radio, print, digital.
01:08:31.000They're all peddling the same narrative.
01:08:37.000You know, whether this coordination we don't know about, or maybe they just all happen to push the same thing, they're all pushing the same thing.
01:08:46.000They're all pushing something that's untrue.
01:08:48.000They're all pushing something that's untrue that has very specific political consequences.
01:08:53.000And it seems like they're doing that deliberately and they're concealing their agenda.
01:08:59.000And it's like, if that's going on, then that shatters the presumption that they are who they say they are.
01:09:07.000That shatters the assumption that there's.
01:09:11.000Investigations going on, that the media is honest, that the media does represent a separate entity from the government or from the political interests, the moneyed interests, it shatters the presumption of civil society.
01:09:26.000It shatters the idea that what you see on TV is what you're really seeing, is that you could take it at face value.
01:09:35.000So suddenly, conspiracy theories become tenable and likely, not unlikely and discredited, they become likely.
01:10:26.000They look at the story last week where the intelligence community came out two years after the fact and said, Oh, hey, actually, remember when all the media and we said that Russia was paying the Taliban to kill Americans in Afghanistan?
01:10:42.000Turns out we have no proof that that happened.
01:11:24.000All of the media, not one publication doubted it.
01:11:26.000All the media took it and ran with it.
01:11:29.000And it was plastered everywhere, wall to wall coverage, all the way through the presidential election, influenced the presidential election.
01:11:37.000And they come out three months after Biden's inauguration and say, oh, we actually have low confidence that that happened, low confidence in that intelligence.0.87
01:12:41.000They're working together for the same agenda, which is bigger defense budgets, destroy diplomacy with Afghanistan, destroy diplomacy with Russia, sabotage the sitting president in his reelection.
01:12:55.000Like, it's basically, it goes without saying that that's what happened.
01:13:01.000And people don't want to entertain what the logical conclusion of that being true would be, which is, That the media is all in on it.
01:16:57.000Well, look, the price system and markets allocate goods and services efficiently.
01:17:05.000And I've always said that because prices communicate things that central organization cannot.
01:17:12.000And I don't think anybody denies this because there are a lot of obvious arguments for why private property and markets and prices work.
01:17:21.000One of them being, in this instance, the problem of socialist calculation, which is to say that if you're going to build something complex, like the example that's always given is the pencil.
01:17:35.000If you're going to build something like a pencil, How does somebody that's building a pencil know about the relative scarcity of all the resources that go into building a pencil?
01:17:44.000How do they know about the relative global scarcity of the wood that is necessary to go into the pencil, or the graphite, or the rubber for the eraser, and so on?
01:17:55.000Well, there's really no way that one firm building a pencil could know all of this information about the scarcity of all the resources that go into a pencil.
01:18:07.000How could a government planner say, Well, this much wood for pencils, this much wood for house construction, this much wood for this.
01:18:16.000You know, no one individual and no group can know about the demand for resources, all the different needs for resources, and all the different places and relative importance of these things.
01:18:29.000And that's why we have the price system, which sends signals universally about scarcity, and it doesn't matter.
01:18:37.000You don't need to know where the wood is going, you know, for example.
01:18:42.000To know the relative scarcity of wood because it has a price.
01:18:45.000You know, somebody that's building a pencil just knows that it costs this much.
01:18:49.000If it costs more, the pencil manufacturer will buy less of it.
01:18:53.000If it costs less, they'll buy more of it.
01:18:56.000And the price fluctuates based on supply and demand.
01:18:59.000And so prices carry information about scarcity and they allow firms and consumers and individual actors to economize on resources.
01:19:12.000So, I don't know if that's a perfect explanation, but that's a basic explanation.
01:19:16.000You have to understand that what economy means is allocating scarce resources.
01:19:21.000You've only got a finite amount of stuff labor, wood, oil, commodities, all kinds of things.
01:19:30.000You've only got a scarce amount of things.
01:19:33.000There's not enough of everything for everybody, so people have to economize.
01:19:39.000They have got to make choices about where we're going to send these things.
01:19:45.000We can't make everything for everybody because there's finite amounts of things.
01:19:51.000So, in an economy, and economic actors have to choose how we allocate the finite amount of resources.
