America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - Donald Trump's Year in Review | America First Ep. 74

00:00:02.000 Good evening, everybody.

00:00:02.000 You are watching America First.

00:00:04.000 My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.

00:00:06.000 We have a great show for you tonight.

00:00:11.000 It's another boring week, another lame, boring week.

00:00:15.000 That's the problem.

00:00:16.000 When you do the show five days a week, you run out of things that go on.

00:00:22.000 We're going through the list of topics for today. 1.00

00:00:25.000 Women in movies, already did that one. 1.00

00:00:28.000 Aliens, Project Bluebeam, it's a little bit out there. 1.00

00:00:31.000 We settle on. 1.00

00:00:33.000 The Jewish banking fraud hiring illegal immigrants. 0.94

00:00:37.000 What is going on up there? 1.00

00:00:39.000 Hiring illegal immigrants. 1.00

00:00:40.000 And, you know, isn't that a big surprise? 1.00

00:00:43.000 Wasn't that a big, oh, you know, Jewish person doing something to, you know, hurt the country and bank fraud? 0.97

00:00:50.000 What's going on? 0.99

00:00:51.000 You know, so there was that.

00:00:53.000 And we have to talk about Donald Trump's year in review.

00:00:57.000 The year in review, this will be minus tomorrow's call in show, the last episode of America First of 2017.

00:01:05.000 And so I think.

00:01:06.000 It would be a fitting time to go over all of Donald Trump's accomplishments, kind of see where we're at.

00:01:13.000 I know it's not a year since the inauguration, but it is 2017.

00:01:18.000 I think it's a pretty good unit of time to judge by.

00:01:22.000 And we'll see how we're doing.

00:01:23.000 How are we doing?

00:01:24.000 How's this administration doing?

00:01:26.000 Is it everything that it was cracked up to be?

00:01:29.000 Is it making America great again?

00:01:31.000 And then we will do our super chats.

00:01:34.000 But remember, folks, this is your last week.

00:01:36.000 To donate to the super chat that we will be giving to the Christian Appalachian Project.

00:01:42.000 So, if you are feeling generous, if you're feeling benevolent, if you're in the Christmas giving spirit, please donate to the super chat and that'll be going, like I said, to the CAP, the Christian Appalachian Project, to help the young kids, the struggling families of Appalachia.

00:02:00.000 And we do care about them, we do love them, and it's a nice thing that we do.

00:02:04.000 So, there's that.

00:02:06.000 And of course, remember the Amfirst Media mugs are on sale right now on AmfirstMedia.com.

00:02:12.000 You can get them very reasonably priced, I believe, $10, and then shipping on top of that.

00:02:20.000 You won't get them in time for Christmas, unfortunately, because Christmas is in four days, but you will get them eventually.

00:02:28.000 So there's that as well.

00:02:30.000 But on to our friend here.

00:02:33.000 On to our friend.

00:02:35.000 This was a pretty wacky, pretty wild story here.

00:02:39.000 I couldn't believe it when I saw it because it's just the most cartoonish.

00:02:43.000 This is like a caricature.

00:02:46.000 And we get criticized on this show, and people in this movement get criticized for being hateful or racist or whatever.

00:02:54.000 But then we see a story like this, and it's like, how can we be the racists if we are merely observing things that are happening?

00:03:02.000 We are merely witness to obvious things that anyone can see, that anyone would find peculiar, see patterns.

00:03:11.000 But we have our first.

00:03:13.000 Commutation.

00:03:14.000 Is that the word right?

00:03:16.000 President Trump commuted his first prison sentence today.

00:03:20.000 He commuted the prison sentence of a man by the name of Shalom Rubashkin.

00:03:26.000 Shalom Rubashkin, of course, a fellow white person, who was caught employing 400 illegal immigrants at one time in a meat processing plant.

00:03:38.000 Several years ago, he was indicted on, I believe, 86 different charges, varying from hiring undocumented workers to just outright.

00:03:47.000 Bank fraud. 0.98

00:03:48.000 I mean, this guy was just your typical, your prototypical, rootless transnational elite. 0.99

00:03:55.000 You know, it wasn't good enough that he was employing 400 illegal migrant laborers at the expense of Americans and taxpayers and the government, but on top of that, defrauding people out of their money with the banks and a number of other things. 0.82

00:04:10.000 I mean, this guy was just an outright criminal.

00:04:13.000 So he has served eight years of a 25 year prison sentence.

00:04:17.000 And the reason they said that they were commuting his prison sentence is because compared to other people who committed these crimes, well, his sentence was just too long, you know.

00:04:28.000 So, And I find this ironic.

00:04:30.000 On top of all the other offensive things about this, the reason they're commuting his prison sentence is because compared to other bank fraudsters, compared to other people who are committing treason against the American worker, he was serving a much longer sentence.

00:04:47.000 The solution?

00:04:49.000 Lower his sentence.

00:04:50.000 Commute his sentence, right?

00:04:51.000 Not jail all the bankers. 0.98

00:04:53.000 Not jail all people that hire undocumented workers.

00:04:57.000 Not jail all globalists and journalists for longer to match his sentence.

00:05:02.000 No, no, you got to cut his sentence in half, right?

00:05:04.000 So that's pretty ironic.

00:05:07.000 But I'm just puzzled by this. 1.00

00:05:10.000 I'm left doing the old Steve Frantz and scratching my head like a dumb idiot, wondering why this has happened. 1.00

00:05:19.000 Why has this happened? 0.99

00:05:20.000 And we're going to talk about later on in the show President Trump's year in review and all the good things that he's done because he has done a lot of good things for the economy, for immigration, for foreign policy, really a lot of good.

00:05:35.000 But then we see things like this.

00:05:37.000 We see things like what we're seeing in the United Nations today with the passage of the General Assembly resolution condemning the United States' recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

00:05:48.000 You look at some of these things where, on the whole, it seems like there's a coherent direction and it's a good direction and there's this America First principle and ethos.

00:05:59.000 But then you see these things, these little things like this.

00:06:05.000 You see the moving of the embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.

00:06:05.000 Prison sentence.

00:06:10.000 You see, for example, the tweets very sympathetic to DACA back in August.

00:06:16.000 And there's these little moments of just confusion, of just dissonance here.

00:06:21.000 And I'm not quite sure what that is.

00:06:23.000 I guess we can maybe make some assumptions because the response from the Jewish community was overwhelmingly positive at the commutation, the commuting of this prison sentence.

00:06:36.000 There was one video that went viral yesterday, or maybe it was earlier today.

00:06:40.000 I'm not sure the timing of it, but there was a video that was going around on Twitter today where there was a Jewish person, an obviously Jewish person, who was saying, You know, I'm a left wing person, but if I had known that President Trump would commute Shlomo Rabashkin's prison sentence, well, I would have voted for Donald Trump.

00:06:59.000 And this is something that is very telling.

00:07:01.000 I mean, number one, maybe we can understand why this happened in that context. 0.96

00:07:06.000 If the Jewish community is celebrating this, Commuting of the prison sentence. 0.82

00:07:11.000 It's safe to say that President Trump, Steve Bannon, the Republican Party is getting their ducks in a row financially for the midterms. 0.98

00:07:20.000 We know where the money comes from in politics and probably in all other places.

00:07:25.000 And so these kinds of curious concessions given to Israel and the Jewish community a couple of months out from the primary and general elections of the midterms, you know, there is some overlap there of interest and of need, of necessity for the midterms.

00:07:42.000 So That's the first takeaway.

00:07:44.000 Maybe there's something going on here.

00:07:46.000 Maybe there's a pattern here.

00:07:48.000 But number two, here's the important thing. 0.83

00:07:51.000 I mean, yeah, there's Jewish money going into politics, and maybe that has something to do with it. 0.60

00:07:55.000 But more broadly, even with regards to that, what we see in the commuting is that a word, commutation? 0.65

00:08:03.000 I keep wanting to say that.

00:08:04.000 I don't know if it's a word. 0.63

00:08:06.000 But what we see when he commutes Shlomo's prison sentence, and the Jewish community says, even though we're leftist, we would have voted for Donald Trump because of this, it tells us something very curious about democracy.

00:08:20.000 It tells us something about multiculturalism.

00:08:23.000 Which is to say that in that case, in that video, and it was just one video, but it was very telling, ethnic groups in America, non white ethnic and racial and religious groups in America, will put their tribal loyalty above class, above geography, above ideology, even.

