00:00:55.000They're going to charge Trump, they're going to convict him, and he's not going to be allowed to run, and no one's even going to care.
00:01:02.000And I still think that's a strong possibility.
00:01:05.000But I've seen a really strong response in the past 24 hours across the board from Americans who actually showed up to Mar a Lago to protest, which included Cozy's own Tyler Russell.
00:01:19.000But also, it seems like there's a universal condemnation of this from Republican leadership.
00:01:25.000And even people like Mike Pence and Mitch McConnell, who you could consider are anti Trump, are speaking out against this and talking about actions they may take.
00:01:38.000I'm going to revise my position last night and I'm going to elaborate on this on tonight's show.
00:01:44.000And I'm going to say that I think there is still a possibility that we are in the best timeline.
00:01:51.000I'm going to revise yesterday's position and say there is still a possibility that we are in the timeline that has the best possible outcome.
00:02:01.000And what I mean by that is we are still in a circumstance.
00:02:09.000Which could turn out to be better than if this wasn't happening.
00:02:14.000That we're still in a timeline that has a better outcome or has a possibility to have a better outcome than if Trump retained the presidency in 2020 and if Trump wasn't being targeted by law enforcement.
00:02:30.000It's not a guarantee, and I don't even think it's likely, but there's still a possibility that all of these events taken together could come up with the best outcome for us.
00:02:41.000And that has a lot to do with how this has unfolded, particularly over the last 18, 24 months.
00:06:14.000Destiny on the left, me on the right, Lauren in the middle, and having a gay man being Destiny, of course, or a bisexual man, and then a woman, and then an asexual incel.
00:06:51.000But listen, but I think that's a joke because, you know, I want to get along with her for the sake of the show, but everybody wants this to happen.
00:08:15.000Destiny's fans love me because they all have a crush on me, because they all have a gay crush on me, because all his fans are gay and trans.
00:08:22.000And so they're all kind of in love with me in a weird way, and they think I'm sort of like have this boyish charm, and they're in love with me, and they love the chemistry that me and Destiny have.
00:08:33.000And I think both of the fan bases hate women, and they both love when we make fun of women like Lauren Southern.
00:08:40.000So I actually think that everybody wins.
00:12:43.000So I encourage all of our Groypers tell your friends, tell your family if you are in Lake Sumter Polk or Orange County, Florida to get out there, vote for Laura Loomer.
00:13:08.000Well, I should say, I don't think a Democrat is even running in this district.
00:13:14.000So this is a highly competitive primary race.
00:13:17.000She has outraised her opponent, which is unbelievable because Webster is like a 20 year incumbent and Laura Loomer raised more money than him.
00:14:11.000This would be the first time that one of our own got into Congress.
00:14:15.000There's other people that are in Congress, obviously, that we support, but this would be the first time that one of us, one of the people, I mean to say, got in there in a wave like this.
00:14:26.000It would be an unprecedented thing for her to get in there.
00:14:30.000So I'd encourage everybody to go and vote for her.
00:16:48.000She is absolutely do whatever it takes to win, and you've got to respect that.
00:16:54.000So, anyway, so I have immense respect for her.
00:16:57.000And I think that if she gets in, she will be the most, one of, if not the most, based congressmen or congresswomen, congresspeople in the country.
00:17:12.000And so, with that, we're going to dive into the show here.
00:17:15.000And I want to talk a little bit about the inflation bill, and then we'll get into the Trump raid and some of the reaction.
00:17:21.000So, we didn't get to cover this yesterday, but I wanted to.
00:17:24.000Huge $700 billion spending bill just passed in the Senate earlier this week.
00:17:29.000And this is the Inflation Reduction Act.
00:17:33.000And honestly, the name is just ridiculous because it has nothing to do with inflation.
00:17:39.000And it's the funny thing about it is you almost have to assume that it was called this so that when Democrats run in the midterms or when Biden runs in 24, if he runs in 24, they can say, well, inflation may be 10%, but he passed the Inflation Reduction Act.
00:17:59.000Okay, but it doesn't do anything about inflation.
00:18:14.000If anything, the federal government spending $700 billion additional creates more inflation.
00:18:24.000Because if you're adding money to the deficit, you are adding to inflation.
00:18:31.000That is one of the ways that the monetary base expands the government borrowing money from the Federal Reserve.
00:18:39.000So you can't spend, and this is not like a routine budget bill.
00:18:45.000This is not a budget bill, one of the necessary budget bills.
00:18:48.000This is $700 billion in additional spending.
00:18:52.000We're running trillion, multi trillion dollar deficits ever since the COVID pandemic broke out, and this is stimulus and relief money, trillions of dollars.
00:19:03.000In paycheck protection and in the cash transfers and so on, in various forms of relief and stimulus.
00:19:11.000This is a $700 billion bill that is tacked on to all the ordinary budget measures, all the necessary budget measures.
00:19:20.000Initially, it was going to be $3.5 trillion.
00:19:22.000It was called the Build Back Better bill, which Biden floated during the campaign.
00:19:28.000And initially, it was supposed to be $3.5 trillion.
00:19:31.000And they couldn't get that through the Senate because Manchin and Manchin from West Virginia, a Democrat, And Sinema from Arizona opposed it because it was just so, even for them as Democrats, it was so much spending.
00:19:44.000And so the Senate is split 50 50, 50 Republicans, 50 Democrats.
00:19:48.000Kamala Harris, as vice president, is the president of the Senate and casts a tie breaking vote in the case of a 50 50 tie.
00:19:57.000And so, when they proposed the Build Back Better bill, its initial form, $3.5 trillion 18 months ago, Manchin and Sinema shut it down.
00:20:06.000And even with the tiebreaker, it would have been $4950 because you would have two Democrats abstaining or voting against and 50 Republicans voting against.
00:20:16.000So, they've been working on this bill for 18 months, and this is what they came up with $700 billion.
00:20:22.000About half of that is going towards climate, and the other half is going towards prescription medications and other measures.
00:20:30.000And to pay for this, they plan to raise $300 billion over the next 10 years by creating a new corporate tax, a minimum book tax on corporations, which I'll explain a little bit later.
00:20:57.000The bill seeks to lower the cost of some medicines, increase corporate taxes, and reduce carbon emissions.
00:21:03.000The passing of the bill, a flagship part of Joe Biden's agenda, is a boost ahead of the midterm elections.
00:21:10.000But it is a significantly scaled back version of the $3.5 trillion package that was first proposed by his administration.
00:21:19.000The bill, a product of 18 months of intense wrangling, passed by a margin of 51 to 50 on Sunday, with Vice President Kamala Harris casting the deciding vote.
00:21:30.000It was previously blocked by two Democratic senators who shared Republican concerns about cost.
00:21:36.000It will now be sent to the Democratic controlled House of Representatives, where it is expected to pass in a vote on Friday before the president can sign it into law.
00:21:45.000The Inflation Reduction Act includes legislation that would allow the government to negotiate lower prices for prescription medicines under its Medicare health insurance program.
00:21:55.000That is expected to save hundreds of billions of dollars over the next decade, according to estimates from the CBO.
00:22:02.000The package also includes a minimum 15% tax on most corporations that make more than $1 billion per year in profits.
00:22:10.000That measure, an issue of contention during negotiations in Congress, is opposed by business groups who argue it will limit investment.
00:22:18.000The bill also includes $369 billion for climate action, which is the largest investment in this issue in U.S. history.
00:22:28.000Some households could receive up to $7,500 in tax credits to buy an electric car.
00:22:39.000Billions will also be spent in an effort to speed up the production of clean technology such as solar panels and wind turbines.
00:22:45.000There will also be $60 billion given to communities that have suffered the most from fossil fuel pollution, which you may guess is blacks and Hispanics.
00:23:13.000They might as well just say they're giving money to blacks and Hispanics.
00:23:16.000They might as well just say, and 10% of the bill will just be given to black people.
00:23:22.000And 10% of the bill, we're just giving it away to black people, because that's what it is.
00:23:29.000They always come up with it's food assistance, it's for food ghettos, it's an economic opportunity zone, it's for.
00:23:37.000Who are the victims of everything forever?
00:23:41.000Oh, racial minorities, particularly the brown ones, of course.
00:23:47.000The authors of the bill say it will cut the country's carbon emissions by 40% by 2030.
00:23:53.000The action on climate comes as the U.S. experiences a wave of extreme weather, including a heat wave, as well as deadly flooding in Kentucky.
00:24:01.000President Biden visited flood damage areas of the state on Monday.
00:24:11.000It's called the Inflation Reduction Act, but all it does is spend lots of money on Healthcare, climate action, and black people.
00:24:21.000How is this in any way supposed to reduce inflation?
00:24:24.000Inflation in June was at 9%, which is, and by the way, it's much higher than that.
00:24:32.000Every time you hear these inflation numbers, you have to double it or multiply it by one and a half.
00:24:40.000You have to tack on half because, of course, they have changed the way that they calculate inflation over the past 50 years.
00:24:49.000And they do this in a variety of ways.
00:24:51.000It's all kinds of statistical alchemy.
00:24:55.000And the kind of methodology or procedure that would have yielded a 20% inflation rate 40 years ago, if applied today, would yield something similar.
00:25:07.000But they just changed how they calculate it.
00:25:09.000So when they say inflation is the highest it's been in 40 years, when the last time that inflation was 10%, well, the last time that inflation was 10%, 40 years ago, they calculated that in a different way.
00:26:42.000People say unemployment is low, but unemployment is actually high because, again, they do the same thing with unemployment that they do with inflation.
00:26:51.000They change the way they calculate it over time.
00:26:56.000The unemployment statistic is even measuring.
00:26:59.000And the unemployment statistic is downstream from the labor force participation rate, which means that the unemployment rate only measures the people that are considered part of the labor force seeking a job who are unemployed.
00:27:13.000It does not, the unemployment rate does not take into consideration all the employable people, all the people eligible for work that are not seeking work, of which that number has increased dramatically over the past two years.
00:27:27.000So, you've got a labor shortage, a high unemployment rate, a low labor force participation rate, high inflation, a falling stock market, and a shrinking GDP.
00:27:38.000Now, they pass a bill to address all of this and call it the Inflation Reduction Act.
00:28:01.000Does it help the falling stock market?
00:28:03.000If anything, it works against that because it imposes a tax on stock buybacks of 1%.
00:28:09.000So, this is really just a big liberal wish list.
00:28:14.000They're spending money on healthcare, they're spending money on minorities, and they're spending money on green energy, all of which, the negotiating the prescription medications, Trump did that, Biden got rid of it, now they're bringing it back.
00:28:43.000And so I want to get into some of the provisions in particular.
00:28:46.000I really want to talk about the tax rate.
00:28:47.000When I say that this hurts exports, what do I mean by that?
00:28:51.000Well, it says in this article, this is one of the provisions of the bill.
00:28:55.000The bill not only spends money on green and on this other stuff, it also imposes new taxes.
00:29:02.000And one of the new taxes that they have is called a minimum tax or a book tax of 15% on corporations that make a billion dollars per more in profits.
00:29:15.000And they say that this is a provision in the bill that will offset the spending.
00:29:19.000It's $700 billion in additional spending.
00:29:22.000Now, the United States brings in something like $3, $4 trillion in tax revenue, and we're spending $4, $5, $6 trillion every year lately.
00:29:32.000And so we've got these trillion dollar deficits, which is our annual negative balance of our income minus our expense.
00:29:46.000This is on top of the existing deficit.
00:29:49.000Which means we're not bringing in enough money to pay for all of the annual spending which is necessary, which is your entitlements, your Social Security, your Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps, unemployment, as well as discretionary things like the military, which is the biggest discretionary item, and then all the other administrative stuff.
00:30:11.000And so they say, well, we're going to offset the additional cost with a new tax, which will create $300 billion of revenue in the next 10 years.
00:30:20.000But the math doesn't really add up here.
00:30:23.000Because the bill costs $700 billion today, and it will raise with the new taxes potentially $300 billion in 10 years.
00:31:13.000It was very high, and they brought it down to a historic low 23%, which made us very competitive.
00:31:20.000And that was a big source of the economic growth under the Trump administration, it wasn't driven by stimulus like the last bull cycle was.
00:31:30.000Since the 2020 recession, the 2017 bull market was driven by deregulation and a 12% reduction in the corporate tax.
00:31:40.000So, what Biden wanted to do initially when he got into office was raise the corporate tax rate to 28%, which is very unpopular.
00:31:47.000And so, what they negotiated over 18 months was this tax, and it's a 15% minimum tax.
00:31:53.000And this is where it gets confusing because even I read this and said, you know, how are you raising the tax from 23% to 15%?
00:32:34.000Corporations, a minimum tax that earn a billion per more in profits.
00:32:39.000But it's also different from the statutory rate in other ways.
00:32:45.000The existing corporate tax rate is a tax rate on the reported income of a corporation, what a corporation reports to the IRS.
00:32:53.000This book tax, this is a book tax, what makes it different is it's a 15% tax on profits reported in a corporation's financial statement, which is what they report to the SEC.
00:33:05.000And this is what they show to investors.
00:33:08.000So, the 23% corporate tax rate, that's the tax on corporate income reported to the IRS.
00:33:14.000This is a 15% minimum book tax on profits reported in the corporation's financial statement.
00:33:21.000Not their tax, but on their financial statement reported to investors and to the SEC.
00:33:27.000And so, the reason that this is put in the bill is because a lot of corporations, this is a tax that applies to a lot of corporations that have been paying zero in federal income tax.
00:33:39.000There are a lot of Giant big corporations that are making billions of dollars in profits, but they're not paying any tax to the federal government, like Amazon.
00:33:51.000Amazon makes billions of dollars, it's a trillion dollar company, and they don't pay any corporate tax to the federal government.
00:34:00.000And that's because what they report to the IRS is either zero income or negative income.
00:34:07.000And corporations are able to do this with depreciation because all of their capital expenditures they can deduct.
