America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - August 29, 2017


Combating Anti-White Hatred | America First Ep. 4


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 6 minutes

Words per minute

169.71

Word count

11,297

Sentence count

837

Harmful content

Misogyny

26

sentences flagged

Toxicity

48

sentences flagged

Hate speech

86

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

I m sick and tired of the hurricane coverage, and I ve got some thoughts on why the media is trying to pin all of the blame on President Trump for the disaster in Houston, Texas, and why he bears the most responsibility for it.

Transcript

Transcripts from "America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. Explore them interactively here.
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:13.000 Okay, well, yeah, well.
00:00:18.000 All right, yeah, whatever, whatever.
00:00:20.000 I didn't even say anything that important the past 15 minutes.
00:00:25.000 That is frustrating.
00:00:28.000 Hang on just a moment here.
00:00:32.000 Okay.
00:00:35.000 All right, you know what?
00:00:37.000 It's the second episode, all right?
00:00:39.000 It's the second episode.
00:00:40.000 Jeez, get off my back.
00:00:45.000 So apparently, there was no sound for the past 15 minutes.
00:00:48.000 Hey, whatever.
00:00:48.000 I don't even care, okay?
00:00:50.000 Doesn't even phase me.
00:00:53.000 And I fixed the lighting, too.
00:00:54.000 Honestly, you know what?
00:00:57.000 If I was in front of a camera right now, I'd be pulling a Bill O'Reilly.
00:01:00.000 I'd be doing the do it live, but how much did you miss?
00:01:05.000 Did you guys miss everything, or what happened?
00:01:07.000 Did it go off?
00:01:10.000 You were only.
00:01:11.000 Okay, only the first five minutes, but apparently, I don't know.
00:01:16.000 Let's see.
00:01:18.000 When did the audio go off?
00:01:19.000 Was it the whole time or was it just.
00:01:21.000 How long was it?
00:01:22.000 Because I hear my dad, he's knocking on the door over there.
00:01:26.000 Was it off the whole time or did it just go off for a moment?
00:01:28.000 I'm not totally sure.
00:01:29.000 No sound for the first six minutes.
00:01:31.000 Okay.
00:01:33.000 Well, what are you going to do, folks?
00:01:36.000 What are you going to do?
00:01:37.000 Complicated business, folks, right?
00:01:41.000 Well, that's embarrassing.
00:01:42.000 What were we talking about?
00:01:44.000 We were talking about the hurricane.
00:01:45.000 Okay.
00:01:46.000 We're talking about.
00:01:47.000 Hurricane Houston, for all my lip readers out there, maybe you can fill in the rest of the audience what I've been saying.
00:01:53.000 I've been talking about Houston, I guess, screaming into the void about it.
00:01:59.000 But basically, if I can summarize my six minutes of thoughts, I'm a fast talker, so I basically wrote out like a hundred page manifesto in the past six minutes.
00:02:09.000 Now I got to recall it all.
00:02:11.000 But basically, look, long story short, long story short, I'm sick and tired of the hurricane news, okay?
00:02:18.000 It's boring.
00:02:20.000 Been there, done that.
00:02:21.000 I've been tired of it after the first hour.
00:02:23.000 Look, I know it's a tragedy, of course.
00:02:26.000 Very sad.
00:02:27.000 Thoughts and prayers, all of this.
00:02:29.000 Okay, but I'm trying to do the news show.
00:02:31.000 I'm trying to keep it high energy and fresh.
00:02:34.000 And all you see on television is water and wind and people are displaced.
00:02:39.000 Bad stuff, horrible stuff.
00:02:41.000 But nevertheless, we have exciting topics.
00:02:44.000 That said, and I'm doing sort of the Reader's Digest here.
00:02:48.000 That said, on the issue of.
00:02:51.000 The hurricane.
00:02:52.000 I think what a lot of people are discounting is the importance of optics and narrative with this hurricane.
00:02:59.000 What you're seeing right now really is this dramatic tug of war between the Trump administration and the media in terms of control of optics and control of the conversation.
00:03:10.000 Because what you saw leading up to the hurricane, what you saw leading up to the hurricane actually making landfall, was that the media sought to, and in a very coordinated manner, In a very concerted effort, sought to pin responsibility for this catastrophe on the president.
00:03:28.000 And this is a fairly safe bet.
00:03:30.000 This is a fairly safe bet that the media is making.
00:03:34.000 Because the media plays it up for a week before the hurricane that this will be the first major leadership test for President Trump.
00:03:41.000 First major leadership test.
00:03:42.000 And you see that, isn't it so funny?
00:03:45.000 Isn't it so funny that we live in a free country, we have a free market, and every major news station and news company has the same headlines, using the same words, pushing the same narrative?
00:03:57.000 It always blows my mind.
00:03:58.000 It always blows my mind as a humble individualist libertarian, which I'm not, but when you see every major news source from Fox to CNN to ABC, CBS, and gee, so weird.
00:04:13.000 They're all using the same headlines, they're all using the same words, it's all pushing the same narrative.
00:04:18.000 It's almost like 90% of media is controlled by six corporations or something, and it's almost like there's a level of organization even on top of that between a group of people.
00:04:30.000 I don't know.
00:04:30.000 Look, I'm not trying to push any conspiracy theories.
00:04:34.000 I'm just asking a couple of questions.
00:04:36.000 Anyway, they pushed for a whole week this narrative that this is the first major leadership test for President Trump.
00:04:44.000 And what they're doing, in effect, by saying this is the first major leadership test, is they're planting the seed in the minds of the American people that what's going to come when the storm makes landfall, all the destruction, all the devastation, the horrible pictures that you're seeing, that President Trump is.
00:05:02.000 Is responsible for that.
00:05:04.000 The President Trump bears responsibility for that.
00:05:07.000 And that's a very dangerous thing to a presidency.
00:05:09.000 We all remember, of course, Hurricane Katrina, and George W. Bush owned that for both terms.
00:05:15.000 And so I think what you're really seeing now as the hurricane has made landfall, as the story develops, is really a tug of war between the president and the media, where the media is saying, look at how bad this is, look at how horrible this is, you know, Republicans are evil, this is all their fault.
00:05:33.000 And then by the same token, President Trump.
00:05:35.000 Whether the federal government can do everything in its power or not, what President Trump is doing very skillfully is trying to paint the picture that he's on the ground and he's helping and he's involved.
00:05:47.000 And really, it's a war of optics.
00:05:49.000 And you saw today he visited Houston.
00:05:51.000 He's going to visit Houston later this week.
00:05:54.000 And he says they're doing everything they can.
00:05:56.000 He held a press conference with Governor Abbott.
00:05:59.000 And that's what you're seeing with Houston.
00:06:02.000 So it's sort of red pilling, I think, when you look at the news to understand that.
00:06:08.000 Nothing that the news ever talks about is about what they're talking about.
00:06:13.000 Does that make sense?
00:06:14.000 Like when CNN talks about Hurricane Harvey, they're not really talking about Hurricane Harvey.
00:06:21.000 They're setting up the Trump administration for bad optics and a congressional defeat in 2018.
00:06:26.000 When President Trump goes down to Texas, I mean, yeah, the federal government's doing things.
00:06:31.000 Yeah, he's going down there to help a little bit.
00:06:33.000 But what that's really about is optics.
00:06:35.000 He's going down there with the storm coat on, you know.
00:06:39.000 Because he's not the president of the United States, right?
00:06:41.000 He's going down there with the storm coat and the rain boots and the khakis to go and do things with his hands or pick people up and put them somewhere else.
00:06:51.000 And I think it's very red pilling to see that everything that you see on television, everything you read about online, when you're reading from a corporate news source, it's never what they're actually talking about.
00:07:03.000 Behind every story, behind every piece of news, every sentence, there is a coded, implicit narrative that they are trying to push for you.
00:07:12.000 And that's why.
00:07:13.000 You know, I think Alex Jones is really one of the smartest guys around in media.
00:07:18.000 And people may scoff at that.
00:07:19.000 People may laugh at that.
00:07:21.000 But his brand, which is InfoWars, which is that there's an information war, I think is so prescient in the 21st century, which is to say that nobody on InfoWars, at least I don't believe, is an ideologue.
00:07:35.000 Nobody on InfoWars is super dogmatic.
00:07:38.000 Or, you know, maybe people might disagree with that.
00:07:41.000 But I think the overriding conviction, the overriding mission of InfoWars is to provide an alternative.
00:07:47.000 To the mainstream media is sort of to serve in a very practical way to say that all of the media is biased, all of the media is controlled, all of the media is trying to convince you of something.