00:08:46.000 That Jewish person who said, I would have voted for Donald Trump, even though he's a left wing person, even though he probably believes in high taxes. 0.54

00:08:54.000 In social justice, in foreign intervention, in environmentalism, even though he believes in these great causes, even though he believes in these universal political principles, he would throw that all aside and he would vote for somebody who stands not only like he's not standing for this guy's stated values, his highest held universal principles, but impeding them, standing against them, working to reverse those principles.

00:09:22.000 But he would vote for him anyway because he was going to help.

00:09:25.000 A fellow member of the tribe.

00:09:28.000 And you see this time and time again.

00:09:31.000 We saw this last week on Tuesday with the election of Doug Jones in Alabama.

00:09:36.000 We saw this in 2016 with Hillary Clinton.

00:09:39.000 We saw this in 2008 and 2012 with Barack Obama. 0.74

00:09:44.000 What we see is that non white people, non Christian people vote according to their tribal group. 0.88

00:09:52.000 And this is the biggest argument. 0.94

00:09:54.000 This is the biggest argument.

00:09:57.000 Problem with our current system, with the present trajectory of this country. 0.88

00:10:02.000 It flies in the face of the necessary preconditions to have multiculturalism.

00:10:08.000 To have multiculturalism, the implicit assumption that everybody must have in their mind and must believe to want these people to come here, to want this policy to be enacted, is that every individual in the country, or rather, every individual in the world, is interchangeable.

00:10:27.000 Underlying the policy of multiculturalism and mass immigration must necessarily be the assumption that people racially are interchangeable, that culture is a construct and relevant.

00:10:41.000 All of these, and these are pretty big and high values, but they have to be assumed.

00:10:47.000 They are implicitly necessary, implicit preconditions to believe that multiculturalism can function in the United States.

00:10:56.000 Because if you don't believe that, and if you look at the evidence and you understand that that's not the case, Then you look at immigration, for example, from Mexico.

00:11:05.000 You look at the refugee crisis from Africa into Europe.

00:11:08.000 And you look at different groups with fundamentally different values, different skills, different characteristics that are immutable, that can never change, and therefore will necessarily create conflict. 0.95

00:11:23.000 And so that's why it's necessary, if you believe in multiculturalism, that you assume that everybody's interchangeable. 0.78

00:11:28.000 Because if you don't believe that, if you don't assume that, and you believe that races are different, and you believe that people are different and tribal, Well, then bringing these people in will create conflict.

00:11:39.000 Will create deadly, deadly, violent political conflict that will end in the conquest of the nation by one group over the other, one group dominating, oppressing the other. 0.88

00:11:52.000 You know, possibly genocide, we may be looking at.

00:11:56.000 And so when you see something like this, and anytime you see something like this, it's very important to talk about it.

00:12:02.000 It's very important to look at it with scrutiny, put it under the microscope.

00:12:07.000 In the case of Doug Jones, in the case of Barack Obama, in the case of Shalom Rubashkin, And see exactly what is going on here and allow yourself to look at the evidence and allow it to challenge those assumptions because it will change the way that you look at what's going on in the country.

00:12:25.000 It will change the way you envision America's identity.

00:12:29.000 That's the biggest problem we have going on, is that people fundamentally, I don't even think they understand their own assumptions about human nature that are changing what we see our country as and what we're doing to our country as a result.

00:12:45.000 Because for 50 years since the 1965 Immigration Act, the American nation has had no ethnic or racial identity.

00:12:54.000 And for the past 20 years, America has had no cultural identity.

00:12:59.000 So we sit at this watershed moment in 2016, 2017, 2018, you know, in a week, where we have to decide can this course continue?

00:13:12.000 Can we continue as a nation without cultural identity?

00:13:15.000 Racial or ethnic identity, or will we go in the opposite direction and work to rebuild all of those identities that America was and perhaps may be in the future? 0.82

00:13:28.000 And when we see these moments, when we see these little cross sections, these very telling moments of honesty by these non white communities where they show their true colors, and in the face of their own ideology, in the face of their economic class, in the face of their regional or geographical biases, they go alongside. 0.76

00:13:48.000 They go with their tribal group. 0.85

00:13:51.000 They go with their tribal loyalty.

00:13:52.000 They are proving to us.

00:13:54.000 They are showing us.

00:13:55.000 They are begging us to see what will be the inevitable result of mass immigration and multiculturalism, which is that you will have warring tribes.

00:14:05.000 You will have war of the world, war of the ethnic enclaves in a formerly coherent country. 0.92

00:14:11.000 So that's Shalom Rubashkin.

00:14:14.000 It's a small story, it's not a huge thing.

00:14:16.000 I didn't see it reported on so much in the news.

00:14:19.000 I went on Fox, BBC, Breitbart, I went on all of them.

00:14:23.000 And I didn't see this anywhere.

00:14:24.000 I saw this on Twitter very early this morning.

00:14:27.000 And nobody talks about it.

00:14:29.000 And there's a very good reason for that. 0.98

00:14:30.000 It's because when people wake up to the fact that Jewish people are going to go with their group, black people are going to vote 97% for their black president, Hispanics are going to vote in those similar numbers for their own kind, these things are telling. 0.93

00:14:46.000 And that will bring down the entire establishment, the entire edifice, the entire foundation on top of which these present policies are constructed. 0.67

00:14:56.000 So.

00:14:57.000 That's Shalom Rubashkin, just a quick little thing. 0.79

00:14:59.000 And now that we have gotten that out of the way, we've gotten our requisite non white bashing. 0.68

00:15:07.000 I'm joking, but mass immigration bashing, that is what the left would say about it. 0.59

00:15:12.000 But now that we've got our mass immigration fix for the night, we have to look at President Donald Trump's year in review.

00:15:21.000 And this has been coming for a long time.

00:15:24.000 It seems like every week we do this, though.

00:15:26.000 Every week in the mainstream media, Donald Trump's record is up for discussion, is up for judgment.

00:15:33.000 Every week, it's a terrible president. 0.97

00:15:35.000 He's a failed president.

00:15:37.000 I mean, I think this is the president beyond a shadow of a doubt, more than Barack Obama, more than George W. Bush, under the most scrutiny, under the most criticism, under the most critical eye being applied to every move, every regulation, everything he does, everything he doesn't do, everything he says, everything he doesn't say.

00:15:58.000 But it's time now, after a year, you know, he got inaugurated on January 20th, elected on November 8th, to look at just what our president has been up to.

00:16:09.000 And it's a very positive picture, by the way.

00:16:10.000 I know a lot of people in the more dissident, more hardcore America First Right have been a little bit disillusioned, disenchanted.

00:16:20.000 And those people have taken the fake news.

00:16:22.000 They've taken what the media has said, and they haven't scrutinized it enough, I don't think, to see what's actually going on.

00:16:31.000 You know, it's kind of ironic that the same people that are getting smeared, slandered, and targeted and outright persecuted by the mainstream media.

00:16:40.000 When the mainstream media does the same to Donald Trump, they kind of go along with it.

00:16:44.000 They kind of take it at face value.

00:16:46.000 But if we look at the actual record of Donald Trump in terms of economy, foreign policy, immigration, I mean, just about everything, it is a very solid record.

00:16:55.000 It's something that I would not be embarrassed.

00:16:58.000 I would not be shy talking about because I think there is a very strong record here that Donald Trump has racked up in a very short amount of time and with very little political experience.

00:17:09.000 That's something else to take into account.

00:17:11.000 So.

00:17:12.000 We start, of course, with one of, I think, the most impactful accomplishments of the president, one of the first as well, which was the confirmation of Justice Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court.

00:17:25.000 This was, in my opinion, one of the biggest. 0.77

00:17:28.000 Outside of winning the election, which I think made him one of the greatest of all time, regardless, because had Hillary Clinton gotten into office, it would have been nuclear war and economic meltdown and mass immigration. 0.55

00:17:40.000 So, barring just winning the election, I believe that the confirmation of Neil Gorsuch was.

00:17:46.000 The necessary thing, probably the only box that was necessary for him to check, in my mind, for him not to be a failure.

00:17:55.000 In the sense that now that we have a solid conservative balance on the Supreme Court, you already have another generation of conservative domination there in some of the most important rulings that will come down socially, economically, in terms of the constitutional role of the executive.