00:34:15.000So if Amazon makes all this money, there's all kinds of accounting tricks that they can do to reduce their taxable income and reduce their tax liability to zero.
00:34:26.000And so if they buy a factory, if they buy a distribution plan, if they buy trucks, if they buy all the money they invest because of the Trump tax cut and how deductions are now calculated, they can deduct so much that they can report no income to the IRS.
00:34:46.000They are, however, reporting income to their investors, and they are reporting income on their financial statements.
00:34:53.000And so, what this book tax is designed to do is to capture tax revenue that the existing corporate tax rate and the existing tax code cannot capture that income, cannot capture that tax liability.
00:35:09.000It's designed to go after Amazon, it's designed to go after these corporations that are effectively evading their tax liability, which is something, by the way, that I support.
00:35:33.000Amazon should pay tax, not just the sales tax and the income tax that they generate by employing people and by selling products, but Amazon should pay a federal tax if they're benefiting from a national marketplace and from infrastructure and from a national place to do business.
00:36:42.000So, in any case, that's the current environment in the United States.
00:36:47.000A lot of people are saying that the first quarter of this year, where we had negative GDP growth, doesn't really count because we had fewer exports and more imports.
00:36:58.000GDP is calculated by adding consumer spending to investment spending plus our exports minus our imports.
00:37:05.000Which would be our trade surplus or our trade deficit.
00:37:08.000And that measures the productivity of the economy.
00:37:11.000How much is being bought, how much is being invested, and how much is being exported on net to other countries.
00:37:17.000America has a trade deficit because we import more than we export.
00:37:22.000So that's always a source of negative in the economy.
00:37:25.000But our GDP is driven by the massive consumption and investment capability and capacity of the American economy.
00:37:32.000In the first quarter, GDP was negative despite high consumer spending, despite investment.
00:37:38.000Because of particularly negative trade deficit.
00:37:44.000And so a lot of economists say, well, that doesn't really count.
00:37:47.000It's all sort of exceptional, anomalous time because of the supply chain issues and the COVID pandemic and the 2020 recession and so on.
00:37:57.000And so here's the point we are experiencing a total collapse of the supply chains.
00:38:02.000We are experiencing record trade deficits.
00:38:09.000The GDP is shrinking because of the trade deficit, and that doesn't matter.
00:38:13.000Well, the GDP is contracting and the trade deficit is increasing.
00:38:19.000You could say that that makes the GDP contraction less significant.
00:38:23.000It's really immaterial because the GDP is shrinking and the trade deficit is exploding.
00:38:29.000And there are these issues, and that is a problem.
00:38:32.000If we want to have a powerful economy, if we want to be a rich nation, if we want to have the ability to project power around the world, we want to have a trade surplus, we want to have a good trade balance.
00:38:44.000So, you could say, oh, well, that's just because our trade is really bad.
00:38:47.000Okay, well, the trade is really bad, so that needs to be fixed.
00:38:51.000And that's been an issue, by the way, for 40 years.
00:38:54.000What this bill does, and so back to the book tax, like I said before, this is a minimum tax on corporations reporting a billion dollars in profits in their financial statements, but who are reporting zero to the IRS or something that will give them a tax liability of less than 15% to the IRS.
00:39:18.000The reason that corporations are able to report low or no income to the IRS is because they are expensing investment.
00:39:27.000They're going to, or they're taking deductions based on capital expenditures and investment.
00:39:35.000Amazon is able to report low or no income to the IRS because every time they invest in the country, every time that they invest in capital, every time they invest in labor, every time they invest in facilities and that kind of thing.
00:39:52.000They're reducing their taxable income.
00:39:58.000And that is something that changes their tax liability for the IRS, but does not change necessarily their profit and loss on their financial statement for the SEC, which is what this new tax looks at.
00:40:09.000And so the reason that the tax code allows for these deductions is because that incentivizes companies to invest.
00:40:18.000If you allow companies, the reason that the IRS, the reason that the tax code works this way, And allows companies to deduct their big capital investments and allows them to depreciate big capital investments over time is because a tax code is designed to incentivize capital investment.
00:40:37.000We want businesses to spend their money.
00:40:41.000If you were not getting a benefit, a tax benefit for spending your money, maybe companies wouldn't spend their money.
00:40:47.000Here's the way that a corporation looks at it a corporation makes a billion dollars, let's say.
00:40:53.000Now, if they report a billion dollars in income to the IRS, they owe 23% on that one billion.
00:40:59.000So, they owe $230 million on that billion.
00:41:02.000If they can spend a billion dollars and reduce their taxable income to zero, they don't have to give $230 million to the IRS.
00:41:12.000So, you think of it this way you're going to pay the $230 million anyway.
00:41:18.000You're going to pay an exorbitant percentage.
00:41:24.000And everybody wants to reduce their tax liability.
00:41:27.000So, a company is going to just be giving that money away, they're just giving it to the government.
00:41:32.000So, the reason that the IRS allows a corporation to deduct big capital investments from their income is because that incentivizes Amazon to say, well, if I'm going to just give that money to the IRS, I might as well spend lots of money in America.
00:41:49.000And although I'll be spending money, and although maybe I'll be spending more than I would have given to the IRS, if I can invest $500 million, which will give me a return and I'll have capital and I could put that into assets.
00:42:03.000Which have value, at least I'm retaining my wealth.
00:42:07.000At least I'm retaining the wealth of my company.
00:42:09.000At least I'm investing in something that could create cash flow.
00:42:13.000I would be better suited spending $500 million on facilities and capital and equipment and things like that, which I could sell later and still have value or that will bring money than if I give $230 million to the government and get nothing from it.
00:42:30.000And that incentivizes companies to invest.
00:42:33.000If you introduce a 15% minimum tax, meaning that if you're not paying, If you're not paying at least 15% on a billion in profits on your reported income to the IRS, you're going to pay at least 15% on what you report in your financial statements.
00:42:48.000It completely destroys the incentive for companies to invest.
00:42:52.000And so it turns out that the companies that will be paying this tax rate are going to be manufacturers.
00:42:57.000Manufacturers that have the most capital intensive kinds of companies.
00:43:02.000A manufacturer that spends money on heavy machinery and capital, that's like the original definition of capital.
00:43:10.000The kinds of companies that are spending tons and tons of money on these capital intensive kinds of companies, those are the ones that are going to be caught up in this new tax.
00:43:23.000And so, back to the original point the economy is shrinking because we're not exporting things.
00:43:29.000And we're not exporting things because America is de industrializing.
00:43:38.000The number of people employed in manufacturing is decreasing rapidly over the past 20 years.
00:43:43.000And the percentage of the GDP that is accounted for by manufacturing is shrinking over time, and the proportion of world manufacturing output that is accounted for by the United States is shrinking over time.
00:45:25.000Because say what you will about Trump and say what you will about the Republican agenda, the economy does matter.
00:45:30.000And we do want to have a wealthy, strong, prosperous country.
00:45:35.000And the way that you do that is deregulation.
00:45:37.000And the way that you do that is a corporate tax rate that is low and a tax code that is simple and friendly to investment and friendly to businesses.
00:45:49.000You also want corporations to come to America.