00:08:03.000 And we say some crazy stuff and it's entertaining and it's wacky, but it's the same thing over there.
00:08:08.000 It's sort of like performance art that InfoWars is a news source.
00:08:13.000 It's sort of to say that someone like Alex Jones is running BBC.
00:08:17.000 You don't think you have nuts running BBC.
00:08:20.000 Look at all the child.
00:08:22.000 Molestation that happened in BBC a few years ago.
00:08:26.000 So, anyway, that's Houston.
00:08:28.000 Didn't want to talk about it because, you know, but here we are.
00:08:28.000 That's Houston.
00:08:32.000 The other thing I wanted to talk about this is another thing that I saw.
00:08:35.000 In addition to every other post being about rushing water, rainfall, fast winds, like, whoa, you know, like it's a storm, okay?
00:08:45.000 We understand what that looks like.
00:08:47.000 But on top of that, I saw something that really struck a chord with me today, okay?
00:08:53.000 And this happens quite often.
00:08:54.000 We do this a lot on this show.
00:08:56.000 Maybe we'll make a segment out of it, sort of a propaganda watch, if you will.
00:09:01.000 But I'm on my Twitter timeline, and I keep seeing this article being posted and commented on.
00:09:06.000 And it's something that I've seen for a long time.
00:09:08.000 It's something I've encountered recently in the aftermath of Charlottesville.
00:09:13.000 And that is the assault and the attack of white and Western identity.
00:09:19.000 And I don't think you've really seen a lot of that.
00:09:22.000 As explicitly as you have since Charlottesville, which is very important.
00:09:28.000 And I'll tell you what the article was.
00:09:29.000 The article I saw was There is no such thing as Western civilization.
00:09:35.000 That was the headline by a man named, get this, get a load of this, Kwame Apaya, or Kwame Apaya, some, you know, Kwame Apaya from Ghana.
00:09:48.000 And this is from The Guardian this morning. 0.98
00:09:51.000 And the article contends that basically, Beyond the fact, I've heard this many times before, that there's no such thing as white identity, whiteness is a construct, white people are evil. 0.97
00:10:01.000 You know, we've been there, done that, got the t shirt. 0.94
00:10:04.000 But with Western civilization, this is the first time I've ever seen that on the chopping board.
00:10:09.000 And Kwame Apaya contends in this very long, very wordy, convoluted article that there is no coherent thing such as Western civilization.
00:10:20.000 It just doesn't exist.
00:10:21.000 That there's no continuity from Greece to Rome to the Renaissance, medieval times to.
00:10:27.000 The present day.
00:10:29.000 And there's something funny about the way that this is argued, which I think is important to note, which is to say that when we get attacked with this sort of thing, and we see it all the time, by the way no such thing as whiteness, no such thing as Western civilization to even have to defend against that, to even have to deny that or to argue against that is, I think, the wrong way to go about it.
00:10:54.000 And that's what I see all the time from a lot of people you see this identity under attack.
00:10:59.000 You see, our identity under attack, whether it's civilizational or racial or ethnic or cultural.
00:11:05.000 And it's under attack by the mainstream media.
00:11:07.000 It's under attack by the people that are in charge of the media. 0.83
00:11:11.000 And people's first instinctual response is to say, you know, of course this is white identity. 0.91
00:11:16.000 Of course it is.
00:11:17.000 And I think that's a huge mistake.
00:11:19.000 And I'll tell you why.
00:11:21.000 Nobody in the world, nobody in the world has their identity under assault like Western civilization does or like. 0.86
00:11:29.000 White people do as a racial group. 0.72
00:11:31.000 There's not one other race in the world, there's not one other civilization in the world where you have these long form expository critiques of identity by people in The Guardian or The Washington Post. 0.83
00:11:45.000 You just don't see it.
00:11:47.000 And that ought to be the argument.
00:11:49.000 That's from bottom to top, that is the argument against this sort of thing.
00:11:55.000 And I see people all the time, they'll rush to say, oh, well, you know, it's this or it's that, and this is the continuity, and they try to prove it.
00:12:02.000 And the only argument, the only argument that must be contended is why is it only our group?
00:12:08.000 Why is it only our civilization that is constantly, constantly under assault to our most intimate connections?
00:12:16.000 And forms of identity when nobody else is subjected to anything remotely like that.
00:12:22.000 Does anybody remember, for example, in like 2005, 2006, when you couldn't call black people black?
00:12:29.000 Does anybody remember that weird time in our lives when you had to call them African Americans and if you called them black, you were somehow a racist? 0.60
00:12:38.000 That's what we're talking about.
00:12:40.000 It is that level of doublethink where with one group, you can't call them certain names.
00:12:46.000 You can call them one thing or else you hate them and you're a racist and you have to get fired. 0.69
00:12:51.000 But with white people, your race doesn't exist and it never existed and your God doesn't exist and your civilization doesn't exist and it was evil to begin with and that's why it's good, that it's all going away. 0.97
00:13:02.000 It's not going away. 0.99
00:13:03.000 What are you talking about?
00:13:04.000 But when it does, we're going to celebrate and cheer and it's going to be great because, you know, blah, blah, blah.
00:13:10.000 Because Vox said so.
00:13:13.000 And so that's the argument.
00:13:14.000 I think that's a very important framing thing that we talk about when it comes to this movement and people that talk about this and.
00:13:22.000 And this goes for conservatives, it goes for white identitarians, white nationalists.
00:13:27.000 I mean, the whole umbrella category of people that see this as a problem.
00:13:32.000 And it is a problem.
00:13:33.000 It's unfair.
00:13:34.000 Even if you're a libertarian, even if you're like a Will Nardi individualist, you're a radical, nihilist, materialist individualist who, you know, a rootless cosmopolitan, and you see nothing wrong with the destruction of the roots of the country.
00:13:48.000 Even if you're that, excuse me, even if you're that, you should still see a problem with this double standard.
00:13:55.000 Even if you don't believe in the convictions, you don't believe in anything like that, you should still see this hypocrisy as an issue or at least a philosophical problem that needs a resolution.
00:14:09.000 And with regards to people that think it's an issue, I think the way to respond to this, the argument is not, you know, this is who we are and we should not have to justify our identity, our existence, our history to anybody.
00:14:27.000 We don't owe them that.
00:14:29.000 We don't owe anybody that.
00:14:30.000 And nobody else does, by the way, either.
00:14:33.000 And it's so funny, too.
00:14:34.000 This article is There's No Such Thing as Western Civilization by Kwame Apaya.
00:14:41.000 And like I said before, he's from Ghana.
00:14:44.000 Now, if you know anything about Africa, if you know anything about the continent of Africa, just about every country, the very premise, the very concept of nation states, of Impersonal government.
00:15:00.000 And what I mean by that is instead of having Shaka Zulu ruling the country, you have the office of the minister or the chief or the president.
00:15:08.000 You didn't have that.
00:15:09.000 So, this entire construction of Ghana, this entire construction of central government, of organizing people by geography as opposed to projecting power over people, didn't exist in Africa until less than 200 years ago.
00:15:26.000 So, that is the grand irony.
00:15:28.000 I think that says it all right there.
00:15:31.000 That you have a Ghanaian American named Kwame Apaya who comes from a country that 200 years ago did not exist, who comes from an entire continent, at least sub Saharan Africa, that 200 years ago did not have written language, did not have one two story building, did not have impersonal government, did not have the concept of organizing people by geographic regions or barriers or lines instead of, like I said before,
00:16:00.000 projections over people.
00:16:02.000 And he's going to come to America and rather. 0.58
00:16:04.000 Than be grateful.
00:16:05.000 Rather than come here and be grateful because we have medicine and we have pluralism and democracy and the rule of law and you don't get killed and raped because you're outside past a certain time of night.
00:16:18.000 Rather than be appreciative of all of this that we have in Western civilization, he's going to get a really cool job because I bet he went to some university in America or he went to one of the top American funded universities in Ghana. 0.86
00:16:31.000 He's going to come here, use that degree, A Western liberal arts education using a Western language, using Western technology at a Western paper to clickety clack on his computer about how all of that doesn't exist and it's a myth and shouldn't we destroy it and it's dumb and it's not worth saving anyway.
00:16:50.000 And that's the argument.