00:18:13.000 Many things I believe that will come down in the next.

00:18:16.000 Five to ten to twenty years that we will have a solid balance of power in the courts, and not just the Supreme Court, but also the federal courts that he's appointed judges to, where he's changing the face and the direction of the judiciary, and that will have a very serious and long lasting impact.

00:18:33.000 So you look at that one alone, and that is already 100% a solid record, in my opinion.

00:18:40.000 But there's a lot more.

00:18:42.000 As I said before the election, if he gets elected, if he gets the confirmation, and we change the conversation on immigration, he'll have done his job.

00:18:50.000 And if there's more, That will be exceptional.

00:18:52.000 And there is a lot more.

00:18:53.000 So there was Neil Gorsuch.

00:18:56.000 He repealed the TPP.

00:18:57.000 This one nobody talks about, but this happened within, I believe it was literally a week of his inauguration.

00:19:03.000 The Trans Pacific Partnership, the TISA, and the TTIP trade deals were all abandoned by the United States, which is, of course, a very solid thing.

00:19:13.000 When you consider that the TPP was supported and written and endorsed by Paul Ryan, Barack Obama, Mitch McConnell, Nancy Pelosi, I mean, everybody in the political establishment was on board with this.

00:19:26.000 And you look at the provisions in the TPP, which, you know, they were very destructive for our trade practices.

00:19:33.000 They were very destructive for our economy.

00:19:35.000 But on top of that, it was just a big fat slap in the face to American sovereignty.

00:19:40.000 This was a massive victory for President Trump right out of the gate.

00:19:45.000 And I don't feel like he got the credit he deserved on that one.

00:19:48.000 It happened so quickly with so many other things, many people forgot about that.

00:19:52.000 But if President Trump didn't repeal that, we would be looking at these.

00:19:57.000 Multinational corporation tribunals where they could sue the United States basically, blackmail the United States over our regulatory or other economic policies.

00:20:07.000 So, a very solid accomplishment there as well.

00:20:11.000 He withdrew us from the Paris Climate Accords.

00:20:15.000 This was another big one.

00:20:16.000 If you looked at the Paris Climate Accords, again, it's dubious whether this would have been like extremely, extremely impactful on the American economy.

00:20:24.000 Wouldn't have been good, but it said something about the world order and America's place in it.

00:20:30.000 In the sense that the Paris Climate Accords, if you looked at its provisions, even with regards to China, even with India, two economic powers, two military powers that, according to all internationalists, are going to form the basis of a new multipolar order, and the Paris Climate Accords basically get away with murder.

00:20:51.000 Both of these countries allowed them to get away with murder environmentally.

00:20:55.000 You know, I mean, you look at the United States and what we had to abide by in the Paris Climate Accords, and we had to give.

00:21:02.000 Billions of dollars to third world countries.

00:21:04.000 We had to cut our emissions.

00:21:05.000 We had to roll back our energy sector.

00:21:07.000 We had to do all kinds of draconian regulations to reduce our emissions.

00:21:12.000 And all China had to do was make a promise that in the future they would decrease the rate at which their carbon emissions were increasing, if that makes sense. 0.82

00:21:24.000 So the United States had to today cut back our economy, cut back our energy, implement things that would harm us and harm our people, and China. 0.71

00:21:34.000 The number two economy in the world had to merely promise that in the future, the rate at which carbon emissions are exponentially increasing would decrease a little bit. 0.93

00:21:45.000 And that was China.

00:21:47.000 So the Paris Climate Accords, you know, it wouldn't have been like catastrophic or devastating, but this was another one of those things where the United States was getting brutalized by the world community, was being humiliated by the internationalists.

00:22:05.000 The international rootless elite and pulling out of that was an economic benefit, but also I think a very sizable achievement in terms of how we should be respected in the world.

00:22:17.000 He withdrew us from the UN Global Compact on Migration.

00:22:20.000 That was very recently.

00:22:21.000 Again, that wasn't a massive thing, but again, it was a statement on where America is at in the world with regards to the internationalist goals of a common market, free trade, free immigration, so another moral victory there.

00:22:37.000 He repealed DACA in August.

00:22:41.000 Again, nobody really looks at that one like a major victory because about a week later, Chuck Schumer's office came out with a note that said Donald Trump would cuck and compromise on everything, and obviously nothing ever came of that.

00:22:53.000 So DACA has been completely repealed.

00:22:56.000 By March, all of the legal protections for the illegal immigrants that are here, the Dreamers, the DACA recipients, those legal protections will be gone, and they will be sent back probably by ICE. 0.63

00:23:09.000 They will be deported. 1.00

00:23:10.000 So, a major victory there.

00:23:13.000 ISIS has been defeated, and people have said, you know, oh, well, that was Bashar al Assad, that was Russia.

00:23:20.000 But again, you look at when the tide of the war started to turn, and it was almost exactly when President Trump got into office.

00:23:29.000 People say that President Trump is somehow not responsible for the American military defeating the American military's adversary.

00:23:38.000 There are 2,000 troops in Syria, there are thousands of troops in Iraq.

00:23:42.000 We have been arming, we have been equipping all of the people, all of the parties.

00:23:47.000 Who have been fighting ISIS, sometimes actually ISIS themselves.

00:23:50.000 So, I mean, it was the leadership of President Trump that ended ISIS.

00:23:54.000 Both of their capitals have been captured.

00:23:57.000 They control less than 5% of both Syria and Iraq.

00:24:00.000 Their leader is wounded and dying.

00:24:03.000 Both Iraq and Syria have declared victory against ISIS.

00:24:06.000 So, major campaign promise that he fulfilled, that he delivered the goods on with that one.

00:24:13.000 Tax cuts.

00:24:14.000 We saw that this week, of course, a tax cut for 80% of Americans, which already has resulted in.

00:24:21.000 Thousand dollar bonuses for hundreds of thousands, if not millions of employees for Wells Fargo, for ATT, Boeing, and others.

00:24:30.000 Billions of dollars of new capital investment by companies, billions of dollars in new corporate philanthropic giving by these corporations.

00:24:37.000 So a major win for the economy.

00:24:40.000 And then you look at the economic growth this year and just so much better than expectations.

00:24:48.000 I did not imagine in my wildest expectations this kind of economic growth in this short amount of time.

00:24:56.000 5,000 points have been added to the Dow Jones since Donald Trump was elected in November.

00:25:01.000 And that is the most in one year in American history.

00:25:05.000 The most points in one year out of any other year that the Dow Jones has been around.

00:25:10.000 More than under Reagan, more than under Bush or Clinton.

00:25:14.000 More points added to the Dow Jones than when the internet was invented.

00:25:18.000 More than when you had the largest period of wealth creation in the history of the world from 1980 to 2005.

00:25:27.000 And we had that in one year under Donald Trump.

00:25:30.000 Unemployment at less than 4% is at a 16 year low.

00:25:34.000 Manufacturing jobs have rebounded back to levels that they were at in 2012 and 2014.

00:25:40.000 Home prices have increased by 3%.

00:25:43.000 Economic growth has been over 3% every quarter that he's been in office.

00:25:48.000 And in fact, because GDP growth was 3.1% in the second quarter, 3.3% in the third quarter, and projected to be 3.2% in the fourth quarter, This will be the first year since 2005 that the United States has grown by more than 3% for three consecutive quarters, so record economic growth.

00:26:09.000 Consumer confidence is at a 17 year high.

00:26:13.000 So, this is an outstanding picture economically, militarily, in terms of trade, in terms of our international position in the world, in terms of regulations.

00:26:26.000 President Trump passed a new law where, for every one new regulation, Two regulations would be repealed.

00:26:33.000 Effectively, however, it has functioned that for every one new regulation, 16 old regulations have been repealed.

00:26:40.000 So the law says that for every one new one, two would be repealed.

00:26:45.000 In fact, in effect, 16 have been repealed.

00:26:48.000 So, massive deregulation machine.

00:26:51.000 The travel ban, of course, effectively ended new visa applications or the acceptance of new visa applications for several high risk Muslim countries in North Africa and the Middle East. 0.66

00:27:05.000 And you look at all of these accomplishments, and this could be enough accomplishments, I believe, for four years, with the exception of the law. 0.91

00:27:13.000 This could be enough accomplishments for four years.

