The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo. The Boomer Generation will be the new globalism. I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it. You're an e-girl. You know the rule. You're not interested. You don't have the clip. Who's got the clip? No e-girls. No clips? No Girls. What is that? Bigfoot? I've never heard of him. Where's that Bigfoot guy? Who s that Bigfoot man? What s that? Who's that man with the red hair and the black and white moustache? Where is he? And what is that guy with the brown and white hair and brown eyes and the red and white beard and the brown brown and brown hair? Is that Bigfoot or is that a man with a red and brown beard and brown brown hair that looks like a woman with a brown and a brownish brown body? Or is it a girl with a black and brown body with a white and brownish body and a blue and brown haired man with brown eyes? Are you not interested? Can you not do it? and you just can t do it And you don't want to do it, and you don t want to and you just don't even care or you just cant do it or you can't even do it and you're not even try You just don t don't know how to do what you can t and it's not even interested can't you just not interested, you're too busy? You re not interested and you have no idea how to and so you just keep saying but you just cannot do it ? what do you know you just not interested in so you're not not even are you just do y ? you just can your not interested you know , I can't that's not interested?! it s no is not interested! this is not even once, not even trying NOT even once ever . Not even once,
Transcript
Transcripts from "America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. You can also explore and interact with the transcripts here.
00:31:16.000Very excited to be back with you here tonight on Thursday.
00:31:21.000And there is a lot to talk about another emergency.
00:31:25.000And it's an actual emergency this time.
00:31:28.000Tonight, our featured story, we are talking once again about the continued coronavirus epidemic that is taking over the world.
00:31:36.000But today, we actually have an official declaration
00:31:41.000Of a global health emergency by the World Health Organization.
00:31:45.000So if you've been watching this show, if you've been following the coronavirus situation as it's been evolving, there's been a conversation happening in the WHO, which is the World Health Organization, about whether or not to designate the current outbreak of the virus as a global health emergency.
00:32:04.000Today, they were going to announce, I presume, at 12.30 p.m.
00:32:09.000that there was not going to be a global health emergency designation for the coronavirus.
00:32:15.000And then, news broke I think maybe like a half hour before they were supposed to convene and hold a press conference and tell everybody what their determination was.
00:32:25.000The news broke like really maybe like 30 minutes beforehand that there was a human-to-human transmission in Chicago.
00:32:33.000In the United States, which is the first time that there's been a human-to-human transmission inside the U.S.
00:32:40.000So then they delayed their press conference by an hour and then they came out at 1.30 and they said, yep, it's a global health emergency and we'll go over this statement by the World Health Organization.
00:32:50.000It's pretty incredible because they make this statement basically talking about the severity of this virus and how it's spreading and so on.
00:32:59.000But, on the one hand, while they were trying to convey maybe the severity of the situation, on the other hand, they were really trying to downplay China's responsibility for it.
00:33:08.000Throughout the whole thing, they're saying, well, let's not blame China, China did everything right, and let's not ban any... let's not unnecessarily ban any kind of transportation or travel.
00:33:20.000And it's amazing that even these so-called scientists, even these so-called doctors, you can tell that they are completely and totally beholden to multinational corporations, to the interests of big business, of the banks.
00:36:44.000You cannot have a successful, good, funny, uh, you know, exciting internet show and internet movement and presence if you're not funny!
00:36:54.000And it kills it when you have to at every moment say, uh, and hey, just for the boomers in the audience, um, this part was the joke and this was the serious part.
00:37:35.000But so, we're gonna be talking about the coronavirus.
00:37:38.000We'll also be talking tonight about this statement from the Elizabeth Warren campaign.
00:37:45.000This is something which has been a common theme on the show.
00:37:50.000When we talk about the Democratic primary, when we talk about the general election, I really want to stress to you how bad things are going to get for us.
00:38:25.000Because it is going to get so bad, so fast, for us, more than anybody else.
00:38:31.000And a lot of people like to say about this upcoming election that, well, if Trump doesn't meet or exceed our expectations, we're going to sit this one out.
00:38:39.000Or if Trump doesn't meet or exceed our expectations, well, we might vote for the other guy.
00:38:46.000Or some people say, well, Trump is okay, but this country's not going to be saved.
00:38:53.000We're not going to fix things at the ballot box.
00:38:54.000It has to get worse before it gets better.
00:38:57.000And so it's been a common and consistent theme on the show to push back on this narrative that because the general election is going to be lame, and it is, it's not going to be as fun as 2016, that it doesn't have significance or that we shouldn't be trying to have the best possible outcome for ourselves based on this kind of collapse thinking, you know, this weird so-called accelerationist mindset.
00:39:21.000And the reason I bring it up tonight is because we got a release from the Elizabeth Warren campaign this week
00:39:27.000Where she said that if she gets elected, she is going to punish disinformation related to elections online with civil and criminal penalties.
00:39:39.000So potentially, if Elizabeth Warren gets elected, what she's saying is that if you go online, and in the next election, you know, the midterms in 2022, you post misinformation about polling places, or you post misinformation about candidates or policies,
00:39:56.000Or you post something that is perceived by whoever is appointed to regulate this kind of thing by the Warren administration, you will be put in jail.
00:40:05.000You'll be fined, maybe you'll be put in jail, maybe there will be other penalties.
00:40:10.000And I cannot stress to you the danger that is posed if we get a Democrat in office immediately.
00:40:17.000And when I say that, I know this is not your common baby boomer Fox News scaremongering about socialism.
00:40:25.000I'm not talking about the floor falling out from under us with the economy and the GDP is going to tank.
00:40:32.000I'm talking about if you're online or even if you're in real life.
00:40:37.000And you try to promulgate or perpetuate our views, the views that we have, if you try to organize, if you try to raise funds, if you donate funds, if you try to participate in any meaningful way in a dissident right-wing movement, if a democrat gets in office you will find yourself in a lot of trouble.
00:40:55.000That's going to be the first consequence of a democrat getting into office.
00:40:59.000So we're going to be talking about that press release
00:41:03.000We'll be talking about the coronavirus.
00:41:06.000We'll be talking about this statement from Elizabeth Warren.
00:41:08.000The good news is it doesn't look like Elizabeth Warren's going to be president.
00:41:12.000That's been the funniest thing about this Democratic primary is when it started they had what like 25 candidates and they would not stop talking about how diverse the field is.
00:41:23.000Look at how you got all these non-whites running for president.
00:41:26.000Look at how you've got all these women running for presidents.
00:41:29.000I remember it was a very popular question to ask just what nine months ago, whatever.
00:41:35.000What was it in like June, May when the election first started or when the debates got underway and when a lot of the candidates started to announce?
00:41:46.000The most common question I remember towards people like Pete Buttigieg and Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders from the press was, why should we elect another straight white man?
00:41:56.000Or in the case of Pete Buttigieg, why should we elect another white man?
00:42:00.000And now, here we are, the primaries are about to begin.
00:42:11.000Well, it's Joe Biden, it's Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and she's fading fast, and Pete Buttigieg.
00:42:17.000So out of all, for all your diversity, all these Black and Hispanic and everybody else that you put up in the Democratic field, Kamala Harris, Cory Booker, Andrew Yang, Julian Castro,
00:43:39.000And like I said, if we're not in a level playing field, if anybody has a bigger advantage, it's the women and the minority.
00:43:48.000In spite of all that, in spite of the fact that it's a Democratic primary that rewards non-whites pandering to non-whites, it's full of non-whites and women and all that, in spite of the fact that their whole party narrative for years has been promoting the non-white, the coalition, the Ascendant, and women at the expense of men, who do you end up with?
00:45:24.000From the news, it says, Democratic presidential candidate Senator Elizabeth Warren on Wednesday released a plan to fight disinformation and to hold tech companies accountable for their actions in light of the 2016 election.
00:45:37.000She said quote disinformation and online foreign interference erode our democracy and Donald Trump has invited both.
00:45:45.000Anyone who seeks to challenge and defeat Donald Trump in the 2020 election must be fully prepared to take this on and I've got a plan to do it.
00:46:43.000If she ever became president, I would literally move.
00:46:46.000Because that would mean that America is now a gay country.
00:46:49.000If we elected, like, some female, and not just any female, at least if we elected Hillary Clinton, we would have a badass female.
00:46:56.000And I don't mean badass like, you go girl, like, you know, whatever they were saying, I believe that she will win, nothing like that, but because she would, like, kill people, you know?
00:47:06.000At least if Hillary Clinton was the president, she was like a murderer.
00:47:10.000If people were trying to mess with her political career, she'd just kill them.
00:47:14.000When she would go and kill dictators and destroy entire countries and then she'd laugh about it.
00:47:20.000And at least, I mean, there was something that was kind of badass about that.
00:47:46.000So, at least if we had a woman president, it would be like, well, at the minimum, we still have this blood-sucking, sociopathic elite running the country, which, you know, there's kind of something edgy about that.
00:47:57.000And not that Elizabeth Warren isn't a part of that, but she does have just a totally different aspect.
00:48:01.000She's got this like fake, folksy, nerdy, plucky kind of a vibe.
00:48:30.000Warren proposed to combat disinformation by holding big tech companies like Facebook, Twitter, and Google responsible for spreading misinformation designed to suppress voters from turning out.
00:48:40.000She said I will push for new laws that impose tough civil and criminal penalties for knowingly disseminating this kind of information which has the explicit purpose of undermining the basic right to vote.
00:48:52.000Warren who has been an advocate for breaking up big tech companies like Amazon and Facebook has said that she wants to make quote big structural changes to the tech sector
00:49:20.000When I look at politics, I look at it from the perspective of process, from a very logistical, a very practical, tangible perspective.
00:49:30.000A lot of people, when they talk about politics, they like to talk about big ideas and big plans and big designs and big theories.
00:49:37.000And my entire worldview is basically informed by logistical things, practical things, the practical day-to-day operations of government and elections and all that.
00:49:49.000And so to me, based on that perspective, I see tech, and I've said this for years, as the number one issue for us.