00:16:51.000 I think that is, beyond the absurdity of it, that's the framing of how we ought to go about this.
00:16:58.000 And we talk a lot about this on the show because we are in the political fight of our lives and tactics.
00:17:05.000 Framing rhetoric is just as important as the issues.
00:17:10.000 And I think we're really coming to a point to really extrapolate and get to the roots of it all.
00:17:17.000 They say that in 2016, the word of the year was post truth.
00:17:21.000 I remember that was sort of a meme that went around after Trump was elected, and all the liberals got up on their high horse because they couldn't have the White House or the Congress, and the media failed them.
00:17:33.000 They got the final, they got the last laugh in saying, well, The Miriam Webster's Dictionary Award of the Year is post truth because President Trump is not truthful. 0.73
00:17:44.000 And, you know, that very arrogant, elitist slap to the president.
00:17:50.000 But I think there is some truth in that.
00:17:53.000 Because what we saw during the 2016 election was the destruction of the widely held myth, the widely held belief.
00:18:02.000 And this is really a liberal, end of history, postmodern belief that.
00:18:07.000 We can, A, that we can know objective truth.
00:18:10.000 We can know things in themselves, if you want to get into German idealism.
00:18:14.000 We can know things in themselves.
00:18:17.000 And number two, that the establishment, which is the corporations, the mainstream media, people with money essentially, they have a monopoly and an authority over it.
00:18:28.000 And I think what you saw with the 2016 election is those two myths, those two beliefs, really sort of like religious beliefs, came crashing down.
00:18:38.000 Because what Donald Trump proved was that, A, we don't know what's true and what's not.
00:18:42.000 Because Jack Posopic is saying that Hillary Clinton has a body double, and NBC is saying that she doesn't, and both of them are lying, so we don't know what the truth is.
00:18:51.000 Because it happened in New York City, and nobody knows.
00:18:53.000 Nobody can know.
00:18:55.000 And then at the same time, it said that all of those old establishment organizations have now been discredited.
00:19:01.000 Because they all threw their weight, and they threw their papers, and their money behind Hillary Clinton, and she lost, even though everyone predicted that she would win.
00:19:09.000 So, you had at the same time those two things happen, and I think that did create sort of a new era, a new phase in this post Cold War era.
00:19:19.000 Whereas now we are, to an extent, post truth.
00:19:23.000 And now, in this post truth era, it doesn't really matter so much what is the truth, at least not in terms of if we want to get practical results for our movement.
00:19:32.000 It doesn't matter so much what's actually happening when you're talking about the fight, when you're talking about how we're going to win our objectives.
00:19:40.000 Of course, it matters to us on an individual level and among this group, this half of the country, what's true.
00:19:47.000 But in the grander fight, the macro fight for the ideas, or, you know, if you believe in that still, or rather the emotions, the zeitgeist of the country.
00:19:57.000 It matters a little bit more about optics and rhetoric.
00:19:59.000 And so that's what we try to do on the show at once for this half of the country, we talk about what's true, but then at the same time, we talk about the rhetoric, how we can make it gel for the rest.
00:20:10.000 And so, you know, if you don't believe me that this is what's happening, if you don't believe me that this is the trend that's going on, that this destruction of white identity, if you think that's alarmism, if you think I'm like being wacky, I'm being a bigoted KKK Nazi, you know, they like to throw that one around now.
00:20:29.000 I mean, here's just three examples.
00:20:31.000 You have There's No Such Thing as Western Civilization by Kwame Apaya. 0.53
00:20:36.000 Quote, There is No Such Thing as White Pride by Matthew Rosa of Ceylon.
00:20:39.000 This is August 17th.
00:20:42.000 There is No Such Thing as White Cultural Heritage by Nathaniel Blake of The Federalist, August 18th.
00:20:47.000 So, this is not like I pulled one headline from one wacky guy from one paper.
00:20:52.000 This is The Federalist, which is a pretty conservative paper.
00:20:56.000 You have Ceylon, which is a pretty liberal paper.
00:20:59.000 And then you have The Guardian, which is mainstream, but liberal leaning, of course.
00:21:03.000 And they all have the same syntax.
00:21:06.000 They all are arguing the same idea.
00:21:09.000 And it's all within 10 days of each other.
00:21:11.000 You know, pretty, really, really activates the almonds, really makes you think.
00:21:18.000 But this is real.
00:21:19.000 This assault is real.
00:21:20.000 And it is immoral and wrong that we as a people and we as a civilization have to justify our existence.
00:21:30.000 And you hear from the other side, the other side of the aisle is saying Black Lives Matter.
00:21:37.000 Black Lives Matter.
00:21:37.000 Why?
00:21:39.000 Who?
00:21:39.000 Well, where?
00:21:40.000 In what context? 1.00
00:21:41.000 Shut up. 1.00
00:21:41.000 Black Lives Matter. 1.00
00:21:43.000 I'm not even a racist.
00:21:43.000 What?
00:21:44.000 Black Lives Matter.
00:21:45.000 Well, what about Chicago?
00:21:47.000 Black Lives Matter. 0.96
00:21:47.000 No, no. 0.96
00:21:48.000 So, on the other side, you have the complete converse a dogmatic conviction that black people not only have a right to exist, but these lives matter and they're significant.
00:22:01.000 It doesn't matter to whom or for what or why they're saying that, but that's the conviction these lives matter.
00:22:08.000 And then on the other side, and they're saying to us, your identity isn't real.
00:22:14.000 It never was.
00:22:15.000 It's evil, even if it did exist.
00:22:18.000 And we hate you, and you shouldn't get into college.
00:22:21.000 So you understand that this is not an argument that you can win by being defensive about it.
00:22:26.000 This is not an argument that you can win by justifying yourself, by justifying your existence, or attempting to prove your history or anything like that.
00:22:38.000 Criticism that this attack is legitimate, you've accepted this premise, which you should not do, which is a very big mistake. 1.00
00:22:47.000 Imagine if I came up to you, put a gun to your head, and said, Hey, I'm going to kill you. 1.00
00:22:52.000 Tell me why you deserve to live. 1.00
00:22:54.000 You wouldn't say, Oh, because, you know, you wouldn't struggle to come up with a reason. 0.99
00:22:58.000 The person that comes up with the gun to your face is a criminal and they should be arrested or killed or physically removed. 0.99
00:23:08.000 But that. 0.81
00:23:09.000 You know, we are supposed to, on a whim, because Kwame Apaya and Matthew Rosa demand that we, the civilization that gave them the modern world, have to justify ourselves to anybody is a joke and a farce and a crime that should be taken up in the highest courts if they weren't controlled by globalists.
00:23:31.000 Really, if we went over to any other country in the world, if I went over to another country, or, you know, say Nathaniel Blake of the Federalist, who wrote that.
00:23:41.000 There's no such thing as white cultural heritage.
00:23:44.000 If Nathaniel Blake went over and wrote for a paper in Nigeria or China, and he wrote for a paper and said, Chinese, there's no such thing as Chinese cultural heritage, could you imagine?
00:23:57.000 He would be fired.
00:23:58.000 A, he would be fired on the spot.
00:24:00.000 B, he would be blacklisted.
00:24:01.000 He wouldn't be able to get employed anywhere.
00:24:03.000 C, there would probably be physical harm done to him if he was in certain areas.
00:24:07.000 People would be that upset by it.
00:24:09.000 Very nationalistic country.
00:24:11.000 But in America, All the major outlets, all the major news media, all the major intellectuals can say all day long that America has original sins. 0.95
00:24:22.000 It's an evil country. 1.00
00:24:24.000 White people are an evil people. 1.00
00:24:26.000 They came here, they did horrible things, and no one can be racist against them because it's a white supremacist system, and there has to be a historical reconciliation. 1.00
00:24:37.000 And actually, white people never existed. 0.98
00:24:39.000 White people never existed. 1.00
00:24:40.000 Their history is a lie, it's shameful. 1.00
00:24:43.000 And you know what? 1.00
00:24:44.000 It's going to be a great day when this isn't a white country anymore. 0.99
00:24:47.000 Could you imagine if all those, all of those narratives, all of those things were levied by one rogue person in any other country in the world? 0.99
00:24:55.000 Wouldn't happen.
00:24:58.000 But that's our country.
00:24:59.000 Anybody think that's peculiar?
00:25:00.000 Anybody think that's weird?
00:25:02.000 Anybody think there's something, you know, going on here?
00:25:06.000 That's another thing with this movement.
00:25:08.000 You know, I don't have to sit here and give you all the answers.
00:25:11.000 You don't have to believe me.
00:25:12.000 You don't have to agree with everything I say.
00:25:15.000 You don't have to believe that this is a problem, whatever.
00:25:18.000 But the task, I think, of this movement is not to tell everybody what's up, and we know what's up, but to get them asking the right questions, getting people to notice that there's something very wrong with that.
00:25:30.000 There's something very much awry with this.
00:25:33.000 And it's not as simple as, well, you know, the mainstream media has a liberal bias.
00:25:38.000 I know a lot of liberals, okay?
00:25:40.000 I know a lot of liberals who believe in Keynesian economics.
00:25:43.000 I know a lot of liberals who think we should have a social safety net.
00:25:47.000 I don't know many liberals. 0.72
00:25:48.000 Who are cheering on the destruction of white heritage and identity.
00:25:53.000 And certainly they're not in the majority.
00:25:54.000 And certainly they're not in the highest purchase of media and government.
00:25:59.000 There's something very wrong here.
00:26:00.000 And people need to notice this.
00:26:02.000 Whether you agree with it or not, whether you think it's going on, have to start asking those questions, folks.
00:26:06.000 And I think ultimately, once you send people down this path, there is an element of inertia where people start asking these questions, people start noticing these things, and then they start noticing more things.
00:26:18.000 And then they hear some things from our guys and they say, gee, you know, I never thought.
00:26:23.000 I never thought that could have been the case.
00:26:25.000 That used to offend me before, but I don't know.
00:26:28.000 Now I'm intrigued.
00:26:30.000 Just a moment ago, I believed this, and that turned out not to be true.
00:26:32.000 There turned out to be some peculiarities over there.
00:26:35.000 Maybe this is true.
00:26:36.000 And once people are sent down this path where they're investigating their preconceived suppositions, I think it's unstoppable.
00:26:47.000 I think for most people, maybe not for most, but for anybody with a plus 100 IQ, I think once you get going, You're gone.
00:26:56.000 You know, you're all the way there.
00:26:57.000 It's only a matter of time.
00:26:58.000 And that's certainly how I was.
00:27:00.000 I started out, you know, as the most, I was basically Will Nardi.
00:27:03.000 I would have been Will Nardi.
00:27:04.000 And it's so funny.
00:27:06.000 The way I met Cassie Dillon was at Boston University.
00:27:09.000 I was debating the student body president there before the election.
00:27:13.000 And, you know, there was Twitter drama, and Young Americans for Liberty set it up.
00:27:17.000 They said, okay, you know, everyone wants to fight Nick on Twitter about politics.
00:27:21.000 Let's do an in person debate.
00:27:23.000 So, Young Americans for Liberty at Boston U set up a debate between me and the student government president about President Trump versus Hillary Clinton.
00:27:32.000 And that's how I met Cassie, because Cassie came down to cover it for Campus Reform or Daily Wire or something.
00:27:39.000 And I went up on stage and I debated basically the Ben Shapiro platform of culture, not race, of libertarian, small government. 0.64
00:27:52.000 Multiculturalism is the problem. 0.98
00:27:53.000 Multiracialism is totally fine.
00:27:55.000 You know, there's nothing wrong with that.
00:27:57.000 And Islam would be great so long as it wasn't extreme and basically the basic conservative talking points.
00:28:04.000 And I had already had some doubts.
00:28:06.000 I had already been pushed a little bit along where I started to see some things.
00:28:10.000 In media, in television, that didn't make sense. 0.58
00:28:12.000 I started to think about this assault on white people, this assault on white identity.
00:28:17.000 And I said, this is a really glaring double standard. 0.55
00:28:20.000 And I don't know if just pure liberal bias satisfies that.
00:28:24.000 And then you start looking into more things and more things and, you know, historical things and statistics and other things and certain philosophers and books.
00:28:34.000 And then you're sold.
00:28:37.000 And that's what we have to do, folks.
00:28:39.000 That's what we have to do.
00:28:40.000 You heard it here first. 0.75
00:28:42.000 But that's your white identity segment for the day.
00:28:46.000 I know a lot of people say, Nick, you talk about that so much that's kind of like your thing and whatever.
00:28:55.000 Look, people go to Ben Shapiro for the basic stuff, people go to Ann Coulter for the immigration stuff.
00:29:03.000 This is an important issue that not a lot of people are talking about, or at least not a lot of people are talking about in a sane, sensible, and logical way.
00:29:12.000 I see it all the time, I see it everywhere.
00:29:14.000 And the reason it really occupies my mind is because there aren't enough people talking about it.
00:29:21.000 You know, I can't really go to YouTube and find a lot of information on this.
00:29:25.000 Well, I mean, I can with certain people, but there's not enough money and production value behind a lot of these things like there is with PragerU or there is with, you know, some Ruben Report or Daily Wire or whatever else.
00:29:39.000 There's not a lot of production value, there's not a lot of quality content dedicated to this issue, and I'm trying to raise awareness.
00:29:46.000 Okay, it's one of these things that really frustrates me.
00:29:49.000 It's a very important thing, and you just never hear much about it.
00:29:52.000 Nobody really talks about it outside of maybe 200 esoteric accounts on Twitter.
00:29:58.000 So that's why we talk about it.
00:30:00.000 But to the news, back to the news for people that are not thrilled with that kind of thing.
00:30:09.000 We have some new developments about North Korea, some new developments coming in from the White House, from Pyongyang, from the United Nations.
00:30:17.000 So these are three major developments.
00:30:19.000 The White House responded to.
00:30:21.000 Yesterday's missile launch over Japan by saying that all options were on the table.
00:30:26.000 All options are on the table.
00:30:28.000 And we've heard that before.
00:30:30.000 I think it's a little bit foreboding that there hasn't really been a drastic response by the White House.
00:30:38.000 And I think less is more in this case.
00:30:41.000 I think we all remember when Tillerson said after one of North Korea's missile strikes that there's nothing more to say on the matter.
00:30:47.000 And in my opinion, when Tillerson just gave that one sentence response a few months ago, That was a lot more powerful because if you're in Pyongyang, if you're in North Korea, you don't know what's coming next. 0.57
00:30:58.000 You don't know if it's an invasion.
00:31:00.000 You don't know if it's another ICBM test in the Pacific Ocean.
00:31:03.000 You don't know what's coming.
00:31:04.000 And so I think that this response has been relatively muted, given the, at least in proportion to what the strike was, what the missile test was.
00:31:16.000 I think that says a lot about the White House's calculus right now.
00:31:20.000 If you have this missile test like we haven't seen since 2009 and 1998, where they fly a missile over Japan, a major act of hostility, one of the biggest acts of aggression towards Japan since.
00:31:31.000 The end of World War II.
00:31:33.000 And the White House responds not even with the president, not even with the Secretary of State, but with a spokesman from the State Department saying all options are on the table, which is redundant.
00:31:43.000 You know, it's a restatement of something they said before.
00:31:46.000 I think that says a lot about what's going on in the Pentagon right now.
00:31:49.000 Maybe we're going to see a much more proportional response soon.
00:31:54.000 Well, so that was the White House's response.
00:31:57.000 South Korea responded by, I believe they fired a missile in response and they condemned it and, you know, yada, yada, yada.
00:32:03.000 Japan did the same.
00:32:04.000 There's going to be a Security Council meeting this week, an emergency Security Council meeting.
00:32:10.000 And then, really, what disturbs me, Kim Jong un said earlier this evening that North Korea should conduct more missile tests in the Pacific Ocean.
00:32:20.000 And the only way for them to do that is flying them over Japan.
00:32:22.000 So, looks like it won't be unlikely that we'll see more missile tests over Japanese airspace, which, if you've been following this, that is a drastic escalation and not very good.
00:32:35.000 Not very good if you don't want war.
00:32:38.000 We'll see what happens.
00:32:38.000 So.
00:32:39.000 We went over the calculus yesterday of why North Korea is doing this.
00:32:45.000 It's a scary time.
00:32:46.000 It's a scary time because we've reached the point where there are no good options with the North Korean situation. 0.99
00:32:55.000 There is not one option where there won't be casualties. 0.64
00:32:58.000 There's not one option where there won't be a huge expenditure by the United States. 0.75
00:33:03.000 It looks like North Korea has chosen war. 0.96
00:33:06.000 And, you know, people, like I said yesterday, they're cheering that on. 0.82
00:33:09.000 It's a bad thing.
00:33:11.000 Because the options right now are this either Kim Jong un rapidly de escalates this, and I'm talking rapidly, like in an unprecedented way that we haven't seen in 25 years, which is highly unlikely.
00:33:24.000 If Kim Jong un does back channeling or they do some kind of bilateral talks, which would be, like I said, unprecedented, there might be a chance they could de escalate this and negotiate a peaceful confiscation or abdication of their nuclear program.
00:33:40.000 Highly unlikely.
00:33:42.000 Option two is that there's a U.S. first strike on North Korea.
00:33:45.000 We invade or we take out the nuclear arsenal.
00:33:48.000 If this is the case, Seoul, the capital of South Korea, is leveled. 0.67
00:33:53.000 Millions of South Koreans are killed instantly, not even because of nuclear weapons, not even because of chemical weapons or any kind of WMD, but because along the demilitarized zone, you have a massive buildup of North Korean artillery.
00:34:08.000 So, just with conventional means, you're talking about Seoul is leveled, millions of casualties.
00:34:14.000 That's instantly.
00:34:15.000 Then, of course, if the United States doesn't take out all of North Korea's nuclear weapons in an invasion or a first strike, you have possible nuclear strikes on South Korea, on Japan, on China, possibly on the western seaboard of the United States or Alaska or Hawaii, all of which would be catastrophic.
00:34:34.000 This would be really a horrible thing.
00:34:36.000 Not to mention the fact that if the United States initiates this hostility, China said that if that was the case, they would intervene on the side of North Korea.
00:34:45.000 We don't know if that's a bluff.
00:34:46.000 We don't know if that's the truth.
00:34:48.000 But if that's not a bluff and China intervenes on behalf of North Korea, you're talking about World War III.
00:34:55.000 You're talking about the end of the world.
00:34:57.000 If the United States and China go to war in the Korean Peninsula, that could escalate into a nuclear confrontation in a matter of weeks or months, and nobody wants that. 0.80
00:35:08.000 So that's option two. 0.87
00:35:10.000 Option three is that we allow North Korea to continue, and either they strike Guam or they strike the United States in some fashion before their ICBM program is completed. 0.87
00:35:22.000 Then, obviously, we have to contend with that in addition to the fact that. 0.79
00:35:26.000 If they decide to strike Guam or the United States or another country, they are prepared to fight off or fend off a U.S. invasion to a considerable degree.
00:35:39.000 If they're going to make the move to initiate aggression, to initiate an armed confrontation, that means that they're more prepared than if we do a first strike.
00:35:48.000 If we do a first strike, it's on our timeline.
00:35:50.000 If they do a first strike, it's on their timeline. 0.57
00:35:52.000 So option three is either they strike us and they are ready for an invasion by the United States. 0.55
00:35:58.000 That means probably. 0.94
00:35:59.000 They might move in on South Korea. 0.96
00:36:01.000 They might preemptively strike Japan and South Korea and Guam and Hawaii.
00:36:06.000 We don't know what that's going to look like.
00:36:08.000 That would be apocalyptic.
00:36:11.000 In addition to that, this is also part of the third possibility. 0.85
00:36:14.000 If the United States doesn't do anything, North Korea continues to develop. 0.72
00:36:18.000 They miniaturize their nuclear warheads. 0.79
00:36:21.000 They expand the size of their nuclear arsenal.
00:36:23.000 They perfect their ICBM technology.
00:36:26.000 And they are a nuclear power like Pakistan or Russia or China or France or the United States.
00:36:32.000 And they don't attack us, and mutually assured destruction rules the day. 0.52
00:36:36.000 Now, these last two options are probably the most unlikely.
00:36:39.000 These last two options are probably impossible at this point.
00:36:43.000 We've probably passed the point of no return with regards to a peaceful diplomatic de escalation, or at least that would be unprecedented.
00:36:51.000 And I don't believe that the United States, either the deep state or any civilian government, would tolerate a nuclear North Korea with an ICBM capability.
00:37:01.000 I just don't think that would be tolerated by the Pentagon. 0.70
00:37:05.000 That the lives of 300 million Americans would sit in the hands of Pyongyang, the most hostile government in the world.
00:37:13.000 So, we're talking about really narrowing it down to these few options, all of which are ugly, all of which involve millions of casualties, unless there's some kind of technology we're not aware of in the Department of Defense that is top secret, Area 51 stuff. 0.72
00:37:30.000 Unless there's some kind of saving grace with military tech, it looks like it's going to be ugly all the way around.
00:37:37.000 My belief is that the sooner we fix this problem, the better.
00:37:40.000 And if we fix it on our timeline, that's the best.
00:37:44.000 So I think that's probably what President Trump is doing goading North Korea into initiating aggression against the United States, goading North Korea, if not into an attack on the United States or our allies, at least an act of hostility so that China will recognize our right to respond to it and stay out of a war. 0.91
00:38:06.000 And then once that happens, We're able to go in and finish off North Korea. 0.82
00:38:12.000 It's going to be very bad. 0.98
00:38:13.000 It's going to be very ugly either way.
00:38:15.000 But, you know, with these things generally, when you have no good options and you have to choose between bad options, you have to pick number one, it has to happen on our schedule and on our terms.
00:38:26.000 That's the only way that we're going to optimize the situation.
00:38:30.000 Because, you know, with Barack Obama, with George W. Bush, when they put it off and they say there's no good options, so we'll continue to wait, they're picking the worst of the options. 0.71
00:38:40.000 They're saying, There's no good options, so we'll let North Korea decide when all this stuff hits the fan.
00:38:46.000 And, you know, I don't think I have to explain why that's not a very good idea. 0.94
00:38:50.000 So that's North Korea, you know. 0.97
00:38:53.000 Realize, I think everyone should take a moment and realize and think about what would happen if everyone would die tomorrow. 0.76
00:39:00.000 I think that's a very sobering way to look at our situation.
00:39:03.000 It's a way that people don't look at it enough, I don't think.
00:39:07.000 I don't think people realize their own mortality in the end of history.
00:39:11.000 People can drive to work and it's air conditioned and there's no harm to their lives and they sit in an office and they type away and they come home and they go to bed in a safe house and that's the end of it.
00:39:22.000 And I think people in this part of history, In this weird time we're living in, because this is really an anomalous time we're living in, this post Cold War era where there's not existential danger, where we know no want, where there's such abundance, where there's such comfort.
00:39:38.000 This is really an anomalous time in history if you look at it broadly.
00:39:43.000 And I think not enough people have come to grips, really, in a practical sense, with their own mortality.
00:39:49.000 And something like this, this sort of existential crisis for the country, is a good reminder to people that.
00:39:56.000 You know, if we don't get our act together, nobody's going to come in and save us.
00:39:59.000 Like, not everything will work out just because.
00:40:03.000 You know, you watch sitcoms enough and you believe that, well, you know, everything will work out.
00:40:07.000 Yeah, well, you know, immigration is not that big of a deal because, yeah, it'll sort itself out.
00:40:13.000 The power of love, man, hashtag love, it'll just be fine.
00:40:17.000 Government's insolvent.
00:40:19.000 Oh, that's alarmist talk.
00:40:23.000 Our unfunded liabilities, our unfunded obligations are more than $100 trillion, twice the amount of currency in the world.
00:40:30.000 That's alarmist.
00:40:31.000 We don't have to fix that.
00:40:32.000 Everything's going to be fine.
00:40:33.000 Television's on.
00:40:35.000 You can go to McDonald's.
00:40:36.000 You can order up a burger for a dollar in a minute.
00:40:39.000 Life is good, man.
00:40:40.000 Chill out. 0.68
00:40:40.000 But when you see that North Korea has nuclear missiles pointed at us because the government that we pay 40% of our income to every year to prevent this sort of thing has been sitting on their hands importing millions of illegal immigrants, it kind of reminds us what's at stake. 0.68
00:40:57.000 It kind of reminds us what the hell's going on here, right?
00:41:00.000 We're in this slumber right now where you wake up, eat, Go to sleep.
00:41:05.000 Wake up, eat, go to sleep.
00:41:06.000 Maybe there's some television mixed in.
00:41:07.000 Maybe you get drunk a little bit to numb the pain every now and again. 0.94
00:41:10.000 But when you have a missile pointed at you, it reminds you that you're essentially paying 40% of your income, which you slave away to earn every year, missing soccer practices, missing life events, to pay this government to get blasted, to get screwed every day.
00:41:26.000 And you see it when North Korea has their missiles at us.
00:41:29.000 So it's a good reminder.
00:41:31.000 It's a very sobering reminder of this scheme that's going on in the country.