00:27:17.000 And anybody who is blackpilled about this president, anybody who thinks the president's not always cracked up to be, that he's not America first, I really question the intentions.

00:27:28.000 I question the motives of these people because the record is so unequivocally, so clearly, so inarguably solid.

00:27:38.000 That for anybody on our side to say that our president, to say that this guy in the White House is a turncoat or he's somehow compromising his principles, I seriously question the motivation.

00:27:49.000 I question the intention because you cannot dispute all of what I've just said.

00:27:55.000 I mean, and not only do you have all of these accomplishments in every sector, in every way, shape, and form, have we been moving in the right direction, but you also have to consider the fact that Donald Trump is not a politician, right?

00:28:11.000 Everything that we said about Donald Trump leading up to the election has been vindicated.

00:28:16.000 We said that that would not only not be a bad thing that he had no political experience, but actually a good thing, actually, it'll make him better.

00:28:24.000 And people said, no, you need to know.

00:28:26.000 You need to know politics.

00:28:27.000 You need to have somebody.

00:28:29.000 You know, that was all the dopey people who wanted Ted Cruz and John Kasich and all the rest.

00:28:35.000 And I wanted Ted Cruz briefly, so I shouldn't neg the Ted Cruz people too hard.

00:28:41.000 But.

00:28:42.000 Donald Trump has proven himself to be, I believe, one of the most competent, one of the most effectual presidents, probably in 50 years, maybe even longer, compared to Barack Obama, George Bush, and just about anybody since the Cold War ended.

00:28:56.000 So we're looking at a really solid picture here for this year, and that only gives us more optimism, only gives us more hope for the coming years.

00:29:05.000 Because you understand that if he was able to accomplish all of this with a Congress and a party, his own party, that was actively impeding him, imagine what is possible.

00:29:16.000 After the 2018 elections.

00:29:19.000 If after the 2018 primaries and after the 2018 general election, we have a much stronger majority in the Senate and in the House, which is projected by many pollsters, and not only do we have stronger majorities, but the people that constitute those majorities are solid, pro Trump, America First type people, just imagine what will be possible in the next two years, what will be possible in the remaining three years of this presidency.

00:29:47.000 I think you really will see a wall.

00:29:49.000 I think you really will see.

00:29:51.000 The ending of the wars in the Middle East and all of the major things that he promised.

00:29:55.000 And I have to say, I didn't know how he was going to do it.

00:29:58.000 You know, building up to the election, of course, we were all in on it.

00:30:02.000 We were all in on one goal of electing Donald Trump because whether you liked him, whether you didn't like him, whether you thought he was just useful or if you were really a believer, I mean, we all knew that the alternative would be a disaster, would be far worse.

00:30:16.000 And so we were all in on it.

00:30:18.000 And after the election, I think a lot of people fell off.

00:30:21.000 I think a lot of people.

00:30:24.000 Got disenchanted and disillusioned.

00:30:26.000 And certainly once it happened, I really didn't know where we were going to go from there because you looked at just what kind of situation he inherited with regards to the economy, with foreign policy.

00:30:38.000 I mean, just about everything was in ruin when he came into office.

00:30:42.000 And don't get me wrong, it's not perfect now.

00:30:44.000 It's by no means an optimal situation now.

00:30:48.000 But the rapidity, the rate at which we have turned 180 degrees and gone in the opposite direction is.

00:30:57.000 It's striking, and it gives me a lot of optimism for what's possible moving forward.

00:31:02.000 I really think this will be the first step if played correctly.

00:31:07.000 If this is kept up and this is consistent, this may be the first step in a genuine revival.

00:31:13.000 And so that is a clear message, I think, to anybody who's blackpilling, who is saying that, you know, we're too far gone.

00:31:19.000 And I hear this very often because the numbers are daunting.

00:31:22.000 In just about, again, any number you look at, it's a scary number.

00:31:27.000 But people tell me all the time, you know, Nick, are we too far gone?

00:31:29.000 Nick, I appreciate your optimism, but I don't think elections are going to cut it.

00:31:34.000 I don't think there's any way.

00:31:36.000 But you look at how much has been accomplished by literally one man in one year.

00:31:42.000 And this should tell everybody that if we were all pulling our weight like Donald Trump, it would be over in a minute.

00:31:49.000 We would save the country in a minute.

00:31:50.000 So big white pills being doled out on America First.

00:31:54.000 Black Pillars, BTFO, we are winning very strongly.

00:31:59.000 I don't see how any of these numbers could look any better.

00:32:02.000 You know, and people are going to say, oh, the wall's not built.

00:32:05.000 Meanwhile, the wall is being constructed on the southern border right now.

00:32:09.000 They're building the.

00:32:11.000 They're building the samples.

00:32:11.000 Prototypes.

00:32:12.000 So, very, very solid picture.

00:32:15.000 We're very happy with Donald Trump.

00:32:18.000 So, that's your year in review.

00:32:20.000 I think I would give him an A.

00:32:21.000 I think I would give him a solid A. You have all kinds of people from the dissident right, from the alt right, from the alt light, from just regular conservative ink nationalist review types trying to tell everybody that this is not good.

00:32:35.000 Black pillars abound from all sides of the political spectrum. 0.98

00:32:40.000 But I think they're all wrong. 1.00

00:32:42.000 They're all.

00:32:44.000 Just absolutely wrong, and the evidence is absolutely crystal clear with regards to everything that's been accomplished.

00:32:52.000 And this is, I think, this far surpasses anything that we could have seen from anyone else.

00:32:57.000 And that should say something as well.

00:32:59.000 Many people would compare this to the ideal, they would compare this to grandiose campaign promises.

00:33:05.000 And even compared to that, he's coming up pretty strongly.

00:33:07.000 But a more realistic comparison would be to say, what would this look like if we were a year into the Marco Rubio presidency?

00:33:14.000 What would this look like if we were a year into the Jeb Bush or Ted Cruz presidency.

00:33:21.000 I doubt it would be as good of a picture.

00:33:23.000 So we're very strong, and this is a white pill not just for this term, not just for this president, but for the system in general that the system can be worked, it can be gamed, and it can be won.

00:33:37.000 It has to be won with elections, and we'll do it.

00:33:41.000 So that's Donald Trump.

00:33:43.000 That's your year in review.

00:33:44.000 The last thing I want to talk about before we get to our super chats is.

00:33:49.000 And we've talked about this on Nationalist Review.

00:33:51.000 We talked about it on Nat Review yesterday. 0.93

00:33:54.000 We've been talking about this kind of in the Super Chats lately over the week.

00:33:59.000 But this is something that I've been looking at more and more, and I've been thinking about it a lot.

00:34:04.000 I've really given serious thought to this while playing Minecraft and doing other things.

00:34:09.000 But I've been watching the peculiar ascendancy of Paul Nealon, who, if you're not familiar, we've had him on the show before for an interview.

00:34:19.000 Paul Nealon is challenging Paul Ryan.

00:34:22.000 For the Republican nomination for the first district of Wisconsin, the first congressional district of Wisconsin.

00:34:30.000 He campaigned against Paul Ryan in 2016, came up a little bit short.

00:34:35.000 You know, he came up about 86 points short.

00:34:39.000 But he will be trying again in 2018.

00:34:42.000 And for people that have not been following him, he's sort of taken a very interesting stylistic choice in terms of his Twitter, in terms of his messaging.

00:34:52.000 If you've been paying attention to his Twitter, He's been going a little bit off the rails, and in a good way.

00:34:58.000 I mean that in a good way.

00:35:00.000 He's been calling out John Podhoritz. 0.81

00:35:02.000 He's been calling out certain Judaic influences in the conservative establishment and just taking a very no holds barred approach, coming at it from a pretty white identitarian perspective.

00:35:14.000 And a lot of people have asked me about this. 0.65

00:35:16.000 A lot of people have asked me, is this a prudent choice?

00:35:20.000 Is Paul Nealon going too far?

00:35:22.000 Is his Twitter too controversial?

00:35:24.000 Is he too extreme?

00:35:25.000 And certainly there is a case to be made. 0.93

00:35:28.000 A lot of silly posts, a lot of esoteric meme posts going on some pretty edgy.

00:35:34.000 Questionable podcasts and other things.

00:35:37.000 But the more that I think about it, my initial impression was that this was a strategic mistake, that I didn't get it, that his campaign manager was either not there or didn't have sufficient control.

00:35:50.000 And then I was just praying to God that he had a strategy.

00:35:53.000 But the more that I thought about it, the more that I realized Paul Nealon right now is conducting and he is instructing us, he is giving us a prototype of what.

00:36:06.000 The America First campaign of the future looks like.

00:36:10.000 This is the model that will work.

00:36:12.000 This is the model for our movement, and everybody should be taking notes. 0.99

00:36:16.000 Because I've been watching the shit posting, and then today I watched his live stream about it. 0.93

00:36:22.000 Because you look at his memes on Twitter, you look at the things that he types and the pictures, but then you watch the video, and something very interesting is going on here. 0.98

00:36:30.000 This is exactly the ideal form that this movement should take. 0.85

00:36:35.000 When he's on Twitter, when he's on the internet, it's edgy, it's funny, it's So controversial that any conservative donor, any like Heritage Foundation old bastard would balk at it.

00:36:48.000 They would say, This guy has no chance. 0.99

00:36:50.000 He's dead.

00:36:51.000 That's what he does on the internet.

00:36:52.000 That's what he does on Twitter.

00:36:54.000 And what is the result?

00:36:55.000 He gets massive engagement.

00:36:57.000 He gets massive retweets, followers, legitimacy, credibility from America First type people.

00:37:04.000 He gets out there.

00:37:05.000 He is working social media pragmatically to the ends that social media is used for, which is.

00:37:12.000 Messaging, which is getting your message out there, getting eyeballs on you.

00:37:15.000 It's no such thing as bad publicity kind of a thing.

00:37:19.000 But then you look, and a very interesting thing happens when he goes on the live stream, whereas on Twitter he is calling people out.

00:37:27.000 It's no holds barred.

00:37:28.000 It's very aggressive.

00:37:29.000 It's very funny.

00:37:30.000 It's very edgy, ironic.

00:37:32.000 But then when he goes on video, he's sitting in his office.

00:37:35.000 He's in his work uniform because he's a blue collar guy.

00:37:40.000 He runs many factories, but he worked his way up and he looks like a real salt of the earth kind of a guy.

00:37:47.000 And he's sitting in his office at his business that he owns, American flags everywhere.

00:37:52.000 And he's talking about his faith.

00:37:54.000 He's talking about his country.

00:37:55.000 He's talking about his people.

00:37:56.000 And he's talking about, incidentally, economic nationalism.

00:38:01.000 And you look at this model where he comes at it online very hard, very sharp, very controversial, very funny, and he gets massive engagement.

00:38:10.000 But then you look at him in appearance when he does his town halls, when he does his guest appearances like at MAGA meetups, he does interviews, he does speeches, and he is.

00:38:21.000 Blue collar, normie presenting, patriotic optics, American optics, and that is exactly the model that will work.

00:38:30.000 Mark my words.

00:38:31.000 I've been putting forth kind of this ad hoc political doctrine of American nationalist optics.

00:38:39.000 I know that's kind of like a dirty word because people are, you know, LARPy and silly, but I've been kind of putting forth this doctrine, and Andrew Anglin and Weave have also concurred that this is the proper direction.

00:38:52.000 And I believe that what we're seeing in Paul Nealon is the proto. 0.52

00:38:56.000 Form, the prototype form of what this will look like in 20 years.

00:39:01.000 And in every sense of the word, he is a pioneer.

00:39:04.000 He is doing God's work.

00:39:05.000 And this will be an election to watch.

00:39:08.000 This will be a campaign to watch.

00:39:10.000 It doesn't matter if he wins.

00:39:13.000 It doesn't matter if he comes close to winning.

00:39:15.000 None of that matters.

00:39:16.000 What matters is that what he is experimenting with, what he is trying, what he is putting out there is, in my opinion, the most interesting.

00:39:27.000 Probably the most pragmatic attempt thus far discovered to get this kind of dissident fringe right ideology into mainstream politics and into elected office.

00:39:41.000 So I just wanted to comment on that.

00:39:44.000 I know many people have been asking me about that, and certainly this situation has been going on for a couple of weeks.

00:39:50.000 Many people have taken notice, and at first I was very skeptical of it.

00:39:54.000 At first I was not quite sure what he was doing, but as I've watched this played out, as I've watched Paul Nealon.

00:40:02.000 Grow and change his tactics because I was on board with him since 2016.

00:40:08.000 I really think there is something powerful going on here.

00:40:11.000 And you're not going to see it this year.

00:40:13.000 You're not going to see it in six months.

00:40:14.000 You're not going to see it probably even in the election results.

00:40:17.000 But this is something for anybody out there who's interested in seeing these political objectives succeed, getting these things into the conversation.

00:40:26.000 This has to be the way.

00:40:28.000 And I'll give you a good example.

00:40:29.000 He talks about, for example, Ari Cohn.

00:40:33.000 And he talks about how Ari Cohn is going to try and throw his Jewish victim identity at Paul Nealon in order to shame him.

00:40:41.000 And Paul Nealon comes at it from a very peculiar angle, whereas some people on this movement would come at it in person, on a live stream, in person, from a very meme tier, from a very edgy, very extreme perspective.

00:40:54.000 You know, you have Mike Enoch who goes to the White Lives Matter rally and he's yelling and screaming about Jewish conspiracy and Jewish this and Jewish that.

00:41:03.000 Paul Nealon goes on the live stream and says, You know, I believe in God.

00:41:07.000 He goes on even Fashion the Nation and he says, I am a servant of God and this is a Christian nation and I won't back down to any religion, Islam, Judaism, and I'm praying for everybody.

00:41:19.000 I believe, and you hear him talk about it from this Christian angle, from this very normie presenting angle.

00:41:26.000 And that's sort of when the light went off in my head and I realized this is viable.

00:41:31.000 This is a really solid thing that he's doing, where he takes something that online, Anybody, any sensible person, anybody in their right mind, even me, would say, You could never get away with that.

00:41:43.000 You could never say that.

00:41:45.000 You could never be that explicit.

00:41:47.000 But he does it in a way online and he translates it on live stream and in person in a way that it works, that that would be a very powerful thing.

00:41:56.000 So that's one to watch.

00:41:58.000 That's Paul Nealon.

00:41:59.000 We're coming up on the 45 minute marks.

00:42:02.000 We'll move into your live chats.

00:42:04.000 But I mean, holy smokes, I saw that with Paul Nealon and, you know, I'm playing Minecraft.

00:42:10.000 I'm such a goober. 0.92

00:42:11.000 You know, I have to say, people call me like this arrogant guy. 0.88

00:42:14.000 People call me like I take myself too seriously.

00:42:17.000 I don't take myself seriously enough.

00:42:18.000 But I'm playing Minecraft from the people in my Discord server, and like half of them are in high school, half of them are like these millennials.

00:42:27.000 And anyway, that's an aside.

00:42:30.000 I just think it's funny because people try to make it out like Nick's trying to be the leader of the alt right, Nick's trying to purge the alt right.

00:42:37.000 And I'm literally just shitposting on Twitter. 0.98

00:42:40.000 Playing Minecraft with racist teenagers online. 0.92

00:42:44.000 But anyway, so I'm messing around this week, and just the more that I think about it, the more that I think about things that he said, things that he's tweeted, the more it all starts to come together.

00:42:55.000 And everybody should really think long and hard about this.

00:42:57.000 That's the kind of thinking.

00:42:59.000 This is the kind of innovation in messaging, in communications, in narrative, in optics that is going to push us into power. 0.98

00:43:07.000 We can't keep trying the same old shit to be vulgar, you know, pardon the French, but the same stuff. 0.98

00:43:15.000 We can't keep doing it. 0.99

00:43:18.000 Have to try new stuff.

00:43:19.000 And Paul Nealon is out there and he is pushing the envelope.

00:43:22.000 This is really experimental stuff and it's one to watch.

00:43:26.000 So, anyway, on to the super chats.

00:43:30.000 Gary Oak with the single shekel. 1.00

00:43:32.000 Thank you for that.

00:43:34.000 Al Chibades, you know, again, it's that Greek name.

00:43:38.000 I'm sorry I'm butchering it, but, you know, I'm not too good with anything but the English names. 0.78

00:43:45.000 Says this chat is a Shoah.

00:43:47.000 A Shoah.

