America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - Codename Crossfire Hurricane | America First Ep. 166

00:00:04.000 Good evening, everybody.

00:00:05.000 You are watching America First.

00:00:06.000 My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.

00:00:08.000 We've got a great show for you tonight.

00:00:10.000 We are back for another powerful episode of the show, and lots going on today.

00:00:16.000 Lots going on.

00:00:18.000 This guy's all the way over here.

00:00:20.000 Lots going on in the news today about the Inspector General's report, and so we're very excited to get into all of that.

00:00:27.000 We've been talking about that for a long time.

00:00:29.000 We've been talking about the Inspector General's report since probably the fall.

00:00:34.000 Of 2017.

00:00:36.000 We had been looking forward to it and talking about when it would come out.

00:00:40.000 And certainly it was supposed to come out about that time as well.

00:00:43.000 They had in mind that it would go on for about that long, right up until the fall.

00:00:49.000 And they kept asking for extension after extension.

00:00:51.000 And finally, on Wednesday, Inspector General Michael Horowitz said that he had completed the draft of his reports, which of course is on the FBI and DOJ's handling of the Clinton email probe.

00:01:05.000 So it has been completed.

00:01:07.000 It'll now take three to four weeks for people to review it to make sure that there's no national security issues, to make sure that everything is correct.

00:01:16.000 And so it should be about three to four weeks, about a month before anybody will see it.

00:01:20.000 And so we're very excited to start talking about that.

00:01:23.000 A big piece in the New York Times as well, detailing some new information given by some of the sources named in the IG report, trying to do a little damage control.

00:01:33.000 But we're going to get into all of that.

00:01:35.000 We're going to get into North Korea and also the Mueller probe.

00:01:38.000 So it's a pretty packed.

00:01:40.000 Very packed episode.

00:01:42.000 Lots going on.

00:01:43.000 And of course, I'm very excited to announce finally my American Renaissance speech from, what was that, a month ago?

00:01:53.000 About a month ago is finally up.

00:01:56.000 It's fine.

00:01:57.000 No, I'm sorry, three weeks ago.

00:01:58.000 It's finally up on the American Renaissance YouTube page.

00:02:02.000 So I know people have been asking me about it for a long time.

00:02:07.000 Every day for a few weeks, Twitter, YouTube.

00:02:10.000 Never heard the end of it, but finally.

00:02:13.000 It is live.

00:02:14.000 It is up there for everybody to check out.

00:02:15.000 It's about 45 minutes on the boomer question. 0.61

00:02:20.000 And already the boomers are not happy.

00:02:23.000 Already the boomers are not happy with my speech. 0.58

00:02:27.000 And I was watching it. 0.75

00:02:28.000 It was really, look, I have to say, it was a really great speech.

00:02:32.000 I'm very talented at what I do.

00:02:34.000 It's very frustrating for me to watch my speech from American Renaissance.

00:02:38.000 And, you know, I got to be honest, coming off the stage after the presentation, I said, you know, was that really my strongest appearance?

00:02:44.000 Is that really so good?

00:02:46.000 But I was watching it just now.

00:02:47.000 I said, man, who this guy is something, right?

00:02:50.000 Which is me, of course.

00:02:52.000 But it does make me frustrated because I watched the speech and I'm thinking, wow, I'm really killing it up there.

00:02:57.000 And then I look at all these mediocrities in the alt light people on Fox News, the people who meet Kanye West, the intellectual dark web, the people getting 30 grand a month on Patreon, people who get all the financing from billionaires.

00:03:16.000 And I say, wow, isn't that.

00:03:18.000 Isn't that just not right?

00:03:19.000 And it's funny because, you know, a lot of people will say about the far right or the dissident right, they'll say that we scapegoat.

00:03:27.000 They say that, well, we blame people for our misfortunes in life.

00:03:31.000 The only reason we would have a problem with the globalist or whoever else is because it's an excuse for why we're not doing so well.

00:03:39.000 But that really is not so much the case.

00:03:42.000 Because, and take a case study, for example, you look at somebody like Sam Hyde, where Sam Hyde is funny.

00:03:49.000 He had a great show.

00:03:51.000 Everyone agreed it was a great show.

00:03:52.000 It got great ratings.

00:03:54.000 But because he pissed off the wrong person, shut it down, career ruined, he's never working again.

00:04:01.000 Same is true with me.

00:04:02.000 You know, you watch my speech, you watch my show.

00:04:05.000 It's top notch.

00:04:06.000 It's the best content.

00:04:07.000 It's the most, one of the most talented people around these days.

00:04:10.000 And I say that compared to a pretty low standard in terms of you look at some of the alt light people.

00:04:16.000 These are not brainiacs.

00:04:17.000 These are not really inspiring people, right?

00:04:20.000 And you compare it to that and you say, well, what is the difference?

00:04:23.000 Of course, it's the content of the message.

00:04:25.000 And so, you know, I was watching today, I was going through Facebook, my Facebook feed, and I'm friends with.

00:04:32.000 Cabot Phillips on Facebook.

00:04:34.000 I don't know why he friended me on Facebook, but he did a long time ago.

00:04:37.000 And he was on Fox Business with Neil Cavuto talking about Israel.

00:04:42.000 And I'm watching this person.

00:04:43.000 I'm thinking, you know, okay, he's tall, he's handsome, he cleaned himself up, you know, he talks good enough.

00:04:50.000 But I'm thinking, this is no special talent.

00:04:53.000 This is not a great brain.

00:04:54.000 This is not a real great insight.

00:04:57.000 And you look into his background, and of course, his father, Tim Phillips, runs Americans for Prosperity.

00:05:03.000 And he grew up and he was best friends with the guy who ran the Leadership Institute.

00:05:08.000 Cabot Phillips is the head of Campus Reform, which is a subsidiary of the Leadership Institute.

00:05:13.000 And, you know, so he got doors open for him by his family, by his parents.

00:05:17.000 And I'm watching him on Fox News and I thought, you know, here is a guy who, like last year, he attacked me when I was a nobody.

00:05:23.000 He had like 10,000 followers, he was the head of Campus Reform.

00:05:27.000 He's on Fox News and he went out of his way to attack me when I was like a nobody, when I had like 2,000 followers and I was just complaining about. 1.00

00:05:37.000 Mixed marriages, I think it was on Twitter.

00:05:40.000 They said, Oh, this is racist, whatever.

00:05:42.000 And I've encountered him several times at Young Americans for Liberty at CPAC.

00:05:47.000 And every time he's got something disrespectful to say, doesn't want to engage, doesn't want to debate, doesn't want to shake my hand.

00:05:53.000 And it's just, it's really something.

00:05:56.000 We're at a point in the country, I think, where we're going to have to eclipse the big money people.

00:06:01.000 We're going to have to find a way.

00:06:03.000 I don't know how we're going to do it.

00:06:04.000 Maybe it's through alt tech or it's grassroots, but it's got to be something because you look at the, The Cabot Phillips, the Ben Shapiro's, all these different people of the world, Prager University, and literally down to a person, they are financed by billionaires.

00:06:20.000 Miley Yiannopoulos, everyone at Breitbart, it's all billionaires funding these people.

00:06:26.000 And it just tells you you're not going to get a real message.

00:06:29.000 You're not going to get real, quality, inspiring, disruptive stuff if it's coming from somebody who has something to gain from it.

00:06:37.000 If it's coming from a billionaire who wants, Their tax break, or they want their H 1B visa workers and all the rest.

00:06:44.000 So, just a brief word.

00:06:46.000 I don't know how we got on that subject.

00:06:48.000 Maybe just a tangent.

00:06:50.000 It's just because I watched the speech.

00:06:52.000 It's such a good speech.

00:06:53.000 It's so compelling, and it was, you know, really something.

00:06:56.000 And I watched that and I say, it's not that the talent isn't there.

00:07:00.000 It's not that the hard work isn't there.

00:07:02.000 It's just that you look at the system, it's a rigged system, and we're going to beat it.

00:07:06.000 That's the thing.

00:07:07.000 I'm not even complaining.

00:07:08.000 I'm saying we are going to beat the rigged system, but that's what we're up against.

00:07:12.000 We're up against people.

00:07:14.000 Through no hard work, through no real talent, but just through money and obedience, and they're going to get on their knees and they're going to do what they're told, they're going to be the superstars, but not for long.

00:07:24.000 So, check out my American Renaissance speech. 0.61

00:07:27.000 Maybe it was a miscalculation to go into the room where you had all the moneyed, wealthy boomers, and for me to rail on the boomer generation for 45 minutes.

00:07:36.000 Maybe that was not the best calculation, but it had to be said.

00:07:40.000 It had to be said.

00:07:41.000 And a lot of people, I think, don't really understand the speech.

00:07:45.000 I saw a lot of the same criticisms.

00:07:48.000 And you know, you're going to get criticized no matter what you say, I think.

00:07:51.000 But I think a lot of people just didn't really listen to it very closely, didn't really understand it.

00:07:56.000 People were saying, well, uh, Generation Z isn't that good.

00:08:01.000 Oh, you cited this number, but look at this number, which is not so good.

00:08:05.000 Or I saw one comment that was like, you can't put all your blind faith into one generation, which it's like, if you listen to the speech, I said, I addressed exactly that concern.

00:08:16.000 I said, you could look at some of the numbers and some are more accurate than others.

00:08:20.000 I said, it's not a guarantee.

00:08:22.000 I said, all, and all I said was that you have a real opportunity for this generation, given their life experience, given the formative events, given some of these numbers that we're seeing.

00:08:34.000 All I said was, They represent an opportunity.

00:08:37.000 They represent a great hope.

00:08:39.000 People are saying, Nick says Generation Z is going to save us and they're perfect and they're so based.

00:08:44.000 But I found this study that said otherwise, right? 0.98

00:08:46.000 You know, you need to listen.

00:08:49.000 You need to listen.

00:08:51.000 But anyhow, that was a speech.

00:08:53.000 We've got to get into the news.

00:08:55.000 There were some things we didn't get into yesterday because we didn't have time.

00:08:59.000 We were having some technical difficulties and I got very upset about the Vice article about all the.

00:09:06.000 Drag queen children.

00:09:08.000 So, we didn't get to everything we wanted to yesterday. 1.00

00:09:10.000 So, we're going to cover a lot of that today.

00:09:11.000 We're going to first talk about the upcoming Inspector General's report.

00:09:15.000 And more specifically, there was a New York Times article that came out two days ago.

00:09:21.000 And this stuff is really fascinating where they know they're in hot water.

00:09:25.000 A lot of these people in the DOJ and the FBI and the intelligence community.