00:49:57.000And the reason being is because whoever controls tech controls the future.
00:50:02.000Mass media for the next generation is dying out.
00:50:05.000You look at television, radio, the press, and obviously they will still persist, and they are finding a new home on social media.
00:50:13.000You know, if you look on YouTube, who are the biggest YouTube channels on the platform?
00:50:23.000But if you look at technology from the perspective of being a dissident in politics, this is like our last opportunity to get our message out there.
00:50:32.000Or it's one of our bigger opportunities to get our message out there.
00:50:36.000If we want to make real structural change in the country, that means, in some capacity, creating a mass movement.
00:50:43.000Or, in some capacity, getting our message out there to reach people that are in the elites.
00:50:48.000You know, even if you're a believer, whether you believe that we need to influence the people at the top of the food chain, or we need lots of people at the bottom of the food chain, you need communications technology to spread your message.
00:51:49.000And so for that reason, throughout the 20th century, when you look at mass media, mass communications, which dictates how you can start a political movement or the political conversation, all of that was controlled by a very small amount of people.
00:52:02.000It was entirely centralized and controlled.
00:52:04.000The reason why we are able to galvanize so many people in the past five years in particular with Donald Trump, with Gamergate, things like that, it's because of YouTube.
00:52:16.000When all of this stuff started to get big in like 2010 and 2011,
00:52:21.000And it played a big part in the Arab Spring.
00:52:23.000All these liberal elites championed this and said it was such a good thing.
00:52:28.000Look at how Twitter and Facebook and all these platforms are helping to mobilize the people and this is going to create democracy and it will break the old modes of control.
00:52:38.000And then five years later, well, they figured out that the kinds of things that people wanted were not the kinds of things that the elites thought they wanted.
00:52:45.000Where as they thought maybe this would precipitate a mass progressive movement or a mass human rights movement, climate change, it certainly has done that to some extent.
00:52:55.000It has also sown the seeds for a mass right-wing populist nationalist movement in America and across the world.
00:53:02.000And so, to me, this is the biggest battle.
00:53:04.000If they snuff out YouTube, Twitter, and all this, and they're on track for doing this, by the way, I don't need to tell you, it's happened in this show, that this is already underway, and it's been underway, and it's nearing its completion, the total elimination of dissonant thought, right-wing views from the internet.
00:53:21.000But if they close the door on that for good by marrying the government with a progressive administration to tech, then it's over forever.
00:53:28.000And that means forget about American Renaissance, forget about America First, forget about VDARE, anything like that, anything approaching something that's going to actually preach nationalism, Christianity, it's all going to go away.
00:53:44.000And so the biggest battle with the next election for me is to a lesser extent it's the big issues like demographics and trade and all that.
00:53:52.000I'm not trying to minimize those issues but on a fundamental level if we can't control to some extent mass media or mass communications the rest of the issues kind of don't matter because we can't tell people about the rest of the issues if we don't have some way of getting that message out.
00:54:08.000So I see this as a competition between a Donald Trump administration who might
00:54:14.000And he's done nothing so far and it's been very disappointing and very sad and pathetic, honestly.
00:54:20.000A Trump administration who might regulate tech in our favor, who might use
00:54:25.000The judiciary might use the Attorney General, whatever it is, legislation, Section 230, the regulatory system, to get Facebook and Twitter and YouTube and the others to uphold free speech.
00:54:38.000We might have a shot at doing that with the Trump administration.
00:54:41.000You know, I don't know, maybe that's going to be Jack Posobiec lobbying Don Jr.
00:54:46.000to tell Dad, you know, pull out his coat and say, hey Dad, we really need some help here.
00:54:50.000And maybe in the next four years something like that will happen.
00:54:53.000Or conversely, you'll have Elizabeth Warren who will get to tech, or Bernie Sanders, or Joe Biden, or whoever it is, and you'll have a progressive administration that will fuse tech with the regulatory regime of the state, of the deep state in particular.
00:55:08.000You know, so Warren is talking about breaking up Amazon and Facebook, but she's not talking about breaking up Amazon and Facebook for the same reasons that we are, and she's not going to do it in the same way that we are.
00:55:20.000Democrats have invoked Section 230 in the same way that we have.
00:55:24.000If you don't know, Section 230 was an amendment to the Communications Decency Act in 1996, and Section 230 said that if you have these big internet companies, they're going to receive total legal immunity because they're good for spreading political discourse.
00:55:43.000It said that insofar as these major internet platforms are allowing people to have free speech, insofar as they are not really controlling the content that's on the platform, they will have immunity from any kind of legal liability for the content posted on their sites.
00:56:00.000If Facebook says anybody can post on Facebook and somebody live streams a mass shooting, as has been done before, well, you can't really hold Facebook accountable because they're not responsible for all the content that's being published.
00:56:34.000So, a lot of conservatives have used the argument over the years that Section 230 is a gateway for regulating tech.
00:56:41.000We use that to bludgeon them and we say, look, your Section 230 immunity goes away because you have now become a publisher instead of a platform.
00:56:50.000So then, necessarily, Facebook and Twitter and YouTube would have to revert back to being platforms.
00:56:55.000Instead of publishers, so that they're not sued into oblivion for every single crime that's committed using or that their platform is used to facilitate crimes in the real world.
00:57:05.000So then they would allow free speech on the internet.
00:57:07.000Well, Nancy Pelosi talks about Section 230 as well.
00:57:11.000And so does Warren and all these other people.
00:57:13.000And they talk about breaking up big tech, but not so that they could bludgeon them into creating a safe space or creating a place for free speech or anything like that.
00:57:23.000But they are trying to use deregulation and breaking them up and Section 230 and all that so that they will stop so-called disinformation.
00:57:32.000It's really all, when you understand politics, it's all just a race to use the law, to weaponize the law, to get your political outcomes, right?
00:57:40.000To destroy your enemy and help your friends.
00:57:43.000And so we want to use Section 230 to bludgeon them to help Alex Jones, to bludgeon them to help me, right?
00:57:52.000Whoever it is, Comrade Stump, Beardson, whatever, and they want to use Section 230 and they want to use these antitrust laws so that they can bludgeon Facebook and Google and Twitter and Amazon and Apple and every other big platform so that they will stop disinformation and under the pretext of spreading democracy and facilitating elections without interference.
00:58:15.000They're going to use these laws to force Amazon and the others to accept regulatory interference, and then it will be a progressive administration writing the rules.
00:58:24.000And what do you think it's going to say?
00:58:26.000It's going to say that if you're right-wing, you can't have a Twitter account.
00:59:29.000And it becomes exponentially, it will have involved, exponentially more pain and suffering for us to get where we need to go.
00:59:36.000I imagine that if we have a progressive administration in the short term, before we can build up the institutions, using our limited resources with networking and funds and social media, you know, even to this day, social media is very constrained, at least our usage of it, right?
00:59:54.000But if a progressive administration gets in charge, that'll become almost insurmountable for us.
01:00:12.000My father's whole family was wiped out by Hitler and his white nationalism.
01:00:16.000Too many people have fought over the years.
01:00:18.000Too many people have died against racism to let it resurface and flourish in America.
01:00:22.000We will go to war with nationalism and racism in every aspect of our lives.
01:00:29.000He said that hate crimes perpetrated on the basis of race would be viewed as domestic terrorism.
01:00:34.000He said, quote, when we combat white nationalism and when we combat racism, we are going to use all the laws in our power, including executive orders, in every area to make certain that we end the discrimination which now exists.
01:00:48.000This is what we're hearing from every candidate.
01:00:51.000Every Democratic candidate is talking along the same lines.
01:00:54.000When they get in power, they're going to criminalize our political opinions.
01:00:59.000And understand, when that happens, nobody's gonna give a shit.
01:01:05.000Sorry for the language, but people need to hear that.
01:01:08.000A lot of people are under this impression that if the progressives start to crack down on us, well, this will awaken everybody.
01:01:15.000That if we get a Democrat in office, maybe that'll be necessary to awaken people, to open their eyes to how bad things are going.
01:01:28.000How many things have we talked about just this week?
01:01:30.000With immigration, birth tourism, with the public charge law, with the drag queens during the Super Bowl, drag queens in your public school.
01:01:39.000They're taking your guns, gonna go door-to-door at the National Guard arresting the police and sheriffs, and they're gonna see semi-automatic weapons.
01:02:03.000After Charlottesville got banned off of everything, and they got banned from Cloudflare, and they got banned from their domain registrar, and now they persist on Bitcoin donations.
01:02:13.000Now I can't know anything about that, and they're running at a $50,000 deficit.
01:02:44.000When the Proud Boys got arrested for defending themselves against Antifa, was there a huge national media scandal?
01:02:50.000When the guys from the Rise Above movement at Charlottesville, and I don't know a whole bunch about this case, but when people got unfairly arrested and thrown in jail and they threw the book at them during Charlottesville, was there a huge national media story?
01:03:06.000And it'll be the same when a Democratic administration gets into place.
01:03:10.000You're gonna see all your favorites, Jared Taylor, Peter Brimelow, me, all these characters, gonna get handcuffed and thrown in jail and nobody's gonna say anything about it.
01:03:22.000And that will be the last that you will hear of us.
01:03:25.000They'll lock the door, throw away the key, take away the internet,
01:03:39.000They like to talk about, well, if a Democrat gets in office, the lights are going to go off, and then shit's going to hit the Fed, and we're going to be out there.
01:03:49.000Maybe it'll happen in the future, but it's not going to happen anytime soon.
01:03:53.000What's going to happen on day one is like Sanders said, or Warren has said, or any of these other candidates have said, is that they will go to war with so-called white nationalism.
01:04:06.000He said, in every aspect of our lives, we will declare war on racism, we will consider it domestic terrorism, we will use every law, executive orders, we will stamp it out.
01:04:18.000That's the future, if these guys get elected.
01:04:21.000So, you know, I think it's very important to stress that, because I see all too often on Twitter, and I don't know if it's a lot of feds, I think, that are pushing this, and a lot of controlled opposition, but certainly there are well-meaning people who really do believe that we might be better off without Trump.
01:04:36.000You know, they see Trump versus a Democrat that wants to declare war on you in every aspect of your life, using every law, and they're like, hmm, well, you know, Trump did cuck to Israel, so I guess it's fine if Bernie Sanders gets elected.
01:04:49.000So I guess this will be better, maybe it'll actually get worse before it gets better.
01:04:53.000It's gonna get worse for you first, and it probably won't get better for you.
01:05:27.000You know, Trump vs. Warren, I don't see it as, well, you know, Warren really does have good economic policies, and you know, Trump did betray us on his promise, and he is controlled by Sheldon Adelson.
01:06:24.000Look at what the Obama administration did, and it was mild under Obama.
01:06:28.000Using the IRS to target conservative groups, using all kinds of backdoor regulations to shut down the NRA, to shut down bullet manufacturers, to shut down gun companies.
01:06:39.000It's like, you really have to be, I think,
01:06:44.000You have to study very hard and research very hard to find all these backdoor ways in which these, every time a Democratic administration gets into power, that they will manipulate everything to punish us.
01:06:56.000And it's going to be so emboldened if somebody else gets in, and you already see how that will take shape.
01:09:51.000So I understand there are droplets on the papers.
01:09:54.000There's coronavirus droplets on the papers.
01:09:57.000So if I handle them, I must take the proper precautions.
01:10:01.000I also have my experimental material out here.
01:10:03.000I was handling the virus in these test tubes right here, but I am immune.
01:10:07.000I was given the antidote for the virus by the World Jewish Congress, so I will be just fine.
01:10:13.000But we're going to read through the report, the latest on the coronavirus outbreak.
01:10:19.000And as I said, or rather, as my friend, my dear friend Nick said earlier during the show, that this has been happening for a long time, but only recently has this been declared a global health emergency.
01:10:37.000And let me put my hands in my pockets in a very doctor-like way.
01:10:41.000It says, the World Health Organization announced Thursday that the outbreak of a deadly and fast-spreading strain of coronavirus constitutes a global health emergency.
01:10:51.000According to the World Health Organization Director General, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus,
01:11:04.000It says, Over the past few weeks, we have witnessed the emergence of a previously unknown pathogen, which has escalated into an unprecedented outbreak, and which has been met by an unprecedented response.
01:11:15.000However, Tedros was adamant... Get this.
01:11:19.000He says, quote, I'm sniffling a little bit.
01:11:22.000He was adamant that, quote, the main reason for the declaration is not because of what is happening in China, but because of what is happening in other countries.
01:11:32.000Let me be clear, this vote is not a declaration of no confidence in China who is deeply concerned about what will happen if the virus begins spreading in countries with weak health systems and the purpose of the declaration is to help those countries.
01:11:47.000Oh, so the World Health Organization is unconcerned with the 9,800 confirmed cases of the virus in China.
01:11:56.000It's not concerned with the 15,000 suspected cases of coronavirus in China.
01:12:01.000It is definitely not concerned with the more than 200 deaths confirmed from coronavirus in China.
01:12:07.000Instead, it is concerned with the six cases in the United States and the 160 cases worldwide.
01:12:17.000It says, uh, the declaration of a global health emergency can work to galvanize international funding according to the WHO's procedures.
01:12:25.000The three criteria for such a declaration are that it is, quote, an extraordinary event, that it constitutes a public health risk to other states through the international spread of disease, and that it is potentially, or that it potentially requires a coordinated international response.
01:12:42.000The WHO said in a statement that, quote, all countries should be prepared for containment, including active surveillance, early detection, isolation, and case management, contact tracing, and prevention of onward spread.
01:12:58.000It says there is no reason for measures that unnecessarily interfere with the international travel and trade.
01:13:03.000The WHO doesn't recommend limiting trade and movement, said Tedros.
01:13:08.000But the WHO also said that in certain circumstances, such as when there are many cases of transmission among a vulnerable population, such measures could be temporarily useful.
01:13:19.000Throughout the whole World Health Organization statement, while they're declaring a global health emergency, they're saying,
01:13:26.000Well we're not concerned about China, and it's not a vote of no confidence in China, and we're not declaring an emergency because of the 10,000 cases in China, and we also shouldn't shut down any travel or trade.
01:13:40.000We're just here to tell you that we need to mobilize resources to help in like Thailand or Singapore where there's like a handful of cases.
01:13:49.000It says experts find the new coronavirus particularly concerning for several reasons.
01:13:54.000First, the World Health Organization said there's evidence that the virus could spread from human to human.
01:14:00.000Quote, the disease is mainly a respiratory disease passing via droplets from one person to another and mostly still through close contact.
01:14:08.000The droplets could come from sneezing, coughing, or even talking.
01:14:11.000This is worrying because it is easier for a virus to spread quickly between humans compared with a virus transmitted from an animal to humans.
01:14:19.000Human-to-human transmission has now been documented in three countries outside China.
01:14:24.000Second, experts still don't know for certain what animal the virus originated from in Wuhan.
01:14:29.000And third, Chinese authorities say the virus has also infected medical workers, which are people who already would be taking serious precautions to protect themselves.
01:14:39.000There is currently no targeted drug to treat the virus, and there is no vaccine to guard against it.
01:14:45.000So, things are pretty rough out there.
01:15:12.000And finally, after two weeks, we have finally figured out that it's spread from human to human.
01:15:17.000And most worrying about that, as they said, is that it goes from people that are being treated to the people treating them.
01:15:24.000Which, if you're treating somebody, that means you've got face masks and rubber gloves and you've taken all the precautions, you're washing your hands, and they're getting it.
01:15:32.000So if they're getting it, imagine if you're just somebody in the subway.
01:15:35.000Imagine if you're just somebody in a supermarket or at a party.
01:15:39.000It means that this is highly highly infectious.
01:16:21.000France and the United States have six, South Korea, Germany, and the UAE have four, Canada has three, Vietnam and Italy have two, India, the Philippines, Nepal, Cambodia, Sri Lanka, and now Finland each have one.
01:16:35.000And perhaps more concerning than any of that are the 15,238 suspected cases in China, which is up from 12,167 yesterday.
01:16:40.000And what is most concerning about the numbers here
01:17:15.000Because if you look at the rate of growth over the past two weeks, it went from I think 8,000 infected yesterday to 9,800 today.
01:17:22.000It's a slower rate of growth than a lot of people had predicted.
01:17:26.000But I think the reason for that, in my medical opinion, is because what you have happening now is China is running out of the resources to test people for coronavirus.
01:17:36.000They're running out of hospital space, they're running out of beds, they're running out of personnel to treat people, and so you reach an upper limit at which the people that have this virus can be properly tested and put under surveillance and so on.
01:17:50.000So when they say suspected cases, well that means that, well, they're trying to monitor it as best they can and maybe that gives us better insight into how fast it's spreading.
01:17:59.000Because at a certain point, you know, up until a certain point,
01:18:02.000You're able to test everybody you think has it or test most of the people you think has it and put them in beds and so on, but now they probably exceeded that number a long time ago.
01:18:12.000So, suspected cases is probably the one to watch.
01:18:15.000That it went from 8,000 confirmed to 9,800 is a lot less significant when you're talking about confirmed infections compared to going from 12,000 to 15,000 suspected infections.
01:18:27.000And the same story is true in the United States.
01:18:29.000You've got six confirmed infections in the United States, but you also had today the first confirmed transmission from human to human of the virus.
01:18:38.000So you have five people that have the virus confirmed that came from China, and I've got the first confirmed case of somebody who caught it in America from somebody who came from China.
01:18:48.000They also have something like 160 suspected cases in the United States alone.
01:18:56.000And it's very concerning to me, like I said yesterday, that people are still more concerned about trade than they are concerned about health.
01:19:06.000In the sense that if you read through the World Health Organization statement on this, they want to make it abundantly clear that they are not blaming China, and they do not want you to stop international travel or international trade.
01:19:19.000Oh, and by the way, it's also a global health emergency.
01:19:22.000Aren't the priorities a little bit messed up there when the leader of the World Health Organization is more concerned with assuaging the concerns of China and of multinational corporations and of big business than he is about the spread of an infectious disease?
01:19:38.000And this is what I talk about when I talk about lab coats and everybody else.
01:19:42.000You know, I'm a Jewish doctor and I'm going off a little bit tonight.
01:20:02.000This is the case with all international bureaucrats.
01:20:05.000People would like to think that when it comes to the United Nations, or any other international body, or a charity, or an NGO, or the World Health Organization,
01:20:33.000Other people that are in the pocket of big business, well, you know, these scientists in the R&D lab, these scientists, these bureaucrats at the United Nations, well, these are selfless people, the kinds of people who work for Habitat for Humanity in college, the kinds of people that did a missionary trip, they go to Guatemala and they build houses, you know, these are just the most selfless people in the world.
01:20:55.000Whereas our government is subject to the influence of big money, and our government is subject to the influence of lobbying.
01:21:01.000Well, international government, supranational government, and scientists, they're above all of that.
01:21:07.000Scientists would never take a check from big business.
01:21:12.000Scientists would never be influenced at an institutional level by big business, by lobbying efforts, or anything like that.
01:21:57.000They would never take any kind of money.
01:21:59.000They would never be under the influence of threats or anything like that from China.
01:22:03.000Of course we know all of that is not true.
01:22:06.000Everybody thinks that, but of course all of that is not true.
01:22:09.000The World Health Organization is terrified, and they're not terrified of the virus, they're terrified of upsetting China.
01:22:18.000And the same is true with our government, and the same is true with our CDC, and the same is true with the United Nations.
01:22:25.000Why do you think the statement reads like this?
01:22:27.000The World Health Organization exists, supposedly, for things like this.
01:22:32.000Supposedly, the World Health Organization exists to contain and stop the spread of infectious diseases or minimize the harm, mitigate the damage of a pandemic, something like this.
01:22:50.000They've finally got their moment in the spotlight, their time to shine when you've got coronavirus on the rise, and we need them, desperately, somebody to coordinate an international response.
01:23:02.000Two weeks in, infections are exponentially rising, the death toll is rising, it's already worse than SARS, it's approaching the level of MERS, so it's going to be one of the worst infectious diseases in two decades.
01:23:14.000And what does their statement read like?
01:23:17.000Well it says, we do not want this to be perceived as a statement of no confidence for China.
01:23:23.000Let me be clear, this is not a declaration of no confidence in China.
01:23:27.000We're not declaring this because of what is happening in China.
01:23:30.000There is no reason for measures that unnecessarily interfere with international travel and trade.
01:23:36.000That is so insane to me that the World Health Organization, while all of this is going on, is saying that it is unnecessary to restrict travel and trade.
01:23:48.000They're saying the reason they're declaring a global health emergency is not because of the 9,800 cases or 9,500 cases in China, but because of the 98 cases elsewhere worldwide.
01:24:01.000Well, how do you think those, if that's the case, if that's true,
01:24:05.000If they really mean that, that they're not declaring this emergency because of the infectious disease in China, but because of the handful of cases in all these other countries, where do you think these other countries got the disease from?
01:24:18.000Where did it come from in the United States?
01:24:20.000Five out of six of the cases in the United States came from people from China.
01:24:25.000And the sixth person got it from somebody from China.
01:24:28.000Where do you think it came from in all these other countries?
01:24:31.000Germany, France, Italy, Finland, Singapore.
01:25:23.000Our Jewish calling is to heal the whole world.
01:25:26.000That's why we have this revolutionary idea.
01:25:29.000These people are bureaucrats and they are being paid off and everybody knows that and that is going to be detrimental.
01:25:37.000I mean don't you understand that for all the people that have already gotten the disease and for the next disease that strikes is going to be detrimental.
01:25:46.000The people that should be handling these kinds of global emergencies are totally in the pocket of third world governments.
01:25:54.000And that's really what China amounts to.
01:25:57.000I mean, you've got some first world cities and all that, but I mean, we're talking about a country that shouldn't be able to be in the same room as the United States when it comes to disease preparedness and a whole host of other things.
01:27:04.000You've got pilots in American Airlines that are now suing the airliners, telling them to cancel flights with China because the pilots are terrified of catching coronavirus.
01:27:21.000And the air is being filled up on a 15-hour flight with probably at least a few people that have coronavirus.
01:27:30.000It spreads to doctors that are treating people, doctors that are wearing masks, that are wearing hazmat suits, gloves, they're washing their hands, they're doing everything possible as medical professionals to prevent getting the disease and they get it.
01:27:44.000And pilots and everybody else on board the plane are going to be in this floating coffin with coughing Chinese people over the course of a 15-hour flight from Beijing to Los Angeles.
01:27:56.000The air is being filled with droplets from people talking and coughing and sneezing.
01:28:02.000And who can blame pilots or anybody else?
01:29:36.000And you know, it's more food for thought just like yesterday.
01:29:39.000We can't stop anybody from coming into the country, and nobody even wants to stop them at a healthcare level, at the healthcare professional level, because they care more about the money they're getting from the big businesses, right?
01:29:53.000And from multinational corporations and all the interests.
01:29:56.000It's very, it's very, no pun intended, sick.
01:30:24.000I would never advocate vigilantism or anything like that.
01:30:27.000I disavow violence and I was kidding when I said that.
01:30:30.000But yeah, you know, Dr. Nick prescribes a bullet to the back of the head of everybody that thinks international trade is more important than the health of our nation.
01:31:37.000So let's see, we've got Charlie Kirk who says, Nick Fuentes' time machine, where does he go?
01:31:43.000Nick Fuentes' time machine, where does he go?
01:31:45.000If I were in a time machine, well if Nick Fuentes were in a time machine, he would probably go to... I guess the question is, would you do something for yourself or would you do something like for history?
01:31:58.000You know, some people say they want to go back in time and kill baby Hitler.
01:32:02.000And it's like, that portrays a very weird, oh really?
01:32:05.000You would go back in time to kill Hitler?
01:32:07.000You wouldn't want to go back and like, talk to your dead relatives or talk to people that you never met?
01:32:12.000You know, it's kind of like a sick thing.
01:32:14.000It's like, gee dude, why do you care about that so much?
01:32:16.000Sounds like you're Jewish yourself or something.
01:34:26.000My aunt, my uncle, grandfather, my grandmother.
01:34:30.000It's very hard for me to talk about, but it's the things that happened.
01:34:34.000They all were in the Holocaust, and some of them lived and some of them died.
01:34:38.000You know, I say that they were all Holocaust survivors, even if they died many years later, because, you know, in a way, in a way, or Holocaust victims, in a way, you were all kind of victims of the Holocaust as a people, in some capacity.
01:34:51.000You know, like, my, my, I say my great-grandfather was a victim of the Holocaust, and he actually died before World War II, but, in a way, like, what the Holocaust represents is, like, Jewish hatred.
01:35:03.000And in that way, the Holocaust is still going on.
01:35:07.000So I don't like when people joke about that.
01:35:09.000When people talk about time travel, it automatically triggers me.
01:35:12.000What I would do if I were time traveling, Dr. Ari Silver, I would go back in time and I would kill Hitler.
01:35:18.000I would go back in time and kill Hitler's whole family.
01:35:21.000I would indiscriminately, I would just start murdering Germans.
01:35:24.000If I could go, me, as the Jewish doctor, Ari Silver, I would go back in time and slaughter all Germans for what they did, before they even did it.
01:35:33.000Even the innocent, babies, you name it.
01:35:36.000I would put the Germans in concentration camps.
01:35:38.000Let's see how those goyim like it, huh?
01:36:30.000You'll you'll not have to look very far.
01:36:32.000You'll find her if you seek her out You'll find the town whore and she will find herself And Kathy's you I wouldn't Kathy's you being the town whore.
01:36:41.000I don't have a problem with that I don't have a problem with that at all.
01:36:44.000I don't think anyone would have a problem with that Let's see fool for Christ says I have no complaints for me fool for Christ said she would be operating some massage parlor No complaints for me massage parlor slash sushi bar
01:38:22.000I think if you went to an auditorium at a Chicago public school on the South Side and you said, look, I know what the media says about you.
01:43:11.000Let's see how it's gonna say something, but that's wrong Soviet and that's not that would not be very Christlike if I said that Soviet Henry I caught myself this show is getting a little vulgar lately Soviet Henry says do you watch I just read that Rhode Island says friends think I have Asperger's go off with impunity No, cuz you know, even the people that I know that have Asperger's I don't give them a pass, you know
01:43:36.000Just because they have Asperger's doesn't mean I'm not completely annoyed.
01:45:51.000Let's see Johnny Appleseed says eventually America first will just start at 9 p.m.
01:45:55.000And I could finally finish Tucker and that's not true America first starts every day at 7 o'clock sharp Greatest story says where's the J doc?
01:50:03.000I don't think Chinese people spitting on anybody is funny.
01:50:07.000Not because it's like, oh, women, or that's a... not because my mother... that offends me because my mother, but just because that's just gross.
01:50:16.000You know, they could spit on their own people Royal voice is what the F is going on with mods tonight.
01:50:25.000I'm not paying attention to the live chat Both schools who send Ronald McDonald in the mailing list to activate us.
01:50:32.000I Don't know what that means Rhode Island says I need Nick to neg me before he gets sent to jail Yeah, we'll just come up with a cringe super chat.
01:52:16.000It's not, it's not like visibly dirty, but I haven't vacuumed in a long time.
01:52:20.000I don't, I don't let anybody come in here because I don't want people fooling with stuff, you know.
01:52:25.000It's like the, when, when people are cleaning the house, I'm like, don't, just don't come in here.
01:52:30.000Because every time somebody cleans my room, it's like people move shit around, and they put things in the wrong drawers, and it's just, I can't handle that.
01:52:39.000God forbid somebody came in here, started fucking with my office and studio.
02:00:13.000It's just like what what if people are just like the most formulaic like doctor thing doctor thing and it's funny Okay, dr. Nick and dr. Thing and now it's funny doctor thing and jewish thing and now we're laughing and now I got him laughing Uh, sir, val groy versus got a twitter ban for btf only chinese women worth it
02:00:35.000Okay, Boatschools is in the Ronald is from the Hyde video.
02:02:38.000Anthony says, I was wearing your campus conservative shirt today at school and this black girl got super mad because it said I'm just a normal innocent Afro-Latino and I'm not Afro-Latino.
02:03:14.000This is just awful Jorge says, oh, I'm just gonna stop reading it right there because it's just not funny Jorge says hope the real it's painfully unfunny actually Jorge says hope the real right drowns left in the USA greetings from Costa Rica.
02:03:52.000Whoever sent this superchat in, do not watch my show.
02:03:55.000If I catch you watching my show, if you meet me in real life, don't tell me that you sent this in, because this is the worst thing I've ever seen in my life.
02:04:04.000We've got a boomer rock anthem and then a wignat pun.
02:04:09.000It doesn't help that I haven't eaten anything since 4 a.m., but these are really bad.
02:05:16.000Haha Dimitri says in doctor's office this morning three different Asian particles different Asian parties in the lobby literally first time I've seen any Asians and I've been going every month for seven years what to think and
02:09:44.000All good, but I think at one point they were all pretty good and then they were okay and you know Then some nights it's just like brah, but they've been I will say since I've gone on D live.
02:09:54.000They're a lot better For what it's worth.
02:09:57.000I don't know why but generally speaking on D live the super chats have been way better and even against entropy all the cringe super chats are always on entropy and all the good ones are always on D live and
02:10:09.000Solid snakes is imagine super chat being read weak smile hearing super chat being read intense glare.
02:10:16.000I Don't know what that means Imagining it being read weak smile here.
02:10:22.000Oh It's sort of like you put you send in your super chat And it's you hear your username being read and you you get up and you're watching the TV Now in a world where everyone thinks I could do my job.