00:43:48.000 I don't even know what the Shoah is.

00:43:49.000 What does that even mean?

00:43:51.000 Charles Heiston says Trump sold out the USA.

00:43:54.000 He put Israel first, not us.

00:43:58.000 You know, I don't think that's true.

00:44:01.000 I think there is selling out, and then I think there is political compromise.

00:44:06.000 And that is a nuance that has to be made.

00:44:09.000 People that don't really care about the truth will say that that nuance doesn't exist.

00:44:14.000 They'll say, oh, come on, you know, what's the difference between selling out and compromising?

00:44:18.000 Well, there is a big difference, you know, because a lot of conservatives just outright.

00:44:24.000 Sellout in terms of Israel.

00:44:26.000 But with Donald Trump, I don't think it is a selling out.

00:44:28.000 I think it is a careful walking a thin line about it.

00:44:32.000 If he were selling out to Israel, he wouldn't have destroyed ISIS. 0.56

00:44:35.000 Consider that.

00:44:36.000 If he were a sellout, I don't think he would have been as hard on Bibi Netanyahu about the settlements or as frank with Bibi Netanyahu.

00:44:46.000 I don't think he would have taken a lot of the lines that he has on certain memorials, certain anniversaries of certain events.

00:44:55.000 There are little subtle things.

00:44:57.000 Excuse me, that he does and implicit things in the policy that tell me that he is not a sellout.

00:45:03.000 That, you know, when he does these little pandering things to Israel, I think that's all it is is pandering.

00:45:09.000 I think it's paying lip service.

00:45:11.000 You know, especially with the embassy situation, notice that nothing actually happened.

00:45:18.000 Notice that he declared that Jerusalem would be the capital, and that was it.

00:45:25.000 The embassy didn't move, nothing changed.

00:45:27.000 He only affirmed what was already in American law.

00:45:31.000 Since 1995, it has been United States law.

00:45:35.000 It has been in the United States law that the U.S. recognizes Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and that the embassy should move to Jerusalem.

00:45:42.000 All he did was say, We're preparing to do that and we recognize Jerusalem as the capital.

00:45:47.000 So he didn't actually do anything.

00:45:50.000 He paid lip service.

00:45:51.000 It was a speech that perhaps could have gotten him somewhere.

00:45:55.000 I mean, we don't know why he did it.

00:45:55.000 I don't know.

00:45:57.000 We'll never know the backroom deals, why that came to fruition.

00:46:01.000 I think the timing was certainly.

00:46:03.000 Curious.

00:46:04.000 But if we look at what actually happened, it's not like he committed two mass invasions to benefit Israel like George Bush.

00:46:11.000 It's not like he toppled several dictatorships to benefit Israel like Barack Obama.

00:46:17.000 He destroyed ISIS. 0.74

00:46:18.000 I mean, that was one of the only things in the way of complete Iranian hegemony in the region. 0.78

00:46:25.000 And he took ISIS out at the expense of Israel and at the expense of a lot of ministers in Israel who didn't want to see that happen. 0.73

00:46:33.000 So. 0.63

00:46:34.000 I think there's something to be said about that.

00:46:37.000 Marissa Blythe with a generous donation.

00:46:39.000 Thank you very much.

00:46:41.000 Who says the politics here in Chicago are black pilling to say the least?

00:46:46.000 Are there any local candidateslash organizations here that you would recommend supporting?

00:46:51.000 Merry Christmas and wishing the charity much success this month.

00:46:54.000 Well, thank you so much for your charitable donation and Merry Christmas to you too.

00:46:59.000 There are no white pilling people in Chicago.

00:47:03.000 I have to be very honest.

00:47:05.000 I look at just about everybody that's running locally and statewide and it's just bad.

00:47:10.000 It's just bad all around.

00:47:12.000 My.

00:47:13.000 Congressman, formerly my congressman.

00:47:14.000 It used to be, well, actually, I don't want to say my congressman because then people could see where I live, but I used to have a good congressman.

00:47:22.000 Now I don't have a very good congressman.

00:47:25.000 And there's really nobody that I've seen, and I don't really follow local and state politics too much, but nobody has really stood out to me as exceptionally pure of heart.

00:47:34.000 You know, I've been to the Chicago City Council for a meeting, and I encourage everybody who lives in Chicago to go, and if you can, Sit in on a meeting of the Chicago City Council because these people, these aldermen who run the city and Rahm Emanuel, these are the lowest lowlifes. 0.91

00:47:53.000 These are the lowest scum you will ever see in your life. 0.94

00:47:57.000 I went there and I was just outright shocked and surprised at who was here running the city. 1.00

00:48:03.000 I mean, so many of these people just look like grifters, grifters or simpletons.

00:48:08.000 And that's not, and I don't mean that in like a class way, I don't even mean that in like a mean way, but it's just, you would imagine that there would be some base level of.

00:48:15.000 Competence in your government, and then you go and you see who these people are, and it just doesn't exist.

00:48:20.000 I have a family friend of mine who's in the Chicago City Council.

00:48:24.000 Very good guy, very solid guy, but the rest, not so much.

00:48:29.000 Vanella Tella says, Who's your favorite based black guy? 0.54

00:48:33.000 Mine is Uncle Ruckus.

00:48:34.000 Mine would be Thomas Sowell.

00:48:37.000 Because Thomas Sowell is a very, I think he's a genius.

00:48:40.000 I think he's a very smart man.

00:48:43.000 And it's got nothing to do with his race or anything like that.

00:48:45.000 But he'd probably be my favorite.

00:48:47.000 He was very influential in my.

00:48:50.000 Intellectual, ideological development.

00:48:52.000 I've read Basic Economics, Facts and Fallacies.

00:48:56.000 I read his book on Marxism, which I recommend so highly.

00:49:00.000 I recommend his book on Marxism, and I recommend everything he's written.

00:49:03.000 He's a very solid writer, very prolific and very good.

00:49:08.000 I read his column for years.

00:49:10.000 Every day in high school, I would get to school early, I'd go to the library, and I'd pull up Jewish World Review.

00:49:17.000 I know that's kind of on the nose, but They used to have a pretty solid collection of conservative pundits and everything.

00:49:24.000 And that was back when I was more of a neoliberal, anyway.

00:49:27.000 And I would come into school every morning early, and I would pull up that website and I'd read Thomas Sowell's column.

00:49:32.000 I'd read Walter Williams' column.

00:49:35.000 I'd read Charles Crownhammer's column.

00:49:37.000 And I'd read George Will's column. 0.97

00:49:39.000 That was before all of them turned into never Trump homos. 1.00

00:49:43.000 But Thomas Sowell is a really solid guy. 0.99

00:49:49.000 Dark Eternal says, Paul Nealon's Twitter is epic.

00:49:52.000 Hi from kosher New Zealand, by the way. 0.81

00:49:55.000 Well, hello to you too.

00:49:56.000 And yeah, Paul is good.

00:49:58.000 New Zealand, huh?

00:50:01.000 That's a great country.

00:50:02.000 It's pretty high in economic freedom, pretty high in just straight up freedom.

00:50:07.000 Demographically, pretty solid country.

00:50:09.000 That might be the place to go when everything hits the fan.

00:50:09.000 I don't know.

00:50:12.000 But yeah, hello from America.

00:50:17.000 Cosmic Doggerin says, I be building cathedrals on Minecraft.

00:50:21.000 In multiplayer, yeah.

00:50:23.000 Well, look, Minecraft is very fun.

00:50:25.000 Minecraft is Chad. 0.95

00:50:28.000 I know I'm gonna take a lot of shit for that, but I'm not gonna like pretend I'm not who I am, you know. 0.97

00:50:34.000 Deep down at heart, I'm 19, but deep down, I'm still a child inside in a lot of ways. 0.98

00:50:41.000 But there will come a time.

00:50:43.000 Probably in about a couple of years, I'll have to stop with Jacob Sartorius.

00:50:48.000 I'll have to stop quoting Wizards of Waverly Place on my Twitter.

00:50:52.000 I'll have to stop playing Minecraft and stop being a goober and get serious.

00:50:56.000 But I'm 19.

00:50:58.000 I can be 19.

00:51:00.000 And I can act my age.

00:51:02.000 I think it would be silly if I wasn't.

00:51:04.000 I think it would be kind of silly if I tried to pretend to be.

00:51:07.000 You know, I think it's much more immature to pretend that you are mature than it is to just, you know, be who you are.

00:51:14.000 But a little bit of esoteric wisdom there from the old Minecraft chieftain Alchabades, awesome.

00:51:23.000 Loving that name.

00:51:24.000 Keep coming back. 1.00

00:51:26.000 Says, Love your fasci haircut, no homo. 1.00

00:51:28.000 How much do you pay? 1.00

00:51:29.000 This is not a fasci haircut.

00:51:31.000 I get a number two on the sides.

00:51:33.000 A number two is not an undercut.

00:51:36.000 And it's not long enough on the top for it to be an undercut.

00:51:39.000 So, not fasci, but.

00:51:40.000 Thank you for the compliment anyway.

00:51:42.000 I actually pay an outrageous amount.

00:51:44.000 I don't go to like super cuts or anything because I just have like a principle.

00:51:50.000 I think it's almost ideological, my hatred for super cuts.

00:51:53.000 It's almost an ideological, it's almost a religious hatred for sports cuts, super cuts, great clips.

00:52:00.000 I can't have it.

00:52:00.000 I don't like it.

00:52:02.000 So I pay.

00:52:04.000 What did I pay for this, Kurt?

00:52:05.000 I think I paid $25 plus tip.

00:52:08.000 And usually I go to another barber in the city and it costs me $30 or $35.

00:52:14.000 And that.

00:52:15.000 I am considering just stopping doing altogether because that's outrageous.

00:52:19.000 But I do go to a barber.

00:52:21.000 There's something about the barber shop, the old school barber shop. 0.93

00:52:25.000 It's one of those last stands of implicit white identity that we have to savor there. 0.85

00:52:30.000 But I'm not, trust me, I'm not thrilled about spending $35 on a haircut. 0.94

00:52:35.000 I don't have that kind of disposable income.

00:52:38.000 So fortunately, I shake my parents down for it.

00:52:42.000 American Chunk says, Would you ever consider breeding with Lauren Rose?

00:52:46.000 Well, that's a pretty.

00:52:48.000 Graphic way to say it.

00:52:52.000 I don't know.

00:52:53.000 I haven't really made up my mind on female content creators as mates. 0.94

00:53:00.000 I don't know if I would prefer someone who's totally out of the spotlight and not into it.

00:53:00.000 I don't know.

00:53:04.000 I probably would.

00:53:05.000 So I would say no.

00:53:06.000 I don't think I would ever seriously consider settling down with a fellow ESOLAB, only because it's just a peculiar thing about this kind of an industry in particular.

00:53:18.000 And to call it an industry, how pretentious is that?

00:53:20.000 But you know what I mean.

00:53:21.000 I mean, this.

00:53:22.000 Field, there's something about it where it gets kind of weird.

00:53:28.000 There's this drama thing, there's this ego thing that goes on, and it's just part of the business.

00:53:32.000 But I wouldn't be thrilled about that.

00:53:36.000 It's too much politics.

00:53:37.000 I think I would be more comfortable with somebody who wants nothing to do with politics. 1.00

00:53:41.000 I don't believe women should be involved in politics. 1.00

00:53:44.000 She wants to be. 1.00

00:53:45.000 That's a personal choice of hers, and good for her. 1.00

00:53:47.000 But I'm a big believer that women, generally speaking, don't have strong political insights. 1.00

00:53:54.000 And I couldn't lie for that long. 0.99

00:53:57.000 I couldn't be married to somebody and continually lie and say, like, that's a solid thing you're doing.

00:54:04.000 But I like her content.

00:54:06.000 For what it's worth, I like her content.

00:54:09.000 She's a very smart girl, obviously.

00:54:13.000 But there is a little bit of a difference there. 0.97

00:54:16.000 Maybe I agree with her on the pragmatic angle that it's good to have women propagating the message. 0.97

00:54:21.000 And I don't know. 1.00

00:54:23.000 Even that's a little bit dubious.

00:54:24.000 Maybe there's some overlap there. 1.00

00:54:26.000 Just generally speaking, I am so anti women in politics. 0.97

00:54:30.000 And the only reason why, it's not because I hate women. 1.00

00:54:32.000 It's not because I think women are dumb. 1.00

00:54:34.000 Okay? 1.00

00:54:35.000 I don't think women are stupid or anything like that. 1.00

00:54:38.000 I don't dislike women. 0.99

00:54:39.000 I'm not a MGTOW.

00:54:41.000 I'm not at all.

00:54:42.000 The only reason is because it's better not only for everybody, but for women in particular. 0.93

00:54:49.000 The reason we don't want women working, the reason we don't want women on the battlefield or in politics, ideally, is because they have the most special, the most divine, the most important. 0.99

00:55:02.000 Job in the society, which is to be mothers, and they're the only ones that can do it. 0.93

00:55:07.000 So, you know, people kind of project onto me all of these like nefarious or immature motives or intentions when I put this message out there. 0.97

00:55:17.000 It only comes from a place of absolute respect for women's most important job, the most important job in a society.

00:55:26.000 I mean, think of it everybody has a mother, and where would everybody be without their mothers?

00:55:31.000 Where would you be without your mother?

00:55:34.000 You wouldn't exist. 0.96

00:55:35.000 So, When we say we don't want women in politics, we don't want women in the workforce, it's not because it's like the 1970s and I'm Archie Bunker opposed to the changing world. 0.97

00:55:45.000 It's got nothing to do with that.

00:55:46.000 It's because women are the backbone of the nation. 1.00

00:55:51.000 You don't have new generations, you don't have strong men and women without good mothers, and that's why they have to be there.

00:55:59.000 So it's just, and there are so many misconceptions about that.

00:56:04.000 It's not that we think women are incapable of doing important jobs. 0.85

00:56:08.000 We think they're supremely qualified for the most important job. 1.00

00:56:12.000 You know, you think we can't empower ourselves by being politicians?

00:56:16.000 No, we don't want you to degrade and debase yourself by doing something as disgusting and dirty and unfortunate as politics.

00:56:24.000 We want you to do the best thing, we want you to do the most important work. 1.00

00:56:30.000 And these women are too dumb to understand that that's what we're trying to do for them. 1.00

00:56:34.000 No, but that was a joke. 1.00

00:56:35.000 That one was a joke.

00:56:38.000 And we have to joke about it. 1.00

00:56:39.000 You know, bashing women is hilarious. 1.00

00:56:41.000 You know, even if it's ironic, it is funny. 1.00

00:56:45.000 Begaby with a five-shekel donation.

00:56:48.000 Thank you.

00:56:50.000 Colton Lacey says, Do you feel bad about demolishing destiny in your debates?

00:56:55.000 I don't feel bad.

00:56:57.000 I think he is a bad person. 0.99

00:56:59.000 I think he is an immoral, broken, and bad person. 0.99

00:57:04.000 So, no, I don't feel bad. 0.99

00:57:06.000 This is a very malevolent guy.

00:57:08.000 This is a guy who.

00:57:10.000 I think deep inside of him, deep inside of his person, he is a broken and sad person. 0.91

00:57:16.000 And that has made him wretched.

00:57:18.000 And, you know, obviously there is a place in the heart of a Christian for forgiveness and for love and all of the rest. 0.93

00:57:25.000 But, I mean, that is a bad person we're talking about. 0.91

00:57:28.000 That's a bad hombre who does not have good intentions.

00:57:31.000 I don't think he wants what's best for the country.

00:57:33.000 I don't think he wants what's best for his own child.

00:57:36.000 I don't think he wants what's best for children or animals or, uh, Or anybody for that matter.

00:57:41.000 I think he's a very nasty guy, so I don't feel bad. 0.60

00:57:44.000 You know, he's talking about how child pornography is okay because there's like a pragmatic angle to it. 0.94

00:57:50.000 I'm thinking, guy, do you know how they make child pornography?

00:57:54.000 Do you believe there is any pragmatic angle to children having sex on film, really? 1.00

00:58:01.000 What an idiot. 1.00

00:58:02.000 What a reckless and malevolent person. 1.00

00:58:05.000 And then, you know, he's divorced. 0.64

00:58:07.000 I'm sorry, but I have no respect for the most part.

00:58:10.000 I mean, if.

00:58:11.000 Barring certain exceptions, where if it's an abusive relationship, if there's drugs involved, if, I mean, there are exceptions.

00:58:18.000 But in the case of Steve Bonnell, there was no, as far as I'm concerned, I don't believe there was an issue there other than refusal to make it work.

00:58:28.000 And so I know that's a personal attack, but really, I, you know, we have to get away from this divorce as socially acceptable.

00:58:34.000 It isn't.

00:58:35.000 There are cases where, you know, maybe it can happen, but this is not something that should be easily forgiven.

00:58:44.000 Ben Orr says, How tall are you?

00:58:48.000 Six foot nine, 288 pounds, 314 IQ, remember?

00:58:53.000 I say it on every show, basically.

00:58:56.000 Sam Hyde, worldwide with a $5 shekel donation.

00:59:01.000 Thank you. 0.98

00:59:02.000 Begbie says, any chance Mama Fuentes will bring some meatloaf and eggnog down to the basement during the live stream? 0.85

00:59:09.000 I've got my mistletoe on top of my computer screen just in case.

00:59:13.000 Merry Christmas, Nick.

00:59:14.000 Wow, it's getting a little hot in here, right?

00:59:17.000 With the mistletoe.

00:59:19.000 No, Mama Fuentes, she doesn't like being on camera so much. 1.00

00:59:23.000 She gets a big kick out of being like a secondary character on the show. 0.51

00:59:29.000 She's like, I keep telling her, I always neg her by telling her she's like the mom.

00:59:33.000 In that Requiem for a Dream movie, if you've ever seen that.

00:59:37.000 In that movie, the mom gets invited to be on a game show.

00:59:41.000 It's this old woman, the very old mom.

00:59:44.000 She gets invited to be on a game show, and she tries to fit into this beautiful old dress of hers from back when she was younger, but she can't because she let herself go.

00:59:55.000 And she wants to desperately fit into this dress so she could be on the game show, and that's her only entertainment because her kid's on heroin or whatever.

01:00:04.000 So she goes on amphetamines to lose weight to fit into the dress, and then she loses her mind and she's obsessed with being on television.

01:00:11.000 And my mom's always like, Wow, your audience loves me.

01:00:14.000 Your audience is always talking about me.

01:00:16.000 I tell her, You know, you're like that mom from Requiem for a Dream.

01:00:20.000 Great movie, by the way.

01:00:21.000 For anybody out there who thinks drugs are cool or not bad, which is a really problematic thing I see, especially in the dissident right, people don't respect drugs, you should watch that movie because that'll set you straight.

01:00:36.000 I've lost many family members to drug abuse, and people come around me like it's some kind of a joke.

01:00:43.000 People who do cocaine or they do whatever, and it's something to be laughed at.

01:00:48.000 It's just this trivial thing.

01:00:50.000 Having a substance abuse problem is a meme.

01:00:52.000 It's funny.

01:00:53.000 It's charming.

01:00:55.000 No, no, it is not.

01:00:57.000 I don't know how we got there.

01:00:58.000 That was pretty dark.

01:00:59.000 Pretty funny, pretty fun super chat, and then it went to a dark place.

01:01:03.000 But yeah, I don't know.

01:01:05.000 Hopefully, she'll have to bring me some kind of a dinner tomorrow. 0.98

01:01:10.000 She'll probably order pizza. 1.00

01:01:11.000 That's what she does on Friday. 1.00

01:01:12.000 Kind of a lazy Friday for mom. 0.99

01:01:16.000 You know, I do enjoy the home cooked meals, but Friday she kind of phones it in.

01:01:20.000 Quite literally, she orders the pizza and the same pizza every week, but that's all right.

01:01:25.000 We'll see.

01:01:27.000 Helga says Trump's EO today on blocking assets of HR abusers.

01:01:32.000 I didn't see that.

01:01:34.000 I did not see that.

01:01:37.000 I didn't see that on Breitbart or anything, so.

01:01:40.000 Alcibiades, my favorite name.

01:01:42.000 Phonetic Alcibiades, student of Plato.

01:01:47.000 Alcibiades.

01:01:49.000 Alcibiades.

01:01:51.000 All right.

01:01:53.000 I'm having trouble if it's still, but if you say so.

01:01:56.000 Zealous Zombie says Do you think the America First initiative will be bad for international relations in Asia?

01:02:04.000 Retracting a lot of commitments towards our stronger allies.

01:02:07.000 No, I don't think so because, you know, you have to understand that every other nation in the world.

01:02:14.000 Expects and respects self interest.

01:02:17.000 What we're saying is not like greedy, give me, give me America over everybody else, but it's simply that the American government will put the American country first and American interests first.

01:02:29.000 And where American interests lie, there will be American support.

01:02:34.000 But where they don't, support will be rescinded.

01:02:37.000 And I think it's pretty fair.

01:02:39.000 Because you look at, for example, some of these countries in Indochina where we have a trade deficit, that's not fair for us.

01:02:46.000 I don't care how strong allies there are, it's not fair that we're getting.

01:02:50.000 Beat over the head with unfair trade practices.

01:02:52.000 So I don't think it will be a major hindrance.

01:02:55.000 And I think if you look at President Trump's relationship so far with Japan, Japan is a pretty good example.

01:03:03.000 I think that flies in the face of that argument that, or that, you know, I don't know if you made that argument, but anybody who would say that America First is hurting our relationships with foreign countries, particularly Asian countries, because the rhetoric that Trump has been saying for 20 or 25 years has been very anti Japan.

01:03:24.000 If we were taking up this argument that America first rhetoric would be harmful, he's been talking for 25 years about how Japan has been ripping us off militarily and economically with regards to trade.

01:03:35.000 And him and President Abe, Shinzo Abe, have been pretty fast friends.

01:03:42.000 And even with South Korea, it's been a pretty solid relationship as well.

01:03:46.000 So I think you look even at Vietnam when they had the APEC summit, he had a pretty warm, Reception there and got a standing ovation when he talked about how America would put its interest first, like they expect every other country to do the same.

01:04:02.000 So I don't think so.

01:04:04.000 I think it's pretty solid all the way around.

01:04:07.000 And it looks like that's going to do it for us tonight.

01:04:10.000 We got Overdrive.

01:04:11.000 I bled over, as always, into Overdrive.

01:04:14.000 Come on, Nick.

01:04:16.000 Come on, Nick.

01:04:16.000 Always bleeding over into poor James trying to do Overdrive.

01:04:22.000 And I keep.

01:04:24.000 Going way over my time.

01:04:25.000 But that'll do it for us tonight.

01:04:27.000 Remember, all donations tomorrow is our last day.

01:04:31.000 All donations go to the Christian Appalachian Project.

01:04:34.000 So be sure to get those in.

01:04:36.000 We'll be doing a call in show tomorrow on the Discord.

01:04:39.000 So get in the Discord if you want to be a part of the call in show tomorrow.

01:04:43.000 I'll be taking your calls.

01:04:44.000 It'll be a grand old time, casual Friday.

01:04:47.000 I'll have my Christmas tie, maybe some hot chocolate.

01:04:49.000 Who knows?

01:04:51.000 But that'll be it for us tonight.

01:04:52.000 Remember to subscribe, like the video, click the bell, and leave a comment.

01:04:57.000 Leave a comment below, subscribe.

01:04:59.000 You got to subscribe at the very least.

01:05:01.000 And you can follow me.

01:05:02.000 All the information is down below to follow or donate if you want to give, maybe, I don't know, a Christmas donation.

01:05:09.000 It's all down there.

01:05:09.000 All the information is there below.

01:05:11.000 We're on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m. Central, 8 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.

01:05:16.000 I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.

01:05:17.000 This was America First, as always.

01:05:20.000 Thanks for watching.

01:05:21.000 Thank you for your donations.

01:05:23.000 We will see you tomorrow for a big show, a big Christmas call in show, our last show before we take a break, a Christmas break for a week.

01:05:31.000 The last show of 2017.

01:05:33.000 So we'll see you tomorrow.

01:05:34.000 Have a great rest of your evening and Merry Christmas.

01:05:41.000 Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.

01:05:48.000 It's going to be only America first.

01:05:52.000 America first. 0.99

01:05:54.000 The American people will come first once again. 1.00

01:06:21.000 It's going to be only America first. 0.99

01:06:24.000 America first. 0.98

America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - December 21, 2017

Donald Trump's Year in Review | America First Ep. 74

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript