00:01:47.000Hurricane Houston, for all my lip readers out there, maybe you can fill in the rest of the audience what I've been saying.
00:01:53.000I've been talking about Houston, I guess, screaming into the void about it.
00:01:59.000But basically, if I can summarize my six minutes of thoughts, I'm a fast talker, so I basically wrote out like a hundred page manifesto in the past six minutes.
00:02:52.000I think what a lot of people are discounting is the importance of optics and narrative with this hurricane.
00:02:59.000What you're seeing right now really is this dramatic tug of war between the Trump administration and the media in terms of control of optics and control of the conversation.
00:03:10.000Because what you saw leading up to the hurricane, what you saw leading up to the hurricane actually making landfall, was that the media sought to, and in a very coordinated manner, In a very concerted effort, sought to pin responsibility for this catastrophe on the president.
00:03:45.000Isn't it so funny that we live in a free country, we have a free market, and every major news station and news company has the same headlines, using the same words, pushing the same narrative?
00:03:58.000It always blows my mind as a humble individualist libertarian, which I'm not, but when you see every major news source from Fox to CNN to ABC, CBS, and gee, so weird.
00:04:13.000They're all using the same headlines, they're all using the same words, it's all pushing the same narrative.
00:04:18.000It's almost like 90% of media is controlled by six corporations or something, and it's almost like there's a level of organization even on top of that between a group of people.
00:04:30.000Look, I'm not trying to push any conspiracy theories.
00:04:34.000I'm just asking a couple of questions.
00:04:36.000Anyway, they pushed for a whole week this narrative that this is the first major leadership test for President Trump.
00:04:44.000And what they're doing, in effect, by saying this is the first major leadership test, is they're planting the seed in the minds of the American people that what's going to come when the storm makes landfall, all the destruction, all the devastation, the horrible pictures that you're seeing, that President Trump is.
00:05:04.000The President Trump bears responsibility for that.
00:05:07.000And that's a very dangerous thing to a presidency.
00:05:09.000We all remember, of course, Hurricane Katrina, and George W. Bush owned that for both terms.
00:05:15.000And so I think what you're really seeing now as the hurricane has made landfall, as the story develops, is really a tug of war between the president and the media, where the media is saying, look at how bad this is, look at how horrible this is, you know, Republicans are evil, this is all their fault.
00:05:33.000And then by the same token, President Trump.
00:05:35.000Whether the federal government can do everything in its power or not, what President Trump is doing very skillfully is trying to paint the picture that he's on the ground and he's helping and he's involved.
00:06:14.000Like when CNN talks about Hurricane Harvey, they're not really talking about Hurricane Harvey.
00:06:21.000They're setting up the Trump administration for bad optics and a congressional defeat in 2018.
00:06:26.000When President Trump goes down to Texas, I mean, yeah, the federal government's doing things.
00:06:31.000Yeah, he's going down there to help a little bit.
00:06:33.000But what that's really about is optics.
00:06:35.000He's going down there with the storm coat on, you know.
00:06:39.000Because he's not the president of the United States, right?
00:06:41.000He's going down there with the storm coat and the rain boots and the khakis to go and do things with his hands or pick people up and put them somewhere else.
00:06:51.000And I think it's very red pilling to see that everything that you see on television, everything you read about online, when you're reading from a corporate news source, it's never what they're actually talking about.
00:07:03.000Behind every story, behind every piece of news, every sentence, there is a coded, implicit narrative that they are trying to push for you.
00:07:21.000But his brand, which is InfoWars, which is that there's an information war, I think is so prescient in the 21st century, which is to say that nobody on InfoWars, at least I don't believe, is an ideologue.
00:07:38.000Or, you know, maybe people might disagree with that.
00:07:41.000But I think the overriding conviction, the overriding mission of InfoWars is to provide an alternative.
00:07:47.000To the mainstream media is sort of to serve in a very practical way to say that all of the media is biased, all of the media is controlled, all of the media is trying to convince you of something.
00:08:03.000And we say some crazy stuff and it's entertaining and it's wacky, but it's the same thing over there.
00:08:08.000It's sort of like performance art that InfoWars is a news source.
00:08:13.000It's sort of to say that someone like Alex Jones is running BBC.
00:08:17.000You don't think you have nuts running BBC.
00:08:56.000Maybe we'll make a segment out of it, sort of a propaganda watch, if you will.
00:09:01.000But I'm on my Twitter timeline, and I keep seeing this article being posted and commented on.
00:09:06.000And it's something that I've seen for a long time.
00:09:08.000It's something I've encountered recently in the aftermath of Charlottesville.
00:09:13.000And that is the assault and the attack of white and Western identity.
00:09:19.000And I don't think you've really seen a lot of that.
00:09:22.000As explicitly as you have since Charlottesville, which is very important.
00:09:28.000And I'll tell you what the article was.
00:09:29.000The article I saw was There is no such thing as Western civilization.
00:09:35.000That was the headline by a man named, get this, get a load of this, Kwame Apaya, or Kwame Apaya, some, you know, Kwame Apaya from Ghana.
00:09:48.000And this is from The Guardian this morning.
00:09:51.000And the article contends that basically, Beyond the fact, I've heard this many times before, that there's no such thing as white identity, whiteness is a construct, white people are evil.
00:10:01.000You know, we've been there, done that, got the t shirt.
00:10:04.000But with Western civilization, this is the first time I've ever seen that on the chopping board.
00:10:09.000And Kwame Apaya contends in this very long, very wordy, convoluted article that there is no coherent thing such as Western civilization.
00:10:29.000And there's something funny about the way that this is argued, which I think is important to note, which is to say that when we get attacked with this sort of thing, and we see it all the time, by the way no such thing as whiteness, no such thing as Western civilization to even have to defend against that, to even have to deny that or to argue against that is, I think, the wrong way to go about it.
00:10:54.000And that's what I see all the time from a lot of people you see this identity under attack.
00:10:59.000You see, our identity under attack, whether it's civilizational or racial or ethnic or cultural.
00:11:05.000And it's under attack by the mainstream media.
00:11:07.000It's under attack by the people that are in charge of the media.
00:11:11.000And people's first instinctual response is to say, you know, of course this is white identity.
00:11:31.000There's not one other race in the world, there's not one other civilization in the world where you have these long form expository critiques of identity by people in The Guardian or The Washington Post.
00:11:49.000That's from bottom to top, that is the argument against this sort of thing.
00:11:55.000And I see people all the time, they'll rush to say, oh, well, you know, it's this or it's that, and this is the continuity, and they try to prove it.
00:12:02.000And the only argument, the only argument that must be contended is why is it only our group?
00:12:08.000Why is it only our civilization that is constantly, constantly under assault to our most intimate connections?
00:12:16.000And forms of identity when nobody else is subjected to anything remotely like that.
00:12:22.000Does anybody remember, for example, in like 2005, 2006, when you couldn't call black people black?
00:12:29.000Does anybody remember that weird time in our lives when you had to call them African Americans and if you called them black, you were somehow a racist?
00:12:40.000It is that level of doublethink where with one group, you can't call them certain names.
00:12:46.000You can call them one thing or else you hate them and you're a racist and you have to get fired.
00:12:51.000But with white people, your race doesn't exist and it never existed and your God doesn't exist and your civilization doesn't exist and it was evil to begin with and that's why it's good, that it's all going away.
00:13:34.000Even if you're a libertarian, even if you're like a Will Nardi individualist, you're a radical, nihilist, materialist individualist who, you know, a rootless cosmopolitan, and you see nothing wrong with the destruction of the roots of the country.
00:13:48.000Even if you're that, excuse me, even if you're that, you should still see a problem with this double standard.
00:13:55.000Even if you don't believe in the convictions, you don't believe in anything like that, you should still see this hypocrisy as an issue or at least a philosophical problem that needs a resolution.
00:14:09.000And with regards to people that think it's an issue, I think the way to respond to this, the argument is not, you know, this is who we are and we should not have to justify our identity, our existence, our history to anybody.
00:14:34.000This article is There's No Such Thing as Western Civilization by Kwame Apaya.
00:14:41.000And like I said before, he's from Ghana.
00:14:44.000Now, if you know anything about Africa, if you know anything about the continent of Africa, just about every country, the very premise, the very concept of nation states, of Impersonal government.
00:15:00.000And what I mean by that is instead of having Shaka Zulu ruling the country, you have the office of the minister or the chief or the president.
00:15:09.000So, this entire construction of Ghana, this entire construction of central government, of organizing people by geography as opposed to projecting power over people, didn't exist in Africa until less than 200 years ago.
00:15:31.000That you have a Ghanaian American named Kwame Apaya who comes from a country that 200 years ago did not exist, who comes from an entire continent, at least sub Saharan Africa, that 200 years ago did not have written language, did not have one two story building, did not have impersonal government, did not have the concept of organizing people by geographic regions or barriers or lines instead of, like I said before,
00:16:05.000Rather than come here and be grateful because we have medicine and we have pluralism and democracy and the rule of law and you don't get killed and raped because you're outside past a certain time of night.
00:16:18.000Rather than be appreciative of all of this that we have in Western civilization, he's going to get a really cool job because I bet he went to some university in America or he went to one of the top American funded universities in Ghana.
00:16:31.000He's going to come here, use that degree, A Western liberal arts education using a Western language, using Western technology at a Western paper to clickety clack on his computer about how all of that doesn't exist and it's a myth and shouldn't we destroy it and it's dumb and it's not worth saving anyway.
00:16:51.000I think that is, beyond the absurdity of it, that's the framing of how we ought to go about this.
00:16:58.000And we talk a lot about this on the show because we are in the political fight of our lives and tactics.
00:17:05.000Framing rhetoric is just as important as the issues.
00:17:10.000And I think we're really coming to a point to really extrapolate and get to the roots of it all.
00:17:17.000They say that in 2016, the word of the year was post truth.
00:17:21.000I remember that was sort of a meme that went around after Trump was elected, and all the liberals got up on their high horse because they couldn't have the White House or the Congress, and the media failed them.
00:17:33.000They got the final, they got the last laugh in saying, well, The Miriam Webster's Dictionary Award of the Year is post truth because President Trump is not truthful.
00:17:44.000And, you know, that very arrogant, elitist slap to the president.
00:17:50.000But I think there is some truth in that.
00:17:53.000Because what we saw during the 2016 election was the destruction of the widely held myth, the widely held belief.
00:18:02.000And this is really a liberal, end of history, postmodern belief that.
00:18:07.000We can, A, that we can know objective truth.
00:18:10.000We can know things in themselves, if you want to get into German idealism.
00:18:17.000And number two, that the establishment, which is the corporations, the mainstream media, people with money essentially, they have a monopoly and an authority over it.
00:18:28.000And I think what you saw with the 2016 election is those two myths, those two beliefs, really sort of like religious beliefs, came crashing down.
00:18:38.000Because what Donald Trump proved was that, A, we don't know what's true and what's not.
00:18:42.000Because Jack Posopic is saying that Hillary Clinton has a body double, and NBC is saying that she doesn't, and both of them are lying, so we don't know what the truth is.
00:18:51.000Because it happened in New York City, and nobody knows.
00:18:55.000And then at the same time, it said that all of those old establishment organizations have now been discredited.
00:19:01.000Because they all threw their weight, and they threw their papers, and their money behind Hillary Clinton, and she lost, even though everyone predicted that she would win.
00:19:09.000So, you had at the same time those two things happen, and I think that did create sort of a new era, a new phase in this post Cold War era.
00:19:19.000Whereas now we are, to an extent, post truth.
00:19:23.000And now, in this post truth era, it doesn't really matter so much what is the truth, at least not in terms of if we want to get practical results for our movement.
00:19:32.000It doesn't matter so much what's actually happening when you're talking about the fight, when you're talking about how we're going to win our objectives.
00:19:40.000Of course, it matters to us on an individual level and among this group, this half of the country, what's true.
00:19:47.000But in the grander fight, the macro fight for the ideas, or, you know, if you believe in that still, or rather the emotions, the zeitgeist of the country.
00:19:57.000It matters a little bit more about optics and rhetoric.
00:19:59.000And so that's what we try to do on the show at once for this half of the country, we talk about what's true, but then at the same time, we talk about the rhetoric, how we can make it gel for the rest.
00:20:10.000And so, you know, if you don't believe me that this is what's happening, if you don't believe me that this is the trend that's going on, that this destruction of white identity, if you think that's alarmism, if you think I'm like being wacky, I'm being a bigoted KKK Nazi, you know, they like to throw that one around now.
00:21:48.000So, on the other side, you have the complete converse a dogmatic conviction that black people not only have a right to exist, but these lives matter and they're significant.
00:22:01.000It doesn't matter to whom or for what or why they're saying that, but that's the conviction these lives matter.
00:22:08.000And then on the other side, and they're saying to us, your identity isn't real.
00:22:18.000And we hate you, and you shouldn't get into college.
00:22:21.000So you understand that this is not an argument that you can win by being defensive about it.
00:22:26.000This is not an argument that you can win by justifying yourself, by justifying your existence, or attempting to prove your history or anything like that.
00:22:38.000Criticism that this attack is legitimate, you've accepted this premise, which you should not do, which is a very big mistake.
00:22:47.000Imagine if I came up to you, put a gun to your head, and said, Hey, I'm going to kill you.
00:23:09.000You know, we are supposed to, on a whim, because Kwame Apaya and Matthew Rosa demand that we, the civilization that gave them the modern world, have to justify ourselves to anybody is a joke and a farce and a crime that should be taken up in the highest courts if they weren't controlled by globalists.
00:23:31.000Really, if we went over to any other country in the world, if I went over to another country, or, you know, say Nathaniel Blake of the Federalist, who wrote that.
00:23:41.000There's no such thing as white cultural heritage.
00:23:44.000If Nathaniel Blake went over and wrote for a paper in Nigeria or China, and he wrote for a paper and said, Chinese, there's no such thing as Chinese cultural heritage, could you imagine?
00:24:11.000But in America, All the major outlets, all the major news media, all the major intellectuals can say all day long that America has original sins.
00:24:26.000They came here, they did horrible things, and no one can be racist against them because it's a white supremacist system, and there has to be a historical reconciliation.
00:24:37.000And actually, white people never existed.
00:24:44.000It's going to be a great day when this isn't a white country anymore.
00:24:47.000Could you imagine if all those, all of those narratives, all of those things were levied by one rogue person in any other country in the world?
00:25:12.000You don't have to agree with everything I say.
00:25:15.000You don't have to believe that this is a problem, whatever.
00:25:18.000But the task, I think, of this movement is not to tell everybody what's up, and we know what's up, but to get them asking the right questions, getting people to notice that there's something very wrong with that.
00:25:30.000There's something very much awry with this.
00:25:33.000And it's not as simple as, well, you know, the mainstream media has a liberal bias.
00:26:02.000Whether you agree with it or not, whether you think it's going on, have to start asking those questions, folks.
00:26:06.000And I think ultimately, once you send people down this path, there is an element of inertia where people start asking these questions, people start noticing these things, and then they start noticing more things.
00:26:18.000And then they hear some things from our guys and they say, gee, you know, I never thought.
00:26:23.000I never thought that could have been the case.
00:26:25.000That used to offend me before, but I don't know.
00:27:23.000So, Young Americans for Liberty at Boston U set up a debate between me and the student government president about President Trump versus Hillary Clinton.
00:27:32.000And that's how I met Cassie, because Cassie came down to cover it for Campus Reform or Daily Wire or something.
00:27:39.000And I went up on stage and I debated basically the Ben Shapiro platform of culture, not race, of libertarian, small government.
00:28:06.000I had already been pushed a little bit along where I started to see some things.
00:28:10.000In media, in television, that didn't make sense.
00:28:12.000I started to think about this assault on white people, this assault on white identity.
00:28:17.000And I said, this is a really glaring double standard.
00:28:20.000And I don't know if just pure liberal bias satisfies that.
00:28:24.000And then you start looking into more things and more things and, you know, historical things and statistics and other things and certain philosophers and books.
00:28:42.000But that's your white identity segment for the day.
00:28:46.000I know a lot of people say, Nick, you talk about that so much that's kind of like your thing and whatever.
00:28:55.000Look, people go to Ben Shapiro for the basic stuff, people go to Ann Coulter for the immigration stuff.
00:29:03.000This is an important issue that not a lot of people are talking about, or at least not a lot of people are talking about in a sane, sensible, and logical way.
00:29:12.000I see it all the time, I see it everywhere.
00:29:14.000And the reason it really occupies my mind is because there aren't enough people talking about it.
00:29:21.000You know, I can't really go to YouTube and find a lot of information on this.
00:29:25.000Well, I mean, I can with certain people, but there's not enough money and production value behind a lot of these things like there is with PragerU or there is with, you know, some Ruben Report or Daily Wire or whatever else.
00:29:39.000There's not a lot of production value, there's not a lot of quality content dedicated to this issue, and I'm trying to raise awareness.
00:29:46.000Okay, it's one of these things that really frustrates me.
00:29:49.000It's a very important thing, and you just never hear much about it.
00:29:52.000Nobody really talks about it outside of maybe 200 esoteric accounts on Twitter.
00:30:00.000But to the news, back to the news for people that are not thrilled with that kind of thing.
00:30:09.000We have some new developments about North Korea, some new developments coming in from the White House, from Pyongyang, from the United Nations.
00:30:17.000So these are three major developments.
00:30:30.000I think it's a little bit foreboding that there hasn't really been a drastic response by the White House.
00:30:38.000And I think less is more in this case.
00:30:41.000I think we all remember when Tillerson said after one of North Korea's missile strikes that there's nothing more to say on the matter.
00:30:47.000And in my opinion, when Tillerson just gave that one sentence response a few months ago, That was a lot more powerful because if you're in Pyongyang, if you're in North Korea, you don't know what's coming next.
00:31:04.000And so I think that this response has been relatively muted, given the, at least in proportion to what the strike was, what the missile test was.
00:31:16.000I think that says a lot about the White House's calculus right now.
00:31:20.000If you have this missile test like we haven't seen since 2009 and 1998, where they fly a missile over Japan, a major act of hostility, one of the biggest acts of aggression towards Japan since.
00:31:33.000And the White House responds not even with the president, not even with the Secretary of State, but with a spokesman from the State Department saying all options are on the table, which is redundant.
00:31:43.000You know, it's a restatement of something they said before.
00:31:46.000I think that says a lot about what's going on in the Pentagon right now.
00:31:49.000Maybe we're going to see a much more proportional response soon.
00:31:54.000Well, so that was the White House's response.
00:31:57.000South Korea responded by, I believe they fired a missile in response and they condemned it and, you know, yada, yada, yada.
00:32:04.000There's going to be a Security Council meeting this week, an emergency Security Council meeting.
00:32:10.000And then, really, what disturbs me, Kim Jong un said earlier this evening that North Korea should conduct more missile tests in the Pacific Ocean.
00:32:20.000And the only way for them to do that is flying them over Japan.
00:32:22.000So, looks like it won't be unlikely that we'll see more missile tests over Japanese airspace, which, if you've been following this, that is a drastic escalation and not very good.
00:33:11.000Because the options right now are this either Kim Jong un rapidly de escalates this, and I'm talking rapidly, like in an unprecedented way that we haven't seen in 25 years, which is highly unlikely.
00:33:24.000If Kim Jong un does back channeling or they do some kind of bilateral talks, which would be, like I said, unprecedented, there might be a chance they could de escalate this and negotiate a peaceful confiscation or abdication of their nuclear program.
00:33:42.000Option two is that there's a U.S. first strike on North Korea.
00:33:45.000We invade or we take out the nuclear arsenal.
00:33:48.000If this is the case, Seoul, the capital of South Korea, is leveled.
00:33:53.000Millions of South Koreans are killed instantly, not even because of nuclear weapons, not even because of chemical weapons or any kind of WMD, but because along the demilitarized zone, you have a massive buildup of North Korean artillery.
00:34:08.000So, just with conventional means, you're talking about Seoul is leveled, millions of casualties.
00:34:15.000Then, of course, if the United States doesn't take out all of North Korea's nuclear weapons in an invasion or a first strike, you have possible nuclear strikes on South Korea, on Japan, on China, possibly on the western seaboard of the United States or Alaska or Hawaii, all of which would be catastrophic.
00:34:34.000This would be really a horrible thing.
00:34:36.000Not to mention the fact that if the United States initiates this hostility, China said that if that was the case, they would intervene on the side of North Korea.
00:34:48.000But if that's not a bluff and China intervenes on behalf of North Korea, you're talking about World War III.
00:34:55.000You're talking about the end of the world.
00:34:57.000If the United States and China go to war in the Korean Peninsula, that could escalate into a nuclear confrontation in a matter of weeks or months, and nobody wants that.
00:35:10.000Option three is that we allow North Korea to continue, and either they strike Guam or they strike the United States in some fashion before their ICBM program is completed.
00:35:22.000Then, obviously, we have to contend with that in addition to the fact that.
00:35:26.000If they decide to strike Guam or the United States or another country, they are prepared to fight off or fend off a U.S. invasion to a considerable degree.
00:35:39.000If they're going to make the move to initiate aggression, to initiate an armed confrontation, that means that they're more prepared than if we do a first strike.
00:35:48.000If we do a first strike, it's on our timeline.
00:35:50.000If they do a first strike, it's on their timeline.
00:35:52.000So option three is either they strike us and they are ready for an invasion by the United States.
00:36:26.000And they are a nuclear power like Pakistan or Russia or China or France or the United States.
00:36:32.000And they don't attack us, and mutually assured destruction rules the day.
00:36:36.000Now, these last two options are probably the most unlikely.
00:36:39.000These last two options are probably impossible at this point.
00:36:43.000We've probably passed the point of no return with regards to a peaceful diplomatic de escalation, or at least that would be unprecedented.
00:36:51.000And I don't believe that the United States, either the deep state or any civilian government, would tolerate a nuclear North Korea with an ICBM capability.
00:37:01.000I just don't think that would be tolerated by the Pentagon.
00:37:05.000That the lives of 300 million Americans would sit in the hands of Pyongyang, the most hostile government in the world.
00:37:13.000So, we're talking about really narrowing it down to these few options, all of which are ugly, all of which involve millions of casualties, unless there's some kind of technology we're not aware of in the Department of Defense that is top secret, Area 51 stuff.
00:37:30.000Unless there's some kind of saving grace with military tech, it looks like it's going to be ugly all the way around.
00:37:37.000My belief is that the sooner we fix this problem, the better.
00:37:40.000And if we fix it on our timeline, that's the best.
00:37:44.000So I think that's probably what President Trump is doing goading North Korea into initiating aggression against the United States, goading North Korea, if not into an attack on the United States or our allies, at least an act of hostility so that China will recognize our right to respond to it and stay out of a war.
00:38:06.000And then once that happens, We're able to go in and finish off North Korea.
00:38:13.000It's going to be very ugly either way.
00:38:15.000But, you know, with these things generally, when you have no good options and you have to choose between bad options, you have to pick number one, it has to happen on our schedule and on our terms.
00:38:26.000That's the only way that we're going to optimize the situation.
00:38:30.000Because, you know, with Barack Obama, with George W. Bush, when they put it off and they say there's no good options, so we'll continue to wait, they're picking the worst of the options.
00:38:40.000They're saying, There's no good options, so we'll let North Korea decide when all this stuff hits the fan.
00:38:46.000And, you know, I don't think I have to explain why that's not a very good idea.
00:38:53.000Realize, I think everyone should take a moment and realize and think about what would happen if everyone would die tomorrow.
00:39:00.000I think that's a very sobering way to look at our situation.
00:39:03.000It's a way that people don't look at it enough, I don't think.
00:39:07.000I don't think people realize their own mortality in the end of history.
00:39:11.000People can drive to work and it's air conditioned and there's no harm to their lives and they sit in an office and they type away and they come home and they go to bed in a safe house and that's the end of it.
00:39:22.000And I think people in this part of history, In this weird time we're living in, because this is really an anomalous time we're living in, this post Cold War era where there's not existential danger, where we know no want, where there's such abundance, where there's such comfort.
00:39:38.000This is really an anomalous time in history if you look at it broadly.
00:39:43.000And I think not enough people have come to grips, really, in a practical sense, with their own mortality.
00:39:49.000And something like this, this sort of existential crisis for the country, is a good reminder to people that.
00:39:56.000You know, if we don't get our act together, nobody's going to come in and save us.
00:39:59.000Like, not everything will work out just because.
00:40:03.000You know, you watch sitcoms enough and you believe that, well, you know, everything will work out.
00:40:07.000Yeah, well, you know, immigration is not that big of a deal because, yeah, it'll sort itself out.
00:40:13.000The power of love, man, hashtag love, it'll just be fine.
00:40:40.000But when you see that North Korea has nuclear missiles pointed at us because the government that we pay 40% of our income to every year to prevent this sort of thing has been sitting on their hands importing millions of illegal immigrants, it kind of reminds us what's at stake.
00:40:57.000It kind of reminds us what the hell's going on here, right?
00:41:00.000We're in this slumber right now where you wake up, eat, Go to sleep.
00:41:06.000Maybe there's some television mixed in.
00:41:07.000Maybe you get drunk a little bit to numb the pain every now and again.
00:41:10.000But when you have a missile pointed at you, it reminds you that you're essentially paying 40% of your income, which you slave away to earn every year, missing soccer practices, missing life events, to pay this government to get blasted, to get screwed every day.
00:41:26.000And you see it when North Korea has their missiles at us.
00:41:31.000It's a very sobering reminder of this scheme that's going on in the country.
00:41:36.000Where we work our fingers to the bone, we give all our hard earned money basically to get screwed, basically to take it every day, to bend over and take it.
00:41:47.000And nobody gets mad about it, by the way, either.
00:42:19.000Kind of hard to have a civil discussion when if you talk about the real problems or anything that's not politically incorrect, you can't feed your family anymore.
00:42:27.000Civil discussion might not be the answer here.
00:43:26.000When no representative of what's actually going on in the country, these concerns that we have, is on television, when they're censoring our websites, they're censoring our YouTube videos, they're taking us off Twitter, they're taking us off Facebook, if you espouse these views publicly, you can no longer get a job.
00:43:52.000What reasonable recourse does a man have?
00:43:58.000If he sees his country being destroyed and thrown away, and nobody's talking about it, and he's not allowed to talk about it, what else is there to do?
00:44:08.000Maybe the answer is beyond having this conversation that we always talk about.
00:44:13.000It's time for a conversation on race, America.
00:44:26.000But I am saying that when you have these people that are saying, especially Ben Shapiro, that are saying, We're tired of political violence.
00:44:34.000You have to understand where the violence comes from.
00:44:37.000You have to understand why these people are in the streets.
00:44:40.000Because whether it's Antifa or whether it's the alt right, neither of those, they both believe, and one of them rightly so, believes that their views are illegal in this country.
00:44:53.000They're illegal in 13 countries in Europe.
00:44:58.000And when Ben Shapiro says, we're going to sit down for a free and open exchange of ideas, marketplace of ideas, and then he goes and debates.
00:45:06.000Stupid college students, stupid 18 year old liberals at Berkeley, to the tune of how many thousands of dollars from YouTube and everything else, and from Young Americans for Freedom, it's sort of an insulting hypocrisy.
00:45:42.000He'll set up the Reagan Battalion, allegedly, with Benny Politschek and some of these other clowns to take secret videos of me in the basement of Leadership Institute and then retweet them with concern posting.
00:47:51.000I think that if it's not protected to a great extent and if it's not popular at the time, they'll take it down because that'll be like their Berlin Wall coming down moment.
00:48:02.000I mean, if you fast forward maybe six years, let's talk hypotheticals.
00:48:08.000If you fast forward six years and there's a horrible economic recession and everyone hates Trump now, he's in a second term, he's embattled, everyone hates this guy.
00:50:41.000You'll have your stay at home cuck husband.
00:50:44.000And it's really a toxic, destructive message for a society.
00:50:48.000Women are the backbone of the country.
00:50:51.000If women are done correctly, if you have a society and you have women whom I respect greatly, if you want to get women right, make them mothers, make mothers great again.
00:51:17.000I don't know, it might have been a catfish.
00:51:19.000But she said to me that she's on antidepressants and she can't afford health care to pay for her antidepressants because she's not making enough money because she has to pay for college and she's already so much in debt.
00:51:33.000And I say, Well, have you tried fulfilling your biological imperative?
00:52:26.000You can either be a marketing person, you can make a six figure salary selling people drugs for diseases that don't exist, you can sell people their Ritalin so you can numb them from paying taxes for nothing, and that could be your empowerment.
00:52:44.000Or you could be the backbone not only of a household but of the country.
00:52:49.000You could create a wonderful, beautiful home that's beautifully.
00:52:53.000Decorated, you could have a beautiful family, you could have beautiful children, many of them that look like you, that look like the person you love, that are smart and that talk.
00:53:04.000You can rear them with all the virtues you grew up with, with everything that's beautiful in life.
00:53:09.000You can give them everything, you can give them something to live for.
00:53:13.000That could be what you live for, that could be what keeps your marriage enduring and interesting, and they will take care of you in your old age and they'll take care of the country when your generation ages.
00:54:02.000The reason they appear offended is because this is actually a very defensive mechanism where if you start talking about, you know, actually people can be mothers and being a mother is a great thing and blah, blah, blah, it offends their sensibilities because they have already convinced themselves that all of that is just old fashioned and wrong and it's, It's a mirage.
00:54:27.000Marriage is actually broken and families are outdated and patriarchy.
00:54:31.000And they've convinced themselves of this disturbingly cynical mindset, which is inhabited by the people that control the media that's feeding them these messages.
00:54:39.000And when they hear this joyous message of truth and justice, it offends them because they've already chosen rebellion.
00:54:47.000They've already chosen the resistance.
00:54:49.000And so when you get people talking and saying this is possible and this is what's right, they are offended by that because they've chosen a life of despair and they're filled with regret.
00:55:03.000Deep AF asks, What are the founding fathers thinking right now?
00:55:07.000They're not very happy, let me tell you that.
00:55:09.000They're thinking, Paul Ryan, you don't know who we are.
00:55:14.000They're saying, Representative Paul Ryan, you don't know who we are.
00:55:18.000Paul Ryan's always the first one to say, that's not who we are.
00:56:29.000The problem is that Richard Spencer very, I think, very incisively divided the alt right into his camp, which is something very specific, and everyone else.
00:56:41.000Something that's very, I don't want to say esoteric, because it's not very esoteric, but something very specific that he created a few years ago.
00:56:49.000To be fair, he did coin the term, but that alt right that he created is about the Jewish question, about race and IQ, about white ethnostate, and all of that.
00:58:53.000But in terms of what Trump needs to do to win in 2018 and 2020 and to keep all this momentum going, is those five things wall, Muslim ban, trade, tax.
01:01:09.000And Spengler is a philosopher about history.
01:01:12.000That's what's really interesting about Spengler.
01:01:14.000Like Hegel, like certain other philosophers, he creates.
01:01:19.000In the framework of his argument about the declining West, he really posits a new philosophy of history itself, which is very interesting, just scholastically, let alone if you believe in the ideology.
01:01:33.000You'll never hear Ben Shapiro talk about Francis Jockey and Oswald Spengler.
01:02:32.000All throughout high school, they never give you any real good books, right?
01:02:37.000I mean, that just goes to show you what's wrong with the education system that you could be 19 years old and not have had the opportunity to read these important books in your entire life because you're being fed to kill a mockingbird and, you know, all this other, and Tom Sawyer.
01:02:52.000And, you know, Tom Sawyer is okay, but being fed a lot of propaganda.
01:02:58.000And they'll, of course, they'll say, oh, well, those are ideologically charged if you're reading Mere Christianity or.
01:03:04.000Abolition of Man or Evola, that's all ideologically charged.
01:03:08.000Sure, but they have no problem giving you the Communist Manifesto to read.
01:03:12.000They have no problem giving you books about Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee and all this other social justice propaganda.
01:04:10.000If anybody has any more questions, and you know, it's late, I go longer, but we've been here for 70 minutes.
01:04:16.000I'm producing five hours of content a week.
01:04:19.000Can't ask for much more than that, in addition to Nationalist Review.
01:04:22.000So, if you have any more questions, comments, concerns, anything like that, if you're watching it live or the replay, you can post those on Twitter using the hashtag AmericaFQ.
01:04:32.000Please subscribe, subscribe to my channel.
01:04:35.000I was on RSBN before, they had a quarter of a million subscribers.
01:04:39.000I had to start fresh with my own channel.