01:19:58.000And fundamentally, what a good economic system does is it allocates those resources efficiently with little waste, and it directs the resources to the places where they need to go.
01:20:08.000So, a price system and private property and markets are very good at allocating resources.
01:20:17.000And, you know, I'm not going to get into a technical explanation of why that is.
01:20:21.000We could just see that historically, Market based societies with private property and with price signals that are not interfered with, they produce material abundance.
01:20:35.000We know that because societies that have these things are richer.
01:20:39.000They use their resources more efficiently.
01:20:42.000They incentivize productivity, they incentivize productive economic activity.
01:20:47.000Whereas societies that do not have private property, they do not incentivize productive activity.
01:20:51.000Societies with price signals, without price signals, allocate resources inefficiently.
01:20:57.000And that's another contributor to poverty.
01:21:00.000And then they've got shortages and they've got all kinds of problems in the supply chains.
01:21:06.000So we know that on a fundamental level, prices, markets, and private property are all things that are more efficient, better at allocating resources and creating the incentives for productive activity than other economic systems.
01:21:20.000That being said, left unchecked, clearly these things are not always good in themselves.
01:21:27.000They do produce negative externalities, they do produce problems.
01:21:33.000And, you know, it's not even so much that I'm necessarily in favor of regulation in principle, so much as I'm not in favor of laissez faire in principle.
01:21:43.000Some people don't look at it like I've just described it.
01:21:45.000What I've said is that private property markets and prices are good insofar as they allocate resources efficiently and incentivize productive activity.
01:21:56.000I didn't say that they're good in themselves, I didn't say that there's anything moral or ethical about them.
01:22:02.000I said that they're good ultimately because they're good for the country.
01:22:10.000They make a society that's richer and more productive.
01:22:13.000They're good insofar as they do those things.
01:22:15.000So it's not even so much that I'm in favor of regulation, so much as I don't think about these, like a market based economy, as an end in itself, which is what a lot of people do think.
01:22:26.000A lot of libertarians think that it is a necessary moral thing that we have free markets, it's a matter of morality.
01:22:37.000It's immoral to not be able to buy and sell.
01:22:40.000It's immoral to not let the price signal communicate relative scarcity.
01:22:44.000It's immoral to not have private property.
01:22:47.000Now, maybe about private property, there's something moral in there, but people take it to these extremes and they say, well, all taxation is theft.
01:23:00.000They extrapolate from, you know, we should own the fruits of our labor to these extremes where they say, No entity or individual or the state can impose any restriction on what we produce and what we can do with what we produce, which leads you to such ridiculous conclusions, which is that, like, we can't regulate Twitter because Twitter's a private company.
01:23:27.000Because, you know, you start out with people should own the fruits of their labor, to there can be no regulation on Twitter.
01:23:36.000There could be no regulation on Amazon.
01:23:38.000There could be no regulation on anything.
01:23:40.000No, no regulation, no taxes, no nothing.
01:23:44.000And it's not even so much that I'm like, well, I'm a regulationist.
01:24:26.000Now, that's not me being in principle in favor of regulation, it's me not being principally opposed to regulation.
01:24:32.000I'm not a laissez faire person who would say, well, any, you know, some laissez faire people would say, oh, well, that's, you know, you're violating other people's rights because, you know, there's an intellectual explanation for that, but that's just one example.
01:24:47.000There's other examples which are more controversial.
01:24:49.000You know, I would say, like, ban weed.
01:25:23.000And if things are not If things are making the society bad, then the government should step in and stop those things.
01:25:29.000A libertarian would say, even if things are ruining the society, we have to let it run its course because it's a moral imperative that we maximize individual freedom.
01:25:40.000And that's really the distinction at the end of the day.
01:25:43.000And a lot of libertarians think that economic liberty and political liberty are bound up with each other.
01:25:49.000They think that ultimately economic liberty is the cornerstone of all liberty.
01:25:53.000That's why a lot of these libertarians are.
01:25:55.000Very in economics, and they're big on the free market dogma because they think that, based because Milton Friedman wrote, you know, 60 years ago, that these two things are inextricably bound up.
01:26:08.000That it's like, okay, well, we can't have freedom unless we have economic liberty.
01:26:11.000Economic liberty is the only desirable end, and I think it's a means to an end.
01:26:16.000I mean, we certainly want liberty, but we don't want liberty at the cost of a good society.
01:27:16.000And so they'll make careful decisions about where they're spending it.
01:27:20.000You know, whether it's food or whether it's housing or whatever.
01:27:23.000When people get things for free, they don't economize.
01:27:25.000Think about it this way if I give you $1,000 and I say, here, Spend this at McDonald's and whatever you don't spend, you give it back to me.
01:27:36.000Compared to if you work your ass off and you get $20 and you go to McDonald's, if you get $20 and you get to keep it, you get to keep the change, you're going to say, okay, well, what am I hungry for?
01:27:52.000You know, how can I maximize the calorie intake and minimize the cost so that I can have money left over and I don't eat so much and I'm full, you know, and there's no redundancy there.
01:28:11.000Whereas, if I give you unlimited money and I say, here, buy whatever you want, people are going to say, oh, I'll just get five things.
01:28:17.000And if I'm not hungry, I'll just throw it out.
01:28:33.000But I just don't believe in this dogma that you could extrapolate that out to mean, like, oh, well, giant corporations could do whatever they want, giant monopolies could do whatever they want.
01:28:43.000Multinational monopolies with trillions of dollars can do whatever they want.
01:28:46.000And, you know, they could buy the media and they could control the elections and they could, you know, they could do whatever they want pollute the river, buy your house, surveil you.
01:28:54.000I mean, like, no, obviously, you know, we want free enterprise within reason.
01:30:52.000I mean, there was such an explosion, and I feel like.
01:30:55.000There was such an explosion in creativity then.
01:30:58.000It was like a real renaissance because social media, I mean, really, social media and smartphones, that's the turning point.
01:31:06.000Internet's been around for decades, computers have been around for decades.
01:31:09.000It was smartphones and social media which really boomed, like, were invented in the early 2010s, boomed in the mid 2010s, like, right at that time.
01:31:19.000And that was like freedom sort of reasserting itself.
01:31:25.000You know, you had all these, and it was amateurish, don't get me wrong, but you had all these different kinds of expression that were breaking through the gate because they had been suppressed for decades.
01:31:35.000Mass media for decades had been controlled by Hollywood and TV and radio.
01:31:42.000And for the first time in like forever, it was like the people broke through the gates with social media and smartphones at their advent without censorship and produced, and a lot of it was amateurish, but it was fresh.
01:32:11.000And I think that's really the difference maker because then over the past five years, it's all been, you know, they all forced it back into the box.
01:32:21.000You know, they got back control over it.
01:33:24.000But that was the product of the open internet.
01:33:30.000That was the culmination of the truly free and open internet and, like, the Full possibility of the internet.0.99
01:33:37.000I know that might sound like an exaggeration because, you know, retard libtards might say, like, oh, Pepe the Frog was a culmination of human freedom.1.00
01:34:21.000I would have a pit viper, heads up display visor, and a robo augmented body.1.00
01:34:31.000I would get in my flying car and I'd drive and pick up my hot trad Asian wife.0.68
01:34:35.000We'd listen to 80s Japanese pop on the way to some.0.99
01:34:39.000Wholesome tradcat disco or something.1.00
01:34:41.000We would be living in total utopia if we just had like five, if for the past five years we had that instead of the slow gayification of everything.1.00
01:38:25.000And now we have Jack Posobic and Benny Johnson doing, you know, SJW libtart at the Trump inauguration four years ago, and we have WP still and all that shit.
01:41:10.000We should mediate a solution between the two parties.
01:41:13.000Kato says, What doesn't grope you makes you baster?0.99
01:41:17.000Fresh Princess in Moondo says, What would you do if your wife slipped on a banana peel and irreparably broke her whole coochie on day one of your marriage?1.00
01:42:54.000But yeah, I would lose my mind if that happened.
01:42:59.000Polish American Groypers says if Anglo Saxons are so smart, then why do they think it's a good idea to give independence to Indian people?1.00
01:43:06.000Now you got a billion Vedants roaming the world.1.00
01:44:45.000It's funny because I was on a call.1.00
01:44:48.000Somebody called in a Good Morning Groyper, one of the streams I did on Telegram, and they said, Well, you know, the Holy Spirit guides my individual interpretation of the Bible.
01:46:01.000And then it's like, well, clearly people are interpreting the Bible wrong.
01:46:06.000Because I was watching a TikTok the other day of people that are speaking in tongues and they're carrying on like this and they're going, oh my gosh, and they're speaking in tongues.
01:46:17.000It's like, okay, well, clearly they got it wrong.
01:48:20.000And if we are to have any kind of certainty about what we have to do, we know that over time and in translation, and basically because we are in the world, something must protect the doctrine.
01:48:35.000If God lays it out, okay, you've got your Bible, you've got your scripture, you've got all of that.
01:48:41.000But if these things are to be protected from mistranslation, misinterpretation, lost over time, There must be an institution which protects these things temporally.
01:48:52.000There must be an authority to say, this is following, this is not.
01:48:57.000This gives you eternal life, this does not.
01:49:00.000If that doesn't exist, then the whole thing is dubious to me.
01:49:05.000If it's left to individual reason, then I'm not getting into heaven because reason is fallible.
01:49:15.000Man's reason is not perfect, it is subject to emotions and folly, and some people are just plain stupid.
01:49:23.000And so that's where you get people coming up with these ad hoc rationalizations where they say, oh, well, the Holy Spirit tells me how to interpret it.
01:49:35.000Well, then why are there so many different branches of Christianity then?
01:49:41.000If the Holy Spirit's telling everyone, if that's where you get confidence in your individual interpretation, well, obviously there's room for doubt because the Holy Spirit's telling everybody something else.
01:50:03.000Oh, well, one denomination, I guess the Holy Spirit just favors this group in Utah or this group in Arizona or these guys over here, these guys in Libya.0.97
01:50:14.000You know, that's really the chief problem to me.
01:50:16.000It's a really like sort of a logical, like a pragmatic problem.
01:50:21.000If the scripture is in the world and insofar as it's serious and God wants us to follow us, we need an authority.
01:50:29.000To adjudicate these things, we need an authority to vanguard and protect these things.
01:50:35.000We need an authority to definitively say what are these conditions.
01:51:05.000Honestly, I wouldn't trust it otherwise.
01:51:08.000I mean, I would still believe that as a historical event that Jesus was crucified on the cross because you've got the early gospels, which is definitive historical proof that Christ died on the cross and was buried and was resurrected.
01:51:25.000But honestly, I would have no confidence in my faith if there was no church because I'm going to read the Bible.
01:51:32.000And, you know, the Bible says some things very clearly, but some things are not so clear, obviously.
01:51:37.000Some things, there's room for interpretation.
01:51:44.000And I'm supposed to take it on Uncle Billy Bob, you know, and while he sounds right, or well, I don't know, I have an idea about it.
01:51:52.000I don't know that I would leave it to my own individual or any other individual's reason.
01:51:57.000I look at the church, which has unbroken apostolic succession going back to the disciples of Jesus Christ, you know, and the doctrine and the tradition and all of that, and I say, you know, I'm going to go with the authority there.
01:52:36.000I'm like, unless you can tell me why that fundamental thing, that central component is wrong, you know, why I'm misguided there, then, you know, then I leave it to the church to interpret these things.
01:54:00.000Base Palpatine says it's funny how people like Hunter Avalon, Michael Knowles, and Ben Shapiro have so much to say about what you supposedly believe, yet they're all too scared to debate you on what you actually believe or even say your name.
01:55:10.000Great speaking to you on Friday as well.
01:55:13.000Full auto says Hey, Nick, just sending a shout out to my soon to be hubby, whose Instagram account got the big Shoah after five years of sharing America First priorities and morals.
01:55:26.000Nothing says freedom of speech like shutting it down.
02:01:47.000So, it lists from most recent to, you know, not recent.
02:01:54.000So, I have to go back like four or five pages.
02:01:58.000And when I get to like the fourth or fifth page, I get the first super chat of the night.
02:02:03.000And then when I get to the top of the page, I have to go to the previous page and then back to the original page to see if more super chats have showed up.
02:02:15.000Because, of course, As people send in new super chats, the super chats go down the page.
02:02:21.000They go down the page and then on to the next page.
02:03:27.000Don't forget to listen to Shooter's new album coming out tomorrow Gamer 2.
02:03:31.000I don't know he's coming out with a new album, but I will definitely check that out.
02:03:37.000Pragmatic Culture says, wanted to check in on Jake Lloyd after you mentioned him last week, and I see his most recent Telegram posts are about barbecuing and making turkey sandwiches with bacon.
02:03:48.000Will this man's hunger ever be satisfied?
02:06:02.000So I says to him, I can't believe what some of these idiot super chatters are saying tonight.
02:06:07.000Sometimes I get the feeling like me and Nick are the only people who really understand politics at an intellectual level, at the deepest level, not just details.
02:06:15.000I'm talking big picture, quantum level stuff that Machiavelli or Plato talked about.0.54
02:06:22.000Cookie Monster says, Did you know that in Spider Man 3, when Peter Parker becomes Eagle from the Dark Suit, Peter Parker answers the phone saying shalom while his hot blonde GF feeds and worships him?0.82
02:07:04.000Bedfoy says, any guidance for feds sympathetic to America First?
02:07:10.000Feels like I could do little to support America First safely, other than send semi anonymous attendees and wait patiently while AF gains more power.
02:07:21.000Also, please promote Good Obsec when accessing AF.
02:07:23.000Content and when contributing, easy for feds to direct ISPs, banks to compile Groyper lists.
02:07:30.000If you're a fed, you know it honestly doesn't really matter that much.
02:07:36.000Honestly, I really want nothing to do with feds, so super chats are fine.
02:07:42.000Watch the show, but I really don't want anything to do with feds.
02:07:46.000Anglo Asian Groyper says, Hi, Nick, what's your advice to someone wanting to start a nationalist movement like yours for their own country?
02:07:55.000Is there any use in me infiltrating my country's right wing party if there's no dissident, Groyper esque movement where I live?
02:08:07.000You just order the Make Your Own Nationalist Movement kit.
02:08:11.000You get a Groyper face mask, you get an America First sticker, you get the America First Kids Playbook, America First Kids Manual.
02:08:26.000Filled with 50 unique games and activities and 50 cutout characters.
02:08:33.000Nick Fuentes, Steve Frantz, and Jake Lloyd, your favorite characters as a collectible cardboard cutout included in the America First Kids Handbook, Kids Craftbook.
02:08:46.000You got two stickers, a wristband, an America First face mask, the handbook.
02:08:57.000All in the America First tote bag and the tiger poster and 50 zoo books and the tiger poster and the tiger poster.
02:09:09.000Do you remember that advertisement for zoo books and the tiger poster?
02:09:16.000They had like a set of 50 books about different animals called zoo books.
02:09:21.000And then, as an extra, it was in like an infomercial, they threw in a tiger poster and they'd always say, You get your 50 zoo books, da da da, and the tiger poster.
02:09:30.000And you get these kids putting the tiger poster up on their wall.
02:20:13.000Blue Ridge Groyper says, just wanted to thank you for fighting as hard as you do for those of us who can't.
02:20:19.000Just reading the news every day is so profoundly black pilling that seeing you fight so hard to grow the movement is the only white pill we have.
02:27:19.000And, you know, when people say, oh, well, if you're right wing, then I can't talk to you, my knee jerk impulse is like, okay, good riddance.
02:27:27.000You know, and I'm somebody who I'll always be okay because I'm a pretty charismatic guy.
02:27:32.000But if I could choose, I would like to have those relationships.
02:27:37.000I would definitely prefer to have that.
02:27:59.000But, you know, then again, when it comes to people like that, if they abandon you over things like that, then they're not really your friends.
02:28:08.000And that's a tough pill to swallow, but it is true.
02:28:12.000Because, you know, in a sense, it's like, well, they still are your friends because.
02:28:26.000So it's a difficult thing to comprehend because it's like, well, if they're, you know, if they would ditch you over that, then you're not your real friends.
02:28:34.000You know, I mean, if not for the people you grow up with.
02:28:37.000But in the sense of actually, you know, what a true friendship is, which is reciprocal, which is loyalty and everything, then, you know, they aren't actually, then it was all a charade.
02:28:52.000All from the beginning, all very superficial.
02:28:54.000And this is a very important thing because, you know, in life, you want to have meaningful relationships.
02:29:03.000And when these kinds of things happen, it's like, you know, it exposes that maybe your relationships aren't as meaningful as you think they are.
02:29:12.000So in some ways, it's actually a good thing.
02:30:12.000I love when you talk about anything, or maybe you don't even talk about it, but people just throw out, you know, I like Coke, and anyone likes Pepsi?
02:31:35.000West Canadian Groypers says, You mentioned before on your show that you would prefer countries like China or Russia destroying American.
02:31:41.000Institutions as right wing dissidents.
02:31:45.000Are we safer using products like Huawei given the nature of the American regime with big tech censorship in the campaign by feds to purge right wingers?
02:32:53.000In order for me to get three gold this turn, I have to give you citrus, truffles, marble, five horses, five iron, five steel, or five oil, right?
02:33:06.000Isn't that always how it goes towards the end of the game?
02:33:57.000Kevin Brose says, What's going on with Marjorie Taylor Greene?
02:33:59.000She distanced herself from QAnon and 9 11 conspiracy posts on her social media to appease the GOP, only to be moved from all her committee assignments.
02:34:09.000She announced the America First Caucus, but capitulated due to pressure from the GOP.
02:34:13.000Would they risk alienating the base by expelling her from Congress?
02:34:17.000Well, to be fair, I got the inside scoop on this.
02:34:23.000Apparently, the AF caucus document was leaked prematurely by.
02:34:29.000Somebody that was trying to sabotage it.
02:34:32.000So, this wasn't supposed to be a draft proposal for the AF caucus, which nobody had read, very early stages, and it was leaked to the media by hostile forces in Congress.
02:34:47.000And basically, I guess the leadership went back and said, Look, if you join this, we'll crush you.
02:34:54.000So, what I was told is that they're shelving it for now.
02:35:06.000And they got hit from all sides, even like conservative members of Congress.
02:35:10.000So I guess they're going to rework it.
02:35:13.000And I don't know that the idea, I don't know how much I could say, but from what I understand, I don't know that the idea is totally finished.
02:35:21.000They just kind of got caught off guard.
02:35:24.000I don't know if I love that, but it is what it is.
02:35:43.000This little girl, during a QA, she goes up to Trump and she goes, My question is, if you're president, will a woman make the same as a man?
02:35:52.000And then she put her hands on her hip and she did this little thing.
02:35:55.000She goes, And the media was supposed to eat this up.
02:37:31.000He does this full lean, like he throws all his weight, like he's got heat vision directed at somebody.
02:37:37.000So he did this power lean at this girl.
02:37:40.000Well, you do, you know, make the same if you do as good a job.
02:37:42.000At least I think he did that in that video, you know, but he.
02:37:45.000But totally, because some people they sort of stand there, but he would totally, he would grab onto the podium on both sides and he would lean.
02:37:58.000You make the same if you do as good a job, right?
02:42:03.000Not only that the Bible says in the beginning the Word was with God and the Word was God, not mentioned, Protestant countries have been much more successful.
02:42:10.000Look at Southern versus Northern Europe.
02:42:12.000So what does that have to do with anything?
02:42:14.000Number one, I mean, maybe that's true in the future, but definitely not in the past.
02:42:21.000And what does that have to do with anything?
02:43:43.000And indulgences, you know, it's 11 30, so I don't want to get into that, but you're probably completely ignorant about what indulgences are.
02:43:51.000And in any case, you know, there's a lot of historical inaccuracies about what exactly was going on there, and there have been corrupt popes, but the institution of the papacy is a temporal institution.
02:44:02.000The doctrine has been unchanged over the Thousands of years.
02:44:30.000Saved by God's grace and human reason, apparently, according to you.
02:44:36.000We are saved by God's grace and apparently human reason.
02:44:41.000Yeah, that sounds like a really Christian doctrine because it's about our subjective and fallible interpretation of the Bible, which we depend on for our salvation.
02:49:17.000Winston says, in reference to my first super chat, here we fucking go with this guy.
02:49:22.000To destabilize Western institutions and eliminate global competition, Russia helps finance and secretly prop up right wing and far left rhetoric.
02:49:29.000Shadow groups, they don't have to focus on the left as much now since they have control and billionaires finance them.
02:49:35.000Yeah, I just don't think that's happening.