00:09:30.000 And they all came forward to some friendly people in the press, friendly journalists who are going to spin it the way they want.

00:09:37.000 They gave him some selective information.

00:09:38.000 And two days ago, the New York Times comes out with a big, like a preemptive strike to spin the IG report, saying, oh, well, actually, they were so reluctant.

00:09:48.000 They didn't want to be election meddlers and all this and that. 0.96

00:09:51.000 And so they're trying to cover their ass before the IG report comes out in a few weeks. 0.97

00:09:56.000 And it was just announced that the report is completed. 0.96

00:09:59.000 So the timing, of course, is suspect.

00:10:01.000 So we'll talk about that.

00:10:02.000 We're going to talk about North Korea, some major developments happening there in terms of the U.S. North Korea summit set to happen on June 12th.

00:10:11.000 If we have time, we'll get to some comments by Rudy Giuliani about the Mueller probe.

00:10:16.000 And then I think there's one last thing that I'm forgetting, or maybe that's everything.

00:10:21.000 But either way, we're going to have to start with the IG report.

00:10:26.000 And the big development is not that we don't really have anything from the IG report quite yet.

00:10:30.000 There are some rumors about what's contained in it.

00:10:33.000 And just to refresh your memory a little bit, the inspector general, of course, is in the Justice Department.

00:10:39.000 Michael Horowitz was put up to the task.

00:10:42.000 Almost exactly after the inauguration.

00:10:44.000 And this is a top of the line guy.

00:10:46.000 He's really a stand up guy.

00:10:48.000 This is by both parties, have said that he's a really quality guy.

00:10:52.000 He served in Democratic and Republican administrations.

00:10:55.000 Michael Horowitz became the inspector general, and he set out about a year ago to look into the handling of the Clinton email probe by the DOJ and the FBI to make sure there were no improprieties there.

00:11:08.000 And over the course of a little bit longer than a year now, he's examined 1.2 million records.

00:11:14.000 He's looked into, I think, like hundreds of interviews and witnesses and all kinds of people.

00:11:21.000 And finally, there's a long and thorough report, and it's been extended many times over.

00:11:27.000 It was expected first in like the summer and then in the fall and then in the winter and then finally got extended again.

00:11:32.000 And now it seems it's completed.

00:11:33.000 We'll see it come through in about four weeks.

00:11:36.000 There are some early rumors about it where some people are saying that it's going to be not looking very good for the DOJ and the FBI.

00:11:43.000 There are some rumors that there are criminal referrals.

00:11:47.000 He's found that the DOJ and the FBI broke criminal law and he'll be referring them for prosecution to the DOJ.

00:11:54.000 That's not confirmed.

00:11:55.000 People say that sources who have seen the report and are connected are saying this, but of course, we're not going to really know anything about it until it drops.

00:12:03.000 But what we can discover is some things that were disclosed in the New York Times article called Operation, or what is it?

00:12:12.000 It's codename Crossfire Hurricane.

00:12:14.000 That was the article penned in the New York Times two days ago.

00:12:18.000 And there are some very shocking revelations in this report, and I'll read you some quotes from it, because really, this stuff is hard to believe how.

00:12:28.000 Obnoxious the corruption is with these people.

00:12:31.000 Where this report comes out two days ago.

00:12:34.000 Yesterday, Michael Horowitz says that the IG report is finished.

00:12:39.000 So, of course, if the timing is that Tuesday there's a huge spread in the New York Times, which is so benevolent, so sympathetic to the DOJ and the FBI, saying, well, they didn't try to meddle in the election and they were reluctant to illegally wiretap and spy on people in the Trump campaign and they were just doing their best.

00:12:59.000 It wasn't really even spying, maybe it was eavesdropping.

00:13:01.000 So, On Tuesday, you have this huge spread.

00:13:04.000 It's like a million paragraphs.

00:13:06.000 Such a long article and so dry and boring and sympathetic.

00:13:10.000 This comes out on Tuesday, essentially clearing the FBI and the DOJ of all wrongdoing.

00:13:16.000 And there's all kinds of new information in this article as well.

00:13:20.000 So, people in the New York Times to write this article consulted with people who will be named in the inspector general's report.

00:13:27.000 And so, I'm sure they came to these reporters beforehand to give their side of the story, to start the spin cycle.

00:13:33.000 And then the next day, the IG report is completed and they're going to look into it.

00:13:37.000 So the timing is very suspect.

00:13:39.000 We know what this is about.

00:13:40.000 They are terrified.

00:13:43.000 And so let's look at some of the things that were in the New York Times article because there was some new information, which was kind of glossed over.

00:13:51.000 If you haven't been following this story, which is very complex, there's a lot of information, there's a lot of spin on both sides.

00:13:59.000 So it's really hard to kind of find what is fact and what is fiction, and there's all kinds of nuances and details.

00:14:07.000 So, if you're just reading the New York Times article and you don't have this background information, it's going to be difficult.

00:14:12.000 But hidden inside this very long article, first you have an admission that the government did spy on the Trump campaign.

00:14:19.000 That's the biggest takeaway.

00:14:21.000 You know, the whole article is supposed to absolve these two organizations and basically the entire intelligence community of any wrongdoing looking into the Trump campaign and the Russia collusion and all of that.

00:14:34.000 But do you remember when Donald Trump, shortly before the election, said that the Obama administration had his wires tapped?

00:14:41.000 Remember that when he said that they were spying on him in Trump Tower and they were looking into his phone calls?

00:14:46.000 And remember what the media's response to that was?

00:14:48.000 The media responded by saying, Trump is lying.

00:14:51.000 Trump has no evidence.

00:14:53.000 Trump doesn't know what he's talking about.

00:14:55.000 There was no spying, all the rest.

00:14:57.000 Well, now the New York Times is admitting explicitly, they are confirming that they did spy on the Trump campaign.

00:15:04.000 And this is from the article The FBI investigated four unidentified Trump campaign aides in those early months, which goes way back.

00:15:14.000 This is way before.

00:15:16.000 This is way before the FISA warrants in October.

00:15:16.000 Trump got elected.

00:15:19.000 This is in the early months.

00:15:21.000 They investigated four unidentified Trump campaign aides, and this was revealed by congressional investigators in February.

00:15:28.000 The four men were Michael T. Flynn, Paul Manafort, Carter Page, and George Papadopoulos.

00:15:34.000 The FBI obtained phone records and other documents using national security letters, a secret type of subpoena, officials said.

00:15:42.000 And at least one government informant met several times with Mr. Page and Mr. Papadopoulos.

00:15:48.000 According to current and former officials.

00:15:50.000 So the story was initially there was no spying.

00:15:53.000 Then the story was well, actually, only Carter Page was spied on.

00:15:57.000 Remember when there was the whole FISA warrant scandal with the Nunes memo?

00:16:01.000 The Nunes memo said that the Obama administration came to the FISA courts, they presented the Steele dossier, and the FISA courts allowed the Obama administration to spy on Carter Page, and they tapped his phones.

00:16:18.000 And that was the extent of it that we had heard about since February, that they spied on Carter Page.

00:16:22.000 Later it came out that the Steele dossier.

00:16:24.000 Which they used to get the warrant to spy on Carter Page was paid for and funded by the Clinton campaign and the DNC.

00:16:32.000 And that was not known to the FISA courts before they gave the FISA warrant.

00:16:36.000 So you imagine, think about this for a second.

00:16:39.000 The Democrats paid for the Steele dossier, which said that the Russians were colluding with the Trump campaign and all the rest.

00:16:46.000 And then the same party, the Democrats that paid for it, presented it to the FISA courts without telling them they paid for it and said, we need to spy on the opposition party.

00:16:56.000 And the FISA courts say, okay, without knowing.

00:16:58.000 That the Democrats who got the warrant to spy on the enemy campaign funded the dossier to serve as the basis for the warrant.

00:17:06.000 So, first, that was all that we knew that Carter Page was spied on, and already there was all kinds of improprieties about that.

00:17:12.000 Well, then we find out in this article that not only did they spy on Carter Page, but they also spied on Michael Flynn, Paul Manafort, and George Papadopoulos.

00:17:21.000 So, this is a much bigger scope than we originally understood, where at first we thought it was just Carter Page.

00:17:29.000 And already that was bad enough because of this incestuous relationship with Lisa Page and Peter Strzok and Bruce Orr and his wife and all these people.

00:17:38.000 But then on top of that, there were three other people Michael Flynn, Papadopoulos, and Manafort.

00:17:43.000 And Michael Flynn, the only reason they spied on him, they spied on him about a year before the transition even took place in December of 2015 because he sat at a meeting with Vladimir Putin.

00:17:55.000 Little known, however, it is literally known, what's the expression?

00:18:00.000 Little did they know.

00:18:02.000 That Jill Stein sat at the same table.

00:18:04.000 So they're spying on Michael Flynn because he sat at a table with Vladimir Putin.

00:18:08.000 Jill Stein was at the same meeting.

00:18:10.000 No investigation on her.

00:18:12.000 And then Manafort and Papadopoulos as well.

00:18:14.000 Not only did they wiretap all these people, they wiretapped Page and Papadopoulos and Manafort and Flynn, but they also did the national security letters, which is a secret type of subpoena.

00:18:28.000 And in addition to that, they had a government informant meet with both Page and Papadopoulos.

00:18:34.000 So it wasn't just, we started out a year ago, there was no spying.

00:18:38.000 Then it was, well, actually, we spied on Carter Page.

00:18:41.000 Well, actually, it turns out that the only reason we did spy on Carter Page was because we funded a memo and didn't disclose that.

00:18:48.000 Then it turns out, no, actually, they spied on four people.

00:18:51.000 Actually, it wasn't just wiretaps, it was national security letters, it was informants, it was a much bigger scope.

00:18:58.000 And the New York Times writes this off as, well, technically, was it really spying?

00:19:03.000 Is eavesdropping really spying?

00:19:04.000 If you.

00:19:05.000 If you tap somebody's phones and you listen in on the conversation, is that really spying?

00:19:10.000 This is in the New York Times article.

00:19:12.000 They're questioning if you wiretap somebody's phone, is that really spying?

00:19:16.000 If you have a federal informant meet many times with multiple members of the Trump campaign, was that really spying?

00:19:23.000 If we paid somebody to come meet you and mislead you as to our identity and get all kinds of private information, but could you really call that spying?

00:19:32.000 I mean, this is the New York Times article.

00:19:33.000 So if you're really trying to.

00:19:37.000 Ferret out the details.

00:19:38.000 You understand just how problematic this is, just how politicized this effort was.

00:19:44.000 Additionally, and this is buried in paragraph 70 of the New York Times article, they admit that there was no collusion, no evidence of Russian collusion.

00:19:56.000 Quote A year and a half later, no public evidence has surfaced connecting Mr. Trump's advisors to the hacking or linking Mr. Trump himself to the Russian government's disruptive efforts.

00:20:09.000 So, two years later, or a year and a half later, I think Mueller.

00:20:13.000 Is on Thursday, which is today.

00:20:16.000 So today is Mueller's one year anniversary of being appointed to the special counsel.

00:20:21.000 So one year of that, really about two years or about a year and a half of the FBI and the DOJ looking into it.

00:20:29.000 And the New York Times admits right here, despite how many indictments, remember those sealed indictments that came down in November and December? 0.90

00:20:37.000 I had this dumb Jewish guy on my Facebook page from high school. 0.72

00:20:42.000 And when they announced the sealed indictments, which ended up being Manafort and Papadopoulos, I believe. 0.98

00:20:48.000 I remember him coming out on Facebook and saying, uh oh, Nick, it looks like Trump is going to jail.

00:20:56.000 A couple of sealed indictments from the Mueller probe, you know, go, Mueller, go.

00:21:00.000 And so, despite those indictments, despite indictments coming down on Manafort and his assistant and Papadopoulos and all these people, and it turned out that none of them had anything to do with the 2016 election or collusion.

00:21:12.000 It was all just either they didn't have a lawyer when they spoke to the FBI, so the story was a little bit weird, or it was things from years and years ago that had nothing to do with the election.

00:21:22.000 Despite all the indictments, all the resources, years of investigation, illegal wiretaps, search warrants, informants, no evidence, no evidence of collusion.

00:21:34.000 And they admitted in the New York Times.

00:21:36.000 And so, all of this is to say the big takeaway from this is that these people are panicking.

00:21:44.000 They wouldn't be giving this kind of information, they wouldn't be leaking.

00:21:48.000 And there were some undisclosed sources that provided information for this article.

00:21:52.000 They're terrified of what's in the inspector's.

00:21:55.000 The inspector general's report.

00:21:56.000 They know what's in it.

00:21:58.000 They know what they've done.

00:22:00.000 And the only reason they're coming to the New York Times is to soften the blow, to start the spin cycle.

00:22:04.000 This is exactly what happened before the Nunes memo came out.

00:22:08.000 There was an article in the Washington Post that was very gentle and very soft about what was in the Nunes memo.

00:22:14.000 And then the memo broke, and the rest is history.

00:22:17.000 So the takeaway here is that these people are terrified.

00:22:20.000 And this is a big white pill.

00:22:21.000 I had been talking about this for a long time.

00:22:24.000 For a long time, fans, viewers of the show, We're getting ready for another strong vindication.

00:22:30.000 I've been talking about this as far back as January or December, I think even further back.

00:22:35.000 And I said that the Inspector General's report will be a very big deal, very earth shattering, and might change the outcome, perhaps, in 2018.

00:22:44.000 And I think we will see that.

00:22:45.000 Obviously, it'll take about a month to come out, so it'll probably come out in the middle of June sometime.

00:22:51.000 And this will be highly, I think, transformative for the midterms and a big deal for the Democratic Party in the long term.

00:22:59.000 If Trump is able to clean house in the intelligence community, if he's able to clean house in the deep state, in the DOJ, in the FBI, if he's able to shut down the Mueller probe, you're really going to see this administration unleashed.

00:23:15.000 And this is to all the haters who said, you know, Jeff Sessions isn't doing his job.

00:23:19.000 The DOJ isn't doing their job.

00:23:22.000 Trump cucked on throwing Clinton in jail.

00:23:24.000 Trump isn't persecuting these people or prosecuting these people.

00:23:28.000 I think that's all going to be found out to be.

00:23:30.000 As always, not true.

00:23:32.000 I think this is going to be a pretty big deal.

00:23:34.000 And like I said, if Trump can clean house in the deep state, if he can clean up this Russia collusion thing, if he could really shut that down, not only is that impediment to his administration removed, and in terms of the constant subpoenas and all this drama, not only is that gone, but think about how the media will be delegitimized after this.

00:23:54.000 Not only the media, but the Democratic Party.

00:23:57.000 That they've constructed their entire platform on 2018.

00:24:01.000 They have not offered an alternative vision for the country.

00:24:04.000 You know, we have made America great again.

00:24:06.000 There's nothing on their side.

00:24:08.000 There's no real visionary or imaginative, inspiring policy proposals.

00:24:13.000 There's no ideological framework.

00:24:15.000 Their entire, and they've really just wasted two years. 0.98

00:24:18.000 Their entire effort for the past two years in terms of branding, in terms of messaging and signaling has been Trump is corrupt. 1.00

00:24:25.000 Trump is a colluder. 0.99

00:24:26.000 Mueller's going to put him in jail and all the rest.

00:24:29.000 And so when this investigation gets shut down and they're going to have to close up shop because of how bad the IG report's going to be and that there's no collusion.

00:24:37.000 And the media has been promoting this all year.

00:24:39.000 The Democrats have been promoting this all year.

00:24:41.000 They will lose all their legitimacy.

00:24:44.000 And you'll really start to see, I think, a lot of movement.

00:24:47.000 So, major things ahead.

00:24:49.000 It'll be released soon.

00:24:51.000 They say three to four weeks, and we'll keep an eye on it.

00:24:53.000 But a very exciting time.

00:24:56.000 All the people who doubted, all the people who were burning their MAGA hats, and they jumped off the Trump train, we're going to see them back again.

00:25:04.000 As always, as they always do, they will come crawling back to the Trump train.

00:25:09.000 And where are they now?

00:25:10.000 Where are the black pillars now?

00:25:12.000 Now that the IG report's coming out, where are the black pillars now?

00:25:15.000 Now that there's no regime change in Iran, there's no regime change in Syria, where are they?

00:25:20.000 I don't know.

00:25:21.000 But so that was the IG report.

00:25:22.000 The next big deal here that we had, of course, is the North Korea episode.

00:25:28.000 This is another one we've been watching for a long time.

00:25:32.000 And it's pretty wild how much we've talked about North Korea.

00:25:35.000 I mean, this is the one thing we've been talking about this since my show started.

00:25:40.000 Last February.

00:25:41.000 It's like every week there's a story about North Korea.

00:25:44.000 And so the latest development was that on Tuesday, North Korea canceled a high stakes summit with South Korea that was scheduled for Wednesday.

00:25:55.000 And then yesterday, North Korea came out with a very blistering statement about the United States, saying effectively that the meeting between Trump and Kim Jong un is in jeopardy because John Bolton is not a good guy.

00:26:12.000 And he referenced, quote, the Libyan model when talking to North Korea about denuclearization.

00:26:19.000 And of course, if that was done, that's a big mistake.

00:26:22.000 The Libyan model would refer to the denuclearization of Libya in 2003, shortly after the Iraq war.

00:26:30.000 Libya had been developing a nuclear program for some time, and the Bush administration facilitated the removal of all their uranium, all their infrastructure, and they shut down the nuclear program.

00:26:41.000 Gaddafi had been very cooperative.

00:26:43.000 And then, as we all know, just eight years later, Gaddafi was brutally removed from power as a result of NATO coalition airstrikes and the United States removing him from power. 0.61

00:26:55.000 And so, for John Bolton to say, well, we're going to attempt the Libyan model, you can understand why that wouldn't fly so well with North Korea.

00:27:02.000 I mean, their rhetoric on why they want to obtain a nuclear arsenal or a nuclear capability is in explicit reference always to what happened in Libya, to what happened in Iraq, to what happened in all these different countries.

00:27:15.000 So, North Korea, they say the only reason, and this is all rhetoric, but they say the reason we want to bomb is to prevent what happened to Gaddafi in Libya from happening to Kim Jong un in North Korea. 0.51

00:27:26.000 And Kim Jong un came to power the same year that Gaddafi was dragged through the streets and brutally murdered and all the rest.

00:27:33.000 And John Bolton to come to them and say, we'd like to pursue the Libyan model of you, not great politics.

00:27:39.000 Now, that said, a lot of people have taken it at face value, which is so typical of people in the right wing, right?

00:27:47.000 Iran burns our flag.

00:27:49.000 They say death to America.

00:27:51.000 And people on the alt right say, well, that's just rhetoric.

00:27:55.000 We don't really believe them.

00:27:56.000 They say they're going to nuke America and burn our flag, but basically, we deserve that.

00:28:02.000 And it actually means death to arrogance.

00:28:05.000 And actually, it's not even that big of a deal.

00:28:08.000 Like if Israel were burning our flag, you would never hear the end of it. 0.95

00:28:11.000 But Iran's doing it. 0.97

00:28:12.000 And they're, oh, but that's actually not a big deal. 0.92

00:28:15.000 We're not going to take their word for it.

00:28:17.000 North Korea says, yeah, John Bolton is the reason that we're suddenly thinking about pulling out.

00:28:22.000 Everybody's like, oh, John Bolton, that's totally true.

00:28:26.000 They totally mean exactly what they say.

00:28:28.000 When they come out with a statement and they say John Bolton is the reason we're suddenly questioning the summit, that's 100% true.

00:28:35.000 My take on this is pretty simple. 0.55

00:28:38.000 North Korea has been seen in the world press, in the American press, as giving away a lot of concessions.

00:28:44.000 And they're making a lot of concessions.

00:28:46.000 They freed the prisoners of war, they're shutting down their nuclear site, and the Trump administration has given nothing.

00:28:53.000 And they've been very vocal about that.

00:28:54.000 We've given nothing, they've given everything.

00:28:57.000 Trump has taken credit for it.

00:28:58.000 He's been doing a victory lap.

00:29:00.000 They've been talking about a Nobel Prize.

00:29:02.000 And so, North Korea, when they make these aggressive statements, they revert back to the aggressive rhetoric.

00:29:07.000 It has nothing to do with John Bolton.

00:29:09.000 It has nothing to do with anything John Bolton has said.

00:29:12.000 It has everything to do with negotiation.

00:29:16.000 And maybe John Bolton said that.

00:29:18.000 Maybe he didn't. 1.00

00:29:19.000 If he did, very stupid and a very big mistake. 0.99

00:29:22.000 But the reason that North Korea is suddenly throwing into doubt or throwing into question the summit has nothing to do with what he said. 0.99

00:29:30.000 Was confirmed as the national security advisor long before today.

00:29:30.000 John Bolton.

00:29:36.000 This was, what, about a month ago?

00:29:37.000 I think it was before the beginning of April that John Bolton announced that he would take over as the national security advisor.

00:29:44.000 I think it was April 1st or sometime around there.

00:29:48.000 So it has nothing to do with John Bolton, it has nothing to do with the Libyan model.

00:29:51.000 The point of North Korea saying this kind of a statement is to get a reassurance. 0.99

00:29:55.000 It's basically a shit test. 0.98

00:29:58.000 It is threatening to pull out and throwing it into doubt so that the Trump administration might give concessions. 0.99

00:30:05.000 Or maybe they'll make reassurances, but it changes the calculation for the Trump administration.

00:30:10.000 That's all.

00:30:11.000 And today, President Trump responded in the Oval Office by saying it would not be the Libyan model, as John Bolton said.

00:30:17.000 In fact, it would be what he said, the South Korean model.

00:30:20.000 He explicitly affirmed that Kim Jong un would be in his country, would be in power, and that North Korea would be very prosperous, they would be protected, and all the rest. 0.70

00:30:29.000 He said, Libya, we went in and we annihilated him.

00:30:32.000 North Korea, we want to see them do well.

00:30:34.000 We're going to protect them.

00:30:35.000 We're going to give them financial resources and all the rest.

00:30:39.000 And so.

00:30:39.000 I don't know.

00:30:40.000 It remains to be seen what will happen.

00:30:42.000 He said that he hopes it could still happen.

00:30:45.000 They haven't heard anything from North Korea in terms of the summit, but that if it doesn't, then maximum pressure remains.

00:30:51.000 And I have a strong feeling that the meeting will go through, the negotiation will go through.

00:30:57.000 But for people to say that, oh, well, it's the neocons, like, don't get me wrong, I hate John Bolton too.

00:31:03.000 When I saw him at CPAC, he was walking past me.

00:31:06.000 He's a very short guy. 0.70

00:31:08.000 And he was walking past me, and I yelled at him, Hey, no more wars for Israel. 0.53

00:31:13.000 So, don't, I'm not, when I come on the show and I say the reason that North Korea is throwing the summit into doubt is not because of John Bolton, I don't come on the show to say that because I'm a big John Bolton fan, or I don't doubt that he's dumb enough to say something about Libya, or that that wouldn't give the North Koreans pause.

00:31:31.000 Don't get me wrong, we are not John Bolton fans.

00:31:33.000 But that said, I think to take rhetoric that seriously is just totally inconsistent, and it belies the fact that.

00:31:40.000 Certain people in this movement, they don't really have an analytical framework.

00:31:45.000 They don't really have a critical process for how to analyze things going on in the world.

00:31:49.000 They see a headline that conforms to their worldview, and there it is.

00:31:54.000 Oh, look at this. 0.98

00:31:54.000 Look, this headline said that Trump is cucking. 0.98

00:31:57.000 I'm right. 0.95

00:31:58.000 This headline, this statement from North Korea says that the reason they're pulling out is because of John Bolton.

00:32:03.000 That conforms to my worldview, so I believe it.

00:32:06.000 You can't do it that way.

00:32:07.000 That's why we've been right on the show so many times.

00:32:09.000 That's why people will pull up headlines and say, Nick BTFO.

00:32:13.000 And if you actually read the article, It's the opposite.

00:32:15.000 So, that's North Korea. 0.60

00:32:17.000 We'll see what happens. 0.97

00:32:18.000 That's the latest.

00:32:20.000 North Korea, first, they pulled out of their meeting with South Korea on Wednesday and they're pausing all negotiations until things are rectified.

00:32:28.000 North Korea said the next day that they would not be backed into a unilateral denuclearization.

00:32:35.000 It has to be two ways and all the rest.

00:32:38.000 And today, Trump said, you have no reason to worry.

00:32:41.000 It's not going to be the Libyan model and all the rest. 0.99

00:32:43.000 So, we'll keep an eye on it. 1.00

00:32:44.000 I'm still optimistic.

00:32:46.000 The last thing we have to talk about here, the last big story from yesterday, which is probably the biggest cell phone here.

00:32:55.000 This came out yesterday, but we didn't have so much time to talk about it.

00:32:58.000 This came from Rudy Giuliani, who just got brought on to the White House to represent the Trump administration against the Mueller probe.

00:33:06.000 And he announced yesterday that the Mueller probe confirmed to him that they, in fact, cannot indict the president, which is so rich.

00:33:14.000 You got to wonder what are we even doing here?

00:33:18.000 If the Mueller probe has been investigating this and the scope of the investigation has basically been unlimited, they've had unlimited resources.

00:33:27.000 They can do subpoenas.

00:33:28.000 They can bring in witnesses.

00:33:29.000 They have all this money.

00:33:31.000 They're indicting people.

00:33:32.000 It's gone on for years.

00:33:33.000 They have the media supporting it.

00:33:35.000 Everybody, they're trying to enshrine it into law so they can't disband it and all the rest.

00:33:40.000 They've got all these resources, and we know what the end objective is.

00:33:44.000 They're not really looking into Russia, they're not really looking into Manafort.

00:33:48.000 The end goal is Trump.

00:33:50.000 And that's why they're bringing in people like Manafort and people like Roger Stone and all the rest, is to build a grand case, a grand effort against the president and maybe attempt impeachment.

00:34:01.000 And it came out yesterday that the Mueller probe itself confirmed that even if they put together their final report, even if there's something awry, they can't even indict the president.

00:34:12.000 They themselves admit it because, of course, the only way to remove a sitting president is not like the Justice Department saying, okay, it's time for him to go.

00:34:21.000 The only way is through impeachment.

00:34:22.000 And the Mueller probe can recommend charges.

00:34:25.000 They can do all kinds of things, but they cannot directly indict the president.

00:34:28.000 And so you have to wonder.

00:34:30.000 There's no evidence of collusion.

00:34:33.000 They can't even indict.

00:34:34.000 They won't even reveal.

00:34:36.000 Manafort's judge, who was indicted recently, Manafort, I'm not talking about the judge, but the judge in the Manafort case has ordered that Mueller reveal the initial scope of his probe.

00:34:47.000 He won't release it without redacting heavily.

00:34:50.000 What are we even doing here?

00:34:52.000 I mean, you look at in every instance, there really is just no mandate for this investigation even to exist.

00:34:59.000 We find that every week, every month, more evidence comes out that the federal government colluded with Hillary Clinton than we find out that Trump colluded with Russia.

00:35:09.000 You know, this probe was set up to say Trump was working with the Russians to overthrow the election and to cheat unfairly.

00:35:15.000 And it seems like every month, as they're digging, we find the opposite.

00:35:19.000 We find more and more that the people that are putting this investigation together, the people working alongside Clinton and all the rest, they're actually the colluders, and if not worse than even what they're alleging against Trump.

00:35:31.000 So.

00:35:32.000 Pretty spectacular defeat for Mueller.

00:35:34.000 And I think this is the best possible scenario for this.

00:35:37.000 You know, a lot of people have said, a lot of people who are not very intelligent have said, why doesn't Trump just disband the Mueller probe?

00:35:45.000 Why is Trump messing around?

00:35:46.000 Why hasn't he just shut down the Mueller probe?

00:35:48.000 You're wasting your time.

00:35:49.000 All these people are wasting their time.

00:35:52.000 Think for a moment.

00:35:54.000 Is it more effective if Trump shuts down the Mueller probe and it looks like there is the appearance of a cover up?

00:36:02.000 He shuts down the Mueller probe and no matter how long it's been going on, No matter how many resources have been expended, no matter how little evidence comes out, he shuts it down, and liberals and the left and the Democrats get carte blanche to say, Well, you know, we would have found the Russian collusion.

00:36:19.000 We were hot on his track, we were right on his heels.

00:36:23.000 But then he shut down the investigation, and now we'll never know.

00:36:27.000 And there will always be that doubt.

00:36:29.000 There will always be the doubt in the media, there will always be the doubt for the Democrats.

00:36:33.000 It doesn't matter what the results of the Probe were, so long as Trump shuts it down, there is the appearance, and you know they will spin it that way that they were getting too close to the secrets.

00:36:45.000 They were getting too close to a real crime, a real wrongdoing, and that's why Trump had to shut it down.

00:36:50.000 And you would never convince them otherwise.

00:36:52.000 Is it better to do it that way, where you'd always have this nagging ambiguity as to what would have happened if they finished their investigation?

00:37:01.000 Or is it better for the Mueller probe to drag on day after day, week after week, month after month, for years?

00:37:09.000 Laying down indictments on everybody.

00:37:12.000 Manafort, Flynn, Papadopoulos, all these different people.

00:37:15.000 They can indict anyone they want.

00:37:17.000 They're interviewing witnesses.

00:37:18.000 They're trying to set up Steve Bannon.

00:37:20.000 They're trying to set up Roger Stone.

00:37:22.000 And every day it turns out there's nothing.

00:37:25.000 There's no smoking gun.

00:37:26.000 Every day another media outlet says, you know what?

00:37:29.000 This is bogus.

00:37:30.000 This is not true.

00:37:31.000 Every day another politician says, it's time to wrap it up.

00:37:35.000 Every day another special Senate Intelligence Committee finds there was no collusion and all the rest until eventually Robert Mueller has no choice.

00:37:43.000 But to pack up and say, you know what?

00:37:46.000 There was no collusion.

00:37:47.000 We finished our report, and the most that we found is that five years ago, Paul Manafort committed some questionable financial dealings in Ukraine, and that George Papadopoulos didn't tell the entire story to the FBI because he talked to them without a lawyer.

00:38:03.000 But that's it, and we're done.

00:38:05.000 I mean, think of the damage that that does to the narrative of the left and the Democrats.

00:38:09.000 And this goes back even to what we were talking about earlier about the IG report.

00:38:13.000 It is a much stronger case to have the Mueller probe died down on its own.

00:38:18.000 They can't even do an indictment.

00:38:19.000 Even if they recommend criminal charges, who's going to prosecute them?

00:38:24.000 A Republican House?

00:38:25.000 Really?

00:38:26.000 You know, and so I think that's why the Mueller probe is banking almost entirely on them, on the Democrats winning the midterms.

00:38:32.000 If the Democrats win the House, the Mueller probe, no matter how little evidence they make the recommendation, the Democrats file articles of impeachment.

00:38:41.000 It's a big, ugly thing, and that's that.

00:38:44.000 And so I think that's what's going on here.

00:38:48.000 But that's the Mueller problem.

00:38:49.000 Some big white pills on the pro, big white pills on the IG report.

00:38:53.000 And now we're going to take a look at your Streamlabs and your Super Chats.

00:38:57.000 First, I'm going to take a little sip here.

00:39:01.000 And we'll take a look and we'll see what we have going on in the Streamlabs.

00:39:08.000 It has been a pretty jam packed episode.

00:39:10.000 Lots to talk about, lots going on.

00:39:14.000 We've got Begbie who says, I want to reiterate, in case some don't know, that you are able to donate with a credit slash debit card on Streamlabs without a PayPal account.

00:39:14.000 And we'll see.

00:39:27.000 Well, there you go.

00:39:29.000 I don't know if it's enabled for me, though, because, and I've been having problems with that.

00:39:33.000 I've been in touch with Streamlabs, the company, where it's like I logged into the Streamlabs broadcasting software with a different user than I do with their website, and so it shows no activity on the website, and therefore they can't verify my account to do.

00:39:50.000 I don't know.

00:39:51.000 It's a lot of complicated stuff, but I guess if you say, I haven't tried it with the debit card, but there you go.

00:39:57.000 Donate to the Streamlabs.

00:39:58.000 If you're going to do a Super Chat, do it on Streamlabs instead, because.

00:40:02.000 The super chat 30% goes to Google, and if 30% goes to Google, that's not a good thing.

00:40:08.000 We don't want to fund Google, and also you want to give all the contributions to me, not to Google.

00:40:12.000 So do try the Streamlabs.

00:40:16.000 Uh, Moki says your Amran speech was great, Nick. 0.98

00:40:19.000 Venerable Fulton J. Sheen was the greatest American Catholic evangelizer in recent history.

00:40:25.000 Can't think of anyone who comes close today.

00:40:27.000 True, true, and thank you for the kind words.

00:40:29.000 But it was a great quote to be used by Fulton Sheen, and he was a great man.

00:40:33.000 I think we'd be a lot better off if.

00:40:35.000 People watched Fulton Sheen as opposed to some of these other characters.

00:40:40.000 And it looks like those are all our Streamlabs rough.

00:40:42.000 We'll have to take a look at our Super Chats here then.

00:40:46.000 And we'll see what people are saying here.

00:40:49.000 A lot more Super Chats. 0.68

00:40:50.000 See, you got to go with the Streamlabs. 1.00

00:40:52.000 Cosmic Doggerin says, Give us a T pose. 1.00

00:40:55.000 Of course, I will always T pose for the homies. 1.00

00:41:00.000 And we are gathering testosterone, we are gathering arcane power from Christ and from the ancestors. 0.99

00:41:08.000 Honor the ancestors, like from the Black Panther, right? 0.83

00:41:10.000 So we do like to T-pose.

00:41:13.000 And you know, on my Fortnite stream the other day, me and Saxon, we were talking to some various random people, a lot of young kids playing Fortnite, asking them, do you T-pose in class?

00:41:24.000 Middle schoolers, high schoolers, a little creepy.

00:41:25.000 We're like, do you T-pose in class?

00:41:28.000 And they all said they do.

00:41:29.000 So very strong. 1.00

00:41:32.000 Nikki Boo32 says, Sam is really gay and easy to bully. 0.99

00:41:36.000 Hashtag Catboy Squad. 1.00

00:41:38.000 It's true, the Catboy Squad.

00:41:40.000 Is very strong, doing very well.

00:41:42.000 Catboys are the real red pill, I gotta be honest with you.

00:41:46.000 Very true, very true.

00:41:48.000 And they are all invited to the compound.

00:41:50.000 Once we set up, we're gonna set up in the West.

00:41:54.000 I don't know, maybe it'll be in like Nevada, if it'll be in like Wyoming.

00:41:59.000 We're gonna set up a big concrete compound, very tall, very wide, like a legitimate compound.

00:42:05.000 Brutalist architecture, something very ugly and imposing, oppressive, with barbed wire fences, guard towers, armed guards.

00:42:15.000 And inside the compound, it'll be Burger King.

00:42:17.000 It'll be Taco Bell.

00:42:18.000 It'll be Fortnite, Catboys, Big Water.

00:42:22.000 I mean, this will be.

00:42:23.000 And this is the birthplace of the next revolution.

00:42:27.000 It'll be the equivalent of like the TWP, whatever they had, their property. 0.71

00:42:32.000 And it'll be a great thing.

00:42:33.000 Happy Days.

00:42:34.000 We're going to have to get a billionaire to build that for us.

00:42:37.000 Happy Days says, FJF, you get my super chats now, buddy.

00:42:41.000 Good job.

00:42:42.000 Well, thank you, big guy.

00:42:43.000 I don't know if I would say FJF.

00:42:44.000 We like JF on the show.

00:42:46.000 We.

00:42:47.000 Big fans of JF, and we do like his program, but hey, I'll take the money, right?

00:42:51.000 American Rebel, I'm changing my name to Kite Crusher for you, Nick.

00:42:55.000 That's very good.

00:42:56.000 That's very good.

00:42:57.000 See, that's much better optics.

00:43:00.000 Spoiler alert says Patrick Little and Kevin McDonald will be on Big Cat Kayla live streams tomorrow.

00:43:06.000 Well, thank you for promoting that.

00:43:10.000 Great when we promote people that are not going to be effective.

00:43:14.000 Simon Skola says Read Siege, Worship Thor.

00:43:17.000 Yes.

00:43:18.000 Yes.

00:43:19.000 The pagan mindset. 0.99

00:43:21.000 You know what, the pagans, they're a big problem. 0.99

00:43:25.000 I really dislike the pagans more than I dislike. 1.00

00:43:29.000 Atheists, more than I dislike a lot of people, because it's such a ridiculous thing. 1.00

00:43:34.000 And it's never too much. 0.98

00:43:36.000 People might say, Nick, you're piling on.

00:43:38.000 You're obsessed with the pagans.

00:43:39.000 It's too much.

00:43:40.000 It's never too much to dab on heathens who will not submit to Christ the King. 0.98

00:43:48.000 And yeah, pagans are a big problem. 0.95

00:43:51.000 Very big LARPers. 1.00

00:43:52.000 You know, there are more mosques in Nevada than there are pagan temples in the entire United States. 1.00

00:44:00.000 There are no pagan temples in Nevada.

00:44:02.000 In the United States.

00:44:03.000 I think there's like one.

00:44:04.000 And it's not even like the old European gods. 0.71

00:44:06.000 It's like a bunch of LARPy, like Egyptian stuff. 0.66

00:44:09.000 So the pagans are a big problem. 1.00

00:44:12.000 And they all say, Nick, you're dividing us.

00:44:14.000 Nick, you're subversive. 1.00

00:44:16.000 Nick, oh, this guy, this Mexican is dividing the movement. 1.00

00:44:20.000 He's a subversive. 1.00

00:44:21.000 He's this, he's that. 0.99

00:44:23.000 Damn right. 0.98

00:44:24.000 We are dividing the pagans right out. 1.00

00:44:27.000 If you're a pagan in the year of our Lord, 2018, you're too stupid. 1.00

00:44:34.000 You're too heretical to be in the movement. 1.00

00:44:38.000 And so I will gladly divide you right out.

00:44:40.000 I don't care how smart you are. 0.83

00:44:43.000 I don't care how pro white you are. 0.90

00:44:45.000 Out. 1.00

00:44:46.000 We don't need heretics in this movement. 0.96

00:44:48.000 We are fighting a spiritual warfare against demons, against Satan. 0.95

00:44:53.000 And we don't need these LARPing people with their sacrifices and their tattoos and their goofy symbology. 1.00

00:45:01.000 We don't need them. 1.00

00:45:02.000 We don't need you.

00:45:04.000 You know, they post this meme where it's like a crusader.

00:45:08.000 And a Viking.

00:45:09.000 And the Vikings, like, together?

00:45:11.000 Because they're confronting the postmodern world. 0.74

00:45:14.000 And the Christians, like, together. 1.00

00:45:18.000 Fat chance. 1.00

00:45:19.000 Fat chance.

00:45:20.000 We don't need you. 0.97

00:45:21.000 We need to fight you, too.

00:45:22.000 You're with them.

00:45:24.000 You're with the atheists. 0.99

00:45:25.000 You're with the degenerates. 1.00

00:45:28.000 So, and you know what's funny to me?

00:45:30.000 They always say this is what they always say. 1.00

00:45:32.000 They always say, like, oh, well, the Catholic Church, they say the Catholic Church rapes little boys. 0.99

00:45:38.000 Yeah, in paganism, that's not even a bad thing. 0.99

00:45:41.000 In paganism, raping a little boy is called pederasty, and it's encouraged, it's embraced in every pagan culture. 0.79

00:45:48.000 So they're like, oh, child abuse in 2018. 0.97

00:45:52.000 What's the problem, pagan? 1.00

00:45:54.000 That's your whole deal. 1.00

00:45:57.000 You can't even.

00:45:57.000 Why is that a bad thing, pagans?

00:45:59.000 You know?

00:46:00.000 For us, at the very least, when a Catholic does that kind of thing, we say, that's a sin. 0.96

00:46:05.000 You're going to hell. 0.85

00:46:06.000 When a pagan sees that, they have to give him a pat on the back and say, good job. 1.00

00:46:12.000 So. 1.00

00:46:13.000 Tree huggers blown out. 1.00

00:46:16.000 The order says Christianity is the path forward. 1.00

00:46:19.000 Exactly. 0.98

00:46:19.000 It's the only way, and all will submit to the fanaticism of a renewed fervor for Christ the King. 0.98

00:46:28.000 Sol Volor says they thought they could get away with it when Hillary would eventually get into office.

00:46:33.000 Exactly.

00:46:35.000 Well, that was the whole, that was the insurance policy.

00:46:38.000 They knew.

00:46:39.000 Like Hillary Clinton knew all the crimes that she'd committed.

00:46:43.000 You go back and the original sin. 0.62

00:46:46.000 Obama gets into office.

00:46:47.000 He puts up Hillary Clinton as the Secretary of State, and Hillary Clinton does pay to play.

00:46:53.000 This is the original problem. 0.93

00:46:54.000 In order to get slush money or her slush fund through the Clinton Foundation, she brokers all kinds of deals for foreign actors, for the Russians, for all kinds of people, and they give her big money in return.

00:47:09.000 There's also sex trafficking going on.

00:47:11.000 That's absolutely true.

00:47:13.000 Pizzagate is real.

00:47:14.000 So there's that as well.

00:47:15.000 But the big thing is pay to play. 0.98

00:47:18.000 She's the Secretary of State. 1.00

00:47:20.000 She uses her role in her public service as Secretary of State. 1.00

00:47:26.000 To broker deals, to give out licenses, to give out favors, all the rest, so people in exchange pay her privately in the Clinton Foundation so she has money to run for president. 0.98

00:47:35.000 When she retires as Secretary of State, she can't turn over her emails. 0.97

00:47:39.000 The reason that she had a private email server in her home and why she used that is because she was doing pay to play and other activities.

00:47:47.000 So the reason that she destroys the emails is because she had to turn them over to the government, which would be accessible by Freedom of Information Act request or other kinds of things.

00:47:57.000 So, she had to destroy those emails. 0.87

00:47:59.000 That's why she kept them on a private server. 0.73

00:48:01.000 They go in to investigate her.

00:48:03.000 And of course, the people that are investigating her are in on the take.

00:48:06.000 Of course, they're in on the system where they're trying to get patronage, they're trying to climb up the ranks. 0.75

00:48:12.000 So, they give her a break.

00:48:14.000 It's a total impropriety in terms of how they handle that.

00:48:17.000 And they cover it up throughout the election because they understand that she's going to get into office.

00:48:22.000 So, they don't want to rock the boat too much.

00:48:24.000 And if they give her a break, maybe they get promoted. 0.73

00:48:26.000 And at the very least, their crimes won't be found out because she'll be president.

00:48:31.000 And so that's the house of cards, essentially, that's being built.

00:48:34.000 You know, that show, even though it was run by a pedophile, that show was basically accurate in terms of how politics works. 0.75

00:48:43.000 There's a lot of blackmail, sexual blackmail. 0.84

00:48:46.000 There's a lot of crimes.

00:48:48.000 It does function like this, where it's just lie on top of lie, cover up on top of cover up.

00:48:52.000 I mean, that was the genesis of the entire scandal.

00:48:55.000 And it's all going to come down.

00:48:57.000 You find out that the investigation was bogus, you recover the 30,000 emails.

00:49:02.000 You find the pay to play, you really start to get to some stuff that is troubling.

00:49:07.000 So, Mark McColl says, Hey, Nick, could I please get a wrench?

00:49:13.000 I don't know what you mean by that.

00:49:13.000 What's a wrench?

00:49:16.000 Atheist Chaplin says, Have some shekels. 0.69

00:49:19.000 Thank you, big guy.

00:49:20.000 Al Sabadi says, Hey, I really like you in a non vice cosplay way, Nick.

00:49:25.000 Keep up the great content.

00:49:26.000 Well, thank you.

00:49:27.000 That's the thing.

00:49:28.000 I look at that vice article, I look at even the boys in makeup.

00:49:32.000 You know, that is.

00:49:34.000 That kills me when I see that because that's something that I know a lot of people would say, like, oh, what's the big deal?

00:49:39.000 Whatever. 0.98

00:49:40.000 The point of makeup is to sexualize.

00:49:43.000 So if you have like young people, whether it's girls or boys, but specifically the boys, you've got young boys covered in makeup and they've got an eyeshadow, they've got the sexy makeup on and all the rest.

00:49:55.000 And it's just so simple.

00:49:56.000 Think to yourself, does a pedophile like this?

00:50:00.000 Would a pedophile be excited by this?

00:50:02.000 If you put out all this content of, 14 year old boys in makeup, is a pedophile going to appreciate this or not?

00:50:09.000 And if you answer in the affirmative, stop what you're doing.

00:50:13.000 Stop encouraging it.

00:50:14.000 If you're participating in it, stop doing it.

00:50:17.000 If you're the parent of somebody doing it, shut it down.

00:50:20.000 This is not difficult stuff, right?

00:50:23.000 Hey, hmm, hmm.

00:50:25.000 Before I do anything, I think to myself, hmm, would a pedophile really be in food?

00:50:29.000 Would they be like jumping for joy that this is popular in the culture?

00:50:34.000 Maybe I should probably stop, right?

00:50:37.000 Maybe I should probably not do that. 0.96

00:50:39.000 But of course, the people who run these institutions are pedophiles. 0.99

00:50:42.000 They're all pedophiles. 0.97

00:50:44.000 Shazbo says, thoughts on Pennsylvania Governor Scott Wagner. 0.99

00:50:48.000 Don't know them.

00:50:49.000 Don't know anything about them.

00:50:52.000 And we have another one from Shazbo who says How can we get small government conservatives to support programs that help the homeless and the addicted?

00:51:03.000 Well, you know, the thing is this to solve homelessness, to solve drug addiction, there is no law that you can pass to fix these things.

00:51:13.000 There's no, in my opinion, there's no federal program that you can do to fix this.

00:51:17.000 You can maybe use federal money, but the answer to the problem is all local.

00:51:22.000 The big problem in the country is we look at local problems.

00:51:25.000 People we see on our morning commute to work are homeless.

00:51:29.000 People we know, people we see in the public transit are on drugs.

00:51:33.000 People in our family are on drugs.

00:51:35.000 Friends of friends, our friend's kid's best friend is on drugs.

00:51:40.000 And we say, how can the government in Washington, D.C., how can the politicians and the bureaucrats and the apparatchiks all the way over in Washington, D.C., what policy proposal can they use?

00:51:55.000 To better benefit people around me in my hometown.

00:52:00.000 And that's obviously the wrong approach. 0.97

00:52:02.000 When you say it like that way, when you say it like that, you understand what a ridiculous premise. 0.64

00:52:07.000 It has to be local. 0.70

00:52:08.000 You have to have a return to the local.

00:52:11.000 And part of that is building back up communities.

00:52:13.000 If everybody is integrated into the community, you don't have these problems so much.

00:52:18.000 If people are homeless, it's not like, oh, that random bum who moved in like a minute ago and was a transient.

00:52:24.000 It's like that guy that I know.

00:52:26.000 Is not doing well financially.

00:52:28.000 And so the community chips in to help him, you know, financially or to get a job or whatever.

00:52:33.000 Or if he's got a mental health issue, we take care of him or we put him in the proper facility.

00:52:40.000 Somebody's on drugs.

00:52:41.000 Same thing. 0.99

00:52:42.000 It's not just, oh, there's that bum again who's on drugs.

00:52:44.000 It's, there's that guy I see at church.

00:52:46.000 There's that guy that I saw at the fraternal club meeting, whatever.

00:52:51.000 And we're going to help him.

00:52:51.000 We're going to take him in to our home.

00:52:53.000 Or, you know, if you have kids, maybe not a good idea, but you're going to take care of this guy.

00:52:57.000 You're going to look after this guy.

00:52:58.000 And that's what.

00:53:00.000 That's what the Catholic Church asks us to do.

00:53:01.000 That's what Christ asks us to do.

00:53:04.000 That was the foundation of America.

00:53:06.000 That's originally how we were able to enjoy freedoms.

00:53:09.000 The reason we're able to enjoy freedoms is because if the people take after one another, they take care of each other, and they're virtuous, you don't need government programs, laws, big government.

00:53:19.000 You don't need it.

00:53:20.000 So that's the way to do it.

00:53:21.000 Of course, this becomes very difficult when you have the most disruptive forces in the world working against us, which are international capitalism and mass migration.

00:53:31.000 Can't have community if you don't speak the same language, if you don't worship the same God, if you don't look the same. 0.72

00:53:37.000 Sorry to say, but that's basically true. 1.00

00:53:39.000 All the studies show this.

00:53:41.000 And additionally, if you have international finance, moving people around, shifting people from one place to another, it also becomes very difficult.

00:53:50.000 So those are maybe the ways we can address getting back to the local, fixing those kinds of problems.

00:53:57.000 Ryan, Nick, what's your view on 9 11?

00:53:59.000 Have you seen General Wesley Clark's interview on Democracy Now! or Ehud Barak's interview with BBC on 9 11?

00:54:06.000 I haven't seen, I've seen Wesley Clark's interview about the Iraq war and all that.

00:54:12.000 Haven't seen him about 9 11 and haven't seen Barack on 9 11 either.

00:54:16.000 Well, look, you know, of course I believe the official government story.

00:54:22.000 You'd have to be crazy not to believe the government.

00:54:24.000 When does the government lie? 0.98

00:54:26.000 If you say that you don't believe the official story for 9 11, you're crazy.

00:54:30.000 You're crazy not to believe what the government told you, right?

00:54:33.000 I mean, if you're a 9 11 conspiracy theorist, you're saying, I reject the official government story.

00:54:39.000 And people who do that, Those are conspiracy theorists.

00:54:42.000 Those are crazy people because they don't believe the government, really.

00:54:46.000 You know, so of course I believe the official government story.

00:54:48.000 Now, nevertheless, you have in the Twin Towers two buildings that were structurally built specifically to withstand multiple airline collisions.

00:54:58.000 I mean, when they built the Twin Towers, they said specifically this could withstand multiple planes hitting it.

00:55:05.000 And it got hit by one plane and the whole thing collapsed.

00:55:08.000 Additionally, you look at the way structurally the building was built in terms of the foundations for the building, the major beams that supported the building were on the outside.

00:55:18.000 You look at the windows, and they were so narrow because you had such a strong foundation that was built from the outside.

00:55:24.000 That was characteristic of the building.

00:55:26.000 This is even something Donald Trump talked about.

00:55:28.000 You had in the World Trade Center that got bombed in 1993, a massive explosion in the basement where the foundation was, withstood that.

00:55:37.000 And yet, you had planes hit both towers.

00:55:39.000 They fell in exactly the same way at free fall speed, collapsed like that.

00:55:44.000 You can talk to many eyewitnesses who said they heard explosions, who said all kinds of things that couldn't have collapsed that way.

00:55:51.000 You also look at World Trade Center 7.

00:55:53.000 What plane hit that building?

00:55:55.000 Nobody's seen that video, right?

00:55:57.000 That building, which was not one of the Twin Towers, that one collapsed in the same way.

00:56:02.000 And they say it was because it was really hot in there.

00:56:05.000 There was a lot of smoke in there, so the building collapsed.

00:56:07.000 Really?

00:56:08.000 A lot of buildings like World Trade Center 7 have been on fire, have withstood severe fire damage, severe heat damage, and they did not collapse like that.

00:56:17.000 And so you look at all that evidence, and also you look at the Casa's belly, which is.

00:56:21.000 What did 9 11, if you can establish motivation, if you can say that maybe it was conspicuous, we look at 9 11 as something that opened the door to our present policy in the Middle East.

00:56:32.000 Would some actors have something to gain from 9 11 being done?

00:56:37.000 Some actors who maybe don't care so much that Americans die.

00:56:41.000 But of course, I believe the official government story.

00:56:44.000 Just a lot of weird questions, you know.

00:56:50.000 I'm sure there's answers to them, but.

00:56:53.000 Just some thoughts about it.

00:56:53.000 I don't know.

00:56:54.000 Just some random crazy thoughts.

00:56:56.000 But of course, I think basically 9 11 was just Osama bin Laden. 0.74

00:57:02.000 And the people that were dancing on the rooftops, it was definitely Muslims and nobody else. 0.88

00:57:09.000 Do not Google dancing Israelis. 0.81

00:57:11.000 Simon Skola, pagans don't need temples. 0.99

00:57:13.000 They live in the trees.

00:57:14.000 Very true.

00:57:15.000 Very true.

00:57:17.000 They are the tree people, they're the plant people.

00:57:19.000 They don't need Christ because they have the grass.

00:57:23.000 And the animals.

00:57:25.000 Totally not a troll says, Do you use Gab for paywall now?

00:57:29.000 Excuse me.

00:57:31.000 A little frog in my throat there.

00:57:35.000 No, excuse me.

00:57:37.000 A little Mossad attack there.

00:57:40.000 No, I'm going to be setting up on my website a paywall plugin, and that'll be available as soon as possible.

00:57:47.000 And I'll let everybody know once that happens.

00:57:49.000 But I'm not, I mean, people are, I think there's like a few people paying on Gab, but I don't really use that.

00:57:56.000 Ryan says paganism and witchcraft aren't inherently bad.

00:58:00.000 The world's not black or white.

00:58:01.000 No such thing as pure good or evil.

00:58:03.000 It only exists in works of fiction.

00:58:05.000 Oh, give me a break.

00:58:06.000 Of course, there is pure good and evil.

00:58:08.000 God is pure good, and Satan is pure evil.

00:58:12.000 Of course, it is black and white.

00:58:14.000 It is so crystal clear.

00:58:16.000 There is the light, there is the dark, there is the perfect being who created the world and everything in it, and the fallen angel.

00:58:24.000 There is the deceiver.

00:58:25.000 Of course, it is black and white.

00:58:27.000 And anything that is opposed to Christ is inherently bad.

00:58:30.000 Witchcraft, paganism, all of the above.

00:58:32.000 It's all inherently purely bad. 0.96

00:58:35.000 Anybody who says there's nothing that's purely good or purely bad, really?

00:58:39.000 So, what about murder?

00:58:42.000 If I went over to your house and killed your family, is that, hey, that's just, it's not black and white, it's gray.

00:58:48.000 That's not purely bad. 0.96

00:58:49.000 There's something good about that.

00:58:51.000 No chance.

00:58:52.000 No chance.

00:58:53.000 But of course, we all know this.

00:58:56.000 It's a matter of degrees.

00:58:56.000 We all know this.

00:58:57.000 The reason we know God is perfect is because we judge things in terms of degrees.

00:59:02.000 We say some things are more perfect or less perfect, some things are closer to an ideal or farther away.

00:59:08.000 And God is all of those ideals incarnate.

00:59:11.000 And that's where we can judge.

00:59:13.000 Fathom degrees.

00:59:14.000 That's the argument from degrees by Aquinas.

00:59:17.000 So we know that God is perfect good.

00:59:19.000 We know that God is perfect love and all the rest.

00:59:22.000 So, of course, there is such a thing as pure good.

00:59:25.000 That's what God is.

00:59:26.000 Not just a person in the sky.

00:59:28.000 He is pure actuality itself.

00:59:31.000 He is the unmoved mover, pure goodness and love itself.

00:59:34.000 So, to say there's no such thing, you've got to read Aquinas, my guy.

00:59:37.000 I appreciate the super chat, but my friend, you're talking a lot of heresy.

00:59:42.000 You've got to read Aquinas.

00:59:44.000 J.E., good job on your Amaranth speech.

00:59:46.000 I really enjoyed it.

00:59:47.000 Thank you, big guy.

00:59:48.000 Glad you enjoyed it.

00:59:50.000 Riley Wolf, do you know of Jesse Lee Peterson?

00:59:53.000 Opinion?

00:59:54.000 Based black man.

00:59:55.000 I do like him.

00:59:56.000 I like him a lot.

00:59:57.000 He's a Christian, so I'm a supporter of that.

01:00:00.000 And he's pretty intelligent, so I'm a fan of his.

01:00:03.000 Cloudstar, do you think it's possible that when the deep state comes crumbling down, Obama will turn against them to save himself?

01:00:10.000 Doubtful, but who knows?

01:00:11.000 I don't think anybody has any idea how this is going to play out.

01:00:15.000 I mean, this is really.

01:00:17.000 Like, we've never seen anything like this before, where this kind of establishment that is so pervasive in media, government, finance, and all the rest is under the gun right now.

01:00:28.000 I mean, there's just never been anything quite like this in modern history.

01:00:31.000 So it's tough to see how it'll play out.

01:00:34.000 I can't speculate at the moment.

01:00:36.000 Mark McColl, I was asking to be a moderator.

01:00:39.000 So can you please mod me?

01:00:41.000 No, no.

01:00:42.000 I only have a couple of mods who I trust, but appreciate the super chats.

01:00:48.000 Ryan, I support traditional Christian moralslash values because they produce the most successful societies. 0.66

01:00:53.000 This is why Christianity was created.

01:00:56.000 Even if Jesus was the Savior, religions are absolutely man made. 1.00

01:01:01.000 Oh my God. 1.00

01:01:02.000 Oh my gosh.

01:01:05.000 No.

01:01:08.000 Wrong.

01:01:10.000 Here's the fundamental fallacy of this kind of thinking religious societies, or rather, Christian societies do better.

01:01:18.000 They do better because people.

01:01:19.000 Believe in Jesus Christ.

01:01:22.000 If you don't believe in Jesus Christ, it does not matter what the system says.

01:01:27.000 I mean, that people behaved well because they thought that they would be judged in the end.

01:01:34.000 There's the incentive.

01:01:36.000 If you don't believe that God is real, that Christ came and died for our sins, that these things are sins as dictated by an extrinsic authority, which is God, there is no incentive to follow them.

01:01:48.000 It defeats the whole purpose of a religion if people don't believe in it.

01:01:52.000 This should be very simple stuff.

01:01:54.000 You know, if I say, okay, well, I believe in Christianity because I think it's good for society, well, the minute I want to do something that my religion forbids, I'm going to say, well, you know, I don't really believe in it.

01:02:04.000 I'm going to go ahead and do what I want anyway.

01:02:06.000 So, this is a way where people want all the fruits of piety and of religious observance, but they don't want any of the sacrifice, any of the responsibilities.

01:02:15.000 And that's all wrong.

01:02:17.000 You can't have it that way.

01:02:18.000 Do you think Muslims would have fanatical devotion to Allah if they did not believe in Allah?

01:02:23.000 Do you think they would be. 1.00

01:02:25.000 Coming over to the West and doing suicide bombings if they didn't believe there'd be a reward in heaven? 0.87

01:02:29.000 And similarly, in parallel, do you think Christians would have any incentive to obey Christian sexual morals or Christian any other kinds of morals if it weren't for the fact that there's a final judgment, if it weren't for the fact that these rules did not come from man?

01:02:45.000 Religions are not man made.

01:02:46.000 Well, many of them are. 0.99

01:02:48.000 Christianity is not. 0.63

01:02:49.000 Christianity came from God. 0.85

01:02:51.000 God came down, became man, and unlike all the other prophets, he performed miracles.

01:02:57.000 Buddha did not perform miracles, Muhammad did not perform miracles.

01:03:01.000 Jesus Christ came and demonstrated proof of his divinity. 0.92

01:03:04.000 He performed miracles to many, many witnesses.

01:03:08.000 And then the grand miracle to vindicate his claims of divinity, that he was the Son of God, was that he rose from the dead and revealed himself to, I think, about a thousand witnesses.

01:03:19.000 He fulfilled 400 and some prophecies, more than 460, to the point where the odds that he fulfilled all of them, coincidentally, would be astronomical.

01:03:28.000 So to compare Christianity to other religions, number one is wrong.

01:03:32.000 Maybe religions are man made, but Christianity is definitely the exception.

01:03:36.000 There is simply no equivalence between Islam and Hinduism and Buddhism and Christianity in terms of their claims and in terms of the evidence. 0.97

01:03:44.000 And then additionally, to say, well, we should only look at religion consequentially misses the mark, misses the mark completely.

01:03:52.000 We did well because we had families and we believed in God and we devoted ourselves to God, and that's because we believed in God, not because we were like, well, this is maybe a good idea.

01:04:03.000 So, Al Sabadis, Michael Williams, deportation bus.

01:04:07.000 Good optics?

01:04:08.000 I don't know what that is.

01:04:09.000 I haven't seen that. 1.00

01:04:11.000 Prince Vegeta, Ryan is a fag. 1.00

01:04:14.000 Jesus is the Christ, and an academic version of Christianity has no effect. 0.99

01:04:18.000 We are saved by faith, not by brainiac BS to feed the ego.

01:04:22.000 Exactly. 1.00

01:04:23.000 I wouldn't say Ryan is a fag. 0.99

01:04:25.000 We're trying to help him understand the faith, and so we're trying to have patience and charity with him, but nevertheless, he's a little misguided. 0.98

01:04:33.000 DL, aren't you going to cover the white man in New York yelling at Hispanics for speaking Spanish in a cafe and going on a rant because he pays for welfare?

01:04:41.000 I didn't plan on it.

01:04:42.000 That's not really like news news, right?

01:04:45.000 Maybe I'll cover it tomorrow.

01:04:48.000 Michael Jones, I predict alt right leaders being rounded up and arrested mafia style under the next liberal president.

01:04:55.000 I don't know about that.

01:04:56.000 Maybe.

01:04:57.000 Certainly they'll find a pretext to start coming after them in legal ways.

01:05:01.000 So I wouldn't put it past them.

01:05:03.000 Prince Vegeta, use this to buy an echo effect on your mic.

01:05:07.000 I will do that.

01:05:09.000 Ryan, I saw David Blaine disappear on stage.

01:05:11.000 He must be the second coming.

01:05:13.000 Yeah, that's definitely comparable.

01:05:15.000 And it always devolves into these very Fedora tier arguments.

01:05:19.000 The fact of the matter is this there is a more robust case for Christ's existence, for his crucifixion, and his resurrection than there is for the existence of Alexander the Great, than there is for the existence of the Buddha, than there is for the existence of all kinds of.

01:05:38.000 Historical figures.

01:05:41.000 You look at the many letters written in the Bible, and they had to have been written no less than 12 years after they said that Christ died.

01:05:48.000 You look at many non biblical historical documents that say that Christ rose.

01:05:53.000 People that were pagans, people that were Christians, all kinds of people.

01:05:56.000 You have a number of Bibles, many languages that came out shortly after Christ's crucifixion.

01:06:01.000 So, you know, the evidence is there.

01:06:04.000 The historicity is solid.

01:06:06.000 And nevertheless, and it's a little too lengthy to explain here, and I'm not the best equipped to do it, but.

01:06:12.000 Christ coming is, you can logically come to the conclusion that if there is such a God, and there is, that he would send some kind of incarnation in human form to bring them up to him.

01:06:24.000 I mean, this is, you can establish this through a priori reason.

01:06:28.000 In the same way that Aquinas established the nature and existence of God through the cosmological arguments and the teleological argument, you can establish that if this God exists, then he would send a messenger like Christ.

01:06:40.000 And that the biggest religion in the world has that as the message.

01:06:43.000 And the Trinity and all the rest is vindication in and of itself.

01:06:47.000 But I know a lot of the atheists have not read Aquinas. 0.62

01:06:51.000 They have not read Augustine. 0.53

01:06:52.000 They have not read any of the major authors, the church fathers.

01:06:57.000 And that's not to say, like, her, der, read Aquinas, like how, you know, what's his name says, read Locke.

01:07:02.000 But it is to say that people are going to make these sweeping universal claims about religion, about Christianity, and they haven't read the fundamental source material.

01:07:11.000 If you're an atheist, an atheist says, I know there is no God.

01:07:16.000 And if you make that claim, then implicit in that should be, well, I searched and searched for evidence, and I thought about it long and hard.

01:07:25.000 And after a process, I determined there is no God.

01:07:28.000 And so if you call yourself an atheist and you haven't even read the Bible, haven't read the best arguments for the historicity of Christ or any other religion, It's just bogus.

01:07:41.000 It's just not true.

01:07:43.000 BurgerFan69, Nietzsche said Christianity was the ultimate bait.

01:07:47.000 A certain group of people who killed Christ wanted everyone to defend Christ because he promoted slave morality instead of being great.

01:07:54.000 Conspiracy?

01:07:55.000 Of course not.

01:07:56.000 And I think if you looked at any of the Crusades or any of the popes who controlled Europe, I think they would be a pretty stark departure from this idea of so called slave morality.

01:08:08.000 Is controlling the entire world, slave morality?

01:08:11.000 Remember when Christian civilization controlled just about the entire planet, with the exception of a few countries? 0.87

01:08:17.000 That doesn't quite sound like slave morality to me.

01:08:20.000 Remember when religious leaders like the popes, or, you know, throughout history and many of the church leaders in the Byzantine Empire, remember when they controlled the kingdoms and the feudal lords and they controlled the Holy Roman Empire?

01:08:32.000 Remember that?

01:08:33.000 That doesn't quite sound like slave morality to me.

01:08:36.000 And they fought all kinds of just wars and there was valor and they.

01:08:41.000 Fought for their homeland and for their people.

01:08:43.000 Does that sound like slave morality?

01:08:44.000 Not quite.

01:08:45.000 But of course, we want to tip the fedora.

01:08:48.000 So there's just simply no evidence about this conspiracy business.

01:08:52.000 It's like an interesting idea, but there's no basis for that.

01:08:56.000 And what would be the conspiracy?

01:08:59.000 The Roman Empire adopted Christianity. 0.69

01:09:02.000 Jake Destabia, we keep saying read Aquinas, but they never do it. 0.96

01:09:06.000 Exactly.

01:09:06.000 They never want to read.

01:09:08.000 Cloudstar, pagans snuck Easter into the Bible.

01:09:11.000 That's just.

01:09:12.000 Nonsense.

01:09:13.000 That's just nonsense.

01:09:15.000 And there's no there.

01:09:17.000 And you can read what's his name?

01:09:20.000 Trent Horn did a really good video.

01:09:23.000 He's got a DVD out, which debunks a lot of the myths about the pagan origins of Christianity, which is simply there's no evidence for it.

01:09:32.000 A lot of it comes from this movie called Zeitgeist.

01:09:35.000 A lot of people get these ideas about, oh, well, Christianity has its roots in Horus or in Krishna or in the pagan gods.

01:09:43.000 And a lot of that comes from this popular movie called Zeitgeist.

01:09:47.000 And in this movie, there were just a lot of factual errors.

01:09:50.000 And this guy, Trent Horn, does a really good DVD about this, and he's also recommended a lot of sources which debunk this.

01:09:58.000 There's some website out there which goes in, and it's atheists who run it, and they systematically debunk those kinds of claims.

01:10:05.000 And we'll look at the Streamlabs, and then we'll call it a night.

01:10:08.000 We've got.

01:10:13.000 Ah, tons.

01:10:14.000 Realpolitik.

01:10:15.000 Who needs books on the Weimar Republic when you can read vice.com? 0.67

01:10:19.000 Exactly right.

01:10:20.000 John Shepard Smith, I was very amused at the Canadian Watch Nick Fuentes America First Graffiti.

01:10:26.000 Is there something we can do to get more people to watch you without tagging a building?

01:10:30.000 Flyers of the sort you and your former business partner once made?

01:10:33.000 Perhaps.

01:10:34.000 I might look into doing that.

01:10:36.000 That'd be pretty cool.

01:10:37.000 I am against the destruction of property, but if you want to put up the flyers, posters, it might be a great idea.

01:10:42.000 Something dissident, it would make you feel cool and you do your part.

01:10:45.000 You know, you could put up a flyer that says, Watch America First or whatever.

01:10:49.000 And imagine if all across the nation and all across the world, people are putting up flyers, America First with Nick Fuentes.

01:10:55.000 That'd be pretty wild.

01:10:57.000 So, maybe I'll put that up on my new website.

01:11:00.000 Peter Teff, Nick, Trump is helping out North Dakota bigly, lifting regulations so we can drill, and he's practically shoving North Dakota soybeans down China's throat.

01:11:10.000 Keep America First white pills coming, my guy.

01:11:13.000 How about a follow on Twitter.com?

01:11:15.000 Sure, just at me after the show.

01:11:17.000 Maybe I'll give you a follow.

01:11:18.000 Who knows?

01:11:19.000 I don't like to tell people I'm going to follow them because then people are like, oh, you've got to follow me.

01:11:23.000 But, you know, maybe hit me up with that at.

01:11:26.000 But yeah, North Dakota is like many of these states where Trump is targeting them individually.

01:11:31.000 Wisconsin, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Arizona.

01:11:34.000 He's undertaken a lot of efforts to help people in those states, which coincidentally are swing states in 2018 and beyond.

01:11:41.000 So it's a great strategy he's got going on.

01:11:44.000 I was pointing this out as recently or as early as fall of last year. 0.99

01:11:49.000 Begbie, you most certainly earn your nickname when we get the Streamlabslash Super Chats when the unwashed masseslash Dullblade Ghetto comes at you with randomness.

01:11:58.000 Very true. 0.98

01:11:59.000 Have to cut them up. 1.00

01:12:01.000 Joe the Croat. 1.00

01:12:02.000 Hey, Nick, it's me, Joe, your once favorite boomer. 0.98

01:12:04.000 I'm about to drag pagan goddess in the YouTube chat to a forced baptism and wedding, after which I'll bang the heresy out of her. 0.99

01:12:12.000 Geez. 1.00

01:12:13.000 Here is doping. 0.82

01:12:14.000 She's not a trap.

01:12:15.000 That's quite the comment.

01:12:17.000 She's also Nick.

01:12:20.000 Hope to see you in Discord once again.

01:12:23.000 Joe, I'm in there all the time.

01:12:25.000 Just because I go in there when you're not there doesn't mean I don't go in there.

01:12:28.000 But I miss you.

01:12:29.000 I haven't seen you around there so much.

01:12:31.000 I pop in every now and again, but.

01:12:33.000 We'll have to catch up soon.

01:12:34.000 We haven't spoken in a while, but much appreciated. 1.00

01:12:37.000 Yeah, drag that pagan goddess to a forced baptism. 1.00

01:12:41.000 I don't know about all the rest, but definitely get her over to our side. 1.00

01:12:45.000 And some dollar dues from M103 Heavy.

01:12:48.000 Thank you very much.

01:12:50.000 And we got one more super chat from Ryan, and then we're calling the quits.

01:12:54.000 He says Have you looked into the now existent race of giants? 0.65

01:12:58.000 In all seriousness, they could have been descendants of Nephilim, which would bring credence to Christianity.

01:13:03.000 I don't know anything about that.

01:13:05.000 I have to look more into the esoteric knowledge.

01:13:07.000 I'm going to have to get Mr. Western Identity, Mr. Owen Cyclops, to tutor me in that regard.

01:13:12.000 But that's all for us tonight.

01:13:15.000 I've got to take a phone call in a little while.

01:13:15.000 I'm tired.

01:13:17.000 So that's going to do it for us tonight on the show.

01:13:20.000 Remember to subscribe to the channel.

01:13:21.000 Give us a big thumbs up.

01:13:23.000 Leave a comment if you like what you saw.

01:13:25.000 Be nice, or else I'll delete it.

01:13:27.000 Click the notification bell to get notified every time we go live.

01:13:30.000 We are on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m. Central, 8 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.

01:13:35.000 I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.

01:13:36.000 This was America First, as always.

01:13:38.000 Thank you guys for watching.

01:13:40.000 Thank you to our Streamlabs donors, our Super Chatters, everybody who watches and shares the show.

01:13:45.000 We love you guys.

01:13:46.000 We appreciate you.

01:13:47.000 And we'll see you tomorrow.

01:13:48.000 We've got BG Cumbie coming on the show, a comedian, a fun guy.

01:13:53.000 And so I don't know what we'll be discussing, but it should be a great time had by all.

01:13:56.000 Very fun, casual Friday episode tomorrow.

01:13:59.000 So we'll see you then.

01:14:00.000 Until then, have a great rest of your evening.

01:14:08.000 Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.

01:14:15.000 It's going to be only America first.

01:14:18.000 America first. 0.94

01:14:20.000 America first. 0.98

01:14:24.000 The American people will come first once again.

01:14:36.000 With respect.

01:14:53.000 I'm mad

America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - May 17, 2018

Codename Crossfire Hurricane | America First Ep. 166

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript