00:00:36.000We had been looking forward to it and talking about when it would come out.
00:00:40.000And certainly it was supposed to come out about that time as well.
00:00:43.000They had in mind that it would go on for about that long, right up until the fall.
00:00:49.000And they kept asking for extension after extension.
00:00:51.000And finally, on Wednesday, Inspector General Michael Horowitz said that he had completed the draft of his reports, which of course is on the FBI and DOJ's handling of the Clinton email probe.
00:01:07.000It'll now take three to four weeks for people to review it to make sure that there's no national security issues, to make sure that everything is correct.
00:01:16.000And so it should be about three to four weeks, about a month before anybody will see it.
00:01:20.000And so we're very excited to start talking about that.
00:01:23.000A big piece in the New York Times as well, detailing some new information given by some of the sources named in the IG report, trying to do a little damage control.
00:01:33.000But we're going to get into all of that.
00:01:35.000We're going to get into North Korea and also the Mueller probe.
00:02:52.000But it does make me frustrated because I watched the speech and I'm thinking, wow, I'm really killing it up there.
00:02:57.000And then I look at all these mediocrities in the alt light people on Fox News, the people who meet Kanye West, the intellectual dark web, the people getting 30 grand a month on Patreon, people who get all the financing from billionaires.
00:04:57.000And you look into his background, and of course, his father, Tim Phillips, runs Americans for Prosperity.
00:05:03.000And he grew up and he was best friends with the guy who ran the Leadership Institute.
00:05:08.000Cabot Phillips is the head of Campus Reform, which is a subsidiary of the Leadership Institute.
00:05:13.000And, you know, so he got doors open for him by his family, by his parents.
00:05:17.000And I'm watching him on Fox News and I thought, you know, here is a guy who, like last year, he attacked me when I was a nobody.
00:05:23.000He had like 10,000 followers, he was the head of Campus Reform.
00:05:27.000He's on Fox News and he went out of his way to attack me when I was like a nobody, when I had like 2,000 followers and I was just complaining about.
00:05:37.000Mixed marriages, I think it was on Twitter.
00:05:40.000They said, Oh, this is racist, whatever.
00:05:42.000And I've encountered him several times at Young Americans for Liberty at CPAC.
00:05:47.000And every time he's got something disrespectful to say, doesn't want to engage, doesn't want to debate, doesn't want to shake my hand.
00:06:03.000I don't know how we're going to do it.
00:06:04.000Maybe it's through alt tech or it's grassroots, but it's got to be something because you look at the, The Cabot Phillips, the Ben Shapiro's, all these different people of the world, Prager University, and literally down to a person, they are financed by billionaires.
00:06:20.000Miley Yiannopoulos, everyone at Breitbart, it's all billionaires funding these people.
00:06:26.000And it just tells you you're not going to get a real message.
00:06:29.000You're not going to get real, quality, inspiring, disruptive stuff if it's coming from somebody who has something to gain from it.
00:06:37.000If it's coming from a billionaire who wants, Their tax break, or they want their H 1B visa workers and all the rest.
00:07:14.000Through no hard work, through no real talent, but just through money and obedience, and they're going to get on their knees and they're going to do what they're told, they're going to be the superstars, but not for long.
00:07:24.000So, check out my American Renaissance speech.
00:07:27.000Maybe it was a miscalculation to go into the room where you had all the moneyed, wealthy boomers, and for me to rail on the boomer generation for 45 minutes.
00:07:36.000Maybe that was not the best calculation, but it had to be said.
00:07:48.000And you know, you're going to get criticized no matter what you say, I think.
00:07:51.000But I think a lot of people just didn't really listen to it very closely, didn't really understand it.
00:07:56.000People were saying, well, uh, Generation Z isn't that good.
00:08:01.000Oh, you cited this number, but look at this number, which is not so good.
00:08:05.000Or I saw one comment that was like, you can't put all your blind faith into one generation, which it's like, if you listen to the speech, I said, I addressed exactly that concern.
00:08:16.000I said, you could look at some of the numbers and some are more accurate than others.
00:08:22.000I said, all, and all I said was that you have a real opportunity for this generation, given their life experience, given the formative events, given some of these numbers that we're seeing.
00:08:34.000All I said was, They represent an opportunity.
00:09:08.000So, we didn't get to everything we wanted to yesterday.
00:09:10.000So, we're going to cover a lot of that today.
00:09:11.000We're going to first talk about the upcoming Inspector General's report.
00:09:15.000And more specifically, there was a New York Times article that came out two days ago.
