00:01:34.000But remember, folks, this is your last week.
00:01:36.000To donate to the super chat that we will be giving to the Christian Appalachian Project.
00:01:42.000So, if you are feeling generous, if you're feeling benevolent, if you're in the Christmas giving spirit, please donate to the super chat and that'll be going, like I said, to the CAP, the Christian Appalachian Project, to help the young kids, the struggling families of Appalachia.
00:02:00.000And we do care about them, we do love them, and it's a nice thing that we do.
00:03:16.000President Trump commuted his first prison sentence today.
00:03:20.000He commuted the prison sentence of a man by the name of Shalom Rubashkin.
00:03:26.000Shalom Rubashkin, of course, a fellow white person, who was caught employing 400 illegal immigrants at one time in a meat processing plant.
00:03:38.000Several years ago, he was indicted on, I believe, 86 different charges, varying from hiring undocumented workers to just outright.
00:03:48.000I mean, this guy was just your typical, your prototypical, rootless transnational elite.
00:03:55.000You know, it wasn't good enough that he was employing 400 illegal migrant laborers at the expense of Americans and taxpayers and the government, but on top of that, defrauding people out of their money with the banks and a number of other things.
00:04:10.000I mean, this guy was just an outright criminal.
00:04:13.000So he has served eight years of a 25 year prison sentence.
00:04:17.000And the reason they said that they were commuting his prison sentence is because compared to other people who committed these crimes, well, his sentence was just too long, you know.
00:04:30.000On top of all the other offensive things about this, the reason they're commuting his prison sentence is because compared to other bank fraudsters, compared to other people who are committing treason against the American worker, he was serving a much longer sentence.
00:05:20.000And we're going to talk about later on in the show President Trump's year in review and all the good things that he's done because he has done a lot of good things for the economy, for immigration, for foreign policy, really a lot of good.
00:05:37.000We see things like what we're seeing in the United Nations today with the passage of the General Assembly resolution condemning the United States' recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
00:05:48.000You look at some of these things where, on the whole, it seems like there's a coherent direction and it's a good direction and there's this America First principle and ethos.
00:05:59.000But then you see these things, these little things like this.
00:06:05.000You see the moving of the embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.
00:06:23.000I guess we can maybe make some assumptions because the response from the Jewish community was overwhelmingly positive at the commutation, the commuting of this prison sentence.
00:06:36.000There was one video that went viral yesterday, or maybe it was earlier today.
00:06:40.000I'm not sure the timing of it, but there was a video that was going around on Twitter today where there was a Jewish person, an obviously Jewish person, who was saying, You know, I'm a left wing person, but if I had known that President Trump would commute Shlomo Rabashkin's prison sentence, well, I would have voted for Donald Trump.
00:06:59.000And this is something that is very telling.
00:07:01.000I mean, number one, maybe we can understand why this happened in that context.
00:07:06.000If the Jewish community is celebrating this, Commuting of the prison sentence.
00:07:11.000It's safe to say that President Trump, Steve Bannon, the Republican Party is getting their ducks in a row financially for the midterms.
00:07:20.000We know where the money comes from in politics and probably in all other places.
00:07:25.000And so these kinds of curious concessions given to Israel and the Jewish community a couple of months out from the primary and general elections of the midterms, you know, there is some overlap there of interest and of need, of necessity for the midterms.
00:08:06.000But what we see when he commutes Shlomo's prison sentence, and the Jewish community says, even though we're leftist, we would have voted for Donald Trump because of this, it tells us something very curious about democracy.
00:08:20.000It tells us something about multiculturalism.
00:08:23.000Which is to say that in that case, in that video, and it was just one video, but it was very telling, ethnic groups in America, non white ethnic and racial and religious groups in America, will put their tribal loyalty above class, above geography, above ideology, even.
00:08:46.000That Jewish person who said, I would have voted for Donald Trump, even though he's a left wing person, even though he probably believes in high taxes.