00:41:36.000 Where we work our fingers to the bone, we give all our hard earned money basically to get screwed, basically to take it every day, to bend over and take it.
00:41:47.000 And nobody gets mad about it, by the way, either.
00:41:50.000 Everyone's just fine with this.
00:41:52.000 Nobody's flipping over cars, nobody's throwing Molotov cocktails, nobody's starting fires, nobody's killing anybody, God forbid.
00:42:02.000 Everyone's just fine with this.
00:42:04.000 It's just, well, you know, if you have a problem with that, you're a radical, you're an extremist. 1.00
00:42:09.000 As Ben Shapiro says, you're repulsive. 0.99
00:42:12.000 The alt right and Antifa are repulsive. 0.99
00:42:14.000 They're using political violence. 0.58
00:42:16.000 Let's have a civil discussion.
00:42:18.000 Really, Ben Shapiro?
00:42:19.000 Kind of hard to have a civil discussion when if you talk about the real problems or anything that's not politically incorrect, you can't feed your family anymore.
00:42:27.000 Civil discussion might not be the answer here.
00:42:31.000 I love that so much.
00:42:32.000 Ben Shapiro, I'm going to Berkeley to have a civil discussion.
00:42:35.000 If you're tired of political violence and you want free speech, come to Berkeley.
00:42:40.000 Really?
00:42:41.000 Really, Ben Shapiro?
00:42:43.000 Because that kind of doesn't exist at all.
00:42:48.000 And if you even approach the real problems or the truth about them, you're blacklisted from everything.
00:42:54.000 So, yeah, maybe it might be time for a little bit extra verbal means.
00:43:02.000 Look, I'm not advocating for anything illegal.
00:43:04.000 I would never, I would never, I would never advise anybody to do anything illegal.
00:43:11.000 I would never advocate for violence, mostly because if I were on the receiving end of violence, it would work out very bad for me.
00:43:18.000 You know, I don't weigh very much.
00:43:20.000 If there was political violence, I wouldn't fare so hot.
00:43:24.000 But I will say this.
00:43:26.000 When no representative of what's actually going on in the country, these concerns that we have, is on television, when they're censoring our websites, they're censoring our YouTube videos, they're taking us off Twitter, they're taking us off Facebook, if you espouse these views publicly, you can no longer get a job.
00:43:47.000 What do you expect us to do?
00:43:49.000 What do you expect to happen, really? 1.00
00:43:52.000 What reasonable recourse does a man have?
00:43:58.000 If he sees his country being destroyed and thrown away, and nobody's talking about it, and he's not allowed to talk about it, what else is there to do?
00:44:08.000 Maybe the answer is beyond having this conversation that we always talk about.
00:44:13.000 It's time for a conversation on race, America.
00:44:17.000 Time for that honest conversation.
00:44:18.000 Maybe there's time for something different.
00:44:22.000 And like I said, that's not necessarily violence.
00:44:25.000 I'm not saying that.
00:44:26.000 But I am saying that when you have these people that are saying, especially Ben Shapiro, that are saying, We're tired of political violence.
00:44:34.000 You have to understand where the violence comes from.
00:44:36.000 That's what I'm saying.
00:44:37.000 You have to understand why these people are in the streets.
00:44:40.000 Because whether it's Antifa or whether it's the alt right, neither of those, they both believe, and one of them rightly so, believes that their views are illegal in this country.
00:44:52.000 And they are, essentially.
00:44:53.000 They're illegal in 13 countries in Europe.
00:44:58.000 And when Ben Shapiro says, we're going to sit down for a free and open exchange of ideas, marketplace of ideas, and then he goes and debates. 1.00
00:45:06.000 Stupid college students, stupid 18 year old liberals at Berkeley, to the tune of how many thousands of dollars from YouTube and everything else, and from Young Americans for Freedom, it's sort of an insulting hypocrisy. 1.00
00:45:22.000 An insulting hypocrisy. 1.00
00:45:24.000 Free exchange of ideas?
00:45:25.000 Why don't you debate literally anybody from the alt right then, Ben Shapiro?
00:45:29.000 Literally anybody.
00:45:31.000 Won't debate Vox Day.
00:45:33.000 Won't debate Jared Taylor.
00:45:34.000 Won't debate any one of these guys.
00:45:36.000 He won't even debate me.
00:45:37.000 I'm not even alt right.
00:45:38.000 I'm not even a white nationalist.
00:45:40.000 He refuses to debate me. 0.84
00:45:42.000 He'll set up the Reagan Battalion, allegedly, with Benny Politschek and some of these other clowns to take secret videos of me in the basement of Leadership Institute and then retweet them with concern posting.
00:45:54.000 Oh, this looks very troubling.
00:45:56.000 But he won't debate, won't engage in the exchange of ideas.
00:45:59.000 Why not?
00:46:00.000 Ask yourself why not.
00:46:03.000 But that's enough about that, folks.
00:46:05.000 We're winding down.
00:46:06.000 We're winding down the show where we got about eight minutes to go.
00:46:10.000 I'll do another six only because the first six minutes there was no sound.
00:46:14.000 So we'll take your questions.
00:46:16.000 Remember to post your questions using the hashtag AmericaFQ, hashtag AmericaFQ, and I'll take those on Twitter.
00:46:24.000 So our first question of the night is from DV Liberator.
00:46:30.000 He asks The new show looks great.
00:46:33.000 You're respecting women, big league.
00:46:36.000 I respect women so much. 1.00
00:46:38.000 Women are.
00:46:40.000 Are beyond criticism in 2017, let me tell you, folks. 1.00
00:46:44.000 So, that's what we do on this show.
00:46:46.000 This show is an approved respecting women program.
00:46:49.000 That's what we do here. 0.99
00:46:51.000 When can we buy some America First mugs?
00:46:55.000 Soon, I guess.
00:46:55.000 I don't know.
00:46:56.000 I was thinking about opening up a merch section on my website, but I don't know if there's enough interest.
00:47:02.000 If you would be interested in merch, comment, okay?
00:47:06.000 Because if enough people comment like we want merch or something, then, you know, we'll see what we can do.
00:47:12.000 But so far, I don't know if there's enough interest.
00:47:14.000 So, Just to gauge interest, if you're interested in merch, if you pay like 20 bucks for a shirt or a mug, just comment.
00:47:21.000 If you're watching the replay of this stream, comment.
00:47:23.000 If not, comment during the live chat now.
00:47:27.000 So soon, hopefully.
00:47:30.000 Showabout asks If the wall is built as planned, do you think that it will be targeted by terrorists or Dems should they win an election?
00:47:38.000 Absolutely.
00:47:39.000 Absolutely.
00:47:41.000 I think it will definitely be targeted while it's being constructed and after it's constructed by people.
00:47:46.000 And then if the Democrats ever.
00:47:49.000 Control Congress or the presidency.
00:47:51.000 I think that if it's not protected to a great extent and if it's not popular at the time, they'll take it down because that'll be like their Berlin Wall coming down moment.
00:48:02.000 I mean, if you fast forward maybe six years, let's talk hypotheticals.
00:48:08.000 If you fast forward six years and there's a horrible economic recession and everyone hates Trump now, he's in a second term, he's embattled, everyone hates this guy.
00:48:19.000 And the wall's not even completed.
00:48:21.000 He's fighting for more funding to complete the wall.
00:48:24.000 And then in 2024, he loses to a Democrat who's, I don't know, maybe a black, trans, I don't know, Jewish person. 0.56
00:48:34.000 That person gets elected and says, you know, it's time for love to trump hate. 0.56
00:48:38.000 And everyone's like, yeah, you know, whatever.
00:48:40.000 And then that'll be their taking down of the Berlin Wall.
00:48:43.000 So I could see it happening if there's not sufficient legal protection there.
00:48:48.000 The Forgotten Man, there's no sound.
00:48:50.000 We can't hear you.
00:48:51.000 Okay, so there's two comments on the sound.
00:48:54.000 But we fixed that.
00:48:55.000 CRISPR J. Fuentes asks, I love the memes.
00:48:59.000 I saw two GIFs of me today by The Current Year, which I loved.
00:49:04.000 Thank you, The Current Year, for the GIFs.
00:49:06.000 I really liked those.
00:49:07.000 I enjoyed those.
00:49:08.000 And I like CRISPR J. Fuentes here.
00:49:10.000 I like the memes. 1.00
00:49:11.000 Question Should women, who I respect, be discouraged from being involved in politics? 1.00
00:49:18.000 Of course they should be. 1.00
00:49:19.000 Women should be discouraged. 1.00
00:49:21.000 I love, this is going to be a perfect soundbite. 1.00
00:49:23.000 And I'm like begging someone.
00:49:25.000 To cut it this way, because if people cut it exactly like I say it, it'll cause a big uproar.
00:49:32.000 I'll get tons of traffic from my website and my Twitter.
00:49:35.000 And every time I say something deliberately controversial, people say, Look, he said something controversial.
00:49:42.000 Controversy ensues.
00:49:43.000 I get more followers, I get more traffic.
00:49:45.000 So please, Reagan Battalion, Benny Palatsek, if you're watching, cut it exactly like I say it. 1.00
00:49:51.000 Women absolutely should be discouraged from getting involved in politics. 1.00
00:49:55.000 Women should absolutely be discouraged. 1.00
00:49:58.000 From getting involved in anything besides being good mothers. 1.00
00:50:02.000 And that's not to say that there should be a law against women being involved in business or politics. 1.00
00:50:07.000 That's not to say that no women should be involved in business or politics. 0.99
00:50:11.000 That's not to say it's a bad thing that women are involved in business or politics.
00:50:16.000 It is to say that as a society, what we should encourage is for women to become good mothers. 0.94
00:50:24.000 That's what we should encourage.
00:50:26.000 And you've seen that from kindergarten all the way up until people are basically dead. 1.00
00:50:31.000 Women are encouraged to, you know, you're a Jedi and you're a kick ass. 1.00
00:50:34.000 You're a superhero. 1.00
00:50:35.000 You're tough.
00:50:36.000 You're tougher than men.
00:50:37.000 You're smarter than men.
00:50:38.000 You can have it all.
00:50:39.000 You can wear the pants in the family. 0.98
00:50:41.000 You'll have your stay at home cuck husband. 0.77
00:50:44.000 And it's really a toxic, destructive message for a society. 1.00
00:50:48.000 Women are the backbone of the country. 0.94
00:50:51.000 If women are done correctly, if you have a society and you have women whom I respect greatly, if you want to get women right, make them mothers, make mothers great again.
00:51:04.000 Have to do it.
00:51:06.000 Women feel more fulfilled in this role, women are happier in this role, women are serving the greater good in this role.
00:51:13.000 I mean, think of it.
00:51:15.000 I was talking to a woman on Twitter.
00:51:17.000 I don't know, it might have been a catfish. 0.99
00:51:19.000 But she said to me that she's on antidepressants and she can't afford health care to pay for her antidepressants because she's not making enough money because she has to pay for college and she's already so much in debt.
00:51:33.000 And I say, Well, have you tried fulfilling your biological imperative?
00:51:37.000 Have you tried being a mom?
00:51:38.000 Have you tried shacking up with someone with money, having a huge family, being the wonderful homemaker, creating a beautiful home?
00:51:46.000 With beautiful people in it, virtuous children for the country.
00:51:49.000 And she's like, she's like, oh, that's get with the times, man.
00:51:53.000 That's so old fashioned.
00:51:55.000 How could you say that?
00:51:56.000 It's 2017.
00:51:58.000 You can't do that anymore.
00:52:02.000 And I said, you know, well, what are you going to school for?
00:52:04.000 And she said, I'm going to school for pharmaceuticals.
00:52:07.000 She wants to be a marketing person for pharmaceuticals.
00:52:12.000 She said that she wants to be empowered by doing marketing for pharmaceuticals.
00:52:17.000 Are you joking?
00:52:19.000 What? 0.99
00:52:19.000 Has anyone thought that through for more than half a second when they watch these dumb commercials? 0.99
00:52:25.000 Think of it. 0.89
00:52:26.000 You can either be a marketing person, you can make a six figure salary selling people drugs for diseases that don't exist, you can sell people their Ritalin so you can numb them from paying taxes for nothing, and that could be your empowerment.
00:52:44.000 Or you could be the backbone not only of a household but of the country.
00:52:49.000 You could create a wonderful, beautiful home that's beautifully.
00:52:53.000 Decorated, you could have a beautiful family, you could have beautiful children, many of them that look like you, that look like the person you love, that are smart and that talk.
00:53:04.000 You can rear them with all the virtues you grew up with, with everything that's beautiful in life.
00:53:09.000 You can give them everything, you can give them something to live for.
00:53:13.000 That could be what you live for, that could be what keeps your marriage enduring and interesting, and they will take care of you in your old age and they'll take care of the country when your generation ages.
00:53:24.000 What's more empowering?
00:53:25.000 What's more empowering, selling a bunch of 15 year olds Ritalin so they don't go on 4chan?
00:53:31.000 Or being a mother?
00:53:32.000 Being the mother of a new country that makes sense finally.
00:53:36.000 You tell me. 1.00
00:53:37.000 Discourage women from going into politics. 1.00
00:53:39.000 Discourage women from going into anything but being a mother. 1.00
00:53:43.000 And that's the truth. 1.00
00:53:46.000 Nobody wants to admit it, but that's the truth. 1.00
00:53:48.000 And that's why all these feminists are so angry and miserable because they know they're rebelling against the truth and what's right. 1.00
00:53:54.000 They know it in their blood. 1.00
00:53:56.000 That's why they're so defensive.
00:53:58.000 And people say, you know, why are you so offended by me?
00:54:00.000 I'm just a little conservative.
00:54:02.000 The reason they appear offended is because this is actually a very defensive mechanism where if you start talking about, you know, actually people can be mothers and being a mother is a great thing and blah, blah, blah, it offends their sensibilities because they have already convinced themselves that all of that is just old fashioned and wrong and it's, It's a mirage.
00:54:27.000 Marriage is actually broken and families are outdated and patriarchy.
00:54:31.000 And they've convinced themselves of this disturbingly cynical mindset, which is inhabited by the people that control the media that's feeding them these messages.
00:54:39.000 And when they hear this joyous message of truth and justice, it offends them because they've already chosen rebellion.
00:54:47.000 They've already chosen the resistance.
00:54:49.000 And so when you get people talking and saying this is possible and this is what's right, they are offended by that because they've chosen a life of despair and they're filled with regret.
00:55:03.000 Deep AF asks, What are the founding fathers thinking right now?
00:55:07.000 They're not very happy, let me tell you that.
00:55:09.000 They're thinking, Paul Ryan, you don't know who we are.
00:55:14.000 They're saying, Representative Paul Ryan, you don't know who we are.
00:55:18.000 Paul Ryan's always the first one to say, that's not who we are.
00:55:22.000 Oh, really, Paul Ryan?
00:55:24.000 Who are we?
00:55:27.000 Are we a bank account for multinational corporations?
00:55:31.000 Are we a Muslim Latino boarding house? 0.97
00:55:35.000 I mean, what the hell are we, Paul Ryan? 0.99
00:55:37.000 That's what they're thinking.
00:55:39.000 Simon Decker, do you follow European politics slash elections?
00:55:43.000 Norwegian, German, and Austrian elections coming up.
00:55:46.000 I only follow them when it's like a big thing.
00:55:48.000 Like I follow the Dutch elections, I follow the French elections, the UK stuff when that was going on.
00:55:55.000 I don't like searching it out, but when it's in the news, I follow it.
00:55:59.000 I understand that the German right wing party, the Nationalist Party, is gaining a lot of strength at the local level.
00:56:06.000 That's what I've heard.
00:56:07.000 DACA asks talk a little bit about the term alt right and why you do not identify.
00:56:14.000 As a member of the group, I also love the new show.
00:56:16.000 Well, thank you.
00:56:17.000 Glad you love it.
00:56:19.000 Well, here's my problem with the alt right.
00:56:21.000 I mean, I, like I said yesterday, identify as alt right in the sense that I'm alternative right wing.
00:56:27.000 Am I alt right?
00:56:28.000 Tough to say.
00:56:29.000 The problem is that Richard Spencer very, I think, very incisively divided the alt right into his camp, which is something very specific, and everyone else.
00:56:41.000 Something that's very, I don't want to say esoteric, because it's not very esoteric, but something very specific that he created a few years ago.
00:56:49.000 To be fair, he did coin the term, but that alt right that he created is about the Jewish question, about race and IQ, about white ethnostate, and all of that.
00:56:59.000 That's alt right as we know it today.
00:57:01.000 That's sort of like the official definition.
00:57:04.000 I have a problem with that because it's not implicit enough.
00:57:09.000 It's too raw, it's too offensive, and obviously it's reprehensible.
00:57:15.000 I disavow it, I admonish all of those things.
00:57:17.000 But the problem with Richard Spencer's alt right is that that is not a movement that has mass appeal.
00:57:23.000 That's not a movement that has mass appeal.
00:57:25.000 And like I said yesterday as well, you're trying to fight to rebrand the alt right as not those things to a certain extent, which are.
00:57:34.000 I mean, there's a place for the alt right.
00:57:36.000 There is a place for the alt right on the ideological spectrum and in this political movement.
00:57:41.000 We need the alt right to be what it is.
00:57:44.000 I'm not alt right because that's not my function.
00:57:48.000 The alt right has a very specific function, and that's not mine.
00:57:51.000 So I will say that that's really what alt right means.
00:57:54.000 That's kind of how it happened since the Sig Heil Gate at the NPI speech when he said, Hail Trump, and everyone did the Hail Victory.
00:58:02.000 That's really when you saw this clear delineation between alt right and alt light.
00:58:07.000 And I will say, I'm neither alt right nor alt light only because those terms are not effective for what I'm trying to do.
00:58:16.000 Build the wall.
00:58:17.000 Name the five most important things the Trump administration has to do.
00:58:22.000 Okay, well, we have number one is the wall.
00:58:25.000 That's number one.
00:58:26.000 Number one is the wall.
00:58:27.000 Number two is probably.
00:58:29.000 Hmm.
00:58:31.000 Tough to say what number two would be.
00:58:32.000 I would say number one is the wall. 1.00
00:58:34.000 Number two is the Muslim ban. 0.94
00:58:36.000 Number three is trade reform. 0.99
00:58:40.000 Four, tax reform.
00:58:41.000 Five, healthcare reform.
00:58:42.000 I would say those five, and those are really more political.
00:58:46.000 If it were up to me, I would say Federal Reserve would be up there.
00:58:49.000 I'd say nationalizing Twitter would be up there.
00:58:51.000 Other things would be up there.
00:58:53.000 But in terms of what Trump needs to do to win in 2018 and 2020 and to keep all this momentum going, is those five things wall, Muslim ban, trade, tax.
00:59:06.000 Healthcare.
00:59:07.000 Those are going to be the things that will win him control of the party and really affect a lasting institutional reform in the party.
00:59:15.000 New Englander, James Alsop, Nick Fuentes, 2024.
00:59:19.000 Be careful, might happen.
00:59:22.000 Roden, opinion on writers like Julius Evola, Francis Parker, Yockey, and Oswald Spengler.
00:59:28.000 Ah, yes, yes, yes.
00:59:29.000 Spengler wrote Decline of the West, Yockey, Imperium, and Evola.
00:59:33.000 I mean, you know, where'd he even begin with Evola?
00:59:36.000 I disavow, I disavow heartily, they're admonished.
00:59:41.000 Very interesting writings.
00:59:42.000 I would encourage everyone to read those books.
00:59:46.000 Decline of the West by Oswald Spengler.
00:59:49.000 It comes in two parts.
00:59:50.000 There's an abridged version as well.
00:59:51.000 You can start with the abridged version.
00:59:54.000 Imperium by Francis Yockey.
00:59:56.000 That's the sequel to Decline of the West.
00:59:59.000 And Julius Evola.
01:00:01.000 You could read Ride the Tiger, Men Among the Ruins, Revolt Against the Modern World.
01:00:05.000 I mean, he's really a prolific writer.
01:00:07.000 He writes on a lot of things, so there's a lot there.
01:00:10.000 But I would definitely encourage people to read those.
01:00:13.000 Obviously, to see what horrible fascist ideas are inside of them.
01:00:17.000 But, you know, it's so funny to me.
01:00:19.000 I grew up and I'm in middle school, I'm in high school, and they always have banned book week.
01:00:25.000 Banned book week.
01:00:25.000 We're celebrating free speech by having all the books they don't want you to read.
01:00:30.000 And of course, you know, what is it?
01:00:31.000 To kill a mockingbird. 0.94
01:00:33.000 Because they say the N word.
01:00:35.000 Meanwhile, you cannot find one copy of a book by Evola in one public library in the Chicagoland area.
01:00:45.000 You cannot find it in one bookstore in the Chicagoland area.
01:00:48.000 What does that tell you, right?
01:00:50.000 And believe me, I tried.
01:00:53.000 So if you want to see what you're not supposed to read, what the elites don't want you to read, why don't you start with those books?
01:00:59.000 Of course, I'm not advocating for anything inside of them.
01:01:02.000 Of course, they are disavowed and admonished, but we're checking out.
01:01:08.000 It's good reading.
01:01:09.000 And Spengler is a philosopher about history.
01:01:12.000 That's what's really interesting about Spengler.
01:01:14.000 Like Hegel, like certain other philosophers, he creates.
01:01:19.000 In the framework of his argument about the declining West, he really posits a new philosophy of history itself, which is very interesting, just scholastically, let alone if you believe in the ideology.
01:01:33.000 You'll never hear Ben Shapiro talk about Francis Jockey and Oswald Spengler.
01:01:38.000 He'll talk about Russell Kirk.
01:01:38.000 Geez.
01:01:41.000 Russell Kirk!
01:01:45.000 Anyway, Swift, have you read C.S. Lewis' The Abolition of Man?
01:01:49.000 No, I haven't.
01:01:50.000 Every time I go to the bookstore, all they have is the Christian life section of C.S. Lewis.
01:01:55.000 All they have is The Great Divorce and Mere Christianity and all those ones. 0.61
01:02:02.000 They never, in the collection of all the Christian writings, they never have that one. 0.85
01:02:06.000 They never have Men Without Chests or anything like that.
01:02:10.000 But this is good.
01:02:13.000 This is good.
01:02:14.000 I love when people are asking me about books because then I can promote books that people need to read.
01:02:18.000 So, haven't read that one.
01:02:19.000 I'll have to check that one out.
01:02:21.000 I really am a fan of C.S. Lewis' works.
01:02:23.000 I've read Mere Christianity. 0.95
01:02:24.000 I've read. 0.76
01:02:25.000 Men Without Chess.
01:02:26.000 I've read some of the other ones, but I'll have to get to that one as well.
01:02:29.000 Problem is, I'm 19, okay?
01:02:31.000 I'm 19.
01:02:32.000 All throughout high school, they never give you any real good books, right?
01:02:37.000 I mean, that just goes to show you what's wrong with the education system that you could be 19 years old and not have had the opportunity to read these important books in your entire life because you're being fed to kill a mockingbird and, you know, all this other, and Tom Sawyer.
01:02:52.000 And, you know, Tom Sawyer is okay, but being fed a lot of propaganda.
01:02:58.000 And they'll, of course, they'll say, oh, well, those are ideologically charged if you're reading Mere Christianity or.
01:03:04.000 Abolition of Man or Evola, that's all ideologically charged.
01:03:08.000 Sure, but they have no problem giving you the Communist Manifesto to read.
01:03:12.000 They have no problem giving you books about Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee and all this other social justice propaganda.
01:03:19.000 It just goes to show.
01:03:22.000 What else?
01:03:22.000 We got two more.
01:03:23.000 We got two more, and then we're calling it a night.
01:03:25.000 Okay.
01:03:26.000 New Englander, would you ever run for office?
01:03:28.000 And if so, where?
01:03:30.000 I would run for office.
01:03:31.000 Not for a long time, but I would run for office.
01:03:34.000 I don't know where I'd start.
01:03:35.000 It would depend on where my clout is.
01:03:38.000 Is that where my reach is at?
01:03:40.000 I don't know what I'd do.
01:03:41.000 It depends.
01:03:41.000 I haven't lived long enough to say yet.
01:03:44.000 I don't really have a grand overarching plan.
01:03:49.000 I'm just sort of taking things as they come.
01:03:50.000 And that's really how you have to play.
01:03:52.000 Never let a good plan get in the way of good planning.
01:03:56.000 Important.
01:03:57.000 So important.
01:03:58.000 Few understand.
01:04:00.000 And our last question for the evening Tucker Von Smokesburg.
01:04:03.000 Are you wearing pants?
01:04:04.000 You'll never know.
01:04:05.000 You'll never know.
01:04:07.000 And I'll leave it at that.
01:04:09.000 That's the show.
01:04:10.000 If anybody has any more questions, and you know, it's late, I go longer, but we've been here for 70 minutes.
01:04:16.000 I'm producing five hours of content a week.
01:04:19.000 Can't ask for much more than that, in addition to Nationalist Review.
01:04:22.000 So, if you have any more questions, comments, concerns, anything like that, if you're watching it live or the replay, you can post those on Twitter using the hashtag AmericaFQ.
01:04:32.000 Please subscribe, subscribe to my channel.
01:04:35.000 I was on RSBN before, they had a quarter of a million subscribers.
01:04:39.000 I had to start fresh with my own channel.
01:04:41.000 I have about 300.
01:04:42.000 So, please subscribe.
01:04:44.000 I know that's kind of douchey.
01:04:45.000 I know we hate all the people that, you know, smash that subscribe button, press the like button for more content and blah.
01:04:52.000 You know, all these normies, they say that all day long.
01:04:54.000 But really, it does help.
01:04:56.000 Click the subscribe button and click the bell icon as well.
01:05:00.000 If you click that, you get notifications when I'm streaming. 0.95
01:05:04.000 I promise I won't be a jerk about it.
01:05:05.000 I won't, you know, give you updates when I make playlists or whatever.
01:05:09.000 It'll just be when I'm making videos, when I'm making that fresh content.
01:05:13.000 So, please subscribe.
01:05:14.000 Please click that.
01:05:15.000 Notification button.
01:05:17.000 You can follow me on Twitter at Nick J. Fuentes, Facebook at Facebook.com slash Dick J. Fuentes.
01:05:22.000 Check out my website where you can find all my content, Nicholas J. Fuentes.com.
01:05:28.000 We're on the air with this show every Monday through Friday at 8 p.m. Eastern, 7 p.m. Central Time.
01:05:34.000 I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.
01:05:35.000 This was America First, as always.
01:05:39.000 Thank you guys so much for watching.
01:05:40.000 We will see you tomorrow.
01:05:41.000 Have a great evening.
01:05:47.000 Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
01:05:54.000 It's going to be only America first.
01:05:59.000 America first. 0.99
01:06:02.000 The American people will come first once again. 1.00
01:06:28.000 It's going to be only America first. 0.99
01:06:33.000 America first. 0.98