00:09:21.000And this stuff is really fascinating where they know they're in hot water.
00:09:25.000A lot of these people in the DOJ and the FBI and the intelligence community.
00:09:30.000And they all came forward to some friendly people in the press, friendly journalists who are going to spin it the way they want.
00:09:37.000They gave him some selective information.
00:09:38.000And two days ago, the New York Times comes out with a big, like a preemptive strike to spin the IG report, saying, oh, well, actually, they were so reluctant.
00:09:48.000They didn't want to be election meddlers and all this and that.
00:09:51.000And so they're trying to cover their ass before the IG report comes out in a few weeks.
00:09:56.000And it was just announced that the report is completed.
00:10:02.000We're going to talk about North Korea, some major developments happening there in terms of the U.S. North Korea summit set to happen on June 12th.
00:10:11.000If we have time, we'll get to some comments by Rudy Giuliani about the Mueller probe.
00:10:16.000And then I think there's one last thing that I'm forgetting, or maybe that's everything.
00:10:21.000But either way, we're going to have to start with the IG report.
00:10:26.000And the big development is not that we don't really have anything from the IG report quite yet.
00:10:30.000There are some rumors about what's contained in it.
00:10:33.000And just to refresh your memory a little bit, the inspector general, of course, is in the Justice Department.
00:10:39.000Michael Horowitz was put up to the task.
00:10:42.000Almost exactly after the inauguration.
00:10:48.000This is by both parties, have said that he's a really quality guy.
00:10:52.000He served in Democratic and Republican administrations.
00:10:55.000Michael Horowitz became the inspector general, and he set out about a year ago to look into the handling of the Clinton email probe by the DOJ and the FBI to make sure there were no improprieties there.
00:11:08.000And over the course of a little bit longer than a year now, he's examined 1.2 million records.
00:11:14.000He's looked into, I think, like hundreds of interviews and witnesses and all kinds of people.
00:11:21.000And finally, there's a long and thorough report, and it's been extended many times over.
00:11:27.000It was expected first in like the summer and then in the fall and then in the winter and then finally got extended again.
00:11:55.000People say that sources who have seen the report and are connected are saying this, but of course, we're not going to really know anything about it until it drops.
00:12:03.000But what we can discover is some things that were disclosed in the New York Times article called Operation, or what is it?
00:12:14.000That was the article penned in the New York Times two days ago.
00:12:18.000And there are some very shocking revelations in this report, and I'll read you some quotes from it, because really, this stuff is hard to believe how.
00:12:28.000Obnoxious the corruption is with these people.
00:12:31.000Where this report comes out two days ago.
00:12:34.000Yesterday, Michael Horowitz says that the IG report is finished.
00:12:39.000So, of course, if the timing is that Tuesday there's a huge spread in the New York Times, which is so benevolent, so sympathetic to the DOJ and the FBI, saying, well, they didn't try to meddle in the election and they were reluctant to illegally wiretap and spy on people in the Trump campaign and they were just doing their best.
00:12:59.000It wasn't really even spying, maybe it was eavesdropping.
00:13:01.000So, On Tuesday, you have this huge spread.
00:13:43.000And so let's look at some of the things that were in the New York Times article because there was some new information, which was kind of glossed over.
00:13:51.000If you haven't been following this story, which is very complex, there's a lot of information, there's a lot of spin on both sides.
00:13:59.000So it's really hard to kind of find what is fact and what is fiction, and there's all kinds of nuances and details.
00:14:07.000So, if you're just reading the New York Times article and you don't have this background information, it's going to be difficult.
00:14:12.000But hidden inside this very long article, first you have an admission that the government did spy on the Trump campaign.
00:14:21.000You know, the whole article is supposed to absolve these two organizations and basically the entire intelligence community of any wrongdoing looking into the Trump campaign and the Russia collusion and all of that.
00:14:34.000But do you remember when Donald Trump, shortly before the election, said that the Obama administration had his wires tapped?
00:14:41.000Remember that when he said that they were spying on him in Trump Tower and they were looking into his phone calls?
00:14:46.000And remember what the media's response to that was?
00:14:48.000The media responded by saying, Trump is lying.
00:15:21.000They investigated four unidentified Trump campaign aides, and this was revealed by congressional investigators in February.
00:15:28.000The four men were Michael T. Flynn, Paul Manafort, Carter Page, and George Papadopoulos.
00:15:34.000The FBI obtained phone records and other documents using national security letters, a secret type of subpoena, officials said.
00:15:42.000And at least one government informant met several times with Mr. Page and Mr. Papadopoulos.
00:15:48.000According to current and former officials.
00:15:50.000So the story was initially there was no spying.
00:15:53.000Then the story was well, actually, only Carter Page was spied on.
00:15:57.000Remember when there was the whole FISA warrant scandal with the Nunes memo?
00:16:01.000The Nunes memo said that the Obama administration came to the FISA courts, they presented the Steele dossier, and the FISA courts allowed the Obama administration to spy on Carter Page, and they tapped his phones.
00:16:18.000And that was the extent of it that we had heard about since February, that they spied on Carter Page.
00:16:22.000Later it came out that the Steele dossier.
00:16:24.000Which they used to get the warrant to spy on Carter Page was paid for and funded by the Clinton campaign and the DNC.
00:16:32.000And that was not known to the FISA courts before they gave the FISA warrant.
00:16:36.000So you imagine, think about this for a second.
00:16:39.000The Democrats paid for the Steele dossier, which said that the Russians were colluding with the Trump campaign and all the rest.
00:16:46.000And then the same party, the Democrats that paid for it, presented it to the FISA courts without telling them they paid for it and said, we need to spy on the opposition party.
00:16:56.000And the FISA courts say, okay, without knowing.
00:16:58.000That the Democrats who got the warrant to spy on the enemy campaign funded the dossier to serve as the basis for the warrant.
00:17:06.000So, first, that was all that we knew that Carter Page was spied on, and already there was all kinds of improprieties about that.
00:17:12.000Well, then we find out in this article that not only did they spy on Carter Page, but they also spied on Michael Flynn, Paul Manafort, and George Papadopoulos.
00:17:21.000So, this is a much bigger scope than we originally understood, where at first we thought it was just Carter Page.
00:17:29.000And already that was bad enough because of this incestuous relationship with Lisa Page and Peter Strzok and Bruce Orr and his wife and all these people.
00:17:38.000But then on top of that, there were three other people Michael Flynn, Papadopoulos, and Manafort.
00:17:43.000And Michael Flynn, the only reason they spied on him, they spied on him about a year before the transition even took place in December of 2015 because he sat at a meeting with Vladimir Putin.
00:17:55.000Little known, however, it is literally known, what's the expression?
00:18:12.000And then Manafort and Papadopoulos as well.
00:18:14.000Not only did they wiretap all these people, they wiretapped Page and Papadopoulos and Manafort and Flynn, but they also did the national security letters, which is a secret type of subpoena.
00:18:28.000And in addition to that, they had a government informant meet with both Page and Papadopoulos.
00:18:34.000So it wasn't just, we started out a year ago, there was no spying.
00:18:38.000Then it was, well, actually, we spied on Carter Page.
00:18:41.000Well, actually, it turns out that the only reason we did spy on Carter Page was because we funded a memo and didn't disclose that.
00:18:48.000Then it turns out, no, actually, they spied on four people.
00:18:51.000Actually, it wasn't just wiretaps, it was national security letters, it was informants, it was a much bigger scope.
00:18:58.000And the New York Times writes this off as, well, technically, was it really spying?
00:19:05.000If you tap somebody's phones and you listen in on the conversation, is that really spying?
00:19:10.000This is in the New York Times article.
00:19:12.000They're questioning if you wiretap somebody's phone, is that really spying?
00:19:16.000If you have a federal informant meet many times with multiple members of the Trump campaign, was that really spying?
00:19:23.000If we paid somebody to come meet you and mislead you as to our identity and get all kinds of private information, but could you really call that spying?
00:19:32.000I mean, this is the New York Times article.
00:19:38.000You understand just how problematic this is, just how politicized this effort was.
00:19:44.000Additionally, and this is buried in paragraph 70 of the New York Times article, they admit that there was no collusion, no evidence of Russian collusion.
00:19:56.000Quote A year and a half later, no public evidence has surfaced connecting Mr. Trump's advisors to the hacking or linking Mr. Trump himself to the Russian government's disruptive efforts.
00:20:09.000So, two years later, or a year and a half later, I think Mueller.
00:20:16.000So today is Mueller's one year anniversary of being appointed to the special counsel.
00:20:21.000So one year of that, really about two years or about a year and a half of the FBI and the DOJ looking into it.
00:20:29.000And the New York Times admits right here, despite how many indictments, remember those sealed indictments that came down in November and December?
00:20:37.000I had this dumb Jewish guy on my Facebook page from high school.
00:20:42.000And when they announced the sealed indictments, which ended up being Manafort and Papadopoulos, I believe.
00:20:48.000I remember him coming out on Facebook and saying, uh oh, Nick, it looks like Trump is going to jail.
00:20:56.000A couple of sealed indictments from the Mueller probe, you know, go, Mueller, go.
00:21:00.000And so, despite those indictments, despite indictments coming down on Manafort and his assistant and Papadopoulos and all these people, and it turned out that none of them had anything to do with the 2016 election or collusion.
00:21:12.000It was all just either they didn't have a lawyer when they spoke to the FBI, so the story was a little bit weird, or it was things from years and years ago that had nothing to do with the election.
00:21:22.000Despite all the indictments, all the resources, years of investigation, illegal wiretaps, search warrants, informants, no evidence, no evidence of collusion.
00:21:34.000And they admitted in the New York Times.
00:21:36.000And so, all of this is to say the big takeaway from this is that these people are panicking.
00:21:44.000They wouldn't be giving this kind of information, they wouldn't be leaking.
00:21:48.000And there were some undisclosed sources that provided information for this article.
00:21:52.000They're terrified of what's in the inspector's.
00:22:21.000I had been talking about this for a long time.
00:22:24.000For a long time, fans, viewers of the show, We're getting ready for another strong vindication.
00:22:30.000I've been talking about this as far back as January or December, I think even further back.
00:22:35.000And I said that the Inspector General's report will be a very big deal, very earth shattering, and might change the outcome, perhaps, in 2018.
00:22:45.000Obviously, it'll take about a month to come out, so it'll probably come out in the middle of June sometime.
00:22:51.000And this will be highly, I think, transformative for the midterms and a big deal for the Democratic Party in the long term.
00:22:59.000If Trump is able to clean house in the intelligence community, if he's able to clean house in the deep state, in the DOJ, in the FBI, if he's able to shut down the Mueller probe, you're really going to see this administration unleashed.
00:23:15.000And this is to all the haters who said, you know, Jeff Sessions isn't doing his job.
00:23:32.000I think this is going to be a pretty big deal.
00:23:34.000And like I said, if Trump can clean house in the deep state, if he can clean up this Russia collusion thing, if he could really shut that down, not only is that impediment to his administration removed, and in terms of the constant subpoenas and all this drama, not only is that gone, but think about how the media will be delegitimized after this.
00:23:54.000Not only the media, but the Democratic Party.
00:23:57.000That they've constructed their entire platform on 2018.
00:24:01.000They have not offered an alternative vision for the country.
00:24:04.000You know, we have made America great again.
00:24:26.000Mueller's going to put him in jail and all the rest.
00:24:29.000And so when this investigation gets shut down and they're going to have to close up shop because of how bad the IG report's going to be and that there's no collusion.
00:24:37.000And the media has been promoting this all year.
00:24:39.000The Democrats have been promoting this all year.
00:24:56.000All the people who doubted, all the people who were burning their MAGA hats, and they jumped off the Trump train, we're going to see them back again.
00:25:04.000As always, as they always do, they will come crawling back to the Trump train.
00:25:41.000It's like every week there's a story about North Korea.
00:25:44.000And so the latest development was that on Tuesday, North Korea canceled a high stakes summit with South Korea that was scheduled for Wednesday.
00:25:55.000And then yesterday, North Korea came out with a very blistering statement about the United States, saying effectively that the meeting between Trump and Kim Jong un is in jeopardy because John Bolton is not a good guy.
00:26:12.000And he referenced, quote, the Libyan model when talking to North Korea about denuclearization.
00:26:19.000And of course, if that was done, that's a big mistake.
00:26:22.000The Libyan model would refer to the denuclearization of Libya in 2003, shortly after the Iraq war.
00:26:30.000Libya had been developing a nuclear program for some time, and the Bush administration facilitated the removal of all their uranium, all their infrastructure, and they shut down the nuclear program.
00:26:43.000And then, as we all know, just eight years later, Gaddafi was brutally removed from power as a result of NATO coalition airstrikes and the United States removing him from power.
00:26:55.000And so, for John Bolton to say, well, we're going to attempt the Libyan model, you can understand why that wouldn't fly so well with North Korea.
00:27:02.000I mean, their rhetoric on why they want to obtain a nuclear arsenal or a nuclear capability is in explicit reference always to what happened in Libya, to what happened in Iraq, to what happened in all these different countries.
00:27:15.000So, North Korea, they say the only reason, and this is all rhetoric, but they say the reason we want to bomb is to prevent what happened to Gaddafi in Libya from happening to Kim Jong un in North Korea.
00:27:26.000And Kim Jong un came to power the same year that Gaddafi was dragged through the streets and brutally murdered and all the rest.
00:27:33.000And John Bolton to come to them and say, we'd like to pursue the Libyan model of you, not great politics.
00:27:39.000Now, that said, a lot of people have taken it at face value, which is so typical of people in the right wing, right?
00:30:11.000And today, President Trump responded in the Oval Office by saying it would not be the Libyan model, as John Bolton said.
00:30:17.000In fact, it would be what he said, the South Korean model.
00:30:20.000He explicitly affirmed that Kim Jong un would be in his country, would be in power, and that North Korea would be very prosperous, they would be protected, and all the rest.
00:30:29.000He said, Libya, we went in and we annihilated him.
00:30:32.000North Korea, we want to see them do well.
00:31:08.000And he was walking past me, and I yelled at him, Hey, no more wars for Israel.
00:31:13.000So, don't, I'm not, when I come on the show and I say the reason that North Korea is throwing the summit into doubt is not because of John Bolton, I don't come on the show to say that because I'm a big John Bolton fan, or I don't doubt that he's dumb enough to say something about Libya, or that that wouldn't give the North Koreans pause.
00:31:31.000Don't get me wrong, we are not John Bolton fans.
00:31:33.000But that said, I think to take rhetoric that seriously is just totally inconsistent, and it belies the fact that.
00:31:40.000Certain people in this movement, they don't really have an analytical framework.
00:31:45.000They don't really have a critical process for how to analyze things going on in the world.
00:31:49.000They see a headline that conforms to their worldview, and there it is.
00:32:20.000North Korea, first, they pulled out of their meeting with South Korea on Wednesday and they're pausing all negotiations until things are rectified.
00:32:28.000North Korea said the next day that they would not be backed into a unilateral denuclearization.
00:32:35.000It has to be two ways and all the rest.
00:32:38.000And today, Trump said, you have no reason to worry.
00:32:41.000It's not going to be the Libyan model and all the rest.
00:32:46.000The last thing we have to talk about here, the last big story from yesterday, which is probably the biggest cell phone here.
00:32:55.000This came out yesterday, but we didn't have so much time to talk about it.
00:32:58.000This came from Rudy Giuliani, who just got brought on to the White House to represent the Trump administration against the Mueller probe.
00:33:06.000And he announced yesterday that the Mueller probe confirmed to him that they, in fact, cannot indict the president, which is so rich.
00:33:14.000You got to wonder what are we even doing here?
00:33:18.000If the Mueller probe has been investigating this and the scope of the investigation has basically been unlimited, they've had unlimited resources.
00:33:50.000And that's why they're bringing in people like Manafort and people like Roger Stone and all the rest, is to build a grand case, a grand effort against the president and maybe attempt impeachment.
00:34:01.000And it came out yesterday that the Mueller probe itself confirmed that even if they put together their final report, even if there's something awry, they can't even indict the president.
00:34:12.000They themselves admit it because, of course, the only way to remove a sitting president is not like the Justice Department saying, okay, it's time for him to go.
00:34:36.000Manafort's judge, who was indicted recently, Manafort, I'm not talking about the judge, but the judge in the Manafort case has ordered that Mueller reveal the initial scope of his probe.
00:34:47.000He won't release it without redacting heavily.
00:34:52.000I mean, you look at in every instance, there really is just no mandate for this investigation even to exist.
00:34:59.000We find that every week, every month, more evidence comes out that the federal government colluded with Hillary Clinton than we find out that Trump colluded with Russia.
00:35:09.000You know, this probe was set up to say Trump was working with the Russians to overthrow the election and to cheat unfairly.
00:35:15.000And it seems like every month, as they're digging, we find the opposite.
00:35:19.000We find more and more that the people that are putting this investigation together, the people working alongside Clinton and all the rest, they're actually the colluders, and if not worse than even what they're alleging against Trump.
00:35:32.000Pretty spectacular defeat for Mueller.
00:35:34.000And I think this is the best possible scenario for this.
00:35:37.000You know, a lot of people have said, a lot of people who are not very intelligent have said, why doesn't Trump just disband the Mueller probe?
00:35:54.000Is it more effective if Trump shuts down the Mueller probe and it looks like there is the appearance of a cover up?
00:36:02.000He shuts down the Mueller probe and no matter how long it's been going on, No matter how many resources have been expended, no matter how little evidence comes out, he shuts it down, and liberals and the left and the Democrats get carte blanche to say, Well, you know, we would have found the Russian collusion.
00:36:19.000We were hot on his track, we were right on his heels.
00:36:23.000But then he shut down the investigation, and now we'll never know.
00:36:29.000There will always be the doubt in the media, there will always be the doubt for the Democrats.
00:36:33.000It doesn't matter what the results of the Probe were, so long as Trump shuts it down, there is the appearance, and you know they will spin it that way that they were getting too close to the secrets.
00:36:45.000They were getting too close to a real crime, a real wrongdoing, and that's why Trump had to shut it down.
00:36:50.000And you would never convince them otherwise.
00:36:52.000Is it better to do it that way, where you'd always have this nagging ambiguity as to what would have happened if they finished their investigation?
00:37:01.000Or is it better for the Mueller probe to drag on day after day, week after week, month after month, for years?
00:37:31.000Every day another politician says, it's time to wrap it up.
00:37:35.000Every day another special Senate Intelligence Committee finds there was no collusion and all the rest until eventually Robert Mueller has no choice.
00:37:43.000But to pack up and say, you know what?
00:37:47.000We finished our report, and the most that we found is that five years ago, Paul Manafort committed some questionable financial dealings in Ukraine, and that George Papadopoulos didn't tell the entire story to the FBI because he talked to them without a lawyer.
00:38:26.000You know, and so I think that's why the Mueller probe is banking almost entirely on them, on the Democrats winning the midterms.
00:38:32.000If the Democrats win the House, the Mueller probe, no matter how little evidence they make the recommendation, the Democrats file articles of impeachment.
00:38:41.000It's a big, ugly thing, and that's that.
00:38:44.000And so I think that's what's going on here.
00:39:14.000We've got Begbie who says, I want to reiterate, in case some don't know, that you are able to donate with a credit slash debit card on Streamlabs without a PayPal account.
00:39:29.000I don't know if it's enabled for me, though, because, and I've been having problems with that.
00:39:33.000I've been in touch with Streamlabs, the company, where it's like I logged into the Streamlabs broadcasting software with a different user than I do with their website, and so it shows no activity on the website, and therefore they can't verify my account to do.
00:41:13.000And you know, on my Fortnite stream the other day, me and Saxon, we were talking to some various random people, a lot of young kids playing Fortnite, asking them, do you T-pose in class?
00:41:24.000Middle schoolers, high schoolers, a little creepy.
00:46:54.000In order to get slush money or her slush fund through the Clinton Foundation, she brokers all kinds of deals for foreign actors, for the Russians, for all kinds of people, and they give her big money in return.
00:47:09.000There's also sex trafficking going on.
00:47:20.000She uses her role in her public service as Secretary of State.
00:47:26.000To broker deals, to give out licenses, to give out favors, all the rest, so people in exchange pay her privately in the Clinton Foundation so she has money to run for president.
00:47:35.000When she retires as Secretary of State, she can't turn over her emails.
00:47:39.000The reason that she had a private email server in her home and why she used that is because she was doing pay to play and other activities.
00:47:47.000So the reason that she destroys the emails is because she had to turn them over to the government, which would be accessible by Freedom of Information Act request or other kinds of things.
00:49:43.000So if you have like young people, whether it's girls or boys, but specifically the boys, you've got young boys covered in makeup and they've got an eyeshadow, they've got the sexy makeup on and all the rest.
00:50:52.000And we have another one from Shazbo who says How can we get small government conservatives to support programs that help the homeless and the addicted?
00:51:03.000Well, you know, the thing is this to solve homelessness, to solve drug addiction, there is no law that you can pass to fix these things.
00:51:13.000There's no, in my opinion, there's no federal program that you can do to fix this.
00:51:17.000You can maybe use federal money, but the answer to the problem is all local.
00:51:22.000The big problem in the country is we look at local problems.
00:51:25.000People we see on our morning commute to work are homeless.
00:51:29.000People we know, people we see in the public transit are on drugs.
00:51:35.000Friends of friends, our friend's kid's best friend is on drugs.
00:51:40.000And we say, how can the government in Washington, D.C., how can the politicians and the bureaucrats and the apparatchiks all the way over in Washington, D.C., what policy proposal can they use?
00:51:55.000To better benefit people around me in my hometown.
00:52:00.000And that's obviously the wrong approach.
00:52:02.000When you say it like that way, when you say it like that, you understand what a ridiculous premise.
00:53:06.000That's originally how we were able to enjoy freedoms.
00:53:09.000The reason we're able to enjoy freedoms is because if the people take after one another, they take care of each other, and they're virtuous, you don't need government programs, laws, big government.
00:53:21.000Of course, this becomes very difficult when you have the most disruptive forces in the world working against us, which are international capitalism and mass migration.
00:53:31.000Can't have community if you don't speak the same language, if you don't worship the same God, if you don't look the same.
00:53:37.000Sorry to say, but that's basically true.
00:53:41.000And additionally, if you have international finance, moving people around, shifting people from one place to another, it also becomes very difficult.
00:53:50.000So those are maybe the ways we can address getting back to the local, fixing those kinds of problems.
00:54:26.000If you say that you don't believe the official story for 9 11, you're crazy.
00:54:30.000You're crazy not to believe what the government told you, right?
00:54:33.000I mean, if you're a 9 11 conspiracy theorist, you're saying, I reject the official government story.
00:54:39.000And people who do that, Those are conspiracy theorists.
00:54:42.000Those are crazy people because they don't believe the government, really.
00:54:46.000You know, so of course I believe the official government story.
00:54:48.000Now, nevertheless, you have in the Twin Towers two buildings that were structurally built specifically to withstand multiple airline collisions.
00:54:58.000I mean, when they built the Twin Towers, they said specifically this could withstand multiple planes hitting it.
00:55:05.000And it got hit by one plane and the whole thing collapsed.
00:55:08.000Additionally, you look at the way structurally the building was built in terms of the foundations for the building, the major beams that supported the building were on the outside.
00:55:18.000You look at the windows, and they were so narrow because you had such a strong foundation that was built from the outside.
00:55:24.000That was characteristic of the building.
00:55:26.000This is even something Donald Trump talked about.
00:55:28.000You had in the World Trade Center that got bombed in 1993, a massive explosion in the basement where the foundation was, withstood that.
00:55:37.000And yet, you had planes hit both towers.
00:55:39.000They fell in exactly the same way at free fall speed, collapsed like that.
00:55:44.000You can talk to many eyewitnesses who said they heard explosions, who said all kinds of things that couldn't have collapsed that way.
00:55:51.000You also look at World Trade Center 7.
00:56:08.000A lot of buildings like World Trade Center 7 have been on fire, have withstood severe fire damage, severe heat damage, and they did not collapse like that.
00:56:17.000And so you look at all that evidence, and also you look at the Casa's belly, which is.
00:56:21.000What did 9 11, if you can establish motivation, if you can say that maybe it was conspicuous, we look at 9 11 as something that opened the door to our present policy in the Middle East.
00:56:32.000Would some actors have something to gain from 9 11 being done?
00:56:37.000Some actors who maybe don't care so much that Americans die.
00:56:41.000But of course, I believe the official government story.
00:56:44.000Just a lot of weird questions, you know.
00:56:50.000I'm sure there's answers to them, but.
01:00:17.000Like, we've never seen anything like this before, where this kind of establishment that is so pervasive in media, government, finance, and all the rest is under the gun right now.
01:00:28.000I mean, there's just never been anything quite like this in modern history.
01:00:31.000So it's tough to see how it'll play out.
01:01:36.000If you don't believe that God is real, that Christ came and died for our sins, that these things are sins as dictated by an extrinsic authority, which is God, there is no incentive to follow them.
01:01:48.000It defeats the whole purpose of a religion if people don't believe in it.
01:01:54.000You know, if I say, okay, well, I believe in Christianity because I think it's good for society, well, the minute I want to do something that my religion forbids, I'm going to say, well, you know, I don't really believe in it.
01:02:04.000I'm going to go ahead and do what I want anyway.
01:02:06.000So, this is a way where people want all the fruits of piety and of religious observance, but they don't want any of the sacrifice, any of the responsibilities.
01:02:25.000Coming over to the West and doing suicide bombings if they didn't believe there'd be a reward in heaven?
01:02:29.000And similarly, in parallel, do you think Christians would have any incentive to obey Christian sexual morals or Christian any other kinds of morals if it weren't for the fact that there's a final judgment, if it weren't for the fact that these rules did not come from man?
01:02:51.000God came down, became man, and unlike all the other prophets, he performed miracles.
01:02:57.000Buddha did not perform miracles, Muhammad did not perform miracles.
01:03:01.000Jesus Christ came and demonstrated proof of his divinity.
01:03:04.000He performed miracles to many, many witnesses.
01:03:08.000And then the grand miracle to vindicate his claims of divinity, that he was the Son of God, was that he rose from the dead and revealed himself to, I think, about a thousand witnesses.
01:03:19.000He fulfilled 400 and some prophecies, more than 460, to the point where the odds that he fulfilled all of them, coincidentally, would be astronomical.
01:03:28.000So to compare Christianity to other religions, number one is wrong.
01:03:32.000Maybe religions are man made, but Christianity is definitely the exception.
01:03:36.000There is simply no equivalence between Islam and Hinduism and Buddhism and Christianity in terms of their claims and in terms of the evidence.
01:03:44.000And then additionally, to say, well, we should only look at religion consequentially misses the mark, misses the mark completely.
01:03:52.000We did well because we had families and we believed in God and we devoted ourselves to God, and that's because we believed in God, not because we were like, well, this is maybe a good idea.
01:04:03.000So, Al Sabadis, Michael Williams, deportation bus.
01:04:25.000We're trying to help him understand the faith, and so we're trying to have patience and charity with him, but nevertheless, he's a little misguided.
01:04:33.000DL, aren't you going to cover the white man in New York yelling at Hispanics for speaking Spanish in a cafe and going on a rant because he pays for welfare?
01:05:15.000And it always devolves into these very Fedora tier arguments.
01:05:19.000The fact of the matter is this there is a more robust case for Christ's existence, for his crucifixion, and his resurrection than there is for the existence of Alexander the Great, than there is for the existence of the Buddha, than there is for the existence of all kinds of.
01:05:41.000You look at the many letters written in the Bible, and they had to have been written no less than 12 years after they said that Christ died.
01:05:48.000You look at many non biblical historical documents that say that Christ rose.
01:05:53.000People that were pagans, people that were Christians, all kinds of people.
01:05:56.000You have a number of Bibles, many languages that came out shortly after Christ's crucifixion.
01:06:06.000And nevertheless, and it's a little too lengthy to explain here, and I'm not the best equipped to do it, but.
01:06:12.000Christ coming is, you can logically come to the conclusion that if there is such a God, and there is, that he would send some kind of incarnation in human form to bring them up to him.
01:06:24.000I mean, this is, you can establish this through a priori reason.
01:06:28.000In the same way that Aquinas established the nature and existence of God through the cosmological arguments and the teleological argument, you can establish that if this God exists, then he would send a messenger like Christ.
01:06:40.000And that the biggest religion in the world has that as the message.
01:06:43.000And the Trinity and all the rest is vindication in and of itself.
01:06:47.000But I know a lot of the atheists have not read Aquinas.
01:06:52.000They have not read any of the major authors, the church fathers.
01:06:57.000And that's not to say, like, her, der, read Aquinas, like how, you know, what's his name says, read Locke.
01:07:02.000But it is to say that people are going to make these sweeping universal claims about religion, about Christianity, and they haven't read the fundamental source material.
01:07:11.000If you're an atheist, an atheist says, I know there is no God.
01:07:16.000And if you make that claim, then implicit in that should be, well, I searched and searched for evidence, and I thought about it long and hard.
01:07:25.000And after a process, I determined there is no God.
01:07:28.000And so if you call yourself an atheist and you haven't even read the Bible, haven't read the best arguments for the historicity of Christ or any other religion, It's just bogus.
01:07:56.000And I think if you looked at any of the Crusades or any of the popes who controlled Europe, I think they would be a pretty stark departure from this idea of so called slave morality.
01:08:08.000Is controlling the entire world, slave morality?
01:08:11.000Remember when Christian civilization controlled just about the entire planet, with the exception of a few countries?
01:08:17.000That doesn't quite sound like slave morality to me.
01:08:20.000Remember when religious leaders like the popes, or, you know, throughout history and many of the church leaders in the Byzantine Empire, remember when they controlled the kingdoms and the feudal lords and they controlled the Holy Roman Empire?
01:10:57.000So, maybe I'll put that up on my new website.
01:11:00.000Peter Teff, Nick, Trump is helping out North Dakota bigly, lifting regulations so we can drill, and he's practically shoving North Dakota soybeans down China's throat.
01:11:10.000Keep America First white pills coming, my guy.
01:11:19.000I don't like to tell people I'm going to follow them because then people are like, oh, you've got to follow me.
01:11:23.000But, you know, maybe hit me up with that at.
01:11:26.000But yeah, North Dakota is like many of these states where Trump is targeting them individually.
01:11:31.000Wisconsin, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Arizona.
01:11:34.000He's undertaken a lot of efforts to help people in those states, which coincidentally are swing states in 2018 and beyond.
01:11:41.000So it's a great strategy he's got going on.
01:11:44.000I was pointing this out as recently or as early as fall of last year.
01:11:49.000Begbie, you most certainly earn your nickname when we get the Streamlabslash Super Chats when the unwashed masseslash Dullblade Ghetto comes at you with randomness.