00:08:54.000In social justice, in foreign intervention, in environmentalism, even though he believes in these great causes, even though he believes in these universal political principles, he would throw that all aside and he would vote for somebody who stands not only like he's not standing for this guy's stated values, his highest held universal principles, but impeding them, standing against them, working to reverse those principles.
00:09:22.000But he would vote for him anyway because he was going to help.
00:09:57.000Problem with our current system, with the present trajectory of this country.
00:10:02.000It flies in the face of the necessary preconditions to have multiculturalism.
00:10:08.000To have multiculturalism, the implicit assumption that everybody must have in their mind and must believe to want these people to come here, to want this policy to be enacted, is that every individual in the country, or rather, every individual in the world, is interchangeable.
00:10:27.000Underlying the policy of multiculturalism and mass immigration must necessarily be the assumption that people racially are interchangeable, that culture is a construct and relevant.
00:10:41.000All of these, and these are pretty big and high values, but they have to be assumed.
00:10:47.000They are implicitly necessary, implicit preconditions to believe that multiculturalism can function in the United States.
00:10:56.000Because if you don't believe that, and if you look at the evidence and you understand that that's not the case, Then you look at immigration, for example, from Mexico.
00:11:05.000You look at the refugee crisis from Africa into Europe.
00:11:08.000And you look at different groups with fundamentally different values, different skills, different characteristics that are immutable, that can never change, and therefore will necessarily create conflict.
00:11:23.000And so that's why it's necessary, if you believe in multiculturalism, that you assume that everybody's interchangeable.
00:11:28.000Because if you don't believe that, if you don't assume that, and you believe that races are different, and you believe that people are different and tribal, Well, then bringing these people in will create conflict.
00:11:39.000Will create deadly, deadly, violent political conflict that will end in the conquest of the nation by one group over the other, one group dominating, oppressing the other.
00:11:52.000You know, possibly genocide, we may be looking at.
00:11:56.000And so when you see something like this, and anytime you see something like this, it's very important to talk about it.
00:12:02.000It's very important to look at it with scrutiny, put it under the microscope.
00:12:07.000In the case of Doug Jones, in the case of Barack Obama, in the case of Shalom Rubashkin, And see exactly what is going on here and allow yourself to look at the evidence and allow it to challenge those assumptions because it will change the way that you look at what's going on in the country.
00:12:25.000It will change the way you envision America's identity.
00:12:29.000That's the biggest problem we have going on, is that people fundamentally, I don't even think they understand their own assumptions about human nature that are changing what we see our country as and what we're doing to our country as a result.
00:12:45.000Because for 50 years since the 1965 Immigration Act, the American nation has had no ethnic or racial identity.
00:12:54.000And for the past 20 years, America has had no cultural identity.
00:12:59.000So we sit at this watershed moment in 2016, 2017, 2018, you know, in a week, where we have to decide can this course continue?
00:13:12.000Can we continue as a nation without cultural identity?
00:13:15.000Racial or ethnic identity, or will we go in the opposite direction and work to rebuild all of those identities that America was and perhaps may be in the future?
00:13:28.000And when we see these moments, when we see these little cross sections, these very telling moments of honesty by these non white communities where they show their true colors, and in the face of their own ideology, in the face of their economic class, in the face of their regional or geographical biases, they go alongside.
00:13:55.000They are begging us to see what will be the inevitable result of mass immigration and multiculturalism, which is that you will have warring tribes.
00:14:05.000You will have war of the world, war of the ethnic enclaves in a formerly coherent country.
00:14:29.000And there's a very good reason for that.
00:14:30.000It's because when people wake up to the fact that Jewish people are going to go with their group, black people are going to vote 97% for their black president, Hispanics are going to vote in those similar numbers for their own kind, these things are telling.
00:14:46.000And that will bring down the entire establishment, the entire edifice, the entire foundation on top of which these present policies are constructed.
00:15:37.000I mean, I think this is the president beyond a shadow of a doubt, more than Barack Obama, more than George W. Bush, under the most scrutiny, under the most criticism, under the most critical eye being applied to every move, every regulation, everything he does, everything he doesn't do, everything he says, everything he doesn't say.
00:15:58.000But it's time now, after a year, you know, he got inaugurated on January 20th, elected on November 8th, to look at just what our president has been up to.
00:16:09.000And it's a very positive picture, by the way.
00:16:10.000I know a lot of people in the more dissident, more hardcore America First Right have been a little bit disillusioned, disenchanted.
00:16:20.000And those people have taken the fake news.
00:16:22.000They've taken what the media has said, and they haven't scrutinized it enough, I don't think, to see what's actually going on.
00:16:31.000You know, it's kind of ironic that the same people that are getting smeared, slandered, and targeted and outright persecuted by the mainstream media.
00:16:40.000When the mainstream media does the same to Donald Trump, they kind of go along with it.
00:16:46.000But if we look at the actual record of Donald Trump in terms of economy, foreign policy, immigration, I mean, just about everything, it is a very solid record.
00:16:55.000It's something that I would not be embarrassed.
00:16:58.000I would not be shy talking about because I think there is a very strong record here that Donald Trump has racked up in a very short amount of time and with very little political experience.
00:17:09.000That's something else to take into account.
00:17:12.000We start, of course, with one of, I think, the most impactful accomplishments of the president, one of the first as well, which was the confirmation of Justice Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court.
00:17:25.000This was, in my opinion, one of the biggest.
00:17:28.000Outside of winning the election, which I think made him one of the greatest of all time, regardless, because had Hillary Clinton gotten into office, it would have been nuclear war and economic meltdown and mass immigration.
00:17:40.000So, barring just winning the election, I believe that the confirmation of Neil Gorsuch was.
00:17:46.000The necessary thing, probably the only box that was necessary for him to check, in my mind, for him not to be a failure.
00:17:55.000In the sense that now that we have a solid conservative balance on the Supreme Court, you already have another generation of conservative domination there in some of the most important rulings that will come down socially, economically, in terms of the constitutional role of the executive.
00:18:13.000Many things I believe that will come down in the next.
00:18:16.000Five to ten to twenty years that we will have a solid balance of power in the courts, and not just the Supreme Court, but also the federal courts that he's appointed judges to, where he's changing the face and the direction of the judiciary, and that will have a very serious and long lasting impact.
00:18:33.000So you look at that one alone, and that is already 100% a solid record, in my opinion.
00:18:42.000As I said before the election, if he gets elected, if he gets the confirmation, and we change the conversation on immigration, he'll have done his job.
00:18:50.000And if there's more, That will be exceptional.
00:18:57.000This one nobody talks about, but this happened within, I believe it was literally a week of his inauguration.
00:19:03.000The Trans Pacific Partnership, the TISA, and the TTIP trade deals were all abandoned by the United States, which is, of course, a very solid thing.
00:19:13.000When you consider that the TPP was supported and written and endorsed by Paul Ryan, Barack Obama, Mitch McConnell, Nancy Pelosi, I mean, everybody in the political establishment was on board with this.
00:19:26.000And you look at the provisions in the TPP, which, you know, they were very destructive for our trade practices.
00:19:33.000They were very destructive for our economy.
00:19:35.000But on top of that, it was just a big fat slap in the face to American sovereignty.
00:19:40.000This was a massive victory for President Trump right out of the gate.
00:19:45.000And I don't feel like he got the credit he deserved on that one.
00:19:48.000It happened so quickly with so many other things, many people forgot about that.
00:19:52.000But if President Trump didn't repeal that, we would be looking at these.
00:19:57.000Multinational corporation tribunals where they could sue the United States basically, blackmail the United States over our regulatory or other economic policies.
00:20:07.000So, a very solid accomplishment there as well.
00:20:11.000He withdrew us from the Paris Climate Accords.
00:20:16.000If you looked at the Paris Climate Accords, again, it's dubious whether this would have been like extremely, extremely impactful on the American economy.
00:20:24.000Wouldn't have been good, but it said something about the world order and America's place in it.
00:20:30.000In the sense that the Paris Climate Accords, if you looked at its provisions, even with regards to China, even with India, two economic powers, two military powers that, according to all internationalists, are going to form the basis of a new multipolar order, and the Paris Climate Accords basically get away with murder.
00:20:51.000Both of these countries allowed them to get away with murder environmentally.
00:20:55.000You know, I mean, you look at the United States and what we had to abide by in the Paris Climate Accords, and we had to give.
00:21:02.000Billions of dollars to third world countries.
00:21:05.000We had to roll back our energy sector.
00:21:07.000We had to do all kinds of draconian regulations to reduce our emissions.
00:21:12.000And all China had to do was make a promise that in the future they would decrease the rate at which their carbon emissions were increasing, if that makes sense.
00:21:24.000So the United States had to today cut back our economy, cut back our energy, implement things that would harm us and harm our people, and China.
00:21:34.000The number two economy in the world had to merely promise that in the future, the rate at which carbon emissions are exponentially increasing would decrease a little bit.
00:21:47.000So the Paris Climate Accords, you know, it wouldn't have been like catastrophic or devastating, but this was another one of those things where the United States was getting brutalized by the world community, was being humiliated by the internationalists.
00:22:05.000The international rootless elite and pulling out of that was an economic benefit, but also I think a very sizable achievement in terms of how we should be respected in the world.
00:22:17.000He withdrew us from the UN Global Compact on Migration.
00:22:21.000Again, that wasn't a massive thing, but again, it was a statement on where America is at in the world with regards to the internationalist goals of a common market, free trade, free immigration, so another moral victory there.
00:22:41.000Again, nobody really looks at that one like a major victory because about a week later, Chuck Schumer's office came out with a note that said Donald Trump would cuck and compromise on everything, and obviously nothing ever came of that.
00:22:56.000By March, all of the legal protections for the illegal immigrants that are here, the Dreamers, the DACA recipients, those legal protections will be gone, and they will be sent back probably by ICE.
00:24:14.000We saw that this week, of course, a tax cut for 80% of Americans, which already has resulted in.
00:24:21.000Thousand dollar bonuses for hundreds of thousands, if not millions of employees for Wells Fargo, for ATT, Boeing, and others.
00:24:30.000Billions of dollars of new capital investment by companies, billions of dollars in new corporate philanthropic giving by these corporations.
00:25:43.000Economic growth has been over 3% every quarter that he's been in office.
00:25:48.000And in fact, because GDP growth was 3.1% in the second quarter, 3.3% in the third quarter, and projected to be 3.2% in the fourth quarter, This will be the first year since 2005 that the United States has grown by more than 3% for three consecutive quarters, so record economic growth.
00:26:09.000Consumer confidence is at a 17 year high.
00:26:13.000So, this is an outstanding picture economically, militarily, in terms of trade, in terms of our international position in the world, in terms of regulations.
00:26:26.000President Trump passed a new law where, for every one new regulation, Two regulations would be repealed.
00:26:33.000Effectively, however, it has functioned that for every one new regulation, 16 old regulations have been repealed.
00:26:40.000So the law says that for every one new one, two would be repealed.
00:26:45.000In fact, in effect, 16 have been repealed.
00:26:51.000The travel ban, of course, effectively ended new visa applications or the acceptance of new visa applications for several high risk Muslim countries in North Africa and the Middle East.
00:27:05.000And you look at all of these accomplishments, and this could be enough accomplishments, I believe, for four years, with the exception of the law.
00:27:13.000This could be enough accomplishments for four years.
00:27:17.000And anybody who is blackpilled about this president, anybody who thinks the president's not always cracked up to be, that he's not America first, I really question the intentions.
00:27:28.000I question the motives of these people because the record is so unequivocally, so clearly, so inarguably solid.
00:27:38.000That for anybody on our side to say that our president, to say that this guy in the White House is a turncoat or he's somehow compromising his principles, I seriously question the motivation.
00:27:49.000I question the intention because you cannot dispute all of what I've just said.
00:27:55.000I mean, and not only do you have all of these accomplishments in every sector, in every way, shape, and form, have we been moving in the right direction, but you also have to consider the fact that Donald Trump is not a politician, right?
00:28:11.000Everything that we said about Donald Trump leading up to the election has been vindicated.
00:28:16.000We said that that would not only not be a bad thing that he had no political experience, but actually a good thing, actually, it'll make him better.
00:28:24.000And people said, no, you need to know.
00:28:42.000Donald Trump has proven himself to be, I believe, one of the most competent, one of the most effectual presidents, probably in 50 years, maybe even longer, compared to Barack Obama, George Bush, and just about anybody since the Cold War ended.
00:28:56.000So we're looking at a really solid picture here for this year, and that only gives us more optimism, only gives us more hope for the coming years.
00:29:05.000Because you understand that if he was able to accomplish all of this with a Congress and a party, his own party, that was actively impeding him, imagine what is possible.
00:29:19.000If after the 2018 primaries and after the 2018 general election, we have a much stronger majority in the Senate and in the House, which is projected by many pollsters, and not only do we have stronger majorities, but the people that constitute those majorities are solid, pro Trump, America First type people, just imagine what will be possible in the next two years, what will be possible in the remaining three years of this presidency.
00:29:51.000The ending of the wars in the Middle East and all of the major things that he promised.
00:29:55.000And I have to say, I didn't know how he was going to do it.
00:29:58.000You know, building up to the election, of course, we were all in on it.
00:30:02.000We were all in on one goal of electing Donald Trump because whether you liked him, whether you didn't like him, whether you thought he was just useful or if you were really a believer, I mean, we all knew that the alternative would be a disaster, would be far worse.
00:30:26.000And certainly once it happened, I really didn't know where we were going to go from there because you looked at just what kind of situation he inherited with regards to the economy, with foreign policy.
00:30:38.000I mean, just about everything was in ruin when he came into office.
00:30:42.000And don't get me wrong, it's not perfect now.
00:30:44.000It's by no means an optimal situation now.
00:30:48.000But the rapidity, the rate at which we have turned 180 degrees and gone in the opposite direction is.
00:30:57.000It's striking, and it gives me a lot of optimism for what's possible moving forward.
00:31:02.000I really think this will be the first step if played correctly.
00:31:07.000If this is kept up and this is consistent, this may be the first step in a genuine revival.
00:31:13.000And so that is a clear message, I think, to anybody who's blackpilling, who is saying that, you know, we're too far gone.
00:31:19.000And I hear this very often because the numbers are daunting.
00:31:22.000In just about, again, any number you look at, it's a scary number.
00:31:27.000But people tell me all the time, you know, Nick, are we too far gone?
00:31:29.000Nick, I appreciate your optimism, but I don't think elections are going to cut it.
00:32:21.000I think I would give him a solid A. You have all kinds of people from the dissident right, from the alt right, from the alt light, from just regular conservative ink nationalist review types trying to tell everybody that this is not good.
00:32:35.000Black pillars abound from all sides of the political spectrum.
00:32:44.000Just absolutely wrong, and the evidence is absolutely crystal clear with regards to everything that's been accomplished.
00:32:52.000And this is, I think, this far surpasses anything that we could have seen from anyone else.
00:32:57.000And that should say something as well.
00:32:59.000Many people would compare this to the ideal, they would compare this to grandiose campaign promises.
00:33:05.000And even compared to that, he's coming up pretty strongly.
00:33:07.000But a more realistic comparison would be to say, what would this look like if we were a year into the Marco Rubio presidency?
00:33:14.000What would this look like if we were a year into the Jeb Bush or Ted Cruz presidency.
00:33:21.000I doubt it would be as good of a picture.
00:33:23.000So we're very strong, and this is a white pill not just for this term, not just for this president, but for the system in general that the system can be worked, it can be gamed, and it can be won.