00:45:52.000And you want corporations to spend their money in America, and you want entrepreneurs to start businesses, and you want investment, and you want jobs, and you want capital and factories, you want industry, you want manufacturing.
00:46:04.000And the way that you do that is by creating a favorable climate for those things to happen, an attractive, competitive climate for those things to happen, which is what Trump did in 2017.
00:46:13.000And Biden comes in and re regulates the economy, increases the spending, introduces new taxes, raises old taxes.
00:46:25.000And people say, oh, you know, in these circles, the economy is not as pressing of an issue, but we're about to face a severe food shortage later this year.
00:46:33.000And we're facing an energy shortage, and we're facing all these problems.
00:46:38.000And it's a direct consequence of these kinds of measures.
00:47:32.000If green energy were viable, and I'm just going to say this quickly, I'm going to restate my position on this.
00:47:38.000If green energy were viable, entrepreneurs and energy companies would be taking advantage of it.
00:47:45.000If green energy were inevitable, if it were economical, if it were competitive, if there was some great value in it, companies would be investing in it.
00:47:57.000And people say, oh, well, no, because the big oil and big coal and natural gas, they don't want that to happen.
00:48:04.000If oil were finite and if oil companies were running out of it, And they weren't going to be able to sell anything anymore.
00:48:14.000Saudi Arabia is trying to diversify its economy by investing in other things and using their oil wealth to invest in other things.
00:48:22.000And that is probably what other oil companies, you know, Saudi Arabia is funded by Saudi Aramco, which is the Saudi state oil company, and other oil companies and other energy companies.
00:48:33.000They too would be diversifying if oil were finite, if oil was a bad option.
00:48:49.000Tesla only exists because of government subsidies for electric cars.
00:48:53.000If Tesla did not have, particularly in California, the tax incentives that they do, which is what they buy, for a long time, that was the primary source of Tesla's income, was selling the tax credits that they got from the state of California.
00:49:08.000That was a primary part of their business model.
00:49:11.000Was sort of shuffling around tax credits, shuffling around subsidies that they got from the government.
00:49:18.000And that's what all the green energy, Solyndra and all of them, it's all about subsidies, it's all tax credits, it's an industry entirely supported and dependent on the government, which comes from the taxpayer, which is directed by activists and ideologues in Congress.
00:49:36.000If green energy were inevitable and viable and economical, and if that really made sense for the economy, you would get it.
00:49:42.000You would get RD, you would get these things.
00:49:45.000They have to throw money at it for decades, billions, hundreds of billions of dollars for that very reason, because it doesn't make any sense.
00:49:54.000It requires trillions and trillions of dollars in capital improvements to make that viable for the electric charging stations, for solar panels, for wind turbines, for all of that.
00:50:10.000It requires major advancements, which theoretically may not even be possible in the ability to harness solar energy or wind energy.
00:50:24.000And so, these hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars in green energy, it's the biggest scam ever.
00:50:30.000And you'll find that if you follow the money, and this was true in the Obama administration as well, the people that are getting these billion dollar contracts, the people that are benefiting from these expenditures, are people that know the people that are signing the bills.
00:50:44.000This is just how the government works.
00:50:47.000The people that write the spending bills.
00:50:51.000They control trillions of dollars of money.
00:50:56.000The House of Representatives, which controls the budgetary process, they're managing $4 or $5 trillion in income.
00:51:03.000If the United States have $50 trillion in wealth or $25, $30 trillion in wealth, and they're managing $5 trillion in income every year, that makes them more powerful than the biggest hedge funds or the biggest companies put together.
00:51:16.000They're managing trillions and trillions and trillions of dollars in assets.
00:51:47.000If it costs $10 million, $5 million to win a House race or a few House races, and one representative on the budget committee is able to influence a trillion dollars in spending, A trillion dollars is a million times more than a million, right?
00:52:11.000A billion is a thousand times a million, and a trillion, am I getting that right?
00:52:17.000So if you spend a million dollars and you elect a congressman, they have influence over how a trillion dollars is spent, over how a billion dollars is spent.
00:52:27.000That's a 1,000 times or 1 million times return on investment.
00:52:32.000That explains the military, that explains green energy.
00:52:36.000Anything the government spends money on, everything that the government spends billions or trillions of dollars in cash on, you have to think, who are they buying it from?
00:52:46.000$700 billion, $800 billion spent on the military, who gets paid the $800 billion or however much goes to a particular contractor?
00:52:57.000There's a business out there that's getting that contract.
00:53:00.000There's a business out there that's getting those hundreds of billions of dollars in business from the government, and they're getting paid by it.
00:53:10.000And how much do you think it costs for a company making hundreds of billions from government contracts?
00:53:15.000How much do you think it costs the government, or how much do you think it costs a company making hundreds of billions of dollars in contracts from the government to continue getting them from Congress?
00:53:26.000How much do you think it costs Lockheed Martin or Boeing to lobby the Congress to get hundreds of billions of dollars in contracts for airplanes and missiles and RD and things like that?
00:54:41.000This has never happened before, by the way.
00:54:43.000A former U.S. president has never had their residence, has never had their home raided by federal law enforcement.
00:54:50.000It is something that has never happened in the history of the United States.
00:54:54.000And it's not the first time that a president has had confidential documents.
00:54:58.000It's not the first time that any cabinet member has had confidential documents.
00:55:03.000There was a guy in the Clinton administration, I believe it was, or the Bush administration, who back in 2005 got busted because he was stuffing confidential documents in his socks and taking them home.
00:55:18.000Some low level security guy, I think it was in the Clinton admin, or maybe Bush, I'm not exactly sure.
00:55:26.000But he was literally going to work in DC at his office and stuffing classified national security documents about 9 11 into his socks and taking them home.
00:55:38.000And then he lied about it to investigators and he got a misdemeanor charge.
00:55:51.000This is the first time in history that a former president has had his residence raided.
00:55:59.000The reason that they said they conducted the raid, I thought initially it was about January 6th.
00:56:03.000It had nothing to do with January 6th, or so they say.
00:56:07.000They say it has nothing to do with January 6th.
00:56:10.000The reason they say they raided the home is because Trump improperly took classified documents from the White House when he left the White House in 2021 and was storing them in Mar a Lago.
00:56:23.000And so the FBI and the DOJ, well, Trump has said this, that the FBI and the DOJ raided Mar a Lago, raided the residence to recover the documents.
00:56:33.000That were improperly transported and held illegally at Mar a Lago.
00:56:39.000So keep in mind, it's shocking enough that this has happened.
00:56:42.000It's never happened before in history.
00:56:44.000But it also happened for a completely bizarre and strange reason that has nothing to do with all the other ongoing legal issues that Trump is having.
00:56:51.000It has nothing to do with the sixth, it has nothing to do with anything else.
00:56:56.000And like I said, this is something that, although it's the first time a president has been raided, it's not the first time that this has happened.
00:57:04.000Hillary Clinton, famously, as Secretary of State, had classified documents stored in her home on her private email server, which she then deleted after she was ordered by Congress in a subpoena to turn them over.