00:33:37.000It has to be won with elections, and we'll do it.
00:33:44.000The last thing I want to talk about before we get to our super chats is.
00:33:49.000And we've talked about this on Nationalist Review.
00:33:51.000We talked about it on Nat Review yesterday.
00:33:54.000We've been talking about this kind of in the Super Chats lately over the week.
00:33:59.000But this is something that I've been looking at more and more, and I've been thinking about it a lot.
00:34:04.000I've really given serious thought to this while playing Minecraft and doing other things.
00:34:09.000But I've been watching the peculiar ascendancy of Paul Nealon, who, if you're not familiar, we've had him on the show before for an interview.
00:34:42.000And for people that have not been following him, he's sort of taken a very interesting stylistic choice in terms of his Twitter, in terms of his messaging.
00:34:52.000If you've been paying attention to his Twitter, He's been going a little bit off the rails, and in a good way.
00:35:02.000He's been calling out certain Judaic influences in the conservative establishment and just taking a very no holds barred approach, coming at it from a pretty white identitarian perspective.
00:35:14.000And a lot of people have asked me about this.
00:35:16.000A lot of people have asked me, is this a prudent choice?
00:35:25.000And certainly there is a case to be made.
00:35:28.000A lot of silly posts, a lot of esoteric meme posts going on some pretty edgy.
00:35:34.000Questionable podcasts and other things.
00:35:37.000But the more that I think about it, my initial impression was that this was a strategic mistake, that I didn't get it, that his campaign manager was either not there or didn't have sufficient control.
00:35:50.000And then I was just praying to God that he had a strategy.
00:35:53.000But the more that I thought about it, the more that I realized Paul Nealon right now is conducting and he is instructing us, he is giving us a prototype of what.
00:36:06.000The America First campaign of the future looks like.
00:36:12.000This is the model for our movement, and everybody should be taking notes.
00:36:16.000Because I've been watching the shit posting, and then today I watched his live stream about it.
00:36:22.000Because you look at his memes on Twitter, you look at the things that he types and the pictures, but then you watch the video, and something very interesting is going on here.
00:36:30.000This is exactly the ideal form that this movement should take.
00:36:35.000When he's on Twitter, when he's on the internet, it's edgy, it's funny, it's So controversial that any conservative donor, any like Heritage Foundation old bastard would balk at it.
00:36:48.000They would say, This guy has no chance.
00:38:01.000And you look at this model where he comes at it online very hard, very sharp, very controversial, very funny, and he gets massive engagement.
00:38:10.000But then you look at him in appearance when he does his town halls, when he does his guest appearances like at MAGA meetups, he does interviews, he does speeches, and he is.
00:38:21.000Blue collar, normie presenting, patriotic optics, American optics, and that is exactly the model that will work.
00:38:31.000I've been putting forth kind of this ad hoc political doctrine of American nationalist optics.
00:38:39.000I know that's kind of like a dirty word because people are, you know, LARPy and silly, but I've been kind of putting forth this doctrine, and Andrew Anglin and Weave have also concurred that this is the proper direction.
00:38:52.000And I believe that what we're seeing in Paul Nealon is the proto.
00:38:56.000Form, the prototype form of what this will look like in 20 years.
00:39:01.000And in every sense of the word, he is a pioneer.
00:39:16.000What matters is that what he is experimenting with, what he is trying, what he is putting out there is, in my opinion, the most interesting.
00:39:27.000Probably the most pragmatic attempt thus far discovered to get this kind of dissident fringe right ideology into mainstream politics and into elected office.
00:39:44.000I know many people have been asking me about that, and certainly this situation has been going on for a couple of weeks.
00:39:50.000Many people have taken notice, and at first I was very skeptical of it.
00:39:54.000At first I was not quite sure what he was doing, but as I've watched this played out, as I've watched Paul Nealon.
00:40:02.000Grow and change his tactics because I was on board with him since 2016.
00:40:08.000I really think there is something powerful going on here.
00:40:11.000And you're not going to see it this year.
00:40:13.000You're not going to see it in six months.
00:40:14.000You're not going to see it probably even in the election results.
00:40:17.000But this is something for anybody out there who's interested in seeing these political objectives succeed, getting these things into the conversation.
00:40:29.000He talks about, for example, Ari Cohn.
00:40:33.000And he talks about how Ari Cohn is going to try and throw his Jewish victim identity at Paul Nealon in order to shame him.
00:40:41.000And Paul Nealon comes at it from a very peculiar angle, whereas some people on this movement would come at it in person, on a live stream, in person, from a very meme tier, from a very edgy, very extreme perspective.
00:40:54.000You know, you have Mike Enoch who goes to the White Lives Matter rally and he's yelling and screaming about Jewish conspiracy and Jewish this and Jewish that.
00:41:03.000Paul Nealon goes on the live stream and says, You know, I believe in God.
00:41:07.000He goes on even Fashion the Nation and he says, I am a servant of God and this is a Christian nation and I won't back down to any religion, Islam, Judaism, and I'm praying for everybody.
00:41:19.000I believe, and you hear him talk about it from this Christian angle, from this very normie presenting angle.
00:41:26.000And that's sort of when the light went off in my head and I realized this is viable.
00:41:31.000This is a really solid thing that he's doing, where he takes something that online, Anybody, any sensible person, anybody in their right mind, even me, would say, You could never get away with that.
00:41:47.000But he does it in a way online and he translates it on live stream and in person in a way that it works, that that would be a very powerful thing.
00:42:18.000But I'm playing Minecraft from the people in my Discord server, and like half of them are in high school, half of them are like these millennials.
00:42:30.000I just think it's funny because people try to make it out like Nick's trying to be the leader of the alt right, Nick's trying to purge the alt right.
00:42:37.000And I'm literally just shitposting on Twitter.
00:42:40.000Playing Minecraft with racist teenagers online.
00:42:44.000But anyway, so I'm messing around this week, and just the more that I think about it, the more that I think about things that he said, things that he's tweeted, the more it all starts to come together.
00:42:55.000And everybody should really think long and hard about this.
00:45:27.000He only affirmed what was already in American law.
00:45:31.000Since 1995, it has been United States law.
00:45:35.000It has been in the United States law that the U.S. recognizes Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and that the embassy should move to Jerusalem.
00:45:42.000All he did was say, We're preparing to do that and we recognize Jerusalem as the capital.
00:47:14.000It used to be, well, actually, I don't want to say my congressman because then people could see where I live, but I used to have a good congressman.
00:47:22.000Now I don't have a very good congressman.
00:47:25.000And there's really nobody that I've seen, and I don't really follow local and state politics too much, but nobody has really stood out to me as exceptionally pure of heart.
00:47:34.000You know, I've been to the Chicago City Council for a meeting, and I encourage everybody who lives in Chicago to go, and if you can, Sit in on a meeting of the Chicago City Council because these people, these aldermen who run the city and Rahm Emanuel, these are the lowest lowlifes.
00:47:53.000These are the lowest scum you will ever see in your life.
00:47:57.000I went there and I was just outright shocked and surprised at who was here running the city.
00:48:03.000I mean, so many of these people just look like grifters, grifters or simpletons.
00:48:08.000And that's not, and I don't mean that in like a class way, I don't even mean that in like a mean way, but it's just, you would imagine that there would be some base level of.
00:48:15.000Competence in your government, and then you go and you see who these people are, and it just doesn't exist.
00:48:20.000I have a family friend of mine who's in the Chicago City Council.
00:48:24.000Very good guy, very solid guy, but the rest, not so much.
00:48:29.000Vanella Tella says, Who's your favorite based black guy?
00:53:06.000I don't think I would ever seriously consider settling down with a fellow ESOLAB, only because it's just a peculiar thing about this kind of an industry in particular.
00:53:18.000And to call it an industry, how pretentious is that?
00:54:42.000The only reason is because it's better not only for everybody, but for women in particular.
00:54:49.000The reason we don't want women working, the reason we don't want women on the battlefield or in politics, ideally, is because they have the most special, the most divine, the most important.
00:55:02.000Job in the society, which is to be mothers, and they're the only ones that can do it.
00:55:07.000So, you know, people kind of project onto me all of these like nefarious or immature motives or intentions when I put this message out there.
00:55:17.000It only comes from a place of absolute respect for women's most important job, the most important job in a society.
00:55:26.000I mean, think of it everybody has a mother, and where would everybody be without their mothers?
00:55:31.000Where would you be without your mother?
00:55:35.000So, When we say we don't want women in politics, we don't want women in the workforce, it's not because it's like the 1970s and I'm Archie Bunker opposed to the changing world.
00:58:11.000Barring certain exceptions, where if it's an abusive relationship, if there's drugs involved, if, I mean, there are exceptions.
00:58:18.000But in the case of Steve Bonnell, there was no, as far as I'm concerned, I don't believe there was an issue there other than refusal to make it work.
00:58:28.000And so I know that's a personal attack, but really, I, you know, we have to get away from this divorce as socially acceptable.
00:59:19.000No, Mama Fuentes, she doesn't like being on camera so much.
00:59:23.000She gets a big kick out of being like a secondary character on the show.
00:59:29.000She's like, I keep telling her, I always neg her by telling her she's like the mom.
00:59:33.000In that Requiem for a Dream movie, if you've ever seen that.
00:59:37.000In that movie, the mom gets invited to be on a game show.
00:59:41.000It's this old woman, the very old mom.
00:59:44.000She gets invited to be on a game show, and she tries to fit into this beautiful old dress of hers from back when she was younger, but she can't because she let herself go.
00:59:55.000And she wants to desperately fit into this dress so she could be on the game show, and that's her only entertainment because her kid's on heroin or whatever.
01:00:04.000So she goes on amphetamines to lose weight to fit into the dress, and then she loses her mind and she's obsessed with being on television.
01:00:11.000And my mom's always like, Wow, your audience loves me.
01:00:14.000Your audience is always talking about me.
01:00:16.000I tell her, You know, you're like that mom from Requiem for a Dream.
01:00:21.000For anybody out there who thinks drugs are cool or not bad, which is a really problematic thing I see, especially in the dissident right, people don't respect drugs, you should watch that movie because that'll set you straight.
01:00:36.000I've lost many family members to drug abuse, and people come around me like it's some kind of a joke.
01:00:43.000People who do cocaine or they do whatever, and it's something to be laughed at.
01:02:17.000What we're saying is not like greedy, give me, give me America over everybody else, but it's simply that the American government will put the American country first and American interests first.
01:02:29.000And where American interests lie, there will be American support.
01:02:34.000But where they don't, support will be rescinded.
01:02:39.000Because you look at, for example, some of these countries in Indochina where we have a trade deficit, that's not fair for us.
01:02:46.000I don't care how strong allies there are, it's not fair that we're getting.
01:02:50.000Beat over the head with unfair trade practices.
01:02:52.000So I don't think it will be a major hindrance.
01:02:55.000And I think if you look at President Trump's relationship so far with Japan, Japan is a pretty good example.
01:03:03.000I think that flies in the face of that argument that, or that, you know, I don't know if you made that argument, but anybody who would say that America First is hurting our relationships with foreign countries, particularly Asian countries, because the rhetoric that Trump has been saying for 20 or 25 years has been very anti Japan.
01:03:24.000If we were taking up this argument that America first rhetoric would be harmful, he's been talking for 25 years about how Japan has been ripping us off militarily and economically with regards to trade.
01:03:35.000And him and President Abe, Shinzo Abe, have been pretty fast friends.
01:03:42.000And even with South Korea, it's been a pretty solid relationship as well.
01:03:46.000So I think you look even at Vietnam when they had the APEC summit, he had a pretty warm, Reception there and got a standing ovation when he talked about how America would put its interest first, like they expect every other country to do the same.