00:57:17.000And she didn't get charged at all, much less raided.
00:57:21.000And the same thing is true of this security guy in 2005 stuffed documents in his socks, got charged with a misdemeanor.
00:57:31.000There was a big negotiation when he left office in 2016 about documents that he took from the White House and was storing in his private residence.
00:57:49.000FBI hasn't given a statement about it, DOJ hasn't given a statement about it.
00:57:54.000And this is something which has shocked everybody, not just the president's allies, but even some Democrats and even anti Trump Republicans.
00:58:37.000It completely undermines the sovereignty or the effective sovereignty of the president.
00:58:45.000It says, reports suggest the FBI activity is connected to an investigation into whether Mr. Trump removed classified records from the White House and took them to Mar a Lago.
00:58:55.000The search was approved at the highest levels of the Department of Justice.
00:58:59.000Republicans have depicted the investigation as politically motivated, with leading figures demanding a briefing from the Attorney General, Merrick Garland, who is the head of the Department of Justice.
00:59:09.000Mr. Trump's former vice president, Mike Pence, who has subtly distanced himself, Amid speculation, they may both launch 2024 White House runs, called on the attorney general to give a full accounting of why the search warrant was carried out.
00:59:23.000He said, No former president of the United States has ever been subject to a raid of their personal residence in American history.
00:59:31.000Mr. Trump's allies in Congress, meanwhile, vowed to launch an investigation if they win back control of the House of Representatives and Senate in November's midterm elections when the balance of power in Washington will be decided.
00:59:42.000Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell released a statement demanding a thorough and immediate Of what led to the events of Monday.
00:59:50.000The Justice Department, quote, should already have provided answers to the American people and must do so immediately, said the top Republican who has already pledged to support Mr. Trump in 2024.
01:00:03.000So this is the Republican reaction, and I have to say, based on what I've heard, I feel a little bit better.
01:00:11.000You know, yesterday I looked at the raid, and the raid is not a surprise at all, because The federal law enforcement has been politicized for a long time.
01:00:22.000And if you recall, it was back when Donald Trump was running for office.
01:00:26.000It was back before Donald Trump was even elected to the presidency in June of 2016, when Barack Obama's administration went to the FISA court and asked for a warrant to spy on Trump Tower.
01:00:43.000That was during a presidential election.
01:00:46.000Now, that was before Trump had the nomination.
01:00:50.000But at that point in June 2016, Donald Trump was the presumptive Republican nominee.
01:00:56.000And a Democratic president, his administration went to a FISA court, and FISA is one of these provisions, I believe, from the Patriot Act.
01:01:05.000He went to the FISA court and got an order, got a warrant to spy on Trump Tower.
01:01:11.000So essentially, the Democratic controlled White House was using the intelligence community to spy on the opposing party's campaign headquarters.
01:01:21.000Trump Tower was the Trump campaign headquarters.
01:01:24.000So, Democrat Obama, the sitting president, is using his power as a commander in chief and using federal law enforcement through the FISA court to get a warrant to spy in an election year on the presumptive nominee of the opposing party for his office to spy on his campaign headquarters.
01:01:51.000Now, people were shocked by what happened yesterday, but six years ago, What Obama did was way worse.
01:01:58.000People compare it to Watergate, where Richard Nixon and the Nixon campaign broke into the Watergate complex to steal documents from the DNC to help them win the 1972 presidential campaign, which looks minor in comparison.
01:02:52.000And they got that under the pretext of Russian collusion, which was never proven, which there was never any evidence produced that that was the case.
01:03:00.000And then you had throughout the Trump administration the same kind of funny business, which was people working to sabotage the Trump administration from within.
01:03:10.000And you had the special counsel appointed under Comey investigating.
01:03:14.000Foreign collusion into the Trump presidency.
01:03:17.000And you had people working under the special counsel, working under Robert Mueller, that were Democrats, that were rooting for Hillary Clinton, that bemoaned Trump becoming president.
01:03:27.000Lisa Page and Peter Strzok, if you remember those names.
01:03:31.000You had the Steele dossier, which was a form put together by a private investigator, and that had all that information about the golden showers and Moscow and all that crazy stuff.
01:03:45.000That was commissioned by the Mueller Council from operatives linked to Hillary Clinton.
01:03:51.000So, and that's not a full summary of it, but you can go back six years and you could go back to 16 and the FISA courts and you could go back to 2017 and 2018 and the special counsel.
01:04:03.000You could go back a long time and see the same abuses of federal law enforcement, the same abuses by the intelligence community, the same abuses by, in particular, the FBI and the politicization of these things.
01:04:19.000The same DOJ, the same FBI that conducted the spying on Trump Tower, that executed the Mueller Council, that commissioned the Steele dossier, and so on, were so surprised that that DOJ ordered a completely politically motivated and unprecedented raid on the former president's residence?
01:04:44.000If we knew these facts in 2016, Why is it that when Trump was inaugurated in 2017 was the FBI not gutted?
01:04:54.000If we knew in 2016 that Obama went to a FISA court, if we knew in 2016 that an illegitimate counsel was appointed to look into Russian collusion, why was the DOJ, why was the FBI not gutted under Trump, the same candidate that was targeted by the FBI and politically targeted by a weaponized federal law enforcement?
01:05:18.000If not in 17, it could have happened and should have happened any year after 18, 19, 20.
01:05:24.000He had four years to gut the FBI, gut the DOJ.
01:05:28.000Is it any surprise that the FBI and DOJ that tried to prevent Trump from becoming president in the first place, tried to overthrow Trump once he became president, is now, after he's president, persecuting him and attempting to prevent him from running again?
01:05:44.000It shouldn't be a surprise to anybody.
01:06:14.000It's scary that federal law enforcement's being weaponized, but that's a fact of our reality.
01:06:19.000It's been weaponized since they killed JFK, it's been weaponized for 60 years.
01:06:24.000Since the federal law enforcement was created, effectively.
01:06:28.000What is scary is that there's no opposition, and the people that claim to be the opposition seem to be controlled by the people they claim to be opposing.
01:06:40.000Because we see this transpire yesterday, and we've seen this transpire for six years, 60 years.
01:06:45.000But we saw this raid on Mar a Lago yesterday, and what are the opponents of this politically motivated siege saying?
01:06:58.000Well, they're saying this is hypocritical.
01:07:01.000If the shoe was on the other foot, Democrats would be outraged.
01:07:05.000The FBI is, I mean, like, we don't have any choice.
01:07:09.000The government is controlled by institutions that are faceless and nameless and cannot be unseated.
01:07:15.000Despite politicians coming and going, the government is controlled by bureaucrats in the FBI, DOJ, Pentagon, et cetera, that never change, that are turned over or not turned over from one administration to the next.
01:08:18.000This is the farthest they've ever reached over, farthest overreach ever, most dramatic, provocative, naked, visible overreach by federal law enforcement ever.
01:08:52.000If federal law enforcement is moving in a coordinated way swiftly with all their power, and the reaction from Republicans is to start selling a t shirt that says, I hate the FBI, we need to fight like hell, we're going to lose.
01:09:36.000Some people spoke out against it, but they're like, Buy a t shirt.
01:09:40.000Buy a t shirt that says, The FBI sucks.
01:09:44.000It's like, okay, so I'm sorry, but if the best we could do after.
01:09:47.000The FBI raids the home of Trump to prevent him from running in a nakedly, obviously political move.
01:09:54.000If the best we could do is unsell a t shirt that says, This is unfair, use code MAGA for 15% off your I Hate the FBI t shirt for your Louder with Crowder mug.
01:10:07.000Use code I Hate the FBI for your Louder with Crowder coffee mug.
01:11:19.000So, Trump leaves office in January 2021, and the DOJ and the FBI and Federal law enforcement works tirelessly since then to prosecute his supporters, throw supporters in jail, and also what they've been doing.
01:11:33.000Their mission is not different from the special counsel, and it's not different from the first impeachment about the abuse of power with the phone call with the Ukrainian president.
01:12:03.000Because you can't, there's not really an obvious way to indict Trump in January 21.
01:12:08.000There's not an obvious way to indict Trump in February 21.
01:12:11.000They impeach him on January 6th, and I think that they did that to hold that over his head.
01:12:16.000They impeached Trump in the House on January 6th, and it's kicked over to the Senate for a trial.
01:12:22.000Now, Republicans had control of the Senate at that point, and Mitch McConnell was the Senate majority leader.
01:12:28.000And so, This created an environment where Trump, if he did something that would upset Mitch McConnell, Mitch McConnell, even though he's Republican, even though he's an ally of the president or should be, could bring the impeachment case against Trump in the Senate and hold the trial and have Trump convicted and removed from office and then possibly face a criminal indictment.
01:12:53.000And that was the environment as president.
01:12:56.000Trump could have been tried in the Senate as the president in an impeachment trial.
01:13:09.000A trial should have been held in the Senate, but Mitch McConnell can choose to bring the trial or not bring the trial.
01:13:15.000And Mitch McConnell chose not to bring the trial, but he could have.
01:13:19.000And it was that dynamic which kept Trump in control from January 6th, when the riot happened, until January 20th, when Biden was formally sworn in as the next president.
01:13:30.000Trump was still president in that period, but that threat of The trial kept Trump in check.
01:13:37.000He was indicted and could have been convicted if McConnell brought it between the 6th and the 20th, and that is what sort of set some guardrails on the last three weeks of the Trump presidency.
01:13:48.000Now, after January 20th, the question of the DOJ and the FBI is how do we indict Trump?
01:15:03.000But because they set the foundation with five, six, 700 people at that point charged for lower level crimes, and members of those groups charged with conspiracy and those crimes, by December 21, they were able to take charges to Stuart Rhodes and Enrique Tario and say, We're charging you with seditious conspiracy.
01:16:09.000From January 2021 on, the goal is to prevent Trump from running for office in 2024.
01:16:15.000They know that because Trump was screwed out of the presidency and refused to concede the election, they already know by November 2020 what's going to happen.
01:16:24.000They know Trump is not going to overturn the results, they know he's not going to concede.
01:16:28.000And they know that he's going to take the next four years to build up his money, build up his infrastructure, and launch a bid to take over in 2024.
01:16:35.000They know that almost immediately after the November election finishes in 2020.
01:16:40.000And so they get to work after the sixth in 2021, building the case, which they know is going to take time.
01:16:47.000They have to mobilize thousands of DOJ lawyers, thousands of FBI agents to build the case.
01:16:52.000850 indictments so far to build the case against Trump to prevent him from running.
01:17:01.000That's when he's scheduled to announce.
01:17:03.000The primary begins in the year preceding the presidential election year.
01:17:07.000So, the Republican primary, when Trump announces and begins to build up steam and becomes the presumptive nominee, that starts in 2023.
01:17:15.000They essentially have to make sure that all of this happens very early on in that process or before it happens because it's a legitimacy game.
01:17:26.000The optics of a Democrat DOJ, a Democrat FBI, In a very contentious way, charging the presumptive nominee of the opposing party during the primary.
01:18:13.000The Georgia prosecutors looking into 2020 election conduct, New York attorney general is looking into Trump's assets, also his tax returns, and so on.
01:18:24.000So, all these legal matters are going on.
01:18:26.000In the midst of that, Trump is raided by the FBI.
01:18:29.000And they say, well, it's about documents.
01:18:33.000The FBI is building their case, the DOJ is building their case.
01:18:36.000The DOJ and Mayor Garland authorized the raid of Mar a Lago not because they improperly had confidential documents, that was the excuse.
01:18:46.000To send 50 FBI agents to the president's home and campaign headquarters and kick his lawyers out and lock the doors and break the safes and take all the documents from the Trump campaign office, from the office of the former president at his headquarters while he's in New York.
01:19:05.000So that they can then take those documents to Washington and look over them and, oh, gee, look what we found.
01:19:11.000We found stuff that's going to kill you in New York and stuff that's going to kill you in Georgia and stuff that's going to hurt you in the J6 investigation.
01:19:18.000So that we can indict you before 23, before you announce.
01:19:30.000In November, the Republicans are going to win control of the House.
01:19:35.000The Republicans are going to win control of the House, and they may win control of the Senate.
01:19:40.000So, now what is the significance of this?
01:19:44.000Well, the House Select Committee on January 6th will expire at the end of this year.
01:19:52.000In December 2022, the House Select Committee investigating January 6th expires, and it would require an act of Congress to renew that committee.
01:20:03.000If the Republicans have a majority in the House, that committee expires, and now Republicans have oversight power, and now Republicans have subpoena power.
01:20:15.000Trump's allies in the Senate and the House have this power.
01:20:18.000Kevin McCarthy, or whoever will be the leader in the leadership, will have this power.
01:20:22.000And so in November 2022 and in January 23, when the new House is sworn in, a vengeful Republican Party, if they coalesce around Trump, will be able to launch a committee to investigate the Biden DOJ and can launch an investigation into the FBI and can launch an investigation into Joe Biden and they can impeach Biden and they can do a lot of things.
01:20:46.000Now, how much impact that will have is questionable.
01:20:52.000But the point is, the Democrats will be under much more scrutiny once that happens, and they know that.
01:20:59.000And so, what this is about is this is more than ever before, it's like a sumo wrestling match.
01:21:06.000It is power against power, it is a political wrestling match between the two parties in a way that it never was before.
01:21:13.000Before, it was like, okay, we vote and we pass the bills and we shake hands and we negotiate, and Tip and the Gipper, Tip O'Neill and Ronald Reagan meeting over dinner after they negotiate.
01:21:26.000And now in 2022, it's like, we're trying to arrest your nominee.
01:21:30.000Oh, yeah, well, not if we get control of the House, then we're going to arrest the FBI.
01:21:33.000And the FBI is like, okay, we'll blackmail everybody.
01:21:37.000So now it's literally just horns locking, heads bashing.
01:21:42.000Okay, this is like, this is an all out wrestling match.
01:21:46.000And it's everything the Republicans can muster in the court of public opinion and with their media assets, and it's their assets in state and federal government against everything the Democrats have.
01:21:59.000And so it's the politicized DOJ and the FBI against now a Republican majority in the House and their oversight power and their subpoena power and what can be broadcast on Fox News and what could be broadcast on social media and how the Republicans can rile up their activists and voters and how the Democrats can try and activate theirs in response.
01:23:05.000Because going into 23, it was a question.
01:23:08.000Fox News hasn't had Trump on in 100 plus days until this happened.
01:23:13.000And McConnell is vocally against Trump for the past 18 months until this happened.
01:23:19.000Same thing with Mike Pence until this happened.
01:23:22.000And with Mike Pence and with the Senate Majority Leader and the future Republican Speaker of the House and with Fox News and with these other assets.
01:23:31.000Now we've got a little bit more of a fighting chance.
01:23:33.000I said yesterday if Trump gets indicted, no one's going to fight.
01:23:37.000If Trump gets convicted, no one's going to fight.
01:23:40.000If Trump can galvanize the Republican machinery in America, we can put up enough resistance to hold off the DOJ and the FBI until Trump secures the nomination.
01:25:06.000We need McCarthy to be a player here, to be a team player, and we need to use that to go after the FBI and the DOJ.
01:25:14.000We then need to resist anything that they, any funny business they try after that in 23.
01:25:19.000We need to get Trump across the finish line, and then Schedule F needs to go for everybody.
01:25:25.000Trump needs to get in power and liquidate the FBI and liquidate the NSA and the CIA and the DOJ and liquidate the Pentagon and the Secretary of State's office, the State Department, the embassies, the consulates needs to liquidate all of it.
01:25:39.000They all need to be sent home, and it could all end here.
01:25:51.000I don't think any of this would have happened if Trump became president again in 2020.
01:25:55.000I don't think any of this could have happened.
01:25:57.000But the election fraud and the January 6th framing and the DOJ investigation, the weaponization of federal law enforcement, is all forcing a situation.
01:26:09.000It is forcing a situation where it's us or them.
01:26:13.000If that situation wasn't forced, they could probably get out a very soft victory.
01:26:18.000And what I mean by that is if Trump served four more years, they could sabotage four more years of Trump, and then he's done.
01:26:24.000If Trump got in in 2020, They could have sabotaged him for four more years.
01:26:29.000They could have tied him up with investigations and impeachment and nonstop media coverage and going after his finances.
01:26:37.000They could have ground that to a halt for another four years.
01:27:16.000They galvanized it behind Trump by banning him from social media, by targeting his supporters.
01:27:21.000They elevated people like Gates and MTG and Gosar to become, in some sense, bigger fundraisers and more powerful than McCarthy and Liz Cheney.
01:27:30.000The 10 Republicans that voted to impeach.
01:27:32.000Eight of them will not be seated again in this next cycle.
01:27:37.000And now, with this raid, it's almost like they sealed their fate.
01:28:10.000Before it was globalists on the left and something like globalists and some of us on the right.
01:28:15.000And either way, the globalists are winning.
01:28:18.000Through the overthrow of Trump and Israel screwing Trump and Kushner leaving and Adelson dying and Netanyahu losing power and through the DOJ weaponization, the elevation of the MAGA block in the House of Representatives, creation of alternative social media, the creation of anti woke cultural figures.
01:28:38.000They have created a dialectic where it's all of them versus all of us, and the institutions are going to work for us.
01:28:44.000Now, they may win, but we also could win.
01:28:48.000And if we win, that's the best possible outcome.
01:28:50.000Before, that wasn't an outcome, that wasn't in the cards.
01:28:53.000Theoretically, if Trump won in 2020, it's arguable if we could have won.
01:28:58.000It's arguable if we could have had any kind of lasting, meaningful victory.
01:29:01.000Because, like I said, they sabotaged the first four years.
01:29:05.000They came back in after four years of Trump and acted like nothing happened.
01:29:09.000They resumed Obama, even though the president is mentally ill.
01:29:13.000Four years of Trump, realistically, like six years of Trump, because he announced in 15, they undid overnight and they just flipped the script.
01:29:23.000And it was like open borders and trade deficits and vaccine mandates and trillions in deficits and you name it.
01:29:30.000They just picked up where they left off.
01:29:52.000Everything that's going on now, they could have done that for another four years of Trump, and then they would have had a Democrat come in in 24, and then it really would have been done.
01:30:25.000He does eight years, no damage, it's over, it's done, he's out of the equation.
01:30:29.000DeSantis comes in in 24 and wins the whole thing somehow, and it's establishment, or he loses, in which case we don't get another chance in 28.
01:30:40.000So this is still potentially the best possible outcome.
01:30:44.000Where in 24, here we are again, eight years, here we are, nine years after Trump announced, and it's still Trump.
01:30:51.000He's still the guy, he's still the leader.
01:30:53.000And he's more vengeful, and he is more a representative of the people.
01:30:57.000And the institutions are more galvanized behind him than ever before, and the establishment is potentially at its weakest and lowest point in 24 as opposed to in 2020.
01:31:08.000This still may be the best possible outcome.
01:31:10.000So I know last night it was sort of a despairing, black pilled show, but this is the white pill.
01:31:18.000If we can galvanize behind Trump, if Trump announces soon and makes himself the opposition leader, and if the Republican and right wing institutions rally behind him, and if a big red wave election happens and we get control of the House and the Senate, And if we fight in 23, and if we fight in 24, we can get a President Trump.
01:31:58.000So much of what is holding back the world from a reactionary uprising is America.
01:32:04.000And its influence through its NGOs and its embassies and its consulates and its money.
01:32:09.000That's why you don't have a reactionary uprising in the world, it's because this liberal regime has its thumb on every country because of the State Department and because of the DOD.
01:32:21.000We could get in there, we could fire all those people and send them all home.
01:33:29.000Just live underground and wait for everything to be destroyed by God, and we can emerge from our basements after a thousand years of darkness.
01:33:43.000There's still some options, but this is our last really good chance, our last really good opportunity before we have to reset the clock 20 more years, realistically, and wait for another generation to be born and mature and grow up and march through the institutions for two more decades.
01:34:23.000And this could be a lifelong thing where we said, you know what, I remember 30 years ago we fucked it up two times, three times, 16, 20, 24.
01:38:56.000Now, we may be destined to fail regardless, but if there's a chance that we can win, the only way it's going to happen is if we say, all good.
01:52:35.000It would be nice to have a congressperson who wasn't afraid of the media so much.
01:52:40.000Because the thing is, I obviously totally support Gosar and I totally support Marjorie Taylor Greene and some of these other ones.
01:52:48.000But it does kind of suck that it has to be this relationship where it's like, we're going to do things, oh, but when the media attacks, we have to say certain things.
01:52:59.000You just wish you had a congressperson who was just going to go all the way, you know, who was just going to go in there and just fully stick to their guns 100% and not always be thinking about, you know, the bottom line necessarily.
01:53:14.000So that's why I really like Loomer because she's going to get in there and you know she's never going to back down to the media.
01:53:20.000She's never going to have to come up with some kind of half hearted thing.
01:53:23.000So that is why I think we need a new generation of candidates that are even stronger than the existing ones.
01:53:28.000As much as I love Gosar, as much as I love Green, you know, there is this thing where.
01:53:33.000They still are a little bit in the matrix where the media will ask them questions and they'll say, Oh, well, I'm not a racist.
01:53:41.000And it's like, that just shouldn't even be in your vocabulary.
01:53:44.000So, you know, I know Gosar and Green don't like everything I've said.
01:53:50.000And I don't particularly like everything that they've ever said, you know, when the media attacks them and they sort of, you know, do that kind of thing.
01:54:00.000So it would be nice to have someone in Congress who just, that's not in their DNA.
01:58:07.000Although she's been attacked so much, what is there that they could do that they haven't already done?
01:58:12.000That's what makes her powerful, because she has nothing to lose.
01:58:15.000Nothing is more, honestly, in some sense, there's like two things that are very powerful it's Jewish women and white men.
01:58:22.000They're like white men with nothing to lose, very dangerous.
01:58:26.000Jewish women with nothing to lose, extremely dangerous.
01:58:30.000So, what happens when you have a high IQ, not so Jewish woman with nothing to lose?
01:58:36.000You know, she's going to become, she's either going to become the Antichrist or she's going to save America.
01:58:41.000You know, like there's going to, one of the, she's either going to rebuild the Third Temple and bring about the end of the world or she's going to be the best congresswoman ever and save America.
01:58:50.000So, yeah, pray for Laura Loomer, a woman with nothing left to lose.
01:59:02.000So that, and that's why they fear her because she doesn't have something to lose like all these other people that are playing to like, You know, they're being real smart and they're being real clever.
01:59:10.000She just goes out there and handcuffs herself to Twitter's headquarters.
02:00:47.000I'm not talking about the violence, but she brings that kind of energy.
02:00:52.000She brings that kind of energy to the table, this like totally off the wall, like insane energy.
02:01:01.000Whereas every other politician is going to have to say, Well, I disavow.
02:01:06.000Well, I don't agree with everything that he says, but Laura Loomer's going to go in there and be like, you know, she's going to go in there and say something totally different, totally organic, totally genuine.
02:01:19.000I'm kidding about all that kind of stuff, but what I mean to say is she's.
02:09:54.000Everything that you say is not backed up by facts.
02:09:56.000When I say that Trump is going to run and he's going to run in January and he's going to do Schedule F, this is based on firsthand knowledge.
02:10:03.000This is based on people that will work in the Trump administration that I know who have told me this.
02:10:10.000And my analysis of Trump is based on things that have happened.
02:10:15.000Trump did get overthrown, Trump did get cheated out of the election with mail in ballots.
02:10:19.000We knew that was going to happen in October.
02:10:45.000That's based on a pattern of behavior, and that's based on what people stand to gain, and that's based on things that we can reasonably know and reasonably infer.
02:10:55.000What you're saying is just wild conjecture.
02:10:58.000Well, maybe, maybe they created monkeypox to cover up this other thing.
02:11:38.000500 miles of border wall were built in real life.
02:11:42.00018 foot steel bollard fence is not perfectly what we wanted, but it's more than what we had before.
02:11:47.000500 miles out of the 1,000 that we needed covered.
02:11:50.000500 miles that Trump forced through, fighting tooth and nail it through Congress for years and forced through the courts.
02:11:58.000And finally, in 2020, got it built at an accelerated pace and built the remain in Mexico policy.
02:12:05.000Worked out deals where Mexico kept Northern Triangle illegals out of Mexico's southern border.
02:12:11.000Trump renegotiated the NAFTA deal, kept us out of war, tried in the very end to pull us out of Afghanistan and Iraq and South Korea and Germany, kept us from entering a war with Syria, which is what they wanted, changed the official policy, which was regime change against Assad, to effectively allowing Assad to continue ruling.
02:12:50.000The deregulation, the tax cuts, the border wall, remain in Mexico, instituting whatever it was, Title 19 to keep illegals out and end catch and release.
02:13:47.000And a lot of the compromises that are made are questionable as to whether we get value from them.
02:13:54.000But then you get people that have an IQ of 90 who say things like this oh, well, you know, chemtrails are real and monkeypox is a cover up for this and, you know, Trump never does anything.
02:14:17.000So, you know, so what's the conclusion then?
02:14:21.000We're all supposed to just go insane and kill ourselves?
02:14:24.000Because, like, you know, because you can always go one step further and say, well, the thing that you think is real is actually fake, and everything's fake.
02:14:52.000They don't want us to know that rat poison is medicine.
02:14:56.000It's all about, you know, if we just base everything in conjecture, and if everything's fake, and if nothing can be done, if everything is just a waste of time, if everything is just, we're going to be skeptical of everything, then, you know, we should all just kill ourselves ultimately.
02:18:56.000Because, you know, when you look at the numerology, it's one of these things where you can really construct meaning out of anything with numbers.
02:20:03.000If there was some kind of system where it's like, this is a system, this produces a consistent thing, it's consistent throughout time, I would say, okay.
02:20:12.000But it's like, well, if you add this number to this number and divide it by this, then it's like, okay.
02:20:16.000So we could play these games all day long.
02:20:19.000You get to add up all the letters in my name and divide it by the number of letters in my name and come up with a number and say, well, that number means this.
02:20:26.000And, you know, who's to say what the rules are?
02:21:48.000That's the only kind of sin that I'll have.
02:21:51.000That's the only kind of sin that I'll permit is my chocolate, my chocolate secret, my secret chocolate, my chocolate sin, says Charlie Kirk Teeth.
02:22:02.000Well, there's another, I guess there's another way you could say it.
02:22:05.000I guess there's another kind of chocolate sin.
02:22:08.000I guess there's another kind of chocolate sin.
02:22:11.000When I look at that, who is that one that ran in Baltimore, Kim Klasik?
02:26:15.000I'm talking about a straight up chocolate sin.
02:26:17.000I'm talking about a totally straight up chocolate sin that cries out from Valhalla for vengeance.
02:26:24.000I'm talking about a chocolate sin that cries out to Valhalla for vengeance, that cries out to Atlantis and the Golden Age giants for vengeance.
02:33:40.000I think it would literally kill any non AF Republican slash boomer to control the framing of a message while making a truly brazen point with it.
02:33:47.000God bless, and here's to Trump's success.
02:38:37.000You're honestly, I think you're a little bit gay if you don't get it.
02:38:40.000You know, that's such a pathetic and small minded and shackled thinking cope to say, oh, you mean the biracial ones, right?
02:38:48.000Yeah, only the ones that are like halfway, only ones that are sort of like halfway a deviation, because a full deviation would just be too out there.
02:38:58.000No, no, I'm talking about straight up jungle.
02:51:18.000You should tell that to someone who cares about your opinion because I'm sure they would really be curious about what you have to say about that.
03:01:54.000You know, after super chat 100, it kind of got a little slow, but yeah, after 118, I felt like that just flew, but it didn't even feel like three and a half hours, it didn't feel like three and a half hours at all.